January 2009 Archives

January 31, 2009

"Netanyahu said if elected prime minister his first mission will be to thwart the Iranian nuclear threat."

"Netanyahu says Iran will not get hands on nukes," by Aron Heller for Associated Press, February 1 (thanks to James):

JERUSALEM - Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's leading candidate for prime minister, said Saturday that Iran "will not be armed with a nuclear weapon."

In an interview with Israel's Channel 2 TV, Netanyahu said if elected prime minister his first mission will be to thwart the Iranian nuclear threat. Netanyahu, the current opposition leader and head of the hardline Likud party, called Iran the greatest danger to Israel and to all humanity....

That is true.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Google grows increasingly irresponsible, partisan, and -- as this story shows -- dangerously naive.

"We're not the bad guys: Google Earth boss," by Stephen Hutcheon for the Sydney Morning Herald, January 31 (thanks to David):

The head of Google Earth has hit back at those who claim that the free virtual mapping program is to blame for aiding and abetting recent acts of terrorism.

Hamas militants in Gaza, who have been firing rockets into Israel, and the Pakistan-based terrorists, who stormed Mumbai late last year, are among several radical groups that have reportedly used Google Earth to help in the execution of their missions.

The Google program marries a swathe of aerial and satellite photography of varying resolution, giving users a bird's eye view of large parts of the Earth' surface - a type of perspective that until a few years ago was available only to handful of scientists and military officials. [...]

"I don't really think it's tipping the balance in favour of the bad guys," John Hanke, the director in charge of Google Earth and Google Maps, said in an interview.

"The evilness is in the philosophies and the desires of those that want to do evil. They will use the tools at hand to do that, whether it's throwing a Molotov cocktail, or shooting a rifle or using some piece of technology as part of the process." [...]

In December, a petition entered at the Mumbai High Court alleges that Google Earth "aids terrorists in plotting attacks" and asked that Google be directed to blur images of sensitive areas pending all full hearing.

The Jerusalem Post reported in December that a documentary called The Field of Death posted on the Hamas military wing's website showed terrorists using Google Earth to plot a rocket attack on a fuel depot inside Israel last April that killed two men.

To avoid knee-jerk reactions, Hanke cautioned that it was important to understand if what people were doing with these tools was any different from what they would have done anyway.

"If Google Earth didn't exist, would they have used a tourist map they could have bought or was the real intelligence actually coming from an on-the-ground informant who was working in the hotel and drawing layouts of everything on a napkin?" he said.

"You have cars; you have car bombs. You have GPS transceivers that help you navigate; those GPS transceivers could be used for lots of nefarious purposes. Cell phones have all kinds of benefits; cell phones can be used to detonate a remote explosive device."...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Ian Buruma, who has been given to some remarkable pronouncements on Islam, published on Friday a remarkable article in The New York Times on Geert Wilders. The article, “Totally Tolerant, Up To A Point,” was intended essentially to blacken the name of Geert Wilders, to present him – for likening the Qur’an to Mein Kampf – as, by contamination, a Nazi himself, and to present the attempt to censor him, by Dutch authorities as, therefore, a perfectly understandable, even laudable thing.

Here’s how Buruma does it. He starts with the word “hatred”:

“If it were not for his hatred of Islam, Geert Wilders would have remained a provincial Dutch parliamentarian of little note.”

Geert Wilders, you see, is not only a “hater” – the theme comes up again and again, without a single example being offered of a single bit of the Qur’an or Hadith that Geert Wilders might be said to “hate” – but he’s also a self-promoter, riding right into a life of fame, riches, and so on, on the back of his “hatred of Islam.”

One would not know from the article by Ian Buruma that Geert Wilders, like Ayaan Hirsi Ali before him, is under a permanent threat of death, that he has been forced to move about always with four or five bodyguards, that every few days he changes the place where he sleeps (sometimes on Dutch army bases), and that for the rest of his life he will endure living under a serious death threat, one that has been carried out on several people in the Netherlands, including Theo van Gogh (by Mohammed Bouyeri), and Pim Fortuyn (by an “animal-rights activist,” van der Graaf, who was manipulated by Muslims into killing Fortuyn).


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Who said sharia can't be "modernized?" This story shows how its ability to harass and intimidate can be extended to all manner of previously unforeseen scenarios and new media!

"Christian activist’s life in danger after arrest on blasphemy charges," by Qaiser Felix for AsiaNews, January 30:

Islamabad (AsiaNews) – The life of Hector Aleem, the Christian peace activist arrested on 22 January in the Pakistani capital on blasphemy charges, is in danger, this according to his 24-year-old daughter Mehvish who told AsiaNews that a mob of Muslim clerics went to court demanding he be handed over to them so that they can put him to death.
Aleem was first brought before Pakistan’s Anti Terrorism Court on 23 January. At this initial hearing the 55-year-old director of Peace Worldwide was remanded into custody for five days at the RA Bazaar Police Station.
“The situation is very tense”, Mehvish Aleem said. “Police didn’t even allow us to see our father when he was produced in the court on 27 January for fear of extremists. [. . .] I see every one is under pressure by Muslim clerics. That is why we are not getting justice.”
“During this sad event we could only meet our father once with the help of Joseph France”, she added. Mr France heads the Centre for Legal Aid Assistance and Settlement (CLAAS), an organisation that has agreed to represent Mr Aleem in court.
Hector Aleem was arrested over night on 21-22 January. “Suddenly many people jumped in the house,” his wife said, “some were in police uniform; others were in plain clothes.”
After turning everything upside down and scaring the family half to death, agents sought “to take my 13-year-old son, David John,” Ms Aleem said.
Aleem’s accuser is a militant in an Islamic organisation, claiming that the director of Peace Worldwide sent him a blasphemous text message on his cellphone.
Such incidents are commonplace in Pakistan, involving Muslims as well.
In fact five members of the Ahmadi community, a Muslim minority considered heretical by other Muslims, were arrested today according to a news report.
They are accused of writing offensive words about Muhammad in the latrines of a mosque in the village of Chank, Punjab province. One of them is 45-year-old man and the others are one 16-year-old and three 14-year-old boys.
An Ahmadi community spokesman said that since blasphemy legislation was introduced in Pakistan in 1986, 266 members of his community were arrested (as of December 2008).

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

HooperCarlson.jpg
CAIR's Honest Ibe Hooper in happier days

We've been warning about CAIR for years, while CAIR has used its trademark intimidation and smear tactics to marginalize and silence its critics. But now at last the truth is coming out. "Beware Of CAIR," from Investor's Business Daily, January 30 (thanks to Ruth King):

Homeland Security: You'd think the Council on American-Islamic Relations would be savoring the results of an election that favors its agenda. Instead, it's having to do major damage control.

Over the past several months, the Washington-based pressure group has suffered a series of punishing blows to its reputation as a self-proclaimed "moderate" voice for Muslim-Americans. In the latest setback, a "Dear Colleague" letter sent out to every House member warns lawmakers and their staffs to "think twice" about meeting with CAIR officials.

"The FBI has cut ties with them," the letter says. "There are indications" CAIR has links to Hamas, the Palestinian terrorist group.

The letter, signed by five Republicans, including the head of the Congressional Anti-Terrorism Caucus, is attached to an article by a homeland-security news service. It reports that the FBI has been canceling outreach events across the country with CAIR, following a recent directive from headquarters to cut ties with the group.

It's a major policy shift at the FBI, which has appeased the notoriously litigious CAIR since 9/11. The group aggressively attacks critics with threats of boycotts and discrimination lawsuits.

The marginalization of CAIR, which has enjoyed astonishing access to official Washington, comes after the successful prosecution of leaders of a U.S. Muslim charity that funneled millions to Hamas terrorists. CAIR and its co-founder Omar Ahmed were named unindicted co-conspirators in that Holy Land Foundation case.

CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad, moreover, was caught on tape participating in a meeting with Hamas leaders to disguise payments as charity. During the trial, the FBI described CAIR as a front group for Islamic extremists....

Read it all. And go over to Pamela's site, where she has the actual letter from the five Congressmen.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

SupportWilders.jpg
Prosecuted for speaking the truth

Dr. Sami Alrabaa, an ex-Muslim, is a professor of Sociology and an Arab/Muslim culture specialist. Before moving to Germany he taught at Kuwait University, King Saud University, and Michigan State University.

"Wilders Prosecution is a Welcome Opportunity to Expose Islam," by Dr. Sami Alrabaa at Canada Free Press, January 31:

Prosecuting Geert Wilders, member of the Dutch Parliament, is a welcome opportunity to expose fascist Islam and radical Muslims. Wilders and his lawyers do not need to go far away to fetch crystal clear evidence that Islam, i.e. the Koran and Hadeeth incite to violence and hatred, and radical Muslims are behind numerous crimes against humanity.

A summary of quotations from the Koran which clearly incite to hatred and violence can be found in the following link:

There is an abundance of fatwas (religious edicts) by Muslim authorities inciting to genocide and suicide attacks against Christians and Jews. All these fatwas are based on the Koran and Hadeeth.

Ali Gom’a, the grand mufti of Egypt, the highest Muslim religious authority in the world, supports murdering non-Muslims. In the daily Al Ahram (April 7, 2008), he says, “Muslims must kill non-believers wherever they are unless they convert to Islam.” He also compares non-Muslims to apes and pigs, not only the Jews.

Muhammad Sayyid Al Tantawi, president of Al Azhar University also approves of killing and maiming Christians, Jews, and other infidels. He added, “This is not my personal view. This what the Shari’a Law says, the law of Allah, the only valid law on the earth.”

Yousef Al Qaradhawi, the spiritual leader of the fundamentalist organization, the Muslim Brothers, urged on Al Jazeera TV (Jan. 9, 2009) Muslims to kill the Jews, not only in Israel but also worldwide. He added, “No peace can be made between us (Muslims) and the non-believers. This what our holy book says. This what Allah says.”

Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti, Sheikh Abdulaziz Bin Abdullah Bin Mohammed al Sheikh said on Iqra’ TV channel, “Killing producers who show women unveiled is legal.”

The Saudi Sheikh Saleh Al-Lehadan, head of the Supreme Judiciary Council, told Al Watan daily, (March 25, 2008) “After getting rid of the Jews in our Arab land, we must turn to the Christians. They have three options: either they convert to Islam, or leave, or pay Jizia (protection taxes). Further, there is not such a thing as Shiites, Sufis, etc. There are only Sunnis. All these sects must renounce their pagan beliefs and return to Sunna, the right path of Islam.”

Most recently, demonstrators in Berlin and Munich, and elsewhere in Germany, raised banners reading, “Hamas! Hamas! Jews to the gas”. The police did not arrest anyone of them and nobody filed a court case against them for inciting to murder which in the German law is punishable.

German apologists like Claudia Roth and Cem Ozdemir (a Muslim of a Turkish decent), chairpersons of the German Green Party, said in a press conference in Berlin (Jan. 20, 2009), “Wilders’ film “Fitna” has contributed to worsening our relations with the Muslims around the globe. Geert Wilders is hurting the feelings of Muslims.”

I said in the conference, “This is not true. I know many Muslims who approve of Wilders’ critique of Islam. They do not feel offended. Only fascist Muslims feel so.” Roth and Ozdemir ignored my remark.

The truth of the matter is “Fitna” is simply reflecting how radical Muslims think and act, inspired and encouraged by the Koran.

Wilders’ comparison of the Koran to Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” and describing it as a fascist book is not inappropriate. Hitler referred to the Jews as “rats and vermin” and the Koran and fascist Muslims call the Jews “The descendants of apes and pigs”....

Tarek Ramadan visited the Islamic Center in Bilelefeld, Germany (May 21, 2008) and gave a speech. Before he began his speech, he asked if there were any journalists in audience. As the answer was negative, he said, “OK, now I feel free to say what I really want.” Ramadan is well-known for telling his infidel audience something and his Muslim audience another thing.

Ramadan said, “My brothers and sisters, we must exploit the so-called democracy and freedom of speech here in the West to reach our goals. Our Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, and the Koran teach us that we must use every conceivable means and opportunity to defeat the enemies of Allah. Tell the infidels in public, we respect your laws and your constitutions, which we Muslims believe that these are as worthless as the paper they are written on. The only law we must respect and apply is the Shari’a.

Ramadan added, “The Germans claim that they want to integrate you in their society. We tell them we are going to integrate them in our Umma (Muslim world) after converting them to Islam.”...

Read it all.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

BlairStupid.jpg
Not schmart

He is stupid to think that Hamas will ever sincerely do this, but his stupidity is shared by most policymakers today, as Hugh explains here. This kind of stupidity stems directly from an ignorance of the Islamic doctrines of jihad and Islamic supremacism. "Hamas: Blair's statements 'stupid,'" by Roee Nahmias for Ynet News, January 31 (thanks to Dave):

Quartet envoy Tony Blair's comments about the need to involve Hamas in the Middle Eastern dialogue are "worthless and stupid" but show that the world recognizes Hamas' strength, sources in the movement said Saturday.

Blair, in an interview with the London-based Times earlier Saturday, said that "it is important that we find a way of bringing Hamas into (the peace) process," but added that "it can only be done if Hamas are prepared to do it on the right terms," alluding to Quartet preconditions – recognition of Israel and renunciation of violence.

"Tony Blair's words prove that Europe and the world have understood that any efforts to remove Hamas from the Palestinian political arena have failed and that today we are the foremost force in this arena," Hamas parliament speaker Mushir al-Masri said in a published statement.

Al-Masri added that "the only way to deal with Palestinian issues and translate them into agreements is through Hamas."

But al-Masri went on to criticize the content of Blair's Saturday statements, namely the Quartet's conditions for engaging Hamas, calling them "worthless and stupid."

"This is a repetition of the same obstacles the West has put up before, as an excuse to reject Palestinian democracy, hinder the Palestinian people and allow the Zionist enemy to continue its crimes – the latest of which was the war in Gaza and the refusal to deal with the legitimate Palestinian government and parliament," he said.

"The reintroduction of such statements shows the stupidity of Blair and others who insist on such a useless proposal," he added.

The Hamas movement published a similar statement, saying that Blair's statement "was a repetition of a former plot. Attempts to involve (Hamas) in the peace process have failed and been rejected by the movement from the beginning, as well as by other Arab sources in the international community."

"These statements indicate that Hamas is, indeed, the main source of power in the Palestinian arena," the statement went on.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The notion that America managed, under Bush, to lose some kind of special place in the affections of the Muslim world -- a special place that it possessed because America "had no colonial legacy" -- is the kind of thing you read in the cheesiest potted summaries of the postwar period ("because, boys and girls, America had no colonial legacy...."). Does Obama think that the Muslim attacks, from without and within, on the Hindus of India have to do with some "colonial legacy"? Does he think that the attacks on Christian Filipinos in the southern Philippines, or on Buddhists in southern Thailand, have to do with a "colonial legacy"? Does he think that Muslim aggression against non-Muslims in southern Sudan, or southern Nigeria, has to do with a "colonial legacy"? Well, only insofar as Muslims, wherever they do not yet completely dominate but are present in sufficient numbers to attempt to work their will on non-Muslims, will do so.

The business of America not having a "colonial legacy" and thus being somehow more natively attractive to Muslims misses the point, misunderstands reality. The Arabs of the Arabian peninsula – present-day Saudi Arabia – never suffered from “colonialism.” The Arabs of the littoral areas – Muscat and Oman, Yemen (and the Hadramaut), the tribal sheikdoms that became the United Arab Emirates – never endured colonialism. What they did have was the Royal Navy, suppressing the slave trade from offshore, and then, in this century, a few small garrisons, one at the entrepot of Aden Town, guarding the route to India, and a few among the sheikdoms known Trucial States -- so-named because, of course, they were constantly warring, and it was the British who kept the constantly-warring Arabs from being at each other’s throats.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Islamic Tolerance Alert, from the home country of that champion of "interfaith dialogue," King Abdullah. "Saudi Arabia: Pastor flees death threats," from Compass Direct News, January 30:

LOS ANGELES, January 30 (Compass Direct News) – A prominent foreign pastor in Saudi Arabia has fled Riyadh after a member of the mutawwa’in, or religious police, and others threatened him three times in one week.
Two of the incidents included threats to kill house church pastor Yemane Gebriel of Eritrea. On Wednesday (Jan. 28), Gebriel escaped to an undisclosed city in Saudi Arabia.
A father of eight who has lived and worked as a private driver in Saudi Arabia for 25 years, Gebriel told Compass that on Jan. 10 he found an unsigned note on his vehicle threatening to kill him if he did not leave the country. On Jan. 13, he said, mutawwa’in member Abdul Aziz and others forced him from his van and told him to leave the country.
“There was a note on my van saying, ‘If you do not leave the country, we will kill you,” Gebriel told Compass by telephone. “Three days after that, [Aziz] said, ‘You’re still working here, why don’t you go out of the country?”
Aziz, another member of the mutawwa’in and a policeman had waited for Gebriel shortly after 9 p.m. A sheikh at a Riyadh mosque, Aziz raged at Gebriel for about five minutes, accusing him of being a Christian and trying to change the religion of others, said a Christian source in Saudi Arabia.
“He finished by telling Yemane to get out of the country or ‘measures’ would be taken,” said the source, who requested anonymity for security reasons. He said Gebriel was in genuine danger of losing his life. “In meeting with me on the morning of Thursday, Jan. 15, Yemane himself was clearly very frightened,” said the source.
That night (Jan. 15), Gebriel told Compass, four masked men – apparently Saudis – in a small car cut off the van he was driving. “They said, ‘We will kill you if you don’t go away from this place – you must leave here or we will kill you,’” he said.
Gebriel subsequently took temporary refuge in a safe house in Riyadh, and after consulting with consular officials from four embassies on Tuesday (Jan. 27), the pastor was whisked away to another city the following day.
In 2005, the religious police’s Aziz had directed that Gebriel be arrested along with 16 other foreign Christian leaders, though diplomatic pressure resulted in their release within weeks.
“No doubt Sheikh Abdul Aziz is still burning,” said the local Christian source. “Nor may such type of death threat be possibly idle words. The current situation and circumstance remind me very much of the machine-gun murder of Irish Roman Catholic layman Tony Higgins right here in Riyadh in August 2004.” [...]
The Saudi regime has reportedly begun to restrain the mutawwa’in, which historically has acted as a virtual vigilante force enforcing the kingdom’s Sunni Islamic social codes as volunteer agents of the semi-autonomous Commission to Promote Virtue and Prevent Vice. The U.S. Department of State’s 2008 International Religious Freedom Report noted that abuses by mutawwa’in have continued.
“Mutawwa’in (religious police) continued to conduct raids of private non-Muslim religious gatherings,” the report states. “There were also charges of harassment, abuse, and killings at the hands of the mutawwa’in, or religious police. These incidents caused many non-Muslims to worship in fear of, and in such a manner as to avoid discovery by, the police and mutawwa’in.”
In the past year, mutawwa’in sometimes have not respected the Saudi policy of allowing private worship for all, including non-Muslims, according to the report. Religious police are not allowed to mete out punishment, but in the past year the Saudi government has investigated several incidents in which the mutawwa’in were accused of violating restrictions on that and other activities, according to the state department report.
The mutawwa’in still wear no uniforms, but the report notes that they are now required to wear identification badges and can act only when accompanied by police. They are authorized to monitor the practice of non-Muslim faiths, display or sale of pornography, alcohol production, distribution or consumption, and adultery, homosexuality and gambling, among other violations.
While Saudi law forbids public practice of any religion besides Islam, foreigners are generally allowed to worship privately if their congregations do not grow too large.
With the Quran and sayings [and life] of Muhammad (Sunna) as its constitution, Saudi Arabia enforces a form of sharia (Islamic law) derived from 18th-century Sunni scholar Muhammad ibn Abd Al-Wahhab that calls for the death penalty for “apostasy,” or conversion from Islam to another faith, although the state department’s report notes that there have been no confirmed reports of executions for apostasy in recent years....

However, the prescription of death for apostasy isn't the invention of Muhammad ibn Abd Al-Wahhab, but of Islam's own prophet: "If anyone changes his religion, kill him" (Bukhari vol. 9, bk. 84, no. 57).


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

RoseanneBarr.jpg
Friend of jihadists

Blithely ignorant of or indifferent to the probability that her jihadist friends would stone her to death if they had the chance, Roseanne Barr (via the New York Post) wants Bruce Springsteen to come out for the jihad at the Super Bowl. (And as addled as he is, he just might.)

BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN!!!!

Springsteen at the Superbowl

The Boss oughta demand during his half-time appearance this Sunday that Obama stop bombing Pakistan (which even President Karzai of Afghanistan has requested) and stop funding the Israeli war machine!
TELL OBAMA TO STOP BOMBING PAKISTAN AND MAKE ISRAEL STOP BOMBING GAZA!!!!


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"If you go to an Anglican Church service you expect to hear an Anglican service." Uh, yeah. Unless the dhimmis are in the driver's seat, such that now Christians can't even be Christians in a Christian worship service.

Absurd Britannia Alert: "Silenced Christian soldiers: Sandhurst chaplain bans Creed 'so services won't offend minority religions,'" by Matthew Drake for the Daily Mail, January 30 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Jonathan Gough, Senior Chaplain at Sandhurst, has dropped the Church of England creed over fears that it may offend religious minorities

Sandhurst military academy has dropped the Church of England Creed from services over fears that it may offend religious minorities.

The move has outraged worshippers who say centuries of religious tradition have been sacrificed for the sake of political correctness.

Senior chaplain Reverend Jonathan Gough dropped the Christian declaration of faith in God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, when he took office earlier this month.

Mr Gough – nicknamed the ‘Right On Rev’ by some of his flock – says he wants avoid offending non-believers.

But Christian cadets and civilians were furious when the traditional Anglican service abruptly ended without the Creed being read last Sunday.

Although no official announcement was made, a fellow Chaplain said it had been removed ‘to stop upsetting cadets who do not believe in God’.

Last night the Ministry of Defence confirmed the Creed, which also refutes heresy, had been withdrawn from services at the Royal Memorial Chapel to make the church more inclusive.

This is despite the fact that it is not compulsory for any Sandhurst cadets to attend....

The Creed, found in the book of Common Prayer, begins: ‘I believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord, who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried’....

Former army officer Patrick Mercer, who went on to become the Bishop of Exeter, last night led calls for the Creed to be returned.

Mr Mercer, who trained at Sandhurst, said: ‘If you go to an Anglican Church service you expect to hear an Anglican service. I think the good reverend is being a little too precious.’...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

ElhamAhmadinejad.jpg
Gholam Hossein Elham with the Thug-In-Chief: Gloating

Gholam Hossein Elham can see this clearly. The mullahs can see this clearly. Does the President and his advisers really believe that Obama's offer to talk to Iran can be seen as anything other than a declaration of weakness and failure?

"Iran says Obama's offer to talk shows US failure," from AFP, January 31 (thanks to James):

US President Barack Obama's offer to talk to Iran shows that America's policy of "domination" has failed, the government spokesman said on Saturday.

"This request means Western ideology has become passive, that capitalist thought and the system of domination have failed," Gholam Hossein Elham was quoted as saying by the Mehr news agency.

"Negotiation is secondary, the main issue is that there is no way but for (the United States) to change," he added.

After nearly three decades of severed ties, Obama said shortly after taking office this month that he is willing to extend a diplomatic hand to Tehran if the Islamic republic is ready to "unclench its fist".

In response, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad launched a fresh tirade against the United States, demanding an apology for its "crimes" against Iran and saying he expected "deep and fundamental" change from Obama....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

“The implications are very substantial. Some of the Muslim population, by no means all of them, are the least socially and economically integrated of any in the United Kingdom ... and the one most associated with political dissatisfaction."

The implications of this are more substantial than that. Among the Muslims in Britain are a substantial number who believe that Sharia ought ultimately to be imposed upon that nation. The growing number of Muslims in the U.K. will make that call increasingly harder to ignore or resist.

Demographic Jihad. "Muslim population 'rising 10 times faster than rest of society,'" by Richard Kerbaj for The Times, January 30 (thanks to all who sent this in):

The Muslim population in Britain has grown by more than 500,000 to 2.4 million in just four years, according to official research collated for The Times.

The population multiplied 10 times faster than the rest of society, the research by the Office for National Statistics reveals. In the same period the number of Christians in the country fell by more than 2 million.

Experts said that the increase was attributable to immigration, a higher birthrate and conversions to Islam during the period of 2004-2008, when the data was gathered. They said that it also suggested a growing willingness among believers to describe themselves as Muslims because the western reaction to war and terrorism had strengthened their sense of identity.

Muslim leaders have welcomed the growing population of their communities as academics highlighted the implications for British society, integration and government resources.

David Coleman, Professor of Demography at Oxford University, said: “The implications are very substantial. Some of the Muslim population, by no means all of them, are the least socially and economically integrated of any in the United Kingdom ... and the one most associated with political dissatisfaction. You can't assume that just because the numbers are increasing that all will increase, but it will be one of several reasonable suppositions that might arise.”

Professor Coleman said that Muslims would naturally reap collective benefits from the increase in population. “In the growth of any population ... [its] voice is regarded as being stronger in terms of formulating policy, not least because we live in a democracy where most people in most religious groups and most racial groups have votes. That necessarily means their opinions have to be taken and attention to be paid to them.” [...]

Muhammad Abdul Bari, general secretary of the Muslim Council of Britain, predicted that the number of mosques in Britain would multiply from the present 1,600 in line with the rising Islamic population. He said the greater platform that Muslims would command in the future should not be perceived as a threat to the rest of society.

“We each have our own set of beliefs. This should really be a source of celebration rather than fear as long as we all clearly understand that we must abide by the laws of this country regardless of the faith we belong to,” he said.

The Cohesion Minister, Sadiq Khan, told The Times: “We in central Government and local authorities need to continue our work to ensure that our communities are as integrated and cohesive as possible.”...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

SpencerPJTVJan30.jpg

Yesterday here in Los Angeles I appeared on Pajamas TV, discussing some recent developments in the global jihad with Roger L. Simon. Subscribe to watch!

And yes, those are my pajamas.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Comments by David G. Littman, representative to the United Nations in Geneva of the Association for World Education and the World Union for Progressive Judaism.

An NGO Appeal was sent by us to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, UN Director-General Sergei Ordzhonikidze (Geneva), Human Rights Council President Martin I. Uhomoibhi, High Commissioner for Human Rights Nevanethem Pillay, UNESCO Director-General Koïchiro Matsuura on January 20, which was followed by an Appeal to Ambassadors in Geneva to condemn the proposed Iranian Defamation of the UN Commemoration Day for Holocaust Victims.

To our knowledge, there was no reaction to this announcement and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad delivered his scholarly contribution in Teheran on January 27. He declared, inter alia: “Reexamining [The Holocaust] is tantamount to cutting the vital arteries of the Zionist regime.”

On January 30, another Urgent Appeal was made by four NGOs to the same personalities after a symbolic call on an Egyptian TV channel by a vociferous Sunni cleric for an Auschwitz-like genocide of Jews by Muslims. Footage from Nazi camps, a Zyklon B gas canister, piles of naked bodies being shovelled into pits, horror upon horror were shown, accompanied by a justification of the holocaust against the Jews, glorified with the usual Qur’anic quotation: “Allah said: ‘Prepare for them whatever force and steed of war you can, to strike terror in the hearts of the Allah’s enemies and your enemies.’”. Then came a grotesque genocidal supplication, still not criticized: “This is what we hope will happen, but, Allah willing, at the hand of the Muslims.” This Appeal and the attached MEMRI introduction may be found below. The vital question to be asked is whether there will be a UN reaction. Silence here and now from the UN and UNESCO would ring loud and clear.

* * * * *

Association for World Education, International Humanist and Ethical Union
World Union for Progressive Judaism, Center for Inquiry

Joint NGO Urgent APPEAL to
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
UN Director-General Sergei Ordzhonikidze
UNHRC President Martin I. Uhomoibhi
UNHCHR Nevanethem Pillay
UNESCO Director-General Koïchiro Matsuura

An Egyptian cleric’s TV call for an Auschwitz-like genocide of Jews by Muslims:
"This is what we hope will happen, but, Allah willing, at the hand of the Muslims."

Friday, 30 January 2009

Your Excellencies,

On 20 January an ‘Urgent Appeal’ was sent to you in relation to the UN International Commemoration of the Holocaust on 27 January, concerning the intention of President Muhammad Ahmadinejad to participate in the launching of a book – on that solemn day – about the “fiction” and the “big historical distortion” of the Holocaust. We provided documentation on this from an 18 January Reuters report.

We are copying for you below the introduction (and links) from a MEMRI report of 27 January 2009, providing reliable and irrefutable evidence (*) from a Sunni Egyptian TV Channel al-Rahma (Mercy) – allegedly owned by Egyptian Sheikh Muhammad Hassan – which aired a show on 26 January featuring Egyptian cleric Amin Al-Ansari calling for a repeat of the Holocaust, this time at the hands of Muslims – the latest visible testimony of the genocidal culture of hate that is being constantly propagated in the Middle East without any effective condemnation from the international community or by qualified persons at the United Nations in New York or Geneva. “There is a time to speak.” That time is now!

We call upon your Excellencies individually and collectively to condemn this broadcast without reservation, and to encourage State Members of the United Nations to invoke article VIII of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; and “to take such action under the Charter of the United Nations as they consider appropriate” – in regard to article III (c): “Direct and public incitement to commit genocide”. Article IV states: “Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated under article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.”

Yours respectfully,

René Wadlow, Association for World Education, Case Postale 205 – 1196 Gland – Suisse
Roy W. Brown, International Humanist and Ethical Union, 1 Gower Street, London WC1, UK
David G. Littman, World Union for Progressive Judaism, Beith-GIL, 12, Quai du Seujet, 1201 Genève
Hugo Estrella, Center for Inquiry, PO Box 664, Amherst, NY, USA
(Representatives of their respective organisations to the United Nations Office in Geneva)
-------------
cc. Special Rapporteurs: racism; right to freedom of expression; freedom of religion or belief, et al.
* Documentation from MEMRI, the Middle East Media Research Institute, based in Washington, D.C.

Special Dispatch – No. 2215 – January 27, 2009 – No. 2215

On January 26, 2009, the day before International Holocaust Remembrance Day, the Sunni Islamist Egyptian channel Al-Rahma [Mercy] TV aired a show featuring Egyptian cleric Amin Al-Ansari. [1] Starting off by examining "the civil strife the Jews have caused throughout the world," Al-Ansari explained that because of the Jews' deeds during and after World War I, "it got to the point that the rulers themselves had no solution but to annihilate them."

Al-Ansari showed viewers how "the holocausts of the Jews in Germany were because of their own deeds - they were killing Germans, kindling civil strife, inciting the people against their rulers, and corrupting the peoples," underlining his points with World War II footage of the bombing of Berlin, which he compared to present-day Gaza.

Then, saying, "Let’s watch what Germany did to Israel - or rather, to the Jews," he screened footage of torture and killing of Jews in Dachau, Mauthausen, and Belsen, providing running commentary, and stating, "This is what we hope will happen, but, Allah willing, at the hand of the Muslims." [...]


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This is part 4 of 6. The first three are here:

Part 1
Part 2
Part 3

In the 1720s the German professor Johann Heinrich Schulze (1687–1744) showed that certain silver salts, most notably silver chloride and silver nitrate, darken in the presence of light, not heat as some scholars had previously believed (the process had been known for some time, but not the cause). The Swedish pioneering chemist Carl Wilhelm Scheele (1742–1786) demonstrated in 1777 that the violet rays of the prismatic spectrum were most effective in decomposing silver chloride.

William Herschel discovered infrared radiation because thermometers, which had recently been developed in Europe, showed a higher temperature just beyond the red end of the visible spectrum of sunlight. The German chemist Johann Wilhelm Ritter (1776–1810), after hearing about Herschel's discovery from 1800, identified another "invisible" radiation which we now know as ultraviolet (UV) in 1801. He experimented with silver chloride since blue light was known to cause a greater reaction to it than did red light, and he found that the area just beyond the violet end of the visible spectrum showed the most intense reaction of all.

During the 1790s Thomas Wedgwood (1771-1805), an early experimenter together with the leading English chemist Humphry Davy (1778–1829) in photography, sun-printed "profiles" of objects onto paper and leather moistened with silver nitrate, but he could not "fix" these images. According to Davy's 1802 report, they were initially successful in producing a negative image (a white silhouette on a dark background), but unless the picture was kept in the dark, the image eventually vanished. There are those who claim that Wedgwood should be credited as the inventor of photography, but they currently constitute a minority.

The first universally accepted permanent images were recorded by the Frenchman Joseph Nicéphore Niépce (1765-1833) in the 1820s. I have found conflicting information in the literature as to exactly when Niépce recorded his first permanent image. Some say that his heliograph "Boy Leading His Horse" from 1825 is the world's oldest photography. In 1827 he successfully produced a camera obscura view of his courtyard in Paris on a bitumen-coated pewter plate, which took eight hours to complete. Photography was still hampered by very long exposure times. Only with later technical advances came the ability to expand the repertoire of views from architecture to cityscapes, street scenes, aerial photography etc. Niépce eventually teamed up with Louis Jacques Mandé Daguerre (1787-1851), a successful Parisian theater designer and painter of the popular spectacle known as the diorama, the closest thing to a modern movie theater in those days. Together they tried to create easier ways to do photography. Scholar Eva Weber in Pioneers of Photography, page 6:

"After Niépce's death in 1833, Daguerre found a way to sensitize a silver-coated copper plate with iodine fumes and to produce a direct positive image without the use of Niépce's bitumen coating. A crucial success came in 1835 when he discovered the phenomenon of the latent image: the camera image does not appear during the exposure of the plate, but is revealed later only during the chemical development process. At the same time, he found a way to bring out this latent image by using mercury vapor, considerably shortening the required exposure time. The fixing process – making the image permanent – was the final hurdle Daguerre surmounted in 1837 by washing the exposed and developed plate with a solution of salt water. In March 1839 he changed the fixing solution to hyposulphite of soda, a method discovered in 1819 by English scientist Sir John Herschel (1792-1871)."

The astronomer and chemist Sir John Herschel, son of Sir William Herschel, coined the term "photography" and made contributions to its development. In 1839 in France, a crowded meeting of scientists and others observed Daguerre's demonstration of the daguerreotype process, the first form of photography to enjoy some commercial success. However, Daguerre was not the only person working with the possibilities of photography, which clearly was an invention whose time had come. Weber again, page 9:

"In 1834, William Henry Fox Talbot (1800-1877), an English country gentleman scholar and scientist, began trying to fix a camera obscura image on paper. By 1835 he was making exquisite 'photogenic drawings,' as he called them, or contact prints, by placing botanical specimens and pieces of lace on sheets of good quality writing paper sensitized with silver chloride and silver nitrate, exposing them to sunlight, and then fixing them with a rinse of hot salt water. (Like Daguerre, he also changed his fixative to hyposulphite of soda in 1839 on Herschel's recommendation). He also made a small negative image of his home, Lacock Abbey, on sensitized paper in 1835. Temporarily losing interest in photography he turned his attention to other studies. When news of Daguerre's discovery reached him, he went back to experimenting, independently discovering the latent image and its development in 1840, as well as the process of making multiple positive paper prints from a single paper negative. He worked hard to perfect his paper process and patented it in February 1841 as the calotype (from the Greek, meaning beautiful image), also known as the talbotype."

Talbot became the inventor of the negative/positive photographic process, the precursor to most photographic processes used in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. He had independently devised photogenic drawing paper by 1835. In 1839 Talbot noted the greater sensitivity of silver bromide – later the chief constituent of all modern photographic materials – made possible by the isolation of the chemical element bromine by the French chemist Antoine Jerome Balard (1802-1876) and the German chemist Carl Jacob Löwig (1803–1890) independently of each other in 1825-26. Talbot made another discovery in 1840, that an invisibly weak dormant picture in silver iodide could be brought out by gallic acid, thus increasing the speed of his camera photography greatly, from hours to minutes. From now on, a quest was mounted for shorter camera exposures and higher resolution.

The daguerreotype was much more popular than the calotype in the early years, but Talbot, in contrast to Daguerre, remained active and continued to experiment. His most significant discovery, the reproducible negative, came to be applied universally only with the development of the wet-plate collodion process in 1851. There were other early pioneers, too. Eva Weber, page 10:

"In 1833 Antoine Hercules Florence, a French artist in Brazil, started to experiment with producing direct positive paper prints of drawings. Most importantly, Hippolyte Bayard (1801-1887), a French civil servant in the Ministry of Finance, began experimenting in 1837 and by 1839 had created a method for making direct positive prints on paper. Official support for the daguerreotype overshadowed Bayard's achievement. Discouraged but persistent, he went on to work with the calotype and other photographic processes. As a photographer he produced a large body of high quality work, covering a wide range of subject matter from still lifes, portraits, cityscapes, and architectural views to a record of the barricades of the 1848 revolution. Other pioneers include Joseph Bancroft Reade, and English clergyman, and Hans Thøger Winther, a Norwegian publisher and attorney."

Further technical improvements were made by the French artist Gustave Le Gray (1820-1884) and the English sculptor Frederick Scott Archer (1813-1857), among others. Weber, page 14:

"Throughout the nineteenth century, each refinement of the photographic process led to a new flourishing of talented photographers, sometimes in a single region or nation, and at other times globally. It is generally agreed that during the daguerreotype era an exceptionally fine body of work came from the United States. In March 1839 Daguerre personally demonstrated his process to inventor and painter Samuel Morse (1791-1872) who enthusiastically returned to New York to open a studio with John Draper (1811-1882), a British-born professor and doctor. Draper took the first photograph of the moon in March 1840 (a feat to be repeated by Boston's John Adams Whipple in 1852), as well as the earliest surviving portrait, of his sister Dorothy Catherine Draper. Morse taught the daguerreotype process to Edward Anthony, Albert Southworth and possibly Mathew Brady, all of whom became leading daguerreotypists."

A daguerreotype by George Barnard (1819-1902) of the 1853 fire at the Ames Mill in New York is the earliest known work of photojournalism. Mathew Brady (1823-1896) became one of the most important photographers during the American Civil War (1861–1865). The English photographer Roger Fenton's (1819-1869) views of the Crimean War (1853–1856) battlefields are widely regarded as the first systematic photographic war coverage. Much impressive work of elegant landscapes and street scenes, portraiture etc. still came from France. In 1858 the French journalist Gaspard-Félix Tournachon (1820–1910), known as Nadar, made the first aerial photographs of the village of Petit-Becetre taken from a hot-air balloon, 80 meters above the ground. The oldest aerial photograph still in existence is James Wallace Black's (1825-1896) image of Boston from a hot-air balloon in 1860.

This was also an age of travel photography, facilitated by steamships, railways and cheaper transport, with French photographers taking pictures in Mexico, Central America and Indochina, British in the Middle East, India, China, Japan, etc. For Easterners in the USA, Western views from the frontier were popular and exotic. Edward S. Curtis (1868–1952) recorded the lives of the Native Americans. Photographs of the remarkable Yellowstone area influenced the authorities to preserve it as the country's first national park in 1872.

The American George Eastman (1854–1932) pioneered the use of celluloid-base roll film, which greatly sped up the process of recording multiple images and opened up photography to amateurs on a wide scale since cameras were no longer so large, heavy and complicated. He registered the trademark Kodak in 1888. Glass plates remained in use among astronomers and others scientists into the second half of the twentieth century due to their superiority for research-quality imaging. Pluto was for instance discovered in 1930 with photographic plates.

There were numerous experiments with moving pictures or "movies" in Europe and in North America, with the French inventor Louis Le Prince (1842-1890) being one of the pioneers, but the brothers Auguste (1862-1954) and Louis Lumière (1864-1948) are usually credited with the birth of cinema with their public screening with admission charge in Paris in December 1895.

The brilliant American Thomas Alva Edison (1847–1931), one of the most prolific inventors in history, played a key role as well. Through his years of working as a telegraph operator he had learned much about electricity, and developed new techniques for recording sounds. However, "records," as in the analog sound storage medium we know as gramophone or vinyl records, which remained the most common storage medium for music until Compact Discs (CDs) and the digital revolution in the 1980s and 90s, were patented by the German-born American inventor Emile Berliner (1851–1929) in 1896. James E. McClellan and Harold Dorn in Science and Technology in World History, second edition, page 354:

"In 1895, with their Cinématographe…Auguste and Louis Lumière first successfully brought together the requisite camera and projection technologies for mass viewing, and so launched the motion-picture era. With paying customers watching in theaters – sometimes stupefied at the illusion of trains surely about to hurtle off the screen and into the room – movies immediately became a highly successful popular entertainment and industry. Not to be outdone, the Edison Manufacturing Company quickly adopted the new technology and produced 371 films, including The Great Train Robbery (1903), until the company ceased production in 1918. Sound movies - the talkies – arrived in 1927 with Al Jolson starring in The Jazz Singer; by that time Hollywood was already the center of a vigorous film industry with its 'stars' and an associated publicity industry supplying newsstands everywhere with movie magazines. The use of color in movies is virtually as old as cinema itself, but with technical improvements made by the Kodak Company in the film, truly vibrant color movies made it to the screen in the 1930s in such famous examples as The Wizard of Oz (1939) and Gone with the Wind (1939). (Color did not become an industry standard, however, until the 1960s.)"

Photography in natural colors was first achieved by the Scottish scientist James Clerk Maxwell (1831–1879) as early as in 1861, but the autochrome process of the brothers Lumière from 1907 was the first moderate commercial success. The Russian photographer Sergey Prokudin-Gorsky (1863–1944) developed some early techniques for taking color photographs and documented the Russian Empire between 1909 and 1915. Color photography progressed with research in synthetic organic chemistry of dyestuffs and the Eastman Kodak Company produced Kodachrome in 1935, yet it did not become cheap and accessible enough to become the standard until the second half of the twentieth century. Black and white photography remains in use to this day for certain artistic purposes, for instance portraits.

While photography was of great use in arts and entertainment, it became an invaluable tool in numerous scientific disciplines, from medicine via geology and botany to archaeology and astronomy, since it can detect and record things that the human eye cannot see. The Austrian physicist and philosopher Ernst Mach (1838–1916) used it for his investigations in the field of supersonic velocity, and from the 1870s developed photographic techniques for the measurement of shock waves. The Englishman Eadweard J. Muybridge (1830–1904) and the Frenchman Étienne-Jules Marey (1830–1904) invented new ways of recording movement.

In the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, traditional photography was gradually replaced by digital techniques. Asian and especially Japanese companies such as Sony played a major role in the digitalization of music, movies and photography, in addition to Western ones. However, with the creation of photography in early nineteenth century, advances in chemistry were crucial.

Chemistry developed out of medieval alchemy. In India, alchemy was used in serious metallurgy, medicine, leather tanning, cosmetics, dyes etc. The work of Chinese alchemists facilitated inventions such as gunpowder, which was to revolutionize warfare throughout the world. Although their views differed considerably in the details, scholars in Japan, China, Korea, India, the Middle East and Europe as late as the year 1750 would have agreed that "water" is an element, not a compound of hydrogen and oxygen as we know today. Likewise, the fact that "air" consists of a mixture of several substances was only fully grasped in the second half of the eighteenth century. The easiest way to date when chemistry was born, as distinct from alchemy, is when scholars started talking about "oxygen" instead of "water" as an element. This transition happened in Europe in the late eighteenth century, and only there.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From "Heaven@Zionists.com," with an IP address tracing to Riyadh in our Friend and Ally Saudi Arabia, comes this gem -- just in from the Hate Mail Bag:

It was always my wish to turn my body into deadly shrapnel against the Zionists and to knock on Heaven's doors with the skulls of Zionists.

If he does end up knocking on that door, he may be surprised at who answers.

UPDATE: Jihad Watch reader Cindy points out that the sentence above is a quotation from jihadist suicide murderer Reem Raiyishi.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

January 30, 2009

al_talmaza.jpg
"This stuff is in your own books!"

It's not enough that al-Qaeda has called Fr Zakaria Botros "one of the most wanted infidels in the world," issuing a 60 million dollar bounty on his head, or that popular Arabic magazines call him "Islam's public enemy #1"; now, as expected, CAIR is getting in on the action, calling for a "national alert" -- as in umma alert, eerily reminiscent of a fatwa -- against him. Apparently his last few shows dealing with Muhammad's questionable sexual habits, including necrophilia -- which I translated here, here, and here -- are irking CAIR, specifically as his words are "embraced by a number of bloggers and Web sites that criticize Islam."

Why do radical Muslims, such as CAIR, hate -- and fear -- Zakaria Botros so? (I first described him and his ministry on NRO; be sure to click on links that go to important video clips of him, with English subtitles, where he makes several impressive demands of Islam). The problem Muslims have with Fr Botros is that they simply cannot refute him: everything he says -- no matter how scandalizing to Islam -- is always based on, often revered, Islamic sources. Moreover, Fr Botros rarely makes any claims about Islam: he only exposes; he only raises questions and then invites Islam's ulema to respond and "clarify" the matter. However, as this story indicates, their response is only to have him censored -- or, for the more radical, killed.

As he always says, however, "This stuff is in your own books! If you don't like it, go burn your books -- you know, the way Caliph Uthman burned all the other contending Korans [there were 7] when he prepared the authoritative version, the one you believe is based on a 'heavenly' Koran!"

Anyone interested in supporting Fr Botros and his mission can do so at his website; here also.

"Broadcast angers Muslims," by Gregg Krupa for the Detroit News, January 30:

Leaders want radio station to stop airing comments by priest they say defame Muhammad.

SOUTHFIELD -- Muslims and interfaith leaders in Metro Detroit are asking a local radio station owner to discontinue broadcasts in which, they say, a Coptic priest has repeatedly defamed the Prophet Muhammad over the past year.

In an Arabic-language broadcast Wednesday on WNZK 680/690 AM, the Rev. Zakariah Boutros said the Muslim prophet Muhammad had engaged in necrophilia and gay sex, according to the Council on American Islamic Relations.

Boutros has previously come under fire from area Muslims, who say he disparages Islam. The controversial, American-based priest can be heard on purchased time slots on radio stations internationally. His words have stirred controversy in Egypt and Great Britain, and are embraced by a number of bloggers and Web sites that criticize Islam.

Amani Mostafa, who hosts the program "Questions About Faith" on which Boutros spoke Thursday, said Boutros was "reading from an Islamic text" when he said, over the air, that the Prophet Muhammad slept in the grave of a dead woman and allowed a man to kiss and caress his chest.

"I am a former Muslim," said Mostafa, who is now Christian. "I know exactly what I am talking about. These are the things we were taught as children. We are quoting the Quran and the Hadiths, and if the Muslims have a problem with that then they have a problem with their own book."

Hadiths are Muhammad's saying or writings, as reported by his followers.

Muslims say that no such wording appears in the Quran or the Hadiths.

"If that's their excuse, it's lame," said Dawud Walid, of CAIR, which distributed a "national alert" Thursday asking Muslims to contact the radio station to express concerns about the broadcast. CAIR also counseled Muslims to be "firm but polite. Hostile comments can and will be used to further defame Islam and Muslims."

Sima Birach, who owns the station, said he had received some complaints on Thursday, though he said he did not know how many.

In an interview with The Detroit News last summer Birach promised to end the broadcasts, upon the request of interfaith Muslim, Jewish and Christian groups in Metro Detroit.

Birach went so far as to put people associated with Boutros's broadcasts on conference calls with this reporter, while he berated them for allowing what some consider hate speech.

"It's not right," Birach said at the time. "It's not fair to use some fake or stupid books to accuse someone's religion. Do you hear me?" But on Thursday, Birach said he had since heard from "several prominent people in the community," that what Boutros stated in the broadcasts is true.

If it wasn't, there would be no Zakaria Botros, as he would've been immediately discredited as a liar and forger. That he's famous, that people listen to him, and want to kill him, all evinces that what he says is, in fact, based on Islamic scriptures and thus not open to debate -- hence the appeal and conversions on the one hand, rabid anger and hate on the other.
"Maybe we need to have more meetings," Birach said, referring to members of the Muslim and interfaith communities.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

nicky-reilly-460_1009572c.jpg
No virgins for you

He was upset about the "war on Islam." Now where did he get the idea that blowing up some infidels would be the best response to that? Mohamed Abdulaziz Rashid Saeed-Alim Update: "Life sentence for inept bomber who targeted restaurant," by Owen Bowcott for The Guardian, January 31 (thanks to all who sent this in):

A Muslim convert described as the "least cunning" terrorist ever to come before a British court was yesterday sentenced to a minimum of 18 years in prison for a bungled suicide nail bombing.

Nicky Reilly - who changed his name to Mohamed Saeed-Alim - accidentally detonated his homemade device in the toilets of the crowded Giraffe restaurant in Exeter, injuring only himself.

The 22-year-old was given a life sentence at the Old Bailey after pleading guilty to attempted murder and preparing an act of terrorism last May. The court was told that he acted alone, though he had been in contact over the internet with two jihad supporters who had urged him to attack military rather than civilian targets.

After the case Debbie Simpson, the assistant chief constable of Devon and Cornwall, said efforts were being made to trace the al-Qaida sympathisers. "We are in contact ... with the Pakistani authorities. We believe there is an association," she said. [...]

A suicide note left in his bedroom described how he was motivated by the "disgusting" behaviour of people in Britain as well as the "war on Islam".


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Not, of course, that there's anything about Islam that might have encouraged this sort of behavior. If guilty, he was probably the sort of man that was already inclined to raping, regardless of religious affiliation . The question here, however, is: did converting to that one religion that treats women as inferiors on the one hand, and seducers on the other -- not to mention objects and animals -- have anything to do with his actions, even if by merely placating his "conscience"?

"U.S. investigates CIA sex allegations in Algeria," from Reuters, January 28:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States is looking into allegations the CIA station chief in Algeria raped at least two Muslim women after lacing their drinks with a drug, a State Department spokesman said on Wednesday.

A report by ABC News said the CIA officer, a convert to Islam, was sent back to the United States after the women came forward with the charges in September.[...]

ABC News reported the two women said the separate sexual assaults took place at the official station chief residence.

The network reported the discovery of more than a dozen videotapes showing the CIA officer engaged in sex acts with other women had led the Justice Department to widen the investigation to include Egypt, where the officer had been posted earlier in his career.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Quick, someone call the U.S. Army War College's Sherifa Zuhur so she can explain to Abu Sayyaf that Islam does not promote kidnappings -- except when it does. "Spate of kidnappings in Mindanao continues; midwife is latest victim," from GMANews, January 29:

ZAMBOANGA CITY, Philippines - Even as authorities are scrambling to solve the recent spate of kidnappings in Mindanao, a local midwife was abducted by suspected Abu Sayyaf bandits in Basilan.

Authorities said kidnappers have already phoned superiors of the victim, Elizar Gomera, who works as a midwife in Lamitan City. The 45-year old victim was reported missing Wednesday after she went to the village of Parangbasak to help deliver a baby.

Such "noble" jihadists...
No group claimed responsibility for the latest kidnapping, but authorities suspect the Abu Sayyaf to be behind the abduction.

Abu Sayyaf group is still holding a trader Eliseo Hablo and three government teachers Freires Quizon, Janette delos Reyes and Rafael Mayorada – all kidnapped in Zamboanga City and brought by boat to Basilan island.

Those holding the teachers captive have demanded P6 million in exchange for the freedom of the hostages, but authorities said the government has a strict no-ransom policy and ruled out payments of ransom to the kidnappers...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

y166646285398298.jpg
Somalia's fearsome pirates

Of course, piracy as a jihadist activity has a pedigree at least as old as the Barbary conflicts with Europe and the United States, and the Islamic slave raiding pirates (see Giles Milton's book White Gold).

"Somali pirates hijack German gas tanker," from the Associated Press, January 29:

NAIROBI, Kenya: Somali pirates hijacked a German tanker loaded with liquefied petroleum gas Thursday off the Horn of Africa. The ship's 13-man crew was reported safe, even though gunshots were heard over the ship's radio.

The MV Longchamp is the third ship captured by pirates this month in the Gulf of Aden, one of the world's busiest shipping lanes.

Piracy has taken an increasing toll on international shipping in the key water link between the Mediterranean Sea and the Indian Ocean. Pirates made an estimated $30 million hijacking ships for ransom last year, seizing more than 40 vessels off Somalia's coastline...

Funding the money jihad, jihad al-mal.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

pakistan5.jpg
The downtrodden and despised of the Islamic world

More on such stories. Imagine how frequent such accounts would be if Pakistan actually had a sizable Christian minority, such as the Copts of Egypt, who, most recently, were surrounded and attacked by 20,000 Muslims for, well, for being Christian.

"Islam, or else," by Jamie Dean for World Magazine, January 30:

Pakistan: Christians in Pakistan face an upswing in violence from militant Muslims.

A Christian worship service in Pakistan's Muslim-dominated city of Karachi turned frightening when unidentified men burst into Christ Awami Church on New Year's Day, demanding that worship stop. The congregation resisted, and the assailants retaliated: Church members say the men desecrated Bibles and a cross on the wall, destroyed hymnals, smashed windows, and dumped garbage on the church grounds.

The attack wasn't isolated. Christians at two other Protestant churches in the city reported assaults during the same week: Church-goers in the Zia neighborhood said attackers broke the church door, shattered windows, and threw garbage into the church.

Congregants in the Golimar community said a group of men threatened them during a Sunday night meeting, but local police intervened.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

AafiaSiddiqui.jpg
A Pakistani girl the Pakistani government can really get behind?

So what if she has been called the "most dangerous woman in the world," who, when arrested, had in her possession "maps of New York, a list of potential targets that included the Statue of Liberty, Times Square, the subway system, and detailed chemical-biological radiological weapon information," -- not to mention a liter of cyanide?

Would that the Pakistani government made such vociferous efforts at protecting Pakistani schoolgirls who simply want to go to school without being blown up.

"Senate urges govt to bring back Aafia Siddiqui," by Muhammad Bilal for the Daily Times, January 30 :

ISLAMABAD: The Senate on Thursday renewed its demand from the United States to repatriate Dr Aafia Siddiqui to Pakistan.

The issue surfaced when two separate reports of the Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and Functional Committee on Human Rights compiled after some senators met Aafia – who is currently detained in a New York jail – were presented in the upper house.

Senator Mushahid Hussain Syed said the government should ask US President Barack Obama to release the Pakistani citizen, as there are no charges of terrorism proved against her.

Senator SM Zafar urged the government and human rights bodies to step up their efforts for the repatriation of Aafia.

Jamaat-e-Islami Senator Professor Muhammad Ibrahim said the previous regime committed serious violations of the human rights and hundreds of people went missing. “Today, the family members of missing persons are protesting outside the parliament house. I request the government to make efforts for the recovery of these missing people,” he added.[...]

Leader of the House Raza Rabbani condemned how she had been treated and said US authorities were yet to decide about initiating a trial due to her poor mental health.

He also assured the Senate that the government is making efforts for the recovery of the missing persons.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

1-30-2009_66937_l.gif
Magnanimity

The Taliban is apparently concerned about its international image? Said a spokesman: “We will outline a new strategy to send a good message to the world.” Exactly, "a good message" -- that is, words; will this message actually translate into reality by allowing girls a normal education?

"Taliban allows girls’ education up to fourth level," from The News, January 30:

SWAT: Taliban leader Maulana Fazalullah has said that he has given permission for girls’ education up to fourth class.

In an interview with a British TV channel here on Friday, Fazalullah said: “He may lift ban on female education in Swat.”

“We will outline a new strategy to send a good message to the world,” he said.

To a question about destruction of schools, he alleged that security forces had also demolished some of the schools in the bleeding valley.

Taliban destroyed the educational institutions as security forces were using them as bunkers, he said.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

My recent radio interview with Israel National Radio regarding the Gaza situation and prospects of "lasting" peace.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Those who tried to object were shot in the legs by Hamas operatives."

"Gaza victims describe human shield use," from the Jerusalem Post, January 29:

Members of a Gaza family whose farm was turned into a "fortress" by Hamas fighters have reported that they were helpless to stop Hamas from using them as human shields.
They told the official Palestinian Authority daily newspaper that for years Hamas had used their property and homes as military installations from which the group would launch rockets into Israel, dig tunnels and store arms. According to the victims, those who tried to object were shot in the legs by Hamas operatives.
Palestinian Media Watch quoted the official Palestinian Authority daily, Al-Hayat al-Jadida as reporting on January 27, "The Abd Rabbo family kept quiet while Hamas fighters turned their farm in the Gaza strip into a fortress. Right now they are waiting for the aid promised by the [Hamas] movement after Israel bombed the farm and turned it into ruins."
According to the report, the hill on which the Abd Rabbo family lives overlooks Sderot, making it an ideal military position for Hamas fighters.
The Abd Rabbo family members emphasized to the paper that they were not Hamas activists and that they were still loyal to the Fatah movement, but that they had been unable to prevent the armed squads from entering their neighborhood at night.

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Given Yemen's track record of partial cooperation, we'll likely be seeing the "rehabilitated" jihadists again, and not teaching macramé at the Sana'a learning annex. As a Yemeni official acknowledged, "Yemen is like a bus station — we stop some terrorists, and we send others on to fight elsewhere ... We appease our partners in the West, but we are not really helping."

"A nice safe haven for jihadists," from The Economist, January 29:

Last March, al-Qaeda websites posted a message advising members to head for Yemen, the Arabian peninsula’s unruly south-west corner. The call, it seems, has been answered. The global terror franchise has released a video showing fugitive Saudi jihadists and their Yemeni hosts proclaiming a merger between their two branches, plus images of combat training in Yemen’s rugged mountains. Now other friends may soon be joining the fighters, by quite a different route. The Yemeni government says it expects most of the 100-odd Yemenis still held in the American prison camp at Guantánamo, where they now make up the largest national group of inmates, to be home by the spring. It is building a special camp where jihadist suspects will be allowed to live with their families, while undergoing reindoctrination to equip them for a peaceful return to society.
Yet, to the chagrin of the Yemeni and Saudi governments, as well as of an Obama administration that wants Guantánamo closed, the two Saudis in the video happen to be graduates both of the tropical island jail and of a vaunted Saudi rehabilitation programme. The Saudi authorities had freed them last year. Reunited with their families, they had benefited, as had several hundred other repentant jihadists, from state pensions designed to ease a return to civilian life. But the pair vanished a few months ago. In the video they vilify the Saudi counselling programme as a trick, and vow to pursue jihad. Nasir al-Wahishi, the new “emir of the Arabian Peninsula”, a Yemeni, to whom they have sworn loyalty, was himself one of 23 al-Qaeda suspects who escaped from a prison in Sana’a, the Yemeni capital, in 2006.
With its rough terrain, weak central state and gun-slinging tribal culture, Yemen may prove a fairly secure redoubt for al-Qaeda. The group has suffered sharp setbacks in such places as Iraq, Lebanon and especially Saudi Arabia, where it has not mounted a serious attack since 2006. The relative quiet in Yemen, which some critics of its government ascribe to a secret amnesty whereby Sunni jihadists backed the state against a smouldering Shia insurrection in the country’s north, has been eroding. Waves of arrests, prompted partly by Western and Saudi pressure, have provoked an escalation of al-Qaeda attacks that culminated in a double car-bombing of America’s embassy in Sana’a last September; the attack failed to penetrate the fortified compound but left 16 people dead.
Though a Western diplomat in Sana’a describes al-Qaeda’s threat there as “very severe” and the government’s efforts to thwart it as merely “episodic”, it is Saudi Arabia, rather than Yemen itself, that is the group’s main target. The fact that al-Qaeda’s Saudi branch has been forced to regroup elsewhere, under Yemeni leadership, may be a sign of weakness rather than strength. As for Yemen, even if the danger of a few hundred armed jihadists is real, locals may well care more about other national plagues: the frightening scale of corruption, poverty, malnutrition, water depletion, Yemen’s plunging oil revenues, its ugly, four-year-old war in the north, simmering separatist sentiment in the south, constant tribal unrest and vicious power struggles among the ruling elite.

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In accordance with Muhammad's own orders: "If anyone changes his religion, kill him" (Bukhari vol. 9, bk. 84, no. 57).

Sharia Alert, and more on this story. "Egypt - Judge tells of desire to kill Christian," from Compass Direct News, January 27:

ISTANBUL, January 27 (Compass Direct News) – After her arrest at Cairo’s airport on Dec. 13 while attempting to flee anti-Christian hostilities in Egypt, convert Martha Samuel Makkar was granted bail on Saturday (Jan. 24), but not before a judge took her aside and said he would like to kill her, according to her lawyer.
Attorney Nadia Tawfiq said Judge Abdelaa Hashem questioned Makkar extensively about her Christian faith during the hearing. Makkar, charged with forging identification documents, explained her reasons for her conversion, avowing her Christian faith and repudiating the judge’s claims that converting from Islam to Christianity was impossible.
“Then he said, ‘I want to talk with Martha alone,’ so we all left the room, and he said to her, ‘Nobody changes from Muslim to Christian – you are a Muslim,’” Tawfiq said. “And she said, ‘No, I am a Christian.’ He told her, ‘If I had a knife now, I would kill you.’ [Makkar] came out crying and depressed, but at least he gave the decision to let her go free.”
Makkar, 24, had planned to escape the dangers she has faced in Egypt by travelling to Russia with her family. She says that since converting to Christianity five years ago, police and members of her extended family have threatened her incessantly, the relatives vowing to kill her.
Airport security personnel had been notified of Makkar’s plans, according to a Coptic rights group.
“They had both [her original and Christian] names and maybe a picture before she reached the airport,” said Helmy Guirguis, president of the UK Coptic Association. “They did not [arrest her] to apply the law, they did it because of hate for Muslims converting to Christianity. It is like a great occasion to go and arrest some poor lady like her in the airport.”
After her arrest, Makkar was charged with carrying forged documents and taken to El-Nozha police station. Authorities also took her husband and two children into custody. The identification that Makkar carried listed her religion as Christian and bore the name she had chosen for herself rather than her given name, Zainab Said Abdel-Aziz.
Legal conversion from Islam to Christianity by Muslim-born Egyptians, and gaining corresponding legitimate documents, is unprecedented in Egypt. Egyptian law does not provide for a means to legally change one’s religion on identification papers.
According to Tawfiq, Makkar said authorities held her in a room at the airport, hit her and denied food to her children.
“People who convert to Christianity are treated exactly like terrorists,” said Guirguis of the UK Coptic Association. “This is not official policy, it’s not on paper, it’s not the law, but it’s what happens.” [...]
Since Makkar’s arrest, she has leveled allegations of sexual abuse and demeaning behavior at police in the El-Nozha station and at personnel of the national security office in Heliopolis. Makkar said she has also suffered at the hands of fellow inmates at Al-Qanata prison, where authorities later took her.
“She has some difficulty with the other prisoners in prison,” said Tawfiq. “One of them kicked her and tried to kill her; one took the Bible and threw it on the floor, pushed her and tried to make her go back to Islam. But she is strong, she is strong.” [...]

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Somalia Jihad Update. "Site of Somali Government Is Put Under Islamic Law," by Mohamed Ibrahim for the New York Times, January 27:

MOGADISHU, Somalia — The radical Islamist insurgents who have seized the provisional capital moved Tuesday to consolidate their control of the town and announced that they were imposing Islamic law there.
The Shabab, one of the most militant Islamist militias fighting for control of the country, captured the town, Baidoa, on Monday, hours after the withdrawal of the Ethiopian troops who had been protecting it.
Speaking to thousands of spectators at a soccer stadium in the northeastern part of town, the Shabab spokesman, Sheik Muktar Robow, urged calm and ordered an end to the looting that took place on Monday.
“I want you to be calm,” said Sheik Muktar, also known as Abu Monsur. “From today on, Islamic Shariah law will be the rule of this town. If anyone opposes the Shariah, appropriate steps will be taken.”

This is not likely to involve a PowerPoint presentation or series of informative pamphlets.

In addition to Baidoa, a market town that has served as the seat of Somalia’s transitional government, the Shabab controls most of Mogadishu, the main city and official capital, and much of the southern part of the country. The Shabab, listed by the United States as a terrorist organization, seeks to turn Somalia into an Islamic state under its particularly strict brand of Islamic law.
Sheik Muktar, whose speech on Tuesday was broadcast on the radio in Mogadishu, also ordered Baidoa residents to turn over any looted property to the Shabab or face unspecified consequences. The offices of the transitional government were looted and ransacked Monday after the Ethiopian troops left, a witness said.
The weak transitional government had been defended by Ethiopian troops since 2006 and supported by other countries in an effort to prop up an effective central government in a country that had not had one in 18 years.
But by the time the Shabab arrived in Baidoa, there was little government left. The president resigned last month. Most members of Parliament departed over the weekend for Djibouti, where they are taking part in United Nations-brokered peace talks and what now amounts to a shadow Somali government.
Once the Ethiopian military abandoned the town on Monday, the insurgents were able to take it without firing a shot....

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

January 29, 2009

ALeqM5j8OyPJ1OANwJt2AOL0ZqC-x2WKlA.jpg
9/11 was "beautiful, delicious to hear [about], everyone was happy"

A (sympathetic, almost glorifying) portrait of a terrorist. "Abdul the Taliban, on the hunt for American 'infidels,'" from AFP, January 29:

KABUL (AFP) — Abdul Shafiq is around 30 years old and has sacrificed his family life for two things: reading the Koran and fighting.

After years in exile following the 2001 US-led invasion of Afghanistan, this Taliban commander is back in the mountains of his birth, having left behind his old life with his family for one mission: chasing out the "infidel" Americans.

It takes several cups of tea in a house next to a snowy hill, somewhere in southern Kabul, before the fighter with a thin face and the features of a Pashtun from southern Afghanistan, agrees to tell his story.

What "story"? Why must everything always have a "story"? Here's a version: Having been indoctrinated by the Koran and its mandate for fighting, Abdul has opted to lead a life of "chasing infidels"?
Abdul Shafiq -- an assumed name -- looks like any other Afghan, except that he has never been as unhappy as in times of peace.

He wears a long cream shirt and leather jacket; his hair and beard are thick and black, his clear brown eyes sparkle as brightly as his silver Pashtun cap dotted with shiny plastic beads.

Who cares? Get to the point -- whatever that may be.
In hiding in Kabul, he rarely spends two nights in the same place, taking a break before returning to the fight.

In the mountains, he heard of new US President Barack Obama "who will change nothing" and of Palestine "where something is happening".

His future seems set: "As long as the Americans are here, we will fight them," says the Taliban militant, whom AFP could only meet through local intermediaries.[...]

Nice, clear, and decisive; would that American leaders had the same tenacious spirit -- would that they would say "As long as radical Muslims are here, we will fight them."
It was in the northern mountains that he heard, over Taliban combat radio, on September 11, 2001 that planes sent by Al-Qaeda, had struck at the heart of the United States.

"That was beautiful, delicious to hear, everyone was happy," the warrior says with a smile.[...]

Iran took in Taliban in their thousands, according to Shafiq. He stayed there for four years, without guns and without combat. He was despondent :(

"I didn't want to do anything," the fighter remembers.

"Anyway, I didn't know how to do anything except fight. We read the Koran but life wasn't that interesting."

At the start of 2006, Afghanistan elected a new parliament. In Kabul, the US army, sure of itself, branded the Taliban finished.

It was then that Shafiq slipped quietly home to Wardak. "They told us that the Americans were stopping the Taliban much less," he says.

He took charge of a group of 30 men who lived on the move, going from one safehouse to another, he says.

Even before then, the Taliban started to regroup. "Everything is structured. The orders come from our leaders in Pakistan," Shafiq says. He is less forthcoming about how they obtained weapons and money.

In villages crowded with unemployed men tired of US bombings and disappointed by international aid that never arrived, Taliban rhetoric slamming the American "invaders" who "plunder Muslim soil" won some support.[...]

And what sort of "rhetoric" did the Taliban use before the US had any discernible role in Afghanistan?
Claiming to be a fighter for Islam above all, Shafiq hardly ever sees his wife and three children, under five. He condemns television as "against Islam" and has never used the Internet.
That's ok, since he probably has possession of several conquered concubines [ma malakat aymankum] who make up part of his spoils of war (ghanima) -- also promised him by the Koran (e.g., 4:3).
When it comes to the war, he calls suicide attacks a "good weapon" and says they should avoid harming civilians -- which they almost most never do.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Satellite.jpg
Preparing to apologize to Iran?

After all, that's what Iran demands. Whereas the Bush administration was not willing to officially engage the Iranian theocracy in direct talks, at least not without certain preconditions, not only is the Obama administration preparing for direct communications (in a "conciliatory" manner), but now the Iranians are the ones insisting that the talks have preconditions -- for the U.S. to meet: Change is certainly here, folks.

"US drafts conciliatory letter to Iran," from the Jerusalem Post, January 29:

The Obama administration is preparing a letter to Iran intended to warm relations and pave the way for direct talks between Washington and Teheran, The Guardian reported Thursday.

Work on the document reportedly began immediately following the November election, upon receipt of a letter of congratulations sent to the elected president by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The Jerusalem Post could not confirm this report.

Diplomats quoted by the paper said the letter, which has seen several drafts so far, would aim to change the US tone towards Iran and offer a different stance on relations between the nations. In it, Obama would seek to assure Teheran that the US is not interested in toppling the Islamic regime, but only to see a change in its conduct.

One of the drafts reportedly calls on the Iranian leader to note the superior standards of living in neighboring countries and consider the advantages of lifting the Islamic Republic's pariah status in the international community.

While its tone is described as conciliatory, the letter also calls on Iran to stop sponsoring terror.

The letter would either be sent to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, or released as an open letter. It is being considered by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as part of a general review of Washington's policy on Iran.

All that said, what do you think Iran's response will be? To hold hands with the U.S. and sing kumbaya? Read on:
On Wednesday a close aide to Ahmadinejad said Iran will not halt its nuclear activities as demanded by Obama's administration.

"We have no non-peaceful activities to suspend. All our activities are peaceful and under the supervision of the IAEA," Aliakbar Javanfekr told Reuters.

Surprise, suprise: while the Obama administration is preparing to dhimmify its "tone" -- you know, since that's what the whole Iran-nuclear-crisis is all about, Bush's less than multi-culti, and all too assertive tone, which, as the story goes, has pushed a "hurt" Iran to defiantly continue enriching uranium -- the Iranian theocracy does not appear willing to change its "tone," or, more accurately, tune.
Javanfekr also dismissed UN resolutions demanding Iran suspend uranium enrichment. "We have passed that stage. We have rejected resolutions. Those resolutions were issued under US pressure. We work in the framework of international laws."

"Obama should act realistically to avoid repeating [former US president George W.] Bush's mistakes," he added.

Three rounds of UN sanctions have been imposed on Iran but Javanfekr said they were "ineffective."

Javanfekr also rejected Obama's calls for Iran to "unclench its fist," saying its was "illogical to talk about unclenching fists when Iran is surrounded by American troops in Afghanistan and Iraq."

Referring to the Obama administration's suggestion of direct talks, Javanfekr said, "We are ready for talks with some preconditions ... including ending America's military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan," he said and repeated the demand for an apology.

Earlier Wednesday, Ahmadinejad called for "profound changes" in US foreign policy - including an end to support for Israel and an apology to the Islamic republic for past misdeeds.

Ahmadinejad also urged Washington to withdraw its troops stationed around the world. He said Iran would be closely watching what President Barack Obama's new administration does and would welcome a real shift in the US approach.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Lord%20Ahmed.jpg
I'll show you who's really "lord" around here

More on this story. "Muslims in the Lords," by Thomas Landen for the Brussels Journal, January 26 (thanks to Bob):

A member of the Lords intended to invite her colleagues to a private meeting in a conference room in the House of Lords to meet the Dutch politician Geert Wilders, an elected member of the Dutch parliament, to watch his controversial movie Fitna and discuss the movie and Mr. Wilders’ opinions with him.

Barely had the invitation been sent to all the members of the House when Lord Ahmed raised hell. He threatened to mobilize 10,000 Muslims to prevent Mr. Wilders from entering the House and threatened to take the colleague who was organizing the event to court. The result is that the event, which should have taken place next Thursday was cancelled.

Lord Ahmed immediately went to the Pakistani press to boast about his achievement, which he calls “a victory for the Muslim community.”

A victory for the Muslim community, but a defeat for British democracy where topics to which Muslims object cannot even be debated. That, apparently, is what one gets when one accepts Muslims into the House of Lords.

Lord Ahmed is considered to be a “moderate” Muslim. The Pakistani born Nazir Ahmed became the United Kingdom’s first Muslim life peer in 1998. He is a member of the Labour Party and was appointed to the Lords by Tony Blair. Lord Ahmed took his oath on the Koran.

He led one of the first delegations on behalf of the British Government on the Muslim pilgrimage of the Hajj, to Saudi Arabia. In February 2005, Lord Ahmed hosted a book launch in the House of Lords for anti-Zionist author Israel Shamir. In 2007, he responded to the award of a knighthood to Salman Rushdie by stating that he was appalled, saying that Rushdie had “blood on his hands.”

Lord Ahmed was among the founders of The World Forum, an organization set up “to promote world peace in the aftermath of 9/11 with an effort to build bridges of understanding between The Muslim World and the West by reviving a tradition of Dialogue between people, cultures and civilizations based on tolerance.”

What does “dialogue” mean to those who make discussion about controversial issues impossible? Thank you, Mr. Blair, for bringing “diversity” to the House of Lords.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A citizen obeys the laws as they are currently formulated: an act of defiance. "Military Judge Denies Obama Request to Suspend Hearings at Guantanamo," by Peter Finn for the Washington Post, January 29 (thanks to all who sent this in):

A military judge in Guantanamo Bay has denied the Obama administration's request to delay proceedings for 120 days in the case of a detainee accused of planning the October 2000 attack on the USS Cole warship, an al-Qaeda strike that killed 17 service members and injured 50 others.

The decision throws into some disarray the administration's plan to buy time as it reviews individual detainee cases as part of its plan to close the U.S. military prison at the Guantanamo naval base in Cuba. The Pentagon may now be forced to withdraw the charges against Abd al Rahim al-Nashiri, a Saudi citizen of Yemeni descent.

In one of its first actions, the Obama administration instructed military prosecutors to seek 120-day suspensions of legal proceedings in the cases of 21 detainees who have been charged. There are approximately 245 prisoners held at Guantanamo.

The request was quickly granted in other cases when prosecutors told military judges that a suspension was in the "interests of justice" so that the "president and his administration [can] review the military commissions process, generally, and the cases currently pending before military commissions, specifically."

But Judge James Pohl, an Army colonel, said he found the government's reasoning "unpersuasive."

"The Commission is unaware of how conducting an arraignment would preclude any option by the administration," said Pohl in a written opinion, portions of which were read to The Post. "Congress passed the military commissions act, which remains in effect. The Commission is bound by the law as it currently exists, not as it may change in the future."

Nashiri is facing arraignment on Feb. 9, and Pohl said the proceedings would go ahead....

Bravo, Pohl.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Erdogan wants Obama to declare that Hamas and Hizballah are not terrorist groups. That would be fine with me, in fact. The State Department should designate them and others to be jihadist groups, and declare that we are fighting a defensive war against Islamic jihadists.

But of course, that is about as likely to happen as Obama naming Tom Tancredo his immigration and borders czar.

"Turkey urges Obama to redefine Mideast terrorism," from Associated Press, January 29 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Turkey's prime minister had a message Thursday for US President Barack Obama: redefine terror and terrorism in the Middle East and use it as the basis for a new American policy.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whose country has played a key role in trying to mediate among Israel and Syria and the Palestinians, said Obama's new Mideast envoy, George Mitchell, will be in Turkey for talks Sunday.

"President Obama must redefine terror and terrorist organizations in the Middle East, and based on this new definition, a new American policy must be deployed in the Middle East," Erdogan told the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

The Turkish leader appeared to be referring to the US Position toward Hamas and Hizbullah, which the United States considers terrorist organizations. While both have military wings, Hamas seized control of Gaza in 2007 and remains in charge following the recent Israeli invasion. Hizbullah is a major political force in Lebanon....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam, gave this command to his followers:

Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war...When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them....If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them. (Sahih Muslim 4294)

So are these "invading militias," when they offer Christians these choices of conversion, payment of tribute and subjugation, or death, really Misunderstanding Islam?

"Escape from Baghdad: Tortured and threatened with death, an Iraqi man and his family flee their war-torn country to seek refuge in Sacramento," by Ted Cox for the News Review, no date :

Saliba was a third-generation Christian. While Hussein’s regime oppressed Shiite Muslims—Hussein was Sunni—Christians practiced their religion openly under his rule.

But after the U.S. invasion, Saliba and his family had to practice their faith in secret. Invading militias distributed a letter to Christians, giving them one of four options: Pay money to Muslims, convert to Islam, leave their homes or be killed.

For two years after the invasion, Saliba had managed to keep his family safe from the violence. But that, like so much of his life before the invasion, was about to change.

In the early morning hours of April 16, 2005, Saliba woke early to head out to work. But as he opened the front door, he saw something strange sitting on his doorstep.

He immediately knew someone had left a bomb for him. A note attached to the bomb read, “You are taking Muslim money. We will kill you and your family.”

Saliba flew through his house, scooping up his wife and daughter as he ran outside to the wall surrounding his property. Frantically, he threw together a makeshift staircase and hoisted his family over the wall separating his house from his neighbor’s.

Read it all.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This is great news, but I still wonder what took the FBI so long.

"FBI Cuts Off CAIR Over Hamas Questions," by Mary Jacoby for IPT News, January 29 :

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has cut off contacts with the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) amid mounting concern about the Muslim advocacy group's roots in a Hamas-support network, the Investigative Project on Terrorism has learned.

The decision to end contacts with CAIR was made quietly last summer as federal prosecutors prepared for a second trial of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF), an Islamic charity accused of providing money and political support to the terrorist group Hamas, according to people with knowledge of the matter.

CAIR and its chairman emeritus, Omar Ahmad, were named un-indicted co-conspirators in the HLF case. Both Ahmad and CAIR's current national executive director, Nihad Awad, were revealed on government wiretaps as having been active participants in early Hamas-related organizational meetings in the United States. During testimony, FBI agent Lara Burns described CAIR as a front organization.

Hamas is a US-designated foreign terrorist organization, and it's been illegal since 1995 to provide support to it within the United States.

The decision to end contacts with CAIR is a significant policy change for the FBI. For years, the FBI worked with the national organization and its state chapters to address Muslim community concerns about the potential for hate crimes and other civil liberty violations in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

But critics said the FBI improperly conferred legitimacy on CAIR by meeting with its officials, even as its own investigative files contained evidence of CAIR leaders' ties to Hamas.

Last autumn, FBI field offices began notifying state CAIR chapters that bureau officials could no longer meet with them until CAIR's national leadership in Washington had addressed issues raised by the HLF trial, according to people with knowledge of the notifications.

CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper declined to comment Wednesday when the IPT called for comment. Before hanging up, Hooper said "We're more than happy to cooperate with legitimate media. But we don't cooperate with those who promote anti-Muslim bigotry."...

Sheesh, Honest Ibe has been pulling that one for years. His act is getting tired.

Anyway, read it all.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is video of my address at the David Horowitz Freedom Center's Wednesday Morning Club in Los Angeles yesterday.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

WAM.jpeg
His sister was a bad Muslim girl

Just received this one from three weeks ago: Waheed Allah Mohammad has pleaded guilty to attempted second-degree murder and first-degree assault for trying to kill his sister, Fauzia A. Mohammad, by stabbing her multiple times. Waheed Mohammad told investigators that Fauzia had dishonored the family and was a “bad Muslim girl,” but no worries -- this wasn't an attempt to add to the growing list of honor killings in the U.S. Oh, no. Waheed just snapped because of post-traumatic stress disorder. His lawyer explained: “I think it was probably more of a domestic violence incident than an attempted honor killing. It (honor killing) is a nice headline but it doesn’t seem to fit what happened here.”

This kind of denial will only make for more honor killings in the U.S.

Attempted Honor Killing in New York Update: "Guilty plea in sister stabbing," by Michael Zeigler for the Democrat and Chronicle, January 7 (thanks to Joseph):

An Afghan refugee admitted today that he stabbed and seriously wounded his sister during an argument that began when she tried to leave her family.

Waheed Allah Mohammad, 22, pleaded guilty to attempted second-degree murder and first-degree assault in exchange for a prison term of at least five years and no more than 15 years.

His trial was to begin next Monday.

During his plea before Monroe County Court Judge John J. Connell, Mohammad said he intended to kill his sister, Fauzia A. Mohammad, 19, when he stabbed her multiple times outside his family’s apartment on Linhome Drive in Henrietta.

The attack occurred when a female friend of Fauzia Mohammad picked her up at the apartment to take her to New York City, where she intended to get a job and start a new life. During a heated dispute involving the entire family, Mohammad got a knife from his car, chased his sister, and stabbed her.

Mohammad told sheriff’s investigators that he attacked his sister because she had disgraced his family and was a “bad Muslim girl,” according to court documents.

Although he hinted to investigators that he was trying to restore lost family honor, Assistant District Attorney Joseph Waldorf declined to characterize the stabbing as an honor attack —an attack intended to restore family honor that is not uncommon in South Asia but is rare in the United States.

Mohammad’s lawyer, Assistant Public Defender John Bradley, said his client snapped as a result of post-traumatic stress disorder brought about by his harrowing life in Afghanistan. Before Mohammad left his country in 2005, he was kidnapped by the radical Islamist Taliban, witnessed the killing of a friend, and tried unsuccessfully to flee on a boat of refugees.

“I think it was probably more of a domestic violence incident than an attempted honor killing,” Bradley said. “It (honor killing) is a nice headline but it doesn’t seem to fit what happened here.”...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I am confident that the Europeans will be all too eager to comply with their wishes.

"Gaza: Egypt warns Europe," from Reuters, January 27:

Cairo - Egypt warned European countries on Tuesday to think carefully before sending ships to patrol Gaza's coastal waters to prevent arms smuggling, saying such a move could have significant consequences on ties with Arab states.

The warning by Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit came after Britain, France and Germany offered to send warships to the Middle East to monitor and prevent arms smuggling to Gaza and to help consolidate a shaky ceasefire.

"In my discussions with European foreign ministers yesterday, I warned them and said: 'You must understand Arab and Muslim feelings'," Aboul Gheit told a news conference, adding that if such a job was needed, the responsibility should be borne by Israel, not Europe.

"I urge you to look and consider this ... because it might have consequences in Palestinian and Arab relations with you," Aboul Gheit said, speaking after talks with EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From our Wishful Thinking Department comes this choice item: "Hindu leaders for 'fatwa' against 'jihad' in India," from the Press Trust Of India, January 28 (thanks to Twostellas):

A group of Hindu leaders on Wednesday appealed to Islamic religious institutions and scholars to come forward with an appropriate 'fatwa' (edict) to declare that Hindus were not 'kaafirs' (non-believers) and that there need not be a "jihad" (war) against them in India.

"The fatwa should say that India is not 'Dar-ul-Harab', which means it is not a land against which Islamists have to wage a war," convener of the All India Acharya Sect Dayanand Maharaj told journalists in Mumbai on Wednesday.

Speaking at a seminar, Dayanand said our country is a 'dar-ul-amen', a land of peace, as here Muslims could practise Islam without any impediment....

Good luck with that. There is no theological justification by which Muslims could not regard Hindus as unbelievers -- nonetheless, the response to this request, if any is forthcoming, will be most interesting.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Contrast this story with the giant "interfaith" photo-op King Abdullah sponsored in Spain last summer. "Saudi Arabia - Authorities arrest Christian convert," from Compass Direct News, January 28:

LOS ANGELES, January 28 (Compass Direct News) – Five months after the daughter of a member of Saudi Arabia’s religious police was killed for writing online about her faith in Christ, Saudi authorities have reportedly arrested a 28-year-old Christian man for describing his conversion and criticizing the kingdom’s judiciary on his Web site.
Saudi police arrested Hamoud Bin Saleh on Jan. 13 “because of his opinions and his testimony that he had converted from Islam to Christianity,” according to the Arabic Network for Human Rights Information (ANHRI). Bin Saleh, who had been detained for nine months in 2004 and again for a month last November, was reportedly being held in Riyadh’s Eleisha prison.
On his web site, which Saudi authorities have blocked, Bin Saleh wrote that his journey to Christ began after witnessing the public beheading of three Pakistanis convicted of drug charges. Shaken, he began an extensive study of Islamic history and law, as well as Saudi justice. He became disillusioned with sharia (Islamic law) and dismayed that kingdom authorities only prosecuted poor Saudis and foreigners.
“I was convinced that the wretched Pakistanis were executed in accordance with the Muhammadan laws just because they are poor and have no money or favored positions, which they had no control or power over,” he wrote in Arabic in his Dec. 22 posting, referring to “this terrible prejudice in the application of justice in Saudi Arabia.”
A 2003 graduate in English literature from Al Yarmouk University in Jordan, Bin Saleh’s research led him to an exploration of other faiths, and in his travels he gained access to a Bible.
“My mind was persistently raising questions and desperately seeking answers,” he wrote. “I went on vacations to read about comparative religion, and I got the Bible, and I used to give these books to anyone before going back to Saudi, as going back there with such books is considered an unforgivable crime which will throw its perpetrator in a dark jail.”
After reading how Jesus forgave – rather than stoned – a woman condemned for adultery, Bin Saleh eventually received Christ as savior. [...]
Writing that both Islam and Saudi Arabia promote injustice and inequality, Bin Saleh described himself as a researcher/writer bent on obtaining full rights of the Christian minority in Saudi Arabia.
He noted on his now-banned Web site (“Masihi Saudi,” at http://christforsaudi.blogspot.com) that he had been arrested twice, the first time in Beirut, Lebanon on Jan. 18, 2004. The U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees office there had notified Saudi authorities that he had been accepted as a “refugee for ideological persecution reasons,” he wrote, but a few days later intelligence agents from the Saudi embassy in Beirut, “with collusion of Lebanese authorities and the government of [former Prime Minister] Rafik Al-Hariri,” turned him over to Saudi officials.
After nine months of detention in Saudi Arabia, he was released but banned from traveling, writing and appearing in media.
He was arrested a second time on Nov. 1, 2008. “I was interrogated for a month about some articles by which I condemned the Saudi regime’s violation of human rights and [rights of] converts to Christianity,” he wrote. ...

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

January 28, 2009

Go back to sleep: it can't happen here....can it? "Israel foils Hizbullah attack in Europe," by Yaakov Katz for the Jerusalem Post, January 28 (thanks to Looney Tunes):

Israeli intelligence agencies recently succeeded in thwarting a major Hizbullah terror attack against an Israeli target in Europe, Channel 2 reported Wednesday, citing security officials.

The attack was reportedly thwarted by Israel in conjunction with a European intelligence agency.

Hizbullah planned the attack to avenge the February 2008 assassination of arch-terrorist Imad Mughniyeh in Damascus, the report said.

Last week, Defense Minister Ehud Barak ordered Israeli security services to raise their level of alertness out of fear that Hizbullah would increase its efforts to launch an attack against an Israeli or Jewish target abroad ahead of the first anniversary of Mughniyeh's assassination on February 12....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Appeasement makes things so much easier, doesn't it, Mr. West?

"Gaza has 'set back' anti-terror fight: minister," from AFP, January 28 (thanks to all who sent this in):

LONDON (AFP) – Security and counter-terrorism minister, Alan West, has warned that the conflict in Gaza has set back the government's attempts to tackle radicalism in Muslim communities here.

"There is no doubt that when you see these pictures coming back, that in the mind of people making hate, there is a linkage between the US, Israel and the UK. Without a doubt it will have set us back," he said.

West also dismissed the refusal by former prime minister Tony Blair to acknowledge the link between foreign policy and security threats.

"We never used to accept that our foreign policy ever had any effect on terrorism. Well, that was clearly bollocks," he said, according to widespread and concurring reports.

"They [the Blair administration] were very unwilling to have any debate about how our foreign policy impacted on radicalisation."...

Yes, indeed, Mr. West. It was bollocks. In fact, if Britain adopted a foreign policy that was utterly compliant with the Islamic supremacist agenda, including the transformation of the U.K. itself into a Sharia state and the reduction of the non-Muslim population to dhimmi status, there would indeed be a decline in jihad terror attacks against it. Just as the Nazis had no reason to invade Vichy France.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

RehovSpencer.jpg
Rehov and Spencer at Restoration Weekend 2008

The great filmmaker Pierre Rehov is fighting against the inundation of pro-Hamas propaganda that floods the Internet and the mainstream media. He has created a few clips that illuminate some important aspects of the jihad against Israel, and kindly sent them over just now.

Here is a fun one -- "How to make a Hamas hero":

And this one answers the question, Do Islamic jihadists really believe they will be given 72 virgins in Paradise?

Here is some exclusive material, cut from one of Pierre's films -- a segment filmed at an Israeli check point:

You can find all of Pierre's clips here, and his website here.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Botros.jpg

This being the continuation of Fr Zakaria Botros’ examination of Muhammad's sexual morality (or lack thereof). See here for Part I and Part II.

Last we left the Coptic priest, he was reading from hadith reports stating that the prophet of Islam “admired” a 2-3 year old girl (saying that he hoped to live long enough to make her his wife), and “laid” in the grave with a dead woman.

In this episode, he began with the prophet’s “transvestite” tendencies. He read from several hadiths, including Sahih Bukhari—Fr Botros claims that there are no less than 32 different references to this phenomenon in Islam’s books—wherein Muhammad often laid in bed dressed in women’s clothes, specifically his child-bride Aisha’s.

Fr. Botros: “Perhaps Muslims think that he only dressed in Aisha’s clothes? Being that she was his “favorite,” perhaps after being intimate with her, he would merely lay in bed with her clothes?” (Here the priest put his face in his hands lamenting that he had to talk of such shameful things.)

Then he offered an interesting and revealing hadith, from Sahih Bukhari (2/911), which records Muhammad saying, “Revelations [i.e., the Koran] never come to me when I’m dressed in women’s clothing—except when I’m dressed in Aisha’s,” implying that it was something of a habit for the prophet to dress in female clothing.

Fr Botros next moved on to some commentaries in the Tafsir of al-Qurtubi—an authoritative exegesis in Islam. He read one anecdote where Aisha said that, one day, while Muhammad was lying naked in bed, Zaid came knocking; Muhammad, without getting dressed, opened the door and “hugged and kissed him”—in the nude. Elsewhere, Qurtubi concludes that, “the prophet—prayers and blessings upon him—was constantly preoccupied with women.”

Fr Botros to Muslims: “So this is your prophet—the most morally upright man? Instead of being preoccupied with, say, prayer or good deeds, he was preoccupied with women?”

He next read from Faid al-Qabir (3/371), wherein Muhammad is on record saying, “My greatest loves are women and perfume: the hungry is satisfied after eating, but I never have enough of women.” Another hadith: “I can hold back from food and drink—but not from women.” After reading these hadiths, Fr Botros would just look at the screen in silence, shaking his head.

He next read an interesting narrative (contained in Umdat al-Qari and Faid al-Qabir). Reportedly, Allah sent Gabriel with some sort of celestial food (called al-kofid) to Muhammad, commanding the latter to “Eat!”—identical to when Gabriel came to Muhammad saying “Read!” (i.e., iqra, the word for Koran). The report goes on to quote Muhammad saying that the food given to him “gave me the sexual potency of 40 heavenly men.” Fr Botros next read from the Sunan of al-Tirmidhi, where it says that the “heavenly man” has the sexual potency of 100 mortal men.

Wondered the priest: “So, doing the math, 40x100, we can conclude that Muhammad, whenever he ate his heavenly aphrodisiac, had the sexual potency of 4000 men? Really, O umma, is this the claim to fame of your prophet—that he was a raving sex maniac?" Then, less seriously, "Imagine the surprise when Westerners find out that, once again, it was Muhammad who first discovered Viagra!”

Zakaria Botros went on to read from more sources, such as Sunan al-Nisa’i, wherein Muhammad used to in a single night "visit" all his women, without washing in between. Asked the priest: “Why even record such obscene and embarrassing things?"

Perhaps most entertaining, Fr Botros spent some time analyzing an anecdote recorded in Ibn Kathir’s al-Bidaya we al-Nihaya. Here is a translation for this lengthy account:

After conquering the Jews of Khaybar, and plundering their belongings, among other things, a donkey fell into the lot of the prophet, who proceeded to ask the donkey: “What is your name?"

The donkey answered, "Yazid Ibn Shihab. Allah had brought forth from my ancestry 60 donkeys, none of whom were ridden on except by prophets. None of the descendants of my grandfather remain but me, and none of the prophets remain but you and I expected you to ride me. Before you, I belonged to a Jewish man, whom I caused to stumble and fall frequently so he used to kick my stomach and beat my back."

Here, chuckling, the priest added, “a taqiyya-practicing donkey!” He continued reading, "The prophet – may Allah’s prayers and peace be upon him – said to him, ‘I will call you Ya’foor. O Ya’foor!’ Ya’foor replied, ‘I obey.’ The prophet asked, ‘Do you lust after females?’ The donkey replied, ‘No!’"

Cried the priest: “Even the donkey blushed for shame concerning your prophet’s over-sexed inquiries! Here we have what is supposed to be a miracle—a talking donkey; and of all things to communicate to this animal, your prophet’s most urgent question was whether the donkey lusts after females?”

Next, reading from Sahih Bukhari (5/2012), Fr Botros relayed an account where Muhammad went into the house of a young woman named Umaima bint Nua’m and commanded her to “Give yourself to me!” The woman responded, “Shall a queen give herself to the rabble?" Shaking his fist, Muhammad threatened her, and then sent her off to her parents.

Zakaria Botros: “You see, people, even back then, in those dark ages, there were still people who had principles, who did not give way to threats and coercion. However, the real question here is, why was Muhammad contradicting the commandments of his own Koran—“if a believing woman gives herself to the prophet” (33:50)—trying to coerce this young lady?”

Finally, with a most distasteful look on his face, the priest read from a hadith in al-Siyuti (6/395), where Muhammad asserts that, “In heaven, Mary mother of Jesus, will be one of my wives.”

“Please, O prophet,” quoth the Coptic Orthodox priest, “do not implicate our saints with your filthy practices…”

[Stay tuned for part IV of "The perverse sexual habits of the Prophet"]


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Max Boot dissects an Obama comment from the Al-Arabiya interview, demonstrating that the President doesn't have the slightest idea what he is talking about when he invokes an era of good relations between the U.S. and the Islamic world as recently as two or three decades ago. Boot says that Obama's comment reveals his "profound ignorance about most aspects of foreign policy, including the recent history of the Middle East." And it also makes it more than likely that Obama is likewise profoundly ignorant of not just the recent history of the Middle East, but the history of the Middle East as a whole. What he thinks he knows, moreover, is likely to be historical myth and propaganda, the acceptance of which is extremely common among those who should know better: Dinesh D'Souza, after all, thinks the Islamic jihad began 25 years ago, and who doesn't believe in the unicorn myth of a tolerant, pluralistic Muslim Spain?

"20 or 30 Years Ago?," from Commentary, January 28 (thanks to Gary):

“America was not born as a colonial power, and that the same respect and partnership that America had with the Muslim world as recently as 20 or 30 years ago, there’s no reason why we can’t restore that. And that I think is going to be an important task.”

So said our new president in his interview Tuesday with Al Arabiya, the Arabic-language satellite news channel. At first the words washed over me. Then I did some simple math. Let’s see… 20 or 30 years ago… that would be 1989 or 1979.

What was happening in relations between America and the Muslim world back then? Not relying on memory alone, I consulted Bernard Grun’s reference book, The Timetables of History.

It turns out that in 1989 U.S. fighters shot down two Libyan jets over the Gulf of Sidra. The last Soviet troops left Afghanistan, creating a vacuum that would eventually be filled by the Taliban. Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa calling for Salman Rushdie’s death for “blasphemy.” Hundreds died in Lebanon’s long-running civil war while Hezbollah militants were torturing to death U.S. Marine Colonel William “Rich” Higgins, who had been kidnapped the previous year while serving as a UN peacekeeper in Lebanon.

And 1979? That was an even darker year-in many ways a turning point for the worse in the Middle East. That was, after all, the year that the shah of Iran was overthrown. He was replaced by the Ayatollah Khomeini, who launched a war against the West that is still unfolding. One of the first actions of this long struggle was the seizure of the US Embassy in Tehran and all of its personnel as hostages. The same year saw the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, which led to the growth of the mujahideen, some of whom would later morph into Al Qaeda and the Taliban. This was also the year that Islamic militants temporarily seized control of the Grand Mosque in Mecca, an event that drove the Saudi royal family to become ever more fundamentalist.

In other news in 1979, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the former prime minister of Pakistan, was hanged by General Zia al-Hak, inaugurating a long period when Pakistan would be under the effective control of the army in alliance with Islamic militants. That year mobs also attacked U.S. embassies throughout the Muslim world from Kabul and Islamabad to Tripoli. The one bright spot in 1979 was the signing of the Camp David Accord between the US, Egypt, and Israel, which did not, unfortunately, auger a “new” Middle East as many optimists hoped.

So this is the sort of “partnership” between the U.S. and the Middle East that President Obama would like to see? If his predecessor had suggested any such thing he would by now be a subject of ridicule for late-night comedians and daytime talk show hosts, and rightly so.

This is actually a revealing slip. To wit, it reveals two things: First, Obama’s profound ignorance about most aspects of foreign policy, including the recent history of the Middle East. A second, and related point, is his tendency to blame the ills of the region on the previous administration-something that is only possible if you started following the Middle East around 2001 and have little idea of what came before. It is then all too easy to claim, as Obama did on the campaign trail, that it was George W. Bush’s “disengagement” from the peace process and his “disastrous” war with Iraq that messed up the Middle East. Only someone with a longer view would realize how profoundly messed up the region was long before Bush came into office....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"As for the thief, both male and female, cut off their hands. It is the reward of their own deeds, an exemplary punishment from Allah. Allah is Mighty, Wise." -- Qur'an 5:38.

But you really have to know Arabic to understand it, right? You really can't just take one verse out of context and try to make something of it, right?

"Somalia Islamists cut off thief's hand," from The Associated Press, January 28 (thanks to all who sent this in):

MOGADISHU, Somalia: Islamic militants who are on Washington's list of terror groups have cut off the hand of a man convicted of stealing fishing nets, officials said Wednesday.

The Islamic group, al-Shabab, is imposing a strict form of Islam with punishments including lashings and stonings that have drawn fear and trepidation in this Muslim country. In one case, the group stoned a 13-year-old girl to death for adultery even though her parents said she was a rape victim.

Mohamed Sahal Iidle, a judge in the port town of Kismayo, said Wednesday that a 26-year-old man had his hand cut off late Tuesday for stealing three sacks full of fishing nets worth $300 (€227) from a businesswoman.

"He screamed once after his hand was cut off," said witness Ibrahim Yare. "Then nurses whisked him away."...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I have more to say about the Geert Wilders case in my column this week: "Jailed For An Insult?," from Human Events, January 28:

“You can’t just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done,” said Barack Obama to Republican leaders Friday. The new president seems to want to make sure that as few people listen to Rush Limbaugh as possible. Senator Mike Enzi (R-WY) warned Thursday that “legislation is brewing on Capitol Hill that would take away free speech from broadcasters by reinstating a law” -- the infamous “Fairness Doctrine” -- “that would require talk shows to provide equal time coverage of opposing viewpoints on any issues they discuss.”

This would wipe out conservative talk shows like Limbaugh’s by mandating that programming reflecting a liberal perspective be aired for “balance” if the conservative shows are aired at all -- and with the mainstream media already heavily tilted toward the Left, this would effectively stifle voices that dissent from the Left/liberal line. “The ‘fairness doctrine’ is a violation of free speech,” said Enzi.

Nor is that all. The White House website pledges that “President Obama and Vice President Biden will strengthen federal hate crimes legislation…” The problem with this, of course, is that “hate” is in the eye of the beholder, so “hate crime” laws are essentially tools for enforcing officially-endorsed views. It’s another form of censorship.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

It isn't enough that Obama has already signaled in numerous ways his readiness to embark on a path of appeasement. Oh, no. Ahmadinejad wants Obama to signal to the world Iran's hegemony. And this after Iran has been at war with the United States for decades, beginning with the hostage crisis.

Why shouldn't he go ahead and give Ahmadinejad what he wants? After all, won't that help establish "mutual respect" between the U.S. and Iran -- which mutual respect Obama has implied more than once has been ruptured by the U.S., not by the Islamic world?

"Obama should apologise to Iran: Ahmadinejad," from AFP, January 28 (thanks to Sr. Soph):

TEHRAN (AFP) - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad demanded on Wednesday that US President Barack Obama apologise for "crimes" committed by the United States against Iran over the past 60 years.

The hardline leader also called on Washington to withdraw its troops from across the world as a proof of Obama's policy of change.

"You were standing against the Iranian people in the past 60 years," Ahmadinejad said during an address in the western region of Khermenshah that was broadcast by state television.

"Those who speak of change must apologise to the Iranian people and try to repair their past bad acts and the crimes they committed against Iran."

As to the troops, he said he expected two kinds of "deep and fundamental" change.

"Meet people, talk to them with respect and put an end to the expansionist policies. If you talk about change it must put an end to the US military presence in the world, withdraw your troops and take them back inside your borders."

Ahmadinejad said the advocates of change must "stop supporting the Zionists, outlaws and criminals."

He called on the United States to "stop interfering in other people's affairs" and said Washington should "let the American people decide their own future ... Stop pressuring them," he added, without saying to what he was referring.

Ahmadinejad said he welcomed change but the "change has to be fundamental."

"If someone wants to talk with us in the language that (George W.) Bush used ... even if he uses new words, our response will be the same that we gave to Bush during the past years," he added....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The headline here reads "Father claims Muslim sons attacked over religion during ball-hockey tourney," but it fails to note that the attackers were other Muslims. The article also does not mention the sect to which the sons belong -- whether Ahmadiyya, or something else -- but their father said, "they believe we are non-Muslim. At the end of the day, that is the cause." And that marked his sons for what he termed a "targeted attack."

"Father claims Muslim sons attacked over religion during ball-hockey tourney," from CanWest News Service, January 28 (thanks to TwoStellas):

Two brothers were attacked by opposing ball hockey players and spectators because of their religion, their father said. Ahmed Buksh said his sons, Elijah, 21, and Izaiah, 20, were playing at the B. C. Institute of Technology gym in Burnaby on Sunday in a tournament put on by the B. C. Muslim Sports Association. "It was a targeted attack on two boys. I never saw anything like it," Mr. Buksh said. "It was just disgusting. They believe we are non-Muslim. At the end of the day, that is the cause." Mr. Buksh said he and his sons are Muslims, but do not follow the Sunni branch of the religion, which the sports association favours. "I just believe in being Muslim," he said. According to Mr. Buksh, the derogatory comments directed toward the men turned to open hostility during the early stages of their second game of the tournament. Both were attacked by the opposing players. One was hit in the head by a stick and the other suffered broken teeth after being hit in the face. "Before you know it, it was just a massive riot," said Mr. Buksh. "I went in there as a father and tried to help."

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

He's recruiting jihadists in prison and demanding that his guards abide by Sharia norms.

"Al Qaeda Killer Makes Veils Jibe From Prison Cell," by Chris Riches in the Daily Express, January 28 (thanks to JH):

A MURDERING Al Qaeda terrorist has sparked outrage after threatening legal action under the Human Rights Act unless women prison wardens in his presence wear veils.

Kamel Bourgass, 33, was jailed for life in 2004 after stabbing brave Special Branch officer Stephen Oake to death in a police raid.

Now Bourgass is not only recruiting extremists to his twisted cause in Wakefield prison but is claiming that women wardens without veils infringe his human rights.

He has even cracked sick jokes about the bravery medal DC Oake received posthumously, sneering that it was made from the “metal of my knife”.

The Algerian had been preparing a deadly ricin poison attack on Bri tain when father-of-three Detective Constable Oake, 40, arrested him.

Bourgass, the first Muslim fanatic to murder a British police officer, has been in Wakefield jail for just a few weeks.

But insiders claim he has already begun preaching Islamist hate against the West to inmates.

And wearing his long black cloak, he has infuriated wardens with the sick jibe about DC Oake.

A prison insider revealed: “He is very abusive and confrontational with staff and says female officers in prayer meetings are a breach of his human rights.

“If they are on duty, he demands they wear a veil.

“We’ve been told to closely monitor him because he preaches hatred at prayer meetings.”...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Saber-rattling from jihadists in Pakistan. "Pakistan’s Crackdown on Militants Leaves Imams Preaching Jihad," by James Rupert for Bloomberg, January 28:

Jan. 28 (Bloomberg) -- A dozen Pakistani policemen stood watch last week outside a Lahore mosque known to be a stronghold of the Lashkar-e-Taiba guerrilla group -- while the imam inside preached jihad to thousands of worshippers.

The squad’s presence was part of Pakistan’s vow to curb Lashkar, which India blames for the Nov. 26-29 Mumbai terrorist attack that killed 164 people, and it showed how limited that effort has been. As the officers heard Saifullah Khalid’s sermon blaring over loudspeakers, he demanded more attacks on India.

“Muslims under the leadership of Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jamaat ud-Dawa will conquer all South Asia!” Khalid roared. “Nobody can stop us from fighting India!”

Pakistan’s offensive -- in response to international pressure to suppress Lashkar and its civilian ally, Jamaat -- is halting and partial at best, says Ahmed Rashid, a Lahore-based analyst and author of several books on Pakistan and Islamic militancy. Fewer Jamaat leaders have been arrested, and fewer of its schools closed, than the national government claims, according to provincial-level figures.

Because the country’s politically dominant army has cultivated Lashkar and Jamaat to help confront India over the disputed territory of Kashmir, “there is not going to be any sudden U-turn in policy,” Rashid said. “I don’t expect a proper crackdown.”

I don't either.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

stealthjihad.jpg

Joseph Farah writes in WorldNetDaily:

I've been studying radical Islam since 1979. I've been writing about it since the early 1980s. I'm considered an authoritative expert on the subject by many. I've lectured all over the world on the topic in the last 10 years.

Yet, I have to tell you, Spencer's new book has been an eye-opener even for me.

When I first saw the title, "Stealth Jihad: How Radical Islam Is Subverting America Without Guns or Bombs," I thought: "I'm not sure people are going to be as concerned by the stealth jihadists as they are about those with the guns and bombs."

But after reading this amazing book, I realize the bigger threat to America comes from the subtle, sophisticated stealth jihadists who are, in fact, winning over the hearts and minds of Americans at a most unlikely time in history – when jihadists have openly declared war on America and shown they mean it.

Spencer reveals the interlocking connections of the most important stealth jihadist groups and individuals actively subverting our country and Western Civilization. He shows how they are winning the day – despite a record of arrests, indictments, trials and convictions for their own covert support of violent jihadists.

Worse yet, he exposes the foreign money trail that supports these groups and individuals – a money trail that starts right back in countries supporting the violent jihadists in Iraq, Lebanon, Afghanistan and the Palestinian Authority.

It is the power and presence of these stealth jihadists that have provided cover to those clerics and mosques inside America that have become a breeding and training ground for violent jihadists now being exported from America to places like Somalia.

I urge you to read Robert Spencer's new book.

I urge you to embrace its truths.

I urge you to do this today as a vital matter of national security.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

January 27, 2009

These "insurgents" were angry and felt the need to "retaliate" for the arrest of their leader by...slaying Buddhists? For the record, nearly 90% of the inhabitants of Pattani, where the murder took place, are Muslims; this may perhaps -- just perhaps now -- shed some light on, not only the identity of these "insurgents," but the sort of leader they may have had ("overthrow the infidel government!"), and their motives (implement sharia). Stories like this lead to such surmisings.

"Buddhist couple killed in Pattani," from The Nation, January 27:

Pattani - A Buddhist couple were killed in a drive-by shooting in this southern border province Tuesday morning, police said.

Police said Mas Jannual, 39, and his wife, Pen Prommanee, 41, were shot dead on a village road in Khuan Pradu village in Tambon Na Pradu in Khok Pho district at 9:30 am.

Police said the couple were riding home from their rubber plantation and were attacked by a pillion rider.

Police believe the two attackers were insurgents who launched the attack in retaliation against the arrest of their local leader recently.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

lane-iran_nuclear_po.jpg

One more year of taqiyya on the one hand, and UN naivete and quibbling on the other, and the Shia state will be prepared to usher in the mahdi -- that is, Armageddon: "Iran could have ability to build nuclear bomb by 2010, study warns," by David Blair for the Telegraph, January 27:

Iran will amass enough low-enriched uranium this year to have the ability to build a nuclear bomb by the end of 2010, a respected think tank has predicted.

The International Institute for Strategic Studies has said Iran is months away from crossing a vital threshold which could put it on course to build a weapon.

Mark Fitzpatrick, the senior fellow for non-proliferation at the IISS, said: "This year, it's very likely that Iran will have produced enough low-enriched uranium which, if further enriched, could constitute enough fissile material for one nuclear weapon, if that is the route Iran so desires."

Further enrichment to produce weapons-grade uranium would take at least 12 months after the threshold that Iran is likely to reach at the end of this year. Iran's scientists will have to overcome numerous technical hurdles and fully master the enrichment of uranium before this can happen.

Iran is defying five United Nations Resolutions by enriching uranium inside an underground plant at Natanz. This process is highly sensitive because it amounts to "dual use" technology.

If uranium is enriched to four per cent purity – which Iran says is the only intention – it can be used to run nuclear power stations. If enriched above 87.5 per cent, however, the uranium reaches weapons-grade and becomes the essential material for a nuclear bomb.

Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) are monitoring Iran's plants, which remain under United Nations safeguards. Their latest report said that Iran was running 3,820 centrifuges – the machines used to enrich uranium – inside Natanz. So far, 630kg of low-enriched uranium had been produced.

Large quantities of low-grade material must be amassed before Iran will have the option of converting this into the high purity uranium needed for weapons. Mr Fitzpatrick believes that Iran will reach this point by 2009.

If the country goes to the next stage and chooses to produce weapons-grade uranium, however, it would have to expel the IAEA inspectors who presently monitor its plants. The international community would therefore have some warning before Iran reached the point of being able to build a bomb.

To have a proper weapons system, Iran would also need to build missiles capable of delivering a nuclear warhead. At present, Iran has Shahab-3 missiles with a range of about 1,250 miles. Documents in the hands of the IAEA suggest Iranian scientists have studied how to convert these weapons to carry nuclear warheads.

President Barack Obama has pledged to "engage" directly with Iran's leaders and seek a diplomatic solution to the nuclear confrontation. During a television interview on Monday, he accused Iran of pursuing a "nuclear weapon" and sponsoring "terrorist organisations".

But Mr Obama added: "I do think that it is important for us to be willing to talk to Iran, to express very clearly where our differences are, but where there are potential avenues for progress. And we will over the next several months be laying out our general framework and approach. And as I said during my inauguration speech, if countries like Iran are willing to unclench their fist, they will find an extended hand from us."

Earlier this week, US ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice said the Obama administration would engage in "direct diplomacy" with Iran.

But she said Iran must meet U N Security Council demands to suspend uranium enrichment before any talks on its nuclear program.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More on this story. "Gaza donations double after DEC aid appeal screened," from Times Online, January 27:

Donations to an emergency fund for Gaza doubled overnight after three TV channels broadcast an appeal that the BBC and Sky News have refused to show.

Members of the public have now pledged over £1 million to help tackle the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip, the Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC) said today.

Terrestrial broadcasters ITV, Channel 4 and Five showed the DEC’s televised appeal for donations last night.

More than 100 MPs from all parties have signed an early day motion criticising the decision taken by BBC and Sky News not to air the three-minute film.

Demonstrators last night staged protests at the BBC’s Broadcasting House in central London, burning their TV licences and occupying the building’s reception until they were removed by police.

The DEC, an umbrella organisation for 13 of the larger aid agencies including Oxfam and the British Red Cross, said today it was “delighted” with the response to its appeal.

“We really do appreciate the support of the British public who have shown their generosity when confronted with scenes of a dire humanitarian emergency," said Brendan Gormley, the chief executive.

“Their donations will improve the lives of so many civilians caught up in a conflict that was not of their making.

Even if they were the ones who voted into power Hamas, the terrorist organization ultimately responsible for the current situation.
All the money raised will go directly to helping the innocent families in Gaza who have been left without basic everyday necessities that we take for granted such as food, shelter and healthcare.”
Except for that money which, one way or another, will find its way to support Hamas' jihad.
Richard Burden, the Labour MP who tabled the early day motion, criticised the arguments put forward by BBC managers to explain their decision as “unconvincing and contradictory”.

“Viewers and listeners can see the difference between a humanitarian appeal and politics - even if the BBC and Sky management cannot,” he said.

“BBC and Sky bosses have the power to make the editorial decisions they want. The rest of us have the right to say they are wrong.”

Mark Thompson, the BBC director general, today repeated that he would not change his mind on screening the advert.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Aside from some defiant, but apparently empty, words "the minister said the government could not stop destruction of schools when the area people took up arms and wore suicide jackets to torch and bomb their own schools."

"School burnings in Swat can’t be stopped, says minister," by Akhtar Amin for the Daily Times, January 27:

PESHAWAR: NWFP Minister for Elementary and Secondary Education Sardar Hussain Babak said on Tuesday that it had become difficult for the government to stop Taliban from torching and bombing girls schools in the restive Swat Valley.

Commenting on destruction of yet another school by Taliban in Odigram, a suburb of Mingora city, on Monday, the minister said the government could not stop destruction of schools when the area people took up arms and wore suicide jackets to torch and bomb their own schools.

He blamed religious parties (JI and JUI-F) for providing moral support to Swat Taliban and ignoring the violence with which they treated innocent people of the valley.

“It is easy for leaders of religious parties to blame the provincial government for deteriorating law and order situation. But one should ask JI Chief Qazi Hussain Ahmed and JUI-F Chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman why they remain silent on terrorist activities of Mullah Fazlullah in Swat district,” Babak said.

He said religious parties were protesting against killings in Gaza while ignoring slaughter of Swati people and destruction of their schools at the hands of Fazlullah.

He rejected a Taliban call for closure of girls schools, saying no one would be allowed to deprive Pakhtun children of their right to education.

Except for the Taliban who, to date, has destroyed some 300 schools.
The minister said militants had called for closure of girls schools in Swat, but the ANP-led provincial government would never surrender to these Taliban...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The UK's only Muslim peer, Lord Nazir Ahmed, was responsible for the British Parliament's dhimmi cancellation of a showing of Geert Wilders' film Fitna. He called the cancellation "a victory for the Muslim community.” And Brian of London has more:

Two years ago when I helped organise Bat Ye'or's visit to the House of Commons we had the pleasure of receiving Lord Nazir Ahmed as our guest. I personally went to enormous trouble and expense to send a personalised printed invitation to every member of both the House of Commons and Lords including spending hours stuffing envelopes before delivering them back to the Houses to be distributed in the internal mail system. We had around 50 MPs and peers which, we were told, was not a bad turn out for such an event. I had also invited just about every member of the press likely to come and a few did.

Lord Ahmed listened to Bat Ye'or give her Eurabia talk. He was the first to ask a question, which was really just an angry statement. He blustered and complained and ended with "By your definition, madame, I am an Islamist". He then got up and left.

This was, of course, unreported in the UK or anywhere.

"By your definition, madame, I am an Islamist." He said it.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

As you read this and/or watch this clip, keep in mind the open calls for genocide against the Jews made by Muslim demonstrators in recent weeks in the U.S. and Europe. "Egyptian Cleric Amin Al-Ansari Justifies the Holocaust, Airs Footage, and Declares: 'This Is What We Hope Will Happen But, Allah Willing, at the Hand of the Muslims' WARNING: Extremely Disturbing Holocaust Footage," from MEMRI, January 26 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Following are excerpts from a show featuring Egyptian cleric Amin Al-Ansari, which aired on Al-Rahma TV on January 26, 2009.

Warning: The show contains extremely disturbing Holocaust footage.

Amin Al-Ansari: Let us examine the civil strife the Jews have caused throughout the world. Of course, we know what problems they caused the Muslims. They have always been like that, but in modern times, they only turned to the Muslims [relatively] late. They went around the world – to the East and West – because they love money, and the West was full of money – in England, France, Germany, and of course, in America, which was still a new country. This was 200 years ago. They focused on these places, and this is why they have spread in America and control the money. They immigrate to any place where there was money.

The Jews spread corruption in the land during World Wars I and II.

The penalty for spreading corruption in the land, according to Qur'an 5:33, is amputation of a hand and a foot on opposite sides, or crucifixion.

Let me tell you a very short story, so that you understand their way of thinking. The Jews do not know how to climb from the bottom up. They do not want to meet poor people, and then climb up, in order to reach the rulers of any country. Instead, they go straight to the rulers. [...]

The corruption spread by the Jews was very great. Very great. It got to the point that the rulers themselves had no solution but to annihilate them. This was said even by the rulers of America themselves. You see that America supports Israel, but this is partly because it hates and fears Israel, since the [Jews] are corruptors. Most of the U.S. rulers said to the American people: We’d better give them a place of their own, and keep them and their evil at bay from our European countries. They wanted to places them in a country of their own, far from anything to do with the European peoples.

In a nutshell, the holocausts of the Jews in Germany were because of their own deeds. They were killing Germans, kindling civil strife, inciting the people against their rulers, and corrupting the peoples. “Every time they kindle the fire of war, Allah extinguishes it.” Let me show you what corruption they caused, and what damage they inflicted upon all the countries of the world – upon peoples and governments alike. Let’s watch the holocaust that the Jews underwent, which were Allah’s way of wreaking vengeance upon them. Let’s watch what the German people, or the German army, did to them. This is, of course, a part of the corruption of Germany by the Jews. [...]

These people like to spread corruption, and when they can’t, they look for those who can, and encourage them to do it. Back in those days, it was England that they encouraged to spread corruption. This is Germany, and this is the destruction it suffered in 1945.

Observe these cities, and think about what exactly is happening. These are the armies that Israel encouraged to corrupt and destroy the German army and country. See the rubble and the dead people on the ground. The world was dying – country and civilization was being annihilated. This is what the Jews did. The Germans were, of course, strong. When they realized that the Jews were behind all this, they took revenge on them. They were not weak, as the Muslims are today. They had something different in mind. Let’s watch what Germany did to Israel – or rather, to the Jews – so we can understand that there is no remedy for these people, other than imposing fear and terror on them.

There is one language that the Jews understand – the language of force. If you are stronger than them, they are afraid of you. That is why Allah said: “They fear you in their hearts more than Allah.” Allah said: “Prepare for them whatever force and steeds of war you can, to strike terror in the hearts of Allah’s enemies and your enemies.”

Qur'an 8:60.

The Jews is afraid of you more than he is afraid of God. When the Germans revealed the treachery and the war of the Jews against them, and the fact that they were spreading corruption in their country – let us watch how oppressors are killed by the people they oppressed.

What we have here are German graves, but let’s watch what the Germans do to the Jews. These are corpses of dead humans and the shattered bones of Jews. Here we have a crematorium, in which the Jews were burnt. These are Jews who are being prepared to be burnt. Look, these are Jews dying of hunger or by gas. Look how they round them up and put them on trucks. Note the humiliation on his face, Allah be praised. “Abasement and humiliation were brought down upon them, and they became deserving of Allah’s wrath.”

He is quoting Qur'an 3:112.

Look what starvation [the Germans] inflicted upon them. Look what humiliation. These are people being buried alive. Does this look like a human being? He is placed in a ditch to be buried alive. This is a pile of bodies. Ibn Mas’oud was right... Look, this is a barbed wire, used to crush their bodies. He and five others will be hanged with a single chain. Concentrate on this, my brothers. Watch this. Look, they are tying five heads together. These are bodies. Here they are drilling a hole in his back with a nail. This child awaits his turn. Watch their humiliation. These are corpses, Allah be praised. The [Jews] are oppressors. They are being deported. Ibn Mas’oud was right when he said: “All the oppressors are killed by those they oppress.” These are bodies, these are dead people, these are skulls. These are the bodies of the Jews being loaded like animals. Watch this tractor clearing away the corpses of the Jews, and these are the refugees awaiting their turn to be killed. A German soldier will come now, and you will see a Jewish woman kissing his hand. Notice what humiliation, fear, and terror have struck her. See how much she is kissing his hand. Watch her humiliation. This is what we hope will happen, but, Allah willing, at the hand of the Muslims....

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

stealthjihad.jpg
Understandable, but incredible

The European essayist Fjordman reviews my book Stealth Jihad over at Atlas Shrugs. His conclusion:

One of the many great things about Spencer is that he is always understandable. This is far from self-evident. Even among anti-Jihadists whom I greatly admire as scholars there are those who write books that are difficult to read. Robert Spencer has that rare gift of combining impeccable scholarship – which he does have, regardless of what the professional "Islamophobia-accusers" might say – with a unique talent for explaining his subject matter to a non-specialist audience, which he does every single day at his website. I can think of very few people who are his equal in this. Stealth Jihad is heartily recommended for those who would like to understand the greatest threat we face today. I would especially recommend that you give a copy of the book to someone who still doesn't fully "get it," and believe that this is all about a few extremists.

Slide into a corner booth over at Pamela's place and read the rest.

Thank you for the review, Fjordman. I appreciate your saying I am understandable. Mblvkcd!

"The Battle of Gaza: Stirring New Dilemmas" is an exclusive Jihad Watch essay by Raphael Israeli. Raphael Israeli was born in Fez, Morocco, and arrived in Israel at the age of 14. A professor of Islamic, Middle Eastern and Chinese history at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, he is the author of 25 books, including Islamikaze: Manifestations of Islamic Martyrology (Frank Cass, London, 2003) and The Spread of Islamikaze Terrorism in Europe: The Third Islamic Invasion (Vallentine Mitchell, London, 2008).

Apologia

When a country decides to go to battle, it is usually in order to resolve, once and for all, issues that she was unable to settle by diplomacy, reflecting on the old adage that war is the continuation of diplomacy. So, after years of regular shelling of Israeli villages from Gaza, and thousands of Palestinian bombs, shells and missiles which landed on its citizens and caused substantial human, emotional and material damage, the Israeli government, propelled by the upcoming elections in Israel, finally decided to venture into this long-awaited operation which the Israeli electorate widely supported.

The operation showed the ultimate primacy of “strategic“ considerations over the human cost they entail. This was in addition to the immense human sacrifice it occasioned, which was mainly caused by the Hamas strategy of using its own population as human shields, without any regard for schools, hospitals and mosques, and assured that Israel either would not dare to assault those places, or would bear the blame for attacking civilians and humanitarian and holy places if it did. Backed by Hizballah in Lebanon, which embraced the same tactics in 2006, and supported by Iran, which had triggered both confrontations, these Islamic movements have in fact set themselves apart from civilized conduct.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is a very useful historical overview of why Pakistan is not and never has been a reliable ally of the U.S., and how it is steadily and probably inexorably becoming a jihadist state. "Understanding Pakistan’s response to Mumbai," by Praveen Swami for The Hindu, January 26 (thanks to Looney Tunes):

If President Zardari’s handling of the fallout of the Mumbai carnage is any indication, the forces he represents have neither the will nor the resources to reverse history.

More than half-a-century ago, two of Pakistan’s most eminent judges drew this bleak lesson from a wave of violence that had led the country into the first of its many experiences of martial law: ‘As long as we rely upon the hammer when a file is needed and press Islam into service to solve situations it was never intended to solve,’ wrote Justice Muhammad Munir and Justice Mohammad Rustam Kayani, ‘frustration and disappointment must dog our steps.’

Pakistan’s establishment didn’t listen then -- and does not seem to be listening now. Ever since the Lashkar-e-Taiba’s attack on Mumbai, commentators have been struggling to explain just why Pakistan appears so reluctant to act decisively against the perpetrators. Some have focussed on the Lashkar’s patronage by the Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate; others on the Pakistani military’s hopes of weakening President Asif Ali Zardari. All these explanations have merit but miss a critical element: the slow transformation of the Pakistani state itself into an instrument of the jihadist agenda.

Last month, as tensions between India and Pakistan escalated, Pakistan’s Federal Minister for Religious Affairs, Sahibzada Noor-ul-Haq Qadri, called a clerical convention to discuss the issue. In their fatwa, the clerics dismissed the charge that the Mumbai attacks were authored in Pakistan, and instead called on their government ‘to unveil Indian conspiracies against Pakistan.’ The fatwa, issued on behalf of the Tahaffuz-e-Namoos-e-Risalat Mahaz ‘ the Front for the Protection of the Prophet’s Honour ‘ made it obligatory on all Pakistani citizens to wage jihad against India should war break out.

Earlier, ISI Directorate chief Lieutenant-General Shuja Pasha hailed jihadist leaders Baitullah Mehsud and Mullah Fazlullah, whose depredations have claimed the lives of thousands of Pakistanis, as ‘true patriots’ for offering to fight India.

Much of the ongoing debate rests on the proposition that Pakistan’s institutional relationship with political Islam was forged by General Mohammad Zia-ul-Haq, in the context of anti-Soviet Union jihad in Afghanistan. In fact, the problem is older ‘ and more fundamental. Ever since the birth of the Pakistani state, Islamists and secular democrats became locked in an irreducible ideological war for its soul. Each important battle, tragically, the religious right won.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"After robbing the homes, the six men returned to Rafiq Masih's house and began mocking Rafiq and his wife for being Christians."

"Muslim Thieves Rape Girl When They Realize Victim is Christian," from AINA, January 27 (thanks to all who sent this in):

The Washington-DC based human rights group, International Christian Concern (ICC) www.persecution.org has just learned that six unidentified men went on a robbing spree in a rural village in Pakistan on the night of January 10, and when they realized that one of the households they were robbing was Christian, they gang-raped a 14-year-old girl in front of her parents to violate their faith.

The six criminals, armed with guns, forced their way into two Muslim houses and three Christian homes, physically assaulted the residents, and took cash, TVs, cell phones and other valuables.

After robbing the homes, the six men returned to Rafiq Masih's house and began mocking Rafiq and his wife for being Christians. Not satisfied with the damage they had already inflicted, the thieves then bound Rafiq and his wife and gang-raped Rafiq's teenage daughter Naomi right in front of them.

The criminals left Naomi unconscious and in critical condition and escaped with the stolen items. Naomi was immediately taken to the hospital....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The "Islam Is the Light" doll was widely dismissed -- people insisted that wasn't really what it was saying. And yet here it is, coincidence of coincidences, the same message shows up now in a Nintendo game.

"Video game plays strange message: Toy says 'Islam is the light,'" from WTHITV, January 27 (thanks to Pamela):

KNIGHTSVILLE, Ind. (WTHI) - Months ago, Rachel Jones was shocked to discover her 4-year-old's baby doll seemed to have a hidden message: Islam is the light.

Imagine her surprise when a game for her 8-year-old daughter's Nintendo DS had the same message.

Rachel said she bought the Nintendo game, Baby Pals, as a gift for her 8-year-old daughter after a good report card.

She had no idea the game also contained the hidden message "Islam is the light."

"We were sitting in the kitchen, and she was playing it," said Jones. "All of a sudden she looked at me, and I looked at her and she said, 'Mom, I think my baby said something.' And so I played it back, and it says 'Islam is the light.'"

The message on the doll and in the Nintendo game sound exactly the same.

The Nintendo game has an "E" rating, which means it's suitable for any age.

In a virtual reality setting, the child playing the game can feed the baby or teach it to crawl, among other things. It's only when the child gives the baby a bath that it repeatedly seems to say "Islam is the light."...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In Islamic law one only concludes a truce with a non-Muslim enemy if one believes the enemy is going to convert to Islam, or in order to gather strength to fight again more effectively. The latter, obviously, is the more common reason, and here we see it playing out again.

And the coverage, as usual, is abominable. The jihadists started it up again by killing an Israeli soldier, and Israel retaliated. So what is AP's headline? "Deadly bombing, Israeli airstrike shake Gaza truce." I.e., the Israelis broke the truce.

"Deadly bombing, Israeli airstrike shake Gaza truce," by Matti Friedman for Associated Press, January 27:

JERUSALEM – Palestinian militants detonated a bomb that killed an Israeli soldier patrolling near Gaza on Tuesday and Israel responded with an airstrike, straining the fragile cease-fire on the eve of a visit by President Barack Obama's new Mideast envoy.

The violence jolted the calm that has largely prevailed since Israel ended a devastating three-week offensive in Gaza on Jan. 17. Since withdrawing its troops, Israel has threatened to retaliate hard for any violations of the truce....

But the New York Times headline is "Two Killed in Violence on Gaza Border," by Taghreed El-Khodary and Alan Cowell, January 27. The story is accompanied by a photo. Caption: "Relatives mourned at the funeral of Anwar Zaid Sammor, a Palestinian farmer who was killed by gunfire on Tuesday after an explosion across the border in Israel that killed one Israeli soldier."

GAZA — An Israeli soldier and a Palestinian farmer were killed along the Gaza-Israel border on Tuesday in the first known fatal breach of the cease-fires that brought a halt to the Gaza war 10 days ago, according to Israeli officials and Palestinian witnesses. It was not immediately clear how the deaths would affect the truce.

A soldier was killed on one side and a farmer on the other, see? The wicked Zionists are wantonly killing civilians again, see? Not a word, of course, about how Hamas boasts of using civilians as human shields, or any investigation of what this "farmer" might have done in his spare time.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Sharia dictates that a non-Muslim cannot hold authority over Muslims. So this is simply more evidence of Sharia creep in modern, moderate Indonesia. "Indonesia: Christian party criticises Muslim edict," from AKI, January 27 (thanks to Twostellas):

Jakarta, 27 Jan. (AKI) - A Christian political leader has criticised a religious edict or fatwa issued by Indonesia's top Islamic body stating that only a Muslim could become president of the country. Sonny Wuisan, leader of the Christian Democratic Party (PKD) told Adnkronos International (AKI) that the edict from the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) was unconstitutional and should be withdrawn.

"This fatwa is against the constitution and the MUI should limit itself to discussing religion," Sonny Wuisan, secretary of the PKD told AKI.

The PKD is a very small Indonesian political party that in particular attracts Indonesians who are ethnic Chinese.

The Indonesian Ulema Council issued several fatwas or edicts including a ban on practising yoga, smoking and voting abstention during its conference in the West Sumatran town of Padangpanjang at the weekend.

The council said that Muslims should vote at forthcoming presidential elections in July if the candidates have certain characteristics such as "being Muslim".

On the other hand some 700 clerics from the council agreed on Sunday that Muslims were forbidden to abstain from voting in elections if “qualified” candidates existed.

“Islam obliges Muslims to elect their leaders if the latter meet certain criteria,” Gusrizal Gazahar, MUI West Sumatra head, said after the meeting.

Wuisan stressed that all religions had a right to participate in the political process.

"This country has a Muslim majority, but it doesn't mean that other religions do not count," said Wuisan....

They just don't count as much.

The fatwas have no legal power but devout Muslims adhere to the rulings because ignoring a fatwa is considered a sin.

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

ObamaAlArabiya.jpg

In a highly significant symbolic move, Obama gives his first interview as President to...Al-Arabiya. "Obama Al-Arabiya Interview: Full Text," from the Huffington Post, January 26 (thanks to all who sent this in):

[...] Q Sir, you just met with your personal envoy to the Middle East, Senator Mitchell. Obviously, his first task is to consolidate the cease-fire. But beyond that you've been saying that you want to pursue actively and aggressively peacemaking between the Palestinians and the Israelis. Tell us a little bit about how do you see your personal role, because, you know, if the President of the United States is not involved, nothing happens -- as the history of peacemaking shows. Will you be proposing ideas, pitching proposals, parameters, as one of your predecessors did? Or just urging the parties to come up with their own resolutions, as your immediate predecessor did?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think the most important thing is for the United States to get engaged right away. And George Mitchell is somebody of enormous stature. He is one of the few people who have international experience brokering peace deals.

He brokered the peace deal in Northern Ireland. One of the ongoing forms of myopia in Washington is the insistence on seeing the problems in the Middle East as another form of the same malady. The possibility never enters their minds that one group will only use negotiated settlements not as means to achieve a lasting peace but as stepping stones to total victory and annihilation of the other group.

And so what I told him is start by listening, because all too often the United States starts by dictating -- in the past on some of these issues -- and we don't always know all the factors that are involved.

You can say that again! But will he listen to anyone who will tell him about the global jihad and Islamic supremacism? What do you think?

So let's listen. He's going to be speaking to all the major parties involved. And he will then report back to me. From there we will formulate a specific response.

Ultimately, we cannot tell either the Israelis or the Palestinians what's best for them. They're going to have to make some decisions. But I do believe that the moment is ripe for both sides to realize that the path that they are on is one that is not going to result in prosperity and security for their people. And that instead, it's time to return to the negotiating table.

Both sides need to realize that? And what exactly is Israel doing that isn't going to result in prosperity and security for its people? Withdrawing from Gaza? Dismantling settlements? Or maybe not allowing rockets to be lobbed indiscriminately at Israeli civilians?

Also, here again, Obama makes the very common assumption that that the top priority for both sides is security prosperity and security for its people. Has he considered the possibility that the majority of Palestinians would prefer to see Israel destroyed than to secure prosperity and security? Isn't there an abundance of evidence for that? Off the top of my head, there is the election of Hamas and the destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza that Mort Zuckerman and others paid $14 million to give to them, and their use as arrival points of weapons smuggling tunnels.

And it's going to be difficult, it's going to take time. I don't want to prejudge many of these issues,

It is clear that he already has in many ways.

and I want to make sure that expectations are not raised so that we think that this is going to be resolved in a few months. But if we start the steady progress on these issues, I'm absolutely confident that the United States -- working in tandem with the European Union, with Russia, with all the Arab states in the region -- I'm absolutely certain that we can make significant progress.

Not a good sign: the EU is busy playing the dhimmi in Europe and Russia is aiding the jihadists in Iran.

Q You've been saying essentially that we should not look at these issues -- like the Palestinian-Israeli track and separation from the border region -- you've been talking about a kind of holistic approach to the region. Are we expecting a different paradigm in the sense that in the past one of the critiques -- at least from the Arab side, the Muslim side -- is that everything the Americans always tested with the Israelis, if it works. Now there is an Arab peace plan, there is a regional aspect to it. And you've indicated that. Would there be any shift, a paradigm shift?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, here's what I think is important. Look at the proposal that was put forth by King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia --

Q Right.

THE PRESIDENT: I might not agree with every aspect of the proposal, but it took great courage --

Q Absolutely.

THE PRESIDENT: -- to put forward something that is as significant as that. I think that there are ideas across the region of how we might pursue peace.

Courage? How on earth did it take courage to propose a plan that will make the destruction of Israel that much easier?

I do think that it is impossible for us to think only in terms of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and not think in terms of what's happening with Syria or Iran or Lebanon or Afghanistan and Pakistan. These things are interrelated. And what I've said, and I think Hillary Clinton has expressed this in her confirmation, is that if we are looking at the region as a whole and communicating a message to the Arab world and the Muslim world, that we are ready to initiate a new partnership based on mutual respect and mutual interest, then I think that we can make significant progress.

They are indeed interrelated, but not in the way Obama thinks. They are interrelated because of the jihad doctrine. And here he repeats a line from his Inaugural Address about "mutual respect," again implying that the respect has only been lacking on the American side. The U.S. has been showering money on Pakistan for years, and Pakistan has been taking it and then aiding the jihad terrorists it was supposed to be fighting. Who's disrespecting whom?

Now, Israel is a strong ally of the United States. They will not stop being a strong ally of the United States. And I will continue to believe that Israel's security is paramount. But I also believe that there are Israelis who recognize that it is important to achieve peace. They will be willing to make sacrifices if the time is appropriate and if there is serious partnership on the other side.

They will be willing to make sacrifices, and will not stop being a U.S. ally, because after all, what choice do they have, even if the U.S. sells them down the river? Note that there is no parallel call for the Palestinians to make sacrifices.

And so what we want to do is to listen, set aside some of the preconceptions that have existed and have built up over the last several years. And I think if we do that, then there's a possibility at least of achieving some breakthroughs.

Q I want to ask you about the broader Muslim world, but let me -- one final thing about the Palestinian-Israeli theater. There are many Palestinians and Israelis who are very frustrated now with the current conditions and they are losing hope, they are disillusioned, and they believe that time is running out on the two-state solution because -- mainly because of the settlement activities in Palestinian-occupied territories. Will it still be possible to see a Palestinian state -- and you know the contours of it -- within the first Obama administration?

THE PRESIDENT: I think it is possible for us to see a Palestinian state -- I'm not going to put a time frame on it -- that is contiguous, that allows freedom of movement for its people, that allows for trade with other countries, that allows the creation of businesses and commerce so that people have a better life.

Israel will thus be bisected or truncated severely. Bush, of course, said the same thing.

And, look, I think anybody who has studied the region recognizes that the situation for the ordinary Palestinian in many cases has not improved. And the bottom line in all these talks and all these conversations is, is a child in the Palestinian Territories going to be better off? Do they have a future for themselves? And is the child in Israel going to feel confident about his or her safety and security? And if we can keep our focus on making their lives better and look forward, and not simply think about all the conflicts and tragedies of the past, then I think that we have an opportunity to make real progress.

The situation for the ordinary Palestinian in many cases has not improved because the great bulk of the aid that the world showers upon them goes to the jihad.

But it is not going to be easy, and that's why we've got George Mitchell going there. This is somebody with extraordinary patience as well as extraordinary skill, and that's what's going to be necessary.

Q Absolutely. Let me take a broader look at the whole region. You are planning to address the Muslim world in your first 100 days from a Muslim capital. And everybody is speculating about the capital. (Laughter.) If you have anything further, that would be great.

How concerned are you -- because, let me tell you, honestly, when I see certain things about America -- in some parts, I don't want to exaggerate -- there is a demonization of America.

THE PRESIDENT: Absolutely.

Q It's become like a new religion, and like a new religion it has new converts -- like a new religion has its own high priests.

THE PRESIDENT: Right.

Q It's only a religious text.

THE PRESIDENT: Right.

Q And in the last -- since 9/11 and because of Iraq, that alienation is wider between the Americans and -- and in generations past, the United States was held high. It was the only Western power with no colonial legacy.

The hatred, you see, is all our fault.

THE PRESIDENT: Right.

Q How concerned are you and -- because people sense that you have a different political discourse. And I think, judging by (inaudible) and Zawahiri and Osama bin Laden and all these, you know -- a chorus --

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, I noticed this. They seem nervous.

Q They seem very nervous, exactly. Now, tell me why they should be more nervous?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think that when you look at the rhetoric that they've been using against me before I even took office --

Q I know, I know.

THE PRESIDENT: -- what that tells me is that their ideas are bankrupt. There's no actions that they've taken that say a child in the Muslim world is getting a better education because of them, or has better health care because of them.

Obama seems to be banking everything on the notion that the ideas that bring one the most material prosperity are the ideas that everyone in every case will choose. Well, it ain't necessarily so. The followers of al-Zawahiri and the rest have other goals, other priorities -- ones that no amount of American largesse will make waver.

In my inauguration speech, I spoke about: You will be judged on what you've built, not what you've destroyed. And what they've been doing is destroying things. And over time, I think the Muslim world has recognized that that path is leading no place, except more death and destruction.

Now, my job is to communicate the fact that the United States has a stake in the well-being of the Muslim world, that the language we use has to be a language of respect. I have Muslim members of my family. I have lived in Muslim countries.

Q The largest one.

THE PRESIDENT: The largest one, Indonesia. And so what I want to communicate is the fact that in all my travels throughout the Muslim world, what I've come to understand is that regardless of your faith -- and America is a country of Muslims, Jews, Christians, non-believers -- regardless of your faith, people all have certain common hopes and common dreams.

And my job is to communicate to the American people that the Muslim world is filled with extraordinary people who simply want to live their lives and see their children live better lives. My job to the Muslim world is to communicate that the Americans are not your enemy. We sometimes make mistakes. We have not been perfect. But if you look at the track record, as you say, America was not born as a colonial power, and that the same respect and partnership that America had with the Muslim world as recently as 20 or 30 years ago, there's no reason why we can't restore that. And that I think is going to be an important task.

Here again, the problem is that America has taken actions that have led to the loss of the respect in which it was once held. It is all up to us to restore that respect.

But he does assure us that he will not simply be a sock puppet:

But ultimately, people are going to judge me not by my words but by my actions and my administration's actions. And I think that what you will see over the next several years is that I'm not going to agree with everything that some Muslim leader may say, or what's on a television station in the Arab world -- but I think that what you'll see is somebody who is listening, who is respectful, and who is trying to promote the interests not just of the United States, but also ordinary people who right now are suffering from poverty and a lack of opportunity. I want to make sure that I'm speaking to them, as well.

Q Tell me, time is running out, any decision on from where you will be visiting the Muslim world?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I'm not going to break the news right here.

Q Afghanistan?

THE PRESIDENT: But maybe next time. But it is something that is going to be important. I want people to recognize, though, that we are going to be making a series of initiatives. Sending George Mitchell to the Middle East is fulfilling my campaign promise that we're not going to wait until the end of my administration to deal with Palestinian and Israeli peace, we're going to start now. It may take a long time to do, but we're going to do it now. We're going to follow through on our commitment for me to address the Muslim world from a Muslim capital. We are going to follow through on many of my commitments to do a more effective job of reaching out, listening, as well as speaking to the Muslim world.

And you're going to see me following through with dealing with a drawdown of troops in Iraq, so that Iraqis can start taking more responsibility. And finally, I think you've already seen a commitment, in terms of closing Guantanamo, and making clear that even as we are decisive in going after terrorist organizations that would kill innocent civilians, that we're going to do so on our terms, and we're going to do so respecting the rule of law that I think makes America great.

Q President Bush framed the war on terror conceptually in a way that was very broad, "war on terror," and used sometimes certain terminology that the many people -- Islamic fascism. You've always framed it in a different way, specifically against one group called al Qaeda and their collaborators. And is this one way of --

THE PRESIDENT: I think that you're making a very important point. And that is that the language we use matters. And what we need to understand is, is that there are extremist organizations -- whether Muslim or any other faith in the past -- that will use faith as a justification for violence. We cannot paint with a broad brush a faith as a consequence of the violence that is done in that faith's name.

Of course we can't. But we can recognize the motives and goals of the enemy, and their sources. Or can we?

And so you will I think see our administration be very clear in distinguishing between organizations like al Qaeda -- that espouse violence, espouse terror and act on it -- and people who may disagree with my administration and certain actions, or may have a particular viewpoint in terms of how their countries should develop. We can have legitimate disagreements but still be respectful. I cannot respect terrorist organizations that would kill innocent civilians and we will hunt them down.

But to the broader Muslim world what we are going to be offering is a hand of friendship.

Q Can I end with a question on Iran and Iraq then quickly?

THE PRESIDENT: It's up to the team --

MR. GIBBS: You have 30 seconds. (Laughter.)

Q Will the United States ever live with a nuclear Iran? And if not, how far are you going in the direction of preventing it?

THE PRESIDENT: You know, I said during the campaign that it is very important for us to make sure that we are using all the tools of U.S. power, including diplomacy, in our relationship with Iran.

Now, the Iranian people are a great people, and Persian civilization is a great civilization. Iran has acted in ways that's not conducive to peace and prosperity in the region: their threats against Israel; their pursuit of a nuclear weapon which could potentially set off an arms race in the region that would make everybody less safe; their support of terrorist organizations in the past -- none of these things have been helpful.

But I do think that it is important for us to be willing to talk to Iran, to express very clearly where our differences are, but where there are potential avenues for progress. And we will over the next several months be laying out our general framework and approach. And as I said during my inauguration speech, if countries like Iran are willing to unclench their fist, they will find an extended hand from us....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

January 26, 2009

1_61_islam_320.jpg
"But tell me, where do the (Palestinian) children play?"

As for Israeli children, who cares? "Israeli Official Blasts Cat Stevens' Song for Gaza Children," by Joseph Rhett Miller for Fox News, January 26 (thanks to She-Child):

A new recording by singer-musician Yusuf Islam, formerly known as Cat Stevens, to raise funds for the children of Gaza is angering an Israeli official who says all children — not just Palestinians — in the war-battered region should receive the same treatment.

"It is good Mr. Islam is interested in helping the children of Gaza," David Saranga, spokesman for the Consulate General of Israel in New York, said in a statement. "The children on the other side of the border should not be forgotten, as well, and it would have been nice for their situation to also be considered when Mr. Islam decided on the dedication of the song."

Along with former Beatles collaborator Klaus Voorman, the London-born Islam recorded his version of the late Beatle George Harrison's "The Day the World Gets 'Round." Islam said he will donate all proceeds from sales of the song to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, the U.N. agency in charge of Palestinian refugees, and the nonprofit group Save the Children.

According to his Web site, Islam hopes the song "will remind people of the immense legacy of love, peace and happiness we can share when we get round to looking at mankind's futile wars and prejudices and start to change our foolish ways."

And how shall we do that, Mr Islam? By embracing sharia law? After all, the word "sharia" can be literally translated as "way."
But Saranga said Islam's intentions missed the mark.

"Children are children are children, regardless of where they live," Saranga's statement continued. "It is about time that someone saves the children of Gaza from their leaders, Hamas."

UNRWA Senior Liaison Officer Saahir Lone said the agency "strongly agrees" that Palestinian and Israeli children are both victims of the conflict. He did not say whether the agency approached Islam to record the song, or if the recording was Islam's idea. He also declined to say whether any other musicians were considered.[...]

Prior to converting to Islam and changing his name in 1977, Cat Stevens sold 60 million albums and had several hit songs, including "Wild World" and "Peace Train." Israeli authorities have barred Islam twice from entering the country due to his alleged ties to Hamas.

Islam also allegedly supported the Islamic edict calling for the death of author Salman Rushdie in 1989, although he claims his words were misinterpreted.

The bane of Islam, both the religion and the man: perpetual, eternal, and everlasting "misinterpretation."
"I never called for the death of Salman Rushdie," Islam wrote on his Web site.

Islam, who was denied entry into the U.S. along with his daughter in 2004, returned to pop music in 2006 with the released "An Other Cup. He did not reply to requests for comment.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Even though she "did everything to be at my husband's side. I lived with him as a Muslim [convert] for ten years, my children are circumcised, they don't eat pork, they are fluent in Egyptian." She goes on to say "This is not about religion, or culture. It is about his revenge - and how he has abused the system to get it." But exactly which "system" is it that he is "abusing"? Could he "abuse" the "system" of the U.S. to send a mother to jail for adultery -- without evidence -- while getting custody of the children? No, the "system" -- that is, sharia law -- is, once again, the fundamental factor here.

"British mother convicted of adultery in Dubai flees with her two children," from the Malaysian Insider, January 26:

DUBAI, Jan 26 - A British mother facing three months in a Dubai jail after an appeal court upheld her conviction for adultery is on the run with her two young children.

Marnie Pearce, 40, fled with her sons Laith, seven and Ziad, four, after a court ruled that she should be jailed for three months for being unfaithful to her Egyptian ex-husband Ihab El-Labban, 41.

Pearce insists she never had an affair, but was framed by her former lover so he could win custody of their sons.

Dubai"s Appeal Court ordered the teaching assistant from Bracknell, Berkshire, to be deported after the prison term had been served, and pay of fine of 3,000 dirhams (RM2,965).

At the time of the ruling, Pearce stayed away from the court on advice that if her guilty verdict were upheld it might lead to her immediate arrest and imprisonment.

Under Dubai law the husband of convicted adulterers decides when they should go to jail.

When Pearce discovered that El-Labban was about to tell police of her whereabouts she went on the run.

She said she had no other option but to flee with her children.

"My ex-husband found out where I am and got a message to a friend warning that unless I hand myself in to the police in the morning he will send the police round," Pearce told the Sunday Mirror.

"So I have to move on. I have to run. I don't know where I am going to stay but I have to get out.

"If I stay I may lose my children and I can"t let that happen."

Pearce pleaded for someone to help her, fearing that she would never see Laith and Ziad again.

"I am begging somebody to help me, please help me. I am scared that if I go to prison my ex-husband will take the children and I will never see them again.

"All I am left with is precious hours with my babies. I am sitting here about to make lunchboxes up for school, and I simply can't imagine a life without them."

It is believed Pearce is staying with friends in Dubai.

Pearce was arrested in March last year and accused of committing adultery with a British man who she insists was only a friend.

She was found guilty of adultery by a Dubai court in November but remained free on bail while she attempted to overturn her conviction.

Pearce alleges El-Labban was cheating on her. He has denied having an affair or framing his wife.

She said when her appeal had been lost, she begged her ex-husband to drop the case.

"I fell to my knees and told him, "You can stop this. You can make this go away." He just sneered and said "no".

Her best hope is for a British court to make her sons wards of court and have the ruling transferred to Dubai so her children can stay with her.

But first she would need to raise thousands of pounds to fund a leading child custody lawyer.

Pearce, who converted to Islam, met El-Labban, a well-off company executive, in Oman and married him in the Seychelles in September 1999.

They moved to Dubai but their marriage eventually broke down.

She said: "The Koran says that heaven is at the feet of the mother. I am Muslim - there should be nothing in this world that takes children from their mother.

"I did everything to be at my husband"s side. I lived with him as a Muslim for ten years, my children are circumcised, they don"t eat pork, they are fluent in Egyptian," Pearce told the Telegraph.

"This is not about religion, or culture. It is about his revenge - and how he has abused the system to get it. My husband could get this case stopped tomorrow but he won"t because he wants me locked up.

"The first thing he will do is take the children to Egypt and then he will take them on to the United States (where he works). This is barbaric: this country has been my life for the last 13 years and I have loved and respected and honoured every part of it." - Daily Mail


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The BBC says it wants to be "impartial," to which many, including the Archbishop of York, rebut,"This is not an appeal by Hamas asking for arms but by the Disasters Emergency Committee asking for relief." But the unfortunate truth is, Western "aid" often, one way or another, makes it into the hands of Hamas terrorists. Here, for example, is a story from 2005 documenting how British relief aid to Palestinians went on to support Hamas’ "terrorist apparatus," as well as fund the families of Hamas suicide-bombers.

"Archbishop of Canterbury criticises BBC decision not to run Gaza aid appeal," by Urmee Khan for the Telegraph, January 26 :

The Archbishop of Canterbury has joined widespread criticism over a BBC decision not to run a Gaza aid appeal after more than 50 MPs backed a move to increase pressure on the broadcaster.

The decision has also angered sections of the public: at least 11,000 people have complained to the Corporation over its refusal to broadcast the Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC) Gaza Crisis Appeal.

The DEC, which includes the British Red Cross, Oxfam, Save the Children and 10 other charities, plans to launch its appeal on Monday. All the main broadcasters including, ITV, Channel 4 and Five have agreed to air a two-minute appeal.

The BBC's refusal to broadcast the appeal has been widely criticised across the spectrum from parliamentarians to religious groups and broadcasters.

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, said: "My feeling is that the BBC should broadcast an appeal."

However, the BBC continues to refuse to transmit the appeal because executives believe it might dent its reputation for impartiality. It also believes Gaza may not be stable enough to allow aid to be delivered.[...]

The Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, said: "This is not a row about impartiality but rather about humanity.

"This situation is akin to that of British military hospitals who treat prisoners of war as a result of their duty under the Geneva Convention. They do so because they identify need rather than cause. This is not an appeal by Hamas asking for arms but by the Disasters Emergency Committee asking for relief. By declining their request, the BBC has already taken sides and forsaken impartiality.'

Over 50 Members of Parliament are backing a parliamentary motion that states "this House is astonished by the refusal of the BBC and other broadcasters to broadcast the Disasters Emergency Committee Gaza Crisis Appeal; [and] notes the unconvincing and incoherent explanations given by BBC spokespeople for the decision".

Mr Burden, a member of the International Development Committee, who tabled the motion, has also written to BBC Director General Mark Thompson to press for an explanation for the BBC's decision.

"I am astonished by the refusal of the BBC to broadcast the DEC Gaza appeal. The explanations given for this so far have been both unconvincing and incoherent.

"This is not about taking sides in the conflict. It is about providing urgent help to people in desperate need. More than 400 children have died, thousands are homeless and nothing short of a humanitarian catastrophe is unfolding in Gaza. The important thing is to get aid in to Gaza. This is recognised by almost everyone – including the Government. The BBC appears to be the only one who has a problem seeing this."[...]

A spokesperson for the BBC said its position remains unchanged.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

30873.jpg
Execution in the PA

"The return to the uncivilized norms that typified the rule of Yasser Arafat is dangerous and shows that whoever trusts the PA and gives it weapons and armored cars is behaving irresponsibly": The PA, long thought of as the "moderate" counter to Hamas, proves otherwise.

"PA Court to Execute 'Spy for Israel,'" by Gil Ronen for Israel National News, January 26:

(IsraelNN.com) A Palestinian Authority (PA) court has sentenced a 28-year-old PA policeman to death for allegedly spying for Israel, and the Legal Forum for the Land of Israel thinks the United States envoy to the Middle East should be aware of this human rights violation.

The convict, a resident of the El Aroub neighborhood, was found guilty of assisting the IDF in the elimination of a terrorist in 2002, during the siege of the Church of Nativity. The convict served in the Presidential Guard in Bethlehem at the time. In addition, he allegedly assisted the IDF to arrest other terrorists.

In an urgent letter to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Defense Minister Ehud Barak, the Legal Forum for Israel says: “We do not know whether the man really is a collaborator with Israel, but in any case, he does not deserve death. You, as the person in charge of Israel's security, should make it clear that Israel will not allow the sentence to be carried out. Israel must intervene, enter the Palestinian area in Hevron and extricate the man unless the PA agrees to commute his sentence.”

Back to Arafat's style
The Forum calls the sentence “unimaginably cruel” and notes that the PA has not executed people for the last seven years. "The return to the uncivilized norms that typified the rule of Yasser Arafat is dangerous and shows that whoever trusts the PA and gives it weapons and armored cars is behaving irresponsibly,” it added.

The Forum demands that the matter be brought up before President Barack Obama and his envoy to the region, Sen. George Mitchell, because they “place trust” in the PA and wish [to] empower it.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This after offering Israel a one-year truce. Of course, that's the whole point of the truce -- to give Hamas time to rearm. "Hamas vows to continue arming militants," from News.com.au, January 26:

A SENIOR Hamas official said the Palestinian Islamist movement will continue to arm its militants in the war-battered Gaza Strip as well as on the West Bank.

"We never failed to get arms into Gaza even during the (Israeli) war and under the bombardment," the Hamas representative in Beirut, Ossama Hamdan, told a rally in the Lebanese capital overnight.

"We have the right to hold weapons. We will continue to get arms into Gaza and the West Bank ... Nobody should think that we will surrender to any measures," he said.

The remarks came a week after a ceasefire in Israel's 22-day Operation Cast Lead which killed more than 1300 Gazans.

"Warplanes, aircraft carriers and satellite technology will not be able to monitor the entry of weapons through Gaza's tunnels," Mr Hamdan said.

"Things might get difficult, but we will do whatever it takes to continue our resistance against Israel."

Israel has signed an agreement with the United States to prevent Hamas from smuggling weapons.

Under the agreement, the United States will reportedly provide "logistical and technical assistance and... train and equip regional security forces in counter-smuggling tactics".
Related Coverage

Cairo has repeatedly denied that arms have been smuggled into Gaza through a network of tunnels linking Egypt to the impoverished Palestinian enclave, saying the arms were being delivered by sea, an account disputed by Israel.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The fact that it is so daring and noteworthy simply to state the obvious says a great deal about the present situation.

"Top EU official: Hamas fully responsible for Gaza war," from the Associated Press and Jerusalem Post, January 26:

Hamas bears full responsibility for the war in Gaza, a top EU official said Monday in the Strip, calling the group "a terrorist movement."
"At this time we have to also recall the overwhelming responsibility of Hamas," Louis Michel, European Commissioner for Development and Humanitarian Aid, told reporters.
"I intentionally say this here - Hamas is a terrorist movement and it has to be denounced as such," Michel said as he visited the town of Jabalya in northern Gaza.
"Public opinion is fed up to see that we are paying over and over again - be it the [European] commission, the member states or the major donors - for infrastructure that will be systematically destroyed," he said.
Reuters quoted the EU official as saying that the Islamic group had used civilians as "human shields" by placing operatives in residential areas, and said that the years of terrorist rocket-fire on southern Israel served as a "provocation."
The report also quoted Michel as saying that, "When you kill innocents, it is not resistance. It is terrorism."
A Hamas official, Mushir al-Masri, was quoted by Reuters as saying his group was "shocked" at Michel's comments. He lambasted the official for "giving cover to massacres and terrorism committed by the Zionist enemy against the Palestinian people… Palestinian resistance is as legitimate as the resistance of European countries that fought against foreign occupiers."
Michel announced €58 million ($74 million) in emergency aid Monday for Palestinians.
Around €32 million ($41.7 million) of the aid package will go to alleviate immediate needs in Gaza such as shortages in drinking water, food and medical supplies. Another €20 million ($26 million) will go to projects in the West Bank, the remaining €6 million ($7.8 million) to Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon.

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

WildersSpencer2.jpg

Geert Wilders, the heroic Dutch parliamentarian who is under fire for speaking the truth, and I discuss the threats to free speech in this article at National Review today:

Wednesday, January 21, was a black day for freedom, and the beginning of an all-out assault on free speech in the Netherlands. The Amsterdam Court of Appeals ordered the prosecution of Geert Wilders (one of this article’s co-authors) for his statements about Islam. To participate in public debate is now a dangerous activity. This is the Netherlands today—and it could be the entire Western world tomorrow.

The prosecution of Wilders was unexpected, though in retrospect one can see that something like it has been in the offing for a while. The year 2008 marked 60 years since the United Nations first promulgated its Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Yet instead of celebrating this notable anniversary by reaffirming human rights, the world in 2008 saw certain fundamentally important human rights nearly disappear under intense pressure from Islamic countries that oppose freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and the equality of all people before the law. Islamic efforts to create exceptional privileges for Muslims in the area of human rights have been advancing for quite some time, and they made great strides in 2008. Now, with the Amsterdam court’s judgment, we see the outcome of such efforts.

The Islamic bloc has been on record for two decades as opposing free speech. In 1990, foreign ministers of the 57 member states of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), currently the largest voting bloc in the United Nations, adopted the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam. It states clearly that Islamic law—sharia—is the only true source of human rights. Few analysts in 1990 understood that this was tantamount to declaring the legitimacy of institutionalized discrimination against women and non-Muslims, and signing the death warrant of freedom of speech and freedom of conscience as well. And not just in Muslim lands: The OIC and allied organizations have been aggressively pursuing efforts to extend elements of sharia into the West, though few people realize it even today....

Read it all.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More open lust for genocide, as the world continues to yawn.

Ted Ekeroth has kindly sent in this new video from Malmö -- another video and more details here.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

SandeelaKanwal2.jpg
Never forget Sandeela Kanwal

"Begner hopes the state doesn't make this about Islam or ethnicity. This death could have happened, he says, in any culture, with any family."

Why does the mainstream media believe it necessary always to exonerate Islam from any responsibility for violence committed by Muslims in the name of Islam? Who decided that this must be done, and on what grounds, and why do they all fall into lockstep without question?

NPR and the others are only enabling the murders of more women like Sandeela Kanwal. Why? Murders happen anywhere, among all groups, but this is not just a murder, it is an honor killing, and it simply isn't true that "this death could have happened...in any culture, with any family." If that were true, then where are the Christian honor killings, as one of the NPR commenters on this article said: "It would be the same part of the story is a christian said God told him to kill his daughter"? All right, put up or shut up: where are those Christians whom God is telling to kill their daughters?

Where is the Christian sect that teaches that while "retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right," yet "not subject to retaliation" is "a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring"? In other words, a father who kills his daughter incurs no penalty. What Christian sect teaches that? The quotes are from a manual of Islamic law certified by the foremost institution in Sunni Islam, Al-Azhar in Cairo, as a reliable guide to Sunni orthodoxy: 'Umdat al-Salik (o1.1-2).

Where, if this murder could have happened in any culture, in any family, are the courts in majority-Christian or culturally Christian countries that teach that "murder to save a woman’s honour not a crime," as the Lahore High Court (LHC) in Pakistan declared just last Thursday?

When NPR retails nonsense of this kind, it only deflects attention from where it ought to be focused: upon Muslim communities in the West. Instead of exonerating Islam, NPR and the rest of the mainstream media ought to be calling upon Muslim leaders in America to acknowledge the widespread acceptance among Muslims of honor killing as Islamically correct, and calling upon them to begin to teach against it.

If they don't do this, there are certain to be more honor killings in the United States.

Yet it is unthinkable that NPR would start calling upon Muslim leaders not only to denounce honor killing, but to institute comprehensive, honest, transparent, inspectable programs in mosques and Islamic schools in America that teach against it and call it the crime that it is. And that in itself is a crime atop another crime.

An update on this story. "Man Accused Of Killing Daughter For Family Honor," by Jamie Tarabay for NPR, January 26 (thanks to Davida):

Morning Edition, January 26, 2009 · Police in Atlanta have been investigating the death of a 25-year-old Pakistani woman, who was allegedly murdered by her father in the name of family honor.

She wanted out of an arranged marriage, but her father thought a divorce would bring shame to the family.

Honor killings are old rites of murder within families, committed because of some perceived dishonor or shame. The United Nations estimates around 5,000 deaths occur each year — mostly women, mostly in South Asia and the Middle East. [...]

It was around 1 a.m. on July 6 when police got several 911 calls connected to that house. The first was from a man who told police, "My daughter's dead." Then, at 1:55 a.m., Clayton County received a 911 call from a woman named Gina Rashid who was worried about her stepdaughter Sandeela.

'My Daughter's Dead'

"I hear a lot of hollering and screaming," Rashid says, "and I just woke up and I asked my family what's going on. They're from Pakistan. They're not speaking any English to me. They're not telling me nothing. Sandeela's dead. Sandeela's dead."

Sandeela Kanwal was the 25-year-old daughter of Chaudry Rashid. Christian says when police arrived at the house, they found the 57-year-old pizza shop owner sitting cross-legged in his driveway, smoking a cigarette.

"They talked to him and asked him what was going on," says Christian, "and he said, 'My daughter's dead.' They asked him again what he'd said and he said, 'My daughter's dead.'"

Police found Kanwal dead on the floor of her bedroom, still in her Wal-Mart uniform. She'd been working the late shift that night. As they surveyed the scene, police tried to piece together what had happened. Rashid was taken into custody and questioned.

"He admitted to actually taking the life of his daughter," says Sgt. Stefan Schindler, a 13-year veteran of the Clayton County Police Department.

"And the reason he took his daughter's life," says Schindler, "by his own words was that she wasn't being true to her religion or to her husband."

Note that NPR doesn't say at this point exactly which religion she allegedly wasn't being true to, but they can't help getting to it eventually.

A Killing To Avoid Shame Of Divorce?

Police believe Rashid killed his daughter because she wanted a divorce and he felt that it would bring shame on his family. Schindler says Rashid told him killing his daughter was a right given to him by God, and that God would protect him. To police, in other words, this was an honor killing.

"Since my career begun here at Clayton County Police Department, I've never encountered anything like this," says Schindler. "This was the first time." [...]

Rashid remains in jail after he was refused bail. He's charged with murder and other felonies including assault.

"Here in Georgia, this is going to make me sound like a backwoods cracker, but we don't have many Muslims," says Begner. "Not too much diversity down here, at least that I'm aware of."

It sent a ripple through this swath of Bible-belt country.

"For me, and my upbringing, nothing in your life prepares you for that," he says.

'This Is American Law'

If it is an honor killing — and what really happened that night is not yet clear — it would be one of a handful of such crimes in this country.

In Dallas, an Egyptian man is wanted by police, accused of murdering his two daughters, reportedly, because they had non-Muslim boyfriends.

In Scottsville, N.Y., a Turkish immigrant has been in and out of psychiatric care since he was charged three years ago with killing his wife and beating his daughters because of alleged sexual assault.

Cue the obligatory mainstream media exoneration of Islam section:

In some honor killings overseas, family members have killed women who've been raped because they're considered to have brought shame on their families. For Muslims in Atlanta, the attention was the last thing they needed.

Shahid Malik is a local representative of Atlanta's Pakistani population and one of the very few willing to speak about the Rashid case.

"This thing hurt the Muslim community, Pakistani community," he says.

He says the killing has nothing to do with Islam, but that Rashid has little education and comes from a small village in Pakistan where tribal traditions are strong.

"I think in their mind, use the name honor killing, they give less punishment," he says. "But that is wrong because law is changed. This is American law."

But it is true that in some Islamic countries there is less punishment given for honor killings -- including modern, moderate Jordan.

Malik says years ago, Pakistan used to punish honor killings with only seven years' imprisonment. Now, he says, the sentence is greater. But he says Kanwal's murder doesn't fit in that category of crimes.

"Whatever this case is or not, this is not an honor killing," he says. "It is not based on Pakistani law. Chaudry Rashid loved his daughter."

He just loved her to death, as they might say in Atlanta.

Begner hopes the state doesn't make this about Islam or ethnicity. This death could have happened, he says, in any culture, with any family....

Oh, really?


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

“We are quite sure that these arrests are part of a bigger operation from the government.”

"Iran: Three Christians Arrested From Homes In Tehran," from Compass Direct, January 23:

LOS ANGELES, January 23 (Compass Direct News) – Three Christians from two different families were arrested from their homes Wednesday morning (Jan. 21) and are being held without charges, sources told Compass.

Authorities took Jamal Ghalishorani, 49, and his wife Nadereh Jamali from their home in Tehran between 7 and 8 a.m., about a half hour after arresting Hamik Khachikian, an Armenian Christian also living in Tehran. Ghalishorani and his wife are Christian converts from Islam, considered “apostasy” in Iran and potentially punishable by death.

Christian sources told Compass that Ghalishorani converted to Christianity 30 years ago, and his wife received Christ about 15 years ago. They have one child, a 13-year-old daughter, while Khachikian has two children, a 16-year-old son and an 11-year-old daughter. Authorities have not told the families of the charges against those arrested or their whereabouts....

The arrests come as part of a tsunami of arrests in the past several months, the sources said.

“We don’t know why the pressure is continuously high, but we see that it is increasing,” said one source. “The government does it to the Baha’i people as well – there are more arrests in the last several months among them than in maybe the whole 30 years before.”

Arrests and pressure on Christians from authorities have ramped up even further in the past few months, the source said, adding that the reasons were unclear.

Another source, however, said the arrests are part of a concerted, nationwide government plan.

“We are quite sure that these arrests are part of a bigger operation from the government,” the source said. “Maybe up to 50 people were arrested. In Tehran alone already some 10 people were arrested – all on the same day, January 21.”

Sources noted that whereas past waves of intense harassment and arrests of Christians eventually have subsided, recent pressure has been “continuously high,” with reports of arrests in almost every month of 2008.

“In the past there have been waves of incredible pressure, but then it seemed to calm down a bit sometimes,” said one source. “Then we had the feeling pressure came and went, but now it is continuously ongoing.”...

The arrests are particularly disturbing in light of the Iranian parliament’s approval last September of a new penal code calling for a mandatory death sentence for “apostates,” or those who leave Islam. In the past death sentences for apostasy were issued only under judicial interpretations of sharia (Islamic law).

Under the new penal code, male “apostates” would be executed, while females would receive life sentences. The new code was to be sent to Iran’s most influential body, the Guardian Council, which will rule on it. The council is made up of six conservative theologians appointed by Iran’s Supreme Leader and six jurists nominated by the judiciary and approved by parliament. This body has the power to veto any bill it deems inconsistent with the constitution and Islamic law.

The last Iranian Christian convert from Islam executed by the Iranian government was Hossein Soodmand in 1990. He was accused of working as “an American spy.” Since then at least six Protestant pastors have been assassinated by unknown killers.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Translation: We really need to re-arm.

In 2008, Khaled Mashaal himself said of cease-fires: "it is a tactic in conducting the struggle. ... It is normal for any resistance that operates in its people's interest ... to sometimes escalate, other times retreat a bit. ... The battle is to be run this way and Hamas is known for that."

Additionally, there are the prescriptions of Islamic law. From Umdat al-Salik (Reliance of the Traveler), a Shafi'i Islamic jurisprudence manual certified as "reliable" by Egypt's Al-Azhar University:

Truces are permissible, not obligatory....Interests that justify making a truce are such things as Muslim weakness because of lack of numbers or materiel, or the hope of an enemy becoming Muslim...If the Muslims are weak, a truce may be made for ten years if necessary, for the Prophet (may Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce with the Quraysh for that long, as is related by Abu Dawud....The rulings of such a truce are inferable from those of the non-Muslim poll tax; namely, that when a valid truce has been effected, no harm may be done to non-Muslims until it expires. o9.16

"Hamas offers year-long truce, opening of Gaza crossings," by Khaled Abu Toameh, Yaakov Katz, and Herb Keinon for the Jerusalem Post, January 25:

Hamas is prepared to reach a one-year truce with Israel if the border crossings into the Gaza Strip are opened, Hamas legislator Mushir al-Masri said on Sunday.
He said that a Hamas delegation currently holding talks in Cairo with Egyptian government officials made it clear that the movement would not agree to a long-term or permanent truce.
In Cairo, Ayman Taha, a member of the Hamas team, said after meeting with Egyptian intelligence chief Omar Suleiman that Hamas rejected an Israeli offer for an 18-month truce. He said the offer had been relayed to Hamas through Suleiman and other Egyptian officials.
"Hamas has proposed a one-year truce that would be evaluated [by Hamas] when it expires," Masri said. "We are talking about a temporary truce that would be contingent on the reopening of all the border crossings, including the Rafah terminal, and lifting the blockade."
A permanent truce would "contradict Hamas's right to pursue the resistance for as long as the occupation exists," he said.

It is worth reiterating that in talking about "occupation," Hamas does not recognize a square inch of Israeli land.

The Hamas delegation also expressed the movement's readiness to accept the presence of European and Turkish forces at the border crossings, Masri said, pointing out that Hamas remained opposed to the deployment of international troops inside Gaza.
"Any foreign troops in the Gaza Strip would be regarded as an occupation force," he said. "But to ensure that the border crossings are reopened, we suggested that they be placed under the supervision of international monitors. We don't want the border crossings to remain at the mercy of the Israelis or any other party."
One Israeli defense official said Jerusalem was considering linking the opening of the Gaza crossings with the negotiations for the release of St.-Sgt. Gilad Schalit.
"The operation has created new understandings between us and Hamas," one Israeli official explained. "Hamas knows that if it renews attacks we will not be restrained."
However, Masri said the truce issue had nothing to do with Schalit.
"The Israeli soldier is not linked in any way to the issue of the truce or the border crossings," he said. "Rather, the case of the soldier is connected to a future prisoner exchange. No one should dream that Schalit will see his family if the border crossings are reopened."
However, according to Palestinian sources quoted in the London-based pan-Arab daily A-Sharq al-Awsat, considerable progress has been made toward a deal to free Schalit, which could go through within three weeks if Israel changes its position on freeing prisoners with "blood on their hands."
Meanwhile, the IDF is maintaining a high-level of alert along the Gaza border and is bracing for the possibility that Hamas will renew rocket attacks against the South in the near future.
Last week, Hamas said that if Israel did not open the crossings to all goods and not just humanitarian supplies, it would renew Kassam and Katyusha attacks on Israel.
IDF sources downplayed the significance of Hamas's threat but said that large forces were deployed along the border and were "prepared for any development."...

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Guelph.jpg

Pamela Geller has a wonderful new plan to honor the memory of Aqsa Parvez, who was murdered by her father in an honor killing.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The message: Submit yourselves to clerical rule, or die. Or perhaps it will be "and/or die."

More on this story. "Swat Valley leaders summoned by Taliban," from UPI, January 25:

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, Jan. 25 (UPI) -- A radical Pakistani Taliban cleric is demanding that a group of more than 50 Swat Valley dignitaries appear in his Islamic "court," local media says.
Maulana Fazullah, commander of the local Taliban militia in the northwestern Pakistan region, wants its provincial and federal lawmakers, dignitaries, elders and their families to present themselves in his sharia court within a week or be hunted down, the Press Trust of India, quoting local media, reported Sunday.
The Taliban has destroyed nearly 200 girls' schools and targeted shops selling CDs and DVDs in the former tourist area. Its Islamic courts have directed men to wear skull caps and stop shaving their beards, PTI says.
The Pakistani army launched an offensive against the Taliban in the Swat Valley in October 2007, but despite several claims it had cleared Swat of militants, the Taliban are in control of most of its major towns and villages, the news agency said.

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

January 25, 2009

Pisheh.jpg
A real Pisheh

Would Obama object? How could he, given that he has already declared he will set down with the mullahs without any preconditions on this side -- including, presumably, the precondition that the Iranians approach the negotiations similarly open-handed and open-hearted?

"MP: Iran Should Set Preconditions for US Talks," from Fars News Agency, January 25 (thanks to Trav):

TEHRAN (FNA)- Iran should set preconditions for talks with US because Washington has allocated a special budget against the government in Tehran, a top legislator said.

Iran should set preconditions for talks and not the United States of America because Washington has passed many legislations against Iran such as imposing sanctions, member of the Iranian parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission Heshmatollah Falahat Pisheh told the Islamic republic news agency.

He also noted that the US has allocated a special budget for operations against the Iranian government.

Referring to the new US President Barack Obama's statement about Iran in which he repeated the preconditions of Bush's government for talking with Iran, he said, "If the new US president seeks to pursue outdated US policies in dealing with Iran, it will not bear any results."

Falahat Pisheh urged for the removal of US sanctions as a sign of goodwill to help pursue a policy of detente with Iran....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The face of the new Europe.

For background, see "Swedish Police Chief Allows Antisemitic Stonethrowing Mob To Attack Demonstrators," from Ted Ekeroth, January 25. Ekeroth shot this video in Malmö today, and it came to me via Pamela, who has more details.

From Ekeroth's description of the video at YouTube:

the first 1 min and 35 sec is from our peaceful manifestation.

At 1.35 we see the arabs behaviour.

At 3.02 you can see one of the stones that was thrown.

At 3.10 you can see eggs being thrown.

At 3.20 you can see the broken bottle they threw.

At 3.30 you can see the fireworks they threw at us.

At 4.18 you can see the police reaction - instead of removing the attacking arab mob, they removed us!

At 4.38 Im asking the police chief about the police no-reaction. See the subtitles at about 4.50 seconds in.

After the clip ends, we are being moved out by the police. We, who have a permit for being there and are not violent gets away.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

NasrallahRosary.jpg
Piety

Here's a hot item for the Roman Catholic on your gift list: the Hassan Nasrallah rosary! Now you can pray prayers that the smiling genocidal Shi'ite would condemn as unbelief, idolatry and blasphemy while he watches you doing it!

"An attempt to influence public opinion within the Christian community so that people get used to seeing a photo of Nasrallah next to the Virgin Mary or saints.” That's gonna take a lot of getting used to.

"Lebanese Christians protest rosary depicting Hezbollah leader," from the Catholic News Agency, January 25 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Beirut, Jan 25, 2009 / 02:57 am (CNA).- Rosaries bearing a picture of Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah have provoked controversy in Lebanon’s Christian community, whose members say the depiction is insulting.

Christians are set to play a significant political role in Lebanon’s Shiite-Sunni power struggle through the June 2009 parliamentary elections, the Middle East Times reports. Hezbollah is a mainly Shiite Islamic party.

"The rosaries are an insult to our Christian beliefs," an official with the Christian Lebanese Forces party said on Thursday, according to Alarab Online.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, she characterized the rosaries as “an attempt to influence public opinion within the Christian community so that people get used to seeing a photo of Nasrallah next to the Virgin Mary or saints.”

The official said the Lebanese Forces are not accusing Hezbollah of producing the rosaries, but feel that the party needs to take action to prevent their distribution.

A Hezbollah official, also speaking on condition of anonymity, said the party had nothing to do with the rosaries. According to Alarab Online, he accused the rival Lebanese Forces of trying to create dissension among religious communities.

"Why is Nasrallah guilty if people decide to put his picture on rosaries?" the Hezbollah official said. "This issue is dangerous."...

For whom, O Hizballah official?


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"You're not allowed to insult anyone's beliefs in the Netherlands, even if those beliefs insult you and everything you stand for."

"Whenever we heard the words 'human rights' in connection with Islam, we're about to be confronted with another piece of ugly opportunism that spits in the face of genuine human rights and insults everyone's intelligence."

"What kind of justice system is it where the truth is inadmissible as evidence?"

"You're being chewed up and spat out, is what's happening to you people. Look at what you're doing: you're prosecuting a man who is under twenty-four hour protection from attack by violent Muslim, yet he's the criminal for expressing an opinion. Lewis Carroll couldn't have written this one any better."

"Nobody should be compelled to respect an ideology that doesn't respect them. And Islam respects nobody. It claims dominion. Respect doesn't come into it. You submit. That's the deal."

"This is a dark hour for the Netherlands. There's no doubt about that. And it's also kind of a watershed moment for the rest of Europe. We'll all be watching now to see how this turns out. If these charges succeed, we'll know the dike has been breached, and it's the beginning of the end of justice as we know it in Europe, and the beginning of creeping Sharia, or, injustice as we know it."

"The truth is sometimes offensive. There's no doubt about that. But that doesn't make it any less true."

Pat Condell discusses the Wilders case and the Islamic initiative against free speech at the United Nations. (Thanks to all who sent this in.)


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Still waiting for that outrage from the Muslim world and much of the mainstream media over Hamas' conduct during the Gaza war and in general. Of course, the heart of the matter is that Hamas is held to an abysmally low standard for human rights compared to other groups and states, particularly Israel.

Why, pray tell, is Hamas so "special?" To fail to hold Hamas to the standards expected of anyone else is to acknowledge they are an illegitimate regime. On the other hand, Hamas' own unwillingness to act like one proves the same.

"Hamas tried to hijack ambulances during Gaza war," by Jason Koutsoukis for the Sydney Morning Herald, January 26 (thanks to Sr. Soph):

PALESTINIAN civilians living in Gaza during the three-week war with Israel have spoken of the challenge of being caught between Hamas and Israeli soldiers as the radical Islamic movement that controls the Gaza strip attempted to hijack ambulances.
Mohammed Shriteh, 30, is an ambulance driver registered with and trained by the Palestinian Red Crescent Society.
His first day of work in the al-Quds neighbourhood was January 1, the sixth day of the war. "Mostly the war was not as fast or as chaotic as I expected," Mr Shriteh told the Herald. "We would co-ordinate with the Israelis before we pick up patients, because they have all our names, and our IDs, so they would not shoot at us."
Mr Shriteh said the more immediate threat was from Hamas, who would lure the ambulances into the heart of a battle to transport fighters to safety.
"After the first week, at night time, there was a call for a house in Jabaliya. I got to the house and there was lots of shooting and explosions all around," he said.
Because of the urgency of the call, Mr Shriteh said there was no time to arrange his movements with the IDF.
"I knew the Israelis were watching me because I could see the red laser beam in the ambulance and on me, on my body," he said.
Getting out of the ambulance and entering the house, he saw there were three Hamas fighters taking cover inside. One half of the building had already been destroyed.
"They were very scared, and very nervous … They dropped their weapons and ordered me to get them out, to put them in the ambulance and take them away. I refused, because if the IDF sees me doing this I am finished, I cannot pick up any more wounded people.
"And then one of the fighters picked up a gun and held it to my head, to force me. I still refused, and then they allowed me to leave."
Mr Shriteh says Hamas made several attempts to hijack the al-Quds Hospital's fleet of ambulances during the war.
"You hear when they are coming. People ring to tell you. So we had to get in all the ambulances and make the illusion of an emergency and only come back when they had gone."...

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Apparently PlayStations weren't good enough. "Trading Bombs for Crayons: Terrorists Get 'Art Therapy,'" by Brian Ross for ABC News, January 23:

U.S. Critics Skeptical That Jihadi Rehab Rehabilitates al Qaeda Terrorists

In what is being touted as 'jihadi rehab,' al Qaeda terrorists newly released from Guantanamo prison or caught on the streets of Iraq before their suicide bombs could explode are putting finger paints and crayons to paper in order to secure their freedom.

The Saudi government, which is running the rehabilitation program on a former royal family retreat outside Riyadh, claims that some 700 former al Qaeda terrorists have been reprogrammed.

The coloring, said program founder Dr. Awad Alyami to his terrorists-turned-art-students, gets "negative energy out on paper." "It's safe here," Alyami said. "It's on the paper, it's not outside." The men also get religious re-education and are promised a new home and car if they behave.

But 'jihadi rehab' is drawing great skepticism from U.S. critics, who caution that actions speak louder than words.

Former FBI agent and ABC News consultant Brad Garrett said that while the men may claim to disavow radical Islam, "they basically schmooze or con their way out of the system, and then they get out."

As if the Saudis running the system don't already know that.
After Said Ali- al-Shihri completed the art therapy program after being released from Guantanamo, he turned up in Yemen as a top al Qaeda leader and was responsible for an attack on the U.S. embassy there last year that left 17 people dead, including one American, U.S. officials said.

This case shows that "you never know when somebody is a true believer," said former CIA officer and ABC News consultant John Kiriakou. "Now they may go through the motions like any other prisoner might, only to pretend to be rehabilitated" and rejoin the fight, said Kiriakou.

"War is deceit."
Others warn that as the U.S. prepares to empty the Guantanamo Bay prison after President Barack Obama reversed one of President George W. Bush's most controversial policies Thursday, the decision must be made whether to prosecute detainees in the U.S. or send them to their home countries...

Where they'll get a set of crayons and be sent on their merry -- that is, jihadi -- way?


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

thumb.cms.jpg
The latest form of jihad: Jihad al-Ziwaj, or "Marriage-Jihad"

As Hamas asserts, "Marriage is the same as jihad." "Gaza bride marries to raise 'martyrs' to Islamist cause," from the Times of India, January 24 :

GAZA CITY: There was no party, no celebrations when 22-year-old Aida al-Qaddumi finally got married this week.

There were no regrets either -- she said she was marrying to raise "fighters" and asked only that she might die as a "martyr" in Israel.

Three weeks of a deadly Israeli offensive on the Gaza Strip forced postponement of the January 7 wedding, but it did not alter her intentions[...]

The Shujaiya quarter where she lives is a Hamas stronghold which came under heavy fire from Israelis troops. Dozens of people -- many of them civilians -- were killed and dozens of houses destroyed.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Along with a good number of terrorists, apparently some civilians were also killed. But when the Taliban intentionally kills civilians -- often by beheading -- not to mention blows schools up and, in general, openly terrorizes Pakistani civilians, not only does the Pakistani government take no action; it often seems to be in cahoots with them.

"Pak urges Obama to halt missile attacks on al-Qaida strongholds," from the Times of India, January 24:

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan urged President Barack Obama to halt US missile strikes on al-Qaida strongholds near the Afghan border, saying on Saturday that civilians were killed the previous day in the first attacks since Obama's inauguration.

Pakistani security officials said eight suspected foreign militants, including an Egyptian al-Qaida operative, were among 22 people killed in yesterday's twin strikes in the Waziristan region.

But the Foreign Ministry said that the attacks by unmanned aircraft also killed an unspecified number of civilians and that it had informed US officials of its "great concern."

"With the advent of the new US administration, it is Pakistan's sincere hope that the United States will review its policy and adopt a more holistic and integrated approach toward dealing with the issue of terrorism and extremism,'' a ministry statement said.

"We maintain that these attacks are counterproductive and should be discontinued," it said.

Pakistani leaders complain that stepped-up missile strikes -- there have been more than 30 since August -- fan anti-American sentiment and undermine the government's own efforts to counter Islamist militants...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More evidence that the Pakistani government is unable -- or unwilling -- to confront and subdue the growing influence of the Taliban. Far from being outraged by the suggestion, then, perhaps the Pakistani government should actually consider asking an apparently all too willing India to intervene?

"Radio spreads Taliban's terror in Pakistani region," by Richard A. Oppel Jr. and Pir Zubair Shah for the International Herald Tribune, January 25:

PESHAWAR, Pakistan: Every night around 8 o'clock, the terrified residents of Swat, a lush and picturesque valley a hundred miles from three of Pakistan's most important cities, crowd around their radios. They know that failure to listen and learn might lead to a lashing -- or a beheading.

Using a portable radio transmitter, a local Taliban leader, Shah Doran, on most nights outlines newly proscribed "un-Islamic" activities in Swat, like selling DVDs, watching cable television, singing and dancing, criticizing the Taliban, shaving beards and allowing girls to attend school. He also reveals names of people the Taliban have killed for violating their decrees -- and those they plan to kill.

"They control everything through the radio," said one Swat resident, who declined to give his name for fear the Taliban might kill him. "Everyone waits for the broadcast."[...]

With the increasing consolidation of their power, the Taliban have taken a sizable bite out of the nation. And they are enforcing a strict interpretation of Islam with cruelty, bringing public beheadings, assassinations, social and cultural repression and persecution of women to what was once an independent, relatively secular region, dotted with ski resorts and fruit orchards and known for its dancing girls.

Last year, 70 police officers were beheaded, shot or otherwise slain in Swat, and 150 wounded, said Malik Naveed Khan, the police inspector general for the North-West Frontier Province.

The police have become so afraid that many officers have put advertisements in newspapers renouncing their jobs so the Taliban will not kill them.[...]

The crisis has become a critical test for the government of the civilian president, Asif Ali Zardari, and for a security apparatus whose loyalties, many Pakistanis say, remain in question.

Seeking to deflect blame, Zardari's government recently criticized "earlier halfhearted attempts at rooting out extremists from the area" and vowed to fight militants "who are ruthlessly murdering and maiming our citizens."

But as pressure grows, he has also said in recent days that the government would be willing to talk with militants who accept its authority. Such negotiations would carry serious risks: security officials say a brief peace deal in Swat last spring was a spectacular failure that allowed militants to tighten their hold and take revenge on people who had supported the military.

Without more forceful and concerted action by the government, some warn, the Taliban threat in Pakistan is bound to spread.

"The crux of the problem is the government appears divided about what to do," said Mahmood Shah, a retired Pakistani army brigadier who until 2006 was in charge of security in the western tribal areas. "This disconnect among the political leadership has emboldened the militants."

From 2,000 to 4,000 Taliban fighters now roam the Swat Valley, according to interviews with a half-dozen senior Pakistani government, military and political officials involved in the fight. By contrast, the Pakistani military has four brigades with 12,000 to 15,000 men in Swat, officials say.

But the soldiers largely stay inside their camps, unwilling to patrol or exert any large presence that might provoke -- or discourage -- the militants, Swat residents and political leaders say. The military also has not raided a small village that locals say is widely known as the Taliban's headquarters in Swat.

Nor have troops destroyed mobile radio transmitters mounted on motorcycles or pickup trucks that Shah Doran and the leader of the Taliban in Swat, Maulana Fazlullah, have expertly used to terrify residents.

Being named in one of the nightly broadcasts often leaves just two options: fleeing Swat, or turning up headless and dumped in a village square.

When the army does act, its near-total lack of preparedness to fight a counterinsurgency reveals itself. Its usual tactic is to lob artillery shells into a general area, and the results have seemed to hurt civilians more than the militants, residents say.

In some parts of Pakistan, civilian militias have risen to fight the Taliban. But in Swat, the Taliban's gains amid a large army presence has convinced many that the military must be conspiring with the Taliban...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us


Watch Fitna now

Now if only they could call off jihad attacks by the Muslims who read the same Qur'an verses that are quoted in Fitna, and who act upon them in the way that Fitna depicts.

Craven Cringing Shameful Dhimmitude Alert: "British Parliament calls off screening of controversial film," from APP, January 23 (thanks to Robert):

LONDON, Jan 23 (APP)‑The British Parliament has cancelled the showing of a controversial film “Fitna” by the right‑win Dutch MP Geert Wilders following vociferous protest by the Muslim community.

The screening was to take place on January 29 at the House of Lords.

The decision to cancel the showing was taken on Friday when Lord Nazir Ahmed had a meeting with the Government Chief Whip of the House of Lords and Leader of the House of Lords, together with representatives from the Muslim Council of Britain, British Muslim Forum and other representatives from the British Muslim community.

The film has created huge controversy around the world, especially in Europe. The decision by the Amsterdam Appeals Court, the second‑highest legal authority in the country, overturns an earlier ruling by the Dutch Prosecution Service, which last June dismissed hundreds of complaints against Wilders on the grounds that his utterances had been made “in the context of public debate”, a position that was endorsed by the Dutch Prime Minister, Jan Peter Balkenende, a Christian Democrat.

But on Thursday, the appeals court argued that the criminal prosecution did not conflict with Wilders’ right to freedom of expression and said it based its decision on the standards set by the European Court of Human Rights.

The Far‑right Dutch politician will now be put on trial for his public statements against Islam. As a result of the meeting at the House of Lords not going ahead, all protests and demonstrations have now been cancelled Lord Ahmed termed the decision as “a victory for the Muslim community.”

Indeed it is, but it is a defeat for all those who want to resist jihad and Islamization.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I'm in daily contact with Arabic-speaking Christians from the Middle East, and know many who echo the Islamic line about the situation there, blaming Israel for all the problems of the region. This stems in many cases from ingrained cultural attitudes: the Arab nationalist project was largely initiated by Christian Arabs in order to provide a secular framework that would be an alternative to the dhimma -- a framework that would allow them the status of equal citizens. But since they were at best a small minority within an Islamic sea, this resulted in their being wholly subsumed within the larger Arab community, whose general outlook remained Islamic in orientation.

It is long past time for a new paradigm for Christians of the Middle East and of Middle Eastern extraction -- and I speak as one of them. The problems that Christians face in the Middle East are not due to Israel, where they can live in peace as full citizens, but to Islam and Muslims. In this article, nothing is said about Israel at all, but Sako "said topics of top priority for a potential synod would include the problem of Christians fleeing the Middle East, paying Christian witness in a predominantly Muslim world, relations with Muslims, the role of Christians in civil and political life, lack of full religious freedom and Christians' prospects for the future." All of that has to do with Islam and the institutionalized discrimination of dhimmitude that, although the dhimma is not in full force, remains a cultural hangover in Middle Eastern nations.

Note also the the Melkite Greek Catholic Patriarch Gregory III Laham said in 2006 that "after 11 September, there is a plot to eliminate all the Christian minorities from the Arabic world." That plot is an Islamic jihadist plot, not an Israeli Zionist one.

The pioneering historian Bat Ye'or had the great insight: Jews and Christians both face subjugation as dhimmis under Islamic Sharia, and must resist it together. It has always been part of the Sharia program to divide the dhimmis from one another and sow mutual distrust and hatred among them, precisely so that they would not unite against their oppressors.

The targets of jihad and dhimmitude should not allow themselves to be thus manipulated. For Arabic-speaking Christians to aid and enable Islamic jihadists in this program is suicidally self-defeating. They and all Middle Eastern Christians need to realize that what is driving Christians out of the Middle East is Islamic jihad and Islamic supremacism, and they need to stand with Israel against it. It may already be too late, since the number of Christians in the Middle East has dwindled so drastically, but at least it should be recognized that when Middle Eastern Christians support the jihad against Israel, they are supporting the very force that is making for their cultural destruction and disappearance from the region.

"Iraqi Bishops Seek Synod to Address Exodus of Christians From Mideast," by Carol Glatz for Catholic News Service via AINA, January 24 (thanks to James):

VATICAN CITY -- Iraqi Catholic bishops called on Pope Benedict XVI to convene a synod to address the mass exodus of Christians from the Middle East and the lack of full religious freedom there.

They also expressed hope that the new U.S. administration under President Barack Obama would be able to bring peace and security to Iraq before withdrawing U.S.-led troops.

Good luck with that.

The bishops, in Rome for their "ad limina" visits to report on the status of their dioceses, spoke during a Jan. 22 press conference at Vatican Radio.

Chaldean Archbishop Louis Sako of Kirkuk said a general synod dedicated to the challenges Christians face in the Middle East would help the church forge a clear plan of action for the present and future. [...]

"If there is no clear position or vision then Christians will no longer be present in the Middle East. Slowly they will leave this land that we call blessed but is now damned," Archbishop Sako said.

He said topics of top priority for a potential synod would include the problem of Christians fleeing the Middle East, paying Christian witness in a predominantly Muslim world, relations with Muslims, the role of Christians in civil and political life, lack of full religious freedom and Christians' prospects for the future. [...]


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

MasaalClearVictory.jpg
Sufis applaud Hamas' jihad

Many times over the years, when I have pointed out that all the orthodox Islamic sects and schools of Islamic jurisprudence teach the necessity to wage war against and subjugate unbelievers, people have countered by invoking the Sufis, whom they believe to be entirely peaceful and devoted to a wholly spiritualized form of Islam.

Unfortunately, this is not the case, and has never been the case: Sufis from al-Ghazali to the present day have taught the necessity of jihad warfare, and have participated in that warfare. Here is more evidence: Iraqi representatives of the Naqshabandi Sufi order meet with Khaled Mashaal of Hamas, praise his jihad, donate jewelry to him, and boast of their own jihad attacks against Americans in Iraq.

"Hamas Leader Khaled Mash'al Meets with Iraqi Terrorists and Accepts Their Women's Gold," from MEMRI, January 22 (thanks to Looney Tunes):

The following report was aired on Al-Rai TV (Syria) on January 22, 2009. It shows a meeting between the head of Hamas' Political Bureau Khaled Mash'al and a delegation of Iraqi terrorists from the Men of the Naqshabandi Order Army organization. The meeting was held in the presence of the owner of Al-Rai TV, Mish'an Al-Jabouri, a Saddam loyalist, who is wanted in Iraq and lives in exile in Syria. In the meeting, the Naqshabandi delegation gave Mash'al gold jewelry donated by the women of the organization. The donation event was aired on Al-Rai TV on January 4, 2009, and is also presented in this clip.

Presenter: This gold jewelry may have been the only possession of the noble Naqshabandi women, who wanted to participate in the nation's Jihad in Gaza. They sent their donations with a delegation of the Army of the Naqshabandi Order, which was a guest of the head of Hamas' Political Bureau. They conveyed their congratulations for the victory of the resistance, and stressed their shared path and fate.

Member of the Iraqi delegation, reading a message from the Naqshabandi women: "We took upon ourselves to sacrifice our necklaces, our bracelets, and our gold jewelry, for the sake of our people in Gaza, even though this jewelry is needed for the liberation of Iraq. We believe this is what our tolerant Islamic shari'a dictates, since the battle against injustice, tyranny, and occupation is a common battle."

Presenter: The representative of the Naqshabandi Army, which has carried out many attacks as part of the Iraqi resistance against the American occupation, conveyed his pride in Hamas' victory over the Zionist entity, and in the steadfastness of Hamas' fighters.

Member of the Iraqi delegation: We share this clear victory with you, the people of Palestine. We share your Jihad and this wonderful victory, which has raised the banner of Allah Akbar, and the full meaning of bravery and sacrifice in the Islamic and Arab nation....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

al-Shahri.jpg
One last thing, Mr. President: you'll hear from us again

This shouldn't surprise anyone, since nothing has been done over the years at Guantanamo to disabuse inmates of their beliefs about the responsibility of Muslims to wage war against and subjugate unbelievers. The prevailing PC "Islam Is A Religion of Peace" line prevents that -- and makes for this recidivism. Indeed, the exaggerated respect that Guantanamo personnel have been directed to show towards the Qur'an -- handling it with gloves, etc. -- only reinforces the jihadist sentiments of the inmates, rather than win hearts and minds.

But none of this, of course, is any part of Obama's calculation as he moves to close Gitmo. The prospect of major jihad terror attacks by former Gitmo inmates does not deter him, and even if one happens, he will most likely not regret what he is doing, because clearly in this his priority is not national security.

Gitmo Recidivism Update. "Two ex-Guantanamo inmates appear in Al-Qaeda video," from AFP, January 24 (thanks to Pamela):

WASHINGTON (AFP) — Two men released from the US "war on terror" prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba have appeared in a video posted on a jihadist website, the SITE monitoring service reported.

One of the two former inmates, a Saudi man identified as Abu Sufyan al-Azdi al-Shahri, or prisoner number 372, has been elevated to the senior ranks of Al-Qaeda in Yemen, a US counter-terrorism official told AFP.

Three other men appear in the video, including Abu al-Hareth Muhammad al-Oufi, identified as an Al-Qaeda field commander. SITE later said he was prisoner No. 333.

A Pentagon spokesman, Commander Jeffrey Gordon, on Saturday declined to confirm the SITE information.

"We remain concerned about ex-Guantanamo detainees who have re-affiliated with terrorist organizations after their departure," said Gordon.

"We will continue to work with the international community to mitigate the threat they pose," he said.

On the video, al-Shihri is seen sitting with three other men before a flag of the Islamic State of Iraq, the front for Al-Qaeda in Iraq.

"By Allah, imprisonment only increased our persistence in our principles for which we went out, did jihad for, and were imprisoned for," al-Shihri was quoted as saying....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

January 24, 2009

It is unconscionable that the world would dare to condemn Israel for the killing of civilians in Gaza despite the steady stream of stories like this that establish that Hamas did everything it could to provoke civilian casualties.

More on this story. "Italian paper: Gazans say Hamas kept them in homes used by gunmen," from Haaretz, January 22 (thanks to Michael):

Palestinian civilians have accused Hamas of forcing them to stay in homes from which gunmen shot at Israeli soldiers during the recent hostilities in Gaza, the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera reported Thursday.

More than 1,250 Palestinians were reportedly killed during Israel's offensive against Hamas in the coastal territory. Israel has been harshly criticized for the large number of civilians among the Palestinian dead, of whom they numbered more than half according Gaza officials.

But the Italian paper also quoted a doctor at Gaza City's Shifa Hospital as disputing the number of Palestinians said to have been killed in the campaign.

"It's possible that the death toll in Gaza was 500 or 600 at the most, mainly youths aged 17 to 23 who were enlisted by Hamas - who sent them to their deaths," he said.

13 Israelis were also killed during the 3-week operation, which was aimed at halting rocket fire on southern Israel and destroying Hamas' infrastructure.

The Gaza doctor was further quoted as saying: "Perhaps it is like Jenin in 2002. At the beginning they spoke about 1,500 dead, and at the end it turned out to be only 54 - of whom 45 were militants."

He was referring to the Israel Defense Forces battle with Palestinian militants in the West Bank town that took place during Operation Defensive Shield at the height of the second intifada.

Top IDF officer: Hamas made 'monstrous' use of children during Gaza op

The IDF Gaza Division Commander on Thursday, meanwhile, branded Hamas' use of women and children during the offensive in Gaza as "monstrous" and "inhumane."

Brig. Gen. Eyal Eisenberg said the civilians were sent by Hamas to transfer weapons to gunmen during the offensive. He also accused the Islamist militant group of booby-trapping many of the civilians' homes.

"Entire families in Gaza lived on top of a barrel of explosives for months without knowing," Eisenberg said.

The officer asserted that despite international calls for investigations into alleged war crimes, the Israel Defense Forces soldiers adhered to moral principles while fighting in Gaza.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More dhimmi apologetics on behalf of the jihad. "Word jihad abused by some angry Muslims," by Mubashir Hassan for The Nation, January 24:

LAHORE - John Kiser, an American intellectual, says that word ‘jihad’ has been much abused by a tiny, but spectacularly successful minority of angry Muslims, whose success has been to pervert a good and holy word into a bad word, one that is associated in the non-Muslim world with Muslims killing people in God’s name.[...]
Question: how can a "tiny minority" of Muslims who "pervert" the word "jihad" be so successful? Why doesn't the "huge majority" of Muslims either set them straight or, at the very least, see to it that their "perverted" interpretation not become so "successful"?
In an interview with The Nation on Friday, John said that Jihad and violence were now widely viewed in the public mind as synonymous with Islam. Such thinking, he believed, fuels Western Islamophobia which, in turn, encourages various forms of aggression-verbal and otherwise-that lends credence to the jihadist argument that the West hates Islam and wants to destroy it. And that is their most potent recruiting tool, he added.
In other words, jihadis wage jihad because the West accepts the definition that jihadis give to the word "jihad"?
“This sense of threat to Muslims’ religious identity can best be understood among secular people if we think of Islam representing what flag and home represent to us,” he observed.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A lucid moment. "Pakistan - Christians acquitted in 'blasphemy' case," from Compass Direct News, January 23:

ISTANBUL, January 23 (Compass Direct News) – Five Christians charged with “blasphemy” against Islam during April 2007 religious holidays were released on Monday (Jan. 19) after reconciliation meetings between Christian and Islamic leaders – the first verdict to have resulted from such efforts in Pakistan.
A Punjab court released Salamat Masih, 42, his 16-year-old son Rashid, and their relatives Ishfaq, Saba and Dao Masih after a judge acquitted them. Their acquittal and release came through out-of-court meetings between Muslim leaders and a Christian Non-Governmental Organization.
“This is a wonderful sign that has made history,” said Shahzad Kamran, a case worker for Sharing Life Ministries Pakistan (SLMP), which negotiated with the Muslim leaders. “This case can set a precedent for future blasphemy cases against Christians.”
The reconciliation meetings between SLMP and local and national imams began last November. Rather than attempt to settle the matter in court, the legal advocacy group sought out Muslim leaders directly to persuade them that the accused were innocent; the Islamic clerics then compelled area Muslims to drop their charges.
The meetings took place between four Islamic clergymen, National Assembly Representative Mushtaq Ahmed and Sohail Johnson of the SLMP. Ahmed was unavailable for comment in spite of repeated attempts to contact him.
Johnson of SLMP took precautionary measures to keep from being exposed to violence, meeting with the imams in neutral locations away from mosques and Muslim parts of the city. The SLMP team managed to convince the Islamic clerics to release the Christians by persuading them that the alleged blasphemy grew from a misunderstanding.
“There is permission granted in Islamic law that if someone unintentionally commits an offense, it can be reconciled,” Johnson said. “[The cleric] said he would do it because he did not want to bring harm and injustice to the community.”
The Islamic clergymen agreed to issue a fatwa (religious edict) declaring the accused men innocent of blasphemy. The Muslim witnesses in the case withdrew their testimony on Jan. 13, and District Judge Sheik Salahudin acquitted the five men in a Toba Tek Singh court.
The legal advocates involved in the case said they would employ reconciliation in future cases of false blasphemy charges. They said that battling such cases in court can still free innocent people, but it does not help to solve sectarian strife that leads to violence and false charges. [...]
The SLMP’s Kamran said the imams declared the defendants innocent because they knew the men did not intentionally insult the Islamic religion. The situation likely escalated because it took place during an Islamic holiday, with the April 2007 Muslim celebration of Eid-e-Millad-ul-Nabi (Muhammad’s birthday) turning into mob violence after the spread of false rumors against Christians. Local Christian Ratan Masih was severely injured. Other Christians fled for fear of their lives, according to SLMP.
Approximately 2,000 Muslims attacked Christian Colony, a Christian neighborhood, stoning houses and torturing Christians, according to an SLMP report. Initially the mob violence began over a quarrel between Rashid Masih’s younger brother Daniel, 12, and a Muslim child named Sunny. In the course of the argument, a sticker fell off Sunny’s shirt that bore the words Yah Rasool Allah, a reference to Muhammad as God’s messenger.
A local resident, Mohammed Farsal, saw the sticker on the ground and accused the Christian children of blasphemy. Violence soon broke out, and police eventually arrested all five men on charges of insulting Islam.
Blasphemy charges against non-Muslims are not uncommon in Pakistan and are typically applied in cases of sectarian violence. Islamic leaders are often under community pressure to blame Christians in these situations.
Human rights lawyers hope this case sets a precedent for future blasphemy cases, with spurious charges of insulting Islam or its prophet becoming more difficult to press.

Meanwhile:

Other legal cases of blasphemy continue in Pakistan, including the arrest of Munir Masih and his wife Ruqiya Bibi for insulting Islam. They were granted bail yesterday in Kasur.
At the hearing, 20 local Muslims pressured the judge not to grant them bail, according to a report from the Centre for Legal Aid Assistance and Settlement.
On Wednesday (Jan. 21), Hector Aleem from Islamabad was falsely accused of blasphemy, most likely as a backlash to his role as a human rights activist, the report said.
Christian lawmakers in the Muslim-majority country of 170 million hope to curb these legal abuses by abolishing Pakistan’s blasphemy laws.

A tall order. More on those laws can be found here.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

turki-al-faisal-pic1.jpg
Consider yourselves warned, infidels

"If the U.S. wants to continue playing a leadership role in the Middle East and keep its strategic alliances intact -- especially its 'special relationship' with Saudi Arabia -- it will have to drastically revise its policies vis-a-vis Israel and Palestine." He even suggests a risk that, upon the promptings of Iran, Saudi Arabia will "lead a jihad, or holy war, against Israel."

Good ol' Prince Turki al-Faisal. Only a little over a year ago did I see this now saber-rattling sheikh at the U.S. Library of Congress; of course, then he was treated -- as are all deep-pocketed Saudis -- with much pomp and grandeur.

"Saudi prince says U.S. ties at risk over Mideast," from Reuters, January 22:

LONDON (Reuters) - A member of Saudi Arabia's royal family warned U.S. President Barack Obama Friday the Middle East peace process and U.S.-Saudi ties were at risk unless Washington changed tack on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Israel had come close to "killing the prospect of peace" with its offensive in Gaza, Prince Turki al-Faisal wrote in an article published on the Financial Times's website.

"Unless the new U.S. administration takes forceful steps to prevent any further suffering and slaughter of Palestinians, the peace process, the U.S.-Saudi relationship and the stability of the region are at risk," said Turki, a former Saudi intelligence chief and former ambassador to the United States and Britain.[...]

Former U.S. President George W. Bush's administration had left a "sickening legacy" in the Middle East, Turki wrote, singling out the Iraq war.

The Bush administration had also contributed to the "slaughter of innocents" in Gaza, said Turki, who currently holds no official government position in the world's top crude oil exporter.

"If the U.S. wants to continue playing a leadership role in the Middle East and keep its strategic alliances intact -- especially its 'special relationship' with Saudi Arabia -- it will have to drastically revise its policies vis-a-vis Israel and Palestine," Turki wrote. He said Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had written to Saudi King Abdullah last week urging Saudi Arabia to lead a "jihad," or holy war, against Israel.

This call for jihad would, if pursued, create "unprecedented chaos and bloodshed" in the region, said Turki.

"So far, the kingdom has resisted these calls, but every day this restraint becomes more difficult to maintain," he said.

Turki urged Obama to condemn what he called "Israel's atrocities" against the Palestinians...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

091218_rihanna.jpg
"Because of her daring outfits and raunchy dances"

Not to mention that "inviting the United States-based Rihanna...would be akin to supporting US ally Israel."

"Islamic group warns Rihanna," from Nation News, January 24:

A RADICAL ISLAMIC group is threatening to take action if Rihanna is allowed to perform in Malaysia, but that country's government has approved the February 13 concert by the Barbadian star.

The youth wing of the Parti Islam SeMalaysia (PAS) called for a cancellation of the concert on Wednesday, saying Rihanna's performances were unsuitable because of her daring outfits and raunchy dances.

The protesters also said inviting the United States-based Rihanna, who turns 21 on February 20, would be akin to supporting US ally Israel, which does not have diplomatic relations with Malaysia, where Islam is the official religion.

However, the Malaysian government announced yesterday that the concert – featuring Rihanna who was a headliner at one of President Barack Obama's post-inauguration balls Tuesday – would be held.[...]

The PAS, according to news sources out of Malaysia, has not ruled out a street demonstration or "other forms of protest" in response to the decision to let the show go on.

The Islamic party has in the past opposed scheduled performances by artistes like Avril Lavigne, the Pussycat Dolls, and Gwen Stefani. (RJ)


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Gladstone.jpg
Islamophobe

William Ewart Gladstone (1809–1898) was Prime Minister of Great Britain four times: 1868–74, 1880–85, 1886 and 1892–94. He called the Qur'an an "accursed book" and once held it up during a session of Parliament, declaring: "So long as there is this book there will be no peace in the world."

Times have changed a great deal. Now the votaries of the book he saw as such an impediment to peace have triumphed: an Islamic reading room is being set up at the library Gladstone founded near his home in North Wales. In this BBC audio report (thanks to Andrew), Gladstone's great grandson Christopher Parish and Professor Richard Aldous, head of history at University College Dublin, tie themselves into knots trying to come up with a reason why Gladstone would have approved of this reading room. Gladstone, you see, was a man of his time, but he actually made favorable comments about Muhammad in the margins of a biography of the founder of Islam, and his remarks weren't as extreme as those of some of his contemporaries...

It doesn't add up. The text of the Qur'an has not changed from the late 19th century to the early 21st. What has changed is the prevailing attitude toward the book. Now it has become a manifestation of bigotry and hatred to see in the Islamic holy book anything but peace and tolerance. But the text of the book remains the same. If it was an impediment to peace in Gladstone's day, it is now. If it is an uplifting exhortation to peace and tolerance now, then it was in Gladstone's day as well.

Yesterday Geert Wilders said: "I view Islam not as a religion, but as a dangerous, totalitarian ideology - equal to communism and fascism. Aren't I allowed to say so?"

No, he isn't allowed to say so. If he had been born two hundred years ago, he might have become Prime Minister of the Netherlands. Instead, he is a hunted man. Likewise Gladstone, were he miraculously transported to the House of Commons in 2009, would be excoriated for "hate speech" if he dared to repeat his view of the Qur'an today.

But the Qur'an remains the same. Eventually, Europe and America are going to deal with the implications of that fact, one way or another.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An update on this story. "Cleric Abu Hamza under fire again," by Mark Dunn for the Herald Sun, January 24 (thanks to JE):

EMBATTLED cleric Abu Hamza came under fire again yesterday for his radical views on rape, with his website claiming Muslim wives could "laugh off" unwanted sex and that rape could be confused with having a "pushy husband".

In response to the sex-on-demand and wife-smacking controversy sparked by Mr Hamza's lectures, his Islamic Information and Services Network of Australasia website published an article saying the media had no right to question his marital teachings.

The article stated: "If a husband enters upon his wife in a manner she does not approve, she might go as far as to contact police and accuse him of rape, or accept it with laughter and embarrassment."

It added that spousal rape was hard to define and could just be a case of being married to a pushy husband.

Tu Quoque Alert:

The response claimed Jewish attitudes to a husband's right to sex, or his right to physically punish his wife, were similar to that preached by Mr Hamza.

Regular lecture attendee Musa abu A'isha said Mr Hamza often preached tolerance, peace and the need to treat women well.

Others who have known Mr Hamza described him as a radical with a bigoted agenda.

"I can say with confidence that this man does not speak for all Muslims and he certainly does not speak for me," said one former female student of Mr Hamza.

Glad to hear it. It is unfortunate, however, that the Australian media doesn't consider the normative character in Islam of Hamza's remarks:

"Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them." -- Qur'an 4:34

Muhammad said: "If a husband calls his wife to his bed (i.e. to have sexual relation) and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning." -- Bukhari 4.54.460

Although Mr Hamza would not take further questions on his views, the response on his IISNA website suggested Muslim wives defined rape differently from non-Muslim women.

"The relation between husband and wife - any husband and wife - is an exclusive and closed union, meaning their relationship can only be intervened upon the request or intent of one of the spouses. No one else has the right to interrupt them," it said.

"So if a Muslim couple agrees to live their life by Islamic teachings, then they are completely free to do so in the privacy of their home."

Or at least the husband is.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In "Silencing Islam's Critics: A Dutch court imports Saudi blasphemy norms to Europe" in the Wall Street Journal Europe, January 21 (thanks to all who sent this in), the anonymous writer makes a point that we have made many times here: that free speech laws were originally enacted precisely in order to protect controversial speech. Inoffensive speech needs no protection. If speech can be outlawed because it is offensive, there will be no outlet for political dissent.

The editorial also explains how the Dutch court has willingly adopted Sharia norms for speech.

[...] There are of course limits to free speech, such as calls for violence. But one doesn't need to agree with Mr. Wilders to acknowledge that he hasn't crossed that line. Some Muslims say they are outraged by his statements. But if freedom of speech means anything, it means the freedom of controversial speech. Consensus views need no protection.

This is exactly what Dutch prosecutors said in June when they rejected the complaints against Mr. Wilders. "That comments are hurtful and offensive for a large number of Muslims does not mean that they are punishable," the prosecutors said in a statement. "Freedom of expression fulfills an essential role in public debate in a democratic society. That means that offensive comments can be made in a political debate."

The court yesterday overruled this decision, arguing that the lawmaker should be prosecuted for "inciting hatred and discrimination" and also "for insulting Muslim worshippers because of comparisons between Islam and Nazism."

The concept of punishing people for "insulting" religious feelings sounds dangerously close to what Islamic countries have long been pushing for: that Western nations adopt blasphemy laws and stop the "defamation" of Islam.

The Amsterdam court yesterday obliged. This is no small victory for Islamic regimes that seek to export their censorship laws to wherever Muslims happen to reside. But the successful integration of Muslims in the Netherlands and the rest of Europe will require that immigrants adapt to Western norms, not vice versa. Limiting the Dutch debate of Islam to standards acceptable in, say, Saudi Arabia, will only shore up support for Mr. Wilders's argument that Muslim immigration is eroding traditional Dutch liberties.

Islamists have long tried to silence Mr. Wilders, who has been living for years under 24-hour police protection. Dutch judges may finally succeed where jihadist death threats so far have failed.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From David G. Littman, latest comments and waking dreams at the United Nations-Geneva:

In 1816, Shelley and 19 year old Mary Godwin were staying at the Villa Diodati overlooking the Lake of Geneva with Lord Byron, who suggested they each write a supernatural tale. The result was Frankenstein – created by Mary in a waking dream – “when I first stepped out from childhood into life.” Yesterday, when I was interviewed about the new Human Rights Council and the forthcoming Durban Review Conference on Racism, while standing on the balcony of the 8th floor of the Palais des Nations, I had this image in my mind’s eye while I gazed toward the Mont Blanc and the Villa Diodati: an image of Frankenstein stomping around the Palais des Nations before his final trek to the North Pole. The TV interviewer, who knew the academic décor well, liked that vivid picture. Little did we think then that soon an incident at the ongoing Durban Preparatory Committee would soon confirm this Boris Karloff scenario.

Hardly had the Thursday afternoon meeting begun than members from the African and Asian Groups (comprised of many OIC Member States) requested the Russian president not to allow any more filming of the meeting. This authorization had been granted by the UN authorities in the customary manner to the well-known French-German TV station ARTE. They – Caroline Fourest and her cameraman – were then requested publicly by the president to cease filming and recording. As someone from AFP was present at that moment, their ‘story’ on this event was picked up worldwide in both French and English. Below is their text in English:


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In "Bad News from Europe: Nazi Methods in Court" at HudsonNY, January 22 (thanks to Tanguy Veys), the always insightful Paul Belien explains what is going on in the Wilders case:

The Dutch judicial authorities are going to prosecute Geert Wilders, one of the 150 members of the Dutch Parliament, for making the movie Fitna. In this short documentary, which explains what happens if a number of verses of the Koran are taken seriously, Mr Wilders compares the Muslims’ holy book to Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf. He claims the Koran calls for violence against Jews and other non-Muslims. Fitna can be seen here.[...]

The case against Mr. Wilders in the Netherlands bears a striking resemblance to the 2004 conviction of the Vlaams Blok, another popular political party, in neighboring Belgium. The Vlaams Blok, despite the electoral support of 24% of the voters, was disbanded following a court verdict that it should be considered to be a racist, hence criminal, organization.

The party was convicted on the basis of an anthology of 16 texts published by local party chapters between 1996 and 2000. Many of these texts simply quoted official statistics on crime rates and social welfare expenditure, One of the texts dealt with the position of women in fundamentalist Muslim societies and had been written by a female Turkish-born Vlaams Blok member from the town of Aalst who had herself been raised in such an environment. The court said the Aalst section of the party published her story “not to inform the public about the position of women in the Islamic world, but to depict the image [of non-indigenous people] as unethical and barbarian.”

The court stated explicitly that what the party had written “was not necessarily untrue,” but alleged that the party’s “intentions” in publishing the truth had been of a criminal nature.

The same applies to Mr. Wilders’ Fitna movie. Whether or not it is true what Mr. Wilders says does not matter to the Dutch court. It claims he has committed a crime by making statements which “substantially harm the religious esteem of the Islamic worshippers … by affecting the symbols of the Islamic belief.”

A major argument in this regard seems to be that Mr. Wilders compared the Koran, with its many verses that call for murdering Jews, to Adolf Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’. Mr. Wilders is one of Holland’s most outspoken defenders of Israel and the Jews. Ironically, his adversaries have on several occasions compared him to the Nazis, but none of them adversaries has been prosecuted for making this comparison. Countless non-leftist European have been compared to the Nazis in the past decades. The European Left has used terms such as ‘Nazi,’ ‘Fascist’ and ‘racist’ to such an extent that the words have become meaningless. Even Israel is regularly called a Nazi state. However, when Mr. Wilders uses the comparison, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal “considers this insulting to such a degree … that a general interest is deemed to be present in order to prosecute Wilders because of this.”

As in Belgium, the prosecution against Mr. Wilders is a political attempt to kill a politician and a party which threaten the ruling establishment. As Dutch public prosecutor Otto Van der Bijl told CNN, Mr. Wilders will be prosecuted because a total of nine (!) people filed complaints against him. One of these is Mrs. Els Lucas of the governing Labour party, a political opponent of Mr. Wilders’ PVV party, and a party which is rapidly losing its blue-collar voting base to the PVV.

What must one call the methods of a court that issues verdicts like the one in Amsterdam? The Wall Street Journal calls them Saudi methods. But perhaps Nazi methods is more appropriate. Or is it a criminal offence to say so because it might incite ‘hatred’ against the Dutch judiciary?

A petition in defense of Mr. Wilders can be signed here.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

January 23, 2009

The most revealing aspect of the following entries is how obvious it is, especially to Pakistanis, that the local authorities, especially the "police," are in cahoots with the Taliban -- if not simply taking orders from them.

"Diary of a Pakistani schoolgirl (ii)," from BBC, January 23:

A Pakistani seventh grade schoolgirl is writing a diary after Taleban militants in the troubled north-western Swat district ordered schools to close as part of an edict banning girls' education. Militants seek to impose their austere interpretation of Sharia law and have destroyed about 150 schools in the last year. News of further attacks and a Taleban invitation to public floggings appears in the latest extracts of the diary, which first appeared on BBC Urdu online.

THURSDAY 22 JANUARY : VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION I am quite bored sitting at home following the closures of schools.

Some of my friends have left Swat because the situation here is very dangerous. I do not leave home. At night Maulana Shah Dauran (the Taleban cleric who announced the ban on girls attending school) once again warned females not to leave home.

He also warned that they would blow up those schools which are used by the security forces as security posts.

Father told us that security forces have arrived at the boys' and girls' school in Haji Baba area. May God keep them safe. Maulana Shah Dauran also said in his speech on FM radio that three 'thieves' will be lashed tomorrow and whoever wants to see can come and watch.

I am surprised that when we have suffered so much, why people still go and watch such things? Why also doesn't the army stop them from carrying out such acts? I have seen wherever the army is there is usually a Taleban member nearby, but where there is a Taleban member the army will always not go.

MONDAY 19 JANUARY: ARMY IN THEIR BUNKERS

Five more schools have been destroyed, one of them was near my house. I am quite surprised, because these schools were closed so why did they also need to be destroyed? No one has gone to school following the deadline given by the Taleban.

Today I went to my friend's house and she told me that a few days back someone killed Maulana Shah Dauran's uncle; she said that it may be that the Taleban destroyed the schools in anger at this.

She also said that no one has made the Taleban suffer but when they are hurt they take it out on our schools. But the army is not doing anything about it. They are sitting in their bunkers on top of the hills. They slaughter goats and eat with pleasure.

FRIDAY 18 JANUARY: NO POLICE IN SIGHT

My father told us that the government would protect our schools. The prime minister has also raised this issue. I was quite happy initially, but now I know but this will not solve our problem. Here in Swat we hear everyday that so many soldiers were killed and so many were kidnapped at such and such place. But the police are nowhere to be seen.

Our parents are also very scared. They told us they would not send us to school until or unless the Taleban themselves announce on the FM channel that girls can go to school. The army is also responsible for the disruption in our education.

Today a boy from our locality went to school and he was told by the principal to go back home because a curfew was to be imposed soon. But when he reached home he came to know that there was no curfew, instead his school was closed down because the army was to move through the road near his school.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

They were responsible for "five near-simultaneous bombings on December 30, 2000, which killed 22 people." On December 30, 2000, hardly anyone in the world understood the global threat of jihad terrorism and Islamic supremacism. It wasn't until September 11, 2001, that large numbers of people woke up -- and seven and a half years after that, the new President of the United States promises to build relationships with the Islamic world based on "mutual respect," as if it has been on our side that the respect has been lacking.

Well, in reality the respect is lacking from the other side, and it was lacking before 9/11. This attack is one indication of that.

"Philippine court convicts 3 Muslim militants for bombings - Summary," from DPA, January 23 (thanks to Block Ness):

Manila - A Philippine court convicted three Muslim militants Friday in the deadly bombing of an overhead train in Manila more than eight years ago and sentenced them to more than 20 years in prison. Manila Regional Trial Court Judge Cielito Mendaro-Grulla found Mukhlis Hadji Yunus, Abdul Fatak Paute and Mamasao Naga guilty of multiple counts of murder and attempted murder.

The attack on the Light Railway Transit train in Manila's suburban district of Blumentritt was one of five near-simultaneous bombings on December 30, 2000, which killed 22 people.

More than 100 people were injured in the attacks, which also included bombings near the US embassy, at a petrol station and on a passenger bus. [...]

Police chief Jesus Versoza welcomed the decision, saying it boosted the government's fight against terrorism.

Versoza said that he has alerted police officers in some areas in the country for possible retaliatory attacks that might be launched by Islamist militants.

"We have initiated security coverage in the court itself and also those involved in the prosecution of the case," he said. "We have also alerted some units for possible retaliatory attacks."

An Indonesian terrorist suspect was also arrested for allegedly financing the bombings, but he escaped detention. He was eventually killed in a firefight with government troops.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Even "though the Pakistani Taliban have not issued any edict for the salwar to be worn in this manner." Apparently the Taliban has no more intentions of offering courtesy warnings and deadlines before murdering less than ideal Muslims.

"Taliban gun down teacher for not hiking 'salwar' above ankles," from the Times of India, January 23 :

ISLAMABAD: A teacher who once fought as a mujahideen against Soviet occupation forces in Afghanistan has been gunned down by the Taliban in Pakistan's troubled Swat valley for not hiking up his 'salwar' or trousers above his ankles.Though the Pakistani Taliban have not issued any edict for the salwar to be worn in this manner, there have been reports of the militants threatening men for not hiking up their trousers.

The militants say hiking up the trousers is essential for offering prayers.

Former mujahideen Amjad Islam, who was working as a teacher in a private school in Swat, was gunned down yesterday for not hiking his salwar above his ankles. The militants then went to Islam's house and gunned down his father, Ghani Akbar, a lawyer by profession.

Islam's body was later hung by the militants from a pole in the College Square in Matta town and local residents were warned not to touch it till Friday morning. The body was taken down and moved to Islam's house after a local jirga intervened.

Local residents said the militants had asked Islam to hitch his salwar above his ankles last morning. The teacher told them he was a former mujahideen and knew everything about Islam. He also said nobody could be forced to pull up his salwar above the ankles, The News daily reported.

Islam said he had also seen the Taliban regime in Afghanistan, which had not forced men to wear their salwar in this manner. His arguments angered the militants and led to a scuffle.

The teacher, who had a pistol, fired at the militants and killed a Taliban fighter and wounded two more. He then tried to flee but the militants shot and stabbed him, killing him instantly. Locals also said Islam's father was a religious and humble man who was well respected in the area...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

As defined by his predecessor. Obama reassures Muslims yet again. More on this story. "Obama 'declared end' to war on terror: media," from the AFP, January 23:

WASHINGTON (AFP) – President Barack Obama "declared an end" to his predecessor's "war on terror" and began to heal the US reputation abroad when he ordered the Guantanamo Bay prison to close, US editorialists wrote Friday.

Obama's order to close the detention facility within a year, end coercive interrogations and shut secret overseas CIA prisons sent a strong signal to the world and presented a new post-September 11 era, wrote The Washington Post.

"President Obama yesterday eliminated the most controversial tools employed by his predecessor against terrorism suspects," the Post said.

"With the stroke of his pen, he effectively declared an end to the 'war on terror,' as President George W. Bush had defined it, signaling to the world that the reach of the US government in battling its enemies will not be limitless," it said.

"In a broad swipe at the Bush administration's lawyers, Obama nullified every legal order and opinion on interrogations issued by any lawyer in the executive branch after September 11, 2001," the Post added.

"It was a swift and sudden end to an era that was slowly drawing to a close anyway, as public sentiment grew against perceived abuses of government power."...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An attempt to stem the tide of Islamization and the advance of Sharia in Turkey has been foiled. "Dozens more held in Turkish coup plot," by Suzan Fraser for AP, January 22 (thanks to Oao):

ANKARA, Turkey (AP) - Police detained more suspects Thursday in a new wave of arrests connected with an alleged secularist plot to bring down the Islamic-rooted government of Turkey, a prosecutor said.

The detentions followed police raids on about 30 locations across Turkey, said Turan Colakkadi, a deputy chief prosecutor for Istanbul. The state-run Anatolia news agency said the headquarters of a secularist metal workers' trade union and an opposition television station were raided.

Colakkadi would not say how many people were detained in the raids, which threaten to aggravate tensions between secularists and Islamists. Anatolia and other news reports said dozens were taken into custody.

"At the moment, searches are taking place in more than 30 places in various provinces. There could be more detentions according to documents or evidence found. That is why I cannot give a figure," he said.

Many see the investigation into the alleged plot as the latest battle between the government of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and secularists who are backed by the military and the judiciary and who consider themselves the protectors of Turkey's secular system.

The conflict between the government and its secular opponents reached a peak in July when the Constitutional Court ruled against disbanding Erdogan's party, which had been accused of steering the country toward Islamic rule. The court did impose a fine, as a warning. [...]

The opposition accuses the government of a witch hunt against secularists who opposed the government's efforts to raise the profile of Islam.

"The trade unions are being silenced, media organizations are being scared off," opposition lawmaker Mustafa Ozyurek told reporters outside the union's headquarters. "Turkey is fast becoming an empire of fear."


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Khalid%20Yasin.jpg

Some "hate speech," apparently, is just fine in the Netherlands. They say that he will be prosecuted if he says something "hateful" in the Netherlands, but his positions are already abundantly clear -- if Dutch officials wanted to be consistent, they wouldn't let him in. "Radical Muslim preacher welcome in Rotterdam," by Rob Kievit for Radio Netherlands, January 23 :

Justice Minister Ernst Hirsch Ballin rejects demands by two parties to bar a radical Islamic preacher from speaking in the Netherlands.

Mr Hirsch Ballin wrote to parliament on Thursday that the preacher, American citizen Khalid Yasin, is free to enter the country and address audiences. The justice minister adds that Mr Yasin will risk prosecution if it turns out that his speeches incite hatred. He emphasises that everyone in the Netherlands has freedom of speech, provided they respect the rule of law.

What do you bet that no matter what Khalid Yasin says, he would not be prosecuted in the Netherlands?

The two major parties of the governing coalition, Labour and Christian democrat CDA, together with the opposition populist right-wing Freedom Party, had asked for a ban. They cited earlier utterances by Mr Yasin, who according to the Freedom Party is "a terrorist" and "an evil man". Labour had asked the justice minister to verify reports that Mr Yasin preaches radical Islam and intolerance between muslims and non-muslims. The Christian democrats wrote to the minister that they feared Mr Yasin would issue calls to violence.

The issue mirrors the case of Freedom Party leader Geert Wilders, against whom a prosecution was started on Wednesday for inciting hatred against Muslims. The MP is a vocal critic of the Qur'an, having compared Islam's holy book to Hitler's Mein Kampf and said it fosters terrorism. Mr Wilders says he was exercising his right to free speech, both inside and outside of parliament.

Converts to Islam

Mr Yasin is scheduled to give two lectures to Islam converts at the private Islamic University of Rotterdam; he will also speak in the town of Maaseik in Belgium. Rotterdam's recently appointed mayor Ahmed Aboutaleb told the ANP agency that Mr Yasin is welcome in his city, but the mayor said he did not want to become involved in a discussion over religion. "Every individual has their own perception of religion." Mr Aboutaleb rejected censorship and said he was hoping for a lively debate, "but if his texts are insulting or inciting to hatred, we'll prosecute him."

Khalid Yasin's opinions

Khalid Yasin has been quoted as:

* advocating the death penalty for homosexuality
* claiming the HIV virus was deliberately engineered by Western governments
* questioning the existence of al-Qaeda and its involvement in the 9/11 attacks
* asserting that the 2002 and 2005 Bali bombings were justified in the light of a history of Western oppression of Islam

Khalid Yasin:

"There's no such thing as a Muslim having a non-Muslim friend. If you prefer the clothing of the kafirs over the clothing of the Muslims, most of those names that's on most of those clothings is faggots, homosexuals and lesbians...The Koran gives a very clear position regarding homosexuality, lesbianism and bestiality - that these are aberrations, they are immoralities and if they are tried, convicted, they are punishable by death."

"Osama bin Laden is not everywhere, omnipotent. ... where's Osama bin Laden? That would warrant $68 billion in 17 countries hunting him and everyone in their houses being afraid of this kind of Osama bin Laden bogey man. This is a creation ... in order to justify a war they call on terror but is really a terror they have put inside the people. It is a war against Islam... There has been no evidence that has surfaced, no bona fide irrevocable, irrefutable evidence ... that there is a group called al-Qa'ida that did the September 11 bombings. I'm of the opinion there was a rogue operation that took place."

Kathy Shaidle has more on this.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

SupportWilders.jpg

Geert Wilders interviewed about his looming prosecution. "Wilders feels persecuted in 'political process,'" by Herman Staal for NRC Handelsblad, January 23:

Geert Wilders was “completely surprised” when he heard on Wednesday that the appeals court of Amsterdam ruled he shall be prosecuted for hate speech and inciting discrimination. Last year the public prosecutor had decided not to try the controversial Dutch member of parliament for his remarks about Islam. In an interview with NRC Handelsblad Wilders says he is "shaken, but also very angry and ready to fight."

"The public prosecutor agreed with me, that I can say what I said. The attorney general at the appeals court has argued the same. I never thought that things would turn out this way," Wilders says. Because of the appeals court ruling, the public prosecutor is forced to prosecute Wilders for statements such as "ban the Koran" and "the core of the problem is fascist Islam", statements Wilders has made in the media and his own film Fitna.

In its detailed order the appeals court says that your statements are a punishable offence. What do you think of the decision?

"I have studied the ruling in depth, and have come to the conclusion that it is a politically motivated verdict. Normally, in these kind of appeals cases, a court rules on subsequent steps and includes an explanation [of its legal logic]. But here the appeals court is entirely focused on the content of the case. Therefore I can no longer get a fair trial. Should I stand before the lower court judge, there will already be a peremptory ruling from the appeals court on his desk. And if I go for an appeal, I end up in the same court. The immediate colleagues of the judges who have already sentenced me, will then be in a position to rule. That is unbelievable. The Wall Street Journal editorial is right. The appeals court is introducing Saudi Arabian legal standards to the Netherlands."

But wasn't there a proper procedure, where you and your lawyer were able to stand up in your defence?

"That is not the case. I have given a statement, but the appeals court has not asked me a single question. I have not been allowed to call any witnesses or experts. This was no normal appeals procedure - this was a political process. They have given a verdict that is content-driven.. I have already been convicted. This is banana justice."

Wilders feels not only that the appeals court’s ruling is a political attack against him, but he says the pending change in Dutch anti-discrimination law is also aimed specifically at his populist PVV (Party for Freedom). Justice minister Ernst Hirsch Ballin (Christian Democrats) wants to do away with the legal ban on blasphemy, but at the same time change anti-discrimination act so that insulting a religion de facto means insulting the group that adheres to it.

"This is simply an anti-PVV proposition. A majority of parliament is likely to be opposed to it. But with this ruling Hirsch Ballin doesn't even need change the law anymore. Thanks to the appeals court, the jurisprudence has simply sailed into becoming law."

You have compared the Quran to Mein Kampf, and called Islam a fascist ideology. Why do you find that these remarks fit within the confines of the law?

"I am not the only one who thinks so. The public prosecutor also agrees, and many professors. Churchill said the same thing."

"I view Islam not as a religion, but as a dangerous, totalitarian ideology - equal to communism and fascism. Aren't I allowed to say so? If I say that about communism, there would not be a problem. I have never talked about people, I've always made it about ideology."

You've referred to the 'Muslim settlers.' Those are people, aren't they?

"That was not about all Muslims. That was referring to the problems in Gouda [where Moroccan youth caused problems that drew nationwide attention last October]. It was just about those Muslim settlers who spoil everything."

But couldn't that make all Muslims feel offended?

"You would be a great appeals court clerk. I am a democrat to the bone. I am allowed to say what I want."

Where do you draw the line?

"At calling for violence. Also, I will not say any base things about entire population groups. The government makes the distinction between western and non-western immigrants. I push it a bit further. But these things need to be thrashed out in the political arena, not in court."

Some critics say all this seems to suit you. You can exploit your role as victim at the hands of the political elite.

"That is a nasty insinuation. I do not want to be before a judge. I do not want to be prosecuted. I want to do my job in parliament. Hundreds of thousands of people have elected me to say what I say. I would need to be condemned if I did not speak my mind. The PVV is doing well. If elections were held today, polls indicate we would get 17 seats [in the 150 seat parliament], our highest mark in two years. The last thing I need is a lawsuit."

The world seems to be infused with new hope from the election of Obama. Isn't your whole approach and tone really 'very 2008'?

"You mean passe? It's not about the tone, it’s about the message. The problems with Islam will only increase. A bit of 'flower power' is fine, but that doesn't suit this isue [sic]. Our proposals are vital."


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Things are not looking good for me. In its 33-page ruling ordering my prosecution, the appeals court already determined I was guilty."

I hope Wilders can come to America, and be granted asylum here. Of course, the new Administration is unlikely to look kindly upon such an appeal.

"Dutch MP behind film on radical Islam: Decision to prosecute me is political," by Cnaan Liphshitz for Haaretz, January 23 :

Dutch lawmaker Geert Wilders, the director of a controversial film on radical Islam, says the decision by the Amsterdam Court of Appeals on Wednesday to prosecute him for allegedly inciting hatred against Muslims was strictly political.

"It puts hundreds of thousands of Dutchmen on trial for opposing Islam's violent messages," the MP told Haaretz on Thursday. [...]

In the interview on Thursday, Wilders maintained that his film, entitled Fitna, is within the boundaries of Dutch law and freedom of expression. "I consulted numerous legal authorities before releasing the film," he stressed.

He added: "Things are not looking good for me. In its 33-page ruling ordering my prosecution, the appeals court already determined I was guilty. Now the case will be reviewed by a lower court and there's every chance the judge will align his ruling with the appeals courts."

Later in the conversation he said: "I hope this thing doesn't end behind bars." As Wilders has not yet been charged, the maximum penalty for the alleged transgressions remains unclear.

If wilders [sic] appeals a future conviction, his appeal will be heard before the same court which ordered his prosecution....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Geert Wilders sends along this Dutch-language article, "Binnen tien dagen arrestatiebevel tegen Wilders," from Elsevier, January 23. Gates of Vienna has the translation:

‘Within 10 days arrest warrant for Wilders’

The Jordanian Muslim movement The Messenger of Allah Unites Us (TMA) is excited that Wilders will be prosecuted by the court in Amsterdam. Juridical procedures in Jordan will lead ‘within 10 days’ to an international warrant for his arrest.

‘Finally Dutch justice takes measures against these terrible crimes’ said, Zakaria Sheikh, chairman of TMA, today in De Volkskrant.

According to Sheikh, statements by Wilder lead to ‘the worldwide sowing of hatred and violence’.

Not like Islamic terrorism. Islamic jihad preachers and acts of jihad violence don't contribute at all to the "worldwide sowing of hatred and violence." Only Wilders does that, by reporting on those acts of hatred and violence.

Boycott

- - - - - - - - -

The Islamic action club (TMA) began in June last year with a boycott against Dutch products because of Wilders’ movie Fitna.

At that time a juridical procedure against the Dutch parliamentarian was initiated that had to lead to an international arrest warrant and possible extradition to Jordan. Sheikh expects the arrest warrant within 10 days.

Criminals

TMA said to the Dutch newspaper that it ‘does not have any problems with the Dutch people’. ‘But these criminals must be brought to trial’, said Sheikh.

Even so the action club doesn’t want to stop its boycott against Dutch products — which presumably is a great success. ‘We have touched the hearts and minds of the consumers’, said Sheikh.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More indication of the widespread acceptance of honor killing in Muslim countries -- while the world continues to look the other way, and no one calls upon Islamic communities in the West to do anything about this, despite the fact that we have already seen honor killings in the U.S.

"Murder while saving woman’s honour not a crime: LHC," from the Daily Times, January 23 (thanks to Pamela):

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) has declared murder to save a woman’s honour not a crime, a private TV channel reported on Thursday. According to the channel, Justice Asif Saeed Khosa ruled this while hearing a murder case. The court acquitted Ghulam Nabi and his son Iftikhar, saying murder to save a woman’s honour was not a crime. The accused had killed one Yasin while saving a female relative’s honour. The trial court sentenced them to 10 years’ imprisonment but the LHC acquitted them.

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Women's rights activists say divorced women are often thrown out of their homes, lose custody of their children, and many end up destitute."

But they can't protest against this treatment. Oh, no. That would be "un-Islamic."

"Sharia police block women's rally," from the BBC, January 19 (thanks to Davida):

Islamic authorities in the northern Nigerian city of Kano have told organisers of a planned protest by divorced women to cancel the event.

The head of the Sharia police, or Hisbah, said the planned protest was an "embarrassment", and is "un-Islamic".

The organisers have agreed to postpone their protest scheduled for 29 January.

Women's rights activists say divorced women are often thrown out of their homes, lose custody of their children, and many end up destitute.

The Director General of the Hisbah, Saidu Dukawa, said there were also security concerns over the protest.

"We fear what could happen in the streets if there is a large gathering of people, it could get out of control," he told the BBC's Hausa Service.

Large gatherings of people can be volatile in Nigeria, which has been rocked by violence between Muslims and Christians over the last 10 years.

Quarrelling spouses

He also said the idea of street protests was "un-Islamic" and "morally wrong".

Unless, of course, one is protesting against Israel, or Danish cartoons, or Papal remarks about Islam, etc.

"Never in the history of Islam have women taken to the street to press for their demands," he said.

Maybe it's time for them to start.

The Hisbah were reported by local media to have said they feared the demonstration would "ridicule Kano in the eyes of the world".

Maybe stopping it will ridicule Kano in the eyes of the world. It should.

Kano is one of 12 northern Muslim-majority states governed by Sharia law.

The Hisbah are in charge of policing the morals of Muslims to make sure they are "Sharia-compliant"....

This is coming West. Watch for it.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, consummated his marriage with Aisha when she was nine. This fact is recorded several times in the hadith collection Muslims consider most reliable, Bukhari: 5.48.234; 5.58.236; 7.62.64; 7.62.65; and 7.62.88. Because Muhammad is the excellent example of conduct for Muslims (cf. Qur'an 33:21), it is very hard to work against child marriage in Muslim-majority countries.

Yet when people raise this point in America and Europe today, they're called "Islamophobes" and worse. The truth then comes out only in places such as the 18th paragraph of a Reuters story about a different topic, as is the case here.

"Indonesia Islamic body to mull ban on smoking and yoga," by Olivia Rondonuwu for Reuters, January 23 :

Indonesia's top Islamic body meets at the weekend for what looks set to be a hot theological debate on a range of issues including whether Muslims should be allowed to smoke, abstain from voting or even do yoga.

Officially secular, Indonesia has the world's largest Muslim population, accounting for roughly 85 percent of the country's 226 million people. Most follow a moderate form of Islam, although there is vocal radical fringe.

Ain't it always the way!

About 700 people, including Muslim clerics and theological experts, are due in West Sumatra for the National Edict Commission meeting, which has the power to issue fatwas.

"There will be debate before we reach conclusions. We need to listen to the pros and cons and it's likely to be a hot debate," said Ma'ruf Amin, a chairman of the Ulema Council, known as MUI.

The MUI has carved a key role for itself in Indonesia and its pronouncements on everything from Islamic banking to halal food can have a big influence on Southeast Asia's top economy....

Underage marriage will also be debated after an Islamic cleric last year incited uproar when he married a 12-year old girl with her parents consent.

Under Indonesian law, men can marry at 19 and women at 16, although under some Islamic laws there is no age limit.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Welcome to the glories of multicultural America: as a result of these attacks, Jewish organizations in the Chicago area are stepping up security.

Incidentally, in the same area not too long ago, a Muslim student faked a hate attack against herself, resulting in an immense outpouring of support and sympathy for her from fellow students and officials at her college.

See the difference?

"Hillel, Jewish organizations heighten security measures," by Christina Salter for the Daily Northwestern, January 22 (thanks to the):

Recent threats made to Chicago-area synagogues have motivated several Evanston and Northwestern Jewish organizations to increase security measures.

According to the Chicago Sun-Times, two synagogues and a Jewish school were vandalized on Jan. 10. The graffiti included hate messages directed at Israel for its invasion of the Gaza Strip.

A week before, bomb threats were made to several Chicago-area Jewish schools. And on Dec. 29, a man threw a Molotov cocktail at the outside wall of Temple Sholom of Chicago, 3480 N. Lake Shore Drive.

The string of events in the area, combined with the ongoing conflicts between Israel and Palestine, sparked conversation over security practices at Jewish centers and synagogues in Evanston. The Fiedler Hillel Center, 629 Foster St., implemented new measures starting this week, said assistant director Cydney Topaz.

Hillel will now use a buzzer system at the front door, requiring any person entering the building to be buzzed in. In addition, any visitors will need to identify themselves while entering the building, Topaz said.

"We definitely wanted to be proactive," she said. "Our main goal is to ensure the safety of the students."...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

jihad4.jpg
Jihad graffiti on a bus shelter in Temple Fortune

Threats to Jews in New York, threats to Jews in London, threats to Jews all over. And yet the UN is focused on "Islamophobia," and Islamic advocacy groups in the U.S. have to manufacture hate crimes to shore up their victim status. When will this madness end? Is the West even still able to produce a political leader who will stand up to this? The free world needs to take a stand and make it clear to Muslims in the West that this is not tolerable. But I am not holding my breath.

"London - More Anti-Semitic Attacks in Golders Green," from Vos Iz Neias?, January 22 (thanks to all who sent this in):

London - The Jewish community in Golders Green has been the target of further anti-Semitic attacks, in the form of more offensive graffiti.

Graffiti reading "Kill the filthy Jews" was daubed on walls and pavements near Golders Green tube station and vandals wrote "Jihad 4 Israel" on top of Holocaust Memorial Day adverts.

Golders Green residents have unanimously condemned the ongoing hate crimes, which have risen up in the wake of the Gaza conflict....

I'm glad they have, but what about the local Muslims?

Joseph Haziza, 27, manager of Menachem Kosher butchers which is next to Sinclair Grove on Golders Green road, said: "In this area of Golders Green the graffiti hasn't been as bad. Further up the Golders Green Road they have been affected, with Muslims coming into Jewish shops and saying: 'I'm going to kill you'.

"I don't wear my cuple [skull cap] when I'm out and about. I don't want to be started on."...

At least one Jewish resident of the area has been brutally beaten: "Bloody Beating In Golders Green," by Justin Cohen for Totally Jewish.com, January 22 (thanks to Pamela):

An Orthodox man from Golders Green yesterday spoke of his determination to continue living an openly Jewish life after he was viciously beaten and left with blood pouring from his face, in one of the most serious incidents of an unprecedented wave of anti-Semitism afflicting Britain.

Wearing a kippah and his long Shabbat coat, Michael Bookarz was walking home from La Fiesta restaurant on Golders Green Road on Saturday night when he was set upon by two hooded attackers. "I was walking towards the A406 at about 10.20pm when I noticed a guy was walking towards me," the 31-year-old told TJ.

"He suddenly started running and punched me in the face. When I was on the ground, another person ran over and they both started kicking me and stamping on my body and head.

"One of them said this is because of what's happened to the Palestinians in Gaza. Someone must have looked out the window because they suddenly just ran off leaving me on the floor.

"I was scared but the main thought running through my head as it was happening was self-preservation and defending myself. The second the attack finished my next thought was to get help. I took my phone out to dial 999 and I could see blood covering the screen of the phone - there was blood pouring down from my nose."...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

ChabadPolice.jpg

We saw Islamic jihadists target the Chabad house in Mumbai. Now they have threatened the Chabad headquarters in Brookyn, New York -- "770," for 770 Eastern Parkway. And who is behind it? The revolting Yousef Al-Khattab, the convert from Judaism to Islam who has rejoiced in the murder of Daniel Pearl and the deaths of American soldiers, and called for genocide on New York streets.

Are we going to allow this in America?

"Threats Made Against 770," from Chabad.info, January 22 (thanks to Militant Islam Monitor):

Along with the expected stir Inauguration day caused across the nation on Tuesday morning, Crown Heights residents saw a tremendous visible police presence following threats that were made against the community on a Muslim blog. This morning, NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly made a phone call to Chanina Sperlin, vice president of the Crown Heights Jewish Community Council from the inauguration ceremony in Washington DC, to discuss threats against 770. The Commissioner is looking into the situation," said Sperlin, "The Crown Heights community was considered a target in the past, and whether or not this is serious remains to be seen." Sperlin also received phone calls from members of the joint terrorism task force and FBI, who assured him that the community does not have to worry, the FBI and NYPD are working together to ensure a major security presence is located in and around Crown Heights.

The site, www.revolutionmuslim.com which featured the threat is run by Yousef Al-Khattab, a New York City cab driver who operates the extremist Islamic anti-American Web site that features violent images on a daily basis: From the Statue of Liberty, with an ax blade cutting through her side; to a video mocking the beheading of American journalist Daniel Pearl, entitled “Daniel Pearl I am Happy Your Dead “; or the latest speech from Sheikh Abdullah Faisal, an extremist Muslim cleric convicted in the UK and later deported for soliciting the murder of non-Muslims.

The latest - a cartoon-like image depicting 770 Eastern Parkway, Lubavitch World Headquarters, as a target in retaliation for Israel’s attacks on Gaza.

Formerly known as Joseph Cohen, al-Khattab is an American-born Jew who converted to Islam after attending an Orthodox Rabbinical school, which he later described as a “racist cult.”

The 39-year-old New York taxi driver launched RevolutionMuslim.com with the mission of “preserving Islamic culture,” “calling people to the oneness of G-d” and asking them to “support the beloved Sheik Abdullah Faisal, who’s preaching the religion of Islam and serving as a spiritual guide.”

A mobile command center was be stationed in front of 770, and many more cops are being sent to patrol the neighborhood streets....

Chabad.info has more information and more photos. Read it all.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Bruce Bawer, author of While Europe Slept, discusses what has led up to the Wilders travesty in "Submission in the Netherlands" in City Journal, January 22 (thanks to Ruth King):

[...] The appalling decision to try Wilders, the Freedom Party’s head and the Dutch Parliament’s only internationally famous member, for “incitement to hatred and discrimination” against Islam is indeed an assault on free speech. But no one who has followed events in the Netherlands over the last decade can have been terribly surprised by it. Far from coming out of the blue, this is the predictable next step in a long, shameful process of accommodating Islam—and of increasingly aggressive attempts to silence Islam’s critics—on the part of the Dutch establishment.

What a different road the Netherlands might have taken if Pim Fortuyn had lived! Back in the early spring of 2002, the sociologist-turned-politician—who didn’t mince words about the threat to democracy represented by his country’s rapidly expanding sharia enclaves—was riding high in the polls and appeared on the verge of becoming the next prime minister. For his supporters, Fortuyn represented a solitary voice of courage and an embodiment of hope for freedom’s preservation in the land of the dikes and windmills. But for the Dutch political class and its allies in the media and academia—variously blinded by multiculturalism, loath to be labeled racists, or terrified of offending Muslims—Fortuyn himself was the threat. They painted him as a dangerous racist, a new Mussolini out to tyrannize a defenseless minority. The result: on May 6, 2002, nine days before the election, Fortuyn was gunned down by a far-left activist taken in by the propaganda. The Dutch establishment remained in power. For many Dutchmen, hope died that day.

Fortuyn’s cause was taken up by journalist, director, and TV raconteur Theo van Gogh, who was at work on a film about Fortuyn when he was slaughtered on a busy Amsterdam street on November 2, 2004. The killer, a young Dutch-born Islamist, had been infuriated by Submission, van Gogh’s film about Islamic oppression of women. Epitomizing the Dutch elite’s reaction to the murder was Queen Beatrix’s refusal to attend van Gogh’s funeral. Instead, she paid a friendly visit to a Moroccan community center.

The spotlight then shifted to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the brilliant Somali-born member of the Dutch parliament and cowriter of the script for Submission, who, rejecting the Islam of her birth, had become an eloquent advocate for freedom, especially for the rights of Muslim women facing no less oppression in the Netherlands than they had back in their homelands. Hirsi Ali was lucky: she wasn’t murdered, only hounded out of the parliament, and out of the country, by a political establishment that viewed her—like Fortuyn and van Gogh before her—as a disruptive presence.

That was in 2006. In that year, as if to demonstrate the gulf between popular and elite views, a poll showed that 63 percent of Dutchmen considered Islam “incompatible with modern European life.” Yet Piet Hein Donner, Dutch Minister of Justice, insisted that “if two-thirds of all Dutchmen wanted to introduce sharia tomorrow . . . it would be a disgrace to say ‘this is not permitted’!”...

Then he goes on to discuss the Wilders case. Read it all.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Obama's agenda for the Islamic world is the focus of my column in Human Events this week:

At last the triumphant day has come, and Barack Obama is President of the United States. Few presidents have taken office burdened with such high expectations -- and one of the chief items on the new Chief Executive’s to-do list is, as he himself put it, to “reboot America’s image in the world and also in the Muslim world in particular.”

Obama thinks of himself as uniquely equipped to do this. He explained early in his presidential campaign that “I think the world would see me as a different kind of President, somebody who could see the world through their eyes….If I convened a meeting with Muslim leaders around the world, to discuss how they can align themselves in our battle against terrorism, but also put our, the relationship between the West and the Islamic world on a more productive footing, I do so with the credibility of somebody who actually lived in a Muslim country for a number of years.”

He has remained consistent in this belief. The Times of London reported Sunday that Obama “believes a personal initiative will dramatise his wish to reassure Muslims, and intends to give a speech in an Islamic capital during his first 100 days in office as a sign of his engagement.”


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

They want one-third of monastery property -- and their legal action, Christians say, is "part of a larger system of discrimination" against Christians. The Muslims say that it is...occupation! "Our land is being occupied by the monastery." Sheesh.

"Turkey: Ancient Monastery Threatened," from Compass Direct, January 22:

ISTANBUL, January 22 (Compass Direct News) – Syriac Christians in southeastern Turkey say a land dispute over the historic Mor Gabriel Monastery is part of a larger system of discrimination against the religious minority in this overwhelmingly Islamic country.

Muslim residents of southeastern Turkey dispute the boundary lines of an ancient Christian monastery dating to the fourth century as being unnecessarily large for the needs of a religious community. Islamic village leaders from Yayvantepe, Eglence and Candarli are attempting to confiscate one-third of the monastery’s property, claiming it was wrongfully appropriated and that they need it for their livestock.

Area Muslims also say the land in question is forest and thereby registered as land belonging to the State Treasury.

“Our land is being occupied by the monastery,” said Ismail Erlal, village leader of Yayvantepe, according to Cihan News Agency. “We make use of the forest there and pasture our animals; we won’t give up our rights.”

Among the most contentious issues are the monastery walls built around its perimeter, rebuilt 15 years ago. Village leaders complain in a lawsuit to obtain the land that the monastery has gone beyond its rightful bounds. In August the land survey office of Midyat said it had determined that 270 hectares of the monastery’s 760 hectares were government property, including land inside and outside the monastery’s walls.

A court in Mardin originally scheduled a hearing for Friday (Jan. 16) to determine the legal status of the monastery walls, but it was rescheduled to Feb. 11 to allow the court more time to examine the case. At the February hearing the court will determine if the 270 hectares of land belong to the government or the monastery.

Metropolitan Timotheos Samuel Aktas, leader of the monastery, answered in a report that the monastery has the right to leave its land uncultivated and has paid taxes on the property since 1937.

The state originally charged the monastery with being founded illegally, but it dropped those charges by canceling a hearing originally schedule for Dec. 24. Rudi Sumer, the attorney representing the monastery, said that the claim was groundless since the monastery has foundation status dating back to modern Turkey’s origins, not to mention centuries of existence beforehand....

But it shows that some people will try anything.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Good thing Obama is closing the place, eh? Gitmo Recidivism Update: "Freed by U.S., Saudi Becomes a Qaeda Chief," by Robert F. Worth for the New York Times, January 22 (thanks to James):

BEIRUT, Lebanon — The emergence of a former Guantánamo Bay detainee as the deputy leader of Al Qaeda’s Yemeni branch has underscored the potential complications in carrying out the executive order President Obama signed Thursday that the detention center be shut down within a year.

The militant, Said Ali al-Shihri, is suspected of involvement in a deadly bombing of the United States Embassy in Yemen’s capital, Sana, in September. He was released to Saudi Arabia in 2007 and passed through a Saudi rehabilitation program for former jihadists before resurfacing with Al Qaeda in Yemen.

That Saudi program works great!

His status was announced in an Internet statement by the militant group and was confirmed by an American counterterrorism official.

“They’re one and the same guy,” said the official, who insisted on anonymity because he was discussing an intelligence analysis. “He returned to Saudi Arabia in 2007, but his movements to Yemen remain unclear.” [...]

“The lesson here is, whoever receives former Guantánamo detainees needs to keep a close eye on them,” the American official said....

Uh, yeah.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Larijani.jpg
Crowing

And "Gaza is the beginning of Israel's serious downfall."

"Larijani: Int'l Plot Against Iran Defeated," from the Fars News Agency, January 22 (thanks to James):

TEHRAN (FNA)- The international plot by the US and some western and Arab countries to bring Iran under control was defeated, Iranian Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani said, describing the recent events in Gaza as part of the same plot.

"Since long ago, a comprehensive plot has been under discussion for the arrangement of the regional scene. This plan was gradually brought on the international stage and turned into a paradigm," Larijani said at a ceremony for honoring Gaza martyrs in the holy city of Qom in central Iran on Wednesday.

"This plot aimed at a type of solidarity among the US and certain western and Arab countries in the region and had been hatched to harness Iran through international participation," he added.

"The US and Israeli leaders dreamed that they would cut one of Iran's arms by attacking Gaza and would rebuild Israel's damaged reputation in the region and the world," the speaker said.

Mentioning that Israel and the US faced a defeat in attaining their goals in the war on Gaza, the top legislator said, "In Gaza, Israel for the first time succumbed to the resistance of the Palestinian people in its alleged territories and Gaza was actually liberated in this war."

"Gaza is the beginning of Israel's serious downfall," he reiterated.

Larijani described Iran's Islamic Revolution as a huge tree which yielded the fruit of Hezbollah's victory in the 33-day war against Israel in summer 2006, which shattered Israel's unreal reputation.

"Gaza events and Zionist regime's scandalous defeat was also the fruit of the campaign that Hezbollah planted in Lebanon," he stated.

He may be right about that.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

January 22, 2009

One hero of free speech discusses another's case. "Holland's national suicide note," by Ezra Levant, January 21 (thanks to Defend Geert Wilders):

The Dutch court of appeal has ruled that Geert Wilders, the Member of Parliament and anti-terrorism activist, must stand trial for hate speech.

You can read the English page of the court's website announcing the decision here.

It is a national suicide note, a white flag of surrender flown by a once-great empire in the face of illiberal fascists and hoodlums. It is a homicide note, too -- announcing the murder of freedom of speech and freedom of religion. And it is a warning note to other Western democracies. The warning is this: liberal democracy, multiculturalism and immigration -- pick any two.

Holland has picked multiculturalism and immigration, and has heaved liberal democracy overboard.

The announcement is so eye-scratchingly stupid, it really must be read line for line. Here goes. (The spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors are from the court's own English translation):

Amsterdam, 21 january 2009 - On 21 January 2009 the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam ordered the criminal prosecution of the member of parliament Geert Wilders for the incitement to hatred and discrimination based on his statements in various media about moslims and their belief.

Did you catch that? It's just like the execrable section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. Incitement to... what? Violence? Murder? Riot? No. Incitement to hatred.

Hatred is an emotion. And apparently in Holland, "making" someone feel that emotion is a crime. And inciting "discrimination" is, too. Not just discrimination itself, mind you. But inciting someone to discriminate. The Dutch court has not announced the prosecution of anyone who Wilders has "incited" to discriminate against someone else. But they're still charging Wilders with discrimination, once removed -- even if that discrimination hasn't happened, and isn't logically tied to his political criticisms of Islamic fascism. (Question: don't we all have a duty to incite each other to discriminate against -- or at least hate -- fascists who would destroy our liberal way of life?)

In addition, the Court of Appeal considers criminal prosecution obvious for the insult of Islamic worshippers because of the comparisons made by Wilders of the islam with the nazism.

I appreciate the honesty. This is the criminalization of "insults".

Of course, the comparison of radical Islam and Naziism can be found in their fascist, anti-democratic and illiberal streaks. And -- something the Dutch should know -- anti-Semitism. But, more practically, if comparing people to Nazis is now a crime, how about the countless comparisons of Jews to Nazis -- comparisons ubiquitous at the United Nations conference in Durban, just to pick one big example?

The Court of Appeal rendered judgment as a consequence of a number of complaints about the non-prosecution of Wilders for his statements in various media about moslims and their belief. The complainants did not agree with the decision of the public prosecution which decided not to give effect to their report against Wilders.

So the prosecutors -- whose job it is, as in Canada, to determine which prosecutions have merit and which don't -- were overruled by the court... because there were "a number of complaints". Is that all it took? Bitch enough and you can coax the cowardly Dutch courts to prosecute a political enemy?

There is much more. Read it all.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

To "prevent provocation, not restrict religious freedom." More on this story. "Muslim prayer at Milan's Duomo sparks ire," from the Associated Press, January 22:

ROME: Italy's interior minister has drafted new rules for public protests after a few hundred Muslims ended a rally earlier this month by praying in front of Milan's cathedral.

The Jan. 3 prayer, which came at the end of a massive pro-Palestinian rally, sparked heated debate in Italy. Muslim leaders apologized to the Archdiocese of Milan, saying they didn't mean to show disrespect.

Only Islamic supremacism.

Interior Minister Roberto Maroni, a leader of the anti-immigrant Northern League party, said Wednesday he had prepared a directive for all regional prefects.

Details haven't been released, but news reports say it is expected to prohibit rallies from being staged in front of places of worship.

Supporters say the directives are preventing provocation, not restricting religious freedom.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Whereas Muslims are simply wife-beaters. "Muslim cleric says Australians addicted to alcohol, gambling," by Mark Dunn for Courier Mail, January 22:

ABU Hamza has claimed Australians are addicted to alcohol, gambling and prostitution in another rant to his followers broadcast over the internet.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd yesterday demanded the self-taught cleric apologise for telling Muslim men they could demand sex from their wives and hit them if they were disobedient.

Note well, "self-taught," as in, surely he got it wrong, surely Islam doesn't teach that, etc.
As revealed in yesterday's Courier-Mail, Mr Hamza told his mainly young male following Islamic law allowed husbands to demand sex at any time and women could be "smacked" if they continually disobeyed men.

In another fire and brimstone sermon, recorded for the internet six months ago, Mr Hamza said non-Muslim Australians were lost in a world of booze, gambling and sex.

Mr Hamza, who has delivered sermons celebrating Australia and then condemning aspects of it, told his followers to spread the word of Islam.

"They (Australians) think happiness can be achieved by being intoxicated, by going to the casino and blowing your money away, by going from one prostitute to the other," Mr Hamza said in his lecture titled "How to live in Australia as a Muslim".

After the sex-on-demand and wife-beating revelations, Mr Rudd yesterday demanded Mr Hamza apologise and withdraw the comments.

"These remarks have no place in modern Australia at all. I would call upon this Islamic cleric to publicly apologise and repudiate his remarks," the PM said.

"Under no circumstances is sexual violence permissible or acceptable in Australia, nor ... in my view to mainstream Muslim teaching."

However Mr Hamza, also known as Samir Mohtadi and a man who has previously spoken out strongly against terrorism, would not offer further comment on his views.

However, in his lecture advising how Muslims should live in Australia he attacked secular Australian society.

"The Australian community is in desperate need for me and you (Muslims), the Australian community is in a state of loss, they don't know how to enjoy themselves," Mr Hamza, the head of the Islamic Information and Services Network of Australasia, told his congregation.

His comments have been condemned by the Islamic Women's Welfare Council of Victoria and Muslim community leaders including Yasser Soliman.

"To claim this is Islamic, or that the Koran forces wives to do things such as (Mr Hamza's) lectures suggest, is quite insulting to most of the Muslim world," Mr Soliman said.

Newsflash Mr Soliman: the Koran (4:34) says, "Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them."

And your prophet Muhammad said: "If a husband calls his wife to his bed (i.e. to have sexual relations) and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning." -- Bukhari 4.54.460.

In another hadith, Muhammad says: "By him in Whose Hand lies my life, a woman can not carry out the right of her Lord, till she carries out the right of her husband. And if he asks her to surrender herself (to him for sexual intercourse) she should not refuse him even if she is on a camel's saddle." -- Ibn Majah 1854.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Actually it's that old black magic, not the jihad, that has stirred them to action.

"Saudi Religious Police Get Tough on Black Magic," by Khaled al Oweigan for Asharq Alawsat, January 22 (thanks to Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi):

Riyadh, Asharq Al-Awsat- Sources within the Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice [CPVPV] in Saudi Arabia have revealed to Asharq Al-Awsat that the CPVPV will move to combat magic and those who practice it, and regulate the exercise of legitimate spiritual healing, by instituting a system designed to deal with such practices which are against Islamic Shariaa Law.

Sources close to the CPVPV leadership in the Saudi capital of Riyadh revealed that a number of legal consultancies were studying the draft version and procedural guidelines of this project. Asharq Al-Awsat managed to obtain a copy of this draft which gives the police the right to deal with witches and sorcerers, and the means to identify and convict them.

A study of this project [to combat witchcraft and sorcery] was carried out by the Center for Research and Study which is affiliated to the CPVPV and which put a number of legal opinions on the table including; a definition of magic, witchcraft, divination, fortune-telling and other similar practices, a scientific definition to magical practices, and a model in order to help uncover such practices.

The study, also clarified the signs and symbols that can be used in the practice of magic, as well as the tools used to control magic, while also advising that a system of cooperation be initiated between the various authorities involved in this fight against such practices and those who perform them....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

WildersJan09.jpg

Outrage: "Dutch Lawmaker, Charged With Insulting Islam, Fears Prison Sentence" by Joel Mowbray for FoxNews, January 22 (thanks to Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi):

A member of parliament in the Netherlands who has been charged with "insulting" Muslims says he fears he will be found guilty and sent to prison in only a few months.

An appeals court on Wednesday overturned a previous decision by prosecutors not to charge Geert Wilders, and ordered that he stand trial.

"The decision of the court today was so strong that there is a real chance unfortunately that there will be a guilty verdict," Wilders told FOXNews.com. "In fact, it was so bluntly motivated that it already looks like a verdict instead of just ordering the public prosecutor to start a trial." [...]

A three-judge appeals panel on Wednesday ruled that Wilders' insults to Islam were so egregious that the principle of free speech was not sufficient defense.

"The court considers [Wilders' film] so insulting for Muslims that it is in the public interest to prosecute Wilders," a summary of the court's decision said. The court explained that Wilders' claims in "Fitna" and other media statements were "one-sided generalizations ... which can amount to inciting hatred."

Wilders on Wednesday defiantly stood by the public statements that could put him in prison.

"I lost my freedom already four and a half years ago in October 2004, when my 24-hour police protection started because of threats by Muslims in Holland and abroad to kill me," he said.

"So of course I don't want to go to jail as a criminal, but I don't fear losing my freedom since I already lost my freedom in 2004."

For several months, Wilders has been receiving pro bono assistance from a U.S.-based nonprofit called the Legal Project, whose aim is to protect free speech in what it says is a worldwide campaign to silence critics of "militant" Islam.

Middle East scholar Daniel Pipes founded the Legal Project following a slew of cases in which authors and activists were sued for alleged hate speech against Muslims and Islam, including several cases in the United States.

"The Legal Project helped me when I was in the United States, arranging meetings with important legal scholars and elected officials," Wilders told FOXNews.com. "They also helped bring public attention to my case, which hopefully will help me raise money for my legal defense fund."

Brooke Goldstein, a human rights attorney and director of the Legal Project, said Wilders' case indicates that free speech is increasingly under assault. "Geert Wilders could be going to jail for making admittedly harsh criticisms of Islam that actually echo statements made by Muslims," Goldstein said.

"Even if he prevails at trial, the damage to free speech will be done. Who wants to risk the time, cost and public harassment of a criminal trial?"

Goldstein said criminal prosecutions for hate speech or incitement are unlikely in the U.S. because of the First Amendment, but she said the mere threat of a lawsuit can stifle speech, especially when they concern corporations that must focus on turning a profit.

Even individuals participating in what they consider basic free-speech activities can find themselves in legal crosshairs, Goldstein said.

One Legal Project client is former CIA official and NYPD counterterrorism consultant Bruce Tefft, who was sued by a Muslim police officer for "workplace harassment" after he allegedly sent anti-Muslim e-mails to a voluntary recipient list of police officers.

Tefft is another man all free people should defend.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Will the world take note? What do you think? War Is Deceit Update: "Gazan doctor says death toll inflated," from Ynet, January 22 (thanks to all who sent this in):

What really is behind the numbers reported on the number of civilian casualties in the Gaza Strip? Italian newspaper Corriere Della Sera reported Thursday that a doctor working in Gaza's Shifa Hospital claimed that Hamas has intentionally inflated the number of casualties resulting from Israel's Operation Cast Lead. "The number of deceased stands at no more than 500 to 600. Most of them are youths between the ages of 17 to 23 who were recruited to the ranks of Hamas, who sent them to the slaughter," according to the newspaper article.

The doctor wished to remain unidentified, out of fear for his life.

A senior Palestinian Health Ministry official later denied the claims, and the Israel Defense Forces' estimate on the number of casualties in Gaza has also remained unchanged.

Despite the claims, the IDF stood behind its estimate that between 1,100 to 1,200 people were killed in the Strip during the fighting, more than two-thirds of them Hamas members.

The army initially believed that the number of civilian casualties was higher, as many Hamas men walked outside their houses dressed in civilian clothes, leaving their weapons at home.

Dr. Moaiya Hassanain, who is in change of the emergency department at the Palestinian Health Ministry in Gaza, denied the figures presented by the Italian paper.

Hassanain told Ynet that the Palestinian figures were issued cautiously, without any political considerations, and that several casualties may not have been reported as their bodies are still under the rubble or have not been handed over to the rescue forces and authorized medical officials.

'Mostly armed teenagers'

A Tal al-Hawa resident told the newspaper's reporter, "Armed Hamas men sought out a good position for provoking the Israelis. There were mostly teenagers, aged 16 or 17, and armed. They couldn't do a thing against a tank or a jet. They knew they are much weaker, but they fired at our houses so that they could blame Israel for war crimes."

The reporter for the Italian newspaper also quoted reporters in the Strip who told of Hamas' exaggerated figures, "We have already said to Hamas commanders – why do you insist on inflating the number of victims?"...

For propaganda's sake, Einstein.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Since al-Qaeda, indeed, many Muslims, are close followers of history, quick to point out the "historic crimes" of the West, while demanding satisfaction, here's a brief article demonstrating the ill-fate of Turkey's Christians: Who, O umma, shall pay for these crimes?

"FACTBOX: Christians in Turkey," from Reuters, January 21:

(Reuters) - Turkey is overwhelmingly Muslim but hosts several ancient Christian communities -- dwindling remnants of sizeable populations that prospered for centuries in the Muslim-led but multi-ethnic, multi-faith Ottoman Empire.
For the record, Turkey doesn't "host" these Christians; they are merely the remnant descendants of the original, and conquered, inhabitants of "Turkey," or "Anatolia."
They include Syriac Christians, Greek Orthodox, Armenians and Catholics. Modern Turkey was founded as a secular republic by Kemal Mustafa Ataturk on the empire's ashes in 1923.
Interestingly, why does this account begin with the 20th century? Why not begin with, say, the battle of Manzikert (1071), when the invading Seljuk Turks first gained major ground in Anatolia, annexing a major chunk from the Byzantines, and slaughtering Christians by the thousands?
Here are some details about Christians in Turkey:

* SOME HISTORY:

-- At the beginning of World War One, Christians still made up 20 percent of the population. However in May 1915, Ottoman commanders began mass deportation of Armenians from eastern Turkey thinking they might assist Russian invaders.

-- Thousands were marched from the Anatolian borders toward Syria and Mesopotamia (now Iraq) and Armenians say some 1.5 million died either in massacres or from starvation or deprivation as they were marched through the desert. There are some 70,000 Armenians left in Turkey. Turkey says large numbers of both Christian Armenians and Muslim Turks were killed during the violent and chaotic break-up of the Ottoman Empire. The number of Christians has now fallen to around 100,000 in a total population of more than 70 million.

OTHER POPULATIONS:

-- Syriacs number 20,000, the majority living in Istanbul. Syriacs migrated throughout the 20th century to Europe, fleeing first from persecution by the new secular republic, and later, from violence between Kurdish separatists rebels and the Turkish military in the southeast. Syriac Christians speak a form of Aramaic, the language of Jesus. They are not an officially designated minority in Turkey like the Greeks or Armenians, so have no special protection for rights such as private education under the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne's provisions for non-Muslim minorities.

-- Istanbul is the ancient seat of Orthodox Christianity but Greek Orthodox, who make up 20,000 of the population, often complain of discrimination and prejudice. Istanbul, the former Constantinople, was capital of the Greek-speaking Orthodox Christian Byzantine Empire for centuries until it fell to Muslim Ottoman Turks in 1453.

"Fell," as in, ruthlessly conquered, violated, ravaged, burned, subjugated, and so forth.
-- Turkey's 30,000 Catholics hope the government will return the St. Paul church, which was confiscated by the state in 1943, to Christian worshippers. It is used now as a museum.

-- St. Paul, the great evangelizer of the early Christian Church, was born in Tarsus in modern-day Turkey and Pope Benedict proclaimed 12 months of events to honor him in June 2008.

-- Pope Benedict made a sensitive, fence-mending visit to Turkey in November 2006 after he had sparked protests from the Muslim world with a speech that Muslims said portrayed Islam as a religion tainted by violence and irrationality.

-- He was praised for visiting Istanbul's famed Blue Mosque and praying there facing toward Mecca "like Muslims."

After Muslims had a fit that he might actually dare to pray in the Hagia Sophia -- yet another of Christendom's major churches, conquered and annexed by Muslim Turkey.
PROPERTY AND THEOLOGICAL DISPUTES

-- Under a reform long sought by the European Union that Ankara hopes to join, Turkey's parliament approved last year a law aimed at boosting the property rights of non-Muslim minorities. Turkish authorities have expropriated millions of dollars worth of property belonging to Christians or their churches, especially the Greek Orthodox, over the decades. The law would allow foundations to re-acquire some confiscated properties but not those sold on to third parties -- something that is unlikely to satisfy Christian communities. The EU has urged Turkey to create a comprehensive legal framework that allows all religious groups unrestricted freedom to operate. By law, Syriacs must attend state schools where teaching is in Turkish, but they can be taught about their own language and religion outside school hours. Brussels has raised concerns over restrictions on the training of Christian clergy in Turkey.

ATTACKS ON CHRISTIANS:

-- Turkey's Christian community has been targeted in a spate of attacks over several years, prompting concern among human rights groups and the European Union.

-- The stabbing of an Italian Catholic priest in 2007 highlighted the attacks. Also in 2007, three Christians were killed at a Bible-publishing house at the Zirve publishing house in Malatya, a city in the country's southeast region.

-- Andrea Santoro, another Italian Catholic priest, was shot dead in the Turkish Black Sea city of Trabzon in 2006.

-- Prominent Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink was killed in January 2007 in Istanbul by a young nationalist gunman. A prosecutor last month indicted a colonel for failing to provide protection for Dink, who had received death threats.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

al-libi.jpg
Abu Yahya al-Libi

This wolf, of course, is not a reference to itself, al-Qaeda, but rather Britain. Another indication that the terrorist organization has Britain in mind for its next major attack? "Al Qaeda figure calls for attacks on Britain," from Reuters, January 22:

DUBAI (Reuters) - A prominent leader of al Qaeda called for attacks in Western countries particularly Britain in retaliation for Israel's offensive in Gaza, arguing that London was behind the creation of the Jewish state.

"It's high time that this criminal country, I mean Britain, paid the price of its historic crime," Abu Yahya al-Libi said in a video posted on an Islamist website.

Well, then, since "historic crimes" still need to be paid for, what about the countless crimes committed in the name of Islam? What about the fact that nearly every single Muslim country today was conquered and colonized by Islam? Who shall pay for these "historic crimes"?
"There is no child who dies in Palestine ... without this being the outcome of the (country) that handed Palestine to the Jews ... Britain."

Libi, whose group was behind deadly attacks in Britain in 2005, is one of the top leaders of al Qaeda believed to be hiding in the border area between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Libi told British people to expect reprisals for the Israeli "annihilation campaign" in Gaza.

"We are not fooled by the policies of courtesy. A wolf is a wolf even dressed as lamb," he said in an apparent reference to demonstrations in Western countries calling for an end to the three-week Israeli offensive.

In the 31-minute video, Libi also repeated calls for attacks on other Western countries including the United States.

"Make them taste the bitterness of war and the tragedies of homelessness and the misery of horror," he said in a call to militant fighters. "They should not be secure while our people (Palestinians) are scared.

"O, mujahideen (holy strugglers) everywhere rise like an angered lion ... do what you can to make the infidel capitals of the West and America and the Arab Tyrants taste what our brothers and weak folks in Palestine have been tasting."

Libi praised a three-day rampage in Mumbai, India in November in which 183 people were killed by suspected Islamists who he called "heroes" and urged similar acts of retaliation.

Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden earlier this month called on Muslims to rise in a holy struggle against the Israeli offensive in Gaza and accused Arab leaders of collusion with Israel.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

susanne-winter.jpg

Free Speech Death Watch Update -- more on this story: "Austrian far-right legislator convicted of anti-Muslim incitement," from DPA, January 22 (thanks to Gudrun):

Vienna - Austrian far-right parliamentarian Susanne Winter was convicted Thursday of incitement because of her anti-Muslim statements, including the claim that Islam's prophet Mohammed was a paedophile.

Is truth no defense? Of course, the whole concept of pedophilia did not exist in Muhammad's day, but when he is taken as the supreme example of human conduct and imitated today, what results is...pedophilia. Muhammad's consummation of his marriage with Aisha when she was nine is in the hadith collection Muslims consider most reliable, Bukhari, several times: 5.48.234; 5.58.236; 7.62.64; 7.62.65; and 7.62.88.

What's more, it is clear that Muslims take this seriously and imitate Muhammad in this. Article 1041 of the Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran states that girls can be engaged before the age of nine, and married at nine: “Marriage before puberty (nine full lunar years for girls) is prohibited. Marriage contracted before reaching puberty with the permission of the guardian is valid provided that the interests of the ward are duly observed.”

The Ayatollah Khomeini himself married a ten-year-old girl when he was twenty-eight. Khomeini called marriage to a prepubescent girl “a divine blessing,” and advised the faithful: “Do your best to ensure that your daughters do not see their first blood in your house.”

Time magazine reported in 2001: "In Iran the legal age for marriage is nine for girls, fourteen for boys. The law has occasionally been exploited by pedophiles, who marry poor young girls from the provinces, use and then abandon them. In 2000 the Iranian Parliament voted to raise the minimum age for girls to fourteen, but this year, a legislative oversight body dominated by traditional clerics vetoed the move. An attempt by conservatives to abolish Yemen’s legal minimum age of fifteen for girls failed, but local experts say it is rarely enforced anyway. (The onset of puberty is considered an appropriate time for a marriage to be consummated.)"

The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) reports that over half of the girls in Afghanistan and Bangladesh are married before they reach the age of eighteen. In early 2002, researchers in refugee camps in Afghanistan and Pakistan found half the girls married by age thirteen. In an Afghan refugee camp, more than two out of three second-grade girls were either married or engaged, and virtually all the girls who were beyond second grade were already married. One ten-year-old was engaged to a man of sixty.

And it's a good thing that this Saudi "marriage officiant" isn't in Austria, or he could face charges also, for saying the same thing. But how many Muslims are in Austria now who believe that Muhammad consummated his marriage with Aisha when she was nine, and that that was perfectly fine? And why isn't the Austrian state going to prosecute them?

A court in Winter's home town of Graz also found the 51-year-old politician guilty of humiliating a religion.

How can you humiliate a religion? A religion has feelings?

She was sentenced to a fine of 24,000 euros (31,000 dollars) euros and a suspended prison term of three months, Austrian news agency APA reported.

The politician, who took a seat in parliament last fall for the Freedom Party (FPOe), made the anti-Islamic remarks in January 2008.

She also proposed in a discussion with students that Muslim men should commit bestiality rather than making "indecent advances" on girls.

Re bestiality, see Mark Steyn here.

The politician had pleaded innocent Thursday, claiming that she "did not want to insult anyone, but only to point out problems."

The verdict is not yet legally binding....

Not yet legally binding? Until what?


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Neo-Nazi/Jihadist Alliance Update: we have noted that jihadists and Nazis have a natural affinity several times over the years -- for example, see here about the Aryan Nations calling Islam "our ally." Of course, some observers today are haunted by the specter of pro-Israel neo-Nazis, but back in the real world, actual neo-Nazis hate Jews and admire Islam and jihad, as did Hitler himself.

"Neo-Nazis plan Gaza 'Holocaust' vigil in Berlin," by Benjamin Weinthal for the Jerusalem Post, January 21 (thanks to Pamela):

The National Democratic Party (NPD), a German neo-Nazi party, announced on its Web site Monday that it will hold a solemn vigil on January 27 in downtown Berlin to "stop the Israeli holocaust in the Gaza Strip."

Hatred of Jews and Israel has over the years, particularly since the Second Lebanon War in 2006, unified diverse political groups in Germany, ranging from members of the German Left Party to pro-Hizbullah and pro-Hamas Islamists, to the NPD. Members of the Left Party, which is the fourth largest party in the Bundestag, with 54 deputies, marched in anti-Israeli demonstrations over the last three weeks in which protesters called for the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews and Israelis. [...]

"Joint hatred of everything Jewish is unifying neo-Nazis and Islamists... German-Palestinians protestors unashamedly admitted that they would vote for the NPD during the next election," Charlotte Knobloch, the head of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, warned in her speech at a pro-Israel rally earlier this month in Munich.

Knobloch noted that the alliance between Nazis and the Palestinians was not new and that in 1941 Adolf Hitler met the grand mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Muhammad Amin al-Husseini, to secure his support for the Holocaust.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Mottaki said Washington must change Bush administration policies that he described as 'based on warmongering, occupation, bullying and unfair relations.'" Iran, you see, need do nothing to improve relations with the United States. It is playing the victim, and demanding adjustments from Washington -- and the President is likely to play into the mullahs' hands in this.

"Iran: Obama must seek 'new' Mideast foreign policy," by Lee Keath for Associated Press, January 21 (thanks to all who sent this in):

CAIRO, Egypt – Iran said Wednesday it is "ready for new approaches" from President Barack Obama as, across the Islamic world, countries cautiously welcomed his promise of mutual respect between the U.S. and Muslims.

Despite the reception, it remained clear that Iran and postwar Gaza will pose early tests of Obama's inauguration speech offer to the Muslim world to "extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist." [...]

Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki struck a moderate tone soon after Obama's inaugural address, telling the country's state-run English language network, Press TV, "We are ready for new approaches by the United States."

Obama has not been specific on what incentives Washington might offer to end the deadlock between the two countries. Mottaki said Tehran was waiting for "practical policies" from the Obama administration before making any specific judgments.

In what may have been a suggestion for improving relations, Mottaki said that if Washington formally requests to open a diplomatic office in Tehran, Iran would study the idea. The U.S. has not had any diplomatic mission in Iran since the seizure of the American Embassy and hostage crisis during Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution.

Mottaki said Washington must change Bush administration policies that he described as "based on warmongering, occupation, bullying and unfair relations."

"A new Middle East is in the making. The new generation in this region seeks justice and rejects domination," Mottaki said, according to the state news agency IRNA. [...]

Jihadists were thrilled by the Inaugural Address:

"We do welcome these comments. We can also anticipate good hope provided Obama really takes a new course of action toward injustices the Muslim world is facing at this moment," Qazi Hussain Ahmed, the head of Jamaat-e-Islami, a major hard-line Islamist party in Pakistan, told The Associated Press by phone.

Many were struck simply by Obama's tone.

"This man is not going to divide the world into good and evil, he won't describe Muslims as terrorists and he won't turn America into a global gangster," said Gamal Wafa, an Egyptian engineer who watched Obama speech on Al-Jazeera TV.

No matter what Muslims do in the name of Islam, Islam and terrorism have nothing to do with one another. Get that into your head -- or else.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This message was sent to UN Ambassadors in Geneva today by David G. Littman:

URGENT APPEAL TO AMBASSADORS to condemn now the announced Iranian Defamation of UN Commemoration Day for Victims of the Holocaust (27 Jan. 2009)

* * * * *

Email message to Ambassadors and Permanent Missions to the United Nations in Geneva

With attached “APPEAL” to Sec-Gen. / Dir-Gen. / Pres. CHR / UNCHR / Dir-Gen. UNESCO

Request: A joint URGENT ACTION (or several) this week – before Tuesday, 27 January 2009

Respectfully, David G. Littman Historian, M.A. (T.C.D.) NGO representative to the United Nations in Geneva: Association for World Education; World Union for Progressive Judaism

* * * * *

ASSOCIATION FOR WORLD EDUCATION
WORLD UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM

Urgent APPEAL
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
UN Director-General Sergei Ordzhonikidze
UNHRC President Martin I. Uhomoibhi
UNHCHR Nevanethem Pillay
UNESCO Director-General Koïchiro Matsuura

* * * * *

International Commemoration Day: Victims of the Holocaust: 27 January 2009

20 January 2009

Your Excellencies,

As reported by Reuters from Teheran on Sunday, two days ago (18 January 2008: 16:53):

A student-linked Iranian publisher plans to launch English – and Arabic – language versions of a book of caricatures and satirical writings about the Holocaust (…). The book deals with the "big historical distortion" of the Holocaust and the English and Arabic editions would be published at a ceremony in Tehran later this month when a message from Ahmadinejad wouldbe read out, Fars News Agency said. It appeared to be translations of a book which official media in September said had been published about the "fiction" of the Holocaust. "The presentation ceremony will be held on Jan. 27 ... with the attendance of a number of government officials," said Mohammad-Mehdi Hemmati, who is involved in the project. (…)

Iran's IRNA news agency said in September the book had 52 caricatures plus satirical writings over 108 pages. It was published by Martyr Shahbazi Publications and the Islamic student movement of the Science and Industry University. (...) Iran staged an international competition and exhibition of cartoons about the Holocaust in 2006.

* * * * *

On 26 October 2005, at a conference on "The World without Zionism" in Teheran, President Muhammad Ahmadinejad demanded that Israel be "wiped off the map." He also menaced all peacemakers: "Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation’s fury."

The Iranian president’s call was part of a prepared address. His statement was not an emotional ad hoc addition as a response to a chanting crowd, but an element in a world view that denies the possibility of any peaceful coexistence with the State of Israel. In the same speech, he provided an Islamic historical overview: "The establishment of the Zionist regime was a move by the world oppressor against the Islamic world. The skirmishes of the occupied land are part of a war of destiny. The outcome of hundreds of years of war will be defined in Palestinian land." Since then, he and other Iranian leaders have expressed similar views – in total contradiction with article II (4) of the UN Charter – while promoting, with the OIC, “Dialogue" and an "Alliance of Civilizations".

A week before this solemn moment – the International Day of Commemoration in Memory of the Victims of the Holocaust – we appeal to you to heed the words and the constant acts of the Iranian President’s "direct and public incitement" for the annihilation of a Member State – punishable under article IV of the Genocide Convention. Article III states: "the following acts shall be punishable: (a) Genocide; (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide; (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide; (d) Attempt to commit genocide; (e) Complicity in genocide."

Those who drafted the 1948 Convention on the Prevention of Genocide had in memory the long incitement to hatred against the Jews by the Nazi leadership. Few took the Nazis seriously in the mid-1930s and did not foresee that hate constantly repeated would lead to systematic genocide. This book of caricatures and satirical writings on the Holocaust is more writing on the wall.

Yours respectfully,
René Wadlow
David G. Littman
Representatives of the AWE and the WUPJ to the United Nations Office in Geneva


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

aqsaparvezgrave2.jpg
So it shall remain, at least for now

Some time ago Pamela Geller began to take up a collection to provide honor killing victim Aqsa Parvez with a headstone -- at present Aqsa lies in an unmarked grave, plot #774 in Meadowvale Cemetery in Brampton, Ontario. I joined Pamela in this effort, which was a chance to honor Aqsa personally and to show those who commit honor killings that we in the West will not acquiesce in their devaluing and destruction of these human beings, and attempt even to erase their memories.

As things have developed, however, the family has (predictably enough) been dragging its feet, and the fact that the Islamic Society of North America owns all the land surrounding the gravesite prevents us from placing a monument near Aqsa's grave. Pamela explains, and sets out an alternative way to honor Aqsa:

First off let me thank all of the fine and decent infidels who contributed so generously to the Aqsa Parvez memorial fund.

Robert Spencer and I have pursued the headstone marker furiously. We approved the headstone back on December 23rd (here), The bottom line is that the family (her alleged murderers) has to "sign off" on it. We are still waiting for them to look at the headstone. Clearly they are the obstacle. We have tried to pursue purchasing a plot near, around or in the vicinity of her unmarked grave. The Islamic Society owns them all. *sigh*.

Here is the last exchange with the cemetery:

Hi Pamela,

I just had a conversation with my boss and the conclusion is that the only option to memorialize Aqsa is the marker for her grave. We do not have a Memorial tree option and the land on Section 17 does not allow for a bench as you need a large open space for it and the section does not have that space.

Thanks,

Philip

********************

Philip, The family is not going to memorialize this girl. She has shamed the family. Sharia law will not allow this girl a headstone. Am I to understand that if the family does not sign off on the headstone that the cemetery in this free, western nation will submit to the barbarity of a misogynist barbaric code and allow this girl to rot in an unmarked grave? Yours in liberty, Pamela Geller

I refuse to be subjugated by the inhumanity of these barbaric "customs". One of my readers is scouting other locations in and around where Aqsa lived. I have also asked one of Aqsa's close friends if Aqsa had a favorite spot. She wrote, "I'm sure we can plant a tree or ............ maybe start an Aqsa foundation against abuse towards women within the family, call it Aqsa's wings or something... I'm sure we can think of something = ) Or if we plant a tree or a bench by Lakeshore in Mississauga to represent her free spirit and refreshing personality, kind of like the lakeshore in summer. The waves are always coming and going and it gives off the refreshing breeze."

My preference is to plant 16 trees (Aqsa was 16 years old when she was murdered) and 18 more (chai for life) in Israel overlooking Jerusalem. I would love to plant a grove, but it's $5,000, and I ain't got that much green ......

The Jewish National Fund plants these trees (here).

I would donate whatever monies left over to Geert Wilders' legal defense fund. Robert Spencer, who has worked with me on the initiative to memorialize Aqsa from the beginning, loves the idea of a tree-planting dedicated to Aqsa, and also supports donating any remaining money to a defense fund for Wilders.
Let me know your thoughts on this.................

More on Aqsa's terrible story here.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

SupportWilders.jpg

The International Free Press Society was established on January 1, 2009, with the Danish scholar Lars Hedegaard and the intrepid Diana West as Vice President. You can read its policy statement here. The Board of Advisors includes Asger Aamund, Bat Ye’or, Stephen Coughlin, Rachel Ehrenfeld, David Harris, Ole Hasselbalch, Hans Jansen, Ehsan Jami, Ibn Warraq, Philippe Karsenty, Roger Kimball, Ezra Levant, Andrew C. McCarthy, Nidra Poller, Kathy Shaidle, Roger Scruton, Mark Steyn, Allen West, Geert Wilders -- and me.

Here is a press release from The International Free Press Society about the Wilders prosecution:

January 22, 2009 - Washington, DC and Copenhagen, Denmark: A Dutch court yesterday ordered the criminal prosecution of Geert Wilders, Dutch parliamentarian and leader of the Freedom Party (PVV), for his statements - written, spoken and filmed -regarding Islam. The Amsterdam Court of Appeals has deemed such statements “insulting,” declaring that they “substantially harm the religious esteem” of Muslims.

Clearly, the effect of this Dutch court order is to set new limits to public debate in Dutch society, in this case about the highly controversial but nonetheless crucially important subject of Islam. This makes the prosecution of Geert Wilders an unacceptable breach of the sanctity of freedom of speech in Western society.

Having ordered a criminal prosecution for the opinions of a duly elected leader of a legitimate political party, Dutch authorities have dealt a devastating blow to political expression. While Dutch prosecutors prepare their indictment and Geert Wilders’ future hangs in limbo, who in The Netherlands will dare discuss political and cultural matters related to Islam - Islamic law, Islamic integration, Islamic crime, Islamic policy - openly, freely and fearlessly? The chilling effect is instantaneous. If, indeed, Wilders is ultimately convicted, free speech will cease to exist in the heart of Europe.

The International Free Press Society believes this court-ordered prosecution against Geert Wilders, a central figure in the fight against the Islamization of the West, amounts to a dangerous concession to the strictures of Islamic law, which prohibits all criticism of Islam, over Western traditions of, and rights to robust and unfettered debate. As such, it is tantamount to a surrender to totalitarian influences that undermine all Western freedoms. And as such, it must be resisted.

It is important to recall recent history. Two Dutchmen, Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh, have been murdered for their outspoken opposition to Islamization in The Netherlands. Another Dutch politician, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, has been infamously forced into exile. Wilders alone now carries this debate over Islam in Dutch society forward - forcefully but logically, outspokenly but reasonably, and always peacefully. In order to do so, this member of Dutch parliament lives in a virtual prison, consigned to 24-hour guard by Islamic death threats against his life. Now, Dutch authorities have ordered him to be prosecuted for the Orwellian crime of committing “insulting” words.

As Wilders puts it, “If I have to stand trial, I will not stand trial alone, but also with the hundreds of thousands of Dutch people who reject the Islamization of The Netherlands.” He will also stand trial with those in The Netherlands and beyond who reject government prosecutions of free speech. In recognition of this this dire situation, the IFPS immediately calls on every supporter of free speech to come to the aid of Geert Wilders.To assist in this effort, the IFPS has launched an international campaign in defense of Geert Wilders and his freedom of speech.

To support these efforts, we urge you to contribute to the Geert Wilders Defense Fund. Donation information can be found at the IFPS website.

We also urge defenders of free speech to sign this letter of protest against the Dutch Government
http://www.petitiononline.com/wilders/petition.html


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Abbas, you will recall, is "moderate" in the eyes of the world because he wants to destroy Israel more slowly than Hamas does.

Another from our Not An Auspicious Beginning file: "President Obama's first call 'was to President Abbas,'" by Tom Baldwin in the Times, January 22 (thanks to all who sent this in):

President Obama placed the Middle East at the forefront of his first hours in office yesterday as he sought to make good on his promise of “ushering in a new era of peace”.

In a flurry of telephone calls from the Oval Office, he reached out to leaders in the region and vowed to engage immediately in pursuit of a permanent Arab-Israeli settlement.

The spokesman for President Abbas revealed that Mr Obama had told the Palestinian leader that their conversation was his first with a foreign statesman since taking office. Mr Obama also spoke to President Mubarak of Egypt, Ehud Olmert, the Israeli Prime Minister, and King Abdullah of Jordan.

Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary, said that the talks with Middle East leaders underlined a “commitment to active engagement in pursuit of Arab-Israeli peace from the beginning of his term”. He added: “In the aftermath of the Gaza conflict, he emphasised his determination to work to help consolidate the ceasefire by establishing an effective anti-smuggling regime to prevent Hamas from rearming, and facilitating, in partnership with the Palestinian Authority, a major reconstruction effort.”...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And closing Gitmo within a year.

From our growing Not An Auspicious Beginning file: "Obama Issues Directives on Detainees, Interrogation, Guantanamo," from FOXNews, January 22 (thanks to all who sent this in):

WASHINGTON -- President Obama, putting his executive pen in his left hand to overrule eight years of Bush administration policy, signed "several" executive orders Thursday, including ones affecting national security and abortion.

The national security orders mandate that interrogation techniques in the Army Field Manual be used by all intelligence and law enforcement services; call for a task force to look at closing the detention center in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, within the year; and order a strategy be developed for handling detainees in the future. The presidential directive also orders a stay in the case of Ali Al-Marri, the only person being held by the military as an enemy combatant on U.S. soil.

The executive order says everyone in custody should be questioned under the Army Field Manual, which is intended for honorable combatants, meaning POWs in a military conflict. The rule would prevent trained interrogators at the CIA from using lawful interrogation techniques against terrorists who have been trained to withstand Army Field Manual techniques.

According to sources in the law enforcement community, the executive order on interrogation does not declare "enhanced interrogation techniques" to be torture; the order is silent on that.

"This allows for a lot of flexibility, a lot of wiggle room," said one source.

While the administration has insisted on one interrogation standard, one source says they are thinking about assembling a group within the next 60 days to make recommendations on a set of separate techniques for the intelligence community to use.

White House counsel Greg Craig acknowledged late Wednesday that the administration will have to establish a panel to make recommendations to address intelligence community concerns.

Separately, according to a draft of the Guantanamo order, "the prompt disposition" of detainee cases should "precede" the closure of the Guantanamo Bay prison. Whether that means the detainees have to be tried if possible before the closure is still unclear....

Where will they put them? Anyone volunteer to put one of them up?


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From the Freedom Party:

The Freedom Party (PVV) and Geert Wilders are faced with an all-out assault. Exploding legal expenses might cripple the continuation of the battle for our liberties. The survival of the Freedom Party and Geert Wilders’s struggle for the defense of the West are now in jeopardy.

Therefore, we need your financial support urgently.

There are three ways you can donate money.

1. Via Paypal. More information on www.geertwilders.nl.

2. Support our Foundation. Stichting Vrienden van de PVV,

bank account : 67.04.72.344

Internationals donators add: IBAN: NL98 INGB 0670 4723 44

BIC: INGBNL2A

3. Send a cheque to: Stichting Vrienden van de PVV, PO Box 20018, zip code: 2500 EA The Hague, The Netherlands.

www.geertwilders.nl

Why does Geert Wilders need support, and why should you support him? See here.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"In Defense of Wilders" -- at FrontPage this morning, Jamie Glazov interviews me about the case against Geert Wilders.

FP: Robert Spencer, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

Spencer: Thank you Jamie.

FP: Geert Wilders is being put on trial by the Dutch Court of Appeals in Amsterdam for making anti-Islamic statements. Tell us what this charge is about and the ramifications if Wilders loses.

Spencer: The charge is essentially that he has insulted Islam and Muslims, and engaged in hate speech. Hate speech, of course, is in the eye of the beholder, and hate speech laws are tools in the hands of the powerful that they can use to silence the powerless and crush dissent.

And make no mistake: even though the Muslims in the Netherlands and elsewhere in the West present themselves as embattled victims of racism and "Islamophobia," that is exactly what is going on here: this is just one part of the 57-government Organization of the Islamic Conference's efforts to silence speech that they deem critical of Islam -- including "defamation of Islam" that goes under the "pretext" of "freedom of expression, counter terrorism or national security."

If they succeed in doing this, we will be rendered mute, and thus defenseless, in the face of the advancing jihad and attempt to impose Sharia on the West -- in fact, one of the key elements of the laws for dhimmis is that they are never critical of Islam, Muhammad, or the Qur'an, so this initiative not only aids the advance of Sharia in the West, but is itself an element of that advance.

FP: So if this attempt to silence the truth about Islam succeeds, who exactly, at this stage, “will be rendered mute”? If the totalitarians get their way, who will be silenced? Tell us what boundaries this affects.

Spencer: Well, when the Organization of the Islamic Conference specifies that they consider defamatory even speech about Islam that goes under the rubric of "counter terrorism or national security," they are trying to stop counterterrorism analysts from studying and discussing the motives and goals of Islamic jihad terrorists. The ones who will be rendered mute will be the ones who we most need to speak: those who understand why the jihadists are attacking us, what they hope to accomplish, and what kind of society they envision.

Since the answers to all those questions and others lead back again and again to core texts and teachings of Islam, the only ones who will benefit from our remaining in ignorance about those answers will be the jihadists themselves, who will be able to continue their work unimpeded by interference from those who understand them and can thus formulate effective ways to oppose them.

The enemies of free speech who are trying to destroy Wilders at this point also wish to silence any critical discussion about Islam in the public square, in accord with Sharia norms. If they get their way here, it will come through the UN, and through President Obama's determination to work closely with the UN and build bridges to Islamic countries.

FP: And free speech in the United States?


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"This was a clause to protect the Middle East. There seems to have been no thought about protecting the bank at all. If the clause is triggered at this level, the Middle East can lay claim to the whole bank."

Consider the implications of the possibility that large sectors of Western finance are controlled from the Middle East. As the jihad advances, where will the resources come from to resist it?

"Barclays may lose control to Gulf investors: Government dismay as state bail-out plan hamstrung by capital-raising clause that saw Gulf investors pump £5.3bn into bank," by Louise Armitstead and Philip Aldrick in the Telegraph, January 22 (thanks to TCS):

The Government is in talks with Barclays after the bank admitted that raising extra capital could trigger a clause that would deliver control to its Middle East investors.

Government insiders were last night reeling at the possibility that helping Barclays could see Britain's fourth biggest lender automatically delivered to the Middle East as the result of a little known clause agreed in the bank's October capital raising.

Sheikh Mansour Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, a member of the Abu Dhabi royal family, and two Qatari investment vehicles invested £5.3bn in the bank in October. In return, they took a series of complicated investment structures, the bulk of which were "mandatory convertible notes".

Under the terms of the deal, the investors have to wait seven months for delivery of the shares, which convert at 153.276p. However, if at any time until June 30 Barclays raises more capital at a lower price, the Middle East investors are able to take their stake at that lower level.

With Barclays' shares now at 66.1p, the bank would have to roughly triple the number of shares issued to Sheikh Mansour and the Qataris. Such a move would hand the Arab investors around 55pc of Barclays, effectively giving them control. With the warrants for an additional £3bn of "reserve capital instruments", their combined stake could rise to 67pc.

One insider said: "This was a clause to protect the Middle East. There seems to have been no thought about protecting the bank at all. If the clause is triggered at this level, the Middle East can lay claim to the whole bank."...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

He told Muslim men that they could beat their wives, in accord with Qur'an 4:34, but wouldn't you know it? His remarks were taken out of context!

"Samir Abu Hamza has told a confidant his message has been taken out of context and that he was referring to hitting wives in a metaphorical sense."

Wow! I've never heard that before! That makes it all make sense! Of course! He meant metaphorical wife-beating! You know, the kind of thing people mean when they say things like, "Wow, he really gave him a tongue-lashing," or "So-and-so should be publicly flogged," or "That's gonna leave a mark" or "Forty lashes with a wet noodle." Of course! How could the world have been so stupid! If only we would learn to quote these clerics, and the Qur'an, in context, everything would be all right, the global jihad and Islamic supremacism would vanish, and a new era of peace would dawn!

An update on this story.

"Wife-beating call was metaphoric: cleric," from AAP, January 22 (thanks to JE):

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Islamic leaders have condemned a Melbourne Muslim cleric who told followers it was permissible to hit their wives and force them to have sex.

But Coburg mosque cleric Samir Abu Hamza has told a confidant his message has been taken out of context and that he was referring to hitting wives in a metaphorical sense.

Mr Rudd told reporters Mr Hamza's comments had no place in modern Australia.

During a 2003 lecture also posted on the internet late last year, Mr Hamza told followers that under Islamic law, men could demand sex from their wives.

Despite Australian law requiring consent, it was impossible for a man to rape his wife even if she refused to have sex, he said.

"Under no circumstances is sexual violence permissible or acceptable in Australia - under no circumstances," Mr Rudd said.

"Under no circumstances are other forms of violence, physical violence, acceptable towards women in Australia nor are they acceptable in my view to mainstream Muslim teachings.

"Australia will not tolerate these sort of remarks. They don't belong in modern Australia, and he should stand up, repudiate them and apologise."

The President of the Islamic Council of Victoria (ICV) Ramzi Elsayed said he had spoken with Mr Hamza about the lecture, titled The Keys to a Successful Marriage.

"He told me he was speaking in a metaphorical sense," Mr Elsayed told AAP.

"In regards to hitting your wife, his position is that it has always been metaphorical - it's not a whack, it's not a slap, it's a wake-up call."

Now, I admit, when I have a 6AM flight and I'm getting a 3:30AM wake-up call in some fleabag hotel, it can feel like a beating. But still...

He said Islam did not condone violence against women or making a wife have sex with her husband against her will.

"Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them." -- Qur'an 4:34

Muhammad said: "If a husband calls his wife to his bed (i.e. to have sexual relation) and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning." -- Bukhari 4.54.460

"He believes he was taken out of context insofar as he was talking about people who censure their spouses - it was not so much a physical hit as a metaphorical one to say wake up, we're heading for a divorce kind-of-thing," Mr Elsayed said.

But the senior honorary legal adviser to the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils, Haset Seli, hit out at Mr Hamza, calling him a lunatic.

"His lecture was absolutely ludicrous, unIslamic and highlighted the ignorance of the man," Mr Seli told AAP.

He said anyone who thinks he can force his wife to have sex with him is a lunatic and certainly not a Muslim....

So will Seli be brought up on apostasy charges before the Islamic authorities in Australia, for implying that Muhammad the prophet of Islam was a lunatic? Naaaah. They know what he is up to.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Feel the love, in an update on this story. "Sudanese men deny murdering U.S. diplomat," from Reuters, January 21:

KHARTOUM (Reuters) – Two Sudanese men on Wednesday denied murdering a U.S. diplomat and his driver in Khartoum, but told a court they thought killing "American unbelievers" was honorable.
They are among five men accused of killing John Granville, a 33-year-old officer with the U.S. Agency for International Development, and his driver, Abdelrahman Abbas Rahama, 39.
Granville and Rahama were shot dead while returning home from New Year's Eve celebrations in Khartoum early on January 1 2008 in a crime that shocked Westerners in the capital, previously seen as one of Africa's safest cities.
"Killing American unbelievers is an honor, but I was not involved in this case," Mohamed Makkawi Ibrahim Mohamed told Khartoum north court.
A second defendant, Abdel Basit al-Hajj Hassan, echoed his statement.
A third defendant, former army officer Mohamed Osman Yusuf Mohamed, also denied taking part in the killing.
All three defendants said they had made earlier confessions to the crime under torture.
The judge is expected to cross-examine the two remaining defendants next week.
In earlier hearings, prosecutors said the men were religious extremists who had decided to attack foreigners in Sudan.
One of the remaining defendants admitted in a video-taped statement supplying the four others with weapons, but denied knowing anything about their plans.

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

January 21, 2009

ObamaPres.jpg
A nation of Christians and Muslims

The Inaugural Speech was thankfully sober and unsoaring, but it contained one phrase that disturbs.

That phrase is this:

"The United States is a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus and non-believers."

The traditional formulation has always paired "Christians" with "Jews" -- "Christians and Jews." Such a blatant change, then, in that traditional formulation is sure to attract notice. It invites inspection. It disturbs. The order in which these adherents of different faiths are named, and which is paired with the obviously, and rightly, dominant “Christians” (this country was both founded on Christian or, to include the Old Testament, Judeo-Christian principles, and owes its development right up to the present day to those same ideas, enshrined in our political and legal institutions which are, after all, the best thing America has to offer) both count.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A prominent feature among America's closest Muslim "friends-and-allies." "Pakistan: Do school texts fuel bias?" by Issam Ahmed for the Christian Science Monitor, January 21:

Lahore, Pakistan – As Pakistani Air Force jets circled the eastern border city of Lahore last week in a show of strength, journalist Rab Nawaz was despondent. But what occupied him was less the threat of war with India than the things his son had begun saying recently.

"My 7-year-old came home from school one day insisting that Indians are our natural-born enemies, that Muslims are good, and Hindus are evil," the widely traveled journalist recalls. "He asked about the relative strength of our air forces and insisted we would win if it came to war.[...]

All public schools must follow the government curriculum – one that critics say is inadequate at best, harmful at worst.

According to Pervez Hoodbhoy, a physics professor at Quaid-e-Azam University in Islamabad, the "Islamizing" of Pakistan's schools began in 1976 under the rule of the former dictator, the general Zia ul-Haq.

An act of parliament that year required all government and private schools (except those teaching the British O-levels from Grade 9) to follow a curriculum that includes learning outcomes for the federally approved Grade 5 social studies class such as: "Acknowledge and identify forces that may be working against Pakistan," "Make speeches on Jihad," "Collect pictures of policemen, soldiers, and national guards," and "India's evil designs against Pakistan."

"It sounds like the blueprint for a religious fascist state," says Professor Hoodbhoy. "You have a country where generations have grown up believing they are surrounded on all sides by enemies, they are the only righteous ones, and the world is out to get them."[...]

An Islamist alphabet chart published in this month's Newsline shows Urdu letters accompanied by guns, daggers, and a depiction of planes crashing into the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001. The chart is not approved by the government. But it is, the article claims, in use by "by some regular schools as well as madrassahs associated with the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam, an Islamic political party that had allied itself with General Musharraf." The Ministry of Education says there are 1.5 million students in 13,000 madrassahs acquiring a parallel religious education.

Critics also complain about insensitivity toward minorities. A section on Christian festivities in the Federal Ethics textbooks had been removed, according to a Daily Times report from 2006 titled "O Jesus, where art thou?" Hindu and Sikh festivals were mentioned only fleetingly.

In the latest edition of Pakistan Studies for Grades 9-10, approved by the Punjab textbook board, all mention of non-Muslim festivals of Pakistan had been removed. Hindus and Christians make up about 5 percent of the population of more than 170 million.

In 2007, two Pakistani students at Middlebury College, Hamza Usmani and Shujaat Ali Khan, embarked on a review of all state-sanctioned texts in a project called "Enlightened Pakistan."

They enlisted contacts ranging from seniors in high school to teachers. The bulk of their report (www.enlightenedpakistan.org), targets poor teaching in sciences, languages, and math. But in social sciences and history, they found "disturbing" themes like "Pakistan is for Muslims alone," "The world is collectively scheming against Pakistan and Islam," and "Muslims are urged to fight Jihad against the infidels."

The report notes that the textbooks routinely engage in historical revisionism and place questions designed to portray Hinduism as an inherently iniquitous religion: "There is no place for equality in Hinduism. Right/Wrong."

Mr. Usmani says the texts encourage illiberal worldviews and "dumb down" education. "No opposing views are presented, no differing ideas. It makes the population less intelligent," he says...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

It's a start. Much more must be done, and will be done.

To: The Dutch Government

WHEREAS Geert Wilders has exercised his fundamental human right of freedom of expression and spoken out, with facts and evidence, of the threat posed by radical Islam;

WHEREAS certain elements within Islamic communities have threatened a boycott of Dutch goods if Geert Wilders is not punished by the Dutch government for exercising his freedom of expression; and

WHEREAS certain elements in Dutch industry and the Dutch government are suggesting that Geert Wilders be prosecuted civilly or criminally, in order to prevent such a boycott;

IT IS RESOLVED that, in the event that the Dutch government attempts, in any way, to punish or prosecute Geert Wilders, civilly or criminally, for exercising his freedom of expression, the undersigned will initiate a boycott of any and all Dutch goods.

Sign here.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Just today I was saying on a radio show that the ACLU hasn't gone after the Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy with the same energy that they have devoted to driving Christian prayer out of public schools. Well, I stand corrected, and am glad of it.

"ACLU to sue TIZA charter school in Twin Cities," by Randy Furst and Sarah Lemagie for the Star Tribune, January 21 (thanks to Looney Tunes):

The American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota said it will file suit today against a publicly funded charter school, alleging that it is promoting the Muslim religion and that it is leasing school space from a religious organization, the Muslim American Society of Minnesota, without following state law.

The suit was to be filed this afternoon in U.S. District Court against Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy, known as TIZA, and the Minnesota Department of Education, which the ACLU says is at fault for failing to uncover and stop the alleged transgressions. The suit names the department and Alice Seagren, the state education commissioner, as co-defendants.

The department investigated the Twin Cities school last year, and the school said it had taken corrective actions in response to concerns about the practicing of religion in the school. TIZA officials have previously said they are in compliance with federal and state regulations.

In May, Asad Zaman, TIZA's director, said the state inquiry vindicated the school's position.

"I now have proof that this is not a religious school," Zaman said at the time. He is one of the defendants, as is Islamic Relief USA, a California non-profit organization and TIZA's sponsor.

But the ACLU claims the school is using federal and state money to promote religion in violation of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The state ACLU said that the suit was being filed after a lengthy investigation by the organization.

"TIZA has received millions of dollars of taxpayer money to support what is, in essence, a private religious school," said Charles Samuelson, state ACLU executive director.

The school, which has one campus in Inver Grove Heights and a smaller site in Blaine, had about 430 K-8 students last year, most of them Muslim. The public charter school, founded in 2003, receives per-pupil funding from the state that the ACLU said is expected to total $3.8 million for the current school year.

Samuelson said the school took government aid money and paid it to a holding company which then donated it to the Muslim American Society of Minnesota.

That is, the Muslim Brotherhood, the group dedicated in its own words to "eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within."

The money was used to pay for rent, according to the suit. He said that the school, holding company and the society were all incorporated on the same day by the same people, which Samuelson said was a conflict of interest. "They created legal fictions, but it's the same organization," Samuelson said.

The suit also alleges that there are prayers on the walls of the school entry and that teachers have participated in student prayer activities, which is forbidden in public schools. Samuelson said the school has used its website to seek volunteers to lead prayers. He also said that students and staff are required to dress in attire that conforms to Islamic religion.

The school has issued a handbook instructing staff to not discuss what goes on at the school, Samuelson said. "You cannot have a broad secrecy oath" in a school funded with public dollars, he said.

The ACLU investigation was prompted by a column about the school's practices by Katherine Kersten, a columnist for the Star Tribune, Samuelson said. The column by the conservative writer was recently discontinued.

Samuelson acknowledged that he has heard that the school has made changes, but he said he has not seen any documentation to support the claim. He said he was not asking that the school go out of business.

"They may choose to become an Islamic school. That would be fine and we would defend their right to do it," but they would have to do so without public funding, he said. "Or they could choose to follow state law and change some of their procedures. That would be fine as well." [...]

In May, the Minnesota Department of Education ordered the school to change the way it handled student prayer and busing.

The school was allowing students and teachers to attend 30-minute Friday prayers on school grounds. The state said those prayers could burden non-praying students, take up too much class time and give students the impression that the school endorsed Islam.

The state also took issue with the fact that TIZA did not provide busing immediately after classes. Instead, the school waited until the end of after-school activities, including a religious studies course run by the Muslim American Society that more than half the students took last year.

In response to the state's concerns, TIZA said in August that it would shorten the Friday prayers and have teachers who wanted to pray go to a separate room, but it said some staff members would still join the students to ensure their safety. The school said an "overwhelming majority" of parents liked the school's later bus schedule, but said it would reimburse families who wanted to arrange earlier transportation.

State education officials said at the time that the changes may satisfy the law, adding that they would visit the school again.

But the ACLU says the changes are not enough to bring the school into compliance with constitutional requirements.

School attempts to play the victim, predictably enough:

School officials said they received death and arson threats, as well as harassing anti-Muslim messages, after public scrutiny intensified last spring. Police increased patrols in response, and the school put in a security buzzer at the door....

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

First, the Taliban gave a deadline before it started blowing schools up; now it's giving men in the Swat Valley a "grow-your-beards" deadline. And yet, for all the Taliban's evident intolerance and totalitarianism, some U.S. "experts" suggest we have "talks" with these Islamic terrorists.

"Stop shaving beards: Taliban's edict for Swat men," from the Hindu, January 21:

Islamabad (PTI): Days after banning girls' education in the troubled northwestern Swat valley [by blowing schools up], the Pakistani Taliban has directed men in the region to wear Muslim skull caps and stop shaving their beards.

In an edict issued on Tuesday, the militants set January 25 as the deadline for the residents to start wearing caps and growing beards.

They said that after the expiry of the January 25 deadline, no man would be allowed to trim his beard as the Taliban were trying to establish a "complete Islamic society".

"The move was in the best interest of the people," they said.

The step is being seen as part of the Taliban's efforts to implement their self-styled Islamic laws in Swat, located just 160 kms from Islamabad.

Taliban have already issued a diktat to the barbers in the valley to resist from shaving and trimming beards, following which all the barbers have displayed posters saying "Shaving is banned" at their salons.

Earlier, the militants have banned girls' education from January 15. Some 400 private schools in the Swat valley of the North West Frontier Province closed down last week.

In the wake of the ban, the Taliban have destroyed at least seven more schools in Swat, including two that were blown early this morning.

The total number of schools torched or blown up by the militants has risen to nearly 190. The education of about 100,000 students, including 45,000 girls, has been affected by the destruction of these schools.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More on this story. "U.S. Army War College Publishes Apologia for Hamas," from IPT, January 21:

The U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) published a monograph last month by Sherifa Zuhur entitled, "Hamas and Israel: Conflicting Strategies of Group-Based Politics," a fairly bland heading that only hints at its deeply disturbing content. This monograph is more accurately described as an apologia for Hamas, a violent Islamist organization dedicated to jihad and the destruction of the State of Israel. Hamas was first designated by the United States (U.S.) government as a terrorist organization in 1995 by a presidential executive order and then again as a foreign terrorist organization (FTO) in 1997. Hamas has remained on the FTO list ever since. The essay also consistently demonizes Israel and its legitimate defense of national sovereignty under international law.

The U.S. Army War College is an official educational facility of the Department of Defense, and is accredited by the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff. The mission of the Carlisle, Pennsylvania-based War College is to prepare its students for strategic leadership positions in the U.S. military and senior levels of civilian policymaking. American taxpayers fund the War College and its Strategic Studies Institute.

According to the monograph's forward (written by SSI Director Douglas C. Lovelace, Jr.), "Hamas and Israel" provides "an orientation to HAMAS and its base" that demonstrates how "efforts….to separate HAMAS from its popular support and network of social and charitable organizations…have not been effective in destroying the organization, nor in eradicating the will to resist among a fairly large segment of the Palestinian population."[1] The pronounced bias in support of Hamas and against the State of Israel that suffuses this monograph shows in the absence of any explanation for why Hamas would continue to be engaged in resistance of any sort through the end of 2008, much less incessant rocket attacks aimed at Israeli civilian population centers, more than three years after Israel withdrew completely from Gaza. Instead, key recommendations include the need for "Israel and the United States…to abandon their policies of non-negotiation and non-communication with HAMAS."[2] Additionally, according to Zuhur, Israel needs to "abandon the aspects of its new defensive strategy which are calculated to thwart peace efforts,"[3] by "[d]ismantling the settlements in the West Bank"[4] and recognizing what Zuhur calls "Hamas' political and strategic development"[5] instead of villainizing the group. She claims that "Israel could not tolerate Palestinian Arabs' resistance of their [sic] authority on the legal basis of denial of self-determination"[6] and slips in a stab at what she terms "Israel's rejection of all comprehensive peace offers by the Arabs."[7] Statements like these betray the actual purpose of this monograph: to criticize Israel for exercising its sovereign right to self-defense while giving Hamas a free pass for terrorist assaults that deliberately target Israel's civilian population. It should be noted that this monograph was published the very week that Israel launched Operation Cast Lead in the Gaza Strip on 27 December 2008.

American dedication to free speech should not extend to using taxpayer money to pay for a paean to Islamist terrorism, backed by shoddy research and written at what is supposed to be this nation's premier U.S. Army institute for national security research and analysis. Unfortunately, there is precedent at SSI for this genre of terrorist apologia. Sherifa Zuhur, an American citizen who is Research Professor of Islamic and Regional Studies at SSI, is the same author who penned an April 2008 SSI monograph, "Precision in the Global War on Terror: Inciting Muslims Through the War of Ideas."[...]


In publishing these two monographs by Sherifa Zuhur, the U.S. Army War College exposes itself to serious questions about its advocacy and promotion of views it knows or should have known are deeply inimical to U.S. national security interests. These two publications are each described on their title pages as "a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101."[20] But their author shills for a foreign terrorist organization. She attacks Israel, a friend and ally of the U.S. and an outpost of liberal democracy in the Middle East, which has been forced to fight jihadist efforts to destroy it for the entire 60 years of its existence. It is fine to present students with varying perspectives on a conflict, but when taxpayer money is used, a higher standard should be demanded. Congress should investigate why the US Army is funding papers supporting Hamas.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This should be good for a few billion more from the ever-gullible Americans. Pakistani Double Game Update: "Pakistan nets Al Qaeda man 'wanted for London attacks,'" by Rana Jawad for AFP, January 21 (thanks to Louis):

ISLAMABAD (AFP) – Pakistani forces on Wednesday arrested a Saudi, senior Al-Qaeda operative allegedly wanted in connection with the 2005 attacks on London in a lightning raid in the country's lawless tribal belt.

Security stormed a militant den in the northwestern city of Peshawar, capturing the operative and six other suspected militants, a senior Pakistani security official told AFP on condition of anonymity.

The official said the Al-Qaeda operative was wanted for the July 7, 2005 suicide bombings in London, and named him as Zabi ul Taifi.

"He's been arrested in the northwestern city of Peshawar this morning. The suspect has been shifted to Islamabad for interrogation," the official said.

"It was a well-planned raid carried out against a militant den. The culprits were caught off guard and captured without resistance," the official said.

Another security official described the Saudi national as a plotter of the July 7 bombings that killed 52 commuters in the English capital....

Pakistan rejects Western accusations that it is not doing enough to tackle the extremist threat within its own borders, where a wave of attacks carried out by fundamentalists have killed more than 1,500 people in 17 months....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

For all of al-Qaeda's talk that it will economically "bleed" the West dry, and that Allah is on "their" side, this story implies otherwise. If the West is limping, the Arab world appears to have been hobbled:

"Arabs lost $ 2.5 trillion from credit crunch: Kuwait," from Gulf in the Media, January 17:

Arab investors have lost $ 2.5 trillion from the credit crunch, Kuwaiti Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammad al-Sabah, whose country hosts an Arab economic summit next week, said yesterday.

The Arab world has lost $ 2.5 trillion in the past four months” as a result of the global financial crisis, Sheikh Mohammad told a press conference following a joint meeting of Arab foreign and finance ministers in Kuwait.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

WildersSpencer3.jpg
Wilders, Spencer: seven more needed

Ever think that one individual or one small group can't make a difference? Consider this: nine people in the Netherlands could be responsible for the final extinguishing of the freedom of speech in the West.

Conceivably, then, nine others could defeat the enemies of free speech and roll back the jihad.

"Dutch politician faces charges over anti-Islam film," from CNN, January 21 (thanks to all who sent this in):

AMSTERDAM, Netherlands (CNN) -- Dutch authorities will file charges against a lawmaker for inciting religious hatred in speeches and a film he made about Islam last year, an Amsterdam district prosecutor told CNN Wednesday.

Geert Wilders is a member of parliament for the right-wing Party for Freedom.

Prosecutors had originally decided not to press charges against Geert Wilders, 43, a member of parliament for the right-wing Party for Freedom.

"We thought a conviction would not be possible," prosecutor Otto Van Der Bijl told CNN. But nine people filed complaints with the Court of Appeal, he said. The court found there was a "reasonable suspicion that Mr. Wilders is guilty of the charges and the prosecution should in fact proceed." [...]

In deciding that Wilders should face charges, the Court of Appeal did not rule on the lawmaker's guilt or innocence, prosecutor Van Der Bijl said.

"The prosecutor's office is now working on an indictment," he said, adding that it could take months to complete.

Van Der Bijl said he did not expect Wilders to be arrested before he comes to trial.

The charges are "insulting groups of people" and "inciting hatred against people of a certain faith," related to his film and speeches, the prosecutor said....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

churchill.jpeg
Unelectable today

Times have changed, and not for the better. "PRESS RELEASE: Geert Wilders charged for agreeing with Churchill and Hitler about Islam," from SIOE (Stop Islamisation of Europe), January 21:

SIOE has no formal links with Geert Wilders’s PVV Party, but supports its efforts to stop the Islamisation of the Netherlands and Europe.

Today Churchill, the most stalwart anti-Nazi, would be arrested in Holland, whereas Hitler would be free to promote Islam unmolested.

As reported by the BBC, a Dutch court has ordered prosecutors to put elected politician Geert Wilders on trial for making anti-Islamic statements.

“The Amsterdam appeals court has ordered the prosecution of member of parliament Geert Wilders for inciting hatred and discrimination, based on comments by him in various media on Muslims and their beliefs,” the court said in a statement.

How things have moved to the worst since Europe defeated Nazism in 1945.

Nazi leader Himmler had this to say about Islam:-

“Muslims responded to the call of Muslim leaders and joined our side because of their hatred of our joint Jewish-English-Bolshevik enemies, and because of their belief and respect for, above all — Our Fuehrer.”

In his memoirs, Albert Speer wrote about Hitler’s enamour of Islam:-

Speer’s narrative includes a discussion which captures Hitler’s effusive praise for Islam, “…a religion that believed in spreading the faith by the sword and subjugating all nations to that faith. Such a creed was perfectly suited to the Germanic temperament.” Hitler, according to Speer’s account, repeatedly expressed the conviction that, “The Mohammedan religion…would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?” [...]

Today Churchill, the most stalwart anti-Nazi, would be arrested in Holland whereas Hitler would be free to promote Islam unmolested.

Geert Wilders (among many others) likened the Koran to Mein Kampf.

Jihad means “personal struggle” (supposedly).

Mein Kampf means “my struggle.”

JUSTICE WILL FIND GEERT WILDERS NOT GUILTY AND THE KORAN GUILTY

“The court also considers appropriate criminal prosecution for insulting Muslim worshippers because of comparisons between Islam and Nazism made by Wilders,” it added.

The most prominent European fighting Nazi tyranny had this to say about Islam:-

“How dreadful are the curses which Islam lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

"A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property‹either as a child, a wife, or a concubine must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen; all know how to die; but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.

"No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.

"Far from being moribund, Islam is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science -the science against which it had vainly struggled -the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”

~~ Sir Winston Churchill~~


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Actually it's Obama who wants to talk to Iran, but I'll bet you knew that already. Brace yourself. It's going to be a hard, hard ride. "Barack Obama: Administration willing to talk to Iran 'without preconditions,'" by Julian Borger for The Guardian, January 21 (thanks to Sr. Soph):

The new Obama administration is willing to talk to Iran "without preconditions" and will work towards the abolition of nuclear weapons, the White House said today.

The Obama foreign policy agenda that appeared on the White House website said: "Barack Obama supports tough and direct diplomacy with Iran without preconditions," the policy outline said. The Bush administration made direct talks between the US and Iran conditional on Iranian suspension of its uranium enrichment programme. This step breaks that conditionality, as part of a fundamental shift in diplomatic approach. The Obama agenda said the new administration will "talk to our foes and friends" and not set preconditions.

However, talks with Iran will be "tough and direct", and will put on the table the same deal that the international community has been trying to get Tehran to accept for the past four years: extensive economic and diplomatic help if uranium enrichment is suspended, further economic pressure and diplomatic isolation if it does not. Iran has resisted this carrot-and-stick approach so far, despite four sets of UN sanctions, but western diplomats hope that direct engagement by Washington will help break the impasse. "In carrying out this diplomacy, we will coordinate closely with our allies and proceed with careful preparation," the White House said. "Seeking this kind of comprehensive settlement with Iran is our best way to make progress."

And...what happens if the diplomacy fails? Well, in that case only Iran will have nukes:

The other notable shift in US foreign policy announced today was a strategic decision to move towards a "nuclear free world", through bilateral and multilateral disarmament. "Obama and [Vice President Joe] Biden will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons, and pursue it," according to the agenda. It is a long term goal. The US will maintain a "strong deterrent as long as nuclear weapons exist", but begin to take steps on the "long road towards eliminating nuclear weapons"....

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Khadr.jpg
Omar Khadr, poor lamb

Posted last July at Jihad Watch:

A retired U.S. soldier who was ambushed by armed fighters holed up in the mud compound where Omar Khadr was captured said on Tuesday the Canadian deserves to be at Guantanamo Bay. [...]

"My lasting image of Omar is of him crouched in the rubble waiting for U.S. troops to get close enough so he could take one of them out, and he did that successfully and that is the underlying reason why we're all here in the first place," Sgt. Morris said.

But not for long, courtesy the President of the United States:

"U.S. judge halts proceedings against Omar Khadr," from Sympatico MSN News, January 21 (thanks to Sr. Soph):

The U.S. military judge presiding over Canadian Omar Khadr's war-crimes case at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, granted an adjournment on Wednesday of 120 days at the request of the new administration of President Barack Obama.

The decisions cast doubt over the controversial U.S. military commissions process and brought fresh calls for the Canadian government to intervene on behalf of the Toronto-born Khadr and have him repatriated to Canada.

The adjournment ordered by Col. Patrick Parrish does not withdraw the charges against Khadr or expunge any evidence presented against him at this week's pretrial hearings, the CBC's Susan Ormiston reported Wednesday from Guantanamo Bay.

Khadr's defence team had wanted Parrish to stay the charges, but did not oppose the prosecution motion to suspend the proceedings.

Khadr, now 22 and the only Westerner remaining in detention at the U.S. naval base in Cuba, is accused of killing an American soldier in Afghanistan in July 2002 when he was just 15.

Lt.-Cmdr. William Kuebler, Khadr's military-appointed lawyer, told CBC News he believes the adjournment signifies "the end" of Khadr's case before the controversial military commissions process at Guantanamo Bay.

"I really don't think that the Obama administration wants to put itself in the position of being the first administration in U.S. history to try a child for war crimes," Kuebler said in an interview.

"So my guess is however this works out, even if there is some revised or revamped ... military commission process, I don't think Omar Khadr will be part of that process going forward."...

Congratulations on your impending freedom, Omar, but pardon me if I don't invite you to a celebratory lunch.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

CosmicTonesforMentalTherapy.jpg
Not mental agony, mental therapy

I have long noted the Islamic legal traditions that forbid music in most circumstances (cf. 'Umdat al-Salik r40.1), and have been called "Islamophobic" for doing so. I guess that makes the Taliban "Islamophobic." The Taliban doesn't seem to have gotten the memo.

"Stop the music: Pakistani Taliban demands removal of audio, video players from buses," by Riaz Khan for Associated Press, January 21 (thanks to all who sent this in):

PESHAWAR, Pakistan - Bus drivers in northwest Pakistan have begun removing audio and video equipment from their vehicles after Taliban militants threatened suicide attacks against those who played music or movies for their passengers, an industry official said Tuesday.

Transport workers in Mardan town received letters this week from militants saying that buses offering such entertainment were guilty of spreading "vulgarity and obscenity," Walid Mir, general secretary of the town's transport union, told The Associated Press.

The militants said they would check the buses and that suicide attacks would be carried out against vehicles that still had audio and video equipment — prompting union members to act quickly, Mir said.

The Taliban letter complained that traveling in buses that provide audiovisual entertainment was a "source of mental agony for pious people," according to a text obtained by AP.

"It is obligatory on us to stop such violations. We request you to remove the vulgar systems ... otherwise suicide bombers are ready," the letter said....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"When they accept the peace process"? And when exactly will that be? This via Pamela, who notes that the Hamas Charter quotes Hasan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, saying: "Israel will rise and will remain erect until Islam eliminates it as it had eliminated its predecessors." Where is there room for a "peace process" in that?

"France ready to talk to Hamas 'when they accept peace process,'" from AFP, January 21 (thanks to Pamela):

AFP - Paris will talk to the Islamist Hamas movement when it shows it is ready to seek peace with Israel, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said on Tuesday. "It is our opinion -- and we realised this long ago -- that Hamas was one of the interlocutors" in the Middle East peace process, he told French lawmakers. "We believe we will have to talk to them when they accept the peace process, when they agree to start negotiations," Kouchner said....

They may well agree to do that. But will that mean they have discarded their overall goal? Absolutely not.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Why doubt their claim? See information about Ed Husain here.

"Critics hit anti-Islamist think tank cost," from UPI, January 20 (thanks to Maxwell):

LONDON, Jan. 20 (UPI) -- The British government is wasting $1.4 million on a think tank run by former Islamic extremists to counter the radicalization of Muslims, critics say.

The public money is being given to the Quilliam Foundation think tank despite doubts expressed by members of the government as well as by Conservative Party opponents, The Times of London reported Tuesday.

The foundation was set up nine months ago by bestselling author Ed Husain and Maajid Nawaz, a former political prisoner in Egypt, as part of the government's strategy to combat the spread of extremist ideology among British Muslims, The Times said.

"It will be very interesting to see what has been achieved with this considerable sum of public money," Patrick Mercer, the Tory Member of Parliament who heads the House of Commons counter-terrorism subcommittee, told the newspaper.

An unnamed government minister told The Times that the size of the grant was outrageous, and saying Britain had seen the rise of an "ex-Islamist industry."

Husain, however, said that Islamism can only be defeated by those who were once a part of it, saying, "If it is becoming an industry, it's a good one and let's have more people on it."

In other words, send more money!


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

RumsfeldBush.jpg

It is indeed a black day for freedom. If this happens, if the Obama Administration allows this to happen, then U.S. sovereignty will be gone, in the air, never to be captured again, and the door will be wide open to the Islamization of the West.

"Bush, Rumsfeld should be pursued for torture: UN rapporteur," from AFP, January 20 (thanks to Pamela):

BERLIN (AFP) — The UN's special torture rapporteur called on the US Tuesday to pursue former president George W. Bush and defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld for torture and bad treatment of Guantanamo prisoners.

"Judicially speaking, the United States has a clear obligation" to bring proceedings against Bush and Rumsfeld, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture Manfred Nowak said, in remarks to be broadcast on Germany's ZDF television Tuesday evening.

He noted Washington had ratified the UN convention on torture which required "all means, particularly penal law" to be used to bring proceedings against those violating it.

"We have all these documents that are now publicly available that prove that these methods of interrogation were intentionally ordered by Rumsfeld," against detainees at the US prison facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Nowak said.

"But obviously the highest authorities in the United States were aware of this," added Nowak, who authored a UN investigation report on the Guantanamo prison....

Asked about chances to bring legal action against Bush and Rumsfeld, Nowak said: "In principle yes. I think the evidence is on the table."

At issue, however, is whether "American law will recognise these forms of torture."...

That will be up to Obama.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Dhimmitude in Gaza: Christians live in daily danger. "A Christian in Gaza," by Lela Gilbert at Jewish World Review, January 21 (thanks to Daizycutr):

[...] It's not just Jews, however, who suffer at the hands of Hamas. Getting far less media attention is the situation facing 3,000 Christians who live inside the Gaza strip. Following the Hamas coup in Gaza, a radical sheikh, Abu Sakir announced, "'I expect our Christian neighbors to understand the new Hamas rule means real changes. They must be ready for Islamic rule if they want to live in peace in Gaza.'" Months ago I had a conversation with two Gazan Christians, who had fled their homes and were hiding out in the West Bank while hoping for asylum elsewhere. Their stories exposed the dangers Christian families face under Hamas, including extortion, rape, beatings and murder....

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I expect he knows, given his inaugural remarks. And one final thought about those remarks: Obama said, "To the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect." Given the context of his thinly veiled attacks on Bush Administration policies during his Inaugural Address, it seems likely that by this Obama meant to reassure the Islamic world that the respect that had not been given them by Bush would now be given them.

But on what grounds does Obama assume that that respect will be mutual? Will he address the doctrines of Islamic supremacism and the replacement theology that makes Muslims view non-Muslims with contempt, as "the most vile of created beings" (Qur'an 98:6)? Will he discuss with Muslim leaders the Islamic concept that Judaism and Christianity are merely perverted forms of the original Islamic message of Abraham, Moses, and Jesus?

A pre-Inauguration story: "US Muslims: Obama's use of Hussein in oath sends message," by Anindita Ramaswamy for the Hindustan Times, January 20 :

Muslim Americans view Barack Obama's intention to use his middle name Hussein during the reciting of the oath of office as a sign that he's heeded their call for greater inclusion....

To Imam Yusuf Salim of Masjid Muhammad, a mosque in Washington, it will be a statement of intent.

"Obama may be Christian, but he cannot deny his roots, his heritage. Hussein is a beautiful name, meaning 'good' or 'handsome.' It was in honour of his grandfather. Why would anyone hesitate to proudly state it?"...

"By reclaiming Hussein in his name, which he had to avoid during the campaign, disappointing and angering many Muslims, Obama will tell Americans and the world that he does really stand for change we can all believe in," said student Rashid Rizvi Mohiuddin, 21. "If not, we'll know it was all eloquence without substance."

Hodari Abdul Ali of Muslim Alliance in North America, a national network of mosques and Muslim organisations, said that while Obama's campaign disappointed him, he held out hope of his potential to heal the Muslim world "damaged" by President George W Bush.

"Obama distanced himself from our community during his historic campaign. It was such a dichotomy - we felt we were being kept at arm's length and yet we funded his campaign and voted for him," said Ali, a fixture at Iraq and Palestinian demonstrations.

"We want to tell him that it's now okay to embrace us," Ali said....

Others spoke of how Muslims were the "most peaceful group in America," their reputation tarnished by the "media and US policy." Teacher Masooma Khan, 44, said: "One of Allah's names means peace, another means justice. We want peace and justice for all, especially minorities, to be the cornerstones of his administration."...

Yeah, that's it. It's the media and US policy that keeps mounting all those jihad terror attacks.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A statement from the Freedom Party of the Netherlands:

Geert Wilders: court decision is an all-out assault on freedom of speech

Survival of Freedom Party in jeopardy

The Hague, January 21, 2009

The Freedom Party (PVV) is shocked by the Amsterdam Court of Appeal’s decision to prosecute Geert Wilders for his statements and opinions. Geert Wilders considers this ruling an all-out assault on freedom of speech.

Geert Wilders: “Apparently this is The Netherlands today. If you speak out you might be prosecuted. To participate in public debate has become a dangerous activity.”

“If I have to appear in court, not only I will be prosecuted, but also hundreds of thousands of Dutch citizens who reject the Islamisation of the West. In Dutch Parliament only the Party for Freedom is willing to speak up for the preservation of our culture and our many freedoms.”

The Freedom Party leader now faces legal proceedings that will probably take years to conclude and will also involve enormous legal fees.

“We depend on small donations. The Freedom Party is the only party in Parliament that does not accept any government funding. This court decision jeopardizes the very existence of the Freedom Party. We simply cannot afford the enormous legal expenses.”

“This is a black day for freedom.”

Yes, it is.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them." -- Qur'an 4:34

But even though it is quite clear that what Samir Abu Hamza says here is an accurate summation of the teachings of the Qur'an and Hadith, he blames the controversy on...three guesses.

"It's OK to hit your wife, says Melbourne Islamic cleric Samir Abu Hamza," by Mark Dunn for the Herald Sun, January 22 (thanks to JE):

A MELBOURNE Islamic cleric has told his male followers they can force their wives to have sex and hit them if they are disobedient.

Coburg's self-styled cleric Samir Abu Hamza said despite Australian rape laws it was impossible for a man to rape his wife even if she refused to have sex with him, the Herald Sun reports.

In a recorded lecture entitled "The Keys to a Successful Marriage", delivered to his male worshippers but now broadcast on the internet and viewed by several thousand people, Mr Hamza said Islamic law allowed men to hit their wives as a last resort, but they were not to make them bleed or become bruised.

He said under Islamic law, as described in a koranic verse, it was a man's right to demand sex from his wife whenever he felt like it.

"If the husband was to ask her for a sexual relationship and she is preparing the bread on the stove she must leave it and come and respond to her husband, she must respond," Mr Hamza told his male followers on the video sermon.

That is not in the Qur'an. It is in the Hadith.

Muhammad said: "If a husband calls his wife to his bed (i.e. to have sexual relation) and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning." -- Bukhari 4.54.460

In another hadith, Muhammad says: "By him in Whose Hand lies my life, a woman can not carry out the right of her Lord, till she carries out the right of her husband. And if he asks her to surrender herself (to him for sexual intercourse) she should not refuse him even if she is on a camel's saddle." -- Ibn Majah 1854

He then mocked Australia's criminal laws, which required consent for sex to be lawful.

"In this country if the husband wants to sleep with his wife and she does not want to and she hasn't got a sickness or whatever, there is nothing wrong with her she just does not feel like it, and he ends up sleeping with her by force ... it is known to be as rape," Mr Hamza said.

"Amazing, how can a person rape his wife?"

In the contradictory sermon, delivered in Melbourne or Sydney about 2003 but posted late last year, Mr Hamza initially instructs his listeners "don't hit your wife".

But he goes on to say exactly how men should hit their wives, according to his interpretation of Islamic teachings.

He said Islam cursed "those people who hit the animal on the face, (but) what about hitting your wife?"

"First of all advise them," he said. "You beat them ... but this is the last resort.

"After you have advised them (not to be disobedient) for a long, long time then you smack them, you beat them and, please, brothers, calm down, the beating the Mohammed showed is like the toothbrush that you use to brush your teeth.

"You are not allowed to bruise them, you are not allowed to make them bleed."

Mr Hamza told his followers not to get carried away and become too physical with the beatings.

"This is just to shape them up, shape up woman - that is about it," he said.

"You don't go and grab a broomstick and say that is what Allah has said," Mr Hamza said to sporadic laughter from his flock.

Mr Hamza runs the Islamic Information and Services Network of Australasia on Sydney Rd, Coburg, which offers spiritual advice, prayer facilities and boxing, karate and gym classes for Muslims.

Despite concerns about his preaching being raised by female members of the Islamic community, Mr Hamza yesterday stood by his comments and blamed controversy over them on a hidden Zionist agenda run by the media....

Meanwhile, other Muslim leaders in Oz rush to denounce the teachings of the Qur'an and Muhammad:

Islamic Women's Welfare Council of Victoria executive director Joumanah El Matrah said Hamza's interpretation was bigoted.

"Even orthodox practitioners and imams do not consider any form of family violence acceptable," she said.

Islamic Council of Victoria vice-president Sherene Hassan said Islam did not condone domestic violence.

"The Prophet Mohammed stated 'The best of you is he who is kindest to his wife'," Ms Hassan said....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

colosseumprayer.jpg
"People mustn't use prayer as a political weapon"

"A fundamentalist operation, the preliminaries of terrorism."

"Muslim Colosseum prayers fuel row," from ANSA, January 19 (thanks to Writer Mom):

(ANSA) - Rome, January 19 - A group of Muslims who prayed in front of the Colosseum during a protest march against the Israeli offensive in Gaza this weekend was accused of threatening behaviour by centre-right politicians on Monday.

Around 50 Muslims knelt with their backs to the Roman amphitheatre and prayed towards Mecca during the march on Saturday, refueling a row over a similar incident that took place in front of Milan's Duomo earlier this month, also during a Gaza protest.

''The pseudo-prayers in Milan and in front of the Colosseum are nothing to do with religion - they are threatening and intimidatory acts towards the Italian people,'' said Maurizio Gasparri, Senate whip for Premier Silvio Berlusconi's People of Freedom (PDL) party.

''Those who take part should be identified by the police and possibly expelled from our country. People mustn't use prayer as a political weapon''.

A former interior minister and chairman of parliament's Anti-Mafia Commission, Beppe Pisanu, described the incidents in Milan and Rome as ''a fundamentalist operation, the preliminaries of terrorism''.

Hundreds of Muslims took part in prayers in front of Milan's Duomo at the beginning of the month, angering right-wing politicians. Attilio Fontana, mayor of nearby Varese, said at the time he ''would like to see what would happen if I went to recite the rosary in Mecca'', while Defence Minister Ignazio La Russa staged a Catholic mass in Piazza Duomo the following Sunday in order to ''reclaim'' the area.

The head of the Association of Moroccan Women in Italy, PDL MP Souad Sbai, described the Muslims' act as ''a provocative demonstration against the West, Christians and moderate Muslims organised by extremist groups''.

But Milan Archbishop Dionigi Tettamanzi refused to condemn the mass pray-in, describing prayer as an ''inalienable right''....

Tettamanzi needs to examine the content of the prayers.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

WildersSpencer2.jpg
I stand with Geert Wilders

For hate speech -- after declining to do so last year, which means that Islamic supremacist groups in the Netherlands have kept up the pressure on lawmakers until they got the outcome they wanted. Hate speech, of course, is in the eye of the beholder, and hate speech laws are tools in the hands of the powerful that they can use to silence the powerless and crush dissent.

And make no mistake: even though the Muslims in the Netherlands and elsewhere in the West present themselves as embattled victims of racism and "Islamophobia," that is exactly what is going on here: this is just one part of the 57-government Organization of the Islamic Conference's efforts to silence speech that they deem critical of Islam -- including "defamation of Islam" that goes under the "pretext" of "freedom of expression, counter terrorism or national security."

If they succeed in doing this, we will be rendered mute, and thus defenseless, in the face of the advancing jihad and attempt to impose Sharia on the West -- in fact, one of the key elements of the laws for dhimmis is that they are never critical of Islam, Muhammad, or the Qur'an, so this initiative not only aids the advance of Sharia in the West, but is itself an element of that advance.

The enemies of free speech are closing in, and we have to stand together now and defend it. Everyone who loves freedom and wants to resist the straitjacket of groupthink and the totalitarian imposition of Sharia norms should stand with Geert Wilders now. I hope Wilders will relocate to the United States, and carry on the fight for truth and freedom here, in what could be their last redoubt.

"Islam film Dutch MP to be charged," from the BBC, January 21 (thanks to all who sent this in):

A Dutch court has ordered prosecutors to put a right-wing politician on trial for making anti-Islamic statements.

Freedom Party leader Geert Wilders made a controversial film last year equating Islam with violence and has likened the Koran to Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf.

"In a democratic system, hate speech is considered so serious that it is in the general interest to... draw a clear line," the court in Amsterdam said.

Mr Wilders said the ruling was a "black day for me and for freedom of speech".

"I am shaken. I had absolutely not expected it," he told the Dutch news agency, ANP.

'Fascist book'

In March 2008, Mr Winders posted a film about the Koran on the internet.

The opening scenes of Fitna - a Koranic term sometimes translated as "strife" - show a copy of the holy book followed by footage of the bomb attacks on the US in 11 September 2001, London in July 2005 and Madrid in March 2004.

Pictures appearing to show Muslim demonstrators holding up placards saying "God bless Hitler" and "Freedom go to hell" also feature.

"Appearing to show"? These photos were real. The Muslim demonstrators really were holding such signs. But this wording from the relentlessly dhimmi BBC is just one indication of how bad things have gotten.

The film ends with the statement: "Stop Islamisation. Defend our freedom."

Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende said at the time that the film wrongly equated Islam with violence and served "no purpose other than to offend".

What has Balkenende ever said or done about the Muslims who continue to insist on equating Islam with violence?

When asked about the impact of his film, Mr Wilders said: "It's not the aim of the movie but people might be offended, I know that. So, what the hell? It's their problem, not my problem".

I have personally heard him sound much less cavalier and indifferent than this about this question, but ultimately that is immaterial. The whole purpose of free speech laws is to protect speech that the powerful find offensive, because it threatens their power. And that, as I explained above, is why this is happening.

He also once wrote in a national newspaper: "I've had enough of the Koran in the Netherlands: Forbid that fascist book."

Mr Wilders has had police protection since Dutch director Theo Van Gogh was killed by a radical Islamist in 2004.

Correspondents say his Freedom Party (PVV), which has nine MPs in the lower house of parliament, has built its popularity largely by tapping into the fear and resentment of Muslim immigrants.

Here is Fitna. Judge for yourself:

Find out why Fitna is not "hate speech," but simply the truth, here: my article "The Fitna Firestorm," which explains how the film merely quotes Qur'an verses and then shows Muslims acting out the violent imperatives of those verses.

UPDATE: Here is the complete ruling, via Rechtspraak.nl:

Amsterdam Court of Appeal orders the criminal prosecution of the Member of Parliament of the Dutch Second Chamber Geert Wilders

On 21 January 2009 the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam ordered the criminal prosecution of the member of parliament Geert Wilders for the incitement to hatred and discrimination based on his statements in various media about moslims and their belief. In addition, the Court of Appeal considers criminal prosecution obvious for the insult of Islamic worshippers because of the comparisons made by Wilders of the islam with the nazism.

So Wilders is being prosecuted by a Dutch court for insulting Islam. In this, Sharia has already triumphed.

The Court of Appeal rendered judgment as a consequence of a number of complaints about the non-prosecution of Wilders for his statements in various media about moslims and their belief. The complainants did not agree with the decision of the public prosecution which decided not to give effect to their report against Wilders.

I.e., "We bowed to pressure from Muslims."

The public prosecution is of the view, amongst others, that part of the statements of Wilders do not relate to a group of worshippers, but consists of criticism as regards the Islamic belief, as a result of which neither the self-esteem of this group of worshippers is affected nor is this group brought into discredit. Some statements of Wilders can be regarded as offending, but since these were made (outside the Dutch Second Chamber) as a contribution to a social debate there is no longer a ground for punishableness of those statements according to the public prosecution.

Their self-esteem is shattered, poor lambs. Read it all here.

See video: Pamela Geller interviews Wilders, linked here. I interview Wilders in six parts -- the first is here and you can find links to the rest there also.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

KSM.jpg
Citizen of Bosnia

The secular Muslim Bosnians, as everyone knows (except inveterate "Islamophobes"), are moderates who are deeply committed to moderation and represent the hope for rapprochement between the West and the Islamic world, for after all, they have nothing, nothing, nothing whatsoever to do with jihad violence or Islamic supremacism -- except, of course, when they granted citizenship to a Kuwaiti who worked for a Muslim Brotherhood front and ended up planning the 9/11 attacks. And then they kept his citizenship a state secret. "Bosnia: Senior Al-Qaeda figure granted citizenship, says report," from AKI, January 20 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Sarajevo, 20 Jan. (AKI) - Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the senior Al-Qaeda official credited with masterminding the 9/11 terror attacks in the United States, was granted Bosnian citizenship before the attacks, a local newspaper reported on Tuesday.

Born in Kuwait to a family originally from the Baluchi region of Pakistan, Mohammed reportedly went to Bosnia in September 1995, disguised as a humanitarian worker for an organisation called Egyptian Relief.

He obtained Bosnian citizenship in November the same year, Bosnian daily Fokus said, quoting local intelligence sources.

The newspaper said Egyptian Relief was just a cover for the Cairo-based Islamist movement, the Muslim Brotherhood.

Fokus said war-time authorities knew about Mohammed’s presence in Bosnia and his citizenship was kept a state secret.

Thousands of mujahadeen from Islamic countries came to Bosnia in the early 1990s to fight with local Muslims and many remained in the country after the war, acquiring Bosnian citizenship....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Islamic Tolerance Alert, and still another scintillating study in proportionate responses to grievances. "Pakistani Muslims attack church, torture Christians," by Qaiser Felix for AsiaNews, January 20:

Kot Lakha Singh (AsiaNews) - Muslim groups have attacked a church and Christian homes in the village of Kot Lakha Singh, in the district of Narowal, province of Punjab. The incident goes back to January 14, and the news was released by Pakistan's National Commission for Justice and Peace (NCJP), after verifying the event with a fact-finding mission carried out on January 19.
Irfan Barkat, head of the NCJP, tells AsiaNews that the violence began with an attack on the home of William Masih, a Catholic of the village. An unspecified number of people tortured those present, including women and children, and then stole money and gold objects from the home. The crowd then attacked the homes of three other Christian families in the village, broke into the church, which is used by both the Catholic and Protestant community, and damaged the furniture and tore the liturgical books and bibles.
The events were reported on January 18 to the police of Nindo Ki, who have not yet made any arrests.
The head of the NCJP explains that at the origin of the violence is the dispute over land that Masih bought a few months ago from a Muslim. The property is also claimed by another inhabitant of the village, Noor Muhammad, who says that he is the legitimate proprietor.
Irfan Barkat says that the small Christian community of Kot Lakha Singh is made up of 25 families (Catholic and Protestant) that, in the overwhelmingly Islamic village, are subjected to constant harassment: "Muslims of the village have socially boycotted the Christians, and Muslim shopkeepers have refused to sell daily use items to Christians."
The everyday tension has been increased by the recent marriage between a Christian young man and Muslim young woman in the village. This has irritated the Muslims, who are now trying to do whatever they can to make the Christians pay for what they believe to be an affront.

Never mind freedom of conscience and the right to the pursuit of happiness on part of the couple.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

January 20, 2009

boy_scout_with_oath.jpg
On my honor, I will do my best to do my duty to Allah, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful

Does that include subjugating infidels -- such as fellow (but non-Muslim) boy scouts? So now Muslims are opposed to the traditional boy scout pledge (surprise, surprise). Assimilation used to mean immigrants adopt the customs of the host (which seems logical since it is always the former who, of their own accord, seek residency among the latter). Now, however, it seems the opposite is in force: the hosts cater to the immigrants in the name of "multiculturalism" -- or, where Muslims are concerned, dhimmitude.

"Scouts adopt Islamic pledge," from the Christian Institute, January 20:

Scouts will be able to pledge allegiance to 'Allah' rather than God and Queen.

Boy Scouts in Dundee will be able to pledge allegiance to ‘Allah’ and drop the traditional oath to God and Queen, says the Scout Association in Scotland.

The Association has given its backing to starting Dundee’s 45th troop which will specifically target Muslim boys.

In the oath Muslim recruits will be able to replace the name ‘God’ with “Allah, the Most Beneficent and the Most Merciful”, and pledge to honour “the country in which I am now living” instead of the Queen.

The Scout Association is already open to all faiths and Muslim boys are currently part of existing troops, but according to the Association they are aware of some who might be opposed to the traditional pledge.

A spokesman for the Scout Association Drummond Cox claims the change “represents a tweak rather than a major change”.

He said: “The Scouts may have been a Christian organisation originally but we have long been non-denominational and inclusive.

“This new troop will in no way be exclusionary and non-Muslim boys may join if they wish in an initiative that has the support of the Muslim community.”

Mr Cox added: “There are already Muslim boys in troops around Dundee but until now we do not have one catering for Muslims specifically. It is affirmative action.”

But Richard Cook of the Campaign Against Political Correctness said: “This is a disappointing development and many people will worry about the sad loss of much-loved traditions.

“Many Muslims in this country are proud monarchists, so it seems wrong to alter the pledge.”

Mr Cook warns: “Quite apart from the risk of creating a two-tier Scout movement, there is also the question of how helpful it is to set up a group that specifically aims to recruit young Muslims when we are trying to be more inclusive of other communities.

“Doesn’t this just perpetuate the divisions at the expense of cherished traditions?”


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I'll bet you didn't even know there was a bishop of Arabia. In this interview, he affirms the institutionalized discrimination against Christians about which we have written a great deal here, and which Islamic apologists (both Muslim and non-Muslim) routinely deny is really happening. "‘A Cross Underneath One’s Clothing Is Okay’: An Interview with the Bishop of Arabia," by Pierre Heumann, translated by John Rosenthal for Pajamas Media, January 20 (thanks to Aaron):

Bishop Hinder, next year Switzerland will be deciding whether minarets should be permitted in the country. How would you advise Swiss voters to vote?

Every public building wants to stand out. That’s normal and legitimate.

Minarets are supposed to mark the presence of Muslims in Switzerland. Is a political claim to power also connected to this symbolism?

I cannot rule out the possibility. But I would answer with another question: why should the minaret of a mosque not be visible? On the other hand, a 200-meter-high minaret would certainly be an affront and would disrupt the city’s appearance. I would say that this has little to do with religious freedom.

The disruption would be less severe than in the case of the building of the glass skyscraper of a bank.

But the bank is also a sort of religion. (Smiles) What would interest me more than the building of minarets is what is preached inside the mosque, in what language the faithful are addressed, and how the imams have been trained.

About what in particular would you be concerned …

A completely separate subculture could evolve, which would have explosive potential. The tower is not necessarily the issue …

"Explosive potential" indeed!

… in the last analysis a matter for building inspectors?

Rather the culture that is being practiced next to the tower is the issue. It is no offense against freedom of religion if one poses the basic demand that Muslims who live in a Western country recognize fundamental rights and the constitution. In this regard, there is certainly a lot of room for improvement.

In the Arab countries for which you are responsible as bishop, church towers are taboo.

In Qatar recently, we were permitted to build a church large enough to accommodate 2,700 of the faithful. There is not a church that big in all of Switzerland. But it is true that in the agreement with the government it is clearly stated that no religious symbols should be visible from the exterior. It is only in the interior that Christian symbols are tolerated. If I had not accepted this condition, my request for the building permit would have been rejected. I did not even apply for the permission to build a church tower.

Note the contrast with Switzerland.

Are you permitted to be seen in the street in your vestments?

We voluntarily practice a certain degree of discretion, in order not to provoke anyone. But in most of the countries of the [Arabian] Peninsula, it is not a problem to wear the clothing of a church official.

Are Christians persecuted in your region?

In my territory, there are no indigenous Christians or surviving minorities from pre-Islamic times like in Iraq. As far as foreign Christians are concerned, there is not any active persecution. There are, however, practices that could certainly be construed as having the character of persecution.

What are you thinking of?

In my diocese, a Christian could hardly ever become a citizen. The only exception is Bahrain. If you practice any religion other than Islam, this frequently results in discrimination in one’s profession.

Despite all the difficulties, you militate for inter-religious dialogue.

Of course. Is there any alternative? But the way is long and difficult and also fragile. The point of inter-religious dialogue is not to get the adherent of another religion to accept our position. But he should learn to accept my belief, just as I accept his, without him having to convert to Christianity himself. In the meanwhile, a learning process has begun in this regard.

Good luck with that.

You say that it is a long process.

The problems already turn up just with basic concepts. For example, when a Muslim speaks of religious freedom, what he means is the right of a Christian woman to marry a Muslim man and to remain a Christian thereafter. Now, part of dialogue is having the courage to pose hard questions.

Which questions?

For example, what happens as regards the children of a mixed couple?

According to Islamic law, they are automatically Muslims.

Yes. And we also have to ask how matters stand as regards a Christian man who marries a Muslim woman. He also automatically becomes a Muslim. He is not even asked if this is what he wants. It would be nonsensical to expect that in the end the two religions would fuse into one. But I believe that a certain change of orientation is possible on a practical level.

What do you have in mind?

Inter-religious dialogue has to be subdivided into specific tasks. For example, the respective understanding of history of the two sides needs urgently to be subject to critical examination. We have to ask what is being taught in the schools and schoolbooks about the other religion. From what I have heard, abstruse things are related about Christianity. But it is progress at least, when a young Muslim learns that he does not have to kill me just because I think differently than he does and have different beliefs.

That is setting the bar pretty low, don't you think?

Are you allowed to proselytize?

For a Muslim, it goes without saying that he should make the message of his faith understandable to other people. I would like to be able to do the same for my religion. Unfortunately, that is not possible in the Arab countries.

What would be the consequence if you proselytized nonetheless?

I assume I would have to leave the country. But conversions from Islam to Christianity are in any case illusory. We strongly advise native residents against converting.

Why?

The convert would not be able to practice his faith. He could not go to church. His family and the people in his environment would not allow it. If he insists, nonetheless, on converting to Christianity, the only option that remains is to emigrate.

Are there forced conversions to Islam?

Prisoners who have memorized the Koran or even converted to Islam can expect to receive reductions in their prison time or even be released. That is, of course, a strong incentive. On the other hand, I do not know of any Western country in which the punishment of a Muslim is reduced if he gets baptized.

Your “clientele” consists of foreign workers who live for the most part in poor conditions in work camps: Catholics from the Philippines or India or Sri Lanka. Are you allowed to hold mass in these camps?

Officially, I am not allowed, even if it is occasionally tolerated. In most Arab countries, we are only permitted to hold mass in places that have been put at our disposition by the government. It has become standard practice to propose camps, mosques, athletic fields, and cinemas. But there are no churches or temples, even though non-Muslims are often the majority in the camps. For many foreign workers, that is a problem, since most do not have enough money to be able to afford transportation to a service elsewhere. For me it is incomprehensible that precisely those who place so much emphasis on faith in God, and who criticize the West for becoming unreligious, render it difficult for others to hold religious services. [...]

Saudi Arabia is particularly strict. Islam is the only religion permitted, but there are well over a million Christians who live there.

It is true that normal Church activities are not possible there. If a Christian has a bible in the house, he no longer is subject to punishment. But if someone brings in a whole shipment of bibles, then that creates problems. But the rosary or wearing a cross under one’s clothing is okay. Needless to say, I cannot travel around freely as a bishop. But that does not mean that no contacts or visits are possible.

You once said in an interview that there are tendencies in Islam to strive for global power. Thus, for example, Saudi Arabia built numerous mosques in Bosnia after the war despite the existence of other more pressing problems. Does dialogue still make sense under these conditions?

The distinction between proselytism and political goals is not so simple in Islam.

In Islam, the congruence between religion and politics is indeed part of the system.

That could be debated. But in light of history, one can say unambiguously that the religious message and its political realization have been congruent. And this is still the case today. To that degree, it is to be expected that the political tendency is dominant in Islam. This can have consequences where Muslims come to represent a majority of the population. I am not one of those who fears that Europe could be overrun by Muslims. But I am also not so naïve that I would not see the danger.

What do you fear then?

For example, a kind of gradual hollowing out of human rights — which is a danger that does not only come from Muslims, however. We need to establish clear conditions. If Western, pluralistic democracy is important to us, then we have to insist that the radical wing of Islam purifies itself and clearly recognizes the principles of democracy and the rule of law. We may also be permitted to expect leading Muslims to address this issue more clearly than they have up to now.

The above interview first appeared in issue number 50/08 of the Swiss weekly Die Weltwoche. The English translation is by John Rosenthal.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Farhad%20Hakimzadeh.jpg
Hakimzadeh: Vandal for the jihad?

Rewriting history is a major enterprise for jihad apologists, and an eminently successful one: the myths of the tolerant, pluralistic Muslim Spain, and the tolerant, pluralistic Ottoman Empire have entered the popular consciousness, despite mountains of evidence to disprove both (see, for example, here and here on the Ottomans, and here and here on Muslim Spain).

The Baron at Gates of Vienna has unearthed a very strange story in this line from last November, and comments quite rightly:

In all the cultures where Islam has become ascendant, the Muslim authorities have attempted to rewrite the history of the conquered lands to obliterate the memory of anything that went before Islam. By this method the cultural contribution of civilizations that preceded Islam — during jahiliyah, “the days of ignorance” — is minimized, denigrated, and distorted.

The destruction of physical evidence is part of the revisionist task. To the average Western scholar, the Bamiyan Buddhas and the archeological artifacts buried in the ancient rubble under the Temple Mount are priceless treasures which must be preserved, restored, studied, and admired. But to a Muslim they are abominations and must be destroyed. If not actual idolatry, they are evidence of non-Muslim civilizations that preceded the introduction of Islam, and are thus an affront to the pride of the entire Ummah.

Is this strange story another small attempt to assuage the umma's wounded pride? The subject matter of what was cut would suggest that it was: material that "charts the early engagement of Europeans with what we now know as the Middle East..."

"History's missing pages: Iranian academic sliced out sections of priceless collection," by Sandra Laville in The Guardian, November 21, 2008:

To the untrained eye the damage is barely visible. Yet within the handbound pages of books charting how Europeans travelled to Mesopotamia, Persia and the Mogul empire from the 16th century onwards, the damage caused by one Iranian academic to a priceless British Library collection is irreversible.

Leading scholars at the library are at a loss to explain why Farhad Hakimzadeh, a Harvard-educated businessman, publisher and intellectual, took a scalpel to the leaves of 150 books that have been in the nation's collection for centuries. The monetary damage he caused over seven years is in the region of £400,000 but Dr Kristian Jensen, head of the British and early printed collections at the library, said no price could be placed upon the books and maps that he had defaced and stolen.

"These are historic objects which have been damaged forever," said Jensen. "You cannot undo what he has done and it has compromised a piece of historical evidence which charts the early engagement of Europeans with what we now know as the Middle East and China.

"It makes me extremely angry. This is someone who is extremely rich who has damaged and destroyed something that belongs to everybody."

Hakimzadeh, 60, faces a jail sentence today when he appears at Wood Green magistrates court in London. The Iranian-born academic fled his country after the fall of the Shah and holds a US passport. He has pleaded guilty to 14 specimen charges of stealing maps, pages and illustrations from 10 books at the British Library and four from the Bodleian Library in Oxford dating back to 1998.

When police searched his home in Knightsbridge, west London, last July they discovered some of the missing maps, pages and pictures inserted into less valuable editions of the same books he owned....

This may indicate that he was simply a book collector gone mad. Still, it is an evocative incident.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

For "reconstruction and rehabilitation in Gaza" -- that and nothing else. "Saudis Pledge to Cover Over Half of PA War Costs," by Nissan Ratzlav-Katz for Israel National News, January 20 :

(IsraelNN.com) The economic cost of the three-week Gaza war to the Palestinian Authority totals more than 1.9 billion US dollars, according to PA estimates. Saudi Arabia has pledged to pick up more than half of the tab, with other states offering financial assistance to Hamas as well.[...]

Saudi Arabia pledged to provide the PA in Gaza, under the jihadist Hamas regime, with one billion dollars. The funds, Saudi King Abdullah said, are to go towards the reconstruction and rehabilitation of Gaza.

Perhaps the Saudis are sincere in their desire that this billion goes to nothing but "reconstruction and rehabilitation." Then again, perhaps they already "donate" separate billions to Hamas to further the latter's terrorist activities, thereby fulfilling their own duty towards the jihad -- jihad al-mal, the "money-jihad," which Bin Laden recently reminded Muslims of.
According to the Saudi monarch, "One drop of Palestinian blood" is more valuable than all the money in the world...

Except, of course, when "Palestinian blood," especially that of women and children, is not just "dropped" but splattered everywhere whenever Hamas members utilize them as human-shields.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

swat_vally_ruin_1242245c.jpg
The price of an education

Making good on its threats. More on this story. "Militants blow up five more schools," by Hameedullah Khan for the Dawn, January 20:

MINGORA, Jan 19: Suspected militants blew up five government schools in Swat on Monday.[...]

Swat District Coordination Officer Shaukat Khan Yousafzai said 182 schools, most of them for girls, had been destroyed by militants, affecting over 100,000 primary- to college-level students[...]

He said one could understand the reason for which the militants were attacking security forces but destruction of schools by them could not be justified.

Actually, the logic of the "militants" is quite consistent: just as the government is not fully implementing sharia law (and thus must be overthrown), so are females in school alien to sharia (and thus must be prevented).


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Western politicians should better understand what India is apparently beginning to understand: secular leaders in Pakistan and Afghanistan simply do not have the authority or influence to realize their goals (whatever those may be) vis-a-vis other more influential "power centres" -- a euphemism for jihadists, such as the Taliban.

"Karzai must be pressed over Taliban, say Dutch," by Mark Dodd for The Australian, January 21:

THE NATO-led mission in Afghanistan, in which Australia is a key player, should pressure the Karzai Government to perform better or face a worsening Taliban insurgency, visiting Dutch Foreign Minister Maxime Verhagen has warned.

Speaking to the Sydney Institute yesterday, Mr Verhagen said the most effective weapon against the Taliban was not helicopters and missiles but more motivated government officials prepared to work for the wider Afghan community and not narrow tribal interests.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Hamas' jihad against Israel is revealed here as part of the larger global jihad. And those who are pursuing Iran's proxy war against Israel will view Obama's pledge to sit down and hash things out with Iran as a chance to validate the activity described in this article, and more.

One good element of this article is that it suggests that the recent Israeli foray into Gaza was not 2006 all over again.

"Iran renews efforts to supply Hamas," by Yaakov Katz for the Jerusalem Post, January 20 (thanks to James):

Iran has renewed efforts to supply advanced weaponry to Hamas and the IDF is concerned that the terror group will try to smuggle long-range Fajr missiles into the Gaza Strip.

According to the latest intelligence assessments, Iran, which was responsible for writing Hamas's military doctrine, has already launched an internal probe to determine how the plan it had created for Hamas failed to cause more IDF casualties.

The military plan created by the Iranians was based on three pillars: The first was the defensive measures that Hamas had created in Gaza, which included dozens of kilometers of tunnels and thousands of roadside bombs and booby-trapped homes.

The second pillar was rocket attacks against the home front. Here too, Hamas failed to fire rockets farther than 40 kilometers, even though it had planned to.

The third pillar was creating a "victory image" in the form of a burned-out tank or the abduction of an IDF soldier.

"Hamas thought it would succeed like Hizbullah did in 2006," a senior defense official said.

The IDF is concerned that Hamas and Iran will try to smuggle long-range Fajr missiles into the Gaza Strip. Fajr missiles, manufactured in Iran, have a range of 70 km. and if fired from Gaza would easily reach Tel Aviv.

On Monday, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni said that renewed weapons smuggling would be legitimate grounds for Israel to renew attacks against Hamas....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Of course, it is all over now and a new era of peace is dawning. But this is a useful reminder of what the people who are supposed to occupy the moral high ground -- according to the governing elites and the mainstream media, that is -- are really like.

A MEMRITV video.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Leftist/Jihadist Alliance Update. "Military components factory ransacked in Gaza protest: Nine people held after break-in at plant near Brighton allegedly making parts for Isareli [sic] missiles," by Mark Townsend for The Guardian, January 17 (thanks to Kevin):

Nine people are being questioned by police following extensive damage at an arms factory where protesters claim military components are being made for Israeli warplanes bombing Gaza.

The group, which calls itself Smash EDO, entered the EDO MBM Technology plant in Moulsecoomb, Brighton, in the early hours of this morning. During the incident computers and furniture were hurled from the windows of the Sussex factory. Police described the damaged as "substantial".

Demonstrators said they were "decommissioning" the site in protest against the killings of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip by the Israeli military. They said equipment made at the plant was being used in Gaza by the Israeli air force.

DCI Graham Pratt of Sussex police said: "Windows had been smashed and offices turned over in what I would describe as wanton vandalism, but with machinery and equipment so targeted that it could have been done with a view of bringing business to a standstill. The damage is significant and the value substantial."

EDO MBM is the sole British subsidiary of US weapons company EDO Corp. From its Moulescoomb base it manufactures laser-guided missiles that have been used extensively in Iraq, the Palestinian territories and Somalia.

The weapons were reportedly used by Israel against Lebanon in 2005, and have also been allegedly used in the occupied Palestinian territories....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

ObamaPres.jpg

The President in his Inaugural Address:

For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus - and non-believers. We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth; and because we have tasted the bitter swill of civil war and segregation, and emerged from that dark chapter stronger and more united, we cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve; that as the world grows smaller, our common humanity shall reveal itself; and that America must play its role in ushering in a new era of peace.

To the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect. To those leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict, or blame their society's ills on the West - know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy. To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history; but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist.

Good luck with that. Will he find that mutual respect reciprocated? Do the Saudis treat us with respect when they fill Islamic schools and mosques in America with material teaching hatred of Jews and Christians and the necessity to subjugate unbelievers under the rule of Islamic law? Do the Pakistanis respect us when they take our money to fight jihad terrorism and use it instead to aid jihad terrorism? Will Obama examine the reasons why that respect may not be forthcoming, and adjust policies accordingly?


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Following right after "Hear, O Israel, the Lord your God, the Lord is one."

"The compassionate, the merciful" is, of course, a reference to the invocation at the beginning of every chapter of the Qur'an except one: Bismillah al-Rahman al-Rahim, "In the name of Allah, the compassionate, the merciful."

Making sure everyone feels included -- terrific. But the prayer indicates yet again that there is little general awareness of the reasons why the term "Judeo-Christian-Islamic values" is a misnomer.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

We have often noted that Hamas and other jihadist groups have launched attacks against Israel from civilian areas, hoping to draw retaliatory fire that it could use for propaganda purposes. Here is more proof: "...the Foreign Ministry views it as proof that Hamas did not refrain from launching rockets close to members of the media, and perhaps even fired near them in a bid to draw Israel into bombing the building."

"Gaza reporter caught on tape confirming Hamas fired rockets near TV offices," by Yoav Stern for Haaretz, January 20 (thanks to Mackie):

Footage of a presenter on the Arabic language television station Al-Arabiya apparently confirms that Hamas fired at least one rocket from close to a building used by journalists during the 22-day conflict between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip.

The Israel Defense Forces shelled the building, drawing international condemnation, and television networks with offices in the building denied that rockets had been launched from anywhere nearby.

But the recording, filmed by an Israeli and released Tuesday by Israel's Foreign Ministry, shows Al-Arabiya presenter Hanan Al-Masri saying that a Grad rocket had been fired from a location near the studios at Al-Shuruk tower in Gaza City. Al-Masri did not realize that she had been caught on camera.

Al-Masri, a Gaza resident, has been a reporter for Al-Arabiya for three years. She is filmed discussing other issues until she is apparently distracted by the firing.

"...A rocket from here? It's here," she says and turns to look at a window. "Listen, it's here, below the building..."

The production team tells Al-Masri that a rocket has been fired from a nearby location. She then calls someone and says: "The rocket that was just fired from here is a Grad?... It's as if it was fired from beneath the office. It was very loud. I thought it was bombing but it was a rocket launch."

The Foreign Ministry says the film is proof that Hamas had fired from the area of the studios.

Although the movie was filmed in one of the first days of Israel's 22-day offensive in Gaza, and Al-Shuruk tower was bombed only towards the end of the war, the Foreign Ministry views it as proof that Hamas did not refrain from launching rockets close to members of the media, and perhaps even fired near them in a bid to draw Israel into bombing the building.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The "Al Qaeda gets the bubonic plague" story was actually a story about a biological or chemical weapons experiment that went wrong.

"Al Qaeda bungles arms experiment," by Eli Lake for the Washington Times, January 19:

An al Qaeda affiliate in Algeria closed a base earlier this month after an experiment with unconventional weapons went awry, a senior U.S. intelligence official said Monday.

The official, who spoke on the condition he not be named because of the sensitive nature of the issue, said he could not confirm press reports that the accident killed at least 40 al Qaeda operatives, but he said the mishap led the militant group to shut down a base in the mountains of Tizi Ouzou province in eastern Algeria.

He said authorities in the first week of January intercepted an urgent communication between the leadership of al Qaeda in the Land of the Maghreb (AQIM) and al Qaeda's leadership in the tribal region of Pakistan on the border with Afghanistan. The communication suggested that an area sealed to prevent leakage of a biological or chemical substance had been breached, according to the official.

"We don't know if this is biological or chemical," the official said.

The story was first reported by the British tabloid the Sun, which said the al Qaeda operatives died after being infected with a strain of bubonic plague, the disease that killed a third of Europe's population in the 14th century. But the intelligence official dismissed that claim....


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The chickens...are coming home...to roost: "Years of demonizing Israel and appeasing Islamist extremism within Britain have now coalesced, as a result of the media misrepresentation of the Gaza war as an atrocity against civilians, in an unprecedented wave of hatred against Israel and a sharp rise in attacks on British Jews."

"Britain's Surrender: London's reaction to the Gaza war shows it is giving up against jihad," by Melanie Phillips in the Wall Street Journal Europe, January 20 (thanks to James):

In Britain, the war in Gaza has revealed the extent to which the media, intelligentsia and political class have simply crumbled in the face of the global jihad.

The U.K. is a major player in European and world politics and is America's most significant strategic ally. Until now, it has been considered one of Israel's firm supporters and a linchpin of the Western defense against the world-wide Islamist onslaught. With the reaction to Gaza, however, that reputation is no longer sustainable.

Years of demonizing Israel and appeasing Islamist extremism within Britain have now coalesced, as a result of the media misrepresentation of the Gaza war as an atrocity against civilians, in an unprecedented wave of hatred against Israel and a sharp rise in attacks on British Jews.

Throughout the war, London's streets have witnessed a hallucinatory level of violent and explicit support for Hamas from Muslims, members of the far left and supposedly progressive individuals.

Night after night, Israel's embassy in well-to-do Kensington found itself under violent siege. Demonstrators attempted to storm the building, howling their support for the terrorist body whose genocidal intentions toward Israel and the Jews necessarily includes killing every one of the occupants inside.

Certainly, there have been anti-Israel protests around the world. But in Britain, not only have these been particularly violent but the authorities have done nothing to stop such incitement of hatred.

The police told pro-Israel demonstrators on at least one occasion to put away their Israel flags because they were "inflammatory." Yet officers allowed some anti-Israel demonstrators to scream support for Hamas -- and even to dress up as hook-nosed Jews pretending to drink the blood of Palestinian babies.

In general, the police have reacted passively to the violence. One recent video clip captured the astonishing spectacle of Muslims stampeding through London's West End hurling traffic cones and other missiles at the police, all the time shrieking "Allahu akbar" and "cowards." The police ran and stumbled backward rather than standing their ground and stopping the rampage.

Not only has such violence barely been reported. There has also been no acknowledgment of the explicitly Islamist nature of these demonstrations. Keffiyeh-clad demonstrators prostrated themselves in prayer or shouted "Allahu akbar" as they attacked Jewish-owned or -founded stores, such as Starbucks and Tesco, on numerous occasions.

Instead, the political class has simply regurgitated Hamas propaganda. In a debate in the House of Commons last week, one MP after another expressed horror at Israel's supposed crimes against humanity in Gaza....

Dispiriting, but unsurprising. Read it all.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Just as Israel handed Hizballah a victory by stopping before the job was done in 2006, so now it has done so again with Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

Ahmadinejad said that he considers this to be "a victory of the Arab and Islamic nations, as well, not just Palestinians."

"Iranian president congratulates Islamic Jihad for Gaza victory," from Ma'an News Agency, January 20 (thanks to James):

Gaza – Ma'an – Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called Islamic Jihad to congratulate the movement for its “victory” over Israel, according to Secretary-General Ramadan Abdullah Shallah.

The Iranian president reportedly congratulated the Gaza-based movement for its “steadfastness and preventing the Israeli troops to achieve their goals,” he said.

According to a statement sent to Ma’an, “Ahmadinejad praised the steadfastness of the Palestinians, considering this victory as a victory of the Arab and Islamic nations, as well, not just Palestinians.”...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

January 19, 2009

black-death.jpg
Al-Qaeda: Medieval in all ways

So far, it has only affected the Algerian branch of al-Qaeda -- the one that, after killing innocents via suicide attacks, proclaimed "glad tidings." (So much for the notion that Allah is on "their side.") Considering how "cosmopolitan" al-Qaeda terrorists are, regularly infiltrating non-Muslim nations, mixing in with the "crowd," this may prove to be -- directly or indirectly -- just one more way for jihadists to kill non-Muslims: instead of committing suicide to kill infidels, "martyrdom-seekers" can now just try to contaminate the former with their Black Death.

"40 Al-Qaeda Terrorists Killed….by The Black Death," from the Inquisitr, January 18 (thanks to Ebonystone):

40 -Muslim members of AQLIM (al-Qaeda in the Land of the Islamic Maghreb), the largest Al-Qaeda group outside the Middle East have died by the Black Death.

The plague, responsible for the deaths of an estimated 75 million people world wide during the 14th century, swept through the AQLIM training at a forest camp in Algeria, North Africa, and was only discovered when security forces found a body by a roadside.

According to The Sun, Al-Qaeda chiefs fear the plague may have been passed to other terror cells, and even Taliban fighters in Afghanistan. One security source quoted by the paper said “This is the deadliest weapon yet in the war against terror. Most of the terrorists do not have the basic medical supplies needed to treat the disease. It spreads quickly and kills within hours. This will be really worrying al-Qaeda.”

There is believed to be 1,000 terrorists attached to the camp where the outbreak took place, with many reported fleeing to other camps, potentially spreading the disease.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More on this story. "Pakistan: Sisters abducted, forced to convert to Islam," from Compass Direct News, January 19:

Repeatedly raped, minor and 18-year-old now face societal rejection.

ISTANBUL, January 19 (Compass Direct News) – The ordeal of two teenage Christian sisters in Pakistan is over after Muslims allegedly abducted and raped them and forced them to convert to Islam, but they fear a future of societal rejection.

Parvisha Masih, 18, and Sanam Masih, 14, said three Muslim men kidnapped them last November, raping them several times during two weeks of captivity.

“We are happy to return to the family, but we are feeling ashamed because there is no respect for us in society now,” Parvisha Masih said. “We don’t want to go back to school and have to face our friends.”

They face a long legal battle that will inevitably bring them into contact with their captors – who have already assaulted their family in court.

“We feel very afraid, and we are still receiving threats,” Parvisha Masih told Compass. “We are worried about our family and about ourselves. I don’t ever want to see those men again.”

On Jan. 2 the sisters recorded statements concerning their alleged abduction, rape and forced conversion to Islam before a local magistrate in Gujranwala. Earlier, they gave statements in Karachi, where they had been taken by their captors some 840 miles to the south. Two First Incident Reports (FIRs) have been filed.

In Gujranwala, Muhammad Irfan, Muhammed Mehboob and Muhammed Rafique, Mehboob’s brother-in-law, are charged with kidnapping...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Because unlike "gullible Westerners [who] can delude themselves that a Sharia (Islamic rule) state in Gaza will care only about itself and Israel," they know better, know that the natural state of a sharia-state is to grow and expand, spilling into neighboring land. After all, though they may be "secular," they do come from an Islamic background and know exactly how totalitarian Islamic law is.

"Why Arab states are unmoved by plight of Hamas: most fear Muslim militancy despite their dislike of Israel," by Tim Butcher for the Telegraph, January 17:

In New York a United Nations human rights chief alleges Israel has committed war crimes in Gaza.

In Geneva the normally silent International Committee of the Red Cross goes public to condemn the Jewish state. And in Kensington barriers have to be erected by police to stop protesters reaching the embassy of Israel.

By contrast, the reaction in the Arab world seems almost mute. There are a few rallies in countries such as Syria and Yemen where Israeli flags are burned but that happens after Friday prayers on high days and holidays anyway.

The Arab League splinters over which member state should host an emergency summit on Gaza. Even in the West Bank, just 40 miles from Gaza and home to 2.5 million fellow Palestinians, a call by militants for mass protest rallies dubbed "days of wrath" passes largely unheeded.

Why is it that, as Israel prepared to announce a cessation of offensive operations in Gaza, the Arab Street remained so apparently unmoved by its assault on the tiny territory?

The answer lies in the way many Arab regimes view militant Islam, as represented by Hamas. The West has come to view Muslim militancy as one of its biggest threats in the 21st century but for many Arab countries including Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Saudi Arabia the same threat has existed for much longer.

Egypt's secular, military leaders have been struggling with the Muslim Brotherhood since the 1920s. They have tried arresting leaders, invoked emergency powers to stop popular demonstrations and banned members of "the Brothers" from standing in elections. President Hosni Mubarak's dictatorship remains in power in Egypt but militant Islam remains one of the most clear and present dangers to his rule.

The links between Hamas and "the Brothers" are strong, deep and long-standing. The Gaza Strip, which is the powerbase of Hamas, abuts Egypt and in the eyes of many the Palestinian movement is little more than the "North Sinai Branch" of the Muslim Brotherhood. So just as Cairo needs to keep "the Brothers" in check, it also has an interest in seeing Hamas weakened.

As Amotz Asa-El, an Israeli commentator, put it: "Gullible Westerners can delude themselves that a Sharia (Islamic rule) state in Gaza will care only about itself and Israel. Mubarak evidently knows better than that."[...]

In 1982 Syria's then president, Hafez al Assad, the father of the current president, Bashar al Assad, showed exactly how tolerant he would be towards his country's Muslim Brotherhood. After the movement started to stage guerrilla attacks on Syrian state organs like the police force, he ordered his army to surround Hama, the town where the group had its de facto headquarters, and shell it with artillery. The death toll, mostly civilian, was never definitively established but some estimates put it as high as 20,000.

So while regimes across the Arab world have condemned the huge loss of civilian life caused by Israel's military assault on Gaza there are few regimes rushing to offer solidarity with Hamas...


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Unfortunately in Pakistan, there are multiple power centres to crack down and unfortunately the civilian government is not one of the more powerful centres.... It (civilian government) has to act fast and convince other power structures to act against terror" -- Indian minister of state

That may be a problem, considering these "other power structures" are often made up of terrorists themselves.

"Pakistan action against terror an eyewash, says India," the Times of India, January 19:

NEW DELHI: Terming Pakistan's action against terrorism as an "eyewash", India on Monday said the civilian government there was "not strong enough" to act against terror on its own.

"What they are doing right now is not enough. It looks like an eyewash. I think the civilian power centre in Pakistan is not strong enough to act on its own. We are not confident and happy over the steps taken so far," Union minister of state for defence M M Pallam Raju told reporters during his visit to annual NCC Republic Day parade camp.

Raju did not agree that Pakistan was cracking under international pressure on India's demand for taking action against the perpetrators of the Mumbai attacks saying, "Unfortunately in Pakistan, there are multiple power centres to crack down and unfortunately the civilian government is not one of the more powerful centres."

He said the civilian government will have to convince other power centres to act against terrorists there.

"It (civilian government) has to act fast and convince other power structures to act against terror as both countries are suffering because of terrorism," Raju said.

He said if Pakistan did not do enough, India will have to take actions on its own.

On the action taken till now by the government, Raju said, "As a responsible nation, we are building enough international pressure to force Pakistan to act otherwise we will have to take measures to defend ourselves."


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And no doubt blames Israel for that too. Perhaps some of these were among the victims of Hamas' recent "crucifixion" spree? At any rate, if this is how Hamas "deals" with fellow Muslim Palestinians, what is the point of compelling Israel, the enemy par excellence of Hamas, to ever "negotiate" with the latter?

"Mideast: Fatah says Hamas 'killed' members during conflict," from Adnkronos, January 19:

Gaza, 19 Jan. (AKI) - The largest Palestinian party, Fatah, on Monday claimed that the rival Islamist faction Hamas attacked its members during military conflict in the Gaza Strip in the past three weeks.

Fatah said 16 people died and another 80 were injured in attacks by Hamas which is the ruling party in Gaza.

According to the Palestinian news agency, Maan, Fatah sent a call to “Hamas and its members” asking that they cease attacks on Fatah affiliates following the end of hostilities in Gaza at the weekend.

Throughout the war Maan said there were unconfirmed reports of harassment and executions of Fatah party members, suspected collaborators and “petty criminals” that were released via several media sources.[...]

A statement from Fatah spokesperson Fahmy Az-Za’reer, on Monday said that Fatah had evidence that Hamas forces had placed hundreds under house arrest and incapacitated more than 80 Fatah members by shooting them in the leg.

He said that there were 16 incidents where Hamas fighters executed Fatah members during the Gaza fighting.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

nazineed.jpg
"Childhood"

Expressing "frustration" is one thing; advocating another holocaust quite another. Yet the media, for whatever reason, is in the habit of conflating the two.

"Nazis needed," by Tim Blair for the Daily Telegraph, January 19 (thanks to Patrick):

The Age‘s elevated shot doesn’t reveal such fascinating detail. AAP merely describes people “carrying placards calling for an end to what was described as a ‘massacre’”. Meanwhile, in Paris:

Vandals hurled Molotov cocktails at a synagogue in a Paris suburb yesterday in the latest outbreak of anti-Semitic violence in France since the start of Israel’s Gaza offensive …

Home to Europe’s biggest Muslim and Jewish populations, France has recorded more than 55 anti-Semitic incidents since Israel launched its Gaza offensive last month, drawing appeals for calm from politicians and religious leaders. Three other synagogues have been firebombed in the past two weeks and vandals have sprayed anti-Israeli graffiti on at least two other Jewish places of worship.

Jews haven’t been so vilified since Islamists attacked the US on 9/11.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Mattson.jpg

In "Hamas Inauguration," the featured article at FrontPageMagazine.com today, I explain why Barack Obama's choice of Ingrid Mattson of ISNA to offer a prayer at his inauguration festivities is so unwise -- or worse:

Barack Obama isn’t wasting any time making an impression: he has selected the leader of a group that has been named an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case to present a prayer during his inauguration festivities. Ingrid Mattson, president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), will offer a prayer at the National Cathedral Tuesday.

Superficially, Obama’s choice is understandable: Ingrid Mattson is a Canadian convert to Islam who has carefully cultivated the image of a moderate spokesperson. Yet her organization’s record is not entirely clean. Federal prosecutors last summer rejected claims that ISNA was unfairly named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror funding case. And ISNA has even admitted ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, complaining only that the government’s evidence for those ties came from old documents, but offering no proof that the organization had reversed course. In a memorandum on the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy in the United States, a Muslim Brotherhood operative named ISNA as an allied organization in what it called “a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The decisions of Israel's commanders continue to perplex, as the disastrously inconclusive end of the Second Lebanon War casts doubt on whether this truce is a tactical move in a broader plan to isolate and dislodge Hamas, or another study in half-measures under international pressure to negotiate with a party committed to Israel's destruction.

Granted, among media conditioned to root for the "underdog" at any cost (alongside deeper ideological issues), all Hamas had to do to claim "victory" is to continue to exist, and retain control of the Gaza Strip. But following the Second Lebanon War, expectations for Israel were also arguably lower, and this was to Israel's advantage: Not even Hamas was expecting Operation Cast Lead when it began last month. Time will tell what consequences the current cease-fire holds for the security of southern Israel.

"Hamas Claims 'Great Victory'," from Sky News, January 18:

In a televised speech Ismail Haniya, the Prime Minister appointed by Hamas in Gaza, said: "God has granted us a great victory, not for one faction, or party, or area, but for our entire people.
"We have stopped the aggression and the enemy has failed to achieve any of its goals."
His comments came as Israel began withdrawing troops from the Gaza strip.
Hamas has joined the ceasefire in Gaza - but said it will resume hostilities unless Israel withdraws all its troops from the area within a week.
The truce ends three weeks of bloodshed which has claimed the lives of more than 1,200 people - half of them civilians.
It has been welcomed by US President-elect Barack Obama, who takes office on Tuesday.
A spokesman said: "President-elect Obama is committed to working to help achieve lasting peace and security for Israelis and Palestinians.
"(He) will have more to say on these issues after January 20th."
Hamas militants have carried out several rocket attacks on Israel since the ceasefire came into effect.
Israeli forces responded to the first with an airstrike on the northern Gaza town of Beit Hanoun in which a woman and child were reportedly wounded.
Israel's war cabinet - led by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert - voted unanimously to back the ceasefire deal brokered by Egypt.
But he said Israeli troops would remain in Gaza and hit back if the militants launched further attacks.
He described the truce as "fragile" and said it would be reviewed on a "minute to minute" and "hour to hour" basis.
Hamas has said there cannot be a lasting peace until Israel pulls its troops out of Gaza and lifts a trade blockade.
A break from the aerial bombing is not a ceasefire. Israel has to withdraw from Gaza and stop fighting. - Source close to Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal
Following talks in Jerusalem between the Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and European leaders, Gordon Brown urged the Israelis to pull all their troops out of Gaza as soon as possible and open up border crossings.
Mr Brown said: "I believe that that would constitute the next stage following the ceasefire that will make possible the resumption of talks that are necessary for a permanent peace."...

Both Brown and Obama, among others, would do well to examine the parameters of cease-fires and peace treaties under Islamic law. For example, below is a passage from Umdat al-Salik (Reliance of the Traveler), a Shafi'i Islamic jurisprudence manual certified as "reliable" by Egypt's Al-Azhar University:

Truces are permissible, not obligatory....Interests that justify making a truce are such things as Muslim weakness because of lack of numbers or materiel, or the hope of an enemy becoming Muslim...If the Muslims are weak, a truce may be made for ten years if necessary, for the Prophet (may Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce with the Quraysh for that long, as is related by Abu Dawud....The rulings of such a truce are inferable from those of the non-Muslim poll tax; namely, that when a valid truce has been effected, no harm may be done to non-Muslims until it expires. o9.16

Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Eurabia Alert. The bomb's placement was designed to intimidate, recalling the carnage at Mumbai's Chabad House in November. "Bomb found at Florence Chabad House," from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, January 18:

A rudimentary explosive device was found at the entrance of the Chabad House in Florence.
The device, described as being constructed from a small camping gas canister, was reportedly discovered during the day Saturday but not reported to police until Saturday night after Shabbat.
The Chabad House is located half a block from the city's main synagogue.
Media reports said a paper fuse apparently had been lit, but had burned out, and no damage occurred.
Florence Chief Rabbi Joseph Levy said the episode was "a very serious gesture that shows how one can pass from irresponsible words to actions such as this."
Tensions are high in Italy over Israel's operation in Gaza. Last week, red paint was thrown at the façade of the synagogue in Pisa. On Saturday, thousands of people, many of them Muslim, staged a pro-Palestinian march in Rome. Some of the placards showed swastikas superimposed on the Star of David.
About 300 people staged a counterdemonstration in Rome's historic Jewish ghetto neighborhood.

Print | FaceBook |