Apotheosis of Eurabia: Swedish police hire protection to enter Muslim enclave

The "situations" that Islam continues to create throughout the Western World are only going to continuously get worse for those of us who want to preserve our western heritage,morality,ideology,and values that so deeply conflict with that of Islam's Sharia.

One of our greatest on going battles is trying to convince our multicultural,PC,dhimmi society on what we are up against that is in stark contrast to our free societies.

Countries in the EU are losing these battles because they fail to understand with any clarity what the clear objective is of Islam. The internet is probably the only source of pure uncensored and unpolitically correct information for us to understand Islam on adaily basis. The MSM refuses to venture there, for fear of upsetting the very ideology that is hell bent on destroying us sooner or later.

Oh well, haven't they brought this on themselves?

Not too long ago, I saw a report on TV on how a lot of Swedes were proud and happy to "help" tens of thousands of muslims running away from islam to settle in Sweden.

I couldn't help thinking how absolutely crazy, irresponsible and suicidal that was, especially because those mohammedan bigots would, sooner or later, try to do away with the Swedish tolerance they were taking advantage of to move to that country. It wouldn't take them long to start demanding that they be given license to recreate, on Swedish soil, the conditions from their homelands that they used as an excuse to apply for asylum.

They've brought this on themselves, period. If they want to change things, they'd better start setting the muslim colonization of Sweden in reverse. How about offering them free plane rides to Saudi Britain, which is already beyond salvation?

The most discriminated people are pretty much the Africans and Jews, no?

Then why both of them don't have violence as much as in the Islamic world? Why do Muslims are so violent, while I haven't heard much of Jewish or Black terror, atleadt not in these levels?

Oh well, haven't they brought this on themselves?
- Proud Kafir

While I am the last to defend anyone defending Islam, I do have to tell you that defending ourselves against the trains of Eurabia going full steam is a hard, if not impossible, piece of work. Eurabia, as Bat Ye'or, Robert Spencer, and others will tell you, has been going on for nearly four decades now, a generation!, and it's Sisyphus work trying to educate those who have been indoctrinated for years at school, at university, at work, by the media. How do you suppose one gets out of this brainwashing, this vicious cycle?

I can tell you, assure you, that my colleagues and I are doing our best, day after day, to educate people about Islam, Eurabia, and its repercussions, and I can furthermore assure you that we are not becoming any more popular! There is lots of hate involved, lots of disbelief, lots of smirking, even people alluding that we are loonies.

So, while Austria is not Sweden, we are ruled by a coalition of deniers (Socialists and Conservatives), who admit there is a Euro-Arab Dialogue (i.e. Eurabia), but who see no reason to change anything. They are more concerned with the "financial meltdown" than with "southern youth" beating up a teacher in front of his students on the street.

Now, in light of all this, what would YOU do?

The security firm will instead render it unnecessary for police officers to keep watch outside their own police station and free up resources for other duties. The firm will help the police to monitor those moving in and around the area.

Why don't they just hire more cops? Does the security firm work substantially cheaper? Maybe the police chief is the brother in law of the security firm owner...or something like that...

What do expect this same situation will occur in the US. Mohammedans are thugs and when they come together they get into a violent fervor. They look down upon infidel laws and that is why many Mohammedans are infidel prisons.

Eurodhimmi...From above: I can tell you, assure you, that my colleagues and I are doing our best, day after day, to educate people about Islam, Eurabia, and its repercussions, and I can furthermore assure you that we are not becoming any more popular! There is lots of hate involved, lots of disbelief, lots of smirking, even people alluding that we are loonies.
Now, in light of all this, what would YOU do?

The same thing you're doing...Only I might start wearing a bullet proof vest and grow some eye's in the back of my head...Don't give up and thanks for your efforts.

It's very hard to tell a kufr about Islam when they don't want to hear it. Islam itself will eventually clue them in, and then they will remember that you have been telling them about this all along...

"Now, in light of all this, what would YOU do?"

I don't think there is much you can do, except what you've been doing, until enough Infidels wake up and fight for what's left of your country. Same applies to all the PC cancer riddled west.

This is part of jihad. Not just outright raids and wars, but infiltration by massive emigration, trade, and cultural subversion, much like what is going on in the US State Department and academia.

Sweden, like the rest of Europe, is paying the price for its liberal, multicultural, Socialist, anti-Judaeo-Christian and lazy policies.

I have known for years that Europe has been culturally, philosophically, intellectually, demographically and worst of all, spiritually DEAD. This makes Europe a ripe ground for a Muslim takeover.

I have no doubt that, unless a world leader takes Islam to task, I will see Sharia imposed upon at least one European nation in my lifetime.

What's happening in Scandinavia is the tip of the iceberg.

All the posts above, one way or another, point to the key problem the West faces today, the problem which, until successfully addressed, will only produce a myriad of other problems. And that problem is the continued refusal by Western societies at large to see Islam, ALL of Islam, as the enemy. If this is done, the corner will have been turned and Islam will then be on the defensive and victory is certain for the West as long as its collective will holds up because Islam is inferior to the West in almost every way. If this is not done, and the stupid pretend game continues that Islam is a noble and great religion which is possessed of peaceful and tolerant characteristics, then things will only continue to get darker for Sweden, for Europe, for America, for all the West. It's that simple and that difficult.

Eurodhimmi, I would do exactly what you're doing.

In addition to that, I think that a very informative way to raise people's awareness would be to expose them to verses from Mein Qurampf, much in the same way that Geert Wilders has done through his film "Fitna", and as Robert Spencer and others have done in "Islam - What the West Needs to Know."

Leaflets at train stations would be something I would use if I were in a position to do so. And I doubt that, when confronted with a choice between women's and gay rights or being ruled by slaves of allah, ordinary European citizens would more likely choose the former (unless they're European/Westerners only on their birth certificates, such as Gordon Brown, Yvonne Ridley, George Galloway, Nicolas Sarkozy, etc.) The case for the right choice just has to be made clearly as you've been making it, and by more and louder voices.

Proud Kafir,

Your ideas are good, but handing out leaflets is not feasible, at least not in Vienna. First, lack of money to print those leaflets. Second, we need official permission to hand them out (not easy in a city ruled by a drunk Socialist mayor with an affinity for a Turkish woman).

Third, I agree that all people need to watch the movies you mentioned; but in reality these people just don't want to hear or see the bad news. You can't force it down their throats. You can write all the informative articles you want, criticize Islam as much as you possibly can (get away with), if people don't want to be educated, then the whole effort is more or less useless.

This doesn't mean we're stopping our efforts. We're also politically active. It's tedious, painstakingly slow, yet it's starting to work. I'm not saying it's paying off, because it's still the Muslim groups getting all the money, but we're making slow progress. One step at a time. Unless we're devoured first...

Now, in light of all this, what would YOU do?

Damned if I know. Same thing here. Just keep at it I guess. Set your expectations low. Own guns.

I wonder why Jihad Watch didn't report this:

France Media Calls New Years Eve Carbecue of 1147 Cars “Regular Occurrences”

http://sheikyermami.com/2009/01/02/france-media-calls-new-years-eve-carbecue-of-1147-cars-regular-occurrences/

The security firm will instead render it unnecessary for police officers to keep watch outside their own police station and free up resources for other duties. The firm will help the police to monitor those moving in and around the area.
...............................

Good God. I thought it was bad enough that Swedish police were hiring a security firm for additional help for entering Muslim enclaves--but they are hiring them to *guard their own station against attacks*.

Really, I imagine them holed up in their bunker, barely able to keep themselves safe. What happens when someone calls the police for help? Are they essentially on their own?

What is Rosengård like for native Swedes--those few who are too old, too poor, or too stubborn to have moved out? What is it like for non-Muslim immigrants? What is it like for those Muslims, who hoped that moving to a modern Western democracy would free them from Shari'ah, and the hijab, and forced marriages, and honor killings?

It must be hell.

"What is it like for those Muslims, who hoped that moving to a modern Western democracy would free them from Shari'ah, and the hijab, and forced marriages, and honor killings?"

Posted by: gravenimage

I wonder where those muslims were when things started to go wrong in their community.

Eurodhimmi, something that worked well enough to wake up my in-laws to the mohammedan threat was to hear from a friend that public buildings in Geneva would no longer be displaying Christmas decorations in order to be "culturally sensitive."

My wife, who loves Christmas decorations despite being agnostic like myself, was in as much shock as her parents. But the shock obviously had the positive effect of waking them up to the fact that news of seventh-century intolerance and bigotry, which seemed to be the preserve of Middle-Eastern and South-Asian slaves of allah, was not far from their own backyard.

I guess if raising awareness by speaking to people is all we can do, we've got to keep doing it because it is indeed better than just avoiding the bad news (and preventing more bad news should be an argument in our favor, because it should be more than obvious to the unaware ones that ignoring the issue can only make it worse.) And I suppose that the more people start realizing what's really at stake by news such as that which shocked my in-laws (or by a gay friend or relative being victiom of muslim violence, or by the dumbing-down of school curricula to avoid offending children born to slaves of allah, or by a female relative getting assaulted by someone at a refugee center saying that "no female is to tell him what to do", etc.) the better.

Earlier today, under another topic at dhimmiwatch, I posted a comment about a chat I had with a Western European diplomat who totally gets it, and whose views on granting asylum to muslims in Western countries are exactly like Hugh Fitzgerald's. And he himself said that there was no point in allowing people who want to recreate in the West the very conditions that they used as an excuse to get asylum in a civilized country, before I had a chance to make that point.

It's stuff like this, and the fact that oil is not a natural resource that will forever be gushing from the Earth's bowels, that give me reasons for hope. But we obviously can't take anything for granted.

Security guards cost less than police and require less training. For the same reason, police hire cleaners not allocate officers to scrubbing toilets.

This one kind of feels like a non story.

It's sad to see what was once a nation of tough Vikings reduce themselves to a bunch of girlymen (sorry if that's an insult to the ladies out there).

OK one can't stand at a station or on a street corner, handing out leaflets;

but one can, accidentally on purpose, leave something behind on the train or the bus.

Do people leave their newspapers behind on the train, in Europe? Or on the buses? They certainly do here...and then other commuters pick them up and read them.

Well: leave your newspaper behind, during your daily commute, when you get off at your stop; and tucked inside your newspaper, for the next person to find, an informative little leaflet (no need to print it out at a printer's - one's laser printer at home, these days, is perfectly up to the job of printing off 10 or 20 A4 sheets, double sided, complete with illustration; how do you think our family did our Christmas letter, 70 copies, with little colour pictures, for all those friends and relations?).

Samizdat, samizdat.

And on the topic of raising the alarm, I recall a poster here some time ago, living in France, who was in the habit of letting out his city apartment to tourists during les vacances. He made sure that the bookshelves contained suitable literature, strategically placed.

If there are any Jihadwatchers posting or lurking here, who happen to be proprietors of cafes, or of motels, or who let holiday apartments, or who have friends or relations who do the same and whom they have 'awoken' to the danger, then think: you have a unique opportunity to discreetly educate the public.

In amongst the sort of reading matter one normally finds in such locations, one may provide...other things.

Why should not a coffee shop with intellectual pretensions, in Australia, or America, or Canada, if owned by a jihadwatcher, feature a copy or two of 'Politically Incorrect guide to Islam and the Crusades', or 'Infidel', or paperback copies of V S Naipaul, 'Among the Believers', 'Beyond Belief', 'India: A Wounded Civilisation', amongst the glossy magazines in the pile in the corner?

Why should not a guesthouse, among the fat paperbacks with their lurid covers on the 'holiday reading' shelf, slip in among them Ayaan Hirsi Ali's 'Infidel' or Ibn Warraq's 'Why I am Not a Muslim', or such books as 'Not Without My Daughter', or Cassandra's lurid-but-all-too-horribly-true '33 Secrets Arab Men Never Tell American Women' and 'Escape! from an Arab Marriage', or Phyllis Chesler's 'My Afghan Captivity'?

Tuck 'Stealth Jihad' and 'Onward Muslim Soldiers' and 'Sword of the Prophet' and 'Jihad in the West', and a second-hand copy of John Roy Carlson's 'From Cairo to Damascus' (you can find it second-hand, online, in various places), and a book called 'Blood Rock' (which tells the story of the defence of Malta by the Knights of St John) in amongst the second-hand paperback spy thrillers, the John le Carre and Tom Clancy.

Hey: even if you just run a truck stop, you should sit down and think - is there something you can do, to spread the word amongst the customers?

Or, dumbledoresarmy, even a copy of A Plague on Both Houses for those who're most likely to pick up a book of "fiction"?

This would be supportive of one of jihadwatch's very own, while still helping to spread knowledge of Islam.

(I've not yet read this, and am hoping someone can chime in with a review. None posted on amazon.com yet.)

payingattention:
Security guards cost less than police and require less training. For the same reason, police hire cleaners not allocate officers to scrubbing toilets.

This one kind of feels like a non story.

The real story is that they find it necessary to hire private security to protect their own police stations from their own citizens. I am sure they are capable of doing it themselves, but it is, as they say, a matter of allocating resources for more important tasks.

I wonder what they're going to do when the "youths" start attacking police stations with automatic weapons and explosives. I'm sure it's just a matter of time.

Correction:

payingattention:
Security guards cost less than police and require less training. For the same reason, police hire cleaners not allocate officers to scrubbing toilets.

This one kind of feels like a non story.

The real story is that they find it necessary to hire private security to protect their own police stations from their own citizens. I am sure they are capable of doing it themselves, but it is, as they say, a matter of allocating resources for more important tasks.

I wonder what they're going to do when the "youths" start attacking police stations with automatic weapons and explosives. I'm sure it's just a matter of time.

OK one can't stand at a station or on a street corner, handing out leaflets;

but one can, accidentally on purpose, leave something behind on the train or the bus.
Posted by dumbledoresarmy

Absolutely!! Magnets will stick to anything metal, like lavatory stalls, gasoline pumps, steel rafters, and hundreds of other surfaces we all come in contact with every day. I've left them everywhere from Atlanta to San Francisco and in between, and I've left flyers and cards in the Sky Magazines on planes, magnets in the lavatories. You can get 5000 little magnets that say: "Learn the truth about islam, visit www.jihadwatch.org." for a nominal price, well worth the investment.

Did correcting the bold really warrant reposting your whole message? I still don't see how hiring civilian security is a story. It is because it is considered a lowly job that they don't put sworn officers onto it. FYI Police establishments in Australia have dedicated security on the front door depending on the site, varying from a receptionist with a signin book through civilian security and up to armed police.

Maybe it looks odd to American eyes... but frankly... non story....

Time for Sweden to hire Blackwater.

As a note to the Aussies and Euros here, and I do love you guys, but as bad as American gun violence is...

and you love to make talking points about our gun violent culture and the lack of gun violence in your own countries...

there is no private security protecting our police stations... yet we battle armed MS-13, Crips, Bloods, Latin Kings and other assorted gang members almost daily. In many American cities. We take care of our own. It is in the fabric of our society...self reliance.

And in America... it is very much a story. We would never allow someone else to protect us, from a threat, which we are better trained and equipped to handle.

Maybe it's time you vote for new politicians. Sorry to be so blunt, but you need to stand up for what is right.

Or, dumbledoresarmy, even a copy of A Plague on Both Houses for those who're most likely to pick up a book of "fiction"?

-from above

I'm currently reading the book. Can't tell you much yet. Will try to write a review once I'm finished.

Or, dumbledoresarmy, even a copy of A Plague on Both Houses for those who're most likely to pick up a book of "fiction"?

-from above

I'm currently reading the book. Can't tell you much yet. Will try to write a review once I'm finished.

I would also suggest reading Brad Thor' latest book for more fiction on Islam.

Europe is locked into the "never again" mindset: they MUST NEVER EVER AGAIN permit any religious or ethnic group within their borders to be subjected to any kind of hostility or suspicion or public disapproval, because seventy years ago a vile little man convinced his fellow Germans that all their problems stemmed from the evil "other" residing in their midst; his "final solution" --eliminating "the other"-- started a conflagration across Europe that still scars their souls.

I sympathize with Europe's leaders, I truly do.

HOWEVER...

If, as a nation's leader, you permit immigration of groups of people whose basic culture and principles are in direct conflict with your own country's culture; if members of those groups commit violence against your citizens; if they create enclaves which essentially function as a "state within a state", where their own customs and laws are enforced and "outsiders" are threatened and attacked; then duty REQUIRES you to take some kind of action for the sake of your citizens and your country.

The first thing would be to ABSOLUTELY HALT further immigration of these groups. The second would be to increase police or even military presence in the "restive" areas, arrest malefactors, hold well-publicized trials, send them to jail for the maximum term, and deport them afterward. The laws may have to be re-written to allow revocation of citizenship for second-generation immigrants; I'm not sure how that would work but it needs to be addressed.

I AM sure that the current see-no-evil policy of "It's a religion of peace and there's just a tiny minority of misunderstanders who pose a threat" is not working. We need leaders who will acknowledge that there are problems with our immigration policies as they now stand, and who are willing to examine and correct those policies. We need leaders whose allegiance is to the well-being of their citizenry, not to politically-correct pronouncements which are totally divorced from reality.

In the battle between real-life circumstances and policies created to atone for past guilt, shouldn't the "reality" part win out? Singling out Muslims is not due to "baseless prejudice", it's due to the fact that Islam is the common denominator in terror attacks committed around the globe for the past decade. Refusing to accept more Islamic immigrants isn't in any way the equivalent of sending people off to extermination camps. Public policy rooted in "never again" taking action against a group is foolish if that group has openly declared its intention to conquer and obliterate your civilization.

Europe is locked into the "never again" mindset: they MUST NEVER EVER AGAIN permit any religious or ethnic group within their borders to be subjected to any kind of hostility or suspicion or public disapproval, because seventy years ago a vile little man convinced his fellow Germans that all their problems stemmed from the evil "other" residing in their midst; his "final solution" --eliminating "the other"-- started a conflagration across Europe that still scars their souls.

Bullshit. It is ethnic cleansing and we all know it. The decision to allow Muslims in, be it to a country, a university, a workplace, or wherever, is an intentional, explicit act of ethnic cleansing masquerading as an act of de facto ethnic cleansing. Wherever Muslims go, first the Jews and the Hindus, then comes Sunday. They did this on purpose and they did it because their Leftist governments are still heartbroken that Hitler didn't finish his Final Solution, so they're trying to recreate it, along with his socialism, in slow-motion. Tactful and farsighted as Leftists are, they are committing suicide, but so long as it's Jews and gays being beaten and killed, teenaged girls getting gang-raped, and old people driven out of their homes who bear the brunt of it that's a-ok. Never again my ass. More like "repeat as necessary even if it kills us, such is the depth of our hatred." It is not a coincidence that Eurabia is a French invention.

Chainsaw:

In Australia we don't have any mainstream politicians promoting gun private ownership. The only party promoting it is the shooter's party and they are only promoting recreational shooting rights.

I have come to the view that since our guns were confiscated, the only ones who do have the guns are the criminals.

The US warning to us re that was correct, it turns out.