Afghanistan's "no sex, no food" law for Shi'ite women goes into effect

This may be an "amended" version of the law, but coerced sex is non-consensual sex. Apologists for Islam in the West often extol the religion's supposed emphasis on "family values," or at least, the outward appearance of stability of the family. But if family life is the basis for how a society functions, it is no surprise that, with family values like this, Afghan society and others across the Islamic world are suffused with tyranny and corruption.

More on this story. "Row over Afghan wife-starving law," by Sarah Rainsford for BBC News, August 16:

An Afghan bill allowing a husband to starve his wife if she refuses to have sex has been published in the official gazette and become law.
The original bill caused outrage earlier this year, forcing Afghan President Hamid Karzai to withdraw it.
But critics say the amended version of the law remains highly repressive.
They accuse Mr Karzai of selling out Afghan women for the sake of conservative Shia support at next week's presidential election.
The law governs family life for Afghanistan's Shia minority.
Sexual demands
The original version obliged Shia women to have sex with their husbands every four days at a minimum, and it effectively condoned rape by removing the need for consent to sex within marriage.
Western leaders and Afghan women's groups were united in condemning an apparent reversal of key freedoms won by women after the fall of the Taliban.
Now an amended version of the same bill has passed quietly into law with the apparent approval of President Karzai.
Just ahead of this Thursday's Afghan presidential election, human rights groups suggest the timing is no accident.
"There was a review process - Karzai came under huge pressure from all over the world to amend this law, but many of the most oppressive laws remain," Rachel Reid, the Human Rights Watch representative in Kabul, told the BBC.
"What matters more to Karzai is the support of fundamentalists and hardliners here in Afghanistan whose support he thinks he needs in the elections."
Women's groups say its new wording still violates the principle of equality that is enshrined in their constitution.
It allows a man to withhold food from his wife if she refuses his sexual demands; a woman must get her husband's permission to work; and fathers and grandfathers are given exclusive custody of children.
| 50 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

50 Comments

There is a principle of equality enshrined in the Afghan constitution?

Then, obviously, something has been lost in the translation.

If denied food, does the woman still have to cook for him?

Where sre hypicrites like NOW http://www.now.org/
.. and Dinesh D'souza?

Heck,Any communication from the national communications director of America's largest Muslim Civil Rights Group?

What a bunch of hypocritic cowards!

Next time there's a dustup involving an Afghan immigrant in your neighborhood, forward this link to your favorite local reporter or post in the comments section of your local online newspaper. Help frame the debate, whatever it is, in terms of the probability that an Afghan male has universal human rights as part of his personal code of ethics.

And, remember, our troops are fighting and dying to prop up this pernicious world view. While the talking heads we keep electing prattle on about "progress", and how "Islam is a religion of peace"
Sickening.

It is a ludicrous and unjust law, but how on earth would you enforce it? If my hubby demanded sex, he'd be the one going without food. Does he get another wife to watch over the 'errant' one while he goes out to do whatever he does to earn a crust during the day? Are the wives so frightened of him they wouldn't let the other one eat? Would the children 'grass' if she sneaked a Twinkie?

If he only has one wife, who cooks his food, cleans etc?

Answers on a postcard, please.....

"Women's groups say its new wording still violates the principle of equality that is enshrined in their constitution."

From the Afghan Constitution:
Article Three, Ch. 1, Art. 3: In Afghanistan, no law can be contrary to the beliefs and provisions of the sacred religion of Islam.

Sorry to break it to the women's groups, but this provision trumps any principle of equality that may be found in their Constitution.

MrsJ:

Postcard size answer:

Swift fist. Complicit relatives & friends.

Threat of isolation, guaranteed unemployment, no shelter, the mercies of the street, i.e. rape assault and murder by strangers, even cops.

Most think it better to give in. Better the devil you know.

how to tell if your Muslim neighbor is dong well romantically. If the wife shops at the plus size stores, he is a happy pappy.
If the wife is fashion model thin, then he is not getting much, if any.

A bit odd, that the more attractive and slim the wife, the less romance. I guess that is why you see so many overweight mature women in Palestine, and the birth rate is so high.

I am so proud that we allowed these retrograde savages to enshrine demonic islamic law in their farcical, medieval constitution. There is no reason for our military to be in Afghanistan except to disrupt and destroy terrorist training camps. It will require at least five more centuries for Afghans to reach twentieth century level, possibly longer. In fact, I wonder if these anti-progressive troglodytes will ever join the modern world.

They seem to enjoy living in the seventh century and we should not waste another dime trying to modernize their infrastructure, only to watch them destroy it again. They are simply not worth any more money or effort. If there are any enlightened, rational people in Afghanistan, they can expend their time and effort to educate their fellow citizens. Let them risk their lives to effect change. Where is the outrage from the pigs at the U.N.? They can't shut up about the putative human rights abuses in Palestine. Here's a real one and as usual, they ignore it.

I will add something of a slightly philosophical nature.

The suffocatingly hostile atmosphere in which mohammedan women live out their life sentences creates an unshakable all-encompassing impression in the mind the universe is a dark, hostile, malevolent place.

This is almost completely unavoidable and happens at every level of the mind, deep into the subconscious processes that feed into conscious thought.

This is not insane per se. Strife, force, hostility, suppression, silence, suffering, threat and slavery truly menace them from all sides.

At the same time, the brain is an extremely efficient and economical organ, with dozens of ways of compressing things to minute shorthand expressions for the purposes of memory, speed and expression. When something is considered a universal aspect of life it gets woven into pretty much every mental impression in subtle and economical ways.

These are the minds that govern the early, first impressions of life, education of the children of the mohammedan block -- and color their life experience forever after.

Mother is the name of God in the lips and hearts of children. - William Makepeace Thackeray
So the little ones of the mohammedan cultures take in the pervasive and gloomy impression of a malevolent and hostile universe and the universal hostility of man toward man, quite literally with their mother's milk.

And like all children, their first conscious efforts in life are directed toward mastering and accustoming themselves to what they think the world is.

But don't worry. The mohammedans themselves tell us that their culture is perfectly compatible with a life based on individual freedom and the recognition of individual rights.

So glad our soldiers are dying to promote this.

Thanks GWB.

And Barry the Childish.

And every political moron, government weasel, and military airhead who have failed to study Islam, at least since September 12, 2001, as if their lives depended on it.

The jihadis must be chuckling in their caves.

An astute post, joeblough. Depressing to be sure (how can most anything dealing with Islam not be depressing?) but quite accurate I think. Couldn't help reflect as I read your post how many minds and lives have been wasted over the centuries because of Islam. Incalculable.

With Islam at the helm, Afghanistan is certain to continue to fail.

As soon as the Muslims of Afghanistan are left to their own devices, they will be at each others throats and fighting their neighbours on all sides.

Such is the nature and reality of Islam.

No sex, starve the women.


Free the women. starve islam.

Infidelic Countries - "No Shirt, No Service."

Islamic Countries - "No Sex, No Food."

/Is there anyway to make other posters' comments darker (easier to read) ?

Tyranny and corruption.

Liberty and accountability.

Sesame Street question: Are these the same or different?

It is continuously amazing to me how #&$^%&ed up these islamic societies are. In America, you might spend time in jail if you (intentionally or otherwise) starve a dog. In shariaworld, you can starve an uppity woman!

What the hell, man? What the hell.

Hi folks,

I am surprised that this no sex, no food thing is presented as a shia issue. The shafii have the same point of view and this is detailed in their Shariah Handbook Reliance of the Traveller approved by Al-Azhar in Egypt. A man does not have to pay for the maintenance of his wife when:
- she does not offer sex
- she leaves the house without permission of her husband
- she goes on hajj
- she travels for her own business needs
- she fasts outside ramadan without permission of her husband

This is pure and simple mainstream Islam and has nothing to do with extremism. Remember Islam is the great world religion respected by Obama et al.

For most muslims this is unknown territory and too absurd to believe.

Excellent post, joeblough. The first and most important task of any culture is to shape the minds of the young. One only has to read of the personal struggles of apostates from Islam to free themselves from the Borg-like Islamic beliefs that had been inserted into them as children to get a sense of why this pernicious religion has endured in the world long after it should have vanished.


As to the situation in Afghanistan, JW readers know that the provision that Islam and Shariah are the basis of law in every Islamic regime (after all, that's why they're called "Islamic"), trumps anything else that may have been slipped into the Afghan constitution by Americans when it was written. In any legal showdown that might ensue over the matter of sex vs food, you can be sure that it will be done in such a way that Islam comes out on top.

Over at Asia Times Online http://atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/KH15Df04.html there is a story about U.S. efforts to "influence" the election by withholding enthusiastic support from Hamid Karzai, thus giving a boost to Abdullah Abdullah. You may remember him from 2001 as one of the Westernized Afganis often appearing on TV to explain events following our invasion. Although it would be nice to see Western reporters question all the candidates, including the new fair-haired boy AA, about this law, given the MSM reluctance to touch anything smacking of Islamically-inspired outrages like this, somehow I doubt it will.

Even if, by some daring display of bravado, a hijab bedecked Christianne Amanpour managed to ask such a question, one can fairly easily imagine the usual shucking and jiving response she would get, and in her summary she would somehow manage to miss the real point of the question and attribute whatever apparent difficulty there is to minor cultural differences - above all making sure there is no connection made to Islam.

It's a wonder how such "minority-fringe views of Islam" like this can have such huge influence in Islamic governments.

i wonder what would happen to islam if all the men would disappear...would the woman keep it going?

Eastview you are soooo right. Let me digress first…

I see ID has finally shuffled on; I’ll miss the way strings break off from a single comment, but I won’t miss the “Twilight Zone” melt down of comments in the last death rattle that ID offered before JW finally had the time to kick it off the cliff, “I – have – had – about – about – enough – of – you!”

Lotsa MSM coverage over the suicide bomb at ISAF, but not once do they mention Islam. Nigeria, more of the Boko Haram clowns being apprehended, but no mention of the “Islamic” fueled fundamentalism causing the “Sectarian” divisions in the MSMs. I loved the bit yesterday by Spencer when he criticized CNN for leaving out islam as the medium as to why muslim youth were so prone to terrorism, blatantly pointing out the same failed economic conditions exist else where islam is not the rule of the land.

Let’s add to this Hugh’s piece (I love this one) on how 12 Trillion dollars of wealth generated by the exploitation of oil for the energy sector has failed to generate any stable or progressive economy or civilization in the ME; calling it the biggest economic failure of all time.

So, lets bring it all into perspective. Islam has had plenty of opportunities in history to allow the folk under its’ yoke to build upon the fortune brought it through conquer of war, or economic benefit, and what do we git? Just a continuance of the medieval cultish beliefs being forced on the helpless Dar al-Islam masses through thuggary, terrorism, and IEDs.

Why do the MSMs avoid reporting the obvious repulsion that islam has for what civilized nations have, and try to preserve? Why do they ignore the fundamental tenants of islam, which commands the violence and intolerance that deters the very efforts of our troops in Afghanistan?

Well, every time some muslim ass-clown speaks out and blames the Jews for controlling the media, I call bullshit, because if they did, the lie that is islam would be all over the news, exposing for what it is. So, it has to be just more taquiyya, where by part of the trillions of dollars of wealth are paying the MSMs to keep them quiet; and of course, the liberal left has been unwittingly bought out through the use of “violations of Human Rights,” “MC,” “PC,” and “Religious Freedom” equated with any “questioning-of” as “racism” or brash “phobia;” all to quell our freedom of speech and keep reality off the radar long enough to allow such stupid bug-shit laws as “food for sex” to exist under ISAF controlled territories at the expense of NATO soldiers deaths!

Fuck that shit.

I gotten to speak to a few fellas who’ve come back from ass-crack-istan, and when I hear that if you try to stop the rape of young boys on Thursday night’s “Man-Love-Boy,” they’ll just end up dead, propped up in an area that you’ll see as a lesson to your own psyche not to interfere, because if you do, the death is on you; and these are the animals who have been allowed to flourish their culture under islam.

I’m going to mother Earth’s asshole for one primary reason: Canadians are there doing their job and they need more fellow CF members to watch their back. And when we’re done in 2011, I hope to fuck we never go back.

Given this law that allows Muslim men to starve their wives into submission, I'm sure we will see street protests by feminists should the Afghan President ever dare come to America.I'm sure we can also expect President Obama and Sec Clinton to speak out any day now, given their vocal complaints about israeli settlements.

A reminder/request: please keep it clean. Comments with f-bombs and the like are subject to deletion.

Kaffir_Kanuck,

You might find it interesting that in the now infamous Arlene Specter Pennsylvania townhall one constituent asked Specter if he had ever read the Koran.This constituent went on to talk about the Koran and the dangers of Islam all unfiltered on cable news.

I'm sure we can also expect President Obama and Sec Clinton to speak out any day now, given their vocal complaints about israeli settlements.

Posted by: Roxane at August 16, 2009 4:23 PM

POTUS/Commander-in-chief, Barak Hussein Obama:
"We also know that military power alone is not going to solve the problems in Afghanistan and Pakistan. That is why we plan to invest $1.5 billion each year over the next five years to partner with Pakistanis to build schools and hospitals, roads and businesses, and hundreds of millions to help those who have been displaced. And that is why we are providing more than $2.8 billion to help Afghans develop their economy and deliver services that people depend upon.".

By voting Barry in, Americans also handed him the keys to the treasury. Why would Barry 'God D**n America' Hussein, or Hillary, who does not have a problem blaming America for Mexican violence, care for Americans, if you see the point.............
As for Americans, they just did not know it but ......... voting traitors into office, comes with a price.

Did anyone catch Christiane Amanpour's sickening documentary on Afghanistan (CNN, Saturday and Sunday nights this weekend)?

ALL the problems in Afghanistan, according to Amanpour, are due to poverty. Nothing to do with islam, of course. So if the American troops just build some more schools, all will be well.

Better ask the Canadian troops who have been assiduously building schools for the last six years, only to have them blown up, about that tactic.

Personally, I can't stand Amanpour and her snotty fake British accent. It's all Pakistaaaan, Afghanistaaaan, Talibaaaaan,....makes me nuts!

Alert,

Fortunately for America, Barry isn't half the politician that Bill Clinton was. I've been watching the townhalls where average Americans have been eating democrat politicians for lunch.The Benedict Arlene Specter townhall was a thing of beauty.Lord Specter was told by one constituent "You work for us, you report to us".Barry might actually lose on his signature health care reform despite having majorities in both the House and Senate.

Dear Robert,
You are surely allowed an "I told you so"! You warned back in 2003 of the incompatibility of the new Constitution and the fact that 'The draft is based on Islamic principles and recognizes that no law can be contrary to the sacred religion of Islam.' As you pointed out then, the "Islamic principles" will always trump the constitution, if there's conflict.
Learned posters above have made the same point.
Yet if you'd been on the Constitutional drafting committee and made that point, you'd surely have been labeled an "Islamophobe" by the "Islamophobiaphobes".
The fact is: the open and tolerant parts of the Constitution are effectively dead, killed by the dead weight of "Islamic principles"....

Robert's 2003 post:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/000036.php

Marisol,

I apologies for f-bombing the comment.

Given the nature of events of late at the ISAF HQ, I’m certain that F-bombs are completely harmless in the face of suicide bombers and indiscriminant IEDs.

If an F-Bomb were to go off indiscriminately in the name of a totalitarian political objective, I’m certain only the PC branch of the offended co-religionists would brandish these wounds to the protectors of the MC HRC leftist monkeys as a harm needing restitution to regain a sensibility long lost on our western culture.

So, if I drop the odd F**k now and then, it isn’t because of the ease of such vernacular as a noun, verb or adjective, but more to bring home the point of the statement; but never to the same effect that killing human beings in the name of a religion will ever affect.

The troopies on the front line fighting this war never worry about offending or cleaning up their language when communicating, and by deleting comments out-right based solely on the odd four letter description of copulation seems a tad Orwellian, especially on a site which champions free speech.

Therefore, if you feel that a commentator has crossed the F’n line by using to many F’n words in a F’d up world where F’n illiterate r’g heads kill and kill and KILL until they get their F’n way in the name of a F’n cult, then, for sure, delete away. Until then, I will only use the entire word, not a derivative, not in an acronym, but the entire word because sometimes, after the blood, the guts, the body parts, the desiccated dried flesh and intestines scraped from mud, brick and vehicle parts, which never make it to the MSM, would in their very display elicited such a word. But in their absence, I simply say…

(Feel free to insert what ever cuss of human depravity you are most used to at this point)

Amazing that these Muslim men would do something so public demonstrating how unattractive and revolting they are to their wives.

So, of course, since it is Afghanistan, the little lady can't slip out of the house to the Dairy Queen for a snack.

Seriously, why exactly are we wasting time, money and American lives for a group of 7th century barbarians who think that the 7th century is just a great place to live in?

No sex, no food? No food, no one alive to COOK the food. Hmmm. Do the husbands really want to do the cooking? Sounds like everyone will starve to death to me. Muslims are such smart people.

I related this story to my wife and I can't repeat what she said here for Robert would surely remove my post. But let me give a little hint with the following statement: Hell hath no fury like an angry redhead.;)

Quran 4:15,16 says gay men are forgiven but gay women are to die. Islam hates women.

Quran 4:15,16 says gay men are forgiven but gay women are to die. Islam hates women.

Kevin -- as a redhead myself, I think I get your drift! ...and I share your wife's sentiment, btw :)

K_K,
I appreciated all your comments in this thread. Sorry, Marisol, I'm with K_K on this one. Gratuitous swearing is offensive and unnecessary to transmit one's message. However, heinous can sometimes only be described using words that demonstrate the action's heinousness.

This happens all over.

American women with small children are tossed aside by their spouses in favor of girlfriends who have more time and energy to devote to the sexual pleasures of their man.

Grueling poverty often follows.

Poverty is the single most significant factor in obesity, so no you can't tell the favored wife by the size of her waistline. Cheap food is usually fattening food, grains and potatoes fill you up and out.

It happens here, I have documented cases of women and children living in desperate poverty and experiencing malnutrition because they were abandoned by their husbands.

You probably expect that the court system is fair in such cases. Lady Justice is very fond of deep pockets.

KaffirKanuck

take care in that hell-pit. I'm sure all the praying folks here - be they Christian, Jew, Sikh, Hindu, Buddhist, Pagan, you-name-it - will be praying hard for you while you're there. *I* certainly will be. If you meet any Aussies there, say hi to them from me.

We hope you'll come back safely. But...please do make arrangements for somebody you know (a family member, say), should anything happen to you, to email Mr Spencer and let him know. If you get wounded, the folks here would like to know. If, heaven forbid, you're killed: then I think we'd want to have your name right up there on the sidebar along with Oriana Fallaci and Dominic.

At least - unlike many other Allied soldiers - you're going into Afghanistan *knowing*exactly what you're dealing with. You *know* the enemy's playbook. And you will, we hope, be able to share that potentially life-saving knowledge right there on the ground, with other non-Muslim soldiers.

Then at least some of our soldiers - Canadian, Aussie, British, the rest - may start coming home on leave with a clear cold knowledge of exactly what Islam is and does and intends for th world, and they in turn can educate and warn their families and fellow citizens.

I see a lot of commenters here are still sentimentalizing Muslim women, as though they are merely victims of Islam.

What else will it take for us to realize these 7th century barbarians are beyond repair? This is retarded islam at work and it takes one step forward four steps backward. Its all sex in islam, pedophile mohammad had only sex on his mind.

From post above: I see a lot of commenters here are still sentimentalizing Muslim women, as though they are merely victims of Islam.

You mean they are not victims? Allah is the greatest victimizer that ever existed...There are at least a billion of his victims walking around in a daze...a few post on JW...

I tried the 'no food unless sex' once...After fasting for a week, I noticed no improvement in the sex department, but I did lose five pounds...My wife thought it was a silly idea...I guess she was right...

Kaffir,

Go with your eyes open and keep your powder dry.

I for one welcome the occasional use of the word fuck and others. This is how many people speak and a significant way to emphasize a point. Marisol's comments reeks of PC and I am totally unimpressed with such a pusillanimous attitude.

A note to JW: Do NOT try and tell us how to speak, we have enough difficulty working on convincing those around us that Islam is a threat without having to worry about being backstabbed or controlled by a site we have mostly come to trust.

duh_swami:

"You mean they are not victims? Allah is the greatest victimizer that ever existed...There are at least a billion of his victims walking around in a daze...a few post on JW..."

I use the English language very carefully. I did not say they are not victims. I said they are not merely victims. The sentimentalization of Muslim women has the tendency to obfuscate the Stockholm Syndrome aspect of the victimization of Muslim women, whereby they become willing slaves, True Believers, supporters of those who oppress them -- and in that respect, we must rationally consider them to be just as dangerous to us as the men, and to let down our guard for them, just because they are women, could have reckless, disastrous consequences for our safety in the future.

Can't help but feel we are preaching to the converted here. Question is, how best to react to these atrocities? After all, as it is said, you can't reason with people that don't use reason to come to their conclusions ...
We need to appeal to the moderate, peace-loving Muslims. I sense if they are trying to justify these actions it's more a case of misguided-ness than hatred.
If we can agree NOT to use religion and try to reason we might get somewhere...

Can't help but feel we are preaching to the converted here. Question is, how best to react to these atrocities? After all, as it is said, you can't reason with people that don't use reason to come to their conclusions ...
We need to appeal to the moderate, peace-loving Muslims. I sense if they are trying to justify these actions it's more a case of misguided-ness than hatred.
If we can agree NOT to use religion and try to reason we might get somewhere...

Can't help but feel we are preaching to the converted here. Question is, how best to react to these atrocities? After all, as it is said, you can't reason with people that don't use reason to come to their conclusions ...
We need to appeal to the moderate, peace-loving Muslims. I sense if they are trying to justify these actions it's more a case of misguided-ness than hatred.
If we can agree NOT to use religion and try to reason we might get somewhere...







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter