Spencer: British Lion Muzzled

LionMuzzled_hh_2.jpg

In "British Lion Muzzled," the featured article at Human Events today, I tell some stories from my recent trip to London -- stories about how Britain is succumbing to Islamic supremacism:

[...] Unrecognized inside the mosques we were able to enter, I was warmly received as a potential convert and laden with books and pamphlets explaining the wonders of Islam -- including, courtesy the Finsbury Park Mosque, a copy of the Koran with illuminating commentary: “The purpose for which the Muslims are required to fight,” we’re told, “is not, as one might think, to compel the unbelievers into embracing Islam.”

Feel better? Don’t. “Rather, its purpose is to put an end to the suzerainty of the unbelievers so that the latter are unable to rule over people. The authority to rule should only be vested in those who follow the Truth Faith; unbelievers who do not follow this True Faith should live in a state of subordination.” So much for liberty and justice for all.

The current state of Britain came most clearly into focus, however, not when we visited the mosques, but when we tried to have dinner. I had an illuminating dinner with a group including the notable British author and freedom fighter Douglas Murray that turned out to offer a bracing introduction to British dhimmitude: the dinner had to be moved at the last minute since the proprietors of the George Restaurant in the aptly-named Isle of Dogs district of London didn’t like us discussing jihad and Islamization on the premises. This was despite the fact that the dinner had been planned to be on-camera and had been cleared with the George in advance.

In fact, when I returned to the George the next night with the producers of the film, we were not allowed entry because the previous night we had been discussing jihad and Islamic supremacism.

Were the proprietors of the George Restaurant hard-line Leftists who viewed jihadists as their allies in the struggle against American imperialism? Or were they frightened by the prospect of the local Muslims, who live in that area in considerable numbers, exacting revenge against the place for daring to host a meeting of the Resistance?

Most likely they were afraid of their own government, which frowns upon those who question the wisdom or viability of the multicultural paradise they are intent upon creating. For when we finally tried to assemble in another place a roundtable of concerned British citizens to discuss the problem of the Islamization of Britain, one by one the British participants dropped out. If they appeared on camera, we were told, the government could and probably would threaten their livelihood.

If the British government makes the stakes too high for its own people to speak publicly against the policies that have brought into Britain thousands of people intent upon destroying the British state and imposing Islamic law, then all is nearly lost.

It’s no wonder that British citizens are turning to noxious racist parties like the BNP: the elites have abandoned them. This is a time for the British people to summon untapped resources of courage, and for the British government to recover its vision. Otherwise all will be lost, and soon.

Read it all.

| 38 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

38 Comments

I'd really like to know why the BNP is termed "racist" here, when I hear so many Brits waiting and willing to vote for them.

First of all, are they really "racist"? And if so, does it really matter?

Look at it this way. People crow and croon when an ethnic group indigenous to a country/region get autonomy. It's OK for there to be "black" countries, "Asian" countries (full of this or that breed of Asian) and so on, but the idea of a "white" country is somehow racist and and beyond the pale.

Is the ANC any less racist than the whites who previously ran South Africa, or are they OK because they favour the blacks instead? And what about Oprah going to Africa to build schools specifically for blacks, and saying "To hell with the whites, i'm not here for them"? Not a peepish sound was made, but if someone said "to hell with the blacks", well, their career would be over.

I think a European country has every right to be "racist" - if Europe can't be considered a "white" homeland, then we're totally lost as a people. The multiculti madness will simply continue until Europeans are swamped and lose their genetic as well as cultural heritage through demographic swamping.

Of course, it doesn't mean that other people can't live there, just as Americans and Europeans often move to Japan (but in small and limited numbers), just that it should be accepted that if someone from another culture does want to live in a new culture, the newcomer must recognize and assimilate to the native culture - even if it is "white".

No doubt if the British Lion Sir Winston Churchill appeared today and espoused his knowledge of Islam as so aptly expressed in his book "The River Wars" he would most likely be spirited away and treated in the same way Geert Wilders is.

Britain has lost its way and apparently can find no British value,culture,or character worth defending against the aggressive totalitarian religion that makes up Islam.

The House of Lords may one day become The House of Allah if they continue to appease Muslims and denounce any leader who espouses to be a lion among the dhimmibrits.

Defending ones values,and culture has nothing to do with race.

"Is the ANC any less racist than the whites who previously ran South Africa, or are they OK because they favour the blacks instead?"
Posted by: Spirit Wolf

One astute observer pointed out, some 25 or 30 years ago, that virtually every sub-Saharan country was ruled by a dominant tribe, and in South Africa, that tribe happened to be white.

It is appalling what is happening in Britain. I have many wonderful British friends who are also appalled, but don't know where to turn. The British leadership is clueless.

Well Robert, I'm glad you've been able to do this work without being recognized and, especially, physically harmed by the mahoundian hordes that inhabit Londonistan.

In present-day Britain, had any of those hostile invaders done any bodily harm to you or Jason Campbell, they probably would only have been fined for "hate speech" and not criminally charged at all. After all, punishing them would have endangered "community harmony/cohesion", wouldn't it?

"Unbelievers who do not follow this True Faith should live in a state of subordination.”


One would be hard pressed to find a more despicable statement. It is treasonous against Britain and all Western countries. This common Islamic view epitomizes tyranny, the worst form of human oppression except this time the tyrants are sanctimonious Muslims who believe they have the right to dominate non-Muslims. To hell with them.

At least in my country, should the United States follow the path of Britain and attempt to implement Shariah law in any respect, even as a multicultural appendage to the Constitution, I will refer them to the following passages:

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson

I thank my lucky stars that I was not born in an Islamic country or Britain as it stands today. I don't think many Americans would stand for Islamic law. Neither do most British citizens - but their government ignores them.

If they appeared on camera, we were told, the government could and probably would threaten their livelihood.

Please say more. How? On what grounds?

Talk about censorship, this site has its fair share.

I think you got it wrong Robert. You visited LONDON, aka Londonistan (courtesy Melanie Philips), where almost a majority of the population is immigrant and likely Muslim.

It is probably similar in Birmingham (Green Lane Mosque), Leicester, Luton, Bradford, parts of Manchester and Lancashire. They are ALL Muslim strongholds. That doesn't apply much elsewhere and the Brits ARE waking up whether or not you believe that they support the "racist" BNP.
People may not vote for the BNP - particularly because of their otherwise far left agenda and general lack of clear policy - but they DO recognise the rightness of standing up for the indigenous population as the BNP propose. THAT aim is seriously being embraced by educated middle-class people as well as the rest of the indigenous population.
I predict that it will all kick off very soon - indeed it has already started in Bradford and Birmingham and I also predict that it will be the UK and not France or the Netherlands or Denmark which starts the move against Islam. Some very innocent Muslims will sadly be affected. Much as in any conflict - Muslims,Christians, Hindus, Buddhists and so on.
The TRULY innocent always suffer.

From the years 2002 to 2008, England had a popular television drama about British intelligence service MI-5, titled MI-5 (or alternately, Spooks). The whole point of the show was to have weekly dramatic stories about MI-5 solving and fighting terrorism.

The very first episode aired in May of 2002, so one would assume it was written, if not also directed, at a time sufficiently long after 9/11 for the writers and directors to have digested the terrorist attack on New York City over 7 months prior to the date of airing. And what kind of terrorism did that first episode of this new gritty, tough, realistic show about terrorism depict? Muslims? Heavens, no! The terrorists of that first episode were anti-abortionists, of course!

I have slowly but surely been renting all the episodes of the show. I am at this stage almost done with season 3 (two more episodes to go). The first season had 6 episodes, all subsequent episodes had 10. So far, of the 24 episodes I have watched, only 3 deal with actual Muslim terrorists. That means that so far, approximately 13% of the terrorism depicted on the show is Islamic. It's supposed to be a gritty realistic drama about this pressing issue of the day. Since when has terrorism been only 13% Islamic? The actual percentage of terrorism in the real world is rather the reverse of that. It's more accurate to say that 13% of terrorism around the world is non-Islamic -- and even that would be a generous estimate: it's probably far lower than that.

The other 21 episodes imaginatively reach and twist and turn to find all manner and flavor of terrorism non-Islamic:

the IRA of course, the dependable staple of the anti-terrorist drama of TV and movies;

Armenian terrorists (who one assumes must be Christians but the whole thing is contextualized in terms purely of political grievances);

white racist terrorists;

Russian terrorists;

a rogue CIA assassin;

Colombian drug cartel getting active in international terrorism;

a disgruntled British Army officer who takes an army base hostage;

Serbs in league with North Koreans;

a rogue French businessman in league with the Chinese...

Meanwhile, two of them deal with falsely assumed Muslim terrorists, and one deals with Jewish terrorists allied with neo-cons! (Funny how these kinds of shows and movies -- and I have seen many different ones over the years aside from MI-5 -- never deal with a falsely assumed non-Islamic terrorism that later turns out to be Islamic...)

Of the 3 that have dealt with Muslim terrorists, they are padded with ways to deflect or soften the Islamic aspect:

One involves a Muslim who goes undercover in a mosque to help MI-5 and in his mouth, as well as in the mouth of a "moderate" cleric, the viewers get a few obligatory lectures written into the dialogue about how "true Islam" is utterly different than what the terrorist imam is advocating. Funny, the show didn't seem to find it necessary at all to insert lectures about how most Russians are not bad people when they had a show about Russian terrorists -- ditto for anti-abortionists, Armenians, Chinese, Koreans, etc.

Another involves a young white grad student who apparently has converted to Islam and joined an Islamic terrorist cell -- but there is nothing in his dialogue remotely Islamic: the only thing he says when articulating his goals is that he wants to further "the Revolution". Also, only his face is shown -- his cohorts when they do appear briefly at the end are all completely masked and shown in the darkness of night.

The third episode involves one of the MI-5 team assigned to guard a pleasant middle-aged Muslim Pakistani bookseller who has become the target of Muslim assassins ("extremists", of course). MI-5 doesn't know why this nice peaceful Pakistani is a target. While guarding him round the clock, "Danny" (the black MI-5 agent) begins to develop a warm friendship with the Pakistani and they both have a bond in their love of cricket. Danny even arranges to drive the Pakistani to a major cricket field in London. Near the end of the show, MI-5 learns that this pleasant harmless Pakistani bookseller in fact is an engineer and for years he had directly assisted a terrorist group in Pakistan which has mass-murdered countless innocent people over the years. Indeed, that terrorist group is the one trying to kill him now, because he had become a double agent to help MI-6 (another branch of intelligence). When he does get shot on Danny's watch, Danny is torn up with grief about losing such a nice friend -- a nice friend who was directly responsible for the murders of countless innocent people. That untidy detail is deftly padded and softened by the writing and direction. Instead, the ugliness is transferred onto British intelligence for cynically having used the terrorist Pakistani bookseller, and then of making a deal with the terrorist group that wants him dead by allowing them to kill him in exchange for cooperation with MI-6 in other matters.

I learn from IMDB (the Internet Movie Database) that season 4 was written and directed before the London bombings on 7/7/05, so I will have to wait until I get around to season 5 to see how the show's writers and directors deal with Muslim terrorism in the wake of a very real, horrible, and undeniably Islamic terrorism right there in the heart of London. I predict that they will follow the usual perverse logic of PC MC: rather than shows signs of increased awareness, concern and knowledge of the threat of Muslims, they will actually regress to a state of further denial and bending-over-backwards "respect" for Muslims bolstered by anxious ways to make sure Islam and most Muslims are disassociated from the "tiny minority of extremists" who happen to be Muslims too.

While ZaNu Labour is the most trecherous party in our history, there is no reason to suppose that "call me Dave" Cameron's conservative party or the Lib Dems are any better as regards the demographic destruction of the natives or the islamificaion of the UK.

Unforunately, the British political hierarchy is in the grip of common purpose marxists who are deermined, along wih their counerpars in Europe, to destroy every sovereign nation state in Europe.

It is blindingly obvious that we have been sold out.

I'm sorry but this is bulls**t.

just because a truth happens to apply in London doesn't make it a universal truth. To speak of 'British lion muzzled' when the experience you feel qualifies you to state such is highly localised is nothing short of sensationalism.

When you've travelled the length and breadth of Britain and visited most of our major cities and towns for a balanced view, I'll be more inclined to treat this as anything more.

Loony Islamic trouble makers in the capital. Who would have thought it eh?

I'm sorry but this is bulls**t.

just because a truth happens to apply in London doesn't make it a universal truth. To speak of 'British lion muzzled' when the experience you feel qualifies you to state such is highly localised is nothing short of sensationalism.

When you've travelled the length and breadth of Britain and visited most of our major cities and towns for a balanced view, I'll be more inclined to treat this as anything more.

Loony Islamic trouble makers in the capital. Who would have thought it eh?

Double post.

Typepad throwing a strop.

Apologies.

Seems Britain's finest hour has been almost immediately followed by its worst hour. If things continue as they are now, then Britain will have no more hours left.

just because a truth happens to apply in London doesn't make it a universal truth

And if you spend a very short trip visiting "some of the most notorious mosques in Britain", that will naturally colour your view.

I live very happily in London and have nothing to do with Muslims - it's a fantastic place to live.

A shame that some very good points in a good piece are marred by the usual extrapolation to a whole country from a highly selective set of encounters.

It is as if I were to go to Dearborn, or those training camps previously reported on and to write "America succumbs etc..."

People are waiting for next year's general election. That's not to say that Dhimmi Dave's government will be any better, but when it's not, people will start to act and speak up.

And some of the other British commenters are right - you shouldn't judge the whole of Britain by a very short visit to a particularly troublesome area.

Robert is also right that our leaders have let us down - but we know this, and as I said, we're all waiting for next year's election. Also, Robert, you keep stating that the BNP is racist, but you never back this up with sources or quotes. Is it because of the membership criteria? Please enlighten us!

From the article: "If they appeared on camera, we were told, the government could and probably would threaten their livelihood." Ordinary British Citizens not speaking out in case the government threatened their livelihood?? How? Unless they are government employees? What the heck are they putting in London water these days? I could have found you many people who'd be willing to go on camera and talk about the Islamisation of Britain.

There is absolutely no room for complacency, but the British Lion ain't dead yet!

I am a proud, patriotic Englishman and Brit (in that order).

But I despair at what my country is becoming, this washed out state of pure apathy. We appear to the rest of the world to actually welcome this Islamic invasion.

Nothing is, in actuality further from the truth but I understand how people may get that impression.

We have been mismanaged so badly over the last 12 or so years by a government that is truly poisoned by 'political correctness'. In fact the general populace has been poisoned and demoralised by it, we are told that our flag is racist, Christmas is offensive to minorities and a whole host of unspeakable offences like this have been committed against the British people, in particular the English over the years.
John Prescott (a lardarse waste of space politician for our friends in the US) is on record as saying England does not exist, it is merely a collection of regions - I was so enraged by that particular comment I am glad I was nowhere near him at the time.

These things repeatedly thrust down our throats over time will demoralise any nation to the point of apathy and I fear the old bulldog spirit is being drained out of us as a nation.

They will not succeed though, the politicians have gone too far, I am of the opinion that they are actually committing treason against their country and their people. Labour WILL NOT be voted in again which is why they are holding off the election as long as possible. I don't actually think that the Conservatives will be much better but they are at least not as far left as Labour.

We are getting to a point now that we are sick to death of the situation as it is, a once strong and proud nation, now a doormat for the left to wipe its treacherous feet. Overrun by a dangerous minority that is succeeding to tell us what to do in our own country. We are becoming an international laughing stock and that is cutting those of us that still have the bulldog blood running through our veins to the bone. I would melodramatically state that the situation is breaking my heart, but that actually happened some time ago.

The government is so far out of touch with the people you'd think they were busy ruining a whole other country, if we were given a referendum regarding the release of this Lockerbie woman and child murderer by the Scottish government, do you actually think he would be free now? NO CHANCE IN HELL.

If we were given a referendum on these matters, there would be an immediate halt on muslim immigration, illegals would be expelled, as would those without citizenship that preach hatred. The scum that abused our boys on their return from Afghanistan would have been arrested on the spot, treason would be punished by death (as is still legally possible). We would strip any offending elements of their recently acquired passports and prosecute any that were born here for treason as above. Shariah courts would be disbanded and the law of the land would be applied equally to Brits and Muslims alike and any other concessions made to these people would be reversed.

I hope I live to see my country wake up and regain it's self-respect.

I WILL be voting BNP, not because I agree with all it's policies because I most certainly don't. I like having Indians and other peaceful ethnic minorities around, they have integrated and enriched our society by their presence.
We dropped a major bollock allowing muzzies in though, we have to address it and I think the BNP is the only party with sufficient backbone.

We have had a gutfull of this shit and things are going to change.

It’s no wonder that British citizens are turning to noxious racist parties like the BNP: the elites have abandoned them. This is a time for the British people to summon untapped resources of courage, and for the British government to recover its vision. Otherwise all will be lost, and soon.

The BNP may have some repugnant aspects, but it is nowhere as evil as the Labour party. The Labour party is a collaborator in the destruction of Britian. Despite the claims of the Left of fascists hiding under every rock, Nick Griffin is not a threat to Britain and never has been. The same cannot be said for Gordon Brown and the host of other globalist-socialist politicians and media hacks.

@CriticalEndgame - the BNP's policies state that the only forced repatriation will be of fake asylum seekers, illegal, criminal and dissident immigrants. Of the others who are recently immigrated, those who want to stay and integrate can, those who wish to return to their homelands will be offered financial help.

So we will still have our manageable, peaceful ethnic minorities.

Not one other political party is addressing the Islam problem other than the BNP, so I WILL be voting for them. Their history may be chequered, but so was the history of other political parties.

People in foxholes have little choice but to stick with those who are pointing their guns in the right direction.

I am encouraged by the fact that SOME Brits are finally pissed off at islam's tactics. Please pester and pressure your lawmakers to amend the welfare or social assistance acts so that the likes of Anjem Chowdhary cannot sponge off the taxpayer. If they cannot find work, they ought to clean the streets to earn their dole. Those talking of jihad so that islam can rule Britain should be charged with sedition. If you can't throw the scum out, make life so difficult for them that they will get out themselves. Good riddance of bad rubbish.

After hearing the comments by the British posters here, I can only hope that real change comes to Britain, but I must confess that I have my doubts when I consider the whole situation according to the information that I get. The fact is that the present state of Britain,just as in America has been brought about by the people through their elections. It appears that the majority of the electorate has cast aside God and Country in favor of greed and ignorant bliss. I hope this will change before it's too late for either country, but Britain appears to be farther down the road to slavery at this point.

kamala & others

"If they appeared on camera, we were told, the government could and probably would threaten their livelihood."

"Please say more. How? On what grounds?"


Robert is entirely right on this one there are myriad always the government can ruin your life and career in Britain. This particularly applies to the BNP and its members.

You could look at the Libertarian Alliance website. Among other things they have outlined how the government ensures that the only people who can join the BNP without fear are from the lower end of society. Working people with limited education and little to lose.

A typical example would be the driver of a Council bus for disabled children who was dismissed when it was found he was a BNP member. It was explained that he was not fired because he belonged to the BNP that would have been an infringement of his freedom. He was fired because as a member of the BNP he could not deal with minorities fairly and was therefore unable to perform his duties properly. The suggestion must be that he would treat disabled children differently according to their race. There was never any evidence he had done so - but you cannot be too careful.

There is an old English saying "There is more than one way to skin a cat" and the Nu Labour Government employs people who know them all.

So the BNP are noxious; well lions do not smeell like a rose garden.

"For when we finally tried to assemble in another place a roundtable of concerned British citizens to discuss the problem of the Islamization of Britain, one by one the British participants dropped out. If they appeared on camera, we were told, the government could and probably would threaten their livelihood."

Wankers

So much for the non noxious british anti- jihadis, Mr Spencer, You time would have been better spent talking to Nick Griffin, who does not back down in front of the goverment or moslems, and see for yourself as to whether he is racist.

I can remember when the Daily Mail pulled Melanie Philips article when she called the BNP obnoxious.

It can be judged by the fact that you where able to tour the mosques, that your are unknown in Britian, and by slagging the BNP will not have a positve effect in giving you a wider british audience.

So the BNP are noxious; well lions do not smeell like a rose garden.

"For when we finally tried to assemble in another place a roundtable of concerned British citizens to discuss the problem of the Islamization of Britain, one by one the British participants dropped out. If they appeared on camera, we were told, the government could and probably would threaten their livelihood."

Wankers

So much for the non noxious british anti- jihadis, Mr Spencer, You time would have been better spent talking to Nick Griffin, who does not back down in front of the goverment or moslems, and see for yourself as to whether he is racist.

I can remember when the Daily Mail pulled Melanie Philips article when she called the BNP obnoxious.

It can be judged by the fact that you where able to tour the mosques, that your are unknown in Britian, and by slagging the BNP will not have a positve effect in giving you a wider british audience.

People call Robert Spencer things like "noxious racist" too. What if everyone believed it. People call Israel all sorts of horrible things. What if all of the world believed it. There would be no Israel. I'm so sick of Geller's and Spencer's glass houses.

I am encouraged by the fact that SOME Brits are finally pissed off at islam's tactics.

Yes, and watch your egotistical anti-Islam god trash them.

The BNP has many good ideas and its wish to cherish and preserve the British heritage, a very great one I might add, is to be applauded, but that requirement of the BNP that one must be white to join is an albatross around its neck. One knows this or should know it. What counts are things like ideas, tradition and heritage, not race. And, of course, Islam has nothing to do with race but everything to do with ideas, and very bad ideas at that. So being anti-Islamic has nothing to do with racism but requiring someone to be of a particular race to join a political party will prove to be more trouble than its worth and will actually water down any effectiveness such a party might otherwise have.

A black British citizen who is a devout Christian, a good family man, who cherishes British civilization, is a deep admirer of Winston Churchill and who is acutely aware that Islam is possessed of theological pathologies that no other religion is would be denied membership in the BNP simply because of his race. This is wrong on its face. And even if there were only one black Brit who would fit this description (or even none) the principle would still be paramount and controlling.

MrsJ,

"Also, Robert, you keep stating that the BNP is racist, but you never back this up with sources or quotes."

There are some givens out there for which most people blithely feel no need to offer proof: e.g. -- that the BNP are bad racists; that the Spanish Inquisition was wrong; that the internment of Japanese-Americans was wrong; that Robert Spencer is an Islamophobe... and so forth.

I absolutely agree with most posts here, in fact most posts on the blog, including the ones that appear very anti-Britain. I take those as meaning anti-British GOVERNMENT policy, in which case I tend to agree wholeheaterdly.

Please, for god's sake don't confuse government with people. In many cases and this one especially, they are not one and the same.

I understand the US posters that say that the British passport can no longer be trusted to be carried by a friend, this is very true. However, muzzies currently account for 2.7% of the UK population, so AT THE VERY LEAST 97.3% of British passport holders are friendly to the USA. This should still account for something, we do tend to bleed and die alongside you too. Admittedly in smaller numbers, but we are a far smaller country.

We need to improve our security? I don't think any Brit will disagree with you there, but then again, it's a GOVERNMENT issue not the people.

Moving on, sadly Wellington is perfectly correct, the BNP is a racist party plain and simple. That is my major gripe with it. I know bloody well that we need a similar party for our cultural existence and freedom but it needs to grow up if it's going to be any use at all, otherwise it is a waste of votes.

If it changed its stance on having to be white, if Nick Griffin publicly withdrew his holocaust denial statement with a public and complete apology to Jews (who are allies here, don't forget) and focussed purely on defending Britain from an ACTUAL rather than imagined threat they may become respectable enough to be electable. Or at least powerful enough to give a massive kick in the arse to the party that is in power to get it moving on some pretty f*cking critical issues.

One thing we all seem to forget here is that we are all politically right of centre, the populace of most western countries are leaning to the left. We spend hours preaching to the converted, everyone here has the same view.

Do we get out there spreading our knowledge of what is happening and what is coming to the ignorant masses? I have already lost two (I thought were good) friends over this, I am not mourning the loss and I am sure I am going to lose more but that isn't the point.

I KNOW I AM RIGHT.

I may change tactics in the future though ;-)

We need a forum at the least for a start, we need to organise our nations and organise with people across 'ponds'. We need to formulate strategies and pass on what is working and what isn't. We need to organise GLOBALLY as ALLIES, no matter if we are Brits, Europeans, Americans, Aussies, Indians or anyone else that want's to remain free.

It's all well and good slagging each other off on myriad blogs, spreading what's happening on the Jihad front and who is further down the slippy slope to dhimmitude hell than the other. The fact is that if we keep doing this we will one by one fall. The enemy is united globally, if the resistance is going to stand a chance we have to ditch 'Yank', 'Brit', 'Kraut' whatever and become a united force against a common enemy.

Right now they are playing the divide and conquer scenario with devastating effectiveness, on top of their already effective "third jihad".

It's our choice guys, we can bicker, snooze and lose our grandchildrens freedom for them, or we can UNITE and FIGHT.

MrsJ,

"Also, Robert, you keep stating that the BNP is racist, but you never back this up with sources or quotes."

And why would that be ?

We just have to look at where the sources and quotes come from, and see how these sources go hand in hand with the moslems

CriticalEndgame --

"if Nick Griffin publicly withdrew his holocaust denial statement"

Could you link me to that statement?

I must agree with wellington that the BNP whites only policy is an albatross around its neck because even the MSM admitted it it has got some support from assimilated blacks. It also has support from Sikhs and Hindus but this has to be covert because the "liberal" MSM targets them even more than regular BNP members.

However there was a case about 2/3 years ago when the "anti-fascists" tried to force the BNP to have an "Asian" join and openly said the intention was to flood it with new members and take it over. Given that the BNP is regularly infiltrated by investigative reporters and the government subsidised Union Against Fascists buses people all over the country to disrupt their meetings, one would have thought they had enough problems already.

A little OT but the current case being brought by the "Equality & Human Rights Commission" - a wonderfully Orwellian title - is being gloated over by the left because if nothing else it will financially wreck the BNP before next years General Election.

@Hesperado

I can't find any direct quotes, although I do know that he once thought the holocaust was sometimes used to make money. He has many times stated in the past few years that the holocaust was a reality.

This is the BNP's stance on the 'Jewish issue': http://bnp.org.uk/2008/04/the-bnp-and-anti-semitism-a-response-to-the-board-of-deputies/

BNP refutes 'smears': http://bnp.org.uk/2007/12/countering-the-smears/
" Why don’t you let blacks and Asians into the BNP?
For the same reason the Girl Guides don’t allow boys to join. Does that mean they are sexist? Does it mean they hate boys? Of course not, it’s just that their aim is to cater for the interests of girls, and similarly the BNP isn’t racist, but our purpose is to cater for the interests of the indigenous British population. The indigenous population of Britain is now the only group which is facing systematic, legalised and institutionalised discrimination, harassment and oppression. That’s precisely why the British people need the BNP – because we are the one and only organisation that has their interests at heart. There are hundreds of organisations exclusively for blacks or Asians, but only one organisation for the indigenous population – the BNP."

"Your leader is on record denying the Holocaust ever happened and claiming that Jews control the media – you are clearly an anti-Semitic party.
Not at all. Dredging up quotes from 10, 15, 20 years ago is really pathetic and, in a sense, rather fascist. Everyone knows that people’s political philosophies evolve and change as they develop – at least three Labour ministers were previously Communist Party members, for instance - and Nick Griffin has repeatedly stated that he has changed his views since then. The BNP is in no way anti-Semitic nor do we deny the Holocaust. We have many Jewish members and are pleased to have a Jewish councillor in Epping, who is, indeed, the group leader there."

Hesperando.

if you are wanting a formal, written statement from me I cannot provide one.

But you knew that, didn't you? :-)

He is on record as saying all sorts of things about it, I admit mostly in early BNP material.

This should back me up enough though.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbDNDSqFeNE

It's old and I do agree with a lot MrsJ said above.

I support the BNP right now, and will vote for them as they are but I think, as I have said in other posts that they would be able to serve us better if they altered their policies a bit.

Firstly, Mr Griffin would do well by formally withdrawing his holocaust denial and issuing an apology. I am aware that he now (grudgingly) acknowledges it happened, all I am saying is that the party needs to alter and to try and change its public image if it is going to be electable and therefore, useful to us.

CJK - Re Britain..... 'the majority of the electorate has cast aside God and Country in favor of greed and ignorant bliss. I hope this will change before it's too late for either country, but Britain appears to be farther down the road to slavery at this point.'

Believe me CJK you have hit the nail on the head as regards my homeland. Lets face it the brain drain from this sad land started with the Mayflower.

It appalls me that many of those who do bother to think about the menace we are facing with this re-emergence of strident islam, flirt with nazism in response.

Whatever way it goes here it looks like the devil wins this little part of the world.
God (and America) help us!

It has begun, help make it grow!

Watch the youtube video on the main page

http://www.englishdefenceleague.org/

This is the English Defence League, there are counterparts in Scotland and Wales forming the British Defence Leagues, details here

http://casualsunited.webs.com/

There is also a Sikh Defence League, details above.

If you cannot join for demo, you can join the "Armchair warriors" you will be sent email addresses and petitions to make our feelings and voices heard.

This is a patriot movement, NOT a racist one. You can join no matter your religion or the colour of your skin, you are all welcome!







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter