Think Islamic Jew-hatred is a byproduct of "occupation"? Think again.

In 1929 Jews in Hebron were living on land they had "occupied" for 3,000 years. "Remembering the Hebron Massacre: Until 1929, Jews had lived in the city for three millennia," by Jerold S. Auerbach in the Wall Street Journal, August 27 (thanks to Dan):

[...] On Aug. 23-24, 1929, the Jewish community of Hebron was exiled following a horrific pogrom. The tragedy is known as Tarpat, an acronym for its date in the Hebrew calendar.

Until 1929, Jews had lived in Hebron for three millennia. There, according to Jewish tradition, Abraham purchased the cave of Machpelah to bury Sarah. It was the first parcel of land owned by the Jewish people in their promised land. Ever since, religious Jews revered Hebron as the burial site of their matriarchs and patriarchs. Conquered, massacred and expelled over the centuries, Jews always returned to this sacred place.

After 1267, under Muslim rule, no Jews were permitted to pray inside the magnificent enclosure, built by King Herod in the 1st century, that still surrounds the burial caves. But following the expulsion of Jews from Spain at the end of the 15th century, a small group of religious Jews rebuilt a community of study and prayer in Hebron.

In August 1929, that community was suddenly and brutally attacked. Incited by the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem—who claimed that Jews were endangering Muslim holy sites on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem—Arab rioters swept through Palestine. In Hebron, the carnage was horrendous.

It began on Friday afternoon when Arabs attacked Jews with clubs and murdered a yeshiva student. The next morning, joined by local villagers, Arabs swarmed through Hebron screaming "Kill the Jews." They broke into the home of Eliezer Dan Slonim, where many Jews had gathered for safety. There they wielded knives and axes to murder 22 innocents. In the Anglo-Palestine Bank, where 23 corpses were discovered, blood covered the tile floor. That day, three children under the age of five were murdered. Teenage girls, their mothers and grandmothers were raped and killed. Rabbis and their students were castrated before they were slain. A surviving yeshiva student recounted that he "had seen greater horrors than Dante in hell."

When the slaughter finally subsided, 67 Jews had been murdered. Three days later, British soldiers evacuated 484 survivors, including 153 children, to Jerusalem. The butchery in Hebron, Zionist and religious officials alleged, was "without equal in the history of the country since the destruction of the Temple." Sir Walter Shaw, chairman of an exhaustive British royal investigation, concluded that "unspeakable atrocities" had occurred. [...]

Hebron Jews are relentlessly vilified as fanatics who illegally occupy someone else's land. As religious Zionists, they are the militant Jewish settlers whom legions of Jewish and non-Jewish critics love to hate. It is seldom noticed that their most serious transgression—settlement in the biblical land of Israel—is the definition of Zionism: the return of Jews to their historic homeland.

| 19 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

19 Comments

Free Hagia Sophia!
End the occupation!
muslim go home!

Thank you, Mr. Auerbach, for reminding us of the story of the Jews of Hebron, brutally massacred by Arabs for no crime other than living in this historically Jewish city. This all happened before Israel was a state. No amount of historical revisionism or extravagant Arab propaganda can change the fact that murderous brutality was directed at the Jews and has not ceased all these years. What has dismayed and shocked the Arabs is that all their crimes and terror have not benefitted them. They have lost and continue to lose. Giving up territory to them to achieve peace will never work. The story of Hebron is the best illustration of that. Even the Jewish community of 1929 with no national borders was too large for the Arabs to tolerate. Even small children were not allowed to live. This should never be forgotten when the subject of "land for peace" rears its head again. Obama, please take note.

Assad slipped up a few weeks ago during an Arabic discussion on Palestinian TV.

He inadvertently commented that his family fled their home in Safed in 1948 out of fear of Jewish vengeance. What on earth was he talking about?

The same day as the 1929 Hebron butchery, his own family and other Arabs of Safed were involved in this as described by the first outsider on the scene.

"Hacohen managed to find his way to the town where the Jewish elders of the cities fell upon him weeping bitter tears. Said Hacohen, "Inside the houses I saw the mutilated and burned bodies of the victims of the massacre, and the burned body of a woman tied to the grille of a window."

Referring to the marauding Arabs, Hacohen continued, "They slaughtered the schoolteacher, Aphriat, together with his wife and mother, and cut the lawyer, Toledano, to pieces with their knives. Bursting into the orphanages, they smashed the children's heads and cut off their hands. I myself saw the victims."

The total loss to Jewish life and property was 18 killed, about 40 wounded and 200 houses burned and looted."

An unspeakable atrocity was committed by Arabs who now call themselves "Palestinians" on Aug. 23, 1929 in Hebron on Shabbatniks, the most peaceful Jewish people in the world who refused to bear arms not only on Shabbat, but on any other day. There was no "Israeli occupation". In fact, the state of Israel did not even exist then. So, what was the future "Palestinians" excuse?
Ruslan Tokhchukov, EnragedSince1999.

good article. offcourse the muslim apologists and the muslim trolls over here will either not comment or if they do they will start spreading their lies (Taqiyya) because spreading lies and half truths is in their blood.

There's a good article over on www.Aish.com about the Hebron Massacre for anyone whos interested, including the part the British played.

At: http://staringattheview.blogspot.com/2009/05/devil-and-jew.html

I did a posting about Jew-hatred in Islam. Robert is right - it goes back much longer than 1948, and has little if anything to do with the modern state of Israel.

Why do so few understand that the Muslim butchery of Jews started with Mo.?

Why do so many turn a blind eye to Muslim atrocities, but scream every time a Muslim dies at Western hands, WHEN MORE MUSLIMS HAVE BEEN BUTCHERED BY MUSLIM HANDS.

THEY ARE HYPOCRITES!

Mohamed hated Jews,he was the one who commanded that Arabia be populated only by Muslims. He was the one who dehumanized Jews by calling them apes and pigs. Hating Jews is part of the ideological dogma of Islam. Nothing has changed, unless you think of all the money over there now.

There is a gate to the old city of Jerusalem that Muslims under the Ottoman Empire blocked with stone work. However, you can still see the outline of the gate.

A cave reputed to be the burial site of the Jewish patriarch Jacob was also blocked up.

This suppression goes back a long long way. Even a stone near Mount Sinai, reputed to be the one that Moses hit with his staff to cause a spring to emerge, has an iron Crescent on it.

The funny thing is that Jewish faith doesn't hinge on any of these things. They're not required to make a pilgrimage to any of these sites.

They have projected their own biases upon others. Nothing much has changed.

Maybe more of the "jewish cabal" needs to buy some TV stations and media content providers to start sneaking some truth and propaganda in to Saturday morning cartoons and whatever media the amazingly liberal jewish parents feed their children to get so passive a group that ignores jew-hatred from islam.

Rammer - thanks for that link.

You know what got me about it?

First: the Jews didn't realize that most of the Muslims, whom they regarded as their friends and neighbours, hated their guts; that the smiling mask of 'friendship' and business relations, concealed a seething will to murder, and not just to murder, but to defile, humiliate, and *hurt*. (Out of a population of some 18000 Arabs who would have been, overwhelmingly, Muslims, exactly *19* acted to protect their Jewish neighbours from the mob. 19 out of 18 000 - now *there* is a 'tiny minority'. 1 in 10 000.)

It is only when one has knowledge of taqiyya, and of the teaching of hatred against the Infidel (and especially, the Jew), and of that awful Muslim line 'we smile at some people, though our hearts hate them', that one can make sense of paragraphs like the following:

"They [the Jews] considered their relations with their Arab {that is, Muslim - dda} neighbors to be strong, based upon years of friendship and shared experiences..." BUT "the mob that rampaged through the city included respected Arab {Muslim - dda} merchants and “good” neighbors who killed their friends, clients and business associates.

Wala wa al-baraa - loyalty and enmity. All those verses in the Quran that tell Muslims NEVER to befriend a non-Muslim...unless feignedly, for temporary Muslim advantage. There it is: Jews living side by side with Muslims for years, thinking them friendly...and then all hell, in the shape of that same Muslim neighbour, came howling to their door.

Second: besides the massive lie that the Muslims of Hebron had obviously been living, there are clear specific instances of taqiyya in this account, as well. It stands out a mile that the Muslims knew damn well what was coming. It was not spontaneous. It had been prepared and planned. And yet: the Muslim leaders deliberately told specific, soothing lies to the worried Jewish leaders..one assumes, merely in order to prevent the Designated Prey from becoming spooked and fleeing before the butchery could be committed.

Quote - "the Arab [MUSLIM] Governor of Hebron, Abdullah Kardos, had promised the Jews that they would not be harmed." Yeah, right. Like speaking soothing words to the animal about to be halal butchered.

Again - 'As they [Jewish leaders] walked out of the meeting, they were met with a barrage of stones thrown by Arab {Muslim -dda} youths. Yet, shortly after the Arabs {Arab Muslims - dda} finished their Friday prayers, Arab {Muslim - dda} notables came to Slonim to reassure him that no harm would come to the Jews of Hebron.
These notables were either misinformed or misinforming." END QUOTE.

Given everything I have learned here, especially from Mr Ibrahim's admirable essays, about the doctrines of deception in Islam: Occam's Razor says that those Muslim leaders in Hebron, who promised the Jews they would not be harmed, were..lying their damned heads off.

False friendship concealing bottomless depths of demoniacal hate that manifested itself not just in murder, but in sadistic torture-rape-mutilation-murder; and deceit, deceit, deceit.

All completely explicable from canonical Muslim texts and how they teach Muslims to treat Infidels.

You read this stuff and it makes you want to go take a bath to wash off the filth.

The public needs to be educated about the history of the Jewish people. Hopefully if that were to happen we wouldn't hear the nonsense that we hear today about Jerusalem and the so called West Bank that we hear today.

Apologies for not checking my maths before the above comment went through. 19 people, out of 18 000 people, is in fact, roughly speaking, 1 in one thousand. 0.1 %. Better than one in ten thousand, as I originally said - but still a pretty tiny minority.

This 'test case' in Hebron rather suggests to me that the argument that the nasty Muslims are the tiny minority and the nice Muslims are the majority, is wrong; it's the other way around. The 'nice' ones (as demonstrated by these nineteen Muslims who sheltered Jews during the Muslim massacre of Jews in Hebron) are a vanishingly small minority; the nasty ones, just waiting for a chance to indulge in horrifying mass violence, are the majority.

Free North Africa!

Muslims Go Home to Mecca!

Free Constantinople and the rest of Turkey!

Free India (AKA {Pakistan)!

Free the non-Saudi Arabian Middle East!

Free Malaysia!

Free the Balkans!

Free Europe!

Muslims Go Home!

And finally,

FREE MUSLIMS FROM ISLAM!

Profitsbeard - amen to that!

(And given the number of apostasisers we are getting these days, both publicised and unpublicised, prominent - Magdi Cristiano Allam - and somewhat less prominent - Rifqa Bary; and given that the Somali jihadis and the Iranian authorities are going nuts chasing the secret Christians, no sooner do they catch some in one place, than half a dozen pop up somewhere else - it seems that there has even been a start made on the last item in your To-Do list).

My prayer, every Friday, is for 'the Defeat of the Jihad, and for the Liberation of Muslims from Islam'. Since I am a Christian, I pray for Muslims to be able to become Christians; yet I also see the hand of the Holy and living God at work in the miraculous self-exorcism and journey out of Islam, of a Wafa Sultan or an Ayaan Hirsi Ali..it took such an enormous effort for them to do it, I believe they had Help whether they knew it or not and whether they even asked for it or not.

The aim of freeing Muslims from Islam may be served in the here and now by supporting the psy-war: by backing Fr Zakaria Botros' program, and other programs that by radio and sat tv pour 'alternative spiritual programming' into the Muslim world; atheists or persons of other faiths who feel unable to support Christian evangelism, have the option of donating to keep Ibn Warraq's and Ali Sina's websites afloat, for they too do quite a good job of 'cult deprogramming'.

The Assyrians and the Carthaginians went down in flames; the Aztec human sacrifice cult was destroyed; the Thuggee cult was destroyed; the war-cult of Odin Glutter of the Crows came to an end; I see no particular reason why Islam, just another war-cult/ death cult/ de facto human sacrifice system, should not be defeated, likewise.

Robert! You've got this one wrong. Not everything can be blamed on Islam, you know? Check out the Wiki article on the Hebron massacre. I wonder how many Christian Arabs took part in this massacre. Also, one has to consider the atmosphere that Zionist invaders were engendering in Palestine. To the Arabs, they were making an enemy of every Jew. No wonder a massacre happened at the first spark.

Ladies and gentlemen

CrusaderRabbit is blaming the victims - the Jews of Hebron- and claiming that they deserved and provoked what the Muslims did to them, not only in Hebron but in Safed and in Jerusalem. If only those nasty Zionists had never come to the land of Israel, the Muslims would *never* have harmed a hair on the head of 'their' non-uppity dhimmi Jews ..Which is absolute garbage.

He conveniently forgets that the cry 'itba al-Yahood!', 'kill the Jews' had been heard in the bazaars for centuries; that screaming, raping, pillaging, allahu-akbaring Muslim mobs had been attacking the helpless, unarmed, hopelessly-outnumbered and vulnerable dhimmi Jews within dar al Islam in every century since the foundation of Islam, and not only in the Holy Land, but in Morocco, and Egypt, and Yemen, and even in far away Persia and *Afghanistan*; that long before Theodore Herzl had even been *born*, the greatest insult that one Arab Muslim in the middle east could hurl at another person - or animal - was to call that person, or animal, a 'Yahood', 'Jew'. He forgets Maimonides' Letter to the Jews of Yemen, written ca. 1200 AD, which identifies Arab Muslims as *the* worst persecutors of the Jewish people, *ever*.

Obviously CrusaderRabbit has not read - and will probably resolutely refuse to read, or if he reads, will absolutely refuse to believe - Andrew Bostom's massive encyclopaedic anthology, "The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism: From Sacred Texts to Solemn History".

I have a horrible feeling that, should a Muslim mob attack the neighbourhood synagogue in suburban Australia, and burn it, and rape the rabbi's wife and cut the rabbi's throat, Crusader Rabbit will be cheering them on and observing that those Wicked Jooz got what they had coming.

Muslims don't hate Jews because of Israel. They hate Israel because it is Jewish, because it is full of uppity Jews who insist on defending themselves and refuse their allah-ordained role of combination milch cow, chew toy, punching bag, scapegoat and supply of females for rape and enslavement, and of victims for ritual human sacrifice (same role, of course, that all other non-Muslims are supposed to fulfil, if they refuse to convert to Islam).

Site Meter