October 2009 Archives

October 31, 2009

Ayatollah Mohammad Imami-Kashani says that the Islamic Republic of Iran is founded upon Islam. So this bloody and repressive regime is an example of what Islamic law brings to a country? Surely then the Ayatollah Mohammad Imami-Kashani must be a misunderstander of Islam! For if Iran really were built upon Islam, it would be peaceful and tolerant, not genocide-minded, threatening, authoritarian, and violent -- right? Right?

"Cleric warns of plots against Islamic establishment," from the Tehran Times, October 31:

A leading Iranian cleric has warned against the enemy's plots to damage the Islamic establishment and called for proper counter measures to be taken.

""We must identify where the enemy seeks to penetrate the Islamic establishment and then counter it,"" said Tehran's Interim Friday Prayers Leader Ayatollah Mohammad Imami-Kashani.

He touched upon Iran's great achievements in different fields saying, ""We must realize that aside from enemy media outlets, the rest of the world supports the Islamic and scientific movements in Iran.""

""When science is founded upon faith and Islam, no one will be able to stop it,"" added the cleric.

""History has shown that the Islamic civilization, which incorporates science, faith and effort, was taking over the world, when certain parties stepped in and laid claim to the achievements of Muslims. They proclaimed themselves as the owners of the world and enslaved Muslim countries,"" he said.

Those darn Zionists. That little sliver that comprises Israel is a splinter in the foot of the Islamic world, hobbling it when otherwise it would be "taking over the world"!

""The Islamic establishment and the Islamic Republic is an establishment built upon the foundation of Islam...and it has made achievements,"" he added.

Ayatollah Kashani, who serves as a member of the Assembly of Experts, went on ot say that ""it is a pity to see that the rapidly-developing Islamic civilization, which the world has its eyes on, questioned.""

""Criticism that is intended to help make progress is good, but views that are expressed to belittle (the) others are not acceptable in any way.""

| 48 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Actually they were calling for "justice," by which they mean that the shooting of Luqman Abdullah was an act of injustice. They're trying to shift attention away from the jihadist violence allegedly being plotted at the Masjid al-Haqq, and onto the supposed excess of the FBI reaction. "Muslims call for justice at funeral for lslamic leader," by Niraj Warikoo for the Detroit Free Press, October 31 (thanks to James):

Muslim leaders called for justice today at the funeral of Luqman Ameen Abdullah, the Islamic leader killed by FBI agents this week during a shootout in Dearborn.''We are looking for justice,'' said Imam Mohammed Elahi of the Islamic House of Wisdom to a packed crowd that spilled outside. ''The closest road to Allah is justice. May Allah bless his soul.'' Elahi said.

''Allah Akbar,'' God is great, the packed crowd said at times during the funeral.The casket of Abdullah is now on its way to a cemetery in Canton.

Ameen was the head of a separate mosque, Masjid Al-Haqq, which consisted primarily of African-American Muslims, say federal authorities. They maintain in a criminal complaint that Abduallh [sic] was a violent extremist who urged attacks on police and called for an offensive jihad that would overthrow the U.S. government and establish Islamic rule.

But family, friends, and Muslims cast doubts on the claims, saying that Abdullah was a generous, modest man who helped the poor, tried to better lives through Islam, and was a respected imam. Abdullah took part in local and national Muslim groups, including the Muslim Alliance in North America, MANA. He was on MANA's advisory board and was sometimes seen at meetings with local imams....

| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Do you think this sympathetic article would have been written this way about a Christian church whose pastor was killed in a gun battle with the FBI? "Slain mosque leader mourned," by Charlie LeDuff for The Detroit News, October 31 (thanks to James):

Detroit -- The brotherhood of the Masjid Al-Haqq mosque gathered for Friday prayers on the city's west side, the first time they had convened since their spiritual leader was shot dead in a gunbattle with the FBI.

The leader, Luqman Ameen Abdullah, 53, was killed Wednesday at a Dearborn warehouse as he was being arrested in connection with a host of charges, including conspiracy, receipt of stolen goods and firearm offenses.

The federal authorities claim Abdullah was the head of a radical jihadist organization intent on carving out an Islamic state within the United States through violent means.

Eleven men face charges. The complaint said many of the men were ex-convicts who were introduced to Islam in prison.

"That's true that 90 percent of the brothers here have been locked up or had contact with the criminal justice system," said Jamil Ibn Rafael smoking a cigarette out front before 2 p.m. prayers began. "But there's so much confusion in the ghetto. They snatch a man up, put him away and dump him back in the ghetto. He feels hopeless. He needs something to organize his life. We want our own life. But we ain't no jihadist overthrow organization."

Rafael did two separate stints in prison. It was at Jackson State Penitentiary where Rafael said he was first introduced to Islam and eventually the mosque.

Abdullah, too, was an ex-convict known as Christopher Thomas until he found Islam in prison and became an acolyte of Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin, better known as H. Rap Brown, a former leader of the Black Panthers who is serving live a life sentence for the killing of two police officers....

"Are there some people in this mosque involved in criminal activity?" Rafael asked. "Yeah, probably. There are criminals in every organization. That don't make you public enemy No. 1. I'll tell you what, there's a lot of paranoia around here. I still think there's one or two snitches in here."

The Masjid Al-Haqq mosque has 120 members, exposed walls and electrical boxes with no switches.

Omar Regan, one of Abdullah's 12 children, returned from South Central Los Angeles, where he leads a mosque, on Friday to wash his father's body and anoint his feet with oil in preparation for burial today.

"How can you be what they say you are when you don't got nothing," Regan told the weeping congregants. "They forgot about the 'hood. The suburbs are OK, but they forgot about the 'hood. They forgot about you and so we all, my Muslim brothers, have to take care of each other."

"They call us radicals. They call us terrorists. We don't care what they say about us because they don't care about what's good."

And with that, two people stood to accept conversion to Islam.

| 48 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This AFP story departs from ordinary mainstream media practice by actually identifying the Thai jihadists as "Islamic," and adds a final paragraph that is, well, killer: more than 3900 people (but apparently fewer than 4000), it says, have been killed "in shootings, bomb blasts, beheadings and crucifixions" since the jihad in Thailand began in 2004.

Beheadings? Crucifixions? Those who insist that this is simply a nationalist insurgency with an Islamic character that is only incidental should take note: no other group around the world besides Islamic jihadists is practicing "beheadings and crucifixions" with any regularity in 2009. And why are "beheadings and crucifixions," both of which one might be forgiven for thinking of as relics of a distant and barbaric past, happening in Thailand at all?

Why, because Islamic jihadists -- contrary to the prevailing wisdom of the learned analysts -- read and follow the Koran.

"The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter..." -- Koran 5:33

"Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks..." -- Koran 47:4

But of course this is the element of understanding the actions of the Islamic jihadists that we are forbidden to explore in the public square.

"Two killed, four wounded in Thai south," from Agence France-Presse, October 31 (thanks to Sr. Soph):

SUSPECTED Islamic insurgents shot and killed two people and wounded three others in a bomb blast in Thailand's troubled Muslim-majority south, police said.

Gunmen broke into a house in Yala province and shot dead a 16-year-old Buddhist girl, also wounding her 29-year-old husband, they said....

More than 3900 people have died in shootings, bomb blasts, beheadings and crucifixions since a separatist insurgency erupted in Thailand's southern provinces bordering Malaysia in January 2004.

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

October 30, 2009

Here is yet another variation on the honor killing theme, coming hot on the heels of the New York woman who tried to kill her husband because he was insufficiently Muslim. In this variation (thanks to Block Ness), a Muslim from Afghanistan beats his brother to death for repeating an insulting remark about his wife. Police are calling it an honor killing. I'm not sure it qualifies as such under Islamic law in the way that the killing of a child by a parent does, but the usage itself is interesting. The FBI applied the label to the murders of Amina and Sarah Said by their father, but then withdrew it. Perhaps the politically correct niceties are now being discarded? That's extremely unlikely -- but this is nonetheless an interesting classification.

| 57 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Almaleki.jpg

Note the egregious, completely gratuitous attack on Rifqa Bary and defense of Islam at the end of this story. The mainstream media continues to feel itself compelled to run interference for Muslims as a group whenever a Muslim behaves badly -- a courtesy they never accord to other groups. An update on this story.

"Muslim Father Arrested for Running Over 'Westernized' Daughter: Cops Capture Iraqi Immigrant Accused of Attempted Honor Killing," by Sarah Netter for ABC News, October 30 (thanks to Paul):

A 10-day manhunt ended when police arrested an Iraqi immigrant accused of running over his 20-year-old daughter to punish her for becoming "too Westernized" and rebuffing the conservative ways he valued.

Faleh Hassan Almaleki, 48, fled from Peoria, Ariz on Oct. 20. He was arrested by U.S. Marshalls in Atalanta when he arrived at the airport there, according to the Associated Press.

His daugher Noor Faleh Almaleki, 20, remains hospitalized in critical condition after her father hit the young woman and her boyfriend's mother with his Jeep Cherokee on Oct. 20 in the parking lot of theDepartment of Economic Development in Peoria.

Noor Faleh Almaleki is in "life-threatening condition," Peoria Police spokesman Mike Tellef told ABCNews.com last week soon after the incident.

Her boyfriend's mother, 43-year-old Amal Edan Khalaf, is also still hospitalized, but with non-life threatening injuries. "It occurred because her not following traditional family values. We've been told that by everybody," Tellef said. "He felt she was becoming too westernized and he didn't like that."...

"Traditional family values." As if Noor Almaleki were a wayward Methodist. And of course, Christian fathers run down their daughters regularly for not following "traditional family values," don't they? What's that? They don't? What are you, some kind of Islamophobe?

Noor Almaleki had backed out of an arranged marriage about a year ago, police learned, and had been living with Khalaf and her son in a nearby town.

Tellef said the young woman dressed in American clothing and was wearing typical Western attire when she was struck....

Honor Killings Unfairly Cast Negative Light on Islam

The notion of an honor killing -- Muslim men murdering female relatives for dishonoring the family by violating Islamic tenets -- made the news over the summer when 17-year-old Rifqa Bary ran away from her parents in Ohio and turned up in the Florida home of Christian pastors Blake and Beverly Lorenz. Rafqa Barry claimed that her Muslim father had threatened to kill her for converting to Christianity.

Rifqa made tearful television appearance, crying on the Lorenzes shoulders, describing how she had to sneak around to attend church.

"They have to kill me because I'm a Christian. It's an honor [killing]. If they love me more than God, then they have to kill me," she told ABC's Orlando affiliate WFTV last month.

Blake Lorenz pointed to other honor killings, including the January 2008 murders of two Texas sisters who were believed to have been murdered by their Muslim father in a religion-fueld rage.

But Rifqa's father, Mohamed Bary, denied the accusation and said that while he preferred his daughter be a Muslim, she was free to practice whatever religion she chose.

"I don't believe my daughter would say this," Bary told "Good Morning America." "She's completely being coached -- I mean trained, influenced by these people. It's so sad."

A Florida judge this month said he planned to send Rifqa back to Ohio after determining there was no evidence that her life was in danger.

Why is this in this article? And what is the evidence that anyone who investigated the threat to Rifqa even knew what to look for in terms of evidence that her life was in danger? As Pamela Geller shows here, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement was outstandingly clueless when interviewing Rifqa.

| 24 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

rabia-sarwar.jpg
Pious


Sheikh Naseem sounds like an abusive husband, but the main problem the wife had was that he wasn't an observant Muslim. And her solution to that was to cut his throat. Why is it that this sort of solution to impiety only ever seems to occur to Muslims? "New Brighton wife tried to kill husband over Muslim principles, cops allege," by John M. Annese for SILive.com, October 29 (thanks to all who sent this in):

STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. -- A 37-year-old wife from New Brighton tried to slit her husband's throat as he slept because he was not the devout Muslim she believed she married, and pressured her to eat pork and drink alcohol, authorities allege.

In a rambling, four-page handwritten confession, Rabia Sarwar laid out the "mental and emotional cruelty" that led to her trying to kill her husband, Susan Wagner High School teacher Sheikh Naseem, early yesterday morning, a law enforcement source said.

"I tried my best to cut his throat," Ms. Sarwar admitted, according to court papers. Except Naseem woke up during the attempt, and took the knife from her, authorities said.

According to Ms. Sarwar's attorney, Joseph Licitra, Naseem "was a cruel person, he preyed on her."

The day before the incident, "he literally threatened to have her parents mutilated," Licitra said.

The way the law enforcement source describes it, Ms. Sarwar, who is Pakistani, told investigators that Naseem, who is half-Pakistani, had presented himself as a devout Muslim before the two had wed five months ago.

But after the marriage, she discovered more about him, she told investigators -- before meeting her, he had only dated non-Muslims, and he considered Salman Rushdie to be one of his favorite authors....

Ms. Sarwar also told investigators that Naseem pressured her into doing things that were against her religious beliefs.

"He made her do stuff that she didn't like to do -- eating pork, drinking alcohol, wearing short clothes. She did all of that to make him happy," the source said.

At about 3 a.m. yesterday, inside the couple's 80 St. Mark's Place apartment, Ms. Sarwar "snapped," the source said, cutting his neck, right cheek and right hand.

In an interview with the Post, Naseem said his wife was having a hard time adjusting to American culture....

No kidding, really?

| 51 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In reality, they're complaining about the "demonizing" of Muslims. What did you expect?

"African-American Muslims question leader's death," by Niraj Warikoo for the Detroit Free Press, October 29:

The death of Luqman Ameen Abdullah - the Muslim leader shot dead Wednesday by FBI agents after he allegedly first opened fire - was mourned and criticized today by some African-American Muslims in metro Detroit and across the U.S.

And religious experts say his death was the first time the U.S. government has killed a religious leader since the 1993 death of David Koresh at the Branch Davidian ranch in Waco, Texas.

"This tragic shooting raises deep concerns regarding the use of lethal force by law enforcement agents," the Muslim Alliance in North America said in a statement today about Abdullah. "We urge law enforcement and the media not to take undo advantage of this tragedy in order to demonize ... African American Muslims in particular."

Abdullah was on an advisory board for the Muslim Alliance, and he often met with local imams, said local Muslims....

In its statement, the Muslim Alliance said, "Luqman was a representative of the Detroit Muslim community to the "National Ummah" and the general assembly (Shura) of the Muslim Alliance in North America (MANA)."

In the complaint, federal authorities described Abdullah as a radical Sunni fundamentalist who advocated violence to establish Islamic rule.

"America must fall," he said at one point, according to the criminal complaint.

But the Alliance said the "reference to the 'Ummah' as a 'nation-wide radical fundamentalist Sunni group consisting primarily of African-Americans' is an offensive mischaracterization."

David Nu'Man of Detroit said he knew Abdullah, describing him as a "good humanitarian."

"He helped youth," Nu'Man said, adding that he was a very giving person. "He would help feed the homeless."...

Oh, well then, he must not have been a jihadist.

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
ClintonHeadscarf.jpg Challenging them on Al-Qaeda, but not on women's rights


But of course the Pakistani authorities say they're doing all they can. As they did all through the years in which they were funneling American anti-terror money to the jihadists they were supposed to be fighting. "Clinton Challenges Pakistanis on Al Qaeda," by Mark Landler in the New York Times, October 29 (thanks to all who sent this in):

LAHORE, Pakistan -- Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, on a visit meant to improve relations with Pakistan, strongly suggested Thursday that some Pakistani officials bore responsibility for allowing terrorists from Al Qaeda to operate from safe havens along this country's frontier.

"I find it hard to believe that nobody in your government knows where they are, and couldn't get to them if they really wanted to," she said to a group of Pakistani journalists on her second day here. "Maybe that's the case; maybe they're not gettable. I don't know."

It is extremely rare for an official of Mrs. Clinton's rank to say publicly what American politicians and intelligence officials have said in more guarded ways for years. The remarks upset her hosts, who have seen hundreds of soldiers and civilians killed as Pakistan has taken on a widening campaign against militant groups that have threatened the country from its tribal areas.

But her skeptical comments also gave voice to the longtime frustration of American officials with what they see as the Pakistani government's lack of resolve in rooting out not only Al Qaeda, but also the Taliban leadership based in Quetta, and a host of militant groups that use the border region to stage attacks on American and NATO forces in Afghanistan....

Mrs. Clinton's comments were prominently played on Pakistani news channels, and government officials rejected her assertion.

"If we knew where Al Qaeda's leaders were, or if we had meaningful intelligence on their whereabouts shared with us, we would act against them," said a senior official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly on this issue....

Despite heightened security concerns, Mrs. Clinton stuck to her schedule, traveling to Lahore to meet opposition leaders and tour the majestic Badshahi Mosque, as thousands of police officers lined the route of her motorcade, shutting down the center of this city of 10 million....

| 24 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Luqman Abdullah.jpg

Another jihad arrest, and more non-cooperation from Muslim leaders. My column in Front Page this morning:

Luqman Ameen Abdullah, the imam of Detroit's Masjid Al-Haqq (Mosque of Truth), was killed Wednesday in a shootout with FBI agents. The agents were trying to arrest him on charges of conspiracy, receipt of stolen goods, firearms offenses and more. Agents also arrested eight mosque members; then Thursday, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police caught Abdullah's son, Mujahid Carswell. Two other accused jihadists also fled, and have not yet been found.

According to the indictment, in his mosque in Detroit Luqman Abdullah was preaching "offensive jihad" and the establishment of a Sharia state in North America. This sovereign Isamic state would be ruled by Islamic law - and by the apparent godfather of Abdullah's movement, Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin. Al-Amin is the former Black Panther and convert to Islam who gained fame under the name H. Rap Brown. Al-Amin is now serving a life sentence for murdering two police officers, while his disciples, like Luqman Abdullah, carry on the message he articulated so memorably in the 1960s: "If America don't come around, we're gonna burn it down."

In the spirit of his mentor, Abdullah has told his flock: "America must fall." He has encouraged the Muslims in his mosque to support Hizballah, the Taliban and Osama bin Laden. He exhorted them to bestir themselves to pious deeds: "We should be figuring out how to fight the Kuffar" - that is, unbelievers. "We got to take out the U.S. government. The U.S. government is nothing but Kuffars." Among the unbelievers were FBI agents, about whom Abdullah declared: "Deal with them, deal with them the way, the way they supposed to be dealt with.... It's not that complicated, man....If they are coming to get me I'll just strap a bomb on and blow up everybody." A law enforcement official wrote in an affidavit that "Abdullah and his followers have trained regularly in the use of firearms, and continue to train in martial arts and sword fighting" - in accord with Abdullah's dictum that every Muslim believer should "have a weapon and should not be scared to use their weapon when needed."

Abdullah found justification for all this in the Islamic holy book, the Qur'an, which he said "justified stealing, robbing and other illegal acts, as long as they profit Islam."

One would think that Muslim spokesmen in America would be anxious to prove their moderate bona fides by repudiating Abdullah, praising the efforts of law enforcement officials, and announcing new measures to teach against the understanding of Islam that prevailed at the Masjid al-Haqq and to shore up the moderate Islam that politically correct orthodoxy insists prevails in all mosques in America in the first place. But no such luck. Instead, they praised Abdullah and excoriated law enforcement.

Dawud Walid of the Michigan branch of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) reinforced CAIR's image as an unsavory group with numerous ties to terror - an image newly reinforced by numerous revelations in the explosive new book Muslim Mafia -- as he tried to paint a very different picture of Abdullah: "I know him as a respected imam in the Muslim community." He emphasized the Masjid al-Haqq's charitable activities, perhaps forgetting that Nazi Germany (and Hamas, and Hizballah) ran social programs as well, and thus their existence is no indication that the one operating them is in every sense benign.

According to the Detroit Free Press, Walid said that a group of imams were going to meet with the head of Detroit's FBI office, Andrew Arena, to complain, about "linking the weapons and smuggling charges to the Muslim faith" - as if the FBI, rather than Luqman Abdullah, had done this. Arena probably won't need much convincing: he has already asserted, without explanation, that Abdullah taught "a very hybrid radical ideology - one mainstream Muslims "would not recognize." For his part, Walid also warned that the death of Abdullah and the arrests of other Masjid al-Haqq would anger Muslims and make them even more suspicious of law enforcement than they already are: "As much as our president says nice, flowery things about Muslims and Islam in Cairo or Istanbul, these types of stories just erode that."

Meanwhile, the Muslim Alliance of North America, of which Abdullah was a member, complained about the shootout in a statement: "This tragic shooting raises deep concerns regarding the use of lethal force by law enforcement agents. We urge law enforcement and the media not to take undo advantage of this tragedy in order to demonize ... African American Muslims in particular."

These kinds of statements fall into a pattern that has played out many times before. An Islamic jihadist plots murder and mayhem, explicitly justifying it all by reference to Islamic texts and teachings. Then putatively moderate Muslims, instead of support law enforcement efforts, criticize them and complain about Muslims being victimized and Islam being unfairly linked to terrorism. Generally this is followed by the spectacle of media and law enforcement officials bending over backwards to make sure that no one gets the impression that Islam had anything to do with the bloody plots that the arrested parties were planning.

The problem with this pattern is that no one involved is doing anything to keep the story of Luqman Abdullah and the Masjid al-Haqq from being repeated in other mosques in the United States in the future. No one is challenging the Muslim community here to clean its own house and stop the dissembling and finger-pointing. No one is speaking openly and honestly about what the Qur'an really says, and what the implications are of that fact. No one, in short, is doing much of anything to ensure that Luqman Abdullah, one of the first clergymen in the United States to be killed in a shootout with the FBI, is not just the first of many.

| 24 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Sharia Alert: A system such as Sharia, with insufficient (or mostly absent) limitations on power, lends itself to even more imaginative abuses than are explicitly stated in the letter of the law. "Somali women beaten for violating Islamic law, officials say," by Mohammed Amiin Adow for CNN, October 29:

(CNN) -- Militants who control parts of Somalia's capital city are beating women in broad daylight for violating their radical brand of Islamic law, according to local officials and witnesses in Mogadishu.
"Just today, Al-Shabaab dispatched men with whips to the streets around Bakara market and they are flogging any woman who is found not wearing socks," according to a female maize trader at the Mogadishu market, who spoke Thursday.
She did not want to be named for security reasons.
In the past two days, more than 130 people, including women who were not wearing headscarves and men chewing dried khat leaves, have been detained for violating Al-Shabaab's interpretation of sharia, or Islamic law, according to witnesses and officials.
Hooded Al-Shabaab gunmen rounded up 50 women on Wednesday from Mogadishu's Bakara market for not wearing the veil that is required for women under some interpretations of Islamic law, according to the maize trader.
"Most of these women were vegetable traders, so they are poor and can't afford to buy veils for 600,000 shillings [about $23 U.S.]," she said.
She said she saw more women being detained Thursday.
Another 80 Somali civilians were detained in the southwestern town of Luuq, near the Kenyan and Ethiopian border, "because they turned deaf ear to orders we imposed on the town," said the local Al-Shabaab commander Sheikh Hussien al-Iraqi.
Al-Shabaab is considered a terrorist organization by the United States because of its ties to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network.
It has been imposing stricter rules on Somali civilians living in the areas it controls.
Earlier this month, Al-Shabaab militants whipped women for wearing bras in an area of northern Mogadishu that they control, shocking residents who have been besieged by the ongoing insurgency. The militants believe the female undergarments are a deception to men.
| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

October 29, 2009

The egregiously pro-jihad and anti-Israel Goldstone Report turns out to have been initiated by the Organization of the Islamic Conference -- which explains why it was egregiously pro-jihad and anti-Israel. The OIC, don't forget, is the chief foe of the freedom of speech around the world today, and is making a concerted effort to criminalize any honest discussion of the Islamic motives and goals of the Islamic jihadists. The winners, if they succeed, would only be those same jihadists. As with the Goldstone Report. "'OIC initiated Goldstone inquiry,'" from Al-Jazeera, October 28 (thanks to David Littman):
Established in 1969 to safeguard global Muslim interests, the 57-member Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC) is the second largest inter-governmental body after the UN. In its 40-year history, the OIC has worked with the UN and others to settle conflicts and disputes, particularly among its member states.

While the preamble to the OIC's charter holds that Islam "is a strong factor for rapprochement and solidarity between peoples", conflicts continue to rage in many parts of the Muslim world.

Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, the secretary-general of the OIC, says the organisation has gained prominence in recent years as a trusted mediator in conflicts involving the Muslim world and was the "initiator" of a UN war crimes inquiry in Gaza. Al Jazeera's Firas al-Atraqchi spoke with Ihsanoglu on the sidelines of the seventh annual Doha Conference on Interfaith Dialogue.

Al Jazeera: The UN's Goldstone report has been in the headlines in the past few weeks - not without controversy - and has brought to light the conduct of the Israelis and Hamas during the war on Gaza earlier in the year. Does the OIC see this as a step forward in recognising what transpired during that war and in bringing the plight of the Palestinians to the fore on an international scale?

Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu: Let me first start by completing the story of the history of the Goldstone report. What I would like to put on record is that the OIC was the initiator of this process.

On January 3, during the attacks on Gaza, we convened the executive committee of the OIC on a ministerial level. It was decided that the OIC group in Geneva should ask the Human Rights Council to convene and consider the possibility of sending a fact-finding mission to Gaza.

The OIC was instrumental in getting through this resolution and thanks to the good offices of Ms Pilay, the UN high commissioner, that she formed this fact-finding mission headed by Judge Goldstone.

On October 8, I visited Geneva and had a meeting with OIC ambassadors and the high commissioner. We revived the process again and the Goldstone report has been approved by the rights council.

Now as for the prospects of the Goldstone report, I think the first thing to mention here is that the acceptance and approval of the report by the UN's human rights council is itself testimony of the world's public opinion about what happened in Gaza.

This report has certain operative paragraphs which aim to determine who is responsible for the massacres and destruction - illegally and in flagrant violation of humanitarian law and the Geneva Conventions on the conduct of war.

I think now the OIC and the international community should work hand-in-hand to implement the proposals made in the Goldstone report.

You said the OIC initiated the process that led to the Goldstone report. Were you surprised then that the Palestinian Authority asked for the council's vote on the report to be delayed?

This was a big surprise for us - an unhappy and sad surprise. I was in Washington DC at the time meeting with the media, think tanks and I was meeting with Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, when news of this broke. We did not expect that, but I am glad that we eventually managed to revive it and get it adopted by the human rights council.

Will the council's adoption of the Goldstone report impact the way Israelis conduct war after hundreds of Palestinian civilians were killed during the war on Gaza?

The Israelis already understood the importance of the impact of this report and that is why you find them leading a very strong campaign to impede the Goldstone report....
Uh, the fact that it is full of lies helps.
| 26 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Yet another stealth jihad attempt to compel non-Muslims to change their behavior to accommodate Muslim sensibilities. "Spotted Piglet Hiccups: Boozy Breslin Clashes With Mosque," by Meredith Bryan for the New York Observer, October 27 (thanks to Ed):

The much-hyped, soon-to-open Breslin restaurant, situated in the 12-story Ace Hotel on Broadway and 29th, is giving members of the Masjid Ar-Rahman mosque across the street some agita. "Five times a day, there's a hundred cabs on the street--the good news is you can always get a cab," co-owner Ken Friedman told the Transom the other evening. He said some mosque visitors "object to seeing people drink alcohol."

After the recent FergusStock, a festival during which famed British chef Fergus Henderson cooked whole pigs for a rapt crowd of New York chefs and foodies, Mr. Friedman said the mosque's leaders called a meeting with the hotel. "They said, 'Can you move the bar?'" he said. "And I laughed. And the guy said, 'Oh, you think that's funny?' And I said, 'Yeah, that is funny, that is really funny, because we're not going to move the bar just because you discovered we're serving booze.' Can you name one restaurant in New York that doesn't serve booze?"

Mr. Friedman and his partner, Spotted Pig chef April Bloomfield, did agree to nix plans for a dive bar in a townhouse next door, but as for the restaurant, "I said, 'This is the United States of America and we'll do whatever the f**k we want.'"

At least for now.

He said the mosque had suggested it couldn't control the behavior of "a few bad eggs"; i.e., "we could get a brick through our window." Mr. Friedman said he made the police aware of this threat.

A volunteer at the mosque returning a call from the Transom said that a law forbids serving liquor within 200 feet of a place of worship and that "not more than 200 feet is between the mosque and the bar." To which Andrew Zobler, the hotel's developer, responded: "The law is clear that in order for that to apply it has to be an exclusively dedicated house of worship, and at their space they have both residences and a restaurant, so basically, because of those uses the law allowed there to be a bar within 200 feet. Everyone was aware of that when the liquor license was granted." He added: "Out of neighborliness and respect we've voluntarily acquiesced to covering the window with a curtain." [...]

When the Transom visited, the "doily curtain" covering had not yet arrived, and paper has been taped to the windows to shield the mosque's worshipers from the sight of a gay wedding over the weekend. "They can threaten, but they can't really stop us," Mr. Friedman said.

Oh, they might think of some way.

| 121 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Abdullah beat children with sticks at his Detroit mosque, the complaint claimed, and was trained with his followers in the use of firearms, martial arts and swords." Imagine the national media frenzy if that sentence were about a Catholic priest or an evangelical pastor. But this story will get media notice only because Abdullah was killed -- and much of it will probably center on questions of whether the shooting constitutes "Islamophobia."

Detroit Jihad Update. "Son of Radical Islam Leader Killed in FBI Shootout Caught in Canada," from FoxNews, October 29 (thanks to Mackie):

One of three people sought by the FBI was captured in Canada Thursday and two were still on the loose after a federal raid and deadly shooting of a radical Islam leader whose goal authorities say was to take down the U.S. government.

Federal authorities in Detroit said the son of 53-year-old Luqman Ameen Abdullah, who was killed in Wednesday night's shootout with FBI agents, was arrested across the border in Windsor, Ontario.

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police took 30-year-old Mujahid Carswell, who was considered armed and dangerous, into custody Thursday. No other details were released.

Carswell was among 11 people charged Wednesday in a criminal complaint in federal court in Detroit.

Andrew Arena, the head of the FBI office in Detroit, says the men follow "a very hybrid radical ideology" that mainstream Muslims "would not recognize."

It would be interesting to see him explain the differences. But probably this statement arises either from ignorance or from a desire to provide some politically correct cover.

Two were still at large: 30-year-old Yassir Ali Khan of Warren and Ontario, and 33-year-old Mohammad Philistine of Ontario.

Abdullah was killed in a gunbattle in the Detroit suburb of Dearborn as federal agents tried to arrest him on a number of charges including conspiracy to sell stolen goods and the illegal possession and sale of firearms.

Abdullah repeatedly told followers that the U.S. government was their enemy and they should be willing to fight the FBI, even if it meant death, according to the criminal complaint against him.

"You cannot have a nonviolent revolution," Luqman Ameen Abdullah said, according to a 2008 conversation secretly recorded by a confidential FBI source.

Abdullah was killed Wednesday at a warehouse in Dearborn, where agents were attempting to arrest him. FBI spokeswoman Sandra Berchtold said Abdullah refused to surrender, fired a weapon and was killed by gunfire from agents.

He was one of 11 people named in a criminal complaint after a two-year investigation.

Among the others charged with Abdullah and in custody were a state prison inmate, the U.S. attorney's office said....

Abdullah beat children with sticks at his Detroit mosque, the complaint claimed, and was trained with his followers in the use of firearms, martial arts and swords.

Neither Abdullah nor his co-defendants were charged with terrorism. But he was "advocating and encouraging his followers to commit violent acts against the United States," FBI agent Gary Leone wrote in an affidavit filed with the complaint.

The FBI said Abdullah, also known as Christopher Thomas, was an imam, or prayer leader, of a radical group named Ummah whose primary mission is to establish an Islamic state within the U.S.

Abdullah told followers that it was their "duty to oppose the FBI and the government and it does not matter if they die" and to "simply shoot a cop in the head" if they wanted the officer's bulletproof vest, Leon wrote.

The affidavit also said bombs, guns and even the recipe for TNT were among Abdullah's regular topics with his allies. Group members and former members said they were "willing to do anything Abdullah instructs and/or preaches, even including criminal conduct and acts of violence," the FBI agent wrote.

He and his followers were American born, mostly African-American converts to Islam....

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Moreover, freedom in America is indivisible from the freedom to practice one's religion. That is why there is a mosque in every state in our union, and over 1,200 mosques within our borders. That's why the United States government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab and to punish those who would deny it." -- Barack Obama, Cairo, June 4, 2009

But what about the rights of women like this one -- the right not to wear the hijab? Who is standing up for them?

"BREAKING NEWS: Somalia Militants Kill Christian Woman For Refusing To Wear Veil," by BosNewsLife, October 28 (thanks to Nissan Ratzlav-Katz):

MOGADISHU, SOMALIA (BosNewsLife)-- Islamic militants have shot and killed a Somali Christian woman because she declined to wear a veil as prescribed by Muslim custom, Christians said in comments monitored by BosNewsLife Wednesday, October 28.

Members of the Suna Waljameca group killed Amina Muse Ali, 45, on October 19 in her home in Galkayo, in Somalia's autonomous Puntland region, said Compass Direct News, a well-informed Christian news agency.

Ali had told Christian leaders that she had received several threats from members of Suna Waljameca for not wearing a veil, symbolic of adherence to Islam, Christians said. She had said members of the group had long monitored her movements because they suspected she was a Christian.

Ali, an orphan and unmarried, in 1997 joined the Somali Christian Brothers' Organization, a movement also known as the Somali Community-Based Organization. She had been an active member of the underground church in the Lower Juba region, Compass Direct News reported.

She earlier worked with the Belgian contingent of United Nations Operations in Somalia as a translator and played a key role as a translator during a peace conference aimed at bringing together warring clans in the lower Juba region.

OCTOBER WARNINGS

Christians said Ali had warned in early October that her life was in danger. "My life is in danger. I am warned of dire consequences if I continue to live without putting on the veil. I need prayers from the fellowship," she reportedly said....

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

| 40 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Saying of agents: "Deal with them, deal with them the way, the way they supposed to be dealt with. ... It's not that complicated, man." Unlike, apparently, the doctrine of Islamic jihad which, according to all the mainstream authorities, he has gotten wrong, wrong, wrong, despite being an imam and teacher of Islam. More on this story. "A look at group's alleged targets," by Niraj Warikoo for the Detroit Free Press, October 29 (thanks to James):

[...] "Luqman Abdullah calls his followers to an offensive jihad," the indictment says.

Here are some of his alleged targets, according to the 43-page indictment.

# In November 2008, Abdullah talked with an undercover agent about a doctor captured in Afghanistan who had been wanted by the FBI. Abdullah then talked about jihad and going after what he called "super agents." "Trail them, follow them, know where they house is at. ... Deal with them, deal with them the way, the way they supposed to be dealt with. ... It's not that complicated, man. ...You got hundreds of agents right down there off of, off of Michigan" Avenue. The reference was to the FBI's Detroit office. [...]

# "Abdullah informed" an undercover agent "that a member of his community in Detroit had shot police officers."

# He referred to Washington as a possible target.

More from here (thanks to Axel) -- and look who is defending Luqman Abdullah:

The FBI said Abdullah, also known as Christopher Thomas, was an imam, or prayer leader, of a radical group named Ummah whose primary mission is to establish an Islamic state within the U.S.

Abdullah told followers that it was their "duty to oppose the FBI and the government and it does not matter if they die" and to "simply shoot a cop in the head" if they wanted the officer's bulletproof vest, Leone wrote.

The affidavit also said bombs, guns and even the recipe for TNT were among Abdullah's regular topics with his allies. Group members and former members said they were "willing to do anything Abdullah instructs and/or preaches, even including criminal conduct and acts of violence," the FBI agent wrote.

But that description doesn't match what Dawud Walid, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations' Michigan chapter, said he knew of Abdullah.

"He would open up the mosque to homeless people. He used to run a soup kitchen and feed indigent people," Walid said. "I knew nothing of him that was related to any nefarious or criminal behavior."

Walid said Abdullah had a wife and children. A phone number for the family had been disconnected.

Ummah believes that a separate Islamic state in the U.S. would be controlled by Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin, formerly known as H. Rap Brown, who is serving a life sentence in a federal prison in Colorado for shooting two police officers in Georgia in 2000, Leone said.

Al-Amin, a veteran of the black power movement, started the group after he converted to Islam in prison....

Abdullah's mosque is in a brick duplex on a residential street in Detroit. A sign on the door in English and Arabic reads, in part, "There is no God but Allah." The mosque was located elsewhere in the city until the property was lost in January because of unpaid taxes.

When the eviction took place, a search turned up empty shell casings and large holes in the concrete wall of a "shooting range," Leone said....

The FBI built its case over two years with the help of confidential sources close to Abdullah who recorded conversations and participated in undercover operations involving the sale of furs, laptop computers, televisions, energy drinks and power tools.

Abdullah received at least 20 percent of any profit and claimed the "Prophet Muhammad said that it is okay to participate in theft; as long as that person prays, they are in a good state," Leone wrote in the affidavit.

"And know that whatever ye take as spoils of war, lo! a fifth thereof is for Allah, and for the messenger and for the kinsman (who hath need) and orphans and the needy and the wayfarer..." -- Koran 8:41

Imad Hamad, regional director of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee in Dearborn, said the FBI briefed him about the arrests.

"We know that this is not something to be projected as something against Muslims," Hamad said.

Yep. That's what it's always about, eh, Hamad? Not -- "We're going to teach against these ideas to try to make sure this doesn't happen again." Just more spurious claiming of victim status.

| 26 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The arrests "[seem] to confirm what many people have suspected - that the security forces are susceptible to infiltration by insurgents or are just not up to the job."

"Police arrested over Iraq bombing," from BBC News, October 29:

Iraq has arrested more than 60 security force members, including 11 senior officers over Sunday's twin suicide bombing in the capital Baghdad.
Those arrested include the commanders of 15 checkpoints near to where the attacks took place.
The attack in which more than 150 people were killed and 500 injured was the deadliest in Baghdad for two years.
Correspondents say the scale of the bombings raised new questions over the competence of Iraqi security forces.
The BBC's Gabriel Gatehouse in Baghdad says it is not clear whether those arrested are accused of negligence or collusion.
However, he added, it seems to confirm what many people have suspected - that the security forces are susceptible to infiltration by insurgents or are just not up to the job.
Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said in a BBC interview that he wanted the UN to investigate external interference, accusing Syria of providing a safe haven for the bombers, which Damascus has denied.
A militant group linked to al-Qaeda, Islamic State of Iraq, said on Tuesday that it had carried out the attacks in a claim that could not be independently verified....
| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In Human Events this morning I discuss yet another strange new initiative in that land of strange new initiatives, the UN:

That they have broken up several major jihad plots in recent weeks is a tribute to American intelligence gathering and law enforcement. To them must go the credit for the fact that the U.S. is not this week picking up the pieces after another major terror attack.

Yet just as Islamic terrorists appear to be ramping up their efforts within the United States, at the UN a new report recommends not the strengthening, but the repeal of counterterrorism laws.

In a bizarre report to the UN Human Rights Council, ostensibly on counterrorism but actually more intent on social engineering, a Finnish law professor who is a special rapporteur to the UNHRC, Martin Scheinin, examines what he calls the "complex relationship between gender equality and countering terrorism."

What does working for "gender equality" have to do with resisting Islamic jihad terrorism? Nothing whatsoever, but Scheinin is determined to change that. He calls on UN member states to "abandon the 'war paradigm'" and instead "enshrine the principles of gender-equality and non-discrimination in the design and implementation of all counter-terrorism measures." He demanded that the American "war on terror" be "actually responsive to the concerns of women, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex individuals in local contexts." Instead, apparently, of actually defending Americans from terrorists.

Scheinin also recommended that laws designed to interdict the financing of terror groups be relaxed. Why? To make sure that "safe and effective channels for funding" were available for "organizations devoted to gender equality." He advocated the repeal of "restrictive immigration controls" that penalize "transgender persons whose personal appearance and data are subject to change." What does that have to do with terrorism? Why, some jihadists have escaped detection by donning burqas -- and Scheinin wants to make that easier. He says that to "focus attention on male bombers who may be dressing as females to avoid scrutiny" runs the risk of making "transgender persons...susceptible to increased harassment and suspicion."

It would be laughable that any of this would appear in a United Nations report on counterterrorism -- if only it weren't true. Scheinin's recommendations obviously stem from the assumption that actual terrorism is a fiction, a construct of governments he considers reactionary (principally, no doubt, the administration of George W. Bush). Unfortunately, one group that doesn't appear to have gotten the message are the Islamic jihadists themselves.

Before the UNHRC follows Scheinin's recommendations to discard counterterrorism laws in the name of political correctness, it should consider some recent developments in the United States.

Just last week, for example, a Muslim in Boston, Tarek Mehanna, was arrested for plotting to massacre American civilians in a shopping mall, as well as to murder to "members of the executive branch" that law enforcement officials declined to identify.

In recent weeks there have been other plots as well: two Muslims, including an imam, were arrested for their alleged roles in an elaborate plot involving numerous other Muslims in New York City and Denver, who were evidently planning a major jihad attack at a sports stadium. Another Islamic jihadist, Hosam Maher Husein Smadi, was arrested after placing an inert car bomb at a 60-story office tower in downtown Dallas. Yet another jihadist, an American convert calling himself Talib Islam, was arrested for plotting to blow up the Paul Findley Federal Building in Springfield, Illinois.

It would be difficult to find a comparable period since 9/11 in which so many plots have been uncovered around the same time -- and this makes Scheinin's recommendations all the more grotesque. Is this really time to "abandon the 'war paradigm'"? This is a time, on the contrary, to refine and expand that "war paradigm," to take into account all the many ways in which Islamic supremacists are attempting to bring elements of Islamic law into Western societies - including those that have no connection to actual terrorism. But the many recent foiled terror plots indicates that the United Nations, if it treats Scheinin's report seriously at all, is suffering from a severe disconnection from reality.

That disconnect is nothing new, really, when it comes to the United Nations. But in this case even more than usual, lives are at stake.

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

October 28, 2009

"The case involves the Joint Terrorism Task Force and prosecutors from the national security unit of the U.S. Attorney's Office." Nonetheless, stand by for outrage and cries of victimhood from Islamic groups, regardless of what the evidence against this imam contains. "Leader of Detroit mosque killed, 11 charged in FBI raids," by Paul Egan for the Detroit News, October 28:

Detroit -- The leader of a Detroit mosque was shot and killed Wednesday during a series of FBI raids that resulted in charges against 11 and the death of an FBI dog.
At least six of those charged were in federal custody late Wednesday afternoon.
The case involves the Joint Terrorism Task Force and prosecutors from the national security unit of the U.S. Attorney's Office.
A complaint filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Detroit names Luqman Ameen Abullah, imam of the Masjid Al-Haqq mosque in Detroit, as "a highly placed leader of a nationwide radical fundamentalist Sunni group." He was killed in the raid, according to a joint statement by federal officials.
More than three people were arrested on charges including conspiracy to commit federal crimes, receipt of stolen goods, providing firearms to felons and changing vehicle identification numbers, said Special Agent Sandra Berchtold, a spokeswoman for the FBI in Detroit. Berchtold also confirmed that an FBI dog was shot and killed in one of the raids.
The operation involved locations in Detroit and Dearborn.
Yellow police tape was put up outside a trucking and warehouse firm on Miller Road just north of Michigan Avenue, and a Dearborn police car was parked outside.
Another site involved in the raids was on Tireman near Interstate 96 on the city's west side.
| 62 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

It's unclear at this point whether they are Islamic jihadists or just useful idiots. "'Hezbollah' dad tried to help thugs," by Kati Cornell and Joe Mollica for the New York Post, October 28 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Two men -- including a married father of two from Queens -- were hit with federal terrorism charges yesterday for trying to provide weapons, ammunition and vehicles to the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah, prosecutors said.

Patrick Nayyar, 45, of Flushing -- who is being held without bail -- and his alleged accomplice, Conrad Mulholland, 43, who is still at large, were indicted in Manhattan for conspiring to provide material support to a terrorist organization.

The men are accused of supplying a Colt handgun, hollow-point bullets and a pickup truck to an FBI informant who said he worked for the terrorist organization, according to court papers.

In a series of meetings from July through September, the suspects allegedly made a deal to sell the informant additional guns, vehicles, bulletproof vests and night-vision goggles.

According to court papers, the weapons changed hands in Nayyar's mother's apartment, which is in his building.

On Aug. 3, Nayyar -- an illegal immigrant from India who was denied citizenship in 2006 for undisclosed reasons -- directed his mother to bring a gun from her bedroom to show the informant, who was wearing a wire.

The woman left the room and returned with a black handgun, according to court papers.

Nayyar -- a contractor who also worked as the super at his building -- handed the weapon to the informant, along with a box of ammunition that was marked "For Law Enforcement Use Only, Not for Retail Sale," the feds charge.

Two days later, the informant returned to the apartment and paid him $1,000.

Nayyar, who was picked up at his home on Sept. 24, was initially charged in Brooklyn federal court with a lesser count of illegal possession of a firearm and ammunition.

That charge was dismissed on Monday.

Yesterday, he was arraigned on the new charges in Manhattan federal court, pleading not guilty to five counts of providing material support to a terrorist organization, making contributions to Hezbollah and illegal possession of a weapon.

He faces 80 years in prison if convicted.

"I know he dealt with suspicious people, but he's not a terrorist," said Nayyar's mom, Sushila, 75, who was not charged in the case.

"He's a hard worker who was disturbed by the death of his father [in 2008]."...

Oh, well, that explains it.

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Sharia Alert, as Aceh weighs in on a currently active discussion in Islamic jurisprudence: whether women can wear pants. Sudan relented on a flogging sentence after intense international scrutiny, while Egypt's Mufti Ali Gomaa said pants are permissible, as long as they are "modest." Muhammad, for his part, "cursed the effeminate men and those women who assume the similitude (manners) of men. He also said, 'Turn them out of your houses'." (Bukhari 8.82.820).

The introduction of Sharia in Aceh was accompanied by the usual promises of moderation, but any Sharia starts a society on a slippery slope toward more of it, for three reasons: First, legal codes that are said to be the product of divine fiat do not lend themselves to compartmentalization or limitations on power. The second is the scope of Islamic law as a "total system" with something to say about every element of life. The third and most troubling is the mandate within Islam to impose Islamic rule by all means (Qur'an 8:39), especially while violence is not only acceptable, but glorified in the Qur'an and the example of Muhammad. This is how Aceh finds itself in the middle of a high-stakes debate on pants.

"Indonesia: Women banned from wearing trousers and jeans," from Adnkronos International, October 28:

Banda Aceh, 28 October (AKI/The Jakarta Post) - Women wearing jeans and other trousers in Indonesia's West Aceh will now face Islamic Sharia police, as will clothes vendors selling slacks for women. West Aceh Regent Ramli M.S. issued the controversial regulation on Tuesday.
Those found wearing tight trousers, such as jeans, will have them cut by Sharia police, and will be forced to wear loose-fitting attire.
"We have issued the regulation to further enforce Islamic Sharia (law) granted by the central government," Ramli told Indonesian daily The Jakarta Post by phone on Tuesday.
To anticipate the huge number of slacks to be cut by police during raids, the West Aceh regency administration has prepared around 7,000 long skirts, which will be provided for free to those caught wearing trousers.
According to Ramli, the new regulation will be effective as of 1 January, 2010.
The regulation also prohibits clothes vendors in the regency from selling slacks or jeans to women.
To implement the regulation, the West Aceh administration will issue an order for Sharia police to conduct raids and patrols in every district in the regency.
The raids will mainly target the regency capital of Meulaboh.
Ramli said he was positive the policy would spark some protest among residents across Aceh, especially in West Aceh.
However, he said he would insist on enforcing the regulation despite possible protests. Although it has yet to be implemented, women in Meulaboh have voiced objection to the ban.
As women, they slammed the regulation as discriminatory, saying it violated their right to freedom of expression.
"I'm surprised the mentality of the Aceh leader is so old-fashioned and primitive.
"There are many other things the administration should handle rather than regulating what women in the province should wear," said a medical worker in Meulaboh, Lola Amalia.
She said the West Aceh administration may have suffered from the euphoria of Islamic Sharia without thinking about the reality of people's conditions.
"I doubt the regulation is the wish of the West Aceh community at large. One of the regent's tricks is to seek sensation," said Lola.
Lola said she was confident the regulation would not be implemented effectively in Aceh society, adding that in principle she had no qualms about wearing clothing regarded as appropriate and in accordance with Islamic Sharia.
However, she said she was unaware which type kind of clothing the administration regarded as appropriate for women in West Aceh to wear.
"It will not be possible for the government to force every woman in West Aceh to wear long skirts.
"Not all women like to wear such clothing," said Lola.
Ramli previously issued a regulation prohibiting government agencies from serving members of the public who wore "un-Islamic" clothing, such as tight jeans and slacks, to government offices.
Aceh is the only province in Indonesia that strictly enforces Islamic Sharia law, a move that was implemented to suppress the separatist movement in the mainly Muslim region.
| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

mickey_muhammed.jpg

The mysterious raid on the halal meatpacking plant, which I noted here last week, turns out to be connected to this plot to kill the Danish Motoonist Kurt Westergaard -- "the Mickey Mouse Project." "Two Chicago men charged in terror scheme," by Natasha Korecki for the Chicago Sun Times, October 28 (thanks to Pamela):

When FBI agents at O'Hare arrested David Headley en route to Pakistan earlier this month on charges he plotted to kill a newspaper cartoonist in Denmark, authorities say he held an additional airline reservation - to Copenhagen.

He was to depart Thursday.

Headley's friend, Tahawwur Hussain Rana, who shared an extreme hatred for cartoons that depicted the prophet Mohammed, arranged for the flight, authorities said.

Any depiction of the prophet, even a favorable one, is forbidden by Islamic law as likely to lead to idolatry.

The Chicago men, who knew each other from a military school in Pakistan, on Tuesday were accused of an international plot dubbed "The Mickey Mouse Project" that since late 2008 included scheming with others to "commit terrorist acts against overseas targets," according to federal criminal complaints made public in Chicago.

The North Side men are accused of plotting to target employees of the Danish newspaper Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten, which published cartoons of the prophet Mohammed in 2005, sparking violent riots across the Muslim world.

The most controversial of the 12 cartoons depicted Mohammed wearing a bomb with a lit fuse as a turban. That cartoon was drawn by Kurt Westergaard, 78 - who was targeted for assassination, authorities said.

But Headley's phone calls were wiretapped and his e-mails were under FBI review. When he tried to board his Pakistan-bound O'Hare flight Oct. 3, the FBI arrested him.

Headley, 49, then confessed to agents about the plot, authorities said. He was charged with one count of conspiracy to commit terrorist acts involving murder and maiming outside the United States and one count of conspiracy to provide material support to the alleged overseas terrorism conspiracy.

Rana, 48, a native of Pakistan and a Canadian citizen, was arrested Oct. 18 at his West Rogers Park home. He was charged with providing material support to a foreign terrorism conspiracy that involved Headley.

In October 2008, Headley used his birth name, Daood Gilani -which he changed in 2006 to avoid suspicion while traveling - when posting a message to a Yahoo group called "abdalians," authorities said.

"Everything is not a joke . . . We are not rehearsing a skit on Saturday Night Live," Headley said in the posting. "Call me old-fashioned, but I feel disposed towards violence for the offending parties."...

Headley told agents the plot recently focused on Westergaard and the paper's cultural editor, Flemming Rose, "whom Headley felt were directly responsible for the cartoons," the criminal complaint states.

He also allegedly told agents he was trained by a terrorist organization called Lashkar-e-Taiba, according to his criminal complaint.

Authorities say Headley reported to Ilyas Kashmiri, the operational chief of what the FBI describes as a Pakistani-based terrorist organization with links to al-Qaida, according to the complaint. Headley was headed to Pakistan to report to Kashmiri when the FBI foiled his plans, according to charges.

When he was arrested, FBI agents found a memory stick on him that contained 10 surveillance videos, including footage of the newspaper office and Danish military barracks, the complaint said....

Rana owns several businesses, including First World Immigration Services, which has offices on Devon Avenue in Chicago, New York and Toronto, as well as a meat-processing plant in Kinsman. That plant is used to slaughter goats and sheep per Muslim religious requirements.

Extensive means were used to carry out a search warrant of the plant earlier this month. Witnesses said about 100 agents were on the scene. Helicopters, trucks and SUVs could be seen in front of the building during the raid....

Mickey Motoon thanks to Henrik.

| 27 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"It was the ninth reported attack on Israel from Lebanese territory since the end of fighting between Israel and the south-Lebanon-based Hezbollah in 2006." "Israel shows restraint after latest rocket from southern Lebanon," by David Harris for Xinhua, October 29:

JERUSALEM, Oct. 28 (Xinhua) -- Israel responded with limited fire towards the source of a rocket launched from southern Lebanon on Tuesday night. It was the ninth reported attack on Israel from Lebanese territory since the end of fighting between Israel and the south-Lebanon-based Hezbollah in 2006.

Four additional Katyusha rockets were found on Wednesday close to Tuesday's launch site. The discovery was made by a joint tour of officers from the Lebanese army and the UN Interim Force in Lebanon, according to Lebanese and Israeli media reports.

Analysts are now wondering for how long Israel will show restraint in the face of these attacks for which no one claims responsibility.

ATTACK CONDEMNED

Lebanese Caretaker Prime Minister Fouad Siniora criticized the initial strike from Lebanon and Israel's immediate response, which was reported to have damaged a couple of nearby homes.

Israel lodged a formal complaint about the fire with the UN, while the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) issued a statement saying "the IDF considers the Lebanese government and military responsible for the prevention of such attacks."

While no one claimed responsibility, the incident took place as UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon issued a report which included a demand that Hezbollah be stripped of its arms in accordance with UN resolutions.

"The threats posed by the existence of militias outside the control of the state, especially Hezbollah's vast paramilitary infrastructure, cannot be overstated," Ban said in the document.

Ban also condemned Israel's overflights of Lebanese airspace. Israel says such surveillance missions will continue as long as it feels there is a threat from Lebanese territory....

| 30 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

As noted here many times, such a law would criminalize all honest exploration of the Islamic motives and goals of the jihadis, thereby rendering us defenseless against them. What is odd here is that the Christian Science Monitor says that the U.S. is opposing this initiative. That is good news if it is true, but if it is true, why did the U.S. cosponsor with Egypt a UN Human Rights Council resolution calling for criminalization of incitement to religious hatred?

"Islamic countries push a global 'blasphemy' law," from the Christian Science Monitor, October 28:

Remember the Danish "Muhammad cartoons" that set off riots by offended Muslims more than three years ago? The debate pitted freedom of press and speech against notions of freedom from insult of one's religion. It rages still - but now in a forum with international legal implications.

For years, Islamic nations have succeeded in passing "blasphemy" resolutions at the United Nations (in the General Assembly and in its human rights body). The measures call on states to limit religiously offensive language or speech. No one wants their beliefs ridiculed, but the freedom to disagree over faith is what allows for the free practice of religion. The resolutions are misguided, but also only symbolic, because they're nonbinding.

Symbolism no longer satisfies the sponsor of these resolutions - the Organization of the Islamic Council. Under the leadership of Pakistan, the 57-nation OIC wants to give the religious antidefamation idea legal teeth by making it part of an international convention, or legally binding treaty. Members of the UN Human Rights Council are passionately debating that idea in Geneva this week.

The United States under Barack Obama recently joined the UNHRC, maligned for years as the mouthpiece for countries that are themselves flagrant human rights abusers. A "new" council formed in 2006. President Obama's hope is that as an engaged member, the US can further reform - and its own interests. This case will test his theory.

Consider the wording put forth by Pakistan, written on behalf of the OIC. It proposes "legal prohibition of publication of material that negatively stereotypes, insults or uses offensive language" on matters regarded by religious followers as "sacred or inherent to their dignity as human beings."

This gives broad latitude to governments to decide what's offensive. Countries such as Pakistan already have national blasphemy laws, but a global treaty would give them international cover to suppress minority religious groups with the excuse that these groups offend mainstream beliefs.

And what about unpopular, even "insulting" dissenters within a majority religion - such as women who seek to interpret Islamic sharia law so that they may gain more rights?

Besides, international treaties are meant to protect the rights of people, not ideas. A legal defense of dignity - how a person is viewed - is not on par with a defense of a person's inherent identity and rights. And treaties already aim to protect individuals from discrimination and violence based on religion.

As a newcomer to the Human Rights Council, the US is vigorously arguing against the OIC's latest push, as are European countries. They may not get very far in changing minds in the governments of Egypt or Saudi Arabia. But human rights advocates such as Freedom House and the US Commission on International Religious Freedom say Latin American and sub-Saharan African countries could be persuaded to resist the OIC's push....

| 26 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

al-ShirbinyCoffin.jpg

The photo above is from a protest in Istanbul. Note the flag following the coffin, featuring the swastika and the Star of David. What does demonizing Israel have to do with this case? Why, nothing -- but it is all part of the larger jihad against the West.

The selectivity of the outrage here is stunning. Alexander Wiens has apparently committed a heinous crime, and he should be punished to the full extent of the law. But to pretend that his crime is a manifestation of some pandemic "Islamophobia" is simply political manipulation. Muslim groups in America and Europe need "hate crimes," because "hate crimes" confer victim status, and victim status confers privilege. Victimhood is big business: insofar as Muslim groups can claim protected victim status for Muslims in the U.S. abd Europe, they can deflect unwanted scrutiny and any critical examination of how jihadists use Islamic texts and teachings to justify violence and supremacism.

That's most likely why CAIR and others have not hesitated to stoop even to fabricating "hate crimes." They want and need hate crimes against Muslims, because they can use them for political points and as weapons to intimidate people into remaining silent about the jihad threat.

But note: while Barack Obama spoke in Cairo about his determination to protect the right of Muslim women in America to wear the hijab, no one is speaking up for the Muslim and non-Muslim women in Islamic countries and in Muslim families in the West who have been threatened or murdered for not wearing the hijab. No one demonstrated for Aqsa Parvez, murdered by her father in Canada for not wearing the headscarf. No one demonstrated for the women killed in Iraq and elsewhere for not wearing it.

The outrage here is selective, and nakedly manipulative.

"German Murder Trial Is Focus Of Anger in Islamic World," from Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, October 28 (thanks to James):

It is a story that has gripped both the Muslim and Western worlds.

It began in 2008, in the German city of Dresden, when an Egyptian-born woman, Marwa al-Shirbiny, asked a man to make room for her 3-year-old son on a children's playground swing.

The man, Alexander Wiens, responded by calling al-Shirbiny -- who was wearing an Islamic headscarf at the time -- a "terrorist" and a "slut."

Al-Shirbiny summoned the police, and Wiens was subsequently fined the equivalent of $480 on charges of verbal abuse.

When Wiens attempted to appeal the conviction this July, al-Shirbiny, then pregnant, attended the hearing. As she was leaving the courtroom, the court records charge, Wiens leapt at her and stabbed her 18 times with a kitchen knife.

Her husband, Elwi Ali Okaz, tried to protect her, and also suffered multiple stab wounds.

To make matters worse, in the melee a policeman shot Okaz in the leg, apparently assuming that the Egyptian man was the attacker, rather than the German defendant.

The murder trial of Wiens, a 29-year-old ethnic German born in Russia, began in Dresden October 26 in the same courtroom where the murder took place. The dead woman's husband, Okaz, attended on a pair of crutches.

Ayyub Axel Koehler, the head of Germany's Central Muslim Council, told Reuters before the trial started that Muslims everywhere are intensely interested in this case.

"This trial is getting huge attention in the Muslim world," Koehler said. "There were riots in some Islamic countries because of this murder. So it's up to us Germans to defend our reputation."

Koehler, a convert to Islam, was referring to demonstrations in Egypt and Iran, and Tehran's request for the United Nations to become involved.

He also said that Germany's Muslim community -- the biggest in Europe after France -- has been badly shaken by the affair.

"We're looking at this trial with great anticipation, because our women and girls are obviously scared," he said. "They are already being discriminated against in public and looked down on."

Koehler said Germany's reputation has suffered badly, and that politicians have ignored Islamophobia and its consequences in society....

| 49 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A welcome according to time-hallowed local custom. "Car bomb kills 90 in Pakistan as Hillary Clinton visits," by Zeeshan Haider and Andrew Quinn for Reuters, October 28 (thanks to Maxwell):

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (Reuters) - A car bomb ripped through a crowded market killing 90 people in Pakistan's city of Peshawar on Wednesday, just hours after Washington's top diplomat arrived pledging a fresh start in sometimes strained relations.

Wednesday's bomb, the latest urban attack since the army launched a major assault on rural Taliban strongholds two weeks ago, was the deadliest since 2007 when around 140 died at a procession to welcome home former prime minister Benazir Bhutto, who was assassinated just weeks later.

The bomb went off in the busy Peepal Mandi market street in a city that for years served as the headquarters of the Pakistan- and U.S.- backed mujahideen war against the Soviet Union's occupation of Afghanistan.

Although nobody claimed responsibility, suspicion immediately fell on Pakistani Taliban militants who are the target of the army offensive....

Hours after the blast, visiting U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told a news conference that Washington fully supported Pakistan's battle.

"I want you to know that this fight is not Pakistan's alone," she said.

"So this is our struggle as well and we commend the Pakistani military for their courageous fight and we commit to stand shoulder to shoulder with the Pakistani people in your fight for peace and security."

Sahib Gul, a doctor at Peshawar's main hospital, said the dead from Wednesday's bomb were mostly women and children.

"Several buildings and a mosque have been badly damaged while a fire has engulfed buildings," witness Aqueel-ur-Rehman told Reuters from the market, which mostly deals in groceries and household goods....

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

But the UN spokesman says that the UN will continue its good works in Afghanistan, building things for the Taliban to destroy. "Kabul Guesthouse Attack Leaves 6 Dead, Including 5 UN Employees," by James Rupert and Gregory Viscusi for Bloomberg, October 28:

Oct. 28 (Bloomberg) -- Six international workers were killed and nine wounded when insurgents attacked a guesthouse in the Afghan capital, Kabul, where officials are preparing for next month's presidential runoff election.

At least five of the dead worked for the United Nations, UN spokesman Aleem Siddique said by telephone from Kabul, with the identity of the sixth victim still to be established. Gunmen opened fire outside the main gate to the Bakhtar Guesthouse at about 6:30 a.m. local time today and forced their way inside, killing UN workers as they "were running to escape," Siddique said. Afghan security forces killed the three gunmen, he said.

One of the UN employees who died was an American, the U.S. Embassy in Kabul said in a statement. The UN isn't announcing the nationalities of the others until their families have been notified....

Special UN representative Kai Eide said the world body will continue its work in Afghanistan.

"The UN has been in Afghanistan for more than half a century," Eide, a Norwegian diplomat, said in a statement posted on the Web site of the UN Afghan mission. "This attack will not deter the UN from continuing all its work to reconstruct a war-torn country and to build a better future for all Afghans."...

Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid said in a telephone call that three militants with suicide vests, grenades and automatic weapons carried out the assault to disrupt preparations for the vote, AP reported.

Militants also fired a rocket, which failed to explode, into the grounds of the luxury Serena Hotel, forcing guests and employees to flee to the basement, AP said....

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is a very serious message from Muslim apostate Rifqa Bary's friend Jamal Jivanjee. You may recall that Judge Daniel Dawson in Florida had said that he would not send Rifqa back to Ohio, where she says her father had threatened to kill her for converting from Islam to Christianity, until he received her family's immigration documents. So the father's attorney cut a deal with Rifqa's guardian ad litem, offering to keep Rifqa in foster care until she was 18 -- which would mean she was free from the father she fears so much -- in exchange for dropping questions about the immigration status. But once the contempt of court charge over the immigration issue was dropped, the father's attorney reneged, leaving Rifqa back in Ohio and in imminent danger of being sent home to her family. From there, of course, once media attention died down, it would not be difficult to have her sent back to Sri Lanka to be killed or institutionalized -- and even here she would be subjected to relentless, unstinting pressure to renounce Christianity and proclaim Islam publicly.

Jamal frames this issue in Christian terms, understandably enough, but I cannot emphasize more strongly that this is a human rights issue that should energize every person of conscience of whatever creed or point of view. Will this girl be exposed to mortal danger in order to appease the gods of political correctness? Will she be allowed to exercise her freedom of conscience in the United States of America? Will Sharia provisions -- calling for the indefinite imprisonment and isolation of the female apostate -- be allowed to prevail in this country? Why is Rifqa, alone among the thousands of minors in foster care, be cut off from the outside world entirely, deprived of phone and Internet use? The phone or Internet could save her life. And saving her life seems to be what malevolent forces in the U.S. are doing their best to make impossible.

Here is Jamal's message from Facebook:

To all those who value life,

Please take a few minutes to consider the life of our sister in the faith Rifqa Bary, which is once again in grave jeopardy. On Tuesday October 27'th, Rifqa Bary was handed over to Ohio authorities for placement in foster care in Franklin County. Over the previous weekend, a very unfortunate deal was made by Rifqa's former Florida Guardian Ad Litem, Krista Bartholomew, with Rifqa's parent's attorney David Colley that allowed Rifqa to be transferred back to Ohio. The gist of this (behind the scenes) deal was the following:

1. Because Rifqa's parents are in the U.S. illegally, they refused and defied numerous court orders to produce documents detailing their immigration status. As a result, Rifqa's parents were in danger of being arrested for contempt of court. The Florida judge who had emergency jurisdiction over the case said that even though the jurisdiction is transferred to Ohio, he was not going to release her until they produced the proper documentation that satisfied the court.

Well, in order to have the immigration issue go away for Rifqa's parents, Mohammad Bary's attorney, David Colley, cut a 'behind the scenes' deal in which the Florida court would drop the contempt of court issue regarding their immigration situation in exchange for an assurance that they would leave Rifqa alone and let her stay in foster care for the next 9 months until she is 18. This sounded like it was too good to be true, and it was! As soon as Rifqa was transferred into Ohio custody and the Florida court gave up their emergency jurisdiction over Rifqa and the immigration issue, Rifqa's parents fired their own attorney that made the deal! Simply put, now that Rifqa was in 'favorable' hands in Ohio, all deals are off!

In my opinion, this was all part of a premeditated plan on the part of Rifqa's parents and the organization called C.A.I.R. who has been advising them according to the Florida department of law enforcement report released to the public. They have since hired a Muslim activist attorney named Omar Tarazi that is no doubt influenced by the mafia like C.A.I.R. organization whose sole agenda is to paint a positive picture of Islam in America at any cost. (The slander of the Lorenz family and the slander of 17 year old Rifqa's own character by releasing her prayer journals to the media are perfect examples of how C.A.I.R. ruthlessly operates to accomplish their agenda.)

They completely went back on the agreement that they made to leave Rifqa alone, and I believe they now are planning to continue to pursue to get her back against Rifqa's will. C.A.I.R. wants her silenced both now, and in the future, because they know that Rifqa's story of abuse is common among many Muslim families. Apostasy in Islam is not something they want to shine a light on. They know that as her story gets out there, there will be a massive exodus of Muslims just like her. Indeed, it has already begun!

2. If that was not bad enough, Rifqa went back to a hostile environment in Ohio right away. In an article posted on Saturday October 24'th, three days before her return to Ohio, the Columbus Dispatch reported that Eric Fenner, the executive director of Franklin County Children Services, has said that he has stated that he "has no reason to believe that Rifqa wouldn't be safe with her parents." Remember this is coming from the very person who has charge over protecting her!

Rifqa then arrived back to Ohio on Tuesday October 27'th. Upon her arrival came a new set of restrictions that her parents and Muslim attorneys have been trying to impose on her from the beginning...solitary confinement! While Rifqa was being protected in Florida, they repeatedly tried to separate Rifqa from other Christians that she leaned on for strength and encouragement. Rifqa's Muslim parents have been saying from the beginning that they don't believe that Rifqa became a Christian on her own accord, rather they believe that her real problem is that she has been brain washed by other people through facebook and over the phone.

Immediately upon Rifqa's arrival to Ohio, came new draconian measures to limit her freedom already! Franklin County Juvenile Magistrate Mary Goodrich put these restrictions on Rifqa at the request of the Franklin county children's services agency immediately upon her arrival back to the state of Ohio.

"Bary's use of Facebook was one issue that led to the situation, said Jim Zorn, a children's services attorney, who asked Goodrich to restrict Bary from using the Internet and her cell phone. "What we want to restrict is the other people, the other organizations, the other forces, that have interjected themselves into this case inappropriately, and has caused the additional problems that we've seen," Zorn said.

Zorn's account of Rifqa's situation is absolutely false! Where is he getting his information? It seems as if the Ohio director of children's services in Franklin County is reading right out of the C.A.I.R. and radical Muslim playbook for this case. Facebook did not in any way lead to this situation. What led to this situation was the fact that a very bright and intelligent girl decided to leave Islam and become a Christian. According to numerous passages in the Qur'an and other Islamic scriptures, this is called apostasy and is punishable by death. Like many others all over the world, Rifqa faced this threat of death, or even deportation back to Sri-Lanka by her own family along with pressure from the Columbus Ohio mosque that her family was actively apart of.

What crime did Rifqa Bary commit that she would be held with such restrictions from communicating to the outside world? While it is legal for 17 year old girls in this country to have abortions without parental agreement, this 17 year old girl is forbidden to have unrestricted access to her phone or facebook friends of her choosing! Is she under house arrest because she is a Christian? This sounds like Sharia law in Ohio!

Immediate Call to Action:

Before I get into the specifics of how we can help, let me say this about a very common misunderstanding that many Christians have regarding God's sovereignty and fighting for justice. Many of my well meaning brothers and sisters in the church have wondered what the balance is between sitting back, trusting God, and actively fighting for justice. Some have said that because I am fighting for justice in Rifqa's situation, I am taking the situation in my hands and I am not trusting that God is sovereign over this situation. That is ridiculous to say the least. First of all there is a tremendous amount of support in scripture that commands the people of God to not remain silent in the face of injustice, and to speak and defend those who cannot defend themselves. For time's sake, I will not list those passages here. If you need help finding these scriptures along with their proper context, let me know and I'd be glad to help direct you to the appropriate passages.

All actions of justice should come from a heart of prayer first and foremost. It is from this place of prayer and intimacy with the Lord that we will find the courage, specific direction, and strength to understand and actually do what He is calling us to do! While not everyone will be called to do the same thing, the Lord will burden our hearts for the things that burden His heart as well. His sovereign heart and actions are carried out through the church, which is simply people! We cannot separate ourselves from this. We are His body, His hands, His feet, His mouth, etc...

A lack of a proper understanding between God's sovereignty and His heart for justice is what allowed the church to sit passively by in Nazi Germany as Jewish people were slaughtered by the millions while Christians were paralyzed by fear and did nothing. Corrie Ten Boom was an exception to the rule. She was not afraid, and she knew what God had called her to do. There should have been millions of Corrie Ten Booms in Germany at that time. This same cowardice and passivity is also what has allowed over 3000 children to be murdered by abortion each and every day in this nation with little or no outcry in prayer and public against this tragedy. We must get this right! Now with that said, here are some specific things we can do for Rifqa right now:

Since most of Rifqa's Florida support base is cut off from her, and she is now under the care of authorities that do not take the threat to her life seriously, I would like to ask you to help them understand that Rifqa is not alone and that there are many people who will not sit idly by while Rifqa is sent back to her demise. This does make a difference. Rifqa's story must continue to be told for her sake, and for the sake of many others! Feel free to repost this article and pass it along to anyone you would like for the sake of getting the word out.

Please contact Franklin County Children Services, and the Ohio governor's office at the following addresses and let them know that you want Rifqa to be able to have the basic freedoms to communicate to the outside world, and that she needs to be protected from her parents & the radical Islamic community:

Franklin County children services can be reached here:
http://www.franklincountyohio.gov/children_services/contact-us.cfm

The Ohio governor's office can be reached here:

http://governor.ohio.gov/Contact/tabid/153/Default.aspx

God bless you for taking a stand,
Jamal Jivanjee
www.illuminate-us.com

| 56 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Or as the great Shaidle puts it, "It's all YOUR fault for being morons, you stupid infidels!"

An update on this story. "Address on niqab not meant to be offensive: Imam," by Charles Lewis in the National Post, October 23 (thanks to Kathy Shaidle):

A Toronto imam said on Friday he did not intend to insult non-Muslims during an address at his mosque on those who want the niqab and burka banned.

Said Rageah, the imam at Toronto's Abu Huraira Centre, said that only someone who did not understand Islam would have come away from last Friday's prayers thinking that anyone at his mosque hated members of other faiths.

He was specifically addressing an article that appeared in the National Post on Thursday in which some critics said the language he used was inflammatory.

Imam Rageah used a prayer last week that, in part, said "Allah destroy them from within themselves, and do not allow them to raise their heads in destroying Islam." And in another part of he asked Allah to "damn the infidels."

Right. Destroy them, damn them, but don't hate them. Got it.

Imam Rageah on Friday said in a brief interview that in both references he was not literally meaning "destroy" but rather to confound or weaken those that would infringe on their rights.

In last week's address, he used the word "kuffar" repeatedly, a word some say is highly derogatory of non-Muslims, especially Christians and Jews....

But on Friday, Imam Rageah said the word is mentioned more than 500 times in the Koran and it would make no sense for Allah to have used a word repeatedly that was so offensive.

"The word has more than one meaning," he said. "It's not always negative but it can be negative. Now if the suggestion is, 'Why don't we avoid the word,' that's an excellent suggestion. But until this issue was raised we didn't think people found the word insulting."

Nonsense. In the Koran, it is always negative. To dismiss this by saying that Allah would not have used an offensive word is simply to demand that non-Muslims accept Islamic perspectives and norms. And that is, of course, what this is all about.

When the word is used negatively, he said, it can apply to Muslims who are liars or non-Muslims who are active enemies of the faith....

Imam Rageah said no one group should try to trample the rights of others. For example, he said no Muslim should ever walk up to someone with multi-coloured hair and say that they object to that person's style.

He acknowledged that many countries, including Muslim countries, restrict free speech, and said it was important that Muslims in Canada exercise their rights by writing to MPs and the media to protest those that would restrict their faith.

So you see, free speech is to be used to strengthen Islam in the West, while it is restricted in Muslim countries in order to...strengthen Islam.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Video thanks to Politically Incorrect.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

October 27, 2009

Therein lies a fundamental dogma of the modern political discourse: Multiculturalism is good for its own sake. All cultural practices are equally valid, and will not come into conflict with one another if everybody just tries really, really hard to get along. In addition, it is always Western civilization that is singled out for needing improvement or redemption by a self-righteously suicidal pursuit of "diversity." Hence the ridiculous cascade in recent years of accommodations for Sharia law and the whims of Islamic supremacism.

"The outrageous truth slips out: Labour cynically plotted to transform the entire make-up of Britain without telling us," by Melanie Phillips for the Daily Mail, October 26:

So now the cat is well and truly out of the bag. For years, as the number of immigrants to Britain shot up apparently uncontrollably, the question was how exactly this had happened.
Was it through a fit of absent-mindedness or gross incompetence? Or was it not inadvertent at all, but deliberate?
The latter explanation seemed just too outrageous. After all, a deliberate policy of mass immigration would have amounted to nothing less than an attempt to change the very make-up of this country without telling the electorate.
There could not have been a more grave abuse of the entire democratic process. Now, however, we learn that this is exactly what did happen. The Labour government has been engaged upon a deliberate and secret policy of national cultural sabotage.
This astonishing revelation surfaced quite casually last weekend in a newspaper article by one Andrew Neather. He turns out to have been a speech writer for Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett. [...]
And it was he who wrote a landmark speech in September 2000 by the then immigration minister, Barbara Roche, that called for a loosening of immigration controls. But the true scope and purpose of this new policy was actively concealed.
In its 1997 election manifesto, Labour promised 'firm control over immigration' and in 2005 it promised a 'crackdown on abuse'. In 2001, its manifesto merely said that the immigration rules needed to reflect changes to the economy to meet skills shortages.
But all this concealed a monumental shift of policy. For Neather wrote that until 'at least February last year', when a new points-based system was introduced to limit foreign workers in response to increasing uproar, the purpose of the policy Roche ushered in was to open up the UK to mass immigration.
This has been achieved. Some 2.3million migrants have been added to the population since 2001. Since 1997, the number of work permits has quadrupled to 120,000 a year.
Unless policies change, over the next 25 years some seven million more will be added to Britain's population, a rate of growth three times as fast as took place in the Eighties.
Such an increase is simply unsustainable. Britain is already one of the most overcrowded countries in Europe. But now look at the real reason why this policy was introduced, and in secret. The Government's 'driving political purpose', wrote Neather, was 'to make the UK truly multicultural'. [...]
A measure of immigration is indeed good for a country. But this policy was not to enhance British culture and society by broadening the mix. It was to destroy its defining character altogether. [...]

Read it all.

| 75 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In "Tingbjerg: one neighborhood's nightmare" at Human Rights Service, October 26, Bruce Bawer gives a glimpse of the kind of thing that will be happening in the United States before too long, unless there is some drastic change in numerous policies:

Few people outside of Denmark have heard of Tingbjerg. It's a residential neighborhood in northwestern Copenhagen. About 6500 people live there, down from about 10,000 in the 1970s. Today the great majority of those residents are Muslims. As the neighborhood has become increasingly Muslim, it's also been increasingly plagued by gang violence, burglaries, car-burnings, vandalism, and other offenses. Over the years, the members of Tingbjerg's non-Muslim minority have come to feel increasingly vulnerable and ill at ease in their community. Many have moved out.

Among the latter is Ulrich Vogel. He is German and gay - and until recently he also happened to be the pastor at Tingbjerg Church. But now, after seventeen years in that position, he's fled - moved out of the church residence, gone underground, taken sick leave, and begun psychological treatment.

Why? Because in recent years Vogel has been the repeated target of crime and harassment by local Muslims. Vogel refused to discuss his situation with Uwe Max Jensen, who reported on the story for sappho.dk on October 6. But Jensen found police reports in local newspapers that describe acts of vandalism at the church on March 26 and August 5 of this year and a break-in at the church residence on August 16. The latter crime involved the destruction and robbery of much of Vogel's personal property, including his computer. And this is apparently only the tip of the iceberg: a member of the church congregation told Jensen that the residence has been broken into "countless" times.

In any case, Vogel has given up. And so, apparently, has the church council: instead of opening up a search for a substitute pastor who's willing to live in the church residence at Tingbjerg, they've decided to sell it.

For days, the rumor circulated that Vogel was tormented by the young Muslims because he's gay. Then, on October 17, Lea Holtze and Jannie Iwankow Søgaard of Kristeligt Dagblad reported that Vogel had broken his silence in order to deny that rumor. No, he insisted: he was tormented not because he's gay but because he's a pastor, and thus "a picture of an institution and a normality that is not welcomed by this group of young people." Vogel also noted, truthfully enough, that he was hardly the only person in the neighborhood who had been victimized by local youth.

"It's a whole neighborhood that's been taken hostage," Vogel said of Tingbjerg, complaining that "one is left to fend for oneself" there because "the police don't do enough." The problems, he said, can't be dismissed as ordinary teenage hijinks: "It feels like pure malice." The pastor recalled that last March, after local youths threw rocks at buses, resulting in a disruption of the public transport system, he spoke out in a local newspaper and on the TV news about the neighborhood's ordeal - an action which, he suggests, may help explain why he appears to have been singled out for repeated victimization....

Read it all.

| 49 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Hillary.jpg
Finding courage

Obama just had the U.S. at the UN consponsor with Egypt a resolution against inciting religious hatred. But apparently his Secretary of State is not on board, or not completely on board. "Clinton Denounces Proposed 'Defamation of Religions' Policies," by Michelle A. Vu for the Christian Post, October 27 (thanks to Islam In Action):

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton voiced strong opposition Monday to proposed U.N. resolutions on "defamation of religions," saying that such policies would restrict free speech.

In opening remarks for the release of the State Department's Annual Report on International Religious Freedom, Clinton said that while some claim so-called defamation of religions policies would help protect freedom of religion, she "strongly disagree[s]."

"The United States will always seek to counter negative stereotypes of individuals based on their religion and will stand against discrimination and persecution," Clinton stated. "But an individual's ability to practice his or her religion has no bearing on others' freedom of speech."

The protection of speech about religion and religious discourse is important in a world with many different faith beliefs, asserted the high-ranking U.S. diplomat.

Earlier this year, the U.N. Human Rights Council adopted an anti-defamation draft resolution that human rights groups warn would protect a religion rather than adherents of religions.

Leonard A. Leo, chair of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, last week testified to Members of Congress that the only religion and religious adherents that are specifically mentioned in the "defamation" resolutions - this year's and past years - are Islam and Muslims.

"Aside from Islam, the resolutions do not specify which religions are deserving of protection, or explain how or by whom this would be determined," Leo stated....

And "defamation of Islam," as we have seen so many times at Jihad Watch, means efforts to resist the jihad and Islamic supremacism -- as far as all too many Muslims are concerned.

| 29 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

AP says: "Jim Zorn, an agency attorney, says Bary's use of Facebook was one issue that led to the girl's situation." So now the Ohio court is officially accepting her father's construction of events, that the Christians in Florida who took her in had "brainwashed" her -- and apparently made her think that her father had threatened to kill her.

They are gambling with this girl's life, and leaving her no safety net in case they turn out to be wrong.

"Rifqa Bary returns to Columbus," by Meredith Heagney for the Columbus Dispatch, October 27:

Fathima Rifqa Bary is back in Columbus. The Florida Department of Children and Families said Franklin County Children Services took her into their custody just before noon.

An Ohio court today ordered that authorities monitor telephone and Internet use of Fatima Rifqa Bary, the 17-year-old religious runaway who left Columbus for Orlando over the summer.

At a dependency hearing today, both sides in the case agreed to continue the case until next month.

Her phone and Internet use will be monitored by Franklin County Children Services....

| 37 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

After all, they said she would be. And they couldn't conceivably not be telling the truth, could they? "Mohamed Bary has denied the allegations, and a Florida Department of Law Enforcement investigation found no credible threat to her safety."

See over at Atlas Shrugs exactly how spectacularly the FDLE mishandled their questioning of Rifqa herself.

"Runaway teen to return to Ohio -- but when?," by Meredith Heagney in the Columbus Dispatch, October 24 (thanks to Pamela):

Authorities aren't saying exactly how or when Fathima Rifqa Bary is returning to Ohio.

But as of yesterday, it's official: The 17-year-old religious runaway is to be transferred into the care of Franklin County Children Services. She will live with a foster family on her return....

Rifqa's immigration status also remains unknown to the public. She is a native of Sri Lanka, and an attorney in the Florida case raised questions about whether she's in the country legally.

Rifqa said her father threatened to kill her for her conversion from Islam to Christianity, prompting her to run away to Orlando in July.

Mohamed Bary has denied the allegations, and a Florida Department of Law Enforcement investigation found no credible threat to her safety.

The Florida Department of Children and Families, which has had custody of Rifqa since August, would not release details about her trip back to Ohio for safety reasons. The state of Florida will pay for the trip.

Eric Fenner, executive director of Franklin County Children Services, would not comment because of a gag order. He has said he has no reason to believe Rifqa wouldn't be safe with her parents.

Rifqa's uncertain immigration status threatened to delay her return; Judge Daniel P. Dawson of the 9th Judicial Circuit Court of Florida said he wanted documentation of her status before sending her back.

His order to return Rifqa indicates that he was satisfied with the information provided, but it should not be read as an indication that Rifqa's status is legal or not, said Carrie Hoeppner, a spokeswoman with the Department of Children and Families....

Classmate Samantha Levy, 16, said Rifqa was so friendly the other students would gladly welcome her back.

"I think if she ever came back to New Albany, everyone would be so kind to her and no one would make her feel uncomfortable at all."

Of course not!

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

They were Muslim terrorists. To identify them as such is simply to tell the truth, not to "disparage" an "ethnic group." What ethnicity are Muslims again? Would a plaque reading "murdered by Nazis" on a soldier's grave in 1943 be opposed on the grounds that it would be offensive to Germans? This gingerly political correctness in dealing with the identity of the Islamic jihadists is the single greatest obstacle standing in the way of our defeating them.

"Father of 9/11 Victim Fights to Have 'Murdered by Muslim Terrorists' Inscribed on Son's Memorial," by Douglas Kennedy for FoxNews, October 27 (thanks to Anne Crockett):

KENT, Conn. -- Peter Gadiel wants everyone to remember his son, James, who was killed during the September 11 terrorist attacks.

And he also wants people to remember how he died: "Murdered by Muslim terrorists."

For Gadiel, any tribute to his son would be woefully incomplete without those words.

"I think it's important, because I think there's a nationwide effort to suppress the identity of the people who were involved in the attacks," Gadiel told Fox News.

Eight years ago, 23-year-old James Gadiel worked for Cantor Fitzgerald on the 103rd floor of the World Trade Center. He died when a hijacked plane crashed into the North Tower.

For years, Gadiel's hometown of Kent, Conn., has wanted to honor the young man with a memorial plaque next to its town hall. But the tribute has hit a snag because James' father wants to include the phrase, "Murdered by Muslim terrorists," under his son's name.

For Peter Gadiel, it is a central fact of the Sept. 11 attacks that is often left out.

"It isn't just overlooked, it's suppressed," Gadiel said. "It's simply wrong to imply that people just died. The buildings didn't just collapse, they didn't just fall down -- they were attacked by people with a specific identity, a specific purpose."

Town officials call the phrase too controversial for a small town memorial, and they recently voted against erecting the plaque if Gadiel insists on the language.

"We perceive ourselves as a very warm, loving town," said Ruth Epstein, a Kent selectman and one of two town leaders to vote the plaque down. "To disparage any one ethnic group is just against everything that we stand for here."...

But for Gadiel, it's an important message that he insists be present on any tribute to his son.

"Muslims have to acknowledge that it was their co-religionists who committed this act in their name," he said. "I am offended that unlike so many others, they refuse to acknowledge that it was their people who did this."

| 126 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Cartoon Rage Update. "US charges two over 'terror plot,'" from the BBC, October 27 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Two men in the US city of Chicago have been charged with planning attacks on foreign targets, the US justice department has said.

David Coleman Headley, 49, and Tahawwur Hussain Rana, 48, were both arrested earlier this month.

Among their alleged targets was a Danish newspaper that printed a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed in 2005, sparking angry protests from Muslims.

Prosecutors say Mr Headley travelled to Denmark twice to plan an attack.

The justice department said it had uncovered "a serious plot against overseas targets".

Mr Headley, who changed his name from Daood Gilani in 2006, was arrested on 3 October as he was about to travel to Pakistan.

He has been charged with "conspiracy to commit terrorist acts involving murder and maiming" outside the US and also with conspiracy to provide material support for the attack.

Prosecutors allege he visited the Copenhagen and Arhus offices of the Jyllands-Posten newspaper, which printed the cartoons, for surveillance purposes.

The charge sheet alleges he also travelled to Pakistan to meet members of the Islamic militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba....

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Weapons for the Shi'ites who are rebelling against the Yemeni government. "Iranian ship laden with weapons seized off Yemen," by Nasser Arrabyee for Gulf News, October 27 (thanks to Sr. Soph):

Sanaa: An Iranian ship laden with various weapons believed to be for Al Houthi rebels was seized Monday off the Yemeni coasts of the Midi harbour in the far northern west of the country, security sources said Tuesday.

The 5-member crew, 4 Iranians and Indian, were taken immediately to the capital Sanaa for investigation.

The security sources believed that the ship was in its way to unload its weapon shipment, which includes anti-armour missiles, somewhere close to Haradh where it could be hidden in a farm before Al Houthi rebels collected them.

The Haradh area is only tens of kilometers from the western frontline of Al Malahaid.

Earlier on Monday, the independent paper Al Ahali said that the Iranian Revolutionary Guards train Al Houthi rebels in training camps in neighboring Eritrea. The paper also said that the Iranian revolutionary guards transport the weapons through the Eritrean harbour of Asab, from where it is transported to Yemen's Midi Harbour.

Abdullah Al Mahdoon, one rebel leader, who surrendered himself to the army earlier this month, said in previous statements, that Al Houthi rebels receive unlimited support from the Iranian revolutionary guards, and experts from the Lebanese Hezbullah....

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This is not a joke. Well, it is, but it is true. "U.N. Report Demands Repeal of Counterterrorism Laws to Promote 'Gender Equality,'" by Joseph Abrams for FoxNews, October 21 (thanks to Jed Babbin):

In case you weren't sure, human gender is "changeable over time and contexts," sex slaves must not be "stigmatized" for their work, and it's important to recognize the role of "transgender and intersex individuals as stakeholders" in counterterrorism policy.

Those are some of the conclusions of a United Nations report on counterterrorism that is intended to promote human rights -- but that critics say is designed to redefine gender and hamstring actual counterterror efforts.

Martin Scheinin, a special rapporteur for the U.N.'s Human Rights Council, filed his report in August after six months of studying the "complex relationship between gender equality and countering terrorism."

Scheinin recommends a radical reworking of counterterrorism policies, insisting that the U.N.'s member nations "abandon the 'war paradigm'" and "enshrine the principles of gender-equality and non-discrimination in the design and implementation of all counter-terrorism measures."

Among his proposals:

• "Repeal all counter-terrorism measures" that sanction the ill-treatment of women and children as a way to put pressure on terror suspects within their families.

• Loosen terror financing laws to ensure "safe and effective channels for funding ... of organizations devoted to gender equality"

• "Repeal restrictive immigration controls" that violate human rights by "unduly penalizing transgender persons whose personal appearance and data are subject to change" as their "self-defined gender identity" changes.

Critics say the suggestions are part of an "absolutely insane" agenda at the U.N. that too often seems intent on undermining efforts to blot out terrorism across the globe.

"I would be surprised and disturbed if the U.S. took any of these recommendations seriously," said Steven Groves, a fellow and international law expert at the Heritage Foundation.

"It seems an inescapable conclusion that their desire is to greatly weaken any effective counterterrorism measure that is made by the U.S. or its allies."

The report criticized enhanced security checks "that focus attention on male bombers who may be dressing as females to avoid scrutiny [and] make transgender persons" -- who might also be crossdressing -- "susceptible to increased harassment and suspicion."...

Scheinin is set to present his findings Monday morning to the U.N.'s 3rd Committee, which helps set policy on social and cultural issues and oversees the Human Rights Council for the world body.

The Finnish law professor has been a special rapporteur since 2005. This year he visited Egypt as part of his mandate for the 47-member Council, and criticized countries like Somalia and Pakistan for selling out women's rights to arrange a tenuous peace with Islamic militants....

Past reports from the special rapporteur have focused on many issues relating to women -- including the challenges faced by pregnant Palestinians trying to cross border checkpoints and the effects of counterterror measures on Chechnyan women.

But U.N. watchers say the new report is a confused amalgamation of important issues like women's rights and tangential ones that have very little real application, including Scheinin's demand that invasions like the U.S.'s "war on terror" in Afghanistan be "actually responsive to the concerns of women, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex individuals in local contexts."...

| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

October 26, 2009

"After his death, at least 50 youths took to the streets and started to break windows at the entrance of Gabelle, an outskirt of the city. The youths also burned garbage, tires, a motorcycle and five vehicles in a shipyard, said the police. When the Police and the fire-fighters arrived on the scène, protesters threw stones and Molotov cocktails against them. Then, the police retaliate by firing tear gas but it was unable to enter into Gabelle."

Think about that last sentence for a minute.

"France/Civil unrest: clashes erupted in Fréjus after a young man killed himself," from ESISC, October 26 (thanks to Bill):

Violent clashes erupted late on Sunday in the town of Fréjus (south of France) after Mohamed El Matari, a 21 years-old Moroccan national, living in the city killed himself while he was trying to steer clear of a roadblock. According to Simon Babri, the chief of staff of the Prefect, "initially, at 17h30, the young man turned back to avoid a roadblock at the entrance of Fréjus and he fled. He tried to bypass a second roadblock and by driving on the bottom side of the road it hit a tree".

After his death, at least 50 youths took to the streets and started to break windows at the entrance of Gabelle, an outskirt of the city. The youths also burned garbage, tires, a motorcycle and five vehicles in a shipyard, said the police. When the Police and the fire-fighters arrived on the scène, protesters threw stones and Molotov cocktails against them. Then, the police retaliate by firing tear gas but it was unable to enter into Gabelle.

No wounded have been reported during the incidents. According to a statement published by the prefecture of the Var region, "at midnight the police were able to take position inside the area and to restore calm." However, police stay in the area during the night to prevent any other incidents.

| 37 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
On my book The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran, and related and unrelated issues.

Read it here.
| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This would, of course, render us mute and hence defenseless in the face of the advancing jihad -- and that is just what it is designed to do. Free Speech Death Watch Alert: "Objections to Muslim and Homosexual Practices to be Unlawful in Europe - Media MIA," by Paul Belien for Hudson NY, October 26 (thanks to Magnus):

If all goes as planned, the 27 member states of the European Union will soon have a common hate crime legislation, which will turn disapproval for Islamic practices or homosexual lifestyles into crimes. Europe's Christian churches are trying to stop the plan of the European political establishment, but it is not clear if they will be successful.

Last April, the European Parliament approved the European Union's Equal Treatment Directive. A directive is the name given to an EU law. As directives overrule national legislation, they need the approval of the European Council of Ministers before coming into effect. Next month, the Council will decide on the directive, which places the 27 EU member states under a common anti-discrimination legislation. The directive's definition of discriminatory harassment is so broad that every objection to Muslim or homosexual practices will be considered unlawful.

On April 2, the European Parliament passed the "directive on implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation," 363 votes to 226. The directive applies to social protection and health care, social benefits, education and access to goods and services, including housing. American citizens and companies doing business in Europe are also required to adhere to it.

Originally intended to serve as an equal treatment directive for the disabled by prohibiting discrimination when accessing "goods and services, including housing," activist European politicians and governments had the directive's scope expanded to include discrimination on the basis of religion, age and sexual orientation.

Under the directive, harassment - defined as conduct "with the purpose or effect of violating the dignity of a person and of creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment" - is deemed a form of discrimination.

Harassment, as vaguely defined in the directive, allows an individual to accuse someone of discrimination merely for expressing something the individual allegedly perceives as creating an "offensive environment." The definition is so broad that anyone who feels intimidated or offended can easily bring legal action against those whom he feels are responsible. Moreover, the directive shifts the burden of proof onto the accused, who has to prove the negative, i.e. demonstrate that he or she did not create an environment which intimidated or offended the complainant. If the accused fails to do so, he or she can be sentenced to paying an unlimited amount of compensation for "harassment." [...]

The same phenomenon, a lack of interest on the part of European and also American public opinion, is apparent with regard to the semi-legal initiatives taken at the level of the United Nations. On October 2nd, the UN Human Rights Council approved a free speech resolution, co-sponsored by the US and Egypt, which criticizes "negative racial and religious stereotyping." American diplomats said the decision to co-sponsor the resolution was part of America's effort to "reach out to Muslim countries." The resolution passed unanimously, with the support of all Western nations. Though the resolution has no immediate effect in law, it provides Muslim extremists with moral ammunition the next time they feel that central tenets of Islam are being treated disrespectfully through the creation of what they perceive to be an 'offensive environment.'

| 189 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

''Religious values should be respected in order the relations between the two sides to remain positive."

In Cyprus, since the Turkish occupation began:

* at least 55 churches have been converted into mosques
* another 50 churches and monasteries have been converted into stables, stores, hostels, museums, or have been demolished
* the cemeteries of at least 25 villages have been desecrated and destroyed
* innumerable icons, religious artifacts and all kinds of archaeological treasures have been stolen and smuggled abroad
* illegal excavations and smuggling of antiquities is openly taking place all the time with the involvement of the occupying forces
* all Greek place names contrary to all historical and cultural reason were converted into Turkish ones.

"Cyprus: Bar Construction in Mosque Infuriates Muslims," from ANSAmed, October 25 (thanks to Insubria):

(ANSAmed) - ANKARA - Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus's (KKTC) Directorate of Religious Affairs has applied to state offices in Greek Cyprus to stop the construction of a bar in the garden of the Hala Mosque in South Cyprus, which has resulted in criticism from Muslims living on the island, Today's Zaman reports. ''Religious values should be respected in order the relations between the two sides to remain positive'', the director of Religious Affairs in the KKTC, Yusuf Suicmez, said, underlining that it is very important for Muslims because the mosque, that lies on the shores of the Larnaca Salt Lake, reportedly houses the tomb of Umm Haram, the aunt of the Prophet Muhammad, making it the fourth holiest Muslim shrine after Mecca, Medina and Jerusalem.
| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Actually this is based on Koran 4:92, which forbids Muslims to kill other Muslims. But Infidels are fair game. "Saudi University Professor Salman Al-Abdali: Suicide Bombings Okay in Tel Aviv, Not in Riyadh," from MEMRITV, October 1 (thanks to Weasel Zippers):

Following are excerpts from an interview with Saudi University professor Salman Al-Abdali, which aired on Iqra TV on October 1, 2009. [...]

Someone who blows himself up amidst the enemy is different from someone who blows himself up in a safe place. Blowing oneself up in Tel Aviv is not like blowing oneself up in Riyadh.

| 26 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Movies and television? No way. Executions? Bring the whole family -- or else! "Somalis 'made to view executions'," by Mary Harper for BBC News, October 25:

Hundreds of people in Somalia have been forced to watch Islamist militants executing two people accused of spying.
People in Merca said al-Shabaab militia patrolled the town with loudspeakers, demanding they attend the executions.
The militants also ordered schools to close for the day as they were keen for children to watch the two men being shot dead by a firing squad.
Most of those at the execution, on a patch of open ground, are reported to have been women and children.
It is becoming something of a pattern for al-Shabaab to encourage young people to engage in violence.
It recently organised a quiz for young men in the southern town of Kismayo.
The prizes included AK-47 assault rifles, hand grenades and anti-tank mines.
The aim, said al-Shabaab, was to stop young men from wasting time, and to focus on important things like defending their territory and their religion.

Priorities: As the Ayatollah Khomeini said, "There is no fun in Islam."

At the prize-giving ceremony, which was attended by hundreds of people, the militants urged parents to teach their children to handle weapons at an early age.
Somali children's rights groups say al-Shabaab is intent on brainwashing the young to believe in violent Islamism.
In this way, it can ensure it has a steady supply of recruits, ready to fight for its aim of establishing extreme Islamist rule, not only in Somalia but far beyond its borders.
| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

October 25, 2009

If these Somali jihadists ultimately join the Somali immigrants who are coming in large numbers into the United States, they will find that "journalists" like Michael Kruse, Phil Keating, Meredith Heagney, Manya Brachear, and S. I. Rosenbaum are their best friends.

"Hizbul Islam threaten Somalia journalists," from Garowe Online, October 24 (thanks to James):

MOGADISHU, Somalia Oct 24 (Garowe Online) - A member of Hizbul Islam rebel faction that is fighting to topple Somalia's interim government has threatened Somali journalists and accused them of supporting the government, Radio Garowe reports.

Sheikh Mohamed Moallim Ali, the information secretary for Hizbul Islam, told a Friday press conference in the capital Mogadishu that Somali journalists interview government officials and African Union (AMISOM) commanders.

"The news you report is against the jihad and you are not nationalists willing to defend your people and your country," Sheikh Mohamed told reporters....

Come to the U.S., Sheikh Mohamed! Nothing but pro-jihad news is fit to print here!

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Wizbang has the story.

This has been going on for a long time. Feminists have long ignored the plight of Muslim women, while conservatives who supposedly don't care about women have been the only champions of women's rights in the Islamic world. See my articles on this: "Feminists Betray Muslim Women"; "The Conservative Vanguard of the Feminist Movement"; and "Two Women Stoned: Feminists Mum" (with David Horowitz and Janet Levy).

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Once again we see rage and fury over a rumor. "Afghans protest rumored desecration of Koran by U.S. troops," by Laura King in the Los Angeles Times, October 25 (thanks to Pamela):

Hundreds of angry protesters in Afghanistan's capital today burned an effigy of President Obama, acting on rumors that American troops had desecrated the Koran.

U.S. military officials emphatically denied that any copies of the Muslim holy book had been mishandled, and accused the Taliban of spreading falsehoods to incite hatred against Western forces....

And while it is perfectly reasonable and understandable that the military would issue such denials, it also serves to validate the ridiculous and dangerous assumption that it is perfectly legitimate to go beserk if a Koran were desecrated.

The incident also pointed to a strong undercurrent of anti-American sentiment at a politically fraught time in Afghanistan, less than two weeks before a runoff to settle a divisive, fraud-tainted presidential election. The Nov. 7 face-off between President Hamid Karzai and former Foreign Minister Abdullah Abdullah was agreed to only after heavy U.S. pressure on Karzai to accept the results of an international audit. The investigators found as many as one-third of the ballots cast for Karzai in the Aug. 20 election had been fraudulent. That put the Afghan leader below the threshold of victory, 50%.

On Sunday morning U.S. news shows, both candidates ruled out a power-sharing agreement to avoid the runoff. Against this political backdrop, the Koran protest reflected a rising religious conservatism even among some members of Afghanistan's educated elite, such as the university students who made up most of the crowd of about 1,000 demonstrators.

Police fired warning shots into the air when the demonstrators marched from Kabul University toward the parliament, but no injuries were reported.

Several marchers insisted they were certain that a Koran had been desecrated by U.S. troops in Wardak province, just outside the capital, even if they could not provide particulars of the incident, such as when it was believed to have taken place.

"Muslims were disrespected!" said Zabiullah Khalil, an engineering student. "The foreigners shot the Koran, and then they burned it. They should be tried for this."

The demonstration, like many in the capital, had a heartfelt yet orchestrated feel to it. Khalil, like a number of other participants, expressed broad anger at the United States in connection with the election and its disputed aftermath.

"We don't want a slave government," he said. "We want a real Islamic country."...

And that you shall almost certainly have.

| 39 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

But...but....they really, really, really want peace! "Hamas: War will settle Jerusalem dispute, not talks," by Jack Khoury for Haaretz, October 25 (thanks to Alexandre):

Following a conflagration of violence at Temple Mount in Jerusalem on Sunday, Hamas political leader Khaled Meshal declared that "Jerusalem's fate will be decided with jihad (holy war) and resistance, and not negotiations."

Clashes between Israeli police and youths armed with rocks broke out Sunday at the Noble Sanctuary/Temple Mount compound, home of the Muslim holy site, the al Aqsa mosque. The confrontation was apparently sparked by radical Jewish clerics' call to their followers to go up to the compound, and by calls by radical Muslim clerics for their followers to defend the site.

Meshal, in Damascus, voiced hope that Israel's Arabs and the residents of the West Bank would join the residents of the Gaza Strip, which is ruled by Hamas, in staging demonstrations in protest of the Jerusalem events, Israel Radio reported.

Typical evasion of responsibility on the Muslim side comes today from Jordan:

Meanwhile, Jordan warned the Israel Police and religious Jewish radicals on Sunday that further provocation at the compound would "fuel violence in the region and jeopardize peace efforts".

"Any new provocative attempts by Israeli troops and Jewish extremists such as what happened today in the shrine's compound represents a flagrant violation of international law and conventions and sets the stage for more tension and acts of violence," Minister of State for Media Affairs and Communication Nabil Sharif said in a statement.

"Jordan, out of its historical responsibilities in being the custodian of the holy places in Jerusalem, is extremely worried about what is taking place and warns against going ahead with this provocative behavior on the part of Israeli troops," he added.

Sharif urged "an immediate end to such dangerous practices which threaten to derail all opportunities of peace and stability in the region"....

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Sunni/Shi'ite Jihad Update from Yemen. The Shi'ites have backing from Iran. "Two Yemeni Soldiers Killed In Ambush In South," from Reuters, October 25 (thanks to Maxwell):

ADEN, Yemen (Reuters) - Two Yemeni soldiers were killed and three others wounded in an ambush by gunmen in the south, where separatist sentiment is running high, a local news website said Sunday.

The gunmen opened fire at the soldiers' vehicle as they were accompanying the body of a fellow soldier killed in the government's fight against a rebellion in the north, independent website Yemen News reported, citing Mahmoud Awas, the head of a local security unit.

Protests and attacks in the south coincide with a war in Yemen's far north which broke out in August between the army and insurgents of the Zaydi Shi'ite sect.

Sunni Saudi Arabia, the world's top oil exporter, and its ally the United States, fear the unrest in Yemen may play into the hands of al Qaeda, which has become more active in Yemen and could exploit instability to carry out attacks....

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

But...but...they really, really want peace! "Hamas accused of inciting J'lem riots," from the Jerusalem Post, October 25 (thanks to Maxwell):

After security forces clashed on Sunday with Muslim rioters on the Temple Mount and elsewhere in east Jerusalem, police blamed Hamas and the Islamic Movement for once again inciting Israel's Arab population to violence in the capital.

"Throughout the day, very large groups of Arab residents of east Jerusalem and other Israeli Arabs have come to the area at the encouragement of the Islamic Movement," Police Chief Commissioner Insp.-Gen. David Cohen told reporters. "I urge them (the Islamic Movement) to show restraint and not to incite."...

Good luck with that.

Police also released a separate statement blaming Hamas for inciting violence in a bid to "disrupt order on the Temple Mount."

Meanwhile, Hamas condemned Israel for "infiltrating the Aksa Mosque" and "defiling" it.
The group also called on Palestinians to rise up against Israel, for Arabs and Muslims worldwide to punish Israel. "The real battle begins again," declared spokesman Fawzi Barhoum.

In the West Bank, the Palestinian Authority condemned the Israeli operation. "Jerusalem is a red line that Israel should not cross," said Nabil Abu Rdeneh, spokesman for PA President Mahmoud Abbas.

Treason:

Israeli Arab MKs blamed Israel for the escalation in tensions, as they had done during previous clashes. MK Ahmed Tibi (United Arab List-Tal) said that Israel had "broken the law," complaining that he had waited 50 minutes in order to ascend the Temple Mount.

UAL-Tal MK Taleb a-Sanaa said that Israel was provoking "a billion Muslims" and sparking unnecessary riots by allowing "extremist elements to defile the mosque."...

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Police said the violence began after Palestinians threw stones at officers on patrol in the area." "Israeli police, Arabs clash near Jerusalem mosque," by Allyn Fisher-Ilan for Reuters, October 25 (thanks to all who sent this in):

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israeli police stormed Jerusalem's al-Aqsa mosque compound on Sunday, hurling stun grenades at Palestinians who threw rocks at them in another outbreak of violence at the holy city's most sensitive site.

A medic for the Palestinian Red Crescent said 18 Palestinians were injured. Police reported that three officers were hurt.

The unrest, following a similar incident a month ago, did not appear to herald any immediate slide into widescale violence that could disrupt U.S.-led efforts to revive Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, suspended since December.

But the confrontation between Israeli police in riot gear and rock-throwing Muslims alarmed by rumours that right-wing Jews planned to enter the site was a reminder that Jerusalem remains a cauldron of heated religious and political passions.

No kidding, really?

Police, who also used tear gas in the clashes, did not go into al-Aqsa mosque, situated on al-Haram al-Sharif (the Noble Sanctuary), regarded by Muslims as the third holiest site after the cities of Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia.

The compound is revered by Jews as the Temple Mount, where the two destroyed Biblical Temples once stood. Israel captured the site in a 1967 war, along with the rest of East Jerusalem, which it annexed, and adjoining parts of the West Bank.

Police said the violence began after Palestinians threw stones at officers on patrol in the area. Police then rushed onto the compound behind riot shields, using stun grenades and batons to repel protesters, who retreated into the mosque.

During the clash, dozens of young Arab men threw rocks, lumps of masonry and water tanks from the roofs of houses at police in the narrow alleyways around the mosque compound, which overlooks Judaism's Western Wall....

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The same group on whose TV program Obama adviser Dalia Mogahed recently defended Sharia. "Islamists who want to destroy the state get £100,000 funding," by Andrew Gilligan for the Telegraph, October 25 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Leading members of a group that wants to bring down the British state and replace it with a dictatorship under Islamic law have secured more than £100,000 of taxpayers' money for a chain of schools.

Accounts filed at the Charity Commission show that the Government paid a total of £113,411 last year to a foundation run by senior members and activists of Hizb ut-Tahrir -- a notorious Islamic extremist group that ministers promised to ban.

The public money helped run a nursery school and two Islamic primary schools where children are taught key elements of Hizb's ideology from the age of five....

Hizb regards integration as "dangerous" and says that British Muslims should "fight assimilation" into British society. It wants to create a global Islamic superstate, or "caliphate", initially in Muslim-majority countries and then across the rest of the world.

It says that "those [Muslims] who believe in democracy are Kafir", or apostates. It orders all Muslims to keep apart from non-believers and boycott "corrupt" British elections and political processes. It has a tiny following and its views are rejected by most British Muslims.

Hizb, which operates worldwide, insists it is non-violent and condemned the London bombings.

However its website previously displayed a leaflet urging Muslims to "kill [Jews] wherever you find them" and at a rally in London earlier this year, Imran Waheed, its chief media adviser in Britain, said that there could be "no peace" with Israel, calling on Muslims to "fight" a "jihad... in the way of Allah" against it.

Its anti-Semitism has resulted in the group being banned in Germany and on some British university campuses....

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

With this, the jihadists aim to demonstrate they can still attack high-value (and what should be highly secure) targets. The selection of targets -- the "Baghdad governate building" and Justice ministry -- underscores the jihadists' intention of imposing Sharia law: Though Iraq's constitution says that "no law that contradicts the established provisions of Islam may be established," those who want Sharia are not inclined to be satisfied with a partial or symbolic implementation -- something the West should stop to consider as well.

"Death toll past 100 in Baghdad bombings," by Jomana Karadesh for CNN, October 25:

Baghdad, Iraq (CNN) -- At least 108 people were killed and 512 wounded in twin suicide car bombings near government offices in central Baghdad on Sunday morning, officials said.
The death toll was the worst in a single incident in Iraq for many months.
Two car bombs detonated in quick succession near Iraqi government buildings about 10:30 a.m., an Interior Ministry official said.
One of the bombs exploded outside Baghdad's governorate building and the second one outside the Justice Ministry, about 500 meters (1,600 feet) away.
Plumes of smoke billowed from the sites of the attacks as victims fled, some with blood streaming down their faces. The streets were strewn with debris, including charred cars and chunks of concrete from damaged buildings. Some government buildings and others in the area were heavily damaged.
Sunday's attacks came a day after Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, completed a two-day visit to Iraq that included a stop at the nearby Foreign Ministry.
An Iraqi official said the government was working to bolster security, but regional cooperation was needed to help fight suicide bombers.
"We are calling on international and U.N. envoys to come and find out why Iraq is being targeted this way," said Ali al-Dabbagh, the Iraqi government spokesman....
| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

October 24, 2009

The Muslim American Society is the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States.

"In recent years, the U.S. Brotherhood operated under the name Muslim American Society, according to documents and interviews. One of the nation's major Islamic groups, it was incorporated in Illinois in 1993 after a contentious debate among Brotherhood members." -- Chicago Tribune, 2004.

And the Muslim Brotherhood's self-proclaimed goal in the U.S. is the destruction of American society and the imposition of Sharia in this country. The Muslim Brotherhood "must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions." -- "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America," by Mohamed Akram, May 19, 1991.

"Man accused in Boston terror plot is son of former Muslim American Society leader: Father moves out of town weeks after son questioned by the FBI," from Americans for Peace and Tolerance, October 23 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Media reports on the Boston terror arrest have named three individuals as conspirators in the plot to machine gun people in shopping malls and kill American officials.Two, Daniel Maldonado and Tareq Mehanna, are in custody. The third, however, Ahmad Abousamra, escaped to Syria after being questioned by the FBI in 2006.

According to the complaint, it was Abousamra who introduced Maldonado and Mehanna to each other during an afternoon of watching "jihad videos" in which Islamic terrorists killed and mutilated American soldiers.

Abousamra seems to be the most extremist of the three, as well as the one most educated in radical Islamist ideology. According to the criminal complaint:

"Abousamra expressed his belief that suicide bombings were permissible. ... Abousamra found justification for his position in the religious writings of Muslim extremists. Abousamra justified attacks on civilians, such as the September 11, 2001 attacks. Abousamra stated that civilians were not innocent because they paid taxes to support the government and because they were Kufar (non-believers). ... Abousamra always justified their extremist views by citing Islamic teachings."

Ahmad Abousamra is the oldest son of Abdul-Badi Abousamra, former vice president of the Boston branch of the Muslim American Society, which operates the largest Islamic center in the Northeast. The MAS has branches in 34 cities within 23 states.

The Muslim American Society, according to Federal prosecutors, "was founded as the overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in America." The Muslim Brotherhood is considered to be the first truly modern Islamic supremacist movement. As such, it has spawned or aided most of the Islamic terrorist organizations functioning around the globe today, including Al Qaeda, Hamas, and Lashkar-e-Taibah....

Read it all.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"All members of the college community should be identifiable at all times when in the college." A reasonable statement. But it is likely that the forces of multiculturalism will soon prevent such commensensical positons from being taken.

"College Bars Muslim Student For Wearing Veil," from SkyNews, October 24 (thanks to all who sent this in):

A Muslim student says she is "emotionally traumatised" after her local college prevented her from enrolling because she wore a veil.

Shawana Bilqes, 18, claims the decision by Burnley College has left her humiliated and has disrupted her studies.

Shawana told Sky News: "I was willing to take it off as a compromise for identification checks, security or whatever. But they said I couldn't wear it anywhere on the premises."

In a statement, college Principal John Smith insisted that unimpeded communication with students was impossible if the face was not fully visible.

"All members of the college community should be identifiable at all times when in the college," he said....

| 41 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Pamela has posted a haunting video of the decline of France. It put me in mind of Hugh Fitzgerald's classic essay Douce France, which is always worth revisiting:

Imagine that you are a cosseted member of the French elite. One child is doing the khâgne, aiming for rue d'Ulm. Another is now a politechnicien. You are very comfortable, working for the state. You and your spouse are journalists, or writers, or one of that vast tribe of people conducting "recherches" and life is comfortable, good, the way it should be. Yes, you do notice more and more Muslims about you as you walk, no longer in the banlieues, but in the center of Paris, or Toulouse, or Lyon. And you remember how uneasy you felt, four years ago, when you happened to be walking on the Cannebière in Marseille. You decided, then and there, that you would not return.

And you have friends who live in the south. And they tell you that the beurs - some call them maghrébins -- make life hell for everyone. They attack French children on the way to school. They vandalize cars. They threaten, and do more than threaten, anyone who is still foolish enough to walk out wearing a kippah or a cross. Whole areas of cities in the south, as in the north, and east, and west, have become off-limits to non-Muslims. In the schools, the teachers have lost authority. They cannot even cover the subjects of World War II, the Resistance, and the murders of the Jews as the state prescribes; they fear, with reason, the violent reaction of the Muslim students.

And as the schools become more and more dangerous for non-Muslim students and teachers, with more time and resources devoted to discipline rather than to learning, French parents and would-be parents are now silently factoring into their childbearing plans the present value of the future cost of what, they see, will now have to be added: private school tuition. And that means, of course, that those French people will plan on smaller families. And they will also be factoring in the growing cost, paid by them, those French taxpayers, for the whole expanding edifice of security, the guards in the schools, the guards at the train stations and métro stations and airports and at government buildings everywhere, the costs of keeping the gravestones from being vandalized, the costs of protecting the synagogues and the churches, the costs for all those tapped phones and agents in mosques, and subsidies to lawyers and judges to hear charges and try cases against Muslims, and the costs of monitoring da'wa in the prisons (more than 50% Muslim).

But the Muslims are indifferent to expenses incurred by the French state. France is part of the world; the world belongs to Allah, and to his Believers. That doctrine has remained immutable for 1400 years. Imam Bouziane, the one they keep trying to deport, had 16 children by two wives, all living on the French state: a representative Muslim man. Over time, the difference between average family size of Muslims and non-Muslims steadily increases. And, over time, the education system continues to disintegrate. Right now, perhaps, you cannot see it. Your children go to the best schools, followed by the best lycées. You vacation in Normandy, or Brittany, or the Ile de Ré. And you do not take the metro often enough, or walk in the right districts, or work in the right factories or offices, to understand what tens of millions of your fellow Frenchmen now have to endure. You, for the moment, are still immune, still willfully unaware. You have spent the last few decades learning about the Muslim world from Eric Rouleau, and his epigones (after they silenced Peroncel-Hugoz, the one journalist who reported the truth) in Le Monde. You are deeply-versed in the constantly reported-upon, endlessly dilated-upon, perfidy of the mighty empire of Israel. You know what we have all had dinned into us: that the Arab Muslims are reasonable people, with clearly-justified grievances, grievances so reasonable and so limited in scope, that justice demands they be satisfied. Everyone agrees on the "solution." It is called a "two-state solution" and of course it is a "solution" for otherwise, of course, it would not have been called a "solution."

And everything looks the way it always has looked: the linden trees, the river, the bridges, the réverbères, the étalage in the neighborhood boulangerie. Douce France, cher pays de mon enfance. At the end of the school day, chic mothers still congregate in little towns, or small cities, outside the school - this or that Ecole Jules Ferry -- waiting to pick up their children. Here come the littlest ones, from Maternelle, running up now -- just look at how small they are. And here are the CE1 group, with those huge cartables on their tiny backs. Run, run, run, to Mommy. Oop-la. And then the years of study, study, study marked by ever-larger cahiers -- "cahier" and "cartable" are the words that identify French DNA better than Piaf or gauloises, isn't that true? And now we will read the books, and study the subjects, set down so completely and precisely by the Ministry of Education. And now we are up to the final year, preparing for the Bac, with copies of blue-backed BALISES, guides to Les Châtiments and La Peau de Chagrin. And just look at the results listed in the newspaper: Claire-Alix has a mention très bien. Fantastic. Everything is fine, everything will always stay the same, whole countries cannot change. It's not possible.

But it is changing, coming apart, quietly, slowly -- let's not look too closely, we mustn't pay too much attention -- the streets, the schools, the hospitals, the ability to speak the truth about things, about life as it is lived, la vita vissuta as they like to say in a neighboring country. Dominique de Villepin always knew there was nothing to worry about; he was born, after all, in Salé, next to Rabat, even spent a few years of his infancy there; of course he knows his Arabs, his Muslims. And surely Eric Rouleau, who for decades in Le Monde was the resident expert on the Middle East (he was so knowledgeable that he never had to so much as mention the teachings of the Qur'an and Sunna), surely he knew everything, didn't he? And those French translations of Edward Said that denounced with such passion the Islamophobia, and those vicious cliches with which the blind and rotting West has always caricatured the Arab Muslim world. Oh, we have been so terrible to the Arabs, we colonialists, we French, we Westerners. And then there is the never-ending outrage of Israel, that running colonial sore. Of course, they have every right, those Muslims, to come here to France. We went to their countries once, now they come to ours. And they have every right to hate us, don't they?

So now we have decided not to understand, and to cut all ties of sympathy to, Israel -- and how did we ever have any sympathy for it in the first place, the way some of our parents did back in 1948 or 1956 or 1967? How could they not have seen what the "Palestinian people" had to endure? Hanan, Yasser, Said, Saeb, Aziz, Walid, Rashid, Mohammed -- you have won our hearts and minds. Take us, do with us what you will.

No one will mention what is happening or what kinds of things we must begin to think about doing to save ourselves. No one of any decency. And whatever Le Pen and Megret say, we must say the opposite (except, of course, when they show their hostility to "the Jews"). Do not say those things, do not think them. Free thought is all very well in theory, but really -- consider the consequences. Don't dare to think outside that box brimming with idées reçues. Défense de penser au dehors du box.

No, everything will be all right as you stroll down the Avenue Paule-Anne. Those Muslims will never be a match for us. Why, just look at those legionnaires marching à pas lent down the Champs-Elysées, think of that string of desert victories. Inside our heads, it is 1930 and over here is the Exposition coloniale. You remember, tu t'en souviens, that painting by le Douanier Rousseau, don't you, with the burnoosed Arab standing next to the black Senegalese? I have it right, don't I? France will always be France. Nothing will ever change.

At a certain point, and despite everything that causes you not to see what is staring you in the face, you realize that something has gone irreparably wrong with your country, and you, and your children, are in danger of losing that country, down to every village and house, qui m'est une province et beaucoup davantage. And you do not know what to do, or how to explain this feeling to others, or in whom to confide your secret fears, or what can be done. It is so confusing, and so upsetting. You cannot vote for Le Pen. You cannot endorse "cowboy" Bush or those ridiculous Americans. You have no place to go.

And then you learn what Jacques Chirac -- who now has a Muslim grandchild himself -- and Dominique de Villepin, do not wish you to learn. For if you did, you might be very angry. You discover that 1 out of every 3 babies born in France today is a Muslim baby. And that means, in 20 years, one of every three 20-year-olds in France will be a Muslim twenty-year-old. And that means, twenty years after that, at present rates of reproduction, France will have a majority Muslim population. Where shall we hide the statues from Marly-le-roi? And the Venus de Milo? And what about all those paintings of animated life -- all those portraits in the Louvre, and the Grand Palais, and the Musée Guimet down there in linden-lined Aix, and everywhere else in art-filled artful France, mère des arts, des armes, et des loix -- that are absolutely forbidden according to the immutable strictures of the Qur'an. Should they be sent for safekeeping to those Americans across the seas? By then most of the Jews in France will have left, gone across the oceans for their own safekeeping, to Israel or to English-speaking Canada (they were worried about the Muslim population of Quebec, you see, which had been allowed to grow under the Province of Quebec's policy of encouraging francophone immigrants, preferring North Africans to potential immigrants from Italy, Greece, Spain), and above all, to America. What luck those Americans have had. No more bequests to France by the likes of the Rothschilds, or Nissim Camondo. No more Donations from another Pierre Lévy. Enjoy the Kufic calligraphy; some find it endlessly fascinating.

For the moment, you allow yourself to believe that something will come up. Most likely, all those Muslims will simply convert. I mean, they do that, don't they, quite easily I'm told. Of course, why didn't I think of it, that is exactly what will happen. The situation is always saved in time. Just like during the war. Nothing to worry about. Nothing.

| 55 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Sharia forbids Muslim women to marry non-Muslim men. As such, what should be a private matter between two people becomes a point of tension driven by the sense of entitlement inherent in Islamic law to "dominate and not be dominated."

"Egypt Muslims stone Coptic churches in sectarian clash," from Agence France-Presse, October 24:

CAIRO -- Muslims students stoned Coptic Christian churches and homes in a southern Egyptian village on Saturday after four Muslims suspected of killing a Copt were kept in custody, police said.
The unrest began when the prosecutor extended the detention of the Muslims in the village of Dairut who are suspected of killing an elderly Copt in his home last week, a police official said.
Stone-throwing Muslim students and Copts clashed before police deployed in the town, the official added.
The men in custody had allegedly sought to attack the Coptic man's son, who was dating a Muslim girl and was rumoured to have passed out a CD with explicit pictures of her. Instead they found only the father at home.
Copts account for six to 10 percent of Egypt's 80-million population. They complain of discrimination and have been the targets of sectarian killings and violence.
| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

On Obama adviser Dalia Mogahed's appearance on Hizb ut-Tahrir's TV show, see here. She says now that she was "misled."

In any case, the Bangladeshi government has done well. If only the U.S. government would follow suit.

"Bangladesh Islamist group banned," from the BBC, October 23 (thanks to Maxwell):

The Islamist organisation, Hizb-ut Tahrir has been banned in Bangladesh, the home ministry has announced.

Home Secretary Abdus Sobhan Sikdar said the government feared Hizb-ut Tahrir posed a threat to peaceful life.

It is the first time that an Islamist group which has not been implicated in any terrorist acts been outlawed.

The group has condemned the ban and pledged that it will not be silenced by a government it said was guilty of a "pro-imperialist stance".

Officials say that Hizb ut-Tahrir has been banned in at least 20 countries and topped a government list of about 10 groups suspected of plotting subversive acts in Bangladesh.

Mutiny

"The government has decided to ban Hizb-ut Tahrir because they are against the interest of law and pose a threat to public security," Mr Sikdar said....

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Why are we importing large numbers of Somalis into the U.S.? Why are no efforts being made -- none whatsoever -- to determine the attachment to the jihad and Islamic supremacism of the Somalis we are bringing into the country?

"Uganda, Burundi Condemn Threats By Somali Insurgents," by Douglas Mpuga for VOA News, October 24 (thanks to Maxwell):

Uganda and Burundi have condemned threats made by Somalia's Islamist Al Shabaab insurgents to strike Kampala and Bujumbura. The threats come in response to a firefight Thursday between peacekeepers and insurgents in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, killing at least 30 people.

The violence broke out after Islamists fired on Somali president's plane as he headed to Kampala for an African Union summit on refugees and internally displaced persons.

Uganda's president Yoweri Museveni has warned the Islamist rebels that they will pay a heavy price if they carry out their attacks, and Burundi authorities say they take the threats seriously.

Major Bahoku Barigye, the spokesperson for the African Union peacekeeping mission in Somalia, said the two countries do not take the threat from Al Shabaab lightly.

But, he said, "the threats on Burundi and Uganda and the threats of terrorism elsewhere in the world have existed for some time," and that there was nothing new in what the Somali insurgents are saying....

Ain't that the truth...

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

We can only hope that she is safe. And now that some U.S. officials have taken seriously the threat that an apostate is under, can Rifqa Bary get some consideration? Or is it too late for that? "Asylum seeker realized her dream but now is missing," by Duke Helfand for the Los Angeles Times, October 24 (thanks to Don):

Gilda Ghanipour has spent the last nine years on the run.

Abandoned by her Muslim family for converting to Christianity, she has shuttled from one address to the next, terrified of being deported to her native Iran, where apostasy can be punished by death.

Last year, Ghanipour stumbled upon a retired immigration judge and his Pepperdine University Law School students, who championed her quest for asylum.

Ghanipour won the case. But she doesn't know it.

The devoutly religious woman vanished shortly before the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services delivered on her dream at the end of August.

Her Pepperdine legal advocates are desperately searching for her -- calling churches she frequented, scouring prison databases, knocking on doors where she once lived.

Somewhere in Los Angeles, they believe, Ghanipour is wandering alone, as she has for most of the last decade, probably clutching her beloved Bible, possibly sleeping in a homeless shelter or in someone's spare bedroom.

Police haven't been able to find her. The coroner has no record of her. Efforts by The Times to locate her through relatives, churches and homeless advocates also were unsuccessful.

The disappearance of the 49-year-old Ghanipour, who speaks three languages and once attended medical school, is especially difficult for those at Pepperdine Law School's Asylum Clinic.

Gilda, as they've known her, was their first client. She offered the lawyers-in-training an early taste of victory. They have only a grainy black-and-white photo to remind them of her thick black hair, her proud smile, her opinionated ways. And they are worried, knowing that Ghanipour has been in ill health.

"Part of me doesn't want to celebrate until we find her," said Kristin Heinrich, a third-year law student....

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Islamic respect for freedom of speech: 60 lashes for covering a story about a man boasting about violating Sharia! Sharia Alert from the Land of the Two Holy Places: "Saudi journalist sentenced to 60 lashes," by Mohammed Jamjoom for CNN, October 24:

(CNN) -- A Saudi court sentenced a female journalist Saturday to 60 lashes for her work on a controversial Arabic-language TV show that aired an episode in which a man bragged about his sex life, two sources told CNN.

The court in Jeddah also imposed a two-year travel ban on Rosanna Al-Yami, according to a Saudi Information Ministry official, who could not be named because he is not authorized to speak to the media. The ban prevents her from traveling outside Saudi Arabia.

This official identified Al-Yami as a fixer, who helps journalists obtain stories, and a coordinator for Lebanese Broadcasting Corp., the network that aired "A Thick Red Line," a popular show on social taboos.

On one episode, a Saudi man, Mazen Abdul Jawad, bragged about sex and got into trouble with Saudi authorities for his boasts. Abdul Jawad was put on trial and sentenced to five years in prison and 1,000 lashes.

Suleiman Al-Jumeii, the attorney who represents Abdul Jawad, also confirmed the sentence against Al-Yami, saying he believes she is the first Saudi journalist ever to be sentenced to lashes.

While the charges include involvement in preparing the program, she was not involved in setting up the episode in which Abdul Jawad appeared, the lawyer said.

Al-Jumeii doesn't represent Al-Yami, but he said he is keeping tabs on all aspects of cases dealing with "A Thick Red Line." The lawyer is attempting to pursue an appeal for his client and get his case heard in a special court that deals only with media matters.

CNN has attempted to get comments from Al-Yami and her attorney.

Abdul Jawad, a 32-year-old airline employee and divorced father of four, spoke openly about his sexual escapades, his love of sex and losing his virginity at age 14 on "A Thick Red Line."

That episode caused an uproar in deeply conservative Saudi Arabia, where Shariah, or Islamic law, is practiced. Premarital sex is illegal, and unrelated men and women are not permitted to mingle....

Memo to CNN: "conservatives" don't usually sentence journalists to lashings. And not for want of candidates.

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

It's not the first time something like this has happened, either. Given the concern even within Pakistan about young officers aiding the Taliban, the fact that this one "only" made it to the first checkpoint is not a reliable indicator of the overall security of the facilities.

"Bomb hits outside suspected Pakistani nuclear-weapons site," by Saeed Shah for McClatchy Newspapers, October 23:

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan -- A suicide bomber attacked a suspected nuclear-weapons site Friday in Pakistan , raising fears about the security of the nuclear arsenal, while two other terrorist blasts made it another bloody day in the country's struggle against extremism.
Increasingly daring and sophisticated attacks by terrorists allied with al Qaida on some of Pakistan's most sensitive and best-protected installations have led to warnings that extremists could damage a nuclear facility or seize nuclear material.
Pakistan's nuclear sites are mostly in the northwest of the country, close to the capital, Islamabad , to keep them away from the border with archenemy India , but that places them close to Pakistani Taliban extremists, who are massed in the northwest. Al Qaida has made clear its ambitions to get hold of a nuclear bomb or knowledge of nuclear technology. Several other sites associated with Pakistan's nuclear weapons have been hit previously.
Pakistan is reeling from a wave of terrorist violence that's coincided with the launch of a U.S.-backed ground operation by the military against the country's al Qaida and Taliban heartland of South Waziristan , on the Afghan border.
A suicide attacker struck a checkpoint Friday morning on the boundary of the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex , an air force base at Kamra, about 40 miles outside Islamabad , killing eight people, including two security personnel, and wounding 15.
"There were strict security arrangements, so he (the bomber) was intercepted at the first checkpost," local Police Chief Fakhar Sultan said.
Many of the attacks have been carried out in a deadly collaboration between Taliban extremists from the northwest and militants from Punjab, the country's most heavily populated province....
| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Surely this will end the jihad, eh? Unfortunately, Obama (like everyone else in Washington) never seems to consider the possibility that the jihad rages against the West for reasons that arise from Islamic theology, not because of anything we can correct by showering goodies upon Muslim nations -- goodies that may well end up being used against the United States. "Obama offers millions in Muslim technology fund," from AFP, October 23 (thanks to Pamela):

WASHINGTON -- The White House Friday highlighted a new multi-million-dollar technology fund for Muslim nations, following a pledge made by President Barack Obama in his landmark speech to the Islamic world.

The White House said the US Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) had issued a call for proposals for the fund, which will provide financing of between 25 and 150 million dollars for selected projects and funds.

The Global Technology and Innovation Fund will "catalyze and facilitate private sector investments" throughout Asia, the Middle East and Africa, the White House said in a statement.

Eligible projects would advance economic opportunity and create jobs in areas like technology, education, telecoms, media, business services and clean technology, the White House said.

OPIC said sample projects could help foster the development of new computer technology or telecommunications businesses, or widen access to broadband Internet services....

| 50 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

But as far as dhimmi British authorities are concerned, he is the one causing trouble.

(Thanks to all who sent this in.)

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

October 23, 2009

The Taliban believe music is un-Islamic. Why? Hadith Qudsi 19:5: "The Prophet said that Allah commanded him to destroy all the musical instruments, idols, crosses and all the trappings of ignorance."

The Hadith Qudsi, or holy Hadith, are those in which Muhammad transmits the words of Allah, although those words are not in the Qur'an.

Muhammad also said:

(1) "Allah Mighty and Majestic sent me as a guidance and mercy to believers and commanded me to do away with musical instruments, flutes, strings, crucifixes, and the affair of the pre-Islamic period of ignorance."

(2) "On the Day of Resurrection, Allah will pour molten lead into the ears of whoever sits listening to a songstress."

(3) "Song makes hypocrisy grow in the heart as water does herbage."

(4) "This community will experience the swallowing up of some people by the earth, metamorphosis of some into animals, and being rained upon with stones." Someone asked, "When will this be, O Messenger of Allah?" and he said, "When songstresses and musical instruments appear and wine is held to be lawful."

(5) "There will be peoples of my Community who will hold fornication, silk, wine, and musical instruments to be lawful ...." -- 'Umdat al-Salik r40.0

"Let the music play: musician prays for Taliban demise," by Lehaz Ali for AFP, October 23 (thanks to James):

DERA ISMAIL KHAN, Pakistan -- Mohammad Akbar says he prays every day for the Pakistani army to crush the Taliban so he can make sweet music once more without fearing for his life.

"They smashed it into pieces and warned me of serious consequences if I ever played it again," said Akbar as he recalled the day two years ago that the Islamists forced him to give a recital of his rubab -- a traditional lute-like instrument that is popular in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

"I recite from the Holy Koran every morning and pray for the success of the military operation and when they are defeated I will buy another rubab," he said. [...]

Akbar looked visibly distressed as he spoke about his ordeal which started two years ago when a Taliban delegation turned up at his home, following a tip-off from one of his neighbours.

Not knowing they were from the Taliban, he served them tea, played his rubab and sang for them in his living room.

And then they grabbed the instrument and smashed it.

"It was a warning from them. I was forced to stop playing an instrument that I started playing in 1981," he said.

Pakistan has seen creeping religious conservatism over the years in parts of the northwest and in July 2007 Taliban extremists launched a bloody insurgency to impose a harsh brand of Islamic law in the Swat valley.

Memo to AFP: "religious conservatism" in the Western sense doesn't involve smashing musical instruments, blowing up music stores and murdering musicians.

They blew up hundreds of music and DVD shops in the troubled North West Frontier Province (NWFP), calling the practice against the tenets of Islam.

Shop owners were forced to display the pro-Taliban material which ranged from tirades against the United States to gruesome clips of beheadings and bomb attacks.

Tears rolled down Akbar's cheeks as he talked about one of his very close friends Ahmad Shah, whom he says was executed by Taliban for playing the flute.

"They slit his throat because he ignored their warning," said Akbar.

The musician also recalled his childhood friendship with Qari Hussain, a reputed mass trainer of suicide bombers whose home town is now surrounded by the army, saying that Hussain also did not like his hobby of playing the rubab.

When he confronted Hussain, who returned to South Waziristan in 2007 after living for years in Karachi, about the Taliban's behaviour, he received an icy reply.

"I went to him to lodge complaint but he asked me to be thankful to God that they did not kill me on his request," he said....

| 99 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Part of a Hamas support network in the U.S. "DOJ Should Show Congress Damning Evidence on CAIR, Reps Say," from IPT News, October 23:

Internal documents from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) show that the group actively tries to place interns in congressional offices and that the group specifically wants to influence policy coming out of committees on the judiciary, homeland security and intelligence.

These disclosures, in the book Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America, prompted four House Republicans to ask Sergeant at Arms Wilson Livingood to investigate whether CAIR has successfully placed interns in offices tied to those committees.

Disclosures in Muslim Mafia came in part from documents and undercover recordings by one of the author's sons, who posed as a Muslim and worked at CAIR as an intern under an assumed name. In addition to detailing the organization's political goals, the book offers examples of how CAIR seeks to impede terrorism-related law enforcement investigations and mislead the public about its stature.

Critics have accused the representatives of waging a witch-hunt for Muslim staffers on Capitol Hill. Their remarks, however, have focused on CAIR's role in placing interns, noting evidence from the successful prosecution of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development that placed CAIR's founders in the midst of a secret Hamas-support network in the United States.

On that point, Representatives Sue Myrick (NC) Trent Franks (AZ) Paul Broun (GA) and John Shadegg (AZ) wrote to Attorney General Eric Holder, asking that he "provide each Member of Congress a summary of the evidence and findings by the DOJ and FBI which led them to name CAIR an unindicted co-conspirator in a terrorism trial."

Both letters note that the HLF evidence, and the questions it raises about CAIR, prompted the FBI to cut off communication with CAIR that isn't tied to a criminal investigation....

Read it all.

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Previously he had said that he would not do so until the family's immigration status was cleared up, and that wasn't going to happen -- given Pamela Geller's discovery that the family was here illegally. And despite the clear threat relayed by the girl and incompetently handled by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, and you can see here. Now apparently none of that matters. The gods of political correctness must be appeased. And if a girl is killed? So what?

"Judge orders Fathima Rifqa Bary to return to Ohio," by Amy L. Edwards for the Orlando Sentinel, October 23 (thanks to Pamela, who has much more here):

An Orange County judge has ordered the Florida Department of Children and Families to make arrangements to send Ohio teen runaway Fathima Rifqa Bary back to her home state.

A DCF spokeswoman just confirmed her agency received an order from Circuit Judge Daniel Dawson.

"This order indicates that the Court has relinquished its emergency jurisdiction and orders the Department to arrange the transportation of the child to the proper authorities with Franklin County Children Services in Ohio," spokeswoman Carrie Hoeppner said.

"The Department will proceed with those arrangements. Please understand that the details of the transfer will not be released, to best ensure her safety."...

Rifqa's father, Mohamed Bary, was laughing and giddy during a brief Friday afternoon phone call with the Orlando Sentinel. He would not comment, though, citing a gag order.

| 34 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Link: Robert Spencer Speaks in Berlin

Speaking at a meeting of the human rights group Bürgerbewegung Pax Europa (BPE) on October 4, the day after the rally in this video. The translation into German is cut out of this video to make it run smoothly in English, but it is important to note that the translation was expertly provided by my friend Monika Kaufmann, our own "Epistemology" in the comments here, who you can see to my right in this video. (Video filmed by E.S.W., thanks to Vlad Tepes.)

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Discussing honor killing in the United States. (Thanks to Bob for the video.)

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Actually they're whining and playing the victim card. Surprised? "Accused Terrorist Taught At Alhuda Academy," by Bronislaus B. Kush and Linda Bock for the Telegram & Gazette, October 23 (thanks to Islam In Action):

WORCESTER -- Boston television crews were preparing to broadcast live last evening from Alhuda Academy on the latest news concerning a teacher charged in a terrorist plot when a young man slowed his sport utility vehicle and rolled down the window.

"Is this the place where they train terrorists to kill Americans?" he asked the cameramen before pulling away.

Similar scenes were repeated outside the East Mountain Street school during the course of the day after word spread of the arrest of Tarek Mehanna, who is accused by federal authorities of plotting to kill soldiers, mall shoppers, and politicians.

The arrest has prompted fear of possible retaliation among area Muslims.

"There's no question that there is a climate of fear building in our community as a result of this arrest," said Tahir Ali, a longtime spokesman for local Muslims. "There are some who are worried that all Muslims will be viewed as terrorists."...

Yet actual incidents of "retaliation" are so few and far between that CAIR has to resort to fabricating hate crimes for purposes of political and media manipulation.

The U.S. Attorney's Office in Boston said the men also planned attacks at malls because U.S. civilians pay taxes to support the government and are "nonbelievers."

Cue the obligatory Shocked Friends and Family piece:

Mr. Mehanna's friends and family, including his father, Ahmed Mehanna, a professor at the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, were shocked to see him depicted as a would-be terrorist.

"No, definitely not," said the elder Mr. Mehanna, when he was asked whether he believed the charges against his son....

Imam Abdul Karim, the spiritual leader of the local mosque, appeared from behind closed doors around 2:30 p.m. to deliver a statement. He declined to answer questions and asked reporters to leave because he said the cameras were making students nervous.

The pre-kindergarten through eighth grade academy is located at the Worcester Islamic Center complex. The three-story center has a school, gymnasium and prayer hall and can hold approximately 1,700 people.

Simo Lulvsfiya arrived at the school-mosque and said he was there to say prayers, which he does a few times a week. He said he has never noticed anything unusual at the facility.

Mr. Lulvsfiya said he was "absolutely" afraid about retaliatory action.

"Hearing things like that is never a good thing," Mr. Lulvsfiya said. "It's never a good thing to hate anyone regardless of their religion. I don't hate anybody -- I am an American."

A woman was in the school all morning monitoring the front doors. She declined to give her name because she said she was afraid. The woman said the school is a wonderful institution with good teachers and about 120 students.

She said school officials conduct criminal background checks on all teachers hired. According to the woman, Mr. Mehanna had taught at the school for a month.

"Who's going to put 'terrorist' on their résumé?" she asked....

Indeed. And who is going to admit that he saw anything suspicious going on at the mosque?

School officials said they first heard of the charges yesterday morning and said they were shocked and dismayed by the allegations made in the indictment.

"The school and its administration are confident in the fairness of our country's judicial system, the principle of due process, and the presumption of innocence," the statement said. "We would like to take this opportunity to condemn all violence perpetrated or contemplated against innocent civilians. This condemnation is required by our faith as Muslims, and our every experience with Tarek Mehanna suggests to us that he shared this belief."...

Why is it not enough to condemn violence against "innocent civilians"? See here.

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Ismail_ALQAWASMI.jpg

Coming on the heels of the plots uncovered in Dallas, Springfield, Illinois, New York City, Denver, and elsewhere, this cannot be taken lightly. "Minn. Man Wanted For Threats Arrested In Chicago," from WCCO, October 23 (thanks to Melisa):

CHICAGO (WCCO) ― Ismail Alqawasmi, 36, of Richfield, Minn., was arrested at O'Hare International Airport on Oct. 23, 2009, after he flew in from Amman, Jordan, and a customs official conducting a name check found an active warrant for "terroristic threats."

A Minnesota man was arrested at O'Hare International Airport Thursday night after a customs official discovered he was wanted on a warrant for "terroristic threats."

Chicago police said Ismail Alqawasmi, 36, of Richfield, Minn., was arrested at 8 p.m. at O'Hare after he arrived from Amman, Jordan on a Royal Jordanian Airlines flight....

Details about the alleged threats were not immediately available....

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This is much welcome and long overdue. For years we have chronicled here how Muslims use the blasphemy laws to victimize non-Muslims in Pakistan. But given the way things are going there these days, this initiative is unlikely to succeed.

"All Christian Parties Conference to End Blasphemy law set to launch movement," from the Pakistan Christian Post, October 18 :

Islamabad: October 18, 2009. (PCP) Pakistan Christian Congress PCC extended invitation to leaders and organizations which are struggling to repeal blasphemy law in Pakistan to participate in All Christian Parties Conference on October 25, 2009, at Rawalpindi Press Club.

The invitations were given to Christian members of parliament who raised voice to repeal blasphemy law in House while Christians selected by Pakistan Peoples Party PPP and Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz group PML(N) were decide not to invite including Shahbaz Bhatti, Federal Minority Minister imposed on Christian by PPP.

General Zial-ul-Haq formulated Hadood Ordinance and introduced Blasphemy law but Section 295 B and C of Pakistan Penal Code were legislated during PPP and PML(N) regimes. The Blasphemy is subject to capital punishment in Pakistan and used against Christians on business rivalry and personnel grudges. The blasphemy law is also being used by Muslim majority in Pakistan to desecrate Holy Bibles and burnt down Churches.

On accusations of blasphemy Islamic militants have destroyed hundreds of homes and killed dozens in year 2009, while children, women and elders were burnt alive.

The federal government of Pakistan and Punjab provincial government failed to secure life and property of Christians and to adopt necessary measure to stop violence against Christians....

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

UPDATE: I was just on Fox and Friends talking about this briefly -- tried to get it all in in the short time allotted. Will post video if I can get hold of it.

Almaleki.jpg

Faleh Hassan Almaleki is still at large. This story doesn't add much to what we already know, but it does typify the lengths to which the mainstream media will go in order to avoid saying anything negative about Islam. The "Iraqi values" that involve honor killings are shared, judging from recent cases, by Egyptians, Jordanians, Syrians, and Pakistanis. What do all those groups have in common? Hmmm, I can't think of anything! Of course, none of this could have anything to do with the fact that a father who kills his child incurs no penalty under Islamic law. A manual of Islamic law certified by Al-Azhar as a reliable guide to Sunni orthodoxy says that "retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right." However, "not subject to retaliation" is "a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring." ('Umdat al-Salik o1.1-2).

In other words, someone who kills his child incurs no legal penalty under Islamic law. In accord with this, in 2003 the Jordanian Parliament voted down on Islamic grounds a provision designed to stiffen penalties for honor killings. Al-Jazeera reported that "Islamists and conservatives said the laws violated religious traditions and would destroy families and values."

An update on this story. "Man accused of running over daughter in Peoria still on loose," by Lesley Wright for The Arizona Republic, October 22 (thanks to James):

Peoria police continued Thursday to look for a Glendale man of Iraqi descent who is alleged to have run over his daughter and another woman in a Peoria parking lot Tuesday.

Faleh Hassan Almaleki, 48, is accused of striking his daughter Noor Almaleki, 20, sending her to a trauma center with life-threatening injuries. Police said her condition had not changed Thursday.

The other woman struck was Amal Edan Khalaf, 43, who was less severely hurt....

A police spokesman said Tuesday that the father reportedly was upset that his daughter had become too Westernized and was rejecting traditional Iraqi values.

Faleh Almaleki was driving a grey or silver 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee with the Arizona license plate ADS-9192. Anyone with information should call Silent Witness or the Peoria Police Tip Line at 623-773-7045.

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
Traducido por Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi

Versículo 40 de Sura 2 habla de los 'Hijos de Israel', empezando una meditación extensa sobre todo lo que hizo Alá por los judíos, y la ingratitud con la que le pagaron. Versículo 41 les advierte que no abandonen 'mis revelaciones por un precio insignificante', lo que interpretan generalmente los comentadores islámicos como exhortar a que se antepongan los servicios de Alá a las preocupaciones de este mundo. Sayyid Abul A'la Maudadi, un intelectual famoso islámico del siglo veinte y partidario del Islam político, dice en su comentario masivo 'Para Comprender El Corán' que este versículo se refiere a los beneficios de este mundo por los cuales (los judíos) rechazaban las directivas de Alá'. Sin embargo, muchos lo han interpretado como reprender a los que le vendieran a Mohamed las materias que afirmaron que fueron la revelación divina, pero no fueron en realidad- son la gente que es vuelta otra vez sobre los carbones en 2:79.

No obstante, los judíos pueden volver a recibir el apoyo de Dios si se hacen musulmanes. El lector que hable inglés no lo vea posiblemente ya que les exhortan las traducciones a que recen tenazmente y practiquen de manera frecuente la caridad (como traduce Abdullah Yusuf Ali), pero en árabe la palabra utilizada aquí para la oración es 'salat' (الصَّلاَة) y la palabra para la caridad es 'zakat' (الزَّكَاة) que se refieren específicamente a la oración y a la caridad islámica. Los no musulmanes no pueden ni rezar ni pagar el zakat. Ibn Kathir lo afirma directamente acerca de la necesidad de hacerse musulmán: 'Alá les mandó a los Hijos de Israel que se hicieran musulmanes y siguieran a Mohamed'. Sayyid Qutb dice aquí que Alá 'les invita a los israelitas a unirse a los musulmanes en sus prácticas religiosas y que abandonen sus prejuicios y sus tendencias etnocéntricas.'

A partir de versículo 47, dice Maudadi, 'se refiere a los episodios más conocidos de la historia judía. Ya que estos episodios fueron conocidos por todos los niños judíos, se narran brevemente, en lugar de en detalle. Se espera que la referencia les recuerde a los judíos tanto de los favores con los que los israelitas habían sido dotados por Dios como los delitos con los que habían respondido a esos favores'. Éstos incluyen el hecho de que los hebreos fueron rescatados del Faraón (2:49-59); el episodio del becerro de oro (2:54-55), y la alimentación de la gente con maná y codornices en el salvaje (2:57 y 2:61), culminando con la afirmación que los judíos fueron cubiertos de humillación y sufrimiento; se la buscaron la ira de Alá. Esto fue porque continuaron rechazando las señales de Alá y matando a sus profetas sin causa justa. Esto fue porque se rebelaron y continuaron pecando.' (2:61).

Ibn Kathir aplica estas palabras a todos los judíos: 'Este Ayah (versículo) indica que los Hijos de Israel fueron plagados de humillación, y que esto va a continuar, lo que significa que no cesará nunca. Continuarán sufriendo la humillación a manos de todos los que interactúen con ellos, junto con la vergüenza que se sienten.'

Posiblemente parezca raro que siga inmediatamente uno de los versículos de 'tolerancia del Corán', el versículo 62 que parece prometerles un lugar en el Paraíso a 'los que sigan las (escrituras) judías, y los cristianos y los sabeos.' Mohammed Asad se regocija: 'Con amplitud de miras sin paralelo en cualquier religión, la idea de salvación se promete aquí a condición de tres cosas solamente: la creencia en Dios, la creencia en el Día del Juicio, y la acción justa en la vida'. Sin embargo, se contradice por añadir 'en esta escritura divina' después de las palabras 'los que hayan sido seguidores de la fe' en su traducción de versículo 62- es decir, para ser salvado, hay que creer en el Corán junto con las revelaciones anteriores. De hecho, los comentadores musulmanes no están dispuestos a ver este versículo como indicación del pluralismo divino. Los traductores Ali y Pickthall, así como Asad, creen que es necesario añadir las glosas entre paréntesis que hacen que el pasaje signifique que los judíos y los cristianos (junto con los sabinos, cuya identidad se discute) no serán salvados a menos que se hagan musulmanes. Y según Ibn Abbas, este versículo fue abrogado por 3:85: 'Si alguien quiere una religión aparte del Islam (sumisión a Alá), no se aceptará nunca, y en la otra vida estará en las filas de los que hayan perdido (todo el bien espiritual).' Qutb opina que 2:62 aplica solamente antes de que Mohamed trajera el Islam al mundo, una opinión apoyada por el dicho de Mohamed registrado por Tabari en que el Profeta del Islam dice que los cristianos que se murieran antes de que viniera serán salvados, pero los que hayan oído hablar de él pero hayan rechazado su reclamación profética no serán salvados.

Pues sigue el primero de los tres pasajes de 'monos y cerdos'. Los yihadistas dicen hoy en día de forma rutinaria que los judíos son monos y cerdos; esta idea es basada en el Corán: 2:63-66, 5:59-60 y 7:166. El primero de éstos afirma que Alá dice a los judíos que profanaran el sábado: '¡seáis como monos despreciables!' Pues dice que los malditos sirven de un ejemplo de advertencia para su época y para todas las épocas futuras. En la teología islámica tradicional estos pasajes no se han considerado para aplicar a todos los judíos. Ibn Abbas dice que los que hayan violado la santidad del sábado fueron transformados en los monos, pues se murieron sin hijos. No obstante, otros, tales como el erudito islámico temprano Ibn Qutaiba, sostuvieron que los monos de hoy en día son descendientes de los judíos que violaran el sábado.

Esto se utiliza mucho hoy en día como metáfora de la corrupción de los judíos, hasta la condición de las bestias. Mohamed empezó esto cuando les habló a los judíos de la tribu Qurayzah que estaba para masacrar como 'los hermanos de los monos'. Hoy, el Gran Jeque de Al-Azhar, Mohamed Sayyid Tantawi, dijo que los judíos fueron 'los enemigos de Alá, descendientes de monos y de cerdos'. El jeque saudí Abd Al-Rahman Al-Suddayis, imam de la mezquita principal en la Meca (la mezquita Al-Haraam), dio más detalles, afirmando en un sermón que los judíos son la escoria de la raza humana, las ratas del mundo, los violadores de los pactos y acuerdos, los asesinos de los profetas, y los hijos de monos y cerdos. 'Otro jeque saudí, Ba'd bin Abdallah Al-Ajameh Al-Ghamidi, hizo la conexión explícita: 'El comportamiento actual de los hermanos de monos y cerdos, su traición, su violación de acuerdos, su profanación de los lugares santos...está relacionado con los hechos de sus antepasados durante la época primera del Islam- lo que demuestra el parecido grande entre todos los judíos que vivan hoy en día y los judíos que vivieran en los albores del Islam'. Para más información sobre este tema, vea usted el estudio excelente del Instituto de Investigación de los Medios de Comunicación del Oriente Medio (MEMRI).

El versículo 67 trata otra vez de los reproches: los israelitas se comportan con rebelión altiva hacia el mando de Alá, dado por Moisés, que sacrifiquen una vaca (la 'vaca' del título de la sura). Leemos que los judíos se hacen tozudos (2:74) y, en última instancia, son malditos por Alá (2:89). Discutiremos más la semana que viene esta maldición y sus implicaciones, y otros asuntos hasta versículo 140 de sura 2.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

As the government attempts to show that it really is using U.S. money to fight against the jihadists. "Bombs Strike Northwest Pakistan as Taliban Attacks Escalate," by Khalid Qayum for Bloomberg, October 23 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Oct. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Two bombs struck northwestern Pakistan today as militants escalated near-daily attacks against security and civilian targets amid an army offensive in the nearby Taliban stronghold of South Waziristan.

A suicide bomber killed seven people outside the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex in Kamra city around 7:30 a.m. as staff arrived for work, district police officer Fakhar Sultan told reporters. Two of those who died worked for the armed forces, while the rest were civilians. A second car bomb exploded near a restaurant in the nearby city of Peshawar five hours later, injuring eight people, the Edhi ambulance service said.

Pakistan's army a week ago began its biggest offensive against the Taliban and its allies in the northwestern tribal region of South Waziristan bordering Afghanistan, deploying 28,000 troops. They are seeking to destroy the faction that was led by Baitullah Mehsud until his death in a U.S. missile strike in August. Pakistan blames the group for 80 percent of terrorist attacks in the country. Mehsud's successor vowed to avenge his killing with suicide bombings.

Retaliation by militants who "think they are winning" in their offensive against the government was expected, said Zafar Nawaz Jaspal, assistant professor of International Relations at Islamabad's Quaid-e-Azam University. "Controlling South Waziristan won't end terrorist attacks completely but it will destroy their training camps and weaken" the militants, he said. The government and military are determined and "willing to pay the price," Jaspal said. [...]

And finally, some common sense in Washington:

In Washington, the U.S. Congress passed a defense spending bill that imposes restrictions on military assistance to Pakistan in a move to ensure the aid is spent fighting the Taliban. The conditions may trigger complaints in Pakistan and fan anti-U.S. sentiment.

Refugee Concerns

Earlier this month, Pakistani opposition lawmakers and the military said conditions attached to a $7.5 billion civilian aid package signed by President Barack Obama undermined the nation's sovereignty. That legislation provides funds over five years to build roads, schools, power facilities and other projects serving civilians....

They think that building roads, schools, etc. will end the jihad. They will be surprised about that.

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

October 22, 2009

Denial and deception instead of any honest effort to come to grips with the root causes of honor killing. "Arizona Police Hunt for Dad Accused of Running Over Daughter: Police Say Faleh Hassan Almaleki Believed His Daughter Was 'Too Westernized,'" by Sarah Netter for ABC News, October 22 (thanks to James):

Police in Arizona are hunting for an Iraqi-American father who they say ran over his daughter with his car to punish her for becoming "too Westernized" and rebuffing the conservative ways he valued.

Memo to ABC News: "conservatives" don't generally run over their daughters with their cars for any reason at all.

Faleh Hassan Almaleki, 48, was last seen fleeing the parking lot of the Department of Economic Development in Peoria, Ariz., Tuesday after hitting his 20-year-old daughter and her boyfriend's mother with his Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Noor Faleh Almaleki is in "life-threatening condition," Peoria Police spokesman Mike Tellef told ABCNews.com today. Her boyfriend's mother, 43-year-old Amal Edan Khalaf, is also still hospitalized, but with non-life threatening injuries. "It occured because her not following traditional family values. We've been told that by everybody," Tellef said. "He felt she was becoming too westernized and he didn't like that." [...]

Not "traditional family values." Western non-Muslims who adhere to "traditional family values" do not generally run down their wayward daughters with their cars.

Noor Almaleki had backed out of an arranged marriage about a year ago, police learned, and had been living with Khalaf and her son in a nearby town.

Tellef said the young woman dressed in American clothing and was wearing typical Western attire when she was struck.

The family were all American citizens, though Tallef believes the parents were born in Iraq.

He said it was unclear if Faleh Almaleki intended to kill his daughter, but "it was definitely intentional that he ran them down." [...]

While Tellef had heard of so-called "honor killings" in other parts of the United States, this was the first such crime in Peoria.

Ibrahim Ramey, human and civil rights director for the Muslim American Society's Freedom Foundation, told ABCNews.com that whenever this type of crime involves a Muslim it can serve to elevate the fears of people who may already harbor misconceptions about Islam.

Typical denial and deception.

In the first place, what is the Muslim American Society?

"In recent years, the U.S. Brotherhood operated under the name Muslim American Society, according to documents and interviews. One of the nation's major Islamic groups, it was incorporated in Illinois in 1993 after a contentious debate among Brotherhood members." -- Chicago Tribune, 2004.

And what is the Muslim Brotherhood?

The Muslim Brotherhood "must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions." -- "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America," by Mohamed Akram, May 19, 1991.

And secondly, instead of worrying about people getting "misconceptions of Islam," he should be working in the Islamic community to root out the assumptions that lead to honor killing. But you'll notice that he says nothing about that.

"It's reprehensible," he said of honor killings. "It's wrong."

Ramey pointed out that a verse in the Koran specifically states that there is no compulsion in religion, meaning that people can not be compelled or coerced into being Muslim or adhering to a certain set of rules.

"People have to obey or adhere to Islam ... according to the dictates of their own conscience," he said.

Yet despite the fact that Koran 2:256 -- "There is no compulsion in religion" -- is in the Koran, honor killing is broadly tolerated in the Islamic world. No one, of course, dares to confront the root of the problem by pointing out such inconvenient truths as the fact that a manual of Islamic law certified by Al-Azhar as a reliable guide to Sunni orthodoxy says that "retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right." However, "not subject to retaliation" is "a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring." ('Umdat al-Salik o1.1-2).

In other words, someone who kills his child incurs no legal penalty under Islamic law. In accord with this, in 2003 the Jordanian Parliament voted down on Islamic grounds a provision designed to stiffen penalties for honor killings. Al-Jazeera reported that "Islamists and conservatives said the laws violated religious traditions and would destroy families and values."

Then this ABC story drags in Rifqa Bary:

Honor Killings Unfairly Cast Negative Light on Islam

The notion of an honor killing -- Muslim men murdering female relatives for dishonoring the family by violating Islamic tenets -- made the news over the summer when 17-year-old Rifqa Bary ran away from her parents in Ohio and turned up in the Florida home of Christian pastors Blake and Beverly Lorenz. Rafqa Barry [sic] claimed that her Muslim father had threatened to kill her for converting to Christianity.

Rifqa made tearful television appearance, crying on the Lorenzes shoulders, describing how she had to sneak around to attend church.

"They have to kill me because I'm a Christian. It's an honor [killing]. If they love me more than God, then they have to kill me," she told ABC's Orlando affiliate WFTV last month.

Blake Lorenz pointed to other honor killings, including the January 2008 murders of two Texas sisters who were believed to have been murdered by their Muslim father in a religion-fueld [sic] rage.

But Rifqa's father, Mohamed Bary, denied the accusation and said that while he preferred his daughter be a Muslim, she was free to practice whatever religion she chose.

"I don't believe my daughter would say this," Bary told "Good Morning America." "She's completely being coached -- I mean trained, influenced by these people. It's so sad."

An assertion without evidence, contradicted by the fact that she was a Christian for several years before she met those who allegedly coached her.

A Florida judge this month said he planned to send Rifqa back to Ohio after determining there was no evidence that her life was in danger.

See here for the facts.

Ramey said it's expected that incidents such as these will cause some backlash against the Muslim community, especially among Americans who have become fearful of Islam in the years since the war on terror and conflicts in places like Somalia.

But they can also open a door for discussion and questions so the community can understand that Islam is not a violent religion.

"It's certainly not part of the religion," he said," to run people down with vehicles."

That is merely a statement about the manner of killing, not about the killing itself.

| 32 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
Pamela has the transcript of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement's interview with Rifqa Bary, the girl who fled from her home after her father threatened to kill her for converting from Islam to Christianity. The transcript is astounding on a number of levels -- notably for the utter cluelessness of the agents who questioned Rifqa. One tells her at one point, "You may have to help me out here because I don't know a lot about the Muslim religion." Indeed not. And so it comes as no surprise that despite her explaining to them about the danger she was in as an apostate, and about how her father beat her, they decided she was under no threat. Read it.
| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Pat Condell on how unfashionable the truth has become. Pamela has a transcript.

| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Feel the love. "Immigrants 'who can't adapt should leave,'" from AAP, October 22 (thanks to all who sent this in):

A MAN harassed by anti-war mail after his son was killed in Afghanistan says immigrants who can't adapt to Australian life and values should live elsewhere.

Private Gregory Michael Sher, 30, was killed in a rocket attack in Oruzgan Province, in southern Afghanistan, in January.

He was the eighth Australian Defence Force soldier to be killed in Afghanistan since 2002, but the first to die as a result of indirect fire.

Mr Sher's father Felix received a phone call and letters, allegedly from self-styled Muslim cleric Sheikh Haron, just before his son's funeral.

"I feel bad that you have lost your son but I don't feel bad that a murderer of innocent civilians has lost his life," a line in one of the letters reportedly said.

Other Australian families of men killed in Afghanistan have allegedly received similar letters in the past two years.

On Tuesday Sheikh Haron was charged with seven counts of "using a postal service or similar service to menace, harass, or cause offence". He was granted bail to appear in court on November 10. [...]

Asked if he had something to say to Sheikh Haron, Mr Sher called on immigrants whose values were not in line with the general community to live elsewhere.

"What I would like to say (is) that when people immigrate to Australia, when they actually do so with the intention of integrating with the general community and living in peace and harmony, rather than confronting it, and causing tension and conflict, and irrespective of what one's religious beliefs are, one can still live happily with the community but not dissolve," he said.

"If people don't like what's happening in Australia, live elsewhere."

Yep.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Daily Mail, and probably everyone involved, sees this exclusively as a racial issue, but it isn't. If Henry Webster had converted to Islam, it is extremely unlikely that Wasif Khan and Amjad Qazi would have continued persecuting him. The Muslim ("Asian") students in the school were "radicalised and hostile." "Radicalised" as what? The Daily Mail gives no hint as to the answer, but the answer is clear: these students were Islamic supremacist thugs who preyed upon non-Muslim students while the dhimmi school administration stood by and wrung its hands about how it would be accused of "racism" if it did anything about it. This shows the usefulness of the charge of "racism" to Islamic jihadists and supremacists, and the necessity of constantly restating the plain fact that the Islamic jihad is not a race, and resistance to it is not a racial issue, but is rather a defense of the legal equality of all people against the Sharia supremacists who would extinguish that equality.

"Parents seek £1m for hammer attack on white son at 'race bullies' school," by Daniel Bates for the Daily Mail, October 21 (thanks to Joel):

A white pupil was battered with a hammer at a school where politically correct teachers were afraid to deal with racial tensions, the High Court heard yesterday.

Henry Webster, 15, suffered a fractured skull and brain damage after being set upon by a gang of Asian youths.

Twelve people were jailed over the 2007 attack, but Mr Webster's parents have now brought a civil action against Ridgeway Foundation School near Swindon.

They claim there was a negligent failure to maintain proper discipline and deal with racial tension and are seeking compensation of up to £1million.

The family's lawyers told the court a 'culture of racist bullying and harassment' built up around a 30-strong gang called the 'Asian Invasion'.

Teachers were too anxious about being seen as bigoted to intervene, but white pupils were branded 'racist' by the acting headmaster and given harsher punishments.

Robert Glancey, QC, representing the family, said tensions escalated after the July 7 London bombings in 2005 and when more Asian pupils joined the school, some of whom were 'radicalised and hostile'.

Racial intimidation and violence became a 'feature of the life of the school' with eruptions of 'extreme acts of violence', it was alleged.

Asians were 'encouraged' to separate from white pupils and formed a gang that would laugh at and abuse them.

Serious incidents included a riot on the playing field in May 2006, which led to armed police attending the school.

At the same time, white pupils received unfair treatment, the court was told. One boy was disciplined for wearing an England shirt.

Mr Glancey said: 'There were a large number of incidents, events, complaints and warnings which would or should have made any school which was being reasonably competent realise there was a serious problem with racism, violence security, discipline and misbehaviour.'...

Among the 12 jailed for between eight months and eight years for GBH and ABH over the incident were Wasif Khan, 18, and Amjad Qazi, 19.

They were the eldest members of the group which attacked Mr Webster and were not pupils at the school. Instead they journeyed to there after a series of text messages and phone calls from Asian pupils....

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Video thanks to Pamela, who has the rest on video here.

Here is the text of Wilders's speech:

Speech Geert Wilders MP / Columbia University New York, October 21, 2009

Ladies and gentlemen, it is a privilege and a great honour for me to speak at this fine academic institution, which gave the world so many Nobel Prize winners. As a Dutchman, I am proud that your first Nobel laureate, in 1906, was of Dutch descent: The youngest President of the United States: Theodore Roosevelt.

I thank Columbia University for inviting me, and I also thank the US border police for allowing me to enter this great country of democracy, liberty and free speech.

Ladies and gentlemen, today, the dearest of our many liberties is under attack all throughout Europe. Free speech is no longer a given. What we once considered a natural element of our existence, our birth right, is now something we once again have to fight for.

I would not qualify myself as a free man. 5 years ago I lost my personal freedom. Since then I am under 24-hour police protection. In addition some people tried to rob my freedom of speech: A Dutch Islamic organization tried to stop the appearance of my documentary 'Fitna'. Because of 'Fitna' the most radical Dutch imam claimed 55.000 Euros in compensation for his hurt feelings. The State of Jordan is possibly going to issue a request for my extradition, to stand trial in Amman. I have been charged in France.

In my own country, the Netherlands, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal overruled the decision of the Dutch public prosecutor not to prosecute me. So, now I have to stand trial in my own country, next January.

But, it is not about me. I am not the only European who fights for freedom of speech, there are so many more: The Danish cartoonist Kurt Westergaard made a Muhammad-cartoon and all of a sudden we were in the middle of the so called 'Danish cartoon crisis'. The Italian author Oriana Fallaci had to live in fear of extradition to Switzerland because of her book 'The Rage and the Pride'. An Austrian politician, Susanne Winter, was sentenced to a suspended prison sentence because she spoke bluntly about the prophet Muhammad. The Dutch cartoonist Gregorius Nekschot was arrested by 10 police men because of his drawings. And the Dutch film maker Theo van Gogh was brutally murdered in the streets of Amsterdam by a radical Muslim.

Last February, I was invited by 2 brave members of the British House of Lords - Lord Malcom Pearson and Baroness Caroline Cox - to show 'Fitna' in the British Parliament. But upon my arrival at Heathrow airport I was denied entry into the UK, on grounds that I would threaten community harmony and therefore public security.

| 36 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

About the jihadist character of the Beltway shootings, see here. An update on this story. "Beltway sniper alleged inspiration for terror suspect," by Laura Crimaldi and Laurel J. Sweet for the Boston Herald, October 21 (thanks to James):

The Sudbury man accused of terrorism - who still lives at home with his parents - wanted to gun down mall shoppers in a plot inspired by the 2002 Beltway sniper attacks, according to court records connected to today's arrest.

The 27-year-old also aimed to kill two members of the executive branch of the government, records state.

But Tarek Mehanna, of 6 Fairhaven Circle, could never obtain the guns he desired to carry out his twisted attack.

Mehanna is accused of conspiring with Ahmad Abousamra and others to obtain the automatic weapons needed to carry out a shopping mall ambush in which they planned to open fire at random, said acting U.S. Attorney Michael K. Loucks. Their crimes allegedly took place between 2001 and 2008.

State Department of Early Education and Care licensing records show Mehanna's mother, Souad Mehanna, has held a license to run a home day-care center since Dec. 11, 1990. Her license allows for up to six children.

The mother spoke briefly to reporters this afternoon before climbing into a livery car outside her Sudbury home.

"He's the best son. He's the best guy. Very good heart," said Souad Mehanna.

Her son, a member of the Worcester Islamic Center in Shrewsbury, had been out on bail since December, when his parents, Souad and Ahmed Mehanna, put up the two-story family home as an $836,000 personal bond following his Nov. 10 federal arrest last year on charges of lying during a terrorism probe....

The mall plot was inspired by the 2002 Beltway sniper attacks and was hatched the second half of 2003, according to an affidavit signed by FBI Agent Heidi L. Williams.

Abousamra, Mehanna and a cooperating witness sought out Daniel Maldonado to provide the gun power for the attack, which would also target emergency responders. The cooperating witness traveled to New Hampshire to meet Maldonado, 31, who had gang contacts before converting to Islam. The plan was abandoned, however, because Maldonado could only provide handguns, and not the automatic weapons sought for the attack, the affidavit said.

Maldonado is serving 10 years in prison for receiving firearms and explosives training at an Islamic Courts Union camp in Somalia. Mehanna was charged last year with lying to FBI agents investigating Maldonado....

In 2004, Mehanna and Abousamra traveled to Yemen to seek jihad training. The men prepared for the trip by hiking, trimming their beards and watching jihad videos, including some from the Chechnyan jihad, the affidavit said.

Mehanna told a cooperating witness the trip was a "failure" because the people they were instructed to seek out were either on a pilgrimage to Mecca or in jail. Despite this, Mehanna told the informant he did not regret the trip because "it was the best two weeks of his life."...

The men are also accused of participating in violent jihad against American interests and their desire to die on the "battlefield."...

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

How did an Islamic cleric, who had dedicated his life to understanding the Koran and the teachings of Islam, come to misunderstand Islam so thoroughly as to get involved in a terror plot? And this guy was a moderate, also -- someone who had cooperated with the FBI in the past. You'd think that a case like this would hit some people with a cluebat and get them to rethink what they think they know about the Koran and Islam -- but it probably won't.

"Cleric Indicted In Alleged NYC Terror Plot," from CNN, October 21 (thanks to Pamela):

NEW YORK (CNN) - A Muslim cleric and funeral director from New York has been indicted on charges that he lied to federal agents about a Colorado man who has been charged with plotting a terrorist attack in the city.

Ahmad Wais Afzali, 37, was indicted late Monday on four counts of making false statements to federal agents, according to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York....

Afzali was charged in September with lying to the FBI in its investigation of Najibullah Zazi, who has since been charged with plotting a terrorist attack. Afzali pleaded not guilty at that time.

Afzali, who is from the New York borough of Queens, was released a few days after his arrest on $1.5 million bail. He is allowed to travel to work and the mosque for worship, and is under electronic monitoring.

Zazi, 24, and his father, Mohammed Wali Zazi, were arrested in September by federal agents in Denver, Colorado. The elder Zazi also was charged with making false statements to investigators.

Najibullah Zazi was indicted 10 days later by a federal grand jury in New York on one count of conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction - bombs - against unspecified targets in the the United States.

The Zazis have pleaded not guilty.

Investigators have said that the younger Zazi plotted to make bombs from household chemicals, and planned to be in New York "with the intent of using" a bomb on September 11....

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Plus another warning about the dangers of the face veil. "Saudi concern rises over Al Qaeda activity in Yemen," by Caryle Murphy for The Christian Science Monitor, October 19 (thanks to Sr. Soph):

The discovery by Saudi police of two Al Qaeda extremists wearing explosive vests in preparation for an "imminent" suicide attack underscores yet again the rising threat to Saudi Arabia from the deteriorating security situation in neighboring Yemen.

The target of the foiled Oct. 13 attack is not yet known, Ministry of Interior spokesman Gen. Mansour Al Turki said Monday. But equipment found in the men's car last week, including explosives, machine guns, grenades, and two additional vests, suggests that the operation would have been significant - potentially resulting in the loss of many lives.

The men, one of whom spent several years in the US detention facility in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, had been sent to Saudi Arabia by an Al Qaeda affiliate based in Yemen, according to a Saudi Interior Ministry statement. Their foiled attack was the second close call for Saudi security forces in less than two months involving Saudi militants from the Yemen-based group, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).

Made up largely of Saudis and Yemenis, AQAP is reportedly being reinforced by veteran jihadi fighters from Iraq and Afghanistan, according to some analysts. It is able to work in relative freedom in Yemen because of the Yemeni government's preoccupation with its own more pressing issues, namely a full-blown rebellion in the north and a secessionist movement in the south. Another reason the Yemeni government tolerates the group's presence may be because the jihadi fighters sometimes assist Yemeni forces in military operations against the rebels, a Western diplomat said - all of which make the precarious state a potential haven for militants. [...]

The two fighters discovered last week, Rayed Abdullahi al-Harbi and Yousef Mohammed al-Shihri, were both on a Saudi government most-wanted list issued in February. Al Shihri is a former Guantanamo detainee, and the brother-in-law of Saeed al-Shihri, the Yemen-based deputy commander of Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula who also was at Guantánamo, spokesman Turki said.

Dressed like women, their faces hidden by veils, Harbi and Shihri were stopped at a highway checkpoint last week in the southern province of Jizan near the Yemen-Saudi Arabia border last week.

When police on duty asked a policewoman to check the identities of the "women," the militants began firing. In the shoot-out that ensued, the would-be suicide bombers and one policeman were killed, the government statement said....

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Now where did he get these crazy ideas about the Religion of Peace? Why is it that all the multitudinous Misunderstanders of Islam seem to misunderstand Islam in the same way? "Suspect allegedly mused about martyrdom on blog," by Edward Mason and Laura Crimaldi for the Boston Herald, October 22 (thanks to James):

Terrorism suspect Tarek Mehanna kept a blog where he allegedly spread a message of hate, railing against U.S. abuse of Gitmo prisoners, offering interpretations of the Koran and chatting online with his virtual followers.

The FBI also contends the blog, called Milestones on the Road to Firmness in Faith, was just one tech tool he allegedly used to call for violent jihad.

Many of the blog's pages are devoted to translations of writings of Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi, a cleric and spritual guide to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the former head of al-Qaeda in Iraq.

It also includes writings from Sayid Qutb and Abdullah Azzam, whom the FBI calls "influential advocates of jihad."

Among the blog's postings:

* A March 13 entry with a photo of blindfolded Gimto terror detainees behind barbed wire and the verse: "I feel down when I see the heroes chained by the despicable and the worthless." It goes on to ask Allah to "cause the world to suffocate" their imprisoners.
* An Oct. 3 entry called "The Hypcrites [sic] of Today," which challenges Muslims he calls hypocrites.
* A final entry, on Oct. 14, on "Advice on Dealing with the Family," urging patience with family members who don't agree with a person's principles.

Mehanna also is credited by the FBI with posting a poem titled "Make Martyrdom what you Seek."

An FBI search of his computer yielded al-Qaeda propaganda, photos of him smiling at Ground Zero in New York and evidence he reveled in the death of American soldiers overseas.

Mehanna also sought out Web links to a video tribute for the 9/11 hijackers and described New York as "the land of rape" in a 2006 communication....

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is my column in FrontPage this morning, discussing the denial and obfuscation coming from Muslims in Dallas in the wake of Hosam Smadi's jihad plot:

Late in September, a Muslim named Hosam Maher Husein Smadi, was arrested after placing an inert car bomb at a 60-story office tower in downtown Dallas. In March 2009, according to his indictment in U.S. District Court, Smadi declared his intention to wage war in the name of Islam. Yet characteristically, if dispiritingly, Muslims in the Dallas area are now expressing fears of a "backlash," rather than taking the hard steps necessary to make sure there are no more jihad plotters who are inspired by Islamic teachings, as was Hosam Smadi.

Smadi was very clear about the Islamic motivation for his plot: "I truly say it that [sic] my dream is to be among God's soldiers, first for the support of Islam and my beloved Sheik Usama, may God give him long life." He decried the "world plan to destroy Islam, Muslims, and to seize their lands for the benefit of the Jews and for the love of infidelity." He swore: "In the name of God, the Gracious and Merciful, this is my vow to you, my brother, that I am ready. And if you were a lover of Jihad as I am, then, by God, I am ready for the Jihadi life." And he affirmed: "The reign is only for the living and powerful God."

Smadi also said that "with the permission of the Almighty Lord of the Worlds, we will have victory and allies from God Almighty. He is the powerful and helpful. Victory is coming, is coming to defeat the Romans [i.e., Christians] and for the destruction of the Jews. God is Most Great. We shall attack them in their very homes."

Yet despite the strong Islamic content of Smadi's statements, Islamic spokesmen have - instead of honestly acknowledging Smadi's Islamic motivation and offering steps toward reform of the elements of Islam that incited Smadi to violence - disingenuously pretended that Smadi's Islam was incidental to his terror plot. Chief among those practicing this deception was Salam al-Marayati of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC). Al-Marayati complained, according to the Dallas Morning News, that "when non-Muslims commit extreme acts, they are quickly dismissed as being crazy or weird or having some deep-seated emotional problem, and are not viewed as representative of an entire group of people. But Muslim bad actors, he said, don't get the same treatment. 'When a Christian does something ... that's how it's reported, that they happen to be a Christian,' Al-Marayati said. 'But if it's a Muslim, it's as if it's the [Muslim] religion that's driving it."

Of course, it was manifestly the Muslim religion that was driving Smadi, but Al-Marayati said nothing about that. He pretended not to notice the elephant in the living room - the fact that people see the Muslim religion as driving terrorist acts not because of some inveterate "Islamphobia," but because Islamic jihadists say that that's what drives them. Just days ago the American-born jihadist Anwar al-Awlaki exhorted Muslims: "Whenever you see the word terrorism, replace it with the word jihad." Jihad, of course, is a concept of Islamic theology. And al-Awlaki was not alone.

Read it all.

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

October 21, 2009

Now why is it that this imam, who has dedicated his life to understanding the Koran, misses its teachings of peace and tolerance? "Toronto imam preaching hate instead of harmony," by Charles Lewis for the National Post, October 21 (thanks to Kim):

A Toronto-area imam is under fire for using derogatory language against Jews and Christians, calling for Allah to "destroy" the enemies of Islam from within and calling on God to "damn" the "infidels."

The address, given last Friday by Imam Saed Rageah at the Abu Huraira Centre and then posted on YouTube (watch it above), is an attack on those who have been calling for a ban on the niqab and burka, both of which cover the faces of women.

"Allah protect us from the fitna [sedition] of these people; Allah protect us from the evil agenda of these people; Allah destroy them from within themselves, and do not allow them to raise their heads in destroying Islam." [...]

The Abu Huraira Centre attracts about 800 to 1,000 people to a typical Friday service. A man who worked at the centre said that many women who attend only wear the hijab, which covers the head, and do not wear any covering on their faces. [...]

Throughout the 35-minute speech he uses the word "kuffar" to describe non-Muslims.

In referring to those Muslims who would seek allies outside the Muslim community to bring about legislation that would ban face coverings, the imam said: "You will see a lot of them going to the kuffar, taking them as friends and allies. The wrath of Allah is upon them. If they were true believers they would never take them as allies."...

That accords with Koran 3:28 and 5:51, both of which tell Muslims not to take unbelievers as allies.

| 45 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
Almaleki.jpg
Faleh Hassan Almaleki is still at large. "Iraqi man runs down daughter for becoming too 'westernized,'" from Yourwestvalley.com, October 21 (thanks to Art):
Peoria police are searching for a man they say ran down his 20-year-old daughter in a parking lot for becoming "too 'westernized' and ... not living according to their traditional Iraq values."

Noor Faleh Almaleki of Surprise was taken to a local hospital with life-threatening injuries, police said. Another woman, Amal Edan Khalaf, 43, of Surprise also was struck and is in the hospital with non-life threatening injuries.

The incident occurred Tuesday afternoon in Department of Economic Security parking lot at 8990 W. Peoria Ave....

Detectives from the Peoria Police Violent Crimes Unit, after talking with family and friends, learned Faleh Hassan Almaleki, 48, of Glendale was the driver, and that he is the father of Noor Faleh Almaleki.

Those interviewed also told police he was with her as she had become too "westernized" and had made threats toward her....
| 83 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Honest Ibe Hooper and Brave Ahmed Rehab of CAIR are even now on their way to Boston to explain to Tarek Mehanna how he is getting the Religion of Peace wrong, wrong, wrong. Aren't you, Ibe? Ahmed? Anyone? Anyone?

More on the Boston jihad plot. "Massachusetts Man Accused of Plotting 'Violent Jihad' (Update2)," by Brian K. Sullivan for Bloomberg, October 21 (thanks to James):

Oct. 21 (Bloomberg) -- A Massachusetts man was charged with plotting terrorist attacks that included shooting up shopping malls and targeting two unidentified U.S. officials as part of a "violent jihad" against Americans.

Tarek Mehanna, 27, was arrested this morning at his home in Sudbury, about 17 miles (27 kilometers) west of Boston, Acting U.S. Attorney Michael K. Loucks said at a press conference. Mehanna had been out on bail on a charge of lying to authorities about the location of a man who trained with al-Qaeda members intent on overthrowing the Somali government, Loucks said.

Loucks said Mehanna, Ahmad Abousamra, who is currently in Syria, and a third man who is cooperating with authorities wanted to obtain automatic weapons and attack U.S. shopping malls. The trio abandoned the plans before 2006 because they couldn't get the weapons, Loucks said.

"The killing of civilians was considered OK because civilians are taxpayers and are non-believers," Loucks said. He wouldn't disclose where the attacks were supposed to take place....

The U.S. complaint alleges that "Mehanna and coconspirators discussed their desire to participate in violent jihad against American interests and that they would talk about fighting jihad and their desire to die on the battlefield," prosecutors said in today's statement.

The trio also wanted to assassinate two members of the U.S. Executive Branch who are no longer in office, Loucks said. He wouldn't identify the targets....

| 137 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Twenty years of prison dawah, rather than a possible life sentence. Toledo Jihad Update. "Toledo man gets 20 years in terror case," by Amulya Raghuvir for NBC24, October 21:

TOLEDO -- A Toledo man has been sentenced to 20 years in prison for his part in a terrorist plot intending to target American soldiers.
Mohammad Amawi was sentenced Wednesday morning in federal court. He had faced up to life in prison. He is one of three defendants who were found guilty last year of plotting to recruit and train terrorists to kill U.S. troops in Iraq.
Another defendant, Marwan El-Hindi will begin his sentencing Wednesday. Wassim Mazloum was also found guilty of the terrorist plot.
U.S. District Judge James Carr told the courtroom that an undercover FBI informant was a key part in bringing the men to justice.
| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Tarek Mehanna, of 6 Fairhaven Circle, is accused of conspiring with Ahmad Abousamra and others to obtain the automatic weapons needed to carry out a mall ambush in which they planned to open fire at random." And apparently no one among the Muslims of Boston took him aside and explained to him that he was getting Islam all wrong, wrong, wrong.

"Feds: Sudbury man planned terrorist attacks at shopping malls," by Laura Crimaldi for the Boston Herald, October 21 (thanks to Islam In Action):

A 27-year-old man from Sudbury has been arrested on charges he planned terrorism attacks inside and outside the United States, including a plot to use automatic weapons to open fire at shoppers and emergency responders in shopping mall attacks, federal prosecutors said today.

Tarek Mehanna, of 6 Fairhaven Circle, is accused of conspiring with Ahmad Abousamra and others to obtain the automatic weapons needed to carry out a mall ambush in which they planned to open fire at random, said Acting U.S. Attorney Michael K. Loucks.

The plot included plans to fire at emergency responders, but was abandoned because the men could not obtain the weapons, authorities said.

Prosecutors also allege the men discussed participating in violent Jihad against American interests and their desire to die on the "battlefield."...

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Obviously they are no longer taught to value the freedom of speech. "Protesters, but no incidents, greet anti-Islamist at Temple," by Christine Olley for the Philadelphia Daily News, October 21 (thanks to Darcy):

Amid a firestorm of contention, several hundred people heard Geert Wilders, a controversial Dutch parliamentarian, speak last night at Temple University.

During his approximately 30-minute speech, Wilders called the Quran "an evil book" and said that the United States was facing Islamization.

A question-and-answer session was cut short, and Wilders was escorted out of the lecture hall after some students began shouting insults at him.

Before the speech, held in Anderson Hall, more than 50 protesters had denounced the appearance of Wilders at the school.

Members of All Sides, an organization that seeks to promote peace between Israel and Palestinians, held pink pom-poms and shouted, "Hey Hey, HO, HO, this racist bull----'s got to go."

What race is Islam again? What race is the global jihad and Islamic supremacism?

Standing next to them with signs decrying Wilders' views were members of the Student Senate, Democratic Socialists and the Feminist Majority Leadership Alliance.

"Wilders speaks out about free speech while at the same time banning the Quran," said Megan Chialastri, vice president of All Sides.

"Banned books are not free speech and there is no way around that," Chialastri said.

In the Netherlands, they do ban books. In calling for the banning of the Qur'an, Wilders is simply calling for consistency in the application of Dutch laws that restrict speech that incites to violence, but which have never been applied to the Qur'an or to the hate-filled imams who preach jihad and Islamic supremacism in obedience to Qur'anic dictates. I myself don't support "hate speech" laws or the banning of any book, but as long as such laws are on the books in the Netherlands (and I believe they should be removed), it is not wrong to ask for them to be applied consistently.

"This is hate speech at its core," said Monira Gamal-Eldin, president of the Muslim Students Association.

The Muslim Students Association was named as an allied group of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Brotherhood internal document that explained the Brothers' mission in the United States as a "grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions."

Inside the auditorium, after going through rigorous security checks, students assembled to hear the Dutch politician speak.

Brittany Walsh, president of the student group Purpose, which had invited Wilders, introduced his 17-minute short film, Fitna - Arabic for disagreement and division among people - in which passages from the Quran are juxtaposed with newspaper clippings and video showing or describing violent acts by Muslims.

...who in many cases explicitly refer to those Koran verses.

Wilders, 46, emerged after the film, flanked by a security detail which he said made him feel as if he was not free but which has been necessary because of numerous threats on his life.

Before he was escorted out, the last student allowed to address Wilders said: "Clearly fascism wasn't defeated, because if it was, a genocide-loving racist clown like you still wouldn't have anything to say."

Spoken in support of an ideology that would destroy the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, the equality of rights of women with men, and the equality of rights of non-Muslims with Muslims. How proud the addled Leftist administration of Temple University must be.

As the audience filed out of the auditorium, two Temple students offered their reactions to Wilders' visit.

"I'm proud," said Jonas Skovdal. "I think it's a big win for humanity that people stood up to him in there."...

Blind tool.

| 100 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

UPDATE: The man who has been arrested is indeed Tarek Mehanna. He is charged with plotting jihad terror attacks against U.S. shopping malls.

"Prosecutors would not immediately say if the man was Tarek Mehanna, who was arrested in November 2008 for allegedly lying to authorities about the whereabouts of a man who trained with al-Qaida members with the goal of overthrowing the Somali government."

I'll keep you posted. "DEVELOPING NEWS: Terror-related arrest made in Sudbury," from WBZ, October 21 (thanks to herr Oyal):

Boston (WBZ Newsroom) -- A Massachusetts man has been arrested on federal terrorism-related charges for allegedly planning attacks inside and outside the United States.

The man was not immediately identified. He was arrested early Wednesday, according to a person familiar with the investigation who asked not to be identified. The person, who was not authorized to divulge details of the investigation, said the man is from Sudbury. The person said the man had two co-conspirators. Their current status was not immediately known.

Prosecutors would not immediately say if the man was Tarek Mehanna, who was arrested in November 2008 for allegedly lying to authorities about the whereabouts of a man who trained with al-Qaida members with the goal of overthrowing the Somali government.
Stay with WBZ Newsradio 1030 to the latest developments.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

But it is "Islamophobic" to notice, doncha know.

"An(other) Inconvenient Truth--about Terrorism," by Timothy Rhea Furnish for the History News Network, October 19 (thanks to the astounding Kathy Shaidle):

So, just over half the world's terrorist organizations are Muslim in origin and function. No other religious ideology is close--not even, most notably, Christianity (with its 2 billion+ membership, you'd think more would be involved in violence, wouldn't you?). Since Muslims make up 20% of the world's population, their involvement in over 50% of the world's terrrorist [sic] groups is telling and troubling--and something the NIS is loathe to admit, thus tainting its claim to "know...the nature of the threats."

Read it all.

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This could result in her being able to get asylum in the U.S. -- or it could end up causing her to be sent back to Sri Lanka, where she could be murdered or institutionalized. Rifqa Bary Update: "Rifqa Bary's Family Risks Deportation," by Pamela Geller for Newsmax, October 19:

Last Tuesday there was yet another hearing for Rifqa Bary, the girl who converted from Islam to Christianity and fled to Florida from her family in Ohio after saying that her father threatened her life.

It was agreed that Ohio has jurisdiction in her case. That means Rifqa is ultimately to be returned to Ohio, but not so fast: the Florida court maintains emergency jurisdiction. And Florida Judge Daniel Dawson is firm: Rifqa will not be returned to Ohio until the family's immigration status is cleared up.

That could take awhile. On Wednesday at my Web site AtlasShrugs.com, I broke the story of the immigration papers of Rifqa's father, Mohamed Bary, running exclusive documentation exposing his immigration status. He is in the United States illegally, and he has committed perjury to stay here.

That explains why for several months the attorneys for Rifqa Bary's parents have been promising to produce but failing to deliver their immigration documents.

Judge Dawson even threatened Mohamed Bary's lawyer, Shayan Elahi, with contempt of court last week for continuing to fail to produce them. The Barys were given 10 days before they will be held in contempt of court. My money says they are going to say the documents are lost.

But they are not lost. They are damning.

Mohamad Bary has sworn entirely contradictory things in his two applications to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service.

He has claimed that he entered the country illegally around 1981 or 1982, and that he lived here five years -- a claim he had to make in order to qualify for the old Reagan-era immigration amnesty of the 1980s, for which he did belatedly apply.

But Mohamed Bary was not here in the 1980s. We know that because he himself said so in a different immigration filing.

In an application for temporary entry into the United States, he claimed that in the three years before his application, he had lived outside the U.S. for at least one continuous year.

This contradicted his amnesty application, in which he claimed that he had resided continuously inside the United States since on or before Jan. 1, 1982.

He could not have lived outside the United States for one year during the same time period in which he had claimed to be living continuously inside the United States. He maintained these contradictory claims as necessary elements to file his applications under the differing statutes -- one governing the issuance of an entrance visa, the other governing the granting of amnesty for continuous illegal presence.

He obviously committed perjury.

There is more. Read it all.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Flying Imams settled their case against US Airways yesterday. But questions linger. Here are more revelations from the blockbuster Muslim Mafia. "'Flying imams' rewarded for ominous airline 'stunt'? Police detective: 'Acts of staged controversy could be used to desensitize security personnel,'" by David Kupelian for WorldNetDaily, October 21 (thanks to all who sent this in):

[...] Most Americans remember the Nov. 20, 2006, spectacle of the half-dozen Muslim clerics who were kicked off a US Airways Minneapolis-to-Phoenix flight after engaging in behavior that alarmed both passengers and crew before takeoff. Many on board feared the imams - who prayed loudly in Arabic, refused to sit in their assigned seats, fanned out in the cabin in pairs to occupy the front, middle and rear exit rows, ordered seat-belt extenders they didn't need, criticized the Iraq war and President Bush, talked about al-Qaida and Osama bin Laden and other disconcerting behaviors - were testing security procedures in a dry run for a future hijacking.

The imams, who insisted they were acting innocently, were booted off the plane, detained for several hours and questioned by airport police, the FBI and Secret Service, and prevented from booking a later flight on US Airways.

As a result, in a high-profile lawsuit championed by CAIR and argued by a CAIR-affiliated attorney, the "flying imams" brought suit against not only US Airways and the airport authority, but even the fearful passengers, or "John Does," who had simply reported the suspicious activity.

Outraged at the obvious chilling effect the case had on citizens who had been encouraged post-9/11 to be vigilant about security, Congress passed a law to protect citizens from being sued for reporting suspicious behavior to law enforcement. The passengers were subsequently dropped from the case.

But after Judge Ann Montgomery of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota ruled the "John Doe" law didn't immunize law enforcement officers named in the "flying imam" lawsuit, the case went forward.

Today, both sides announced that an out-of-court settlement involving payment to the imams had been reached, though the amount was undisclosed per mutual agreement.

"The settlement of this case is a clear victory for justice and civil rights over fear and the phenomenon of 'flying while Muslim' in the post-9/11 era," said CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad. "We thank all those who supported the imams through the lengthy and difficult legal process."

According to the judge, the imams had been subjected to "extreme fear and humiliation of being falsely identified as dangerous terrorists."

That's the story being told by most of the media today. However, as reported in "Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America," by former federal agent P. David Gaubatz and investigative journalist Paul Sperry, there's another, far more ominous and threatening side to the flying imam story - and CAIR's involvement with it - that has not been told until now.

According to the hot-selling book, the ringleader of the flying imams, Omar Shahin, was involved in an eerily similar disturbance aboard another airline several years earlier, as was CAIR.

"Rewind to 1999," says "Muslim Mafia." "That year, two Muslim college students were removed from an America West flight to Washington from Phoenix after twice attempting to open the cockpit. The FBI later suspected it was a 'dry run' for the 9/11 hijackings, according the 9/11 Commission Report."

"At the time, however, authorities didn't have enough suspicion to hold the students. And as soon as Hamdan al-Shalawi and Muhammed al-Qudhaieen were released, they filed racial profiling suits against America West, now part of US Airways."

Representing the two Muslim students was none other than CAIR, which held a news conference condemning "this ugly case of racial profiling" and urging Muslims to boycott America West.

"Muhammed and Hamdan had done absolutely nothing wrong," CAIR's Awad insisted. "Their crime was being Arab, speaking Arabic."

In a bizarre prequel to the flying imam event, the two Muslims aboard the America West flight spoke loudly in Arabic despite being fluent in English, also switched their seats and roamed the plane from the tail section to the cockpit as did the six imams, all the while asking suspicious questions about the plane and its routes.

"'Flying Imams' ringleader Omar Shahin is familiar with such shenanigans," reports "Muslim Mafia." "Witnesses say he prayed loudly in Arabic before boarding his US Airways flight - which also originated from Phoenix. And once on board, he asked for a seatbelt extender even though he didn't need one and never used the one provided him. (He and another imam left the extenders on the floor of the plane.) And he roamed the cabin and tried to switch seats with another imam."

The plot gets thicker.

Shahin also knew both of the students who were kicked off the America West flight, as documented in "Muslim Mafia," which reports that Shahin ministered to them at his former mosque in Tucson, Arizona, where they had attended college on visas from Saudi Arabia. When they were arrested, Shahin rushed to their defense - along with CAIR.

Incredibly, reveals "Muslim Mafia," "Shahin has admitted to being a former supporter of Osama bin Laden while running the Saudi-backed Islamic Center of Tucson, which functioned as one of al-Qaida's main hubs in North America."

FBI investigators believe bin Laden operated a cell at that same mosque. Hani Hanjour, the Saudi hijacker who piloted the plane that hit the Pentagon, worshipped there along with bin Laden's one-time personal secretary, according to the 9/11 report. Bin Laden's former chief of logistics was president of the mosque before Shahin took over.

"These people don't continue to come back to Arizona because they like the sunshine or they like the state," said FBI agent Kenneth Williams. "Something was established there, and it's been there for a long time."

And the America West pair and their imam were right in the middle of it.

Al-Qudhaieen's name turned up in Williams's investigation of Islamic flight school students in the Phoenix area and he later became a material witness in the 9/11 investigation. And as it turns out, his partner Al-Shalawi - far from being an innocent random passenger - had contacts with al-Qaida operatives, according to the 9/11 report, and trained for attacks in Afghanistan. Both were deported back to Saudi Arabia.

Shahin, the spokesman for the six flying imams, is a native of Jordan, and currently leads the North American Imams Federation, or NAIF, a sister organization to CAIR, both controlled by the international Muslim Brotherhood, which federal authorities recognize as the parent organization of both al-Qaida and Hamas. In fact, Shanin was returning from a private NAIF conference in Minneapolis when he was removed from the flight. During the conference he had met with newly elected Minnesota congressman Keith Ellison, who had just spoken the previous night at a CAIR event.

Piecing together the events surrounding the removal by law enforcement of the six imams from US Airways Flight 300, "Muslim Mafia" poses a chilling question: Was the "flying imams" spectacle really an "orchestrated stunt"? Here's the timeline:

* Sat., Nov. 18 Rep.-elect Keith Ellison (D-MN) speaks via video at annual CAIR fundraising banquet in Washington.

* Sat., Nov. 18 North American Imams Federation (NAIF) holds private conference in Minneapolis organized by imam and NAIF President Omar Shahin, who holds workshop on "Imams and the Media."

* Sun., Nov. 19, 10 am Ellison speaks to NAIF in Minneapolis about "Imams and Politics."

* Sun., Nov. 19, 7 pm Ellison meets with Imam Shahin.

* Mon., Nov. 20 Shahin and five other imams from NAIF conference are bounced from US Airways flight for "odd" and "suspicious" behavior and are detained by police at Minneapolis airport.

* Tues., Nov. 21 Shahin returns to US Airways ticket counter with media to claim discrimination.

* Tues., Nov. 21 CAIR, a sister organization to NAIF, calls for federal investigation into incident and other alleged Muslim profiling.

* Wed., Nov. 22 Ellison sends letter to US Airways CEO and Minneapolis airports commission director demanding a meeting to discuss possible "discrimination" and airline and airport policy for removing passengers from flights.

* Mon., Nov. 27 Shahin travels to Washington and organizes with CAIR and congressional officials a protest of US Airways at Reagan Washington National Airport. CAIR attorneys prepare discrimination lawsuit for Shahin against US Airways. (Sources: Police and wire reports; CAIR press releases; NAIF brochure)

Shahin, who has raised funds for the Holy Land Foundation (convicted of terror-financing by the U.S. government) and other charitable fronts for Hamas, was the public face of the flying imams in their fight against US Airways and the passengers who were fearful of them.

CAIR quickly signed legal retainer agreements with Shahin and the other imams, promising them "large compensation," according to notes taken during one of CAIR's conference calls....

Read it all.

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Last Thursday, our National Security Adviser declared nothing was going to stand in the way of the creation of a Palestinian state. My column in Human Events today:

Last Thursday, National Security Adviser General James L. Jones declared that nothing was going to stand in the way of the creation of a Palestinian state. Speaking of the Israel-Palestinian conflict at the Fourth Annual Gala of the American Task Force on Palestine, Jones said, "The time has come...to relaunch negotiations without preconditions to reach a final status agreement on two states."

Jones emphasized the President's personal commitment to this resolution: "President Obama's dedication to achieve these goals is unshaken, is committed, and we will be relentless in our pursuit of achieving these."

"Without preconditions." It was a telling indication of how far the Obama presidency has departed from the ringing declarations of Obama the candidate, who stated in a major address to the American Israel Political Action Committee (AIPAC) on June 4, 2008 that "we must isolate Hamas unless and until they renounce terrorism, recognize Israel's right to exist, and abide by past agreements. There is no room at the negotiating table for terrorist organizations." He even said that "the Palestinian people must understand that progress will not come through the false prophets of extremism or the corrupt use of foreign aid."

But speaking at the ATFP gala last week, Jones said nothing about isolating Hamas until they renounce terrorism. Not a word about the need for Hamas or any other Palestinian entity to recognize Israel's right to exist. Nothing about compelling the Palestinians to abide by past agreements, which they have routinely violated. And Jones was entirely mum about the necessity for the Palestinians to renounce "the false prophets of extremism," of which they are obviously still quite enamored.

Obama said different things at AIPAC last year. He did call for the creation of a Palestinian state, but at the same time he denounced "terrorist groups and political leaders committed to Israel's destruction" and "maps across the Middle East that don't even acknowledge Israel's existence, and government-funded textbooks filled with hatred toward Jews." He spoke indignantly of the fact that "Israeli children have to take a deep breath and summon uncommon courage every time they board a bus or walk to school."

How will Obama's "relentless" pursuit of a Palestinian state, "without preconditions," guarantee the safety of those Israeli children? It was noteworthy that the day after General Jones assured the ATFP crowd that that state would be established, Hamas's Al-Aqsa TV broadcast a children's program, "Tomorrow's Pioneers," that featured a Palestinian child expressing a desire to become an English teachers in order "to teach children the language of their enemy." Then a recurring character on the program, Nassur the bear, chimed in: "Like me! Just like I know the Zionist enemy's language."

That Palestinian children are being taught that the U.S. and Israel are the "enemy" is no surprise, but it came last week as yet another indication of just how disconnected from reality is the Obama administration's policy. General Jones, according to an ATFP press release, "said that ending the conflict and the occupation is essential because what is at stake is 'nothing less than the dignity and the security of all human beings.'"

But Obama and Jones manifest a singular myopia about which side is threatening that dignity and security when only one side is teaching its children that the other is the "enemy" -- a sentiment that is in any case hardly compatible with the new era of peace that is supposed to dawn with the establishment of this state. Will the Palestinians cease to regard Israel and the U.S. as their "enemies" once this state is established? Will they begin to teach their children peace and tolerance? Will they renounce the jihad doctrine that will settle for nothing less than the entire destruction of Israel, as their leaders have repeated on numerous occasions?

The real answer to all those questions and others like them is "no," but even worse is the fact that Obama and Jones are not asking them. They appear to be determined to establish a Palestinian state despite the abundant evidence that the Palestinians have not renounced their jihadist intransigence, and will use a new Palestinian state as a terror base from which to launch new attacks against the "Zionist entity" -- just as Israel's withdrawal from Gaza did not usher in the promised new era of peace, but only more jihad.

Obama and Jones should know better. And probably do.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

beyonce.jpg

There Is No Fun In Islam* Update: "Beyonce cancels Malaysian concert after Islamist pressure," from DPA, October 21 (thanks to James):

Kuala Lumpur - Multiple Grammy award-winner Beyonce Knowles has indefinitely postponed the Malaysian leg of her world tour following opposition by hardline Islamists over her racy costumes and dance moves, news reports said Wednesday.

Beyonce, who was due to perform in the capital Kuala Lumpur on Sunday, had earlier agreed to tone down her performance and clothes for the show.

However, local organisers of the concert announced that the show would be postponed, without a new date given.

Malaysian Tourism Minister Rais Yatim said the government had not imposed any pressure or conditions on Beyonce, adding that the decision to cancel the show could have been due to pressure from local hardline Islamists, the New Straits Times daily said.

Parti Islam SeMalaysia (PAS) had objected to Beyonce's concert, saying the singer's costumes and performances were 'too sexy' for local audiences....

The Islamic party has in the past opposed scheduled concerts by numerous famous Western female performers, including Rihanna, Avril Lavigne, the Pussycat Dolls and Gwen Stefani....

* The Ayatollah Khomeini said that.

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Dhimmi idiocy. "Lockheed Martin Unveils First New F-16 for Pakistan in Ceremony Attended by Air Force Chiefs," a press release, October 13 (thanks to DFS):

FORT WORTH, Texas, Oct 13, 2009 /PRNewswire- unveiled the first of 18 new F-16s being produced for Pakistan in ceremonies today at its Fort Worth, Texas, facility. Officials including the Chiefs of Staff of the U.S. and Pakistan Air Forces were on hand to witness the event.

Air Chief Marshal Rao Quamar Suleman, Chief of the Air Staff, Pakistan Air Force (PAF), accepted the first F-16 Block 52 aircraft on behalf of his nation. Also present were Husain Haqqani, Pakistan's Ambassador to the United States, and other senior officials.

The U.S. government was represented by Rep. Kay Granger, Texas 12th District, and Gen. Norton Schwartz, Chief of Staff of the Air Force.

"Peace Drive is the flagship of modernization for Pakistan's Air Force. It is the latest configuration of the best 4th generation multirole fighter available in the world today," said John Larson, vice president of F-16 programs for Lockheed Martin....

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An article in the Washington Post several weeks ago tells you much of what you need to know about Scott Gration, former General and an early supporter of Obama (who was looking around for generals to support him). He spent some time in his youth in the Congo and Kenya, which supposedly qualifies him as an "expert" on a vast place called "Africa" and on a particular place, quite different from either the Congo or Kenya, called the Sudan.

Here's a bit from that article:

Although Gration describes the approach as pragmatic and driven by a sense of urgency, his critics here and in the United States say it is dangerously, perhaps willfully, naive. During a recent five-day trip to Sudan, Gration heard from southern officials, displaced Darfurians, rebels and others who complained uniformly that he is being manipulated by government officials who talk peace even as they undermine it. Still, at the end of the visit, Gration maintained a strikingly different perspective. He had seen signs of goodwill from the government of President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, he said, and viewed many of the complaints as understandable yet knee-jerk reactions to a government he trusts is ready to change.

"We've got to think about giving out cookies," said Gration, who was appointed in March. "Kids, countries -- they react to gold stars, smiley faces, handshakes, agreements, talk, engagement."

As you might imagine, reaction to Gration's comments have been less than positive. The Save Darfur Coalition, Enough Project and Genocide Intervention Network released a joint statement expressing concern the Administration's strategy for promoting peace in Sudan:

The quotes from Special Envoy Gration are deeply troubling. The time is well past for the President, Vice President and Secretary of State to exert much-needed leadership over U.S. diplomatic efforts with Sudan or face the prospect that Sudan will descend into much broader violence....

Jerry Fowler of the Save Darfur Coalition added, "It's jarring to hear talk of 'gold stars' and 'smiley faces' for a regime headed by an indicted war criminal. We have always insisted that the best way to deal with Khartoum is a sensible balance of pressures and incentives. The pressures part of that calculation seems to be missing in General Gration's comments. The Sudanese government is primarily responsible for creating the political instability in Sudan and bears the brunt of the responsibility for ending it. And blaming the victims for not being more open minded towards their oppressors defies logic."

We can only hope that as Administration's national security team meets to discuss the its long overdue Sudan Policy Review the discussion is about a balanced set of incentives and disincentives (or "smiley faces" and "frowney faces"?).

Scott Gration was selected to join Obama's pre-election "team" because, as a former military man, he provided useful protection from suggestions that Obama was anti-military, and also because Gration had as a son of missionaries spent some time in Africa, and that also appealed to Obama.

But we do not have to seek the cover of generals -- some generals are intelligent, and some are dumb, and some are quick learners, and some are hopeless at grasping new things. And we who are not particularly interested in whether or not someone spent time "in Africa" because we know that African states and peoples vary widely, as widely as do the states and peoples of Europe. We would never think of lumping them together, so that if Scott Gration did not spend time in the Sudan, and does not understand the history of the slow and seemingly inexorable Arab move southward at the expense of black Africans, that is, had he not lived in Sudan itself, his experience elsewhere in Africa is of little value.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I wrote here about Obama adviser Dalia Mogahed's pro-Sharia appearance on a Hizb ut-Tahrir television show in Britain. Now, in "Does Sharia Law Promote Women's Rights?" in FrontPage (October 20), Cinnamon Stillwell reveals even more about the deceptions, half-truths and soothing fictions about women's rights under Sharia that Mogahed and Nazreen Nawaz peddled on that program:

[...] In delivering these outlandish pronouncements, Mogahed was soft-spoken and careful to confine her commentary to the results of her study. Not so with fellow guest Nazreen Nawaz, who took up the bulk of the interview expounding didactically on the benefits to be bestowed upon humankind by the revival of a Khilafah state, or caliphate. The caliphate envisioned by Nawaz is a mythical one, hearkening back to the so-called "golden age of Islam," where, according to the party line, all was progress and advancement and everyone lived in harmony. If we could only return to the halcyon days, she urged, all the considerable problems of the Muslim world would be solved. As she put it: "Islam came to solve human problems." These utopian beliefs reflect those Marxists who insist that "real communism" has not yet been implemented, Stalinism or totalitarianism is an aberration, and that the solution lies in implementing a "true" Socialist state.

Claiming that the brutality of the Taliban in Afghanistan and the mullahs in Iran are distortions of sharia law rather than examples of its true implementation, Nawaz promised that under the proposed caliphate, rulers would be democratically elected and accountable to the people, while women's rights would be protected.

Demonstrating the utter delusion of a fanatic, Nawaz alleged that:

We know that sharia pioneered rights for women. This idea that women have the same rights of citizenship to a man, this was unheard of in empires or civilizations of the past. And we know that Islam brought this.

Nonetheless, Nawaz conceded that "there is evidence from Islam that says the Muslim woman cannot be the ruler of a state. This is from the Islamic text," but managed to justify this exclusion by pointing to recent Muslim women leaders such as the late Benazir Bhutto of Pakistan who, she claimed, have "brought very little in terms of the lives and the standard of living of women in these countries."

She also defended Islam's "strict regulations in terms of social laws" and expressed admiration for precisely those features of Islamic law that most oppress women:

...men and women cannot socialize, they cannot be alone together...in terms of lowering the gaze, all of these things, the dress code, they're all there to insure that there's a healthy cooperation so that men and women can focus at the job at hand.

In contrast, Nawaz condemned the West for allowing women too much personal freedom, citing the breakdown of the family and promiscuity as the results:

I think living in the West we see some of the fruits of this idea of liberty and this idea of freedom, where people are free to have any relationship they want to. I believe that it's caused a lot of problems in the social structure, you have adultery, you have problems of teenage pregnancies....

These are indeed dire consequences, just not, as Nawaz believes, of personal liberty. Rather, they result from the dissolution of the moral framework that supports liberty itself. The struggle to maintain the family structure and women's dignity amidst growing libertinism is alive and well in the West. But when given the choice, who would trade liberty for the opposite outcome: totalitarianism?

Furthermore, Nawaz demonstrated a lack of understanding about how women's rights, and indeed human rights, have been achieved historically in the West:

Women have made a lot of progress in the West in terms of economic, political rights, education, and so on. But I would reject the claim that these values of secularism, and liberal values, and even in terms of democracy have, that they can claim victory for this progress. Because if we remember history, women actually had to fight against these values in order to secure their rights....And women even today have to fight in secular democracies against discrimination of these levels.

In the face of this vigorous defense of sharia law and strident condemnation of secular democracy, Washington insider Mogahed said not a word. Only when prompted to comment directly on one of Nawaz's diatribes on the fictional caliphate did Mogahed finally speak, and then she restated the results of the Gallup poll in such a way as to provide backhanded support for Nawaz's Islamist views. As she put it:

What Muslims around the world tell us they believe is that the key to progress is attachment to their spiritual and moral values. They really do see, many of them, that Islam offers a solution for their problems and they see Islam as their society's greatest asset. When we asked people what they admired most about the Muslim world, what they tell us is their attachment to Islam, Islamic values, value of hospitality, the value of family. So I think that whereas people around the world do feel that the problems are diverse, many of them do mention Islam as a part of that solution, and when we ask people what can Muslims do to help themselves, one of the most frequent responses is for them to unify and another is for them to follow Islam and make it a greater and more authentic part of their lives.

If making Islam a "greater and more authentic part" of Muslim's lives results in the implementation of sharia law, based not in mythology but in contemporary practice, the predictable outcome is the furtherance of backwardness, repression, intolerance, and inequality afflicting the Muslim world today. Is this really, as Mogahed would have it, what Muslims want?

Read it all.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Good question. "Three Years Alone," from Steyn Online, October 21 (thanks to the incomparable Kathy Shaidle):

Three years ago, October 2006, America Alone: The End Of The World As We Know It was officially published in the US and Canada...It's been an eventful three years, leading not just to paperback and foreign editions but three investigations for "flagrant Islamophobia" and (just this very month) an appearance before the Canadian Parliament. Sometimes in all the ructions, the main thrust of my thesis get lost, but I believe the central points hold up better than ever - and are borne out by news stories on an almost daily basis: a) This demographic transformation is happening very fast; and b) In the end, it's not about "them", it's about "us". Are there characteristics particular to western civilization that are worth defending? If we don't think there are, why would anybody else?
| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

October 20, 2009

"Way too much overkill for immigration." Yep.

"Kinsman, IL - FBI Raids Halal Slaughterhouse," from CBS Chicago via Vos Iz Neias?, October 20 (thanks to Paul):

Kinsman, IL - Federal agents conducted a raid Sunday afternoon at a goat meat processing plant near Morris, Illinois. The secretive operation was led by the Chicago FBI office, the Feds are being very tight-lipped on what they found and why they were even there.

Spokesman Ross Rice confirms agents were at 6260 Kinsman Road, in Kinsman, Illinois. The business is called First World Management. Rice would not say why agents were there but said nobody was taken into custody. [...]

According to sources, the plant provides goat, beef and lamb meat which is prepared in the Halal way in accordance with Muslim custom.

The government workers inside First World Management meat packing plant in Kinsman Monday wouldn't say why they were there or why scores of FBI agents and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents were there Sunday.

The trouble is the FBI isn't saying much about what happened at this rural Grundy County plant. A spokesman confirms that the plant, which has a Muslim prayer room, was raided as part of an ongoing criminal investigation. [...]

Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials said the agency assisted in the raid, but had no further comment. According to sources, many of the FBI and ICE agents were armed.

Several USDA criminal investigators were on site at the plant on Monday, but they would not comment on the situation.

One man who was talking about the raid was Jim Cavaness. He's a handyman who occasionally works at the plant where goats, sheep and cows are slaughtered. On Sunday, he witnessed the raid and says he was questioned by FBI agents.

Cavaness says the FBI asked him if he had seen anything unusual at the plant. He says he's never seen anything unusual, but, he says, judging by the amount of firepower on the scene, the FBI wasn't just working an immigration case.

"Way too much overkill for immigration," Cavaness said.

Neighbors who saw the raid on Sunday told CBS 2 it was a huge operation, involving more than 100 agents, police officers and even what one believed to be National Guard troops.

Sources say during the raid, the driveway was filled with more than 50 government vehicles. There was a helicopter flying overhead and a command center set up. On top of it were government sharpshooters with rifles at the ready.

George Jackson III is an attorney hired by one of the plant operators, Dr. Syed Hamid. Jackson and Dr. Hamid spoke briefly while on their way to a meeting with the federal prosecutor Monday.

Jackson says it's too early to say why there was such a huge show of force at the plant.

"Obviously, it was more than what was needed here, but why they felt the need to come forward with that much manpower allegedly, it's too early to say," Jackson said....

| 43 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Mohammad Razaq Yaqubi said that. He must be some kind of Islamophobe. "Taliban continue to expand their reach," by Gull Rohm Niazmand for MCT News Service, October 20 (thanks to James):

KUNDUZ, Afghanistan The insignia on the door says the vehicle belongs to the provincial police. But the man behind the wheel is clearly a member of the Taliban.

The insurgents recently captured eight Ford Ranger pickup trucks from the police in this northeastern province that borders Tajikistan.

It's easy to tell when it's the Taliban who are speeding through the Chahr Dara district of the province. They blare loud Islamic and national songs from the speakers mounted on the roof of the truck and hug each other as they careen through the streets. [...]

The Taliban have complete control over Chahr Dara. They have established their own brand of Islamic rule, and they can move around the villages and bazaars openly.

"We have control only over the governor's office," said the district governor of Chahr Dara, Abdul Wahid. "Outside those walls we have no jurisdiction at all. People do not come to the governor's office to solve their problems they go to the Taliban." [...]

Provincial police chief Mohammad Razaq Yaqubi blames drugs smugglers for the increased presence of insurgents.

"The Taliban try to increase cultivation and production of opium in this region," he said. "This war in Kunduz belongs to the narcotics mafia, which is operating in the name of Islam." [...]

One local resident, who refused to give his name, said he's seen U.S. forces aiding the insurgents.

"I saw it with my own eyes," he said. "I was bringing my cattle home in the evening, and I saw Taliban getting off American helicopters. They were also unloading motorcycles from these aircraft. Later, a local mullah whom I know very well went to talk to the Americans, and then the helicopter left."

Capt. Elizabeth Mathias, a spokeswoman for U.S. forces in Afghanistan, dismissed such reports.

"The U.S is not supporting Taliban militants, nor are we expanding the conflict into Central Asia," she said. "The Afghanistan-Pakistan region, and specifically instability within those two countries, is keeping American and NATO forces busy enough," she said.

"As for rumors, I honestly feel it is a natural reaction by people as they try to understand the difficult situations they face," Mathias said. "(Government and coalition forces) continue to combat destabilizing forces in the area and communicate those efforts to the residents of Kunduz."...

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Flying Imams' lawsuit was "the latest component in a national campaign to intimidate airlines and government agencies from acting prudently to ensure passenger safety." In other words, it was a quintessential stealth jihad effort.

"US Airways, others settle lawsuit filed by Muslim clerics," by Mike Sunnucks for BizJournals.com, October 20 (thanks to James):

A settlement has been reached in a federal lawsuit filed by six Muslim clerics against US Airways and other parties after they were removed from a flight between Minneapolis and Phoenix in 2006.

The imams sued US Airways, the FBI and Minnneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. Other passengers on the flight had expressed concerned about their behavior, which included asking for seat belt extenders, sitting in seats to which they were not assigned, and saying prayers and having discussions in Arabic.

The clerics were removed from the aircraft, questioned and then released without charges.

The imams filed suit in 2007 in U.S. District Court in Minneapolis, claiming they were unlawfully detained. Details of the settlement were not released, but will be presented to the federal court judge who let the case proceed.

"Law enforcement officials did what they believed was appropriate to ensure the safety of travelers based on the information available at the time," said Tom Anderson, general counsel for the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport in a statement. "We will continue to be vigilant in maintaining the security of Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport and the safety of travelers who use it."...

| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"You know, he made his protest and that's fair enough," said Blair. "I think it's important for you guys as well to not always mistake the protest for the general view of the whole population." Of course. The vast, vast majority dearly want peace, eh?

"Protester assails Blair in Palestinian mosque," from Reuters, October 20 (thanks to all who sent this in):

HEBRON, West Bank, Oct 20 (Reuters) - Bodyguards subdued a Palestinian man on Tuesday as he approached Middle East envoy Tony Blair, shouting "You are a terrorist."

The former British prime minister was verbally assailed while visiting an ancient mosque during an official trip to the West Bank city of Hebron.

The protester, carrying a bag, was backed into a corner by guards who tried to shut him up. "He is not welcome in the land of Palestine," the struggling man shouted.

Blair, 56, is envoy for the "Quartet" of powers on the Middle East, comprising the European Union, the United States, Russia and the United Nations.

He gave a tight-lipped smile and a pacifying wave in the general direction of the shouting man, and afterwards played down the incident as a "protest and that's fair enough", but not one that should be viewed as typical of local feelings.

Most Palestinians and Israelis want the conflict "resolved in a peaceful way", he said. They understand "it's not going to be resolved unless we find a way of creating two states, a state of Israel and a state of Palestine side by side in peace."...

And what will prevent that Palestinian state from becoming a new base for the jihad against Israel? Why, nothing.

"You know, he made his protest and that's fair enough," Blair told reporters once the man was removed. "I think it's important for you guys as well to not always mistake the protest for the general view of the whole population," he said.
| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In "What Is Victory? If defeating the Taliban is not our goal, what is?" at National Review today, Andrew C. McCarthy talks sense -- where there is apparently none in the Obama Administration.

Rarely has there been such a dramatic disconnect between rhetoric and reality. On Afghanistan, the national-security Right talks about "victory," concerned Democrats talk about "success," and Obama allies such as Sen. John Kerry talk about the "fulfillment of our mission." They aren't talking about the same thing. The somnolent press is content to court, rather than clarify, this confusion, but that's no reason for the rest of us to go along for the ride.

What is "victory" or "success"? What is this "mission" of ours that must be fulfilled?

Staunch supporters of our military are seething as President Obama dithers over Gen. Stanley McChrystal's request for an additional 40,000 troops. Their frustration would be justifiable if the main issue were Obama's inconstancy. Months ago, the president endorsed the counterinsurgency strategy of McChrystal, his hand-picked commander. Now, he is balking. In what has become a habit for Obama, he changes the rationale for his temporizing almost daily: from the need to study further a situation he had purportedly studied plenty before backing McChrystal; to the notion that a counterterrorism strategy, rather than counterinsurgency, may be the way to go; to the latest excuse, floated this weekend by White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, that the uncertainty hovering over Afghanistan's fraud-ridden election makes a deployment decision premature.

Whatever the explanation on offer, the conservative reaction is always the same: "Isn't this the war Obama said we had to win?" Nothing has changed, the national-security Right reasons: The Taliban are still our enemies; if they take over Afghanistan they will give safe haven to al-Qaeda, and we will be in grave danger of another 9/11. So why won't Obama just give McChrystal what he needs to defeat the Taliban? [...]

So why are we pretending that the mission in Afghanistan is something it is not? McChrystal is not trying to defeat the Taliban. Indeed, McChrystal tells Filkins it would be useless to attempt that. "You can kill Taliban forever," he says, "because they are not a finite number."

And here is the not-so-secret dirty little secret: Islamic militancy, whether in the form of the Taliban or its many other varieties, is "not finite." That is because neither its source nor its center of gravity is confined to Afghanistan. Nevertheless, we have chosen not to address the source, which is Islamist ideology, and we have chosen to fight only in Afghanistan, as opposed to the many places where the enemy rolls new fighters off the assembly line. We have made these choices because we lack the will for a broader fight....

Read it all.

| 28 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Democracy on the march. "Sharia slowly advancing in Najaf and Basra, for non-Muslims too," by Layla Yousif Rahema for Asia News, October 20 (thanks to C. Cantoni):

Baghdad (AsiaNews) -For the past ten days, no one has been able to drink or buy alcoholic beverages in Najaf because of a bylaw adopted by local authorities. The decision comes as the latest in a series, suggesting that Sharia is being slowly implemented in Iraq, and that it also applies to non-Muslims.

Najaf is considered a holy city for Shia Muslims because the first Shia imam and fourth caliph, Ali ibn Abi Talib, is buried there. Because of the city's special nature as a Shia holy city, the provincial council ruled unanimously that "drinking, selling or transporting alcohol of any kind in whatever quantity" was inappropriate since such activities are incompatible with Islam. Violators, even if they belong to another religion, face the possibility of being sued before a court. The ruling applies to the city of Najaf and its province and includes a ban on advertising.

It is a decision "against democracy, civil liberties and human rights," said Mgr Louis Sako, Chaldean archbishop of Kirkuk. "It will just encourage trade in bootleg alcohol because people will continue to drink, but in secret."

More importantly, the new rule is a sign that Islamic law is creeping into some Iraqi cities, Mgr Sako warns.

Last August for example, the Basra Provincial Council, which rules over Iraq's second largest city, banned the sale of alcoholic beverages following a request by Shia parties, which dominate this southern region.

Ahmad al Sulaiti, deputy governor of the province and a religious leader elected with the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (previously known as the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq or SCIRI), motivated the ban on alcoholic beverages on the ground that Iraq's constitution "bans everything that violates the principles of Islam."

The problem lies with constitution itself. When the new charter was adopted, religious minorities, especially Christians, had pointed out its ambiguities.

"It guarantees respect for religious freedoms, but at the same time in Article 6 establishes that no law can be adopted that is contrary to the Muslim religion," Mgr Sako said. "It was clear from the start that this would create serious problems for minorities."...

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Big surprise here. An update on this story.

"Lebanon: Exploded Devices Lead To Hezbollah Not Israel, Press," from ANSAmed, October 20 (thanks to Insubria):

(ANSAmed) - BEIRUT, OCTOBER 20 - The spy devices destroyed between Saturday and Sunday along the temporary border reportedly belonged to the Lebanese Shiite movement Hezbollah and not to Israel, the pan-Arab paper, Asharq al Aswat, reported today. The Saudi owned newspaper, which contrary to standard practice cited "an unofficial source" from Israel, specified that the devices blown along the central sector of the Blue Line that demarks the two countries were a part of "Hezbollah's telecommunications network". The Party of God, on the other hand, confirmed yesterday that the devices destroyed was spy equipment placed there by Israel along the Lebanese land telephone line after the war in 2006, and in violation of UN Resolution n.1701, which interrupted hostilities between the Jewish State and Hezbollah three years ago. A spokesman from UN forces deployed in southern Lebanon (Unifil) for their part specified to ANSA that "an investigation is underway", and that it has not yet been possible to reach a conclusion on the nature of the devices, or who placed them. Preliminary investigations at first attributed them to Israeli ownership. (ANSAmed).
| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Thanks to Banafsheh.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Thanks to Banafsheh.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Thanks to Banafsheh.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Thanks to Banafsheh.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Traducido por Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi.

Sura 2, Al-Baqara ('La Vaca'), como casi todos los capítulos del Corán, toma su título de algo contado dentro de ella- en este caso, la historia de Moisés cuando les pidió a los hebreos (según el pedido de Alá) que sacrificaran una vaca (2:67-73). Es la sura más larga del Corán- 286 versículos en total- y comienza el patrón general (pero no absoluto) del Corán de empezar con la más larga y terminar con la más corta, con la excepción de la Fátiha que tiene el puesto de honor como la sura primera a causa de su importancia en el Islam. Sura Al-Baqara, 'La Vaca', fue revelada a Mohamed en Medina- es decir, durante la segunda parte de su carrera como profeta que empezó en La Meca en 610. En 622 Mohamed y la comunidad musulmana en ciernes se movieron a Medina, donde por primera vez Mohamed se convirtió en un líder político y militar. Los teólogos islámicos opinan en general que las suras de Medina tienen prioridad sobre las de la Meca si hay desacuerdo, según el versículo 106 de este capítulo del Corán, en que Alá habla de abrogar los versículos y reemplazarlos con los mejores. (No obstante, esta interpretación de versículo 106 no se acepta universalmente. Algunos dicen que no se refiere a la abrogación de cualquier cosa del Corán, sino solamente de las escrituras judías y cristianos. Más sobre este tema cuando llegue el momento).

Sura 2 contiene una gran cantidad de materia importante para los musulmanes, y se valora mucho. El comentador del Corán medieval Ibn Kathir (cuyo comentario es leído y respetado por los musulmanes) afirma de manera directa que recitar esta sura aflige a Satanás, contando que uno de los seguidores primeros de Mohamed, Ibn Mas'ud, afirmó que Satanás 'sale de la casa en la que se recita Sura Al-Baqarah, y, cuando sale, se echa un pedo.' Sin el mal gusto de Ibn Mas'ud, Mohamed dice: 'Satanás huye de la casa en la que se recita Sura Al-Baqara'.

El capítulo empieza con tres letras árabes: alif, lam y mim. Muchos capítulos del Corán empiezan de esta manera con tres letras árabes, lo que ha dado lugar a mucha especulación mística sobre lo que podrían significar. Sin embargo, el 'Táfsir Al-Jalalyan', otro comentario clásico del Corán, resume sucintamente la opinión de la mayoría: 'Alá sabe mejor lo que se significa por estas letras'.

El versículo que sigue inmediatamente estas letras contiene una doctrina islámica central: 'Ésta es la Escritura que no se puede dudar.' El Corán no debe ser cuestionado o juzgado por cualquier norma fuera de sí mismo; en vez de esto, es el criterio por el cual todas las cosas deben ser juzgadas. Por supuesto, no es muy diferente de la manera en la que muchas otras religiones consideran sus escrituras. Sin embargo, no ha habido el desarrollo en el Islam de la crítica histórica y textual que ha transformado la manera en la que los judíos y los cristianos entienden hoy en día sus escrituras. El Corán es el libro que no se puede ni dudar ni cuestionar: cuando un erudito islámico, Suliman Bashear, les enseñó a sus estudiantes en la Universidad Nacional de An-Najah en Nablus que el Corán y el Islam fueron productos del desarrollo histórico y que no fueron revelados de manera perfecta a Mohamed, sus estudiantes le echaron por la ventana de su sala de clase.

2:1-29 discute de manera extendida la perversidad de los que rechazan la creencia en Alá, y suena varios temas que se repetirán muchas veces en el Corán. Se dice que el Corán es la orientación para los que creen en lo que fue revelado a Mohamed junto con lo que se reveló antes (versículo cuatro). Esto implica la suposición del Corán afirmada muchas veces que es la confirmación de la Torah y del Evangelio que enseñan el mismo mensaje que recibe Mohamed en sus revelaciones del Corán (vea usted 5:44-48). Cuando se halló que la Torah y el Evangelio no están de acuerdo con el Corán, los judíos y los cristianos fueron accusados de haber corrompido sus escrituras- lo que creen aun hoy en día los musulmanes tradicionales. Mohamed Asad lo afirma positivamente: 'la religión del Corán se puede entender correctamente solamente cuando se consideran las religiones monoteístas grandes que precedieron y que, según la creencia musulmana, culminan y logran su formulación definitiva en la fe del Islam'.

Otro tema es el control absoluto de Alá por encima de todo, incluso las decisiones de las almas individuales a creer en él o rechazarle: 'En cuanto a los infieles, no les importa si les adviertes o si no les adviertes: no creerán. Alá ha ratificado sus corazones y su oír, y hay una venda en sus ojos; incurrirán una gran pena' (2:6-7). Los Qadarís de la historia islámica temprana opinaban que los seres humanos tenían el albedrío, así podían decidirse a hacer el bien o el mal. Sus adversarios afirmaron que Alá había determinado todas las cosas. Aunque los dos lados podían citar muchísimos versículos del Corán para apoyar sus puntos de vista, las autoridades musulmanas condenaron eventualmente la ideología Qadarista como herejía ya que limitó la soberanía absoluta de Alá sobre todas las cosas. Por eso los que rechacen la fe lo hacen porque Alá lo desea, como se puede ver en estos versículos, no porque tengan el albedrío. Dice Ibn Kathir: 'Estos versículos indican que cualquier persona que Alá haya deseado que sea miserable, no tendrá nunca nadie que pueda hacer que esté contenta, y cualquier persona que Alá haya hecho que sea equivocada, no tendrá nadie que pueda darle la orientación.' (Un buen análisis breve de la controversia Qadarista se puede encontrar en el libro del erudito islámico famoso Ignaz Goldziher: Introducción a la Teología y a la Ley Islámica).

Pues condena a los hipócritas y a los creyentes falsos que plagaron a menudo a Mohamed durante su carrera como profeta (13:20). Finalmente, hay la afirmación de la sublimidad del Corán, de modo que les desafía a ellos que duden a que produzcan una sura semejante si se niegan a creer en su origen divina (23). Esto es un reto que muchos han probado, pero, desde luego, es un reto que no se puede hacer con éxito para los que desafíen- 'no pueden producir una cosa semejante' (17:88).

2:25 introduce los jardines famosos del Paraíso en los que los creyentes vivirán- más sobre este tema más tarde.

2:30-39 cuenta la historia de Adán y Eva de tal manera que sugiere que los oyentes de la recitación ya están familiarizados con la historia. Alá les dice a los ángeles que se postren antes de Adán (34), una orden que parece depender de la noción bíblica que la humanidad fue creada a imagen de Dios, aunque la idea no aparece aquí. Según Ibn Kathir,'Alá afirmó la virtud de Adán encima de todos los ángeles, porque enseño a Adán, en lugar de los ángeles, los nombres de todas las cosas.' Satanás se niega a postrarse, convirtiéndose en un no creyente (34) y tienta a Adán y Eva con la fruta prohibida. Alá promete revelaciones para aconsejar a la humanidad, advirtiéndoles que los que pasen por alto las revelaciones serán castigados en el Inferno.

Pues la sura se trata en los versículos 40-75 de los Hijos de Israel que hacen un papel tan importante en el Corán (y, no por casualidad, en la conciencia islámica moderna). Hablaremos de esto la semana que viene en el blog del Corán.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Part I. (Thanks to Banafsheh.)

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Odd. If this is really a sign from Allah, why does it make the baby so uncomfortable? In this it is reminiscent of Muhammad's first revelation, in which -- according to Bukhari, the collection of Hadith considered most reliable by Muslims -- Gabriel left Muhammad in a state of terror and confusion:

The Prophet added, "The angel caught me (forcefully) and pressed me so hard that I could not bear it any more. He then released me and again asked me to read and I replied, 'I do not know how to read.' Thereupon he caught me again and pressed me a second time till I could not bear it any more. He then released me and again asked me to read but again I replied, 'I do not know how to read (or what shall I read)?' Thereupon he caught me for the third time and pressed me, and then released me and said, 'Read in the name of your Lord, who has created (all that exists) has created man from a clot. Read! And your Lord is the Most Generous." (96.1, 96.2, 96.3) Then Allah's Apostle returned with the Inspiration and with his heart beating severely. Then he went to Khadija bint Khuwailid and said, "Cover me! Cover me!" They covered him till his fear was over and after that he told her everything that had happened and said, "I fear that something may happen to me."

Here again we see turbulence and discomfort accompany an alleged revelation from Allah -- belying in indirect but unmistakable terms the supposedly peaceful content of those revelations.

"Miracle or hoax? Russians puzzled as phrases from the Koran start appearing 'spontaneously' on baby's skin," from the Daily Mail, October 19 (thanks to all who sent this in):

A baby is sparking a wave of speculation in Russia after phrases from the Koran allegedly began appearing on his skin.

Sayings from the Muslim holy book are said to appear on nine-month-old Ali Yakubov's back, arms, legs and stomach - before apparently fading away and being replaced with new sayings.

Russian medics claimed they are puzzled over the cause of the marks on a baby's skin, which started when the word Allah apparently appeared on his chin within weeks of his birth. [...]

Local MP Akhmedpasha Amiralaev said: 'This boy is a pure sign of God. Allah sent him to Dagestan in order to stop revolts and tension in our republic.'

The boy's mother claimed: 'Normally those signs appear twice a week - on Mondays and on the nights between Thursdays and Fridays.

'Ali always feels bad when it is happening. He cries and his temperature goes up. It's impossible to hold him when it's happening, his body is actively moving, so we put him into his cradle. It's so hard to watch him suffering.'

The phrases regularly replace each other on the baby's skin, she said.

Local imam Abdulla has told locals that the Koran forecasts that before the end of the world, there may be people with its sayings on their bodies....

| 28 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The victims were "were enjoying [fire]crackers on Diwali night when they were attacked by Muslims of Nagorivad." Will the Islamophobia never end?

"Minority Hindus attacked again in Ahmedabad's Shahpur," for DeshGujarat.com, October 18 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

Minority Hindus were attacked again by Muslims in Ahmedabad's Shahpur area, this time on Diwali.

According to sources, the minority Hindu people in Shahpur's Nagorivad and Ghanchi na dela locality were enjoying crackers on Diwali night when they were attacked by Muslims of Nagorivad. Muslims - Mohammad Saijad Mohammad Hissain Luhar, Nadim Lukman Luhar, Mohammad Nazeer Aslam Nagori, Farhan Faruk Nagori, Isfakbhai Nagori. According to sources, the Muslims first objected firing of crackers and then start attack on Hindus. Heavy stone pelting on both sides following this invited police to intervene. Police have detained five Muslims in this case.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Couldn't she just have put him on her blocked list? Isn't a sentence of 70 lashes rather severe in this case? Maybe, but it is not out of sync with the draconian character of Sharia in general. Sharia Alert from the Kingdom of the Two Holy Places: "181 love messages = 70 flogs," by Abdullah Bajubair for Al-Eqtisadiah via Arab News, October 13 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

[...] We have a story in which all of these synonyms have been used by a man expressing his love to his wife after she left, deserted or abandoned him by khula (a form of divorce in Shariah where the woman secures her divorce through financial compensation to the husband). The Kingdom's newspapers recently reported that the husband agreed to the khula, something that makes us believe that it was the wife who wanted to separate.

The husband, agonized by love, sent his ex-wife 181 text messages requesting her to come back. The woman refused all these messages, which were enough to fill a book on love and which would immediately become a bestseller.

While he was bombarding his ex-wife with love messages, relatives and friends tried to reconcile them but the woman turned a deaf ear. Not only that, she took her ex-husband to court for annoying her with too many love messages.

The judge at the summary court in Buraidah sentenced him to 70 lashes and prevented him from ever approaching her again. The Court of Cassation then approved the verdict making it final....

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Shi'ites say they were innocent civilians. The government says they were Shi'ite rebels hiding out in the hospital. There is no way to tell who is telling the truth. "War is deceit," after all. Sunni/Shi'ite Jihad Update: "Yemen says soldiers kill 44 Shiite rebels in air attacks near Saudi border," by Ahmed Al-Haj for the Canadian Press, October 19 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

SAN'A, Yemen -- Yemeni warplanes killed at least 44 Shiite rebels in a series air strikes [sic] near the Saudi border, a senior government official said Sunday. The insurgents, however, claim the dead were civilians.

Mohammed Abdelallah al-Qawsi, deputy interior minister, said 27 of the rebels were killed by a strike on a rebel hideout in an abandoned hospital in the small town of Razeh.

The rebels, however, said the hospital was still functional and those killed inside were civilians.

"This is another lie by the government, all those who were killed were innocent civilians," said rebel spokesman Mohammed Abdel Salam by telephone.

The Yemeni army maintained rebels were shooting at the army from the hospital.

The international aid group, Medecins Sans Frontieres, said Razeh hospital was a fully functioning facility when they evacuated their staff from it Thursday....

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The thugs of the Muslim Students Association can't answer him, so they tried to silence him. This time, they failed.

The Muslim Students Association, by the way, was named as an allied group of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Brotherhood internal document that explained the Brothers' mission in the United States as a "grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions."

None of that, of course, makes the Philadelphia Inquirer. Nor does the Inquirer note that Wilders is "anti-Islamic" essentially for quoting the Koran and showing how Islamic jihadists use it to justify violence and supremacism.

"Temple allows Dutch speaker with anti-Islamic views," by Robert Moran for the Philadelphia Inquirer, October 20 (thanks to James):

A controversial Dutch politician with anti-Islamic views will be allowed to speak at Temple University this evening despite calls by Muslims that he be prevented from giving an address on campus.

Geert Wilders, a member of the Dutch parliament, has called for a halt to the immigration of Muslims to the Netherlands and a ban on the Quran.

On Friday, he was allowed to visit Britain after a court ruled that a government prohibition against his presence was unjust. He called the court ruling "a victory for the freedom of speech."

During his British visit, according to multiple news accounts, Islamists protested outside where Wilders spoke, holding placards that read: "Islam Will Dominate the World" and "Sharia for the Netherlands." They also chanted, "Free speech go to hell."...

"Temple University is a community of scholars in which freedom of inquiry and freedom of expression are valued," the university said in a statement yesterday. "We respect the right of our student organizations to invite people who express a wide variety of views and ideas."

The Muslim Students Association asked the university to reject his visit. "The Muslim population at Temple feels attacked, threatened, and ultimately unsafe that Mr. Wilders has been invited to voice his hate-driven opinions," the association said....

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is a report from the October 2009 OSCE 2009 Human Dimension Implemention Meeting. The implications for the continued survival of the freedom of speech are many.

"OSCE - What is a 'message crime'? (updated)," by Henrik Ræder Clausen for EuropeNews, October 8:

Report from OSCE 2009 Human Dimension Implemention Meeting.

Related ICLA papers:
ICLA Contribution on Tolerance and Non-discrimination
Freedom of Expression: New challenges, new responses

I didn't expect that I'd start out my report from this conference by picking up a lead from COJEP, but so be it. They introduced the concept of a 'Message crime', in order to convey the real significance of the much-debated hate crimes. This term cuts through a ton of confusion and is worth adopting. For details, read on.

There are many kinds of crime, and many kinds of motivation for crime. Most crimes are committed for personal reasons, like undue material gain, jealousy, sexual reasons, to exact revenge to eliminate critics, opponents and enemies. Some crimes, however, have a target much more important than their immediate victim(s). These are message crimes. There are, of course, intermediate forms. A ruthless political leader or a mafia boss will eliminate his opponents for both reasons, both to get rid of a troublesome person and to deter others from causing him similar problems in the future. What is interesting here is the message aspect of crime, not the personal.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) is a key but little-known group, about which we are going to be bringing you some important information. Here first is some background that will bring you up to speed on the group, a report by E.S.W. from a July 2009 meeting:

A report from the Human Dimension Roundtable July 9-10, 2009 Vienna:

Map of OSCE states: http://www.osce.org/publications/sg/2007/10/22286_968_en.pdf

http://www.osce.org/publications/sg/2009/01/35857_1220_en.pdf

One may wonder what the Counterjihad and an organization like the OSCE could possibly have in common. Before I delve into this matter, I will provide a short overview of the OSCE as it is a rather obscure organization, especially for non-Europeans, despite United States and Canada's membership. I will also touch on how the OSCE processes work.


Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

October 19, 2009

Actually they're whining about a "backlash" -- something that has hardly ever materialized despite constant mainstream media focusing upon it after virtually every jihad arrest -- and claiming victim status.

Memo to Dallas Muslims: want to make sure there is no backlash? Here are some easy steps.

1. Stop committing violent acts. When you hear Muslims plotting violent acts in your local mosque, call the police and FBI.

2. Confront those Muslims who justify violence and Islamic supremacism by reference to the Qur'an and Sunnah, and argue against the applicability of those passages to our age or any other age in the future.

3. Confront and report those Muslims who say violent or hateful things in private when they think no non-Muslims are around.

4. Begin comprehensive and transparently inspectable programs in your mosques and schools to teach against the ideas of violent jihad and Islamic supremacism, and the virtues of the U.S. Constitutional principles of non-establishment of religion, equality of rights for all, and freedom of speech.

5. Actively work with Western law enforcement officials on long-range programs to identify and apprehend jihadists and root out the jihad doctrine and Islamic supremacism from within Western Muslim communities.

"Dallas-area Muslims fear backlash from arrests tied to terror plot," by Selwyn Crawford for The Dallas Morning News, October 19 (thanks to Peter):

North Texans were both angry and relieved last month when federal agents arrested a Jordanian teenager in a failed plot to blow up a Dallas skyscraper.

But for area Muslims, the arrest of 19-year-old Hosam "Sam" Smadi evoked yet another emotion - fear.

"Being a Muslim in America today is not easy," said Hadi Jawad, a longtime Dallas business owner and a volunteer at the Dallas Peace Center. "We feel under siege. There is open season on our faith. Muslims are painted with a broad brush."

No, they aren't. Mainstream media types are always quick to claim, even on the slimmest of evidence, that this or that terror attack has nothing to do with Islam, that Islam teaches peace, that all Muslims condemn, etc. But Jawad and other Muslims could do much more to stop this alleged broad-brush painting by opposing jihad activity more forthrightly and energetically, instead of simply whining about backlash when a jihadist is caught.

Jawad and other Muslims praise the work of law enforcement in arresting Smadi, as well as two other terrorism suspects in New York and Illinois. But because of all three suspects' Islamic faith, they say the arrests cast aspersions on Islam that hearken back to the atmosphere that existed immediately after 9/11.

Though most area Muslims are quick to say the mood of the country has not returned to that bitter level, most add that their lives here would be practically unbearable if any Muslim terrorist were to carry out another attack on American soil

"We have to work toward a common yardstick of justice, but we are just one catastrophic incident away from the post-9/11 atmosphere and even worse," said Salam Al-Marayati, executive director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council in Washington, a Muslim civil rights organization. "We have to accept the double standards, as bad as they are. That's just the fact, unfortunately."

And MPAC has not helped. Just the opposite.

Muslims in North Texas say they don't know of any physical assaults on them of late, but that after any high-profile negative event involving Muslims - such as the arrest of Smadi - they face increased racial taunts and verbal harassment.

Poor dears! Poor fragile lambs! Christians in Egypt are being wantonly murdered, but Muslims in North Texas are being...called names!

Al-Marayati says suspicions about Muslims persist, in large part, because Americans - most of whom are Christian - either can't or won't make a distinction between the mainstream and fringe elements of Islam, while they discern that difference for others. He says, for example, that when non-Muslims commit extreme acts, they are quickly dismissed as being crazy or weird or having some deep-seated emotional problem, and are not viewed as representative of an entire group of people.

But Muslim bad actors, he said, don't get the same treatment.

"When a Christian does something ... that's how it's reported, that they happen to be a Christian," Al-Marayati said. "But if it's a Muslim, it's as if it's the [Muslim] religion that's driving it."

Al-Marayati is setting up a familiar smokescreen, but for all its common usage it still doesn't make any sense. Why do people see the Muslim religion as driving terrorist acts? Because Muslims say so. Repeatedly. Just the other day we say Anwar al-Awlaki saying, "Whenever you see the word terrorism, replace it with the word jihad."

In March 2009, five Muslims accused of helping plot the September 11 attacks, including the notorious Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, wrote an "Islamic Response to the Government's Nine Accusations." In it they quote the Koran to justify their jihad war against the American Infidels. "In God's book," asserts the letter, "he ordered us to fight you everywhere we find you, even if you were inside the holiest of all holy cities, The Mosque in Mecca, and the holy city of Mecca, and even during sacred months. In God's book, verse 9 [actually verse 5], Al-Tawbah [the Koran's 9th chapter]: Then fight and slay the pagans wherever you find them, and seize them, and besiege them and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush."

Osama bin Laden's communiqués have also quoted the Koran copiously. In his 1996 "Declaration of War against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places," he quotes seven Koran verses: 3:145; 47:4-6; 2:154; 9:14; 47:19; 8:72; and the notorious "Verse of the Sword," 9:5. Bin Laden began his October 6, 2002, letter to the American people with two Koran quotations, both of a martial bent: "Permission to fight (against disbelievers) is given to those (believers) who are fought against, because they have been wronged and surely, Allah is Able to give them (believers) victory" (22:39) and "Those who believe, fight in the Cause of Allah, and those who disbelieve, fight in the cause of Taghut (anything worshipped other than Allah e.g. Satan). So fight you against the friends of Satan; ever feeble is indeed the plot of Satan" (4:76)."

In a sermon broadcast in 2003, bin Laden rejoiced in a Koranic exhortation to violence as being a means to establish the truth: "Praise be to Allah who revealed the verse of the Sword to his servant and messenger [the Islamic Prophet Muhammad], in order to establish truth and abolish falsehood." The "Verse of the Sword" is Koran 9:5: "Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful."

The idea that the Koran commands them to do violence to unbelievers runs from the very top of the international jihadist movement - Osama bin Laden - down to the rank and file. Overall, it is extremely rare - if not impossible - to find a jihadist who does not cite the Koran to justify his actions. Britain-based jihadist preacher, Abu Yahya, asserts simply, "It says in the Koran that we must try as much as we can to terrorise the enemy." And Pakistani jihad leader Beitullah Mehsud claims that "Allah on 480 occasions in the Holy Koran extols Muslims to wage jihad. We only fulfill God's orders. Only jihad can bring peace to the world." He specified that his jihad - struggle in Arabic - was an offensive military operation: "We will continue our struggle until foreign troops are thrown out. Then we will attack them in the US and Britain until they either accept Islam or agree to pay jazia." The "jazia," or jizya, is a tax that the Koran (9:29) specifies must be levied on Jews, Christians, and some other non-Muslim faiths as a sign of their subjugation under the Islamic social order.

One pro-Osama website put it this way: "The truth is that a Muslim who reads the Koran with devotion is determined to reach the battlefield in order to attain the reality of Jihad. It is solely for this reason that the Kufaar [unbelievers] conspire to keep the Muslims far away from understanding the Koran, knowing that Muslims who understand the Koran will not distance themselves from Jihad."

That is what al-Marayati would not have us notice. There are simply no Christians or Jews committing violence and justifying it with reference to Biblical texts. The situation in Islam is very different.

Mohamed Elibiary, president of the Freedom and Justice Foundation, a Muslim interfaith organization in Plano, agrees.

"The average American thinks it must be the religion" that pushes Muslim extremists, Elibiary said. "There must be something about them. That sentiment has been there since 9/11, and it hasn't gone anywhere."

Re the slick Elibiary, see here. Gee, Mohamed, where could people have gotten that "sentiment"?

| 34 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Ferry Point Bridge from St. Stephen, New Brunswick to Calais, Maine, was closed. "The five people who attempted to cross into the United States are not Canadians and are possibly illegal immigrants - possibly from Afghanistan."

"Possible illegal immigrants leave car, try to enter U.S. on foot, by Derwin Gowan for the Telegraph-Journal, October 19 (thanks to James):

ST. STEPHEN - The RCMP bomb squad stood by in St. Stephen Sunday night as American authorities questioned five people who attempted to enter the United States.

The Canada Border Services Agency closed the Ferry Point Bridge from St. Stephen to Calais, Maine, shortly after 6 p.m. and asked the RCMP to divert traffic. Police at the Calais end of the bridge did the same.

Not only did the police not allow traffic across the bridge but, at the St. Stephen end, they did not allow motorists to drive up Milltown Boulevard past the end of it. Traffic coming one way detoured up Watson Street, the other way up Main Street, to Union Street.

The five people who attempted to cross into the United States are not Canadians and are possibly illegal immigrants - possibly from Afghanistan, RCMP J Division media relations officer Sgt. Claude Tremblay said late Sunday night from Fredericton.

"The reason we closed the bridge is because they left their vehicle and went on foot," Tremblay said....

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
Islam In Action is on the case.
| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
Introducing a new running feature: my Qur'an commentary, Blogging the Qur'an, in Spanish, translated by Aymenn Jawad al-Tamimi.

Traducido por Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi.

La 'Fátiha' (el principio) es la sura (capítulo) primera del Corán y la oración más común del Islam. Si es usted musulmán devoto que reza cinco veces al día (como se requiere en el Islam), recitará la Fátiha diecisiete veces a lo largo de esas oraciones. Según una tradición islámica, el profeta Mohamed dijo que la Fátiha superó cualquier cosa que revelara Alá ('el Dios' en árabe, y la palabra de Dios utilizada por los cristianos y los judíos que hablen árabe, así como los musulmanes) en la Torah, y el Evangelio o en el resto del Corán. De hecho, describe de manera eficaz y elocuente muchos temas principales del Corán y del Islam en general: Alá es el Señor de los Mundos que debe ser adorado y pedido por la ayuda, y el juez misericordioso de todas las almas en el Último Día.

En la teología islámica, Alá es el altavoz de todas las palabras del Corán. Algunos han pensado que es extraño que Alá diga algo como 'Alabado sea Alá, Señor de los Mundos', pero en el Islam tradicional se entiende que Alá le reveló esta oración a Mohamed a los principios de su carrera como profeta (que empezó en el año 610 EC, cuando recibió su primera revelación de Alá a través del ángel Gabriel- una revelación que se ha incluido ahora en el capítulo noventa y seis del Corán) para que los musulmanes supieran rezar.

Los dos versículos últimos de la Fátiha les importan más a los no musulmanes y son la razón por la cual se ha visto recientemente en las noticias. Un sacerdote chiita, Husham Al Husainy, ocasionó controversia por parafrasear este pasaje durante una oración en una reunión de invierno de la Comisión Nacional Democrática, implicando que rezaba para que los que convinieran se hicieran musulmanes. Pues Imam Yusuf Kavakci de la Mezquita Centra de Dallas rezó la Fátiha en el Senado del Estado de Texas, dando lugar a las mismas preocupaciones.

Los dos versículos últimos de la Fátiha piden a Alá: 'Muéstranos el camino recto, el camino de los que hayas apoyado; ni el camino de los que ganen tu ira ni el camino de los que se extravíen.' Se entiende en el Islam tradicional que el 'camino recto' es el Islam- vea usted el libro del apologista islámico Juan Espósito que se llama 'El Islam: El Camino Recto'. El camino de los que hayan ganado la ira de Alá son los judíos, y los que se hayan extraviado son los cristianos.

El comentador clásico del Corán Ibn Kathir explica que 'los dos caminos que describió él aquí son equivocados,' y que los 'dos caminos son las de los cristianos y de los judíos, lo que es un hecho del que debe estar enterado el creyente para que los evite. El camino de los creyentes es saber la verdad y atenerse a él. En contraste, los judíos abandonaron la religión, mientras que los cristianos perdieron el conocimiento verdadero. Esto es por qué los judíos ganaron la 'ira', mientras la frase 'los que se extravíen' es más apropiada de los cristianos'.

La interpretación de Ibn Kathir de este pasaje no es una interpretación 'extremista' solitaria. De hecho, la mayoría de los comentadores musulmanes creen que los judíos son los que han ganado la ira de Alá y los cristianos son los que se han extraviado. Esto es lo que opinan Tabari, Zamakhshari, el 'Táfsir Al Jalalayn', el 'Tánwir al-Miqbas min Tafsir Ibn Abbas', y Ibn Arabi, junto con Ibn Kathir. Una opinión diferente, pero no de la mayoría, es la de Nisaburi que dice que 'los que han ganado la ira de Alá son la gente de negligencia, y los que se han extraviado son la gente desmesurada'.

Los wahabís fueron criticados hace unos años porque agregaron 'tales como los judíos' y 'tales como los cristianos' en las glosas entre paréntesis en este pasaje de los Coranes impresos en Arabia Saudita. Algunos comentadores occidentales se imaginaron que los Saudís crearon esta interpretación, y de hecho toda la idea de la hostilidad del Corán contra los judíos y los cristianos. Los musulmanes por todo el mundo aprenden como parte de su religión que la oración central de su fe anatematiza a los judíos y los cristianos.

Sin embargo, esta interpretación es desafortunadamente venerable y tradicional en la teología islámica. No es probable que imprimir la interpretación entre paréntesis en una traducción afecte a las actitudes musulmanas, ya que el texto árabe es siempre y en todos los lugares normativo en cualquier caso, y ya que tantos comentarios tradicionales contienen la idea de que los judíos y los cristianos son criticados aquí. Diecisiete veces al día, por los devotos.

Tenga la bondad de notar que no digo que las actitudes anti-judías y anti-cristianas de la interpretación de la Fátiha son las 'correctas'. Aunque no creo que los textos religiosos sean infinitamente maleables y se puedan interpretar de cualquier manera que quiera el lector, como creen aparentemente algunos, en este caso la interpretación de Nisaburi es tan aceptable como las demás: no hay nada en el texto que le obligue absolutamente que crea usted que se habla de los judíos y de los cristianos. Y se debe señalar que en su comentario masivo del Corán de 30 volúmenes y llamado evocativamente, Fi Zilal Al-Qur'an (en la Sombra del Corán), el teorista yihadista del siglo veinte Sayyid Qutb no menciona ni a los judíos ni a los cristianos en relación con este pasaje. Sin embargo, la idea en el Islam de que los judíos han ganado la ira de Alá y que los cristianos se han extraviado no depende solamente de este pasaje. Los judíos han ganado la ira de Alá porque rechazaron a Mohamed (2:87-90) y que los cristianos se han extraviado porque creyeron en la divinidad de Cristo (5:72).

Los Hadith, las tradiciones de las palabras y de los hechos de Mohamed y de los musulmanes primeros, contienen también materias diciendo que los judíos han ganado la ira de Alá y que los cristianos se han extraviado del camino recto. (Los judíos son malditos también, según Corán 2:89, y los dos son malditos según 9:30). Un hadith cuenta que un musulmán temprano, Zaid bin 'Amr bin Nufail se reunió en sus viajes con los eruditos judíos y cristianos. El erudito judío le dijo, 'No te harás judío si no recibes una parte de la ira de Alá', y el erudito cristiano dijo, 'No te harás cristiano si no recibes una parte de la maldición de Alá.' Por supuesto, Zaid se hizo musulmán.

A causa de éstos y otros pasajes semejantes no debería ser sorprendente que muchos comentadores musulmanes hayan entendido que la Fátiha encapsula estos puntos de vista.

La semana que viene: Una introducción al capítulo más largo del Corán, Sura 2, 'Al-Baqarah', y un análisis breve de los versículos 1-39.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

PostAmPres.jpg

From Publishers Weekly:

Questioning the Commander-in-Chief

In a quick pre-Frankfurt six-figure sale, Mitchell Ivers at Simon & Schuster/Threshold acquired world English-language rights to The Post-American Presidency by Pamela Geller, the popular Atlas Shrugged blogger, and four-time New York Times bestselling author Robert Spencer (The Truth About Muhammad and The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam [and the Crusades]). Scott Mendel at the Mendel Media group did the deal and says the book will appeal far beyond Threshold's conservative base. Publication is expected in July 2010.
| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Flow of terrorist recruits increasing: Westerners attending camps in Pakistan and Afghanistan despite successful U.S. strikes," by Craig Whitlock for the Washington Post, October 19 (thanks to all who sent this in):

BERLIN -- Midway through a propaganda video released last month by a group calling itself the German Taliban, a surprise guest made an appearance: a cleanshaven, muscular gunman sporting the alias Abu Ibrahim the American.

The gunman did not speak but wore military fatigues and waved his rifle as subtitles identified him as an American. The video contained a stream of threats against Germany if it did not withdraw its troops from the NATO-led mission in Afghanistan. Although the American's part in the film lasted only a few seconds, it has alarmed German and U.S. intelligence officials, who are still puzzling over his background, his real identity and how he became involved with the terrorist group.

U.S. and European counterterrorism officials say a rising number of Western recruits -- including Americans -- are traveling to Afghanistan and Pakistan to attend paramilitary training camps. The flow of recruits has continued unabated, officials said, in spite of an intensified campaign over the past year by the CIA to eliminate al-Qaeda and Taliban commanders in drone missile attacks.

Since January, at least 30 recruits from Germany have traveled to Pakistan for training, according to German security sources. About 10 people -- not necessarily the same individuals -- have returned to Germany this year, fueling concerns that fresh plots are in the works against European targets....

Read it all.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Another Which-Side-Is-Obama-On Alert. Whether officials believe it or not, the Obama administration is thus validating Sudanese feelings of having been wronged by prior reactions from the civilized world to the genocide in Darfur and the institutionalized abuse in the south of the country.

It is highly likely that Sudan will get something for nothing (or for a token gesture), and all the U.S. will get out of it is another cycle of obfuscation, equivocation, and broken promises, not unlike the cases of Iran and North Korea. "U.S. to shift Sudan policy, pursue greater engagement," from CNN, October 19:

WASHINGTON (CNN) - The United States will change its policy on Sudan to pursue greater engagement with the Sudanese government and less isolation, senior U.S. officials said Monday.
"Our conscience and our interests in peace and security call upon the United States and the international community to act with a sense of urgency and purpose," President Barack Obama said in a written statement.
The revised strategy aims to end conflict and genocide in the western region of Darfur. It also seeks to ensure the effective implementation of a 2005 peace treaty that ended a civil war between mostly Muslim northern Sudan and the country's Christian and animist south, which killed more than 2 million people.
The United States also wants to keep Sudan from becoming a safe haven for terrorists.
More than 300,000 people have died in Darfur while over 3 million more have been displaced, according to U.N. estimates, in a campaign of killing and rape that the United States has denounced as genocide.
The shift towards greater engagement comes after an "intensive review across the United States government," Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said.
"Sudan today is at a critical juncture," and while achieving peace and stability will not be easy, "sitting on the sidelines is not an option," she added.
Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said the Obama administration will "employ calibrated incentives as appropriate and exert real pressure as needed."
The U.S. government will seek verifiable consequences and ensure "significant consequences for parties that backslide or simply stand still," she said.
The new policy represents a shift for Obama, who indicated a preference for greater sanctions during last year's presidential campaign. At the time, he also backed the possible establishment of a no-fly zone to protect residents of Darfur from the Sudanese air force.
White House advisers have been divided over the proper approach towards the government in Khartoum. Retired Air Force Maj. J. Scott Gration, the U.S. special envoy to Sudan, was lambasted by liberal critics for suggesting wooing the Sudanese government with "cookies" and "gold stars, smiley faces, handshakes, agreements, talk (and) engagement." Rice has reportedly pushed for a tougher, more confrontational position.
Violence in Darfur erupted in 2003 after rebels began an uprising against the Sudanese government. To counter the rebels, Arab militias with ties to the government went from village to village in Darfur, killing, torturing and raping residents, according to human rights organizations.

This is the leader we're "engaging":

Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir has been indicted by the International Criminal Court on charges of war crimes.
| 53 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Now why would he read verses from the Book of Peace before committing an act of murderous violence? Find out in my book The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran.

"Suicide bomber read verses before attack," from Corriere della Sera, October 19 (thanks to C. Cantoni):

MILAN - A small green-painted door opens onto the balcony. Inside, an old sofa stands against one wall. Resting on the cushions was a Koran open at the Cow Surah, the verses that suicide bombers read before they go out to blow themselves up. The book was the last trace left by Mohamed Game in his lair, a third-floor flat in a block in Via Gulli. Just after seven o'clock last Monday morning, Game prayed before the open pages. Then he picked up his explosives-packed toolbox and left. He went down three floors of stairs to the street, turned left and went on his way. At a normal pace, it would have taken him just over five minutes to reach the nearby barracks in Piazzale Perrucchetti, at the end of the street. Seven hundred and fifty metres separated Game from martyrdom. It has been a week since the attack on the Santa Barbara barracks in Milan....
| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Sharia Alert from...Washington, D.C. As Weasel Zippers points out, just imagine the national and international outcry if a tea party protester had said this. But this will receive no notice from anyone.

| 44 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This video is nothing short of shocking, as radio host and author John Ziegler is repeatedly berated and abused by David Keene of the American Conservative Union for the crime of asking questions that make Keene uncomfortable. Video thanks to Pamela, who has the background -- don't miss it.

What does this have to do with jihad? Everything. The Ziegler video, with its depiction of Keene's egregious behavior, gives a good opportunity to spotlight the failure of the conservative mainstream to deal with the jihad issue. David Keene is not only the head of the ACU, but also of the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), which I criticized in Newsweek last February for its Grover Norquist-mandated refusal to deal with the jihad or Islamic supremacism in any meaningful or effective way.

At the time I was interviewed by Newsweek, Pamela Geller was working tirelessly behind the scenes to secure a speaking slot for Geert Wilders at CPAC, but CPAC was dragging its feet. With that in mind, I told Newsweek that people were afraid to deal with this issue, and added at Jihad Watch that "Keene's, or someone's, priorities are seriously out of order. Wilders should be front and center at CPAC, and the defense of free speech its central theme."

I didn't know it at the time, but after I was interviewed by Newsweek and before their article appeared, Keene decided to honor Wilders at CPAC and give him an award. But when the Newsweek piece hit, with quotes from me as well as David Horowitz saying, "How is it possible that a conservative conference does not have a single panel on the threat from radical Islam?," Keene was furious. He was so furious that he canceled the award for Wilders and refused to let him speak at all, saying he wasn't going to look as if he was being pushed around by Robert Spencer. Suddenly a few remarks in Newsweek by David Horowitz and me were controlling David Keene's world. Principles? Free speech? Jihad and Islamization? Pah. For Keene, it was just a schoolyard fight, and he was behaving like a schoolyard bully -- as he does here with Ziegler.

Pamela Geller, of course, had the last laugh. She never gave up, and single-handedly organized a wildly successful evening for Wilders that was held at the Omni Hotel in Washington, the site of CPAC, during the time CPAC was being held, but it was not a CPAC event. She gave Wilders much greater, more effective exposure than he got an any other stop on his American tour at the time -- indeed, it was a great event, an event for the ages. I was honored to be able to assist a bit with that effort, and to speak briefly there. Her amazing work shows what one determined and hard-working citizen can accomplish, despite the roadblocks thrown in her way by the likes of David Keene. See Pamela's account and pictures here and her other reports here.

And this video now shows yet again -- the conservative movement needs new leadership. David Keene should be removed from any leadership role with the ACU and CPAC. But as long as Grover Norquist, with his jihadist friends and allies, still wields so much influence among conservatives, that is unlikely to happen.

Don't miss this video also. As Ziegler says, "If David Keene is a leader in the conservative movement, that's a movement I don't want to be part of." Amen to that.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I discussed the Islamic reforms of Syed Ahmad Khan in my 2003 book Onward Muslim Soldiers. His life, as this retrospective shows, illustrates why there are so few Islamic reformers, and the enormous difficulties they face. "How the clergy wanted Sir Syed beheaded," by Arif Mohammed Khan in the Times of India, October 19 (thanks to Mohan):

Sir Syed Ahmad Khan was the first Muslim voice of reform in India. He emerged on the scene at a time when Indian Muslim society was sunk in obscurantism and inertia and showed no desire to struggle out of its medieval grooves. The unwholesome influence of clergy had made them view modern education as incompatible with and hostile to religion.

The abortive uprising of 1857 and the cleric call to jihad made Muslims target of British wrath and reprisals. Sir Syed as a judicial officer served the government during the crisis but the aftermath of disturbances deeply impacted him.

He wrote: "I reflected about the decadence of the Muslim community, and came to the conclusion that modern education alone is the remedy of the ills they are suffering from. I decided on a strategy to disabuse their minds of strong communal belief that the study of European literature and science is anti-religion and promotes disbelief."

The objectives of Sir Syed, born in early 19th century (October 17, 1817), were educational and social reforms; he had no desire to dabble in religion. But all his initiatives were opposed in the name of religion.

Describing his dilemma, Sir Syed said: "We were keen to avoid any discussion of religion, but the problem is that our behaviours, social practices and religious beliefs are so mixed up that no discussion of social reform is possible without provoking a religious controversy." Frustrated with the clergy, he added, "When urged to give up something harmful, they say it has religious merit and when asked to do something positive they assert it is prohibited by religion. So we have no options but discuss the religious context to push our agenda forward." [...]

The intensity of opposition can be understood from the comments of Maulana Abul Hasan Ali Nadwi in his book "Islamiat aur Maghribiat ki Kashmakash" written more than 60 years after Sir Syed's death. Maulana says: "ËœThe education mission of Sir Syed and his advocacy of Western civilization became correlatives and caused apprehensions and doubts in the minds of people. A wave of opposition took hold of the religious circles and his movement met with a simultaneous call for its boycott."

First Sir Syed was targeted when he shared food with the British and defended his action in a signed article. The opposition became fierce during his stay in London. Sir Syed responded through a memorandum saying: "The terrifying call of Kanpur, the lyrical satire of Lucknow, the idle tattle of Agra and Allahabad, the fatwas of Rampur and Bareilly and the snide remarks of holy men of Delhi grieve me not. My heart is overflowing with the idea of welfare of my people and there is no room in it for any anger or rancor."

Conscious of cleric hostility Sir Syed offered not to have any role in matters of religious instruction in the college and invited leading clerics to prepare the syllabus. Maulana Qasim Nanotvi and Maulana Yaqoob of Deoband shot down the proposal saying they cannot associate with an institution which will have Shia students on the campus.

Maulana Hali in his biography of Sir Syed says that 60 maulvis and alims had signed fatwas accusing Sir Syed of disbelief and apostasy. There was total consensus among the Indian clerics, only divine approval was missing. Maulvi Ali Bakhsh did the needful and travelled to Mecca and Medina on the pretext of pilgrimage and secured a fatwa calling for beheading of Sir Syed if he repented not and persisted with his plan to establish the college....

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The invitation to Islam has long been a prelude to war if the invited party fails to return an RSVP in the affirmative:

Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war...When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them....If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them. (Sahih Muslim 4294)

That hadith restates and elaborates upon Qur'an 9:29, which offers unbelievers conversion, subjugation or death:

Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Choudary is not deluding himself that the Queen is likely to break into programming on the BBC and recite the shahada, the Islamic profession of faith. He's just following protocol. "Hate preacher tells Queen: Turn Muslim," by Simon Hughes for Sun, October 18:

Hate preacher Anjem Choudary sparked fury yesterday after calling for the Queen to become Muslim.
He demanded an Islamic revolution across Britain.
Choudary, 42, said Her Majesty - head of the Church of England - should convert to ensure her place in paradise.
He also wants to see senior members of the Government switching faiths. Choudary, a key henchman of rabble rousing cleric Omar Bakri, said: "We invite everyone from the Queen, to the ministers, to the Parliament, to the aristocracy, to the ordinary person in Britain to embrace Islam.
"Save yourself and your children in this life from misery and prepare them for a great destiny in the hereafter."
He made his call during an internet rant to promote a march in London later this month supporting Sharia law.
The ex-lawyer also made a scathing reference to the next general election, declaring: "Britain does not need a new leader, it needs a revolution - an Islamic revolution."
Labour MP Andrew Dismore said: "It'd be laughable if we didn't know that some take this man seriously." A Muslim group branded Choudary an "extremist nut".

That was MPACUK, the Muslim Public Affairs Committee in the U.K., seizing on a moment at which Choudary's "extremism" might make them look "moderate," though their own track record is none too impressive, either.

| 58 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

October 18, 2009

Would that they were all like this. "Terrorist plot unravels at rural Oregon ranch," by Les Zaitz for The Oregonian, October 17 (thanks to James):

Oussama Kassir, a self-proclaimed al-Qaida tough guy, flew into a rage after his late-night arrival at a remote Oregon ranch.

The barren rangeland, suggestive of Afghanistan, was to become an Islamic fighter training base.

Kassir expected to be welcomed by Muslim recruits, eager to learn the ways of war.

Instead, he got an Islamic leader from Seattle, a mentally impaired 18-year-old and two women more interested in canning jars than jihad.

Kassir expected access to a weapons armory.

He got one pistol and a .22-caliber rifle.

The events that led to the effort 10 years ago to establish a jihad camp outside Bly have been well-chronicled. But testimony and exhibits from Kassir's trial in New York provide the fullest account to date of what went on behind the gates of the Dog Cry Ranch.

What emerges from the trial record is an almost comic account of passwords, night patrols and target practice. Jihad, it seems, couldn't take root alongside the sagebrush and weeds that greeted Kassir.

Kassir recently was sentenced to life in prison for his effort, and his two partners in the enterprise are awaiting extradition to the U.S.

The whole set up was in fact a hustle by a petty crook from Seattle named James Ujaama.

An "Islamic time share"

Ujaama envisioned the Oregon camp as an Islamic time share, selling visits to foreign Muslims. Twice he lured groups from his Seattle mosque for weekend visits to the ranch. They thought they were going on a bit of a Western adventure -- riding, shooting and chasing cows.

In late 1999, Ujaama pitched a more grave version to a London imam, Abu Hamza al-Masri. The hook-handed preacher was known for fiery oratory, lashing the West while secretly arranging entree for Muslims to militant camps in Afghanistan. Ujaama promised al-Masri a safe haven, recruits and weapons to transform the desert ranch into a Muslim military training camp.

Al-Masri bought the pitch, and Kassir soon found himself on a trans-Atlantic flight to the U.S. He would later boast that he had trained in al-Qaida camps in Afghanistan. He brought along a partner, Haroon Aswat, supposedly an al-Qaida trainer himself. Aswat later would spend time in an al-Qaida safe house in Pakistan, his visit recorded in a ledger bearing the fingerprints of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed -- the mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

For the Oregon trip, the wiry Aswat packed homemade training CDs with graphic instructions on how to make bombs and poisons.

One manual warned that making poison was "more dangerous than making explosives. Always use good protective clothing. I know too many mujahedeen whose lungs and bodies are messed up due to the lack of quality protection equipment." [...]

And when it all unraveled:

Kassir and Aswat took refuge in a Seattle mosque and tried taking the training to the Muslims who hadn't wanted to move to Bly.

After a few classes, the men from London gave up and packed their bags for home. Kassir explained his exasperation to Osman.

"I've been trying to train these brothers," Kassir said. "They're not taking it seriously."

Good on them.

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Hizballah is accusing Israel, but the evidence points to...Hizballah. "Another Mysterious Explosion in Southern Lebanon Panics Residents," by Edward Yeranian for VOA News, October 18 (thanks to Maxwell):

An explosion early Sunday in southern Lebanon, close to the Israeli border, caused residents to panic and reportedly prompted the Lebanese Army to fire anti-aircraft guns into the air. It's not immediately clear what caused the blast, although Hezbollah supporters are rushing to accuse Israel.

What a surprise!

The explosion, early Sunday, between the southern Lebanese border towns of Houla and Mais al-Jabal is the latest in a series of unexplained blasts to hit the region, over the past month. United Nations peacekeeping forces (UNIFIL) were quickly sent to the area to investigate....

Voix du Liban Radio reported that Lebanese Army troops in the garrison town of Marjayoun fired anti-aircraft guns at Israeli drones, which overflew the area. The radio also claimed that the drones destroyed part of a Hezbollah communications link.

Lebanon's official government news agency also accused Israel of blowing up Hezbollah communications equipment, but it was impossible to verify the claim.

The explosion follows another blast, Monday, in the southern Lebanese town of Teir Felsay, which has a strong Hezbollah presence. Hezbollah denied accusations that a secret weapons depot had exploded.

Israel later showed footage taken by a drone, showing men unloading heavy objects from a large convoy of trucks, insisting that they were rockets. Hezbollah claimed the objects were metal garage doors.

Hilal Khashan, professor of political science at the American University of Beirut, calls the series of recent explosions an "ominous sign," and says they give the world community "the impression that Hezbollah is sabotaging the peace and violating U.N. Resolution 1701."

Khashan says that Hezbollah has been giving a long series of excuses for recent explosions that many find difficult to believe:

"An explosion occurred last week, one last night, and one maybe a month ago," said Khashan. "The first two explosions, Hezbollah gave excuses and attributed them to meddling with Israeli leftovers from the 2006 war. Now, it would be extremely difficult for Hezbollah to keep giving us excuses about bombs from the 2006 summer war. So, the pressure will mount on Hezbollah to explain its position. My fear is that these spates of explosions will eventually put the country on another round of war with Israel."...

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Give up terrorism? Renounce Sharia? Cut out the rocket attacks? End the suicide bombings? Stop the genocidal rhetoric? Nope. They don't have to do a single thing. No preconditions. Let's establish that terror base state now!

"National Security Advisor Reiterates US Commitment to Peace, Palestinian State at ATFP Gala," from the American Task Force for Palestine, October 16 (thanks to Pamela):

Washington, DC, Oct. 16 -- At the Oct. 15 Fourth Annual Gala of the American Task Force on Palestine (ATFP), the National Security Advisor, General James L. Jones, reiterated the Administration's commitment to establishing a Palestinian state and determination to move forward with peace talks.

"We are clear, unambiguous and consistent," said Gen. Jones, "The time has come to relaunch negotiations without preconditions to reach a final status agreement on two states." The National Security Advisor emphasized that, "President Obama's dedication to achieve these goals is unshaken, is committed, and we will be relentless in our pursuit of achieving these." He said that ending the conflict and the occupation is essential because what is at stake is "nothing less than the dignity and the security of all human beings." "We must move beyond talking about talks and get to the hard work of addressing the core issues that separate Israelis and Palestinians," Jones said....

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Islamic apologists will again assure us that honor killing has nothing to do with Islam and is a cultural practice followed by a wide variety of peoples -- and yet Muslim girls keep getting killed in disproportionate numbers. No one, of course, dares to confront the root of the problem by pointing out such inconvenient truths as the fact that a manual of Islamic law certified by Al-Azhar as a reliable guide to Sunni orthodoxy says that "retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right." However, "not subject to retaliation" is "a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring." ('Umdat al-Salik o1.1-2).

In other words, someone who kills his child incurs no legal penalty under Islamic law. In accord with this, in 2003 the Jordanian Parliament voted down on Islamic grounds a provision designed to stiffen penalties for honor killings. Al-Jazeera reported that "Islamists and conservatives said the laws violated religious traditions and would destroy families and values."

"She got pregnant outside marriage, so father killed her: police," from AFP, October 19 (thanks to Andrew):

A Jordanian man was charged on Sunday with premeditated murder after allegedly stabbing to death his 22-year-old daughter because she became pregnant outside wedlock, police said.

"The father and his brother took the girl on Saturday to a doctor because she suffered stomach pains, and everybody was surprised to learn that she was six months pregnant," a police spokesman said.

"On their way home, the father stabbed the girl with a sword 25 times in her stomach, killing her immediately as well as her unborn baby boy."...

Murder is punishable by the death penalty in Jordan but in such cases of the so-called "honour killings" a court usually commutes or reduces sentences, particularly if the victim's family urges leniency.

In the past, parliament has refused to institute harsher penalties.

Around 15-20 women are murdered each year in Jordan in the name of honour, despite government efforts to fight such crimes. So far this year, 17 cases have been reported.

| 47 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Somehow Sa'd Al-Din Al-Shazli seems to have gotten the crazy idea that the Koran makes it incumbent upon Muslims to wage war against Israel. Now where could he have gotten such an impression of the Book of Peace? Has he been listening to greasy Islamophobes? Hasn't he read the Book of Peace for himself?

For a clue as to how this really might have happened, consult my book The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran. "Former Egyptian Chief of Staff Sa'd Al-Din Shazli: There Will Definitely Be More Wars between the Arabs and Israel," from MEMRI TV, August 17 and September 14 (posted more recently), with thanks to John):

Following are excerpts from two interviews with former Egyptian chief of staff Sa'd Al-Din Al-Shazli, which aired on Al-Jazeera TV on August 17, 2009 and September 14, 2009.

[...] The [Soviets] said to us openly, even in the days of Gamal Abd Al-Nasser: "We supply [arms] to you so that you can retrieve the land you lost in June 1967, but the destruction of Israel is where we draw the line."

Interviewer: That's an important point.

Sa'd Al-Din Al-Shazli: Of course. Who are we to destroy Israel?! There was still a long way to go... They could give us weapons, knowing for sure that we were a long way from destroying Israel, which was the red line of the USSR vis-à-vis the US. Obviously, this could be done only under a different international balance of power.

Interviewer: If you had destroyed Israel's military force in the Sinai and the "Seam Line," this would be tantamount to the destruction of Israel.

Sa'd Al-Din Al-Shazli: No, no. Even if we had destroyed their armored brigades, we could not have reached the straits. We could not reach the straits as long as the Israeli air force was in place. We did not yet have mobile air defense systems. There was still a long way to go. The destruction of Israel is still difficult to accomplish. The [Soviets] helped us only to retrieve our land, and even this - in stages.

[...]

Interviewer: Do you expect future wars between the Arabs and Israel, or was the October 1973 war the last war, as some people have claimed?

Sa'd Al-Din Al-Shazli: There will definitely be more wars. This is based on our belief in God, the Koran, and the Prophet Muhammad.

Interviewer: So you do not ignore the aspect of faith...

Sa'd Al-Din Al-Shazli: Absolutely not. Without the aspect of faith, we could not have done a thing. Without faith, we are nothing. Like any regular person, faith is the basis for everything. The words "Allah Akbar" are a central component of victory. The great thing is that this religious perception is supported by the strategic perception, which says that sooner or later, the Arabs will definitely defeat the Jews, or defeat Israel.

Interviewer: That is the strategic perception?

Sa'd Al-Din Al-Shazli: This is definite.

We'll see about that.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Able to observe the Taliban close up for an extended period, a New York Times reporter discovers that they aren't actually the moderate nationalists that his own paper may have led him to believe they were. "7 Months, 10 Days in Captivity," by David Rohde in the New York Times, October 17 (thanks to Sounder):

Over those months, I came to a simple realization. After seven years of reporting in the region, I did not fully understand how extreme many of the Taliban had become. Before the kidnapping, I viewed the organization as a form of "Al Qaeda lite," a religiously motivated movement primarily focused on controlling Afghanistan.

Living side by side with the Haqqanis' followers, I learned that the goal of the hard-line Taliban was far more ambitious. Contact with foreign militants in the tribal areas appeared to have deeply affected many young Taliban fighters. They wanted to create a fundamentalist Islamic emirate with Al Qaeda that spanned the Muslim world.

And beyond. As Beitullah Mehsud put it in 2007, "We will continue our struggle until foreign troops are thrown out. Then we will attack them in the US and Britain until they either accept Islam or agree to pay jazia (a tax in Islam for non-Muslims living in an Islamic state)."

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
WeaPens.jpg
My friend Bosch Fawstin at Big Hollywood:
This one's for the writers and artists who tell the truth about the enemy, using the enemy's own words and actions against them.
| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Indeed it does. "Editorial: The U.N. sides with terrorists," from the Washington Times, October 19 (thanks to Choi):

[...] On a factual level, the Goldstone report is notoriously flawed and one-sided. Much of the 575-page document was cut and pasted from unsubstantiated and suspect reports from nongovernmental organizations with openly anti-Israel sentiments. Some of the "witnesses" interviewed by the mission were disguised Hamas officials. The fact that Hamas loves the report should raise eyebrows about its contents.

Even more troublingly is the report's fatal moral blind spot, which is ignoring the differences between Israel, a sovereign state, and Hamas, a terrorist organization. The Israeli armed forces are professional organizations governed by strict policies to limit civilian deaths during the conduct of war. Israel is a signatory to the Geneva conventions and respects the rights of noncombatants. After the conflict, Israel conducted some 100 investigations into reports of misconduct by its troops.

Killing civilians is central to Hamas' military doctrine. Hamas launched 7,000 rocket and mortar attacks on Israeli cities between the pullout from Gaza in 2005 and 2009. During the ground fighting in Gaza, Hamas routinely used mosques, schools and hospitals as military sites and employed civilians as human shields. Hamas exploited the chaos of the conflict to round up Palestinian political opponents, some of whom were crippled with shots to the legs, while others were reportedly executed.

There is no moral equality between Hamas and Israel any more than there is between al Qaeda and the United States. Yet under the Goldstone logic, terrorists and sovereign states are identical. The incidental, unintentional civilian deaths Israel caused during the Gaza conflict are condemned as war crimes; the widespread and intentional Hamas attacks on Israeli civilians are basically ignored. The Goldstone model makes it impossible for civilized states to strike effectively against the world's barbarians who are fighting a shadow war against decency that views innocent noncombatants as both legitimate targets and useful shields.

The United States voted against the report and will presumably use its veto power if action is taken before the Security Council....

Really? One would hope so, but in this age of Obama, when the U.S. cosponsors (with Egypt) an anti-free speech resolution at the United Nations, one cannot be so sure.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More peace-loving peace and love from the peaceful, loving, tolerant Palestinians. "Palestinian children learn: English is the language of the enemy," by Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik for Palestinian Media Watch, October 18:

Hamas children's program, "Tomorrow's Pioneers", last week included a part in which children learned that it is important to know English because it is "the language of their enemy."

Following is the transcript:
Child host: "What do you want to be in the future, Allah willing?"
Child caller: "A teacher of the English language."
Host: "Why do you want to be specifically an English teacher?"
Child: "To teach children the language of their enemy." [Child host smiles.]
Host: "Very nice. A great field. It is not enough for us to know our own language... We also want to study the language of our enemies, to know how to have contacts with them, and so that we can convey the message of Palestinian children..."
Nassur: "Like me! Just like I know the Zionist enemy's language."
Host: "Really?"
Nassur: "Hebrew."
Host: "Okay, speak [in Hebrew]."
Nassur: "I can't." [laughing].
[Al-Aqsa (Hamas) TV, Oct. 16, 2009]

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." -- Koran 9:29

"Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war, do not embezzle the spoils; do not break your pledge; and do not mutilate (the dead) bodies; do not kill the children. When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them....If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them." -- Sahih Muslim 4294

"If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess [i.e., a slave girl]..." -- Koran 4:3

Feel the love. "Taliban in Pakistan Warns Christian Leaders to Convert to Islam or Face Dire Consequences," from International Christian Concern via AINA, October 16 (thanks to Weasel Zippers):

Washington -- International Christian Concern (ICC) has learned that on October 6, members of the Taliban sent threatening letters in Sargodha, Pakistan warning Christian leaders to convert to Islam or face dire consequences.

A copy of the letter obtained by ICC warns Christians to convert to Islam, pay Jizya tax (an Islamic tax imposed on religious minorities) or leave the country. If Christians refuse to accept the choices given to them, the letter explains that they "would be killed, their property and homes would be burnt to ashes and their women would be treated as sex slaves. And they themselves would be responsible for this."

Rev. Zaheer Khan, pastor of Maghoo Memorial Church, Rev. Aamir Azeem, pastor of United Christians Church and Rev. Zafar Akhter, pastor of United Presbyterian Church each received a copy of threatening letter.

The Islamists sent the letters to the following Christian institutions: St Peter's Middle School, Sargodha Institute of Technology, Sargodha Catholic High School, St John's Primary School and Fatima Hospital.

Besides the Christian institutions, the letter was also sent to the main Immam-Bar-Gha (Shiite Muslim's gathering hall). Shiites are a minority Muslim group in Pakistan where the majority of the population is Sunni Muslim....

| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Quaere: Why is Turkey in NATO? Is Turkish membership of any value, or is it a danger to the effectiveness of NATO as that organization must necessarily turn its attention away from Russia to the threat from Islam worldwide, and especially to the threat, foreign and domestic, that Muslims who take Islam seriously pose to the West and to the West's most important military alliance, NATO?

Of what conceivable good, of what possible benefit, is Turkish membership in NATO to the other members of NATO? And why should Turkey be a member, and not instead a country that is of far greater value militarily and morally to that very West that NATO was originally established to protect -- that is, Israel?

| 35 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This sort of thing couldn't have anything to do with Muhammad's dictum that "war is deceit," could it? Naaah. To think that would be "Islamophobic." "Jewish Leaders, Israel at Odds Over Ties With Muslim Group," by Nathan Guttman in the Forward, October 14 (issue of October 23), with thanks to Joel:

The Muslim World League, an organization emerging as a ubiquitous presence on the interfaith conference circuit, boasts close ties to the Saudi monarchy and produces a magazine that has published antisemitic screeds.

That dual identity has put Jewish groups in a bind in deciding how to relate to the group and the widely attended, high-profile interfaith forums it is producing on behalf of the Saudi king, Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz.

In September, Jewish groups abruptly withdrew their participation in one of those interfaith conferences after the league's magazine published an article depicting the world media as under total control of the Jews.

But now, in part at Israel's apparent behest, one of the Jewish community's primary umbrella groups for interfaith affairs plans to proceed with an unprecedented trialogue this December involving world Jewry, the Vatican and -- representing Islam -- the MWL.

At Israel's apparent behest? What on earth are the Israelis thinking? Sometimes we let Realpolitik get the better of us, to our own detriment.

Read it all.

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Wait a minute. Can we get Michael Kruse on this? How about Meredith Heagney? Or maybe even Honest Ibe Hooper and Brave Ahmed Rehab of CAIR? I mean, don't these people know that Islam doesn't call for the killing of apostates? Where is M. Cherif Bassiouni when you need him?

"Parliament takes on revised penal code," by Ahmed Naish for Minivan News, October 14 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

The revised penal code was sent to a seven member ad hoc committee today for further review with unanimous consent of MPs.

All 60 MPs in attendance voted in favour of sending the bill to committee. The new penal code will come into effect a year after it is passed....

Existing laws and regulations, principles of Islamic sharia and norms and values acceptable to Maldivians were taken as the basis for drafting the law, he said.

Suood said difficulties arose when there were conflicts between the three. "Some Islamic sharia punishments are not enforced in the Maldives. For example, there is no amputation for thieves or death for apostates."

Another difficulty was disagreements among fiqh scholars in interpreting the Qur'an and the hadiths, he continued, and the traditional values and practices in the country were considered in such cases....

Several MPs said Islamic sharia should take precedence in specifying offences and punishments and spoke in favour of introducing the death penalty.

Ungoofaru MP Dr Afrashim Ali of the opposition Dhivehi Rayyithunge Party (DRP) said the penal code did not include offences specified in Islamic fiqh or law, adding it was obligatory to enforce punishments set out in Islam.

Apart from the Qu'ran and the hadiths, said Afrashim, the consensus (ijmah) of religious scholars should be taken into account when drafting such laws.

"Before looking at the laws of England or France, we have to look at the principles of sharia in Islam," he said. "I am not saying at all that we should not benefit from laws developed in England or France in 1,000 or 2,000 years."

While there was no objection to assimilating laws of non-Islamic countries, he said, it should not take precedence over Islamic laws....

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Mercedes-Benz is hoping to increase its presence in the lucrative Middle-Eastern market by establishing a pair of financial firms that are fully compliant with the specific regulations of Islamic law, or Sharia." What's wrong with that? They're just trying to do business, right?

Two things are wrong with that. One is that opening the door to one aspect of Sharia helps open the door to all of it, and you can be sure that there will be Muslims in the West who will be doing all they can to take advantage of that wedge, and to try to advance the elements of Sharia that would deny freedom of speech and legal equality to all people. The other is that once again the precedent is set -- as it is being set here, there, and everywhere -- that it is Western institutions that must comply with Sharia, not Muslims who must comply with Western norms.

"Mercedes-Benz Offering Sharia Loans in Middle East," by Viknesh Vijayenthiran for FoxNews, October 16 (thanks to Pamela):

Mercedes-Benz is hoping to increase its presence in the lucrative Middle-Eastern market by establishing a pair of financial firms that are fully compliant with the specific regulations of Islamic law, or Sharia.

Islamic law prohibits its followers from charging or collecting interest fees when money is lent or accepted, or investing in businesses, goods or services that are contrary to its religious principles.

To get around this, Mercedes-Benz has launched Mercedes-Benz Finance Middle East and Mercedes-Benz Leasing Middle East. The new companies are headquartered in Dubai and offer loans and leasing to private and business customers for new and pre-owned passenger cars and commercial vehicles, including the all-important Sharia-compliant Islamic finance product.

There are several methods of investing that comply with Islamic law. For example, instead of offering a loan with interest to buy a car, the financial firm could purchase the car outright at an inflated price that includes the interest portion and then sell it to a customer who can then make fixed payments on a regular basis....

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
obama_antisemitism.jpg

As noted many times here, Barack Obama has never shown much respect for the freedom of speech, or any interest in protecting it -- quite the contrary. However, he shows no interest in restricting genuine and vile hate speech on his own website. "Barack Obama's Anti-Semitic Website," by Pamela Geller at Big Government, October 17:

During the 2008 presidential election, Barack Obama's website, Organizing for America - over which Obama has editorial control -- played host to a series of vile anti-American, Jew-hating posts and pieces. It was overwhelming. There were numerous, heinous calls for Jewish genocide and incitement to hatred. And it is happening again, right now, on the official website of the man who is supposedly the leader of the free world.

The site was and is closely policed. The site moderators remove material that they consider to be "disrespectful to our other users" and to "detract from a welcoming community where all people can engage in positive discourse." What they find disrespectful can be interesting: once during the campaign a conservative blogger, Bill Levinson, posted a blog on Obama's website consisting entirely of a series of quotations from Obama's own book, Dreams of my Father. Obama's team did not approve of their standard-bearer's words, and so Levinson's blog and account were deleted from the Obama site in just under 36 hours. That's right, Barack Obama's website banned Obama's own words. But the most disgusting anti-semitic ravings remained on the site, along with blogs advocating anarchy and the overthrow of the United States Congress. [...]

Continuing the lies and blood libels, the post claims: "Worse than the Nazis Israeli forces used to invade peaceful Palestinian towns, execute men, women and children in cold blood everywhere and anywhere they encounter them, dynamite their homes on top of their residents, and finally demolish the whole town making room for new Israeli colonies." It charges that Israel pursued "a pre-meditated genocidal plan" against the Palestinian Arabs.

Suffice to say that this entry passed muster with Obama's moderators and is clearly acceptable to Obama for America.

Why hasn't Obama stopped the terrible hate speech he was hosting on his site? This has been going on for well over a year. And it continues. He knows the anti-semites post these blood libels on his website. So why does he retain the platform as President of the United States? It's evil. Why does he encourage it with his silence? Is Obama an anti-semite? By his fruits we shall know him, and so we know him.

Read it all.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here yet again we see an Islamic scholar explaining to non-Muslims how jihad is essentially a benign concept. Yet for some reason mosques in America don't seem to be hosting Dr. Mukhtasar Syamsuddin and asking him to explain the same thing to them. For some reason Dr. Mukhtasar Syamsuddin doesn't seem to be reaching out to Muslim audiences here or abroad to convince potential jihadists that the jihadist groups are getting jihad and Islam wrong, wrong, wrong.

"Fulbright scholar offers glimpse into Muslim world," by Cathy Spaulding for the Muskogee Phoenix, October 17 (thanks to James):

When Fulbright Scholar Dr. Mukhtasar Syamsuddin discusses the "Muslim World," he has several different world to discuss.

"The Islamic culture is the only one in the world based on the Koran, but the Muslim culture is a social construct," he said. "There are Muslim Americans, Muslim Canadians, Muslim Arabs, Muslim Indonesians."

Syamsuddin, a Muslim Indonesian, will share these worlds with Northeastern State University over the next six weeks through the Fulbright Visiting Specialists Program. Syamsuddin is the first Fulbright Scholar to be hosted by NSU....

Syamsuddin teaches philosophy and philosophy of religion at Gadjah Mada University in Yogyakarta, Java, Indonesia. Theme of his Fulbright visit is "Direct Access to the Muslim World."...

Syamsuddin said he also will spend his six-week visit clarifying Islamic terms such as "jihad," which, he said, are misunderstood.

"Jihad is to do your religious commitments truly," he said. "It does not mean you have to fight against another Muslim or another person. Terrorism is not an expression of jihad."

I wonder what Dr. Mukhtasar Syamsuddin would say to Anwar al Awlaki to convince him that he was all wrong when he said: "Whenever you see the word terrorism, replace it with the word jihad."

He said jihad is a misunderstood word "not just in America, but in the Islamic world itself."

He said Islamic terrorists see unbelievers as the enemy and have tried to kill them.

""But according to Islamic teaching, the unbeliever is not the enemy," he said. "One Islamic teaching is to keep their life in harmony, not in conflict and not to kill."

"O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty (unto Him)." -- Koran 9:123

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

What fun the Sharia advocates will have in Europe. An update on this story. "Stoning, Caning Are Now the Law in Aceh, Local Legislator Says," by Nurdin Hasan and Anita Rachman for the Jakarta Globe, October 15 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

Banda Aceh. A controversial bill that includes a provision for the stoning to death of adulterers is now officially law, even without the signature of the Aceh governor, a local councilor said on Thursday.

The draft of the Qanun Jinayat Code, a set of bylaws that replaces elements of the Criminal Code with Shariah provisions for Muslims, was endorsed by the Aceh Legislative Council on Sept. 14.

The measures call for the stoning of adulterers and 100 lashes for anyone caught engaging in premarital sex, among its other punishments.

The ratification of the bill has been sharply criticized by human rights activists, and Governor Irwandi Yusuf reportedly refused to sign it into law.

Moharriadi Syafari, a councilor from the Muslim-based Prosperous Justice Party (PKS), said the main reason for the law was to "save" people in Aceh from acts not approved by religion.

"Human rights activists should not see the Qanun Jinayat from a narrow-minded perspective, as though it breaches human rights, because basically Islamic law has a high respect for human rights," Syafari said.

Sure. They stone and cane people very respectfully.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Will the Islamophobia never end? "Christian Girl Attacked For Saying She's Pakistani," by Jawad Mazhar for BosNewsLife, October 11 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

DHAREMA, PAKISTAN (BosNewsLife)-- A Christian schoolgirl in Pakistan's Punjab province was recovering Sunday, October 11, after she was allegedly "ruthlessly beaten" with a bamboo stick by a Muslim headteacher for saying she is "a Pakistani" citizen.

The bedridden Nadia Iftikhar, 11, told BosNewsLife she was seriously injured when the teacher of the local evening coaching school 'Bright Future Academy' in the town of Dharema got angry because she challenged her views on Islam.

"Our teacher was teaching us about the culture of Pakistan and Pakistani people and quoted a sentence from the text book saying 'We are Pakistani and all of us are Muslims'," the girl recalled. "At this point I interrupted and said: "Madam, I am also a Pakistani, but not a Muslim instead I am a Christian."

The teacher, identified as Humaira Hassa, "got furious and grabbed a bamboo stick and started thrashing in a barbarian way and kept saying all Pakistanis are Muslim, you are not a Pakistani but a Christian," the girl said. "Your home land is some where in Europe or America," the teacher allegedly said.

Nadia added showed scars of the wounds at her back. Classmates said the girl briefly became unconscious, but was eventually brought home. The teacher could not be reached for comment.

NO POLICE

The girl's father, Iftikhar Masih, 45 said he did not went to local police. "I am an impoverished Christian man and am busy working for a daily wage to feed my family."

Local Christians in Punjab province have also complained of police complicity in attacks against Christian believers. "However I have taken her to the doctor and and we believe that her injuries will be healed and she will be able to return to her school."

It was not immediately clear whether the 6th grade girl would be welcomed again by the Bright Future Academy where she said she has been studying for three years....

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Sharia Alert from modern, moderate Indonesia -- but wait a minute! I thought there was "no compulsion in religion"! "Muslim civil servants in Gorontalo obliged to read Koran on Friday," from The Jakarta Post, October 17 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

Gorontalo mayoralty administration has obliged its Muslim civil servants to read the Koran every Friday.

Gorontalo mayor Adhan Dambea said Saturday that he was not yet satisfied with the implementation of his instruction.

"Some civil servants are still unable to read the Koran fluently," he said.

He said his administration would provide religious teachers to improve the civil servant ability to read the Koran.

However, he promised that public service would not be affected with the new Koran reading activity in his administration.

Well, that's a relief!

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Internet is a powerful tool for jihad recruitment because it can be accessed by anyone at any time. In past ages a jihadist preacher would have had to make a laborious and perilous journey in order to make the recruits that can be made quickly and easily online now. "The powerful online voice of jihad," by Michelle Shephard for the Toronto Star, October 18 (thanks to James):

In a snowy field near Barrie, a group of young Muslim men listened intently to the eloquent voice emanating from the laptop.

Anwar al Awlaki preached in perfect Arabic and flawless English about the need to fight in the name of religion, because the "world is united in fighting Islam."

The time for jihad is now, no matter your training, he told members of the group that would later become known as the Toronto 18. Six months following that "training camp," those youths were rounded up in Canada's largest post-9/11 terrorism investigation and charged with plotting to blow up downtown Toronto and military targets.

Zakaria Amara, the leader of that group, entered a surprise guilty plea earlier this month. A date for his sentencing is to be set on Tuesday.

Awlaki's role in allegedly inciting "homegrown terrorism" was just a footnote in the volumes of evidence submitted in the Toronto case.

But in recent months, as Awlaki's name has popped up in terrorism cases in Canada, the U.S. and Britain, intelligence services are closely monitoring the U.S.-born cleric....

One of Awlaki's most popular video series is "Constants of Jihad," in which he translates and interprets a well-known Arabic book promoting fighting in the name of Islam.

"Whenever you see the word terrorist, replace it with the word mujahid," he says on the video. "Whenever you see the word terrorism, replace it with the word jihad."

RCMP informant Mubin Shaikh, one of the Crown's star witnesses against the Toronto suspects, was at the December 2005 training camp when the video was played.

"Guys like Anwar al Awlaki provide do-it-yourself Islam," Shaikh told the Star. "He's building a fantasy and then pushing them over the edge. It appeals at a very basic level. It's like sheep food and they gobble it up."...

This implies, of course, that Anwar al Awlaki is actually getting Islam wrong, wrong, wrong. But once again, for the umpteenth time, we see the broad allegation being made, without any specifics to back it up. Yet without those specifics, this airy and general dismissal is unlikely to convince any Muslims who may be swayed by al Awlaki that his understanding of Islam is incorrect.

[...] Awlaki was born in New Mexico but returned with his family to Yemen when he was young. In 1991, he came back at 20 to study engineering at Colorado State University. He received a master's degree in education in San Diego and later enrolled in a human resource development PhD program at George Washington University.

During his time in the U.S. he was an imam at San Diego's Rabat mosque, a Muslim chaplain in Washington and an imam at the Dar Al Hijrah Islamic Center in Falls Church, Va.

And apparently no one in any of those places denounced him as an "extremist" or explained to him how he was twisting and hijacking Islam. Of course, maybe he was "moderate" back then.

Following the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the FBI interviewed Awlaki (also spelled Aulaqi) owing to his connections to two of the 9/11 hijackers.

"(Nawaf al) Hamzi and (Khalid al) Mihdhar reportedly respected Aulaqi as a religious figure and developed a close relationship with him," the 9/11 Commission Report concluded.

A large-scale Misunderstander of Islam was respected as a religious figure? Hmmm.
Read it all.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Task force created to combat al Qaida in Afghan prisons," by Mark Seibel for the McClatchy Newspapers, October 5 (thanks to Paul):

WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration took steps Thursday toward confronting a troubling al Qaida presence in Afghanistan's prison system, announcing the creation of a military task force to oversee detention operations there and naming a prominent military lawyer to be its deputy commander.

Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, had called for the task force's creation last month in a strategic assessment that included dire warnings about the prison system.

"There are more insurgents per square foot in corrections facilities than anywhere else in Afghanistan," McChrystal wrote. "Unchecked, Taliban/al Qaida leaders patiently coordinate and plan, unconcerned with interference from prison personnel or the military."

The Afghan prison system, including a U.S-operated detention center at Bagram Air Base, also helps create future insurgents, McChrystal said. That's because "the Afghan people see U.S. detention operations as secretive and lacking in due process" and because "hardened, committed Islamists are indiscriminately mixed with petty criminals and sex offenders," McChrystal said.

"They are using the opportunity to radicalize and indoctrinate them," McChrystal warned....

All of that could be said to be going on in U.S. prisons. How long will it be before anyone notices?

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The Organization of the Islamic Conference is attempting to shut down free speech worldwide, as we have noted here many times. We've also noted many times that the thuggish Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations is likewise no friend of free speech, and rather than meet its opponents in free and open debate, attempts to silence and defame them. And now the Muslim Brotherhood entity known as the Muslim Students Association is doing the same thing, or trying to, to Geert Wilders at Temple University.

These impulses stem from two core facts. One is that Islamic spokesmen cannot answer the arguments of those who show how jihadists use Islamic texts and teachings to justify violence and supremacism, and so they refrain from trying: look how many Muslim leaders and academic Islamic apologists like John Esposito and Carl Ernst have shied away from debating me. The other is that shutting us down and silencing us is part of a larger attempt to render the West mute and hence defenseless against the advancing jihad. We cannot possibly defeat an enemy that we cannot talk about, cannot name, cannot identify, cannot study as to his motives and goals. And we're very near that situation as it is.

"Temple Muslim Students Association Attempts To Shut Down Wilders Event," by David Horowitz in the Philadelphia Bulletin, October 18 (thanks to James):

The Temple Muslim Students Association is attempting to shut down the scheduled appearance of Geert Wilders on Oct. 20. As part of its Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week, and its campaign to Stop the Campus War Against Israel and the Jews, the David Horowitz Freedom Center is sponsoring appearances by Dutch Parliamentarian Geert Wilders at Temple and Columbia universities (Oct. 20 and 21). The Muslim Students Association has issued a statement condemning the event and calling on the Temple Administration to close it down. The David Horowitz Freedom Center statement follows:

David Horowitz Freedom Center Response To The Muslim Students Association

The Temple Muslim Students Association has issued a call to the Temple University administration to censor the forthcoming campus appearance of Dutch Parliamentarian Geert Wilders on the 20th of October, which is sponsored by the David Horowitz Freedom Center. The Temple administration should reject this attack on the First Amendment rights of all members of the Temple community.

It is not surprising that the Muslim Students Association would seek to shut down the free speech of Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders who has been an outspoken critic of Islamic terrorists and Islamic attacks on Jews and other religions. Assaults on the First Amendment and efforts to censor critics of radical Islam are, in fact, typical of the tactics used by the Muslim Students Association, the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim American Society, all groups which support the jihad against the west and are part of the network created by the Muslim Brotherhood, which is the parent organization of the terrorist groups al-Qaeda and Hamas. The faculty advisor for Temple MSA is presently a member of the Muslim Brotherhood.

It is the height of hypocrisy for the Muslim Students Association to accuse Geert Wilders of spreading hate or anyone of being a hate group. Chapters of MSA at UC Irvine and Ohio State have raised money for the terrorist group Hamas whose goal -- as stated in its official charter -- is the destruction of the Jewish state and the extermination of the Jews. Speakers sponsored by the MSA have called for the execution of homosexuals, war against the United States and the destruction of the Jewish state and the extermination of the Jews. Every year, on the day commemorating the birth of the Jewish state, the MSA sponsors nationwide campus protests against the existence of the Jewish state calling its creation the "nakba" - the catastrophe. This is an act of genocidal hate.

Temple MSA refers to the fact that security will be necessary at the event as proof that Geert Wilders is dangerous. This is the perfect Orwellian mindset of supporters of the jihad. The threat to the Wilders event making security measures necessary comes from Muslim radicals who have already assassinated two prominent Dutch critics of Islamic terrorism - Pym Fortun [sic] and Theo Van Gogh (who not incidentally both happened to be gay).

In point of fact Wilders has not been tried by any Dutch court, and was recently exonerated by a British court which declared the ban on his entry illegal.

The Temple community should reject the call by the MSA to censor free speech on the Temple campus, and should recognize it for what it is - an assault on the right of all Americans to have a democracy that is inclusive, tolerant and respectful of the rights of others.

UPDATE: Pamela has the contact info for the President of Temple University. Be proactive. Don't let the MSA's thuggish intimidation tactics stand.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Actually the "global arrogance," which is the new favored term for the U.S. Not bad, but "Great Satan" had that connection to the Meccan pilgrimage which gave it an extra frisson for Muslims worldwide.

In reality, this attack was carried out by a Sunni jihadist group in rebellion against the Twelver Shi'ite mullahcracy. "Suicide attack on Iran's Revolutionary Guard leaves 20 dead," by Jenny Booth for the Times Online, October 18 (thanks to Alan of England):

A suicide attack targeting the Revolutionary Guards in Iran today has killed around 20 people and wounded 40 more, according to Iranian state television.

At least two senior commanders from the elite and politically influential force were said to be among the dead, in an attack that is being blamed on Sunni rebel group.

English-language Press TV said that "the finger of accusation is directly pointed at the Jundollah group," referring to ethnic Baluch Sunni insurgents who have been blamed for previous attacks in the region.

A statement from the Guards meanwhile accused America and its allies of involvement in the attack, which took place in the southeast of the country near the Pakistan border.

"Surely foreign elements, particularly those linked to the global arrogance, were involved in this attack," said the Guards statement, reported on Press TV. Iran often uses the term "global arrogance" to refer to the United States, its old foe....

News agencies named the two most high-ranking casualties as the deputy head of the Guards' ground forces, General Nourali Shoushtari, and the Guards' commander in Sistan-Baluchestan province, General Mohammadzadeh. Shoushtari was also a senior official of the Guard's elite Qods force, media said....

Jundollah (God's soldiers) claimed responsibility for a bomb attack on a Shia mosque in Sistan-Baluchestan province in May that killed 25 people.

In 2007 the group abducted nine Iranian soldiers in the same region, demanding that Tehran free 16 imprisoned members of the group.

Iran accuses the US of backing Jundollah in order to create instability in the country. Washington denies the charge. Jundollah itself says it is fighting for the rights of the Islamic Republic's minority Sunnis.

Iran, a predominantly Shia country, also claims that there are links between Jundollah and the al Qaeda network. Most people in Sistan-Baluchestan are Sunnis and ethnic Baluchis. Iran rejects allegations by Western rights groups that it discriminates against ethnic and religious minorities....

Of course! Why should a regime based on Islamic law discriminate against religious minorities? What's that? Because Islamic law institutionalizes discrimination against religious minorities? You mean...you mean...Iran is run by Islamophobes?

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

October 17, 2009

"The reason the young men were rewarded with weapons is to encourage them to participate in the ongoing holy war against the enemies of Allah in Somalia," said Sheikh Abdullahi Alhaq. Monty Hall he ain't. I'd rather have the latest from Speidel.

They were being quizzed on, among other things, the Koran. Then the winners got guns and grenades. Expect Honest Ibe Hooper and Brave Ahmed Rehab to send a strongly-worded letter complaining about their linking of Islam with terrorism.

"Guns and grenades for Somali Ramadan quiz winners," from AFP, October 17 (thanks to Shawn):

No luxury cruise but a ticket to jihad was the prize for the winners of a team quiz organised by Somalia's insurgent Shebab group during the holy Muslim month of Ramadan.

"The reason the young men were rewarded with weapons is to encourage them to participate in the ongoing holy war against the enemies of Allah in Somalia," Sheikh Abdullahi Alhaq said at a ceremony late Friday.

The radio-broadcast quiz organised by the Al-Qaeda-inspired Shebab organisation in the southern Somali city of Kismayo lasted throughout Ramadan, which ended last month.

Five neighbourhoods of the port city entered the competition, which consisted mainly of questions on science, culture and the Koran.

The winners -- a team from Farjano district -- were given a first prize consisting of one AK-47 assault rifle, two hand grenades, an anti-tank landmine and office supplies at a ceremony attended by hundreds of residents.

"The team in the first place gets the weapons and office equipment worth upward of 1,000 dollars," Sheikh Abdullahi Alhaq said, sparking cheers and applause in the crowd....

| 26 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Comments by David G. Littman, NGO Representative to the United Nations in Geneva for the World Union for Progressive Judaism (WUPJ) and the Association for World Education (AWE), speaking this time in a joint statement for WUPJ and the Simon Wiesenthal Center (SWC):

The promised follow-up to "Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah its most sublime belief." In order to get over the September 30 'out of order' administrative hurdle, I suggested a 'gentleman's agreement' in reaction to a request to 'look to the future'. The result was I was able to read my joint statement for the WUPJ and the Simon Wiesenthal Center slowly, taking 3 minutes, without the President stopping me or making any comment after.

Enough has been written about the shameful 12th Special Session of the Human Rights Council without me adding more, except to say that the decision by France and the UK not to participate in the vote at all ('yes', 'no' or 'abstain') is the first time, to my knowledge over the 25 years, that they have acted thus. The real question is why?

The most extraordinary NGO statement was delivered by Col. Richard Kemp, former commander of the British forces in Afghanistan, who served with NATO and the UN, and commanded troops in Northern Ireland, Bosnia and Macedonia. Speaking under the auspices of UN Watch, he declared solemnly at the start and as his conclusion: "Based on my knowledge and experience, I can say this: During Operation Cast Lead, the Israeli Defence Forces did more to safeguard the rights of civilians in a combat zone than any army in the history of warfare." His words should be heard by all:
http://webcast.un.org/ramgen/ondemand/conferences/unhrc/special/12th/hrc091016am1-eng.rm?start=01:21:35&end=01:24:18 (2¾ minutes - UN webcast - RealPlayer)

My joint statement follows (with UN webcast); it concluded with a famous quotation from the Book of Daniel: Thou art weighed in the balances, and art found wanting.

* * * *

WORLD UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM
UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL: 12th Special Session (15-16 October 2009)
Statement by Representative David G. LITTMAN - 16 October 2009

UN Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict: the Goldstone Report

http://webcast.un.org/ramgen/ondemand/conferences/unhrc/special/12th/hrc091016am1-eng.rm?start=01:37:14&end=01:40:14 (3 minutes - UN webcast - RealPlayer)

[The words in square brackets were not pronounced in the two minutes time limitation]

Thank you, Mr. President. This is a joint statement with the Simon Wiesenthal Center.
We are grateful to the Palestinian Authority for initiating this 12th Special Session which should send a clear message on the Council's priorities when we consider all the horrendous human rights tragedies currently happening worldwide. Abba Eban, Israel's famous foreign minister, put it very pertinently in one line after the 1973 Geneva Peace Conference: "The Arabs never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity." [21/12/1973]

Our statement relate to B §2 to 4 of the current draft resolution [A/HRC/S-12/L.1], referring to the Goldstone / Gaza report & to C §3: "Stressing that the right to life constitutes the most fundamental of all human rights."

As we pointed out on 30 September here, neither the 452 pages of the Mission's Gaza Report [A/HRC/12/48], nor that of the High Commissioner [A/HRC/12/37], make any mention of a root cause of the Gaza tragedy - the genocidal 1988 Hamas Charter: a Charter that calls for Jews to be killed and Israel eliminated; a Charter which, like Hitler, quotes a crude forgery, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, inspiring a terrorist regime to systematically teach a culture of hate and death to children and adults in schools, the press & TV.

[In his 1924 preface to Mein Kampf, Hitler explained: "A doctrine can only keep its uniformity if it has been fixed in writing forever". Few took Hitler seriously, preferring to sleep through the 1930s. The Hamas Charter fits this Nazi-like pattern and its preface quotes Muslim Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna: "Israel will exist and continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it."]

This Charter [which we have denouncing here since the 1989 Commission (45th session, 31 January 1989)] goes further, including all Jews and Judaism: "Israel, Judaism & Jews challenge Islam and the Muslim people. 'Let the cowards never sleep.'" [Article 28] Article 7 quotes a 'saying' [hadith] widely preached in sermons by clerics, calling on Muslims to fight and kill Jews.1 Article 8 is the Hamas slogan, taken from the Muslim Brotherhood, & inspiring 'Jihadist Martyrdom Bombers' worldwide. [Details in our written statement. 2 & 3 and *]

In stressing the UN principle that: "the right to life constitutes the most fundamental of all human rights", we call on this 12th Special Session of the Council to condemn the Hamas Charter: a defamation of religion, a blueprint for murder, and a 'direct and public incitement to commit genocide', punishable under article 3 and 4 of the 1948 Genocide Convention. And also: to condemn, unequivocally, all calls to kill in the name of God, Allah, or religion - any religion.

Mr. President, should our call be ignored again - after such a weird, one-sided report, debate & resolution - the biblical prophesy would come to the mind of many of us here:
"this is the writing that will be written: MENE, MENE, TEKEL, UPHARSIN...
Thou art weighed in the balances, and art found wanting." [Daniel: 5:25-27]
-----
(1) "HAMAS aspires to implement Allah's promise, whatever time it may take. The Prophet, prayer and peace be upon him, said: 'The Hour [Day of Judgment] will not come until Muslims will fight the Jews and kill them; until the Jews hide behind rocks and trees which will cry: O Muslim! O Abdallah [slave of Allah] there is a Jew behind me come & kill him. This will not apply to the Gharqad tree which is a Jewish tree.'"

(2) "Allah is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its Constitution; Jihad is its path, and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes." (Article 8).This 'saying' - from the 1928 Charter of the Muslim Brotherhood, of which Hamas is a wing, according to its article 2 - is recorded from al-Bukhari and Muslim, both considered by serious Islamic scholars as highly reliable sources for the hadith of Prophet Muhammad]

(3) After his release from an Israeli prison in October 1997, Sheikh Ahmad Yassin, founder and spiritual head of Hamas, declared that Israel must "disappear from the map." He added: "We have an aim and an enemy, and we shall continue our Jihad against the enemy; a nation without a Jihad is a nation without a purpose."
* Attached is our detailed written statement E/CN.4/2003/NGO/226: The 1988 Genocidal Charter of HAMAS: an evil legacy for 'Jihadist- Martyrdom' bombers. See also our texts: A/HRC/S-1/NGO/4 (2006); A/HRC/S-9/NGO/3 (2009)* * * *

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More from Muslim Mafia. "Book Exposes CAIR's Exaggerations, Efforts to Stymie Law Enforcement," from IPT News, October 15

A new book claims to give readers an inside look at the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), arguing everything from its claims of financial and political clout to its genuine agenda are rooted in deception.

Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America is based in large part on access to CAIR operations obtained by Chris Gaubatz, the son of co-author P. David Gaubatz. Using an alias, the younger Gaubatz spent six months as a CAIR intern in 2008.

Working under the name David Marshall, Chris Gaubatz worked closely with CAIR leadership including Executive Director Nihad Awad, Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper, and Legislative Director Corey Saylor. Chris Gaubatz claims to have walked out with 12,000 pages of documents (most of which he had been instructed to shred) and 300 hours of clandestine video.

Among the findings from co-authors Gaubatz and Paul Sperry: that CAIR wildly exaggerates its membership numbers, that it is plagued by budget problems and dissension, and that it is financially dependent on a small network of wealthy Persian Gulf-based donors. In many cases, the book adds precision to general facts about CAIR that already are in the public domain. [...]

Muslim Mafia claims that CAIR relies on two dozen wealthy supporters, many of them from Persian Gulf countries including Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, for 60 percent of its $2.7 million annual operating budget, including one donor who contributes $600,000 a year.

The authors point to notes from a 2006 board meeting where Awad reported that the Washington public-relations firm Hill and Knowlton had put together a "business plan" to help CAIR raise money from other Gulf states. State Department records obtained by the Investigative Project on Terrorism show that that year, CAIR officials, with Hill and Knowlton in tow, sought huge donations from the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. [...]

In January, the Investigative Project on Terrorism broke the news that the FBI had cut off access to CAIR after evidence in the HLF trial showed CAIR founders were part of a Hamas-support network in the U.S. In a subsequent letter, an FBI official said questions about CAIR's relationship to Hamas led to the conclusion the agency could "not view CAIR as an appropriate liaison partner."

Anecdotes in Muslim Mafia won't help the organization return to the FBI's good graces. It offers examples of CAIR's efforts to impede federal investigations related to terrorism despite its claim to be a partner to law enforcement.

For example, Chapter Six details the way CAIR coached a mosque leader in Western Maryland not to cooperate with an FBI investigation of suspicious activity.

Likewise, a 2004 investigation was thwarted when the FBI raided the Institute for Islamic and Arabic Sciences in America in Merrifield, Va. on suspicions of terrorist activity. But when the agents from the Bureau's Joint Terrorism Task Force arrived, the book claims, the building had been cleaned out because CAIR had warned institute officials of the raid.

Another chapter is devoted to the case of former Fairfax County,Va. Police Department Sergeant Mohammad Weiss Rasool, who pled guilty to illegally searching a federal database in order to tip off a terror suspect about an FBI investigation.

"He's a habitual liar and a traitor," a senior FCPD official said of Rasool. "He disgraced the uniform." As CAIR's representative on the police force, Rasool traveled into the District of Columbia to meet with CAIR Executive Director Awad. A CAIR visitor log published on p. 325 of the book, documents one of Rasool's visits in 2005.

The log is among numerous examples of internal CAIR documents cited in the book. Among them is a 2007 letter thanking Awad and CAIR for "the additional contribution of $9,000 to be used for the legal expenses relative to Imam Jamil Al-Amin's case." [Emphasis added]

Al-Amin was convicted in 2002 of killing a Georgia police officer. CAIR and other Islamist groups have touted his case, but the book shows CAIR gave directly to his legal fund. [...]

So far, CAIR has not challenged the veracity of the claims in Muslim Mafia. Instead, it has focused on the authors' political backgrounds and minimized the findings. "All they can come up with is that we are political active?" Hooper asked in a Politico story. "The terror threat is that Muslims are politically active?"

That seems a deliberate attempt to misstate the issue, which is not whether Muslims should be employed on Capitol Hill or anywhere else. It is whether CAIR is an honest and reliable broker for American Muslims. The record, already long and detailed before Muslim Mafia's publication, shows CAIR habitually engages in deception about its activities. The book reinforces that conclusion with internal examples.

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Ask them concerning the town standing close by the sea. Behold! they transgressed in the matter of the Sabbath. For on the day of their Sabbath their fish did come to them, openly holding up their heads, but on the day they had no Sabbath, they came not: thus did We make a trial of them, for they were given to transgression. When some of them said: 'Why do ye preach to a people whom Allah will destroy or visit with a terrible punishment?' said the preachers: 'To discharge our duty to your Lord, and perchance they may fear Him.' When they disregarded the warnings that had been given them, We rescued those who forbade Evil; but We visited the wrong-doers with a grievous punishment because they were given to transgression. When in their insolence they transgressed (all) prohibitions, We said to them: 'Be ye apes, despised and rejected.'" -- Koran 7:163-166

"On Thursday (Sept. 15th, 1853), we arose before dawn, and prepared with a light breakfast for the fatigues of a climbing walk. After half an hour spent in hopping from boulder to boulder, we arrived at a place situated on the lower declivity of the Jabal Sabir, the northern wall of the Muna basin. Here is the Majarr al-Kabsh, 'the Dragging-place of the Ram,' a small, whitewashed square, divided into two compartments. The first is entered by a few ragged steps in the south-east angle, which lead to an enclosure thirty feet by fifteen. In the north-east corner is a block of granite, in which a huge gash, several inches broad, some feet deep, and completely splitting the stone in knife-shape, notes the spot where Ibrahim's blade fell when the archangel Gabriel forbade him to slay Ismail his son. The second compartment contains a diminutive hypogaeum. In this cave the patriarch sacrificed the victim, which gives the place a name. We descended by a flight of steps, and under the stifling ledge of rock found mats and praying-rugs, which, at this early hour, were not overcrowded. We followed the example of the patriarchs, and prayed a two-bow prayer in each of the enclosures. After distributing the usual gratification, we left the place, and proceeded to mount the hill, in hope of seeing some of the apes said still to haunt the heights. These animals are supposed by the Meccans to have been Jews, thus transformed for having broken the Sabbath by hunting. They abound in the elevated regions about Arafat and Taif, where they are caught by mixing the juice of the Asclepias and narcotics with dates and other sweet bait." -- Sir Richard F. Burton, Personal Narrative of a Pilgrimage to Al-Madinah and Meccah, Tylston & Edwards 1893, volume 2, pp. 219-220.

"Wife: Bin Laden Loves Gardening, Cars, Jihad," from Newser, October 17 (thanks to James):

(Newser) - Osama bin Laden was a tough dad who liked growing corn and sunflowers when he wasn't busy preparing for jihad, his first wife and his fourth son reveal in a memoir to be published this month. Bin Laden loves fast cars and owned a gold Mercedes and a speed boat, but shuns the use of most modern appliances and would beat his children for "showing too many teeth" when laughing, writes Najwa bin Laden, mother of 11 of the al-Qaeda leader's 14 children. She married him when she was 15 and he was 17.

Growing Up bin Laden tells how bin Laden--a math whiz and fluent English speaker --became increasingly radical over the '80s and '90s, forcing his family to spend nights in the desert without shelter to prepare for hard times ahead. He once ordered his children's pet monkey to be run over because "it was not a monkey at all, but was a Jewish person turned into a monkey by the hand of God."...

| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is the latest from the erudite European essayist Fjordman:

Diophantus of Alexandria is sometimes called "the father of algebra," although the title is disputed. He worked in Roman Egypt in the third century of our era, but while he is usually assumed to have been a Greek, very little is known about his life. His collection of books known as the Arithmetica, a landmark work in the history of algebra and number theory with the so-called Diophantine equations, is believed to have been completed around AD 250. Dirk J. Struik explains in A Concise History of Mathematics, Fourth Revised Edition:

"Their skillful treatment of indeterminate equations shows that the ancient algebra of Babylon or perhaps India not only survived under the veneer of Greek civilization but also was improved by a few active men. How and when it was done is not known, just as we do not know who Diophantus was -- he may have been a Hellenized Babylonian. . . . In Diophantus we find the first systematic use of algebraic symbols. He has a special sign for the unknown, for the minus, for reciprocals. The signs are still of the nature of abbreviations rather than algebraic symbols in our sense (they form the so-called 'syncopated' algebra); for each power of the unknown there exists a special symbol. There is no doubt that we have here not only, as in Babylon, arithmetical questions of a definite algebraic nature, but also a well-developed algebraic notation which was greatly conducive to the solution of problems of greater complexity than were ever taken up before."

Basic algebra was known to the ancient Egyptians, to the Babylonians in Mesopotamia in the second millennium BC, to the Chinese, the Indians and other cultures. Yet with the exception of the work Diophantus and some contributions by scholars in medieval East Asia, India and the Middle East, the history of algebra seemingly made surprisingly little progress for several thousand years until Renaissance Europe, after which modern algebra was born. The solutions to linear and quadratic equations were known to the ancient Babylonians, but the solution to the general cubic equation did not come until Renaissance Italy.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Online reports of a study by the US Central Intelligence Agency cast doubt over the survival of Israel beyond the next two decades. Regardless of the validity of the report, with what is now known about the costs in blood and treasure that the U.S.-Israeli relationship has imposed on the U.S., its key ally, Israel could fall within five years." - from a broadcast at Al-Arabiya here

The "costs in blood and treasure" of paying directly for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, in order to "win [unwinnable Muslim] hearts and minds," by all sorts of reconstruction, and to keep these countries together despite their ever-present internecine hostilities. They also include paying for all sorts of Muslim regimes in order that their populations might be protected from the Lords of Misrule, and the economic and political and social failures of their societies [directly attributable to Islam itself], to such countries as Egypt and Jordan and even to the "Palestinian" "Authority" that would not exist for one minute without foreign, Infidel aid that keeps pouring in. And if on top of that one adds the twelve trillion dollars that has gone to the Muslim members of OPEC (11 of the 12 members, if one counts Muslim-dominated Nigeria, where the oil revenues never reach the Christian south), a number that would be lower had the Saudi lobby not throttled all attempts at taxes on oil and gasoline and other measures that could long ago have diminished OPEC oil revenues.

| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An update on this story. "United States admits tackling Italians over payments to the Taleban," by Tim Reid for the Times Online, October 17:

The US Government acknowledged for the first time yesterday that payment of protection money to the Taleban by Italian forces in Afghanistan was discussed by American officials and their Italian counterparts last year.
A senior US official confirmed, two days after The Times reported that Italian authorities had paid the bribes, that "the issue [of payments] was raised with the Italians".
The official would neither confirm nor deny that the representation to Silvio Berlusconi's Government was in the form of a démarche or diplomatic protest, but Nato officials have told The Times that such a complaint was made by the US in Rome last year.
The payment of Italian protection money was revealed after the deaths of ten French soldiers in August 2008 at the hands of a large Taleban force in Sarobi, east of Kabul. French forces had taken over the district from Italian troops, but were unaware of the secret Italian payments to local commanders to stop attacks on their forces, and misjudged threat levels.
The day after The Times report, a Taleban commander and two senior Afghan officials also said that Italian forces had struck deals to prevent attacks on their troops.
Bruce Riedel, who headed President Obama's Afghanistan policy review this year but is no longer inside the Administration, told The Times that he heard allegations of the Italian payments during a trip to Paris in the last week of September. A businessman with close ties to the French Government told him that the Italians had been paying the Taleban "but had forgotten to tell us [the French]", Mr Riedel said.
Rome has angrily denied the report. "The Berlusconi Government has never authorised nor has it allowed any form of payment toward members of the Taleban insurgency," said a statement by the office of the Italian Prime Minister.
Ignazio La Russa, Italy's Defence Minister, insisted that the allegations were "absolute rubbish". The French Opposition, however, has demanded an urgent explanation to Parliament, describing the details as "very serious".
Yesterday Hervé Morin, the French Defence Minister, said the idea that an army might pay Taleban insurgents not to attack them would breach established military doctrine. He added: "I have no reason to question the word of the Italian Government."
Canada has also been forced to deny reports that its soldiers paid the enemy in Afghanistan to keep the peace. A foreign wire service quoted an Afghan Army source as saying that Canadian soldiers in Kandahar province, in the Taleban-strong south, had made payments to insurgents.
"I haven't heard of any type of payment that would be done by our troops in order to remain protected," said Lieutenant-Colonel Chris Lemay, a spokesman with the Canadian Expeditionary Forces Command. "With the number of casualties we've been getting, had we paid these guys they wouldn't be holding up their end of the bargain."
| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

October 16, 2009

Because Wilders "insulted the prophet Muhammad" -- by telling the truth about him, apparently.

Video thanks to Pamela.

| 138 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

One would hope that American Jews are now reconsidering their support for Obama in large numbers. "Official: Obama 'disgusted' with Israel," by Aaron Klein for WorldNetDaily, October 16 (thanks to all who sent this in):

JERUSALEM - U.S. officials in recent days expressed to the Palestinian Authority that President Obama's administration is "disgusted" with Israel, a top aide to PA President Mahmoud Abbas told WND in an interview.

Nimr Hamad said the White House was disgusted that Israel is refusing to halt all settlement activity as a precondition for re-starting talks with the PA over the creation of a Palestinian state. "Settlement activity" refers to Jewish construction in the West Bank and eastern sections of Jerusalem.

Hamad repeated that the term "disgusted" was used more than once in recent meetings with U.S. envoys to describe the administration's attitude toward Israel. Hamad did not name the U.S. envoys using the terminology....

| 24 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"If they think this will stop terrorism, imprisoning these people, I don't think it will stop terrorism. I think it will increase the threat on Australia." So in other words, don't prosecute jihad terrorists. It will only provoke them. Lie down and accept Islamization peacefully and without resistance, and all will be well.

An update on this story. "Verdicts 'may spark attacks,'" from AAP, October 16 (thanks to Michelle):

The brother of one of five Sydney men convicted of plotting a terror attack says the guilty verdicts will increase the threat of attacks in Australia.

A jury has today found the men guilty of conspiring to commit an act or acts in preparation for a terrorist act.

During a 10 month trial the NSW Supreme Court was told the devout Muslims plotted with each other and at least four other men between July 2004 and November 2005 to carry out a violent jihadist act.

Outside court following the guilty verdicts the angry brother has warned the men's imprisonment will increase the threat of terror attacks in Australia.

His sister agrees the Muslim community will react to the news of the guilty verdicts but says she doesn't believe it will lead to increased terrorism in Australia.

The brother of one of five Sydney men convicted of plotting a terror attack says the guilty verdicts will increase the threat of attacks in Australia.

The men, all aged between 25 and 44, denied the charges, with their lawyers maintaining there were innocent explanations for much of the material relied on by the crown.

Outside the Supreme Court following the guilty verdicts, the brother of the 25-year-old described the case as "bullshit".

"If you really go through the case and the words in the brief, you'll know it's bullshit," he said.

"If they think this will stop terrorism, imprisoning these people, I don't think it will stop terrorism.

"I think it will increase the threat on Australia."

He indicated he expected a reaction when "the people overseas, when they see this".

When asked if the verdicts would harm Australia's international reputation, the man replied: "What do you think?"

The man's sister agreed the Muslim community would react to the news of the guilty verdicts, but said she didn't believe it would lead to increased terrorism in Australia.

"The Muslim community, obviously they're going to react," she told reporters.

"(But) It won't increase terrorism in Australia. I don't think it will. That's my brother's opinion."...

| 27 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Each of us must use our own mind in pursuit of truth. (17:36; 10:100; 39:17-18; 41:53; 42:21; 6:114-116; 10:36; 12:111; 20:114; 21:7; 35:28; 38:29)." (Edip Yuksel here.) 

If Edip Yuksel believes that "each of us must use our [sic] own mind in pursuit of truth," then why does he feel compelled to list verses from the Qur'an as textual authority for this unremarkable statement? Does he want "each of us" to use our minds "in pursuit of truth," or does he, Edip Yuksel, rather, want "each of us" to be, as he apparently is, blindly and blandly obedient to the Qur'an, Hadith, and Sira? For what else can one conclude when a banality is asserted with which no one would think of taking issue ("each of us must use [his] mind in pursuit of truth"), and yet he feels it necessary, in order to ensure that this obvious statement be accepted by his Muslim audience, that he dutifully list Qur'anic passages by way of Authority, so akin as it is to the medieval "auctoritee" we find in Chaucer: 17:36; 10:100; 39:17-18; 41:53; 42:21; 6:114-116; 10:36; 12:111; 20:114; 21:7; 35:28; 38:29.

And there's a bit more about Edip Yuksel that can be learned, after two seconds of googling, and that suggest or rather reveal that he is a bit of a nut, theorizing about the "mathematical" structure of the Qur'an and focusing on the number 19. Here's what I found in an interview with what I presume is a magazine ("Furkan"):

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And he and CAIR cofounder Omar Ahmad are being investigated by the FBI. Which is better than, say, their being consulted by the FBI, which went on long enough. More from the explosive and important book Muslim Mafia. "Hill terror front group investigated by FBI," from WorldNetDaily, October 16 (thanks to all who sent this in):

The Washington field office of the FBI is actively investigating the founding chairman and acting executive director of the nation's premier Islamic-rights group in Washington, based on evidence that emerged from the largest terror-financing case in U.S. history, a blockbuster new book alleges.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, along with its founding chairman Omar M. Ahmad, were named by the U.S. Justice Department as unindicted co-conspirators in a criminal conspiracy led by the Holy Land Foundation charity to underwrite Palestinian terrorism.

"CAIR has been identified by the government at trial as a participant in an ongoing and ultimately unlawful conspiracy to support a designated terrorist organization - a conspiracy from which CAIR never withdrew," federal prosecutors wrote in September 2007, according to court documents.

Following the blacklisting, the FBI severed ties with CAIR, a move that sent shock waves throughout the American Muslim establishment.

"Until we can resolve whether there continues to be a connection between CAIR or its executives and Hamas," explained assistant FBI director Richard C. Powers, "the FBI does not view CAIR as an appropriate liaison partner."

The 15-year-old nonprofit organization's top executives for years had enjoyed virtually unfettered access to the corridors of power in the capital, even meeting with presidents and rubbing elbows with congressional leaders.

Now Ahmad and CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad have come under active investigation for their roles in the criminal conspiracy to funnel millions of dollars to Hamas terrorists, according to "Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America."...

Like Ahmad, Awad, who has turned down congressional invitations to answer questions under oath, remains under FBI scrutiny.

"He's a bad guy - one of Hamas's senior guys in the United States," the book quotes a veteran special agent with the FBI's Washington field office saying.

Ahmad, for his part, abruptly resigned from CAIR's board after his unindicted terrorist co-conspirator designation. The longtime CAIR chairman, 49, is on record telling a Muslim audience in California that the Quran should supersede the U.S. Constitution as the highest authority in the land.

FBI agents and federal prosecutors "are very actively working to indict" CAIR's national leaders, confirms a U.S. official familiar with the ongoing investigation in connection with the Holy Land case. He says "fresh evidence" emerged from the case, triggering a closer look at both of CAIR's founders and their connections to Hamas....

There is much more. Read it all.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A few weeks old, but still current -- the stealth jihad to whitewash Islam and propagate it in the public schools still continues. "Schoolhouse Shariah," from Investor's Business Daily, September 24 (thanks to Allyson):

Multiculturalism: California's educrats have put out new rules for teaching Islamic studies to seventh-graders in public schools, and they are as biased as ever. They'll also likely spread eastward.

The lesson guidelines adopted by the bellwether state whitewash the violence and oppression of women codified in Islamic law, or Shariah. And they're loaded with revisionist history about the faith.

For example, the suggested framework glorifies Shariah as a liberal reform movement that "rejected" the mistreatment of women that existed in Arabia before Muhammad and his successors conquered the region, according to Accuracy in Academia. The guidelines claim that Islamic law established for the first time that men and women were entitled to equal "respect."

Sounds as if Dalia Mogahed could have written that!

Not so, says Islamic scholar and author Nonie Darwish, who grew up Muslim in Egypt.

"I am shocked that that is what they teach," she said. "Women had more rights in Arabia before Shariah."

In fact, "wife beating is allowed under Shariah" today, she added. "It allows a woman seen without a headdress to be flogged, punishes rape victims, and calls for beheading for adultery."

California's course on world religions also omits Islam's long history of jihadist violence, while portraying Christianity as an intolerant and bloodthirsty faith....

You can't teach the Ten Commandments in public schools. But teaching the five pillars of Islam is A-OK.

Read it all.

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Dalia Mogahed, you are needed in Mogadishu! Stereotyping of Islam is going on there!

Sharia Alert: "Whipped for wearing a 'deceptive' bra: Hardline Islamists in Somalia publicly flog women in Sharia crackdown," from the Daily Mail, October 16 (thanks to all who sent this in):

A hardline Islamist group in Somalia has begun publicly whipping women for wearing bras that they claim violate Islam as they are 'deceptive'.

The insurgent group Al Shabaab has sent gunmen into the streets of Mogadishu to round up any women who appear to have a firm bust, residents claimed yesterday.

The women are then inspected to see if the firmness is natural, or if it is the result of wearing a bra.

If they are found wearing a bra, they are ordered to remove it and shake their breasts, residents said.

Hmmm. I'll bet Al-Shabaab has a lot of pious young men applying for these inspector jobs.

Al Shabaab, which seeks to impose a strict interpretation of Sharia law over all Somalia, also amputated a foot and a hand each from two young men accused of robbery earlier this month.

They have also banned movies, musical ringtones, dancing at wedding ceremonies and playing or watching soccer.

'Al Shabaab forced us to wear their type of full veil and now they order us to shake our breasts,' a resident, Halima, told Reuters, adding that her daughters had been whipped on Thursday.

'They are now saying that breasts should be firm naturally, or just flat.'...

| 38 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
Pamela Geller has uncovered some explosive information about Mohamed Bary, the father of the most famous convert from Islam to Christianity, Rifqa Bary -- who fled from her father's home after she says he threatened to kill her for her apostasy. It seems that the Barys are in the U.S. illegally, and that Mohamed Bary has sworn to contradictory statements on his visa applications -- in other words, he has clearly committed perjury.

The family could therefore be deported, with Rifqa -- which would leave her at the mercy of the Islamic community in Sri Lanka, many of whom no doubt believe devoutly in the Islamic death penalty for apostasy that Rifqa's detractors in the U.S. are so avid to deny. Rifqa, however, could apply for asylum. And certainly she could make a strong case that her life would be in danger if she returned to Sri Lanka.
Read the details over at Atlas Shrugs here and here.
| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
"The root cause of the Gaza tragedy is not mentioned in the Goldstone/Gaza Report to the UN Human Rights Council: the genocidal Hamas Charter that teaches children hatred and death."

Comments by David G. Littman, NGO Representative to the United Nations in Geneva for the Association for World Education (AWE) and the World Union for Progressive Judaism (WUPJ):
This is the promised follow-up to my last article.

Two weeks ago, I delivered three oral statements to the 12th session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva (all reproduced below): on the Gaza/Goldstone Report and Hamas Charter (item 7); violence against women (item 8); Defamation of Judaism and Jews (item 9). After I had finished speaking for the WUPJ the 1st time, the HRC president declared (not on webcast):

Before moving to the next speaker, may I call upon everyone to stick to the agreed practice and link their statement to the item under discussion; clearly, part of the previous statement are extraneous to the item under discussion and out of order; this should not be repeated.

After I spoke for AWE the same morning under item 8, the president made similar remarks, but without saying, "out of order." This concerned 'violence against women' - it seems that I should have referred also to the ' Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action', not only to: Integrating the human rights of women throughout the UN system - so I was informed! Toward the end of the day, I was told by the NGO liaison officer that one of the statements would be removed from the official report of the meeting because the president had used the expression "out of order"- later, I learned that it was the statement on Gaza. As this 'decision' seemed discriminatory, I prepared a 10 point letter to the president, Belgian Ambassador Alex Van Meeuwen - also reproduced below - to which there has been no response after twelve days. At an NGO meeting after the plenum, in reply to a question, the president stated that he had heard me refer to Iran, which was not related to the subject of item 7; I replied that I had only referred to Iran in the Hamas-Gaza context that was the subject of WUPJ's statement.

I was informed yesterday that the Secretary of the Human Rights Council [Eric Tistounet] has agreed to maintain the webcast of our oral intervention on the UN website and the verbatim version of this intervention on the HRC extranet, but with an asterisk* indicating that the statement was ruled partially out of order: "consequently, your statement will not be included in the report of the 12th session of the Human Rights Council."

In a rapid reply, I asked whether, because the President used the expression "out of order", in relation to "parts of the previous statement", signified that his 'ruling' was correct. I asked:

We maintain that an NGO, like any other representative, is entitled to an explanation on such a serious matter and my 10 point letter to the President, dated 2 October (by fax, email, and post), is very comprehensive (...) Do the 'rules and regulations' imply that should the President make a 'slip of the tongue' when speaking he cannot retract the words "out of order" which must automatically be implemented by the Secretariat?

Hopefully, I shall obtain a reply to this question from the friendly president at the 12th Special Session of the HRC- requested by the Palestinian Authority with the usual 'sponsors' - and scheduled for October 15-16. Israel's Foreign Minister Abba Eban had this to say forty years ago: "The Arabs never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity." (The Times, London, 17 December 1970) It will be interesting to see what NGOs will be forbidden to say at the Special Session - and what will be ruled 'out of order' as a result of pressures from OIC countries.

| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A pleasant workhorse of a wine, Abu Mohammed's latest home-made vintage has fruity aromas and a core flavor of apples. He also offers a range of styles from minimal oak and bright fruit, to heavy oak or butter styles that go with a wide range of food, from hors d'oeuvres and salads to light meats and spicy pasta dishes. Some are best savored while firing Qassam rockets into the Negev.

Lighten up, folks. That's just a joke. If there were more wine drinkers in Gaza, there would almost certainly be fewer Qassams exploding in the Negev.

Sharia Alert from rapidly moderating Gaza: what fun these folks will have in Europe! "Dangerous life of wine-lovers in Islamist Gaza," from AFP, October 15 (thanks to C. Cantoni):

Abu Mohammed goes to great lengths to enjoy his wine in Gaza. Risking the wrath of the enclave's Islamist Hamas rulers, he sneaks to the rooftop of an abandoned house to make his own nectar.

Here in his secret hideaway, Abu Mohammed carefully turns grapes into home-made vintages he savors only in the privacy of his own home, far away from the disapproving eyes of Hamas police and Gaza's conservative society.

Making own wine

"I started making my own wine after Hamas took power," says the 40-something civil servant who, like all the other Gaza bootleggers interviewed by AFP, declined to give their real names for fear of being arrested.

"I asked friends how to do it and I did some research on the Internet," he says.

Abu Mohammed risks much to indulge his palate.

Gaza has always adhered to traditional Islam and alcohol has never been widely available in the coastal strip.

Before Hamas swept the January 2006 parliamentary election, anyone could bring alcohol in from Israel and Egypt and a handful of restaurants and bars served spirits.

But that stopped when Hamas -- the Arabic acronym for the Islamic Resistance Movement -- routed loyalists of the rival secular Fatah faction from the territory in June 2007 after a week of deadly street clashes.

Since then, the sale of alcohol in Gaza has been banned altogether under a de facto law imposed by Hamas.

"No liquor is authorized," warns a sign to visitors at the Erez border crossing checkpoint with Israel in the north, saying any alcohol found will be destroyed on the spot.

Meanwhile the smugglers doing a brisk trade in everything from cars to diapers through tunnels between southern Gaza and Egypt refuse to whisk alcohol into the territory for fear of running afoul of Hamas....

Guns? Bombs? Sure. A nice chianti to enjoy with your liver and fava beans? No dice.

"I am terrified by the idea of being discovered by Hamas police," he says. "That's why I make sure to do it all alone and in secret and above all not to sell it."

Hussein knows the feeling. The 56-year-old -- who has been making his wine in small wooden barrels "to add flavor" -- is not only "afraid of being discovered by the Hamas police, who will have no mercy," but also of losing face in a socially conservative society that does not look kindly on imbibers.

Ziad, 30, says he drinks alone to minimize any chances of getting caught....

Jamal Dahshane, who heads the Hamas police anti-drug unit and considers confiscating alcohol a "social duty," admits he's never run across such a case.

"Even if we discover that a person makes his own alcohol, we don't have the means to arrest him because Palestinian law does not prohibit alcohol consumption," he says. "Only the selling of alcohol can be considered as a criminal offence."...

| 27 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Welcome to Cool Britannia! "Protesters meet Dutch far-right MP," from the Press Association, October 16 (thanks to Tziona):

Around 40 Muslim demonstrators gathered near the Houses of Parliament as Geert Wilders arrived in central London.

Brandishing banners saying "Shariah is the solution, freedom go to hell" and "Geert Wilders deserves Islamic punishment", the protesters were held back by police....

Addressing journalists alongside UKIP peer Lord Pearson, Mr Wilders said his visit was "a victory".

Explaining his controversial views on Islam, he said: "I have a problem with the Islamic ideology, the Islamic culture, because I feel that the more Islam that we get in our societies the less freedom that we get."

Well, "Freedom Go to Hell" would indeed seem to suggest that.

| 31 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Defense attorneys said the men were just hunting and camping."

An update on this story. "Five convicted in Australia of terror," from CNN, October 16:

(CNN) -- Five men were convicted Friday in Sydney, Australia, of trying to commit terrorist acts in the country's longest-ever terror trial, court officials said.
The guilty verdicts came after a jury deliberated for 23 days, according to a statement from the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
The men -- Mohamed Ali Elomar, Abdul Rakib Hasan, Khaled Cheikho, Moustafa Cheikho and Mohammed Omar Jamal -- were found guilty of "conspiracy to do acts in preparation for a terrorist act or acts."
The men will be sentenced on December 14.
About 300 witnesses testified in the 10-month trial, in which prosecutors used about 18 hours of recorded telephone conversations to prove that the men were planning a terror attack in Australia.
The suspects were connected to four other suspects who had earlier pleaded guilty to charges that included acquiring weapons, hydrochloric acid and bombs for an attack.
The men were arrested in November 2005 after a raid at a home.
"They were stockpiling weapons, but we don't know what the intended target was," said Sonya Zadel, a court spokeswoman, who would not reveal which terror group the men were connected to.
The Australian Broadcast Corporation said three of the men had trained at paramilitary camps in western New South Wales to prepare for the attacks. But defense attorneys said the men were just hunting and camping.
| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

There are conflicting reports about whether it was a car bomb, or a woman in a burqa. "Pakistan: Fresh blast strikes northwestern city," from AdnKronos International, October 16:

Peshawar, 16 October (AKI) - A bomb blast in the northwestern Pakistani city of Peshawar on Friday killed at least eleven people, police officials said. A burqa-clad woman riding pillion passenger aboard a motorbike blew herself up at the gates of a police station which carried out investigations for the CIA, Pakistan's Geo News reported. But other reports said the blast - the latest in a recent string of attacks across the country - was a car bomb.
The blast came after some 40 people died in a series of coordinated attacks on Thursday which included a bombing near a government complex in Peshawar, commando-style attacks in the eastern city of Lahore and a suicide car bombing in northern city of Kohat.
Friday's blast in Peshawar reportedly took place in the Swati Pathak area of the city, which is close to the Pakistani army garrison. It is the fourth time in a week that militants have carrried out bombings in the city, which is the capital of North West Frontier Province.
The blast severely damaged the building of the police station and destroyed several vehicles. The injured including many prisoners were rushed to hospital, Geo News reported....
| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

What could go wrong? They repented! "Libya frees 'repentant' Islamists," from the BBC, October 15 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Libya has released 88 Islamist inmates, some of them belonging to a group with suspected links to al-Qaeda, the country's state-run charity has said.

It said among those freed were 45 members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, which had been accused of trying to oust Col Muammar Gaddafi's regime.

The militants had been in prolonged talks with Tripoli to reach a deal to renounce violence and win the release.

"Renounce violence." Apparently working for their goal -- imposing Sharia -- by means other than violence is just fine.

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

October 15, 2009

This morning, talking about the Rifqa Bary case.

Many thanks to Bob for the video.

| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I gave four talks in Los Angeles on October 12 and 13, but this one from the David Horowitz Freedom Center's Wednesday Morning Club was the only one that was videotaped. The other ones are gone, in the air, never to be captured again.

Many thanks to Sean for the video.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Isn't it amazing that someone presumably as well informed about Islam as the Grand Ayatollah Lotfollah Safi Golpayghani could actually be a Misunderstander of Islam? But it's true! Somehow he has missed how the Koran provides for "gender justice," and has gotten the crazy idea that women in governing roles would be contrary to Sharia. "God will be furious if women become governors: Iran cleric," from AFP, October 15 (thanks to Tanstaafl):

TEHRAN, IRAN - A top hardline Iranian cleric said on Thursday that "God's fury" would be unleashed if Iran appoints women as governors of some provinces, as was raised as a possibility by a minister last week.

"If some people want to change the principles and values of the revolution without considering the views of clerics, they will face the fury of God and of the people," Grand Ayatollah Lotfollah Safi Golpayghani said on his website.

Golpayghani was reacting to remarks by interior minister Mostafa Mohammad Najjar in the holy city of Qom last week, who when asked whether Iran would appoint women as governors of provinces, replied: "Yes. It is possible."

Golpayghani said the appointment of women in such top jobs was against sharia (Islamic) law.

"They come to Qom, the centre of Shiite Islam, and announce that they will appoint women as governors of some provinces. Do you want to fight with the Koran and the Prophet with such talks that go against sharia?" he asked.

"Who are you against? God's rule or the definite rules of religion?" Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has also faced stiff resistance from hardline clerics, including Golpayghani, in appointing women as cabinet ministers....

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
The Saudis -- the skimming-off-the-top gang known as the Al-Saud family, and their courtiers, and the government itself -- have more than a trillion dollars squirreled away for their Rainy Day Fund. And they will continue to receive, far into the future, hundreds of billions every year. But their proleptic squealing is quite something to behold.

And we know that when a rich Saudi feels he ought to do something to store up points, he spends money to strengthen and spread and protect Islam. He gives money to groups. Those groups in turn conduct Da'wa all over the Western world. He gives money to pay for mosques and madrasas, all over the Western and the already-islamized world. He pays for academic programs that are designed to make sure that the Saudis, and Muslims generally, keep a lock on the teaching, in the West, about Islam and all matters related to Islam. He helps pay, directly or indirectly, for the Western hirelings -- journalists, former diplomats (including ambassadors), former intelligence agents, businessmen angling for fat contracts -- who for the past half-century have presented a picture of this primitive, malevolent place as a "staunch ally" of the West, constantly on the verge of modernizing and reforming and god knows what else. It's all nonsense. Believers in Islam, Believers in Wahhabi Islam, are not and can never be "staunch allies" of any Infidels. Oh, they can smile and hand out keys to a Jaguar, or offer money for "consulting," or any number of other tangible expressions of a desire to curry, for their own ends, favor in the capitals of the Western world. The Age of Corruption fits them to a T.

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

See? Nothing to worry about from Erdogan and the advance of Sharia in Turkey. Let them into the EU! "Turkey: 32 suspects arrested in plots on Israeli, US targets," from the Jerusalem Post, October 15 (thanks to Elisa):

As if to send out a much-needed reminder of the mutual security interests between Ankara and Jerusalem following an apparent downturn in relations, it was reported Thursday that Turkish authorities had arrested 32 suspected al-Qaida terrorists who may have been planning attacks on NATO, US and Israeli targets.

According to a report by the state-run agency Anatolian, which was cited by Reuters, the suspects were caught in raids in eight provinces, and security officials believe some trained in al-Qaida camps in Afghanistan.

"Teams from the Istanbul Anti-Terror Squad have launched an operation against al-Qaida members found to be planning operations against US and Israeli representative offices and NATO installations," Anatolian reported.

The Hurriyet daily said that computers, discs and documents seized in the raids linked the suspects to al-Qaida....

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Indeed -- they've even spread to me. An update on this story. "Anatomy of a Swedish Blood Libel: Allegations of Israeli organ theft are ugly, false, harmful--and they spread," by Andrea Levin in the Wall Street Journal, October 14 (thanks to Dan):

Allegations that Israel plunders and trafficks Palestinians' organs are ugly, false, and harmful to peace efforts. No less dangerous--such libels spread.

The Aug. 17 story by Donald Bostrom in Aftonbladet, Scandanavia's leading daily, has quickly metastasized to mainstream Muslim media, spawning cartoons of Jews stealing body parts and drinking Arab blood. These have been published in Syria, Qatar, Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, and Oman, to name a few.

In early September, Algeria's al-Khabar newspaper echoed Mr. Bostrom in a new fantasy claiming Jewish-directed gangs of Algerians and Moroccans round up Algerian children, spirit them into Morocco and thence to Israel to have their body parts harvested and sold. On Sept. 17, Iran's PressTV breathlessly declared "an international Jewish conspiracy to kidnap children and harvest their organs is gathering momentum."

Hate-filled Web sites have also taken up the theme. Almost invariably, wherever such permutations on the idea of Israeli organ theft appear, Aftonbladet is cited.

Of course, Mr. Bostrom has enjoyed newfound acclaim in some quarters for his article. As the fresh rumors of child-snatching and organ theft circulated in Algeria, the National Federation of Algerian Journalists welcomed him last month to bestow an award for excellence, and promised support for his work.

Meanwhile, editors at Aftonbladet have neither acknowledged nor corrected any of the factual errors that litter the article, and instead react with indignation to charges of misconduct. In a perversion of journalistic standards, Editor-in-chief Jan Helin admitted on his own blog on Aug. 19 that Aftonbladet had no evidence for the incendiary charges against Israel. Nevertheless, according to another Aftonbladet editor cited in Israel's Ha'aretz newspaper on Aug. 20, Mr. Helin's publication "stands behind the demand for an international inquiry" into Israeli actions....

Hopeless dhimmis.

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Evidently this was going to be a very major attack. New York Jihad Plot Update. "Officials: Zazi Had Contact With Top Al-Qaida Leaders," by Dina Temple-Raston for NPR, October 15 (thanks to James):

The man arrested last month for allegedly plotting to blow up targets in New York contacted one of Osama bin Laden's right-hand men, U.S. intelligence officials say.

Officials say Denver shuttle bus driver Najibullah Zazi used an intermediary to contact Mustafa al-Yazid, the head of al-Qaida's operations in Afghanistan. Yazid is perhaps best known for saying earlier this year that he would use nuclear weapons against the U.S. if only he could get his hands on them. The Zazi connection to Yazid was first reported by The Associated Press.

While officials would not characterize the nature of their contact, the fact that Zazi could actually reach out and get hold of a top al-Qaida operative in Afghanistan is significant. This is the third time in the past few years that al-Qaida's top leadership appears to have given recruits with U.S. ties some sort of special consideration or attention.

"I think al-Qaida is always in search of interesting operatives who can operate in the West, and in particular, in the United States," said Juan Zarate, a former deputy national security adviser for terrorism in the Bush administration.

Could Have Been A 'Coup' For Al-Qaida

Zazi appears to fit the profile of an "interesting operative." He's an Afghan immigrant who had lived in the U.S. for 10 years. His lawyer told NPR that Zazi was about to apply for his green card. Until he was arrested last month, he had never been in trouble with the law. And because of those factors, he was able to move freely around the U.S.

Zarate says that combination would have been a coup for al-Qaida. "A coup for al-Qaida in this instance would be the ability to create the kind of threat in the homeland that al-Qaida has tried to foment ever since 9/11," said Zarate. "And I think that, for authorities, is the chilling dimension of this."

Authorities say Zazi, 24, trained at an al-Qaida camp in Pakistan last year. They accuse Zazi of trying to make homemade explosives using ingredients from beauty supply stores purchased in the Denver area. The FBI says it found chemical residue consistent with bomb-making in a hotel room Zazi rented just days before the anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks....

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In "CAIR's inner workings exposed" in WorldNetDaily today, Daniel Pipes discusses several crucial aspects of the new revelations coming out now about CAIR, courtesy the explosive new book Muslim Mafia.

A substantial body of criticism about CAIR exists, some of by me, but until now, the group's smash-mouths and extremists have managed to survive all revelations about its record. The publication today of "Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America" (WND Books) may, however, change the equation.

Written by P. David Gaubatz and Paul Sperry, the investigation is based largely on the undercover work of Gaubatz's son Chris, who spent six months as an intern at CAIR's D.C. headquarters in 2008. In that capacity, he acquired 12,000 pages of documentation and took 300 hours of video.

Chris Gaubatz's information reveals much that the secretive CAIR wants hidden, including its strategy, finances, membership and internal disputes, thereby exposing its shady and possibly illegal methods. As the book contains too much new information to summarize in small compass, I shall focus here on one dimension - the organization's inner workings, where the data show that CAIR's claims amount to crude deceptions.

Claim 1: According to Ibrahim Hooper, the organization's communications director, "CAIR has some 50,000 members." Fact: An internal memo prepared in June 2007 for a staff meeting reports that the organization had precisely 5,133 members, about one-tenth Hooper's exaggerated number.

Claim 2: CAIR is a "grass-roots organization" that depends financially on its members. Fact: According to an internal 2002 board meeting report, the organization received $33,000 in dues and $1,071,000 in donations. In other words, under 3 percent of its income derives from membership dues.

Claim 3: CAIR receives "no support from any overseas group or government." Fact: Gaubatz and Sperry report that 60 percent of CAIR's income derives from two dozen donors, most of whom live outside the United States. Specifically: $978,000 from the ruler of Dubai in 2002 in exchange for controlling interest in its headquarters property on New Jersey Avenue, a $500,000 gift from Saudi prince al-Waleed bin Talal and $112,000 in 2007 from Saudi prince Abdullah bin Mosa'ad, at least $300,000 from the Saudi-based Organization of the Islamic Conference, $250,000 from the Islamic Development Bank, and at least $17,000 from the American office of the Saudi-based International Islamic Relief Organization.

Claim 4: CAIR is an independent, domestic human rights group "similar to a Muslim NAACP." Fact: In a desperate search for funding, CAIR has offered its services to forward the commercial interests of foreign firms. This came to light in the aftermath of Dubai Ports World's failed effort to purchase six U.S. harbors in 2006 due to security fears. In response, CAIR's chairman traveled to Dubai and suggested to businessmen there: "Do not think about your contributions [to CAIR] as donations. Think about it from the perspective of rate of return. The investment of $50 million will give you billions of dollars in return for 50 years." [...]

Looking further ahead, I expect CAIR's days are numbered. It's a dirty institution, founded by Islamic terrorists and with many subsequent ties to terrorists. Over the years, it has established a long record of untrustworthiness that includes doctoring a photograph, fabricating anti-Muslim hate crimes, and promoting suspect polling. It has also intimidated critics via libel suits, boasted of ties to a neo-Nazi, and allegedly paid hush money. Eventually, close scrutiny of this outfit will likely lead to its demise.
Read it all.
| 42 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In "Criticizing Islam? Sorry, You're Cancelled" in Human Events today, Pamela Geller discusses how anti-jihad voices are increasingly shut down these days. They can't answer us, so they have to silence us.

It has happened to me also. Last Friday, I was scheduled to appear on The Eddie Burke Show on WBYR, "the best news and talk in Alaska," to debate the "freelance journalist" and anti-Semite Alison Weir.

Weir is the founder of the fiercely anti-Israel organization called "If Americans Knew." Daniel Okrent, the former Public Editor of the New York Times, says: "Representatives of If Americans Knew earnestly believe that the information they present to be true, and refuse to accept evidence that contradicts their beliefs." The Anti-Defamation League says: "Weir's criticism of Israel has, at times, crossed the line into anti-Semitism." [...]

I was going to take her on. Until I got a call from Eddie Burke late Friday afternoon.

Apparently, Alison Weir would not appear on the show with me, so Burke had to cancel me. He had promised Alison Weir an appearance when she came up to Alaska, so no opposing voice would be allowed to be heard.

Burke is a good guy. And I said to him, "You, Eddie, you're a decent fellow; one day, I hope you will step outside yourself and look at what happened here objectively. You have given in to a racist and a liar, provided an open platform for a Jew-hater to spread venom and bile, and capitulated to a demand for censorship. Why bow to those who traffic in lies and evil? Why strike at the heart of free speech?"

Read it all.
| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Jihad in Pakistan still escalating. "39 dead as militants ambush Pakistan police," by Arif Ali for AFP, October 15 (thanks to James):

LAHORE, Pakistan -- Militants unleashed coordinated attacks on Pakistani police in which 39 people died Thursday, storming offices in Lahore and bombing a northwest station to escalate 11 days of carnage.

The simultaneous assaults underscored the power of armed radicals to strike in the heart of Pakistan and the weakness of poorly equipped security forces, despite promises of a new offensive against the Taliban near the Afghan border.

Nuclear-armed Pakistan, which borders Afghanistan and is a key ally in the US-led fight against terror, is reeling from Taliban-linked attacks in which more than 160 people have died since October 5. Chronology: 11-days of bloodshed.

Minutes apart, between 9:00 am and 10:00 am, gunmen armed with suicide vests and grenades stormed the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) branch in Lahore, plus a police training school and a commando academy on the city's outskirts.

The training centre in suburb Manawan was previously attacked on March 30 in a militant raid that killed eight police recruits. And the FIA building in Lahore was bombed in March 2008, killing 16 people....

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From the Hate Mail Bag: this latest from my friend in Djibouti could be the funniest hate mail ever. Subject line: "Truthwatch team have blood-on their hands."

Spencer and his team has blood on thier hands. Time will rule out. Supporting the genocide in Palestine for the last 60 years, Afghanistan for the last nine years, Iraq for the last six years and other parts of the world has been justified by the Truthwotchers of Spencer and his team. They have blood on their hands. They deny any wrong did or doing by thier so called armies in our land and they report all the things they percieve from our world.

They took their arms to fight against the TRUTH and they are tirelessly doing that for thier hidden agendas.

Spencer himself has a stolen Palestinian Kidney which was donated to him by the ZIONIST dogs who bite those Pal People.

let us ask if he is defending his "lie-freedom" why he justify that the dead palestinian organs are sold to his second/first identity.

I should tell this man that he should bring back this organ that is not his and he stole it.

| 36 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Israel said the delay was caused by the difficulty in the strengthening of Heron engines to enable local Aselsan-made electro-optical payloads..." The delay ought to have been caused by a clear-eyed recognition on Israel's part that it should not be supplying military hardware to an increasingly Sharia-oriented Turkey. An update on this story. "'Turkey may sue Israel over delay in supply of Heron UAVs,'" from the Jerusalem Post, October 15 (thanks to James):

If Israel fails to supply Turkey with Heron type unmanned aerial vehicles as agreed in a deal by the two countries, Ankara will fine Israel for three or four million dollars, as well as take the matter up with the International Court of Commercial Arbitration, the Turkish Today's Zaman quoted a top official at the Undersecretariat for Defense Industries