The head of the Saudi delegation Mohammad S. Al Sabban dismissed the IEA figures as “biased” and said OPEC's own calculations showed that Saudi Arabia would lose $19 billion a year starting in 2012 under a new climate pact. The region would lose much more, he said.
Only $19bn/year? Wow, such a piddly amount. Sounds like the average annual budget for keeping all of the Saudi princes and princesses in the newest model of Mercedes-Benz or upgrades to their personal Boeing/Airbus personal jets. Spare me the sob story.
“We are among the economically vulnerable countries,” Al Sabban told The Associated Press on the sidelines of the talks ahead of negotiations in Copenhagen in December for a treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012.
Economically vulnerable? Oh, boy, what a whopper that is. As Hugh has noted many, many times here on JW, the Arabs have been the recipients of somewhere in the area of $12 TRILLION over the past 35 years. I'm assuming that 'wealth' went towards building a viable and self-sustaining infrastructure other than hundreds and hundreds of shiny skyscrapers and man-made islands in the shape of palm fronds?
“This is very serious for us,” he continued. “We are in the process of diversifying our economy but this will take a long time. We don't have too many resources.”
Poor A-rabs. Seems to me that they had 80+ years to find some uses for sand other than glass. But, hey, who am I to criticize all of the other "resource poor" countries who were forced to buy basic raw materials to build up their economies.
Cry me a f*cking river, Saudi Barbaria: If it weren't for oil, you bunch of bedouin savages would still be living in tents in the middle of the desert, without a clue what it means to have electricity, running water, cars, cell phones, airplanes, A/C, fresh food,....
Oh, and BTW, it is NOT a conspiracy by Western nations to try to protect our planet; It is, however, a well stated and well demonstrated plan for Islam to destroy this planet all for the 'love' of a delusional, psychotic, demented pedophile rapist murdering thieving mad man -- The Profit.
The head of the Saudi delegation Mohammad S. Al Sabban dismissed the IEA figures as “biased” and said OPEC's own calculations showed that Saudi Arabia would lose $19 billion a year starting in 2012 under a new climate pact. The region would lose much more, he said.
Only $19bn/year? Wow, such a piddly amount. Sounds like the average annual budget for keeping all of the Saudi princes and princesses in the newest model of Mercedes-Benz or upgrades to their personal Boeing/Airbus personal jets. Spare me the sob story.
“We are among the economically vulnerable countries,” Al Sabban told The Associated Press on the sidelines of the talks ahead of negotiations in Copenhagen in December for a treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012.
Economically vulnerable? Oh, boy, what a whopper that is. As Hugh has noted many, many times here on JW, the Arabs have been the recipients of somewhere in the area of $12 TRILLION over the past 35 years. I'm assuming that 'wealth' went towards building a viable and self-sustaining infrastructure other than hundreds and hundreds of shiny skyscrapers and man-made islands in the shape of palm fronds?
“This is very serious for us,” he continued. “We are in the process of diversifying our economy but this will take a long time. We don't have too many resources.”
Poor A-rabs. Seems to me that they had 80+ years to find some uses for sand other than glass. But, hey, who am I to criticize all of the other "resource poor" countries who were forced to buy basic raw materials to build up their economies.
Cry me a f*cking river, Saudi Barbaria: If it weren't for oil, you bunch of bedouin savages would still be living in tents in the middle of the desert, without a clue what it means to have electricity, running water, cars, cell phones, airplanes, A/C, fresh food,....
Oh, and BTW, it is NOT a conspiracy by Western nations to try to protect our planet; It is, however, a well stated and well demonstrated plan for Islam to destroy this planet all for the 'love' of a delusional, psychotic, demented pedophile rapist murdering thieving mad man -- The Profit.
The head of the Saudi delegation Mohammad S. Al Sabban dismissed the IEA figures as “biased” and said OPEC's own calculations showed that Saudi Arabia would lose $19 billion a year starting in 2012 under a new climate pact. The region would lose much more, he said.
Only $19bn/year? Wow, such a piddly amount. Sounds like the average annual budget for keeping all of the Saudi princes and princesses in the newest model of Mercedes-Benz or upgrades to their personal Boeing/Airbus personal jets. Spare me the sob story.
“We are among the economically vulnerable countries,” Al Sabban told The Associated Press on the sidelines of the talks ahead of negotiations in Copenhagen in December for a treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012.
Economically vulnerable? Oh, boy, what a whopper that is. As Hugh has noted many, many times here on JW, the Arabs have been the recipients of somewhere in the area of $12 TRILLION over the past 35 years. I'm assuming that 'wealth' went towards building a viable and self-sustaining infrastructure other than hundreds and hundreds of shiny skyscrapers and man-made islands in the shape of palm fronds?
“This is very serious for us,” he continued. “We are in the process of diversifying our economy but this will take a long time. We don't have too many resources.”
Poor A-rabs. Seems to me that they had 80+ years to find some uses for sand other than glass. But, hey, who am I to criticize all of the other "resource poor" countries who were forced to buy basic raw materials to build up their economies.
Cry me a f*cking river, Saudi Barbaria: If it weren't for oil, you bunch of bedouin savages would still be living in tents in the middle of the desert, without a clue what it means to have electricity, running water, cars, cell phones, airplanes, A/C, fresh food,....
Oh, and BTW, it is NOT a conspiracy by Western nations to try to protect our planet; It is, however, a well stated and well demonstrated plan for Islam to destroy this planet all for the 'love' of a delusional, psychotic, demented pedophile rapist murdering thieving mad man -- The Profit.
The head of the Saudi delegation Mohammad S. Al Sabban dismissed the IEA figures as “biased” and said OPEC's own calculations showed that Saudi Arabia would lose $19 billion a year starting in 2012 under a new climate pact. The region would lose much more, he said.
Only $19bn/year? Wow, such a piddly amount. Sounds like the average annual budget for keeping all of the Saudi princes and princesses in the newest model of Mercedes-Benz or upgrades to their personal Boeing/Airbus personal jets. Spare me the sob story.
“We are among the economically vulnerable countries,” Al Sabban told The Associated Press on the sidelines of the talks ahead of negotiations in Copenhagen in December for a treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012.
Economically vulnerable? Oh, boy, what a whopper that is. As Hugh has noted many, many times here on JW, the Arabs have been the recipients of somewhere in the area of $12 TRILLION over the past 35 years. I'm assuming that 'wealth' went towards building a viable and self-sustaining infrastructure other than hundreds and hundreds of shiny skyscrapers and man-made islands in the shape of palm fronds?
“This is very serious for us,” he continued. “We are in the process of diversifying our economy but this will take a long time. We don't have too many resources.”
Poor A-rabs. Seems to me that they had 80+ years to find some uses for sand other than glass. But, hey, who am I to criticize all of the other "resource poor" countries who were forced to buy basic raw materials to build up their economies.
Cry me a f*cking river, Saudi Barbaria: If it weren't for oil, you bunch of bedouin savages would still be living in tents in the middle of the desert, without a clue what it means to have electricity, running water, cars, cell phones, airplanes, A/C, fresh food,....
Oh, and BTW, it is NOT a conspiracy by Western nations to try to protect our planet; It is, however, a well stated and well demonstrated plan for Islam to destroy this planet all for the 'love' of a delusional, psychotic, demented pedophile rapist murdering thieving mad man -- The Profit.
You are all too unkind. Remember, we are good people who don't know the meaning of Schadenfreude, and only wish the Saudis well. I have an idea. We could dismantle all those mosques which the Saudis have so generously built for us, for our future as part of the Muslim world, and send the materials to Saudi Arabia so they will not lack building materials for a long, long time. All they would have to provide is the oil for transportation.
I, for one, would be only too happy to give up the odd Saturday in this charitable cause.
And guess who is in the G-20, to whom the Obama administation just ceded control of our nation's financial system. Yes Saudi Arabia who wants a handout, after OPEC's major run up in oil prices helped to cause the recent financial crisis and speculative blow up and crash in commodity prices.
In the future our financial and banking system will be subject to the whim of the G-20 Financial Stability Board. The SEC will now answer to the Financial Stability Board. The Board is populated by central bankers that are appointed by Countries, including Argentina (defaulted on huge loans from the IMF and other creditor countries), Indonesia (wildly unstable), Mainland China (oppressive evil empire), South Korea (democratic? for all of 12 years!), Saudi Arabia (dictatorial monarchy), etc.
Essentially by ceding to the Financial Stability Board, Obama has given up our sovereignty to control by foreigners that have vested interests that may run counter to our own, or may wish to dismantle and damage our wealth and economic system. This little noticed act may end up having more disastrous effect on our lives than anything else he may ever do.
Wow...Saudia might actually have to start building stuff instead of leaching off of mother earth. They should imediately start glass-making factories so they'll have something they can sell and it will utilize some of the excess crude they'll have. If they aren't up to actually working for a living like the rest of the world, they can always pound sand!
Or we can pay them revenue to store underground in abandoned oil wells our nuclear waste. They're right to cry and beg in typical Bedouin manner because they see it coming. Their days are numbered, we're getting off oil by 2020 in a big way. Go solar!
The Saudis -- the skimming-off-the-top gang known as the Al-Saud family, and their courtiers, and the government itself, have more than a trillion dollars squirreled away for their Rainy Day Fund. And they will continue to receive, far into the future, hundreds of billions every year. But their proleptic squealing is quite something to behold.
And we know that when a rich Saudi feels he ought to do something to store up points, he spends money to strengthen and spread and protect Islam. He gives money to groups. Those groups in turn conduct Da'wa all over the Western world. He gives money to pay for mosques and madrasas, all over the Western and the already-islamized world. He pays for academic programs that are designed to make sure that the Saudis, and Muslims generally, keep a lock on the teaching, in the West, about Islam and all matters related to Islam. He helps pay, directly or indirectly, for the Western hirelings -- journalists, former diplomats (including ambassadors), former intelligence agents, businessmen angling for fat contracts, who for the past half-century have presented a picture of this primitive, malevolent place as a "staunch ally" of the West, constantly on the verge of modernizing and reforming and god knows what else. It's all nonsense. Believers in Islam, Believers in Wahhabi Islam, are not and can never be "staunch allies" of any Infidels. Oh, they can smile and hand out keys to a Jaguar, or offer money for "consulting," or any number of other tangible expressions of a desire to curry, for their own ends, favor in the capitals of the Western world. The Age of Corruption fits them to a T. And of course it is the Saudi Lobby in Washington that has prevented, for nearly four decades, the formulation of a sensible energy -- and environmental -- policy, based on taxing oil and gasoline, in order to depress demand, encourage the use of other sources and kinds of energy, and in order -- for those who understand how the Saudis have set their prices when they were still, as they no longer are, the swing producer -- to recapture oligopolistic rents (for more on this, google "Jihad Watch" and "oligopolitstic rents" and "Hugh").
It is the Saudis, and other rich Arabs, who should be reiumbursing the Americans for getting rid of Saddam Hussein. And now it is the Saudis who should be paying the Americans for protecting them from Iran. And if a nuclear shield is offered by the American government to the rich Arabs, that offer should not be free, but should be charged for, because we really have no stake in the survival of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, the U.A.E., and protecting them is something for which we should demand, and get, payment. How about two hundred billion a year, from here to eternity?
Yes, that sounds about right.
And as for the Jiyzyah of Foreign Aid that America and Europe have for decades been giving to Egypt, Jordan, the "Palestinians," Pakistan, and so many other Muslim countries, that Jizyah is bad, psychologically for us, and its continued giving only encourages the Muslim recipients in their belief that this is their due, that it is theirs by right. Certainly there is not the slightest gratitude exhibited by any of them, and there never will be, although here and there some ruler, sensing annoyance in Congress may, like Maliki, while saying nothing to his own people, will in Washington, before an American audience, utter a sentence or two of phony gratitude. It's happened.
No, make the Saudis, and the Emiratis, and the Kuwaitis, and the two-faced Al-Thanis of Qatar, pay for their fellow members of the Umma. Let's see how much real solidarity there is, when it comes time to actuallly give aid, not only to fellow Arabs -- Jordan, Egypt, the "Palestinians," but also to Pakistan, and Indonesia, and sinking Bangladesh. Yes, that will be a test for the solidarity of the Ummah, in a situation other than that of the shared hostility and hate toward all Infidels.
That should be a main task for all those who want "peace" or rather, "peace with justice," in the world. Stop the Saudis. Diminish the amounts they have available to use in the Jihad of Wealth.
And whenever any Saudi dares to say the kind of outrageous things that were said by "the head of the Saudi delegation Mohammad S. Al Sabban" when he "dismissed the IEA figures as “biased” and said OPEC's own calculations showed that Saudi Arabia would lose $19 billion a year starting in 2012 under a new climate pact. The region would lose much more" simply show by icy silence, or expressed contempt, that their fantastic greed, their disgusting assumptions about what they are entitled to, after all that they have received without doing a minute's work to earn it, and after the spectacle of Saudi palaces and arms-buying and private 747s outfitted for this or that prince or pinceling of the Al-Saud, and the sexual debauchery that is such a feature of the lives of the rich Arabs, especially in the Gulf, and even more, among those Arabs and Muslims when they travel to the West, which they regard merely as a Fun-Fair-Cum-Brothelp where Anything Goes.
I've said it before, Hugh should run for office. He wouldn't be bound by what al-CNN, CAIR, MujaheedSNBC, the Huffington Post or the Daily Kos would expect him to say about mahoundianism, and his straightforward and truthful approach to dealing with jihad would be like Geert Wilders's (America is in desperate need of her own Wilders.) And he wouldn't care about any criticism from the special envoy from the UN (the United Arabs, that is) for the promotion of islamization and islamophilia, that self-hating mahoundian Doudou Diène either.
Not to mention that his knowledge of the subject would prevent any mahoundianism-enabler debating him from being dealt a humiliating defeat in every single discussion he participated in ONLY if the likes of Ahmed Rehab and Ibrahim Hooper were chosen as moderators (though I'd not expect them to be moderators, but the actual ones being made to look like utter fools in their attempts to defend their uswa hasana, all insane all kamel and his inbred bedouin savage cult.)
Boneshack: you wrote: "...assuming that 'wealth' went towards building a viable and self-sustaining infrastructure other than hundreds and hundreds of shiny skyscrapers and man-made islands in the shape of palm fronds?"
What if some of the $12 trillion had gone to naturalizing and integrating the Falastin Arab refugees into the Arab states?
From past observations of Obama's less-than-a-year experience in messing up our country I would say that he will do everything in his power to steal from American taxpayers to give a handout to these rogues. By the way, where did most of the lunatics of 9/11 come from? Yep, you guessed it, but does Obama care, I think not!
Once all the Islamic oil is gone, or better still, we can run our cars in overdrive on solar, their geo-strategic value is NIL, and having troops there or supporting those countries in any way would make no more sense than having US troops in Germany or Iceland. (Oops, we still have those).
Once that goes, we can follow the Rush Limbaugh formula - give aid to countries in direct proportion to how pro-US they are. In other words, plenty for countries like Columbia, and peanuts for ones like Nicaragua.
Let the sands of time be their Armageddon, as their ability to maintain a society without their slave nations, as provided by the prophet, not longer pay the tax, and they realize they have nothing left but their belief – ostracized from civilization – they are bound to do a Jim Jones. We’re just lucky they don’t have nukes to commit suicide – only their ideologically fueled ignorance.
I have my own thoughts about Mr Fitzgerald - whose moniker I suspect of being a nom de plume.
I am fairly sure that although he writes at length here, and choose to do so in a very distinctive manner (a style I suspect him of adopting at least in part to relieve the mind-crushing boredom of having to repeat over and over, the same information and the same good advice about Islam and the jihad, when he could be thinking and talking about so many other much more interesting and fun things), he is perfectly capable of talking in much simpler language when he chooses.
That he doesn't choose to do so *here*, doesn't mean he can't do it elsewhere...or that he may not, in fact, *be* doing it elsewhere.
Is the oil drying up?
Chutzpah!
From the article:
The head of the Saudi delegation Mohammad S. Al Sabban dismissed the IEA figures as “biased” and said OPEC's own calculations showed that Saudi Arabia would lose $19 billion a year starting in 2012 under a new climate pact. The region would lose much more, he said.
Only $19bn/year? Wow, such a piddly amount. Sounds like the average annual budget for keeping all of the Saudi princes and princesses in the newest model of Mercedes-Benz or upgrades to their personal Boeing/Airbus personal jets. Spare me the sob story.
“We are among the economically vulnerable countries,” Al Sabban told The Associated Press on the sidelines of the talks ahead of negotiations in Copenhagen in December for a treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012.
Economically vulnerable? Oh, boy, what a whopper that is. As Hugh has noted many, many times here on JW, the Arabs have been the recipients of somewhere in the area of $12 TRILLION over the past 35 years. I'm assuming that 'wealth' went towards building a viable and self-sustaining infrastructure other than hundreds and hundreds of shiny skyscrapers and man-made islands in the shape of palm fronds?
“This is very serious for us,” he continued. “We are in the process of diversifying our economy but this will take a long time. We don't have too many resources.”
Poor A-rabs. Seems to me that they had 80+ years to find some uses for sand other than glass. But, hey, who am I to criticize all of the other "resource poor" countries who were forced to buy basic raw materials to build up their economies.
Cry me a f*cking river, Saudi Barbaria: If it weren't for oil, you bunch of bedouin savages would still be living in tents in the middle of the desert, without a clue what it means to have electricity, running water, cars, cell phones, airplanes, A/C, fresh food,....
Oh, and BTW, it is NOT a conspiracy by Western nations to try to protect our planet; It is, however, a well stated and well demonstrated plan for Islam to destroy this planet all for the 'love' of a delusional, psychotic, demented pedophile rapist murdering thieving mad man -- The Profit.
From the article:
The head of the Saudi delegation Mohammad S. Al Sabban dismissed the IEA figures as “biased” and said OPEC's own calculations showed that Saudi Arabia would lose $19 billion a year starting in 2012 under a new climate pact. The region would lose much more, he said.
Only $19bn/year? Wow, such a piddly amount. Sounds like the average annual budget for keeping all of the Saudi princes and princesses in the newest model of Mercedes-Benz or upgrades to their personal Boeing/Airbus personal jets. Spare me the sob story.
“We are among the economically vulnerable countries,” Al Sabban told The Associated Press on the sidelines of the talks ahead of negotiations in Copenhagen in December for a treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012.
Economically vulnerable? Oh, boy, what a whopper that is. As Hugh has noted many, many times here on JW, the Arabs have been the recipients of somewhere in the area of $12 TRILLION over the past 35 years. I'm assuming that 'wealth' went towards building a viable and self-sustaining infrastructure other than hundreds and hundreds of shiny skyscrapers and man-made islands in the shape of palm fronds?
“This is very serious for us,” he continued. “We are in the process of diversifying our economy but this will take a long time. We don't have too many resources.”
Poor A-rabs. Seems to me that they had 80+ years to find some uses for sand other than glass. But, hey, who am I to criticize all of the other "resource poor" countries who were forced to buy basic raw materials to build up their economies.
Cry me a f*cking river, Saudi Barbaria: If it weren't for oil, you bunch of bedouin savages would still be living in tents in the middle of the desert, without a clue what it means to have electricity, running water, cars, cell phones, airplanes, A/C, fresh food,....
Oh, and BTW, it is NOT a conspiracy by Western nations to try to protect our planet; It is, however, a well stated and well demonstrated plan for Islam to destroy this planet all for the 'love' of a delusional, psychotic, demented pedophile rapist murdering thieving mad man -- The Profit.
From the article:
The head of the Saudi delegation Mohammad S. Al Sabban dismissed the IEA figures as “biased” and said OPEC's own calculations showed that Saudi Arabia would lose $19 billion a year starting in 2012 under a new climate pact. The region would lose much more, he said.
Only $19bn/year? Wow, such a piddly amount. Sounds like the average annual budget for keeping all of the Saudi princes and princesses in the newest model of Mercedes-Benz or upgrades to their personal Boeing/Airbus personal jets. Spare me the sob story.
“We are among the economically vulnerable countries,” Al Sabban told The Associated Press on the sidelines of the talks ahead of negotiations in Copenhagen in December for a treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012.
Economically vulnerable? Oh, boy, what a whopper that is. As Hugh has noted many, many times here on JW, the Arabs have been the recipients of somewhere in the area of $12 TRILLION over the past 35 years. I'm assuming that 'wealth' went towards building a viable and self-sustaining infrastructure other than hundreds and hundreds of shiny skyscrapers and man-made islands in the shape of palm fronds?
“This is very serious for us,” he continued. “We are in the process of diversifying our economy but this will take a long time. We don't have too many resources.”
Poor A-rabs. Seems to me that they had 80+ years to find some uses for sand other than glass. But, hey, who am I to criticize all of the other "resource poor" countries who were forced to buy basic raw materials to build up their economies.
Cry me a f*cking river, Saudi Barbaria: If it weren't for oil, you bunch of bedouin savages would still be living in tents in the middle of the desert, without a clue what it means to have electricity, running water, cars, cell phones, airplanes, A/C, fresh food,....
Oh, and BTW, it is NOT a conspiracy by Western nations to try to protect our planet; It is, however, a well stated and well demonstrated plan for Islam to destroy this planet all for the 'love' of a delusional, psychotic, demented pedophile rapist murdering thieving mad man -- The Profit.
From the article:
The head of the Saudi delegation Mohammad S. Al Sabban dismissed the IEA figures as “biased” and said OPEC's own calculations showed that Saudi Arabia would lose $19 billion a year starting in 2012 under a new climate pact. The region would lose much more, he said.
Only $19bn/year? Wow, such a piddly amount. Sounds like the average annual budget for keeping all of the Saudi princes and princesses in the newest model of Mercedes-Benz or upgrades to their personal Boeing/Airbus personal jets. Spare me the sob story.
“We are among the economically vulnerable countries,” Al Sabban told The Associated Press on the sidelines of the talks ahead of negotiations in Copenhagen in December for a treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012.
Economically vulnerable? Oh, boy, what a whopper that is. As Hugh has noted many, many times here on JW, the Arabs have been the recipients of somewhere in the area of $12 TRILLION over the past 35 years. I'm assuming that 'wealth' went towards building a viable and self-sustaining infrastructure other than hundreds and hundreds of shiny skyscrapers and man-made islands in the shape of palm fronds?
“This is very serious for us,” he continued. “We are in the process of diversifying our economy but this will take a long time. We don't have too many resources.”
Poor A-rabs. Seems to me that they had 80+ years to find some uses for sand other than glass. But, hey, who am I to criticize all of the other "resource poor" countries who were forced to buy basic raw materials to build up their economies.
Cry me a f*cking river, Saudi Barbaria: If it weren't for oil, you bunch of bedouin savages would still be living in tents in the middle of the desert, without a clue what it means to have electricity, running water, cars, cell phones, airplanes, A/C, fresh food,....
Oh, and BTW, it is NOT a conspiracy by Western nations to try to protect our planet; It is, however, a well stated and well demonstrated plan for Islam to destroy this planet all for the 'love' of a delusional, psychotic, demented pedophile rapist murdering thieving mad man -- The Profit.
Sorry for triple...Dreaded 'Gateway Timeout' error...
You are all too unkind. Remember, we are good people who don't know the meaning of Schadenfreude, and only wish the Saudis well. I have an idea. We could dismantle all those mosques which the Saudis have so generously built for us, for our future as part of the Muslim world, and send the materials to Saudi Arabia so they will not lack building materials for a long, long time. All they would have to provide is the oil for transportation.
I, for one, would be only too happy to give up the odd Saturday in this charitable cause.
And guess who is in the G-20, to whom the Obama administation just ceded control of our nation's financial system. Yes Saudi Arabia who wants a handout, after OPEC's major run up in oil prices helped to cause the recent financial crisis and speculative blow up and crash in commodity prices.
In the future our financial and banking system will be subject to the whim of the G-20 Financial Stability Board. The SEC will now answer to the Financial Stability Board. The Board is populated by central bankers that are appointed by Countries, including Argentina (defaulted on huge loans from the IMF and other creditor countries), Indonesia (wildly unstable), Mainland China (oppressive evil empire), South Korea (democratic? for all of 12 years!), Saudi Arabia (dictatorial monarchy), etc.
Essentially by ceding to the Financial Stability Board, Obama has given up our sovereignty to control by foreigners that have vested interests that may run counter to our own, or may wish to dismantle and damage our wealth and economic system. This little noticed act may end up having more disastrous effect on our lives than anything else he may ever do.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFDBkf4F_hs&feature=channel
Wow...Saudia might actually have to start building stuff instead of leaching off of mother earth. They should imediately start glass-making factories so they'll have something they can sell and it will utilize some of the excess crude they'll have. If they aren't up to actually working for a living like the rest of the world, they can always pound sand!
Or we can pay them revenue to store underground in abandoned oil wells our nuclear waste. They're right to cry and beg in typical Bedouin manner because they see it coming. Their days are numbered, we're getting off oil by 2020 in a big way. Go solar!
I can barely hold back my tears.
The Saudis -- the skimming-off-the-top gang known as the Al-Saud family, and their courtiers, and the government itself, have more than a trillion dollars squirreled away for their Rainy Day Fund. And they will continue to receive, far into the future, hundreds of billions every year. But their proleptic squealing is quite something to behold.
And we know that when a rich Saudi feels he ought to do something to store up points, he spends money to strengthen and spread and protect Islam. He gives money to groups. Those groups in turn conduct Da'wa all over the Western world. He gives money to pay for mosques and madrasas, all over the Western and the already-islamized world. He pays for academic programs that are designed to make sure that the Saudis, and Muslims generally, keep a lock on the teaching, in the West, about Islam and all matters related to Islam. He helps pay, directly or indirectly, for the Western hirelings -- journalists, former diplomats (including ambassadors), former intelligence agents, businessmen angling for fat contracts, who for the past half-century have presented a picture of this primitive, malevolent place as a "staunch ally" of the West, constantly on the verge of modernizing and reforming and god knows what else. It's all nonsense. Believers in Islam, Believers in Wahhabi Islam, are not and can never be "staunch allies" of any Infidels. Oh, they can smile and hand out keys to a Jaguar, or offer money for "consulting," or any number of other tangible expressions of a desire to curry, for their own ends, favor in the capitals of the Western world. The Age of Corruption fits them to a T. And of course it is the Saudi Lobby in Washington that has prevented, for nearly four decades, the formulation of a sensible energy -- and environmental -- policy, based on taxing oil and gasoline, in order to depress demand, encourage the use of other sources and kinds of energy, and in order -- for those who understand how the Saudis have set their prices when they were still, as they no longer are, the swing producer -- to recapture oligopolistic rents (for more on this, google "Jihad Watch" and "oligopolitstic rents" and "Hugh").
It is the Saudis, and other rich Arabs, who should be reiumbursing the Americans for getting rid of Saddam Hussein. And now it is the Saudis who should be paying the Americans for protecting them from Iran. And if a nuclear shield is offered by the American government to the rich Arabs, that offer should not be free, but should be charged for, because we really have no stake in the survival of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, the U.A.E., and protecting them is something for which we should demand, and get, payment. How about two hundred billion a year, from here to eternity?
Yes, that sounds about right.
And as for the Jiyzyah of Foreign Aid that America and Europe have for decades been giving to Egypt, Jordan, the "Palestinians," Pakistan, and so many other Muslim countries, that Jizyah is bad, psychologically for us, and its continued giving only encourages the Muslim recipients in their belief that this is their due, that it is theirs by right. Certainly there is not the slightest gratitude exhibited by any of them, and there never will be, although here and there some ruler, sensing annoyance in Congress may, like Maliki, while saying nothing to his own people, will in Washington, before an American audience, utter a sentence or two of phony gratitude. It's happened.
No, make the Saudis, and the Emiratis, and the Kuwaitis, and the two-faced Al-Thanis of Qatar, pay for their fellow members of the Umma. Let's see how much real solidarity there is, when it comes time to actuallly give aid, not only to fellow Arabs -- Jordan, Egypt, the "Palestinians," but also to Pakistan, and Indonesia, and sinking Bangladesh. Yes, that will be a test for the solidarity of the Ummah, in a situation other than that of the shared hostility and hate toward all Infidels.
That should be a main task for all those who want "peace" or rather, "peace with justice," in the world. Stop the Saudis. Diminish the amounts they have available to use in the Jihad of Wealth.
And whenever any Saudi dares to say the kind of outrageous things that were said by "the head of the Saudi delegation Mohammad S. Al Sabban" when he "dismissed the IEA figures as “biased” and said OPEC's own calculations showed that Saudi Arabia would lose $19 billion a year starting in 2012 under a new climate pact. The region would lose much more" simply show by icy silence, or expressed contempt, that their fantastic greed, their disgusting assumptions about what they are entitled to, after all that they have received without doing a minute's work to earn it, and after the spectacle of Saudi palaces and arms-buying and private 747s outfitted for this or that prince or pinceling of the Al-Saud, and the sexual debauchery that is such a feature of the lives of the rich Arabs, especially in the Gulf, and even more, among those Arabs and Muslims when they travel to the West, which they regard merely as a Fun-Fair-Cum-Brothelp where Anything Goes.
Hugh,
Thank you! Couldn't have said it any better.
HUGH FITZGERALD FOR PRESIDENT!
Mr Spencer for President.
Mr Fitzgerald for Secretary of State.
Let Allah Provide! ;)
I've said it before, Hugh should run for office. He wouldn't be bound by what al-CNN, CAIR, MujaheedSNBC, the Huffington Post or the Daily Kos would expect him to say about mahoundianism, and his straightforward and truthful approach to dealing with jihad would be like Geert Wilders's (America is in desperate need of her own Wilders.) And he wouldn't care about any criticism from the special envoy from the UN (the United Arabs, that is) for the promotion of islamization and islamophilia, that self-hating mahoundian Doudou Diène either.
Not to mention that his knowledge of the subject would prevent any mahoundianism-enabler debating him from being dealt a humiliating defeat in every single discussion he participated in ONLY if the likes of Ahmed Rehab and Ibrahim Hooper were chosen as moderators (though I'd not expect them to be moderators, but the actual ones being made to look like utter fools in their attempts to defend their uswa hasana, all insane all kamel and his inbred bedouin savage cult.)
In order to be a success politically one has to have the ability to communicate with the common man.
Hugh has never shown an inclination to be prepared to communicate with a language the common man can relate to.
So I think he has made his view on such a topic quite clear over the years.
Boneshack: you wrote: "...assuming that 'wealth' went towards building a viable and self-sustaining infrastructure other than hundreds and hundreds of shiny skyscrapers and man-made islands in the shape of palm fronds?"
What if some of the $12 trillion had gone to naturalizing and integrating the Falastin Arab refugees into the Arab states?
From past observations of Obama's less-than-a-year experience in messing up our country I would say that he will do everything in his power to steal from American taxpayers to give a handout to these rogues. By the way, where did most of the lunatics of 9/11 come from? Yep, you guessed it, but does Obama care, I think not!
Once all the Islamic oil is gone, or better still, we can run our cars in overdrive on solar, their geo-strategic value is NIL, and having troops there or supporting those countries in any way would make no more sense than having US troops in Germany or Iceland. (Oops, we still have those).
Once that goes, we can follow the Rush Limbaugh formula - give aid to countries in direct proportion to how pro-US they are. In other words, plenty for countries like Columbia, and peanuts for ones like Nicaragua.
Let the sands of time be their Armageddon, as their ability to maintain a society without their slave nations, as provided by the prophet, not longer pay the tax, and they realize they have nothing left but their belief – ostracized from civilization – they are bound to do a Jim Jones. We’re just lucky they don’t have nukes to commit suicide – only their ideologically fueled ignorance.
payingattention
I have my own thoughts about Mr Fitzgerald - whose moniker I suspect of being a nom de plume.
I am fairly sure that although he writes at length here, and choose to do so in a very distinctive manner (a style I suspect him of adopting at least in part to relieve the mind-crushing boredom of having to repeat over and over, the same information and the same good advice about Islam and the jihad, when he could be thinking and talking about so many other much more interesting and fun things), he is perfectly capable of talking in much simpler language when he chooses.
That he doesn't choose to do so *here*, doesn't mean he can't do it elsewhere...or that he may not, in fact, *be* doing it elsewhere.
.
Screw 'em!
.
.
How do we make sure that our weak-minded politicians don't borrow even more money from China to give it to the SOWdi swine?!
How do we make sure that our money does not get thrown to the pigs?
.