Bosnia: Muslim army commander arrested for war crimes

Remember, this was within the context of the good war, in which the United States showed the umma that we are not anti-Muslim, and sided with modern, moderate Muslims who love the U.S. dearly to this day. "Bosnia: Muslim ex-commander arrested for war crimes," from AKI, November 4 (thanks to C. Cantoni):

Sarajevo, 4 Nov. (AKI) - A former Bosnian Muslim army deputy commander, Nihad Bojadzic, was arrested in Sarajevo on Wednesday on suspicion of having killed over 20 Croat civilians and prisoners of war during the 1993 Muslim-Croat war, the state prosecutor's office said. Bojadzic was due to be handed over to Bosnia's state war crimes court.

Bojadzic, 47, is suspected of committing the mass killings while serving as deputy commander of the Bosnian Muslim-led army special platoon 'Zulfikar' when it overran the village of Trusina near the southern town of Konjic in April 1993.

Prosecution spokesman Boris Grubesic told media that 19 of the victims were Croat civilians, three were Croatian soldiers who had surrendered themselves, while four people, including two children, were wounded.

Four more Muslims were arrested on the same charges in September and are in detention pending trial....

| 19 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

19 Comments

Hmm, wonder if he'll refuse counsel, make diatribes against the court, protest the illegitimacy of the proceedings, and make a general @ss of himself (like Moussaoui, Sadam, et al).

I wonder if we can get Hilary to admit we might have been on the wrong side.

I was thinking the same thing. Although I don't know if she has acknowledges that either her or Billy do any wrong. This has always been a craw in my side with him taking our troops into the area to help Muslims slaughter more Christians.

I have something else to stick in our collective craw! Billy bowing to the grave of the unknown jihadi in Bosnia. These animals did unspeakable things to Christians in Republika Srpska ..... and Bill bows to their dead. Shame is all I feel for this.

http://www.srpska-mreza.com/Bosnia/Srebrenica/AlQaeda.html

Funny how when it suites Robert, as in Albanians helping Jews, he calls people from this region cultural or default Muslims. But, on other occasions, read anything negative, they suddenly become knowledgeable, devout and practicing Muslims who are part of the whole Jihad conspiracy, LOL,

I wish I knew then what I know now about islam when I served on NATO and UN peacekeeping tours in 2003-04 in the muslim sector. Of course, the Bosnian muslims only took the best parts of islam while maintaining the best of the west, i.e. the women did all the work while the men sat around drinking beer or slivovitz.

This has generated a fraction of the publicity given to the trial of Radovan Karadzic.
I wonder why?

Jowen,

Albanians and Balkan history is pretty confusing stuff. During the cold war the Albanians had the first Atheist state. All of the religious leaders, Muslim, Christian alike were executed. Now this is Albania proper, not Kosovo. Apparently, during the Cold War in Kosovo the Serbs allowed religious observances, Christian, and Muslim alike. I think the point Robert is making is that most Albanians are not very good Muslims at all, don’t go to mosque etc. From what I’ve learned it is not uncommon to have, even in a family unit, some Albanians that consider themselves Atheists, Muslim, and Christian. Another interesting fact is that apparently Albanians did not make very good Nazi’s like their Muslim brothers in Bosnia did. Albanian SS units basically fell apart, due to a lack of discipline. Most were just into looting, raping and pillaging it appears. There were actually partisan Albanians who were fighting the Nazi as well. I guess if you were going to HAVE to pick an “Islamic” ally …. and it pains me to say this, Albanians would not be a bad choice. Historically Albanians are sort of like the eggplant of cultures in that who ever comes into the region and can help them in their ethnic fight against the Serbs they will ally with. They will also fight against foreign powers as well. When they were invaded by the Turks the Catholic Albanians fought just as hard as the Orthodox Serbs did against them, but rather than live in dhimmitude most converted to Islam in about a 100 year time frame. The Serbs did not. Later many Albanians actually fled with the Serbs to the north, but still others allied with the Turks, mostly keeping their Albanian identity. It is a long story, but in the end I think most Albanians have a strong cultural allegiance to Turkey, while many others revile the Turks. For Americans, post Cold War, I think alliances should be based upon cultural lines, rather than geopolitical lines created by the cold war. Boil it down, and I think Serbs make better allies than Albanians, and Bosnians, because in our struggle against Islam the Serbs have a VERY STRONG historical and cultural lineage resisting Islamic expansion. Their motivations in allying with us against this would go far, far beyond convenience, and appeasement, which for the most part I think is the motivation behind Albanian interests.

Do we continue to play Islamic faction against non-Islamic faction for imagined gains in the Islamic world? Do we continue to back Islamic powers to gain geopolitical, and economic gain, which for certain our relationship with Albania, and Turkey is. To a certain degree the U.S. and Albania are perfect bed partners. I’m ashamed to say. I wish things could be different somehow, but just how would be make a 180 without potentially setting up a new Balkan crisis? I urge all here to actually study the history over there, I think it is pretty important, because there is a lot we can learn about what is in store for us in the break up of Yugoslavia, and historical facts in regards to our relationship with Islamic forces to further our geopolitical goals.

"This has generated a fraction of the publicity given to the trial of Radovan Karadzic.
I wonder why?"

NATO is heavily invested in the status quo in the Balkans. You'll notice the Croatian trials have come and gone with little fan fare as well.

Nasir Oric was let off with little more than a slap on the wrist. Nasir oric was launching attacks on Serb forces from a U.N. safe zone attacking Serbian villages. The Serbs would counter attack and he would flee to the safe zone in Srebrenica, under U.N. protection (Sound familiar? Typical Islamic cowardice.) This was an insult that Serbs could not tolerate for long, and eventually they over ran Srebrenica in the safe zone from which attacks had been launched. Srebrenica was intentionally abandoned by the Izetbegovic regime, which is why it was over run so quickly when it finally fell. There is evidence that Clinton told Alija Izetbegovic that he needed, "5,000" dead in order to convince the American public to intervene. Srebrenica was staged to manufacture a "war crime". In light of this if I was Radovan Karadzic I would seriously doubt the integrity of the international courts to actually be interested in justice, rather I would expect them to continue their bias justifications for picking sides.

http://www.srpska-mreza.com/Bosnia/Srebrenica/Pumphrey.html

The fact of the matter is that these "moderate" European Bosnian Muslims elected an Islamic supremacist, and a former Nazi too boot, to lead their government, who advocated the restoration of a global Caliphate (Which includes the Balkans, and Serbs.) when the Bosnian Muslims had the moral majority to install such a regime. Alija had also resurected Turkish, and Nazi propaganda during his election as well. Bosniad Serbs (Republika Srpska) had lived as dhimmi for centuries, and on a larger timeline they had just gained their freedom from the Caliphate. To them this was a declaration of war, and the Bosnian Muslims were to be fought until they surrendred, which they were about to do, untill Clinton intervened. Esentially Clinton prolonged the war in Bosnia, by arming the Muslims, and enabled the first proto-Islamic State to be formed in Europe, by denying the Serbs their just surrender. Clinton betrayed western civilization when he backed the Bosnians in my opinion. Look at who we got into bed with. Al Queda, Iran, jihad fighters from the Sudan, Afghanistan, Pakistan. The whole thing is just a filthy mess. The only thing we can do at this point is expose it to the light of day to try and disinfect ourselves.

Sorry, but it's common knowledge that the Serbs mass-raped Croatian and Muslim females as part of their "ethnic cleansing" war tactics for a "Greater Serbia." If you don't like that truth, I can't help you. I pity you that you have no compassion for the raped and impregnated Croat and Muslim females. I suggest you read "Srebrenica," by Jan Honig, and here's a link to that War Crime:

http://www.gendercide.org/case_srebrenica.html

BTW, I've been in Croatia, including the Dalmatian Coast - Split, Dubrovnik, before the Serbs started the horrible war. It was beautiful, absolutely beautiful, before the Serbs started the carnage. Slobo Milosevic and his minion Karadzic commanded mass-murder and mass-rape. Just like Hitler and his minions in Germany. Anyone who denies this is living in delusion-land.

Insult me as much as you like, I couldn't care less, as I know I'm speaking the truth. And, oh yes, "The Truth-Teller must have one foot in the stirrup" (Armenian proverb), so, see ya.

Ah these "moderate Balkan muslims"...

http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=hp&hl=en&js=y&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.alo.rs%2Fvesti%2F21044%2FMuftija_finansijer_vehabija&sl=sr&tl=en&history_state0=

"Sandzak Mufti Muamer Zukorlić part of organized religious-political group made up of Bosnian Muslim politicians and Islamic leaders, which deals with the funding of Wahhabi movement over the funds for humanitarian aid from Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Yemen, transmitted media in Sarajevo."

Darcy, I never said I condoned any atrocities committed by the Serbs.

Just because I say this does not mean I think all the conflicts in the Balkans were simply caused by Milosevic’s desire for a greater Serbia. The Bosnia War was also partly caused by President Alija Izetbegovic’s declaration that Bosnia was going to be placed under Sharia Law and that therefore the rights of non-Muslims were not going to be respected.

Also I suggest you read some of the JihadWatch archives.

Such as

Muslim Sarajevo: "Ethnic cleansing in this city has, unfortunately, been successfully completed"
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/022149.php#comments

On the subject of Serb atrocities.
Do you know someone like Noam Chomsky has stated that the infamous photograph of a starving man that appeared during the Bosnian War was actually a fabrication?

There was a lot of propaganda flying around during the Balkans conflicts.
Do you know that one British newspaper published an account of an atrocity where Christians captured two Muslim men and forced them to bite off each other’s testicles?
The evidence? A journalist was handed, by a Muslim, an audio recording of the two men screaming.
Reflect on that for a minute: would this be sufficient evidence in a British Court to ensure a conviction? Surely not. And how easy it would be to fabricate such a piece of “evidence” as propaganda.

Darcy, I never said I condoned any atrocities committed by the Serbs.

Just because I say this does not mean I think all the conflicts in the Balkans were simply caused by Milosevic’s desire for a greater Serbia. The Bosnia War was also partly caused by President Alija Izetbegovic’s declaration that Bosnia was going to be placed under Sharia Law and that therefore the rights of non-Muslims were not going to be respected.

Also I suggest you read some of the JihadWatch archives.

Such as

Muslim Sarajevo: "Ethnic cleansing in this city has, unfortunately, been successfully completed"
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/022149.php#comments

On the subject of Serb atrocities.
Do you know someone like Noam Chomsky has stated that the infamous photograph of a starving man that appeared during the Bosnian War was actually a fabrication?

There was a lot of propaganda flying around during the Balkans conflicts.
Do you know that one British newspaper published an account of an atrocity where Christians captured two Muslim men and forced them to bite off each other’s testicles?
The evidence? A journalist was handed, by a Muslim, an audio recording of the two men screaming.
Reflect on that for a minute: would this be sufficient evidence in a British Court to ensure a conviction? Surely not. And how easy it would be to fabricate such a piece of “evidence” as propaganda.

I just don't buy the whole "Greater Serbia" thing. The war in Croatia started after the Croatian government declared that Serbians would be considered as second class citizens in their own country. The Serbs wanted their own state, (Serbian Krajina) and who could blame them after the Croatian Nazi puppets murdered 600,000 Serbs just 45 years prior. Serbian forces were only involved in areas that had Serbian civilians. Civilians were targeted on all sides, it appears. I just don't believe the whole one sided buisness of blaming everything on the Serbs. Croatians glorify their Nazi past even to this day.

http://www.eurojewcong.org/ejc/news.php?id_article=4392

"As early as 2007, investigators at the Emperor’s Clothes (TENC) news analysis website were warning of the growing popularity of the singer-songwriter Perkovic, whom TENC director Jared Israel calls a "clerical-fascist".

In a video recorded at a Perkovic concert in 2007, fans chanted the Ustashe slogan Za dom spremni ("For home, ready"), while members of the immense crowd give the Nazi salute. At an earlier concert, in Zagreb, Croatia, fans chanted, Ubij, ubij, ubij Serbina - "Kill, kill, kill a Serb."

I don't know ... I've talked to many Croatians, they down play their Nazi past when it suits them. It is hard for me to believe that the Serbian reaction in Croatia would have had nothing to do with the cultural glorification of Nazism, and the mass murder of Serbs just a few decades prior.

I just don't buy the whole "Greater Serbia" thing. The war in Croatia started after the Croatian government declared that Serbians would be considered as second class citizens in their own country. The Serbs wanted their own state, (Serbian Krajina) and who could blame them after the Croatian Nazi puppets murdered 600,000 Serbs just 45 years prior. Serbian forces were only involved in areas that had Serbian civilians. Civilians were targeted on all sides, it appears. I just don't believe the whole one sided buisness of blaming everything on the Serbs. Croatians glorify their Nazi past even to this day.

http://www.eurojewcong.org/ejc/news.php?id_article=4392

"As early as 2007, investigators at the Emperor’s Clothes (TENC) news analysis website were warning of the growing popularity of the singer-songwriter Perkovic, whom TENC director Jared Israel calls a "clerical-fascist".

In a video recorded at a Perkovic concert in 2007, fans chanted the Ustashe slogan Za dom spremni ("For home, ready"), while members of the immense crowd give the Nazi salute. At an earlier concert, in Zagreb, Croatia, fans chanted, Ubij, ubij, ubij Serbina - "Kill, kill, kill a Serb."

I don't know ... I've talked to many Croatians, they down play their Nazi past when it suits them. It is hard for me to believe that the Serbian reaction in Croatia would have had nothing to do with the cultural glorification of Nazism, and the mass murder of Serbs just a few decades prior.

"Do you know someone like Noam Chomsky has stated that the infamous photograph of a starving man that appeared during the Bosnian War was actually a fabrication?"

See this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xox7TR11evI

We were definitely on the wrong side in that war. I said that in 1999 and I'm even more convinced today. I used to know a lot of Yugoslavs before the war, I got along very well with them, I like the people and they told me a lot about their country and the differences between Serbs and Croats. But nobody ever mentioned that there were also Muslims living there. It was of no importance at that time, because they were integrated. During the war this changed dramatically, a real re-Islamisation took place among the Muslims of the Balkans.

Wednesday night I talked to a woman whose father was Bosnian. She confirmed my observations, she told me that before the war the mosques used to be empty, Mohammedans didn't practice. But after the war Izetbegovic, the Bosnian criminal, under Tito he spent 15 years in jail, received a lot of money from his Saudi friends to rebuild the country. All of a sudden there were a lot of veiled women, the mosques were full and the Mohammedans took pride in their stupid faith. This is the evil fruit of dawa, we should ban Mohammedan proselitising all over the civilised world.

We were definitely on the wrong side in that war. I said that in 1999 and I'm even more convinced today. I used to know a lot of Yugoslavs before the war, I got along very well with them, I like the people and they told me a lot about their country and the differences between Serbs and Croats. But nobody ever mentioned that there were also Muslims living there. It was of no importance at that time, because they were integrated. During the war this changed dramatically, a real re-Islamisation took place among the Muslims of the Balkans.

Wednesday night I talked to a woman whose father was Bosnian. She confirmed my observations, she told me that before the war the mosques used to be empty, Mohammedans didn't practice. But after the war Izetbegovic, the Bosnian criminal, under Tito he spent 15 years in jail, received a lot of money from his Saudi friends to rebuild the country. All of a sudden there were a lot of veiled women, the mosques were full and the Mohammedans took pride in their stupid faith. This is the evil fruit of dawa, we should ban Mohammedan proselitising all over the civilised world.

Leave a Comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.