Her father tried to assault her after he learned that she had converted to Christianity. One may hope that Ohio authorities handling the Rifqa Bary case are taking careful note of this case. "Judge: Christian's 'arranged' Islamic marriage invalid: Muslim father allegedly assaulted daughter after learning of her conversion," by Bob Unruh for World Net Daily, November 28:
A judge in Ohio ruled a marriage arranged by a Muslim father for his 17-year-old daughter who now has converted to Christianity isn't valid, clearing her of accusations she made false statements in applying for a marriage license with the man who now is her husband.The little-reported case developed in Ohio, where Larry Crain, senior counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice, argued on behalf of his client, identified only as "Nishan."
Nishan was married last month to a man she began dating this year when she converted to Christianity, the ACLJ said.
She didn't reveal her conversion to her "devout Muslim family members" until just before the marriage because she feared what they might do.
When her father discovered her plans, he allegedly tried to assault her and then filed a claim that she had falsified her marriage-license application because of the earlier arranged marriage.
The ACLJ explained, "Nishan's marriage was arranged by her father during a trip to Karachi, Pakistan, in May 2007 following her graduation from high school. Three days after the 'nikah' ceremony, Nishan and her father returned to the United States.
"She remained confused about the ceremony conducted during her trip to Pakistan and later took precautionary steps to annul her vows by preparing an affidavit for the U.S. consulate in Pakistan in August of 2007," the legal team said. "She gave her affidavit to her father who assured her he would send the necessary paperwork to the consulate. Her family never again mentioned her alleged Paksitani husband and Nishan believed that all necessary steps had been taken to annul any alleged marriage vows."
However, her father's anger over her conversion to Christianity and her marriage included the statement she had falsified her marriage-license application in the U.S.
"The fact is that Nishan never knowingly or intentionally misstated her marital status on her application ... the fact is that even if Nishan's own attempts to nullify her Pakistani marriage were insufficient, her conversion to Christianity in 2009 effectively annulled her partial marriage pursuant to Islamic law, which provides that if either spouse leaves Islam ... and the two never consummated their union, the 'nikah' is immediately annulled," the team explained....
Finally, a heartening story which is free of PC MC madness.
Giving civil rights to someone who has left Islam will spur other closet converts to come out.
The final sentence indicates the annulment was in full accordance with Islamic law. And if it hadn't been, would the judge have ruled similarly?
@Cornelius
God I hope not!
But you never can tell because so many of them are taught not to distinguish right from wrong. Or, put another way there is no absolute.
My faith is that truth will prevail and it looks like it did in this case. A president has been set that should give the Rifqa Bary case some direction. Cleared her the right to practice her faith free from Islamic evil.
It is apparent that the girl went through a partial or preliminary marriage ceremony [or whatever] and then, having converted to Christianity, met and married some other suitor. That is one confused young lady. It is little wonder that the family was annoyed. However, I agree with @Cornelius that the judgment was in accordance with Islamic law and does not set a precedent in Ohio or elsewhere, the judge was too street smart for that.
It is apparent that the girl went through a partial or preliminary marriage ceremony [or whatever] and then, having converted to Christianity, met and married some other suitor. That is one confused young lady. It is little wonder that the family was annoyed. However, I agree with @Cornelius that the judgment was in accordance with Islamic law and does not set a precedent in Ohio or elsewhere, the judge was too street smart for that.
The judgment was in accordance with Islamic law .. @Cornelius is correct. There is no precedent for human rights here.
meekee wrote:
It is apparent that the girl went through a partial or preliminary marriage ceremony [or whatever] and then, having converted to Christianity, met and married some other suitor. That is one confused young lady.
..................................
I don't think she was "confused". She was forced into an arranged marriage when her family had hold of her in Pakistan.
As soon as she returned to a free country, she did all she could to have the "marriage" annulled, converted to Christianity (which she had probably been contemplating for some time), and married the man she really loved.
Far from "confused", I think this young lady is a model of rectitude at a very young age—firmly aware of what she believes, and who she loves—and admirably unafraid to pursue her own values and happiness.
I wish her all the best now that she is free of Islam and her abusive, coercive family.