Righteous smackdown of UN Human Rights Council's anti-Israel, pro-jihad bias

Watch here. The page is in Hebrew but the video is in English. (Thanks to Joshua.)

UPDATE: Jan has kindly sent in the YouTube link above -- it is the same video. It turns out that the video is not new, but from 2007. Apologies for that -- generally I do not post archival material, but it was represented to me as new and I could find no further info. In any case, new or old, it is a great video.

| 7 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

7 Comments

HOT D-D-DAMN! I don't know who that wonderful kid is that was giving hell to the council but can we get him to come to the USA? For Heaven's SAKE I could use s'more of THAT! And I want my Congress and my Senators and my President and my Judiciary to hear ALL of that... and MORE! YES! THANKS, ROBERT! YOU ROCK!

Wonderin1

Transcript and link to a sequel video showing the truly offensive U.N. speeches ruled "admissible"

http://www.unwatch.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=bdKKISNqEmG&b=1313923&ct=3698367

WOW! Thanks, Tom D! Shame on me for not already knowing about Mr. Hillel but I am most certainly grateful to make his acquaintance, even from afar. Maybe we could all use some of what this brilliant young man has been eating for breakfast! LOL! I wonder if they've got any more like him back on the farm? Send 'em on....

Wonderin1

I love the indignant refusal (at the end) of the committee guy to thank Mr. Neuer for daring to be frank and for stating the obvious.

The video seems to have been taken between 19 June 2006 and 18 June 2007. That is the time span during which Luis Alfonso de Alba served as president of the UN Human Rights Council. He is the man who appears in the video after the speech from UN Watch is done. Luis Alfonso says that for the first time he cannot thank a speaker for a statement. Luis Alfonso condemns the speaker's language, so that one might think the speech had included obscenities, which of course it did not. Why Alfonso de Alba chooses to condemn a perfectly accurate speech is beyond me. His behavior here does not fit into any decent pattern I can recognize. If he claims to be only a neutral mediator among the members of the council, then why does he condemn the statement of one speaker? If, on the other hand, Luis Alfonso does not claim neutrality, and intends here to take a stand, why does he take a stand in defense of dictators? Is he simply too weak or cowardly to do anything but what the big players demand of him? Is he just an elegant puppet of criminal despots?

Bravo! The truth must be told and such "notable' members like China and all the islamic dictators must have their wrists slapped at every opportunity.

Leave a Comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.