Geert Wilders receives summons: a sledgehammer blow to the freedom of speech

A statement on the Wilders trial:

The 20th of January 2010 will be a crucial day for defending our freedom. This is the day when the political trial against Geert Wilders will start. Yesterday, Geert Wilders was summoned by the Public Prosecution Service (PPS) on behalf of the Court of Justice of Amsterdam. The indictment reads: group insult of Muslims, incitement to hatred and discrimination against Muslims due to their religion and incitement to hatred and discrimination against non-western immigrants and / or Moroccans due to their race.

Geert Wilders: "On the 20th of January 2010, a political trial will start. I am being prosecuted for my political convictions. The freedom of speech is on the verge of collapsing. If a politician is not allowed to criticise an ideology anymore, this means that we are lost, and it will lead to the end of our freedom. However I remain combative: I am convinced that I will be acquitted."

In earlier stages, the PPS did not see any reason to prosecute Mr. Wilders.
Bram Moszkowicz, the lawyer on the case at hand, has submitted a notice of objection to the summons on the point of group insult on behalf of Geert Wilders. Earlier this year, the Supreme Court of the Netherlands ruled that even though it is indeed punishable to insult a group of people, it is not punishable to insult a religion as such. Due to this the order of the Court of Amsterdam on this point is deemed incorrect.

And here is the summons, from the District Court, Office of the Public Prosecutor, in Amsterdam:

SUMMONS OF THE ACCUSED

To: name: Wilders
first names: Geert

born on: 06 September 1963 in Venlo

residing in: 2513 AA The Hague
address: Binnenhof 1 A

I hereby summon you to on Wednesday 20 January 2010 at 09:00 o'clock appear as the accused at the hearing of the three-judge criminal division in the district of Amsterdam, Parnassusweg 220, in order to be tried on that which is specified below.

I refer to the notices under 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 on the reverse side of this page.

A notice of objection submitted by you will be handled on the date and time as specified in the summons. In case of dismissal the Court can directly proceed with deliberation of the case.

The Public Prosecutor
[illegible signature]


The aforementioned summoned person is charged with the fact that

1. he, on one or more dates in or about the period from 8 August 2007 up to and including 27 March 2008, in The Hague and/or Amsterdam and/or (elsewhere in) the Netherlands, on multiple occasions, at least once, (each time) in public, orally, in writing or through images, intentionally offended a group of people, i.e. Muslims, based on their religion, by (each time) intentionally in
- De Volkskrant and/or
- on the internet on the website www.liveleak.com (in the film Fitna)
placing (having placed) and/or showing (having showed) and/or having heard one or more texts and/or images and/or footage and/or audio fragments with the following content:

(De Volkskrant of 8 August 2007, 'Enough is enough: prohibit the Quran')

'A moderate Islam does not exist. It does not exist because there is no distinction between Good Islam and Bad Islam. There is Islam and that is it. And Islam means the Quran and nothing but the Quran. And the Quran is the Mein Kampf of a religion that intends to eliminate others and that refers to those others - non-Muslims - as unfaithful dogs, inferior beings. Read the Quran, this Mein Kampf, again. In whatever version, you will see that all the evil that the sons of Allah commit to us and themselves originates from this book (Oriana Fallaci, The Force of Reason, post-script, page 305, February 2006).'

and/or

'The core of the problem is the fascist Islam, the sick ideology of Allah and Mohammed as laid down in the Islamic Mein Kampf: the Quran. The texts from the Quran leave little to imagination.'

and/or

'Prohibit this miserable book the way Mein Kampf was also prohibited!'

and/or

'I have enough of the Quran in the Netherlands: prohibit this fascist book.'

and/or

(The film Fitna, placed on www.liveleak.com on 27 March 2008)

'Islam wants to control, subdue and is out for the destruction of our Western civilisation. In 1945 Nazism was beaten in Europe. In 1989 communism was beaten in Europe. Now the Islamic ideology must be beaten. Stop the Islamisation. Defend our freedom.'

(Article 137c of the Dutch Criminal Code)

2. he, on one or more dates in or about the period from 7 October 2006 up to and including 27 March 2008, in The Hague and/or Amsterdam and/or (elsewhere in) the Netherlands, on multiple occasions, at least once, (each time) in public, orally, in writing or through images, incited to hatred of people, i.e. Muslims, based on their religion, by (each time) in
- De Volkskrant and/or
- De Pers and/or
- Dagblad De Limburger-Limburgs Dagblad and/or
on the internet
- on the website www.geenstijl.nl and/or www.pvv.nl and/or
- on the website of Radio Nederland Wereldomroep and/or the Wereldomroep and/or
- on the website www.liveleak.com (in the film Fitna)
placing (having placed) and/or showing (having showed) and/or having heard one or more texts and/or images and/or footage and/or audio fragments with the following content:

(De Volkskrant of 7 October 2006, 'The Pope is completely right')

'The borders are closed to all non-Western immigrants the same day.'

and/or

'The demographic composition of the population is the biggest problem of the Netherlands. I am talking about what comes to the Netherlands and what reproduces here. If you look at the figures and the development therein* Muslims will move from the big cities to the country. We must stop the tsunami of the Islamisation. This hits us in the heart, in our identity, in our culture. If we do not defend ourselves all other points from my programme will appear to be useless.'

and/or

'Of course. 99 percent of the people who came to live there are of an Islamic origin.'

and/or

'Absolutely. The figures show this. One out of five Moroccan youngsters is registered with the police as a suspect. Their behaviour derives from their religion and culture. You cannot consider these two facts separately. The other day the Pope was completely right: the Islam is a violent religion. Islam means submission and conversion of non-Muslims. This interpretation rules in the living rooms of these problematic youngsters, in the mosques. It has been embedded in this community itself.'

and/or

'Everybody adapts to our dominant culture. Who does not do so will no longer be here in twenty years time. They will be deported.'

and/or

'We have a gigantic problem with Muslims, in every respect it is going too far, and we present solutions that cannot even get a mouse to come out of its hole.'

and/or

'Those Moroccan boys are really violent. They beat up people because of their sexual orientation. I have never used violence.'

and/or

'Of this tsunami of a culture foreign to us that becomes ever more dominant here. This must be stopped.'

and/or

(Internet column 'Mohammed (part II): the Islamic invasion' of 6 February 2007, on the website of www.geenstijl.nl and/or the website www.pvv.nl)

'In the Nederlands Dagblad of last Saturday Professor Ralphael Israeli is also quoted who predicts a "Third Islamic Invasion of Europe" by means of "penetration, propaganda, conversion and demographic changes". In his eyes the Europeans are even committing "demographic suicide" with the advancing Islam. The first Islamic invasion was stopped at Poitiers in the year 732 after the conquest of Spain, Portugal and the south of France and the second invasion attempt by the Ottoman Turks as stopped before the gates of Vienna where they were, fortunately, beaten in 1683. According to Prof. Israeli the third invasion attempt that is now going on in Europe has a much bigger change of success.

The man is absolutely right. The Muslim population doubles with every generation - 25 years - and the number of Islamics in each and every European country is taking disturbing forms.'

and/or

'The Netherlands as Islamic mission country. If a terrorist like Mohammed B. could yet not be stopped, the tactics of penetration, propaganda, conversion and demographic change will indeed prove to be successful if the cowardly political elite from VVD to PvdA and from SP to CDA and their European equivalents continue to remain silent about it and denounce and demonise those who are not. There is enough Islam in Europe and in the Netherlands. The PVV will oppose this third Islamic invasion attempt with man and might.'

and/or

(De Pers of 13 February 2007, 'What is driving Geert Wilders?')

'We want enough. Close the borders, no more Islamics in the Netherlands, many Muslims deported from the Netherlands, denaturalisation of Islamic criminals.'

and/or

'It is the facts. The Islam is a violent religion. If Mohammed would be alive here today the Lower House would immediately agree to hunt him out of the country.'
and/or

'Former chief of the Mossad Efraim Halevy says that the Third World War has already started. I am not putting these words in my mouth, but it is correct though.'

and/or

'I have good intentions. We let something happen as a result of which this becomes a totally different society. I am well aware that in a few decades there will not be an Islamic majority yet. But it is growing. With aggressive elements, imperialism. Just take a walk down the street and look what it is bringing us. You feel that you are no longer living in your own country. A fight is going on and we must defend ourselves. Soon there will be more mosques than churches!'

and/or

(De Volkskrant of 8 August 2007, 'Wilders: prohibit the Quran, also in mosque')

'A prohibition is a prohibition. Hence not only the sale but also the use in mosques and possession at home must be punished. If this is not possible in the current legislation then a new prohibitory provision must be created.'

and/or

'This book incites to hatred and murder, and does therefore not fit in our legal system. If Muslims want to participate they must renounce this Quran. I understand this is much to ask, but we must stop making concessions.'

and/or

(De Volkskrant of 8 August 2007, 'Enough is enough: prohibit the Quran')

'A moderate Islam does not exist. It does not exist because there is no distinction between Good Islam and Bad Islam. There is Islam and that is it. And Islam means the Quran and nothing but the Quran. And the Quran is the Mein Kampf of a religion that intends to eliminate others and that refers to those others - non-Muslims - as unfaithful dogs, inferior beings. Read the Quran, this Mein Kampf, again. In whatever version, you will see that all the evil that the sons of Allah commit to us and themselves originates from this book (Oriana Fallaci, The Force of Reason, post-script, page 305, February 2006).'

and/or

'The core of the problem is the fascist Islam, the sick ideology of Allah and Mohammed as laid down in the Islamic Mein Kampf: the Quran. The texts from the Quran leave little to imagination.'

and/or
'Prohibit this miserable book the way Mein Kampf was also prohibited!'

and/or

'I am so ashamed of all those in- and outside of the government and the Lower House who refuse to stop the Islamic invasion of the Netherlands. I am so ashamed of Dutch politics where the overrepresentation of members of ethnic minorities in crime and criminality is accepted day in day out without an answer to it.'

and/or

'The Hague is filled with cowardly folks. Scared people who were born cowardly and will die cowardly. Who feel and stimulate that the Dutch culture is founded on a Jewish-Christian-Islamic tradition. Who issue a general pardon to liars and criminals.'

and/or

'Who do not give a damn about the interests of the Dutch citizens and cooperate in the transformation of the Netherlands into Netherabia as a province of the Islamic super state Eurabia.'

and/or

'I have had enough of the Islam in the Netherlands: no more Muslim immigrants. I have had enough of the adoration of Allah and Mohammed in the Netherlands: no more mosques. I have had enough of the Quran in the Netherlands: prohibit this fascist book.

Enough is enough.'

and/or

('Wilders wants a renewed mini Quran' of 7 September 2007 on the website of Radio Nederland Wereldomroep and/or the Wereldomroep via the link: http://static.rnw.nl/migratie/www.wereldomroep.nl/actua/nl/nederlandsepolitiek/070909wildersintvw-redirected)

'This kind of renewed version would be desirable, according to the PVV leader; a Quran deprived of all vindictive verses. "It should actually have the format of a Donald Duck", according to Wilders.'

and/or

(De Limburger of 9 February 2008, 'Islam is my Fitna')

'I point to the role which the horrible Quran plays in the Islamisation of our society.'

and/or

'In the film I illustrate texts and verses from the Quran with documentary images that demonstrate that the Quran is not a dead letter but the face of the Islam: a huge threat.'

and/or

(De Volkskrant of 11 February 2008, 'It no longer has any use, but The Film will be there')

'In the GPD interview he explains that he will illustrate texts and verses from the Quran with documentary images. He wants to, by way of example, demonstrate that the Quran is not " a dead letter but the face of the Islam: a huge threat".'

and/or

(The film Fitna, placed on www.liveleak.com on 27 March 2008)

The film starts with a black image with the text: "Warning: this film contains very shocking material". Then the sound of a match being lighted can be heard and a book with oriental looking symbols is opened up that looks like the Quran. On the first page a cartoon can be seen of Mohammed with a bomb in his turban. The sound of a burning fuse can be heard. A clock appears that starts counting down from 15:00.

A page of the book is turned over. Two open pages can be seen. On the page on the right the following text appears: "Quran, Surah 8, verse 60". Then on the page on the left appears: "Surah 8. Verse 60: Prepare for them whatever force and cavalry ye are able of gathering, to strike terror, to strike terror into the hearts of the enemies, of Allah and your enemies". A voice can also be heard which (most likely) sings this text in the Arabic language. On the page on the right, next to the text, footage of the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York (09/11/2001) are shown as well as of the attacks by Muslim extremists in Madrid and London with footage of the victims. This footage is alternated with footage of apparent imams who say: "What makes Allah happy? Allah is happy if non-Muslims are being killed" and "Destroy the unbelievers and polytheists, your (Allah's) enemies and the enemies of the religion. Allah, count them and kill them up to the very last of them. And do not spare a single one".

The page is turned. Now the page on the right states: "Quran, Surah 4, verse 56" and on the page on the left: "Surah 4, verse 56: Those who reject our signs, we shall soon cast into the fire: as often as their skins are roasted through, we shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty: for Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise". Then footage follows of a man who yells: "If Allah permits us, oh nation of Mohammed, even the stone will say Oh Muslim. A Jew is hiding behind me, come and cut off his head. And we shall cut off his head! By Allah, we shall cut it off! Oh Jews! Allah Akbar! (Allah is Great!). Jihad for the sake of Allah! Jihad for the sake of Allah! Victory to Allah! Allah Akbar! (Allah is Great!)".

Then footage is shown of a young girl wearing a headscarf who is asked by a person off-screen who the Jews are. The little girl answers: "They are apes and pigs". The voice says: "Are they apes and pigs? Says who?" The little girl says: "Allah". The voice asks: "Where did he say this?" The little girl answers: "In the Quran". The following footage shows a mass of people who are dragging corpses behind them. The following footage again shows images of the attacks in London showing, among other things, an exploded red double-decker bus. Then footage follows of apparently an imam who calls outs: "The Jews are Jews. They are the ones who must be butchered and killed". These stills are intertwined with stills of Muslims (as follows from the headscarves and facial covering worn by one of the female persons) who show texts on signs: "Be prepared for the real Holocaust" and "God bless Hitler". Then footage of a group of people in uniform who are lined up follows, apparently fighters who are standing with extended right arm (apparently bringing the Hitler salute).

A page is turned. On the new page the following text appears: "Quran, Surah 47, verse 4" and then: "Surah 47, verse 4: Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers in fight, smite at their necks; At length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly on them". A voice can also be heard which (probably) presents this text in the Arabic language. Then a newspaper article is shown of the murder of Theo van Gogh. A fragment of an interview with Theo van Gogh can be heard where he says, among other things: "I do not think that bullet will come for me!". A picture of a male person appears who looks like Mohammed B. who has been convicted of the murder of Theo van Gogh. On screen appears: Mohammed B. Immediately thereafter an audio fragment in which the voice of Mohammed B. can be heard who says: "If I had the opportunity, if I would be free, and I had the opportunity to do it again, what I did on 2 November, I would have done exactly the same". Footage appears of people who yell: "Learn from Theo van Gogh. Learn from the examples you can see! Because you pay with your blood!" and also footage of people with bloody knives. A newspaper article is shown with the header: "Hirsi Ali and Wilders into hiding. Death list. Targets in letter of Mohammed B.". A fragment can also be seen of, as can be seen on screen, a Saudi TV station, Iqra TV, where a person says: "Houses and young men must be sacrificed, throats must be cut and skulls must be crushed. This is the road to victory". Stills are shown of people wearing balaclavas and holding firearms. In between them they hold a man who is apparently their prisoner. The person wearing a balaclava in the middle reads a statement out loud. Then the masked men move to cut off the head of the prisoner. The beheading itself can (barely) not be seen. Yet the audio of the fragment remains audible. Sounds can be heard that apparently point to the beheading. After a few seconds the footage returns and one of the masked men can be seen holding the cut-off head of the prisoner up.

A page is turned again. On the new page can be read: "Quran, Surah 4, verse 89" and then: "Surah 4, verse 89: They but wish that ye should reject faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing as they, so take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah. But if they turn renegades, seize them and kill them wherever ye find them, and take no friends or helpers from their ranks". A voice can also be heard which (probably) presents the text in the Arabic language. The text is followed by footage of Arabic looking people who state the following: "The Islam is a sacred religion. The best religion there is. If somebody converts to Christianity he deserves the death penalty". Another person says: "The Islam is superior compared to the Jews, the Christians, the Buddhists and the Hindus. The only law recognised by Allah is the Islam. And he who pursues anything other but the Islam shall never be accepted". The following newspaper headlines appear on screen: "Former Muslim Jami molested", "Islamic witch hunt again threatens", "Death to Rushdie" and "Letter on body Theo van Gogh disclosed. Hirsi Ali also receiving death threats".

The page is turned. It says: "Quran, Surah 8, verse 39" and then: "Surah 8, verse 39: Fight them until there is no dissension, and the religion is entirely Allah's". Moreover, a voice can be heard which (probably) presents this text in the Arabic language. An Ayatollah appears who says: "The Islam is a religion that wants to control the world. It did so before and shall eventually do so again". Followed by President Ahmadinejad who says: "The message of the Revolution is global, and is not restricted to a specific place or time. Have no doubt... Allah willing, Islam will conquer what? It will conquer all the mountain tops of the world".

Then a number of apparently Arabic men appears on screen that make the following statements:

"We have ruled the world before. And Allah willing the day shall come that we will again rule the whole world. The day shall come that we will rule over America! The day shall come that we will rule over Great Britain and the whole world!".

"Allah ordered us to spread this religion all over the world".

"Thou shall take over the United States! Thou shall take over the United Kingdom! Thou shall take over Europe! Thou shall conquer them all. Thou shall be victorious! Thou shall take over Egypt. We have faith in Allah!".

Then apparently Arabic people with signs are shown. The following texts can be read: "Islam will dominate the world" and "Freedom go to hell".

Then the following text appears: "The Netherlands is under the spell of the Islam". Stills are shown of mosques that are most likely situated in the Netherlands. A voice can also be heard which says: "These mosques are all part of the Dutch government system". Footage is shown of a woman dressed in a burka combined with the newspaper header "Government: no burka prohibition" as also with satellite dishes and apartment buildings. Graphs are shown of the increase of the number of Muslims in the Netherlands in the course of the years. In the graphs the years 1909, 1960, 1990 and 2004 are shown with, respectively, the following numbers: 54, 1399, 458,000 and 944,000. Next to these graphs the number of Muslims in Europe in 2007 appears. The graph increases up to 54,000,000 and continues beyond the top of the screen. In the background stills can be seen of women with headscarves, satellite dishes and Dutch police officers in uniform taking off their shoes when they apparently enter a mosque. An apparent Muslim says: "If my sister or my mother has sex with another person I will also kill them". The interviewer asks: "Then you commit blood vengeance!" The man answers: "Absolutely". Another apparent Muslim says: "For example, in the Netherlands you can be adulterous or gay. But I do not wish to be part of that because the Islam considers that to be a crime". A still appears of a postcard with the text: "Greetings from the Netherlands" where you can only see mosques. Then a preach can be heard, on screen the following appears: "Said in Dutch mosques": "They must renounce political parties and worldly bodies of thought like liberalism, democracy, socialism and everything that smells of it and originates from the human brain" and (according to the text on screen pronounced in the El Tawheed mosque): "If a married man, by the grace of Allah, commits adultery, or a married woman commits adultery, she will be stoned".

On screen the following question is shown: "The Netherlands in the future!?". Stills are shown of apparently homosexual men (on screen it reads: "Gays") who are hanged, children smothered in blood (on screen it reads: "Children"), stills of a woman with a bloody knife in her hand with a child smothered in blood on her lap, a woman (on screen it reads: "Women") with a naked lower torso tied down to a bed and then a lot of blood (she is apparently being circumcised), a chopped off head of apparently a Muslim woman (she wears a headscarf), a woman dressed in a burka at a noose and a veiled woman who is shot through her head. These scenes are concluded with a large number of newspaper headlines. An enumeration of the headlines is provided below:

Islamists seek control, politically driven Muslims gain influence in Europe
Spanish Court examines ties. Laakkwartier with Madrid in terror web
Sudanese demand execution of British 'teddy bear lady'
Three people suspected of planning attack
Hell will break loose. "What you need is a heavy bomb attack". "We do not agree with the freedom of speech, because we renounce democracy", "Our alternative is the Islam"
Explosive increase blood vengeance in Amsterdam
School closes on Muslim holidays
AIVD investigation: Jihad lessons at primary school
Minister reports Rotterdam abuse cases. Free trip to Mecca via Islam school
Ankara wants Turkish in classroom here
Donner eases the rules. Foreign imams can enter country more quickly
Murderer Theo van Gogh predicts terrorist acts. Mohammed B.: "My followers are ready"
Van Gogh murdered after Fatwa announcement
Almost half of the young Moroccans anti-Western
Mosques under spell of radical Muslim group
Suicide commandos in the Netherlands
Hamas meets in Rotterdam
Alexander must swim for hours. Moroccans throw gay into the water
Imams do not like gays
'Imam legitimises violence against gays'
'Throw gays of high buildings'
Mosque: "Turn the Netherlands into a Muslim state"
Girls still being circumcised
'Muslims prevent doctors from providing care to women'
Halal fund: sliced meat for Muslims. New on Amsterdam Stock Exchange
Al Qaeda issues death sentence. Jihad against Wilders
'Quran game licence' Arabic Specialist Hans Jansen: "You already offend the Islam by not becoming a Muslim"

Then a hand can be seen that takes up a page of the Quran. The screen then turns black and the sound of paper being torn can be heard. On screen the text appears: "The sound you just heard was a page from the telephone directory. Because it is not up to me but up to the Muslims themselves to tear the vindictive verses from the Quran. Muslims want you to give room to the Islam, but the Islam does not offer room to you.

The government wants you to respect the Islam, yet the Islam has no respect at all for you. The Islam wants to control, subdue and is out for the destruction of our Western civilisation. In 1945 Nazism was beaten in Europe. In 1989 communism was beaten in Europe. Now the Islamic ideology must be beaten. Stop the Islamisation. Defend our freedom".

The film again concludes with the image of the cartoon of Mohammed with the turban. It can be seen that the fuse in his turban is almost near the end. A ticking clock can be heard. The clock appears on screen and counts down from 00:03 to zero. A flash of lightning can be seen and a bolt of lightning can be heard. Then the Quran is closed, the word "Fitna" is shown which flows into the word "Fin" and then the credits of the film are shown.

(Article 137d of the Dutch Criminal Code)

3. he, on one or more dates in or about the period from 7 October 2006 up to and including 27 March 2008, in The Hague and/or Amsterdam and/or (elsewhere in) the Netherlands, on multiple occasions, at least once, (each time) in public, orally, in writing or through images, incited to discrimination, within the meaning of article 90 quarter of the Dutch Criminal Code, against people, i.e. Muslims, based on their religion, by (each time) in
- De Volkskrant and/or
- De Pers and/or
- Dagblad De Limburger-Limburgs Dagblad and/or
on the internet
- on the website www.geenstijl.nl and/or www.pvv.nl and/or
- on the website of Radio Nederland Wereldomroep and/or the Wereldomroep and/or
- on the website www.liveleak.com (in the film Fitna)
placing (having placed) and/or showing (having showed) and/or having heard one or more texts and/or images and/or footage and/or audio fragments with the following content:

(De Volkskrant of 7 October 2006, 'The Pope is completely right')

'The borders are closed to all non-Western immigrants the same day.'

and/or

'The demographic composition of the population is the biggest problem of the Netherlands. I am talking about what comes to the Netherlands and what reproduces here. If you look at the figures and the development therein* Muslims will move from the big cities to the country. We must stop the tsunami of the Islamisation. This hits us in the heart, in our identity, in our culture. If we do not defend ourselves all other points from my programme will appear to be useless.'

and/or

'Of course. 99 percent of the people who came to live there are of an Islamic origin.'

and/or

'Absolutely. The figures show this. One out of five Moroccan youngsters is registered with the police as a suspect. Their behaviour derives from their religion and culture. You cannot consider these two facts separately. The other day the Pope was completely right: the Islam is a violent religion. Islam means submission and conversion of non-Muslims. This interpretation rules in the living rooms of these problematic youngsters, in the mosques. It has been embedded in this community itself.'

and/or

'Everybody adapts to our dominant culture. Who does not do so will no longer be here in twenty years time. They will be deported.'

and/or

'We have a gigantic problem with Muslims, in every respect it is going too far, and we present solutions that cannot even get a mouse to come out of its hole.'

and/or

'Those Moroccan boys are really violent. They beat up people because of their sexual orientation. I have never used violence.'

and/or

'Of this tsunami of a culture foreign to us that becomes ever more dominant here. This must be stopped.'

and/or

(Internet column 'Mohammed (part II): the Islamic invasion' of 6 February 2007, on the website of www.geenstijl.nl and/or the website www.pvv.nl)

'In the Nederlands Dagblad of last Saturday Professor Ralphael Israeli is also quoted who predicts a "Third Islamic Invasion of Europe" by means of "penetration, propaganda, conversion and demographic changes". In his eyes the Europeans are even committing "demographic suicide" with the advancing Islam. The first Islamic invasion was stopped at Poitiers in the year 732 after the conquest of Spain, Portugal and the south of France and the second invasion attempt by the Ottoman Turks as stopped before the gates of Vienna where they were, fortunately, beaten in 1683. According to Prof. Israeli the third invasion attempt that is now going on in Europe has a much bigger change of success.

The man is absolutely right. The Muslim population doubles with every generation - 25 years - and the number of Islamics in each and every European country is taking disturbing forms.'

and/or

'The Netherlands as Islamic mission country. If a terrorist like Mohammed B. could yet not be stopped, the tactics of penetration, propaganda, conversion and demographic change will indeed prove to be successful if the cowardly political elite from VVD to PvdA and from SP to CDA and their European equivalents continue to remain silent about it and denounce and demonise those who are not. There is enough Islam in Europe and in the Netherlands. The PVV will oppose this third Islamic invasion attempt with man and might.'

and/or

(De Pers of 13 February 2007, 'What is driving Geert Wilders?')

'We want enough. Close the borders, no more Islamics in the Netherlands, many Muslims deported from the Netherlands, denaturalisation of Islamic criminals.'

and/or

'It is the facts. The Islam is a violent religion. If Mohammed would be alive here today the Lower House would immediately agree to hunt him out of the country.'

and/or

'Former chief of the Mossad Efraim Halevy says that the Third World War has already started. I am not putting these words in my mouth, but it is correct though.'

and/or

'I have good intentions. We let something happen as a result of which this becomes a totally different society. I am well aware that in a few decades there will not be an Islamic majority yet. But it is growing. With aggressive elements, imperialism. Just take a walk down the street and look what it is bringing us. You feel that you are no longer living in your own country. A fight is going on and we must defend ourselves. Soon there will be more mosques than churches!'

and/or

(De Volkskrant of 8 August 2007, 'Wilders: prohibit the Quran, also in mosque')

'A prohibition is a prohibition. Hence not only the sale but also the use in mosques and possession at home must be punished. If this is not possible in the current legislation then a new prohibitory provision must be created.'

and/or

'This book incites to hatred and murder, and does therefore not fit in our legal system. If Muslims want to participate they must renounce this Quran. I understand this is much to ask, but we must stop making concessions.'

and/or

(De Volkskrant of 8 August 2007, 'Enough is enough: prohibit the Quran')

'A moderate Islam does not exist. It does not exist because there is no distinction between Good Islam and Bad Islam. There is Islam and that is it. And Islam means the Quran and nothing but the Quran. And the Quran is the Mein Kampf of a religion that intends to eliminate others and that refers to those others - non-Muslims - as unfaithful dogs, inferior beings. Read the Quran, this Mein Kampf, again. In whatever version, you will see that all the evil that the sons of Allah commit to us and themselves originates from this book (Oriana Fallaci, The Force of Reason, post-script, page 305, February 2006).'

and/or

'The core of the problem is the fascist Islam, the sick ideology of Allah and Mohammed as laid down in the Islamic Mein Kampf: the Quran. The texts from the Quran leave little to imagination.'

and/or

'Prohibit this miserable book the way Mein Kampf was also prohibited!'

and/or

'I am so ashamed of all those in- and outside of the government and the Lower House who refuse to stop the Islamic invasion of the Netherlands. I am so ashamed of Dutch politics where the overrepresentation of members of ethnic minorities in crime and criminality is accepted day in day out without an answer to it.'

and/or

'The Hague is filled with cowardly folks. Scared people who were born cowardly and will die cowardly. Who feel and stimulate that the Dutch culture is founded on a Jewish-Christian-Islamic tradition. Who issue a general pardon to liars and criminals.'

and/or
'Who do not give a damn about the interests of the Dutch citizens and cooperate in the transformation of the Netherlands into Netherabia as a province of the Islamic super state Eurabia.'

and/or

'I have had enough of the Islam in the Netherlands: no more Muslim immigrants. I have had enough of the adoration of Allah and Mohammed in the Netherlands: no more mosques. I have had enough of the Quran in the Netherlands: prohibit this fascist book.

Enough is enough.'

and/or

('Wilders wants a renewed mini Quran' of 7 September 2007 on the website of Radio Nederland Wereldomroep and/or the Wereldomroep via the link: http://static.rnw.nl/migratie/www.wereldomroep.nl/actua/nl/nederlandsepolitiek/070909wildersintvw-redirected)

'This kind of renewed version would be desirable, according to the PVV leader; a Quran deprived of all vindictive verses. "It should actually have the format of a Donald Duck", according to Wilders.'

and/or

(De Limburger of 9 February 2008, 'Islam is my Fitna')

'I point to the role which the horrible Quran plays in the Islamisation of our society.'

and/or

'In the film I illustrate texts and verses from the Quran with documentary images that demonstrate that the Quran is not a dead letter but the face of the Islam: a huge threat.'

and/or

(De Volkskrant of 11 February 2008, 'It no longer has any use, but The Film will be there')

'In the GPD interview he explains that he will illustrate texts and verses from the Quran with documentary images. He wants to, by way of example, demonstrate that the Quran is not "a dead letter but the face of the Islam: a huge threat".'

and/or

(The film Fitna, placed on www.liveleak.com on 27 March 2008)

The film starts with a black image with the text: "Warning: this film contains very shocking material". Then the sound of a match being lighted can be heard and a book with oriental looking symbols is opened up that looks like the Quran. On the first page a cartoon can be seen of Mohammed with a bomb in his turban. The sound of a burning fuse can be heard. A clock appears that starts counting down from 15:00.

A page of the book is turned over. Two open pages can be seen. On the page on the right the following text appears: "Quran, Surah 8, verse 60". Then on the page on the left appears: "Surah 8. Verse 60: Prepare for them whatever force and cavalry ye are able of gathering, to strike terror, to strike terror into the hearts of the enemies, of Allah and your enemies". A voice can also be heard which (most likely) sings this text in the Arabic language. On the page on the right, next to the text, footage of the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York (09/11/2001) are shown as well as of the attacks by Muslim extremists in Madrid and London with footage of the victims. This footage is alternated with footage of apparent imams who say: "What makes Allah happy? Allah is happy if non-Muslims are being killed" and "Destroy the unbelievers and polytheists, your (Allah's) enemies and the enemies of the religion. Allah, count them and kill them up to the very last of them. And do not spare a single one".

The page is turned. Now the page on the right states: "Quran, Surah 4, verse 56" and on the page on the left: "Surah 4, verse 56: Those who reject our signs, we shall soon cast into the fire: as often as their skins are roasted through, we shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty: for Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise". Then footage follows of a man who yells: "If Allah permits us, oh nation of Mohammed, even the stone will say Oh Muslim. A Jew is hiding behind me, come and cut off his head. And we shall cut off his head! By Allah, we shall cut it off! Oh Jews! Allah Akbar! (Allah is Great!). Jihad for the sake of Allah! Jihad for the sake of Allah! Victory to Allah! Allah Akbar! (Allah is Great!)".
Then footage is shown of a young girl wearing a headscarf who is asked by a person off-screen who the Jews are. The little girl answers: "They are apes and pigs". The voice says: "Are they apes and pigs? Says who?" The little girl says: "Allah". The voice asks: "Where did he say this?" The little girl answers: "In the Quran". The following footage shows a mass of people who are dragging corpses behind them. The following footage again shows images of the attacks in London showing, among other things, an exploded red double-decker bus. Then footage follows of apparently an imam who calls outs: "The Jews are Jews. They are the ones who must be butchered and killed". These stills are intertwined with stills of Muslims (as follows from the headscarves and facial covering worn by one of the female persons) who show texts on signs: "Be prepared for the real Holocaust" and "God bless Hitler". Then footage of a group of people in uniform who are lined up follows, apparently fighters who are standing with extended right arm (apparently bringing the Hitler salute).

A page is turned. On the new page the following text appears: "Quran, Surah 47, verse 4" and then: "Surah 47, verse 4: Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers in fight, smite at their necks; At length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly on them". A voice can also be heard which (probably) presents this text in the Arabic language. Then a newspaper article is shown of the murder of Theo van Gogh. A fragment of an interview with Theo van Gogh can be heard where he says, among other things: "I do not think that bullet will come for me!". A picture of a male person appears who looks like Mohammed B. who has been convicted of the murder of Theo van Gogh. On screen appears: Mohammed B. Immediately thereafter an audio fragment in which the voice of Mohammed B. can be heard who says: "If I had the opportunity, if I would be free, and I had the opportunity to do it again, what I did on 2 November, I would have done exactly the same". Footage appears of people who yell: "Learn from Theo van Gogh. Learn from the examples you can see! Because you pay with your blood!" and also footage of people with bloody knives. A newspaper article is shown with the header: "Hirsi Ali and Wilders into hiding. Death list. Targets in letter of Mohammed B." A fragment can also be seen of, as can be seen on screen, a Saudi TV station, Iqra TV, where a person says: "Houses and young men must be sacrificed, throats must be cut and skulls must be crushed. This is the road to victory". Stills are shown of people wearing balaclavas and holding firearms. In between them they hold a man who is apparently their prisoner. The person wearing a balaclava in the middle reads a statement out loud. Then the masked men move to cut off the head of the prisoner. The beheading itself can (barely) not be seen. Yet the audio of the fragment remains audible. Sounds can be heard that apparently point to the beheading. After a few seconds the footage returns and one of the masked men can be seen holding the cut-off head of the prisoner up.

A page is turned again. On the new page can be read: "Quran, Surah 4, verse 89" and then: "Surah 4, verse 89: They but wish that ye should reject faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing as they, so take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah. But if they turn renegades, seize them and kill them wherever ye find them, and take no friends or helpers from their ranks". A voice can also be heard which (probably) presents the text in the Arabic language. The text is followed by footage of Arabic looking people who state the following: "The Islam is a sacred religion. The best religion there is. If somebody converts to Christianity he deserves the death penalty". Another person says: "The Islam is superior compared to the Jews, the Christians, the Buddhists and the Hindus. The only law recognised by Allah is the Islam. And he who pursues anything other but the Islam shall never be accepted". The following newspaper headlines appear on screen: "Former Muslim Jami molested", "Islamic witch hunt again threatens", "Death to Rushdie" and "Letter on body Theo van Gogh disclosed. Hirsi Ali also receiving death threats".

The page is turned. It says: "Quran, Surah 8, verse 39" and then: "Surah 8, verse 39: Fight them until there is no dissension, and the religion is entirely Allah's". Moreover, a voice can be heard which (probably) presents this text in the Arabic language. An Ayatollah appears who says: "The Islam is a religion that wants to control the world. It did so before and shall eventually do so again". Followed by President Ahmadinejad who says: "The message of the Revolution is global, and is not restricted to a specific place or time. Have no doubt... Allah willing, Islam will conquer what? It will conquer all the mountain tops of the world".

Then a number of apparently Arabic men appears on screen that make the following statements:

"We have ruled the world before. And Allah willing the day shall come that we will again rule the whole world. The day shall come that we will rule over America! The day shall come that we will rule over Great Britain and the whole world!".

"Allah ordered us to spread this religion all over the world".
"Thou shall take over the United States! Thou shall take over the United Kingdom! Thou shall take over Europe! Thou shall conquer them all. Thou shall be victorious! Thou shall take over Egypt. We have faith in Allah!".

Then apparently Arabic people with signs are shown. The following texts can be read: "Islam will dominate the world" and "Freedom go to hell".

Then the following text appears: "The Netherlands is under the spell of the Islam". Stills are shown of mosques that are most likely situated in the Netherlands. A voice can also be heard which says: "These mosques are all part of the Dutch government system". Footage is shown of a woman dressed in a burka combined with the newspaper header "Government: no burka prohibition" as also with satellite dishes and apartment buildings. Graphs are shown of the increase of the number of Muslims in the Netherlands in the course of the years. In the graphs the years 1909, 1960, 1990 and 2004 are shown with, respectively, the following numbers: 54, 1399, 458,000 an 944,000. Next to these graphs the number of Muslims in Europe in 2007 appears. The graph increases up to 54,000,000 and continues beyond the top of the screen. In the background stills can be seen of women with headscarves, satellite dishes and Dutch police officers in uniform taking off their shoes when they apparently enter a mosque. An apparent Muslim says: "If my sister or my mother has sex with another person I will also kill them". The interviewer asks: "Then you commit blood vengeance!" The man answers: "Absolutely". Another apparent Muslim says: "For example, in the Netherlands you can be adulterous or gay. But I do not wish to be part of that because the Islam considers that to be a crime". A still appears of a postcard with the text: "Greetings from the Netherlands" where you can only see mosques. Then a preach can be heard, on screen the following appears: "Said in Dutch mosques": "They must renounce political parties and worldly bodies of thought like liberalism, democracy, socialism and everything that smells of it and originates from the human brain" and (according to the text on screen pronounced in the El Tawheed mosque): "If a married man, by the grace of Allah, commits adultery, or a married woman commits adultery, she will be stoned".

On screen the following question is shown: "The Netherlands in the future!?". Stills are shown of apparently homosexual men (on screen it reads: "Gays") who are hanged, children smothered in blood (on screen it reads: "Children"), stills of a woman with a bloody knife in her hand with a child smothered in blood on her lap, a woman (on screen it reads: "Women") with a naked lower torso tied down to a bed and then a lot of blood (she is apparently being circumcised), a chopped off head of apparently a Muslim woman (she wears a headscarf), a woman dressed in a burka at a noose and a veiled woman who is shot through her head. These scenes are concluded with a large number of newspaper headlines. An enumeration of the headlines is provided below:

Islamists seek control, politically driven Muslims gain influence in Europe
Spanish Court examines ties. Laakkwartier with Madrid in terror web
Sudanese demand execution of British 'teddy bear lady'
Three people suspected of planning attack
Hell will break loose. "What you need is a heavy bomb attack". "We do not agree with the freedom of speech, because we renounce democracy", "Our alternative is the Islam"
Explosive increase blood vengeance in Amsterdam
School closes on Muslim holidays
AIVD investigation: Jihad lessons at primary school
Minister reports Rotterdam abuse cases. Free trip to Mecca via Islam school
Ankara wants Turkish in classroom here
Donner eases the rules. Foreign imams can enter country more quickly
Murderer Theo van Gogh predicts terrorist acts. Mohammed B.: "My followers are ready"
Van Gogh murdered after Fatwa announcement
Almost half of the young Moroccans anti-Western
Mosques under spell of radical Muslim group
Suicide commandos in the Netherlands
Hamas meets in Rotterdam
Alexander must swim for hours. Moroccans throw gay into the water
Imams do not like gays
'Imam legitimises violence against gays'
'Throw gays of high buildings'
Mosque: "Turn the Netherlands into a Muslim state"
Girls still being circumcised
'Muslims prevent doctors from providing care to women'
Halal fund: sliced meat for Muslims. New on Amsterdam Stock Exchange
Al Qaeda issues death sentence. Jihad against Wilders
'Quran game licence' Arabic Specialist Hans Jansen: "You already offend the Islam by not becoming a Muslim"

Then a hand can be seen that takes up a page of the Quran. The screen then turns black and the sound of paper being torn can be heard. On screen the text appears: "The sound you just heard was a page from the telephone directory. Because it is not up to me but up to the Muslims themselves to tear the vindictive verses from the Quran. Muslims want you to give room to the Islam, but the Islam does not offer room to you.

The government wants you to respect the Islam, yet the Islam has no respect at all for you. The Islam wants to control, subdue and is out for the destruction of our Western civilisation. In 1945 Nazism was beaten in Europe. In 1989 communism was beaten in Europe. Now the Islamic ideology must be beaten. Stop the Islamisation. Defend our freedom".

The film again concludes with the image of the cartoon of Mohammed with the turban. It can be seen that the fuse in his turban is almost near the end. A ticking clock can be heard. The clock appears on screen and counts down from 00:03 to zero. A flash of lightning can be seen and a bolt of lightning can be heard. Then the Quran is closed, the word "Fitna" is shown which flows into the word "Fin" and then the credits of the film are shown.

(Article 137d of the Dutch Criminal Code)


4. he, on one or more dates on or about 7 October 2006, in The Hague and/or Amsterdam and/or (elsewhere in) the Netherlands, on multiple occasions, at least once, (each time) in public, orally, in writing or through images, incited to hatred of people, i.e. non-Western immigrants and/or Moroccans, based on their race, by (each time) in De Volkskrant placing (having placed) one or more texts with the following content:

(De Volkskrant of 7 October 2006, 'The Pope is completely right')

'The borders are closed to all non-Western immigrants the same day.'

and/or

'Of course. 99 percent of the people who came to live there are of an Islamic origin.'
and/or

'Absolutely. The figures show this. One out of five Moroccan youngsters is registered with the police as a suspect. Their behaviour derives from their religion and culture. You cannot consider these two facts separately. The other day the Pope was completely right: the Islam is a violent religion. Islam means submission and conversion of non-Muslims. This interpretation rules in the living rooms of these problematic youngsters, in the mosques. It has been embedded in this community itself.'

and/or

'Those Moroccan boys are really violent. They beat up people because of their sexual orientation. I have never used violence.'

(Article 137d of the Dutch Criminal Code)

5.

he, on one or more dates on or about 7 October 2006, in The Hague and/or Amsterdam and/or (elsewhere in) the Netherlands, on multiple occasions, at least once, (each time) in public, orally, in writing or through images, incited to discrimination, within the meaning of article 90 quarter of the Dutch Criminal Code, against people, i.e. non-Western immigrants and/or Moroccans, based on their race, by (each time) in De Volkskrant placing (having placed) one or more texts with the following content:


Explanatory notes to the procedure

1. Presence at session
If you were younger than age 18 years at the time of the act with which you are charged you are required to appear at the session. In all other cases you are not required to appear. If the judge deems it absolutely necessary that you be present at the session, he can require you to appear. If you do not appear, the court ultimately can have the police bring you to court under duress. A lawyer can represent you at the court hearing. Oral authorisation is sufficient for this. You can also be represented at sessions of the sub-district court [kantonrechter] and/or the police court for economic offences [economische politierechter] by someone who is not a lawyer, unless you have been charged with a criminal offence. That person must hold a special written power of attorney. If your representative or authorised lawyer does appear at the session and you do not, you will be deemed to have appeared in person for the further handling of the matter.
2. Legal representation
If you do not have a lawyer, you can request a lawyer at the Juridisch Loket, or Legal Desk (telephone 0900-8020). If you are in detention, you will be given a lawyer,
3. Avoiding prosecution and proposal for an out-of-court settlement
4.
If only a monetary fine has been imposed, you can ask the public prosecutor to propose an out-of-court settlement. In this proposal, the public prosecutor will set the conditions you must satisfy to avoid criminal proceedings. If you pay the maximum of the monetary penalty within the time set, the public prosecutor cannot refuse your request for a proposal for an out-of-court settlement. If you fulfil the conditions stated in this proposed out-of-court settlement then this summons will lapse and you need not appear before the court. It may happen that the public prosecutor will offer you a proposed out-of-court settlement before your court date, or has already done so. You are not required to accept it. In such a case, however, the summons remains in force.
5. Objections
If you wish to file a notice of objection against this summons you must do so within eight days of the date of this summons and before the start of the court hearing. This does not apply to matters before the sub-district court. If you wish to file a notice of objection it is important that you state why you do not agree with this summons. You must submit your notice of objection, personally, to the Clerk of the Court. You lawyer or someone to whom you have given a special written power of attorney may also do this. You may not file a notice of objection if you have already received notice of further prosecution for the same charge,
6. Requesting postponement of the session
You can ask the court for a postponement of the proceedings of your case, for example, if you cannot prepare adequately or if you cannot appear due to illness or a scheduled holiday. Request the postponement of the proceedings of your case as soon as possible after receiving the summons. You must do this in writing, stating your name, the date of the hearing, and the public prosecutor's office number in your letter along with why you want the postponement. If you have a receipt for the booking of a trip or a physician's certificate, include it. Send your request to the Clerk of the Court. If you would like more information about this, contact the Clerk of the Court (see the front for the address, or go to www.rechtspraak.nl ).
The Court is not obliged to postpone the session. You must also enquire personally before the hearing date whether you have been given a postponement.
7. Witness and experts
8.
The public prosecutor can call witnesses and experts to appear at the hearing. If any witnesses and experts have been called, this will be stated on the summons. You can also bring witnesses and experts to the hearing. It would be appreciated if you so notify the public prosecutor in advance. You will be responsible for any costs associated with this. You can also ask the public prosecutor to call witnesses and/or experts for you. Direct such a request in writing to the public prosecutor at least ten days before the court session. If the summons is sent to you later than fourteen days before the court session, then you are obliged to ask the public prosecutor to call witnesses and/or experts for you within four days after the date of the summons but no later than three days before the court session. You are to describe these witnesses and/or experts by the name, profession, and place of residence of the persons desired. The public prosecutor is not required to call for you the witnesses and experts you have requested. If you do not agree with the public prosecutor's decision, you can make this known to the judge at the session. It is no longer possible to have new witnesses and experts called after proceedings have been suspended.
9. Information about the judgment
If this summons has been served on your personally or if you, your authorised lawyer or your representative is present at the (further) session(s), the judgment of the Court becomes irrevocable after 14 days and you will not receive any notice of this. This will also be the case if there were special reasons by which you were able to know in advance the day of the session. You can obtain information about the judgment from the Clerk of the Court or from your lawyer. If you have made a motion for adjournment, you must inform yourself whether this has been honoured.
10. Possibility of appeal
If you do not agree with the decision of the court, you can appeal to a higher court within fourteen days.
How?
You can do so by going to the Clerk of the Court and filling in a form that you must sign, or by asking your lawyer to lodge an appeal, or by sending a letter to the Clerk of the Court.
Note carefully: you must state clearly in this letter that you grant the Clerk the authorisation to lodge an appeal on your behalf and that you authorise the Clerk of the Court on your behalf to receive the notice of the appeal hearing. The Clerk will then forward this notice to the address you have provided.
Your appeal will not always be taken up!
If you have been sentenced only to pay a monetary penalty of up to €500 and if it concerned a charge or charges for which the maximum punishment was four years imprisonment, the President of the Court of Appeal could decide not to have the higher court take up your case again. It is therefore important that you clearly inform the President in a letter (the notice of appeal) why you want to submit your case to a higher court. The Clerk must receive this letter within fourteen days after you have lodged your appeal. You will receive notice as to whether your appeal will be taken up or not. If the case is taken up you will receive a summons to appear before a session of the Court of Appeal. Should the case not be taken up, the judgment that you had appealed becomes irrevocable. You then have no further opportunity for appeal (remedy at law) and will receive a giro collection form within a few weeks to pay the penalty.
Do you have further questions? Take up contact with the Clerk of the Court. The contact details are on your summons.
Recording of your details in the Reference Index of Persons
Your personal details will be recorded in an automated system. For more information about this, contact the district court public prosecutor's office [arrondissementsparket]. Its address is given on the front of this summons.


• Article 137c Dutch Penal Code
o 1. He who publicly, verbally or in writing or image, deliberately expresses himself in an way insulting of a group of people because of their race, their religion or belief, or their hetero- or homosexual nature or their physical, mental, or intellectual disabilities, will be punished with a prison sentence of at the most one year or a fine of third category.
o 2. If the offence is committed by a person who makes it his profession or habit, or by two or more people in association, a prison sentence of at the most two years or a fine of fourth category will be imposed.

• Article 137d Dutch Penal Code
o 1. He who publicly, verbally or in writing or in an image, incites hatred against or discrimination of people or violent behaviour against person or property of people because of their race, their religion or belief, their gender or hetero- or homosexual nature or their physical, mental, or intellectual disabilities, will be punished with a prison sentence of at the most one year or a fine of third category.
o 2. If the offence is committed by a person who makes it his profession or habit, or by two or more people in association, a prison sentence of at the most two years or a fine of fourth category will be imposed.

| 58 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

58 Comments


Geert, why not add that you are being insulted by two or more persons who have made it their habit to insult you with their accusations and prosecution for going to the trouble of describing the Muslim's insulting cult as it is and for condemning Muslims for being insulters and inciters of hatred pursuant to the prescriptions of Islam?

This could either be very good, or very bad.

If this is in fact a fair, impartial trial, then Wilders will be able to prove beyond any doubt, that everything he has said is completely true. If that happens, maybe some people will actually start listening to him.

But to be honest, I'm not very optimistic. I do not think that there is much chance of a fair, impartial trial. In fact, I would almost be willing to bet money that the jury will be front-loaded with Muslims. I would not give Mr. Wilders better than a 50/50 shot at staying out of prison.

Discussion of the contents of the Qur'an, Hadith, and Sira, or of the history of Islamic conquest of vast lands peopled by non-Muslims, and what happened to those non-Muslims during their subsequent subjugation under Muslim rule, does not constitute an "insult." It constitutes, rather, the discharge of responsibility that Dutch people all have, or should feel they have, to learn more about developments in the Netherlands and elsewhere in Western Europe that, clearly, if not halted and reversed, will change forever the societies they live in. They have inherited a life estate in the legacy of Dutch, and of Western, civilization, a legacy that many of them have done little to deserve. But they will deserve it, if they at least do what they can to preserve it, and to transmit it, more or less intact and certainly not destroyed, to others. So they should think not of their unimpressive contemporaries, but of those who came before, and over many centuries, created what they created. Neither Rembrandt nor Spinoza could have produced what they did, not for one minute, under Islam. Start with those inhabitants of the Netherlands. Start with Rembrandt, and Spinoza, and work backwards, and then forwards.

Article 137c Dutch Penal Code - 1. He who publicly, verbally or in writing or image, deliberately expresses himself in an way insulting of a group of people...

Article 137d Dutch Penal Code - 1. He who publicly, verbally or in writing or in an image, incites hatred against or discrimination of people or violent behaviour against person or property of people...

These "laws" are terrifying. Thank God and the founding fathers for the First Amendment.

This is not a simple matter of freedom of speech any more, rather it is a crucial test of the very foundation of any judicial system and how true it upholds justice and truth.

To my knowledge any court ruling relies on solid evidence before delivering any verdict and what more of proofs do you need more than what the Qu’ran provides that what Mr. Geert is saying is true and not a figment of his imagination?

Why should Mr.Geert be condemned for his ideas and Imams condoned for very same thing that is being spread and delivered throughout millions of sermons by hatful Imams in mosques all over the world while hateful parents, particularly that woman who appeared in Fitna, inciting hate in an innocent child. Should the court rule against Mr. Wilders it also should rule, condemn and expel all the Imams who preach using the very same words.

It will be indeed a sad day for humanity if the ruling goes against Mr. Geert and those hate machines be let off the hooks. This should call for a revolution…

Quite the opposite from a "Sledgehammerblow Against Freedom"
The very fact this has happened will open a whole new scenario against the Islamofacists and those who support them. Geert is being given an invaluable opportunity to defend his right to freedom of expression. This will backfire big time as when he is in the dock his indomitable will and inteligence will make mincemeat of those puerile animals that dare to question him. This is indeed an act against freedom of expression and conscience and westerners, grounded in the traditions of western liberty will rally round to support him. The very words they use to condemn him will condemn them - as what they are Dhimmis, Communists & traitors to the very liberties that seek to deny to Geert. I am not yet Kuffar enough to buckle under to these vermin. Let them do thier worst, all they will do is to expose themselves and the miserable religion they seek to defend as a fraud.

Regard the following Quotes:

We can never be sure that the opinion we are endeavoring to stifle is a false opinion; and if we were sure, stifling it would be an evil still. ~John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, 1859


The fact is that censorship always defeats its own purpose, for it creates, in the end, the kind of society that is incapable of exercising real discretion. ~Henry Steele Commager


The only valid censorship of ideas is the right of people not to listen. ~Tommy Smothers


Censorship reflects society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime. ~Potter Stewart


We have a natural right to make use of our pens as of our tongue, at our peril, risk and hazard. ~Voltaire, Dictionnaire Philosophique, 1764


The dirtiest book of all is the expurgated book. ~Walt Whitman


Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so, too. ~Voltaire


I am thankful for all the complaining I hear about our government because it means we have freedom of speech. ~Nancie J. Carmody


The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error. ~John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, 1859

The very indictment of Geert Wilders exonerates him.

Well since the dhimmi court insists on going ahead. let the trial be made public,demand that it be public!

Define the difference from speaking in an effort to present knowledge and awareness rather than a charge of hate speech.

Bring on the experts as witnesses for the defense such as Robert Spencer, and a host hundreds more, especially the brave apostates from Islam. Lay it out for all to see and examine on TV.

The media spent millions of hours on the OJ Simpson trial, now bring on a trial that really matters to everyone in the West.

It is time to lay it all out and Geert Wilders is a very capable man to do it. Allow Lord Pearson a seat in the court house,Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Wafi Sultan,Bridget Gabriel,Bat Yeor,Ibn Warraq,Nonie Darwish,and a host of many more --Let them testify to Islam, Let the prosecution and the defense ask them questions, bring on a hundred media trucks to broadcast it all over the world.


We should all be in that court sitting proudly right next to Geert Wilders with arms locked together in the defense of freedom of speech, because without it we are lost.

If this is in fact a fair, impartial trial, then Wilders will be able to prove beyond any doubt, that everything he has said is completely true. If that happens, maybe some people will actually start listening to him.

The "truth" is not what he is being prosecuted for. He is not being charged with slander or libel. He is being charge with "insulting" and "inciting hatred of" a group of people. Mitigation based on the factual accuracy of said statements is not mentioned in these statues.

Were these "laws" to be enacted in the US just about everyone here at JW would be open to such prosecution. Even more pernicious, unlike slander and libel which is directed at a specific person, the state speaks for the "group" and can ascribe whatever feelings they might or might not have to assure a conviction.

Why aren't the Dutch laws against inciting hatred and exprssing insults being directed against the hundreds of imams and Moslem leaders who are the ones who are actually saying and doing these things. All Wilders has done is quote them and illustrate their actions.
How can it be acceptable for an imam to say: "kill the apostates", and unacceptable for Wilders to say: "the imam said 'kill the apostates'"? It's the imam who is doing the hating, not Wilders.
The whole business is a travesty of justice. The Dutch should be demanding the removal of the Public Prosecutor and the judges of this court.

One further thought:
If it's inciting hatred for Wilders to quote an imam, or the Koran, by saying: "the imam said 'kill the apostates'", then it must also be wrong for the public prosecutor to quote Wilders by saying: "Wilders said 'the imam said "kill the apostates"'".
In other words, the public prosecutor is quoting the imam just like Wilders is, so the public prosecutor should be prosecuting himself as well as Wilders.

One further thought:
If it's inciting hatred for Wilders to quote an imam, or the Koran, by saying: "the imam said 'kill the apostates'", then it must also be wrong for the public prosecutor to quote Wilders by saying: "Wilders said 'the imam said "kill the apostates"'".
In other words, the public prosecutor is quoting the imam just like Wilders is, so the public prosecutor should be prosecuting himself as well as Wilders.

The two articles of the Dutch Penal Code you provided (thanks by the way) are indeed terrifying. They run directly counter in law and spirit to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. Reading them straightforwardly as I did I could see how these ill-conceived, freedom-crushing laws could allow for the conviction of someone like Geert Wilders.

Also, even though Islam truly is a religion of hate and intolerance and many individual Muslims in The Netherlands have said things far more critical of non-Muslims than Wilders has said of Muslims, it will not matter, I strongly suspect, precisely because Islam is a recognized religion in Holland and thus will be exempt from any application of these two provisions of the Dutch Penal Code. In short, in The Netherlands Muslims can say most anything they want and non-Muslims must be far more careful. Hence the reason why that intrepid soul, Geert Wilders, is on trial. It seems clear to me that Dutch law is in desperate need of reform and should itself be put on trial so to speak.

I think you hit the nail on the head. The state, it appears, is the arbitrator if what is and isn't "insulting" and is free to selectively choose who is and isn't to be prosecuted. IMO, Wilders politically threatens the PCMC elite in power and so must be eliminated from the political theater. A short stint in jail might do the trick - Hence the charges.

However, if acquitted, this could be a political disaster for the PCMC elites as Wilders popularity would probably soar (apparently his party is already the most popular in the Netherlands). As such I tend to believe the fix is in but, who knows, if they have a jury system like the US you might get some clear thinking jurists. Let's hope!

Step #1: the Koran says: "kill the apostates"
Step #2: an imam quotes the Koran: "kill the apostates"
Step #3: Wilders quotes the imam: "kill the apostates"
Step #4: the public prosecutor quotes Wilders: "kill the apostates"
And somehow, steps #1, #2, and #4 are acceptable, but step #3 is not! Wilders goes to jail, and the imam and the public prosecutor do not! There's some really twisted thinking here.

From the listed quotations: 'Former chief of the Mossad Efraim Halevy says that the Third World War has already started. I am not putting these words in my mouth, but it is correct though.'

No, the Cold War was the Third World War, and from the looks of this trial, the West lost it. The collectivist tyrants are running things in Europe and now in America. The show trials of their political enemies have begun.

It is the Fourth World War that is currently underway--Islam's revitalized assault on humanity, fueled by oil money and modern communications, and facilitated by treasonous socialist weasels in high places.

So now the socialist weasels are putting the leader of the Free World, Geert Wilders, on trial. Totalitarian by instinct, the weasels ally with fascist Islam in order to snuff freedom out. Freedom is something neither of these tyrannical cults--socialism and fascism--can tolerate.

Look for the weasels to set the rules of evidence so that neither Wilders himself, nor Wilder's witnesses may testify on anything of substance, while the "hurt Muslms" can whine away and plead endless insult. Look for the weasels to stack the jury, so a "guilty" outcome is assured.

The weasels and their Muslim allies must destroy Geert Wilders. That clearly is their plan. They will stop at nothing to accomplish this political assassination.


Erik Mokum replies to comment from shortfattexan

In The Netherlands we don't have trial by jury. It all depends on the "requisitoir" of the prosecutor (Officier van Justitie), on the "facts", on the evidence - in this case - given by the specialists, and the way by which Geert's lawyer, Bram Moskovicz, defends his client and finally the weighing of all this by the judge in the light of the law.
Moskovicz is one of the topmost lawyers in Holland.

Moskovicz, Moskovicz...,Bram..!? Is he jewish? Yes, he's jewish. His father, Max, was a survivor and, in his days, also a toplevel lawyer.
Bram Moskovicz is, very often, the lawyer of top-criminals in Holland (we do have them in Holland), because...., because of the experiences of his father with the cruel Nazi-state. Everyone, even the lowest of criminals, has to have a fair trial.
With Bram, Geert is in able hands, but still.
Will this trial be a turning point?

The people who comment as to the legality or otherwise of the prosecution of Geert, miss the point. Geert said that this is a political trial. And that is exactly what it is. Who stands to benefit if he is convicted. The stupid politicians who sparked this whole affair, the Islamofacists who helped and the PC Liberal elite ? No, they will not benefit in the slightest. they will be exposed to the full glare of publicity concerning this travesty. What is on trial here is the whole concept of freedom of expression and conscience. Western people have a concept of this buried into thier very DNA. The people persecuting Geert will rue the day they ever started this inquisition against him and against western concepts of liberty and justice. When other commentators say that this inquisition is justified under the Dutch Constitution they miss the point. It could actually put the Dutch Constitution in relation to these matters under the spotlight. Whatever the case, convicted or not Geert will win the moral and ethical battle and garner even greater support. Sorry to sound like an optimist, perhaps wiser heads prefer to sound and act like pessimists whilst this champion of freedom is hounded. Now is not the time for doubts but for unfettered support of this champion who represents us and the west against the evil that is Islam.

He has so many looking for him.

Shouldn't you delete the address?

Hard to believe that Geert is being charged with speaking the Truth about Islam. This is both a grave day against free speech and truth, as well as an opportunity to protect both.

I noticed a key word missing from point # 1, the word, Islam:

"...intentionally offended a group of people, i.e. Muslims, based on their religion,..."

Hmm, there is no mention of Islam in this statement as being the "religion" in question. Nevertheless, I would think that one of the things that Geert's defense team will establish is the fact that Islam is not merely a "religion", but that it encompasses many aspects of being a political system of government as well -- and that it deserves a much broader term than what's being presented in this case!


What a backwards mess this has become, because ISLAM should be put on trial, NOT Geert!!

Geert, you are in our thoughts and prayers :)

Erik Mokum replies to comment from shortfattexan

In The Netherlands we don't have trial by jury. It all depends on the "requisitoir" of the prosecutor (Officier van Justitie), on the "facts", on the evidence - in this case - given by the specialists, and the way by which Geert's lawyer, Bram Moskovicz, defends his client and finally the weighing of all this by the judge in the light of the law.
Moskovicz is one of the topmost lawyers in Holland.

Moskovicz, Moskovicz...,Bram..!? Is he jewish? Yes, he's jewish. His father, Max, was a survivor and, in his days, also a toplevel lawyer.
Bram Moskovicz is, very often, the lawyer of top-criminals in Holland (we do have them in Holland), because...., because of the experiences of his father with the cruel Nazi-state. Everyone, even the lowest of criminals, has to have a fair trial.
With Bram, Geert is in able hands, but still.
Will this trial be a turning point?

The ones persecuting Geert (and people like them) are so quick to say they care about Muslims and their feelings. What about the feelings of the host populations that Muslims invade, who do not want their societies changed so?

Who else stands up for them?

I respectfully disagree that commenting on the legality of this trial misses the point. Yes, of course, it is chiefly a political trial but it is Dutch law that is allowing this travesty of true justice to proceed and so to ignore the law when the law itself is the enabler of stupidity and repression would be a very important omission indeed.

At the gates of Vienna - King of Poland, John III Sobieski.

In the fields of Tours - Charles Martel (Charles the Hammer).

Is the truth its own defense?

Is the truth its own defence? (for our UK readers)

Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the indictment is its length and the amount of detail it contains. A lot of work has gone into it, much more than you would normally see. The authorities are determined to get him. I fear for the outcome. European friends laughed in disbelief when I predicted that O. J. Simpson would be acquitted. For Americans accustomed to first amendment protection a prediction that Wilders will be convicted may seem equally laughable.

I couldn't have said it better. Unfortunately (as far as I understand) the Netherlands, as well as many other European nations, have constitutions that allow the state to pass laws that prohibit speech.

Anyway, I support Wilders 100% and my fervent wish is that he defeats these SOBs at their own game and goes on the be the next PM. One of his first actions should be to try to strengthen the constitutional provisions of free speech as to make such current and future laws unconstitutional.

From 1933 to 1939, Winston Churchill was one of the very, very few in the world sounding the alarm to the danger of Hitler and the Nazi's. If you were to read a bio or two or eight on Churchill you would find, at least on this speaking out about what you believe in issue, amazing parallels between him and Geert Wilders. What detractors (and most were detractors) said about Churchill (hate monger, war monger, slanderer, racist, washed up lunatic etc.) sound very much like what we hear today being spewed against Wilders. Imagine, for a moment, that the Nazi's had been allowed to sue or prosecute Churchill and put him on trial for defamation and hate mongering. Just thank God "political correctness" was not the order of the day in the 1930's, for had it been I shudder to think it would have led. I'll end with a rather relevant Churchill quote:

"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfils the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things."

So, Geert Wilders is a systematic and well-informed critic of Islam.

What was the problem, again?

To all of us: every one of us, not just the posters but the lurkers, must put a sum of money into Geert Wilders' defence fund as linked by Mr Spencer on this website.

At least 2500 people read here regularly - for that is the rough number of people who have so far placed a vote in the dhimmi/ anti-dhimmi polls. If each of those 2500 people donates, say, even as little as $10 per person for Geert Wilders' defence, it will add up.

In addition: all of us who are practising Christians, and all who are observant Jews: pray, pray, pray and fast. Pray for Rifqa; pray also for Geert, and for his lawyer and the rest of his team.

Rifqa's case involves Muslims trying to force American law and government to obey and enforce the sharia rule that *no-one* is permitted to leave Islam, and that if they try to leave, they must be PUNISHED.

Geert's case involves Muslims trying to force Dutch law and government to obey and enforce the sharia rule re. Blasphemy (that is: that *no-one* is permitted to question or criticise or 'insult' Islam, and that if they do, they must be PUNISHED).

This article has put me in an introspective mood. I sit here, in comfort, reading and (poorly & humbly) reflecting upon the writings of our founding fathers and I can't but marvel:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

I can't think of a more singularly powerful statement that repudiates all that I have have come to know about the charter and nature of islam.

I am sometimes dejected with our modern world and wonder what has and will become of us. However, re-reading the above refreshes my spirit and reinvigorates my hope. To know that men of character once gathered to defy tyranny and changed the entire world.

This article has put me in an introspective mood. I sit here, in comfort, reading and (poorly & humbly) reflecting upon the writings of our founding fathers and I can't but marvel:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

I can't think of a more singularly powerful statement that repudiates all that I have have come to know about the character and nature of islam.

I am sometimes dejected with our modern world and wonder what has and will become of us. However, re-reading the above refreshes my spirit and reinvigorates my hope. To know that men of character once gathered to defy tyranny and changed the entire world.

Hi everyone,

The procedure states:

"The public prosecutor can call witnesses and experts to appear at the hearing. If any witnesses and experts have been called, this will be stated on the summons."

Yet I don't see mention of any witnesses or experts in the summons. Did I miss it? How can the prosecution prove its case without them? This doesn't make sense. Surely, they can't simply ask the judge's to take "judicial notice" of the purported hurt feelings he's caused (i.e. assume facts based on their widespread, non-controversial acceptance as such). That would obviate the whole point of the trial in the first place.

Also, does anyone know if either truth, or good faith subjective belief in the truth of one's statements, are relevant to Wilders' defence?

Sadly, the law he's being charged under is almost the polar opposite of the first Amendment. Even Canada, where I live and where the notion of free speech is far more qualified than in the states, doesn't criminalize speech that merely offends people because it attacks their beliefs. Hopefully, there's some way Geert can go after the law itself. If not .....

In any event, Geert's a hero and clued-in people everywhere around the world are so proud of him.

I would appreaciate if we could arrange a demonstration. A real "one" this day of the 20 January in Holland.

Why cant we raise 30.000 or more people? I mean after the minaret-election in Schwitzerland? There is a movement groving that - if it comes out of the shelter - will rock the European democracy and it can change the "luve all people" attitude that goes around together with the skelets in the corridors in the EU dicatorships tyrrannic castle!

Get Izlam out of our communities! Say no to phedophilia and suppressing of women! Say no to a new ideology of superity and violence against "unbelievers". Say no to backstriving, as wafa Sultan says! Stand up for Geert Wilders the 20 og January! Say no to Hitler and Chamberlain and yes to Churchill! Help the victims of Izlam to get out of it! Do not be the usefull idiot, that embrace this nasty ideology and their speokesmen, that does not want anything else than to cross our values and make us all be slaves of Allah and bastards like the Iranian president!

Muhammad was a phedophile according to 33.21. He was a incestueous sociopath according to the contens and the words of the entire Sura 33. I claim that people who beieve in that bastard as being a prophet of god - they cannot be real. If they are not idiots, then they are victims! These are the 2 possibilities. You cannot follow a man with absolute no moral without being a total moron or a victim. (I am speaking about 1,5 billion people here).

You ask them if they ever read Sura 33!
I tell you they did not! And then again they claim us for being the "bad guys"!

For this case (joining the protest march at the 21 of January) you can write me at: hej(at)expozite.com


The military denier & pacifist

Hans Erling Jensen
Eticha - the human Think Tank!
Denmark

Why, but, Henrik, it hurts the little dears' feelings so, and we can't have that, now, can we? As you know, when we dirty kafirs point out how Muslims sometimes (only just occasionally now, mind you) get... now what's the right word?... Oh, yes, "violent," they become so... well, violent. And that disrupts communityharmony. I'm sure you will agree with me when I assert that, next to submission to the perfect word of Allah hisownself, communityharmony is the highest human aspiration.

Wilders certainly does threaten communityharmony. No matter what the Truth may be, he must be silenced.

A sad day. So horrible watching the Dutch commit cultural suicide.

Can anyone get the e-mail address for the Public Prosecution Service which brought forth the indictment?

"The public prosecutor can call witnesses and experts to appear at the hearing. If any witnesses and experts have been called, this will be stated on the summons. You can also bring witnesses and experts to the hearing."

However Geert will have to pay for them, whilst the state can bring as many witnesses as it likes and these are paid for by the state. Now I have no doubt that the likes of Robert and many others will, if asked go to the court to support and defend Geert. However the injustice of the state with its massive resources persecuting one individual smacks of injustice. A similiar ploy is being used in the UK against the BNP whereby the state has enacted legislation (the laughingly named Equalities Act) to try to outlaw a political party. This has resulted in the near bankrupcy of the party that has 2 That has 2 MEPs and numerous councillors all over England and has garnered well over a million votes in various elections.

I don't think that is what I said. Are you saying that the Law is, or should be apolitical ? If so I agree.However this is a classic case of the law being used by crooked PC Multiculturalist politicians to further thier own warped views. I think I said in the piece that this would bring the spotlight not just onto the political issues but also the Judicial issues raised by this traversty.

All the Best

Eric

Good idea. Get cracking.

And I have a suggestion: let every person who attends carry a white rose, or a banner or placard displaying the image of a White Rose, in order to remind people of the White Rose Society that told the truth in Nazi Germany, even though they mostly got killed for doing so.

Further thought. Those of us who cannot travel to the Netherlands for a 'Telling the Truth Is Not a Crime!' rally on 20 January, should consider holding smaller rallies in solidarity, outside the Dutch consulates and embassies in our respective countries.

For example: Australians could rally outside the Dutch Embassy in Canberra, and outside the Dutch consulates in each of our state capitals.

To all members of any sites in the world
Web Sites..kindly assist Mr Geert Wilders in these
coming cases against him....

Most of the Ex-muslims Brothers And Sisters are very
good at translating the Words in the Koran..kindly help
Mr Geerts Wilders in defending his case by quoting the
Words in the Koran...and nothing but the words in the
Koran these to enable Mr Geerts Wilders,because the rebuttal words are not Mr Geerts, but the Al KORAN have
written and says so.... for the last 1400 years till today

Ebonystone: The Netherlands of Willem van Nassouw and Piet Hein is dead, dead, dead, or moved to Iowa and Tasmania. The present-day Netherlands will honor and praise both agressive homosexuals who see heteros as "breeders" and hate-spewing mullahs who call Jews apes and swine as examples of "diversity", but demands that orthodox Christians of either the Roman, Reformed, or Mennonite type shut up. It's too bad that global warming is probably false: if it were true, there'd be a chance that the country could turn again into a physical swamp to match the moral swamp that it has become.

Boycott Royal Dutch Shell!

"He who publicly, verbally or in writing or image, deliberately expresses himself in an way insulting of a group of people because of their race, their religion or belief, or their hetero- or homosexual nature or their physical, mental, or intellectual disabilities, will be punished with a prison sentence of at the most one year or a fine of third category"

Let us closely examine this article 137c--whether any offence is made out under the Dutch Penal Code.

The ingredients are
1.expresses himself in an way insulting of a group of people because of their race, their religion or belief, or their hetero- or homosexual nature or their physical, mental, or intellectual disabilities
2. Such expression must be done deliberately.

It may be noted that insult should be directed at "group of people"(Muslims) . Directing insult at the religion(Islam) does not attract this article.[See Catch the Fire Ministries Inc & Ors v Islamic Council of Victoria Inc [2006] VSCA 284 (14 December 2006)]
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/vic/VSCA/2006/284.html
The above decision by Supreme Court of Victoria was in the context of a similarly worded legal provision in Australia. The Court held as under:
"........As has been seen, the prohibition .... is not a prohibition against saying things about the religious beliefs of persons which are offensive to those persons, or even against saying things about the religious beliefs of one group of persons which would cause another group of persons to despise those beliefs. It is against saying things about the religious beliefs and practices of persons which go so far as to incite other persons to hate persons who adhere to those religious beliefs.[55] And as a matter of logical analysis, it does not suffice to establish incitement to hate a group of persons[56] to show that scorn has been poured on the religious beliefs or practices of that group of persons (although it may be relevant)."

Article 137d Dutch Penal Code
o 1. He who publicly, verbally or in writing or in an image, incites hatred against or discrimination of people or violent behaviour against person or property of people because of their race, their religion or belief, their gender or hetero- or homosexual nature or their physical, mental, or intellectual disabilities, will be punished with a prison sentence of at the most one year or a fine of third category.

Great provision in the Penal Code. This can be used to ban the Quran itself because that is what the Quran does.."publicly, verbally or in writing or in an image, incites hatred against or discrimination of people or violent behaviour against person or property of people because of their race, their religion or belief, their gender or hetero- or homosexual nature or their physical, mental, or intellectual disabilities". Nothing to despair.

Article 137d Dutch Penal Code
o 1. He who publicly, verbally or in writing or in an image, incites hatred against or discrimination of people or violent behaviour against person or property of people because of their race, their religion or belief, their gender or hetero- or homosexual nature or their physical, mental, or intellectual disabilities, will be punished with a prison sentence of at the most one year or a fine of third category.

Great provision in the Penal Code. This can be used to ban the Quran itself because that is what the Quran does.."publicly, verbally or in writing or in an image, incites hatred against or discrimination of people or violent behaviour against person or property of people because of their race, their religion or belief, their gender or hetero- or homosexual nature or their physical, mental, or intellectual disabilities". Nothing to despair.

Article 137d Dutch Penal Code
o 1. He who publicly, verbally or in writing or in an image, incites hatred against or discrimination of people or violent behaviour against person or property of people because of their race, their religion or belief, their gender or hetero- or homosexual nature or their physical, mental, or intellectual disabilities, will be punished with a prison sentence of at the most one year or a fine of third category.

Great provision in the Penal Code. This can be used to ban the Quran itself because that is what the Quran does.."publicly, verbally or in writing or in an image, incites hatred against or discrimination of people or violent behaviour against person or property of people because of their race, their religion or belief, their gender or hetero- or homosexual nature or their physical, mental, or intellectual disabilities". Nothing to despair.

It's horrible to see. Wilders should cut his losses and flee to the U.S. if he can before he's behind bars just for the crime of expressing his mind.

http://go.to/islamhistory

We all need to pray that Geert will win.
They are so stupid to print his address for every Muslim to see but I know he is not able to live in his house.
My brother lives in The Hague. (Den Haag)
It is scary to see some of the neighborhoods.In som eof the schools the teachers and the schools ae muslim with maybe 2 or 3 Dutch children attending.
All over The Netherlands are Muslims and in less than 15 years over half will be Muslim.
It is the Muslim who discriminate against others because of their hatred and discrimination against none Muslims.
G-d bless Geert.

I understood you to mean, ericthekuffar, that dealing with the legality of the proceedings is not germane and my point was that it is important because the way the Dutch law is written could allow for Wilders to be found guilty. It's a repressive law to be sure but the law is the law, even when ill-conceived or when it stultifies freedom or common sense. I could see a Dutch judge reading the law as is to convict Wilders even though such a law shouldn't exist in the first place and the judge himself might even disagree with it. The Netherlands needs a First Amendment type provision to their constitution, ditto for every other European nation, to prevent badly written laws from stifling freedomn of speech. My best to you and yours.

Regardless of this summons and the trial, if it happens, and
the outcome of the trial, I am quite hopeful that Mr. Wilders
will win the support of the majority of the Dutch people and
will be their prime minister and will start the march of islam
back to arabia from where it originated and where it belongs.
Islam is being exposed as it has never been exposed in it's
history of about 14 lunar centuries and it's falsehood is becoming known to more and more people thanks to the websites
like jehadwatch, thereligionofpeace and many more.

It is a Stalinist criminal code that he is being prosecuted under. Article 137d of the Dutch Penal Code could be used to crush any opinion about virtually any topic, if someone deems it to be defamatory or an incitement. Of course, the truth of the comment or written word does not seem to come into this legal code. It means that someone who is simply upset or angry over what someone has said, could possibly take that other party to court.

Thank you Robert, for posting a link to Geert Wilders' website. Here's the letter I e-mailed to him:

Dear Mr. Wilders:

I am a retired American Police Officer, living in Colorado. I am college-educated, having graduated two times from California State University at Long Beach.

I have followed your career and your criminal case as closely as I can via Pamela Geller's, Robert Spencer's and Diana West's internet writings.

Please be assured that you have people here in the United States, regular working class folks, who support your anti-jihad, anti-Islamization political positions, and your right to express them in a free society.

I am well aware of the danger that the Islamization of Europe and of The United States of America presents to our basic freedoms. I wish you well, sir, in your battle to maintain your freedom from imprisonment and to continue your valiant efforts to save your country from the dark forces of jihad and Sharia.

Having read Ms. West's book, "The Death of the Grown Up", and several of Mr. Spencer's books, I have a good understanding of what we are up against in fighting the jihad movement. I am with you in the spirit of your noble cause. I can only wish that we had more political leaders of your courage and wisdom in the United States at this moment in history.

Very truly yours,

John L. Work

First they came for Geert Wilders, and I did nothing...
Everything for believers in freedom and democracy is on the line here. Totalitarianism is like a cancer - once it has established a beachhead it metastasizes rapidly until it has consumed the entire organism. If we fail to dig in our heels now we're going to lose. We've been reasonable and polite for far too long; we must now take the fight to the enemy before all is lost.

One way or another, Geert Wilders will come through this the stronger. Nelson Mandela went from prison to become President of South Africa. Geert Wilders will become Prime Minister of the Netherlands, and the tide will turn against the evil of Islam.

This is part of an orchestrated attack by the marxist liberalists within the EU. They have already outlawed any criticism of the EU in a blatant attack upon free speech!!! WHY ARE WE TOLERATING THIS REPRESSION???????????

It is time for the free thinkers in the EU to rise up and March on their respective Governments and tell the criminals like Barroso, the convicted criminal head of the EU, that we will simply not play their fascist, Stalinist game. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! Time to rise my friends!

This is part of an orchestrated attack by the marxist liberalists within the EU. They have already outlawed any criticism of the EU in a blatant attack upon free speech!!! WHY ARE WE TOLERATING THIS REPRESSION???????????

It is time for the free thinkers in the EU to rise up and March on their respective Governments and tell the criminals like Barroso, the convicted criminal head of the EU, that we will simply not play their fascist, Stalinist game. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! Time to rise my friends!

This is part of an orchestrated attack by the marxist liberalists within the EU. They have already outlawed any criticism of the EU in a blatant attack upon free speech!!! WHY ARE WE TOLERATING THIS REPRESSION???????????

It is time for the free thinkers in the EU to rise up and March on their respective Governments and tell the criminals like Barroso, the convicted criminal head of the EU, that we will simply not play their fascist, Stalinist game. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! Time to rise my friends!

[Your 'Submit' button takes ages to kick in and looks as though it's keeled over and got lost, which is why there are three posting of mine!!]

When you read the indictment, look very carefully at the wording of that part of it which describes the content of 'Fitna'.

I am not sure whether this is just because it's in legalese, or whether it is deliberately worded in such a way as to try to imply that all the material used in 'Fitna' (the Quran verses, the preaching imams, the beheading video, etc.) to demonstrate that Islam contains violent teachings, that some clerics use these to justify violence, and that Muslims act on those violent teachings and readings, is pure fabrication, perhaps invented by Wilders or by other malevolent Islamophobes: that the verses which are said to be from the Quran, are not; that even the people who look like imams, or even the clip from MEMRI showing the little girl reciting her catechism in Jew-hatred, are not in fact Muslims at all.

A few examples of what I mean:

- "a book with oriental [why not say "Arabic"? - dda] looking symbols is opened up that *looks like* {my emphasis - dda} the Quran."

Implication: it could have been something else pretending to be the Quran.

Note: I hope Wilders kept the actual Arabic Quran he used for this and other segments, so he can produce it in court and it can be compared with the film footage where it appears. I hope he also kept good records of 1. the precise translation he employed and 2. the audio recordings of Quranic recitations, which can be verified by former Muslims such as Wafa Sultan.


Again:

-Two open pages can be seen. On the page on the right the following text appears: "Quran, Surah 8, verse 60". Then on the page on the left appears: "Surah 8. Verse 60: Prepare for them whatever force and cavalry ye are able of gathering, to strike terror, to strike terror into the hearts of the enemies, of Allah and your enemies".

-A voice can also be heard which *(most likely)* {note the weaselwording - dda} sings this text in the Arabic language.

{Note the implication that the text may not say what Wilders' film says it does, or that the recitation might be actually saying something else.

I hope that someone like Raymond Ibrahim or Wafa Sultan can go through the film saying, Yes, indeed, these pages with Arabic text ARE pages from the Quran and they do in fact say such-and-such, and those chanters you hear reciting in Arabic ARE saying exactly what the translation Wilders is using, says they are.

More.

- On the page on the right, next to the text, footage of the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York (09/11/2001) are shown as well as of the attacks by Muslim extremists in Madrid and London with footage of the victims.

- This footage is alternated *with footage of apparent imams* {my emphasis - dda. "Apparent imams"?? WTF? Note the implication that these might not *be* actual imams; that the footage is somehow faked. Wilders' team will have to be able to produce the original raw footage, from MEMRI or wherever, Arab or Persian TV, date of broadcast, name of broadcaster, and other details, to show that Wilders has taken some totally typical Muslim TV footage and hasn't fabricated a thing - dda}

who say: "What makes Allah happy? Allah is happy if non-Muslims are being killed" and "Destroy the unbelievers and polytheists, your (Allah's) enemies and the enemies of the religion. Allah, count them and kill them up to the very last of them. And do not spare a single one".

Another example from the indictment:

- "Then footage is shown of a young girl wearing a headscarf who is asked by a person off-screen who the Jews are. The little girl answers: "They are apes and pigs". The voice says: "Are they apes and pigs? Says who?" The little girl says: "Allah". The voice asks: "Where did he say this?" The little girl answers: "In the Quran".'

Note that the indictment seems to be worded in such a way as to imply that this scene might be a fabrication: it seems reluctant to admit that such a scene has been lifted, unedited, out of an Arab Muslim TV broadcast. Again, I hope the source footage is fully documented - and that MEMRI can produce the whole thing from their video archives if necessary, just as it was taped off Arab TV.

I hope this gives some idea of what I'm getting at.

I am sure we will hear the mantra 'taken out of context' over and over and over when this trial happens. I wouldn't mind betting that everything except what is absolutely indisputable western-media news footage - e.g. the murder of Theo Van Gogh - will be claimed to be either out of context or fabricated out of whole cloth to slander Muslims.

Leave a Comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.

Site Meter