All right. It was the holy time. So why didn't he think that it would be all right during the holy time to grope this passenger? Could it be because she was just an Infidel whore? The contempt that many Muslim men have for Western non-Muslim women is well documented, after all. "Ramadan used as defence by cabbie groper," by David Barrett for The Daily Telegraph, December 4 (thanks to Lloyd):
A DISGRACED Muslim taxi driver tried to use the holy time of Ramadan as his defence against allegations he repeatedly grabbed the breast of a disabled female passenger.Abdul Majid Qazizada, 51, had argued that Ramadan was a time when Muslim men "don't even touch their wives".
He was yesterday found guilty of the aggravated indecent assault of a 23-year-old woman who suffers cerebral palsy and epilepsy.
Magistrate Jennifer Betts said Qazizada claimed he was a devout Muslim who was fasting when the attack occurred in September last year.
" 'Men don't even touch their wives (during Ramadan)', were his words," Ms Betts said in Ryde Local Court.
The court heard how the woman got into Qazizada's taxi to go home after going out with friends at Ryde-Eastwood Leagues Club.
During the short ride home, she felt at first "a little scared", then later "very worried", when Qazizada repeatedly told her: "You're a lovely lady." After parking in the driveway of her home, Qazizada told the woman he would help her get out of the taxi.
As she struggled to get out of his taxi, Qazizada squeezed the woman's breasts several times.
Throughout the assault, he asked the woman: "Are you all right?". Each time she replied: "No."
Qazizada eventually left, saying: "Have a good night."...
Ramadan made him do it. That appears to be his defeense. Which is to say, Islam made him do it. And he's right, in a way. And Islam makes all kinds of people do all kinds of things, and it is those things, all over the Western world, that we should care about. What Muslims do to Muslims, in the hell-holes of their own making --- that should be of no concern at all.
Being a muhammadan means NEVER having to say you're sorry.
And how does Naomi Wolf feel about this?
I feel that any infidel women who gets into a cab driven by a Muslim male risks sexual assault, rape, robbery or murder. Ladies, it is your decision. But if I were you, I would not risk it. To hell with multi-cultural political correctness. You have a right to protect yourself and refuse to ride alone in any vehicle with a Muslim male.
I know, Islamic apologists, not all Muslim cab drivers will assault unaccompanied women. But there is nothing in the Qur'an, the Hadith or Islamic exegesis to prevent them from doing so. As long as Islam divides the world between the faithful and unbelievers, kaffir women are not safe when traveling alone in a car with a Muslim male.
Even in the home of Islam, Saudi Arabia, women are forbidden from traveling without a male relative in tow. This, it is claimed, it to protect them from..........................other Muslim men.
I would extend my warning to all the Muslimahs in our readership, but I don't want to be accused of being an Islamophobe like the brothers in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Especially after watching Wafa Sultan's short speech and Q & A yesterday, where she talks about lack of moral code, it's even more chilling.
Cab drivers are notorious for squeezing. A cab drivers life is full of squeezing 'opportunities'...It's not unusual to trade squeezing for cab fares...Sometimes they squeeze a little too much and get in trouble.
The Mahoundian cab driving squeezers, have undergone extensive training by following the examples of Mahound, one of histories greatest squeezers. Mahound squeezed every female he came across, and a few boys as well...
If a kufr woman does not want to get squeezed, she should never accept a ride from a Mahoundian cab driver.
And I think it's true that for every incident like this that gets reported and prosecuted, there are dozens or scores that are just ignored.
Ugh, a disabled lady who probably couldn't even defend herself properly? How repulsive!
Indeed. Hurray for this woman reporting the creep. I bet he thought he would get away with it, because he thought she wasn't mentally competent enough to know what was really going on, because he's too primitive-minded to understand that while someone with cerebral palsy may have a difficult time speaking, it doesn't affect intelligence.
And he uses Ramadan as an excuse? What a barker. It seems his line of reasoning is that if you're not allowed to touch your wife during this "holiday", it's threfore OK to assault a khufr woman to satisfy his bestial urges.
Throw him into the North Sea without a raft.
"I bet he thought he would get away with it..."
Yep, it probably shocked the you-know-what out of him that he didn't get away with it.
It must be very puzzling for Muslim men that western women in general will not lay down and just take this crap. This guy is lucky that the 23 year old woman did not go Elin Woods on him. ; )
I'm also quite amused by Muslim logic. As these Islamo-puritans lecture the rest of us on our debauched societies, slutty teenagers and wrong, wrong, wrong religious beliefs, they never miss a chance to beat, slice, screw or grope someone. I for one am getting sick to death of their hypocrisy and feigned moral superiority, and never miss a chance to expose them for what they really are.
I'm a long time Jihadwatch read and once in awhile I still have to struggle mightily to understand the grotesque Islamic implications of what I am reading. This is one of those times.
Well Poetcomic, even though I think it's a case of do as I say and not as I do for this Muslim man, I am also perplexed as to why these people don't understand or respect somebody else's personal space, especially when it comes to sex. In my Catholic faith it is a grave sin to be sexual with anyone other than your spouse because our bodies are temples of the Holy Ghost and therefore not to be disrespected or abused. There is a reason you feel icky if someone makes unwanted sexual suggestions or advances. If you are really trying to be good and live chastely I think it is even more disconcerting to have to deal with this crap. And it's interesting that while there are always exceptions to the rule, I find most western men I know through business or organizations and groups I travel in are respectful of that personal space and they don't ever go down that road, and as a consequence I trust them. I do not, unfortunately, trust Muslim men, and the story above is a prime example of why I don't.
From that story and so many others I've read of Muslim men behaving badly there seems to be a point where a Muslim man's growth is stunted. They only seem to learn manners in order to be more effective at duplicity. There doesn't seem to be any grasping of the concept of love your neighbor as yourself. I mean, this guy thought the 23 year old was a lovely woman and decided to help himself to her body in order to enjoy himself. There was not any consideration for her feelings or what she wanted. It was all about what he wanted and how he could get it.
This guy reminds me of the caveman mentality. Haven't we come a long way, baby, since then?
It is pretty bleak in the Islam-o-verse. I think it was Walid Shoebat (a "Palestinian" apostate) who said that "Islam was me against my brother. My brother and I against our father. My father, brother and I against our uncles. Our family against the tribe. Our tribe against the other tribes. And always, Islam against everything."
Oh, Walid must be a misunderstander of Islam!
It's almost as if the delicacies of civilized courtship are beyond them.
No matter how "fast" a couple chooses to go, it's a mutual decision (barring slimy practices like taking advantage when one is intoxicated, etc, but there are legal measures to help deter that kind of behaviour.) Muslims? They seem to favour the "arranged marriage" - this man wants you and is willing to pay for you, you must go with him and do what he says now for the rest of your life." This releases the man of ANY sort of responsibility to give any sort of damn about whether the girl in question even LIKES him, he doesn't have to even try to get her to like him - that just doesn't even matter.
I wonder if it's even possible for a Muslim male to be shy?!
It's always the infidel women who have to be blamed, they're so seductive. And during such a stressful time, as Ramadan is, when Mohammedans have to fast, concentrate only on spiritual matters, do nothing wrong, and aren't allowed to touch their wives, then the poor, virtuous guy meeets a lecherous infidel woman and can't help it, he has to grope her. We've got to admit he really contained himself, he didn't rape her. Indeed, Mohammedans have got a lot more self control than our Western men, I admire them.
It is just amazing to me. The overall IQ of those with the PC MC mentality on the subject of Islam must be less than 75. They cannot see this kind of behavior for what it really is.
Since Muslims are trained to believe that Kuffar are sub human, the Muslim is free to behave any way he wants with a Kufar woman. She is less human than he. Abe Lincoln outlawed this behavior. It is called slavery.
By coincidence, I'm just finishing Irshad Manji's "The Trouble with Islam." In a section in which she chides Muslims for demanding not to be criticized for their bad behavior, she includes as an example ... a Muslim cabbie sexually assaulting a disabled passenger.
Makes me wonder just how common this is.
More than what is actually recorded.
Folks, just look at the rate of rapes in Norway. Before Muslim immigration and then after Muslim immigration. I know that Fjordman has commented about it, but I wonder if anyone else has.
This happens because Islam is not a religion but we pretend it is. Islam is a criminal form of brutal social control based a lies and deception.
Islam is not a religion. Islam is not a religion. The sooner we get this simple fact through the thick skull of Western Civilization, the sooner we can liberate muslim lands from the 1,400 year old nightmare Mohammed unleashed.
Allah is not God
Mohammed was not a prophet
Islam is not a religion
Muslims are not citizens
Agreed, Mike! ...great comment :)
A DISGRACED Muslim taxi driver tried to use the holy time of Ramadan as his defence against allegations he repeatedly grabbed the breast of a disabled female passenger.
Abdul Majid Qazizada, 51, had argued that Ramadan was a time when Muslim men "don't even touch their wives".
.......................
This is also disingenuous—a Muslim abstains from sex during Ramadan *during daylight hours*. This man had at most—what—sixteen hours until he could lawfully go and impose himself on his long-suffering wife.
But no—he had to assault a *disabled* Infidel woman, because he couldn't wait? What if a Catholic tried to use the same "defense" during Lent—everybody would be disgusted by this, most of all his fellow Catholics.
This reminds me of reading about Betty Mahmoody's ordeals in "Not With out my Daughter", during the time she was trapped in Iran. Even though she was extremely careful to dress "modestly" whenever she was out—hijab, long coat, loose-fitting pants—if anyone found out she was not Iranian, it was pretty much open season. She was groped and almost assaulted several times—once by a bus driver!
Many Muslim men have little respect for any woman—and none at all for Infidel women. Those who do are very much the exceptions.
as disabled man i tend to get very outraged when i hear of anyone trying to take advantage of anyone who is disabled
and imo this cabby should have been turned into a eunuch its bad enough when the woman can fight back and just might have the training to turn that little pos into mulch but to go after a woman who cant fight back is just low and sub human
and then to blame it on a muslim holy ? month the guy imo is just a pervert who sees all women as things for his use
If you click on the link you'll find that this incident of Mohammedan male monstrousness happened in Sydney, Australia; Ryde and Eastwood, mentioned in the story, are Sydney locations. The 'Daily Telegraph' reporting the story is the Sydney, Australia, Daily Telegraph, not the British 'Daily Telegraph'.
As I recall, there have been *many* cases of Mohammedan taxi drivers, in Australia, raping non-Muslim women who were unlucky enough to hail a cab with a Mohammedan driver, or be assigned one when they called the taxi company. I have quite a few such on file, that didn't come up here at jihadwatch, though sheikyermami has caught most of them.
I must say that when I deduced, upon observing the distinctive set of the turban and the steel bracelet on the wrist, that the be-turbanned taxi driver who turned up (summoned by the hospital's 'taxi phone'), to take me and my young daughter home from our city hospital, was not a Mohammedan (as a casual glance at an Indian-seeming person in a turban might suggest) but a Sikh, I felt much, much safer. A politely-worded inquiry confirmed my deductions: he was, indeed, a Sikh, and I and my daughter had a pleasant, courteously-driven ride home.
Pursuant to my posting above:
what I should also have said that since the attack took place in Sydney, it would be a bit difficult to throw him in the North Sea without a raft, as you suggested.
Sydney Harbour, however, which is infested with large sharks that don't mind taking a bite out of the occasional swimmer (they've been doing it ever since the days of the First Fleet) is nice and handy...
Where is the outrage of the FEMINISTS? If this had been a
white Christian male USA Today and NYT would have been all over it.
Of course this perveted "misunderstander" of Islam would have to say that his holy holiday of Ramadan would give him justification to do this is staunchly supported because she was just an infidel whore.
Now we know that muslim men consider non-muslim women whores and sluts, but have no problem marrying them, going to strip clubs here in America, Europe, and some parts of the Arab world to watch them. Have no problem raping them, as they do all over Europe and the muslim world and condone it with their religious beliefs. They use them as sex slaves in arab nations, or harams as Muhammed did himself.
Yet Mohammed had at least two concubines who were not Muslim. Mary the Christian and Rayhana/Raihana/Rayhanah bint Zayd/Zaid. He also had some slave girls on the side too. Bukhari vol.7 no.274 p.210; Abu Dawud vol.3 no.4458 p.1249. Salmah for example, was a maid-servant of Mohammed. Abu Dawud vol.3 no.3849 p.1084; al-Tabari vol.39 p.181.
So whatever this taxi driver did would not be so much condemned in the eyes of the prophet.
Now had a non-muslim taxi driver did this to a muslim woman, we would see rioting in the streets, car bombings, burning of infidel stores, and chants of death to the infidel!!
Where is the outburst of "rightful" muslims who would abhor this?
Of course this perveted "misunderstander" of Islam would have to say that his holy holiday of Ramadan would give him justification to do this is staunchly supported because she was just an infidel whore.
Now we know that muslim men consider non-muslim women whores and sluts, but have no problem marrying them, going to strip clubs here in America, Europe, and some parts of the Arab world to watch them. Have no problem raping them, as they do all over Europe and the muslim world and condone it with their religious beliefs. They use them as sex slaves in arab nations, or harams as Muhammed did himself.
Yet Mohammed had at least two concubines who were not Muslim. Mary the Christian and Rayhana/Raihana/Rayhanah bint Zayd/Zaid. He also had some slave girls on the side too. Bukhari vol.7 no.274 p.210; Abu Dawud vol.3 no.4458 p.1249. Salmah for example, was a maid-servant of Mohammed. Abu Dawud vol.3 no.3849 p.1084; al-Tabari vol.39 p.181.
So whatever this taxi driver did would not be so much condemned in the eyes of the prophet.
Now had a non-muslim taxi driver did this to a muslim woman, we would see rioting in the streets, car bombings, burning of infidel stores, and chants of death to the infidel!!
Where is the outburst of "rightful" muslims who would abhor this?
In Australia, and I'm sure many other parts of the world, when the guilty party was caught the cops used to give the male relatives of the victim a few minutes in private with the scumbag.
Ahhhh, for the good old days.... { sigh}
Sounds nice! I think you should see how it is to enjoy Ramadan in a cold country like Sweden. I've been doing it for about 17 years now, and I tell you one thing - you won't ever forget the first time fasting in Sweden!
By the way, I just subscribed to the RSS-feed of your blog. Keep up the good work!
Thank you for a "friendly" post about Ramadan. I think it's pretty sad, that wherever I go - I see people saying bad things about us Muslims. Just stop it! Spend time with a Muslim, become a Muslim, read books about the religion of Islam - and learn about it. You can't say bad things about something you don't know anything about. Yeah, sure - some Muslims are terrorists, but the majority of us aren't. Quit the BS!
Go away, da'wa artist.
Are you even capable of comprehending that this disabled Australian non-Muslim lady is NEVER going to want to see another self-proclaimed Muslim ever, ever again?
Nobody here is going to become a Muslim, EVER. There are people here who hope and pray that, should they be faced even with the dreadful choice that faced Piotr Stanczak, to either recite the infernal Shahada or...be beheaded, slowly, with a large knife, they would somehow find the supernatural courage to endure beheading rather than sell their soul to 'allah' the Eater of Souls.
Oh we've read the Quran, most of us more than once. *I* have, and I regard it as a dangerous and violent and surreal 'cult text', a sort of ANTI-bible. I agree entirely with the wise Frenchman Robert Redeker, who described the Quran as 'a book of extraordinary violence", and with Jacques Ellul, who observed that Islam was "fundamentally warlike".
Many here have read the whole of the Sira - and been thoroughly REVOLTED by the person and works of that evil war-lord Ubul Kassim, alias Mohammed, whom Maimonides very rightly diagnosed as 'ha-Meshugga', 'the Mad One'. Many have even ventured into the mad-hattery of the Hadith.
We know way, way too much about The Religion of Blood and War - which is what Sir Winston Churchill called it, on the basis of much close first-hand experience in the field.
And the more we learn, the more repelled we are.
Oh, and don't think that I don't know that once you have made the 'call' or 'invitation' to Islam, and been refused, as I have refused you, classical Islam prescribes that the next step is war, to force me to submit as a dhimmi...or to kill me, if I continue to refuse to submit.
Great post and well said dumbledoresarmy.
Converting to Islam would be a travesty of the mind and psychological suicide.
You cut the BS keylogger 1. You say not all muslims are terrorists, but the ones we have been capturing and killing have been muslim terrorists.
No muslim such as yourself I am seeing is protesting these abhorrent acts. BTW, remember 9/11 when muslims all over the world cheered.
It your duty to either convert us peacefully, make us pay the tax if we refuse to convert, and last but certainly not least to wage war with us to force us to convert or kill us.
To refute that keylogger 1 and say different is to deny what the Quran says. To criticize the terrorists and protest would be to go against your fellow man or ummah and that could mean death.
Even though not all muslims are commiting terrorist acts, they secretly support it through finance or remaining silent. And remaining silent to a crime or inhuman act, would just be like doing it yourself.
That is a travesty.