This stellar Hate Mail Bag entry comes to us from Toronto. I starred out the obscenities, but they are, of course, spelled out in the original:
Name: NISAR AKHTAREmail: nisarakhtar@hotmail.com
Subject: YOU MOTHF**KER JEWS
Message: I am wondering you mohter f**ker jews using all your energy & others money against running the ugly propahanda against islam & muslims?
do you believe for a moment that your this evil illuminti agenda can harm islam?islam is the most fast spreading religion in the world!!period
you are in any way the most ugliest & hateful creature.most cases your father is a ugly pig who f**ked your mother & you the son of one eye lucifer opened you eyes...
so think for a moment about your existance on this earth& do some real research about your real father???you cannot be a son of any human.
I am feelin' the love now!
"fast [sic] spreading" >> like a disease.
we expend energy because the ideology of Islam enslaves any who follow it. it is not an enslavement to life, but to death. some care for you Nisar, because should you continue enslaved to Muhammad and Sharia, you will truly meet Lucifer for an eternity. you ought to change the way you think.
Robert. I talked to my wife the other day about how the absence of the hate-mail feature at JihadWatch had somehow taken away an element of hilarity from here, especially when I think back to something you got once, along the lines of "you're very ugly, your wife probably hates you and you have a small d**k..."; not to mention the rest of the angry, hydrophobic, and nearly-always-loaded-with-the-most-amusing-spelling-mistakes hate-mail messages from mahoundians that you used to publish. Thanks for bringing it back!
I don't think there's anything funny about hate mail and death threats, and I feel bad this particular piece of vileness originated in Toronto.
Well, okay, some of them were pretty amusing....
Well at least our prophet didn't go making deals with 'cloven hoofed' people.
This mail should be passed on to both the Toronto Police Service, and the local RCMP detatchment.
It's likely this idiot really did use his real name.
Dunno how seriously they'll take it, though, but if you file a formal complaint, they'll have to register it. and hopefully at least look into finding the guy and warning him if he's not already wanted on something or another.
I think this poster needs one of those "what would Jesus say" moments.
'this evil illuminti agenda'?
I like Illuminti! They sound like a medieval society dedicated to ruling the Earth through the use of herbs, tisanes and boiled sweets.
On a more serious note, Robert, perhaps you should draw this to the attention of the Hotmail people. I don't think Microsoft would be happy that their mail service is being used to send racist filth like this.
And to think the Nobel prize committee keeps overlooking people of this ilk.
Ah. I did not know that one could be Eastern Orthodox and Jewish at the same time.
Well, he SAID you are Jewish, so it MUST be true. Right?
. . . no?
Could it be that the hate-mailer was just a little bit inaccurate in a point or two? Hmmm?
The Religion of Peace strikes again...
From google...Jaan Nisaar Akhtar (February 14, 1914 - August 19, 1976) was a famous Indian poet of Urdu ghazals and nazms and also a lyricist for Bollywood...
YOU MOTHF**KER JEWS...is very poetic, but it comes from a usurper of the name...
"you are in any way the most ugliest & hateful creature.most cases your father is a ugly pig"
I wonder if he was looking in a mirror at himself???
Hmmm,
Maybe he had a bad experience when he was studying to be an entomologist. Mothf***er.
David
"On a more serious note, Robert, perhaps you should draw this to the attention of the Hotmail people. I don't think Microsoft would be happy that their mail service is being used to send racist filth like this."
Yeah espetially since Bill Gates is the king of the Evil Illuminati LOL .... but seriously though this stuff isn't funny.
Ah once again personal attacks instead of attacking the integrity of the work. Must be because the work is sound and backed by facts.
Translation:
All your hate are belong to us.
What a dumbass.
No. It's not that he actually thinks Mr Spencer is a Jew.
He calls Mr Spencer a Jew because 'Jew' is the very, very worst cuss-word in his (the Muslim's) vocabulary.
Sort of like a modern westerner calling someone a 'nazi'. They don't actually mean that they think the person they're thus addressing is a full-on aryan supremacist signed up with the local branch of the Neo-Nazi party; they just mean 'I hate you and this is the worst insult I can think of, to throw at you'.
William Lane, when he lived in Egypt in the early-mid 19th century, observed that Egyptian Muslims used the term 'Jew' as their insult of last resort: it would be addressed, for example, to a recalcitrant donkey, when the infuriated owner had run out of cuss-words.
Thx for printing these. I somehow doubt the New York Times would be so gauche as to actually print anything so realistic, but that's what's out there.
The reason I go to JW is precisely because I want my reality straight up.
Problem is, if you brought these people over and gave them the dole, housing, freedoms and education, instead of thanking you they would use their new skills to spout grammatically correct hate.
Problem is, if you brought these people over and gave them the dole, housing, freedoms and education, instead of thanking you they would use their new skills to spout grammatically correct hate.
"....the ugly propahanda against islam & muslims?"
....no propaganda at all...just the facts....
Islam...feel the love?
Your obviously not a true CANADIAN. You are angry and need help, but not from us. Try going home and staying there. Oh ya tell all your friends to do the same. Looking forward to seeing your asses leave for good. You are an embarasment to CANADA.
"You are an embarrassment to CANADA."
Are you people still letting in the Barbarians?
Yeah, us too. It must stop.
The only way to win over muslims is to show them the love of Christ as Jesus said," love your enemies" and "blessed are the peacemakers".
The early christians won over the terrorist Romans (eventually ) when the early christians showed them the power of God's love, instead of the power of the sword
because the only way to win over anybody is to show them that you rely totally on God's power rather than the power of the sword and in so doing, the early christians were able to over-power the Roman empire, not by the sword, but by God's love through prayer, perseverance, fasting, love and the power filled Words given by the Holy Spirit through the early christians that eventually melted the hearts of the enemy.
And God promised the early christians that no amount of persecution or terrorism from the Romans will ever be able to make the christians deny Christ and God will never leave them, no matter what ,
As the Word states in Romans 8: 28-39 :
"And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love Him, who have been called according to His purpose. For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. And those he predestined, he also called; those he called, he also justified; those he justified, he also glorified.
What, then, shall we say in response to this? If God is for us, who can be against us? He who did not spare his own Son, but gave him up for us all—how will he not also, along with him, graciously give us all things?
Who will bring any charge against those whom God has chosen? It is God who justifies. Who is he that condemns? Christ Jesus, who died—more than that, who was raised to life—is at the right hand of God and is also interceding for us.
Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall trouble or hardship or persecution or famine or nakedness or danger or sword?
As it is written:
"For your sake we face death all day long;
we are considered as sheep to be slaughtered.
No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all of creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord." Amen !!
UNfortunately. And our immigration rate is very high. A large proportion of that is probably from 3rd world, mostly Muslim countries. As it is, 53% of Toronto is foreign-born now, from the last census.
http://www.immigrationwatchcanada.org
It is amazing how Islam develops the intellect. Once again, one does not really see any defense of Islam. Apparently, it is a faith with virtues that are unmentionable or mysterious. What are the benefits of being a Moslem? From what I have seen and heard, only Molech or the Aztec gods could be possibly more vile than Allah, and that would be a close contest. If Islam is the only monotheistic faith, I will chase after Hera, Zeus, or any odd tree sprite that might come along. They would have more going for them than Allah and his wonderful prophet.
And at least Pan and his mates know how to have a good time!
I'd like to see all the Muslims of the world repatriated to their spiritual home, the desolate Arabian deserts, and settled in one vast encampment in Saudi Arabia, looking to their Arab masters for succor and sustenance.
Let the Arabs look after their murderous ideological spawn.
Islam: Satan's droppings
Muslims: faces to hell; arses to heaven
45ch - You raise a difficult and problematic point for those of us that follow Christ and are also concerned about Jihad: namely, what does "love" look like.
Can it take the form of armed resistance to men bent on performing evil acts/terrorism? Is there such a thing as "just war" for a Christian? How aggressively should we pursue truth in our interpersonal relationships and dialogues with people who embrace Islam - to the point of conflict and the dissolution of the relationship, even with those not as "radical" as this emailer is?
If it boils down to the Golden Rule, which it surely must for a Christ-follower, then I personally tend to side with the view that C.S. Lewis described in Mere Christianity.
I just don't want to use my faith as a reason to just sit back and trust that if I'm "loving" to people who embrace the tenets of Islam in the same way as this emailer does, that the "love" will get through to them. I think that I also need to truly act in love towards the others in my society that are at risk from these people and their agenda - often due to ignorance of the problem.
Maybe it's because I've seen too many people view "love" as primarily an emotional response, and not as a purposeful and directed intellectual course of action that I feel this way.
You got that right, Barbarians, I don't recall Inviting radical fools to enter our country, I believe the screening process is flawed..or he is a boulter with dual citizenship, comes to CANADA when his country of Origin is in turmoil..Maybe If these people would realize that the real Canadians are actually getting tired of their crap they would take a lower tone..Also wonder If Canada will ever follow suit like the Swiss,or Austrailia I certainly would hold my head up Higher as a Proud Canadian...Remember There are 3 things willing to die for you..Jesus Christ, An American soldier, And a CANADIAN soldier...AMEN.
Also When I typed this out it was directed to Nisar if thats even his real name..
..must be a Leafs fan..another loser.
Loser defined: A pregnant prostitute lining up to to buy tickets for a Leafs game. Toronto..Last one to bed turns out the lights..
It's not "Toronto the Good" anymore..It's "Toronto the Too Good". Aside: The Leafs are an embarassment to Canada! lol.Habs fan..
Thanks, dda, for that anecdote about William Lane's experience in Egypt. I've already made a mental note of it. Really, Islam is no less anti-Semitic than Nazism and that's demonstrated time and time again by Islamic ideology and the misguided fools who follow it.
Active,
For christians, no war is "just".
Jesus prophesied that the Jews should flee Jerusalem when the terrorist Romans came to attack Jerusalem in AD70.
If ever there was a "just" war, defending Jerusalem against the pagan, terrorist Romans would have been it, but not according to God.
As for apprehending today's terrorists, the US govt has the rendition program and that should prevent any terrorist from gaining power.
As for christians, we need to pray, and evangelize through the Word of God and not the sword because that is the only way God can change the hearts of muslims and other non-christians ( including the Jews ) as God eventually changed the hearts of the terrorist Romans and Christianity was able to over-power the evil of the terrorist Romans and eventually, the terrorist Romans gave their hearts to God.
Re. Lane: memory is a funny thing, the reference should be *Edward* William Lane, and the book is 'An Account of the Manners and Customs of the Modern Egyptians", or 'Manners and Customs of the Modern Egyptians', first published in 1836 and then revised and republished in 1860; it's been in print ever since, so you should find it in any good university library.
The passage in which Lane notes that an angry Arab Muslim will call his jaded ass a Jew, as the ultimate insult, is cited by Littmann and Bat Yeor in their article, 'Protected Peoples Under Islam', which is item 4 in Spencer's anthology, 'The Myth of Islamic Tolerance'; they found the passage on pages 559-60 of the 1963 Everyman's Library reprint of the 1836 edition.
DDA,
You do not have to worry about terrorists taking over, because the US rendition program apprehends all suspected terrorists before they have a chance to harm the US govt. in anyway.
As for christians, they need to trust God because everything is in God's hands and that is why Jesus prophesied that the Jews should flee Jerusalem when the terrorist Romans came to attack Jerusalem in AD70 since in God's infinite wisdom, there is no such thing as a "just" war, even against the terrorist pagan Romans who were determined in destroying Jerusalem.
niiiiice!
hey, but this is the RELIGION OF PEACE, remember???
it's only offensive when it AFFECTS THEM!!!
45CH sez:
"You do not have to worry about terrorists taking over, because the US rendition program apprehends all suspected terrorists before they have a chance to harm the US govt. in anyway."
....That is not true.....
Muslim intimidation comes in many forms.
Here are the facts of day-to day life in Brown's Britain. Despite our politicians weasly statements to the contrary, the fact remains that Britain is loaded with no-go areas, where any infidels enter at their own risk. The danger is very real and growing all the time. So much so that I, and many like me, have lost interest in the meaningless platitudes spouting from the mouths of our politicians and councillors.
There are several well known no-go areas around here, and every so often, another street is absorbed into them. I personally have experienced hostility from these young Muslims, the glaring, the muttered curses, the spitting on the street in front of you where you are about to step, squaring up as they walk towards you then suddenly veering away at the last moment, often with an upraised arm as if they were about to strike a blow, smirking to the rest of their gang loitering nearby. They walk s-l-o-w-l-y across the street in front of cars driven by infidels, forcing them to brake or risk injuring them. I once lived in an area that was gradually subsumed into an expanding Muslim ghetto. I moved out when their children started defecating in the street outside my window.
Both of my teenage daughters have been accosted by Muslim men with sexual advances so crude I can't repeat them, been abused, insulted, called 'whores' and 'white bitches' and worse. In one case the little swine exposed himself to them in the street. On another occasion my youngest, visiting a local park with her friends, encountered a group of Muslims. The young men immediately approached them, intimidatingly close, making sexual invitations. The girls tried to move away. One of the young men snatched her sun hat and disappeared into the bushes. A minute later he emerged and returned the hat. It was soaking wet, he'd urinated on it. Panicked, the girls broke and ran, pursued by the boys who struck out at them, shouting racist insults and that this park was for Muslims. We informed the police, a statement was taken, nothing happened. This is my direct experience. This is what happens because Muslim boys are taught that women are worthless and that white infidel women are worth even less. I've comforted my girls when they've come home sobbing and I've paced around at night, when my family are sleeping upstairs, with my teeth gritted and fists clenching and unclenching.
All the drug dealers in this area are exclusively young Muslim men. One of them was hacked to death on the street with an axe in a local drug war. They use fireworks to announce their arrival, sending up a lone rocket to let the kids know the drugs are ready for them to collect. They used these drugs to groom at least fifty young white girls to use for their pleasure. This isn't hearsay, I can show you the press clippings. And this isn't South Central, this is the leafy suburbs of rural England. It's common knowledge around here that Muslim parents make a deal with their sons, that if he accepts their choice of girl in an arranged marriage, then they will turn a blind eye to anything he does in the meantime. I could take you, right now this instant, to the run-down streets in the Muslim enclaves, with the yards full of garbage and old furniture, to the houses with battered doors and rotted windows and show you the Bentleys and shiny new Mercedes parked outside.
The police are powerless, they are most often used against us to enforce pc policies as our lives are sacrificed for the sake of 'social cohesion.' In terms of our protection the police are little more than a row of empty uniforms. Many of them are good men and women. It's their policymaking political superiors who deserve to be expunged. And all the while we are told that things cannot improve unless we try harder to understand the Muslim culture, to make allowances, to accommodate, to give ground. Well we're not going to do that anymore, ever again. Our leaders have broken the social contract that exists between a government and its citizens. We have been betrayed. Inevitably, there will be a reckoning.
Nice. As Allah is in fact Satan this is quite funny. Let this low lifed Muslim understand that we have been promised victory of the evil one (Allah) and that the serpents head (Allah) will be crushed. Even though you might have the numbers you cannot defeat the almighty God.
Dear 45CH: I too am Christian and I know the difference between murdering and killing as defined in Greek and Hebrew and war is never just but somtimes neccessary.
You are dead wrong about terrorists harming us here. There
are enough sleeper cells and sympatizers in the population and in the government also to make me fear for my family and my country. Being a good loving Christian doesn't mean puting a bullseye on your back.
Dear 45CH: I too am Christian and I know the difference between murdering and killing as defined in Greek and Hebrew and war is never just but somtimes neccessary.
You are dead wrong about terrorists harming us here. There
are enough sleeper cells and sympatizers in the population and in the government also to make me fear for my family and my country. Being a good loving Christian doesn't mean puting a bullseye on your back.
Dear 45CH: I too am Christian and I know the difference between murdering and killing as defined in Greek and Hebrew and war is never just but somtimes neccessary.
You are dead wrong about terrorists harming us here. There
are enough sleeper cells and sympatizers in the population and in the government also to make me fear for my family and my country. Being a good loving Christian doesn't mean puting a bullseye on your back.
Wow!! Further confirming the fact that Religions like that of islam prey on the feeble, weak minded and uneducated masses all over this planet.
This guy's really about the funniest I've seen yet.
And he's right in my neighborhood. Lovely!
I really hope he finds my house and paints a star of david on it!" I love advetising!
I could also use a new house. Come on, buddy...let's roll!
Bring your molotov cocktails and all your jihadist buddies with you. The house insurance is paid.
Just let me get my dobermans out of the house safely, okay.
Rico,
What war has been necessary ?
When the terrorist Romans were going to attack Jerusalem in AD70, should the Jews have defended Jerusalem or listened to the prophecy of Jesus when Jesus said to flee Jerusalem ?
Robert:
I do suggest that you keep the RCMP informed and, if necessary, inform CSIS (Canadian Security Intelligence Services). CSIS has a very good record! They just got a clear conviction two months ago for a terrorist who had set-up shop about 100 miles from Montreal after marrying a French-Canadian girl so that he could get citizenship. He was nabbed as he was about to atek a flight out of Canada.
He was in contact with Egyptians and Morrocans and they had plans to attack targets in Germany. He had tested a few devices inside of a huge snowball near a highway to assess their impact. Fortunately, all this was videotaped. I have seen the material.
Both agencies collaborated well along with units from other Western countries and other investigative groups. His lawyers have appealed but the evidence against him is too overwhelming for the Crown to lose and he will be put-away for a very long time.
RCMP will not give out any emails or contact names but you need to send a snail mail to :
National Communications Services
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police
1200 Vanier Parkway
Ottawa, ON
K1A 0R2 CANADA
Would also encourage others to print-out the hate-mail Robert received and send it to the RCMP/CSIS.
Spot on...for a Muslim, to refer to someone as a Jew is the ultimate insult. You're exactly correct in observing that it matters not one iota if the target of the label "Jew" is actually Jewish or not. I do so love these shining examples of the "peace" and "tolerence" of Islam.
Well said, mate.
DDA,
What would Jesus do if the Ottoman Empire existed during the time of Jesus and was in control of Palestine, instead of the Roman Empire ?
I don't deal in might-have-beens.
I don't profess to know or guess what he would have done, but I don't think his advice would necessarily have been the same (in any case, I think re. Jerusalem, he could see that the Jews didn't have the numbers to win against Rome without massive supernatural intervention, and so was simply counselling prudence) because the Roman Empire was an entirely different kind of society from the Muslim Ottoman Empire.
The polytheistic Romans, although they persecuted the Jews and the Christians, were much more open to investigating and embracing Biblical truth than the Ottoman Muslims. One could win over the Romans by peaceful witness. I think Jesus saw that, and all his actions were to that end.
Whereas, with Islam: no matter how deeply the dhimmi populations submitted and obeyed, Muslims in all parts of dar al Islam *never stopped* bullying, oppressing, robbing, raping and periodically mass-killing them, and *never* considered converting to the faith of the dhimmis. Like a cat plays with a mouse, the Muslims seem to have enjoyed letting this or that individual dhimmi or dhimmi population recover for just a little while, let them think they were 'off the hook'... before pouncing on them and stomping them back down into the dirt.
The absolute, silent, peaceful submission of the dhimmis, and all their grovelling and flattering of the Muslims, seems only to have increased the diseased Muslim appetite for sadistic exercise of unlimited power against helpless individuals and groups.
I don't think it's necessarily loving to let a bully always and everywhere do exactly as he likes - up to and including appalling acts of violence against other people - and give him everything he wants. Because what that does, is *increase* the damage he's doing to his soul. It's not loving to give an alcoholic or a heroin addict the 'stuff', even if they scream for it. It's not loving to slavishly rush to satisfy the every appetite of a malignant narcissist or a serial killer, either. If the Muslim thug comes to you and tells you to hand over your preteen daughter, or your lovely wife, or your young sister, so he can rape her and 'convert' her to Islam and lock her up in the hareem - will you bow and scrape and say 'yes, yes, effendi! Your wish is my command, effendi!', and hand her over, ignoring her terrified tears? Or will you do what one brave Christian did in Judea, not so long ago, when a bunch of Muslim thugs came to seize his beautiful daughter to force her to wed one of their number? - he got out the double-barrelled shotgun and let fly.
Any grandma knows that saying 'No' to a screaming, tantruming toddler is sometimes necessary; and that physical restraint to prevent said toddler from hurting himself or others, is also sometimes necessary.
To give the Bad Baby Muslims everything they want, every time they demand it, no matter how unreasonable and selfish the demand, no matter how much it hurts their victims, and no matter how damaging it is for their own souls to wallow in unrestrained lust, cruelty and pride, is nothing other than what grandma calls "spoiling".
It doesn't teach them anything; it merely hardens them in their narcissistic belief that everything in the world is theirs by right to be eaten, or f***ed, or killed.
Hard Rain
thank you for that gripping description of the realities of 'Islamoforming'.
I think you will find eerily similar to your experience, the account by one 'arjun sevak' who used to post here regularly a few years ago, describing the 'Islamoforming' of his home suburb in a city in India.
I reposted it in this forum only a short while ago, but I think it bears posting yet again, since I think all newbies here, now and in future, will learn something very important from reading arjun's and your stories side-by-side.
In thread attached to this article:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2007/06/majid-khadduri-and-george-w-bush.html
just scroll down through the comments.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2007/06/majid-khadduri-and-george-w-bush.html#c414583
"I grew up in a middle class neighbourhood. It was a beautiful place with 2 parks for the kids and trees lining the roads. The housing society of the area had made around 150 homes there around 50 years back.
"We bought that house when I was a kid.
" Just across the road, the government gave a bit of land for a mosque.
"The area surrounding the mosque was open and everything seemed to be all right.
"Then the mosque speakers went up. The mullah of the mosque used to give the azan 5 times a day but it was not very loud and did not reach our homes.
"Slowly, muslims started encroaching on the empty area around the mosque. They started with small shacks and gradually built up.
"About 3 years ago, some saudi sheikh gave some money to this mosque and they put up a minaret over a hundred feet high.
"Now the entire area around the mosque is a complex maze of alleys. That area is now a muslim ghetto.
"The mosque has high decibel speakers that violate all the noise pollution norms but no infidel dares to complain.
"The azans are so loud that they reach every home of our society. And time to time, a "scholar from mecca" visits the mosque and gives sermons at the top of his voice.
"I moved to another location because my mother has a heart condition and the azan and the screaming, hysterical sermons was bad for her blood pressure. It woke everyone up at 5 a.m. everyday and the sermons lasted entire days.
"I loved that house and I clung to it for some time, hoping that maybe I could move back again.
"Then I realized that that area is turning islamic and I sold my house.
"Now people tell me that I was wise to do so, since property prices are coming down in the area.
"Since we moved a year back, more than 10 families quit the area.
"Now we are very far away from that place and I still feel bad about my home, but I know that I did the right thing by moving.
"The trees around my housing society are slowly disappearing since the muslims gangs come at night and cut them up for firewood.
"The dogs of that area are dying because the muslims run their cabs over them.
"One cannot leave anything in the garden since things just disappear at night.
"They even steal light bulbs from the porches.
"Point of this long post is, we don't force them to live in ghettos, they themselves create their own slums.
"They don't like living in housing societies and the mosque is the centre of their existence.
"They create their ghettos around mosques so that they can answer the azan 5 times a day.
"And this is how they take over us, bit by bit, house by house, area by area."
Posted by: arjun.sevak at June 29, 2007 11:05 AM
A little further down the thread, arjun gave a little more information, in response to questions from other posters:
arjun.sevak | June 30, 2007 1:23 AM
"Thank you J.S. I don't want to wish what happened to the people of my neighbourhood upon any infidel, but this is what is going to happen to us anywhere there is a muslim population. And this is the beginning.
"PMK they built their shacks over a period of 15 years.
'At first these were temporary structures and the authorities did not bother much with them.
'Slowly they spread over an area of several acres and now it is a full blown ghetto with 7 mosques.
'But it all began with a single mosque, *the mosque that got the minaret* {Nota bene, anybody here who is from Switzerland! - stopping those minarets is a *very* good idea - dda}.
'They never sought permission for any building, and some years back when an enthusiastic official tried to demolish their illegal structures they carried out a protest march.
'Then the politicians intervened and let them be.
'This ghetto is a "state within a state", i.e., the law of the land ends where the ghetto begins.
'Building inspectors don't go in, cleaners don't go in, meter readers don't go in.
'Some politician gave the order that since these people are "poverty struck" they must get free electricity and so they get free electricity.
'Their major occupations are - driving cabs, basic iron fabrication, carpentary, auto mechanical works and butchery.
'There are 3 such ghettos in my city that are built entirely on encroached government land.
'Regarding your question that it won't happen to me again, I am not optimistic about that.
'interestinconundrum, yes you are right, the quality of life has gone up now that we are far away from muslim population. I miss my home, but that place is not just what it used to be any more." END OF POST.
As in India, so also in England...and Australia...and France...and Denmark...and Canada...and everywhere else that Muslims have colonised and are colonising.
DDA,
Why did the muslims allow Jews to settle in Jerusalem in the 1800s ?
DDA,
The Romans persecuted Jews and exiled them from Palestine and the muslim Ottoman Turks let Jews come back to Jerusalem in the 1800s.
So why did the muslims allow Jews to settle in Jerusalem in the 1800s ?
DDA,
Regarding Islamoforming.
Muslims in America are making great contributions to our nation and that is the reason muslims earn much more than the average American.
So muslims are different in different areas of the world and even in India, the richest man in India is a muslim who is helping the Indian people progress.
dumbledoresarmy,
What you have described is pretty much dead on the description C.S. Lewis provided of how to best understand the Golden Rule in his writings in Mere Christianity.
Thanks for the confirmation.
45ch asks why the Ottoman Turkish Muslims let some Jews come back into the Land during the 1800s (and, actually, in small numbers, before that).
Simple answer: Jews are productive hardworking people and could be squeezed for jizya; also, because it's a mitzvah - a good deed - to live in the Holy Land, Jews elsewhere in the world would pass round the hat to provide the money for said jizya, if their Jewish brethren in the Land couldn't pay the extortionate sums demanded as the price of their continued residence...and of their staying alive.
So, either way, the Jewish population could be held to ransom, with money extorted not only from Jews within the Land, but also from Jews of the diaspora who would answer pleas for help from their kin.
However, it should be remembered that in 1917 the Muslim rulers of the region were in fact gearing up to dispose of the Jews - who were probably starting to be perceived as getting just a bit too numerous, prosperous, uppity and organised - in much the same manner as they had previously annihilated the Armenians. There is good reason to believe that, had General Allenby and Chauvel's advance not been so lightning-swift, from Egypt to Damascus, briskly rolling up the Turks and Germans like a carpet, all of the Jews then resident in the land of Israel would have been either driven into exile or exterminated...as so many dhimmi populations have been, at different times in their history, when the tension between keeping them around as a cash cow/ semislave labour force, and the Quranic drive toward getting rid of them altogether, resolved itself in the latter direction.
Here's a simple Aussie soldier's inimitable summary of the predicament of the Jewish population, as written down in his diary during the campaign in 1917:
"Lots of them [i.e. the Jews] have had a hard time from the Turks. They seem to live between two devils, the Turk and the Arab {both, of course, Muslim - dda}. Apparently the Turk prevents the Arab from massacring them outright, because the Jews are a very handy people to squeeze taxes from". Ion Idriess, 'The Desert Column', chapter 50, p. 184.
"They seem to live between two devils, the Turk and the Arab". Doesn't sound much like an idyll, to me. Both hate your guts and want to kill you; but one lets you live (most of the time) in order to squeeze money out of you.
Dr Andrew Bostom has a couple of articles on the reality of how the Turkish Muslims treated the Jews, both in 'Palestine' and in other parts of their domain. Here's one, which is quite sufficient to show the very limited and unreliable nature of Ottoman Muslim 'tolerance'.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/Read.aspx?GUID=68314118-6D77-4E06-B4D5-282AF4285BC9
Andrew G Bostom: Under Turkish Rule, Part 1.
In Front Page Magazine.com, July 27 2007.
An example of the observations of an eyewitness:
'Canon Antoine Morison, 60 from Bar-le-Duc in France, while traveling in the Levant in 1698, observed that the Jews in Jerusalem are “there in misery and under the most cruel and shameful slavery”, and although a large community, they were subjected to extortion.'
'Similar contemporary observations regarding the plight of both Palestinian Jews and Christians were made by the Polish Jew, Gedaliah of Siemiatyce (d. 1716), who, braving numerous perils, came to Jerusalem in 1700.'...
'No one can use green, for this color is worn solely by Muslims.
'The latter are very hostile toward Jews and inflict upon them vexations in the streets of the city…
'the common folk persecute the Jews, for we are forbidden to defend ourselves against the Turks or the Arabs.
'If an Arab strikes a Jew, he [the Jew] must appease him but dare not rebuke him, for fear that he may be struck even harder, which they [the Arabs] do without the slightest scruple. '
Murderous violence could erupt against the dhimmis at any moment. For example, the Muslim mass attack upon Jews in Safed in 1834:
"The Safed pogrom, alluded to by Maoz, lasted 33 days in June/July 1834, and was particularly devastating—many Jews were killed, hundreds wounded, and the town nearly destroyed".
Yup.
Life between two devils. How nice.
DDA,
Why would Jews want to move to jerusalem and pay taxes to the muslims in the 1800s ?
DDA,
In addition to the above question, why would Jews want to move to Jerusalem in the 1800s if, as you say, Jews were persecuted by muslims ever since the 7th century, for over a thousand years ?
Thanks dda, I've just finished reading through the links you posted. Very illuminating, alarming and depressing to see the parallels you point out between my own and Arjun's experiences. A global phenomena, n'est pa?
Can I just say that in writing about my experiences I drew more or less randomly from events in my life. There are many more I could have mentioned and may do so in the future. It seems Israel is not the only front line in our struggle against jihad. There are front lines drawn throughout so many of our towns and cities in the free world now. Some of the front lines are physical and tangible, others are cultural, intellectual, spiritual and moral. I've spent most of my life trying to adhere to the liberal view of tolerance and acceptance, which I thought was the consesus view of our society, only to find that it wasn't the consesus view at all, that a lot of people were getting bloody angry, and that I was one of them! As a bunch of people we seem to be hitting tolerance-fatigue.
I'm going to re-run a comment I posted a few days ago on a different thread, which shows my anger and concern. I've got to say, I think a fight is coming our way. Sorry it's a long post, I can be verbose, it's one of my failings. My old dad used to throw up his arms and declare, "I swear that boy was vaccinated with a gramophone needle!" Anyway, here goes:
"Robert and Hugh are fond of posting 1938 alerts, yet for us here in Britain it's 1641 - the year before the outbreak of the English Civil War.
The minarets issue, and the way the Swiss vote met with approval from all the common folk of Europe, points to an on-going, across-the-board, hardening of attitudes towards Islam. Sadly, in voicing dismay at the outcome of the referendum our political leaders once again fell into line with the Islamists and failed to support this glorious expression of the democratic will of the people. What's even worse, and the thing that makes me truly despair, is to stand by and watch as our spiritual leaders, the heads of our churches and even the Vicar of Christ himself, fail to defend Christian civilisation against the cultural onslaught of Islam.
Brothers and sisters, for all our casual talk of civil conflict, there are many that now regard it as nothing less than inevitable and it's become a common talking point wherever friends meet in the pubs, cafes and restaurants here in Britain. We're polarising with shocking speed. Day by day, attitudes are hardening. A great weight of history rests on the outcome of the general election next summer, and upon the amount of ground gained by the anti-Muslim nationalist parties in that election. How that will affect the country is anyone's guess, but I fear the prospects for peace are bleak. Yesterdays unthinkable has become tomorrow's necessity.
Our own governments will not admit the truth, for in truth, they are the cause of the problem. For decades now, their illusory, utopian fantasies of multiculturalism, their abdication of any responsibility to protect our western values, their throwing open of our doors to allow access for the outriders of what has ALWAYS BEEN an enemy religion, their arrogance that they would never be called to account for their criminal actions, has finally exposed them as morally redundant. While indulging themselves in their sickening games of self-righteous one-upmanship, those Quislings have sold us all down the river. Did they really think they could disregard us? Did they really think we wouldn't have a point of view? They thought they were doing the right thing, but all they've been doing is dragging us all to the edge of a precipice. Does anyone think, seriously, that we can get out of this without a fight?
Many second and third generation Muslims, having been born here, claim British citizenship, yet hold to their ideas about Muslim supremacy. In their eyes they have as much right as anybody to be here, and they will not leave. Yet their hostile ideology makes of them an implacable enemy whose presence cannot be tolerated, so some level of open conflict is almost certainly inevitable. I wish there was some other way. I wish there was some way we could sit down and sort out our differences, but there is no middle ground because this isn't about land or food or money. It's about core values.
We in the west have a particular horror of religious warfare. We've been there before. There's precious little room for negotiation, and even less chance of compromise when you are fighting for your core beliefs, which makes religious confrontations uniquely grim and bitter. However, through no choice of our own this struggle has been thrust upon us, and no matter how earnestly we may desire a peaceful resolution to the problem, we MUST achieve a safe and secure future for ourselves and our families, and failure will mean the destruction of our very way of life, so our options are limited. In order to ensure the freedom and sovereignty and the continued life of this nation we must set about the removal of Islam from our society and there is little chance that can be achieved without some level of confrontation.
Now I'm not saying the British people should pour out to fight in the streets. I don't need to; for when a society is put under pressure as ours is now, history always provides its own catalyst. It's as inevitable as the sun will rise tomorrow. When and where that catalyst will occur is unknown to me, but it will come."
Do you even begin to realize how creepy you are?
Anyway, for the benefit of others reading here who are unfamiliar with the subject, and who may be confused by your attempt to argue that the Jews can't have been treated so badly, if they went to live there:
The reason why a continual steady trickle of Jewish pilgrims and some returning to live (mostly scholars and artisans), all through the centuries, kept on creeping back to the Land of Israel, both out of the Christian lands and out of the other Muslim-dominated lands, is because it was *Home*, like no other place on the face of the earth; because it contained their most sacred places (what we Aussies have learned to call 'Dreaming Places'), because it contains the bones of their ancestors - Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Sarah, Rachel, Leah and Rebekah, David and Solomon; because, as I stated quite clearly in my posting above, it is considered a mitzvah, a good deed, to live in the land of Israel. Many went to Israel in old age, hoping to be buried on the Mount of Olives.
So some went there, and even made their homes there, although going there was dangerous and expensive; and *despite* knowing that it was inhabited by evil barbaric Muslims. Jews didn't go there because the Muslims were nice - the Muslims weren't, they were mostly quite horrid; Jews went simply because they, the Jews, wanted to be in their sacred homeland, and were prepared to grit their teeth and put up with the horrible Muslims who infested it.
Did Christian pilgrims and monks and nuns go to the land of Israel, the Holy Land, during the period of the Muslim Imperium, because it was a safe, happy, fun tourist destination? NO. They went simply because their desire to see (and, in some cases, to live a life of prayer within) the land where their Lord had walked on earth, was so strong that it overcame their fear of the horrible murderous thieving Muslims who swarmed all over it, robbing and insulting and cheating and sometimes even killing the Christians who dared to visit.
Hard Rain
I'm in Australia. We're not in half as bad a position as you are, overall; though there are heavily Islamoformed parts of Sydney and Melbourne that are well on the way. But our total number of Mohammedans is not even a million, yet. Yet.
Have you checked out 'New English Review'? It's the blog where Spencer's friend Mr Hugh Fitzgerald (I think the name is a nom de plume) hangs out when he isn't instructing us here. It has a UK and European focus.
http://www.newenglishreview.org/
And here's something else, just for you, because I think it might help:
http://pajamasmedia.com/ejectejecteject/2007/05/21/you-are-not-alone-part-1/
Click on the link then scroll on down through. The bit on game theory and prisoner's dilemma and Cheating is interesting and all worthwhile, but the part you need is the part headed 'The Remnant'. Read that.
And you are not alone. There's a chap called 'Ovinesongs'. FredMk1 you've already met in these threads. There's a lady over at NER who calls herself 'Esmerelda Weatherwax' - she used to post here as 'Granny Weatherwax', a few years back, and still looks in occasionally; and there's her friend 'Mary Jackson'. There was a 'Richard the Lionheart' (not the British blogger Lionheart, but he named himself in honor of same); he lived in London, with a wife and young child, but he had reached the point you have reached. There are others. More, many more, than you think. All you have to do is find each other.
And you know what I think: I think it is people like you that are meant, when the old story speaks of the Cave in Craig-y-Dinas where the great bronze bell hangs, and Arthur sleeps surrounded by his knights...until they are needed.
From Gwyn Jones' 'Welsh Legends and Folktales',the tale 'Where Arthur Sleeps' - "Who are these warriors?" said the Welshman. "And who is their sleeping king?" "The king is Arthur, and those that surround him are the men of the Island of the Mighty. They sleep with their steeds and their arms because a day shall come when land and sky shall cower at the clamour of a host, and the bell will tremble and ring, and then those warriors will ride out with Arthur at their head, and drive our foes headlong into the sea, and there shall be justice and peace among men for as long as the world endures".
It is people like *you* who *are* those Knights, who are hearing that bell begin to swing, and tremble, and ring; and who are stirring and stretching and waking.
dda
Thank you brother, you do me great honour. And I'm grateful for your guidance. I'll find the others as you suggest.
dda
Thank you brother, you do me great honour and I'm grateful for your guidance. I'll find the others as you suggest.
DDA,
You said the Jews had to put up with the Muslims in Palestine.
In what way did they have to put up with the muslims ?
was it just taxes they had to pay ?
btw, does Nonie Darwish also say that muslims are an infestation ?
Hard Rain: Many thanks for your very insightful, all-too-familiar, and frightening tale of the oppression, discrimination, violence, and arrogance you and your fellow Brits are subjected to on a daily basis from the Muslims overrunning your communities. Alas, I have learned that whenever Muslims become at least 5% of a population, this is exactly the kind of behavior you can expect to be displayed by them. Truly, these ingrates bite the very hands that sustain them.
And kudos to you for your brilliant comment that you posted on a different thread. I do not honestly believe that any one of us here could have said it better, or portrayed so chillingly the fate that is to befall us all if we do not take a united stand against political correctness, creeping (and in many instances, blatant) shari'a, and the Islamic determination to turn our Western lands into the same inbred, illiterate, poverty-stricken, immoral, and despotic cess-pools from whence these cretins originally hail. Those who assist and/or encourage the madness, violence, intolerence, hatred, and attempts at domination by far too many Muslims need to be branded for the traitors to Western civilization, culture, and humanity that they truly are.
I do hope you will be a regular contributer here on JW - I so admire and appreciate your postings.
heart,
Just as Jews/Christians do not follow the controversial aspects of the bible, muslims do not follow the controversial aspects of the Koran and the statistics prove that too.
Here is what the statistics say :
The problem lies more among non-muslims than muslims, according to every major statistics regarding violence.
I wish the opposite were true so I can be on your side, but I have to go with the facts and not emotions.
Here are 10 areas pointing to non-muslims being more violent :
(1) 1400 islamic terrorist attacks should be compared to the number of attacks by the US military on targets and the number of sorties run by the US air force every day since 2001 which have resulted in hundreds of thousands of civilians dead according to the Lancet report and that is only in Iraq and does not include the tens of thousands dead in Afghanistan due to US collateral actions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lancet_surveys_of_Iraq_War_casualties
(2) More than a hundred million have died due to genocides in non-muslim countries compared to the genocides in muslim countries
http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/dictat.html
(3) in non-war zones :
I am sure you have heard of stories or read the news about your town's murders etc and most of them were done by non-muslims and probably non by Al-Qaeda, so you are more in danger from your fellow citizens.
If you were living in a muslim country, there is a good chance you could be a victim of a muslim but at the same time, the murder rates in a place like Saudi Arabia (rank : 61) is much lower than in the US ( rank : 24) and several muslim countries have lower murder rates than the US.
ref : http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_mur_percap-crime-murders-per-capita
(4 ) In fact, the countries with the most murder rates, the top 12 are non-muslim.
ref : http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_mur_percap-crime-murders-per-capita
ref : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate
(5) Here is a site that records the fact that there are more non-muslims committing mass murder than muslims :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_murderers_and_spree_killers_by_number_of_victims
(6) you do not find American muslims killing "infidels" in America today and in fact all the killing sprees in the world are overwhelmingly committed by non-muslims
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spree_killer
(7) Compared to American muslims targeting non-muslims, many more of the non-muslim majority target muslims in America .
The targeting of innocent minorities for alleged crimes/sins perpetrated by others is common everywhere, including the US : In 2001 after the 9/11 attacks, Arab Americans, Muslims, and Sikhs were victimized in nearly five percent of the total number of hate crimes reported that year (481 out of 9,730), a seventeen-fold increase over the prior year.
http://www.civilrights.org/publications/hatecrimes/arab-americans.html
(8) Jewish militias forced palestinians to flee their homes during the war of independence in 1948 when the Israeli army committed more atrocities and killed more civilians than the Arabs did, in large part because the Israelis captured 400 Arab towns and villages, whereas the Arabs took fewer than a dozen Israeli settlements.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killings_and_massacres_during_the_1948_Palestine_War
Regarding genocides committed by Jews in Old Testament times :
A Jerusalem-based Holocaust Studies Professor Yehuda Bauer stated : "As a Jew, I must live with the fact that the civilization I inherited ... encompasses the call for genocide in its canon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocides_in_history#Before_1490
(9) Here are the facts from the US dept. of justice:
American men and women who have killed their own children or loved ones or relatives or ex-spouses between 1976 and 1997 number at 116,814 ( annual rate of 5562 )
ref : http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/wo.txt
Annual worldwide high end estimate of honor killings : 5000 per year
ref : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honor_killing
Tragically, Muslims don't follow sharia as much as non-muslims follow the ideology of hate in killing their daughters/children, loved ones, intimate partners or ex-spouses or relatives.
No matter how much sharia is out there, the sad fact is that non-muslims have been more violent towards their relatives/daughters/loved ones/ex-spouses/children/intimate partners than muslims have been been
ref : http://crime.about.com/b/2004/10/29/parents-killing-their-children.htm
(10) Both violent and non-violent muslims in prison number about 9,600 Muslim inmates in federal prisons in 2003 out of a US prison population of 7.3 million, so out of one muslim (either violent or non-violent ) going into prison, there are about 760 non-muslims in prison, not considering converts to islam in prison since the crime was committed before their conversion.
ref : http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/03/02/record.prison.population/
ref : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_United_States%27_prisons
Conservative estimate of the muslim population in the US taken from the Pew Research Center instead of the figures reported by the Council on American-Islamic Relations which reports 6-7 million muslims :
2.5 million muslims in 2009 out of 300 million Americans, meaning for every 1 muslim, there are about 120 Americans according to the Pew Research Center
ref : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_the_United_States#Demographics
So muslims in prison ( both violent and non-violent) 1 for every 760 non-muslims
Muslims in the general US population : 1 muslim for every 120 Americans meaning there are about 6.3 times less muslims in prison as compared to the general muslim population in the US.
Non-muslims in the general US population : 297,500,000 which is about 99% of the population according to the 2009 data from the Pew Research Center
ref : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_the_United_States#Demographics
Non-muslims (before converting in prison) in the prison population : 7,290,400 which is about 99% of the prison population.
If muslims in prison are 6.3 times less in number than the general muslim population in America and non-muslims in prison represent about the same proportion as the general population,so is it right to say that muslims are on the whole much less violent than non-muslims ? or even if the data is horribly skewed for some inconceivable reason, we still cannot say that muslims in America are more violent than the non-muslims in America.
Islam does not have a hold on muslims as seen in numerous muslims leaving Islam and Islam does not make muslims follow Sharia as can be seen in numerous muslim countries that do not have sharia :
Burkina Faso
Chad
Gambia
Guinea
Mali
Senegal
Somalia
Kazakhstan
Kyrgystan
Tajikstan
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Albania
Azerbaijan
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Kosovo
Turkey
Heart of a Lioness
Your kind comments are much appreciated. I count it as my very good fortune that I seem to have fallen amongst friends and fellow-travellers. At least here we can join hands across the world. For a long time I thought I was on my own.
I'll certainly carry on posting if you don't mind having to trawl through my long-winded and dubious prose!
Hard Rain -
don't worry. Some of us - like me - write long postings too.
Do your wife and daughters share your knowledge and fears? If they do, please persuade them to adopt a nom de plume and wade in. There are quite a few women from different countries who are regular posters here - Isabellathecrusader and Gravenimage are US citizens, but Spirit Wolf is a Canadian lady, Mrs J is an Englishwoman, and 'eurodhimmi' and 'epistemology' are women from continental Europe. I'm sure Mrs J for one would appreciate it if your wife joined the discussion; they could compare notes.
Call me sister, since I'm a middle-aged Aussie matron with Scots, Irish, English, Danish and German ancestors. I can understand the slip, though, as my nom de plume has a 'masculine' sound at first glance. I see it as short for '[member of] dumbledore's army', in a semi-jocular reference intended to bring out the analogy that I perceive, between the activities of the DA/ Dumbledore's Army in Rowlings' fifth 'Harry Potter' novel, 'Order of the Phoenix', formed by Harry and his friends to practise their skills in Defence Against the Dark Arts, and what happens here in Mr Spencer's virtual Hedge School for those who wish to Resist the Third Jihad.
When I originally chose to stop lurking and step onto the comments floor in 2007, I also thought of using 'order of the phoenix' but ruled it out as far too presumptuous; I privately reserve that term to designate all those who physically and publicly under their own names put themselves right out in the firing line as Resisters - e.g. Mr Spencer, Nonie Darwish, Wafa Sultan, Fr Zakaria Botros, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Rifqa Bary, Geert Wilders, the SIOE, members of Pax Europa, and so on, as well as the young soldiers of the IDF and indeed all non-dhimmified Jews everywhere. These are the real-life equivalent of Rowlings' fictional Order of the Phoenix, going up against the real-life equivalent of Voldemort and the Death Eaters. Some - Theo Van Gogh, Fr Daniel Sysoyev - have already been killed on the front lines.
http://i426.photobucket.com/albums/pp343/livingengine/troll.jpg
hard rain,
No, I have not counted the number of terrorist incidents in the name of Islam since 9/11 since I have been busy reading and seeing the local news since 9/11 about murders committed in the name of hate by non-muslims in my state ( oklahoma ) on a daily basis and I have not read any news in oklohama about muslims committing murders in the name of islam since 9/11.
Since 9/11, how many muslims in your state have committed murders in the name of islam, compared to how many non-muslims have committed murders in the name of hate ?
living,
If you can come up with any viable study that shows muslims are more dangerous than non-muslims, let me know, thanks
DDA,
Do Nonie Darwish, Wafa Sultan, Fr Zakaria Botros, Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Rifqa Bary
refer to muslims as less than human ?
Hate begets hate, so the best way to change the hearts of the tiny minority of muslims who practice hate is to criticize without making muslims seem less than human
dda
Oops... sorry ma'am. I thought... er... Dumbledore... that is, I assumed... erm... Well, I warned you I'm an idiot!
Anyway thanks for the gender clarification, on yourself and our other resistance comrades. Harrumph! Newbies, eh? What can you do with them?
However I suspect we all agree the really important thing is that together we all speak with one ever-strengthening voice.
You have an impressive and noble lineage, sister, some of which I share. My family moved to England when I was a boy, but by birth I'm a Scot, a Celt, by God's grace a Highlander and a Hebridean to boot. The slogan of my clan is 'Buaidh Na Bas' - Victory or Death. Once I regarded those words as little more than the fading echo of a romantic past. Not any more. In our veins, sister, the blood runs deep, does it not?
As for my wife, I hardly dare unleash her upon an unsuspecting world. She is second generation Polish, very European, beautiful, proud and very Catholic. Believe me when I say that I am the very acme of restrained and understated tolerance in comparison to she, who bears the spirit of a true crusader and possesses a spine cast from pure blue steel in the shipyards of Gdansk. She gets a look in her eyes that makes me understand why people revere Saint Joan.
Our daughters, though still young, are cut from the same formidable cloth as their mother, so what can I say? I'll talk to them about posting here but don't blame me if they burst forth in a clarion blast of blaring trumpets and banners unfurling. You have been warned!
Your 'Order of the Phoenix' idea is spot on, by the way, and lists many of the men and women I most admire in our hard-pressed world, our world under siege, where having the courage to speak the truth invites not only the murderous intentions of the jihadis, but often, heartbreakingly, the condemnation of those among us who should know better. But the season turns towards the birth of Our Lord, so we should take heart. This isn't the first time we've faced the enemies of reason in the endless battle for freedom, justice and equality. We have handed them defeat before and will do so again. This is our Forever War; our forefathers fought it, and our descendants will fight on. All that's required of us is that we too play our part.
Let's also keep Gilad Shalit in our thoughts at this time. Come home safe to your family, young man. And soon.
45ch
Hello. I was wondering when you would finally get around to me.
You ask "since 9/11, how many muslims in your state have committed murders in the name of islam?"
Well, I don't live in a state, I live in England, so let me see... Oh yes, shall I tell you a story?
On the morning of July 7th 2005, a young friend of ours, one of my wife's colleagues, was hurrying through central London. He'd just finished an early business meeting and was weighed down with a briefcase, laptop, a small overhead projector and all the other things an ambitious young executive needs to cart around with him when visiting clients. The morning was warm, the young man was hot and flustered, but he hurried along the busy street towards the bus he needed to catch in order to reach his next meeting. Heading towards Tavistock Square he could see his bus, the number 30, waiting at the stop. Then the strap for his projector case slipped from his shoulder, almost tripping him as the apparatus slid down his arm. Cursing quietly to himself and fumbling with his cases and bags he decided to stop there and sort himself out. It would only take a moment and he would catch the next bus, which would be along in just a few minutes, so he set about his task.
Suddenly, he later told us, there was a deafening roar and he looked up to see the roof of the bus flying through the air. Simultaneous to this, an arc of blood sprayed out across the pavement and up the wall of the nearby building.
It wasn't until later that he realised that if he had been really determined to make it, he would have been on the bus when the bomb detonated.
Other bombs went off across London that morning. When it was over they counted 56 dead and 700 injured. All four of the suicide bombers were also dead. Their names were Mohammad Sidique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer, Hasib Hussain and Germaine Lindsay.
Al Jazeera later aired a videotape statement from Mohammad Sidique Khan. In it he said:
"Our drive and motivation doesn't come from tangible commodities that this world has to offer. Our religion is Islam, obedience to the one true God and following the footsteps of the final prophet messenger."
Any more questions, 45ch?
Hard Rain, you stated :
45ch
Hello. I was wondering when you would finally get around to me.
You ask "since 9/11, how many muslims in your state have committed murders in the name of islam?"
Well, I don't live in a state, I live in England, so let me see... Oh yes, shall I tell you a story?
Any more questions, 45ch?
Comment :
There are murderers in every religion but my question was very simple; how many murders happened in the name of islam, compared to murders by non-muslims in the name of hate ?
Here are the facts from the US dept. of justice:
American men and women who have killed their own children or loved ones or relatives or ex-spouses between 1976 and 1997 number at 116,814 ( annual rate of 5562 )
ref : http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/wo.txt
Annual worldwide high end estimate of honor killings : 5000 per year
ref : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honor_killing
Tragically, Muslims don't follow sharia as much as non-muslims follow the ideology of hate in killing their daughters/children, loved ones, intimate partners or ex-spouses or relatives.
No matter how much sharia is out there, the sad fact is that non-muslims have been more violent towards their relatives/daughters/loved ones/ex-spouses/children/intimate partners than muslims have been been
ref : http://crime.about.com/b/2004/10/29/parents-killing-their-children.htm
If you need any other areas in which it seems non-muslims are more violent, let me know.
45ch
For the 1000th time.
Islam COMMANDS the acts of violence that its followers - too many of them - perform against one another (wives, daughters, etc), against 'blasphemers', against apostates, and against non-Muslims (to punish them for the heinous and unforgiveable crime of insisting on remaining non-Muslim, which constitutes aggression and persecution against Islam).
When non-Muslims kill each other in common-or-garden murders, those murders are CRIMES and are FORBIDDEN by the criminal and religious codes of non-Muslim countries.
A non-Muslim man who beats his wife is a criminal.
A Muslim man who beats his wife because he perceives her as 'rebellious', is not a criminal, according to sharia; he is doing what his religion and the laws derived from it PERMIT AND COMMAND him to do.
You are wilfully refusing to recognise the difference between the two cases.
Furthermore, re. your bizarre claim, which you keep repeating ad nauseam, that Muslims in general are less violent than non-Muslims in general: I don't trust the stats that come out of Islamic countries, because those countries operate according to an honour-shame mentality. Such a mentality massively militates AGAINST self-examination and truth-telling and instead encourages people and groups to conceal their failures or blame them on others. I tend to assume that whatever stats *do* trickle out, are probably the tip of the iceberg...given the huge inhibitions against owning up to any wrongdoing at all.
If this were a pub, I wouldn't have been surprised, after that appalling answer you gave him (an answer that evinced not the tiniest skerrick of empathy for or interest in his wife's friend or for any of the people who were killed on that bus, an 'answer' in which you aggressively repeated your canned recited-by-rote tu quoque/ moral equivalencing, and in which you ostentatiously ignored the fact of the plain declaration of WAR made by those who murdered the people on the bus) Hard Rain were to kick your backside out the door and down the steps into the gutter.
I have said this before but I will say it again: if you really are resident in Oklahoma, USA, then GET OUT. NOW.
Leave. You think dar al Islam is so wonderful? You are absolutely convinced that the USA and the rest of dar al Harb / Lands of the Infidels are and always have been violent, dangerous sh*t-holes, vastly more dangerous and immoral than peaceful, beautiful dar al Islam where everyone is soo nice to everybody else?
Fine. Go live there (I suggest you migrate to Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Aceh in Indonesia, or perhaps one of the sharia-ising states in Peninsular Malaysia) but you better be consistent and leave your obviously-despised American citizenship behind you. Get naturalised in the Islamic country of your choice; and do. not. come. back.
DDA,
You say Islam "commands" and yet we find numerous muslims interpreting those commands differently, just as christians either ignore or interpret controversial parts of the bible as commands that are only to be applied for the time when revelations happened and not as commands for today.
How does a sufi muslim interpret the islamic commands ?
The fact that non-muslims appear to be more violent than muslims, especially here in the US, shows that those commands are being interpreted in a more moderate way
45ch wants us to think of Sufi Muslims as nice, sweet, loving people.
Actually, they were ruthless Muslim supremacists like all the rest.
The modern (20th century) Persian Muslim Tabandeh was a Sufi.
Sultanhussein Tabandeh, the author of A Muslim Commentary on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (a commentary that, by the way, is completely hostile to said Declaration) was a Sufi leader -- and in that book he defends the harsh sharia punishments and says: "Islam and its peoples must be above the infidels, and never permit non-Muslims to acquire lordship over them."
And here is the voice of another Sufi, the 17th-century Indian Muslim, Sirhindi:
‘The violent truth behind the Sufi Mask’ – ‘excerpts from Sita Ram Goel, specimens from letters by Sirhindi’.
'On the desirability of harbouring hatred toward the kafir, whether secretly or openly.
'Therefore, it is necessary that infidelity should be cursed in order to serve the faith (Islam).
'Cursing unbelief in the heart is the lesser way.
'The greater way is to curse it in the heart as well as with the body.
'In short, cursing means to nourish enmity towards enemies of the true faith,
'whether that enmity is harboured in the heart when there is fear of injury from them (infidels),
'or it is harboured in the heart as well as served with the body when there is no fear of injury from them.
'In the opinion of this recluse, there is no greater way to obtain the blessings of Allah than to curse the enemies of the faith (be impatient with them).
'For Allah himself harbours enmity towards the infidels and infidelity...
'It is said that the Shariat prospers under the shadow of the sword (al-Shara' tahat al-sait).
'And the glory of the holy Shariat depends on the kings of Islam ....
'Islam and infidelity (kufr) contradict one another. To establish the one means eradicating the other, the coming together of these contradictories being impossible.
'Therefore, Allah has commanded his Prophet to wage war (jihad) against the infidels, and be harsh with them.
'The glory of Islam consists in the humiliation and degradation of infidels and infidelity.
'He who honours the infidels, insults Islam.
'Honouring (the infidels) does not mean that they are accorded dignity, and made to sit in high places.
'It means allowing them to be in our company, to sit with them, and talk to them.
'They should be kept away like dogs.
'If there is some worldly purpose or work which depends upon them, and cannot be served without their help, they may be contacted while keeping in mind all the time that they are not worthy of respect.
'The best course according to Islam is that they should not be contacted even for worldly purposes.
'Allah has proclaimed in his Holy Word (Quran) that they are his and his Prophet's enemies. And mixing with these enemies of Allah and his Prophet or showing affection for them, is one of the greatest crimes...
'The abolition of jizyah in Hindustan is a result of friendship which (Hindus) have acquired with the rulers of this land...
'What right have the rulers to stop exacting jizyah?
'Allah himself has commended imposition of jizyah for their (infidels') humiliation and degradation.
'What is required is their disgrace, and the prestige and power of Muslims."
END EXCERPT.
What spirituality! He's urging Muslims to foster active hatred and contempt in their hearts, toward all non-Muslims qua non-Muslims.
The venomous hate-mailings that are sent to Mr Spencer by Muslims, may be seen as expressions of perfect obedience to the principles enunciated by 'saints' like Sirhindi when he said things like this: "there is no greater way to obtain the blessings of Allah than to curse the enemies of the faith".
And here, from this article by Andrew Bostom - 'Losing our soul to the Islamintern'
http://www.andrewbostom.org/content/view/66/55/
- is a terrifying passage from another Sufi: the 18th century Moroccan Sufi “master” Ibn Ajibah from his Koranic commentary.
Bostom notes that he was told about this work by his colleague, the Australian scholar Dr Mark Durie, and then observes:
"Describing unabashedly the purpose of the humiliating Koranic poll tax (as per Koran 9:29) of submission for non-Muslims brought under Islamic hegemony by jihad,
"Ibn Ajibah makes clear the ultimate goal of its imposition was to achieve what he called the death of the “soul”, through the dhimmi’s execution of their own humanity:
QUOTE FROM IBN AJIBAH
'[The dhimmi] is commanded to put his soul, good fortune and desires to death.
'Above all he should kill the love of life, leadership and honor.
'[The dhimmi] is to invert the longings of his soul, he is to load it down more heavily than it can bear until it is completely submissive.
'Thereafter nothing will be unbearable for him. He will be indifferent to subjugation or might. Poverty and wealth will be the same to him; praise and insult will be the same; preventing and yielding will be the same; lost and found will be the same.
'Then, when all things are the same, it [the soul] will be submissive and yield willingly what it should give.'
[Tafsir ibn ‘Ajibah. Commentary on Quran 9:29. Ahmad ibn Muhammad Ibn 'Ajibah]
This Sufi writer seems to envisage, as desirable, a state in the dhimmi that might be comparable to the total submission that is sought, in his victim, by such creatures as the pimp setting out to 'break' the latest girl, the savagely abusive spouse, and the psychopathic serial torturer-killer, or for that matter, the torturers in the 'Ministry of Love' in Orwell's 1984: the victim is to be reduced to something resembling plastic, no longer a subject but an object, without boundaries, that permits itself to be used and abused at will, without even a whimper of resistance or complaint.
Now let's compare that state of total submission, in the dhimmis, that this oh-so-spiritual Sufi master from Morocco deemed to be desirable and to be the goal aimed at by Quran 9:29, with psychologist M Scott Peck's and Erich Fromm's definition of Evil:
From ‘Toward a Psychology of Evil’, in 'People of the Lie', Pp. 46-47
'Evil is in opposition to life. It is that which opposes the life force. It has, in short, to do with killing.
'Specifically, it has to do with murder – namely, unnecessary killing, killing that is not required for biological survival…
'When I say that evil has to do with killing, I do not mean to/ restrict myself to corporeal murder.
'Evil is also that which kills spirit.
'There are various essential attirubtes of life – particularly human life – such as sentience, mobility, awareness, growth, autonomy, will. It is possible to kill or attempt to kill one of these attributes without actually destroying the body.
'Thus we may ‘break’ a horse or even a child without harming a hair on its head.
'Erich Fromm was acutely sensitive to this fact when he broadened the definition of necrophilia to include the desire of certain people to control others – to make them controllable, to foster their dependence, to discourage their capacity to think for themselves, to diminish the unpredictability and originality, to keep them in line.
Distinguishing it from the ‘biophilic’ person, one who appreciates and fosters the variety of life forms and the uniqueness of the individual,
he demonstrated a ‘necrophilic character type’, whose aim it is to avoid the inconvenience of life by transforming others into obedient automatons, robbing them of their humanity
[Erich Fromm, The Heart of Man (Harper & Rose, 1964)].
It strikes me that 'obedient automatons', robbed of their humanity, is *EXACTLY* what Ibn Ajibah intends that the dhimmis should become.
dda
Once again I owe you thanks for your support. The counter-arguments you presented to 45ch's claims were so overwhelmingly conclusive that I now KNOW for sure that I am on the side of righteousness and justice. I'm just glad that you and I are on the same side - I'd be terrified to face you across the barricades!
Surely by now you can dust off your hands, having comprehensively demolished every point advanced by 45ch. However, I doubt there is anything any of us could say to that individual that would make the tiniest dent in their blinkered beliefs, no matter how incisive the logic and irrefutable the evidence presented. I'm frankly suspicious of 45ch, not so much because of their spurious assertions, which you dismantled with such ease anyway, but with the logic he/she/it (delete where applicable) is using. To me it seems perculiarly elliptical, self referencing and distinctly non-Greek, rather like the warped logic of those Muslims who tell us that if we feel insulted by being called Kuffars, then we should convert to Islam and then they won't call us nasty names anymore. How's that for a remedy?! The same insulting nature of this logic is stamped all over 45ch's arguments.
To my mind 45ch is at best a bigoted, unthinking time-waster or at worst, a bigoted but very knowing time-waster, constanly trying to tie us down checking and re-checking information and statistics, and arguing in loops that ultimately lead nowhere. I think this is what's led some of us to suspect that this person is a Muslim. Another indication of this is the imperviousness to compassion you observed in 45ch's response to my post - very much the hallmark of the committed jihadi. The jihad is prosecuted against us at all levels. I've little doubt they are in these forums too, trying to muddy the waters. My suggestion is to ignore this person and let them go play elsewhere.
Don't get me wrong. I'm up for a good argument. I'd love to get a real discussion on real issues with someone who could coherently argue the other side of the case. I sincerely want to hear any counter-arguments that anyone may have, but only if they can clearly express their views within a logical framework, instead of inviting us to chase our tails and get nowhere, as 45ch is trying so hard to do.
As I know you will understand (though 45ch probably won't), the young friend of ours who made such a narrow escape on 7/7 was very traumatised by what he'd witnessed. My wife sent two of her colleagues to comfort him and they all stayed in town that night. He cried a lot, drank a lot and eventually passed out, also understandably. His friends put him to bed. That young man is now an active member of SIOE, as am I.
When the jihadis take our lives, they think that they are sowing terror amongst us, but in this they are deluded, for they seriously misjudge the character and temper of our people. Every bombing, every murder, harms a few of us, sometimes many of us, but it also creates a much larger community of horrified and enraged witnesses who turn to the Resistance and say: "This has to stop. How can I help?" Thus we fight in ever-growing numbers.
Merry Christmas dda, to you and all resisters everywhere.
A happy Advent season and a merry Christmas to you too, 'Hard Rain'; my regards to your wife and daughters.
Thank you for your kind words; and I concur with your canny analysis of the current bandersnatch (aka threadjacker/ bandwidth stealer).
God bless you, and may all His holy angels surround your house.
There's a lovely Jewish prayer in the Krias Shema: I found it in Chaim Potok's "My Name is Asher Lev". It invokes the four great Archangels and the cloud of the glory.
"In the Name of the Lord, the God of Israel:
may Michael be at my right hand, Gabriel at my left
before me Uriel, behind me Raphael
and above my head the Divine Presence of God".
It seems to me to be a perfectly good prayer for a Christian as well as a Jew; I hope our Jewish colleagues here won't mind if we Christians ask if we can use it too. Unlike our own traditional 'four angels round my bed' prayer it's very much the prayer of someone who is going out into a dark world full of danger; but the pillar of fire and cloud is with them.
Now I must away and write all my last-minute Christmas cards...
DDA,
The comment about sufi muslims is to illustrate that not all muslims think alike.
Mr Spencer himself does admit that not all muslims think alike when he states " It is continually noteworthy that Muslims all too often present themselves either as bloodthirsty, violent thugs, or as cringing weaklings who are "traumatized" by an unkind word "(end of quote )
So if muslims don't think alike, does that explain why we have 57 different muslim countries in the world, including numerous muslim countries that are non-sharia and democratic ?
Another example of people in religion not thinking alike :
Most christians have a moderate interpretation of Luke 19, likewise, almost all muslims either ignore controversial parts of the Koran or interpret it to mean that those commands were for that period in time and not as commands for today.
For example : Matthew 15:1-7
Then some Pharisees and teachers of the law came to Jesus from Jerusalem and asked, "Why do your disciples break the tradition of the elders? They don't wash their hands before they eat!"
Jesus replied, "And why do you break the command of God for the sake of your tradition? For God said, 'Honor your father and mother' and 'Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.' But you say that if a man says to his father or mother, 'Whatever help you might otherwise have received from me is a gift devoted to God,' he is not to 'honor his father with it. Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition. You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you (end of quote )
Comment :
How would you interpret what Jesus said; was He calling for the death penalty of rude children or was Jesus simply pointing out the fact that capital punishment for rude children was the Law since the Age of Grace only started after Jesus sacrificed on the cross to pay for the sins of all rude children.
Now, would Jesus have agreed to any children being put to death ? off course not, since He clearly said that anybody without sin is the only one who can put somebody to death.
Likewise, the commands in the Koran could be interpreted several different ways and that is the reason we have 57 different muslim countries including numerous muslim countries that do not have sharia and are democratic
Hard Rain,
How do you explain the fact that there are 6.3 times less number of muslims in the American prison population as compared to non-muslims ?
ref : http://www.bernardgoldberg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=31532&p=91738#p91738
It just shows that muslims are just like non-muslims and they interpret the controversial aspects of their religion in ways that does not lead to violence
This is truth.why are you running away from truth.
all the comments posted here are from jews.
robert spencer is also an employee of a jew!
any comments.
Are you attempting to parody a Muslim response?
Or are you in fact a Muslim, hurling at Mr Spencer and the commenters here an epithet that you
1. must surely know to be factually false (Mr Spencer is not of Jewish ethnicity and is a Christian, following the Greek Melkite Catholic tradition, while most of those who read and post here are Gentiles from many ethnic backgrounds, though our Jewish contributors are many and most welcome)
but which (2) - because of the irrational and vicious hatred of Jews which your death cult has taught you - is the worst insult you can think of hurling at anybody?
Know that if you insist on calling *me* a 'Jew' (which I am not; I am of north-west European ethnicity, and Christian faith) I will take it as the highest imaginable honour. To me it is not the grossest insult imaginable but, rather, a compliment.