As I said here, this is just face-saving and window dressing. As long as the military remains pro-Sharia and pro-Islam, and refuses to explore or discuss the elements of Islam that jihadists use to justify violence and terror, there will be more Nidal Hasans. They will be unavoidable.
"Army Secretary Directs Fort Hood Accountability Review," by Gerry J. Gilmore for the American Forces Press Service, January 22 (thanks to H.):
WASHINGTON, Jan. 22, 2010 - The Army will conduct a review to determine if leaders were negligent in their supervision of accused Fort Hood shooter Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, Defense Department officials announced yesterday.Army Secretary John McHugh has directed Army Gen. Carter F. Ham, commander of U.S. Army Europe, "to conduct an accountability review to identify whether any personnel were responsible for failures or deficiencies in applying Army programs, policies, and procedures to the alleged assailant," according to a Defense Department news release.
McHugh also has tasked Ham to provide personal observations he may have developed as a senior Army leader and as a member of the independent panel that investigated the shooting that he believes may be of help to the Army in charting a way ahead.
The independent panel -- co-chaired by former Army Secretary Togo D. West Jr. and retired Navy Adm. Vernon E. Clark, a former chief of naval operations -- provided its report to Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates on Jan. 15....
Could it be someone related to the real killer of O. J. Simpson's wife, the one he's determined to find and bring to justice?
Hugh, only a detailed and protracted search of every U.S. golf course can provide that answer.
And I don't play golf.
To scapegoat the particular officers who promoted Hassan is to ignore the prevailing culture of political-correctness that tied their hands. On the other hand, if military officials start to fear the repercussions of being too politically correct the way they have long feared not being politically-correct enough, then I say: MAKE AN EXAMPLE!
Drum Hassan's superiors who promoted him out of the service with general discharges. It's pathetically small compensation for the families of the victims...and it doesn't attack the root of the problem, but it's a start.
Pathetic.
An 86 page report and that can't even give the shooters name. Yep politically correct to the core as usual. No mention of motivation for murdering 13 Americans and wounding 29 others.
The question is; who layed out the orders on how to present this report? Any guesses?
This President and his attorney general are blinding our intelligence to where we hardly have a clue where the next attack may come from.
Clearly Major Nidal Hasan was driven by Islamic fanaticism and jihad imperatives written so clearly in the Quran for all to see. It was Hasan's complete motivation, inspired equally by radicals outside the U.S. and yet the report cannot reveal the simple truth of the matter. How can we believe what is coming from this government today whenever Islam is involved if they cannot be up front and honest with the American People?
This is not only outrageous,but it is shameful. Who can we trust if the people who are suppose to defend this nation choose foolishly to play paddy cake with the enemies of freedom?
Are there still influences in the Pentagon like Hesham Islam who tried to get Major Coughlin's thesis toned down as well as dismissed from the Pentagon when he had the ear of 2nd in command at the Pentagon dhimmi David England.
We have an enemy we are fighting and he is at our doorstep,he is a sleeper cell in our country,he is trying to marginalize our abilities to defeat him by using our own courts system to suppress us anyway they can and we let it happen everyday.
We are being lead by blind fools. A police detective would think this was crazy if you where trying to identify a suspect to a crime.
I think it could be the "Intruder" who killed little JonBenet Ramsey.
It is not at all comforting realizing that what is presumed to be the world's most powerful military has been infiltrated and could be brought down by people from the 7th century. As far as who was responsible for allowing Hasan to remain, it is not a few "bad apples", but rather the climate of PC that is to blame.
It is not at all comforting realizing that what is presumed to be the world's most powerful military has been infiltrated and could be brought down by people from the 7th century. As far as who was responsible for allowing Hasan to remain, it is not a few "bad apples", but rather the climate of PC that is to blame.
It is not at all comforting realizing that what is presumed to be the world's most powerful military has been infiltrated and could be brought down by people from the 7th century. As far as who was responsible for allowing Hasan to remain, it is not a few "bad apples", but rather the climate of PC that is to blame.
The Army will find only one villain in this: The Jews!
The Jews, being the world's whipping boy for the last 2000 years.
It was Colonel Mustard in the Conservatory with the candlestick.
All the officers who were responsible for promoting this MUSLIM NUT and all the officers who chose to ignore his ISLAMIC RANTINGS were concerned about one thing...their OERS (officer efficiency reports). They must have a stellar OER to get promoted. To get promoted they must LAY LOW and stay out of harms way.
"It is not at all comforting realizing that what is presumed to be the world's most powerful military has been infiltrated and could be brought down by people from the 7th century."
The West's early 21st century genuflecting and submitting to 7th century AD Islam after they attacked us has got to be one of the WEIRDEST historical twists in recorded history.
I still can't figure it out.
I have alot of trouble dealing with why, why, why, was Hasan skipped over by those who saw signs of his fanatcism?
Many obvious signs were present, way before the mass murder at Ft. Hood. The answers were to be had, but no one questioned what was seen and known.
This really galls me.
"to conduct an accountability review to identify whether any personnel were responsible for failures or deficiencies in applying Army programs, policies, and procedures to the alleged assailant,"
Or maybe this is a backhanded way of putting the programs, policies and procedures on trial, as they should be...