Former PM of Malaysia: Jews "had to be periodically massacred"

Andrew Bolt is one of the few Australian journos who writes honestly on Islam and its shocking doctrines. His is a courageous voice in an otherwise mediocre sea of dhimmitude. Of course there are other brave exceptions -- Miranda Devine,
Paul Kelly, Piers Ackerman, Janet ALbrechtson and Peter Day -- and some others, but on the whole, dhimmitude has a large sway over Australian commentators. Not one news outlet covered the large Coptic rally 19th January in the centre of Sydney.

Andrew Bolt is one of the few Australian journos who writes honestly on Islam and its shocking doctrines. His is a courageous voice in an otherwise mediocre sea of dhimmitude. Of course there are other brave exceptions -- Miranda Devine,
Paul Kelly, Piers Ackerman, Janet ALbrechtson and Peter Day -- and some others, but on the whole, dhimmitude has a large sway over Australian commentators. Not one news outlet covered the large Coptic rally 19th January in the centre of Sydney.

Wow. Just wow.

Andrew Bolt is one of the few Australian journos who writes honestly on Islam and its shocking doctrines. His is a courageous voice in an otherwise mediocre sea of dhimmitude. Of course there are other brave exceptions -- Miranda Devine,
Paul Kelly, Piers Ackerman, Janet ALbrechtson and Peter Day -- and some others, but on the whole, dhimmitude has a large sway over Australian commentators. Not one news outlet covered the large Coptic rally 19th January in the centre of Sydney.

Mea culpa -- triple posting~

Apologies for a dreadful mixed metaphor.

"If people like Bolt can really get a handle on Islamic antisemitism - and start lifting the lid on it".

I should know better than to write something like that.

Instead, let's try that again, without the unfortunate metaphors.

"If people like Bolt can start to understand about Islamic antisemitism - and start telling the Aussie public about it"....

Mahathir Mohamad is one of most abhorrent anti-Semites on this planet. He can be compared to Ahmadshithead of Iran, another obnoxious bloke. Of course he likes the idea that Jews were massacred, he hates everything that's Jewish.

The fact that this conspiracy lover and theorist explains 9/11 as an Americsn fake, only shows that he's a gob-shite and a moron. The only problem is really "For how many Muslims does Mahathir speak?" How many does he represent? I'm afraid there are more of them than we expect. Anti-Semitism is intrinsic to Islam, it's an important part of its ideology.

The Australian people I know are very kind and hospitable, Mahathir, as all Mahoundians got things wrong and still(!) feels offended, Mahoundian business as usual.

Malaysia's former premier Mahathir Mohamad said on Wednesday there was "strong evidence" the US faked the September 11 terror attacks as an excuse to go to war against Muslims.

"There is strong evidence that the attacks were staged. If they can make Avatar, they can make anything,' Mahathir told the Conference for the Support of Al-Quds (Jerusalem), as quoted by local media. [Quite possibly the strangest compliment James Cameron has received. - M.]
.............................

Well, Mahathir Mohamad has never cared about being consistent.

Here he is, early in 2002, in a strange Taqiyy-filled apologia for Islamic terrorism—where he appears to acknowledge that Muslims were responsible for 9/11—but only in order to claim that *Orthodox Christians* are far worse terrorists.

http://www.asiasociety.org/policy-politics/international-relations/intra-asia/islam-terrorism-and-malaysias-response?page=0%2C0

The full text of an article by Manfred Gerstenfeld about Mahathir Mohamad’s antisemitic speech,the one he so famously delivered at the tenth summit of the O.I.C., can be found here:

http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=111&FID=443&PID=0&IID=944

And here are some excerpts from that article:

At the Organization of the Islamic Conference summit, Malaysian Prime Minister Mohamad Mahathir, the conference host, represented relations between Muslims and Jews as a worldwide frontal confrontation, offering some new examples of a "Jewish conspiracy." His words were broadly applauded.

• Since an EU summit was being held at the same time, it was proposed to include a condemnation of Mahathir's remarks in the summit's final statement. However, this was blocked by French President Jacques Chirac and Greek Prime Minister Costas Simitis. Instead, the condemnation was delegated to the Italian EU presidency.

• A New York Times editorial said the EU's refusal to condemn Mahathir's speech at its own summit adds "a concern that displays of anti-Semitism are being met with inexcusable nonchalance," while a Le Monde editorial noted that "such words are common currency in the Arab Islamic world where they pass for evident truth...and this direct form of racism, purely and simply is practiced as a normal category of the 'political debate.'"

• The importance of the Mahathir affair is that it has exposed in a short time and in a concentrated way the profound anti-Semitic thought present among major layers of both mainstream Muslim elites and society.
• The Mahathir affair is also an important case study for the analysis of Western reactions to Islamic anti-Semitism.

Finding Scapegoats for Islamic Weakness

The tenth summit of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (IOC) - attended by leaders of 57 countries - opened on October 16, 2003, in Putrajaya, Malaysia. In his welcoming speech, the conference host, Malaysian Prime Minister Mohmad Mahathir, attacked the Jews and the West.
His main theme was to lament Islam's weakness and to discuss how this could be remedied. His words were broadly applauded. With his remarks about the Jews, Mahathir started a chain reaction that was to provide wide-ranging proof of the character and dynamics of mainstream Islamic anti-Semitism.

While much attention was given to Mahathir's speech, what happened subsequently is even more important. The questions to be addressed are: Who condemned Mahathir and how? Who supported him and in what way? And who remained silent?

Muslims and Jews: A Worldwide Confrontation?

In his speech, Mahathir represented relations between Muslims and Jews as a worldwide frontal confrontation. Though he only devoted a few sentences to Jews, he presented some new examples of what anti-Semitism studies call "the theory of Jewish conspiracy." Mahathir said:
1.3 billion Muslims cannot be defeated by a few million Jews. There must be a way. And we can only find a way if we stop to think, to assess our weaknesses and our strength, to plan, to strategize and then to counter-attack.

We are actually very strong. 1.3 billion people cannot be simply wiped out. The Europeans killed six million Jews out of 12 million. But today the Jews rule this world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them.
We are up against a people who think. They survived 2000 years of pogroms not by hitting back, but by thinking. They invented and successfully promoted Socialism, Communism, human rights and democracy so that persecuting them would appear to be wrong, so they may enjoy equal rights with others. With these they have now gained control of the most powerful countries and they, this tiny community, have become a world power. We cannot fight them through brawn alone. We must use our brains also.1

Creating Myths

The worldwide attention given to Mahathir's anti-Semitic remarks overshadowed the rest of his speech which contained a number of observations that are typical of much of contemporary discourse by Islamic leaders. Mahathir said: "We are all Muslims. We are all oppressed. We are all being humiliated."

He added: "We are now 1.3 billion strong. We have the biggest oil reserve in the world. We have great wealth. We are not as ignorant as the Jahilliah [the ignorant of the pre-Islamic period] who embraced Islam. We are familiar with the workings of the world's economy and finances. We control 50 out of the 180 countries in the world." He concluded that because Islamic countries do not unite against the outside world, they are not using their power efficiently.

Many of the "facts" Mahathir expressed concerning Muslims were misrepresentations. It is difficult to claim that all Muslims are being humiliated. Many inhabitants of oil-rich countries are quite well-off, where it is Muslims who humiliate other Muslims, sometimes almost treating them like slaves. Mahathir avoided mentioning the near absence of democracy and the presence of major corruption in the Islamic world, responsible for much of its problems. Mahathir replaced these facts with myths.

International Reactions

Mahathir's anti-Semitic attacks led to many reactions from the Western world. U.S. State Department spokesman Adam Ereli said: "We view them with the contempt and derision they deserve." A few days later at the Asia-Pacific Summit in Bangkok, President Bush told Mahathir - according to White House spokesman Scott McClellan - that his words about the Jews controlling the West by proxy "were wrong and divisive....It stands squarely against what I believe." Mahathir, however, denied that Bush had rebuked him.

Australian Prime Minister John Howard commented on Mahathir's OIC speech: "Any suggestion from anybody anywhere in the world of dividing the world into Jewish and non-Jewish groupings is historically indefensible and wrong and something that most Australians would regard as quite repugnant."

Later, at the Asia-Pacific Summit, Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer declared: "We regard anti-Semitism as unacceptable and the Australian government hopes that there won't be further comments of this kind."

The Foreign Minister of New Zealand, Phil Goff, said: "We're concerned about language that brings back memories of so-called Jewish conspiracies."

Outgoing Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chreיtien, who also attended the Asia-Pacific Summit, refused to condemn Mahathir personally when asked to do so at a press conference in Bangkok, and referred to an earlier statement by his foreign ministry. The Toronto Star wrote, "Jean Chrיtien suffered an unexpected casualty yesterday. He lost his tongue....Chrיtien greeted Mahathir with a warm handshake, as many leaders did. But he kept his mouth shut on the subject of anti-Semitism."

European Union Divisiveness

British Foreign Minister Jack Straw summoned the Malaysian high commissioner to complain about Mahathir's remarks. The Foreign Office stated: "It is particularly regrettable that some positive and welcome messages in Mahathir's speech, such as the emphasis on negotiation being the path to peace, were obscured and overshadowed by racist remarks." Also, the German Foreign Office summoned Malaysian diplomats in order to complain.

Italy currently holds the presidency of the European Union. Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini told reporters: "The [Malaysian] prime minister used expressions that were gravely offensive, very strongly anti-Semitic and...strongly counter to principles of tolerance, dialogue, and understanding between the Western world and the Islamic world."

Since an EU summit was being held at the same time, it was proposed to include a condemnation of Mahathir's remarks in the summit's 19-page final statement. According to Ha'aretz, the draft stated: "his unacceptable comments hinder all our efforts to further inter-ethnic and religious harmony, and have no place in a decent world. Such false and anti-Semitic remarks are as offensive to Muslims as they are to others."

However, French President Jacques Chirac opposed the inclusion of these lines in the summit statement, and Greek Prime Minister Costas Simitis supported Chirac, Ha'aretz reported. According to a statement issued by the French Embassy in Israel, Chirac condemned Mahathir's remarks but considered the EU summit an inappropriate place to state this. French Embassy spokesman Pierre Filatoff told Agence France-Presse that "the EU rules did not allow such declarations (condemning anti-Semitism) to be integrated in such documents." Apparently, the leaders of most EU countries thought differently.

Thus, it was decided that the Italian presidency of the Council of the European Union would post a statement on its website, saying: "The EU deeply deplores the comments made earlier today by Dr. Mahathir in his speech at the opening of the 10th session of the Islamic Summit conference in Putrajaya, Malaysia....Such words hinder all our efforts to further inter-ethnic and religious harmony, and have absolutely no place in a tolerant world."

Chirac's Ambiguity Toward Jews Exposed

By now President Chirac had much reason to be satisfied. He had once again proven his friendship for the Islamic world. He vetoed the condemnation of one of their leaders in a major European Union meeting, and substituted instead an Italian statement on an EU website, as well as a statement by the French Embassy in Israel.

It was Mahathir's reaction, however, which exposed Chirac. The Malaysian prime minister thanked Chirac for blocking the EU summit declaration which intended to deplore his speech. The Malaysian daily The Star quoted Mahathir on Chirac: "I think he understands better. Anybody who reads the whole speech through will understand what I said. In fact, I was worried that the Muslims would be against me, but it was the Europeans who were against me. I can't understand them."

Chirac was now caught in a situation where he had to minimize the damage. Had he not reacted, this would have exposed him as condoning anti-Semitism and would have shown the statement of the French Embassy in Israel to be a minor, meaningless gesture toward the Jews.

.........
Press Reactions

The Western press reported extensively on the Mahathir affair. The New York Times wrote in an editorial: "Sympathy for the Muslims' plight must not be confused with the acceptance of racism. Most Muslims have indeed been shoddily treated - by their own leaders, who gather at feckless summit meetings instead of offering their people what they most need: human rights, education, and democracy. The European Union was asked to condemn Mr. Mahathir's speech in its statement yesterday ending its own summit. It chose not to, adding a concern that displays of anti-Semitism are being met with inexcusable nonchalance."

A few days later, the paper balanced these views with a column by Paul Krugman largely blaming the United States for the anti-Americanism in the Muslim world. Krugman called Mahathir's remarks "inexcusable," yet tried to explain them. Krugman was smarter than Mahathir. When he stated that Bush backs Sharon unconditionally, this is a much more elegant way of stating the fallacy that the Jews run the world by proxy.

Columnist Richard Cohen in the Washington Post referred to the standing ovation the summit's audience gave Mahathir for his speech: "Mahathir's claque included Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Abdullah, Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf, our guy in Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai, and even Russia's Vladimir Putin, representing his country's large Muslim minority....But what corrupts and enfeebles large parts of the Islamic world is not Jews in either New York or Tel Aviv but its own self-serving and inept leadership - in other words, some of the very people who stood and cheered the speech."

Singapore's Straits Times political editor Zuraidah Ibrahim commented on the speech: "To give it the kindest spin possible, one could say that he was only trying to rally Muslims to learn from the Jews as they seek to slough off the humiliation and oppression of centuries. That he was lauding the Jews for setting a positive example: they responded to persecution by using their brains, not just their brawn. But to leave it at that would be to gloss over his dangerous and irresponsible portrayal of Muslims as being in an epic confrontation against the Jews. The sad truth, however, is that it is a line one has heard said among Muslims. Must it be that way? Must Muslims view the world in such foreboding terms, of them versus us?...It is easy to reduce all of the world's problems to either Islamic terrorism or a Jewish conspiracy. But that doesn't mean it is right."

The French daily Le Monde wrote in an editorial that nobody had left the hall when Mahathir voiced his anti-Semitic comments. The author wondered why nobody had left and suggested: "Not out of courtesy for the host of this tenth summit. Not out of apathy. For a much more severe reason. Because the audience approved. Because such words are common currency in the Arab Islamic world where they pass for evident truth and are regularly uttered by government, the press - which is most often controlled - and teachers...and this direct form of racism, purely and simply is practiced as a normal category of the 'political debate' - which alas has penetrated some of our [French] suburbs." The paper concluded that Mahathir has allowed himself to announce peaceful means to fight against the "Jews." He should know that his speech nourishes terrorism.”

It is useful to know that after the speech, Hamid Karzai, the corrupt and oily man who is “taking a leadership role” in Afghanistan, his government propped up by the sacrifice of American lives and by billions of dollars supplied by American taxpayers, said he was deeply impressed by Mahathir Mohamad’s analysis of the situation of Muslims:

“It is great to hear Prime Minister Mahathir speak so eloquently on the problems of the ummah (Muslim world) and ways to remedy them,” Mr. Karzai said. “His speech was an eye-opener to a lot of us and that is what the Islamic world should do.”

"it is great to hear....Mahathir speak so openly on the problems...and ways to remedy them"

"an eye-opener..."

Our Man in Kabul.

Mahathir is just one of the numerous non-Western politicians who bristle at any 'racism'directed at their own ethnic group while also expressing prejudice towards minority groups in their own countries and of course,towards 'Europeans'. Whether or not Mahathir received the 'cold shoulder' in Canberra is irrelevant,since Australia is a Western country off shore of Asia, it's a convenient target.
Mahathir's attitudes are typical of so many Moslems,others are to blame for the backward and chaotic nature of Islamic societies;Jews,'Crusaders',neo-colonialism etc,never the Moslem ideology itself.

Wow - I'm nearly speechless and that's a big statement.

It really has become clear to me that being under the influence of Islam, shuts down any ability in a human to exercise critical thinking skills.

Our dhimmi politicians have lead Muslims to believe they will soon conquer the West. I believe that when push comes to shove, the men of the West will push back.

What we do in the next few years will cause our grandchildren to revere us. Or spit on our graves.

...and women had to be periodically beaten
...and infidels had to be periodically subjugated
...and Islam had to be periodically excused by PC morons
By the way, Ali Sina had a great article on how Islam inspired the Mafia. That makes sense, as the Arabs had conquered Sicily at one point (about 800 to 1240) and the it's obvious that the concept of protection money was derived from the dhimmi tax, or jizya.

We all know who this Mahathir is. This pig will fall down to kiss the feet of an arab while another arab screws his ass.
More importantly we should be boycotting all products made in malaysia. the idiots senior bush, the moron clinton, and the chimp bush junior have looked the other way as american companies, by the droves, have closed down business in the usa to set up shop in malaysia and indoneasia among others. Just don't buy their goods.

We all know who this Mahathir is. This pig will fall down to kiss the feet of an arab while another arab screws his ass.
More importantly we should be boycotting all products made in malaysia. the idiots senior bush, the moron clinton, and the chimp bush junior have looked the other way as american companies, by the droves, have closed down business in the usa to set up shop in malaysia and indoneasia among others. Just don't buy their goods.

Can you explain how is it that you believe muslims are so full of hate yet there has not been one suicide bombing in the UNITED STATES ever?

There are almost 10 million muslims in america and over 1 million illegals cross the border every year.

Plus despite the fact that we have killed millions of muslims in the last 8 years there has NOT BEEN ONE ATTACK?

Also do you not know that muslims believe in the TORAH and all the prophets?

Do you know that muslims are allowed to marry jews and christians?

Do you know that during the inquisition in spain when jews were being slaughtered they sought refuge in ISLAMIC nations.

Stop with the hate and wake up. It's really 2010, not 1BC. Islam has been around for 1000's of years. It has contributed greatly to society.

Actually Matathir has it more or less backwards, as one might expect.

It's actually Matathirs that have to be periodically massacred.

To judge by the evidence presented it would seem that we're overdue for a Matathir massacre.

The best defense is a good offense.

It seems you've been skipping your meds again. Anyway, its time to parachute you in to Mecca during the Hajj, with a kippot superglued to your head.

Thwe above post was aimed at jewnot4israel.

dumbledoresarmy | January 24, 2010 2:39 PM | Reply Apologies for a dreadful mixed metaphor.

"If people like Bolt can really get a handle on Islamic antisemitism - and start lifting the lid on it".

I should know better than to write something like that.

Actually, that metaphor wasn't that dreadful ;-)

Yeah, on one hand, it does seem to imply that Bolt should unleash Islamic anti-Semitism, but the way I read it, even the first time, was that Bolt should expose Islamic anti-Semitism (more precisely Judeophobia, since Islam ain't any more generous towards non-Semitic Judaism), and not let it remain concealed in its pan (note I didn't say 'veiled')

;-D

Manfred Gerstenfeld about Mahathir Mohamad’s antisemitic speech,the one he so famously delivered at the tenth summit of the O.I.C. ...His words were broadly applauded.

It's also important to note that that O.I.C. summit, and every O.I.C. summit, is attended by all the Muslim political and religious leaders of the Muslim world from the 57 countries -- including major clerics. Obviously, all the Muslim representatives of the world share Matahir's views.

The last dot to connect is. . . all Muslims. How long will it take before the still inchoate anti-Islam movement takes that one small step that remains a giant leap for Mankind?

At the risk of being labeled a 'conspiracy theorist' I'll admit that I do think there is a lot to be said for the notion that 9/11 was not perpetrated by the people that were identified in the media.

There are just too many things that don't add up: the fact that NORAD and ground-based defenses were magically circumvented, the fact that the buildings collapsed at all given that they were designed to withstand such attacks, and that they did so in a way that indicated controlled demolition, the immediate cleanup/destruction of evidence at the sites, the fact that one building collapsed that wasn't even struck, etc. Eyewitness accounts and film footage also provide a lot of evidence for controlled demolition.

The list of oddities is endless really, and anyone who chooses to close their eyes and say that other explanations for this event aren't possible, well...those people are guilty of the same sort of blind, willful ignorance we see with radical Islam.

I think the problem is more complex, and not just black and white. Jihad against the west has been around for decades, but in the past decade it has been exacerbated greatly by the unfortunate US tendency to promote its interests globally using military means. In essence, the radicalization we are now seeing is reactionary, and built upon failures by the US to respect the sovereignty of other nations.

But this is not an apology for Islamic fundamentalism. Not at all. In fact I think the public practice of Islam should be banned entirely in Western countries, as it simply is not compatible with democratic societies. The ideologies are too different, and the political, all-or-nothing non-negotiable nature of Islam means that there is no solution other than exclusion.

Bet a lot of Neo- Nazis and Muslims are saying amen to that.
He probably angered that nutty holocaust denying president
of Iran by stating that there was a HOLOCAUST.

At the risk of being labeled a 'conspiracy theorist' I'll admit that I do think there is a lot to be said for the notion that 9/11 was not perpetrated by the people that were identified in the media.

There are just too many things that don't add up: the fact that NORAD and ground-based defenses were magically circumvented, the fact that the buildings collapsed at all given that they were designed to withstand such attacks, and that they did so in a way that indicated controlled demolition, the immediate cleanup/destruction of evidence at the sites, the fact that one building collapsed that wasn't even struck, etc. Eyewitness accounts and film footage also provide a lot of evidence for controlled demolition.

The list of oddities is endless really, and anyone who chooses to close their eyes and say that other explanations for this event aren't possible, well...those people are guilty of the same sort of blind, willful ignorance we see with radical Islam.

I think the problem is more complex, and not just black and white. Jihad against the west has been around for decades, but in the past decade it has been exacerbated greatly by the unfortunate US tendency to promote its interests globally using military means. In essence, the radicalization we are now seeing is reactionary, and built upon failures by the US to respect the sovereignty of other nations.

But this is not an apology for Islamic fundamentalism. Not at all. In fact I think the public practice of Islam should be banned entirely in Western countries, as it simply is not compatible with democratic societies. The ideologies are too different, and the political, all-or-nothing non-negotiable nature of Islam means that there is no solution other than exclusion.

@Banislaminthewest.blogspot.com

Just a thought,,,
re 9/11:
if it's a conspiracy theory then how do you explain the attempt at bombing the WTC under Clinton? I wish someone could tell me...

How do you explain the fact that the terrorists haven't let up for a minute? I really am curious about this.

BTW the buildings were not designed to sustain an attack like this at all. It had never happened before.Who knew?

These were metal-framed buildings. Metal heats and weakens and collapses. Many buildings have a concrete core and if the WTC had a concrete core it would not have collapsed.

@ jewnot4israel
I doubt there are that many Muslims in the US.
Frankly, I think you are a troll.Most of your 'facts' are simply untrue.

Mahathir has unfortunatly found common cause with American fascist extrodinare Willis Carto's American Free Press.

Star writer for Carto's AFP, Michael Collins Piper met Mahathir, and sought his help in re opening the 911 investigation.

Piper has been described as the U.S. far-right's emissary to the Muslim world, devoting a great deal of attention to building ties between the neo-fascist far-right and Muslim anti-Zionists. He has worked particularly closely with former Malaysia PM Mahathir bin Mohamad and his chief aide Matthias Chang. Piper led a delegation of "9/11 truth" advocates to a Kuala Lumpur conference hosted by a foundation run by Mahathir and Chang. That conference, which nominally concerned Islamic culture, was devoted largely to bashing Jews and Israel.

There Piper continued to promote the line that the governments of Israel and/or the United States were behind 9/11.
http://adamholland.blogspot.com/2009/11/traficant-to-testify-for-demjanjuk_04.html

Gramfan said:

"if it's a conspiracy theory then how do you explain the attempt at bombing the WTC under Clinton? I wish someone could tell me...

How do you explain the fact that the terrorists haven't let up for a minute? I really am curious about this.

BTW the buildings were not designed to sustain an attack like this at all. It had never happened before.Who knew?

These were metal-framed buildings. Metal heats and weakens and collapses."
-----------------------------
I don't want to get bogged down in a silly debate, since you seem to lack logical reasoning ability.

But first, the fact that someone tried to bomb the WTC under clinton does not mean anything. It is a separate event.

Next, the fact that terrorist attacks are still happening (in the middle east) does not mean they were responsible for 9/11.

Finally, the buildings WERE designed with jetliner impacts in mind. The cores of these buildings were robust, and the temperature that the fires burned at would not have even come close to melting or compromising the frame. Even if the fires did, only a small area of the building would have been weakened, not the whole thing. Both fell straight down...this happens ONLY with controlled demolition.

9/11 conspiracies debunked by Popular Mechanics

9/11 conspiracies debunked by Popular Mechanics

You serious Jew_Lover?

Popular mechanics? Give me a break. Let's go get some real professional opinions:

http://www.ae911truth.org/

Gramfan:

After visiting the link I posted above for Jew_Lover, you might then want to see the videos posted here. Then come back and tell me again about how many structural engineers you know. If you don't buy what the professionals have to say, there is no point in saying any more.

http://www.youtube.com/ae911truth

UK to be hit with more 7/7-type attacks for generations: Muslim leader

http://in.news.yahoo.com/139/20100125/882/twl-uk-to-be-hit-with-more-7-7-type-atta.html

Britain could be exposed to more 7/7-style suicide bomb attacks for generations a senior Muslim advisor warned Monday.

The Daily Express quoted Iqbal Wahhab, a leading businessman and member of the -Ethnic Minority Advisory Group, as saying that a terrorist attack Britain was imminent.is warning comes after Home Secretary Alan Johnson raised the security alert from SDHp "substantial" to "severe" at the weekend.

Latest intelligence reports suggest that the Yemen-based Al Qaeda cells have trained female suicide bombers to attack the West.

"I'm sure there will be more suicide bombing because more and more people are being recruited all the time into these groups and they're getting more and more sophisticated in the way they operate," Wahhab said.

"There is a clear and present danger. It's not just scaremongering. I'm just being realistic. There could be another 7/7 next week," he added.

He claimed that high unemployment among Muslims was partly to blame for this threat.

"Politicians need to be talking to the right people. It's not just about photo calls with imams and community leaders at Downing Street. A lot of the policies get hatched by people in Whitehall who rarely go out and visit or SDHp experience what I've seen over the last two or three years, which is a completely different picture," Wahhab said.

Wahhab, who runs London's Roast restaurant, said ministers should do more to get young Muslims to go into business.

ISLAM IT THE RELIGION OF PEACE FOR EXCELLENCE,WE KILL PERIODICALLY SOME JEWS AND CHRISTIANS AND WE BURN TOO SOME CHURCHS(NOT ALL CHURCHS BECAUSE WE ARE PEACEFUL PEOPLE) ITS NT IMPORTANT CAUSE THEY ARE INFIDELS,AND WE RE ORDERED TO DO THAT BY OUR HOLY PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PEACE BE UPON HIM).PLEASE I HAVE A QUESTION:HOW MANY INFIDELS I MUST TO KILL TO GET MY 72 VIRGINS?SOMEBODY CAN RESPOND ME PLEASE?.

ISLAM IT THE RELIGION OF PEACE FOR EXCELLENCE,WE KILL PERIODICALLY SOME JEWS AND CHRISTIANS AND WE BURN TOO SOME CHURCHS(NOT ALL CHURCHS BECAUSE WE ARE PEACEFUL PEOPLE) ITS NT IMPORTANT CAUSE THEY ARE INFIDELS,AND WE RE ORDERED TO DO THAT BY OUR HOLY PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PEACE BE UPON HIM).PLEASE I HAVE A QUESTION:HOW MANY INFIDELS I MUST TO KILL TO GET MY 72 VIRGINS?SOMEBODY CAN RESPOND ME PLEASE?.

"Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which
hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of truth, from
among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission and feel
themselves subdues". 9:29(HOLY)

"Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which
hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of truth, from
among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission and feel
themselves subdues". 9:29(HOLY)

One of my favorite articles written by an anti-Bush, anti-Republican author in Rolling Stone blasting 9/11 conspiracies...

Why the "9/11 Truth" movement makes the "Left Behind" sci-fi series read like Shakespeare

loup garou,

More please! Tell us how Islam guides your understanding of what to do with infidels.

What does your imam say you should do with infidels?

What did your parents teach you about infidels?

What kind of school did you attend? Do they teach you about what to do with infidels? Out loud? Or just with a wink and a nod?

When you write to "Dear Imam" and ask him how many infidels you need to kill in order to gain Jannat, what does he say?

Who is the perfect example of how to treat infidels, in your eyes?

Thank you so much for sharing your beliefs with us!