FDI CPAC event: "The single most important event of this three-day conference"

cpac-fdi2-018.jpg


Here is a fine article on our FDI event at CPAC -- a sharp contrast to the shoddy and biased Fox report. "CPAC Day 2 - Jihad: The Political Third Rail," by Mark J. Koenig at the NewsRealblog, February 20:

(All photos provided courtesy of Pamela Geller - see her coverage of this event here)

While the agenda for day 2 of the CPAC conference featured a long list of additional conservative speakers and panel discussions, I will be focusing here on what I believe to be the single most important event of this three-day conference. Jihad: The Political Third Rail, was a panel discussion presented by Freedom Defense Initiative, a new activist organization started by Pamela Geller of atlasshrugs.com, and the Freedom Center's own Robert Spencer, who runs jihadwatch.org.

This panel featured several American and international resistance fighters working to stop the spread of Islamic supremacism and most importantly, America's infiltration by Muslim sympathizers. The central focus of the event was the Islamic jihad against the West and how Islamic organizations are working to silence free speech both in Europe and America. Security was very tight for this event, and it drew a standing-room only crowd, as you can see in the photo below.

house.jpg

Pamela Geller started the discussion while video was shown of Muslim radicals rioting in multiple cities across Europe and North America over the past couple of years. She pointed out that this is not being reported in the major media, and that fully TWO THIRDS of the jihad attacks since 9-11 happened in 2009. As Pamela stated, there is a cover-up in progress and "Truth has become the new hate speech."

First to speak was Wafa Sultan, author of A God Who Hates, and one of three witnesses approved to testify for Geert Wilders in his hate speech trial. Ms. Sultan is a former Muslim and outspoken critic of Islam. She stated that she has had countless fatwas issued against her. After listing several recent jihadist attacks, including the Fort Hood massacre and the media's unwillingness to connect the dots, she asked: "Jihad - is this a word we dare not speak?" Sultan pointed out that Islam is not merely a religion - it is a dangerous totalitarian political ideology.

After pointing out that President Obama has appointed a special envoy to the OIC, Sultan explained that this envoy is closely associated with the Muslim Brotherhood. She asked: "Is this man's loyalty to Islam or to the U.S.?" She explained as well that this envoy has been working for some time now to stifle speech critical of Islam.

Body scanners were her next topic. Sultan stated that she believes this machine could be employed against Muslim radicals as a powerful psychological weapon because of its potential for humiliation. It should be noted that Sultan is trained as a psychiatrist. Unfortunately, she stated, after a fatwa was issued claiming these scanners violate Muslim teachings regarding modesty, our TSA agreed to capitulate and substitute pat-downs by members of the same sex for Muslims.

Finally, Sultan explained that Saudi Arabia is a mastermind of Islamic terror, and that Saudi King Abdullah has the power to enforce changes in Muslim behavior if he is brought under enough pressure from the U.S. government. "September 11th was tragic, but infiltration of Islam is a subject of equal concern" she said. "We must fight it."

Robert Spencer introduced the next speaker - Stephen Coughlin - a former Pentagon Islamic law specialist who was fired from his job for his analysis of Islamic infiltration. Coughlin provided a clear and cogent analysis of the Islamic threat. He explained that the question of whether or not these terrorists are following 'true' Islam is irrelevant from a fact-driven perspective. They have repeatedly told us these are the reasons they fight jihad.

A vital part of Coughlin's discussion dealt with the doctrine of abrogation within Islam. This doctrine states that Mohammed was given progressive revelation of Allah's will, and that the later Koranic verses supersede and nullify earlier contradictory more peaceful verses. This is something that is recognized by all schools of Islamic jurisprudence. Coughlin also demonstrated that since the 9-11 commission report, political correctness has expunged words such as Muslim, enemy, Al-Qaeda and Islam from official government documents including the Ft. Hood massacre report. Coughlin: "The 9-11 commission has been completely undermined. You cannot defeat an enemy you are not allowed to define. By definition, this administration has no strategy to defeat this enemy since they refuse to define it."...

Read it all.

| 25 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

25 Comments

| Leave a comment

"...Sultan explained that this envoy is closely associated with the Muslim Brotherhood. She asked: "Is this man's loyalty to Islam or to the U.S.?"

Answer: Islam.

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)
also available in French intro+Chapter 1 so far
‘Le Guide Politiquement Incorrect de l'Islam’ disponible en Français intro+chapitre 1
don' t hesitate to share this with your french speaking friends using social networks buttons available on the website or email share options.
http://www.avraidire.eu/category/islam/robert-spencer-islam/le-guide-politiquement-incorrect-de-lislam-robert-spencer-islam-islam/

"Unfortunately, she stated, after a fatwa was issued claiming these scanners violate Muslim teachings regarding modesty, our TSA agreed to capitulate and substitute pat-downs by members of the same sex for Muslims."

It's unbelievable. They get concessions because they're Muslims. The people who attacked us and massacred 3,000 of our citizens on 9/11.

The West has truly gone insane and is suicidal.

Indeed. For, as Organization of the Islamic Conference Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu declared at Columbia University on Sept. 18, 2008,

The Muslim Ummah, means the 'community of the faithful'. It is a unique bond that has no similar example under any other political or religious system in the world. It is a belonging to ideals which bring Muslims together in an eternal brotherhood lock which transcends all other consideration of allegiance or loyalties or barriers of nationhood, ethnicity, geography or language.

More on the FDI CPAC event here.

Very good.

But we gotta attract the next generation to make this happen. The people in the picture above don't look like they will strike fear in the hearts of our enemies.....

Very soon we will have security measures that will apply only to Infidels.

Muslims, the very ones that are the cause of these very expensive measures will be exempt. Why? Because Islam is the RoP, everyone in State Dept, White House, Pentagon, Foreign Office, and the EU, says so. One of the few Muslims who disagree are Qatada, and possibly Chaudary.

Besides, questioning the integrity of Muslims is Islamophobic, therefore security measures should not be applied to Muslims.

Whatever. The real problem is the demographic growth of Muslims in the West. If these absurd security measures makes us realize, that it is better for all, that Muslims live in countries where their customs are acceptable, then it wont be such a bad idea. While Muslims are here in the West, it is clear that they find our customs offensive, just as we find their customs deeply offensive.

Are we 'on to' FOX yet? Those 'Unofficial' Islamophobes are doing a great job...keep it up...The enemies of freedom are getting nervous...

The media is absolutely in the bag for the left and islam.
If they curtail our freedom on the web, I guess we will have to go back to mail.
I wonder how much a satellite channel would cost?

By definition, this administration has no strategy to defeat this enemy since they refuse to define it."...

A slight correction. "the former administration had no . . ." The current administration is adding and abetting the enemy.

We could try and guess on the motives behind this from nativity to willful collusion. I am leaning toward collusion because like Islam spokesman every time the President or one of his officials says anything it is a lie in one form or another. He (Obama) also cleverly structures his arguments with red herrings, straw-men and false assumptions. Just like our friends of Mohammad.

If is quacks like a duck, good guess is that it is a duck.

"....our TSA agreed to capitulate and substitute pat-downs by members of the same sex for Muslims"

I am having trouble finding a reference online to this alleged decision by the TSA. Lots of fatwas (yawn) but no evidence of TSA making that policy.

Does anyone have a link?

Body scanners were her next topic. Sultan stated that she believes this machine could be employed against Muslim radicals as a powerful psychological weapon because of its potential for humiliation. It should be noted that Sultan is trained as a psychiatrist."

Wafa Sultan who grew up in Syria, as a Muslim, amid other Muslims, and who has had the benefit of psychiatric training and of her long meditation, on her own, of how Islam works on the minds of its adherents. Indeed, this highly intelligent and supremely articulate lady has been pondering the matter for all of her adult life. And when she came to America, she learned more about Infidels, but also about the ways that Islam continues to maintain its hold on those who live within Infidel societies, and receive every kindness, and yet continue to adhere to a murderous hatred. In one talk she gave, she called that a Syrian boy of her acquiantance had finally been made an American citizen. She congratulated him on this, and was startled to find that he, instead of accepting her congratulations, launched into a tirade against the Americans and made a motion, with his shoe (as I remember) as a way to show his contempt for Americans, those Americans who were now his fellow citizens.

John Brennan, Janet Napolitano, Barack Obama, and others in this administration show that they do not understand the psychology of Muslims. It has been studied, studied by Andre Servier, and by many others -- Snouck Hurgronje, for example, or Arthur Jeffrey, almost en passant in their comments on Muslim peoples. Many non-Muslims who have endured life within Muslim-ruled polities have left ample testimonies as to how Muslims think. Many former Muslims, raised up in societies suffused with Islam, who are now apostates, including Ayaan Hirsi Ali (see "Infidel") and Nonie Darwish and Magdi Allam and many others, have all written, written keenly and perceptibly, about Muslim supremacism and Muslim triumphalism, and about the need for Infidels not to give in, not to allow Muslims to continue to swagger about, but to press home on the very matters that, in their minds and hearts (that cannot be "won" in the way the Administration thinks, but in a completely different way), they know: they know their own technological backwardness, for example, but are unable to connect that technological backwardness to a greater problem, the stunting of mental growth, and of the spirit of questioning and skepticism without which science (as opposed to mere technology, which in the end relies on scientific inquiry) cannot be pursued for long, or well.

And what is it Wafa Sultan says about those scanners? She says they will "humiliate" Muslims. And therefore, she says, they are a good thing, and not a bad thing. It is important that Muslims at every step be forced to confront their own misfittedness, and the things which they themselves have caused. If they don't like the scanners, tant pis -- the planes are a Western invention, all of modern aviation is a Western invention. Muhammad did not fly. Muhammad was the Perfect Man, al-insan al-kamil. Muslims can transport themselves as he did, if they so wish. And if they do not so wish, they will have to accept the scanners that we, all over the world, are now forced to endure because of Muslim texts, Muslim attitudes, Muslim behavior.

Why is it Wafa Sultan, who grew up in the world of Islam, thinks so very differently from Brennan and company? And why is it all those, without exception, who have left Islam, or who have studied Islam and are not, whether out of venality (Esposito) or unquenchable stupidity (Armstrong) become apologists for Islam, all agree on thiis point, that is agree that Muslims need to be confronted with our awareness of the connection between Islam and their own failures, some of which failures they themselves recognize? Bring on those scanners. And if Muslims don't like it, do not make exceptions for them. Go out of your way never to give in to their demands. Never.

Doesn't Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal own something like a 7 percent stake in the Fox News Corporation? Don't the 'Vahabis' have a say in the news vis-a-vis Islam?

"the former administration.....(AIDED and abetted the enemy) . . ." The current administration is adding and abetting the enemy (and then some!).

"Very soon we will have security measures that will apply only to Infidels."

The poster above had one meaning in mind: that scanners and other devices, made necessary by threats (and acts) of Muslim terrorists, acting on the Qur'anic injunction to "strike terror" into the hearts of Unbelievers, will be used with Infidels,but Muslims will be able to claim that they should be "exempt" for "religious reasons," and among those "reasons" is apparently the idea of a too-intrusive investigation of the body that will, you see, "humiliate" Muslims. We, all over the world, who have been forced to spend an extra hour or two in every airport -- the loss in man-hours alone must be in tens of millions, and the cost to Infidels, in lost productivity, tens or hundreds of billiins, all because of Muslims using terrorism as their preferred instrument of Jihad -- will however have to endure these searches, unpleasant -- let's fact it - as they are.

But "DP"'s sentence -- "Very soon we will have security measures that will apply only to Infidels" -- can be interpreted in another way as well, also giving a true result. We, the Infidels, are the ones who need protection if we speak truthfully about Islam. It is Geert Wilders who must travel everywhere with bodyguards, and it is those such as Wafa Sultan and Ayaan Hirsi Ali who, as articulate ex-Muslims willing to speak out, who must do the same.

And Tariq Ramadan? He can travel up and down the Infidel world, presenting his hissing apologetics for Islam (and occasionallty allowing the mask to slip, as when he exclaimed "it's all over, it's all over" -- meaning, as the tape clearly showed, he meant that "we Muslims are in Europe to stay, and you European Infidels can do nothing about it." we Muslijmswithout a care in the world. His sinister triumphalism was on display.

Yes, he can travel anywhere, withoug bodyguards or worry, while those who are like Geert Wilders must be guarded day and night.

Something is not right.

Something here is not right.

"Why is it Wafa Sultan, who grew up in the world of Islam, thinks so very differently from Brennan and company?" from a poster above.

Why is it that Barak Obama, who grew up in the world of Islam, thinks so very similarly to Brennan and company?

I still am seeking a link regarding the TSA exemption for Muslims. Until we have that, it seems that point remains merely rumour.

"Something is not right.

Something here is not right."

Well, yeah - the 7th century AD Islamic Barbarians are taking over the West due to Political Correctness.

That's not right. Why don't we just let the Fascists and Nazis take over?

In vancouver, British Columbia, Muslim community leaders recently objected to dogs being used to sniff out bombs in public venues. Though the attached link does not mention more than one of the stated reasons (dogs are haram for most Muslims and it would be an "imposition" for Muslims who might be on their way to sala'at and who would be then forced to return to home to re-do the wudu ablutions is the reason that one source stated) it is "interesting" that any credence would be given to this complaint. Security should be the main concern, not some citizens' superstitious habits.

http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Explosive+sniffing+dogs+patrol+Metro+Vancouver+transit+system/2327023/story.html

The request to use females to pat down females makes sense. This is what Israeli security personnel do. It's also the practice in most law enforcement communities.

"Something is not right.

Something here is not right."
**********

It's absolutely mind -boggling, it's as if the majority, not all, have swallowed the koolaid and aren't even aware that it happened.

The rest of us, being unaffected are able to see the effects of the poison quite clearly, but the victims are refusing the anti-dote.

Darcy wrote:

"Unfortunately, she stated, after a fatwa was issued claiming these scanners violate Muslim teachings regarding modesty, our TSA agreed to capitulate and substitute pat-downs by members of the same sex for Muslims."

It's unbelievable. They get concessions because they're Muslims. The people who attacked us and massacred 3,000 of our citizens on 9/11.
.........................

I agree, Darcy—the very people who necessitated these intrusive security measures will be exempt from them. just madness.

Yes, Darcy, we, the civilized ones, have gone collectively mad. Political correctness at its worst makes everybody go mad. Watch the Muslim youth snigger as a European woman goes through the full body scanner, while he waits to be hand-patted by, most probably, a Muslim custom operator. All the while with explosives in his anal passages. Absurd? No, it will happen.

Frankly, regarding your other comment, I would far rather live under the good old Fascists or even Nazis in preference to living under Islam. Which we will all soon have to, if things continue the way they are.

'Something is definitely not right' and hasn't been for a long, long time. The question is what can we, the normal, right thinking people, do to make things right again?

"I agree, Darcy—the very people who necessitated these intrusive security measures will be exempt from them. Just madness."

The insanity is colossal.

I'll never understand how the Barbarians attack us, and we submit.

Why is it that the rank and file in the military do not know what they are placing their lives on the line for. In WWII,Korea,Viet-Nam they were told,or is it to P.C. to say ISLAMIC Terrorists????

JOIN WWW.ACTFORAMERICA.ORG
Help their full time lobbyist to defend against radical Islam. The more members the more power the lobbyist will have. it is free to join and takes only a minute.
www.actforamerica.org

Seems like FDI is the only activist group that is really single-focused in the war against the the spread of islam. Let's hope that it continues to grow and flourish.

Eliza....I do not understand what you mean in..."seems like"....read the comment right before yours.....

FYI...ACT has 80,000 members and 375 chapters nationwide "in the war against the spread of Islam" and more ACT's overseas. I heard that two of the local chapters alone had meetings of 400 people apiece last week.... ACT is already "grown"...already "flourishing"....You can get in the fight on the front lines right now with the largest grassroots "activist" national security organization in America!

Check out the ACT promotional video:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gk4E-B5LDkw

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter