Will the Islamophobia never end?
But seriously, how could King's College allow this? Has multiculturalism and political correctness rotted their judgment to such a degree that a Muslim preacher can say anything and do anything and still receive their approval? Or are they themselves antisemitic enough -- as Leftists increasingly tend to be -- to wink at this?
"Islamic preacher who called Jews 'filth' to speak at London university," by Felix Allen for the London Evening Standard, February 25 (thanks to Paul):
A London university has been condemned for inviting an Islamic preacher with anti-Semitic and homophobic views to give a lecture to students.Sheikh Abdullah Hakim Quick is due to speak at King's College's Strand campus at six tonight.
Peter Tatchell, of pressure group Outrage, accused university bosses of cowardice and "complicity with fundamentalism" by giving the preacher a public platform.
Sheikh Quick has denounced the "filth" of Jews and once gave a televised lecture in which he said the Islamic position on homosexuality is "death".
He added: "Muslims are going to have to take a stand [against homosexuals] and it's not enough to call names."
He is due to give a talk on the environment in an event organised by the University of London Union Islamic Society for its Green Week campaign.....
He's going to talk on the environment. Is that some sort of code word for jihad? Will the advent of Sharia reduce global warming? No, it will just increase global warmongering.
"Has multiculturalism and political correctness rotted their judgment to such a degree that a Muslim preacher can say anything and do anything and still receive their approval?"
Yes.
I now understand how the Nazis managed to mass-murder six million Jews, plus gypsies, homosexuals, and the disabled.
"Never again?" - Yeah, right. IT'S HAPPENING AGAIN. RIGHT NOW. Muslims are the new Nazis.
He added: "Muslims are going to have to take a stand [against homosexuals] and it's not enough to call names."
Naaaaah!
Infidels are going to have to take a stand against islam and it's not enough to call names.
FIXED!
"Or are they themselves antisemitic enough -- as Leftists increasingly tend to be -- to wink at this?
I think your question is rhetorical, but yes, that is exactly what the problem is. And it's frightening.
Muslims in Britain already are taking a stand against homosexuals, and it goes way beyond calling names. There is a growing campaign of vicious attacks on gays by feral packs of Muslims: http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/01/violent-muslim-homophobia-jihad-against.html
"feral packs of Muslims"
Oh, they're feral allright - wild animals. 100% uncivilized humans. Why? Islam makes them so.
Britannia, wake up. You have beasts among you who would like nothing more than to devour you.
Geert Wilders...banned in Britain.
Doctor Michael Savage...banned in Britain.
Filthy scumbag liar for islam? Welcomed with open arms for fear of insulting islam.
Appeasement...feeding the Crocodile in hopes that it will eat the appeaser last. Morons...
islam is a lie and
Truth is killing it.
Is Britain really on the way to its end? It certainly sounds like it. How many dead Brits will there be in the final conflict ... and what will be the new Ummah-friendly name?
By the way... anyone want to take bets on the total number of months remaining?
Good point about the contrast there, AlaskanInfidel---it's truly hard to spin it as anything else other than craven appeasement.
HAKIM! (Quick(ly) Sheikh) from Abdu(nose) his own...
HAKIM! (Sheikh Quick(ly) faster now) Abdu(nose) is...
HAKIM! (Quick! Get a handker(Sheikh)) - Abdullah nose "filthy".
HAKIM!
Hakim was Quick(ly) Sheikh(en) while in Abdullah(hood) ?
Let me get this right. Britain bans Geert Wilders from stepping foot on British soil; but this guy is allowed to lecture at a university?
It seems that the man should be banned from speaking (and this due to Britains laws regarding hate speech alone)due to his ugly track record.
Here is something I posted regarding preaching and teaching hate at a famous London mosque"
These are some excellent clips, from London, of how a very large and influential "British" mosque spreads hatred:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6a-YgZgwQ8&feature=related
If you look for "undercover mosque" on YouTube, you can actually find more clips with even MORE hateful remarks. Trust me.
Listen to this liar practice al-taqiyya, explaining words plainly stated are not what they mean, taken out-of-context, etc. etc. etc. ad nauseum.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cCnJsqHDuo
In Britain, the dhimmi police actually tried to shut the documentary down, accusing the journalists of sundry crimes and misdemeanors.
Watch Grand Dhimmi George Gallway attempt to squeeze the producers of this documentary:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiPonzAslFQ&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whRaYuDRC_0&feature=related
Thank God the police effort was quashed. Tragic that, in an allegedly free country, people can exert pressure to destroy others' freedom of expression and right to have information presented them.
After persecuting the journalists, bringing false accusations against them in what was obviousely an attempt to shut them up, THEN, after being served their asses on a platter, the police APOLOGIZED:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuW2NMO_EgI
FROm the article: "He is due to give a talk on the environment in an event organised by the University of London Union Islamic Society for its Green Week campaign".
A Muslim, talking about *the environment*???
Cognitive dissonance alert.
*Everywhere* that Islam has gone it has produced not only moral, spiritual, social, intellectual and political collapse, but *also* agricultural and *ecological* collapse on a scale that is truly terrifying.
John Quincy Adams said of Mohammed that he had spread "desolation and delusion" and he (JQA) is right.
Just read James Parkes' book 'Whose Land?' or Lowdermilk's 'Palestine: Land of Promise'; the latter has some very telling discussions of the abundant archaeological and geological - yes, geological - evidence of massive environmental collapse (deforestation, shockingly high soil erosion, depopulation, desertion of villages, destruction of terracing) following immediately upon the Muslim takeover of the land of Israel and continuing, growing only worse and worse, throughout the entire period of the Muslim occupation (there was a brief respite during the time of the Latin Crusader Kingdoms, during which population and productivity increased rather than decreasing, only to resume the downward slide the moment the Muslims took over again).
Dr A Carlebach summed it up decisively in his article in Ma'ariv, October 7 1955, on the deadly legacy of Islam:
"You can talk 'business' with everyone, and even with the devil. But not with Allah...This is what every grain in this country shouts.
" There were many great cultures here, and invaders of all kinds. All of them -- even the Crusaders -- left signs of culture and blossoming.
"*But on the path of Islam, even the trees have died*".
Not coincidentally, I recall reading, in one of the historical sources compiled within Bostom's 'Legacy of Jihad', a description of Muslim armies cutting down *whole forests* in India in order to extract from the shelter of the trees, and torturously murder by impalement, the human beings who had fled there to hide.
And I recall an article which stated that the rapacious Ottoman Empire, in the Levant, imposed a 'tree tax'. Peasants had to pay a tax for every tree on their property; and peasants being peasants, and the tax being (as always, under the Ottomans and in every Muslim land) ruinously extortionate, the peasants simply *cut down all the trees and refused to plant any more* (whether fruit trees, shade trees, shelter trees, or timber trees)...with dismally predictable results.
There are works one can consult, that describe in relentless detail the devastating effects of the Muslim occupations of 1. North Africa 2. Iberia 3. the Balkans and 4. Asia Minor, now known as 'Turkey', upon what one would today loosely call 'the environment'.
Islam is anti-life. It hates and destroys not only human life but *all* life.
Not many people in the world are contemplating a "final solution" to the muslim problem,muslims already have such plans for us nevertheless.
Modern islamic worldview: Reality is a jewish conspiracy
95% of Pakistani truckers have sex with boys: http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/02/pakistani-truckers-do-it-with-boys.html
Apparently it isn't classed as homosexuality if one of the partners is a beardless boy, because being beardless makes them 'female'.
Presumably, the UAF and SWP will be out mob handed to oppose this homophobic anti-Jewish bigot?
No? Why's that?
Islam regards it as meritorious to kill salamanders:
Killing salamanders by hand
Is it correct to kill salamanders by hand? Is it proven that there is reward for killing them?
Praise be to Allaah.
Killing salamanders is prescribed because there is a great deal of evidence to that effect. It should be done with a tool or implement, etc. There is nothing in the reports to specify that they should be killed by hand or to encourage killing them by hand. I do not think that this is correct and there is no report to this effect. That is alien to Islamic teaching and good characteristics.
In al-Saheehayn and elsewhere it is narrated via Sa’eed ibn al-Musayyib that Um Shareek told him that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) told her to kill salamanders. According to the report narrated by al-Bukhaari, he said: “It (the salamander) used to blow on Ibraaheem, peace be upon him.”
In Saheeh Muslim it is narrated via ‘Abd al-Razzaaq, Mu’ammar told us from al-Zuhri from ‘Aamir ibn Sa’d from his father that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said enjoined the killing of salamanders and called them mischief doers.
Killing salamanders with one blow brings more reward than killing them with two blows. This was narrated in Saheeh Muslim via Khaalid ibn ‘Abd-Allaah from Suhayl ibn Abi Saalih from his father from Abu Hurayrah, that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever kills a salamander with one blow will have such and such hasanah (good deeds); whoever kills it with the second blow will have such and such hasanah, less than the first; and whoever kills it with three blows will have such and such hasanah – less that the second.”
Shaykh Sulaymaan al-‘Alwaan.
Ibn Maajah (may Allaah have mercy on him) narrated in his Sunan from Saa’ibah the slave woman of al-Faakih ibn al-Mugheerah that she entered upon ‘Aa’ishah and saw a spear sitting there in her house. She said, “O Mother of the Believers, what do you do with this?” She said, “We kill these salamanders with it, because the Prophet of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) told us that when Ibraaheem was thrown into the fire, there was no animal on earth but it tried to extinguish the fire, except for the salamander, which was blowing on the fire (to keep it burning). So the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) commanded that they should be killed.”
(Sunan Ibn Maajah, 3222. He said in al-Zawaa’id, the isnaad of ‘Aa’ishah’s hadeeth is saheeh, its men are thiqaat (trustworthy)
And Allaah knows best.
Islam Q&A
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid
Here's the source of the salamander information.
This is so bizarre that one would think only an "Islamophobe" could have come up with it.
http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/13821
The same website also offers advice about how to reply to a parrot!
"In my grandfather's house there is a real live parrot, and when I pass by it, it greets me and says ‘al-salaamu ‘alaykum”. In this case do I have to return the greeting of this bird?."
http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/140497
islam degrades the 21st century environment of the western democratic world.
Let's clean up the environment before the stench ovecomes us all.
University of London Union Islamic Society Green Week Campaign? I think that they expect us to believe that "green" refers to environmental benefit whereas the true reference is to the green flag of Islamic Jihad.
Their web site has a link to a handy shopping list (in their terms a boycott list) http://p.b5z.net/i/u/6138135/i/boycott-leaflet-a4-ramadan-campaign.pdf.
It's interesting that they have done so much research to decide that Wonderbra, Victoria's Secret, Playtex, Gossard and Lovable are Haraam. I thought that the Somali Al-Shabaab brothers had already decided that all bras were forbidden because they were a deception, having much fun in asking women passing checkpoints to demonstrate their submission by jumping up and down.
The forbidden list also advertises a website purporting to explain how companies on the list support Israel http://inminds.co.uk/boycott-israel.htm - this is for a company "Innovative Minds" that claims to be a software developer but seems more active in hosting the boycott material, in distributing islamic content CD-Roms and in offering to write web pages for like minded organisations. Where did they get the "Innovative" tag ? I suppose that as long as they confine their innovation to matters other than Islam it will not be bid'ah.
The environment? Is this guy a scientist? No doubt he'll heat up the planet with all the poisonous hot air he'll be spewing. Give me a break!
As IF you care!
But not quite filthy enough apparently for Muhammad to have completely stolen Judaic Halachic Law in 7th Century Arabia and claim it as his own (in the process making it truly filthy when it wasn't before)..
Muslim 'men' dressing like women and waving daggers over their heads calling Jews filthy ? Not that's rich !