Islamic scholars (and Hamas-linked CAIR) say airport body scanners violate teachings of Islam

The Fiqh Council of North America (FCNA) is affiliated with ISNA, which is a Muslim Brotherhood group. The Brotherhood is dedicated in its own words to "eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within." The FCNA issued a flimsy, loophole-ridden condemnation of terrorism several years ago. And CAIR, of course, is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case -- so named by the Justice Department. CAIR operatives have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR's cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Honest Ibe Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements.

And so now these groups say that body scanners are un-Islamic. Very well. There may be plenty of reasons to oppose body scanners, but when they put it this way, they suggest they'd be just fine with some sort of exemption from such scanning for Muslims. That would mean that the one group that would be subjected to lighter airport security checks than any other group would be...Muslims. And that would in turn make things easier than ever for jihad terrorists. Surely that can't be the objective of the FCNA and CAIR, now, can it?

"Airport Body Scanners Violate the Teachings of Islam, Says Muslim Group," by Susan Jones for CNSNews.com, February 11 (thanks to all who sent this in):

(CNSNews.com) - A group of Muslim scholars says it supports airline safety, but it is "deeply concerned" about the use of airport scanners that show nude images of the human body.

"The Fiqh Council of North America (FCNA) emphasizes that a general and public use of such scanners is against the teachings of Islam, natural law and all religions and cultures that stand for decency and modesty," the group said in a Feb. 10 statement posted at Islam Online.

"It is a violation of clear Islamic teachings that men or women be seen naked by other men and women," FCNA explained. The group noted that Islam emphasizes modesty, considering it part of the faith. "The Qur'an has commanded the believers, both men and women, to cover their private parts" and to be modest in their dress.

While exceptions can be made in cases of "extreme necessity," FCNA indicated that passenger body scans do not rise to that level.

FCNA is asking for changes in scanner software so the machines will produce only body outlines. In the meantime, the group says Muslim travelers should choose pat-down searches over scanner images - in cases where searches are necessary.

The Fiqh Council of North America is an affiliate of the Islamic Society of North America, which advises and educates its members and officials "on matters related to the application of Shari'ah (Islamic law) in their individual and collective lives in the North American environment."

The Council on American-Islamic Relations also issued a news release on Wednesday, endorsing FCNA's statement on the use of body scanners.

| 46 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

46 Comments

| Leave a comment

Is a pat down search going to find surgically implanted bombs that Muslim doctors can now do?
Is a pat down search going to find explosives packed up their *ss?
Is a pat down search going to find bombs inserted in their vaginas?

Profile Muslims or Die - Can't Get Much Simpler Than This

OK, so let me see....At the airport and other places:

Muslims are exempt from the full body scanners for religious reasons

Muslims will not be patted down for religious reasons

Muslims will not be wanded for religious reasons

Muslims do not have to remove their shoes for religious reasons

Muslims will be escorted to bypass those smelly infidel waiting lines for religious reasons

Muslims will not be patted down for religious reasons

Muslim baggage will not be scanned under any circumstances for religious reasons

The Air Force will provide jet service for Muslims for religious reasons. A special prayer compartment for 10 occupants will be provided and only Halal food will be served at all US airport restaurants

Foot baths will be installed in all public restrooms for religious reasons

Barry promises to pass a blasphemy law with mandatory stiff civil sentences

Is there anything else we can provide for our Muslim masters?

We keep hearing the old cliche about killing one human being is like killing all of mankind.All this talk about
suicide bombing being UN-Islamic,yet Muslims are carrying out these acts on a daily basis.
If body scanning is UN-Islamic,don't use them in Muslim run countries.On the other Muslim organisations shouldn't be dictating on security matters to non-Muslim countries.The
reason for all these extreme security measures in the first
place is because of acts of violence by Muslims.Governments
have a duty to protect their citizens.

How 'bout this?

We stand them all in a line out in front of God and everybody and one-by-one break open like a shotgun each and every Muslim and Muslima who wants to get on any sort of mass transportation device and look until we find that for which we are searching.

And anyone who bitches about it goes through thrice.

A group of Muslim scholars says it supports airline safety, but it is "deeply concerned" about the use of airport scanners that show nude images of the human body...

I knew that was coming...I suppose you don't have to be religious to object to having your 'private parts' put on display, but it helps...A pat down might be ok until you come to the underwear and bra...Are they going to pat those down as well? 'Drop em'...'bend over'...Allah would roll over in his grave...if he had one...My idea of 'Pig Airline' is looking more attractive all the time...You can fly Pig and you don't have to get naked first...

You are right.

If Islam is to be given respect, then Muslims must be exempt from security measures.

We are heading towards a logical inconsistency. The minds of the PC and multicultis are going to explode trying to reconcile security with Islam.

For religious reasons that conflict with Western values, Islam has no business in western business. . .period.

Too obvious - let 'em saddle up the ol' camels then.

Yet another reason for a new airline: "No-Mo Air" - they'll serve pork rinds rather than chips, etc.

"A group of Muslim scholars says it supports airline safety..."

I should think everyone in the world supports airline safety, just as everyone supports good brakes on cars.
Even muslim suicide murderers do: the safer the airline the greater the effect when that security is breached.

"but..." and it's a big butt(!) they want to be seen as special and therefore exempt from intelligent precautionary measures. They are already special -their ideology throughout the world kills on a regular daily basis.

They will just have to give up flying.

#1 Muslims blow up infidels as per the teachings of Islam.

#2 Muslims object to the infidels attempt to thwart #1 because that violates the teachings of Islam.

#3 Got to #1.

Got it.

Well fine then, let's forget the body scanner and just profile.

Profile, profile and profile again. Simple.

None force them to use a plane....the problem is solved they don't travel by plane so they don't have to pass through the scanners...

This could be the solution, body scanners are against Islam, no Muslim can go through the scanner, ALL passengers must be scanned, therefore NO Muslims can fly, equals Islamic terrorism on airplanes problem solved, except that they would sneak bombs on board if they were involved with freight companies or had any other access to the planes. So perhaps scanning will be required for everyone getting near a plane and all freight scanned as well. Or, just don't allow Islam in the West, that would really be the best solution for all concerned. The West will bankrupt itself trying to avoid Jihad attacks and it will inconvenience itself submitting to outrageous examinations and all sorts of privacy invasions just to try to avoid Jihad attacks.

Where are all the Catholic nuns protesting body scanners?

They are out there, right?

security for infidels is Un-Islamic.

Well let's see here...Un-Islamic to reveal a view of one's unhidden body to another (in case you were wondering, this also applies to husband and wife)...how does a Muslim cope Islamically with full body-scanners for air transportation?

An inseparable part of the foundation of Western societies is individual right. Any Muslim objecting to the use of body scanners always has the individual right to refuse. All he has to do is refuse to fly on a US airline, and find some alternative. I imagine that necessity will soon mandate body scanners for bus and train transportation too (say it ain't so).

This opens up the intriguing enterpreneurial possibility of Arabic-based transportation.

Introducing

Hamid's Rent-a-Camel...When Kaffir Airways Just Don't Cut it!

I'm sure the Highway Patrol will just love this!

Nobody is looking at their bodies, covered or uncovered.

They are looking at a screen.

Where in the Koran does it mention LCD screens?

The FCNA, ISNA, CAIR, sure makes their life complicated. Perhaps each group has a top secret "alert" committee when some big red light goes off, and they are officially "offended" when something goes against their counter culture. Humor again is a great quality. Hard to believe that there is such a group on earth than can become offended by virtually anything and everything. A group should be created to counter their groups. Call it the COCC, that is the Council On Crappy Complaints. In these days of political correctness, how can anyone take their rantings with any serious consideration. Only their fanticism forces real folks to focus on the content of their rantings. While far from being an expert on the glories of Islam, I am an avid follower of this site, and the events in the world as they unfold, as they relate to the Islamic freak show unfolding in front of our view. All I can do is be aware, inform others, and do my small part both promoting awareness, and monetarily to support such excellent postures as jihad watch. Apologize for the dribble, but could not resist putting in my two cents.

DP111 wrote:

We are heading towards a logical inconsistency.
................

We're already at the point of logical inconsistency, when—as has almost become a cliche, by now—little old ladies from rural Wisconsin are randomly searched, sometimes when they're in line right behind young Middle-Eastern men who don't get a second look.

But this—*specifically exempting Muslims*—would take us right over the edge, if the rest of us were subjected to full body scans.

more:

"The Fiqh Council of North America (FCNA) emphasizes that a general and public use of such scanners is against the teachings of Islam, natural law and all religions and cultures that stand for decency and modesty"
................

How do you like this phrasing? Not only are they refusing to cooperate with body scanners, they're implying that anyone who *does* submit to these scans is not doing so out of a concern for the safety of themselves and their fellow passengers, but because they do not "stand for decency and modesty".

Since it is the actions of Muslims that have made all this inconvenience necessary in the first place, they have an almost unbelievable amount of gall.

Well, I find it outrageous that some stranger might be staring at my wife's body, too. However, I suspect that these Islamic "scholars" are more worried about greater difficulties faced by suicide bombers than over female modesty. Maybe I'd take them a little more seriously if they'd have said that they understand the security concerns of the US Government, and then offered to listen in and report on anyone planning an attack.

So let me get this right, panty exposure is a no no, but bloody entrails after explosion is OK, swell...

"on matters related to the application of Shari'ah (Islamic law) in their individual and collective lives in the North American environment."


Don't they mean "target rich enviroment"?

Ten years ago, were you even thinking of Muslims?

Good Grief!

And the inflight movies will be Porky's (One and Two).

"...general and public use of such scanners is against the teachings of Islam, natural law and all religions and cultures that stand for decency and modesty..."

Well, if Muhammedans were meant to fly, they'd have wings, wouldn't they?

then walk or swim. is it a coincidence that the teachings of Islam frown upon a safety procedure that prevents acts of terror with a plane committed in accordance with the teachings of Islam? these guys are so transparent

"The Fiqh Council of North America (FCNA) emphasizes that a general and public use of such scanners is against the teachings of Islam, natural law and all religions and cultures that stand for decency and modesty,"

How refreshing that FCNA makes it clear that Islam is distinct from "religions ... that stand for decency...."

Muslims are the reason we've come to body scanners! Their arrogance is beyond unbelievable, it is insane. If they don't want to submit to body scans, they can walk, swim, crawl, or slither to their terror training camps in Pakistan and their incestuous weddings to child relatives in the islamic netherworld. If we are forced to submit to these body scans while the obvious threats to airline security are exempted for religious reasons, I expect the airline industry will collapse. I will not fly anywhere if muslims are not thoroughly and completely screened and declared free of explosives, poisons, and weapons.

How convenient for muslim terrorists to object to body scans and explosive sniffing dogs on religious grounds. I can't wait to see how this plays out. I don't relish the idea of body scans but I doubt if I would be given any options. I'm not a muslim and I'm not a threat to anyone but I wouldn't be allowed to fly if I refused to submit to the screenings.

Muslims should only be allowed fly in the same way that Mohammad did.

On an airborne jackass with a woman's face, named Baraq.

Problem solved.

We can keep on playing cat and mouse for ever, until our life becomes completely impossible.
Die hard Libs won't come to their senses even if the Islamic flag will replace the American over the White House.

All the phony anti-war people never seems to be bothered by the ones who wage war, for the sake of waging war, rather, they are so passionate against stopping them. There is no logic to that, they are self haters, who wants us to join them jumping off the cliff.

When a significant part of the people be knowledgeable about the subject, statements like 'Islam is peace' won't fly (pun intended) so easily.

Like Wilders said, I don't care how people call themselves. Any group of people who harbor extremists views, such as waging war against unbelievers, should not be protected from any legal actions, (let alone, sit at the White House).

It's not about 'offending' anyone. Let's face it. As if we're embarrassed for hurting someone's feelings. It's about being scared and not wanting 'problems'. It's about not standing up to an aggressor so he might spare them.

Non of these empty statement (like offending gives license to kill), should go unchallenged. Including 'Islam is peace', there would be no need for it if that was true.

Some Amish people object to having their picture taken for a drivers license. That's fine. They dont have to drive an automobile. If Muslims dont want a full body scan, that's fine as well- they can take a car, train, or boat. Flying is not a constitutional right.

If they are allowed to bypass being scanned then the American public are fools for allowing this. Boycott the airline industry if this is the case. Let them depend on the Muslims for their income.

"Islamic scholars (and Hamas-linked CAIR) say airport body scanners violate teachings of Islam"


Inferring Islam teaches that the safety of ones people is unimportant, nes pas?

Then stay out of my country. Stay in your Islamic hell. Don't come to America!

I will shortly be departing the middle east to take a short leave and will not be scanned or rubbed down! So what's the point of western airports going through this procedure as nothing would be easier than for a lunatic to take 'something' on his or her person and blow us all up. He/she wouldn't care as paradise awaits - for myself I am not in a hurry! As I frequently fly this route I am constantly amazed and furious at how often muslim women in Amsterdam Schipol Airport at not made to remove headscarves or jackets and yet I just remove shoes, jacket, etc., and I'm white, English, female and 68 years of age. My blood boils every time and if we allow this non-scanning of muslims, then we have only ourselves to blame. I too would like to claim that it is against my Christian religion, as we women are also expected to hide our bodies. Furthermore, I find the whole groping and manhandling and now the scanning simply horrible and utterly undignified, but I would be the loser if I objected whereas some muslim woman would be waved through with a smile. This must not be allowed to happen. The next time I am in line to board my plane and a muslim woman is not made to remove her jacket and headscarf nor put through a scanner, I am ready. These people make me sick as my life has far more dignity than any of these pathetic grovelling creatures. The only hope we have is that muslims will travel less and less to the West and solve the problem for us. And those who are already in the west will hopefully leave and never come back. Happy Days.

Most likely, they're worried that we'll be able to see that some of their Burkha clad beauties have balls. Real ones!

That would mean that the one group that would be subjected to lighter airport security checks than any other group would be...Muslims. And that would in turn make things easier than ever for jihad terrorists. Surely that can't be the objective of the FCNA and CAIR, now, can it?

Sure it can be, to make things easier on Islamists at security check points, while the rest of us who are not about to do 'blow them up' jihad are subject to rigorous search body scans. Voila! Fait accompli! Muslims sail through security while the rest of us are herded through like cattle.

'Get along little doggies'... Islam is a mockery of justice and human decency. Sick!

They will just have to give up flying.

That's the ONLY solution for airline safety: No Muslims allowed.

If they want to be exempt from Islamic restriction on onerous full body security checks, they must first apply for and satisfactorily pass the exam to certify these Islamics are safe to fly on public carriers, or else they are exempt (for religious reasons) from flying with the rest of us. These restrictions on Islamics flying is for 'religious purposes' only.

They (FCNA/MB) have misplayed their hand. How foolish they are. They have lain down a gauntlet that cannot be picked back up.

Remember, this has the effect of a fatwa. They are speaking not only to Westerners but to the Ummah. The Ummah has now been told that it is immodest to go through scanners. They will be looking over their shoulders, now, if they travel and go through a scanner. One presumes the illustrious members of the Fiqh Council also are world travelers, now and again. I can't wait 'til they face their first scanner, and have to struggle with the convenience of continuing their journey, and that irrevocable modesty that judgment cannot influence.

They will see other Muslims submitting to the scanner. They will do it too. Their fatwa falls down, goes boom.

But say they show solidarity, and refuse to go through scanners. They will not fly and the imbroglio that will result will begin to make giant headlines. Airport security is not like footbaths in obscure community colleges...people care deeply.

Let them take their stand and be ravaged by the West, or let them be gainsayed and look impotent and toothless (which they probably are since they're beating their wives lightly with their miswaks).

If Muslims dont want a full body scan, that's fine as well - they can take a car, train, or boat.

You know what happens when you put them on trains and buses - you get 3/11 and 7/7. Prison ships staffed with heavily-armed infidel crews is the answer.

I have no problem with people who want to be modest. Frankly, as long as they're law abiding, I don't have any problem with little enclave communities. But Muslims want to be of the world and own it, whereas other sequestered-by-choice-and-creed types are in the world but not of it.

To disparage an X-ray inspection,
You can make a religious objection.
Here's the idea -
You can use your taqiyya,
Say "That's no bomb, it is just an erection."

Is that Baraq as in 'Obama'?
On a more serious note, check out how Israeli security works at Tel Aviv airport. They use human beings trained by 'lie to me' experts. Several layers of them monitor everyone and, and, and it works! Every one gets checked out all the way through, no mincing of words. No mucking about. You look suspicious? You get searched, thoroughly. End of story. Fly El Al...

Fine then. Muslims can be scanned with a different technology that does not send imaging data to an LCD. Instead of bouncing high frequency electromagnetic waves off their bodies, they can step outside and get scanned with a few hundred metal BB's from a shotgun. Whether they are carrying bombs are not, they won't be much of a threat after the scan.

So the Bible doesn't exactly teach nudity. I'm getting a dispensation from the Pope!!!!!! Muslims can hide behind their religion so can Christians.

The Bible doesn't exactly teach nudity. I'm getting a dispensation from the Pope! Muslims can hide behind their religion so can Christians!

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter