Your action needed: Muslim Brotherhood-linked thugs of ISNA warring against free speech, trying to bully Dallas Morning News

The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) is a premier stealth jihad group in the United States today. Federal prosecutors in 2008 rejected claims that ISNA was unfairly named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation Hamas terror funding case.

ISNA has admitted ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas. The Muslim Brotherhood is waging, in its own words, "a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah's religion is made victorious over all other religions."

And now this thuggish, deceptive, unsavory group is, like so many Islamic groups in the West today, warring against the freedom of speech and trying to impose Sharia speech restrictions upon Infidels. ISNA is putting pressure on the Dallas Morning News, inundating the editor with emails attacking reporter Brooks Egerton, because of Egerton's article about ISNA's Louay Safi.

Ironically, Egerton's article doesn't even mention Louay Safi's approval of execution for apostates, as detailed in his book Peace and the Limits of War. The Dallas Morning News, if it had just wanted to make Safi look bad, could have done a much better job simply by quoting his own words.

Here's what the ISNA website says:

Action Requested

The negative article by Brooks Egerton was published on the front page of the Sunday edition of the Dallas Morning News. ISNA appeals to members of the Muslim community in general, and the Texas Muslim community in particular, to let the newspaper know about their feelings regarding this negative presentation. Please make sure that you speak respectfully but firmly on this issue.

Please contact Ms. Maud Beelman, the DMN News Editor, and Brooks Egerton, the article writer, at the Dallas Morning News and request that the newspaper issue a retraction and allow ISNA to publish rebuttal on the DMN op-ed page.
Maud Beelman, The DMN News Editor
Mbeelman@dallasnews.com
214-977-8456
Brooks Egerton, staff writer
begerton@dallasnews.com
214-977-7622

Note that ISNA, even when speaking to its own constituency, doesn't say the report is inaccurate -- just that it was a "negative presentation." Well, Louay, sometimes the truth hurts.

Please write to the same email addresses that ISNA published, expressing your gratitude for Egerton's accurate article and politely urging the Dallas Morning News not to apologize, retract, or bow to Islamic supremacist intimidation.

| 11 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

11 Comments

only consistent presentation of truth will expose the destructive intentions of these unholy bloats.

reporters and publishers alike need encouragement to do the job for the sake of proper illumination.

however, the guilds and unions "governing" the media needs be considered as being aligned with with the foreigners until proven otherwise. the task won't be without danger;they practice no restraint.

Done (I have sent my concerns to the DMN) -- I have grandchildren that will need continuing education about the absolute evils and dangers that exists in Islam.

I do not want them living in the 14th Century..

"Done (I have sent my concerns to the DMN) -- I have grandchildren that will need continuing education about the absolute evils and dangers that exists in Islam.

I do not want them living in the 14th Century"

14th? Try 7th. In Arabia.

I have also "sent my concerns" to Brooks Egerton at the DMN.

Done - e-mail sent to the editor, with cc to the reporter, Egerton.

I sent one to Ms. Beelman and one to Mr. Egerton last night.

FISNA

Done --- 2 separate e-mails sent.

http://www.avraidire.eu/2009/12/lhorrible-realite-de-lislam/

video gore d'un enfant taliban de 12 ans egorgeant un homme encore vivant.°°°°°°°°18+ âmes sensibles s'abstenir

Done.
E-mail sent to editor with CC to the reporter.
I hope there will be no retraction.

Leave a Comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.

Site Meter