Palestinian TV promotes suicide attacks

When watching this video and reading about the glories due to the shahids (martyrs), remember that in the Qur'an a martyr is not simply one who dies for Allah, but one who kills for Allah and is killed in the process (9:111). So this whole sermon is essentially a recruitment video for suicide attackers.

"Martyrs get 'A full life with Allah and 72 wives,'" by Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik for Palestinian Media Watch, February 7:

[...] Six privileges, or kindnesses, to be granted the holy Martyr are mentioned in a hadith (tradition attributed to the Prophet Muhammad in Islam) and were explained in a recent Friday sermon broadcast on Hamas TV.

The privileges that are bestowed upon the one who dies for Allah and mentioned in the hadith are:
1- The Shahid's sins are forgiven
2- He sees his place in Paradise and lives a full life of joy with Allah
3- He is protected from "the Great Shock" on Judgment Day
4- He is crowned with a crown of honor
5- He marries 72 dark-eyed wives
6- He will be able to intervene on behalf of 70 of his family members on Judgment Day, thereby ensuring them the reward of Afterlife

For years, both the Palestinian Authority and Hamas have promoted the ideal of dying as a Martyr for Allah. The promotion has been successful. [...]

The following is the translation from the Hamas TV sermon explaining the Shahid's six rewards:

"Just as Allah selected the best of His creations, to be prophets and messengers, so Allah has chosen from among us, and from the best of His creations, to be the Shahids (Martyrs). ... Oh Allah, grant us Shahada (Martyrdom) for Your sake, Oh Master of the world! Join us with the Shahids (Martyrs)! ...

The Shahid of this life and of the Afterlife is one who ascended to Allah [dying] on the battlefield. ... This is the highest level of Shahada (Martyrdom). The Prophet said: 'The Shahid has six privileges.' [Sunan A-Tirmidhi (1663) and Sunan Ibn Majagh (2799), all subsequent quotes are from this Hadith if nothing else indicated. - Ed.]

The first of these privileges:

'He is forgiven [his sins] with the first gush of his pure blood.' ... Therefore, the Shahid is not washed, but is left bloodied. Why? His blood will testify for him before Allah about his Shahada (Martyrdom) on Resurrection Day.
The second [privilege]: 'He sees his place in Paradise.'
If we only knew what Allah has prepared for the Shahids in Paradise, we would not sit idly in this world. ... Shahids do not die. Shahids live a full life with Allah. They live in the highest Heaven and in the world of angels, eating, drinking, walking and enjoying themselves. Therefore Allah has forbidden us to say that Shahids are dead. He has forbidden us and told us: 'Do not think that those who are killed in the name of Allah are dead. No, because they are alive, and their livelihood is with Allah.' [Quran, Sura 3:169]
...
The third kindness: 'The Shahid is shielded from the Great Shock [on Judgment Day].'
...
The next kindness: 'A crown of honor is placed upon his head, one stone of which is worth more than all there is in this world.'
The next kindness: 'He marries 72 of the Dark-Eyed wives.'
One description of the Dark-Eyed [maidens]: 'If one of the women of Paradise would look towards the earth, she would light up everything between heaven and earth.' [Sahih Bukhari, 6199]
The next kindness: 'He is a heavenly advocate for 70 family members.'"
[Al-Aqsa TV (Hamas), Jan. 1, 2010]

| 35 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

35 Comments

Looks like the grumblings of WWIII. Can't wait until 1,000,000 plus Muhams decide to go postal. Hopefully Mr. Constitutional lawyer, Taqiyya Obama doesn't find a flaw in this constitution to play his role in disarming us prior to openning the flood gates of hell.

(MAT. 18:1-5) At that time the disciples approached Jesus and said, “Who is the greatest in the kingdom of Heaven?” He called a child over, placed it in their midst, and said, “Amen, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven. Whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of Heaven. And whoever receives on child such as this in my name receives me.”

On this separation alone, Muhammad disassociates himself from sealing the Judeo-Christian Prophethood.

I's getting just a bit harder, is it not, for the whole business of the "Palestinian people" -- a "tiny people" only struggling for its "homeland" -- to continue to be accepted by intelligent people in the West. The campaign to create, out of the local Arabs, the soi-disant "Palestinian people," started, remember, only after the Six-Day War, when the defeat suffered by the Arabs led them to conclude that military means would not suffice, and should not again be attempted until, through a sustained campaign of propaganda to undermine Israel, it was forced to give up the territory it had won in a war of self-defense, and even give up that territory which had been allotted, by the League of Nations' Mandates Commission, to the Mandate for Palestine for the sole purpose of the creation of the Jewish National Home. For many years that propaganda campaign, funded by vast amounts of Arab oil revenues, and by a combination of old-fashioned antisemites and up-to-date leftists sympathizing with the "Palestinians" because they were so...well, so anti-American, so Third World, and therefore no matter how fascistic in actual beliefs and practices, to be favored over those far-too-Western and far-too-educated and far-too-advanced Israelis, who also made the terrible error of belonging, organically, to the West, now joined by armies of Western hirelings who did the Arab, and especially Saudi, bidding (and are doing it still-- see the review of Esposito's latest book by one Joseph Preeville, a self-identified "writer" who lives in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, which he finds just swell in every respect, and admires Islam, and wishes to defend it, as much as John Esposito himself, if such were possible).

But now as we in the West begin to grasp the nature of the ideology of Islam, and as many in the West begin to recognize how they, too, in Great Britain and France and Germany and Italy and everywhere, are threatened by aggressive Muslim demands and by the immutable texts that inculcate the idea of the duty of Jihad, the struggle to remove all obstacles to the spread, and then the dominance, of Islam, we begin to grasp what Israel faces.

Indeed, we being to grasp, many of us, the problem Israel faces better than many in Israel do -- for them, it is just too painful, apparently, to recognize that there is no end, no "solution" to the Jihad being waged on them. But they must come to recognize it, and must explain this to the world, at first privately in meetings with others in the threatened West, and then at last, in various clever ways -- first a little, thence to more -- publicly. To recognize and speak openly about the problem does no harm, but allows for a salutary realism in refusing the false "solutions" of further Israeli concessions, which will do nothing to change or end the duty of Jihad, and will merely make it far more difficult for Arab leaders to resist the call to join in open war-making against Israel given what would then appear to be, and would be, its obvious much increased vulnerability. For the sake of peace, Israel has not only to refuse to give up a single inch or dunam of land more, but to explain to itself that this does not spell disaster, but represents reality breaking in. And the rest of the West should heed this, and think clearly about its own problems -- especially in Europe -- with all the instruments of Jihad now unsheathed against it.

"One description of the Dark-Eyed [maidens]: 'If one of the women of Paradise would look towards the earth, she would light up everything between heaven and earth.' [Sahih Bukhari, 6199]"

I recall reading, over 10 years ago, before exploding Muslims came onto my reader, in a multi-volume French dictionary that the etymology of houri (the "dark eyed maidens" or virgins of Islamic Paradise) derives from a meaning of "having eyes where the black pupils are markedly contrasted with the whiteness of the eye".

The rate at which these murdering morons are going, i suspect there will soon be a shortage of wives in "heaven".
And whilst we are on the subject, what provision is made for female suicide bombers ?
Yes,i thought so, none, nil, nada !
Perhaps we could entice them to do a show ? Strictly come bombing amongst themselves.

Again we have more proof of how screwed up not just Muslims are but Islam itself. It's not only a matter of dealing with Muslim kooks, prolific as they are. It's a much bigger problem than even this, i.e., dealing with Islam itself, which inculcates in the believer an intolerance towards others, and a proclivity towards violence whenever believers don't get their way, which is not seen with any other major religion and their adherents.

Also agree with Patrick above that Jesus was possessed of an infinitely superior character compared to that of Mohammed. Whatever one's religious beliefs or lack thereof, no sensible and knowledgeable human being can look upon Jesus and Mohammed without being convinced of the vast superiority of the former over the latter. Would that all Muslims would wake up tomorrow devout Christians. The world would be instantly in far better shape were this to happen.

Of what use can 72 virgins be, when the flesh has left the jihadis' bodies?

Always thinking about the flesh, rather than the spirit. That's the jihadi way.

That is 1,000,000,000 plus Muhams.

Muhammad's descriptions of hell with fires, scalding water in their bellies and the giving of those in hell new skins to feel the fire again and again sound just like what those suicide bombing denizens of hell must feel as they enter into the fire through the explosive gate.

We really can't condemn any Muslim for preaching or calling for people to follow their religion, the problem is Islam and the Koran. We should not be surprised or shocked when Muslims follow the Koran, instead we should just take what the Koran calls for as the reason that it cannot be allowed, Islam that is, in the West. This fantasy the West is currently on that Muslims can be allowed to spread in the West but that none of them will actually follow Islam is destined to nothing but failure and misery. The tolerant position is that this man is merely following his religion, that is his duty as a Muslim. They must just be kept separate from the West or from any other country that wants to live in peace.

It is a shame that so many people, who were intended to be made into God's image, are so totally Hell bent.

"6- He will be able to intervene on behalf of 70 of his family members on Judgment Day, thereby ensuring them the reward of Afterlife"

How very interesting. Islam always presents itself as a direct line between man and God, with no mediators. Yet here, the mullah is presenting suicidal terrorists as mediators. Add this to the long line of pirs, Shi'ite imams, and others whom Islam throws up as supposed mediators!

But how poor and miserable such mediation is compared with Jesus Christ, God-become-man, and the mediation he offers! How deluded these suicide bombers, who only destroy, when Jesus came to give us life and that abundantly.

The New Testament speaks of Jesus, the just one, giving his life for the unjust, bearing our sins in his body on the tree (I Peter 2:24; 3:18); the poor Falastin Arab Muslims are offered only sinful men compounding their other sins with murder and suicide (self-murder). This is the fruit of the Qu'ran's evil lie that Jesus did not die on the cross.

Kepha, weeping over the ruin of so many people in the land where the Word of God was given.

6- He will be able to intervene on behalf of 70 of his family members on Judgment Day, thereby ensuring them the reward of Afterlife
-------------
This explains why the families are so keen on having a suicidal maniac amongst their clan.

l would love it if some smart islamist would ask one of these preaching immans if he would go on a become a suicide bomber (shahid), l mean these immans always foaming at the mouth goading the stupid arab street to do their bidding, why cannot these clerics do their own "shahid"? then l ask myself what could be more more dumb than a koran follower?

The sixth privilege granted to the holy Martyr..
6- He will be able to intervene on behalf of 70 of his family members on Judgment Day, thereby ensuring them the reward of Afterlife

Paradise with Allah, 72 wives, and 70 axxholes from your family.
Could be a good Rob Zombie flick.

God the Father sent His son The Lord Jesus Christ to die on the cross for the sins
of many,to open the Kingdom of Heaven and to give eternal life to the church which
is the body of Christ.

Allah, the Devil himself and his false prophet, Mohammed teach the faithful Muslim to
to send their children to die and in the process murder the innocent.

Christ came to give life.

Mohammed came to destroy life.

The Scottish Billy Connelly comedian has a video on You Tube on the muslims 72 virgins which points out,

"72 virgins! That's not a reward that's a punishment! 2 red hot whores now that's what I call a reward!"

He also wondered how they trained suicide bombers. They must say - "Watch this carefully lads I'm only going to show you once."

Wellington, this is OT, but instead relates to some recent comments about O'Neill's book "Holy Warriors" we exchanged a few days ago. I went back and added an extended comment to the original story you may find interesting http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/01/how-islam-breathed-new-life-into-slavery-and-the-slave-trade-in-europe.html . When you get a chance to read the book, and a new story relating to the topic appears here, which it surely will, I'd be interested in your learned opinion about it. Same goes for everyone else.

Apologies to everyone - Now back to the regularly scheduled programming.

islam is a CON!


1. Matthew 22:30
At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven.
Matthew 22:29-31 (in Context) Matthew 22 (Whole Chapter)
2. Mark 12:25
When the dead rise, they will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven.
Mark 12:24-26 (in Context) Mark 12 (Whole Chapter)

Marriage at the Resurrection
23That same day the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to him with a question. 24"Teacher," they said, "Moses told us that if a man dies without having children, his brother must marry the widow and have children for him. 25Now there were seven brothers among us. The first one married and died, and since he had no children, he left his wife to his brother. 26The same thing happened to the second and third brother, right on down to the seventh. 27Finally, the woman died. 28Now then, at the resurrection, whose wife will she be of the seven, since all of them were married to her?"

29Jesus replied, "You are in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God. 30At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven.

===================

Compare this to the muhammadan sex orgy!!!!

Thanks for that FredMk_1 :D

"Don't trust anyone who only has ONE book"!!! Brilliant!

Enfin un site français avec des vidéos de Robert Pencer sous-titrées, à voir absolument si vous êtes francophone!

http://www.avraidire.eu/tag/robert-spencer/page/2/

That 6th privilege is a real humdinger. And, boy, does my family ever need it! Among the various uncles and aunts, parents and grandparents, cousins and in-laws, it has -- count 'em! -- 14 gays, 11 lesbians, 16 apostates, 4 rape victims, and 17 women who have been alone with an unrelated man. Fortunately, we also have my little brother, Ali, who has been enrolled at the local suicide-madrassa. To help him remember, we've written our names on a note that is pinned to the inside of his shirt.
Ah, Allah is indeed most merciful.

China, Japan still fighting over history
By Peter J Brown
http://atimes.com/atimes/China/LB11Ad01.html

"Both Chinese and Japanese scholars have made it clear in their papers that the war fought between China and Japan from 1931 to 1945 was an aggressive war Japan waged against China," said Bu.-from the article

--------------

There are remarkable similarities between the Japanese "Hakko-Ichiu" (which justified "Holy War" waged to bring the world to submission) waged by Japan from 1931 to 1945 in Asia (which was put them on a collision course with the US) and Islam's jihad. (And both "holy wars" may come to a similar end.)

To understand the history of WW2 in Asia, it is essential to understand the "religious" motives that justified the Japanese behavior in China. The Chinese are still bitter about what Japan's "Holy War" brought them in terms of mass murder (including mass be-headings, mass rapes etc.).

(We do not think of General MacArthur as a "religious reformer"-but he was that in the occupation (1945-1953) of Japan, as he worked through the Emperor to end the "religious" rationalizations that provided the "reasons" for Japan's "holy war" of conquest, mass-murder, and exploitation in Asia.)

One day future Muslims may be as ashamed of their "holy war" against "unbelievers" as modern Japan is for "Hakko-Ichiu." But many of Islam's victims and their families may never forgive them. Today Japan may be America's Banzai Buddy, but it probably will take several centuries for the Chinese to forgive what the Japanese did in China (as with Jewish people and the Holocaust perpetuated by the Germans.)

Islam may one day join the Nazis and the Japanese "Hakko-Ichiu" as unforgivable belief-systems after jihad has become a distant memory.

allah, you are such a deceiver and a trickster. Same holds true for your evil prophet mohammad.

islam is so backwards and evil. One can only marvel at how gullible and sex-crazed a muslim man must be in order to subscribe to such foolish nonsense. Yeah, commit murder & suicide for allah, and then sex will be your eternal reward. Only an evil and twisted buffoon would believe in sex heaven in the first place.

Sex sells ...and they condemn the West for sexual misconduct. Hmm.

Fred

have you ever read Steve Martin's New Yorker monologue, '72 Virgins'??

http://www.newyorker.com/humor/2007/01/29/070129sh_shouts_martin

For the best effect, imagine this naughty, naughty sketch as a radio play, introduced as follows:

*Silence with heavy breathing* tickticktick (or, mobile phone rings). Deafening explosion - KABLOOEY!! *silence for a count of ten*

Hesitant male voice, as of horny adolescent, says: 'Hi...? I'm Ahmad...".

Then a succession of female voices, in varying accents, in varying tones from Infinitely Bored Hollywood West Coast Adolescent through to Little Old Lady, perform Martin's marvellous script.

My favourite is Virgin # 5, a classic Cat Lady spinster:

"Do you like cats? I have fourteen!"

...

We kafir just have to laugh at the insanities and absurdities. Otherwise we'd be screaming.

And the more and the louder we laugh, the better.

The apostate Ali Sina has argued that mockery works.

Does anybody know how to look up [Sahih Bukhari,6199]@ the USC for Muslim-Jewish Engagement Translation of Sahih Bukhari
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/........The layout is in Volume, Book, Number and I cant find the Hadith.

Promoting Peace is Un-Islamic.

I only read your post a few minutes ago, Eastview, otherwise I would have responded earlier. If O'Neill really thinks that Charlemagne and Alfred the Great are fictitious, and that something like 300 years of man's history didn't occur, then he is a kook of the first degree and everyone of sense should distance themselves from this guy. Will have to read his book, if for no other reason than that you have aroused my curiosity considerably. Stay tuned for more. Thanks.

I just had to add that I wonder what Robert Spencer and Hugh Fitzgerald think about all this.

I, too, would love to hear Robert's and Hugh's take on this. Will look forward to picking up the thread again at some future opportune time.

There are so many, many books that need reading, that my head gets boggled...how do you, Eastview and Wellington find time to read a book and discuss it fairly soon?

I normally read 4-10 books at once, but in small increments at a time...over months, I get thru them, but in the meantime, I've added more books to the pile, so the pile stays the same, mostly.

Perhaps I'm less organized....

Tomorrow, the 11 of Feb., is a day to watch. Mahmoud A. of Iran has threatened to stun the West with a "punch". How serious is this? I heard talk. That Iran could launch an electronic impulse "bomb" that could theoretically cripple the power grids here in USA, and also stop vehicles from operating. I don't know how true this is, or if it's just hot air.
But I made a few provisions, just in case.

Anybody know of this supposed "attack"?

The world is filled with many books.

There is but one book that surpasses them all, God's Holy word,the Bible.

Champ-

Actually, I don't think the 72 Virgin Place stuff has as much to do with sex as it has to do with power-domination, with sex being secondary to that. 72 Virgin Place essentially makes women into anatomical playgrounds in a Stepford wives way. It's a power fantasy with no pretense to giving any pleasure to a woman.

The religion is bizarre. I think people would leave it (like a battered wife) if Muslims had complete freedom to run to other religions (even in Saudi Arabia). That's why M. said it must dominate. It has to dominate or else people will be running for the doors.

It's a monopoly game with Dhimmi Place, Islam-must-dominate-railroad, 72 Virgin Place and a stack of get-out-of-jail-free cards etc. where the dice must be loaded for Islam to survive. Islam must dominate or die.

Agreed, Frank :)

champ
SoCalGal-

There is something real about you that I respond to. But, frankly, I'm like Rocky Marciano about money and people. Rocky once said: "money flows from my pockets like glue." I too move slow with decisions and approaches re money and people. Both need a lot of analysis. But you are for real.....

Leave a Comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.