Shocker: Iran's latest response to world powers on nuke program "falls short"

And around we go. "APNewsBreak: Iran nuclear offer falls short," by George Jahn for the Associated Press, February 23:

VIENNA - Iran has formally set out its terms for giving up most of its cache of enriched uranium in a confidential document -- and the conditions fall short of what has been demanded by the United States and other world powers.
The document -- seen by The Associated Press on Tuesday -- says Tehran is ready to hand over the bulk of its stockpile, as called for under a deal brokered by the International Atomic Energy Agency and endorsed by the five permanent U.N. Security Council members and Germany.
But Iran adds that it must simultaneously receive fuel rods for its research reactor in return, and that such an exchange must take place on Iranian territory.
The Iranian offer was sure to be rejected by the six powers, which have waited for nearly six months for such an official answer.
The United States and others fear Iran's nuclear program is geared toward making nuclear weapons, while Tehran claims it is simply to provide more power for its growing population. The United Nations has slapped sanctions on Iran for its defiance on nuclear issues.
Ali Asghar Soltanieh, the chief Iranian delegate to the IAEA, told the AP the letter was "formally reflecting" his country's position, which has been expressed to the IAEA and to the media in various forms.
The U.S. and its allies have previously said there can be no significant deviation from the original deal, which would commit Iran to shipping out its nuclear material first and then waiting up to a year for it to be turned into fuel for its reactor, which makes medical isotopes.
The letter -- dated Feb. 18 and addressed to International Atomic Energy Agency chief Yukiya Amano -- says Iran is "still seeking to purchase the required fuel in cash." However, it was unclear how Iran would do that, because there are no stockpiles of fuel specifically made for its reactor.
Iran is ready to exchange its low-enriched uranium for the fuel rods "simultaneously in one package or several packages in the territory of the Islamic Republic of Iran," the letter says.
World powers insist that Iran ship out most of its enriched uranium first then wait for the fuel rods because that would delay Iran's ability to make a nuclear weapon by leaving it with too little material to make a warhead.
But Iran's continued rejection of the deal appears to have worked in its favor.
When the agreement was drawn up nearly six months ago, it foresaw Iran exporting about 1.2 tons of low-enriched material for further enrichment in Russia to near 20 percent and then reprocessing in France into fuel rods. Back then, that would have been about 70 percent of the Iranian stockpile.
But Iran has continued to enrich since, and now has about 2 tons of low-enriched uranium.
That means that even if Iran now agreed to ship the requisite 1.2 tons, it would still be left with about 800 kilograms (1,765 pounds) -- about two-thirds of what is needed to enrich further to produce weapons-grade uranium....
| 3 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

3 Comments

Let's hope the Iranians' nuke-tipped rocket aimed at Israel also "falls short".

On Qom, perhaps. (Where Khomeini "studied".)

Good thing all the big brains keep telling us they are yearrrrs away from having the big bang. It's been going on for years now. Year after year, year in and year out. As the years get shorter we enter that neither world where years start to turn to the negative. Soon one finds themselves behind in years and wonder where they all went.

Fascinating debate, what is the religion of peace? Islam or Christianity? Jay Smith takes on the muslims on Hyde Park, Speaker’s Corner in London, every Sunday.

http://www.avraidire.eu/2010/02/jay-smith-on-speakers-corner-hyde-park-debating-with-muslims/

Leave a Comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.

Site Meter