Does Mohamed Elibiary, who is called in this ridiculous puff piece "the country's leading Muslim deradicalization expert," need to deradicalize himself? After all, he was one of the speakers at a December 2004 conference in Dallas entitled "A Tribute to the Great Islamic Visionary," Ayatollah Khomeini. When Rod Dreher of the Dallas Morning News called him on this, he threatened Dreher, telling him: "Expect someone to put a banana in your exhaust pipe."
I have met Mohamed Elibiary. He is a slick fellow. You can read here his dancing and obfuscation about deception in Islam and other matters, in a long exchange we had here at Jihad Watch. Read it carefully, noting the questions I ask him and the answers he gives to them, and ask yourself whether he really is or ought to be thought of as "the country's leading Muslim deradicalization expert" -- not that there is any more suitable candidate out there.
"Many Muslims quietly working to head off radicalism," by Eileen Flynn for the Austin American-Statesman, February 6 (thanks to Ed):
In 2008, a New York woman feared her brother, a troubled young Muslim man living in New York, might be getting involved in a violent radical group in Pakistan. So she called a cleric in Houston for advice. The cleric in turn called Mohamed Elibiary, head of the Plano-based nonprofit Freedom and Justice Foundation.Elibiary, who has quietly emerged as the country's leading Muslim deradicalization expert, devised an intervention that played on the young man's familial duties and got him to return to the United States where counselors and mentors steered him away from militant extremism.
That case is detailed in a new report from the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a think tank that has compiled stories of other would-be terrorists who abandoned their violent plans.
And it's a reminder that in the aftermath of last year's Fort Hood shootings and the recent terrorism-related arrests of young Muslim Americans, we need people like Elibiary working with government and law enforcement....
Of course, people like Elibiary, and only people like Elibiary, are already working closely with government and law enforcement.
".....war is deceit........" says Muhamed
".....deradicalization is war....." says me
Ayatollah Khomeini - a great islamic visionary?
This is a man who said:
"A man can quench his sexual thirst by use of a baby. The only condition is that he does not penetrate the vagina, but anal sex is okay."
"It is better if a girl marries so early that she gets her first period in the home of her husband rather than in the home of the father. Every father who gives his daughter away in marriage at such an early age will have obtained a place in heaven"
"A man can have anal sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels, etc. However, he should kill the animal after ejaculating."
"If a man has anal sex with his son, brother or father after he is married, the marriage is to continue."
Hat Tip to Atlas Shrugs
If that's the type of "visionary" Mohamed Elibiary admires, he has no place in a free, Western, *civilized* society.
http://www.avraidire.eu/2009/12/robert-spencer-demonte-lislam-sous-titres-francais-1/
ENFIN UN SITE WEB FRANCAIS QUI NOUS DONNE UN REGARD HONNETE SUR L'islam. bcp de videos de Robert Spencer sous-titrees en francais
Some Islamic leaders are simply proponents of the stealth Jihad, instead of the Ummah's Military wing. Eventual subjugation by demographics is more effective when dealing with the self-loathing multicultural west. And this article and its clueless reporter proves that point.
we need to keep informing people who these so called "moderate muslilms" really are. anyone equates Ayatollah Khomeini - a great islamic visionary is not a moderate Muslim!
"the country's leading Muslim deradicalization expert,"
Well it's not as if he is up against a lot of competition.
The award is probably justified.
"the country's leading Muslim deradicalization expert,"
What we need is a leading radical de-Muslimization expert. More than one, really.
I hope he's up on his arts and crafts...The Saudi's have shown that only art therapy can 'deradicalize' a recalcitrant jihadi...Finger painting has been known to calm even the most violent savage...
There is a saying, 'you can only lie once'. The second time, people won't trust your word so fast.
Unless of course, you're a Muslim in the West. In that case, no matter how many times a 'peaceful Muslim' change his skin and gets caught red-handed, the same people are always shocked, every single time.
Isn't trust something that needs to be earned?
If a certain cell phone model would go bad with the same exact symptoms, could the maker get away with "these are unrelated problems"?
Classic-my man is classic.
YES: http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/3842
I think...everything will be okay now (sarc)
(Off Topic)
I need some help debating a Muslim apologist on Univ of Oregon's student paper's website.
Any help would be greatly appreciate. I'm too ineffectual to do it on my own.
Here is the link:
http://www.dailyemerald.com/opinion/for-some-hate-crimes-happen-every-day-1.1115667
This area is a mine field in which I have big ignorant blundering feet.
But first, is it relevant to ask what connection the Washington Institue for Near East Policy has with Elibiary? See pp.17 and 31 of the report mentioned by Eileen Flynn:
http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/pubPDFs/PolicyFocus101.pdf
Second, Martin Kramer very briefly but cogently puts forward a thesis (not original to him as he admits) that seems relevant here, although its level of focus is macro, not micro which is where Flynn, Elibiary and the Institute report are operating:
http://sandbox.blog-city.com/superfluous_young_men.htm
Supporting material here:
http://www.opendemocracy.net/conflicts/democracy_terror/islamism_war_demographics_rage
http://longevity.stanford.edu/files/Critical%20Demographics%20Mideast%20for%20publication%2003-17-09.pdf
Perhaps DJM above provides support for the Kramer/Heinsohn Superfluous Young Males thesis with his quote attributed to the Killer from Qom:
"It is better if a girl marries so early that she gets her first period in the home of her husband rather than in the home of the father. Every father who gives his daughter away in marriage at such an early age will have obtained a place in heaven"
From the ayatoilet so smelllys little green book of islamic horrors.
If you "accidentally" take the virginity of the infant rather than "merely" sodomizing her, you are then responsible for her financially for the rest of her life, but she will not count as one of your wives.
This along with the pedophilia of the "prophet", his penchant for sucking on the tongues of young boys and girls, his having sex with a corpse, enjoying men licking his chest and all the rest of the deviant behavior exhibited by mo the molester...yeah...who could resist joinin' the muslim sex club?
If the general public were made aware of the perversions that are an integral part of islam, our work would be made much easier...simple in fact.
islam is a lie and
Truth is killing it.
Alaskaninfidel,
If you have a minute come help reveal the lie that is Islam at:
http://www.dailyemerald.com/opinion/for-some-hate-crimes-happen-every-day-1.1115667
hey Arafat been to your discussion site, just need to present the facts and when they are ready for it, it will seep into their little brains. keep up the good work!
Thanks Ikeev!
Anytime you want to pitch on go for it.
Taking the colleges back --one at a time-- from the stealth Jihadists!
Last night I sat in my local Starbuck's, perusing volume four of the Sahih al Bukhari, which I had just purchased from a store specializing in Islamic books. A man sitting nearby identified himself as a Muslim and asked me what I thought of Islam. I said that I am not favorably disposed to it. He then went on to share the following "thoughts" with me:
1. The Sahih al Bukhari is not an Islamic book and was written by "THE Jews" because "they want us to hate each other." When I pointed out that the book was written by an imam, translated by another imam who is an Islamic scholar and the president of a Muslim university in Saudi Arabia, and that it represents the basis of Sunni Islam and its legal system, I was told the following:
2. The translation is a lie and that I have to know Arabic before I can REALLY understand Islam because, after all, "THEY" only let into this country what "THEY" want us to know. He identified himself as a Hispanic man, born and raised in San Diego. He did not read Arabic fluently himself and was unfamiliar with some of the terms I used.
3. The FBI controls the drug trade in minority neighborhoods.
4. Americans live in a police state which controls what I can read and arrests anyone who is a dissident.
As I listened to this man tell me that I must go to his mosque and that I will realize that Islam is "all love and peace" I began to laugh and simply got up and walked to a part of the shop where I would no longer hear him.
I thought that here is a man, born and raised in the United States, but who has converted to Islam and who hates the United States so much that he compares it to Nazi Germany and is so deluded as to think he lives in a police state lacking basic human freedoms.
How common is this mentality among Muslims?
Alaskaninfidel, please supply some links to these sources so I can reference and check them. Thanks.
Muhammed Bear,
Thanks for taking it to the Muslim apologists at Univ. of Oregon's site.
You're the greatest Bear of all!
Looks like some of Robert's followers are carrying the words of truth over to that column by the comments I see there!! WOOHOO!!
Way to go folks!! Let's get the truth out!!
Ted, don't you their eternal reactions?
"Don't tar all Muslims with the same brush"
"There is not one Islam".
"Yeah, but look at what the Jews do, the Christians do, the atheists do"
"And Hitler was a Christian and look what he did"
and so on and so forth.
The problem is with any ideology that controls every aspect of a person's life and abandons morality for the ends which are always perceived to be for the greater common good.
Islam shares this nasty little trait with Nazism.
Christianity and Judaism are antithetical to this as self determination is paramount.
Atheism is just the rejection of a belief.
Your analogy fails.
http://www.homa.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=56&Itemid=53
"Leader Or Exterminator? Ayatollah Khomeini's Religious Teachings on Marriage, Divorce and Relationships"
I'd say fairly common. Even the most moderate of Muslims, if indeed one can use the word "moderate" to describe such people, still think a brutal psychopath who was also a sexual pervert, but who founded Islam, was not a bad man (if they concluded that Mohammed was malevolent they simply couldn't remain Muslim I should think). If one can look at Mohammed positively, or even be neutral on the guy, then that person can potentially believe any nonsense that comes down the pike.
The key to destroying Islam is to destroy the character of Mohammed. Even Muslims who claim to be Muslim simply for cultural and family reasons aren't yet prepared to see Mohammed for what he was. Once Mohammed is properly assessed, then no longer can a person adhere to all the nonsense that Islam insures an uncritical mind will buy into.
Now, gotta' go. Have a Super Bowl to watch.
Very interesting, Jim.
Waiting at check-in in a long queue for a flight that never happened, I spent a considerable time with a young man returning to Karachi via Dubai. We discussed Islam and he was doing the da'wa thing, to which I was listening, nodding, uh-huh and such. He was using the Qur'an and hadiths freely, but then after a while I started coming back with hadiths and Qur'anic quotes as well.
And lo! He started disowning any reliance on the hadiths! I wonder if our experiences might be connected with the sort of TV work Fr Zakaria Botros has been doing, pretty much dicing and shredding the credibility of parts of these revered texts?
(I'm aware that there has long been a strain of thought within Sunni Islam that has preferred not to use the hadiths)
Your post snuck in while I was typing. But you are right, exposing Mohammed is a key, and Botros excels in this, as AlaskanInfidel above shows (making a big assumption that AI has directly or indirectly come across the Botros work).
"I thought that here is a man, born and raised in the United States, but who has converted to Islam and who hates the United States so much that he compares it to Nazi Germany and is so deluded as to think he lives in a police state lacking basic human freedoms.
How common is this mentality among Muslims?"
I'd say it's universal among Muslims -- though of course, many if not most of them will lie and pretend they don't feel this way, if they perceive it in their best interests to feign amicability. For us to assume otherwise in any way that would tend to foster concretely applicable policy consequences would undermine our own best interests and our own priority of defending ourselves against the Muslims who in following their Islam seek to destroy our societies by hook or by crook -- Muslims who, needless to say, we cannot with sufficient reliability distinguish from Muslims who allegedly do not enable that goal of our destruction.
Meanwhile, also a few million Westerners feel that way too about their own West -- i.e., the majority of Leftists. Not all Leftists necessarily do much of anything about these strangely alienated feelings they have; often they continue a parasitic dependence upon the same System they fear and loathe. Furthermore, the poison of these feelings of alienation has seeped (albeit leavened with nutritious soy and sweetened with organic honey) into the broader mainstream through PC MC -- that vast cafe-latte-drinking-Whole-Foods-shopping-Ikea-furnishing-NPR-listening-Weeds-watching bourgeoisie of the modern West (and most acutely, North America).
(Parallel, or perpendicular, or peripheral to this Leftist alienation and its much more pleasant PC MC spawn, remain a tiny minority of ultra-right-wing Gnostics cultivating a quasi-apocalyptic view of the present and the immediate future: this particular subculture, needless to say, has had no substantial influence on the PC MC mainstream; indeed, they serve as Eqo Quoque scapegoats used by the Leftists and PC MCs to point to, and thus to deflect, whenever we warn of the real enemies and the far more numerous threats to our modern societies coming from Muslims.)
You are correct in your assumption. Once Father Botros' site came to my attention, I discovered the rest of the perversions approved by the ayatoilet so smelly.
It's quite simple to search "Khomeinis little green book" and you'll get a whole raft of links to his perverted little book...just little green book will work as well.
I was out running the snow blower as we had a small snowfall last night and my Bichons can't play quite as hard as they would like when they vanish beneath the flakes or I would have joined the fray sooner. I shall follow that link now, though others here are far more learned than I. Being poorly armed will never deter me from engaging the enemy...and those that defend the slavery that is islam are most assuredly my enemy.
islam is a lie and
Truth is killing it.
I *like* caffe latte.
I have four Ikea chairs in my house.
Oh no! I'm a traitor to the Cause!
Interesting...so far my posts at http://www.dailyemerald.com/opinion/for-some-hate-crimes-happen-every-day-1.1115667 have failed to appear. I may end up with multiple posts if they go through.
islam is a lie and
Truth is killing it.
If you do not remove from Muhammaden radicals, the Koran and those that preach it as the unquestionable word of Allah that must be submitted to along with the image and life of Muhammad as the perfect man to be emmulated; you cannot deradicalize them. You may have a temporary truce but eventually the proddings of the Koran and Imams will lead to or back to radicalization which is the highest form of Muhammaden ('those that leave their homes and families to fight for the cause of Muhammad with their lives and their wealth')
If you do deradicalize a Muhammaden, they are no longer Muhammaden and are in jeopardy of eternal damnation.
You can deradicalize a Muhammaden by showing them that the Koran is a fake and therefore Muhammad is a fake and that there is no fear of damnation for apostasy. Quite the contrary, they are in jeopardy of damnation and criminal arrest in this world and any other world if they remain committed to this spiritual and social corruption.
Here's a Taqiyya-filled "opinion piece" for the Dallas News from Mohamed Elibiary:
"Holy Land verdict is another U.S. defeat"
In it he claims the US government intends to "criminalize traditionally innocent activities such as charity if the government felt it provided “material support” to terrorist groups." He neglects, somehow, to mention what is wrong with that.
I have long suspected that Muslim "charity"—Zakat—has more to do with funding Jihad terrorism than in aiding charity as we Westerners reckon it. This column does nothing to dissuade me.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/viewpoints/stories/DN-elibiary_01edi.5befe31.html
AlaskaInfidel,
This particular college site does not allow any links. This might be why you're having problems. It will allow copying and pasing entire articles, but no links. Otherwise I have not had any problems posting on that site.
Thanks for trying!
Jim Foster wrote:
Last night I sat in my local Starbuck's, perusing volume four of the Sahih al Bukhari, which I had just purchased from a store specializing in Islamic books. A man sitting nearby identified himself as a Muslim and asked me what I thought of Islam. I said that I am not favorably disposed to it. He then went on to share the following "thoughts" with me:
The Sahih al Bukhari is not an Islamic book and was written by "THE Jews"...
...................
I had to ruefully laugh at this, Jim.
My guess is that if you had indicated that your impression of Islam was favorable, this fellow would have extolled the authenticity of Bukhari, and the excellent example presented by the Hadith.
Anything that reflects negatively on Islam *must* be the handiwork of the Jooooooooz.
oh...crap. Yep...hadda link. I'll try again later to gather my thoughts.
In a nutshell all debate regarding islam is entirely pointless as no religion which was created by a man with mos creds deserves any sort of credibility. Pedophile, dabbler in necrophilia, obsessed with chopping off heads, his view of women...the list goes on and on. Blood and Death. This is the fruit that islam bears.
Any religion that is OK with sodomizing an infant has gotta go, just on that basis alone and only because it will not reform.
Hmm...perhaps just repeating what I said above will get the ball rolling there, unless I've been beaten to the punch...
islam is a lie and
Truth is killing it.
Have you ever met a convert to Christianity from islam? The most joyous, happy people you'll ever meet. Annoyingly so. But who can blame them? Free of the slavery of islam they can't help but celebrate.
dumbledoresarmy,
You could always infiltrate the enemy :)
"My guess is that if you had indicated that your impression of Islam was favorable, this fellow would have extolled the authenticity of Bukhari, and the excellent example presented by the Hadith."
That would be a useful experiment for Jim, or any of us. On the next Muslim, tell him "I'm very interested in Islam, and I find Bukhari to be enlightening. I've heard people condemn Bukhari, but I'm not so sure..." etc.
""Don't tar all Muslims with the same brush"
"There is not one Islam".
"Yeah, but look at what the Jews do, the Christians do, the atheists do"
Jihad is a big part of Islam. No other religion has any similar obligation.
How does a moderate, yet devoted Muslim deals with that duty?
Now, last I checked, there is only one Islam and only one book.
"Yeah, but look at what the Jews do, the Christians do, the atheists do"
Which is?
Thank God Nazism wasn't a religion...
"How common is this mentality among Muslims?" This must be a rhetoric question! Honestly, the easiest explanation that some Muslims who are familiar with ethics and moral philosophy can accept is the Isrealiaat" claim. The Isrealiaat claim is that early Jewish converts to Islam have inserted false reports using their uniquely literate position as the scribes in an illiterate society and also as the oral report transmitters. This was either through the good intentions of a few well meaning new converts who wanted to spice up Islam or the bad intentions of Islam-hating vile Jews who conspired to insert immoral ungodly teachings for the purpose of distorting Islam and ruining it. This is the fig leaf that some educated Muslim hide behind even though they are a very small minority as the worst reports of Mohamed's atrocities and vile commandments are accepted and taught in all the mainstream Sunni with their counterparts also taken as truth among the Shiites.
Arfat:
Do not do like some foolish Protestant ministers who tried debating slick Ahmed Didat and lost miserably due to their lack of knowledge. I debated Muslims on forums even before 911 as a college student I have beat some of them to the point that I was issued threats and one posted my last name through an NTTP trace to my college email address. Being the only one with that last name in a school and town with a significant Muslim community, I watched my back till graduation. The point is that debating Muslims even when you are immanently armed with knowledge through a life time of studying Islam in its native language is an exercise in futility as I have found out. Worst yet, the liberal and not so liberal whites, the black and Hispanic anti-establishment posters in those forums ganged up on me and did not care when threats (both veiled and covert) were posted against me. In the end I have given up on 90% of young college age people and long drawn-out debates with Muslims. One posted after much insults that his heart is sealed and he will see me burning in hell. Of course, back then I cannot afford more time to sink in such pursuits.
what is Islam without projection?
What rhymes with MPACUK?
Child rape and child abuse is endemic in Islamic countries, especially in Afghanistan
....and yet, the demented swine from MPACUK would have us believe that "Americans do it too."
http://sheikyermami.com/2010/02/08/what-rhymes-with-mpacuk/
"And Hitler was a Christian and look what he did"
and so on and so forth."
You are misinformed.
Hitler was no Christian and neither where the Nazis.
Joseff Goebbels, Nazi Minister of Propaganda, noted:
"The Fuhrer is deeply religious, though completely anti-Christian. He views Christianity as a symptom of decay. Rightly so. It is a branch of the Jewish race... Both [Judaism and Christianity] have no point of contact to the animal element, and thus, in the end, they will be destroyed."
Hitler thought ill of Christianity, preferring Islam for its warrior spirit:
"You see, it's been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn't we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good?
"The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?"
(Adolf Hitler, quoted by Albert Speer, p. 96, Inside the Third Reich.)
Great post Christian Soldier! (Reffering to the response to Demsci).
I have seen many similar moronic statements from the likes or Demsci, but your reply is one of the better ones I've seen. I'll be adding that to my 'FAQ-debating with Lib&Jihadists Inc.' list.
"look at what the Jews do, the Christians do, the atheists do" he (Demsci) says.
I do, and I actually like it. We call it either the Free World, Western Society, or Liberal Democracy.
I also see what happens where there are no Jews, Christians or Atheists. And we read all about it right here in JW.
Islam is in a class by itself.
Many liberals an apologists for this dark evil like to interject these erroneous comparisons such as Demsci did.
The barbarity and savagery of Islam far surpasses any other evil perpetrated upon
mankind by an organized group of people.
Islam is a global terrorist organization and always has been.
When in the world will this insane, farcical dance be over? You know we're going to have to get it on sooner or later. If the bully wants to fight you, sooner or later, in the hall, on the playground after school or whatever, sooner or later the guy is going to confront you somewhere and then you're going to have to fight - or get your ass kicked, and that is exactly what this is. To those who are reluctant we just have to say, you guys won't be able to avoid this forever..........
Typo correction:
Many liberals and apologists
I left a comment in response to the article. As a Zionist, I believe that we are doing a lousy job of countering the Pro-Muslim propaganda (occupation, aparthied, etc.) used by the Muslims to sway western sensibilities. Anti-Semitism is on the rise in Europe and it will be in the US too if we don't do something about it. Go to ACT!forAmerica (.org) and get involved. We're getting organized to fight back and need all hands on deck.
have_mercy, Thanks for your input. I am, and have been, concerned about my anonymity and do my best to share anything about myself. As we all know the lengths Islamists will go to stop people who speak the truth to Islam.
In any case I do not write to change the hearts of those who are unchangeable, but do so to reach those who are reachable.
Speaking for myself, discovering Jihad Watch and similar outstanding websites has helped me immensely. I am nothing more than a curious person who wants to understand why things are the way they are. I know I am not unusual or unique in this regard. I know there have to be plenty of people like me on college campuses, who if given logical explanations --instead of the incessant bullshit Muslim propaganda machine-- then this can or will change those who care about finding logicals answers about Islam. And these people can reach out to others just as I am trying to do.
I know this sounds like a sappy Hollywood movie (think “Pay it Forward”) and I hope I’m not deluding myself, but if nothing else it helps me refine my thinking about Nazism. Ooppps, I meant Islam!
I pack a Glock 30 (.45 cal.) everywhere I go. I've been armed since I was 18 when my now dead brother in law threatened to kill me. He had killed at least 4 men that I knew of then so...
No permit to carry concealed in Alaska. Some jihadi's gonna poke his head up yell, "Allahu Ak"...and that's about as far as he'll get before being gunned down by all that surround him. The crossfire will be the biggest danger.
I'm easy to find and I know it.
islam is a lie and
Truth is killing it.
AlaskaInfidel, What made you aware of the truths about Islam? It took me a while to figure it out, to find great websites like this one. What brought you --or anyone else for that matter-- to understand Islam for what it truly is?
Hi, Christian Soldier,
Ted ask a question about why many ignorant and political correct people still trust almost all muslims, even after many other muslims have lied.
And as I so often have talked to both Muslims, political correct and ignorant people I answered him THEIR answers. They are NOT my answers and I agree fully with you about Hitler. And with Ted and Muhammad Bear.
It's just that I by now have a lot of experience, also because I read websites like this for a few years now, which caused me to give Ted a fore-taste of what answers he might get.
I have heard so many blatant lies and distortions of history, so much Tu quoque, culture-relativism. At first I was so flabbergasted, appalled by the sheer audacity of lies, the malice behind them, then the huge indoctrination and gullibility of Muslims.
I am part of the Resistance, as DDA sometimes says.
That is a difficult question to answer. The search began years ago...the search for Truth regarding islam.
The first attempt to take down the World Trade Center caught my attention for sure.
It may have been initiated by the 9/11 attack. I wanted to know what motivated those murdering scum to take the actions that they did.
I have always been interested in religions in general, since childhood.
I may have found Jihadwatch at a Conservative website. I just can't recall.
The numerous attacks by muslims on all other religions, the fact that they called for my death as a non-believer may have caught my attention as well. Only an idiot ignores death threats as the Jews will attest to. As a survivor of one of the death camps said, "When someone tells you they are going to kill you, you should believe them." I believe them.
I guess what it comes down to is, "Know thine enemy".
and I do...better and better every day thanks to my friends at JW.
No islam...Know Peace.
Know islam...throw up.
In case your wondering about this flood of anti-Moslem posts, here is what "Arafat" posted on an anti-Moslem site called "Jihad Watch" along with a link to this address:
"I need some help debating a Muslim apologist on Univ of Oregon's student paper's website.
Any help would be greatly appreciate. I'm too ineffectual to do it on my own."
This is how they respond to the Truth about islam at the college site posted above.
They call the Truth about mo and his made up religion "anti-Moslem". That's the way of Truth. I love it. Truth is anti-Moslem!! Perfect! Too bad the apologists there can't see the Truth of their own words.
islam is a lie and
Truth is killing it.
Ted, Christian soldier,
I hope you read my last post and understand that I only tried to mention what kind of reactions we are up against. Maybe clumsily.
In the beginning I was myself appalled, disappointed, confused by the standpoints, opinions of my own Western people, political-correct, multi-culturalist and ignorant of history and worldwide Islamic conditions as they often are.
After reading a lot in books, like those of Robert Spencer, MA Khan etc, and websites like Jihad-watch I have now gotten used to all sorts of arguments the other side and "independents" may have.
Your explanation is well understood.
Keep fighting the good fight against the scourge of Islamic-Fascism.
Christian Soldier
This is true-he subsrcibed to a bizaare blend of Nordic and occult beliefs--he was also good friends with the Mufti of Jerusalem at the time.