This article acknowledges that the practice is permitted under Sharia law. But far too few people realize that the persistence of this practice in Muslim communities stems from Muhammad's own example:
"Narrated 'Aisha: the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death)" (Sahih Bukhari 7.62.64).
"Muslim child brides on rise," by Tom Godfrey for the Toronto Sun, March 12:
"Federal immigration officials say there's little they can do to stop "child brides" from being sponsored into Canada by much older husbands who wed them in arranged marriages abroad.
Top immigration officials in Canada and Pakistan say all they can do is reject the sponsorships of husbands trying to bring their child-brides to Canada. The men have to reapply when the bride turns 16. The marriages are permitted under Sharia Law.
Muslim men, who are Canadian citizens or permanent residents return to their homeland to wed a "child bride" in an arranged marriage in which a dowry is given to the girl's parents. Officials said some of the brides can be 14 years old or younger and are "forced" to marry. The practice occurs in a host of countries including: Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan and Lebanon.
Not valid in Canada
Canadian visa officer Steve Bulmer said in classified documents he refused to allow one Pakistani man to sponsor his 15-year-old bride in August 2009.
"I can find no section (of law) that states the marriage is 'invalid' or 'void," Bulmer wrote in e-mails obtained by lawyer Richard Kurland under Access of Information. "I am afraid the age does not invalidate the marriage even if it is illegal to marry."
Abdul Hameed, of the Canadian embassy in Islamabad, said child marriages are not valid in Canada.
"A child marriage is punishable but it does not render the marriage invalid," Hameed said. "We are refusing such application on grounds the marriage will not be valid as per Canadian laws."
William Hawke, of immigration's Permanent Resident Unit, said the young brides won't be allowed in Canada.
"Sponsorship applications submitted for a spouse under 16 will be refused," he said. "
http://news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1852&theme=Printer
"PEDOPHILIA, ALLOWED BY ALLAH AND PATRONIZED BY PROPHET"
65:4 is the most ugiest sura of the shit Quran!
It allows PEDOPHILIA for Muslim men to marry and have sex with an even one-day-old infant girl ... DISGUSTING
065.004
YUSUFALI: Such of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses (1.), for them the prescribed period, if ye have any doubts, is three months,
(2.) for those who have no courses (it is the same) UNBELIEVABLE!!!
(3.) : for those who carry (life within their wombs), their period is until they deliver their burdens: and for those who fear Allah, He will make their path easy.
From the article:
"Top immigration officials in Canada and Pakistan say all they can do is reject the sponsorships of husbands trying to bring their child-brides to Canada. The men have to reapply when the bride turns 16. The marriages are permitted under Sharia Law."
From the article - "some of the brides can be 14 years old or younger and are "forced" to marry. The practice occurs in a host of countries including: Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan and Lebanon." Add Yemen and Saudi Arabia and Somalia to that list, for starters. And instead of 'the practice occurs in a host of countries' the paper should have written "the practice is legal in a host of Muslim countries...".
Now, O Toronto Sun, you missed an opportunity to educate your non-Muslim readers by quoting the very same passage from the Sahih Bukhari that Marisol quoted above, and explaining that *to this day* Muslims believe it is perfectly OK and indeed a very good idea, following the perfect example of Mohammed the 'perfect man', to wed and bed NINE-YEAR-OLD GIRLS.
Canadians might be able to wrap their minds round the idea of a 14 or 15 year old girl having sex...after all, despite the Age of Consent, there are Canadian girls of that age who (foolishly) *are* having sex with boyfriends of a similar age or not much older; but the idea of a man of 30 or 40 or 50 screwing a *nine-year-old* is something else again.
Canadians HAVE to realize that *this* - adult men screwing *little* girls, little girls who don't even have breasts yet, little girls who may not even have started their periods - is what mainstream Muslim shari'a *permits and approves*: whether the Muslims are Shiites as in Iran, where Khomeini married a ten-year-old and reduced the marriageable age (for girls) from 18 to NINE, and advised parents that they should marry off their daughters at so young an age that the girl will ideally experience menarche "in her *husband*'s house" not in her parental home, or whether the Muslims are Sunnis, as in Afghanistan and Yemen and Saudi Arabia, where the very idea that girls of nine or ten or eleven should NOT be wedded and bedded, has gotten the Muslim clerics up in arms.
Canadian jihadwatchers - letters to the editor of the Toronto Sun with all the ugly facts about Islam's permission, prescription and approval of the wedding and bedding of prepubescent and barely-pubescent girls, and cross-referring to some of the more egregious cases that have recently come to light, such as the 8 year old in Saudi Arabia who sought divorce from her octogenarian husband but was not granted it, or the nine-year-old Nojoud in Yemen who was raped repeatedly by her adult husband, should be sent ASAP.
Memo to the Canadian Immigration Authorities: the sensible thing to do is to stop allowing any Muslims from anywhere to immigrate to Canada, full stop. Because ALL Muslims are supposed to observe sharia law: and sharia law permits not only polygyny but the wedding and bedding of nine-year-old girls. If you don't want Muslim men screwing little girls (and just look up 'thighing', too, O Toronto Sun editor and journalists, and find out what *that* is) then...don't import Muslims.
"I am afraid the age does not invalidate the marriage even if it is illegal to marry."
.....................
That law needs amending. Of course, who in civilized Canada would have seen the need for such a law before Muslims began to push their way in in such large numbers?
I also wonder how many little child brides come into Canada and the rest of the West as "relatives" of cohorts of their abusers?
What a sick, sick creed Islam is.
http://newstime.co.nz/2009/abu-bakr-was-shocked.html
Page 80 “… to brought him his six-year-old daughter, Aisha. Abu Bakr was shocked.”
"Federal immigration officials say there's little they can do to stop "child brides" from being sponsored into Canada by much older husbands who wed them in arranged marriages abroad.
Top immigration officials in Canada and Pakistan say all they can do is reject the sponsorships of husbands trying to bring their child-brides to Canada. The men have to reapply when the bride turns 16. The marriages are permitted under Sharia Law.
Muslim men, who are Canadian citizens or permanent residents return to their homeland to wed a "child bride" in an arranged marriage in which a dowry is given to the girl's parents. Officials said some of the brides can be 14 years old or younger and are "forced" to marry. The practice occurs in a host of countries including: Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan and Lebanon."
Let me get this straight. Adult Muslim men, who wish to bring to Canada their child-brides, and who find themselves sometimes foiled by the Canadian police, are still permitted to live in Canada as Canadian citizens, presumably to travel back to Pakistan or other Muslim countries and have sexual relations, in those countries, with their child-brides, and then, when the child-brides reach the ripe old age of 16, to enter Canada as the wives of people who, in the West, are regarded, and should be regarded, as pedophiles.
Legislation must be drafted that will allow for the stripping of citizenship, and expulsion, of such people. It is not enough to simply prevent them from bringing girls of nine or ten or twelve into Canada as their brides or "brides," but of not allowing to remain in Canada those who have sexual intercourse with these girls outside of Canada, within their Shari'a-approved marriages, sanctioned by Islam, and who, if they could, would change the laws of Canada so that none of them flatly contradict, as so many of them do, and as the legal and political institutions of Canada do, and as the existence of Canada as an Infidel nation-state does. Now it happens that Canada, no better but no worse than many other advanced Western countries that chose to elevate such ideas as "tolerance" and "diversity" (a mindless tolerance, a diseased diversity) to Idols of the Age, to which much emotiional incense is burned, has allowed in Muslim immigrants without bothering to find out what the texts of Islam inculcate, which is surely what counts, and not the fact that some Muslims, for various reasons, do not take quite to heart, or at least do not now act on, all of what is inculcated, though we have abundant evidence that a great many are far more hostile, and inwardly aggressive, toward non-Muslims (indeed, we have the testimony of apostatates who describe how, among themselves, Muslims talk about, think about, non-Muslims and how amazingly adept and smooth they are of presenting a different facade to those same Infidels) tjhan many realize and, what's more, some who may be temporarily "moderate" can turn on a dime, not always for political, but sometimes under the stress of personal setbacks and defeats and resentments of a kind so many of us experience in life, but do not have the grid of Islam to provide a ready-made scapegoat (in this respect, Islam is a little like antisemitism, where Jews play, for the antisemite, searching for The Answer, that is the answer to all confusions about the world, the secret source and explanation of all the world's ills, the center of all imagined conspiracies, and so on; in Islam, it is not the Jews but a larger group -- "the Infidels" -- whispering those temptations of Shaytan, and working always to foil the good, the true, the kind, the decent Muslims, from everywhere spreading Islam and making sure that Muslims in the end rule, everywhere.
The very idea that someone would marry a nine or ten-year-old, and then go back to intermittently have his way with her, if unsuccessful in smuggling her into Canada (perhaps as his child or his niece? How?), and that someone can continue to enjoy the great privilege of Canadian citizneship, though clearly such a person cannot possibly integrate into Canadian society, is absurd.
Draft and pass the right laws to deal with this, and many other related matters. Don't be afraid of offending Muslims. They are not really offended; their victimization is phony. And the more one stands up to their demands, and makes clear that such demands will have a cost, the more likely those already in our countries will quiet down, rather than become still more aggressive. It is when they sense that the Infidels will cave in, will do their bidding, will keep up this pretence that there is nothing at all wrong with Islam, that convinces them always and everywhere to keep it up. There is no end to this, but a strong counter-offensive, not mere defense, will work to keep the problem to possibly endurable proportions.
If you read the many comments on that story you'll see that every single commenter is outraged at this. There is not one "defender" of "multicultural understanding" except for one who, I'm sure, was just being sarcastic. If you took a poll I'd bet that better than 9 out of 10 Canadians would feel the same way, so it's only a matter of time before the politicians must start to feel a serious backlash for their support of these people and their medieval Mahoundian practices...right?
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Right? Isn't the "rubber band" just being stretched and stretched and stretched here? Does there not, at some point, have to be a moment when the tension is too great and the rubber band has to snap?
We need to be open to other cultures and practice multiculturalism. Children as brides are part of Muslim culture. Why do you at (Jihad Watch) seek to impose your values on Muslims and assume that a Muslim man should not marry a six or nine year old girl? By what standard do you make that judgement?
Jihad Watch is being judgemental in this matter. It's also racist to question this. You are engaging in hate speech. Is that not true?
http://newstime.co.nz/2009/daniela-santanche-italy-leader-muhammad-was-a-pedophile.html
Daniela Santanchè (Italy leader): “Muhammad was a pedophile”
http://schnellmann.org/A_Complete_Guide_to_Pedophile_in_Islam.pdf
“(Print) “A Complete Guide to Pedophile in Islam” (PDF 168 KB) “… We must reach the Muslim youth before the Jihadists reach them”
Are you being sarcastic?
Officials said some of the brides can be 14 years old or younger and are "forced" to marry.
Why is that word in hash-marks? Force is certainly being used against these girls. If not beatings by parents, then the brutal psychological violence inflicted by senseless, barbaric beliefs and customs.
It's racist to want to defend little girls from being fucked by middle aged men? Think again Bud. You must be a Muslim or you wouldn't even try a stupid statement like that here. Or are you simply a good old American home grown pedophile type, hoping for change and looking for fresh opportunities?
I've converted to Islam.
The Qu'ran and Allah permits this. Does it not?
You are an Islamophobe.
If I have a choice between Pamela Geller and a six year old girl with her crayons-which do think I'll find more interesting to play with? Which one do you think I'll ask to go outside to play with the puppy?
Allah permits.
I'm open to re-conversion, Isabella. Make me an offer.
"You are an Islamophobe."
You're a total and complete Idiot.
And, a pervert. And, a pedophile. Go check yourself in to the nearest mental institution, Creep.
On the other hand - I think you may still be sarcastic - but, it's not funny. Understand? It's not funny. What kind of charge are you getting out of this?
LOL
Sent my letter the the editors. I only wish it could have been Hughs words.
Any man, or woman for that matter, who admitted being married to a child would normally be arrested, right? Aren't there laws to keep predators off the streets? Why aren't they being applied?
Like every convert to Islam, we can be sure Frank is a lonely sociopathic loser.
Give him a tissue.
I just had a weird "vision" that "Frank" is really "Honest Ibe" on a baiting expedition. I'm probably wrong, but the way his statements are worded is suspicious. Ibe was just here at JHW a few days ago and now this guy pops up with these leading statements that just cry for outrage.
Coming soon to a United States location. Watch for it.
Of course I'm being sarcastic. I'm amazed that anyone but a Muslim could take this crap seriously.
Imagine some guy introducing his "wife" with her crayons and coloring book? It's bizarre.
Sometimes I loath human nature, Darcy. My only defense is sarcasm and humor. Swift was mild in calling humans "Yahoos".
And Frank the plank, Islamic law doesn't permit the reverse. And what a pity Western law doesn't force those who convert to Islam to live in Saudi Arabia or Pakistan.
Okay Frank, if you say so. Your sarcasm and humor is a bit odd in that it doesn't immediately present as such, but okay. I guess some folks are just drier with their funnies.
I'll go to Saudi Arabia and live there to enjoy the multiculturalism and tolerance. In Saudi Arabia there is a tolerance like crazy, unheard of in the US. In Saudi Arabia they give unique meaning to freedom of conscience. Is that not true?
Everybody wants to live in Saudi Arabia-unlike the US.
In any Muslim country you can feel the tolerance everywhere. Hindu? No problem. Jew? No problem. Christian. The same. Tolerance comes off the walls in every Muslim majority country. Freedom of conscience is everywhere in Islam. It's obvious. You can't begin to put into words the tolerance of Islam. It takes your breath away.
No non-Muslim will ever be the same after they've experienced Muslim tolerance in a Muslim majority country. It's wonderful.
Isn't it true?
It has been happening here (Australia)for a long time: Muslim Lebanese "Australians" (and probably other Muslims too) marrying teenagers, going to see them, sometimes living with them in Lebanon until they are old enough to be brought here as legal wives.
But our government can now, since legislation was passed quite a few years ago, prosecute Australian men who go overseas, mainly to Asia, for child-sex-tourist purposes. Maybe Muslims are exempt from this kind of legislation, or maybe the sex-tourists should marry the kids and then they would not be prosecuted?
Final word: Since I've converted to Islam, and returned to the US, I always tell every non-Muslim: "you should treat Muslims in America the way we treat non-Muslims in Saudi Arabia. You need to learn the openness practiced to other cultures everywhere where Muslims dominate.
Islam is about peace and "doing unto others as they do unto you." Yet all I run into is Islamophobia. I don't understand it.
Why fear Islam? It's not rational. That's the problem in the US and other countries that don't enjoy Sharia law.
You need to be open to Islamic culture.
Yep, definitely Ibrahim Hooper.
Keep it up, Frank. The more poker-faced and drier, the better. I'll hold the asciugamano for you myself.
Which one do you think I'll ask to go outside to play with the puppy?
Frank does IT with puppies!?!?!?
Hey Frank: You're not making any sense. You're not funny. You sound disoriented,
personality-disordered. Lots of aggression there. These are muslim-like symptoms, Frank.
No self-respecting 6-year old girl wants to play with muslims, Frank. Whoops, there's the bell--back to your cell!
He's tried and tried but they've all rejected him!
Frank wrote:
Of course I'm being sarcastic.
................
Frank, that's why I end *every* wry comment—no matter how obvious I believe it to be—with "sarc/off". It can be difficult, at times, to know when someone is being sarcastic in print.
Although I did realize your comments were very much tongue-in-cheek.
"Final word"
Promise?
Yay!
I've learned a lot of how it might be possible to write well from studying your writing style over the past several years, but have not learned nearly enough. But at least now I can recognize good writing when I see it, Hugh.
"It can be difficult, at times, to know when someone is being sarcastic in print."-gravenimage
Gravenimage,
Frankly, I was little repulsed by the density of some these people. But, on second thought, I think you are right that sarcasm is not easily expressed in print. Thank you for your wise comment.
You are right.
Frankly, sarcasm isn't all that hard to spot. When it's done well, that is...
Sarcasm. Uh-huh.
Maybe next time you'll choose a more appropriate subject for your exercise in creative writing. Men having sex with little girls is never cute, funny or clever, and yet there is a significant number of the earth's population who is getting away with doing just that.
But I will give you this, I thought your imitation of a POS was superb.
You're very insecure, Georgie Boy?-aren't you? You are a perfect reason as to why Gravenimage's comment needs to heeded.
Your response shows a determined malice. Maybe ye should be posting on the little green football site. That site is headed by a malicious, insecure individual, too.
"Frankly, I was (sic) little repulsed by the density of some (sic) these people."
Uh, excuse me - Jonathan Swift you ain't. So, get off your high horse.
And, I believe that most of us are "repulsed" by your inappropriate "sarcasm."
Thankfully paedophilia is illegal everywhere in the western world.
However I think Canada should modify its laws to recognise that if an application for migration is made by a man to bring his under 16/18 year old wife to Canada then that is prima facie evidence of the man's paedophilia and guilt.
Fuck you, Frank. We have neither time nor inclination for your silly games.
This site is cutting-edge and you want to play tag?
As if you have something to bring to the battle other than sarcasm.
Undaunted
go easy on 'Frank' a bit, please.
Frank has been posting here for years. I think he may have posted here before you came on board - certainly I remember seeing his name here long before. Many of his non-sarcastic postings have been well worth reading - indeed, some of them, on the subject of lying and what it does to those who (such as Muslims) make a habit of it, I found so useful and thought-provoking that I copied and kept them.
He has much more than sarcasm to offer, and usually does offer more than sarcasm.
Well, DDA, from what I know there were laws in Holland and Denmark about brides being at least 21 or even 25 before being allowed to immigrate. Then too there was set an income-obligation, alongsides an maintenance-responsibility-obligation, for bridegrooms who marry with girls from abroad. And of course there is this 3-year-period in which the immigrant not yet has the citizenship and so, when the marriage breaks down, has to return.
But, frankly, I am one of those who say that immigrating on grounds of "love", marrying a citizen, does not have to be shoved down the throats of the receiving population. Do you?
Oh, total banning of importing brides (or bridegrooms) is not necessary. It's just that when 2 people want to marry, they should be expected to do a lot for their love; either living for a change in the poorer country, or qualifying for employment in the new country, learning the language.
And I hope signing a very sharp formulated contract about loyalty above all to the democratic system, over the Islamic (OR ANY ANTI-DEMOCRATIC) system, when the 2 contradict. Same with loyalty to the new country over loyalty to the old country. Not with the illusion of that being obeyed, but with the idea that this contract can be used as an instrument to insure loyal or neutral behavior and to react with extradition or penalties for behaving hostile, to democracy and new country.
I feel quite secure, Frankie, thanks for your concern.
Why the (amateurish) attempt to screw with folks here? Do you have a point? Why hide it in poor writing? Does it satisfy some need you have that people responded to your nonsense? Do you get your kicks from baiting people, Frank? That's the very definition of insecurity, Frank.
Now that you have your little itch scratched, perhaps you could say something of substance?
And then again, perhaps not...
Not to mention the practice of thighing that occurs at wedding celebrations as described in the question asked and answered of Khomeini in his little green book.
One must wonder if this abomination is being practiced as well. No reason to assume that it is not.
islam is a lie and
Truth is killing it.
Here's a very typical posting by 'Frank' made here in 2006. When you read it, go back up to his brief exchange of compliments with Mr Fitzgerald, above; note the style and tone of the writing. I'd bet my bottom dollar it's the same person.
Now, in the 2006 posting, 'Frank' he cites a statement by Mr Spencer
"Now this is a very common tactic. I encounter this all the time. Probably about 10 times a day people say you know nothing about Islam, you’re completely ignorant. And yet they cannot put – bring forth even one statement that I have made in any of my books that is inaccurate."- Robert
And then he reflects upon it:
' Anyone who has studied logic notices how Muslims use logical fallacies (as noted above [by Mr Spencer]) when addressing facts re Islam.
' I wonder if they are consciously using the fallacies, or is it ingrained habit-their normal way of thinking?
'It's not an issue of intelligence (many are very bright), but it seems that when it comes to Islam, logic gets tossed out the window.
- Posted by: Frank at August 24, 2006 9:08 AM
Another poster then responded:
'Frank:
One of the more interesting aspects of Taquiya is that muslim arabs can sail right through most polygraph examinations, even when you know that what they are telling you is not the truth. That's one reason why we've stopped using them in Iraq to judge the veracity of the information given to us by the locals.
They can hear a story about how their cousin heard this or that, and then become convinced that they experienced/heard it first hand. it's very weird...'
Posted by: tazman69er at August 24, 2006 2:35 PM
To which Frank, whom I believe on grounds of style to be the same Frank who has begun posting fairly regularly again here in the past few months, replied:
azman69er-
'We must always be careful to verify sources, but if the information you received is accurate, that is truly amazing.
'I think the price of constantly deceiving others is that a person begins to believe their own lies, and their judgement becomes distorted.
'For our own sake, it's best to speak the truth to the best of our ability-not deceive-and in every way to be what we appear to be.
I agree with Socrates who said, “The shortest and surest way to live with honor in the world is to be in reality what you appear to be.”
http://www.sbnbooks.com/3Min_foreword.shtml
- Posted by: Frank at August 24, 2006 4:21 PM
I think Frank's rage at the ugliness of Mohammedanism, on display in the posted article lured him into the bleak - and unmarked - sarcasm of the postings he indulged in today. Hugh and I saw it, because we remember his entire pattern of past postings going all the way back to early 2006. Most others did not.
I think perhaps Frank took it too much for granted that most regulars here would - like me - remember what he's said and therefore recognise that such statements as were posted today under *his* moniker could *only* be sarcasm.
Frank - am I right?
Here's another historic posting by 'Frank', some two years after the 2006 posting I re-posted above.
'Compare this nonsense [the article under discussion was a Muslim woman lying about taqiyya] with Christ's absolute condemnation of all hypocracy [sic: hypocrisy]-deception. It's probably the hardest teaching of Jesus.
'He was very clear: all deception comes from the evil one. No exceptions.
'However, this article reveals that Muslims are becoming aware that non-Muslims know that Islam permits deception. The deception is loathsome. "War is deception". Islam permits deception.
'Folks get it, Islam permits deception, and no [a]mount of Muslim bs will undo the growing knowledge of that fact among non-Muslims.
'The first victim of deception is the deciever.
' I think patterns of deception (Fibrahim Hooper style) change brain patterns, deception cripples the ability to think logically, makes one prone to others' deception (as with Hooper's pal the Rev. Jim Nutter).
'Every person I've ever met who is bright and honest are formidable in their ability to think clearly.
'Liars are very vulnerable to exposure and much of their intellectual energy is wasted in deception.
'Deceivers must distort reality. Deception alters perception. It's a damaging (to the deciever) permission in Islam.
- Posted by: Frank at January 11, 2008 10:13 AM
I think there is amuch bigger issue at stake here then ,,child brides,, alrough repugnant, this is just the beginning of problems for Canada.
The much greater issue is to start enforcing and implementing Shariah Laws into the Canadian social fabric......
When muslims can establish that, then, canada will go the same way as EUROPE as we are to polite and the fanatical muslims will exploit this to no end.
We have seen a increase in honuor killings and also multiple wives marriages, the Canadian Government is doing very little to curb this anti social conduct which is not in line with the CANADIAN LAWS.
Islamization is becoming a issue in centers like Toronto, Montreal, and other canadian cities where muslims start to become more focal and demand there rights....under Sariah laws.
It is sad to see that under the cover of freedom they are starting to enslave and taking away freedom!!!!
Canada must stand up against the religion of violence.....which is Islam.
dumbledoresarmy-
I believe in Almighty God with all my heart, all my soul and all my mind. I ask Him from the depths of my soul to please bless you.
I know God will answer my prayer. I hope He will give you every good thing in this world and in the world to come. He knows I mean that from my heart. He hears simple me.
Bonhoeffer said that when we call upon Jesus God hears. I call upon Jesus to me re my wish-prayer for you.
He will hear and answer in the affirmative for you. Please God.
Look...Frank said he recently converted to Islam...He is now a Moooslim.....unless this is his style of humour, which, if it is, I do not find funny...but if it is true, then we know all we need to know about this person.
He would do well to go somewhere else...perhaps that little green football place.
Dumbledoresarmy quotes: "Khomeini married a ten-year-old and reduced the marriageable age (for girls) from 18 to NINE, and advised parents that they should marry off their daughters at so young an age that the girl will ideally experience menarche "in her *husband*'s house" not in her parental home..."
Canadian Muslims won't opt
For importing child brides to be stopped.
Their favored defense is
They should witness first menses
And make sure they are properly popped.
Frank: Welcome to the monkey house.
Meanwhile, the FEMINISTS are SILENT!
Cowards!
You're a muslim ....
You're a Christian ....
Which is it? ..or are you neither?
You realize, of course, that now no one will take you seriously.
Whatever you are, one thing is for certain, you are a lying jerk!
Guys, don't bother with this clown ....