Reports of confession wrong: Jihad Jane pleads not guilty

Didn't that Buffalo-based, mahoundian-TV-station owning, Porkistan-born wife beheader also plead not guilty to charges of chopping off his wife's head?

Unless we're talking apostates (who will mercilessly be condemned and threatened by their former fellow members of the Umma), mahoundians always see themselves as "innocent" and "not guilty", don't they?

How dare the Americans try her in a kuffar court!

I says this in the original story:

"LaRose is likely to follow routine legal procedure today during her arraignment and plead not guilty. Such a plea would not preclude a negotiated plea agreement; it would simply mark the start of formal court proceedings against LaRose."

Being a muhammadan means never having to say you're sorry.

She has been in custody since October, this says. Why are we only hearing about all this now?

I think Ms. Napolitano was too busy hunting down disgruntled vets of the Iraq and Afghan wars to report Jane's bust.

*** 92:8 ***

But you must admit that there were no planes or trains blown up by vets during this our Director of Homeland Security's tenure, so good work there.

Colleen LaRose appeared in federal court in Philadelphia...

Now that's a damned shame. Evidence is that she committed her crime as a Jihad war terrorist, in other words as an enemy combatant.

*** 33:21 ***

Therefore she should be tried in a military tribunal.

Colleen LaRose appeared in federal court in Philadelphia accused of plotting with others over the Internet to kill a Swedish cartoonist who depicted the Prophet Mohammed in a way that was offensive to Muslims
...................

I doubt many Westerners reading this will even blink—but they should. By saying that Lars Vilks "depicted the Prophet Mohammed in a way that was offensive to Muslims" Reuters basically implies that all Muslims have a right to feel aggrieved, but that Ms. LaRose just 'went a bit too far'.

This is b*llsh*t. Lars Vilks is not Muslim, and it is in no way incumbent upon him—or on *any* Infidel—to follow Islamic norms.

It's a smaller point, but there is no need to refer to Mohammed as the "Prophet" Mohammed, either—he can be referred to either with "prophet" uncapitalized, or—preferably, when space allows—as "the *Muslim* Prophet Mohammed".

He's not our "prophet", in any case. This also serves—intentionally or not—to enforce Muslim norms. This is also true with the uncritical reference to places like Karbala and Qom as "Holy" cities.

Not to me they ain't. Bet they aren't to you, either.

This is b*llsh*t. Lars Vilks is not Muslim, and it is in no way incumbent upon him—or on *any* Infidel—to follow Islamic norms.

Sorry, Graven, but that's not how this works. They have an epithet for failing to maintain fidelity with their belief system (Infidel), and have god-commands and laws that make such behavior a capital crime.

*** 8:7 ***

Your run-of-the-mill poor hard working Moslem Man never knows when he may be called upon (activated) to act as executioner for such crimes. Mohammed and his gang did yeoman's work in this regard back in the day, as I'm sure you know.

*** 33:21 ***

The whole of Islam is bullsheet, but it's a scam, a great scam, with a proven track record of success and a bright future.

Blonde = peroxide = home made bombs! No wonder Al Qaeda was interested in recruiting her.

LaRose is an enemmy agent and should be tried as such.
What do they normally do with enemy spies and saboteurs?

And gravenimage...He's not our "prophet", in any case.
He wasn't a prophet anyhow.
Doesn't a prophet have to predict something of the future?
As far as I am concerned Mo nver predicted any future events that came true...unless by saying "I am going to kill those Jews" and he did it, that counts as prophesying.

Definition: Rabbinic scholar Maimonides, suggested that "prophecy is, in truth and reality, an emanation sent forth by the Divine Being through the medium of the Active Intellect, in the first instance to man's rational faculty, and then to his imaginative faculty."[4] This closely relates to the definition by Al-Fârâbî who developed the theory of prophecy in Islam.[5]

The Catholic Encyclopedia defines prophecy as "understood in its strict sense, it means the foreknowledge of future events, though it may sometimes apply to past events of which there is no memory, and to present hidden things which cannot be known by the natural light of reason."[6] From a skeptical point of view, there is a Latin maxim: prophecy written after the fact vaticinium ex eventu [7].

By the Islamic/Rabbinic definition of prophesy, I am a prophet. Anyone is a prophet if they receive divine inspiration. Many times in my past I had lucid dreams of events and ideas of universal proportions, often during a few draughts at the local pub. Shakespeare and Bacon, it was said, received much of their inspriation in the same manner. Many times, as well, my drinking friends, thought I was "losing it" so I put a stop to my divine inspiration and cut back on the number of draughts. Too bad...I may have started a successful cult. LOL

PS. I attribute much of this inspiration to ergot, the fungus found on grains.

She'll probably pleade insanity and try to claim that raging testosterone hormones were the cause of it all. "That she was going through the change in life".

Ha, ha, the menopause defense is a good one! (The only problem is she's expressing her temporary insanity to the wrong side. Maybe that's our answer----get all of the menopausal women we can find in the West and let them loose on mozoids (sarc).)

I wonder, has Ms Colleen LaRose had her official islamic clitorectomy yet? It takes more than just a name change, Dear!