Saudis jump on, says world must intervene against "arrogant" Israel

Why does Israel have more Muslims living there as a percentage than any other non-Islamic country?

If Israel is so bad, why don't the more than 1,000,000 Muslims simply leave?

Arrogant? How about confiscation of ALL non-Islamic religious materials by SA upon arrival and destruction soon thereafter?

Israel for Idiots and Muslims

But that is what the Al-Saud say, and what all the Arab rulers say, whenever Hillary Clinton, or the even more egregiously gullible Madeleine Albright, come a calling: they tell them that nothing can happen, that the natural "friendship" of Saudi Arabia (Jordan, Egypt, Syria, you name it) for the West, and especially for the United States, is blocked by the insensate support of the Americans for Israel.

The word "arrogant" used by the Saudis, those daggers-and-dishdasha boys, who are above the law, who cannot be prosecuted anywhere in the Western world -- see the bribery scandal in Great Britain that was dropped because the Saudis threatened to end a contract for the sale of planes and other armaments, see how the Saudi princes are treated whenever they are caught doing this or doing that anywhere in the world -- with their sneers of cold command, the contumely they exhibit toward the entire world of Infidels, despite the fact that they couldn't keep their country running, or even keep themselves secure from popular fury, without Western support of every kind, dare to use the word "arrogant" about tiny Israel, a country and a refuge trying merely to survive, in conditiions other than those of maximum peril, in the face of the endless Jihad being waged against it, and which Saudi Arabs, and the Al-Saud, understand perfectly well, indeed understand perhaps better than anyone else in the world, why there is no end to that Jihad, no assuaging of it, and why therefore, from the Infidel Israelis' point of view, any further concessions, beyond those so many already granted over the years, would be suicidal folly. It is that suicidal folly that Saudi Arabia hopes to encourage.

Jew_Lover,

Thanks for sharing the terrific link, but I think it starts out with an error.

The map of the Islamic area leaves out Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, Western Sahara, Mauritania, Mali, Niger, Sudan and Somalia. I could also be leaving some Islamic countries out, and in any case the map says it all even if the countries I've listed are not included.

And the cowardly West just might oblige the call by their Muslim masters to go on jihad against Israel for them. Would not be a first ... .

March 24, 1999: The day evil struck. NATO evil. And it fell into a long pattern ... .

March 18, 1799, exactly 200 years earlier, almost to the day:

Napoleon and his army have just swept accross Eretz Israel all the way up to Acre. Earlier, he sent secret envoys to local Jews in Jerusalem and Maronite Catholics in Lebanon promissing liberation and statehood for both, and received enthusiastic responses. The Muslim commander in Acre, an old, cruel Bosnian Muslim Djezzar ("Butcher") Pasha who ruled the region with an iron hand, feared the battle with Napoleon who had just brutally vanguished Muslim Turks and future "Palestinians" in Jaffa. He had already loaded his belongings and harem newly replentished with adolescent and young teenage girls aboard a ship and was ready to sail away, when help had arrived ... from the English. Admiral Sir Sidney Smith of the Royal Navy had intercepted a French ship carrying siege artillery for Napoleon from Egypt. He then talked out Djezzar out of fleeing, promising massive aid. He kept his word by coducting a huge sealift of weaponry and supplies to the Muslims. And reinforcements, enormous reinforcements aboard English ships: Bosnians, Albanians, Turks ... . Talk about history repeating itself.
With the English help, the Muslims had defeated Napoleon in Acre. It was not the first jihad attack by the English. Just the previous summer, another English admiral, none else than the national hero of the English people Horatio Nelson, inflicted a Pearl Harbor on Napoleon's Navy at Aboukir, Egypt. Blinded by hate and imperial rivalry, the English were William Pitt-Bull on France, Revolutionary or Napoleonic.
Had not the English destroy Napoleon's campaign to liberate Israel and Levant, the consequences would have been quite spectacular: the State of Israel could well have been created 150 years earlier, as well as free Maronite Christian Lebanon. The 2 non-Muslim states could well forge a military alliance, too early for coward Reagan to destroy it, which he did, in 1983. And Hezbollah duly thaked the Americans by blowing up their Marines.
Shows that the West's imperial rivalry have always aided the Global Jihad.

In 1953, Russia went to war on the Turkish Ottoman Empire, a.k.a. Islamic Califate. Now, the Tsarist Russia was worse than today's Russia, any way you look at it. Then as now, howerver, in the Balkans it was a 100% positive force. On Danube, the Russian troops had run into unexpected difficulties and got blooded by the Muslim army mostly made up of Albanians and Bosnians who exceeded the Turks themselves in their jihad ferocity and cruelty to Christians. They were ably led by Omar Pasha, Michael Lattas, a Croat who voluntarily converted to Islam! Still, Russia persisted, and the Muslims were on the brink of total expultion from Europe. It was not to be. England and France, out of imperial rivalry, would rather see Constantinople in the Muslim hands than under the Christian rule. England and France joined Turkey in the jihad, fighting the bloody Crimean war. For Islam.

And Kosovo 1999 topped it all.

Yes, today is the 11th Anniversary of the unspeakable evil the Western world did unto the Serbian people. To please the Muslims and as a "Grand Rehersal" for the "Big Job" on Russia. Driven by the 2 predominant pathologies of the West's ruling elites: cowardly dhimmi servitude toward Muslims and hate toward Russia. Russia of the old drunken buffoon Yeltsyn who was so very needy for America's friendship, and who was a total yes-man for the West. But instead of appreciating Russia's friendliness, the sociopaths who dominate our US government, and European governments, only saw in it an opportunity to destroy Russia. The abuse of Yeltsyn's good will was only matched by their lowly slavishness to the Muslims.
It is now known as a fact that the Western governments' and media's allegations of "Serb atrocities in Kosovo" were not just over 99% untruth as I previously estimated, but 100% deliberate lies. The democratically elected governments of the United States and UK have outlied even Hitler with his Gleiwitz hoax that he used to invade Poland. The Western democracies used hundreds of Gleiwitzes as excuses of their own evil war on the Serbian people and their holy Christian places. All total lies. There were no "500 Albanians buried uner garbage near Orahovac", no "mass graves", no "Albanians thrown into Trepca mine", no "Dead Albanians hauled away in refrigerator trucks", no "massacre in Racak", and no "rape camps".
But there are rape camps now in Kosovo, the child sex-slave brothels run by Kosovar Albanians under the protective wings of the US and NATO militaries.
The unspeakable evil the Western democracies did unto the Serb people. The evil.

Ruslan Tokhchukov, EnragedSince1999. Will always be.

This call has surely been enabled/encouraged by Obama Administration's sharp criticisms of Israel. When you have "allies" like the US, thinks Israel no doubt, who needs "enemies". At least the Muslim countries make it plain: they want Israel destroyed (then there will be "peace"...)

If Obama had an ounce of human decency, if he really cared about being a "peacemaker," he would have spoke out after the Palestinians began rioting, saying that no one should take his condemnation of Israel as an excuse for violence, and if the Palestinians continue this, he will get no help from the U.S.

If he was against "settlements" and Israel building in "East" Jerusalem, but really meant the words his subordinates occasionally mouth about our unbreakable friendship with Israel, he would have appeared publicly with Bibi yesterday, stepped to the microphone and said that while we disagree over "East" Jerusalem, our alliance is as strong as ever. He didn't because it isn't and he doesn't want it to be. He hates Israel, as we've know for years.

During the transition, when Israel was fighting in Gaza and anti-Semitism was on display throughout Europe and even at pro-Hamas demonstrations in the U.S., Obama--as an internationally popular President-elect could have made a statement that would have made some of his supporters in the media and on the left back off from the vile atmosphere they were helping to inflame. Instead, he took the coward way out and said that the U.S. has only one President and he supports him. Yet he did make a comment about concern for civilian casualties on both sides, which everyone could read between the lines to know that meant concern about people in Gaza, not support for an ally who was fighting to protect its civilians from rocket attack.

And this is the same Saudi Arabia where schoolgirls are sent into their blazing school building to retrieve their hijabs, resulting in 15 of them being roasted alive, sentences people to death on trumped up charges of black magic, and produced 15 of the 19 9/11 murderers, not to mention giving us Osama bin Laden. That country is the fountainhead of seething hatred against the infidel, and if any country should have received the treatment Ann Coulter recommended in the wake of 9/11: "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert the population to Christianity" then it is Saudi Arabia.

The Saudi theo-monarchy permits no free press, no freedom of religion, no independent judiciary, no elections. They don't use waterboarding. They use real torture. Every civilized and even half-civilized state would be within its rights to grind the Saudi thugocracy into the desert sands. Instead of inventing pseudo-criticisms to throw at others, the Saudi thugs should stop building their government around Muhammad, who said, in Sahih Bukhari, the most canonical of hadith collections, "Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him."

Unbelievable. Just in the last few months, Saudi Arabia has sentenced a 75-year-old woman and two men sentenced to imprisonment and lashings, for the crimes of the men *bringing the old lady food*. She was their old nurse, who had fallen on hard times.

They also sentenced a victim of gang-rape to flogging, because she was out with an unrelated man when they were attacked.

Saudi courts refused to annul the "marriage" of a little eight-year-old girl to a man of fifty-eight.

And a harmless Lebanese TV host was *sentenced to death* for "witchcraft"—because he did silly on-air horoscopes.

None of this, apparently, "defies international will. But green-lighting the permits for building apartment houses—Oh, the humanity...

If one keeps in mind that Saudi Arabia is not really a country but a family, and a very corrupt, hypocritical and disgusting family at that, everything else will fall into place. Put another way, a person of sense shouldn't give a damn what Saudi Arabia has to say about Israel, or most anything else for that matter. Screw 'em.