April 2010 Archives

April 30, 2010

You have a right to be free.

The freedom of conscience is guaranteed by the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 18, which declares that people have the right to change religions or have no religion at all.

Muslims have a right to this freedom. Yet all too often they are harassed or threatened for leaving Islam, even in the U.S.

Stand for religious liberty against this violent intimidation. Help sponsor an SIOA bus ad offering aid to those who make the difficult and often dangerous decision to leave Islam. We're taking this campaign nationwide.

On May 3 our Freedom Buses will be rolling again on the streets of Miami. You can find details on how we defeated CAIR and succeeded in running these ads here.

Donate to the SIOA religious liberty campaign via Paypal here. If you have any trouble with that link, click on the "Contribute to Jihad Watch" button on the upper right of the Jihad Watch front page. All donations will go to the SIOA bus campaign.

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us


Sleeping in the middle of the day

Here is part 4 of my interview last Monday with NYC ITV. You can access all of the segments of the interview here (they're on the lower right).

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"No-one may wear in public places clothes that are aimed at hiding the face." An update on this story. "French anti-burqa law to jail offenders," from Indian Express, April 30 (thanks to Ed):

France will jail and impose huge fines on anyone who forces a Muslim woman to wear a full-face veil, according to a leaked version of a proposed law revealed on Friday.
While women will face only a 150 euro penalty if they choose to don a burqa or a niqab, President Nicolas Sarkozy wants to slap one-year prison terms and USD 20,000 fines on those who make others wear them.
"No-one may wear in public places clothes that are aimed at hiding the face," says the text of a new law that is to be presented to parliament in July, according to a copy seen by the pro-government newspaper Le Figaro.
The law will create a new offence of "incitement to cover the face for reasons of gender," the paper said, and this offence will incur a 15,000 euro fine and a year in prison.
Legislators decided to impose a much smaller fine on women caught wearing the veil in public "because these women are often victims," one of the authors of the law told Le Figaro on condition of anonymity.
| 27 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Particularly noteworthy in this story is the claim that banning polygamy will force women into prostitution because they can't find husbands. There are no other options for women to be considered, apparently. "Malawi move to ban polygamy angers Muslims," from BBC News, April 30:

Muslims in Malawi have been angered by government plans to ban polygamy.
A spokesman for the Muslim Association of Malawi told the BBC the proposed law would discriminate against the country's Muslim minority.
He said with about 6% more women than men in Malawi, if polygamy were banned, many women would be left without a husband and become prostitutes.
The gender minister said the ban was necessary to prevent women from being abused in polygamous relationships.
She said problems occurred because men could not give their full attention to more than one woman.
"When a man has two, three, four wives, they are not co-operative - one will be the loved one," said Gender Minister Patricia Kaliati.
It had not been a hasty decision and there had been wide consultation about the matter, she said.
But Imran Shareef Muhammed - secretary general of the Muslim Association of Malawi - disputed this.
"The minister is lying - she didn't consult the Muslim community," he told the BBC's Network Africa programme.
"We are totally rejecting it. There are also other ethnic groups [who practise polygamy] and they also totally reject this," he said.
"If these people go ahead banning polygamous marriages it means many women will go into prostitution.
"Every woman has the right to be under the shelter of a man."

Does she have the right to opt not to be?

He said under Sharia law, polygamy was optional.
"I have only one wife, my dear wife... but the moment they proceed with this, I will take a second wife," he said.
Should the ban come into affect [sic], those already in polygamous marriages would not be affected, but those who flout it could face imprisonment, the minister said.
| 23 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

He has citizenship in two of the most prosperous, advanced societies on the planet. How 'bout that gratitude? More on this story. "Aussie on NY terror charges," by Carly Crawford for the Herald Sun, May 1:

The Australian man arrested as part of a growing al-Qaeda probe in New York is a devoted follower of fundamentalist Islam, sources say.
New York-based Sabirhan "Tareq" Hasanoff, who has both Australian and US citizenship, was one of two men charged with conspiring to provide material support al Qaeda in the US yesterday.
He is accused of lending the extremist network his computer expertise and handling huge sums of money for the group in New York.
Hasanoff's co-accused, Wesam El-Hanafi, 33, allegedly travelled to terror hotbed Yemen to receive orders, later purchasing seven digital Casio watches online.
Such watches are often used as timers to set off terrorist bombs.
He and Hasanoff were arrested overseas and flown to the US ahead their court appearance in Virginia yesterday.
They each faced one count of conspiring with al Qaeda between November 2007 and March 2010 and face up to 15 years in jail.
Hasanoff, 34, allegedly received $US50,000 ($A66,000) from an al Qaeda associate in 2007 and later discussed joining the radical terror cell, court documents show.
The tenant who occupies his townhouse in Flushing, Queens, described Hasanoff as a polite family man who, like his wife Wahida, is heavily into fundamentalist Islam.
"She's very religious and her husband is too," Fahima Rustam told News Limited at the neat split-level home yesterday.
"I'm scared - he was very nice, very quiet person," she said.
The FBI interviewed Ms Rustam early one morning about six months ago, digging for details about her landlord.
Hasanoff has two children - a boy aged five and a four-year-old daughter.
Two days ago, Ms Rustam got a phone call from Hasanoff's sister who asked her to start writing her rent checks in the sister's name, rather than her brother's.
"She didn't say why," said Ms Rustam, who has rented the home for the past four years.
NYPD commissioner Ray Kelly played down fears of a looming terror attack, saying there was no evidence of a specific plot.
"This was part of an on-going investigation into material support for al-Qaeda," NYPD commissioner Ray Kelly said.
| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

They wanted to help "modernize" al-Qaeda -- ironic, considering al-Qaeda's thoroughly un-modern vision for society. "2 N.Y. men charged with aiding al-Qaida," from the Associated Press, April 30:

NEW YORK - Two U.S. citizens were charged Friday with conspiring to provide computer assistance, watches and other support to help "modernize" al-Qaida.
A vaguely worded indictment unsealed Friday in federal court in Manhattan accused Wesam El-Hanafi of traveling to Yemen to meet with unnamed al-Qaida members in February 2008.
The terrorists "instructed him on operational security measures and directed him to perform tasks for al-Qaida," the indictment says. While there, he also "took an oath of allegiance to al-Qaida," it adds.
In February 2008, El-Hanafi bought computer software that allowed him to secretly communicate over the Internet, federal prosecutors allege. That summer, he met with an unnamed co-conspirator and the second defendant, Sabirhan Hasanoff, in Brooklyn to discuss joining al-Qaida, according to the indictment.
The confidential co-conspirator paid $50,000 to Hasanoff, who later traveled to New York City and performed unspecified "tasks for al-Qaida," the court papers say. The papers say that the conspiracy included El-Hanafi purchasing seven Casio digital watches, but doesn't say why.
In a statement, U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said the men had schemed "to modernize al-Qaida by providing computer systems expertise and other goods and services." His office declined further comment.
El-Hanafi, 33, and Hasanoff, 34, were to make an initial court appearance in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia. Friday afternoon.
| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Racially motivated? No. Islam is not a race. Religiously motivated? Yes, and very obviously so. But craven fear drives authorities to outdo Orwell himself, and sweep this affair under the rug as being merely "political" in nature. "Muslim daubs war memorial with 'Islam will dominate the world' - but walks free after CPS says he was NOT racially motivated," from the Daily Mail, April 30 (thanks to all who sent this in):

A British Muslim has shown 'no remorse' after desecrating a town's war memorial with extremist Islamic slogans, a court has heard.
But the Crown Prosecution Service has decided that graffiti proclaiming future world domination for Islam, glorifying Osama Bin Laden and calling for the assassination of the British Prime Minister, 'was not religiously or racially motivated'.
Tohseef Shah, 21, admitted a charge of criminal damage to the memorial, outside Burton College in Burton on Trent, when he appeared at Burton Magistrates Court.
Shah admitted spraying the words 'Islam will dominate the world - Osama is on his way' and 'Kill Gordon Brown' on the plinth of the East Staffordshire Borough Council-owned memorial, on December 10 last year.
He was given a two-year conditional discharge and was ordered to pay £500 compensation to the council, plus £85 costs.
Prosecutor Andrew Bodger said information about Shah and photographs of the graffiti were sent to CPS headquarters in London, for a review by senior lawyers.
He was given a two-year conditional discharge and was ordered to pay £500 compensation to the council, plus £85 costs.
Prosecutor Andrew Bodger said information about Shah and photographs of the graffiti were sent to CPS headquarters in London, for a review by senior lawyers.
They found there was insufficient evidence that the criminal act was racially or religiously motivated - which could have led to a more serious charges and a harsher sentence.
The graffiti was discovered by a council street cleaning manager, who reported the incident and photographed the damage.
The pictures of the desecration were shown in court.
CCTV footage showed two figures spraying the slogans on the memorial. Although they could not be clearly identified, the footage showed one of the vandals discarding the spray can.
Shah, Horninglow, Staffordshire, has no previous convictions.
He was later identified from DNA on the spray can and admitted his actions.
Mr Bodger said: 'Shah wouldn't give an explanation as to why he had done it and had shown no remorse for this very sensitive matter.
The CPS specialist unit was sent the pictures, as well as his mobile phone records, to see if there was a racially or religiously motivated connotation.
'It was decided there was not enough evidence to prove this, and they decided it was politically motivated. It has caused great offence to the community.'
Defending solicitor Mumtaz Chaudry dismissed any belief that Shah held extremist views.
He said: 'This is nothing to do with his religious beliefs, his family's beliefs or his cultural beliefs. He is just an ordinary guy.
'He is remorseful but, at the time of his interview, he was simply answering questions and didn't realise that was the right time to show remorse.
| 60 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The hackers "left instructions to the Danish government to introduce a new law to punish people who publicly insult religion [i.e., Islam]," and "implied in their demands that if the law is not introduced, the hacking of Danish websites will continue."

"Denmark's KFC website targeted by Islamist hackers," from the Daily Mail, April 30:

Denmark's KFC website has been targeted by Islamist hackers.
The hackers decided to gain access to the fast food site and post an educational video about their religion on the page.
They also left instructions to the Danish government to introduce a new law to punish people who publicly insult religion.
The hackers implied in their demands that if the law is not introduced, the hacking of Danish websites will continue.

Emoticon jihad: if graven images are haram, it didn't stop these guys:

The hackers left a slightly cryptic message on the site, which read: 'If your Gov. don't make rules for Punishing anyone Insult Religions in the name of (Freedom of Speech ! ) or ( Freedom to Insult ) :)
'So, take this rule of Hacking ! in the name of
'[ Hacking is a Knowledge and the Knowledge is Free !!!]
'If your People can behave and Learn how to Respect , act rationally and stop to Insult Other Religions
'under the name of ( Freedom to Insult ) or ( Freedom of Speech )
'Then the Rule of Hacking will be stopped

Abrupt style change begins...

'Finally , I would like to remind also with the decree which the Human Rights Agency in the United Nations adopted on the 12th of April 2005. This decree insisted on the ban of distortions and vicious attack against religions and especially Islam; which had been strongly attacked in the last few years !

... And now back to this guy:

'Don't worry .. No files deleted .. Just my Index* has been added to your lame bOx ;)
'Greets Go To: All My Friends in MSN :)'
While it is not clear why the KFC site in particular was chosen, some have speculated it is because of the lack of security on the webpage.
But it is clear why Denmark was targeted - following a controversial cartoon depicting the Prophet Muhammad wearing a bomb-shaped turban being printed in a Danish newspaper....
| 163 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More on this story. "Belgium bans burkas: Women who refuse to show faces to be jailed for a week under draft law," from the Daily Mail, April 30:

Belgium became the first European country to impose a full ban on wearing a burka last night.
Its parliament approved a draft law which states women can be jailed for hiding their faces in public.
The bill - which must be rubber-stamped by the Belgian senate - is set to become law by July.
Centre-Right MP Daniel Bacquelaine said last night: 'The notion of recognising people in the street is essential to maintain public order.
'It's also a question of human dignity. The full face veil turns a woman into a walking prison.'
The ground-breaking legislation comes just ten days after an earlier vote on banning the burka was scuppered by the collapse of the country's parliament and resignation of its prime minister, Yves Leterme.
Despite the political turmoil, MPs in the fragile five-party coalition managed to push through the controversial law yesterday evening.
It means anyone will be banned from covering their face in a public place, including the street, shops, offices, schools and hospitals.
Women will be fined £110 for the first offence.
If they refuse to pay or are caught a second time, they can be jailed for a week. It is estimated up to 400 of the country's 280,000 Muslims wear the burka in public.
The move comes as other countries consider bringing in similar legislation. There is widespread support for a ban on burkas, or full face veils, and niqabs, which cover the head and face but leave the eyes visible, in the Netherlands.
In Switzerland, voters recently supported a ban on the construction of new minarets, while France is preparing to vote in July on its own law banning Islamic headwear.
Under French proposals, women would be fined up to £600 for hiding their faces, and be 'unveiled' at a police station so they could be identified.
Husband who forced their wives to wear burkas would be sent to prison....
| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

There must be a whole lot of "misunderstanders" of Islam in Sweden for Comedy Central to be so afraid for its affiliated personnel there. Otherwise, what are they afraid of regarding these episodes -- disgruntled redheads protesting the "ginger" jokes? "South Park Muhammad joke won't air in Sweden," from The Local, April 29 (thanks to LazyBuddha):

The Swedish affiliate of broadcaster Comedy Central has said it will not show two controversial episodes of US satirical cartoon show South Park depicting the Muslim prophet Muhammad in a bear costume, Aftonbladet reports.
"Comedy Central has decided not to air these two episodes of South Park. It is a decision we've made with great reluctance. Comedy Central believes strongly in creative freedom of expression; when unique and deeply insightful creative talents like those behind South Park are able to express themselves freely, we all benefit.
"However, the safety of our employees is our unquestioned number one priority, and therefore we have decided to take these precautionary measures," the broadcaster explained in a statement released to Aftonbladet.
Spokesman Peter von Satzgerl told the Svenska Dagbladet daily that the decision came as a result of "international directives" from the channel's parent network in the United States.
The Muhammad joke formed part of a 200th anniversary episode screened in the US on April 14th, prompting threats of retribution from an Islamist group directed towards the notoriously irreverent show's creators, Matt Stone and Trey Parker.
The warning, posted on the website revolutionmuslim.com and interpreted as a direct threat in much of the US media, cautioned Stone and Parker that they "will probably wind up like Theo van Gogh", a Dutch filmmaker murdered in 2004 after making a film critical of Islamic society.
The pair appeared to heed the warning last week when the second part of the centenary show was aired, with the word Censored appearing after the Muslim prophet's name was mentioned, and with the bear-suited Muhammad replaced by Santa Claus.
The first episode contained typically mocking depictions of several religious figures and assorted celebrities, with Buddha at one point being chastised by Jesus for snorting cocaine. It is not the first time that Muhammad and other religious figures have featured on the show, having previously put in an appearance in the fifth season episode Super Best Friends.
The 200th episode tells the story of a class action suit filed by all the celebrities who have been mocked on the show. Tom Cruise promises to end the law suit if the town can produce the Muslim prophet Muhammad.
The South Park townsfolk in the end decide to hand Muhammad over to a group calling itself the Ginger Separatist Movement, to avert a threatened bombing of the town.
| 48 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The State Department seems to think that, among the other attacks carried out by Doku Umarov's group, a massacre on the Moscow subway isn't jihadi enough for the jihadi club. This decision seems far more political than practical, though it is not clear what Foggy Bottom hopes to gain by looking the other way. "State Department to leave Chechen rebel group off terror list," by Josh Rogin for Foreign Policy, April 29:

The State Department's update of its annual list of official terrorist groups is imminent, but the group that just attacked Moscow won't be on the list.
The Caucasus Emirate, which has been waging a jihad against the Russian government, is led by Doku Umarov, who calls himself the "emir of the North Caucasus." He was previously President of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria, but dissolved that Republic and established the Emirate in its place in 2007 in order to impose sharia law in his territory.
Umarov declared all the way back in 2007 that his group was expanding its struggle to wage war against the United States, Great Britain, and Israel. Last month, he released a video claiming credit for the suicide attacks in Moscow in March that resulted in the deaths of 39 people.
But apparently, the State Department chose not to include Caucasus Emirate in the newest update to its list of foreign terrorist organizations, according to Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-FL, who is calling on the State Department to add the group for the sake of national security and U.S. -Russia relations.
"This is a low profile organization that has continued to carry out high profile acts of terrorism, including the twin bombings in Moscow recently," Hastings told The Cable in an exclusive interview, "They've got a jihad against Russia and the United States. If that ain't a terrorist organization, I don't know what is."
Hastings is introducing a new Congressional resolution Thursday detailing the crimes committed by Caucasus Emirate and urging the State Department to add them to the list of foreign terrorist organizations.
Hastings, who is a member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), got involved in the issue after hearing about the group from scores of Russian lawmakers. He said listing the group would be an easy win for U.S.-Russian relations.
"President Obama has pressed the reset button, but too often we find ourselves not trying to do things with the Russians," said Hastings, "The State Department has the opportunity to amend the report to include this organization."
Some experts note that there is internal debate within the Chechen rebel community about whether the group's declarations of jihad against the West is really such a good idea.
"It seems that the Caucasian rebels themselves are frightened by their own 'war declaration' against the West," Andrei Smirnov wrote in an article for the Jamestown Foundation, "The absurdity of the rebels' declarations lies in the fact that they declare war against the West, and at the same time beg for aid in their anti-Russian struggle."
"Whatever the Caucasian rebels say, it is clear that they do not have much in common with the interests of the international Jihadi movement," Smirnov went on, "This movement has no smaller plans than the Jihadi movement worldwide, but it nonetheless limits itself to activities inside Russia's borders and has no ambitions to grow into an international problem."...

They are already a facet of a major "international problem,", and "regional" jihadist groups, united by the intention to impose Sharia law, have a funny way of forming broad alliances, and sharing resources and personnel -- see, for example, al-Shabaab in Somalia, and the former Salafist Group for Call and Combat in northern Africa.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Kenya has responded by deploying security agents. As a government spokesman said here, "On our side of the border is a nation of law and order where there is no legal restriction on showing football."

"Kenya investigates Islamic group crackdown on soccer," by Noor Ali for Reuters, April 30:

(Reuters) - Kenya has deployed security agents to its border with Somalia after Islamic clerics announced they had clamped down on the public broadcast of soccer and films, a security official said.
Clerics in the frontier town of Mandera said Monday they had confiscated a number of satellite TV dishes in a football-obsessed nation ahead of the World Cup because public film dens were corrupting youths.
"Two groups, an undercover team from National Security Intelligence Service and (an) anti-terrorist unit, arrived here Tuesday night to investigate," a senior local security source who did not wish to be named told Reuters late Thursday.
The security officer also said another team had been dispatched to Dadaab refugee camp which is home to some 270,000 mostly Somali refugees in the mostly Muslim region.
He said local residents from Mandera, located just a few kilometres from the porous border, claimed al Qaeda-linked al Shabaab rebels in Somalia had made phone calls to congratulate the clerics.
A government spokesman denied the deployment but one leading cleric in Mandera, Sheikh Daud Sheikh Mahmud, said he had been informed of the intelligence officers' arrival.
Mandera district's top civil servant sought to allay fears that hardline Islamist insurgents in southern Somalia might be extending their influence across the frontier and said it was a local security committee that had closed down the video halls.
"The closure of video dens has the government's blessing," said District Commissioner Francis Lenyangume.
Lenyangume said parents backed the move because the dens were frequented by drug pushers and showed pornographic films. Local residents were free to watch the World Cup and satellite TV in their own homes, he said.

Creeping Sharia is creeping Sharia, and the Kenyan government has a vested interest in monitoring and resisting it. For that matter, claims of this kind at combating "pornography" are best taken with a grain of salt, as demonstrated by the threat posed to legitimate cultural and religious expression seen in Indonesia.

Al Shabaab militants control swathes of central and southern Somalia, including much of the area bordering Kenya, enforcing a harsh version of sharia law that includes banning music on radios and amputating the hands of thieves.
Ten percent of Kenya's 39 million people are Muslim and 78 percent are Christian, according to the CIA World Factbook.
| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The facts of this case smack of sheer opportunism, and in this case, the judge saw through it. "Dearborn Heights woman told to remove hijab loses court case," by Paul Egan for the Detroit News, April 29 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Detroit -- A federal judge today dismissed a lawsuit against a Wayne County judge accused of telling a woman to remove her Islamic head scarf.
U.S. District Judge Marianne O. Battani ruled there was no evidence Wayne Circuit Judge J. William Callahan knew Raneen Albaghdady's head covering had religious significance when he asked her to remove it during a name change petition last June.
"Albaghdady never protested removal of her head piece, she never informed defendant that her 'hat' was a hijab, and most critically, when asked to remove it, said, 'OK. It doesn't matter,'" Battani said in an 11-page opinion dismissing the lawsuit brought by the woman and the Council on American-Islamic Relations of Michigan.
"There simply is no evidence that Callahan would have required the removal of a head covering if he had known of its religious significance."
Albaghdady of Dearborn Heights said in an affidavit she acquiesced because she was "terrified and scared," but Battani, who reviewed a videotape of the court proceeding, said "her demeanor in court does not comport with her assessment of her feelings."...
| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

April 29, 2010

PostAmericanPresidency.jpg

Here's what they're saying about The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration's War on America, which is coming July 27 from Simon & Schuster -- you can pre-order now here:

Sheer brilliance! The ultimate patriot's handbook. Sharp, well-written and to-the-point. Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer lay bare Barack Hussein Obama's radical, anti-America agenda and how to stop it. No true American's library will be complete without this book.

- Brad Thor, #1 New York Times bestselling author of Foreign Influence. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At a time when the US media - the traditional watchdogs of American democracy have transformed themselves into President Barack Obama's lapdogs, the new media, on the Internet plays a crucial role in bringing accurate news to the public's attention. At Atlas Shrugs, Pamela Geller does this on a daily basis. In the Post-American Presidency, Geller shines her laser on President Barack Obama - his life, his values, his friends and his perceptions of the country he leads. What she reports will disturb not only every American who believes in that America is the Shining City on the Hill and that the American people are what Abraham Lincoln referred to as "the almost chosen people." It should also disturb people around the world who recognize that the international system stops working when the American Atlas shirks the burden of its uniqueness.

--Caroline Glick, Senior Contributing Editor, Jerusalem Post, former assistant foreign policy advisor to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and author of The Shackled Warrior. Israel and the Global Jihad.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Czechs, Israelis, Indians and other US allies were the first to realize we were heading toward a post-American world. Now it's time for Americans to wake up to the realities of this President's transformation of the country and its global role. Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer are two of the most incisive analysts of events at home and abroad, and you could not ask for better guides to where "hope", "change" and czars are taking us - and what Americans can do about it. 

--Mark Steyn is an international bestselling author, columnist and leading Canadian human rights activist.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This book is a chilling analysis of how the policy of president Barack Obama is chipping away at the very foundation of America's leading role in the world. It exposes his philosophy of near universal 'moral equivalency'; a philosophy that is a dead ringer for the cultural relativism that has been poisoning Europe for the past decades. America is the last man standing and it is vital that the people in Europe adopt the attitude of proud American citizens and learn that it is not shameful to be proud of one's heritage. This book is incredibly fascinating and at the same time holds a deeply disturbing message -- a message we should all take to heart. 

---Geert Wilders Dutch MP

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Barack Obama is a revolutionary on a mission to cut America down to size. One size fits all, to be precise. His post-sovereign America is a country no different from any other: economically bankrupt, morally rudderless, with nothing exceptional about it besides the heights from which it tumbles and the remorselessness of its choice - his choice - to decline. With their characteristic attention to detail, clarity and fearlessness, Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer assay the wreckage. The Post-American Presidency is must reading for every concerned American who needs to know why we're in this perilous moment, and where we're headed if we don't take our exceptional country back.

--Andrew C. McCarthy, National Review legal affairs editor and bestselling author of Willful Blindness: A Memoir of the Jihad

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Barack Obama is the most radical individual ever to occupy the White House. This excellent book by Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer explains exactly what that means and why its implications are fraught with such dangers for this great Republic.

---David Horowitz, conservative activist, coauthor of Destructive Generation and author of Radical Son

| 40 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Provided the law is allowed to stand and is enforced, it is a victory for human rights, non-Islamic law, and... Vitamin D. "Belgian lawmakers vote to ban full Islamic veil in public," from Agence France-Presse, April 29:

AFP - Belgian lawmakers voted overwhelmingly Thursday to ban the wearing of the Islamic burqa in public, paving the way for the first clampdown of its kind in Europe.
In the lower house of federal parliament, 136 deputies voted to ban nationwide clothes or veils that do not allow the wearer to be fully identified, including the full-face niqab and burqa.
There were two abstentions. No one voted against.
The upper house of parliament has two weeks to raise any objections to the decision.
The ban will be imposed in streets, public gardens and sports grounds or buildings "meant for public use or to provide services" to the public, according to the text of the bill.
Exceptions could be allowed for certain festivities like carnivals if municipal authorities decide to grant them.
People who ignore the new law could face a fine of 15-25 euros (20-34 dollars) and/or a jail sentence of up to seven days, unless they have police permission to wear the garments.
All governing parties and the opposition agreed on the move -- most on the basis that people cannot be recognised wearing the clothing....
| 45 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"The Viale Jenner mosque has been linked to Islamist terrorism several times but has so far managed to avoid closure, despite a July 2008 order from the government."

Why? "Italy: Imam 'arrested' in Milan after terror conviction," from Adnkronos International, April 29 (thanks to Sr Soph):

Milan, 29 April (AKI) - A radical Muslim preacher was arrested in the northern city of Milan on Thursday, sources close to Milan's Muslim community told Adnkronos International (AKI). Italy's top appeals court on Wednesday jailed Egyptian-born Abu Imad on terrorism charges.
The imam, who previously led prayers at Milan's central mosque was taken to police headquarters and was to be transferred to the city's San Vittore prison, the sources told AKI.
Imad was the imam at Milan's Viale Jenner mosque until early 2009 but was not previously arrested. Under Italian law, suspects can remain at liberty until they have completed their appeal, if a judge does not consider they are likely to flee the country or tamper with any evidence against them.
Italy's highest appeals court, the Court of Cassation, on Wednesday upheld a previous prison sentence imposed on Imad by a Milan court in December 2007.
The court sentenced Imad to three years and eight months in prison for conspiracy to carry out a terrorist act.
Ten other people were also jailed for the same offence, receiving sentences that varied from two to 10 years, while four others were acquitted due to lack of evidence.
Milan prosecutors had asked for jail terms ranging from four years and six months to 15 years for all the defendants.
Imad and his co-defendants had allegedly set up a Salafite cell that was active in Milan and elsewhere in the northern Lombardy region.
The cell's mission is believed to have been recruiting suicide bombers, trafficking illegal immigrants and indoctrination.
The Viale Jenner mosque has been linked to Islamist terrorism several times but has so far managed to avoid closure, despite a July 2008 order from the government.
| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The military spokesman, quoted below, seems a bit overconfident. To quote an American military saying, "Hope is not a method." "Pakistan Taliban militants 'reappear' in Swat valley," from BBC News, April 29:

Taliban militants have resumed targeted killings of local leaders in Pakistan's troubled Swat valley, officials have told the BBC.
Pakistan's army declared the Swat valley free of militants after carrying out an anti-Taliban operation in 2009.
A Pakistani army spokesman said three people had died in attacks over the last 10 days. Local journalists say that seven have died in 15 days.
The militants were effectively in control of the region from 2007.
In 2009, they started to expand their power across North West Frontier Province, prompting the army to launch its offensive.
Differing accounts
"There have been three incidents of targeted killings," Col Akhtar Abbas, head of the army public relations in Swat, told the BBC.
"But these incidents do not mean that the Taliban can return in any organised form to the Swat valley. The army is confident of this."...
| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

With apologies to Sam Cooke:

Don't know much about history;
Don't know much biology;
Don't know much about a science book;
Don't know much about the French I took;

But I do know that Allah hates you*;
And I know that if we blame the Jews,
What a halal world this would be.

*Sahih Bukhari 2.24.555: "Allah has hated you" for asking too many questions.

"Three schools blown up in Orakzai Agency," from Dawn, April 29:

PESHAWAR: Three schools were blown up by militants in the Mamozai area of upper Orakzai Agency on Thursday.
The attacks were the latest in a slew of militant violence. On Wednesday, suspected militants attacked a checkpoint in Beizot. Forces retaliated and killed five suspected militants and injured several others.
Five suspected militants were also arrested in Mishit-Mela and Ferozekhel.
It has been almost four weeks since the Orakzai operation was launched in the agency, in which troops claim to have killed over 400 militants so far.
Security forces also claim to have consolidated their positions in most parts of the lower Orakzai and now claim to be advancing towards the central part of the agency.
In the Khyber Agency at least five militants have been killed and 18 others have been arrested including two commanders of Lashkar-e-Islam in Bara Tehsil.
| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Sharia Alert: On the chopping block are sites dealing with "activities that conflict with the country's Islamic culture." There's a lot of room to work with there, and that's most certainly the idea. "Afghanistan to launch internet crackdown," by Matthew Green for the Financial Times, April 28:

Afghanistan's government is introducing new rules to ban internet users from accessing sites promoting pornography, alcohol and gambling or other activities that conflict with the country's Islamic culture, a senior official said on Wednesday.
The communications ministry is in discussions with internet service providers and telecommunications companies to introduce filtering systems to restrict access to certain sites and aims to start enforcing the ban next month.
"Areas like gambling, promoting alcohol or pornography - these are certainly areas which will be filtered because they are against our values," a senior official in the country's communications ministry told the Financial Times.

One major problem here is that, as we have seen in Indonesia, the excuse of fighting "pornography" easily becomes an elastic clause under Sharia for the suppression of legitimate religious and cultural expressions.

The official said a complete list of restricted sites and topics was being drawn up by the culture ministry and he did not yet have full details.
The official said the filtering system was being put in place in response to concerns expressed in parliament. Lawmakers have repeatedly objected to foreign media content they consider unsuitable for Afghan society, in particular movies made in India featuring scenes of men and women singing and dancing together.
The were at least 20 internet service providers active in Afghanistan, the official said.
A second government official confirmed that there was a joint effort underway by the ministry of communications and the ministry of culture to ban access to pornographic sites.
One internet provider wrote in a note to clients that it had been required to start filtering content relating to alcohol, dating sites, drugs, weapons, gambling and pornography from May 1.
| 51 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"He denied breaking the law but said he would not respect any law that contradicted his religious beliefs."

Again, there is an obvious conflict of interest in his being involved in the governance of Nigeria as a whole. "Nigerian senator Sani denies marrying girl of 13," from BBC News, April 28:

A Nigerian senator accused of marrying a 13-year-old Egyptian girl says he has done nothing wrong.
Ahmad Sani Yerima, 49, told the BBC that his fourth wife was not 13, but would not say how old she was.
He denied breaking the law but said he would not respect any law that contradicted his religious beliefs.
The Nigerian senate ordered an investigation after complaints from women's groups but the senator said he did not care what the groups thought.
Mr Sani was the governor of Zamfara state, where he oversaw the introduction of Sharia law - for the first time in a northern state - in 1999.
He said he felt it was this that was behind the uproar over his marriage.
"I consider all those complaining about this issue as detractors, because since 1999... many people have been waging different kind of wars against me," he told the BBC's Hausa Service by telephone from Egypt.
The senator said he had followed "standard rules for marriage in Islam".
"I don't care about the issue of age since I have not violated any rule as far as Islam is concerned," he said.
"History tells us that Prophet Muhammad did marry a young girl as well. Therefore I have not contravened any law. Even if she is 13 as it is being falsely peddled around.

Is Ahmad Sani Yerima an Islamophobe?

"If I state the age, they will still use it to smear Islam," he said. [...]
The women's groups want Mr Sani to be taken to court, to face a fine and a jail sentence.
They say he has contravened the Child Rights Act of 2003 which, although not ratified by all Nigeria's 36 states, is law in the capital where he lives and his marriage is believed to have taken place.
"As a Muslim as I always say I consider God's law and that of his prophet above any other law," Mr Sani said.
"I will not respect any law that contradicts that and whoever wants to sanction me for that is free to do that."

Ok then, let's do that.

| 31 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

There. That wasn't so hard, was it? Nonetheless, don't expect this to go unchallenged. "Libel on tour: James Gill," by James Gill for the Times-Picayune, April 28 (thanks to Mackie):

Within minutes Monday a legislative committee repudiated both Islamic and British law.

Neither, perhaps, represents an immediate threat to justice in Louisiana, but it was not entirely an alarmist and xenophobic stunt when the committee approved two bills by Rep. Ernest Wooton, R-Belle Chase. Mostly, but not entirely.

One of Wooton's bills, which provides that no foreign law shall be applied here if it violates a right guaranteed by the American Constitution, is by any rational measure superfluous. But it is not unknown for immigrant litigants to invoke the tenets of Sharia to which, the committee was told, the Maryland courts deferred in a child custody case.

The Louisiana Supreme Court has so far insisted that cases in America are settled according to American law, but the committee figured it was wise to commit future jurists to that sound principle. At least the bill does no harm.

Wooton's other bill may be largely symbolic too, although it is worth passing just in case. It does not single out the Limeys, but its refusal to enforce foreign defamation judgments that are "repugnant to the public policy of this state" is clearly aimed at them. Other states have passed, or are considering, similar legislation in response to a libel award rendered in London against the American writer Rachel Ehrenfeld.

It must be embarrassing for the British when American legislators lump them together with the avatars of medieval repression, but plenty of them are evidently aware it is fair, at least in the context of libel law. As a general election approaches, all three major parties in the UK promise to reform laws that have created "libel tourism" on the very island where John Milton wrote the book on press freedom, "Areopagitica." That was in 1644, so it's about time the government got the hang of it....

Indeed.

| 91 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is part 3 of my interview Monday with NYC ITV, in which I answer the Question That Won't Die. You can access all of the segments of the interview here (they're on the lower right).

| 72 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Suhail A. Khan serves on the Board of Directors for the American Conservative Union and as a Senior Fellow at the Institute for Global Engagement, a Christian organization dedicated to religious freedom worldwide.

And both the American Conservative Union and the Institute for Global Engagement ought to be ashamed to be associated with this base smear artist.

Suhail Khan here defames me as "anti-Muslim," and if standing for freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and the equality of rights of all people before the law is against Muslims, well, Suhail Khan said it.

Khan also charges me with "bigotry" and some kind of morphing anti-Semitism, which is particularly absurd since his coreligionists regularly rail at me as a "Zionist Jew," but of course Khan means that Arabs are Semites, and because Islam is an Arabic faith (although most Muslims are not Arabs), to oppose Islamic supremacism and the denial of rights entailed by Sharia must be anti-Arab and hence anti-Semitic. Got it?

And the corollary to that, of course, is that the Muslims are the new Jews, and so to resist the jihad and Islamic supremacism is to pave the way for a new Holocaust, this time with Muslims as the victims. Khan and others who use this argument are trying to bamboozle people into thinking that standing up for human rights against Sharia is paving the way for genocide.

If you see the ridiculousness of Khan's twisted trail of self-pity and claim of victimhood for Muslims, you'll know why he was so thoroughly bested when he acted as Dinesh D'Souza's backup man in a debate with me -- while officially serving as the moderator of my debate with D'Souza at CPAC 2007. See for yourself, and judge for yourself, here and here.

Note also here again the descriptor "blogger," which Khan uses in order to impugn and diminish, opting for it rather than telling his readers that I have written bestselling books, advised the FBI and Centcom, etc. This is not personal -- Khan is under no obligation to say anything or not say anything about me. The point is that this is all part of his presentation, which is one long attempt to smear and discredit those who tell truths about Islam that Khan wishes would remain untold.

Nonetheless, for all his personal nastiness and carelessness with the facts, I am still willing to debate Suhail Khan. Yet despite the fact that he debated me by proxy, pointing most of his remarks toward me while he was supposed to be debating Frank Gaffney, he continues to duck my invitation to debate the real me. Now, why is that?

I suspect it's because he knows I will catch him out when he tells whoppers like this one:

"Anti-Semitism on training wheels," by Suhail Khan in The Daily Caller, April 27 (thanks to James):

Anti-Muslim blogger Robert Spencer proclaims that the Muslim prophet Muhammad was a guilty of host of heinous crimes including the rape of a child because he was betrothed to Aisha when she was nine years old. Of course, most are keenly aware that a betrothal and actual marriage are two separate things and readers of the Old Testament recall that Isaac was betrothed to Rebecca when she was three years old. Like Wilders, Thomas, and Coulter, Spencer's bigotry easily morphs into anti-Semitism.

Ah, how sweet. He was "betrothed." Just like Isaac and Rebecca. It's only I, greasy Islamophobe that I am, who would try to make something ugly out of that. Right? Well, readers of The Daily Caller may be fooled, but for the less cloudy-minded, here is what the Islamic texts actually say:

Narrated 'Aisha:

that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death). -- Bukhari 7.62.64

Sahih Bukhari is the hadith collection that Muslims consider most reliable. It says, not just in the above passage but in three other places as well, that Muhammad consummated his marriage with Aisha when she was nine years old.

Mr. Khan, "consummated" and "betrothed" are not synonyms.

Oh, and by the way, Suhail Khan is lying about the Old Testament also. Isaac and Rebecca first meet in Genesis 24, and she is very clearly an adult woman, not a three-year-old. Nor does Genesis make any mention of their already having been betrothed before they met.

| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

An elaborate set-up, as detailed below. Police have taken no action, and the family is still receiving threats. Over a beard. "Pakistani Muslims Severely Beat, Sodomize Christian Barber," from Compass Direct, April 28:

SARGODHA, Pakistan, April 28 (CDN) -- A Christian barber in this Punjab Province city is still recovering from broken bones and other injuries sustained earlier this month after eight Muslims allegedly beat and sodomized him for cutting the beard of a Muslim.
Marwat Masih, 29, initially refused the request of 19-year-old Qandeel Cheema to cut his beard in Sargodha's Gulshan-e-Bashir town on April 13, knowing that area Sunni Muslims believe the Quran prohibits it. But Cheema, a high school student, told Masih that he had lived and studied in Lahore and therefore wanted a more modern look, the bed-ridden and feeble Masih told Compass.
"I refused to shave his beard, but he showed me his packed bags and said that he would leave the town straight after the shave, and so no one would ever know that I had shaved his beard," Masih said.
Eyewitnesses told Compass that as Masih was cutting Cheema's beard, the client's older brother - local radical Muslim land owner Shakeel Cheema - was returning by tractor from his fields and, noting the family Jeep in front of the Marwat Hair Stylist shop, stopped in.
"When Shakeel Cheema saw me shaving his younger brother's beard, he became angry and started vandalizing mirrors, the sound system and chairs, and he desecrated a wooden cross perched on the top of the front mirrors," Masih said. "He also started beating my head with his shoes."
Eyewitnesses told Compass that Shakeel Cheema shouted orders to his companions to tie Masih up and throw him into the wagon attached to his tractor, and that he ordered his younger brother to leave for Lahore at once.
Masih said that he was blindfolded with a black cloth and taken to an unknown place where he was locked in a room. An hour later, Shakeel Cheema and seven others arrived and began striking him with clubs, breaking his ribs, a wrist and leg bones.
"Shakeel Cheema said, 'Now we are going to teach you a real lesson for shaving the beard of a Muslim man," Masih said, and after a long, pained pause he related how Cheema and the seven others sodomized him. "I started bleeding and fell unconscious."
His father, Laal Masih, older brother Hassrat Masih and other relatives had begun searching for him, and after midnight that night they found him lying half-naked and unconscious off the main street of Gulshan-e-Bashir town, his father told Compass. They immediately took him to Rural Health Centre, where doctors kept him under observation for two days and treated him for internal bleeding and the broken ribs, leg bones and wrist.
"We submitted an application to the Saddr police twice, but they took no action against Shakeel Cheema and his accomplices," Laal Masih said. The family is appealing to Christian ministers and parliamentarians for assistance.
Still receiving threats of harm if they do not leave the area, family members also said they cannot afford the fees of a standard physician and have resorted to help from lesser trained doctors.
Police have refused to file a First Information Report against Cheema and his accomplices, who all remained at large at press time.
A shopkeeper next to Masih's barbershop told Compass that the barber deserved the abuse.
"He deserves such punishment, as he did something that is forbidden according to the teaching of the Quran and the sunna [arabic word for the sayings or habits of Muhammad, the prophet of Islam]," said Muhammad Maqsood, who has a long, white beard. "Marwat Masih paid for his crime."...
| 55 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

April 28, 2010

Speaking of lies and smears, a story went out last week about a Virginia driver with an anti-jihad sign on the back of his truck, who was made to change his license plate number after CAIR complained that his existing plate number contained coded neo-Nazi slogans. The implication of the story, of course, was that anti-jihadists are neo-Nazis -- which, despite the febrile fantasies of libelblogger Charles Johnson and his cohort, CAIR's amiable stomach-stapled beekeeper Honest Ibe Hooper, flies in the face of the facts: Muslims generally allied with the Nazis during World War II (and Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem, was a major player in the planning of the Holocaust), and actual neo-Nazi groups like the Aryan Nations are pro-Muslim.

And now it turns out that CAIR's whole story was false in the first place: the driver in question, Douglas Story, is not a neo-Nazi at all, but a racing fan. The alleged code numbers for neo-Nazi slogans were actually favorite race car drivers' numbers.

Will Honest Ibe Hooper apologize to Douglas Story? Come on, Ibe! It would be the decent thing to do!

"Virginia driver denies license plate had coded racist message," by Brigid Schulte for the Washington Post, April 29:

Douglas Story, a Chantilly dump truck driver for the Virginia Department of Transportation, says he wanted to grab people's attention when he paid $224.90 to have a mural of the burning World Trade Center detailed onto the tailgate of his Ford F-150 along with a sticker that reads: "Everything I ever needed to know about Islam I learned on 9/11."

But he got more than he bargained for when a photo of his pickup went viral on the Web last week. Motorists and Muslim groups complained that his Virginia vanity license plate -- 14CV88 -- was really code for neo-Nazi, white supremacist sentiments. The state Department of Motor Vehicles voted last week to recall Story's plates and force him to buy new ones.

"There is absolutely no way I'd have anything to do with Hitler or Nazis," Story said Wednesday. He contacted The Washington Post after an article about his plate appeared last week; the state, citing privacy rules, had declined to release the identity of the plate's owner. "My sister-in-law and my niece are Jewish. I went to my niece's bat mitzvah when she turned 13 three years ago. Does that sound like something an anti-Semite would do?"

Story says the numbers 14 and 88 on his plate were not references to a white power slogan or "Heil Hitler," as the Council on American-Islamic Relations theorized, but an homage to his favorite NASCAR drivers: Tony Stewart, who drives car No. 14, and Dale Earnhardt Jr., who drives No. 88.

Story applied for the vanity plate in March 2009, shortly after Earnhardt changed his car number from 8 to 88 and Stewart changed his from 20 to 14.

CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper said his group looked into the meaning of the numbers 14 and 88 after receiving complaints about Story's license plates. He said the group found that among neo-Nazis, 88 refers to "Heil Hitler," because H is the eighth letter of the alphabet. White supremacists sometimes use the number 14, Hooper said, as shorthand for the 14-word motto, "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children."...

Hooper said he doesn't buy Story's version "given the overt anti-Muslim bigotry displayed on the truck and the Confederate flags and their historic connotation of racism. But it's his right to make that appeal to the Virginia DMV."

Story said he has no intention of appealing. "I don't want my truck firebombed," he said.

Story received a certified letter last week from the DMV ordering him to get new plates. And his boss told him that he could no longer park on VDOT property with the anti-Islam mural. So Story spent an afternoon getting new randomized plates and peeling the mural off by hand.

"I feel naked," he said.

UPDATE April 30: The Washington Post has uncovered evidence that Douglas Story is indeed a white supremacist racist. In that case, he deserves whatever he gets from the DMV.

| 43 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A certain blogger claims that Pamela Geller and I were responsible for the removal of a video taken at our FDI event at CPAC in February and appropriated by another blogger for his own use. The latter blogger's entire video channel was taken down, an unfortunate event he attributes to our alleged complaint. There is just one problem with this scenario: neither Pamela Geller nor I ever complained about his use of the video, or ever asked anyone to take it down from anywhere.

UPDATE: Pamela Geller responds trenchantly here, shedding much-needed light of truth on the matter.

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

It is a shame that this kind of thing has to be done, but occasionally it must.

A certain writer claims that I plagiarized his work. He presents no direct evidence (i.e., textual comparison) to support his claim, and that is because he cannot do so: I have not plagiarized his work, or anyone else's.

UPDATE: Eye on Islam weighs in here and here.

| 47 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Bravo. "Call for Congressional Inquiry of Censorship of Islamic Terminology in Gov't," a press release:

EL SEGUNDO, Calif., April 26 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- PJTV CEO Roger L. Simon called upon the Chairman and the Ranking Member of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee to launch an inquiry of censorship within the U.S. Government. In a video on PJTV, Simon noted that Senators Lieberman and Collins have pushed for more openness to address potential Islamic radicalization and threats through many hearings and that Senator Lieberman recently rejected the Administration's call to not use terminology such as "Islamic extremism" inside national security documents.

"If government employees are censored in the terminology they can use, then their resulting analysis and plans are also censored," commented Roger L. Simon, CEO of PJTV, in his latest video. "Did the federal government develop a style guide which prevents the use of these Islamic phrases? We should be calling it what it is, and it's time for Senators Lieberman and Collins to lead a probe into this sudden change."

Simon pointed to a recent PJTV video which analyzed the word count of "Islam," "Muslim," "Sharia," "Jihad," "Hamas" and "Hizbollah" in various government documents. The 9/11 Report had a word count of more than 600 for these terms. However in three subsequent documents -- a 2008 National Intelligence Strategy Document, a 2009 FBI document and the recent 2009 Ft Hood Report -- there were zero occurrences of any of the above words.

"The cultural pressure of political correctness cannot explain the 100 percent sanitization of these three documents. It's obvious there is a formal strategy or plan already in place," Simon noted in calling for the probe. He called on Lieberman and Collins to examine four areas:

1. To what degree are government documents and reports (perhaps both public and classified documents) being sanitized regarding Islamic terminology?
2. To what degree is there a program or practice of verbal censorship? What are government employees allowed to say in their internal meetings? And are there internal policies or what the media might call "style guides" that prevent Secretaries of Departments, their staff and even the White House Press Spokesperson from using specific Islamic terminology?
3. Who are the people or organizations inside the government that are pushing for this censorship?
4. What people or groups outside the U.S. government may have been advocating this censorship?

| 30 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

He's 49, she's 13. Of course, he's just following Muhammad's example, made sacrosanct per Qur'an 33:21. It is quite clear whose law Yerima is following, which sets up a conflict of interest with his role in the governance of Nigeria as a whole, as the country still has a non-Sharia constitution to uphold.

"Investigation into Nigerian senator's 'child bride'," from BBC News, April 28:

Nigeria's Senate has ordered an investigation into reports that one of its members has married a 13-year-old Egyptian girl.
Ahmad Sani Yerima, 49, is alleged to have married her at the national mosque in Abuja several weeks ago.
Senators called for the investigation after receiving a petition by protesting women's groups, who believe Mr Sani has broken the law.
The senator has not spoken publicly about the reports of his marriage.
The BBC's Caroline Duffield, in Lagos, says Nigeria's human rights commission has already begun an investigation.
Mr Sani was the governor of Zamfara state, where he oversaw the introduction of Sharia law - for the first time in a northern state - in 1999.
Legal action
Our correspondent says reports of the marriage - appearing in newspapers - are creating a storm among human rights groups.
The female senators, lawyers and doctors who are protesting say that they fear for the child's health.

Speaking of her health, as she came from Egypt, chances are all too high that she has also already undergone female genital mutilation.

"What we are concerned with is that our minors, the girl child, should be allowed to mature, before going into marriage," Mma Wokocha, President of the Women's Medical Association and one of those behind the petition, told the BBC.
"This very evil act should not be seen to be perpetrated by one of our distinguished legislators ... that is what we are saying.''
The senator is reported to have paid a dowry of $100,000 (£66,000) to the child's parents - and to have brought the girl into Nigeria from Egypt.
The women's groups want Mr Sani to be taken to court, to face a fine and a jail sentence.
Our reporter says the whereabouts of the teenager are unknown - and it is not clear whether she has any parent or guardian with her.
Newspaper reports have also accused the senator of having previously married a 15-year-old girl in 2006.
The investigation is to be carried out by a Senate committee.
| 38 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Author of British Government Memo Insulting Pope Not Afraid for His Life
by Michael Williams

The upcoming visit of Pope Benedict XVI to the United Kingdom has been soured--to the point where some Vatican officials have considered calling it off--by a scabrously anti-Catholic memo written by a British civil servant and circulated among senior officials by way of "preparing" for the papal visit. The document suggested that an "ideal" papal trip would include the pope blessing a same-sex union, reversing the Catholic Church's teaching on the ordination of women, opening an abortion clinic, and launching a brand of "Pope Benedict" condoms. Issued by the Papal Visit Team which was devoted to making the visit go smoothly, the document circulated through Britain's Whitehall and through 10 Downing Street without raising an eyebrow--until it was leaked to the Sunday Telegraph. As commentator Damian Thompson wrote, "The Foreign Office is hideously embarrassed, because the insult to the Pope clearly wasn't spur-of-the-moment schoolboy satire, but indicative of ignorant contempt for the Catholic Church.... None of the four-strong team is a practising Catholic, church sources are saying."

In response, British officials quickly apologized, and announced that the responsible party had been verbally reprimanded, and shifted to other duties. Note that he wasn't fired, he isn't living in hiding under 24-hour guard, and that the streets did not fill with crowds of ranting Irish and Polish youths demanding his death. There hasn't been an international campaign of violence and intimidation aimed at Englishmen. The bigoted bureaucrat was simply shifted to another job. Hmm.... It almost makes you think that some religions operate differently than others.

It later emerged that the author of the memo is Oxford-educated Anjoum Noorani, 31, whose official title was Head of the Papal Visit Team. According to the Daily Mail, "Mr Noorani is understood to be British Pakistani - but colleagues say he is not a Muslim." The paper didn't specify if Noorani is an ex-Muslim, or (which seems very unlikely) a member of the tiny minority of persecuted Pakistani Christians, whose family was lucky enough to escape. If he is a secularized Muslim, Noorani's case suggests that the "best-case" scenario for Muslim assimilation in Britain is this: Those who give up their aggressive, intolerant faith in Islam will adopt instead the aggressive, intolerant secularism of the British elites--who use "multiculturalism" as a stick with which to beat just one set of institutions: those traditional to the West.

| 52 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Why? There were rumors that the Christians were going to build a church. Sharia forbids Christians to build new churches or repair old ones. "West Java, thousands of Islamic extremists attack a Christian center," by Mathias Hariyadi for AsiaNews, April 28 (thanks to Block Ness):

Jakarta (AsiaNews) - Thousands of Muslim extremists attacked a Christian educational center in Bogor regency, West Java province, Indonesia. The toll from yesterday's attack is three destroyed cars and several buildings damaged or burnt. The wrath of fundamentalists was unleashed, and encouraged by the local Council of Ulema (MUI), by unsubstantiated rumours that the Christian community BKP Penabur were planning "to build a place of worship" within the complex.

Targeted attacks against the Christian community continue in the regency of Bogor, coupled with the impotence of the Indonesian authorities unable to stop the violence with a religious background. Yesterday morning, thousands of Islamic extremists attacked and set fire to the center of the Foundation Penabur BPK, despite the garrison erected earlier by hundreds of police.

The fundamentalists destroyed and burned three cars a part of the 10 buildings that make up the whole Christian complex. The Muslims anger was spurred on by rumours that the leaders of the foundation wanted to construct a chapel. The rumours were groundless, but were enough to ignite minds and incite the crowd. Local sources, on condition of anonymity, tell AsiaNews that the attackers were "people from the neighbouring sub-districts Cisaura and Ciawi. One detail that, in reality, shows the attacks were well orchestrated....

| 34 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Resistance" to what? Is Israel occupying Lebanon?

"There is a difference between arms which only serve invasions, occupations and aggressions, such as those of the United States and its ally Israel ... and the arms of a resistance which defends, protects, and liberates," said Fadlallah. "Liberates," that is, by imposing Sharia. An update on this story. "Hezbollah slams US accusations, vows to keep arming," from AFP, April 28 (thanks to all who sent this in):

BEIRUT -- Hezbollah has shot back at US accusations it was stockpiling sophisticated weapons and vowed to continue to build its artillery, in comments published on Wednesday.

"Our choice was and remains to secure all the arms of resistance that we can," Hezbollah MP Hassan Fadlallah told the Arabic-language newspaper As-Safir, which is close to the Shiite militant group.

The daily ran a front-page headline that read "Washington and Tel Aviv push missile hoax to brink of war" and quoted Fadlallah as saying Hezbollah's arms did not compare to the "armament" and "crimes" of the United States and its ally Israel.

Hezbollah's arms do not compare to "the level of armament of the United States, which it used in its crimes against peoples around the world, from Hiroshima to the more than 100,000 martyrs killed in Iraq and the tens of thousands killed in Palestine, Lebanon and Afghanistan," Fadlallah said.

"There is a difference between arms which only serve invasions, occupations and aggressions, such as those of the United States and its ally Israel ... and the arms of a resistance which defends, protects, and liberates," he added....

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

No Compulsion In Religion Alert from Egypt: "'We Refuse to Be Muslims By Force' Say Egyptian Christian Twin-Boys After Losing Court Case," by Mary Abdelmassih for the Assyrian International News Agency, April 26 (thanks to Benedict):

(AINA) -- On March 30 an administrative judicial court in Egypt dismissed a lawsuit filed by Mrs. Camilia Lutfi, mother of the Coptic Christian twins boys Mario and Andrew, against the Interior Minister, and the director of the Civil Status Department for refusing to re-instate the Christian religion on their birth certificates, and invalidate those which were forcefully changed to "Islam" in 2005 by their father Medhat Ramsis Labib, who had converted to Islam.

After his conversion, Andrew and Mario became Muslims in what is called "Islamization by dependence," by which children follow the religion of a converted parent (to Islam only) until they reach the age of puberty (fifteen), because Islam is "the best among all religions," according to Egyptian Court rulings.

The purpose of Lutfi's litigation was to restore back to her twins their identity as Christians, before reaching the age of 16 in June, when they will have their national ID cards issued. Camilia said that because of the developments in their case, her worst nightmares would materialize, in which they would have Islam as religious affiliation on their ID cards. "If they change to Christianity after that, they will be considered apostates," she told Freecopts advocacy. She expressed her surprise at the intransigence of the judiciary in dealing with the issue of her sons, especially after they have already reached the legal age of 15-years, when they can choose their own religion. "The boys have lived this tragedy for the last ten years, through no fault of their own."

ElYoum 7 Newspaper reported that 15-years-old Mario and Andrew were extremely disappointed with the court verdict, saying "faith is not by force, we want to remain Christians and we do not wish to become Muslims." Both boys are practicing Christians and were consecrated last year as deacons in their regular church in Alexandria....

Read it all.

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

John Cowan's statement, of course, is being taken simply as a manifestation of racism and bigotry, and consequently he has become anathema to Labour. There seems to be no consideration whatsoever of the wisdom of marrying someone whose revered holy book and supreme guide to behavior mandates the beating of disobedient women (cf. Qur'an 4:34) and subjugates women as inferior to men in numerous ways. There seems to be no consideration of the reality of Islamic polygamy, which is also sanctioned by the Qur'an, and general relegation of women to the status of commodities.

If John Cowan were an informed and intelligent man with the courage of his convictions, he could take this opportunity to speak up for the rights of women and against their institutionalized oppression in Islam. But I doubt he will do that.

"Muslim row Labour candidate, John Cowan, suspended," from the BBC, April 26 (thanks to Twostellas):

A Labour candidate has been suspended after allegedly saying on an internet forum that he would not want any children of his to marry a Muslim.

John Cowan, who is said to have admitted paying cash to a cleaner claiming benefits, called the row a "storm in a tea cup".

His suspension comes too late for him to be replaced on the ballot paper for South East Cambridgeshire.

A party spokesman said he hoped voters may "hold their noses" but vote Labour.

Mr Cowan told the BBC it was all "really a storm in a tea cup" adding that "one or two things... were misquoted and taken out of context".

"There were one or two comments that with hindsight could have been made a bit clearer," he said....

The latest controversy includes an accusation that he stated on a message board he would not like any children of his to marry a Muslim....

Labour said Mr Cowan's actions were "totally unacceptable and well below what the party expects".

A decision will now be made whether to expel him from the party.

A Labour Party spokesman said: "Everybody in the Labour Party is extremely angry about this.

"There is a feeling of anger in the party. They feel he has let down not just the party but ordinary party members.

"We will seek to make sure he is never a Labour Party candidate again."...

All right, then!

| 33 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Maybe they're feeling tremors in Tehran. Sharia Alert from the Islamic Republic: "Suntanned women to be arrested under Islamic dress code," by Damien McElroy and Ahmad Vahdat in the Telegraph, April 27 (thanks to Twostellas):

Iran has warned suntanned women and girls who looked like "walking mannequins" will be arrested as part of a new drive to enforce the Islamic dress code.

Brig Hossien Sajedinia, Tehran's police chief, said a national crackdown on opposition sympathisers would be extended to women who have been deemed to be violating the spirit of Islamic laws. He said: "The public expects us to act firmly and swiftly if we see any social misbehaviour by women, and men, who defy our Islamic values. In some areas of north Tehran we can see many suntanned women and young girls who look like walking mannequins.

"We are not going to tolerate this situation and will first warn those found in this manner and then arrest and imprison them."...

The announcement came shortly after Ayatollah Kazim Sadighi, a leading cleric, warned that women who dressed immodestly disturbed young men and the consequent agitation caused earthquakes.

Another preacher warned Tehran's citizens to flee before the inevitable punishment for flagrant behaviour was visited on the city.

"Go on the streets and repent for your sins," Ayatollah Aziz Khoshvaqt, one of the country's highest clerics, told worshippers during a recent sermon in northern Tehran. "A holy torment is upon us. Leave town."

| 27 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Right now in Germany Aygul Ozkan can propose a crucifix ban based on secular principles. Such a ban just coincidentally dovetails neatly with the restrictions upon dhimmis as dictated by Sharia. Eurabia Update: "Muslim leader wants crucifix ban in Germany," from AP, April 2 (thanks to Twostellas):

BERLIN: A Muslim politician chosen to become a minister in a German state says she wants to ban crucifixes from classrooms, causing an uproar within her own conservative party.

Aygul Ozkan who will become social minister in Lower Saxony state told newsweekly Focus in an interview that "Christian symbols do not belong in state-run schools."...

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Monday I was interviewed by NYC ITV. The interview is in 36 parts here (links to each at lower right of page). After I posted the first part yesterday, several readers emailed to suggest I post a segment each day for awhile -- so here goes.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Syria and Iran supplying their client well. "Hezbollah armed with improved missiles - US," from the BBC, April 28:

The US defence secretary has warned that Hezbollah now has more rockets and missiles than most governments.

Robert Gates accused Syria and Iran of supplying weapons of "ever-increasing capability" to the military wing of the Lebanese Shia Islamist movement.

"This is obviously destabilising for the whole region," he said following talks with his Israeli counterpart.

But Mr Gates did not say if Syria was supplying Hezbollah with Scud ballistic missiles, as Israel has alleged....

After meeting Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak in Washington on Tuesday, Mr Gates said Syria and Iran was "providing Hezbollah with rockets and missiles of ever-increasing capability".

US worries about Syrian intentions

"And we're at a point now, where Hezbollah has far more rockets and missiles than most governments in the world, and this is obviously destabilising for the whole region and we're watching it very carefully," he told a news conference at the Pentagon.

Mr Barak also warned that Syria was arming Hezbollah with "weapons systems that can turn or disrupt the very delicate balance in Lebanon".

But he played down the chances of war over the alleged transfers.

"We do not intend to provoke any kind of major collision in Lebanon, or vis-a-vis Syria... but we are watching closely these developments and think that they do not contribute to stability in the region."...

Well, at least it's good that you're watching.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

At The American Thinker today, Pamela Geller notes some interesting similarities between jihadist Zarein Ahmedzay's prescription for peace and Barack Obama's:

If you close your eyes and listen to Zarein Ahmedzay, the jihadist convicted Friday for his role in unleashing a bomb in the New York City subway system on the anniversary of the 9/11 Islamic jihad attacks on America, you would here disturbing echoes of the policy of Barack Obama and his dhimmi administration: "I strongly urge the American people to stop supporting the war against Islam. And this will be in their own interest. ... The real enemy of this country are the ones destroying the country from within ... I believe it's a special group, Zionist Jews, who want a permanent shadow government." Obama hasn't spoken about "Zionist Jews," but the underlying sentiments are similar.

Ahmedzay's narrative reflects Obama's policy on Islamic jihad. He urges America to stop defending herself against the global jihad. Like Obama and his silly Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, Obama suggests that fighting jihad will only...create jihad. And as for all the jihadi attacks before Iraq and Afghanistan operations, well...that's irrelevant, an inconvenient truth. The left never lets logic and evidence get in the way of its anti-American narrative.

The day this New York subway jihad bomb plot was foiled, Obama was in New York addressing the United Nations. His speech was about the greatest threat facing mankind today: global warming. I kid you not. He said on that occasion, "We are determined to act. And we will meet our responsibility to future generations." He said that a failure to address the threat could lead to an "irreversible catastrophe." Time, he said, is "running out," but "we can reverse" the problem. "If things go business-as-usual, we will not live; we will die," he said. "Our country will not exist." He told us that it wouldn't be easy, but "I am here today to say that difficulty is no excuse for complacency. Unease is no excuse for inaction."

All that would have been true if he had been referring to the jihad against the United States. But his only response to that is to give the jihadis whatever they want.

Obama's strategy in dealing with Islam is summed up by a single word that is the very definition of Islam -- submission. His cover-up of the Islamic motivation and other aspects of the Fort Hood jihad massacre, the largest attack on a military base on American history, will go down in history as the most blatant act of subversion ever committed by a president of the United States....

Read it all.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Referring to the Army's dhimmitude in the Franklin Graham case, an editorial at Investor's Business Daily wonders why the Army is bowing to Hamas-linked CAIR, and to Islamic sensibilities in general. "PC In The DOD," from Investor's Business Daily, April 26 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Political Correctness: The Army disinvited the Rev. Franklin Graham from praying at the Pentagon because he might offend Muslim soldiers. But isn't that the same attitude that led to the Fort Hood massacre?

The Army didn't want to offend a Muslim soldier -- Maj. Nidal Hasan -- who openly threatened "infidels" in Islamic diatribes. Brass ignored his jihadist rants and treated him with kid gloves. Hasan later opened fire on soldiers.

An internal Pentagon probe mentioned none of this, so no one should be surprised that the painful lesson of Fort Hood has not been learned -- that catering to militant Muslims does not win their hearts and minds. In fact, it can embolden them.

In the latest chapter of military PC, the Pentagon canceled the appearance of Graham, son of evangelist Billy Graham, at an upcoming National Day of Prayer event because of Muslim complaints over his past "inappropriate" remarks about Islam.

After the 9/11 attacks, Graham described Islam as "a very evil and wicked religion." He explained that he thought it was his "responsibility to speak out against the terrible deeds that are committed as a result of Islamic teaching."

The Council on American-Islamic Relations called on its supporters to pressure the Pentagon to withdraw its May 6 prayer invitation to Graham. CAIR hailed the Pentagon's cave-in as a "victory."

No matter the circumstances, bowing to such a radical group -- one with proven terror ties -- is a new low in political correctness, even for the Army....

Indeed. Read it all.

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

April 27, 2010

Will the Islamophobia never end? "NYC student pleads guilty to terrorism charge," by Larry Neumeister for Associated Press, April 27 (thanks to Block Ness):

NEW YORK (AP) -- An American student who prosecutors say helped a friend deliver some protective clothing to an al-Qaida military commander fighting Americans has pleaded guilty to a single terrorism charge.

Syed Hashmi (Sigh-IHD' HASH'-mee) entered the plea Tuesday in Manhattan federal court to conspiracy to provide military support to al-Qaida.

Both sides in the case recommended a maximum prison term of 15 years for the plea.

The 30-year-old Hashmi had faced up to 70 years in prison if convicted of four criminal counts....

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

While so many captives to wishful thinking in the West continue to place their hope in Islamic reformers gaining a wide following, this is generally the fate of those who actually question Islam's tenets. Islamic Tolerance Alert from the Kingdom of the Two Holy Places (and more on this story): "Head of the religious police in Mecca, men and women can pray together," from AsiaNews, April 27 (thanks to Block Ness):

Riyadh (AsiaNews) - The Saudi official news agency, SPA, had reported his dismissal only to delete all reports a few hours later, a fatwa says "he should be killed," the Grand Mufti has denied his authority to speak about Islamic law. He, Ahmed al Ghamdi, head of the religious police in Mecca, the first holy city of Islam, confirms his convictions: men and women can pray together and meet freely, even if only in public.

The episode has been strictly censored by Saudi Arabia, monitored by the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice, the official name of the muttawa, the religious police. Of which Ghamdi is a senior official.

The question of the possibility of men and women "mixing" - in public, never in private - has for weeks been at the centre of a debate between scholars and politicians. Thus, the Saudi newspaper The National, has devoted a long article to the story, recalling the words of the Justice Minister Muhammad al Issa who warned against confusing public promiscuity, which he believes is allowed by Islam, with meetings in private between men and women who are neither married nor related by kinship, which is prohibited.

The problem is not merely one of religious tradition, it also has economic implications. The ban has in fact heavy negative influences on women's employment and foreign investment since it requires gender division even in the offices of international companies.

So, since December, when Ghamdi first spoke out on the issue, the question has occupied newspapers and television programs. A debate which is due to the climate of moderate reforms that King Abdullah is introducing into the country in an attempt to modernize it.

But the reaction of conservatives has been very hard. If Ghamdhi argues that the division did not exist at the time of Mohammed his opposers cry of violations of Sharia and apostasy.

Memo to Asia News: "conservatives" generally do not advocate the strict separation of the sexes, or call for the murder of those who oppose that separation.

Sheikh Abdulrahman Al Barrak has issued a fatwa which says that promiscuity "as supported by modernists" is prohibited because it allows "the sight of what is forbidden and prohibited conversations between men and women." Anyone who facilitates such promiscuity is an infidel", and if not retracted "should be killed". And finally, anyone who allows his daughter, sister or wife to work with men or to attend a mixed school is guilty of "a kind of prostitution"....
| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Not that the Palestinian war against Israel has anything to do with Islam. Oh, no. A few land concessions on Israel's part will patch things up. "Hamas TV sermon: Iceland volcano was Allah's punishment of Infidels," by Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook for PMW, April 27:

A Palestinian cleric preaching on Hamas TV said the volcano in Iceland and the volcanic ash that paralyzed European air travel were sent by Allah to punish "Infidels and polytheists with fear and terror."

Indicating that the volcanic eruption was Allah's punishment, the Hamas cleric cited a chapter of the Quran: "We [Allah] never destroyed a city unless its people were unjust." [Sura 28:59] He stressed this by comparing the eruption of the volcano to the flood sent by God in the times of Noah to punish humanity for its sins.

He also mocked the United States, saying its power is an illusion:

"As Allah lives, dear brothers, America - with its numbers and its equipment, with its might and its scepter, with its planes and its missiles, with its war ships and with its destroyers - it has no more power against Allah than do spider webs against His power."...

Read it all.

| 44 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

2010-04-25 15.23.34.jpg
2010-04-25 15.14.50.jpg
2010-04-25 15.20.09.jpg
2010-04-25 15.24.49.jpg
2010-04-25 15.42.38.jpg
2010-04-25 15.46.15.jpg

Last Sunday I was in New York for the Rally In Solidarity with Israel in front of the Israeli consulate, cosponsored by SIOA (join SIOA here). Jihad Watch reader Christine kindly sent in the photos above. SIOA Executive Director Pamela Geller has more photos here, and she also spoke. Here's the video:

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And meanwhile, Pakistan is still dragging its feet about prosecuting the perpetrators of the Mumbai massacre. Now, why is that? "Mumbai terrorist group threaten Indian 'water jihad,'" by Rob Crilly in the Telegraph, April 27 (thanks to Joan):

Pakistani terrorists behind the Mumbai attacks have threatened to launch a fresh jihad against India over disputed water rights.

The Indian and Pakistani prime ministers are due to meet on Wednesday amid escalating tensions over limited water resources.

Pakistan has repeatedly accused India of breaching the terms of a 1960 treaty governing the use of shared river systems, complaining that irrigation channels on its side of the border have emptied.

The issue has now been adopted by militants in Jamaat-ud-Dawah, widely regarded as a front for Lashkar-e-Taiba, a Jihadi group fighting Indian troops in Kashmir and responsible for the November 2008 wave of gun and bomb attacks that killed at least 170 people in Mumbai.

Hafiz Saeed, the founder of Lashka-e-Taibi and head of Jamaat-ud-Dawah, threatened a water war with India during a recent TV interview.

"Look at India's attitude, especially after the 9/11 attacks. It has taken advantage of Pakistan's weaknesses and made dams and stopped our water.

Pakistan, for its defence, will have to fight a war at all costs with India if it is not prepared for talks on Kashmir and water," Saeed said in an interview with Frontline, a private TV channel.

His comments followed earlier statements claiming that control of water resources was being used as a weapon to weaken Pakistan.

"India is trying to hatch a deep conspiracy of making Pakistan's agricultural lands barren and economically annihilating us," said one....

Delhi broke off talks with Islamabad after the Mumbai attacks, which a senior Pakistan official later admitted had partly been planned in his country.

They resumed briefly in February but India insisted full negotiations would require Pakistan to prosecute those responsible for the Mumbai killings....

Is that unreasonable?

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In "Defeating Radical Islam: The Herculean Strategy" in Pajamas Media (via Middle East Forum), April 20, our old friend Raymond Ibrahim clears up some wishful thinking:

Will the recent killings of al-Qaeda leaders Abu Omar al-Baghdadi and Abu Ayub al-Masri have any tangible effects on the "war on terror"? Vice President Joe Biden -- who referred to the slayings as "devastating blows to Al Qaeda in Iraq" -- certainly seems to think so.

The situation is reminiscent of when al-Qaeda leader Abu Laith al-Libi was killed in early 2008. Then, Congressman Peter Hoekstra issued a statement saying al-Libi's death "clearly will have an impact on the radical jihadist movement."

And who could forget all the hubbub surrounding the killing of that notorious decapitator, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Then, almost every major politician, including President Bush and Iraq's Prime Minister Maliki exulted.

It is, of course, a good thing to eliminate terrorists. But will the deaths of individual Islamist leaders -- including Ayman al-Zawahiri or Osama bin Laden himself -- eliminate the ideology that creates them in the first place?

History provides an answer:

Consider the progress of the Muslim Brotherhood, the world's largest and oldest Islamist organization. Founded in 1928 in Egypt by Tariq Ramadan's grandfather, Hasan al-Banna, it originally boasted only six members. In the following decades, in part thanks to the radical writings of Sayyid Qutb -- whom al-Qaeda quotes liberally in their many writings -- the Brotherhood, though constantly clashing with Egypt's government, grew steadily.

As leaders, both Banna and Qutb were eventually targeted and killed by the Egyptian regime. Yet the Brotherhood continued thriving underground. Then, to the world's surprise, the partially-banned, constantly-suppressed Brotherhood managed to win 88 out of 454 seats in Egypt's 2005 parliamentary elections -- making them the largest opposition bloc in the government.

After two of its most prominent leaders were killed, after thousands of its members have been harassed, jailed, or otherwise eliminated, today the Brotherhood is stronger and more influential and secure than at any other time in its history.

Palestinian Hamas, itself an offshoot of the Brotherhood, furnishes another example. Founded in 1987 by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, Hamas has since been labeled a terrorist organization by several governments, including the United States, most notably for its suicide operations against Israel. Yassin was eventually assassinated in March 2004.

The result? Far from fizzling away, Hamas, like the Brotherhood, went on to win a major landslide election in the January 2006 Palestinian parliamentary elections, establishing it even more than previously....

Read it all.

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Tanenbaum.jpg
NYHRC1.jpg
NYHRC2.jpg


New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has on his New York City Human Rights Commission the CAIR lawyer Omar Mohammedi. Mohammedi was appointed to the Commission in October 2002.

Mohammedi represents several organizations that are the defendants in a 9/11 lawsuit. One is the World Assembly for Muslim Youth (WAMY). About WAMY Lorenzo Vidino reports:

[...] the World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY), a Saudi nongovernmental organization...seeks to spread Wahhabism, the radical and intolerant Saudi interpretation of Islam, throughout the world with its literature and schools. WAMY, which falls under the umbrella of the Muslim World League, has the stated goal of "arming the Muslim youth with full confidence in the supremacy of the Islamic system over other systems." It is the largest Muslim youth organization in the world and can boast unparalleled resources. In 1991 WAMY published a book called Tawjihat Islamiya (Islamic Views) that stated, "Teach our children to love taking revenge on the Jews and the oppressors, and teach them that our youngsters will liberate Palestine and Al-Quds [Jerusalem] when they go back to Islam and make jihad for the sake of Allah." The sentiments in Tawjihat Islamiya are the rule rather than the exception. Many other WAMY publications are filled with strong anti-Semitic and anti-Christian rhetoric.

Omar Mohammedi was also the attorney for the Flying Imams, the six imams who were removed from a US Airways flight after passengers complained that they were acting suspiciously. Mohammedi filed a lawsuit against US Airways on their behalf, claiming discrimination. Initially he also initially filed suit against the passengers who complained, which would have had a chilling effect on anyone reporting suspicious behavior by Muslims in airports -- although that part of the suit was dropped after Republicans in Congress passed legislation to protect the passengers.

Mohammedi has also served as President and General Counsel of the New York chapter of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

Contact the Mayor directly by writing, calling, faxing or e-mailing, and politely and respectfully let him know that Mohammedi must go.

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg
City Hall
New York, NY 10007
PHONE 311 (or 212-NEW-YORK outside NYC)

FAX (212) 788-8123

E-MAIL:
http://www.nyc.gov/html/mail/html/mayor.html

Pamela Geller has much more on this case here.

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
GabrielRS.jpg Brigitte Gabriel, ACT member Michael Klein, and me


Last Saturday I had the honor and pleasure of participating in freedom fighter Brigitte Gabriel's American Congress for Truth webcast, "Radical Islam: A Threat America Must Take Seriously." Other speakers were the superb Brigitte Gabriel herself, terrorism expert Walid Phares, former FBI agent John Guandolo, and American Congress for Truth and ACT! for America Executive Director Guy Rodgers.

ACT plans to upload videos of the webcast, but they are not yet available. I will keep you posted.

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Parvez Ahmed is the former National Board Chairman of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). He thus has no business being on a Human Rights Commission. Ray Holt deserves congratulations. "Councilman Changes Vote On Nomination: Parvez Ahmed's Nomination To Commission Stirs Controversy," from News4Jax.com, April 26 (thanks to Randy):

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. -- An ongoing controversy over Dr. Parvez Ahmed being appointed to Jacksonville's Human Rights Commission might spark controversy between council members themselves Tuesday night.

Councilman Ray Holt called Channel 4 Monday afternoon to say he is changing his vote to approve Ahmed's nomination.

"I don't want to put somebody on there who might someday rationalize or minimize violence in Jacksonville," Holt said.

Holt said he changed his vote from yes to no after he e-mailed Ahmed about his views on issues concerning many issues on terrorism and the Middle East. Holt said Ahmed e-mailed him back a document he wrote.

"I read through it. It's 30 pages long, but I read through it," Holt said. "I think he minimizes terrorism. I think he rationalizes terrorism. And it just showed poor judgment."

Holt said one of his concerns is Ahmed calls the Iraq war a "U.S.-led fiasco." Another concern is a quote by Ahmed saying, "Both Hamas and Hezbollah have conducted suicide bombings that killed civilians. Unlike al-Qaida, however, they do not embrace such violence as a matter of policy."

"Well I don't care if it's their stated policy. They do it. And it's wrong and for you to rationalize it by saying it's not their stated policy," Holt said. "I think that shows a real gap in judgment."...

Bravo, Mr. Holt.

Here is some background. When the story of Parvez Ahmed's appointment first broke, Randy McDaniels of ACT Jacksonville prepared a 20+ page Intel brief on Ahmed and CAIR, and submitted it to Jacksonville Mayor Peyton and the Jacksonville City Council. They, unsurprisingly, disregarded this information and dug in their heels -- and the Florida Times Union began running articles on racism and hate speech.

Nonetheless, the mountain of evidence of Ahmed's unsavory associations kept growing higher. Still, during a rules committee hearing last Monday, former Jacksonville Mayor Delaney referenced the book To Kill a Mockingbird, implying that opposition to Ahmed was racism, saying that it had the feel of a 1960's lynching, and even equating it to the World War II-era interment of Japanese in the U.S. The public was not allowed to speak, and so ACT was unable to respond to this defamation.

Parvez Ahmed did not help his own case, however, when (like all CAIR operatives) he refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. The vote is tomorrow.

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

These are indeed criminal proceedings, but the criminals are those who are putting Wilders on trial. From the excellent Wilders On Trial site:

Criminal proceedings to resume in October 2010

The criminal proceedings against Geert Wilders will continue in October of this year. The dates of absence of the people involved in the proceedings prevent the case coming up for trial sooner. The last expert-witnesses will be heard on the 28th of June.

The provisional planning of the proceedings will be as follows:

October 4th, 6th and 8th: trial proceedings
October 12th: indictment
October 15th: defence
October 19th: replication and rejoinder
November 2nd: verdict

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Yesterday I posted here about how lowlife UNC professor Omid Safi falsely claimed that I threatened to kill him and family. I also wrote this email to UNC Chancellor Holden Thorp, cc'ing Safi's department head Laurie F. Maffly-Kipp, Safi's wali and fellow UNC professor Carl Ernst, and Safi himself:

Dr. Thorp:

Professor Omid Safi has falsely claimed that I threatened to kill him and his family.

Details here:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/04/omid-safi.html

I do not know how far and wide he has spread this claim, or what damage he has thereby done to my reputation.

I request that you reprimand Professor Safi immediately, and dismiss him from his faculty position at the University of North Carolina.

As a UNC alumnus I am ashamed for the university, and hope that you will not allow this trafficker in libel and defamation to continue to spread his lies from his position there.

Robert Spencer

I got no answer from any of the addressees. Or at least no direct answer. I just received word from the person to whom Safi sent his libelous message that her Facebook account has been suddenly disabled, without explanation. It was on Facebook that Safi sent her his message.

I question the timing. Don't you?

American university education is in a sorry state, but Omid Safi's behavior here is a particularly egregious example. If you think it is outrageous that a liar and smear artist like Omid Safi holds a professorship at a major university, please write, courteously and respectfully, to UNC Chancellor Holden Thorp: chancellor@unc.edu. Write also to UNC Department of Religious Studies chair Laurie F. Maffly-Kipp: maffly@email.unc.edu.

Ask that Safi be reprimanded and/or fired, for the sake of the integrity of the University of North Carolina and American academia in general.

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Yesterday I gave a lengthy and wide-ranging interview to NYC ITV. It is available in 36 parts (!) here -- you can find links to the other parts on the lower right-hand side of the page. The first part is above.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The ineffable New York Times carried a story last week, one that from first to last was designed - whether by the reporter, Scott Shane, or by his editors, is unknown - to tug at the heartstrings of the reader. And those heartstringed-tugged readers were to sympathize with the parents of Ramy Zamzam, one of the five Washington-area Muslims who went off to Pakistan to conduct Jihad through open warfare, with the Taliban (and possibly Al Qaeda) and against the Americans, even though all five boys were American citizens and had grown up in the United States.

Indeed, the story was not only directed, I think, at winning sympathy for the Zamzam parents, and especially for his mother Amal Khalifa, but by the principle of contiguity, to win sympathy for Ramy Zamzam himself. After all, you don't have to star in "Mad Men" to know that most advertising is based on that very principle of Contiguity, which is a form of Metonymy (see, do, Roman Jakobson's monograph published by Mouton on "The Metaphoric and Metonymic Poles"). You know, just like those cigarette ads Before the Flood, the ones that show the manly man and the womanly woman (yes, very much Before the Flood) and work by contiguity -- as in those advertisements for Salem cigarettes, where the girl and the boy are taking puffs from Salems by a brook, which is to say, if the boy smokes Salems, the girl and the brook are thrown in at no additional cost.

The article is entitled "A Thanksgiving Meal, Then Charges of Jihad: A Mother's Tale." Here it is.

Let's start with that very first sentence: here is "Ramy Zamzam, 22, is a proud first-year dental student in his new white jacket, framed by his beaming parents." So there he is, like all of us, as we stand between our "beaming" parents, ourselves "proud" of being admitted to, or finally receiving a degree from, this or that institution. Here is Ramy Zamzam, doing just what all of us do, and his parents love him, and he loves them, and they are proud of him, and he is affectionate toward them, and so on.

The scene has been set for the reader, And the initial impression is given, that something is wrong, something is not quite right, in depicting Ramy Zamzam, as apparently those mean old Pakistani authorities have been depicting him, as a would-be participant in violent Jihad against the mortal enemies of the jihadists, Americans and the West.

| 24 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In Human Events this morning, I discuss four recent Islamic supremacist assaults on the freedom of speech in the United States:

Four incidents recently showed anew how keenly Islamic supremacists want to shut down the freedom of speech--and how eager many Americans are to accommodate them.

The most notorious incident was Comedy Central's censorship of a "South Park" episode lampooning Islam's prophet Muhammad. Even Bill O'Reilly faltered when presented with an opportunity to defend free speech, telling "South Park's" creators: "I would've advised them not to do it. If somebody came to me and said, 'Look, O'Reilly, I want to do a little satire of Muhammad on "The Factor,"' I would say I don't think so, because the risk is higher than the reward."

The risk of defending free speech against violent threats and intimidation is higher than the reward? If the Founding Fathers had thought that way, we wouldn't be having this conversation now. If the enemies of free speech, such as those who threatened "South Park's" Matt Stone and Trey Parker over their Muhammad episode, see that death threats will frighten their victims into silence, they will only issue more death threats. Unless free people stand up and defend the right of free discourse no matter what the risk, we will surely lose that right--and any ability to stand up against the tyranny of a powerful group whose word and status cannot be questioned.

And that chastened silence before a privileged class is certainly the goal of Islamic supremacists in the United States. Besides threatening "South Park," they also compelled the Pentagon to withdraw an invitation to evangelist Franklin Graham to participate in its National Day of Prayer event on May 6. Graham's crime? Calling Islam "evil," a comment he explained in this way: "If you look at what the religion does just to women, women alone, it is just horrid. And so yes, I speak out for women."

The plight of women in the Islamic world is real. The Army should have given Franklin Graham's explanation of his remarks thoughtful consideration--just as they should have considered the implications of the fact that the chief group complaining about Graham's appearance at the event was the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas jihad terror funding case.

Instead, now the Army is abetting the whitewashing and cover-up of the institutionalized mistreatment of women in Islamic law. The Graham invitation could have been, as Barack Obama might say, a "teaching moment," and an opportunity to stand up for the human rights of those women and other groups oppressed by Sharia. Instead, it is just an occasion for more submission to Islamic supremacists....

Read it all.

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

April 26, 2010

"The only thing we have to fear..." An update on this story. "Cartoonist Molly Norris Erases 'Draw Muhammad' Gag," from MyFox9, April 26 (thanks to all who sent this in):

(CANVAS STAFF REPORTS) - In more fallout around the decision by Comedy Central to censor an episode of "South Park" that contained comedic depictions of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, a cartoonist has now censored herself .
Seattle artist Molly Norris originally posted on her website a cartoon showing many different objects - including a purse, a domino, a coffee cup and a spool of thread - claiming to be a likeness of Muhammad.
Norris said that May 20 would be the first annual "Everybody Draw Muhammad Day" and created a fictional group, Citizens Against Citizens Against Humor, to sponsor the event. She dedicated the illustration to Matt Stone and Trey Parker, the creators of "South Park."
She sent the illustration to some bloggers and talked to a local radio host, saying "it's a cartoonist's job to be non-PC."
Now Norris has backed off from that position. She no longer has the illustration on her website and she claims responses to the idea were overwhelming. Instead she has a drawing of herself, with various word balloons containing her feelings about the incident, including "I said that I wanted to counter fear and then I got afraid."

Too late: the paints and brushes await:

But she may have started something she can't stop. Others have taken up the cause of "Everybody Draw Muhammed Day."
Reason.com's blogger Michael C. Moynihan says he will be contributing artwork and will post fans' work on his site as well. The fictional group Citizens Against Citizens Against Humor now has its own site that already contains some irreverent illustrations of Muhammad.
A Facebook page devoted to "Draw Muhammad Day" has followed Norris's lead and backed away from the idea, but fans on the site are still arguing about it.
A rival Facebook page, Ban Draw Muhammad Day , also contains ongoing arguments on both sides of the issue.
On Sunday night's episode of "The Simpsons", the "South Park" issue was mentioned in the opening credits when Bart writes on the chalkboard in school. The chalkboard scrawl reads: "South Park - We'd stand beside you if we weren't so scared."

In the words of Homer himself: "[You] found my one weakness: that I'm weak! "

| 98 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And he cited verses from the Qur'an to justify his actions. Funny how that keeps happening. "Underwear Bomber: New Video of Training, Martyrdom Statements," by Matthew Cole, Brian Ross, and Nasser Atta for ABC News, April 26:

New videos produced by al Qaeda in Yemen show the accused underwear bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab and others in his training class firing weapons at a desert camp whose targets included the Jewish star, the British Union Jack and the letters "UN."
The videos, to be broadcast Monday on ABC World News with Diane Sawyer, appear to support Abdulmutallab's statements to the FBI that there are "others like me" who also trained with him in Yemen to carry out attacks against U.S. and western targets.
The tape also includes an apparent martyrdom statement in Arabic from the 23-year old Nigerian justifying his actions against "the Jews and the Christians and their agents." He says, "the enemy is in your lands with their armies, the Jews and the Christians and their agents." He reads several passages from the Koran and adds, "God said if you do not fight back, He will punish you and replace you." [...]

That's Qur'an 9:39.

The videos, obtained by a Yemeni journalist working for ABC News, are the first to show Abdulmutallab with the al Qaeda group. In the video he and others use automatic weapons to fire at targets that include a Jewish star, the British Union Jack and the a symbol of the United Nations.
Some, but not all, of the faces of others at the training camp are blurred in the video released by al Qaeda of the Arabian Peninsula. Their logo is embedded in a corner of the screen.
"The other people in the video are presumably the people we are still looking for," said Richard Clarke, an ABC News consultant and former White House counter-terrorism official. The video also shows the purported al Qaeda fighters in Yemen firing at what appears to be an unmanned surveillance plane overhead.
| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Clever man, this Lies. Gaming the System Alert: "French Muslim man hits back in polygamy row," from Expatica, April 26 (thanks to Sr. Soph):

A Muslim butcher who could be stripped of his French passport over allegations of polygamy hit back on Monday, insisting that he had not broken the law.

Lies Hebbadj, an Algerian-born 35-year-old, has been at the centre of a political storm since last week when his wife complained that she had been fined for driving while wearing her "niqab" full-face veil....

Interior Minister Brice Hortefeux suggested the man could lose his French passport, saying he was believed to have four wives who had borne him 12 children and that each was receiving welfare benefits.

But Hebbadj called a news conference on Monday to contend that, while he has several mistresses, he had not engaged in polygamy, which is illegal in France.

"As far as I know, it is not forbidden to have mistresses in France, nor is it forbidden under Islam," said Hebbadj, who runs a halal butcher shop in the western city of Nantes.

"Maybe under the Christian faith, but not in France," he added.

"If you lose your French nationality for having mistresses, then a lot of French men would have been stripped of their citizenship."

Immigration Minister Eric Besson is investigating whether Hebbadj should lose his French citizenship, which he acquired after marrying a French woman in 1999.

| 38 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

As Hugh Fitzgerald has often noted here, Islam is a vehicle for Arab supremacism. The centrality given to Arabic, such that prayers cannot be offered and the Qur'an not properly recited in any other language, has led historically to clashes between Arab and non-Arab Muslims, with the former having a decided sense of superiority. "Negro-Mauritanians complain about complete 'Arabisation,'" from Middle East Online, April 26 (thanks to Twostellas):

NOUAKCHOTT - Mauritania's ruling Coalition of Parties of the Majority (CPM) has accused the opposition of whipping up ethnic tension after violent clashes between Moor and non-Moorish students.

CPM president Mohamed Mahmoud Ould Mohamed on Sunday night told journalists that he condemned "a desperate attempt by some opposition parties who falsely interpret government declarations, to revive matters of ethnic allegiance."...

On April 15, Moorish students clashed at Nouakchott university with Negro-Mauritanian students who were protesting over what they described as the "complete Arabisation of the administration" in Mauritania, a mainly desert nation where the Moors historically ruled over black African southerners.

A student who asked not to be named said that several people were injured by hurled stones.

Police stormed the campus and made about 30 arrests from the rival sides, a security source said. They used their batons and tear gas to break up the clashes.

The violence followed a series of demonstrations and counter-demonstrations about the language of the administration.

French-speaking students and opposition members, mainly Negro-Mauritanians, object to what they see as their exclusion from jobs, while Arabic speakers protest at the place given to French in the educational system and in the administration.

The polemic erupted after Mauritania on March 1 celebrated the day of the Arabic language, when Prime Minister Moulaye Ould Mohemd Laghdaf stated that the civilisation of the country was "Arabo-Islamic."

Two weeks later, Minister of Superior Education Ahmed Ould Bahya tried to calm the situation down by declaring that "no option for a complete Arabisation" has been undertaken by the government....

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

He also mocked the pope, but given the recent embarrassment over at the Foreign Office, the order, or "Asbo" can't be about that. What if he just mocked Christian beliefs, and not Islam? Would authorities have pursued the case? And for that matter, if Taylor was accused of "causing religiously aggravated harassment, alarm or distress," how has the Asbo system been applied against the Muslims in the U.K., including clerics, who serve up far more caustic rhetoric about non-Muslims?

"Athiest who mocked Jesus and Muslims hit with Asbo," from The Asian News, April 26 (thanks to Twostellas):

An atheist who left leaflets mocking Jesus, Islam and the Pope in an international airport's prayer room has been given an Asbo.
Harry Taylor, 59, from Salford, left home-made posters at Liverpool John Lennon Airport three times in 2008.
The self-styled philosopher denied three counts of causing religiously aggravated harassment, alarm or distress but a jury unanimously found him guilty in less than an hour.
One leaflet showed a smiling crucified Christ next to an advert for a brand of 'no nails' glue. In another, a cartoon depicted two Muslims holding a placard demanding equality with the caption: "Not for women or gays, obviously."
Islamic suicide bombers at the gates of paradise were told in another: "Stop, stop - we've run out of virgins."
Another leaflet depicted the Pope with a condom on his finger.
Taylor, of Griffin Street, Higher Broughton, told Liverpool Crown Court he was sexually abused by Catholic priests as a youngster.
But he said he bore no grudge against religious people and claimed he was merely trying to convert them to atheism. Taylor, who is unemployed and on medication for depression, said it was 'preposterous' to suggest people could be incited to violence by cartoons.
He had adapted newspaper and magazine cartoons and added captions of his own.
But some went way beyond exercising freedom of expression, prosecutor Neville Biddle said, including one that linked Muslims to attacks on airports.
It emerged in court that Taylor was convicted of similar offences in 2006.
He left offensive leaflets in Manchester city centre churches St Ann's and the Hidden Gem.
Judge James told him: "Not only have you shown no remorse for what you did but even now you continue to maintain that you have done nothing wrong and say that whenever you feel like it you intend to do the same thing again in the future."
Taylor's Asbo bans him from carrying religiously offensive material in a public place. He was also sentenced to six months in jail, suspended for two years, ordered to do 100 hours' unpaid work and pay £250 costs.
| 26 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Two aspects of this story raise an eyebrow, given Yemen's track record as a "bus station" for jihadists. One is the fact that the assailant was "known to authorities." The other is an officials claim of "dozens" of arrests "as police raided addresses across Sana'a." Now, if they knew where they were, why were they not willing or able to act beforehand? That is, of course, assuming the official is not stretching the truth in the first place. In any event, this incident will likely result in Yemen asking for still more money -- above and beyond the $150 million already pledged from the U.S., and $5.2 billion from around the world -- and getting it.

"Al-Qaeda blamed for suicide attack on British ambassador," by Richard Spencer and Mohammad al-Shorabi for the Telegraph, April 26:

Mr Torlot escaped unscathed when a suicide bomber, believed to be wearing sports kit to disguise his explosive belt, threw himself at his car while he was on his way to work in the capital Sana'a.
At least one bystander was said to have been slightly hurt, but no one was killed other than the suicide bomber himself. Mr Torlot was protected by the armour plating on his car.
The incident will renew fears that Yemen, a desperately poor nation in the middle of one of the world's richest regions, could become a failed state used as a permanent base of operations for al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups.
Embassy officials say the attack on Mr Torlot took place at 7.55am on Monday. As a high-profile terrorist target, Mr Torlot has a police escort as well as his own security detail, even when travelling to work from his home in the south of Sana'a.
His convoy was driving through a poor neighbourhood near Berlin Park to the east of Sana'a's picturesque Old City, less than half a mile from the embassy, when the bomber struck.
Witnesses said the young man was seen to be dropped off by a black car with tinted windows five minutes beforehand. But they said he was too slow to react to the vehicles, missing Mr Torlot's car.
Another witness, Mohamed Alian, told reporters he only succeeding in damaging the escort vehicle. Embassy officials denied reports that two escort policemen had been injured.
The body of the bomber, who was dressed either in school uniform, according to witnesses, or sports gear according to the interior ministry, was scattered widely by the force of the explosions, with some parts found on nearby rooftops.
The man's foot was left lying in the gutter as police began a clear-up operation.
He was named by security officials locally as Othman Noaman, a Yemeni student from the southern town of Taiz, who was known to the authorities. He had been receiving training in Marib, a province to the east of Sana'a which has become a noted al-Qaeda heartland.
The official claimed that there had already been "dozens" of arrests in connection with the attack as police raided addresses across Sana'a for militants....
| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From Jihad Watch reader Camelia:

An atheist passes a priest and shouts "Jesus is a lie!". He then passes a Jew and shouts "God is a lie!". He then passes a Muslim cleric and shouts, "Good day Sir!". :))
| 33 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Over at Frontpage, Jamie Glazov interviews my SIOA colleague Pamela Geller about the bus ad initiative in Miami:

Geller: Last Tuesday (April 13), Stop Islamization Of America and the Freedom Defense Initiative, the new organization I have begun with bestselling author and Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer, rolled out our "Leaving Islam" ad campaign on Miami buses. But on Friday (April 30), in an outrageous denial of our free speech rights, Miami-Dade Transit pulled our ads - because they might be "offensive to Islam."

At the behest of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an un-indicted co-conspirator in a Hamas funding case, Miami-Dade Transit took our SIOA ads off the buses in South Florida because they offended Muslims.

Miami-Dade Transit was bowing to Sharia, Islamic law, which forbids non-Muslims to insult Islam. But ultimately free speech won out: after we threatened a lawsuit, Miami-Dade Transit agreed to restore our ads and add them to twenty new buses at the cost merely of printing the new posters. Our lawyer, David Yerushalmi, did a superb job, with the aid of the Thomas More Law Center's Robert Muise.

FP: What was the motive of your campaign?

Geller: Jamie, this campaign was and is in defense of religious freedom. Our ad asks, "Fatwa on your head? Is your family or community threatening you? Leaving Islam? Got questions? Get answers! RefugefromIslam.com." This is the first time anyone offered public help to people threatened under Islam's death penalty for apostasy. America is the land of the free, and apostates must know they are free here. Safe here. Government and law enforcement should be on this. But they aren't. So we are. It is time for free citizens to stand for freedom -- or lose it.

Miami-Dade Transit's kowtowing to CAIR, even though it ultimately reversed itself, shows how close we are to losing it....

Read it all.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The facts at hand presumably speak for themselves, but a trifle more vulgarly, I suspect, than facts even usually do. A few years back I had a rather unpleasant exchange with Omid Safi, a professor at that time at Colgate University, now at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Or at least he seemed to think it was unpleasant; I thought it was riotous: an entertaining exposure of academic pomposity and the vacuity of the dominant MESA orthodoxy that has a stranglehold on university Middle East Studies departments.

And it ended, mind you, with Safi refusing to debate me -- hiding behind his degree even when I offered to get someone who had a PhD to debate him, and continuing to propagandize his students about "Islamophobia" rather than train them to think critically about the issues of Islam and jihad.

Or at least that's where it ended for me. Safi, it appears, has been nursing a grudge -- one he could easily have assuaged by accepting my challenge to debate, defeating me, and thus proving that I really am the empty-headed ideologue he pretends that I am. Instead, he chose a different route.

I have just been sent the email below -- one that Omid Safi sent on November 11, 2008. It contains the most outrageous falsehood about me that I have ever seen in all the years I've been doing this work: it's one thing to say I'm stupid, or evil, or secretly inclined to this or that rotten ideology. It's quite another to claim that I have done something I have never done -- something that if I had indeed done, Safi could have and should have gotten me arrested. The fact that he didn't do that shows in itself that he is lying. Nonetheless, there is no way for me to know how far and wide he has spread this defamatory charge. I am publishing his email here now as an example of the depths to which a pseudo-academic propagandist like Safi will sink when intellectually cornered, and as a public challenge to him to retract and apologize. I also call upon the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to rebuke and/or dismiss this sorry excuse for an academic.

And I warn Professor Safi that if he claims this email is fabricated, that I have all the necessary documentation and testimony from its recipient to demonstrate that it is genuine.

Professor Safi, I await your retraction of this claim about me, and your public apology.

dear Parvaneh khanoom,
ba arz-e salam.
I have not looked at Spencer's latest piece of trash, but I have to caution you against taking what he says seriously. He is a hateful man, who has personally threatened me and my family with death. These are not people who are interested in serious scholarly debate.

My own work has tended to focus on the tradition of falsafeh, 'erfan, and poetry, especially the works of people like Molavi and Attar, Hafez and Sa'di. But I also think (and you are free to disagree with this) that it is impossible to read these people aside what they were: observant Muslims. All of their poetry (especially for Molavi) is filled with references to the Qur'an and Islamic teachings.

Of course you are right that we as Iranians had a beautiful civilizations before the rise of Islam. As a historian of Iran I also think that we have had a beautiful civilization after the rise of Islam.

If I may ever suggest readings, please allow me to be of service. It would be my great pleasure.

ba nahaayat-e ehteraam
omid

One last note: Safi implicitly defends those who really do threaten to murder their opponents, since Iran's "beautiful civilization after the rise of Islam," which he praises above, presumably includes the Iranian mullahs who built the Islamic Republic. Then, in a classic example of projection, he charges those who oppose such murderous regimes with doing what they do.

iran_hanging_outrage_2.jpg A beautiful civilization after the rise of Islam
| 197 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The translation of the original headline, according to Jihad Watch's handsome, leather-bound American English / English-English Dictionary is "Birmingham purveyor of a particular curry dish is jihad kingpin." And knowing is half the battle.

"Brummie balti boss 'is terror kingpin," by Tom Wells for The Sun, April 26 (thanks to the aptly named Thomas Pellow):

A British dad arrested by armed cops was last night accused of masterminding terrorism for Osama bin Laden - from his Birmingham balti restaurant.
Curry house boss Golam Mostafa, 55 - suspected of heading a UK terror cell - was seized in Bangladesh.
British police were said to have been probing him for money laundering and frozen his bank accounts when he scarpered there three years ago.
He allegedly sent thousands he made from selling baltis to finance terrorism in Bangladesh.

Jihadist entrepreneurship.

The cell he is accused of running back here was part of a feared group called HUJI - Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami.

Great. Who else in this cell is still on the Sceptered Isle?

Its chiefs - closely linked to al-Qaeda and the Taliban - support bin Laden's fatwa demanding the murder of all Americans and Jews.
Mostafa's arrest is his SECOND since returning to Bangladesh.
He had barely arrived in his bolthole when cops found guns, ammunition and books on bomb-making at his home in Sylhet.
He was jailed for 17 years but launched an appeal - which saw him freed on bail.
Last night Bangladeshi police chief Shahidul Hoque said the new arrest followed fresh extremism.
He declared: "Mostofa was carrying out militant activities and tried to get arrested militant leaders freed."

And probably not by asking nicely.

A Foreign Office spokesman said: "We are aware of reports of a UK national being detained in Bangladesh and are making inquiries."
| 3 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Another item for our ever-expanding You-Can't-Make-This-Stuff-Up file. And this comes after their failed candidacy for the Council for Human Rights. Not that the Iranians would say they're against women's rights. They're only interested in the position, privileges, and obligations in society that Sharia prescribes for women. Those are their rights, and nothing more. "Tehran candidates itself for UN post in defence of women's rights," from AsiaNews, April 26:

Tehran (AsiaNews / Agencies) - The authorities of the Islamic Republic confirmed yesterday that they no longer wish to become members of the United Nations Council for Human Rights. Except that, at the same time, Tehran has proposed itself as a member of the Commission for the protection of women's rights. The news was greeted with relief by governments and activists that opposed the nomination of the regime, but also with some hilarity at the idea of its wanting to assume the role of a defender of women.
Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Mehmanparast Ramin, , said the decision to withdraw from the Council for Human Rights was taken jointly with other Asian countries, thus presenting a single candidate. According to a western diplomat quoted by Reuters, Tehran backed down when it became clear it could not secure enough votes to get a seat.
The Council for Human Rights has 47 countries and has its headquarters in Geneva. Tehran is under fire from the international community for its systematic violation of fundamental human freedoms. American UN mission spokesman, Mark Kornblau, expressed satisfaction: "It 'a step in the right direction for the Council. The presence of countries like China and Saudi Arabia in it, has contributed over the years to discredit the image of the UN body.
The Islamic Republic had tried to join the Council in 2006. But its candidacy failed as a result of pressure from the United States.
However in a move that smacks of provocation, Iran has put itself forward as a candidate for the Commission to protect the rights of women. The mullahs' regime is one of the toughest in the world towards women, who live in a state of semi-segregation. The are daily arrests and violence against women who are not "adequately covered" or who act in "a non Islamic way". At Friday prayers April 16 last, the mullah of Tehran Sadigo Kazem said that women who do not wear the hijab are responsible for the spread of adultery and "increase the risk of earthquakes" ...
| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

As was the case with bin Laden, it's not who's operating the page that is of interest, but the fact that, per this report, "experts say militant groups have been scrambling in recent weeks to get on sites like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube."

And you thought Mafia Wars was annoying. "Terrorist No2 gets axe from Facebook," by Simon Hughes for The Sun, April 26:

A second fugitive al-Qaeda leader has appeared on Facebook to spread terror messages.
Ayman al-Zawahiri has a £16.5million price on his head - equal to Osama Bin Laden, whose page was revealed by The Sun earlier this month.
Now Facebook has axed his page too - plus two more linked to the Taliban - after a Sun probe into extremist infiltration of networking sites.
Egyptian Zawahiri's page had a photo of him with a semi-automatic rifle in the background.
Videos included a truck bombing in Afghanistan. The page could be found via a Voice of Jihad site, which included film clips calling for attacks on the UK and US.
Experts say militant groups have been scrambling in recent weeks to get on sites like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.
Facebook said: "These pages have been removed."
| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

April 25, 2010

The master of the dance here dances masterfully. "On U.S. speaking tour, once-banned Muslim scholar Tariq Ramadan shares his vision for the future: Ramadan speaks to the Chicago Tribune about his U.S. visit and asks American Muslims to be involved in American society and spread a better understanding," by Noreen S. Ahmed-Ullah in the Chicago Tribune, April 23 (thanks to James):

The Bush administration denied Muslim scholar Tariq Ramadan a visa six years ago, forcing him to turn down a tenured position at the University of Notre Dame. Groups like the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit and fought successfully on his behalf. In January, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton revoked a ban, allowing the Swiss-born Ramadan and another Muslim scholar to visit the U.S. On his first trip back, Ramadan, now a professor at Oxford University, gave a keynote address this month at a fundraising dinner for the Chicago office of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. He also sat down with the Chicago Tribune.

Q: Why do you think you were banned from the United States?

A: I gave money to many organizations and two were blacklisted in the United States. (The Bush administration) said you gave the money so you should reasonably have known that these organizations were connected to Hamas, or allegedly connected to Hamas. The problem for (the Bush administration) was that they made a mistake because I gave the money between 1998 and 2002, before these organizations were blacklisted in the States, while they were never blacklisted in Europe where I lived. This was all a pretext for keeping me outside (the U.S.). It was an ideological exclusion. [...]

Note what he does not say. He doesn't say that he denounces Hamas, or that he didn't know the organizations were linked to Hamas. He says that he gave before the organizations were put on the list -- a narrow technicality that doesn't address any of the really important issues here regarding Ramadan's beliefs, loyalties, and allegiances.

Q: You've been criticized for double-speak, saying one thing to Muslim audiences and another to Western, non-Muslim audiences. Right-wing blogger Robert Spencer has called you a "stealth jihadist." Are you a stealth jihadist?

A: No. They all know that. These are people who have a problem with the Muslim presence. They are scared our presence in the West is going to change Western policies to something which is more open, for example, toward Palestinian rights, more critical toward the unilateral support of the States toward Israel.

Note the descriptor "right-wing blogger," which is simultaneously intended to impugn and diminish, setting up red flags for right-thinking liberal Trib readers. What is "right-wing" about standing up for the freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and legal equality of all people? And while I am indeed a "blogger," I guess, even if I never write about my new lawnmower or the way I like my coffee, it is the one way to describe me that gives Trib readers no hint that I have written bestselling books, advised the FBI and Centcom, etc. This is nothing personal -- the point here is not that the Trib should have printed my resume or said nice things about me. The point is that this is just another example of the all-pervasive journalistic bias regarding reporting on the jihad: anyone who doesn't fit into the prevailing ideological straitjacket is demeaned and impugned.

And note also that the question that Noreen S. Ahmed-Ullah asks is monumentally silly. If Tariq Ramadan really is a stealth jihadist, does Noreen S. Ahmed-Ullah really expect him to say, "Why, yes, of course I'm a stealth jihadist"? The question itself is a setup for Ramadan to shoot down the idea, but he still manages to keep the waters muddy instead of clarifying anything, by saying that people like me oppose him because he is anti-Israel. So in other words, he is not a stealth jihadist, he just supports the jihad against Israel -- which he, an informed and intelligent Muslim, surely knows is indeed a jihad, and not simply a political conflict over land. So in denying he is a stealth jihadist, Ramadan essentially affirms that he is a stealth jihadist.

Q: Your critics point to your grandfather, Hassan al Banna, who founded the Muslim Brotherhood, a political Muslim group in Egypt that has been violent at times. They draw links between your own beliefs and that of the Brotherhood. Do you belong to the Muslim Brotherhood?

A: I don't belong to the Muslim Brotherhood. (A few days ago) someone asked me to condemn my grandfather. I said, "Look. I'm not from the Muslim Brotherhood. He was living in the '30s and the '40s. He was against British colonization. He built schools. He was promoting a vision. There are things with which I agree, and others, that put into context, I may disagree. But I'm not condemning him. He never killed someone."

Note that while he says that he does agree with some aspects of the Brotherhood program, he only "may" disagree with other aspects. Again, he is sidestepping the essential question: does Tariq Ramadan wish to extend the hegemony of Sharia to the West, even by non-violent means?

| 30 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More on the recently foiled New York subway jihad plot. "British al-Qaeda commander planned July 7-style attack on New York subway," by Duncan Gardham for the Telegraph, April 25 (thanks to all who sent this in):

A British al-Qaeda commander planned to emulate the July 7 London suicide bombings with a coordinated attack on the New York subway system, it has emerged.

Rashid Rauf, who also planned the transatlantic airlines plot, allegedly told three Americans to attack targets in the United States.

His role in the plot emerged as a man pleaded guilty to the plot which was cracked by the FBI last September after a tip off from British intelligence.

It would have been the biggest attack on US soil since September 11, according to the US Attorney General, Eric Holder.

Rauf's role in the New York plot emerged as Zarein Ahmedzay, a 25-year-old former New York taxi driver, pleaded guilty to charges including conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction.

It is claimed they had bought the ingredients to make similar explosives as those used in the July 7 2005 bombings which killed 52 people on three tube trains and a bus in London.

In court Ahmedzay said he travelled to Pakistan with two other former school friends from Queen's, New York, Najibullah Zazi and Adis Medunjanin in the summer of 2008.

At the camp in the lawless region of North Waziristan, Ahmedzay said the three men offered to join the Taliban and fight US forces in Afghanistan, but were told they would be "more useful if we returned to New York City... to conduct operations."

Asked by the judge what kind of operations, he said: "Suicide-bombing operations."...

Medunjanin, who is of Bonsian [sic] origin, plans to plead not guilty and a fourth man is in custody in Pakistan.

A Bosnian Muslim? But...but...I thought they were all peaceful, moderate and America-loving!

| 6 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The rules of "rock-paper-scissors" are more grounded in reality: here, hurt feelings trump safety behind the wheel. Indeed, this case is so much like others in which practices in the Muslim world, or by Muslims who continue those practices in the West: You can't criticize without apologists claiming the problem does not really exist even as it stares them in the face, and if you do, you cannot possibly have any motive other than bilious, seething hatred.

An update on this story. "French muslims [sic] feel stigmatised in veil row," from RTÉ News, April 25:

Muslims in the French city where a woman was fined for driving in an Islamic veil complained of being stigmatised by the affair as the political repercussions rumbled on.
With the government planning to ban the full Islamic veil in public, the fining of the French woman took a political turn when a minister threatened to punish her muslim husband for offences including polygamy.
'The muslims of Nantes... are worried by this systematic stigmatisation which goes against the values of the Republic,' the collective of Nantes mosques said in a statement.

There may be a certain urgency here to deflect attention from the practice of polygamy -- that could be an entirely new proverbial can of worms, alongside the ongoing issue of the niqab. And there's no better diversionary tactic than claiming victim status as loudly and as often as possible.

And, how about those "values of the Republic?" Does "liberty" apply only to the freedom to adhere to Islamic law? And how do "fraternity and equality" among Muslims and non-Muslims fare under Sharia?

The association 'considers that the stopping of a driver is a judicial procedure and is angry at how such an event has been turned into being all about Islam.'
The woman has challenged the fine as a breach of her human rights.

Ah, yes. The fundamental, inalienable right to drive a large, heavy, and fast-moving piece of machinery while half-blind.

President Nicolas Sarkozy's government said last week it would push ahead with a ban on wearing a full-face veil in public, despite a warning from state legal experts that such a law could be unconstitutional.
In this context, the Nantes incident gained political momentum and dominated the news this weekend.
France's interior minister, Brice Hortefeux, alleged the woman's husband may belong to a radical group and may be a polygamist with four wives and 12 children and guilty of welfare fraud. [...]
The deputy mayor of Nantes, Socialist lawmaker Jean-Marc Ayrault, said the state authorities had known about the polygamy allegations for some time. 'Why are they pretending just now to have discovered the situation? he said.
The state prosecutor in Nantes, Xavier Ronsin, said that so far no charge had been lodged against the husband but an investigation could be launched if there were grounds to suspect fraud.
Mr Hortefeux wrote that the husband was born in Algeria and acquired French nationality by marrying the woman in 1999.
Polygamy, being married to more than one person at the same time, is a jailable offence in France, but only civil marriages conducted by a state official count - not religious marriage ceremonies.
It was not clear whether the veiled woman's husband was joined to his other alleged wives by civil marriage or by religious rites such as Muslim weddings.
As to whether the man could be stripped of his French nationality, a source close to the investigation said that French law allowed this only in the case of serious crimes against the state such as terrorism, not for polygamy.
Naturalised citizens can however have their nationality revoked if they are found to have obtained it fraudulently.
| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Reports conflict at this point on whether al-Ghamdi has been fired outright. It would be interesting to find out what, if anything, he would do to bridge the gap between the opinions he has expressed and the oppression he continues to oversee in his position as "general manager for the Mecca branch of the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice." "Decision to replace top Saudi cleric withdrawn," from Al-Arabiya, April 25:

A decision to replace a senior Saudi religious police officer on Sunday has been retracted hours after reports that he was sacked following comments about easing the rules for prayer in mosques, and allowing men and women to mix freely.
An official report earlier said Sheikh Ahmed al-Ghamdi was replaced as general manager for the Mecca branch of the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice in an announcement from the organisation's president, Sheikh Abdulaziz al-Humain.
In the report, Humain gave no reason for the move, which included several other new appointments of senior officials of the religious police, popularly known as the muttawa.
Ghamdi was reportedly dressed down three days ago by the country's highest cleric for saying that Muslims are not necessarily required to pray inside a mosque with a group of other Muslims in daily prayers.
Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul Aziz al-Sheikh told Ghamdi he was getting involved in matters of Islamic sharia law that were outside his authority, the Al-Madinah newspaper reported on Friday.
Al-Sheikh also said in his sermon during Friday prayers that anyone suggesting that congregation prayer is not necessary is "leading people to hell," according to reports.
Ghamdi's replacement followed his denial on Wednesday that he had already been sacked for statements advocating free mixing of unrelated men and women.
Ghamdi, who could not immediately be contacted, has said several times since December that there is nothing in scripture supporting the strict segregation enforced by Saudi Arabia's ultra-strict Wahhabi school of Sunni Islam.
| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Jihad against girls' education, or mass hysteria? "80 Afghan schoolgirls fall ill; poison feared," by Rahim Faiez for Associated Press, April 25:

KABUL - Dozens of Afghan schoolgirls have fallen ill in recent days after reporting a strange odor in their classrooms in northern Afghanistan, prompting an investigation into whether they were targeted by militants who oppose education for girls or victims of mass hysteria.

Either way, the reports from three schools within 2 miles (3 kilometers) of one another in Kunduz province have raised alarm in a city threatened by the Taliban and their militant allies.

The latest cases occurred Sunday, when 13 girls became sick, Kunduz provincial spokesman Mahbobullah Sayedi said. Another 47 complained of dizziness and nausea the day before, and 23 fell ill last Wednesday.

All complained of a strange smell in class before they fell ill....

"This is a matter of concern not only for us but for the families," Sayedi said, blaming the sicknesses on "enemies" who oppose education for girls.

In the capital of Kabul, President Hamid Karzai's spokesman, Waheed Omar, said any attempt to keep girls out of school is a "terrorist act."...

Girls were not allowed to attend school when the Taliban controlled most of Afghanistan. The group was ousted from power in the 2001 U.S.-led invasion. The Taliban and other conservative extremist groups have been known to target schoolgirls.

In one of the most chilling attacks, men on motorbikes sprayed acid from squirt guns and water bottles onto 15 schoolgirls and teachers in 2008 as they walked to a girls school in Kandahar, the southern city that is the spiritual birthplace of the militant movement....

Related incidents in this story paint a picture of fanaticism and chaos:

Elsewhere in Afghanistan on Sunday, hundreds of people blocked a main road in Logar province, west of Kabul, and burned several trucks to protest what they said were civilian deaths in NATO operations. They gathered hours after NATO said coalition troops killed several insurgents and captured a Taliban sub-commander.

"The man they killed was a schoolteacher and a mullah," said businessman Jan Mohammed. "They killed him inside his house and because of that the people came and burned my gas station, my car and my house."

He complained that if NATO thought the mullah was with the Taliban, "they should have arrested him at his school not gone to his house at midnight."

"The people are very angry. They are saying these people killed are innocent civilians," provincial spokesman Din Mohammad Darwesh said...

So let me get this straight. They were enraged over the killing of innocent civilians, so they burned down a bystander's gas station, car and house. I guess they decided to express their moral indignation by taking the high road!

And meanwhile, a jihad/martyrdom bomber took a few civilians with him on his way to meet his houris:

In southeastern Afghanistan, a suicide bomber attacked private security guards while they were at a bazaar, killing four Afghans and wounding 12, the government said.

Two of the dead and five of the wounded worked for the U.S. Protection and Investigations security firm, an Interior Ministry statement said. The other victims were civilians....

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This story makes extensive use of the "culture" canard -- that is, don't blame Islam, blame "cultural" influences. Here's the problem: Cultural influences do count, and in a big way. Why?

Islam, despite its claims of being eternal, unchanged, and handed down in perfect form from on high, did not come up in a vacuum. It is utterly suffused with the baggage of Muhammad's culture, place, and time -- seventh-century Arabia -- not to mention his personal biases and hangups. All of this baggage is made sacrosanct via Qur'an 33:21, which calls Muhammad a "beautiful pattern of conduct" for believers.

Thus, the obsession with virginity described in "Arab cultures" here is tremendously reinforced and encouraged by several major aspects of Islam: the severity of punishments for sexual crimes, the uneven responsibility conferred on women to protect their and their families' "honor" through veiling and seclusion, and the sanction found in Qur'an 4:34 for attempting to "control" women with violence.

Of course, that doesn't stop the author of this report from avoiding the Islamic issue, and tacking on the usual tu quoque boilerplate, noted below.

"The virginity industry," by Najlaa Abou Mehri and Linda Sills, for BBC Radio 4, April 25:

Young Arab women wait in an upmarket medical clinic for an operation that will not only change their lives, but quite possibly save it. Yet the operation is a matter of choice and not necessity. It costs about 2,000 euros (£1,700) and carries very little risk.
The clinic is not in Dubai or Cairo, but in Paris. And the surgery they are waiting for is to restore their virginity.
Whether in Asia or the Arab world, an unknown number of women face an agonising problem having broken a deep taboo. They've had sex outside marriage and if found out, risk being ostracised by their communities, or even murdered.
Now more and more of them are undergoing surgery to re-connect their hymens and hide any sign of past sexual activity. They want to ensure that blood is spilled on their wedding night sheets.
The social pressure is so great that some women have even taken their own lives. [...]
Noor is a trendy professional who works in Damascus. He's fairly representative of young Syrian men in a secular society. But although Noor says he believes in equality for women, underneath the liberal facade lies a deep-rooted conservatism.
"I know girls who went through this restoration and they were caught out on their wedding night by their husbands," he says. "They realised they weren't virgins. Even if society accepts such a thing, I would still refuse to marry her."
Muslim clerics are quick to point out that the virginity issue is not about religion. "We should remember that when people wait for the virgin's blood to be spilled on the sheet, these are all cultural traditions," says Syrian cleric, Sheikh Mohamad Habash. "This is not related to Shariah law."

But killing for adultery (Sahih Bukhari 8.82.816), and demanding four witnesses to "prove" sexual crimes such as rape (Qur'an 24:4) most certainly are related to Sharia.

And now, some hastily tacked-on moral equivalence:

Christian communities in the Middle East are often just as firm in their belief that women should be virgins when they marry.
Arab writer and social commentator, Sana Al Khayat believes the whole issue has much to with the notion of "control"....

But where did that come from?

| 59 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is yet more indication that the war against Israel is a jihad against Israel, motivated by an antisemitism with deep, ancient roots in Islam -- and thus it will not be solved by Israeli concessions, or the establishment of a Palestinian state. The one thing we can be sure of about this is that Western analysts will ignore it, as they have all the other indications of the same thing. "Calls for Jihad in a Rally of Kuwaiti Students Union: This Is a War of Religion, Not a War between Israelis and Arabs," from MEMRITV, March 29 (thanks to all who sent this in):

The following excerpts are from a rally in which Kuwaiti students show solidarity with the Palestinian cause. The rally aired on Al-Jazeera TV on March 29, 2010.

Kuwait poet Ahmad Al-Kandari: We call upon the Arab rulers to stop being naïve, to stop submitting [peace] initiatives, to stop tormenting the Palestinian people, to stop being so feeble and weak, and to support the mujahideen of Hamas, not [Mahmoud] Abbas, the traitor.

[...]

I call upon everybody to repeat after me:

The fortresses will never fall as long as our blood flows.

The fortresses will never fall...

Crowds: As long as our blood flows.

Ahmad Al-Kandari: The fortresses will never fall...

Crowds: ...As long as our blood flows.

Ahmad Al-Kandari: We are the soldiers of Hamas, and Jihad is our path.

We are the soldiers of Hamas, and Jihad is our path.

Generation after generation - we will never recognize Israel.

Generation after generation - we will never...

Crowds: ...Recognize Israel.

Ahmad Al-Kandari: We will never ever...

Crowd: ...Recognize Israel.

Ahmad Al-Kandari: Oh generation, strive for victory, and accept nothing less than victory. Tell the night about the men on the battlefront, who felled heresy with a deadly blow. We lay in wait, watching them advance, with a well-planned ambush ready for them. A voice arose: "Kill them, inflict endless wounds upon them."

[...]

This is a message to the Zionists, the murderous, treacherous, and occupying Zionists, the Zionists who rob our history and steal our antiquities. Say to Zion: We have brought slaughter upon you, and we shall watch you dying. You will encounter our army of Al-Qassam, for whom death serves as a cloak.

[...]

Say to Zion: "We have brought slaughter upon you, and we shall watch you dying. You will encounter our army of Al-Qassam, for whom death serves as a cloak. We have turned your trickery back against you with soldiers who do not hesitate to slaughter you." A voice arose: "Kill them, inflict endless wounds upon them."

[...]

Kuwait MP Jama'an Al-Harbash: Allah willing, a war will be waged between us and them - the war foretold by the Prophet Muhammad: "Judgment Day will not come before you fight the Jews - with them on the west bank of the river, and you on the east bank - and the trees and the stones will say: Oh Muslim, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me. Come and kill him." This war is drawing near, Allah willing.

That is a famous hadith. You can find several iterations of it in this hadith collection, which is recognized by Muslims as one of the most reliable of such collections.

Crowds: Khaybar, Khaybar, oh Jews! The army of Muhammad has begun its return. The army of Muhammad has begun its return.

Jama'an Al-Harbash: That day draws near, my dear ones. As for the [Arab] regimes, the obstacles, the countries of surrender and appeasement, and those who have forsaken the holy places and the land, in their efforts to cling to their seats and pass them on [to their sons] - they will be trampled underfoot by the mujahideen.

The promise of Allah is more true than theirs. The word of Allah is more true than theirs. The blood of the mujahideen is more true than their lies and deceit. This is a war of religion, not just a war between Arabs and Israelis, or a war between liberators and occupiers. This is an ideological war, an Islamic war, which will end in victory only under the banner of Jihad. The glory of this war will not be earned by Abu Mazen and the collaborators. It will be earned by the mujahideen.

[...]

Kuwait student leader 'Abd Al-'Aziz Dahi Al-Fadhli: History has proven, ever since 1948, that peace with the sons of Zion is to no avail, and that the only option is the Islamic resistance and support for the Islamic resistance.

We say to our Arab regimes: Today is the day of support for the resistance. Today is the day for declaring Jihad. There is no path of reconciliation and negotiations. Jihad, and Jihad alone.

[...]

Khaybar, Khaybar, oh Jews, the army of Muhammad will return! [...]

Khaybar. As I explain in my book The Truth About Muhammad, Muhammad led a Muslim force against the Khaybar oasis, which was inhabited by Jews -- many of whom he had previously exiled from Medina. When he did so, he was not responding to any provocation. One of the Muslims later remembered: "When the apostle raided a people he waited until the morning. If he heard a call to prayer he held back; if he did not hear it he attacked. We came to Khaybar by night, and the apostle passed the night there; and when morning came he did not hear the call to prayer, so he rode and we rode with him....We met the workers of Khaybar coming out in the morning with their spades and baskets. When they saw the apostle and the army they cried, 'Muhammad with his force,' and turned tail and fled. The apostle said, 'Allah Akbar! Khaybar is destroyed. When we arrive in a people's square it is a bad morning for those who have been warned.'"

The Muslim advance was inexorable. "The apostle," according to Muhammad's earliest biographer, Ibn Ishaq, "seized the property piece by piece and conquered the forts one by one as he came to them." Another biographer of Muhammad, Ibn Sa'd, reports that the battle was fierce: the "polytheists...killed a large number of [Muhammad's] Companions and he also put to death a very large number of them....He killed ninety-three men of the Jews..." Muhammad and his men offered the fajr prayer, the Islamic dawn prayer, before it was light, and then entered Khaybar itself. The Muslims immediately set out to locate the inhabitants' wealth. A Jewish leader of Khaybar, Kinana bin al-Rabi, was brought before Muhammad; Kinana was supposed to have been entrusted with the treasure of on of the Jewish tribes of Arabia, the Banu Nadir. Kinana denied knowing where this treasure was, but Muhammad pressed him: "Do you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?" Kinana said yes, that he did know that.

Some of the treasure was found. To find the rest, Muhammad gave orders concerning Kinana: "Torture him until you extract what he has." One of the Muslims built a fire on Kinana's chest, but Kinana would not give up his secret. When he was at the point of death, one of the Muslims beheaded him. Kinana's wife was taken as a war prize; Muhammad claimed her for himself and hastily arranged a wedding ceremony that night. He halted the Muslims' caravan out of Khaybar later that night in order to consummate the marriage.

Muhammad agreed to let the people of Khaybar to go into exile, allowing them to keep as much of their property as they could carry. The Prophet of Islam, however, commanded them to leave behind all their gold and silver. He had intended to expel all of them, but some, who were farmers, begged him to allow them to let them stay if they gave him half their yield annually. Muhammad agreed: "I will allow you to continue here, so long as we would desire." He warned them: "If we wish to expel you we will expel you." They no longer had any rights that did not depend upon the good will and sufferance of Muhammad and the Muslims. And indeed, when the Muslims discovered some treasure that some of the Khaybar Jews had hidden, he ordered the women of the tribe enslaved and seized the perpetrators' land. A hadith notes that "the Prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives."

Thus when modern-day jihadists invoke Khaybar, they are recalling an aggressive, surprise raid by Muhammad which resulted in the final eradication of the once considerable Jewish presence in Arabia. To the jihadists, Khaybar means the destruction of the Jews and the seizure of their property by the Muslims.

Young boy: There is no god but Allah. Allah loves the martyrs. You have taught us what it means to be a man. All the money in the world will not make us forget.

All the money in the world? You mean, American aid won't win over your heart and mind?

Read it all.

| 41 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

April 24, 2010

This is a good thing. After all, who ever heard of a pious Muslim Iranian who hated America? The very idea is unheard of! And the fact that this "civil rights" organization is linked to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, and has had several of its officials convicted of terror activity -- that wouldn't impugn its credibility as a critic of American practices in any way, would it? Of course not!

More cultural intimidation, followed by the predictable cringing dhimmitude -- this time from wrestlers, no less. "Wrestling-show skit prompts an apology," from the Star-Tribune, April 23 (thanks to Tom):

A skit that some decried as racist will be dropped from future shows run by the American Wrestling Federation, according to a Muslim civil liberties group that objected to accounts of the performance.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations of Minnesota (CAIR-MN) said it accepted an apology this week from the Elk River-based federation, which has run a series of wrestling shows at metro-area high schools this year.

In the controversial skit, performed last month during a booster club fundraiser in the gym of St. Michael-Albertville High School, a wrestler billed as an Iranian made a show of unrolling a rug and kneeling to pray, then insulted Americans as the crowd booed.

The skit portrayed Muslims and Iranians in an "inaccurate and bigoted" way, according to CAIR-MN. "Not only was the Muslim-Iranian wrestler portrayed in a way where he would be perceived as a bad/evil character, correlating this character with unpatriotic rhetoric is offensive to the nearly 100,000 Muslims in Minnesota. ... To promote your show as a 'family friendly' event suitable to be performed at a public high school is appalling and discriminatory," the group said in a letter to the federation.

| 30 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Ably skewering PC idiocy. "PC Alert: Rev. Franklin Graham Banned by the Pentagon for Telling the Truth About Islam," by Doug Giles, April 24:

Franklin Graham, distinguished Christian minister and son of an American evangelical treasure (i.e. Billy Graham) was banned from praying at the Pentagon for their upcoming May 6th National Day of Prayer event because he called Islam "evil."

Apparently Franklin didn't get the memo that we can't say squat about Islam anymore. Oh, hell no. Muslims are groovy no matter what they do, and anyone who says otherwise ... is ... well ... evil ... in the eyes of the thought police who're heading up the United States of Political Horse Smack.

Check it out: When Muslims kill 3,000 Americans, we can't call them "wicked." When they abuse women, cut off little girls' clitorises, stone unruly wives, honor kill their teenage daughters for texting someone not named Achmed, and keep precious women in stone-age bondage worldwide, we can't say that's BS because that might offend them. And God forbid we should offend folks who're six bubbles off level and don't get basic women's rights.

I'm scratching a bald spot on the back of my head on this one because we won't put up with that bollocks with any other people or religion except with Islam; they get a free pass. Yes, we're being whipped into believing that we're misjudging them even though the preponderance of historical evidence indicates that those who believe they're bogus are spot on....

Read it all.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Impose a Palestinian state (i.e., new jihad base) upon Israel, Abbas demands of Obama, or stop blustering about it. And Obama, ever anxious to please the Islamic world, may well comply. "Abbas calls on Obama to impose Mideast peace deal," by Karin Laub for Associated Press, April 24 (thanks to John):

RAMALLAH, West Bank - Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas called on President Barack Obama on Saturday to impose a Mideast peace deal, reflecting growing frustration with what Palestinians see as Washington's failure to wrangle concessions out of Israel's hardline government.

In an unusually blunt appeal, Abbas said that if Obama believes Palestinian statehood is a vital U.S. interest, then the American leader must take forceful steps to bring it about.

"Since you, Mr. President and you, the members of the American administration, believe in this, it is your duty to call for the steps in order to reach the solution and impose the solution -- impose it," Abbas said in a speech to leaders of his Fatah movement.

"But don't tell me it's a vital national strategic American interest ... and then not do anything," he added....

| 38 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

SIOA Executive Director Pamela Geller is speaking, and she has more details here.

STAND IN SOLIDARITY WITH ISRAEL'S RIGHT TO BUILD AND LIVE IN ITS OWN COUNTRY.

A CLARION CALL FOR A UNITED JEWISH JERUSALEM, AND PROTEST AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION'S SCAPEGOATING OF ISRAEL. DATE:

A Rally in Solidarity with Israel, Sun, April 25, 2010

TIME: 1 PM LOCATION: Israel Consulate, 2nd Ave between 42nd and 43rd St,

NYC Jewish Action Alliance and: Freedom Defense Initiative (FDI) and Stop Islamization of America (SIOA) Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, Children of Jewish Holocaust Survivors, Doris Wise Montrose, President; Center for Policy Research in American Education (CPR);Christians and Jews United for Israel, May Long, President; Coalition for Israel, Howard Weber, President; Mallory Danaher, Director, David Horowitz Freedom Center; Hindu Human Rights Watch; Sarah N. Stern, Founder and President, Endowment for Middle East Truth (EMET); Global Security Council, Dr. Charles Jacobs, President, Americans for Peace and Tolerance; Dr. Herbert London, President, The Hudson Institute; Susan Rosenbluth, Editor, Jewish Voice and Opinion; Human Rights Coalition Against Radical Islam; Joan Peters, author, From Time Immemorial; Dr. Daniel Pipes; Glenn Richter; Unity Coalition for Israel, Esther Levens, President;; Lt. Col. Allen West; Jeffrey Wiesenfeld, CUNY Trustee; Zionist Organization of America, Morton Klein, President; Z Street, Lori Lowenthal Marcus, President; and many other leaders and organizations.

If you haven't joined Pamela Geller and me in the launch of Stop the Islamization of America, join here now.

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The last part of this, Ahmedzay's rant against "Zionist Jews," not reproduced below, was reported yesterday. This report is extraordinary for the fact that it shows Ahmedzay quoting Qur'an 9:111 to justify suicide bombing. This is a common tactic of suicide bombing recruiters, but to point it out in teh West usually brings one a charge of "Islamophobia." I guess Ahmedzay must be an "Islamophobe." "Zarein Ahmedzay's statement when he pleaded guilty to terrorist charges," from the New York Post, April 23 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

"Your Honor, I would like to quote from the Qur'an."

"Quote, Verily, Allah has purchased of the believers their lives and their wealth for the price of Paradise, to fight in the way of Allah, to kill and get killed. It is a promise binding on the truth in the Torah, the Gospel and the Qur'an, end of quote.

That's Qur'an 9:111, the justification for suicide attacks. The only guarantee of Paradise in the Qur'an is this verse, which guarantees it to those who kill and are killed for Allah.

This once again underscores the jihadist contention that they represent Islamic authenticity -- a charge never yet refuted by Muslim "moderates" in any way that has proven effective to change jihadists' minds.

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Draw-Mo_Promo.jpg

The paintbrush/pen/pencil/crayon is mightier than the sword. Or hey, even needlepoint if you're up for it. The possibilities are endless. "Seattle cartoonist launches 'Everybody Draw Mohammed Day'," by Jamie Griswold for the Associated Press, April 23 (thanks to all who sent this in):

After Comedy Central cut a portion of a South Park episode following a death threat from a radical Muslim group, Seattle cartoonist Molly Norris wanted to counter the fear. She has declared May 20th "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day."
Norris told KIRO Radio's Dave Ross that cartoonists are meant to challenge the lines of political correctness. "That's a cartoonist's job, to be non-PC."
Producers of South Park said Thursday that Comedy Central removed a speech about intimidation and fear from their show after a radical Muslim group warned that they could be killed for insulting the Prophet Muhammad.
The group said it wasn't threatening South Park producers Trey Parker and Matt Stone, but it included a gruesome picture of Theo Van Gogh, a Dutch filmmaker killed by a Muslim extremist in 2004, and said the producers could meet the same fate. The website posted the addresses of Comedy Central's New York office and the California production studio where South Park is made.
"As a cartoonist I just felt so much passion about what had happened I wanted to kind of counter Comedy Central's message they sent about feeling afraid," Norris said.
Norris has asked other artists to submit drawings of any religious figure to be posted as part of Citizens Against Citizens Against Humor (CACAH) on May 20th.

But drawings of one "religious figure" in particular will provoke death threats and accusations of hatred and racism.

On her website Norris explains this is not meant to disrespect any religion, but rather meant to protect people's right to express themselves.
| 83 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Practicality: The safety of the traveling public takes priority over the whims of those who would drive half-blind for the sake of a supremacist ideology. "Driver wearing Islamic face veil fined in France," by Pierre-Baptiste Vanzini for the Associated Press, April 23:

NANTES, France - A woman driver wearing an Islamic face veil has been fined by French police for not having a clear field of vision. The fine was small, but it garnered big attention Friday and may illustrate what is to come as the president pushes to outlaw the veils nationwide.
Traffic police in the western city of Nantes fined the 31-year-old woman euro22 ($29) in early April, her lawyer said. The fine was based on a rule that says drivers should have freedom of movement and a sufficient field of vision, lawyer Jean-Michel Pollono said.

Only Al Pacino gets to drive blind. And only in that one movie.

Pollono said Friday that he is protesting the decision, saying a veil is no different from a motorcycle helmet in terms of hindrance to vision.
The driver gave a news conference Friday -- while wearing the niqab veil, which covers the entire face except for the eyes -- and expressed "a feeling of injustice" over the incident.
"I didn't commit any infraction," said the driver, who declined to give her name. "I see just as well as you. ... I have driven like this for nine years. I've not had any problems."
The driver is French by nationality. The lawyer said she had never been stopped until now, after months of recent parliamentary discussion and government talk about possibly banning the veils.

But wait, there's more:

As the case escalated in the media spotlight, Interior Minister Brice Hortefeux's office said he wrote to his counterpart at the Immigration Ministry to request a study into whether the woman's Algerian-born husband could be stripped of French nationality for suspected illegal behavior.
In the letter to Immigration Minister Eric Besson, Hortefeux said the man was suspected of polygamy and fraud of state social services by allegedly benefiting from state financial aid for single parents paid to each of his four wives -- all of whom wear veils. An Interior Ministry official provided details of the letter, though not the husband's name, to The Associated Press....
| 41 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Fox provides an illuminating profile of the young convert to and Misunderstander of Islam, demonstrating yet again the jihadists' consistent tendency to portray themselves as the exponents of authentic, pure Islam -- and featuring Hamas-linked CAIR's Honest Ibe Hooper pretending that he never heard a jihadi speak before. "Road to Radicalism: The Man Behind the 'South Park' Threats," by Joshua Rhett Miller for FOXNews.com, April 23 (thanks to all who sent this in):

EXCLUSIVE: By all appearances, Zachary Adam Chesser was the boy next door. He played football and was on the crew team at one of the best high schools in the country. He even studied Japanese. He was hardly the sort of boy you'd expect would suggest on a radical Islamic website that the creators of the edgy cartoon series "South Park" will be targeted for death.

But Chesser also had a dark side. He was a "loner," a former classmate said, one who frequently drew pictures of Satanic figures in his notebooks and had just a few friends, most of them male.

"He was definitely sort of weird," the classmate told FoxNews.com. "He was very into violent industrial music, borderline Satanic bands and stuff like that. He had dark undertones in his interests."

Two years later, Chesser is literally a changed man. He now uses an alias and has a new set of hobbies. He now likes to be called Abu Talhah Al-Amrikee, and his primary interest in this world appears to be Islamic radicalism.

Last week, Chesser, 20, posted a warning on the website RevolutionMuslim.com following the 200th episode of "South Park," which included a caricature of the Prophet Muhammad disguised in a bear suit. The young man, who just two years ago was studying foreign languages at George Mason University, wrote on the site that Trey Parker and Matt Stone, the cartoon's creators, "will probably end up" like Theo van Gogh, a Dutch filmmaker who was murdered in 2004 after making a film critical of Islamic society.

"It's not a threat, but it really is a likely outcome," Chesser told FoxNews.com from his home in Centreville, Va. "They're going to be basically on a list in the back of the minds of a large number of Muslims. It's just the reality."...

True enough. The real tragedy here is that a rapidly declining number of non-Muslim Westerners seem willing to stand up to this thuggery. Instead, they appear all too willing to kowtow and give the jihadis what they want, as long as the jihadis don't hurt them -- even Bill O'Reilly was saying this the other day.

Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, characterized Revolution Muslim as a loosely-organized group with such outrageous beliefs he believes it may be a "setup" to smear Islam.

"They say wild and irresponsible things periodically," Hooper told FoxNews.com. "There's a strong suspicion that they're merely a setup to make Muslims and Islam look bad. They say such wild and crazy things that you have to wonder."

Sure. They're saying that those who insult Islam should be killed, which is standard Islamic teaching. Apparently Honest Ibe has never heard of this. Does Nihad Awad know that his partner is so ignorant of Islam?

Chesser, for his part, declined to indicate exactly what led him to join the group. A faculty member for George Mason University's Muslim Student Association said he had no knowledge of Chesser, who began attending the school in fall 2008 before dropping out in his second semester.

Reached by FoxNews.com via e-mail on Thursday, Chesser said one of his goals in writing for the group is to "raise awareness of the correct understanding of key Islamic beliefs." But he also warned: "If you kill us, then we kill you."

"I seek to help the world understand that neither the Muslims in general nor the mujahideen including Al Qaeda are abject to peace, but that this peace come with the following conditions: a complete withdrawal of non-Muslim forces from Muslim lands, an ending of the propping up of the apartheid regime of Israel, and a ceasing of the propping up of the brutal dictators we currently have who refuse to rule by divine law," Chesser's e-mail read....

Sounds like Obama's plan. The only catch is that even if the West did all those things, the jihad imperative to impose Sharia would still remain.

| 32 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

There is "no compulsion in religion" (Qur'an 2:256), as Islamic apologists in the West forever remind us. Yet when manifestations of Islamic supremacism such as the kidnapping and brutalizing of Gajri become public, those apologists are curiously silent. "'Hindu girl forced to convert to Islam,'" from ExpressIndia, April 23 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Islamabad - A Hindu girl from Punjab province was kidnapped and forced to convert to Islam and is currently being held in a madrassa, leading Pakistani rights activist Ansar Burney said today.

Burney said his rights organisation, the Ansar Burney Trust International, had learnt that 15-year-old Gajri, the daughter of Mengha Ram, was abducted by a Muslim neighbour from her home at Katchi Mandi, Liaquatpur, in Rahim Yar Khan district on December 21, 2009.

Gajri's parents later found out that she was being held captive in a madrassa or seminary in southern Punjab and that she had been married and converted to Islam, Burney said.

The local administration is "refusing to respond to the abduction" of the girl, who is not being allowed to leave the madrassa or to speak to her parents, he said.

Burney, a former human rights minister, condemned the forceful conversion of the Hindu girl and demanded her immediate release.

"Pakistan is a state party to the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which oblige authorities to protect religious minorities under international law," he said.

According to Ansar Burney Trust, on 21 December 2009 Gajri disappeared from the home of her Hindu parents in southern Punjab.

On December 26 last year, the local police station in Gajri's hometown received a letter with an affidavit from madrassa that said she had "embraced Islam and had married her neighbour Mohammad Salim", Burney said.

The letter did not enclose a marriage certificate, he said.

Police did not immediately inform Gajri's parents about the letter even though they had tried to file a First Information Report after she had gone missing.

The parents were discouraged from doing so by police, Burney said....

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Jaweed Kaleem's reporting on our SIOA religious liberty bus ads has been poor from the beginning, and this story is no better. "Controversial anti-Muslim ads to be reinstalled on Miami-Dade buses," by Jaweed Kaleem for the Miami Herald, April 24 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

Ten controversial advertisements by an anti-Muslim group that were removed from Miami-Dade Transit buses after the department received complaints will go back up.

"Anti-Muslim" -- SIOA is dedicated to defending the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, and the equality of rights of all people before the law. This is "anti-Muslim"? In that Kaleem is telling us more about what he believes about Islam than he probably intends to tell.

CAIR certainly complained. They boasted about that when the ads were taken down. But when the ads were taken down, they were only running on our initial order of ten buses. CAIR operatives spotted one of ten buses running in a fleet of 600 for three days? I doubt it. It is much likely that they heard about the ads from an informed party -- could it have been Jaweed Kaleem himself?

The ads, which a transit official said were pulled last week because they ``may be offensive,'' have the message ``Fatwa on your head? Is your community or family threatening you? Leaving Islam? Got questions? Get answers!'' and direct Muslims to a website urging them to leave the ``falsity of Islam.''

Actually, the transit official, Karla Damian, said that the ads "may be offensive to Islam." Kaleem leaves out that part about Islam, perhaps because he is aware of how absurd and offensive it is that American public officials are bowing to Sharia.

Transit spokesman Clinton Forbes said that, after reviewing the ads with the Miami-Dade County Attorney's office, the county decided that, ``although they may be considered offensive by some, they do not fall under the general guidelines that would warrant their removal.'' He added the county ``is not endorsing the message being presented.''

Apparently, we can't even expect basic accuracy from the Miami Herald: Forbes didn't say those things. They're from a statement by Harpal S. Kapoor, director of Miami-Dade Transit. Attributing them to a Transit spokesman is like saying that Robert Gibbs is nationalizing the healthcare system.

The ads, purchased by New York-based Stop the Islamization of America, will be reinstalled May 3, said Pamela Geller, the organization's director. Geller said CBS Outdoor, which contracts ad sales for county buses, will also run 20 additional ads.

Kaleem doesn't mention that CBS Outdoor is giving us the 20 additional ads at a steep discount, in tacit recognition of the fact that they were wrong to take them down in the first place.

``It was a violation of free speech that they were removed. Whether you like it or not, all ideas should be presented. It is dangerous not for all but some to leave Islam in America. This is a victory for free speech and religious liberty,'' Geller said.

Muhammed Malik, director of the South Florida chapter of the Council on American-Islamic relations, which had praised the ads' removal, said it will now use them ``as an opportunity to spark discussion about what Islam is really about.''

``Freedom and liberty are buzzwords they use as a smoke screen for their hatred,'' he said....

Once again Kaleem mentions nothing about what CAIR really is -- its Hamas links, etc. -- and allows Malik to defame us without bothering to ask us for a reaction or response. Malik, you may recall, lied about Islamic apostasy law in an earlier Kaleem story.

Pamela Geller's take on this egregious article is here.

| 32 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

April 23, 2010

He went to Afghanistan to wage jihad in order to establish the "perfect justice of Allah" -- i.e., Sharia. "Zazi cohort pleads guilty in subway terror bombing plot, blames Jews," by Janon Fisher for the New York Post, April 23:

A city cab driver who the feds claim plotted with a self-confessed al-Qaeda terrorist to unleash an attack on the subway system pleaded guilty today to terrorism charges -- then went on a rant against "Zionist Jews" for trying to destroy this country.

Zarein Ahmedzay appeared in Brooklyn federal court and told a judge that he received orders from al-Qaeda leaders to carry out the botched plot last September to bomb several Manhattan subway lines.

"Your honor, I strongly urge the American people to stop supporting the war against Islam. It would be in their interest," warned Ahmedzay. "I am thankful for myself that I did not do anything to harm anyone, but I fear someone else might."

Ahmedzay, 25, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction and providing material support to al-Qaeda. He faces life in prison when he is sentenced July 30.

The feds said he joined admitted terrorist Najibullah Zazi and another pal from their Queens high school on a trip to Pakistan two years ago to seek terrorism training.

The bombings were planned for just a few days after the eighth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks.

Zazi, an airport van driver, admitted earlier this year that he tested homemade bomb-making materials in a Denver suburb before driving to New York with the goal of attacking the subways to avenge US military involvement in Afghanistan.

During his court appearance, Ahmedzay continued his tirade, saying the "real enemy of this country are the ones destroying the country from within ... I believe it's a special group, Zionist Jews, who want a permanent shadow government."...

"During the summer of 2008 we went to Afghanistan to wage jihad against American occupiers and the corrupt Karzai government to establish the perfect justice of Allah," said Ahmedzay. "We were prepared to kill the occupying forces, including United States military. ... [al-Somali and Rauf] spoke English very well. We told these individuals that we wanted to wage jihad in Afghanistan."

Ahmedzay and the third suspect, Adis Medunjanin, had previously pleaded not guilty to charges they sought to join Zazi.

"The three of us decided to continue with the suicide bombing during the month of Ramadan," he said.

Zazi handed over the detonator and the bomb - a combination of acetone and hydrogen peroxide.

When Zazi caught a whiff of the FBI surveillance, he and Medunjanin were told that the plot was off.

Federal prosecutors said the men had modeled the attacks after the London transit bombings of July 2005 that killed 52 people.

"I personally believed that conducting an operation in the United States would be the best way to end the wars [in Iraq and Afghanistan]. ... They decided we would be more useful in New York. I was familiar with the city as I was a New York City taxi driver. I knew the city very well. The most important thing was it hit well known critical structures to maximize the damage and casualties."...

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Planning a suicide bomb attack on city subways. "Feds: 2 al-Qaida leaders ordered NYC bomb plot," by Tom Hays for Associated Press, April 23 (thanks to Block Ness):

NEW YORK (AP) -- Prosecutors say two al-Qaida leaders met with New York terror suspects in Pakistan and ordered them to conduct a suicide bomb attack on city subways.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Knox identified them as senior operative Saleh al-Somali and Rashid Rauf. Both died in strikes in the past year in Pakistan.

Knox made the disclosure in Brooklyn federal court Friday as Zarein Ahmedzay (zah-RAYN' ah-MIHD'-zay) pleaded guilty to the suicide bomb plot last September.

Ahmedzay admitted to conspiracy to use weapons of destruction and providing material support to al-Qaida. He was charged with admitted al-Qaida associate Najibullah Zazi (nah-jee-BOO'-lah ZAH'-zee).

Authorities say they and another high school classmate from New York planned the attacks for days after the eighth anniversary of Sept. 11....

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

After all, here in the West, we insist our science be testable and verifiable. And to be verified, it must be questioned -- heaven forbid. So, Hojatoleslam Kazem Sedighi, your moment arrives April 26. Of course, Khomeini said there's no humor in Islam, so Sedighi may be busy stocking up on canned goods. "Thousands will don low-cut tops and shorts to see if they can trigger an earthquake," by Jonathan Harwood for the The First Post, April 23 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Iranian cleric Hojatoleslam Kazem Sedighi caused outrage and raised eyebrows around the world last week when he blamed earthquakes on scantily clad women rather than the movement of the earth's tectonic plates.
Now women are being urged to put that theory to the test by donning low cut tops and short shorts on Monday April 26 to see if they can spark a tremor.
The campaign to trigger a 'Boobquake' was begun by American student Jennifer McCreight who has so far got 40,000 people to sign up to the idea on a special Facebook page (where another 150,000 have been invited) and has attracted a large following on Twitter.
She decided to take action after reading Sedighi's comments last Friday, when he told a prayer meeting: "Many women who do not dress modestly... lead young men astray, corrupt their chastity and spread adultery in society, which (consequently) increases earthquakes."
He went on to ask. "What can we do to avoid being buried under the rubble? There is no other solution but to take refuge in religion and to adapt our lives to Islam's moral codes." [...]
With the power of our scandalous bodies combined, we should surely produce an earthquake," she said. "If not, I'm sure Sedighi can come up with a rational explanation for why the ground didn't rumble. And if we really get through to him, maybe it'll be one involving plate tectonics."
The 22-year-old science student at Purdue University in Indiana said that on Monday, after changing out of her immodest clothes, she would look at the earth's seismic activity and compare it to the norm. "If an earthquake reduces only my bedroom to rubble, I'd also take that as sufficient evidence for God's wrath. I'm not too worried," she said.
McCreight said that there was a serious reason for her attempts to trigger a tremor. She explained: "I think people were fed up with ridiculous anti-science and anti-women claims like the one made by Sedighi, and sometimes light-hearted mockery is the best solution."

Indeed.

| 70 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More good news, in an update on this story. It's a private university. Students who don't want that wording on their diplomas certainly have a robust system of state schools to choose from in Texas. And for that matter, successfully attacking this aspect of the university would set a disastrous precedent for more of the same. "Trinity diplomas keep 'our Lord'," by Melissa Ludwig for the Express-News, April 23 (thanks to Carlos):

Trinity University's board of trustees announced Thursday they will not grant a student group's request to drop the phrase "our Lord" from diplomas, saying that while Trinity welcomes all religions, it is right to honor its Christian roots.
"The board's decision reflects its desire to continue a Trinity tradition, and the words 'in the year of our Lord' are appropriate for the diploma, given Trinity's history and heritage," said Walter Huntley, vice chairman of the board and an Atlanta businessman.
The Trinity Diversity Connection, which requested the phrasing be dropped, issued this statement:
TDC "respects the decision the board of trustees made and appreciates their time and concern on this issue. While this was not the decision many of us were hoping for, we realize that this is a complicated issue. (TDC) will continue to represent, and advocate for, diversity on our campus."
Trinity was founded in 1869 by Presbyterians; its name signfies joint efforts of three Presbyterian synods in the name of the Holy Trinity. Since 1969, the university has been governed by an independent board of directors, maintaining a "covenant relationship" with the church.
In the past decade, school officials have sought to diversify the student body, recruiting more international students and fostering a campus environment that's accepting of all backgrounds and faiths.
The TDC requested last year that officials drop the reference to "our Lord" from diplomas, arguing that a degree is a personal document and that not all students believe in Jesus Christ.
The student government and a commencement committee backed the TDC's request, but university and diversity group leaders encountered a national backlash after the San Antonio Express-News ran a story on the debate that was picked up by news outlets around the country....
| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Liberty, equality, fraternity, and sanity: "When you arrive in France, you respect the laws in force .... Everyone will have to respect the laws in France. That's how it is." An update on this story. "France veil ban 'will apply to Muslim tourists too'," from Agence France-Presse, April 22 (thanks to Dumbledoresarmy):

Muslim tourists in France will be forbidden to wear the full-face veil along with French residents under the Government's plan to ban the garment in public places, a minister said today.
"When you arrive in France, you respect the laws in force .... Everyone will have to respect the laws in France. That's how it is," Nadine Morano, a junior minister for families, told the radio station France Info.
Hundreds of thousands of visitors come to France each year from the Middle East, according to estimates from the tourism ministry, and veiled women are a common sight in the luxury stores on Paris shopping boulevards.
Ms Morano said women breaching the ban would be fined but would not be unveiled "on the spot".
Ms Morano said the planned ban was in line with France's secular principles but also aimed to give "a message at international level" and would apply equally to visitors from abroad...
| 31 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

No matter what the circumstances, the Army has no business bowing to the will of a group that has been named an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas funding case, and has had several of its officials convicted of jihad terror-related charges.

And given Franklin Graham's explanation of his remarks, now the Army is abetting the whitewashing and coverup of the institutionalized mistreatment of women in Islamic law. This could have been, as Obama might say, a "teaching moment," and an opportunity to stand up for the human rights of those women and other groups oppressed by Sharia. Instead, it is just an occasion for more dhimmitude.

"Franklin Graham Regrets Army's Decision to Rescind Invite to Pentagon Prayer Service," from FOXNews.com, April 22 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Evangelist Franklin Graham said Thursday that he regrets the Army's decision to rescind its invitation to him for the Pentagon's National Day of Prayer service on May 6, but expressed "strong support" for the U.S. military.

Evangelist Franklin Graham said Thursday that he regrets the Army's decision to rescind its invitation to him for the Pentagon's National Day of Prayer service on May 6, but expressed "strong support" for the U.S. military.

An Army spokesman confirmed to Fox News that the invitation to Graham to be honorary chairman at the event was rescinded amid complaints from Muslim members of the military about his description of Islam as an evil religion....

Earlier Thursday, Graham stuck by his remarks about Islam, including that Muslims are "enslaved" by their religion, [sic]

Franklin, the son of famed evangelist Billy Graham, told Fox News that he loves Muslim people and wants them to know that God loves them, even if they can be saved only through Jesus Christ.

"I want them to know that they don't have to die in a car bomb, don't have to die in some kind of holy war to be accepted by God. But it's through faith in Jesus Christ and Christ alone," Graham said.

Graham said said he loves the Muslim people, just not their religion -- which he called "horrid" for its restrictions on women.

"I love the people of Islam but their religion, I do not agree with their religion at all. And if you look at what the religion does just to women, women alone, it is just horrid. And so yes, I speak out for women. I speak out for people that live under Islam, that are enslaved by Islam and I want them to know that they can be free," he said.

After the 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, Graham said Islam "is a very evil and wicked religion." In a later op-ed piece in The Wall Street Journal, Graham wrote that he did not believe Muslims were evil because of their faith, but "as a minister ... I believe it is my responsibility to speak out against the terrible deeds that are committed as a result of Islamic teaching."

Army spokesman Gary Tallman told Fox News on Wednesday that Graham's "presence at the event may be taken by some as inappropriate for a government agency."

"As the executive agent of the Pentagon chaplain's office, Army leadership determined it needed further review," he said.

The Military Religious Freedom Foundation raised the objection to the appearance, citing Graham's past remarks about Islam, in a letter sent Monday to Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

Mikey Weinstein, president of the foundation, said the invitation offended Muslim employees at the Pentagon because Graham never retracted or apologized for his description of Islam as evil. Weinstein said the invitation would endanger American troops by stirring up Muslim extremists....

Yes, "Muslim extremists" will be downright chummy as long as Franklin Graham stays away.

After Graham's appearance, the Council of American-Islamic Relations issued a call for supporters to petition the Pentagon to drop Graham.

"To have an individual who calls Islam evil and claims Muslims are enslaved by their faith speak at the Pentagon sends entirely the wrong message at a time when hundreds of thousands of our nation's military personnel are currently stationed in Muslim countries," said CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad. "Franklin Graham's appearance has the potential to harm unit cohesion and morale through the promotion of distorted, intolerant and divisive views within military ranks."...

| 62 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Clearly those who carried out these assaults have misunderstood Islam's respect for Christians and teachings of tolerance and peace. This sounds like yet another job for that amiable stomach-stapled beekeeper, CAIR's Ibrahim Hooper! Honest Ibe, time to fly to Tehran!

"Three Cases of Assault Upon Iranian Christian Leaders Reported in the Past Week," from AINA, April 23:

Washington -- International Christian Concern (ICC) has observed that within the past week there has been an unusually high number of forceful arrests of Iranian church leaders, a result of heightened and aggressive government tactics used to suppress the growing Christian church.

According to reports by Farsi Christian News Network (FCNN), the most recent incident occurred on April 14 when undercover security officers physically assaulted and arrested Pastor Bahnam Irani. The officers introduced themselves as agents of the Ministry of Information before invading Pastor Irani's house-church in Karaj and taking him to an undisclosed location.

Sources indicate that the ten believers attending the worship gathering were new to their faith in Christ. After the raid, the group was forced to complete prepared documents revealing the activities and whereabouts of church leaders. The attendees were also told that they would be summoned to further questioning at a later date.

In a similar occurrence, on April 11 the Ministry of Information arrested 19 year old Daniel Shahri in his home in Isfahan. When entering, the officers rendered an arrest warrant issued by the revolutionary court on charges of internet related activity and forming a house-church.

The third reported arrest occurred on February 28, when Hamid Shafiee and his wife, Reyhaneh Aghajary, were forcefully taken from their home in Isfahan. As of now, they remain in prison and are in poor health still awaiting charges to be brought against them.

As is often the case, arrests of Christians occur collectively and systematically. Once one Christian group is detained, security forces acquire additional information from interrogations, and from investigations of confiscated cell phones and computers which disclose the location of more Christians....

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

April 22, 2010

Saber-rattling and thumbing their noses at a weak president whom they know will not act. "Iran begins war games in Persian Gulf oil route," by Nasser Karimi and Lee Keath for Associated Press, April 22 (thanks to Choi):

TEHRAN, Iran - Iran's elite Revolutionary Guard held war games Thursday in the strategic Persian Gulf oil route, the Hormuz Strait, a show of its military strength at a time when the country's leaders are depicting President Barack Obama's new nuclear policy as a threat.

Ahead of the military maneuvers, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused Washington of trying to dominate the world through its nuclear arsenal and vowed that Iran would not bend before what he called "implicit atomic threats."...

Iran has been holding military maneuvers, dubbed as The Great Prophet, in the strategic waters of the Persian Gulf annually since 2006 to show off its military capabilities -- and serve as an implicit warning of the consequences if the United States or Israel attack Iran's nuclear facilities....

On Thursday, the military unveiled a new attack speedboat, describing it as an "ultra-speed and smart" vessel called "Ya Mahdi." Iran also said 313 smaller speedboats with the capability of firing rockets and missiles would participate....

On Wednesday, ahead of the exercises, Khamenei spoke to a conference of nurses and denounced Obama's new nuclear guidelines. U.S. officials have said the changes aim to push Iran into cooperating with the U.N. on its nuclear program, but the supreme leader depicted them as dangling the threat of nuclear attack over his country.

"Implicit atomic threats against Iran will have no effect," he said. "The Iranian people will not submit to such threats and will bring those who make them to their knees." He repeated that Iran is not seeking to build a nuclear weapon.

"The nuclear powers, particularly the United States, are using their nuclear might to try to impose their authority over the world," he said....

| 36 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This is why Islamic supremacists issue threats and practice intimidation in the first place: because it works. These Hollywood dhimmis are only making sure that this sort of thing will happen again. an update on this story, and a Free Speech Death Watch Alert: "'Muhammad' now a dirty word on 'South Park,'" from The Hollywood Reporter, April 22 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

Now "South Park" can't even say the words "Prophet Muhammad."

After last week's episode of the Comedy Central series sparked a threat (and yes, it was certainly a threat) from a radical Islamic website, the network has cracked-down-for-their-own-good on creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone during last night's continuation of the show's storyline.

For those who missed the drama, the show's 200th episode last week mocked the one "celebrity" that the series has been largely unable to depict, the Prophet Muhammad, who was hidden from view in a bear costume. A U.S.-based website RevolutionMuslim.com then warned Parker and Stone they could end up like Theo Van Gogh (the Dutch filmmaker who was murdered by Muslim extremists after depicting Muhammad on his show) and even posted the address of the show's production office. The site has since been shut down.

Last night, "South Park" continued the controversial Muhammad storyline, but with a key difference: every instance of the words "Prophet Muhammad" was bleeped out, making the episode practically incomprehensible, especially to anybody who missed the previous week.

The character of Muhammad was once again also hidden from view, covered by a large block labeled "censored."

A Comedy Central spokesperson confirmed it was the network's decision to bleep the words....

These cowards are not singular. The collapse of Western will and courage is all around us.

Pamela has much more. Read it all.

| 95 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

CAIR tried to raise money off its initial victory in its campaign against free speech in Florida. There was just one problem: they lost.

CAIR should return any money raised via this campaign of defamation, intimidation, and libel. Will they? I wouldn't hold my breath.

CAIRFundraiser.jpg

Here is WND's story on CAIR's crushing defeat and the victory of the freedom of speech and religious liberty. Kudos to WND, one of the very few media outlets with the courage to tell this story and the wit to realize its important implications.

"'Leaving Islam' ads return to Miami buses: 'This is a huge victory on the constitutional issues,'" from World Net Daily, April 22:

Bus ads offering support to Muslims wanting to leave Islam that were censored just days ago by the Miami-Dade Transit agency because of complaints from Muslims are being returned to the streets, this time in even greater numbers.

The ads are the work of Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs and Robert Spencer of JihadWatch through the Stop Islamization of America initiative.

The transit agency decided to censor the ads after a complaint was filed by the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

On the Stop Islamization website, a statement said, "Not only will [Freedom Defense Initiative] and SIOA's buses be going back up, but another 20 will be added to the existing [campaign]."

"This is a huge victory on the constitutional issues. This is the work of SIOA. Have you joined our Facebook group yet? ... Robert and I want to roll this out nationwide. We have no big money, big donors. ... We are two people fighting with all the gusto we can muster."...

Read it all.

| 61 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A provocative question answered by our old pal and former Jihad Watch writer Raymond Ibrahim. "Was Marco Polo an 'Islamophobe'?," by Raymond Ibrahim for Pajamas Media via Middle East Forum, April 16:

If the same exact criticisms being made against Islam today were also made centuries ago, is it reasonable to dismiss them all as "Islamophobic"-- that is, as "unfounded fear of and hostility towards Islam," as the Council on American Islamic Relations would have it?

This is the question I often ask myself whenever I read pre-modern writings on Islam. Take that elementary schoolbook hero, Marco Polo and his famous memoirs, for example. By today's standards, the 13th century Venetian merchant would be denounced as a rabid "Islamophobe." For me, however, his writings contain a far more important lesson -- one in continuity -- and deserve closer scrutiny.

Before examining Polo's observations, it should be noted that his anthropological accounts are, by and large, objective. Unlike simplistic explanations that portray him as a prototypical "Orientalist" with an axe to grind against the "Other" -- specifically non-whites and non-Christians -- in fact, Polo occasionally portrayed the few Christians he encountered in a negative light (such as those of the island of Socotra) and frequently praised non-Christians, including Muslims.

For example, he hails the Brahmins of India as being "most honorable," possessing a "hatred for cheating or of taking the goods of other persons. They are likewise remarkable for the virtue of being satisfied with the possession of one wife (p.298)." He refers to one Muslim leader as governing "with justice" (p.317) and another who "showed himself [to be] a very good lord, and made himself beloved by everybody (p.332)."

That said, Polo clearly had no problem being blunt about Islam (political correctness being nonexistent in the Middle Ages). Whereas he praised the Brahmins for their "hatred for cheating or of taking the goods of other persons," regarding the Muslims of Tauris, (modern day Iraq), he wrote:

According to their doctrine, whatever is stolen or plundered from others of a different faith, is properly taken, and the theft is no crime; whilst those who suffer death or injury by the hands of Christians, are considered as martyrs. If, therefore, they were not prohibited and restrained by the powers who now govern them, they would commit many outrages. These principles are common to all Saracens (p.63).

In fact, based on the Muslim prophet Muhammad's numerous raiding expeditions, plundering infidels is quite standard in Islam and treated regularly in legal manuals; the Koran has an entire chapter dedicated to and named after plunder (Surat al-Anfal). As for being a martyr simply by dying at the hands of the infidel enemy, this too has ample support in Islam's texts and enjoys consensus among the ulema. The authoritative Hans Wehr Arabic-English Dictionary translates shahid (martyr) as "one killed in battle with infidels."

There is much more. Read it all.

| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A just end to a trial that was in itself an appalling miscarriage of justice. An update on this story. "SEAL acquitted of failing to prevent beating of Iraqi prisoner: The inmate is accused of masterminding a grisly attack on four American contractors," from The Associated Press, April 22 (thanks to Mackie):

A U.S. military jury Thursday cleared a Navy SEAL of failing to prevent the beating of an Iraqi prisoner suspected of masterminding a 2004 attack that killed four American security contractors.

The contractors' burned bodies were dragged through the streets and two were hanged from a bridge over the Euphrates river in the former insurgent hotbed of Fallouja, in what became a major turning point in the Iraq war.

The trial of three SEALs, the Navy's elite special forces unit, has outraged many Americans who see it as coddling terrorists.

Petty Officer 1st Class Julio Huertas, 28, of Blue Island, Ill., was found not guilty by a six-man jury of charges of dereliction of duty and attempting to influence the testimony of another service member....

Huertas is the first of three SEALS to face a court-martial for charges related to the abuse incident. All three SEALs could have received only a disciplinary reprimand, but insisted on a military trial to clear their names and save their careers....

The Iraqi prisoner who was allegedly abused, Ahmed Hashim Abed, testified Wednesday on the opening day of the trial at the U.S. military's Camp Victory on Baghdad's western outskirts that he was beaten by U.S. troops while hooded and tied to a chair.

Navy Petty Officer 3rd Class Kevin DeMartino, who was assigned to process and transport the prisoner and is not a SEAL, testified he saw one SEAL punch the prisoner in the stomach and watched blood spurt from his mouth. Huertas and the third SEAL were in the narrow holding-room at the time of the incident, he added.

But defense attorneys tried to cast doubt on the beating claims, showing photographs of Abed after the alleged beating in which he had a visible cut inside his lip but no obvious signs of bruising or injuries anywhere else.

In her closing arguments, Huertas' civilian attorney Monica Lombardi pointed to inconsistencies between DeMartino's testimony and nearly every other Navy witness. She also reminded the jury of the terrorism charges against Abed, who is in Iraqi custody and has not yet been tried, saying he could not be trusted and may have inflicted wounds on himself as a way of recasting blame on American troops.

But prosecutor Lt. Cmdr. Jason Grover said DeMartino said the SEALs were itching to abuse Abed as payback for the killings of the Blackwater guards -- two of whom were former SEALs.

Shame on you, Grover.

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

LeavingIslam?.jpg


Despite the important free speech aspects of this story, and despite the fact that the Hamas-linked Islamic supremacists of CAIR have never before been dealt such a defeat, the mainstream media (including the allegedly conservative media) is -- not surprisingly -- ignoring the story of the restoration of our SIOA bus ads, with the notable exception of CNS News.

Join SIOA here.

We are taking the bus ad campaign nationwide. Help us pay for the ads -- and the lawyers -- by contributing. Use the "Contribute to Jihad Watch" button on the upper right sidebar.

"Activists Claim Free Speech Victory As 'Leaving Islam' Ads Return to Buses," by Patrick Goodenough for CNS News, April 22:

(CNSNews.com) - A public transit authority in Florida has reversed a decision to take down banner advertisements on buses that offer help to Muslims wanting to leave their faith. Activists are hailing the move as a victory for free speech and religious freedom.

Not only will the ten originally planned ads appear on Miami-Dade Transit buses in coming days, but an additional 20 ads will be run at no extra cost.

The decision came after the group initiating the ad campaign threatened a lawsuit, claiming breach of contract and violation of First Amendment rights.

It was confirmed in an agreement signed on Wednesday, according to lawyer David Yerushalmi, whose firm prepared a federal complaint together with the Thomas More Law Center.

The bus company pulled the ads last week less than 48 hours after they had gone up, after a controversial Islamic pressure group complained that they promoted "anti-Islam bigotry."

Produced by an organization called Stop the Islamization of America (SIOA), the ads alluded to the difficulties faced by Muslims wanting to leave Islam.

Under Islamic law, or shari'a, any Muslim who abandons his faith is guilty of apostasy, an offense that leading scholars have taught is punishable by death.

"Fatwa on your head?" the ads' tagline read. "Is your community or family threatening you? Leaving Islam? Got questions? Get answers!" The ads also give the URL of a Web site offering resources for people who have abandoned Islam or are thinking about doing so.

Their appearance triggered protests from the South Florida chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). Its director, Muhammed Malik, said the issue of apostasy was being used as "a smoke-screen to promote anti-Islam bigotry and attempt to marginalize American Muslims."

Following the CAIR complaints, a Miami-Dade Transit spokeswoman told Florida media that the authority decided to remove the ads after reviewing them and determining that they might be offensive. An outside company, CBS Outdoor, had sold the ad space and the ads had not been routinely reviewed at the outset.

Yerushalmi said he had been ready to go to federal court this week to apply for a temporary restraining order, but that during a teleconference with the Miami-Dade County Attorney's office, "the county attorneys conceded the ads should not have been pulled."

The lawyer then negotiated a retraction of the earlier contract termination with CBS Outdoor. "The ads are expected to go back up by early next week."

Miami-Dade Transit did not respond to queries Wednesday.

The driving forces behind SIOA and a related group, the Freedom Defense Initiative, are Pamela Geller of the Atlas Shrugs Web site, and Jihad Watch director and author Robert Spencer.

When they launched the campaign last week, Geller and Spencer said it marked "the first time anyone has offered public help to those who are threatened under Islam's apostasy law. In the Land of the Free, government and law enforcement should be on this. But they aren't. So we are. It is time for free citizens to stand for freedom - or lose it."

SIOA has cited cases like that of Rifqa Bary, the teenage girl of Sri Lankan origin who converted to Christianity from Islam and then fled from her Ohio home to Florida last year, claiming in an affidavit that her father had threatened to kill her because of her conversion. [...]

CAIR did not respond Wednesday to queries sent to its South Florida chapter office and to Malik's personal email address. [...]

Heh.

In one Hadith (the Sahih al-Bukhari) Mohammed commands, "Any [Muslim] person who has changed his religion, kill him," and in another (Imam Malik's Muwatta) Mohammed specifies that the form of execution should be beheading.

CAIR's stated position on the subject, outlined in a statement last year, is that "faith imposed by force is not true belief, but coercion."

The statement included several Koranic references to back up that assertion, including the "no compulsion in religion" one, but said nothing about the various Hadith relating to death for apostasy.

Sudan, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, and Mauritania are some of the countries where people have been formally accused or found guilty of apostasy.

Apostasy laws typically give an accused person three days to reflect before being condemned. "If he does not repent within this time limit, he is to be condemned to death as an apostate and his property will be confiscated by the Treasury," states Mauritania's criminal code.

In Afghanistan, a Christian convert named Abdul Rahman was sentenced to death in 2006 for apostasy, but after the U.S. and other Western countries with military forces deployed there put pressure on the Karzai administration, he was freed and allowed to seek asylum abroad.

Even in countries where conversions are not punishable by law, apostates often face hostility or violence at the hands of relatives, communities or Islamist radicals. The Barnabas Fund, a British-based charity working among Christian minorities in the Islamic world, says Muslims who change religions often face "a lifetime of fear."

| 24 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

No surprise on the media blackout. Kudos to Erick Stakelbeck for getting the facts. "CBN Uncovers Exclusive New Details About Ohio Muslim's Arrest," by Erick Stakelbeck for CBN, April 21:

There is a full-fledged media blackout regarding the latest potential case of a phenomenon we've covered extensively here at CBN News: homegrown jihad.

Thankfully, CBN does not subscribe to the "move along, folks, no jihad here" philosophy that is so prevalent in the mainstream media, not to mention at the highest levels of the U.S. government.

I have obtained court documents from the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Ohio detailing the case of a 38-year-old Caucasian convert to Islam named Abdullah Mohammed Muslim (formerly known as Johnnie Clagg). See picture below.

AbdullahMuhammadMuslim.jpg


He pleaded guilty on March 24th to charges of being a previously convicted felon in possession of a firearm, to possession of unregistered destructive devices and to charges related to attempted identity theft and Passport fraud.

Muslim's attorney told a local Columbus TV station that his client had traveled to the tribal regions of Pakistan--where Al Qaeda operates tons of training camps--but had no connections to terrorist groups.

Of course not. I guess North Waziristan is merely a new vacation hotspot for white Muslim converts from middle America (and Germany: see here)

What follows are the details about Muslim's case, including some exclusive new information that has been previously unreported.

On October 19, 2009 federal agents found a large weapons arsenal in Muslim's Columbus, Ohio home. According to court documents, the stash included:

-- Enough material to make five pipe bombs.

-- Several smoke cannisters

-- An AK-47

-- An Arsenal 7.62 assault rifle

-- A military/swat ballistic vest, plus one ballistic face mask

-- A military flak jacket.

-- A 9mm semiautomatic rifle

-- Over 1,000 rounds of ammunition

-- A CD with digital images of The Anarchist Cookbook "and similar books."

-- A CD with pictures of a small plane crash in Ohio

But the weapons stash was just the tip of the iceberg.

Materials uncovered during the search of Muslim's home confirmed that he was also trying to steal the identity of a wheelchair-bound man in West Virginia who suffers from cerebral palsy. Columbus ATF spokesperson Kimberly Riddell told CBN News that while ATF took the lead in the Muslim investigation, the State Department also became involved due to the identity theft/passport offenses.

According to court documents obtained by CBN News:

"Muslim devised a fraudulent scheme to steal the identity of another real person for the purpose of obtaining a passport so he could leave the country prior to his November 12, 2009 sentencing."

Yes, you read that right. At the time he was picked up in October '09, Muslim was already awaiting sentencing on additional weapons-related charges....

There is much more. Read it all.

| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

On April 19 - Patriot's Day - The New York Times ran a story about the new solicitude shown to Muslims in America by the Obama Administration. There were many things of importance left out of the story, and what was in the story was presented in such a way as to mislead the unwary.

Take, for example, how the saga of Rashad Hussain is presented.

In February, the president chose Mr. Hussain, a 31-year-old White House lawyer, to become the United States' special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference. The position, a kind of ambassador at large to Muslim countries, was created by Mr. Bush. In a video address, Mr. Obama highlighted Mr. Hussain's status as a "close and trusted member of my White House staff" and "a hafiz," a person who has memorized the Koran.

Within days of the announcement, news reports surfaced about comments Mr. Hussain had made on a panel in 2004, while he was a student at Yale Law School, in which he referred to several domestic terrorism prosecutions as "politically motivated." Among the cases he criticized was that of Sami Al-Arian, a former computer-science professor in Florida who pleaded guilty to aiding members of a Palestinian terrorist group.

At first, the White House said Mr. Hussain did not recall making the comments, which had been removed from the Web version of a 2004 article published by a small Washington magazine. When Politico obtained a recording of the panel, Mr. Hussain acknowledged criticizing the prosecutions but said he believed the magazine quoted him inaccurately, prompting him to ask its editor to remove the comments. On Feb. 22, The Washington Examiner ran an editorial with the headline "Obama Selects a Voice of Radical Islam."

Muslim leaders watched carefully as the story migrated to Fox News. They had grown accustomed to close scrutiny, many said in interviews, but were nonetheless surprised. In 2008, Mr. Hussain had co-authored a paper for the Brookings Institution arguing that the government should use the peaceful teachings of Islam to fight terrorism.

"Rashad Hussain is about as squeaky clean as you get," said Representative Keith Ellison, a Minnesota Democrat who is Muslim. Mr. Ellison and others wondered whether the administration would buckle under the pressure and were relieved when the White House press secretary, Robert Gibbs, defended Mr. Hussain.

"The fact that the president and the administration have appointed Muslims to positions and have stood by them when they've been attacked is the best we can hope for," said Ingrid Mattson, president of the Islamic Society of North America."

Rashad Hussain made comments in 2004 at a public meeting that suggested that he believed that the prosecution of domestic Muslim terrorists, in many high-profile cases, was not warranted but was, rather, "politically motivated" - a belief, or a charge, that takes as its corollary the notion that those accused of terrorism in the cases Rashad Hussain cited were innocent. But while the American judges and juries disposing of the cases he cited appeared not to have been quite so convinced of the defendants' innocence as was Rashad Hussain, the most disturbing of all of his examples was the case of Sami al-Arian, the South Florida tenured professor who turned out to be in up to his neck in support of, and connections with others who were operatives of, Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

In the end, Sami al-Arian was convicted and given a long jail sentence, after which he is to be deported. But even though that verdict and sentence had not been reached, anyone at all familiar with that case would have found it not even close to being "politically motivated," and would certainly not have dared to suggest that that particular case was "politically motivated." One had to be a true-blue Believer in Loyalty to Fellow Members of the Umma and, not incidentally, a deep Unbeliever in the fairness of the American system of justice to conclude, as did Rashad Hussain - not a college freshman, but a student at Yale Law School, a year or two away from being a Member of the Bar - that such a case was "politically motivated."

But that was not the worst of it. The worst of it was the deliberate attempt to conceal, to erase, to efface, all traces - unsuccessful, as it turned out - of what he, Rashad Hussain, had said, because he knew it would be dangerous for what he hoped would be his irresistible rise through the ranks. He had long been playing on that Yale law School background, and on the bright cheery smiling plausible promotion of himself as a Good American Muslim, one deeply devoted to this country - who dared to say him nay? His future employers would have the smug assumption that if he was good enough to be Assistant Deputy White House Counsel, Special Envoy to the O.I.C., you name it, then of course he had already been thoroughly vetted. Of course he was good enough for whatever he would next apply for. Only the mean-minded, only the viciously right-wing and the hysterically suspicious would not understand at once that this, clearly, was exactly the kind of Bright Young Muslim Reformer we needed and should encourage, by appointing him now to this office, and now to that. And so he expected, and for all I know still expects, to rise high, though he has never yet been questioned, or rather had his views, as a Muslim, examined. And that is amazing, because he cannot claim ignorance of Islam, insofar as he has claimed that he has read and memorized the entire Qur'an, which entitles him to the title of hafiz, a title that Obama himself took care to mention, apparently unaware of what that meant.

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Dear Jordan: Sorry about the warehouse. Our bad. XOX, the mujahedin." "Rockets fired at Israel fall in Jordan: source," from Reuters, April 22:

Two rockets were fired from the Jordanian port of Aqaba towards Israel on Thursday but landed on an empty warehouse in Jordan, a Jordanian security source said.
Jordanian Minister of State for Information, Nabil al-Shareef, told the state news agency Petra: "A limited explosion took place in the early hours of the morning at a refrigeration warehouse at the northern edge of the city that caused minor damage."
Aqaba is adjacent to the Israeli city of Eilat.
In Jerusalem, the Israeli military said security forces searched Eilat after explosions and flashes of light were reported nearby, but they found no evidence indicating a security-related incident.
Later, the remains of a Katyusha rocket were found near Aqaba and the army was investigating the source, it said.
The incident took place nine days after Israel told its nationals holidaying in Egypt's Sinai peninsula, across the border from Eilat, to leave at once, saying militants planned to kidnap Israelis.
Israeli media reports said earlier that Israel suspected the rockets were fired by militants in the Sinai. One rocket landed near Aqaba, and the other fell into the Gulf of Aqaba, the reports said.
An Israeli security source said nothing had hit Eilat, a popular resort.
Egyptian sources denied that rockets were fired from Sinai.
| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The intrepid mujahedin, gassing schoolgirls. "Afghanistan: Girls inhale 'poison' at Kunduz school," from Adnkronos International, April 21:

Kabul, 21 April (AKI) - At least 12 female students were hospitalised in Afghanistan on Wednesday after inhaling a poisonous substance sprayed at a school in northern Afghanistan.
The 12 students of the Fatima Zahra Girl School, and a teacher and an assistant were mysteriously poisoned, Hamayon Khamush, director of the hospital in Kunduz city, was quoted as saying by Xinhua.
The Taliban's strict form of fundamentalist Islam prohibits girls from attending school.
To defend their ideology, Taliban militants have attacked girl students with gas and acid.
In May last year 90 girls were hospitalised in Kapisa province, north-east of the capital, after someone sprayed toxic chemicals in the classroom.
A similar gas attack reportedly took place on Tuesday in Shina, a suburb of Kabul, where over a dozen girl students had to be sent to hospital after exhibiting symptoms of poisoning.
| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I discuss Obama's appeasement in Human Events this morning:

The New York Times reported Monday, with no hint that it understood the implications of what it was reporting, that Barack Obama is reaching out to Hamas-linked groups in the United States, while hamstringing our response to the terror threat by making obfuscation of the ideology of jihad terrorists official U.S. policy.

Times reporter Andrea Elliott says that "Muslim and Arab-American advocates" have met with top White House officials, including Obama Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Atty. Gen. Eric Holder. They've discussed, among other things, "counterterrorism strategy."

Their influence has been felt. White Houses sources say they had a hand in Obama's scrapping a policy that subjected airline passengers from 13 Muslim countries to greater security scrutiny. According to Elliott, "That emergency directive, enacted after a failed December 25 bombing plot, has been replaced with a new set of intelligence-based protocols that law enforcement officials consider more effective."

Which ones? On what grounds? More effective for what? How can it be ineffective to subject people who come from areas where there actually are terrorists to greater scrutiny?

The Times also mentions that Hillary Clinton this month allowed controversial Muslim spokesman Tariq Ramadan, who had been barred from the U.S. by the Bush Administration, to enter the country. It did not deem fit to print, however, Ramadan's contribution to a charity that was funneling money to Hamas--which was one of the reasons he was barred in the first place.

In any case, despite all Obama's efforts, the objects of his affections are not yet satisfied with his performance. "Arab-American and Muslim leaders," Elliott reports, "said they had yet to see substantive changes on a variety of issues, including what they describe as excessive airport screening, policies that have chilled Muslim charitable giving and invasive FBI surveillance guidelines."

Yes, airport screening is excessive. So let's relax it, at least for Muslims. What could go wrong?

Read it all.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Comments by David G. Littman, NGO Representative UN-Geneva: Association for World Education (AWE); World Union for Progressive Judaism (WUPJ)

I received an email this morning - indirectly - by an Arab Affairs Correspondent from an American news agency who was in the midst of, as she explained:

I'm writing a piece about the Organization of the Islamic Conference. Apparently the OIC is planning to set up a human rights division within its ranks, following a meeting between its secretary general and the UN high commissioner for human rights. I'd like to know what your opinion is of this move. Do you think this is a PR move? Is it too little, too late? Do you think this kind of commission can be effective and will bring about any changes in the situation of human rights in Muslim countries? Kindly get back to me as soon as you can so that I can quote you in a written item...you can see more details here.

One 'click' provided a glimpse at a fascinating meeting at the OIC Headquarters in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia between OIC Secretary General Professor Dr. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu and UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Mrs. Navanethem Pillay (below). This was a clear follow-up to Ihsanoglu's statement made seven weeks earlier at the UN Human Rights Council, which was quoted at length in our 19 April Jihad Watch piece: Let me conclude on a happy note.

* * * * *

Although our opinion was received "too late" to be used, it might be useful to share it with Jihad Watch readers worldwide, especially in view of the OIC's very noteworthy information that: "The High Commissioner congratulated the Secretary General on the prospective establishment of the Commission and assured full support of her Office in its formative phase." This is it:

Two days ago I posted a long piece on Jihad Watch (with a video) to enable people worldwide to 'see' what is happening at the Human Rights Council. I have copied below a few lines (in red) from my accompanying essay which quotes OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu when he spoke at the 13th session of the HRC on 1st March 2010. You have my 'opinion' just below [it follows here without that quotation]:

* * * * *

To sum up, I'd recommend that delightful 'story' of the Emperor by Hans Christian Anderson when only a child dares say "The Emperor is naked." - What the OIC will be offering to the world is a stark naked 1990 Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam with Sharia-gate Human Rights 'clothing', all this as "a paradigm shift within the OIC" - and a panacea for human rights worldwide. When will the world finally 'see' that evident truth and cry out that the OIC is as naked as the fairy-tale Emperor?

* * * * *

Hillel C. Neuer, the very active and effective NGO Executive Director of UN Watch in Geneva, yesterday posted an excellent denunciation concerning the publication by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) on 19 April of "a press release misrepresented the one-sided nature of the UN Human Rights Council's permanent investigative mandate on Israel, currently held by Richard Falk, who happens to be America's leading promoter of 9/11 conspiracy theories." This press release was released on the same day as the High Commissioner was greeted in Jeddah by the OIC Secretary General and 'briefed' on The Independent Permanent OIC Human Rights Commission; and that of our lengthy article here.

* * * * *

OIC Secretary General Receives the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights

Date: 19/04/2010 - View in: Arabic | French - Print

PillayIhsanoglu.jpg


Mrs. Navanethem Pillay, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights called on the Secretary General Professor Dr. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu at the OIC Headquarters in Jeddah as part of her visit to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. In welcoming the guests, the Secretary General appreciated the confident, objective and impartial manner in which the High Commissioner had performed the difficult task with a sincerity of purpose since the assumption of the important office.

The Secretary General informed the High Commissioner that the OIC was on the verge of establishing an Independent Permanent Commission on Human Rights. The statute of the Commission was near finalization and likely to be entered into force following adoption by the forthcoming Session of the Council of Foreign Ministers due to be held in Dushanbe next month. He emphasized that the establishment of the Commission must be viewed as a landmark event and a most positive development in the four decade long history of the Organization. Briefing the High Commissioner on the OIC Human Rights Commission, the Secretary General expressed the hope that the establishment of the Commission will introduce a paradigm shift within the OIC in the way universal human rights and freedoms flow together with Islamic values to offer a coherent and strong system aimed at facilitating the full enjoyment of all human rights in the OIC member states. The High Commissioner congratulated the Secretary General on the prospective establishment of the Commission and assured full support of her Office in its formative phase. She also thanked Secretary General for his leadership and contribution to the successful outcome of the Durban Review Conference and indicated her hope for a continued cooperation with the OIC in the future.

The meeting afforded the opportunity of exchange of views on the whole range of issues pertaining to the OIC's engagement with the Office of the High Commissioner and ended with the agreement to continue to build on the cooperation and coordination between the two Organizations.

| 1 Comment
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

April 21, 2010

LeavingIslam?.jpg


Here is the story, from Wall Street Journal's Market Watch:

SIOA: Victory for Free Speech -- Religious Liberty Bus Ads Restored to Miami Buses

MIAMI, April 21, 2010 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- SIOA applauds end to 'campaign of hatred and intolerance'

The Freedom Defense Initiative (FDI) and Stop the Islamization of America (SIOA) today announced that Miami-Dade Transit is restoring bus advertisements in defense of religious freedom that had been taken down after an anti-free speech campaign by a Hamas-linked Islamic hate group.

Join SIOA on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=info&gid=110841015612178

The CBS Outdoor bus ad company restored the ads after Miami-Dade Transit bowed to a threatened lawsuit by its attorneys David Yerushalmi and Robert Muise (the latter of the Thomas More Law Center) on behalf of SIOA executive director Pamela Geller and associate director Robert Spencer for breach of contract and infringement of their First Amendment free speech rights.

The South Florida chapter of the Hamas-linked Islamic supremacist hate group Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) had pressured Miami-Dade Transit to drop SIOA's religious liberty ads, which offer aid to Muslims threatened for leaving Islam.

The SIOA ad at issue, which will now run on thirty buses, not just on the original 10 buses on which it ran originally in Miami-Dade County, stated: "Leaving Islam? Fatwa on your head? Family or community threatening you? Got questions? Get answers! RefugefromIslam.com."

SIOA has evidence that, all over the world, Muslims trying to leave Islam are regularly threatened and even murdered. Recently, apostates from Islam have been killed in Bangladesh, Chad, Somalia, and threatened with death in Afghanistan, Egypt, Iran, and Nigeria - as well as in Australia, Britain and the United States, where the teenage Christian convert Rifqa Bary has been threatened and victimized. Saudi Arabia also subjects apostates to capital punishment.

Yet the Executive Director of the South Florida chapter of the CAIR hate group, Muhammed Malik, made a patently false and misleading statement in a Miami Herald story about Miami-Dade Transit's capitulation to Sharia: "Islam guarantees freedom to and freedom from religion. . . . [We] reject as un-Islamic any extremist interpretation that sanctions the killing of any individual because she decided to 'leave Islam.'"

Malik's statement is explicitly contradicted by the command of Muhammad, the prophet of Islam and supreme example of conduct for the Muslim: "Whoever changes his Islamic religion, then kill him." (Bukhari 9.84.57) Contrary to Malik's claim, all the schools of Islamic jurisprudence teach that a sane adult male who leaves Islam must be killed. As pointed out above, this is not some theoretical Sharia dictate; this is extant law in every Muslim country that follows Islamic law.

Thus, the internationally renowned Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi of Al-Jazeera has said that "Muslim jurists are unanimous that apostates must be punished...The majority of them...agree that apostates must be executed."

Ironically, the Council on American-Islamic Relations presents itself as a civil rights organization, a claim often parroted by media outlets; but in reality, CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case -- so named by the Justice Department. In this trial, the evidence demonstrated that CAIR founders Omar Ahmad and Niwad Awad (who still serves as CAIR's executive director), were present at a Hamas planning meeting in Philadelphia in 1993 where they and other Hamas operatives conspired to raise funds for Hamas and to promote jihad in the Middle East. CAIR has steadfastly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups.

Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror:

  • Ghassan Elashi, founder of CAIR's Texas chapter, in 2009 received a 65-year prison sentence for funneling over $12 million from the Islamic charity known as the Holy Land Foundation to the jihad terrorist group Hamas, which is responsible for murdering hundreds of Israeli civilians
  • Mousa Abu Marzook, a former CAIR official, was in 1995 designated by the U.S. government in 1995 as a "terrorist and Hamas leader." He now is a Hamas leader in Syria.
  • Randall Royer, CAIR's former civil rights coordinator, in 2004 began serving a 20-year prison sentence for aiding al-Qaida and the Taliban against American troops in Afghanistan and recruiting for Lashkar e-Taiba, the jihadist group responsible for the 2008 Mumbai jihad massacres.
  • Bassem Khafagi, CAIR's former community relations director, was arrested for involvement with the Islamic Assembly of North America, which was linked to al-Qaida. After pleading guilty to visa and bank fraud charges, Khafagi was deported.
  • Rabih Haddad, a former CAIR fundraiser, was deported for his work with the Global Relief Foundation (which he co-founded), a terror-financing organization.

In 1998 Omar Ahmad, CAIR's co-founder and longtime Board Chairman, said: "Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth."

After he received unwelcome publicity as a result of this statement, Ahmad denied saying it, several years after the fact. However, the original reporter, Lisa Gardiner of the Fremont Argus, stands by her story.

CAIR's spokesman Ibrahim Hooper once said: "I wouldn't want to create the impression that I wouldn't like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future."

CAIR also defamed the leaders of FDI and SIOA, Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, in its press release about the initial but short-lived success of its campaign of intimidation against the freedom of speech and the freedom of religion.

Pamela Geller, Executive Director of FDI and SIOA, is the founder and publisher of the acclaimed news and commentary blog AtlasShrugs.com. She is also a regular columnist for Andrew Breitbart's Big Government and Big Journalism, as well as for Newsmax. Geller is the author (with Robert Spencer) of the soon-to-be-released book, The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration's War on America (foreword by Ambassador John Bolton) (Simon & Schuster).

Pamela Geller's videoblogs ("vlogs") on a wide range of current events have won enthusiastic acclaim, as have her exclusive Atlas interviews with internationally renowned authorities on jihad, terrorism, and related issues, including John Bolton, Geert Wilders, Bat Ye'or, Ann Coulter, Mark Steyn, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Jerusalem Mayor Uri Lupolianski, Steve Emerson, Christopher Hitchens, Natan Sharansky, and many others. (Videos of many of these interviews are available at AtlasShrugs.com.) She routinely confers with leading scholars on the Middle East, Islam, Eurabia, China and Russia.

Geller has broken numerous important stories -- notably the questionable sources of some of the financing of the Obama campaign. Her articles /op-eds have also been published in The Washington Times, Big Government, The American Thinker, Newsmax, Human Events, Israel National News, World Net Daily, Front Page Magazine, Big Journalism, New Media Journal, Big Hollywood, and Canada Free Press, among other publications.

Geller began her publishing career at The New York Daily News and subsequently took over operation of The New York Observer as Associate Publisher. She has made appearances on Hannity and Red Eye on the Fox News channel, and made a highly praised appearance on the Joy Behar Show in February 2010. She is a frequent guest on talk radio and has regular segments on two radio shows, The Jaz McKay Show and Jamie Allman In the Morning. She speaks regularly to organizations, synagogues and groups across this nation. Geller was a featured speaker at the David Horowitz Freedom Center's Restoration Weekend in 2009.

Robert Spencer is a highly acclaimed expert on Islam and Sharia, the director of Jihad Watch, a program of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, and the author of ten books, including the New York Times bestsellers The Truth About Muhammad and The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades). Spencer is a weekly columnist for Human Events and FrontPage Magazine, and has led seminars on Islam and jihad for the United States Central Command, United States Army Command and General Staff College, the U.S. Army's Asymmetric Warfare Group, the FBI, the Joint Terrorism Task Force, and the U.S. intelligence community.

Spencer has also written eleven monographs and well over three hundred articles about jihad and Islamic terrorism. His work has been translated into many languages, including French, Spanish, Italian, German, Czech, Portuguese, Finnish, and Bahasa Indonesia. His articles on Islam and other topics have appeared in the New York Post, the Washington Times, the Dallas Morning News, Canada's National Post, Middle East Quarterly, AtlasShrugs.com, First Things, National Review, and many other journals.

Spencer has appeared on the BBC TV, CNN, FoxNews, PBS, MSNBC, CNBC, C-Span, and France24, as well as on numerous radio programs including Bill O'Reilly's Radio Factor, The Laura Ingraham Show, Bill Bennett's Morning in America, Michael Savage's Savage Nation, The Michael Reagan Show, and The Sean Hannity Show. He has been a featured speaker at Dartmouth College, Stanford University, New York University, Brown University, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the University of Virginia, and many other colleges and universities.

SIOA is one of America's foremost organizations defending human rights, religious liberty, and the freedom of speech against Islamic supremacist intimidation and attempts to bring elements of Sharia to the United States.

| 92 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

LeavingIslam?.jpg


The SIOA legal complaint against Miami-Dade Transit has been settled. Not only will our FDI and SIOA religious liberty bus ads be going back up, but another twenty will be added and will soon be on the streets of Miami.

This is a major victory for the freedom of speech and a disastrous defeat for the thuggish Islamic supremacists of CAIR. It is also a major victory for SIOA. If you haven't joined SIOA yet, join now.

Also, please make a contribution to the religious liberty bus ad campaign. Pamela Geller and I want to roll this out nationwide, but we have no money or major donors. We are simply two free citizens fighting to preserve our freedom. Every dime you contribute goes to initiatives like FDI at CPAC (buy the DVD), the Aqsa Parvez Memorial, Geert Wilders at CPAC -- these were actions that the indomitable and extraordinary Pamela Geller developed and executed with help from me.

We are making things happen -- when have you ever seen CAIR defeated before? Unlike so many others, we are not just talking endlessly or playing defense. We are on the offensive in the struggle to save our civilization. Please help us. Make a Paypal contribution NOW -- click on the "Contribute to Jihad Watch" button on the upper right (soon we will have 501c status for SIOA, but don't have it yet).

We are going nationwide with this campaign, and we will need money for the ads -- and the lawyers.

Here is a statement from our superb lawyer, David Yerushalmi:

Law Offices of David Yerushalmi, P.C. Win Victory for the First Amendment. . . Case Demonstrates that CAIR is a Fraudulent Civil Rights Organization Lobbying on behalf of the OIC

April 21, 2010--Miami, Florida: When the South Florida chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) pressured the Miami-Dade Country Transit Authority to yank bus panel ads contracted and paid for by Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer of the Freedom Defense Initiative because the ads were "offensive to Muslims", the two activists turned to the Law Offices of David Yerushalmi, P.C. for help. Mr. Yerushalmi joined forces with the Thomas More Law Center and the two law firms began preparing a federal complaint alleging breach of contract and violation of Ms. Geller's and Mr. Spencer's First Amendment Rights.

The bus ad, which appears above, began running on Tuesday, April 13th. Just two days later, on Thursday, after pressure from CAIR, the bus ads had already been pulled down and Mr. Yerushalmi's clients received notice of the ad contract termination through media reports on Friday.

CAIR, as it typically does, issued nationwide press releases and blasted emails to tens of thousands of outlets on Friday crowing over its "victory" of suppressing free speech on the grounds that the ads promoted "bigotry". Newspaper and other media stories in the Miami Herald, the Orlando Sentinel, Fox Business News, and NBC ran blindly with the CAIR-generated story on Friday with headlines like: "Miami-Dade Transit Throws Islamic Ad Under the Bus."

Ironically, CAIR, which has been named by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI as a Muslim Brotherhood-Hamas front group and unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror fund raising trial--a trial which culminated in guilty verdicts for all of the Muslim Brotherhood defendants--claims it is "the nation's largest Muslim civil rights organization."

"It is ironic," Mr. Yerushalmi noted, "that the media allows CAIR to claim the mantle of a civil rights organization when it embraces censorship by the government all in the service of the 'anti-blasphemy' platform of the Organization of Islamic Countries (OIC), which calls for international legislation providing for criminal penalties against anyone who 'insults Islam and its prophet Mohammed.' Free speech is apparently not one of the freedoms in CAIR's version of the U.S. Constitution--at least not for critics of Islam."...

| 138 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

But deep down, they really, really want peace!

Moderation = boycotting goods rather than suicide bombing. But at bottom this is just another play for victim status by what is in reality a relentless and intransigent jihad group. "Palestinian PM vows to step up 'peaceful resistance,'" from AFP, April 21 (thanks to Maxwell):

BILIN, West Bank (AFP) - Palestinian premier Salam Fayyad vowed on Wednesday to step up "peaceful resistance" against Israeli occupation by boycotting settlement goods throughout the West Bank.

"There has been progress in the boycott of settlement products, which comes from the idea of popular peaceful resistance, and I hope we will rid our markets of all settlement goods by the end of the year," he told an international conference in the West Bank village of Bilin.

The village has been the scene of weekly protests against Israel's controversial separation barrier, during which youths chant slogans and hurl stones at Israeli troops, who respond with tear gas and rubber bullets....

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This is a common species of wishful thinking and willful blindness. Its proponents imagine that Islam is a Religion of Peace™ with no anti-Semitic elements (you know the drill, Islam reveres the "People of the Book," etc.), but it was corrupted by the Nazis. Thus all one needs to do to solve this problem is to eliminate the Nazi elements and call Muslims back to the true teachings of the Qur'an, and the jihad will end. How wonderful! Except it's completely fictional, and based on ignorance or denial of the jihad doctrine, Islamic supremacism, and Qur'anic anti-Semitism.

Note also what my estimable and indefatigable colleague and collaborator Pamela Geller has revealed about the Mufti of Jerusalem's role in the Holocaust, and his own radio broadcasts.

"Roots of Islamic funamentalism [sic] lie in Nazi propaganda for Arab world, book claims," by Allan Hall in the Telegraph, April 21:

The roots of Islamic fanaticism can be traced to Adolf Hitler's radio messages broadcast around the Arab world during the Second World War, according to a new book.

"Your only hope for rescue is the destruction of the Jews before they destroy you!" Hitler said in a 1942 message, one of thousands broadcast across the Middle East in an attempt to woo the Arab world.

In a broadcast aimed at provoking an anti-Semitic uprising in Egypt, he said: "A large number of Jews who live in Egypt, along with Poles, Greeks, Armenians and Frenchmen, have guns and ammunition.

"Some Jews in Cairo have even asked the British authorities to set up machine guns on the roofs of their houses," he claimed.

But the Nazi's wartime broadcasts had remained a largely hidden chapter in the history of the war until the transmissions were unearthed by a US scholar, who believes they have fuelled continuing unrest in the Middle East.

"The conflict between Israel and the Palestinians would have been over long ago were it not for the uncompromising, religiously inspired hatred of the Jews that was articulated and given assistance by Nazi propagandists and continued after the war by Islamists of various sorts," said Jeffrey Herf, a history professor at the University of Maryland....

Herf is not original with this roseate and fantastic view. Journalist Lawrence Wright writes in this vein in The Looming Tower: Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11:

Until the end of World War II ... Jews lived safely--although submissively--under Muslim rule for 1,200 years, enjoying full religious freedom; but in the 1930s, Nazi propaganda on Arabic-language shortwave radio, coupled with slanders by Christian missionaries in the region, infected the area with this ancient Western prejudice [anti-Semitism]. After the war, Cairo became a sanctuary for Nazis, who advised the military and the government. The rise of the Islamist movement coincided with the decline of fascism, but they overlapped in Egypt, and the germ passed into a new carrier.

This is a common view, but in reality there is a strong native strain of anti-Semitism in Islam, which is rooted in the Qur'an. The Muslim holy book contains a great deal of material that forms the foundation for a hatred of Jews that has perdured throughout Islamic history. It is virulent and hard to eradicate. The Qur'an portrays the Jews as the craftiest, most persistent, and most implacable enemies of the Muslims -- and there is no Islamic authority that has moved to mitigate the most destructive interpretations of all this. The Qur'anic material on the Jews remains the prism through which far too many Muslims see the Israeli-Palestinian conflict--and Jews in general--to this day.

A vivid illustration of this came in 2004 from Islam Online, a website founded by, among others, the internationally influential Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi in 1997. Although al-Qaradawi has won praise from Islamic scholar John Esposito for engaging in a "reformist interpretation of Islam and its relationship to democracy, pluralism, and human rights," that "reformist" impulse doesn't seem to carry over to his view of Jews (he has justified suicide bombings against Israeli civilians), or the view of them he has allowed to be published on Islam Online.

In 2004 the site posted an article titled "Jews as Depicted in the Qur'an," in which Sheikh 'Atiyyah Saqr, the former head of the Fatwa Committee at the most respected institution in Sunni Islam, Al-Azhar University in Cairo, depicts Jews in a chillingly negative light, illustrated with abundant quotations from the Qur'an. Among other charges he levels at the Jews, Saqr says that they "used to fabricate things and falsely ascribe them to Allah"; they "love to listen to lies"; they disobey Allah and ignore his commands; they wish "evil for people" and try to "mislead them"; and they "feel pain to see others in happiness and are gleeful when others are afflicted with a calamity." He adds that "it is easy for them to slay people and kill innocents," for "they are merciless and heartless." And each charge he follows with Qur'anic citations (including, among others, 3:75; 5:64; 3:181; 5:41; 5:13; 2:109; 3:120; 2:61; 2:74; 2:100; 59:13-14; 2:96; and 2:79).

Though he offers many examples of the alleged evil traits of the Jews supported by the Qur'an, Saqr doesn't mention the notorious Qur'anic passages that depict an angry Allah transforming Jews into apes and pigs: 2:63-66; 5:59-60; and 7:166. The first of those passages depicts Allah telling the Jews who "profaned the Sabbath": "Be as apes despicable!" It goes on to say that these accursed ones serve "as a warning example for their time and for all times to come." The second has Allah directing Muhammad to remind the "People of the Book" about "those who incurred the curse of Allah and His wrath, those of whom some He transformed into apes and swine, those who worshipped evil." The third essentially repeats this, saying of the Sabbath-breaking Jews that when "in their insolence they transgressed (all) prohibitions," Allah said to them, "Be ye apes, despised and rejected."

In traditional Islamic theology these passages have not been considered to apply to all Jews. The classic Qur'anic commentator Ibn Kathir, whose commentary is widely distributed and respected among Muslims today, quotes earlier authorities saying that "those who violated the sanctity of the Sabbath were turned into monkeys, then they perished without offspring," and that they "only lived on the earth for three days, for no transformed person ever lives more than three days." While parts of the Qur'an are hostile to the Jews, Muhammad's curse, in this case, was limited to these Sabbath-breakers, not to all Jews.

However, that hasn't stopped contemporary jihadists from frequently referring to Jews as the "descendants of apes and swine." The implication is that today's Jews are bestial in character and are the enemies of Allah, just as the Sabbath-breakers were. The recently deceased grand sheikh of Al-Azhar, Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi, who was the most respected cleric in the world among Sunni Muslims, called Jews "the enemies of Allah, descendants of apes and pigs." Saudi sheikh Abd al-Rahman al-Sudayyis, imam of the principal mosque in the holiest city in Islam, Mecca, said in a sermon that Jews are "the scum of the human race, the rats of the world, the violators of pacts and agreements, the murderers of the prophets, and the offspring of apes and pigs."

Another Saudi sheikh, Ba'd bin Abdallah al-Ajameh al-Ghamidi, made the connection explicit: "The current behavior of the brothers of apes and pigs, their treachery, violation of agreements, and defiling of holy places ... is connected with the deeds of their forefathers during the early period of Islam--which proves the great similarity between all the Jews living today and the Jews who lived at the dawn of Islam." A 1996 Hamas publication says that today's Jews are bestial in spirit, and this is a manifestation of the punishment of their forefathers. In January 2007, Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas stated, "The sons of Israel are mentioned as those who are corrupting humanity on earth," referring to Qur'an 5:64.

All this shows that leading Muslim authorities approach the Qur'an not as a document rooted in history, but as a blueprint for understanding the world today. Likewise, Sheikh 'Atiyyah Saqr describes the Qur'anic teachings that because Jews "revolted against the Divine ordinances ... they found no warm reception in all countries where they tried to reside. Rather, they would either be driven out or live in isolation." Moreover, "Almighty Allah told us that He'd send to them people who'd pour on them rain of severe punishment that would last till the Day of Resurrection." Then comes a threat: "All this gives us glad tidings of the coming victory of Muslims over them once Muslims stick to strong faith and belief in Allah and adopt the modern means of technology."

The classic Qur'anic commentators not do not mitigate the Qur'an's words against Jews, but only add fuel to the fire. Ibn Kathir explained Qur'an 2:61 ("They were covered with humiliation and misery; they drew on themselves the wrath of Allah") this way: "This Ayah [verse] indicates that the Children of Israel were plagued with humiliation, and that this will continue, meaning that it will never cease. They will continue to suffer humiliation at the hands of all who interact with them, along with the disgrace that they feel inwardly." Another Middle Ages commentator of lingering influence, 'Abdallah ibn 'Umar al-Baidawi, explains the same verse this way: "The Jews are mostly humiliated and wretched either of their own accord, or out of coercion of the fear of having their jizya [punitive tax] doubled."

Ibn Kathir notes Islamic traditions that predict that at the end of the world, "the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah), and the Muslims, along with 'Isa [Jesus], son of Mary, will kill the Jews." The idea in Islam that the end times will be marked by Muslims killing Jews comes from the prophet Muhammad himself, who said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. 'O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.'" This is, not unexpectedly, a favorite motif among contemporary jihadists. On March 30, 2007, a spokesman for Hamas, Dr. Ismail Radwan, said on Palestinian Authority television:

The Hour [Resurrection] will not take place until the Muslims fight the Jews and the Muslims kill them, and the rock and the tree will say: "Oh, Muslim, servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, kill him!"

We must remind our Arab and Muslim nation, its leaders and people, its scholars and students, remind them that Palestine and the Al Aqsa mosque will not be liberated through summits nor by international resolutions, but it will be liberated through the rifle. It will not be liberated through negotiations, but through the rifle, since this occupation knows no language but the language of force.... O Allah, strengthen Islam and Muslims, and bring victory to your Jihad-fighting worshipers, in Palestine and everywhere.... Allah take the oppressor Jews and Americans and their supporters!

The history of Jews who lived under Muslim rule is a more or less unbroken record of theologically sanctioned humiliation and wretchedness. Like the Christians, Jews were allowed to practice their religion within restrictions, but they were seldom allowed to forget their humiliation. Although the strictness with which the laws of dhimmitude (the subservient status of Jews and Christians) were enforced varied, they were never abolished, and during times of relaxation the subject populations always lived in fear that they would be enforced with new stringency. Muslim rulers did not forget that the Qur'an mandates that both Jews and Christians must "feel themselves subdued." One notable instance is recounted by the Arab historian Phillip Hitti: "The caliph al-Mutawakkil in 850 and 854 decreed that Christians and Jews should affix wooden images of devils to their houses, level their graves even with the ground, wear outer garments of honey color, i.e. yellow, put two honey-colored patches on the clothes of their slaves, ... and ride only on mules and asses with wooden saddles marked by two pomegranate-like balls on the cantle." A millennium later, in 1888, little had changed. A Tunisian Jew noted:

The Jew is prohibited in this country to wear the same clothes as a Muslim and may not wear a red tarbush. He can be seen to bow down with his whole body to a Muslim child and permit him the traditional privilege of striking him in the face, a gesture that can prove to be of the gravest consequence. Indeed, the present writer has received such blows. In such matters the offenders act with complete impunity, for this has been the custom from time immemorial.

In 1291 Isaac ben Samuel, a noted Kabbalist and Palestinian Jew, sought refuge in a Christian-controlled area of Spain after the collapse of the last Crusader kingdom in the Levant. He explained, "For, in the eyes of the Muslims, the children of Israel are as open to abuse as an unprotected field. Even in their law and statutes they rule that the testimony of a Muslim is always to be believed against that of a Jew. For this reason our rabbis of blessed memory have said, 'Rather beneath the yoke of Edom [Christendom] than that of Ishmael [Islam]. They [the rabbis] plead for mercy before the Holy One, Blessed be He, saying, 'Master of the World, either let us live beneath Thy shadow or else beneath that of the children of Edom' (Talmud, Gittin 17a)."

Ben Samuel's choice of Christian Spain is paradoxical, as Muslim Spain was supposed to have been a famous exception to the oppression of Jews that prevailed elsewhere among both Muslims and Christians. Islamic apologist Karen Armstrong enunciates the common wisdom when she says that "until 1492, Jews and Christians lived peaceably and productively together in Muslim Spain--a coexistence that was impossible elsewhere in Europe." Even the U.S. State Department has proclaimed that "during the Islamic period in Spain, Jews, Christians, and Muslims lived together in peace and mutual respect, creating a diverse society in which vibrant exchanges of ideas took place."

Yet the philosopher Maimonides, a Jew who lived for a time in Muslim Spain and then fled that supposedly tolerant and pluralistic land, remarked, "You know, my brethren, that on account of our sins God has cast us into the midst of this people, the nation of Ishmael, who persecute us severely, and who devise ways to harm us and to debase us....No nation has ever done more harm to Israel. None has matched it in debasing and humiliating us. None has been able to reduce us as they have....We have borne their imposed degradation, their lies, and absurdities, which are beyond human power to bear."

Notably, Maimonides directed that Jews could teach rabbinic law to Christians, but not to Muslims. For Muslims, he said, will interpret what they are taught "according to their erroneous principles and they will oppress us. [F]or this reason ... they hate all [non-Muslims] who live among them." But the Christians, he said, "admit that the text of the Torah, such as we have it, is intact"--as opposed to the Islamic view that the Jews and Christians have corrupted their scriptures. Christians, continued Maimonides, "do not find in their religious law any contradiction with ours."

Even María Rosa Menocal, in her romantic and fantastic hagiography of Muslim Spain, The Ornament of the World, acknowledges the second-class status to which Jews and Christians were relegated there. "In return for this freedom of religious conscience the Peoples of the Book (pagans had no such privilege) were required to pay a special tax--no Muslims paid taxes--and to observe a number of restrictive regulations: Christians and Jews were prohibited from attempting to proselytize Muslims, from building new places of worship, from displaying crosses or ringing bells. In sum, they were forbidden most public displays of their religious rituals."

According to historian Richard Fletcher, "Moorish Spain was not a tolerant and enlightened society even in its most cultivated epoch." On December 30, 1066, about four thousand Jews in Granada were murdered by rioting Muslim mobs--more than would be killed in the Crusaders' infamous Rhineland pogroms of the mid-twelfth century. What enraged the Granadan Muslims was the political power of the Jewish vizier Samuel ibn Naghrila and his son Joseph: the mob resented the fact that these men had authority over Muslims, which they saw as a "breach of sharia." The mob was incited to kill the Jews by a poem composed by Muslim jurist Abu Ishaq: "I myself arrived in Granada and saw that these Jews were meddling in its affairs. ... So hasten to slaughter them as a good work whereby you will earn God's favor, and offer them up in sacrifice, a well-fattened ram."

The mob heeded his call. A Muslim chronicler (and later sultan of Granada), 'Abd Allah, said that "both the common people and the nobles were disgusted by the cunning of the Jews, the notorious changes they had brought in the order of things, and the positions they occupied in violation of their pact [of second-class status]." He recounted that the mob "put every Jew in the city to the sword and took vast quantities of their property."

"Strongest among men in enmity to the believers wilt thou find the Jews..." -- Qur'an 5:82. Hitler didn't write the Qur'an.

| 46 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Oh, and Hamas. And this will continue and expand, of course, in view of Obama's dhimmitude. "Iran boosts Qods shock troops in Venezuela," by Bill Gertz in the Washington Times, April 21 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

Iran is increasing its paramilitary Qods force operatives in Venezuela while covertly continuing supplies of weapons and explosives to Taliban and other insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq, according to the Pentagon's first report to Congress on Tehran's military.

The report on Iranian military power provides new details on the group known formally as the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF), the Islamist shock troops deployed around the world to advance Iranian interests. The unit is aligned with terrorists in Iraq, Afghanistan, Israel, North Africa and Latin America, and the report warns that U.S. forces are likely to battle the Iranian paramilitaries in the future.

The Qods force "maintains operational capabilities around the world," the report says, adding that "it is well established in the Middle East and North Africa and recent years have witnessed an increased presence in Latin America, particularly Venezuela."

"If U.S. involvement in conflict in these regions deepens, contact with the IRGC-QF, directly or through extremist groups it supports, will be more frequent and consequential," the report says....

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
Baloch.jpg Iftikhar Baloch


Iftikar Baloch -- and I do not mean to imply anything about him, especially since in this story he is a victim of the Islamic supremacists -- looks as if he is a recipient of one of those Hitler haircuts that are so popular in Pakistan.

Here is a story by the Times' Sabrina Tavernise about a gang of Islamic supremacists running roughshod over a university in Pakistan. It contains the usual oddities of Tavernise stories, as Hugh has pointed out. "At Top University, a Fight for Pakistan's Future," by Sabrina Tavernise in the New York Times, April 21 (thanks to BK):

LAHORE, Pakistan -- The professor was working in his office here on the campus of Pakistan's largest university this month when members of an Islamic student group battered open the door, beat him with metal rods and bashed him over the head with a giant flower pot.

Iftikhar Baloch, an environmental science professor, had expelled members of the group for violent behavior. The retribution left him bloodied and nearly unconscious, and it united his fellow professors, who protested with a nearly three-week strike that ended Monday.

The attack and the anger it provoked have drawn attention to the student group, Islami Jamiat Talaba, whose morals police have for years terrorized this graceful, century-old institution by brandishing a chauvinistic form of Islam, teachers here say.

But the group has help from a surprising source -- national political leaders who have given it free rein, because they sometimes make political alliances with its parent organization, Jamaat-e-Islami, Pakistan's oldest and most powerful religious party, they say.

The university's plight encapsulates Pakistan's predicament: an intolerant, aggressive minority terrorizes a more open-minded, peaceful majority, while an opportunistic political class dithers, benefiting from alliances with the aggressors.

The dynamic helps explain how the Taliban and other militant groups here, though small and often unpopular minorities, retain their hold over large portions of Pakistani society....

Maybe it helps explain it, but it doesn't get to the bottom of it. It doesn't explain why no one calls the aggressors on their aggression, or expects anything from them. It doesn't explain how they gained enough power to become beneficial to the opportunistic political class. And Sabrina Tavernise doesn't explain any of this, of course, because it would lead her into discussion of Islamic texts and teachings.

But this is the University of the Punjab, Pakistan's premier institution of higher learning, with about 30,000 students, and a principal avenue of advancement for the swelling ranks of Pakistan's lower and middle classes.

The battle here concerns the future direction of the country, and whether those pushing an intolerant vision of Islam will prevail against this nation's beleaguered, outward-looking, educated class.

That is why the problem of Islami Jamiat Talaba is so urgent, teachers say.

"They are hooligans with a Taliban mentality and they should be banned, full stop," Maliha A. Aga, a teacher in the art department, said of the student group as she stood in a throng of protesters in professorial robes this month. "That's the only way this university will survive."

The rhetoric of the group, like that of its parent political party, is strongly anti-West, chauvinistic and intolerant of Pakistan's religious minorities. It was a vocal supporter of the Taliban, until doing so became unpopular last year.

Its members block music classes, ban Western soft drinks and beat male students for sitting near girls on the university lawn.

"It's fascist," said Shaista Sirajuddin, an English literature professor, of the Islamic student movement. "Every single government has averted its eyes."

Why? And by the way, by labeling this movement "fascist," isn't Shaista Sirjuddin being "Islamophobic"? After all, our "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week" was "Islamophobic," wasn't it? Honest Ibe Hooper, drop your bees and call your office!

The group is something of a puzzle. It may be aggressive, but it is relatively small, and has waned in popularity among students in recent years. One young teacher said association with it now brought stigma.

Cognitive dissonance alert: everyone dislikes them, and stigmatizes those who join, but meanwhile they have the run of the place and terrorize everyone else, and enjoy connections in high places.

But it still manages to dominate by deftly wielding Islam as a weapon to bludgeon its enemies, denouncing anyone who disagrees with it as un-Islamic.

Of course, it couldn't get away with this if its Islamic arguments were faulty or implausible.

The tactic is effective in Pakistan, a young country whose early confusion about the role of Islam in society has hardened into a rigid certainty, making it highly taboo to question.

"It's unthinkable to talk even about human rights without reference to the Holy Book," said Ms. Sirajuddin, referring to the Koran. "Such is the dread to be talked about as un-Islamic." [...]

The group created a parallel administration, according to a former member, Nadim Jamil, and has divided the university into five zones, with a nazim, or mayor, assigned to each. The dormitories are their fiefdoms, he said, where mayors monitor movements, hold Koran reading classes and recruit members. [...]

As unpopular as it may be on campus, the group never has trouble getting recruits. Many first-year students are shy, underprivileged youths from the countryside. The group appeals to this weakness, helping with expenses and opening up a system of benefits: More milk in their tea. Better food. Cleaner dishes. [...]

Sure. It's always the material appeal that gets them -- never the religious appeal. For Sabrina Tavernise to portray the religious appeal as effective would run her into more cognitive dissonance.

Last week, several of the attackers were arrested, but Mr. Ashraf, the ringleader, was not among them. Besides, the group's top leader on campus is the son of an important politician....
| 35 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

There cannot be liberty, equality, or fraternity in a society where a segment of the population will not or cannot show its face to the rest. An update on this story. "Sarkozy to submit bill banning Islamic face veils," by Sylvie Corbet for the Associated Press, April 21:

PARIS - French President Nicolas Sarkozy has ordered legislation that would ban women from wearing Islamic veils that fully cover the face and body in public places, the government said Wednesday.
It is Sarkozy's first political action toward an outright ban, though he has repeatedly said such outfits oppress women and are not welcome in France, home to a firmly secular government.
Government spokesman Luc Chatel said after a Cabinet meeting Wednesday that the president decided the government should submit a bill to parliament in May on an overall ban on such veils "in all public places."
That ups the stakes in Sarkozy's push against veils such as the burqa and niqab and chador. Some in his own party have bristled at a full-out ban, and France's highest administrative body has questioned whether it would be constitutional.
Sarkozy insisted that "everything should be done so that no one feels stigmatized," according to Chatel. Sarkozy said the veils "do not pose a problem in a religious sense, but threaten the dignity of women."
Chatel did not say how the new bill would affect a resolution already slated for discussion in parliament May 11 on ways of limiting the full veils....
| 42 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

April 20, 2010

Throwing a pig's head into a mosque, or into anything, is obnoxious, reprehensible, and always and everywhere to be condemned.

That being so, why the double standard?

UK police bow to "Islamic sensitivities," allow Muslim protesters to throw shoes

Isn't throwing shoes just as potentially "distressing," as well as even more likely to cause actual injury, as throwing a pig's head?

So why is one "culture" and the other "racism"?

Shouldn't both be held in equal contempt, and prosecuted with equal ferocity?

"Arrests after pig's head thrown at Crawley mosque," from the BBC, April 19 (thanks to Daniel):

Three men have been arrested after a pig's head was thrown into the car park of a mosque in West Sussex.

Police were alerted by people attending Langley Green mosque, in Crawley, on Saturday after a white car drove by.

A 21-year-old man from Horley was arrested nearby on suspicion of a racially or religiously-aggravated public order offence, police said.

On Sunday two other men, aged 20 and 25, both from Crawley, were also held. All three have been bailed until May.

Ch Insp Steve Curry, Crawley district policing commander, said: "While this was a very unusual incident, it has obviously caused great distress to those involved and we have worked closely with community leaders in dealing with the matter.

"This was immediately declared a racist incident and is being investigated as such....

| 90 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Abdul Tawala Ibn Ali Alishtari, aka Michael Mixon -- yet another convert to the Religion of Peace™ who misunderstands his new religion? "US loan shark jailed for aiding Afghan terrorists," from the London Evening Standard, April 20 (thanks to Block Ness):

A New York businessman has been sentenced to 10 years in prison for trying to funnel money to a terrorism training camp in Afghanistan.

Abdul Tawala Ibn Ali Alishtari, 57, pleaded guilty in September to terrorism financing. He helped transfer £152,000 believing it would help train militants but his accomplice was an undercover agent....

Alishtari, also known as Michael Mixon, thought the money would be used to buy night vision goggles, medical supplies and other equipment. He told the agent to make sure he was "three steps away" from the money to avoid it being traced.

Alishtari donated $20,000 in 2003 to the National Republican Senatorial Committee and more than $15,000 to the National Republican Congressional Committee between 2002 and 2004, which the Republican Party election bodies have given to charity.

Grover, is that you?

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Here is the typical jihadist displacement of responsibility that we have seen so many times. Islamic supremacists never do anything wrong. They are always the aggrieved parties. If they are clearly guilty of some wrongdoing, they will go to stunning lengths to blame their victim, or their enemy. "Pakistan: Islamist blames US for suicide bombing," by Riaz Khan for Associated Press, April 20 (thanks to Maxwell):

PESHAWAR, Pakistan - An Islamist politician whose party lost several members in a suicide attack blamed Pakistan's alliance with the U.S. for the violence and urged Islamabad on Tuesday to break ranks in the war on terror.

The comments showed the depth of anti-Americanism in Pakistan, whose support Washington considers key to stabilizing neighboring Afghanistan. In the past three days, attacks in Pakistan have killed some 74 people in a new wave of violence....

"It is because we have brought America's war to our own country," Sirajul Haq, a provincial party leader, said Tuesday in Peshawar after attending funerals for some of the victims. "Still, there is time to end this alliance with America" to avoid more bloodshed....

| 23 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"U.S. and Iraqi forces killed two of al Qaeda's top figures in Iraq overnight, in what Vice President Joe Biden called today a 'potentially devastating blow' to al Qaeda in Iraq."

"Iraqi anti-al Qaeda chief's family slain by gunmen," from Reuters, April 20 (thanks to Maxwell):

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Gunmen stormed the house of an anti-al Qaeda tribal chief and killed his wife and children, hours after the Iraqi government announced that leaders of the militant group had been killed in a raid, police said Tuesday.

The Sunni militia was not at home when the killings happened. The armed men cut the throats of his three young sons and shot his wife and a daughter in the head, police said.

The killings occurred late on Monday in Tarmiya, a mostly Sunni town 25 km (15 miles) north of Baghdad that was once a stronghold of al Qaeda before tribal chiefs turned on the group and allied themselves with U.S. forces instead.

A police source said the authorities believed the killings might have been a reaction to the deaths of al Qaeda in Iraq's top two leaders on Sunday....

| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Do you remember the last time Sabrina Tavernise, who reports for The New York Times from Islamabad, was discussed at this site? It was a little piece, put up on February 6, 2010, about how she covered the rape and beating to death of a 12-year-old girl in Pakistan. Here it is:

Fitzgerald: Sabrina Tavernise, the Times, and What Would Be Fit for the Printer

Neither Sabrina Tavernise - who certainly got wind of this article - nor her editors at the newspaper, saw fit to respond. They did not see fit to explain their calamitous lapses, not to be confused with the old-fashioned lapsus calami of the ink-stained wretches. No, when the Times issues a correction, it's almost always of the harmless kind, the kind that does not call into question the knowledge, and the objectivity, of the paper, for that would never do. Instead, it's to correct a name or a date.

Now just the other day, on April 16, Sabrina Tavernise reported again from Islamabad. This time her article was about the U.N. and the findings of the commission entrusted with investigating the killing of Bhutto and the aftermath of that killing, the various ways that almost all of the evidence was destroyed, and other goings-on that apparently have to do with Pakistan's Interservice Intelligence Agency, or I.S.I., and about Pakistani police taking their orders from generals of that powerful and feared I.S.I.

Here is that article.

Read it over. There's very little to complain about, is there? Why, it seems almost acceptable. It gives the Pakistani military, the I.S.I., and the police their meretricious due. But there is a section where Sabrina Tavernise decides to veer from the matter at hand, and to reach for an analogy. Here it is:

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"It is impossible for us to avoid reaching the conclusion that the departments simply do not want to cooperate with our investigation." "Obama administration subpoenaed in Fort Hood probe," by Thomas Ferraro for Reuters, April 19 (thanks to Benedict):

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Two U.S. lawmakers subpoenaed the Obama administration on Monday for information sought in a congressional probe of last year's shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas, that left 13 soldiers dead and an Army psychiatrist charged with murder.

Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Joe Lieberman, an independent, and Susan Collins, the panel's top Republican, took the action after the departments of Justice and Defense failed to provide the materials by Monday's deadline.

The two senators have been trying for months to obtain documents and be provided access to witnesses that they say are critical to their investigation of the shooting spree at Fort Hood in November that ended with 13 soldiers killed and dozens wounded.

An Army psychiatrist, Major Nidal Malik Hasan, has been charged by the military with 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted murder. The case drew heavy criticism after it became known Hasan had been in contact with an anti-American Muslim figure sympathetic to al Qaeda.

In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, who heads the Justice Department, and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Lieberman and Collins wrote: "It is impossible for us to avoid reaching the conclusion that the departments simply do not want to cooperate with our investigation."

"It is with great disappointment and reluctance that we have directed service of subpoenas to you which demand disclosure of the requested information by Monday, April 26, 2010," they added....

| 66 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
LeavingIslam?.jpg Not allowed in Miami


In Human Events today, Pamela Geller decries Miami-Dade Transit's dhimmitude and submission to Sharia restrictions on free speech:

In an outrageous denial of free speech rights, Miami-Dade Transit last week forced the removal of a "Leaving Islam" ad campaign on Miami buses because the ads might be "offensive to Islam."

The Freedom Defense Initiative, the new organization I have begun with bestselling author and Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer, and the group Stop Islamization of America started the ad campaign as a defense of religious freedom.

Our ad asked, "Fatwa on your head? Is your family or community threatening you? Leaving Islam? Got questions? Get answers! RefugefromIslam.com."

It was the first time anyone offered public help to people threatened under Islam's death penalty for apostasy.

At the behest of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an un-indicted co-conspirator in a Hamas funding case, Miami-Dade Transit took the ads off the buses in South Florida because they offended Muslims. Miami-Dade Transit is bowing to Sharia, Islamic law, which forbids non-Muslims to insult Islam.

CAIR and other Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups ran campaigns on buses across the country last year, including Miami, inviting people to convert to Islam and claiming that Abraham, Moses and Jesus were Muslim prophets.

Miami-Dade Transit allowed the CAIR bus ads despite being offensive to Jews and Christians. The CAIR bus ad campaign ran in Miami-Dade and Broward counties for eight weeks, according to the Miami Herald. No one took offense, despite the Islamic supremacist nature of the ads. No one breathed a word of protest.

At least three of the bus companies that ran CAIR's dawah (invitation to Islam) bus ads turned down our ad. And Miami-Dade Transit tore our ads down in less than 48 hours.

So Muslim groups can run bus ads seeking converts to Islam, but we cannot make information available to Muslims who want to leave Islam.

Still think this is a free country? Still think we enjoy freedom of speech? Think again....

Read it all.

| 29 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In "Appeasing the Muslim Brotherhood" at FrontPage today, Nonie Darwish exposes his closest Islamic adviser, Dalia Mogahed:

When President Obama spoke to the Muslim world in Cairo last June, a large portion of his guests were leaders and members of the Muslim Brotherhood. The speech was designed to please them more than supporting the reformist movement in Egypt and across the Muslim world.

The Obama administration has hired the first White House Muslim advisor, Dalia Mogahed, who helped with writing Obama's speech. Mogahed is herself an Islamic ideologue who supports Islamic Sharia and denies any connection between radical Islam and terrorism. Mogahed, who was born in Egypt, has also been a firm defender of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). Both of these US groups are tied to the Muslim Brotherhood.

As an American of Egyptian origin myself, I can tell who is a reformist and who is a radical Muslim sympathizer, and I do not think that Ms. Mogahed's views are in any way supportive of a reformation in Islam or of its concept of jihad. To the contrary, she denies the existence of any problem with Islamic ideology and she acts in total harmony with the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood. Her excuses are the same old excuses we Egyptians learned day in and day out in defense of Islamic jihad and in blaming others for misunderstanding of Islam. Her answers are always given with total confidence and conviction, as she tells her audience that any violent actions by Muslims have nothing to do with Islam. Never mind that Islamic mosques, education, art and songs all glorify jihad as a holy war for the sake of Allah.

Mogahed brings nothing new to Islamic propaganda but she certainly sounds interesting to Americans who are unfamiliar with this same old Islamic propaganda and who find it hard to question a religion. The truth about Mogahed is that she combines the good old Muslim sheikhs rhetoric with a better presentation that Americans can understand. Sheikhs never take any kind of criticism of Islam and they ridicule those who question Islam with statements like: "Who are you to speak for Islam? Leave the analysis to the experts on Islam." Mogahed's logic is very similar and, coincidentally, her book is entitled: "Who Speaks for Islam." It is a meaningless title showing statistics that are designed to show that Muslims are different and are not all terrorists, which is no news.

Of course among Muslims there are good and bad people, like in any other group. What Mohahed refuses to admit is that reputable critics of Islam have nothing against Muslim people, but they correctly decipher that the problem stems from the ideology of Islam and its scriptures and commandments. What Mogahed refuses to discuss are the actual laws of Sharia, the history of jihad, the ideology and education that produced 9/11, Islamic imperialism, oppression of human rights, women and minorities. Her answers are usually simplistic, such as the argument that Sharia cannot be bad to women because the majority of Muslim women allegedly support Sharia? The bottom line of Mogahed's propaganda is the same old complaint: that Islam is misunderstood and that Muslim people's anger and violence is triggered by politics and not by religion. The problem with the West is all a misunderstanding, she argues, and with some education and sensitivity training the West will accept Islam as a religion of peace. Her position in the White House has given her a powerful opportunity to enhance the standing of radical Islamist groups in the eyes of our government instead of the reformists and anti-Sharia Muslims....

Read it all.

| 21 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In Human Events this morning I discuss more media bias:

Prosecutors in Cook County said Friday that James Larry, a Chicago Muslim, has confessed to brutally murdering his wife, his seven-month old son Jihad, and two of his nieces. According to the Chicago Tribune, Larry was a prison convert to Islam who had been arguing with his wife over her refusal to become a Muslim and wear Islamic clothing. His sister revealed that he had been clutching a copy of the Koran and telling relatives that "something in the book told him to kill someone."

Were James Larry a Christian, his murders would be front-page headlines, and talking heads on all the networks would be discussing in hushed tones the dangers of Christian fundamentalism, complete with clips of Robert DeNiro as the Scripture-addled maniacal killer in Cape Fear, or any number of hundreds of other Hollywood fantasies about violent Christian fanatics.

But James Larry is a Muslim, and so true to form, outside of the Tribune and a handful of other sources, mainstream media coverage ignored the story altogether or, at very least, did not deem fit to print or mention all the inconvenient evidence that he was motivated to kill at least in part by such Koranic exhortations as "kill the polytheists wherever you find them" (9:5). The Associated Press story on the murders has none of that. According to AP, Larry was just "hearing voices."

The whole process of news gathering and news reporting needs to be demystified, even in this Internet age, and news reports recognized not as objective, dispassionate accounts, but as the work of human beings with agendas. While it is possible that Kristen Schorsch, Annie Sweeney and Cynthia Dizikes, the authors of the Chicago Tribune story, are simply better, more thorough reporters than Don Babwin of AP, it is more likely that Babwin had access to exactly the same information that showed up in the Tribune report, but chose not to go with it.

He probably thought it would be "Islamophobic" to do so, or that to do so would fuel one of those fabled but nonexistent "backlashes" against innocent Muslims. So he appears to have decided that it was better to cover up key facts about this incident....

Read it all.

| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And his clients are not yet satisfied with his performance. "White House Quietly Courts Muslims in U.S.," by Andrea Elliott in the New York Times, April 20 (thanks to all who sent this in):

[...] Muslim and Arab-American advocates have participated in policy discussions and received briefings from top White House aides and other officials on health care legislation, foreign policy, the economy, immigration and national security. They have met privately with a senior White House adviser, Valerie Jarrett, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. to discuss civil liberties concerns and counterterrorism strategy.

The impact of this continuing dialogue is difficult to measure, but White House officials cited several recent government actions that were influenced, in part, by the discussions. The meeting with Ms. Napolitano was among many factors that contributed to the government's decision this month to end a policy subjecting passengers from 14 countries, most of them Muslim, to additional scrutiny at airports, the officials said.

That emergency directive, enacted after a failed Dec. 25 bombing plot, has been replaced with a new set of intelligence-based protocols that law enforcement officials consider more effective.

Which ones? On what grounds? More effective for what? How can it be ineffective to subject people who come from areas where there actually are terrorists to greater scrutiny?

Also this month, Tariq Ramadan, a prominent Muslim academic, visited the United States for the first time in six years after Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton reversed a decision by the Bush administration, which had barred Mr. Ramadan from entering the country, initially citing the U.S.A. Patriot Act. Mrs. Clinton also cleared the way for another well-known Muslim professor, Adam Habib, who had been denied entry under similar circumstances.

The Times makes no mention of Ramadan's contribution to a charity that was funneling money to Hamas.

Arab-American and Muslim leaders said they had yet to see substantive changes on a variety of issues, including what they describe as excessive airport screening, policies that have chilled Muslim charitable giving and invasive F.B.I. surveillance guidelines. But they are encouraged by the extent of their consultation by the White House and governmental agencies.

Yes, airport screening is excessive. So let's relax it, at least for Muslims. What could go wrong?

"For the first time in eight years, we have the opportunity to meet, engage, discuss, disagree, but have an impact on policy," said James Zogby, president of the Arab American Institute in Washington. "We're being made to feel a part of that process and that there is somebody listening." [...]

Zogby is lying. Bush met with Muslim leaders right after 9/11 and proclaimed Islam a Religion of Peace™. He employed Karen Hughes in a variety of naive and wrongheaded attempts to reach out to the Islamic world. He did everything he could to emphasize that the "war on terror" was not a "war on Islam." And so now Zogby says that poor victimized Muslims are now being listened to for the first time in eight years. Well, many people play the victim game with great effectiveness, bamboozling their marks into believing they have done something wrong when they haven't, and making them think that they need to make amends when actually they have done nothing wrong at all. And no one does this more effectively than Muslims in the West.

The administration's approach has been understated. Many meetings have been private; others were publicized only after the fact. A visit to New York University in February by John O. Brennan, Mr. Obama's chief counterterrorism adviser, drew little news coverage, but caused a stir among Muslims around the country. Speaking to Muslim students, activists and others, Mr. Brennan acknowledged many of their grievances, including "surveillance that has been excessive," "overinclusive no-fly lists" and "an unhelpful atmosphere around many Muslim charities."

Yes, at times the dhimmitude has gotten a bit thick. Remember that the "unhelpful atmosphere around many Muslim charities" comes from the fact that they were passing on charitable contributions to jihad terrorist groups. How "unhelpful" of the U.S. Government to want to stop that money flow.

"These are challenges we face together as Americans," said Mr. Brennan, who momentarily showed off his Arabic to hearty applause. He and other officials have made a point of disassociating Islam from terrorism in public comments, using the phrase "violent extremism" in place of words like "jihad" and "Islamic terrorism."

Yes. This is another initiative that began with Bush, and now Obama is taking credit for it, when actually it shames them both. The Islamic jihadists refer to Islamic texts and teachings to justify violence and supremacism, and make recruits among peaceful Muslims. Who does it benefit when government and law enforcement officials ignore that? Only the jihadists, whose motives and goals remain unknown, unexplored, unchallenged.

While the administration's solicitation of Muslims and Arab-Americans has drawn little fanfare, it has not escaped criticism. A small but vocal group of research analysts, bloggers and others complain that the government is reaching out to Muslim leaders and organizations with an Islamist agenda or ties to extremist groups abroad.

No kidding, really?

They point out that Ms. Jarrett gave the keynote address at the annual convention for the Islamic Society of North America. The group was listed as an unindicted co-conspirator in a federal case against the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, a Texas-based charity whose leaders were convicted in 2008 of funneling money to Hamas. The society denies any links to terrorism.

"I think dialogue is good, but it has to be with genuine moderates," said Steven Emerson, a terrorism analyst who advises government officials. "These are the wrong groups to legitimize." Mr. Emerson and others have also objected to the political appointments of several American Muslims, including Rashad Hussain.

In February, the president chose Mr. Hussain, a 31-year-old White House lawyer, to become the United States' special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference. The position, a kind of ambassador at large to Muslim countries, was created by Mr. Bush. In a video address, Mr. Obama highlighted Mr. Hussain's status as a "close and trusted member of my White House staff" and "a hafiz," a person who has memorized the Koran.

Within days of the announcement, news reports surfaced about comments Mr. Hussain had made on a panel in 2004, while he was a student at Yale Law School, in which he referred to several domestic terrorism prosecutions as "politically motivated." Among the cases he criticized was that of Sami Al-Arian, a former computer-science professor in Florida who pleaded guilty to aiding members of a Palestinian terrorist group.

At first, the White House said Mr. Hussain did not recall making the comments, which had been removed from the Web version of a 2004 article published by a small Washington magazine. When Politico obtained a recording of the panel, Mr. Hussain acknowledged criticizing the prosecutions but said he believed the magazine quoted him inaccurately, prompting him to ask its editor to remove the comments. On Feb. 22, The Washington Examiner ran an editorial with the headline "Obama Selects a Voice of Radical Islam."

Funny how he only noticed he was quoted inaccurately six years later. My articles on the Hussain affair are here and here.

Muslim leaders watched carefully as the story migrated to Fox News. They had grown accustomed to close scrutiny, many said in interviews, but were nonetheless surprised. In 2008, Mr. Hussain had co-authored a paper for the Brookings Institution arguing that the government should use the peaceful teachings of Islam to fight terrorism.

Yes, that has been working so well since 9/11.

"Rashad Hussain is about as squeaky clean as you get," said Representative Keith Ellison, a Minnesota Democrat who is Muslim. Mr. Ellison and others wondered whether the administration would buckle under the pressure and were relieved when the White House press secretary, Robert Gibbs, defended Mr. Hussain.

Ellison, the man who pronounced Hussain squeaky clean, made the pilgrimage to Mecca paid for by the Muslim Brotherhood, from which come Hamas and Al-Qaeda, and which is dedicated in its own words to "eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within."

"The fact that the president and the administration have appointed Muslims to positions and have stood by them when they've been attacked is the best we can hope for," said Ingrid Mattson, president of the Islamic Society of North America. [...]

That is, Hamas-linked ISNA.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

April 19, 2010

Islamic law forbids a Muslim woman from marrying a non-Muslim man. Love will conquer such rules in particular cases, of course, but that doesn't exempt the loving couple from violent retaliation from Islamic supremacists who take such laws seriously. Sharia Alert from Pakistan: "Pakistani Brothers Threaten Family of Catholic Who Wed Muslim," from Compass Direct, April 19 (thanks to Maxwell):

SARGODHA, Pakistan, April 19 (CDN) -- Family members of a Muslim woman who married a Roman Catholic here have threatened to kidnap the groom's mother and sister and kill the newlyweds and other relatives, the Christian family members said.

Muslims have heavily bribed police to allow the crimes, sources told the Christian family.

The brothers of Sadia Bashir, the 22-year-old Muslim woman who married the Christian, issued the same threats most recently on April 12, said her father, Mushtaq Bhatti. After the young couple wed in court on May 16, the Muslim family accused the groom, 24-year-old Jibran Masih, and his mother and father of kidnapping, for which they languished in jail for several months last year.

Masih, his mother Nargis Bibi and Bhatti could have been sentenced to death, a life sentence or a fine had the Lahore High Court not declared them innocent in December.

The high court ordered the Muslim family to stop issuing dire threats to the Christian family, but threats of kidnapping and murder have continued with police encouragement, Bhatti said. On Jan. 18, he said, Bashir's brothers tried to kidnap his wife, Jibran Masih's mother, as she walked back home after escorting another daughter to college in Sargodha.

The brothers, Muhammad Arif and Muhammad Tariq, got out of a red car and began dragging her to it, tearing off her blouse as she struggled to keep from being put in the car, Nargis Bibi said.

She managed to escape their clutches on the crowded street and immediately reported the incident to the New Satellite Town (NST) police station with her husband, she said. Police reluctantly registered charges of abducting for the purposes of adultery, she said, but they have not arrested the brothers....

"On the First Information Report [FIR] of the Muslim family of Muhammad Bashir falsely charging us with kidnapping, police immediately arrested us," Nargis Bibi said, "but on our FIR they were idle and have not arrested any of the Muslim culprits."...

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Dhimmitude, cowardice, craven opportunism, and blind Leftist America-hatred. An update on this story. "Embattled Gender Analyst Leaves Post at Amnesty," from Women's eNews, n.d. (thanks to Morgaan Sinclair):

Gita Sahgal calls her entry into the world of journalism "sort of accidental," but her most recent news appearances have been entirely on purpose.

On Feb. 7, the Sunday Times of London published her sharp critique of Amnesty International's support for former Guantanamo prisoner Moazzam Begg. She went public, the article says, because her internal warnings had been ignored.

Amnesty, the nearly 50-year-old rights group founded to speak on behalf of prisoners of conscience, has hailed Begg as a human rights defender, hosted him on speaking tours and included him in a meeting with politicians at Downing Street.

Sahgal has called him "Britain's most famous supporter of the Taliban." She points to passages in his 2006 autobiography, Enemy Combatant, where he describes moving to Taliban-ruled Afghanistan to "live in an Islamic state--one that was free from the corruption and despotism of the rest of the Muslim world." He also ran a bookstore in Birmingham, England, that sold works by known al-Qaida mentor Abdullah Azzam.

Hours later she was suspended, with pay but without explanation, from her job.

On April 9, she and the organization parted ways. In a statement released that day, the organization cited "irreconcilable differences."

Sahgal served as Amnesty International's top gender specialist since 2002. Two days before her suspension, the organization had promoted her to the newly-created position of interim head of the Gender, Sexuality and Identity division.

"It tells you a lot about where women's rights stand at Amnesty International," Sahgal said in a phone interview in March. "When they had to make the choice between Begg and their most senior discrimination expert who also has researched fundamentalism, they chose Begg."...

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Dhimmitude, ineptitude, criminal negligence, willful blindness. "TSA tells terrorists where body scanners are, and exempts them," from Creeping Sharia, April 18 (thanks to Choi):

First, the TSA posted its entire Screening Management Standard Operating Procedure document online. The posting of that amateurishly redacted document was followed by the posting of a second document with the same redaction flaw – revealing more TSA baggage screening policies.

Terrorists, who no doubt have dissected the unredacted documents, have also been discussing ways to evade and beat airport scanners on jihadi forums:

“We have that system in place in Algiers…does anyone know if it’s capable of detecting [the flammable gas] butane?”

On another Jihadist site, a visitor questions security involving 3D scanners at British airports asking: “Can I refuse [to pass through] for religious reasons?”

Before long comes this answer: “...advise those who wish to avoid the Heathrow scanners to take the train to Paris… and then board a plane from there.”

The TSA website features a map and lists of locations to help terrorists determine which airports to avoid when planning to smuggle explosives aboard commercial airplanes. There’s also a video on CNN showing just how easy it is to beat TSA’s screenings. ...

Astounding, but true. And there is much more. Read it all.

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

I'll dance to the beat, shuffle my feet
Wear a shirt and tie and run with the creeps
Cause it's all about money, ain't a damn thing funny
You got to have a con in this land of milk and honey
-- Grandmaster Flash

It's all about money: Wilders' truth-telling about Islam could hamper Dutch business dealings with Islamic countries -- particularly ones like Libya, which recently declared jihad (in this case, an economic boycott) against Switzerland for its minaret ban. If Wilders becomes Prime Minister of the Netherlands, what will become of deals like these?

Of course, deals like these are short-sighted and ultimately self-defeating. But try to explain that to BAM today.

"BAM Division Starts Joint Venture In Libya," from Dow Jones, April 19 (thanks to Maxwell):

AMSTERDAM (Dow Jones)--Dutch construction company Royal BAM Group NV (BAMNB.AE) said Monday its Tebodin Consultants & Engineers division will start a joint venture with Libyan company Petroleum & Chemicals Consultancy, or PCC.

BAM will hold a 60% share in the Tebodin Libya joint venture and PCC will hold the remaining 40%. Tebodin Libya will be involved in consultancy, engineering and construction for the local oil and gas industry and in water management in Libya....

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Yet Putin continues to back Iran's "peaceful" nuclear program, despite the fact that the mullahs hold to essentially the same world view and political ideas as those of the Chechen jihadists. "At least four officers killed in Russia's Chechnya," from Reuters, April 19 (thanks to Maxwell):

MOSCOW, (Reuters) - Militants killed at least four members of the Russian security forces on Thursday and Friday in the North Caucasus, where the Kremlin is struggling to contain an Islamist insurgency, Russian media reported....

Suicide attackers killed 40 people on the Moscow metro last month and turned the global spotlight on Russia's mainly Muslim North Caucasus, especially Chechnya, Ingushetia and Dagestan.

The Islamist militants say they want a sharia-based, pan-Caucasus state independent of Russia.

In those three regions, at least 862 people were killed last year in clashes, bombing and gun battles, according to the Internet news agency Caucasian Knot.

Despite efforts by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev to eradicate what he has called a "cancerous tumour", critics say poverty, patronage from abroad and heavy-handed tactics by Russian forces encourage the insurgency.

Yes, of course. Poverty -- that's why there are so many Haitian suicide bombers. And the Russians may indeed be heavy-handed, but the jihad doctrine and Islamic supremacism would still exist even if they weren't.

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Dhimmitude and antisemitism rolled into one. "UK authority: Western Wall not in Israel," from Ynet, April 14 (thanks to all who sent this in):

The British Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) criticized Israel for including pictures of the Western Wall in a tourism advertisement, claiming that the holy site is technically not located within the country's borders, the Independent reported Wednesday.

"We told the Israeli Tourist Office not to imply that places in the Occupied Territories were part of the state of Israel," ASA, which is a public organization but not government-funded, said in a statement.

It was not the first time the organization had been called upon by the British public to remove Israeli ads. One year ago ASA ordered the Israeli Tourism Ministry to remove posters displaying a map of Israel that included the West Bank and the Golan Heights within its borders from London's Underground, after receiving 300 letters of protest.

The current case was also brought to ASA's attention by a "concerned citizen" who said the ad was misleading as it implies that east Jerusalem, under Israeli law since 1967, was a part of the state.

The poster, which is comprised mostly of a photo displaying a Tel Aviv beach, included a tiny picture of Temple Mount at the bottom....

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A new twist on Muhammad the Bear has elicited the video above, which is currently available at YouTube, though that could change. Interestingly, there have been at least two prior depections of Muhammad on South Park -- one in 2001 (shown here, on the right), and another in 2006 that didn't make it to air, but can be found online. But a bear suit... that means war! Who knows, maybe it's because the Pedobear jokes all but write themselves.

Oodles of hateful rhetoric on a variety of topics and against a variety of people -- Theo Van Gogh, Salman Rushdie, Kurt Westergaard, Lars Vilks, and Geert Wilders -- can be found in the remainder of the video.

"Security Brief: Radical Islamic Web site takes on 'South Park'," from CNN, April 19:

The radical Islamic Web site Revolutionmuslim.com is going after the creators of the TV cartoon series "South Park" after an episode last week included an image of the Prophet Mohammed in disguise.
Revolutionmuslim.com, based in New York, was the subject of a CNN investigation last year for its radical rhetoric supporting "jihad" against the West and praising al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. Its organizers insist they act within the law and seek to protect Islam.
On Sunday, Revolutionmuslim.com posted an entry that included a warning to South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone that they risk violent retribution - after the 200th episode last week included a satirical discussion about whether an image of the prophet could be shown. In the end, he is portrayed disguised in a bear suit.
The posting on Revolutionmuslim.com says: "We have to warn Matt and Trey that what they are doing is stupid and they will probably wind up like Theo Van Gogh for airing this show. This is not a threat, but a warning of the reality of what will likely happen to them."
Theo van Gogh was a Dutch filmmaker who was murdered by an Islamic extremist in 2004 after making a short documentary on violence against women in some Islamic societies. The posting on Revolutionmuslim.com features a graphic photograph of Van Gogh with his throat cut and a dagger in his chest.
The entry on Revolutionmuslim.com goes on to advise readers:
"You can contact them [the makers of South Park], or pay Comedy Central or their own company a visit at these addresses ..." before listing Comedy Central's New York address, and the Los Angeles, California, address of Parker and Sloane's production company.
Contacted by CNN, the author of the post, Abu Talhah al Amrikee, said that providing the addresses was not intended as a threat to the creators of South Park but to give people the opportunity to protest.
Over still photographs of Parker, Stone, van Gogh and others, the Web site runs audio of a sermon by the radical U.S.-born preacher Anwar al-Awlaki, who is now in hiding in Yemen. The sermon, recorded some time ago, talks about assassinating those who have "defamed" the Prophet Mohammed - citing one religious authority as saying "Harming Allah and his messenger is a reason to encourage Muslims to kill whoever does that." U.S. officials say al-Awlaki is on a list of al Qaeda leaders targeted for capture or assassination.
The clip ends with a warning on a graphic directed at Parker and Stone, saying "The Dust Will Never Settle Down."
Al Amrikee said the purpose of including the al-Awlaki sermon in his posting was to remind Muslims that insulting the prophet is a severe offense for which the punishment in Islam is death. He said RevolutionMuslim may hold protests about the show.
Calls to Comedy Central were not returned.
| 149 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And so the hard-won principle of equality of treatment for all starts to give way, and Muslims begin to be established as a privileged class in society, as Sharia dictates. "Muslim army recruits get special conditions," from Swiss Info, April 19 (thanks to C. Cantoni):

The Swiss army has drawn up guidelines outlining special conditions for meals and prayers for its rising number of Muslim recruits.

The move is in line with the army's tradition of catering to other faiths, spokesman Martin Bühler said, following an article in the NZZ am Sonntag newspaper. Special provisions already exist for Jewish soldiers.

Muslims going into the summer recruit school - part of obligatory military service for young men - can now signal that they do not want to eat pork. They will instead be offered an alternative. Halal products can in some cases be brought in.

However, the five daily prayers will not be possible, but recruits will be able to pray once the day's army duties are over.

I expect that that will prove unacceptable.

The guidelines have been drawn up with the input of Muslims, according to the NZZ am Sonntag.

The number of recruits of Islamic faith has been on the rise in the past few years. In some infantry recruit schools, one in ten new soldiers is a Muslim, the paper said....

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

A few minutes ago I received an email that made this assertion:

As gris eminence Bernard Lewis has pointed out, the terrorists loosened Islamic law interpretations fairly recently to permit suicide in the cause of jihad. Why can't it be changed back?

I responded:

Actually the idea of suicide in the cause of jihad is no innovation. It is founded upon Qur'an 9:111, which guarantees Paradise to those who "kill and are killed" for Allah. It is a phenomenon that is actually found throughout Islamic history, and is not new. In the 18th century John Paul Jones wrote about Ottoman sailors setting their own ships on fire and ramming the ships of their enemies, although they knew this meant certain death for them.

And centuries before that, the Assassins, Hashishin, went into their missions knowing that death was virtually certain, and energized by the promise of Paradise that had been made vivid for them in an artful scenario that was used as a recruitment tool: the prospective assassin would be given hashish and then taken into a garden full of beautiful women, and told that he was enjoying a taste of Islamic Paradise. Then to return to that Paradise, he was told that he had to go out and kill his victim, and be killed in the process.

| 33 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Feel the love. "2 bombs hit northwestern Pakistani city; 22 dead," by Riaz Khan for Associated Press, April 19 (thanks to Maxwell):

PESHAWAR, Pakistan - Two bombs, hours apart, exploded in the Pakistani city of Peshawar on Monday, killing 22 people and underscoring the reach of militants despite successive military offensives close to the Afghan border, police said.

The first blast exploded outside a school run by a police welfare foundation in the northwestern city, killing a young boy and wounding 10 people. Just before dusk, a second bomb went off close to a police station in a busy market area, killing 21 and wounding around 30, said police officer Zahid Khan.

Some of the victims were supporters of a hardline Islamist party holding a rally close to the station, said Khan.

Taliban and al-Qaida militants based in the Afghan border region -- who are fighting Pakistani security forces -- have carried hundreds of attacks over the last three years. Two blasts over the weekend in the nearby Kohat tribal region killed around 50 people, most of them refugees lining up to register for food and other aid.....

| 8 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Tiny Minority of Extremists™ Update: "Mideast: Salafist Spokesman,11,000 Support Al Qaeda In Gaza," from ANSAmed, April 19 (thanks to Insubria):

(ANSAmed) - GAZA, APRIL 19 - In the Gaza Strip, Al Qaeda "can currently count on 11,000 supporters", said a spokesman for the local Salafist movement, Abu al-Hareth, in an interview with the press agency MAAN. However, his words were viewed with scepticism in Gaza, where estimates still hold that the various Al Qaeda-inspired movements total a few hundred militants at the most. Abu al-Hareth said that the armed groups in Gaza taking their cue from the teachings of Osama bin Laden did not have direct links with Al Qaeda, but that they were influenced by his orders. He added that relations with Hamas had been tense since last summer the latter's security forces broke into a Salafist mosque in southern Gaza and killed 16. Subsequently Hamas carried out numerous arrests among the group. "We are kept under control 24 hours a day," complained Abu Hareth. Nevertheless, the spokesman added that the Al Qaeda-inspired armed groups had managed to conduct a number of attacks on Israeli forces deployed along the Gaza. Under the generic name of Jaljalat, noted the spokesman, currently four Salafist-inspired are operating in Gaza: Jund Ansar Allah; Jaish al-Islam; al-Tawhid wa al-Jihad and Jund-Allah. (ANSAmed).
| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

UPDATE: Was the Orlando Sentinel embarrassed by this shoddy hit piece? They have just removed it from their site. Let's hear it for the last shreds of journalistic integrity. (Thanks to Morgan for the heads-up.)

-------------------------------

They call this journalism. "Miami-Dade Transit Drops Anti-Islam ads," by Jeff Kunerth in the Orlando Sentinel, April 19:

Miami-Dade Transit has decided to drop bus advertisements sponsored by an anti-Islam hate group after complaints by the South Florida chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

The South Florida CAIR asked that the ads, produced by the hate group Stop the Islamization of America, be dropped because they promote bigotry and may fuel discrimination against ordinary Florida Muslims.

"We believe Miami-Dade Transit did the right thing in dropping this campaign of hatred and intolerance," said CAIR-SFL Executive Director Muhammed Malik. "The advertisement's reference to apostasy is merely a smoke-screen for the promotion of anti-Islam bigotry and the attempted marginalization of American Muslims."

I added this comment:

Your characterization of Stop Islamization of America as a hate group is not only inaccurate, but libelous.

SIOA stands for the freedom of speech, the equality of rights of all people before the law, and the freedom of conscience (as exemplified by these bus ads, designed to protect those threatened with death for leaving Islam, in accord with Islam's traditional death penalty for apostasy, which comes from Muhammad the Islamic prophet's dictum, "If anyone changes his religion, kill him").

All of these are denied in Islamic law. Would you then defend their extinguishing and characterize their defense as "hate"?

Please note also that the Council on American-Islamic Relations is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case, has had several of its officials convicted of jihad terror activities, and has opposed every anti-terror measure introduced since 9/11.

Which one is the "hate group" again?

The Orlando Sentinel ought to be ashamed to publish this defamatory nonsense.

| 45 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Once again we are bidden to ignore the evidence of Muslim behavior around the world, and believe instead the smooth deceptions of a kindly man who explains it all for us. "Open house educates public on Islam," by Ann Compton for The Daily Athanaeum, April 18:

West Virginia University students got a chance to experience Islam, the world's fastest growing religion of 1.4 billion followers, Saturday at the Islamic Center of Morgantown's Open House.

The comparative religion-themed event featured booths describing different aspects of the religion.

One booth explained the role of women in Islam. At another, Muslim youths from local high schools described the hijab, the headdress worn by Muslim women.

Attendees learned that, contrary to what is often presented by the media, Islam does not oppress women. Presenters cited verses from the Quran, the Islamic holy book, to support their statement.

I expect they didn't get around to mentioning the verse that says: "Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them." -- Qur'an 4:34

They noted one third of new Muslims today are women.

The event's main session was a lecture given by Imam Sohail Chaudry, the spiritual leader of the Islamic Center. He discussed the Prophet Muhammad's role in the Christian Bible.

Islam is also the most misunderstood religion, he said.

"We ourselves have a lot to do with that ignorance, because we do not make the effort to go out and meet Muslims in our area," he said.

"We don't go out to our local Islamic center - we believe whatever the television tells us."

Chaudry explained Muslims believe in Jesus Christ, though differently than Christians.

Jesus is seen as a prophet, born of the Virgin Mary but not the son of God, unlike in Christianity.

Tabatha Fego, a sophomore education major, attended the event to earn extra credit for her world religion class.

"We learned about Islam, and it was just really interesting to come here and sort of see it in action after learning about it," she said.

Catalina Mejia, a sophomore advertising major, agreed.

"I like Islam a lot more now after coming here and learning about it. It's really cool to see how other people practice their religion," she said.

| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
niqab-protest.jpg Somebody opposes the niqab ban


Irony. "Bill discriminates against Muslims: protesters," from CBC News, April 18 (thanks to Patrick):

About 60 women, a third donning the Muslim veil, demonstrated Saturday in front of Montreal City Hall and demanded the province scrap legislation that would require anyone receiving public services to show their face.

Bill 94 was proposed last month amid Quebec's public debate over how far governments should go to accommodate religious customs.

Government officials have said the bill is a solution to the need to balance individual freedoms with the values of Quebec society, including the equality between men and women and secular public institutions.

But protesters described the legislation as being discriminatory....

One woman who declined to give her name also wore the niqab as she watched the protest. She said Bill 94 is not fair.

"I personally would never attend university if they tell me to take off my niqab, so, they're making me become illiterate," she said.

No. You are. Nothing is requiring you to live in Quebec. Nothing is requiring to bend to your will.

Immigration Minister Yolande James said the government is promoting secularism.

"What we do say is services are being rendered and to participate, that your face is to be uncovered," she told CBC News....

| 27 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Comments by David G. Littman, NGO Representative UN, Geneva: Association
for World Education (AWE); World Union for Progressive Judaism (WUPJ)

In our recent comments on the latest FGM origo mali (origin of evil) event at the UNHRC (Geneva), we announced this revealing video on the landmark 16 June 2008 'Shariah-gate Shipwreck'. We thank Vlad Tepes blog for once again documenting, jointly with us, this classic example of the HR Council 'Game of Nations' where the OIC tries to rule the roost.

We would add, however, that this - and other attempts - to muzzle freedom of expression at the UN Human Rights Council is being more and more challenged by Western delegates, and it is also possible that the influence of cyberspace to convey such 'news' is having a beneficial effect too. What we were able to say in our 10 CHR statements last month in the absence of Egypt's comic trouble-maker is indicative.

* * * * *

Landmark 'Sharia-gate Shipwreck' at the UNHRC and its aftermath

On 16 June 2008 (@16:40), we were given the floor at the 26th session by the president of the Human Rights Council, Romanian Ambassador Doru Romulus Costea, to deliver a joint statement for AWE and the International Humanist and Ethical Union on 'Integrating the Human Rights of Women throughout the United Nations system' (item 8). The first 'point of order' by Egypt's delegate came after our mention of 'FGM', and just before 'Egypt'. There were a total of 12 points of order: 7 by Egypt, 2 by Pakistan, 2 by the Islamic Republic of Iran, 1 by Cuba; with 4 positive points: 2 by Slovenia (for the EU), 1 by Canada, 1, Germany; and 11 explanations by the president, who gave the floor to me 4 times to conclude the original 3-minute statement. The entire verbatim text below, taken from the UN webcast, illustrates a common OIC tactic, especially used by Egypt and Pakistan, with backers (Cuba), but not only on his issue (China re: Tibet, etc.). It is reproduced for viewers to see how the gangrene is spreads if it is not challenged. Our statement at the end has [ ] brackets with documentation & auto-censored words on presidential advice.

| 11 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Of course, Osama probably wasn't operating it. But a clear jihad sympathizer was, and he attracted a large number of Islamic supremacist fans. "'Osama Bin Laden' Facebook Page Shut Down: Facebook Page in Terrorist's Name Drew Hundreds of Fans," by Lara Setrakian for ABC News, April 17 (thanks to all who sent this in):

A Facebook account in the name of Osama bin Laden was shut down Friday, after attracting more than 1,000 "fans" and posting the speeches and recordings of Islamic extremists produced by al Qaeda-affiliated Al-Sahab Media Group.

The page, which went up on March 25, referred to bin Laden as the "Prince of Mujahideen," and set his location to the "mountains of the world," according to the Arabic language news site Elaph. Bin Laden is believed to be hiding in the mountainous area that stretches across Pakistan and Afghanistan.

It remains unclear whether the page was operated by close associates of bin Laden or by supporters based abroad. A Facebook spokesman cast doubt on a direct link.

"People often attempt to register fake accounts under the name of famous or infamous people," Facebook spokesman Andrew Noyes said.

"There is no evidence to suggest that the account in question or the other dozens of people who have tried to present themselves as Osama bin Laden have any relation to the terrorist," he said. "As is our standard practice, we have disabled the account."

There continues to be a Facebook page for the Taliban, with a smaller following of 31 people and signs that the page itself is a prank.

Facebook has access to the email and IP address associated with a profile or group, and works with local and federal law enforcement in certain cases. Noyes declined to say if there would be any follow up on this case, or on the hundreds of followers who signed up as bin Laden's "fans."...

"Nobody dares to say, 'I follow your father' in public. But I find it very often and everywhere, people say, 'We like your father, your father is a hero,'" Omar bin Laden said....

But...but...everyone always tells us that Osama's followers are a Tiny Minority of Extremists™!

| 5 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

How 'bout that logic. And the priorities. Hamzi at once argues in the name of "freedom" for the absence of a minimum age of marriage, and insists it's not really a problem anyway. Then, what accounts for the ferocity of the opposition? Muhammad's example does, along with the esteem in which his conduct is held per Qur'an 33:21. That is the criterion for the "freedom" Hamzi extols.

An update on this story. "Yemen: Islamic lawmaker decries child marriage ban as part of 'Western agenda'," by Alexandra Sandels for the Los Angeles Times, April 18:

The recent death of 13-year old Yemeni child bride Elham Assi, who reportedly bled to death last week after being tied down and forced to have sex with her 23-year-old husband, has sparked outrage among rights activists in Yemen.
They are now stepping up their lobbying efforts to push for the implementation of a child marriage ban.
But that may prove a daunting challenge since fierce opposition against a ban on child brides still runs high among some religious leaders and conservatives.
Sheik Mohammed Hamzi, an official of the Islamist Yemeni opposition party Islaah and the imam of the Al-Rahman mosque in the Yemeni capital of Sana, is one of those who staunchly opposes a legal ban on child marriage.
Although he emphasizes that a woman should not get married before she is physically and mentally ready and that she herself needs to accept the marriage, he believes a law that prohibits child marriage constitutes a rights violation.
"I am against the child marriage law because it restrains the freedom of others. When a certain age [for marriage] is set, it violates the rights of others. For example, imagine a young man of 13 or 14 years of age who wants to have sex. ... This is a violation of his rights," Sheik Hamzi told The Times in an interview at his Sana home last week. [...]

From this point on in the article, he's "Hazmi."

But Hazmi dismisses claims by rights groups that there is a problem with child marriages in his country. He said the child-bride cases that have been reported in the media were merely isolated incidents.
"Just ask my mother and sisters how many times they've found a little girl getting married at the marriages they've attended," he said. "Not many."
The country's Ministry of Social Affairs, on the contrary, says child marriages are common in Yemen. According to a 2009 report by the ministry, a quarter of all females in Yemen marry before the age of 15.
To Hazmi, however, women's- and children's-rights activists are putting a few isolated cases of child marriage in the spotlight to rally support for the law.
"There is no problem here with child marriage," he said. "These cases of young girls getting married are exceptions. These organizations that are promoting for this law couldn't find any examples except for those of Nujoud and Elham."
Hazmi said the groups that are campaigning for the law were harmful to the country, trying to promote a "Western agenda" in Yemen.
"It's all a Western agenda they are following," he said. "They get paid from the West to make us to believe in Western culture. This is very bad because our culture is different here."
The best that could happen, in his opinion, is that the government shuts them down.
"No one wants to marry these women's-rights activists anyway," he said. "They're just depressed that they are not married and jealous."
Would he allow his own young daughters to be married?
"No," he says and looks at the two as they're scurrying around in the room. "At this age, I don't want them married."

The reporter would do well to check back in a year, and again in five.

| 26 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

How about that. That, after all, is the aim of jihad in general. And while this story makes a point of branding the Taliban's enforcement of sharia as "antiquated and regressive," the penalty it singles out as an example, amputation, is found in the Qur'an more than once (5:33, 5:38). The reporter probably thought she was going the extra mile to put in a good word about the "real" Islam; as James Thurber said, "You might as well fall flat on your face as lean over too far backward."

"AP: Taliban say buildup under way," by Kathy Gannon for the Associated Press, April 18:

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - The Taliban are moving fighters into Kandahar, planting bombs and plotting attacks as NATO and Afghan forces prepare for a summer showdown with insurgents, according to a Taliban commander with close ties to senior insurgent leaders.

And they will strive for the utmost propaganda mileage out of the civilian casualties they cause as a result.

NATO and Afghan forces are stepping up operations to push Taliban fighters out of the city, which was the Islamist movement's headquarters during the years it ruled most of Afghanistan. The goal is to bolster the capability of the local government so that it can keep the Taliban from coming back.
The Taliban commander, who uses the pseudonym Mubeen, told The Associated Press that if military pressure on the insurgents becomes too great "we will just leave and come back after" the foreign forces leave.
Despite nightly raids by NATO and Afghan troops, Mubeen said his movements have not been restricted. He was interviewed last week in the center of Kandahar, seated with his legs crossed on a cushion in a room. His only concession to security was to lock the door.
He made no attempt to hide his face and said he felt comfortable because of widespread support among Kandahar's 500,000 residents, who like the Taliban are mostly Pashtuns, Afghanistan's biggest ethnic community. [...]
"We are always getting instructions from our commanders, what suicide attacks to carry out, who to behead if he is a spy," Mubeen said, gesturing with a maimed hand suffered during fighting in 1996 when the Taliban were trying to gain control of the capital of Kabul. [...]
"Our brothers are already here and ready," he said. "Our people are skilled now. They know a lot of things, how to make things more difficult and to be more sophisticated in our attacks."
Mubeen said Taliban fighters had received better training, although he would not say where and by whom.
"But we were interested to get the training and we understood that we needed the training," he said.
Mubeen said the Taliban's main goal in the war is the establishment of sharia, or Islamic law, in Afghanistan. When they ruled the religious militia enforced an antiquated and regressive interpretation of Islamic law that appalled the West, including publicly amputating hands and feet for theft and carrying out public executions...
| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

April 18, 2010

Looks as if someone got a tongue-lashing in the Oval Office. Unless you'd prefer to believe that some plans were drawn up with remarkable swiftness. An update on this story: "Gates says US is prepared on Iran's nuclear plan," by Calvin Woodward for Associated Press, April 18:

WASHINGTON - Defense Secretary Robert Gates asserted Sunday that the U.S. is prepared to take a range of actions against the Iranian nuclear program and told friends and foes not to fall for any perception Iran can catch Washington off guard .

Gates said a memo he wrote in January identified steps to be taken in defense planning after the Obama administration decided to increase pressure against Iran's nuclear ambitions.

It was not, he insisted, a "wake-up call" that set off a scramble by an unprepared government, as was suggested by sources who disclosed the memo's existence to The New York Times....

Okay, okay! I will go back to sleep!

| 28 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

| 40 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

How is it that Abdul Baseer could memorize the Qur'an and miss all of its teachings of peace, and get the idea that jihad had something to do with killing unbelievers? How did this obviously pious and serious Muslim become a Misunderstander of Islam? You'd think that accounts like this would create some cognitive dissonance among those who believe that Islam is a Religion of Peace™. But they don't.

"Behind the scenes of a Pakistani suicide bombing," by Chris Brummitt for AP, April 18 (thanks to all who sent this in):

LAHORE, Pakistan -- Abdul Baseer sent the grenades and explosive vest ahead, then boarded a bus that would take him to his target, accompanied by the 14-year-old boy he had groomed as his suicide bomber.

But before they could blow up their target, a luxury hotel in Lahore where they believed Americans would be staying, the two were arrested and are now in jail -- Baseer unrepentant about having plotted to send a boy to his death, and the boy saying he never knew what was in store for him. [...]

Like many who cannot afford a regular education, Baseer attended three Islamic boarding schools where children learn the Quran by heart and spend little time on secular subjects. The religious schools provide free board and lodging, but are widely criticized for indoctrinating students with an extreme version of Islam.

At least one of the schools Baseer attended, Jamia Faridia in the capital, Islamabad, has been linked to terror.

"Through my studies, I became aware that this is the time for jihad and fighting the infidels, and I saw that a jihad was going on in Afghanistan," said Basser, a rail-thin man speaking just louder than whisper. "I looked for a way to get there."...

On the final trip he took part in the ambush of a U.S. patrol after he and other fighters had lain in wait in the snow for two days."I was happy to be in place where I could kill unbelievers," he said. "I thank God that we all returned safely and had a successful mission."...

| 9 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"Akhtar has been arrested twice before - in the United Arab Emirates in 2004 and by Pakistani authorities in 2008 - but released each time for unknown reasons." Now, that's interesting. Surely he wasn't released because authorities in the U.A.E. and Pakistan were sympathetic to jihad -- naah, that couldn't be it. An update on this story. "American suspects linked to militants: prosecutor," from AP, April 17 (thanks to Sr. Soph):

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistani government presented evidence in court Saturday that allegedly showed contacts between five detained Americans and a reputed al-Qaeda-linked militant leader, revealing the leader's identity for the first time, a prosecutor said.

The northern Virginia men are on trial charged with planning terrorist attacks in Pakistan and conspiring to wage war against nations allied with it. They deny any wrongdoing.

But prosecutors say they made contact with Qari Saifullah Akhtar, the leader of the Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami militant network, which is believed to have extensive contacts with al-Qaeda and the Taliban. Formed in the 1980s, it recruited militants from the Punjab province to fight in Afghanistan and later Kashmir in operations supported by Pakistani security forces.

Akhtar has been arrested twice before - in the United Arab Emirates in 2004 and by Pakistani authorities in 2008 - but released each time for unknown reasons. At the time of his arrest in 2008, he was publicly accused of involvement in a failed attack on former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto in 2007.

Prosecutor Nadeem Akram said the evidence produced Saturday at the court includes documents, phone call logs and retrieved e-mails. The court sessions are taking place behind closed doors in a high security prison in Sargodha.

The Americans, all in their late teens or early 20s, were arrested in December in Sargodha, a city in Punjab province. They were reported missing by their families in November after one left behind a farewell video showing scenes of war and casualties and saying Muslims must be defended....

| 2 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The American Muslim likes to wring its hands about "Islamophobia." Here's a tip for Sheila Musaji: if you want people not to dislike and be suspicious of Muslims, stop acting in such a sleazy, dishonest manner.

I just sent this email to Sheila Musaji:

Ms Musaji:

http://www.theamericanmuslim.org/tam.php/features/articles/hutaree_christian_militia_not_an_isolated_phenomena/0018035

In that article you quote from my article here: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=36267

Then you purport to summarize what I am saying, and what Pamela Geller, Chris Baker and the New York Post are saying: "Let's summarize what these folks are saying: Arresting the Hutaree is nuts, and an attack on free speech and the Christian faith."

In reality, in the same article from which you quoted, I wrote: "If the allegations against this group are true, they richly deserve to be raided and arrested and shut down."

Ms. Musaji, you have lied about me many times in the past, and I have let it go by. This time I am requesting a full retraction and apology from you, published in The American Muslim, for suggesting that I support the Hutaree and oppose their arrest.

In any case, the disclosure at Jihad Watch of this obvious libel by you will expose yet again the naked dishonesty of The American Muslim and the open contempt it obviously has for its readers.

Robert Spencer

I'll let you know if I get an answer. But I won't be holding my breath.

| 29 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
AbdullahMuhammadMuslim.jpg Abdullah Muhammad Muslim, the former Johnnie Clagg


No doubt Abdullah Muhammad Muslim intended to fashion pipe bombs of peace.

Columbus, Ohio -- I wonder if Abdullah Muhammad Muslim goes to the mosque whose members informed Rifqa Bary's parents that she had converted to Christianity. In any case, note that he is yet another prison convert.

"Man Faces Gun Charges After Cache Of Weapons Found," from 10TVNews.com, April 16 (thanks to D. C. Watson):

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Federal officials said on Friday that a large amount of weapons were found at the home of a man who allegedly stole the identity of someone bound to a wheelchair and suffering from cerebral palsy, and used it to try to flee the country.

Abdullah Mohammed Muslim, formerly known as Johnnie Clagg, faces felony gun charges, 10TV's Andy Hirsch reported.

Muslim, 38, allegedly stole personal information from people and tired to use it to get a passport to leave the country.

Police stopped Muslim's vehicle on the city's southwest side in October. He was wanted on charges of identity theft and trying to falsify a passport.

After being arrested, federal agents went to his home and said they found an arsenal inside, Hirsch reported.

Investigators said they found two AK 47s, a 9mm semiautomatic rifle and more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition, pipe bomb materials, a ballistic face mask and vest, and a flak jacket.

Muslim's attorney said his client traveled from Columbus to tribal areas of Pakistan and that he converted to Islam while spending time in prison.

He said his client has no ties to any terror organizations.

Federal authorities agreed, saying this was not a case of terrorism...

Of course not! It never is -- not even when a Muslim shouting "Allahu akbar" mows down thirteen Americans at Fort Hood!

| 40 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

And why is that? "Gates Says U.S. Lacks Policy to Curb Iran's Nuclear Drive," by David E. Sanger and Thom Shanker in the New York Times, April 17 (thanks to Sr. Soph):

WASHINGTON -- Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates has warned in a secret three-page memorandum to top White House officials that the United States does not have an effective long-range policy for dealing with Iran's steady progress toward nuclear capability, according to government officials familiar with the document.

Several officials said the highly classified analysis, written in January to President Obama's national security adviser, Gen. James L. Jones, came in the midst of an intensifying effort inside the Pentagon, the White House and the intelligence agencies to develop new options for Mr. Obama. They include a set of military alternatives, still under development, to be considered should diplomacy and sanctions fail to force Iran to change course.

Officials familiar with the memo's contents would describe only portions dealing with strategy and policy, and not sections that apparently dealt with secret operations against Iran, or how to deal with Persian Gulf allies.

One senior official, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the memo, described the document as "a wake-up call." But White House officials dispute that view, insisting that for 15 months they had been conducting detailed planning for many possible outcomes regarding Iran's nuclear program.

In an interview on Friday, General Jones declined to speak about the memorandum. But he said: "On Iran, we are doing what we said we were going to do. The fact that we don't announce publicly our entire strategy for the world to see doesn't mean we don't have a strategy that anticipates the full range of contingencies -- we do."

But in his memo, Mr. Gates wrote of a variety of concerns, including the absence of an effective strategy should Iran choose the course that many government and outside analysts consider likely: Iran could assemble all the major parts it needs for a nuclear weapon -- fuel, designs and detonators -- but stop just short of assembling a fully operational weapon....

| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Ignoring the jihad threat, appeasing jihadist Pakistan -- all this and more is in Obama's favor, as far as Omar Sacirbey is concerned. But he still has to do more! It's never enough! "Obama walks the talk in new Muslim outreach," by Omar Sacirbey for the Religion News Service, April 15 (thanks to Mackie):

Nearly a year after President Barack Obama's historic speech in Cairo announcing that America wanted a "new beginning" with the Muslim world, evidence of that policy shift has, in recent weeks, become hard to ignore.

The Obama administration is revising national security guidelines that strip references to "Islamic radicalism" and other terms deemed inflammatory to Muslims. Officials also reversed 3-month-old guidelines that singled out passengers on flights arriving from 13 Muslim countries, and Cuba, for mandatory screening.

Controversial scholar Tariq Ramadan entered the United States for the first time in six years after being barred by the Bush administration, and the Obama administration has dispatched American Nobel Prize winners to advise Muslims scientists, economists and other professionals on how to improve their research and better manage their institutions. At month's end, the U.S. government will play host to some 500 mainly Muslim business people for intensive seminars on entrepreneurship.

"There's a lot going on but not a lot being told," said Qamar ul-Huda, a senior officer at the Religion and Peacemaking Program at the United States Institute for Peace, an independent nonpartisan institute chartered by Congress. "Many Muslims are not aware of what's happening, and that needs to be addressed."

Many analysts say tangible benefits to U.S. foreign policy and security already are visible, such as increased U.S.-Pakistani cooperation that has resulted in the capture or killing of an unprecedented number of high-level Taliban leaders.

In June, Obama will have another chance to win over Muslims when he visits Indonesia, the Southeast Asian nation where he spent part of his childhood and which boasts the world's largest Muslim population.

Still, analysts say the long-term battle for Muslim hearts and minds is just beginning, and they caution it will take time to win over people in societies plagued by unemployment, corruption, and social malaise -- much less those who are more familiar with U.S. troops in Afghanistan than business seminars in Washington.

Obama and other administration officials stopped using terms like "Islamic extremism" shortly after taking office and are purging "Islamic radicalism" from the National Security Strategy policy document.

"It's offensive to everyday Muslims who don't like their religion tied to extremism," ul-Huda said. While not yet finalized, the new language will target terrorism groups rather than use general terms that connect terrorism to Islam....

One wonders what ul-Huda is doing to stop Muslims from tying Islam to "extremism." But I think I already know the answer to that.

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More precisely, he says he was fired because he filed a complaint with the EEOC, claiming he was being harassed for being a Muslim. In any case, lots of people have unpleasant work environments, and have to work with people who are rude or unkind or cruel to them. So what? It's a part of life -- unless you're a Muslim who can seize the opportunity to claim protected victim status and cash in in the courtroom. "Lawsuit claiming firing was retaliation is headed for trial," by Peter Krouse for The Plain Dealer, April 17 (thanks to Twostellas):

CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Rami Awad's more than three years as a branch employee of National City Bank ended badly -- and a jury is about to hear what happened.

In 2007, Awad was fired on the grounds that he improperly opened several accounts and processed a loan without the customer's authorization. But that's not the real reason he was let go, he claims. Awad, an Arabic Muslim of Palestinian descent, sued the bank and a former supervisor and the case is set for trial April 26 in federal court.

Awad, 32, contends he was fired in retaliation for a claim filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in February 2007. He also claims he was subject to a hostile work environment.

U.S. District Judge James Gwin recently dismissed several other claims by Awad of discrimination related to promotions, pay, punishment and termination, but allowed Awad's claims of retaliatory firing and a hostile work environment to proceed.

A spokesman for PNC Financial Services Inc., which bought National City in late 2008, declined to comment. The bank and co-defendant Nancy Malta have filed court documents denying Awad's allegations.

In his complaint, Awad claims that he was harassed by his fellow employees because of his religion and nationality.

In one instance, while working as a part-time teller at a branch in Boardman, the manager said to Awad in front of others, "You are probably one of the terrorists on the watch list," according to the complaint.

At the bank's McKinley branch, when Awad spoke on the phone in Arabic, a bank officer would make discriminatory comments such as "Rami is about to bomb something," the complaint states.

Awad later worked at a branch in Wexford, Pa., where his duties also included opening accounts. He claims the branch manager, Malta, told him drinking alcohol with colleagues is part of the job, and that if someone doesn't drink he should not be in banking.

Awad claims Malta knew he did not consume alcohol because of his Muslim faith.

The EEOC claim alleged that Awad was passed over for promotion because of his national origin. Awad claims that prior to his EEOC hearing, Malta threatened to have him fired....

| 13 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
persian-women.jpg Causing tremors


"We have no way but conform to Islam to ward off dangers."

This is, of course, a completely unprovable assertion. Because even if every Iranian heeded the addled and apparently sex-obsessed Ayatollah Kazem Sedighi and did his or her best to cut out the extracurricular activities and immodest dress, human nature being what it is and religious standards being what they are, there would always be more to do. Human beings are imperfect. Every religious person in every religious tradition can always examine himself and find some way he could be more observant, more religious. And so even if this crazy man were listened to, Iran would still have earthquakes -- and that would not make anyone think, Maybe Ayatollah Kazem Sedighi is nuts. Instead, they would just think, What we need now to fix this problem is even more Islam.

"Extramarital sex fuels earthquakes, warns Iran cleric," from AFP, April 17 (thanks to Sr. Soph):

A SENIOR Iranian cleric has claimed that dolled-up women incite extramarital sex, causing more earthquakes in Iran, a country that straddles several fault lines, newspapers reported today.

"Many women who dress inappropriately ... cause youths to go astray, taint their chastity and incite extramarital sex in society, which increases earthquakes," Ayatollah Kazem Sedighi told worshippers at overnight prayers in Tehran.

"Calamities are the result of people's deeds," he was quoted as saying by reformist Aftab-e Yazd newspaper.

"We have no way but conform to Islam to ward off dangers."

The Islamic dress code is mandatory in Iran, which has been under clerical rule for more than three decades.

Every post-pubescent woman regardless of her religion or nationality must cover her hair and bodily contours in public. Offenders face punishment and fine....

| 71 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
khamenei.jpg Stop it, you're killing me


Projection Alert: of course it is Iran's nuclear program that is a tool of terror and intimidation, and Iran that is deceptively calling for non-proliferation. But Khamenei here accuses his enemies of what he himself is doing -- a recurring pattern among Islamic jihadists.

"Iran calls US nukes tool of terror, intimidation," from AP, April 17 (thanks to Nelson):

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - Iran's supreme leader told a nuclear disarmament conference in Tehran on Saturday that the United States' atomic weapons are a tool of terror and intimidation.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said America deceptively calls for non-proliferation while holding on to its own weapons and failing to confront Israel, which is widely believed to have nuclear bombs....

"The deceptive policy by the sole nuclear offender, which falsely claims to be advocating the non-proliferation of nuclear arms while doing nothing substantive for this cause, will never succeed," Khamenei said.

Iran's conference brought together representatives from 60 countries, including China, Russia, Pakistan, Iraq, Turkey and France, as well as delegates from international bodies and non-governmental organizations, according to Iranian media.

The supreme leader, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and several other senior Iranian officials took turns at the podium to warn that America's nuclear policy was endangering the world and encouraging nations to consider withdrawing from the Non-Nuclear Proliferation Treaty.

If the U.S. meant what it said about stopping the spread of nuclear weapons, Israel would not have been able to "turn the occupied land of Palestine into an arsenal with huge stockpiles of nuclear weapons," Khamenei said....

"The insistence of these governments on holding and increasing the destructive powers of these weapons ... serves as a tool of collective intimidation and terror," Khamenei said of the U.S. and other nuclear-armed nations.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This Chicago Sun-Times story, after being more honest than AP by noting that Larry killed all these people because he believed he had some responsibility before Allah to do so, makes sure to include the standard disclaimer from a local Muslim group -- the kind of thing that is usually as a matter of course appended to any story about a Muslim committing violence in the name of Islam: Islam condemns, Islam forbids, Islam is peace, etc. etc. etc.

The sheer pro-forma aspect of such disclaimers, and their frequent employ, ought to give some people pause. But it doesn't. In any case, it is here once again disingenuous. James Larry murdered his family, according to this Chicago Tribune report, after complaining that his wife was not behaving according to Islamic standards, and saying that the Qur'an was telling him to kill (which it certainly does do -- see 2:191, 4:89, 9:5, 9:29, 47:4, etc.). Now, honor killing, which is also the subject of a blizzard of Islamic disclaimers whenever it appears in the news, is nonetheless relatively common in many Muslim countries, and is effectively encouraged by the fact that honor murderers often are given lighter sentences than other murderers.

Syria recently scrapped a law limiting the length of sentences for honor killings, but "the new law says a man can still benefit from extenuating circumstances in crimes of passion or honour 'provided he serves a prison term of no less than two years in the case of killing.'"

That's right: two years for murder!

In 2003 the Jordanian Parliament voted down on Islamic grounds a provision designed to stiffen penalties for honor killings. Al-Jazeera reported that "Islamists and conservatives said the laws violated religious traditions and would destroy families and values."

And a manual of Islamic law certified as a reliable guide to Sunni orthodoxy by Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, says that "retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right." However, "not subject to retaliation" is "a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring." ('Umdat al-Salik o1.1-2).

In other words, someone who kills his child incurs no legal penalty under Islamic law.

That's why these honor killings keep happening -- because they are broadly tolerated, even encouraged, by Islamic teachings and attitudes. Yet no authorities are calling Islamic leaders to account for this. But in light of all this, James Larry ought not to be dismissed as a simple madman, and the Islamic community let off with the standard "Islam condemns, Islam forbids" disclaimer. Instead, there ought to be a serious public discussion about how the texts and teachings of Islam are used by Islamic jihadists to justify violence, and how they can be and are used even by violent creepy lunatics like James Larry to justify wanton slaughter. Only then can any effective steps be taken to try to prevent future murders like these.

But nothing like that is going to be done. Even to suggest that it should be done is "Islamophobic." And so instead, more people will be murdered in the future the way James Larry's family was murdered.

"Murder suspect 'suffering greatly,' his lawyer says: Bail denied Wisconsin man accused of killing 4 in his family," by Rummana Hussain for the Chicago Sun-Times, April 17:

The Wisconsin man charged with killing four family members and seriously injuring two other relatives in a hail of bullets as they slept at his sister's Marquette Park home suffers from a "multitude" of mental health illnesses, his attorney said Friday.

James Larry, a 32-year-old Muslim convert who allegedly told authorities he was ordered by "Allah" to carry out the carnage, has been under doctors' care since 2002 and recently received psychiatric treatment in Janesville, Wis., said Julie Koehler, an assistant Cook County public defender.

Koehler said Larry was crying, his head bowed, when prosecutors detailed how he allegedly killed his pregnant wife, Twanda Thompson, 19; son, Jihad, 7 months, pregnant niece Keyshai Fields, 16, and 3-year-old Keleasha Larry, another niece.

"He is suffering greatly," Koehler said, after Judge Peggy Chiampas ordered Larry held without bond.

Larry also shot his 57-year-old mother, Leona Larry, and a nephew Demond Larry, 13, before dawn Wednesday. Both remain in critical condition, Assistant State's Attorney Jamie Santini said.

The body count could have been worse, Santini added. He said Torino Hill, a 35-year-old man living in the home's basement, was spared when James Larry's gun jammed and another niece, 12, escaped injury when she ran down the street and called police....

James Larry, who has a lengthy criminal record, admitted his role in the shooting spree, told detectives he knew his wife and 16-year-old niece were pregnant and even led police to the 9mm handgun he allegedly used in the shooting, Santini said.

"That's not the lot, turn left. It's the first vacant lot off the alley on the left," Larry directed officers, according to a police report.

James Larry also allegedly told officers he wished he "had more bullets."

"I wish I had more bullets. Kill me. I threw the gun in a vacant lot by the police station. I'll show you," James Larry said, according to the report.

A relative said that when James Larry looked to the sky and didn't see the moon or the sun before dawn Wednesday, "that meant Allah told him to take his family."

On Friday, several local Muslim leaders and organizations denounced the murders and stressed that the Islamic faith should not be associated with the tragedy.

James Larry's sister Keshai -- the mother of three victims, including the two dead girls -- joined Inner-City Muslim Action Network members and Jewish and Christian leaders later in the afternoon to show solidarity with the religious groups, IMAN's executive director Rami Nashashibi said.

For years, the Marquette Park-based IMAN has been involved in many anti-violence efforts in the neighborhood and is taking an active role in assisting the victims, Nashashibi said.

"We find this type of horrific violence absolutely incompatible with any understanding or any expression of Islam," he said.

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

From Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs:

This is a daily struggle wherever Muslims have gained a majority. In the state of West Bengal, in India bordering Bangla Desh, Muslims infiltrated over the last few decades to such an extent that today they are 30% of the population of the state. In many villages bordering Bangla Desh, infidels' (Hindus') daily life is that of fear and terror. (hat tip Satya)

Please call the officials. When they get several calls from abroad, particularly from the United States, they do respond. Mr. Siddiqui is District Magistrate and his cell is 9434770000. His office number is 8342 251650 and home number is 8342 250002.

Here is the link for the phone numbers of the City Government of Mushidabad. http://murshidabad.gov.in/phones.htm#B2

There is an eyewitness account over at Atlas Shrugs of this attack. Don't miss it.

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

LeavingIslam?.jpg


Dina el-Gowhary's father, Peter Athanasius, is a convert also. Our religious freedom bus ads in Miami, pictured above, were pulled by Miami-Dade Transit for being "offensive to Islam." CAIR's Muhammed Malik said: "Islam guarantees freedom to and freedom from religion." Will he then issue a public statement in support of Dina el-Gowhary and Peter Athanasius? Don't hold your breath -- but this case yet again shows that our ad is entirely accurate, warranted, and justified. That's why we have filed suit against Miami-Dade Transit.

By the way, Dina el-Gowhary appealed to Obama for help last year. No help, of course, was forthcoming.

"Muslim Egyptian Girl Who Converted to Christianity Subjected to Acid Attack," by Mary Abdelmassih for AINA, April 17 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

(AINA) -- Dina el-Gowhary, the 15-year-old Egyptian Muslim-born girl who converted to Christianity, was subjected to an acid attack, the latest in a string of failed attempts by Muslim fanatics against her and her father, 57-year-old Peter Athanasius (Maher el-Gowhary), who converted to Christianity 35 years ago. Several Fatwa's [sic] were issued calling for the "spilling of his blood," which makes their lives in constant danger in the face of the reactionaries and advocates for the enforcement of Islamic apostasy laws, which call for the death of a convert.

Dina said that three weeks ago as she ventured out from their hiding place in Alexandria with her father to get some bottled water, her jacket was set on fire due to acid being thrown at her. "My father quickly took my jacket off before the fire reached my arms. Ever since then I am terrorized to go out in the street, with or without my father."

Through an aired interview with Freecopts advocacy Dina addressed an open letter to President Mubarak of Egypt begging him to save her and her father and allow them to leave Egypt.

She said that she had written previously to President Obama, who got her message and responded to it (AINA 11-17-2009). It was reported that the el-Gowharys met with the US Committee on International Religious Freedom on their last visit to Egypt in January 2010, and that they have asked for asylum in the United States (Fox News video).

Dina wonders whether she will get the same attention from President Mubarak as she did from President Obama. "Will he listen and lend us a helping hand, if, as they claim, he truly does not differentiate between Muslim and Christian citizens?" She asked the Egyptian President, who newly became grandfather to a baby girl "Do you accept that your granddaughter would live under the same conditions like mine? I have no home, I am always afraid when I go to church or even go out in the street, I have no friends and no education."

In her letter to President Mubarak, Dina expressed her deep distress at the mistreatment and continuous troubles she finds everywhere she goes, including being beaten and humiliated. She tells of how "because of her love for Jesus" she left her Muslim mother and went to live with her Christian father, abandoning school where she was persecuted by teachers and students. "I was threatened many times before. Once coming back from school, a bearded young man stepped out of a car, lifted me through my clothes from the ground and warned me that if my father and myself do not go back to Islam, both of us will be killed."...

"Once coming back from school, a bearded young man stepped out of a car, lifted me through my clothes from the ground and warned me that if my father and myself do not go back to Islam, both of us will be killed."

"Islam guarantees freedom to and freedom from religion." -- Muhammed Malik

Why doesn't Muhammed Malik fly over to Cairo and set these people straight about Islam?

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Misunderstanders of Islam commit yet another honor killing -- this time of a two-day-old girl -- in modern, moderate, secular Turkey. "Two-day-old girl killed in 'honour killing,'" from Reuters, April 17 (thanks to Thomas):

Turkish police on Friday detained an unmarried mother and six other people near Istanbul for their suspected role in the so-called "honour killing" of a 2-day-old baby girl, state news agency Anatolian said.

The baby was suffocated by her grandmother after the family learned the 25-year-old mother became pregnant out of wedlock, Anatolian said.

"My family decided to kill my baby," the mother told the police, according to Anatolian. "My 55-year-old mother choked the baby with a cloth. Then, my brothers buried the baby in a hole in the garden and covered the hole with cement."...

Among those detained were also a doctor and the doctor's secretary, They allegedly had agreed not to register the baby's birth in return for an undisclosed amount of money.

The baby's father is doing his military service and was not involved in the incident.

"Honour killings," or crimes carried out against women seen to have tainted the family's name, are not uncommon in mainly Muslim Turkey, particularly in poor and rural areas.

The European Union, which Turkey has applied to join, has repeatedly urged Ankara to take a tougher stance against such crimes.

To great effect, no doubt.

| 31 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

April 17, 2010

War Is Deceit, after all, but I can't help but wonder about the implications of stories like this for the West. Multiculturalists are in a tizzy about attempts to ban the burqa in France and elsewhere, and American officials apologize profusely for asking a Muslim woman to remove her hijab (which is, of course, a far cry from a burqa) for a driver's license photo -- but what about the security hazards posed by the nature of the burqa itself? "Bombers dressed in burkas kill 41 in Pakistan: Officials were distributing food to refugees when explosions went off," from The Associated Press, April 17:

PESHAWAR, Pakistan - Two suicide bombers dressed in burqas blew themselves up Saturday in a camp for refugees fleeing military offensives in northwestern Pakistan, killing 41 people and wounding 62, officials said.

The blasts occurred at a food distribution point, but there were conflicting reports whether the victims were lining up for food or being registered. The camp is sometimes used by foreign humanitarian groups, including the World Food Program, to deliver aid.

Meanwhile, the Pakistani army admitted that civilians were killed in an airstrike last Saturday in the northwest that supposedly targeted militants. It did not say how many had died, but apologized in a rare acknowledgment of an error that could help reduce anger among local tribes, whose support it needs to defeat the Taliban and al-Qaida.

The two suicide bombers struck six minutes apart at a camp in the Kacha Pukka area of Kohat, a tribally administered region close to the Afghan border. They were dressed in burqas, the all-encompassing veil worn by conservative Muslim women in parts of Afghanistan and Pakistan, local police official Abdullah Khan said....

| 46 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

But what he is really trying to do is get his enemies to disarm. "Islam precludes use of nuclear weapons - supreme leader of Iran," from the Voice of Russia, April 17:

Iran's supreme spiritual leader Ali Khamenei has said Islam precludes the use of nuclear weapons. In his message to the participants in an international disarmament conference in Tehran he said the people of Iran are fully aware of the danger of the spread of weapons of mass destruction. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called for an independent panel to oversee nuclear disarmament. Delegates from 56 countries are attending the disarmament conference in Tehran....
| 109 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

This working with jihadists goes back twenty years, and continues. And Obama is pressuring India and favoring Pakistan. "Pak used terrorists as a tool in Kashmir: UN," from Indian Express, April 16 (thanks to Slothy):

Pakistan's powerful spy agency ISI continues to have close links with Lashkar-e-Taiba and has used the terror group's services to foment anti-India passion in Kashmir and elsewhere, a UN report said today.

"The Pakistani military organised and supported the Taliban to take control of Afghanistan in 1996. Similar tactics were used in Kashmir against India after 1989," said the much-awaited report by UN-appointed independent panel to probe the killing of former Pakistan premier Benazir Bhutto.

The three-member panel concluded that such a policy of the Pakistan military to use terrorists as a tool to achieve its strategic objectives against its neighbours resulted in active linkages between elements of the military and the Establishment with radical Islamists at the expense of national secular forces.

Noting that the jihadi organisations are Sunni groups based largely in Pakistan's Punjab, the 65-page report said that members of these groups aided the Taliban effort in Afghanistan at the behest of the ISI and later cultivated ties with Al-Qaeda and Pakistani Taliban groups.

"The Pakistani military and ISI also used and supported some of these groups in the Kashmir insurgency after 1989. The bulk of the anti-Indian activity was and still remains the work of groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba, which has close ties with the ISI," said the panel headed by Chile's UN ambassador Heraldo Munoz.

"A common characteristic of these jihadi groups was their adherence to the Deobandi Sunni sect of Islam, their strong anti-Shia bias, and their use by the Pakistani military and intelligence agencies in Afghanistan and Kashmir," the report said....

| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Disturbing in so many ways: "Dozens of children, ages three to seven years old, hope to win plastic weapons as prizes, as well as balls and other typical toys in a type of quiz show for toddlers conducted by an international terrorists."

"Somalia: Al-Qaeda video aims at child recruits," from AdnKronos International, April 16:

Mogadishu, 16 April (AKI) - Al-Qaeda recruiters are targeting children and aiming to make Somali suicide bombing a multi-generational family affair.
A new recruitment video by Al-Shabaab, the Somalia-based Al-Qaeda branch that operates in the Horn of Africa, opens with an image of a child playing with a toy gun.
He's not just any boy, but the son of the bomber who almost assassinated former Somali president Abdullah Yusuf when he blew himself up on 11 October 2007 at the parliament in the southern city of Baidoa. The attack is celebrated by Al-Shabab as part of an operation that allowed the terror group to expand in Somalia.
A message's meaning isn't easily lost when in the video an image of the toddler and deceased father are placed side-by-side while a voice in Arabic sings praises of the Baidoa attack.
"After four years since the Baidoa attack," say Al-Shabab leader Mukhtar Abu az-Zubair, "it's still possible to see the consequences. That operation laid the foundation to conquer the city. This is because our road to victory is paved with the blood of martyrs past and martyrs of the future."
"Unfortunately many children are trained by Al-Shabab, said Hasan Osman, director of Radio Shabelle, a popular radio station in Somalia's capital Mogadishu, in an interview with Adnkronos International (AKI). "Militant Islam began concentrating on recruiting children into combat when attacks became bolder and they decided to advance into the capital." [...]
Viewers of the new 28-minute recruitment video are encouraged to join the struggle with scenes of a room decorated for a party in Mogadishu, attended by children of dead jihadists and their mothers who are dressed in black.
Dozens of children, ages three to seven years old, hope to win plastic weapons as prizes, as well as balls and other typical toys in a type of quiz show for toddlers conducted by an international terrorists.
"Name the month in which you must fast?" goes one question. The questions increase in difficulty until the tiny contestants are asked to identify Abu Musab al-Zarqawi," the late founder of Al-Qaeda in Iraq, killed in 2006 in a US airstrike.
| 17 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

April 16, 2010

"CAIR: Anti-Islam Ads Pulled From Miami Buses," CAIR's press release on the dhimmis at Miami-Dade Transit pulling our religious liberty bus ads, has the unsavory Hamas-linked thugs yet again doing the sack dance over the freedom of speech, and spreading sleazy libels about Pamela Geller and me.

The South Florida chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-SFL) today announced that Miami-Dade Transit is dropping bus advertisements sponsored by an anti-Islam hate group.

Let's see. CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case -- so named by the Justice Department. CAIR operatives have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror, and that CAIR's cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Honest Ibe Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements.

Meanwhile, SIOA is dedicated to defending the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, the legal equality of all people, and the Constitutional principle of non-establishment of religion as the only secure foundation for a society in which people of good faith differ in conscience.

Which one is the hate group again?

CAIR-SFL asked that the ads, produced by the hate group Stop the Islamization of America, be dropped because they promote bigotry and may fuel discrimination against ordinary Florida Muslims.

So it does look as if Miami-Dade Transit bowed to the will of these duplicitous Hamas-linked Islamic supremacist thugs. We're suing Miami-Dade Transit for infringement of our First Amendment rights and breach of contract.

"We believe Miami-Dade Transit did the right thing in dropping this campaign of hatred and intolerance," said CAIR-SFL Executive Director Muhammed Malik. "The advertisement's reference to apostasy is merely a smoke-screen for the promotion of anti-Islam bigotry and the attempted marginalization of American Muslims."

No, CAIR's actions are merely a smokescreen for the Islamic supremacist suppression of the freedom of speech and the introduction into the U.S. of Sharia provision requiring dhimmis to refrain from speaking in unacceptable ways about Allah or Muhammad, on pain of death.

He said Stop the Islamization of America's leaders, Pam Geller and Robert Spencer, are considered by many Muslims to be among the nation's most vicious Islamophobes.

CAIR would have you believe that telling the truth about the global jihad and Islamic supremacism is "Islamophobia." I think the term Islamorealism is more accurate.

Then CAIR defames Pamela Geller, who ably answers here. Unfortunately for the gentle stomach-stapled beekeeper Honest Ibe Hooper and his merry band of liars at CAIR, on the same day that CAIR claimed that Geller was "seemingly supportive of the slain South African apartheid leader Eugene Terre'blanche," she wrote about Terreblanche at the American Thinker that he was the "leader of the noxious and hateful neo-Nazi Afrikaner Resistance Movement (AWB)." Whoops!

And so it goes. Virtually all of what CAIR says about Pamela Geller is unsupported smear, some of it taken from the by now hopelessly discredited libelblogger Charles Johnson, whom CAIR doesn't even name in this press release. This is a departure from earlier smearfests from CAIR, and shows that even Honest Ibe Hooper and his fellow libel artists know that Johnson is so thoroughly discredited that to name him as the source of the "fascist" smears would be to show them to be hollow on their face.

Then CAIR turns to me:

Robert Spencer has also been criticized for the extremism exhibited on his personal anti-Muslim web site "Jihad Watch," which recently compared Muslims to Nazis. Jihad Watch Board Vice President Hugh Fitzgerald wrote: "When I see thousands of people in a mosque, I am put in mind not of a gathering at St. Peter's, but rather, of a Nuremberg Rally, a horizontal collective affair, rather than vertical, with the prostration itself performing, or signifying, blind obedience of the kind that, at the real Nuremberg, is signified by the heil-hitlering salute of thousands, yelling in unison, and saluting, and re-saluting." [Spencer refused to repudiate those statements.]

Why should I?

...One then right-wing critic wrote of Spencer's blog: "His website has descended into a true hate site at this point, dominated by extreme, bigoted commenters who regularly advocate genocide and mass murder of Muslims." [That writer has since broken with the far-right, in part because of pervasive anti-Islam bigotry its proponents often exhibit.]

That is all, of course, referring to the execrable libelblogger Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs, who today has won a new distinction: he is now the tool so debased, so universally distrusted and despised that even Hamas-linked CAIR won't name him.

In 2007, Spencer spoke at a so-called "Counterjihad Brussels" conference in Belgium attended by those with links to far-right parties such as Filip Dewinter of Vlaams Belang (Belgium) and Ted Ekeroth of Sverigedemokraterna (Sweden). Both parties have been accused of either having a racist platform, a neo-Nazi past or having links to neo-Nazis and other racists.

They have been "accused." An accusation is not the same thing as a fact. The libelblogger Johnson has spread a great deal of second-hand misinformation and disinformation about these groups, but in any case the fundamental question is this: the Counterjihad Summit featured speakers such as Israeli Knesset member Aryeh Eldad; the great historian Bat Ye'or; the great scholar of jihad Patrick Sookhdeo and others. There was nothing remotely racist or neo-Nazi about it. Even if these parties are all that Johnson claims they are (and given his record of lies and distortions I'm more inclined to believe that the opposite of anything he says is true), that in no way obliges me to answer for them or makes me responsible for them in any way. I've spoken at a lot of events, with a lot of other speakers, and I am no more responsible for the totality of their views as they are for mine. I once spoke at the same event as Hillary Clinton; does that make her an "Islamophobe"?

"The bus ads are part of a growing 'Islamophobia machine' nationwide that must be challenged by Americans of all faiths," said CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad.

This one really made me laugh. CAIR is a well-heeled money machine with funding from the Saudis. Pamela Geller and I are two American citizens with no major donors, no rich backers -- nothing but the truth on our side. And that's why CAIR is so afraid of us.

He noted that CAIR has long held that religious decisions should be matters of personal choice, not a cause for state intervention. According to CAIR's position statement on Islam and apostasy: "Faith imposed by force is not true belief, but coercion. Islam has no need to compel belief in its divine truth."

Great. Then CAIR should support our campaign, which is by no means dead. Nihad Awad and Honest Ibe Hooper can donate to our religious liberty bus ad campaign by clicking on the Contribute to Jihad Watch link on the upper right-hand sidebar.

| 66 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

After Miami Herald reporter Jaweed Kaleem incorrectly identified me rather than Pamela Geller as the head of SIOA in the original version of this article, I corrected the record here. Kaleem was kind enough to send me this note this morning:

Robert: my mistake in incorrectly identifying you in the article. I'll get that fixed online. FYI the decision to remove the ads was a last-minute one; I did not know of it when I interviewed you via email.

I responded with this:

Thanks. I appreciate the correction. Why didn't you mention CAIR's unindicted co-conspirator status, links to Hamas, and terror convictions of its officials in your article? Why didn't you mention the many apostates from Islam who have been murdered or threatened with death around the world in recent years, or the fact that all the sects of Islam and schools of Islamic jurisprudence teach that apostates from Islam should be killed? I would be happy to supply you with data on these or other matters for a follow-up article. Let me know -- I'd be happy to help.

And Jaweed Kaleem answered:

The answer to most of your questions is that my articles usually have a local focus. I have written about the South Florida chapter of CAIR for a few years now and have never seen or heard them advocate terrorism. I don't write about the national CAIR organization. Re: the apostasy issue, I have heard of many of these incidents in abroad, but have heard of few in the U.S. and none in South Florida. Sure, I'll take a look at your data. If you can provide me with a former Muslim in South Florida who has been threatened for leaving the religion and who would have appreciated the help of the ad, I can look into a follow-up interview.

Well, unfortunately, in South Florida Muslims read the same Qur'an and follow the same Sharia that other Muslims read and follow in other parts of the world. They may not, for any number of reasons, live it out in the same way, but there is no South Florida Islam that is distinguished from Islam in other parts of the world by any significant doctrinal difference. Nor is there any coherent reason to believe that CAIR-South Florida differs in any substantial way from CAIR national. Accordingly, the information I provide here for Jaweed Kaleem is not restricted to South Florida -- but it holds true there as well. And I decided to do this publicly rather than in a further email, since the information here may be useful to others besides Jaweed Kaleem.

First, re CAIR: CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case -- so named by the Justice Department. CAIR operatives have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror, and that CAIR's cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Honest Ibe Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements.

And regarding apostasy, Kaleem quotes CAIR's Muhammad Malik saying this: "Islam guarantees freedom to and freedom from religion....[We] reject as un-Islamic any extremist interpretation that sanctions the killing of any individual because she decided to 'leave Islam.'"

So evidently Muhammad Malik and CAIR reject as "un-Islamic" these words of Muhammad, the prophet of Islam and supreme example of conduct for the Muslim (cf. Qur'an 33:21): "Whoever changes his Islamic religion, then kill him." (Bukhari 9.84.57)

Evidently Muhammad Malik and CAIR reject as "un-Islamic" the Tafsir al-Qurtubi, a classic and thoroughly mainstream exegesis of the Qur'an. About Qur'an 2:217, Qurtubi says this: "Scholars disagree about whether or not apostates are asked to repent. One group say that they are asked to repent and, if they do not, they are killed. Some say they are given an hour and others a month. Others say that they are asked to repent three times, and that is the view of Malik. Al-Hasan said they are asked a hundred times. It is also said that they are killed without being asked to repent."

Evidently Muhammad Malik and CAIR reject as "un-Islamic" the teachings of all the schools of Islamic jurisprudence, since they all teach that a sane adult male who leaves Islam must be killed. They have some disagreements about what must he done with other types of people who leave Islam, but they have no disagreement on that.

Evidently Muhammad Malik and CAIR reject as "un-Islamic" the internationally renowned Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who has been praised as a "reformist" by pseudo-academic John Esposito and who has said this about Islamic apostasy law: "That is why the Muslim jurists are unanimous that apostates must be punished, yet they differ as to determining the kind of punishment to be inflicted upon them. The majority of them, including the four main schools of jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi`i, and Hanbali) as well as the other four schools of jurisprudence (the four Shiite schools of Az-Zaidiyyah, Al-Ithna-`ashriyyah, Al-Ja`fariyyah, and Az-Zaheriyyah) agree that apostates must be executed."

Meanwhile, although it's just dandy that "Islam guarantees freedom to and freedom from religion," Muslims all over the world seem to misunderstand Islam on this point. There are many killings of apostates and threats to their lives that take place frequently in the Islamic world.

Click on every word -- each one is a story about an apostate being murdered or threatened with death. Now, isn't that odd? Why did all these Muslims misunderstand Islam's protection of religious freedom? Why are so many Muslims misunderstanding Islam in just the same way?

But none of this was fit to print in the Miami Herald. I think it almost certain that Jaweed Kaleem didn't even ask Muhammad Malik any hard questions. Maybe he will get another chance as our lawsuit runs its course.

| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Pamela Geller put the contrast clearly and vividly:

Miami-Dade Transit says NO!
Offensive to Muslims:
Bus ads edit 210

Miami-Dade Transit says YES!
Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Muhammad as Muslim prophets -- not offensive to Jews and Christians:

Islam bus ad

I am very pleased to announce that Pamela Geller and I are filing suit against Miami-Dade Transit for dropping our "Leaving Islam" religious liberty bus ad campaign because they deemed it possibly "offensive to Islam." We are suing for breach of contract and violation of our First Amendment rights.

We are deeply grateful that David Yerushalmi, P.C., an expert in Sharia, and The Thomas More Law center are taking this case on a pro bono basis. But there are many costs involved -- and so please donate to the legal fund. Any funds we can raise to offset David Yerushalmi's costs will allow him to take on more cases like these -- and nothing is more certain than that there will be more.

You can make a tax-deductible contribution to:

Society of Americans for National Existence (or just SANE)
P.O.B. 6358
Chandler, AZ 85246

Re: FDI Legal Defense Fund

Or contribute online by hitting the "Contribute to Jihad Watch" Paypal link on the upper right side of the Jihad Watch front page.

Here is SANE's IRS letter: Download 501c3IRSAcceptanceLtr

Pamela Geller has a great deal of background on this case -- including the facts on how Miami-Dade allowed the dawah bus ad but disallowed our religious freedom ad -- here.

Join us in this fight for the freedom of speech -- before it's too late.

| 46 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us
LeavingIslam?.jpg The ad in question


I just had this exchange with a Jihad Watch reader regarding the pulling of SIOA's religious liberty bus ads after they ran only three days, and I thought it worth sharing with you:

1. Jihad Watch reader to Spencer:

Its a shame things are so 1 sided. I wonder if Mrs. Geller toned it down to a level where Cair wouldnt be able to make an intollerance complaint but could still get the message out if this could be successful.

2. Spencer to Jihad Watch reader:

You're whistling in the dark. Everyone tones down what they say in order to placate the Muslims. Ultimately that is the road to Sharia and dhimmitude. What is offensive about our ad? What is wrong with its tone? Apostates are threatened and killed all over the world. We offered them help. What would you suggest we tone down? What would you suggest we not say in order to please them? Why must we always play this game, instead of speaking the truth without fear? There is nothing objectively wrong or offensive about our ad. You're falling into their trap, allowing them to define what is offensive and what isn't. I refuse to do so.

And even if our ad were offensive to someone, so what? I am offended by all sorts of things. I wouldn't dream of trying to get them suppressed because they offend me, and no one would take me seriously if I did. But Muslims are already a de facto privileged class, even in America -- if I'm offended, no one gives two hoots and no one should, but if Muslims are offended, watch out! Heaven and earth will move!

The group that is allowed to suppress speech with which it disagrees, or which it finds offensive, is a group that can suppress dissent and carry out its will unchallenged. That is the road to tyranny.

Don't stand for Miami-Dade Transit submitting to Sharia and Islamic supremacist intimidation. Let Miami-Dade Transit know: write courteously but pointedly to Karla Damian, kdamian@miamidade.gov.

| 62 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Don't these Yemeni persecutors know that Muslims revere the "People of the Book"? "Persecuted Yemeni Jews to be given sanctuary in Britain: Al-Qa'ida-inspired attacks prompt UK to offer refugee status to those with British links," by Jerome Taylor for The Independent, April 14 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Britain is on the verge of signing a secret deal to allow a small number of Yemeni Jews facing severe persecution in their home country to move to the UK, The Independent has learnt.

The tentative agreement is the product of months of painstaking negotiations between the Foreign Office and the Yemeni authorities, who have struggled to contain rising anti-Jewish sentiment as they battle a sectarian insurgency in the north and growing al-Qa'ida-inspired militancy.

An estimated 20 or 30 families living in the northern town of Raida already have relatives living in the UK. They have been desperately trying to seek sanctuary here amid rising hate attacks, murders and forced conversions by the hostile Shia al-Houthi tribe, which dominates Yemen's mountainous border with Saudi Arabia.

Assaults against the country's small Jewish community intensified to such a level last year that the US State Department organised a series of airlifts to evacuate more than 100 Jews with connections to the Yemeni community already living in America.

Until now, Britain has always refused to offer a similar blanket refugee status to those with British relatives. Many Yemeni families in the UK have subsequently complained that their relatives' visa requests had been regularly turned down or held up. But under the terms of the new negotiations, Raida Jews with British connections will be invited to apply for a three-month visitor visa to see their relatives in Britain. There is still a group of 70 Jews living in the capital Sana'a under government protection, but they are not included in the negotiations with Britain....

| 27 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Democracy on the march. Sunni/Shi'ite Jihad Update: "Officials say Iraqi forces foil 9/11-style plot," by Qassim Abdul-zahra and Lara Jakes for Associated Press, April 14 (thanks to all who sent this in):

BAGHDAD - Iraqi security forces disrupted a 9/11-style plot by al-Qaida in Iraq to fly hijacked planes into Shiite religious shrines, Iraqi and U.S. officials said Wednesday.

Iraqi security officials said they temporarily shut down at least two airports and have arrested two men -- one of the intended pilots and an airport worker -- suspected in the plot, which appeared aimed at undermining the country's stability while U.S. troops prepare to go home....

Airports in Baghdad and Najaf were shuttered last week as intelligence officials said they learned of the plot. The airport in Najaf remains closed because of its proximity to the gold-domed Imam Ali shrine, one of the most revered Shiite religious mosques in the world, one of the officials said....

Two senior Iraqi officials said al-Qaida planned to hijack flights as they were leaving Iraqi airports, prompting Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to order tighter screening -- including searches of security forces and background checks of pilots and airline crews.

Passengers and airport workers also will undergo more rigorous searches, and VIP lanes that let officials breeze through lines will be discontinued, one of the Iraqi officials said....

What???? It's...it's profiling! It's hate! Honest Ibe Hooper, call your office! This is a clear case of racism, bigotry, and the targeting of innocent Muslims by Islamophobic law enforcement officials!

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

According to Islamic law, dhimmis -- primarily Jews and Christians under the "protection" of the Islamic state -- are "forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays" ('Umdat al-Salik, o11.5(6)).

in this case, no actual dhimmis or churches are involved. The bells just remind the Islamic supremacists of churches, and so they have to be silenced.

"Bells toll no more for schools in Somali town," from Reuters, April 15 (thanks to Alexandre):

MOGADISHU (Reuters) - Somalia's al Shabaab militants have ordered schools in Jowhar town to stop using bells to signal the end of classes because they sound like those of Christian churches, teachers said on Thursday.

Al Qaeda-linked al Shabaab is Somalia's most powerful insurgent group and controls large parts of the south and the capital Mogadishu. It is battling the western-backed government for control of the Horn of Africa nation.

Teachers and a school headmaster in Shabaab-controlled Jowhar town, some 90 km (56 miles) north of Mogadishu, said an al Shabaab member had ordered schools to silence their bells because the sound was too similar to those in Christian churches.

"We were called by Sheikh Farah, the head of Al Shabaab's education, and he told us that we can't use bell sounds from now on. He said any school heard using bell sounds after now will be brought to Islamic justice," a school teacher in Jowhar told Reuters by telephone.

A local headmaster confirmed the report and added that al Shabaab had informed his school that it would begin explaining to students the significance of Islamic Jihad.

Now here is yet another opportunity for CAIR's gentle stomach-stapled beekeeper, Honest Ibe Hooper, and Brave Ahmed Rehab and all the rest. They could send a CAIR team over to Somalia to teach the Misunderstanders of Islam of al-Shabaab the true, peaceful significance of Islamic Jihad. How about it, Honest Ibe? Brave Ahmed? What better way to demonstrate your moderate bona fides, eh?

Al Shabaab runs administrations in the areas it controls using a harsh version of sharia law, cutting off hands of thieves, making sure women wear veils and banning what it calls social vices, like music and TV sports....

That "harsh" version of Sharia is rooted in Qur'anic literalism -- for example, the amputation of thieves' hands is commanded in Qur'an 5:38.

| 15 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us


Now is the time for your tears

At least he is being deported. An update on this story. "Wrist slap for Zazi's 'tip' imam: 4 days in bomb case," by Janon Fisher for the New York Post, April 16:

The Queens imam who lied to the FBI about tipping off subway suicide-bomb plotters was given a wrist slap yesterday by a Brooklyn federal judge who sentenced him to the four days he's already served in jail.

Ahmad Wais Afzali, 38, had been facing six months in the clink after pleading guilty to lying to authorities about telling convicted suicide subway bomb plotter Najibullah Zazi that federal agents were following him.

But despite his break, he will have to leave the country in 90 days or be deported to his native Afghanistan under the plea agreement.

Zazi, who is also from Afghanistan and who the feds say had three co-conspirators, planned to murder hundreds of New Yorkers by detonating homemade backpack bombs in the Manhattan subways during rush hour.

Afzali, who worked as an informant for the NYPD, told Zazi that his phones were tapped, but warned him not to get involved in "nonsense" in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The al Qaeda-trained bomb plotter aborted his plan, threw away his bomb material and fled the city after Afzali spilled the news that the law was onto him....

Under the plea negotiations with the feds, Afzali will have to leave the United States and never return. The imam, who also runs a successful funeral parlor in Queens, will have to leave behind his wife, elderly parents and his children.

"I'm going to go back to my house, visit my family and friends, give them a big hug and start planning for my long journey ahead," he told reporters outside the courthouse.

Afzali said he does not expect to return to Afghanistan, which he left as a child.

"I'm going to start shopping around [for a place to live]. I'm sure some good country will host me. That shouldn't be a problem," he said.

Why? What's wrong with Afghanistan? It's essentially a Sharia state, where the "best of people" (Qur'an 3:110) rule. What's the problem?

| 10 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

But of course he will not identify who exactly they are, what they're extreme in, or why they are fighting. "Home-grown, solo terrorists as bad as Al-Qaeda: FBI chief," from AFP, April 15:

Al-Qaeda still aims to strike inside the United States but home-grown or unaffiliated extremists now "pose an equally serious threat," FBI chief Robert Mueller warned US lawmakers Thursday.

Home-grown by whom? Unaffiliated with what? Extreme in what?

"Al Qaeda and its affiliates are still committed to striking us in the United States," Mueller told a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee, pointing to plots to bomb New York City subways and the failed Christmas airline attack.

"Home-grown and lone-wolf extremists pose an equally serious threat," the Federal Bureau of Investigation director said, citing the shootings at the sprawling Fort Hood army base in Texas.

Experts have warned that a "lone wolf" -- an extremist acting alone, without connections to an established network like Al-Qaeda -- may be the most difficult threat for authorities to thwart....

And that is partly because Mueller and other authorities refuse to name who they are or investigate what motivates them, which is an essential step toward figuring out how they can be stopped.

| 18 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

April 15, 2010

LeavingIslam?.jpg Haram


Submission. The Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations can run bus ads all over the country calling Abraham, Moses and Jesus Muslim prophets, an assertion offensive to any Jew or Christian, but a human rights group cannot run bus ads defending religious liberty. Some groups that are "offended" get contempt and mockery if they express their feelings of offense. Others get immediate results, perhaps due to the thuggish nature of their coreligionists.

Dhimmitude on the bus, an update on this story: "Miami-Dade Transit says it will remove `offensive' bus ads," by Jaweed Kaleem for the Miami Herald, April 16:

Miami-Dade Transit is pulling advertisements from 10 buses that South Florida Muslims have said are offensive to Islam.

The ads, which went up Tuesday, said ``Fatwa on your head? Is your community or family threatening you?'' and directed Muslims to a website to encouraging them to leave Islam.

Robert Spencer, who heads New York-based Stop the Islamization of America, which purchased the ads for one-month as the first leg of a national campaign, said they were ``offered in defense of religious liberty.''

Jaweed Kaleem, who contacted me for this story a couple of days ago, makes some false assumptions here. I do not head SIOA. Pamela Geller does. She is the Executive Director. I am the Associate Director. And these bus ads in defense of human rights and religious freedom were entirely her brainchild. She deserves full credit for a noble initiative in a cowardly age.

But on Thursday, Miami-Dade Transit spokeswoman Karla Damian said that after reviewing the ads, the department decided they ``may be offensive to Islam'' and would remove them before the buses ran on Friday.

Since when is being "offensive to Islam" grounds for removal of any public statement? Are we living in a Sharia state already?

Damian said the ads were able to initially go up because Miami-Dade Transit has an outside company sell ad space and does not routinely review ads before they run.

The South Florida chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations had critiqued the ads as promoting ``bigotry'' and making false statements about Islam.

``Islam guarantees freedom to and freedom from religion. . . . [We] reject as un-Islamic any extremist interpretation that sanctions the killing of any individual because she decided to `leave Islam,'' said director Muhammed Malik.

Muhammad Malik, as might be expected from the representative of an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas funding case that has had several of its officials convicted of terror activities, is lying. Apostates from Islam are threatened with death or murdered all over the world. We have carried stories here of apostates being threatened or killed in Pakistan, Egypt, Somalia, Iran, and elsewhere. There is nothing false or offensive about telling the truth about this. But telling the truth is becoming increasingly difficult, and rare.

Pamela Geller's comments on this act of cowardice are here.

Don't stand for Miami-Dade Transit submitting to Sharia and Islamic supremacist intimidation. Let Miami-Dade Transit know: write courteously but pointedly to Karla Damian, kdamian@miamidade.gov.

| 73 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

"The faithful are terrified. These terrorist acts seek to make life difficult for Christians and drive them out of Basilan."

"ASIA/PHILIPPINES - Bishop of Basilan issues appeal through Fides, says Cathedral is destroyed, people are terrified; asks for help from Universal Church," from Agenzia Fides, April 14 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

Isabela (Agenzia Fides) - "It is terrible. The bomb that exploded yesterday destroyed 70% of the Cathedral of Isabela and is now unsafe for use. Thank God, there were no casualties. Today we celebrated Mass at the Catechetical Center. The faithful are terrified. These terrorist acts seek to make life difficult for Christians and drive them out of Basilan." This is the dramatic testimony Fides has received from Bishop Martin Jumoad of the Prelature of Isabella, the capital of Basilan Island, in the southernmost part of the Philippines.

Yesterday, there were two terrorist attacks on the island: a bomb hit a government building and another hit the Catholic Cathedral in the city, leaving it severely damaged. Later, there were shots exchanged between terrorists and security forces, resulting in about 15 victims.

"It is the first time we are attacked so directly and with such force. In the past, I received several threatening letters and intimidation. There have been other smaller attacks, but now it is very different. This could be a tragedy. I seriously fear for my life and the lives of the faithful. However, today I went out to encourage the faithful. This is my mission," the Bishop told Fides.

"I have prepared a pastoral letter calling on Catholics to stay in Basilan, which is our home, and asking them to remain calm, not to react to violence, and to pray for peace. Today, a procession of people carrying candles as a sign of peace lit the city. Our hope must not die," he added, recalling that the population in Basilan is over 60%, compared to 40% Christian.

The bishop met with the civil authorities, "receiving support and solidarity." "One of the main problems - he said, telling Fides about the talks - is the proliferation of weapons in society. Throughout the southern Philippines, authorities are committed to fighting against this. Furthermore, they have assured us that the police will do their duty in tracking down the leaders, in combating terrorism, and in providing security to the people."...

The events that occurred yesterday, according to local sources of Fides, are signs of the "resurgence of terrorism in which several elements come together: the intention to sow instability on the eve of national elections (May 2010), intimidation towards Christians, and a feud between militias and Philippine Marines, present for years in the Southern Philippines."...

| 19 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

What's that? The "gunman" was a Muslim? He said something about the Qur'an? Surely not! None of that is in the AP story, which is an object lesson in journalistic bias and obfuscation: "Source: Chicago gunman heard voices to kill family," by Don Babwin for Associated Press, April 14 (thanks to Paul):

CHICAGO - A person close to the investigation of a shooting in Chicago that left a woman and three children dead says the gunman told police that he committed the crime after hearing voices telling him to kill his family.

Compare that to the Chicago Tribune story I discussed here. It says that "the man had converted to Islam several years ago while serving time in prison and had a dispute with his wife -- one of the victims -- because she would not adhere to his faith. He told police that he needed to take his family back to Allah and out of this world of sinners, a source said....The wife's sister, Shirina Thompson, said the suspect had been talking about "going to Allah." Both Thompson and a neighbor in Wisconsin said the man had fought with his wife in recent days because she refused to wear Muslim garb....Letisha Larry, one of the suspect's sisters, said her brother had been acting strange, carrying around the Quran and telling family members that something in the book told him to kill someone."

But AP has none of that. He was just "hearing voices."

This is one of the reasons why we always post at Jihad Watch the names of the reporters who write the stories. These whole process of news gathering and news reporting needs to be demystified, even in this Internet age, and news reports recognized not as objective, dispassionate accounts, but as the work of human beings with agendas. While it is possible that Kristen Schorsch, Annie Sweeney and Cynthia Dizikes of the Tribune are simply better, more thorough reporters than Don Babwin of AP, it is more likely that Babwin had access to exactly the same information that showed up in the Tribune report, but chose not to go with it.

He probably thought it would be "Islamophobic" to do so, or that to do so would fuel one of those fabled but nonexistent "backlashes" against innocent Muslims. So he probably decided it was better to cover up key facts about this incident. And the thing is, Don Babwin is no worse a journalist than thousands of others working today. He was just doing what they all do, in large and small ways, every day.

To expose them as they do this, and to inform you about what is really going on, is one of the main reasons why Jihad Watch exists.

| 27 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Jihad imam in Queens, a Misunderstander of Islam, to be deported. "'Terror' imam avoids prison time in subway bomb plot, faces deportation," by Janon Fisher for the New York Post, April 15 (thanks to all who sent this in):

An imam from Afghanistan inked to the suspects in a failed suicide bomb plot against the city's subway system dodged prison time today, but was ordered to leave the country within 90 days.

Ahmad Afzali, 38, who had pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI earlier this year, was sentenced this afternoon to time served -- a total of four days four days [sic] from Sept. 20 to Sept. 24 -- at his sentencing in Brooklyn federal court.

"The spiritual and psychological burden is far greater than any sentence you can impose," he told the judge.

"Honest to God, it was never my intention to help those idiots for what they do in the name of Islam. I apologize ... I am pleading for mercy. I am not a bad man."

Afzali, who was also ordered to wear a monitoring device, will have to leave the US within 90 days or face deportation.

Afzali was arrested in September after the feds thwarted a diabolical plot by Najibullah Zazi, a Colorado airport van driver, to set off bombs in the city's subways.

Afzali has said that he had wanted to help authorities, but lied to the FBI about his phone conversations with Zazi....

Prosecutors have said the attacks were modeled after the July 2005 London bus and train bombings that killed 52 people.

| 25 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Once again, American custom and practice must give way to Islamic custom and practice. In Muslim countries, non-Muslims must adapt to Muslim customs. In non-Muslim countries, non-Muslims must adapt to Muslim customs. Get the picture? "DMV apologizes for Muslim headscarf photo flap," by Mike Chalmers for The News Journal, April 13 (thanks to Creeping Sharia):

The Delaware Division of Motor Vehicles has apologized to a 16-year-old Arab-American who was told to remove her Islamic headscarf before the agency would take her driver's license picture.

Muslim women are allowed to wear the scarves, known as hijab, in their driver's license pictures as long as they do not cover their faces, said DMV Director Jennifer Cohan.

"We called her and apologized profusely," Cohan said. "This could have been handled with a little more sensitivity on our part."

During the incident, which happened last Wednesday at the DMV office just outside Georgetown, another customer made a derogatory comment to the girl, she said. The DMV eventually allowed the girl to keep her hijab during her picture, but she is visibly upset in the photograph, Cohan said.

The agency has offered to retake the picture.

The Pennsylvania chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations praised the DMV for its "prompt and appropriate action" of apologizing to the teenager and offering to retake the picture.

| 39 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

He had fought with his wife because she would not become a Muslim and wear Muslim garb. "Suspect held in slayings of wife, baby son, two young nieces: 2 other family members are hospitalized, one on life support," by Kristen Schorsch, Annie Sweeney and Cynthia Dizikes for the Chicago Tribune, April 14 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Amid the sudden crackle of gunfire, a 12-year-old girl ran from a Marquette Park bungalow and fled along South Mozart Street. A gunman -- a relative -- took a shot at her and missed. Soon, she burst through the door of a nearby gas station, dressed only in pajamas, begging an attendant to call her mom.

When Keshia Larry answered the phone early Wednesday morning, she heard her daughter speak these panicked words: "He killed everyone."

Police would later enter the bungalow and find a scene one commander described as "incomprehensible." Four people -- an adult and three children, all related -- were dead. The adult and the oldest child were pregnant. Two other family members were hospitalized, one on life support.

Police had soon apprehended a suspect, a Wisconsin man with a lengthy criminal record who was related to all those killed. Sources involved with the investigation said the man had converted to Islam several years ago while serving time in prison and had a dispute with his wife -- one of the victims -- because she would not adhere to his faith.

He told police that he needed to take his family back to Allah and out of this world of sinners, a source said. A police report quoted him as saying, "I wish I had more bullets. I wish I had more bullets."...

Family members said the suspect had been acting strangely. The wife's sister, Shirina Thompson, said the suspect had been talking about "going to Allah." Both Thompson and a neighbor in Wisconsin said the man had fought with his wife in recent days because she refused to wear Muslim garb.

The children killed were Jihad, the 7-month-old son of the gunman; his 3-year-old niece, Keleasha Larry; and his 16-year-old niece, Keyshai Fields, who friends said was four months pregnant. The nieces, both daughters of Keshia Larry, were found shot to death in the same bed.

The suspect's wife was 19-year-old Twanda Thompson. Family members said the couple were married just weeks ago and that Thompson was expecting their second child. She and Jihad were found in bed in a separate bedroom with gunshot wounds in their heads, police said....

Letisha Larry, one of the suspect's sisters, said her brother had been acting strange, carrying around the Quran and telling family members that something in the book told him to kill someone....

| 85 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In FrontPage this morning I discuss the new policy on Islamic terrorism, same as the old policy on Islamic terrorism:

Barack Obama has removed all mention of Islam from the National Security Strategy document, which during the Bush Administration said: "The struggle against militant Islamic radicalism is the great ideological conflict of the early years of the 21st century." Obama apparently agrees with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who said Monday: "Islam and terrorism cannot be mentioned together, because they are contradictory to each other."

Erdogan, incidentally, also famously said this about "moderate Islam": "These descriptions are very ugly, it is offensive and an insult to our religion. There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that's it." And that statement itself demonstrates one of the key fallacies of the Obama Administration's stance that Islam has nothing to do with, uh, Islamic terrorism.

Now that the idea that Islam and terrorism have anything to do with one another has been relegated to the dustbin of history, it's worth asking why anyone got this idea in the first place. Was it sheer bigotry? Racism? Let's see. Could it have been from Osama bin Laden, who once praised Allah for the Qur'an's "Verse of the Sword" (9:5), which instructs Muslims to "slay the unbelievers wherever you find them"? Or maybe it was from Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini, who once thundered: "Islam says: Kill in the service of Allah those who may want to kill you!...There are hundreds of other [Koranic] psalms and hadiths [sayings of the prophet] urging Muslims to value war and to fight. Does all that mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war? I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim."

Maybe it was from the British Muslim Omar Brooks, who said in 2005 that it was imperative for Muslims to "instill terror into the hearts of the kuffar" and added: "I am a terrorist. As a Muslim of course I am a terrorist." Or maybe it was from the Qur'an itself, which tells Muslims to "strike terror into the hearts of the enemies of Allah" (8:60). Maybe it was from the perpetrators of the 15,000-plus terror attacks committed in the name of Islam since 9/11.

But a recent conference of Islamic scholars in Mardin, Turkey, has given apparent intellectual heft to the Obama/Erdogan contention. Discussing a fourteenth-century fatwa by the Islamic scholar Ibn Taymiyya, a favorite of contemporary Islamic jihadists, the scholars declared: "anyone who seeks support from this fatwa for killing Muslims or non-Muslims has erred in his interpretation and has misapplied the revealed texts."

That sounds great. It is unequivocal. But what it is unequivocal about is the use of Ibn Taymiyya's fatwa to justify killing Muslims or non-Muslims. It unequivocally declares that illegitimate. It does not declare illegitimate the killing of Muslims or non-Muslims itself.

I am not saying that these scholars did not mean to condemn the killing of Muslims and non-Muslims in the name of Islam. Maybe they did. But they did not do so by condemning the use of Ibn Taymiyya's fatwa, for there are plenty of other Islamic sources that justify the killing of unbelievers.

Read it all.

| 28 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The European Union and "Beautiful" Minarets
by Fjordman

Inspired by Bat Ye'or's groundbreaking work Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis, I wrote my own book Defeating Eurabia in 2008. My conclusion back then, which still stands today, was that the European Union constitutes a threat to the entire European continent and needs to be dismantled:

"The EU has accepted that the Union should be enlarged to include the Muslim Middle East and North Africa. The EU has accepted that tens of millions of immigrants from predominantly Muslim countries in northern Africa should be allowed to settle in Europe in the years ahead. This is supposedly 'good for the economy.' It is planning to implement sharia laws for the millions of Muslims it is inviting to settle in Europe. It has passed stronger anti-racism laws while making it clear that 'Islamophobia' constitutes a form of racism, and is cooperating with Islamic countries on rewriting school textbooks to provide a 'positive' image of Islam to European children. Finally, the EU is developing an Arrest Warrant which stipulates that those charged with serious crimes, for instance racism, can be arrested without undue interference of the nation state they happen to live in. In essence, the EU is formally surrendering an entire continent to Islam while destroying established national cultures, and is prepared to harass those who disagree with this policy. This constitutes the greatest organized betrayal in Western history, yet is hailed as a victory for 'tolerance.'"

Those who still believe that Eurabia is a merely "conspiracy theory" should take a closer look at how European authorities handled the Swiss ban on the building of minarets, which constitute a visible symbol of Islamic supremacy. For example, the Ottoman Turks used the minaret as one of the elements to visually appropriate conquered Byzantine churches and convert them to mosques. The ancient Bulgarian town of Nessebar was a part of the First and Second Bulgarian Empires from the seventh to the fourteenth century AD and saw the creation of numerous medieval churches. Yet like the rest of the Balkans it experienced centuries of steep cultural and economic decline following the Turkish Muslim conquests.

| 34 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Some years ago those in the Province of Quebec, wanting to in part allay the fears that many in Quebec (and not only members of the Parti Québecois) had about the survival of French in an Anglophone sea, and wanting to ensure more immigrants who spoke French and would continue to speak it, decided to favor French-speakers in its immigration policy. It had been noticed, for example, that immigrants from Greece and Italy tended to want to have their children enrolled in English-language schools. They showed a dangerous preference for choosing English-language schools for their children, possibly for economic reasons (English as the "international language of business" etc.), and therefore they were deemed dangerous to French Canadians, to the Parti Québecois, and to all those who, understandably, wished to preserve French in the only Canadian province where it still prevailed.

The policy adopted was to favor those from "Francophone" countries. The definition of Francophone countries obviously gave pride of place to France, but also included all those places that had once been French colonies. In the Western hemisphere that meant the Antilles (Guadeloupe, Martinique), French Guiana, and Haiti. In Africa it meant Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, and many countries in sub-Saharan Africa - Gabon, Togo, Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo (or is it the People's Republic of Congo? I forget which) -- in short, all of the states hacked out of what was formerly French West Africa and French Equatorial Africa.

Language trumped all other considerations. But in the end, what happened is not that Montreal was flooded with French people who had decided to seek their fortune in the New World, but by French people who were unhappy with France. And the main reason French people right now are unhappy with France is the Muslim population, and how it has changed French well-being, French schools and the elaborate system of preparations and competitions needed to get into them at all levels, French employment practices, French everything.

And not too many people had the money, even, to show up from far-away Gabon or the Democratic Republic of Congo, or Chad.

So who did show up? It was maghrébins, in the main, from Morocco, from Tunisia, from Algeria, but also people from Lebanon and Syria. Now those from Lebanon, which had once been part of a French mandate, consisted of both Muslims and non-Muslims, chiefly Maronites. The Maronites leave Lebanon for North America for the same reason that some - not many as yet, but some - French leave France: they leave because of what resurgent Islam, and the burgeoning Muslim presence, has done to Lebanon. It is hard to believe that just a half-century ago, Charles Malik was Lebanon's most eminent representative, and that he could wish assurance walk the corridors of power in Beirut as he did those of the U.N. in New York, where he was one of the careful formulators of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that Muslims find so objectionable. The Maronites and other Christians have seen a steady decline in their power, and the Maronites - speaking the best French of any Lebanese, for the Muslims tend not to study or care about it in the same way - have arrived in French-speaking Quebec only to be horrified by the influx of Muslims, the very people they were fleeing. They left Lebanon just as other Maronites, late in the 19th and early in the 20th centuries, left it because of the Muslim threat, the harbinger of which was the pogrom by Muslims against Maronites in Damascus in 1860.

| 14 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

April 14, 2010

The legacy of Muhammad's marriage to Aisha. "Yemeni Bride, 11, Hospitalized with Genital Injuries," by Lara Setrakian for ABC News, April 14 (thanks to George):

An 11-year-old Yemeni girl who was was married to a man in country's Hajja province was hospitalized today with genital injuries, said a human rights group in Sanaa.
It was the second incident involving a child bride in the last week. A 13-year-old girl died after being sexually assaulted by her adult husband. Both girls were married in the country's rural Hajja province.
The 11-year-old girl was married last year only under the condition that the adult husband would wait until she reached puberty to consummate the marriage. He did not wait, nor do many of the men who marry young brides, says Amal Basha, director of the Arabic Sisters Forum.
An estimated 50 percent of women in Yemen are married before age 18, some as young as 8. Less than a week ago the Sana'a-based human rights group reported the death of a 13-year-old bride in the same rural area. The Associated Press reported the girl was allegedly raped, and that her 23-year-old husband is now in police custody.
"She looked like she was butchered," said the girl's mother, Nijma Ahmed. The AP also cited police a report saying the husband forced himself on his young bride, feeling under pressure to prove his manhood.
An average of eight women die each day in Yemen due to child marriage, many of them in childbirth, according to the Arabic Sisters Forum. The group runs a hotline for victims of domestic violence and has been lobbying in support of a minimum marriage age now under consideration by the Yemeni parliament.
Pushing against the proposed law is the strong hand of Islamic conservatives in Yemen. Clerics have declared women like Amal Basha apostates from Islam for opposing child marriage, which they see as divinely ordained. The government, she says, is intimidated by the religious and tribal customs.
"They say this is Islamic...and they declared jihad against... the UN treaty on women's rights," she said.
"They say my campaign is a Western agenda, that it will lead to sex out of wedlock and prostitution," Basha said....
| 133 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

It's an opportune time to ask: what other country in the world would be expected to tolerate a massive arms buildup by a jihadist pseudo-state on its border, as Israel has faced from Hizballah? "Israeli officials say Syria gives Hezbollah Scuds," by Mark Lavie for the Associated Press, April 14:

JERUSALEM - Israeli defense officials said Wednesday they believe Hezbollah has Scud missiles that could hit all of Israel, a day after Israel's president accused Syria of supplying the Lebanese guerrillas with the weapons for the first time.
Israeli officials say the introduction of Scuds could alter the strategic balance with Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed militia that battled Israel to a stalemate during a monthlong war in 2006.
President Shimon Peres, speaking in Paris, charged that Syria is playing a double game, talking about peace, while "it is delivering Scuds to Hezbollah to threaten Israel," according to a statement from his office.
The remarks by Peres, whose position is largely ceremonial, went beyond public assessments of senior Israeli defense figures. He gave no details.
In Washington, the Syrian Embassy dismissed the allegations and accused Israel of trying to divert attention from questions about Israel's nuclear program. Israel is widely believed to possess nuclear arms, though it does not confirm or deny this.
"If we are to discuss armament in our region, we should begin with Israel's massive nuclear weapons arsenal and continuous arming with top-caliber U.S. weapons, which helps perpetuate its occupation of our territories," said embassy spokesman Ahmed Salkini. "The timing also indicates a sinister attempt to undermine any U.S.-Syrian rapprochement."

Translation: We're getting called out, and it's really awkward.

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Wednesday the Obama administration has relayed its concerns to Syria at the highest levels about weapons that could destabilize the region.
Some Scud missiles have a range of hundreds of miles (kilometers) and could reach any target in Israel if fired from Lebanon. They can carry an explosive warhead of up to 1 ton.
The defense officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were discussing a classified intelligence assessment, stopped short of stating unequivocally that Scuds are now deployed in Lebanon. [...]
Boaz Ganor, an expert from Herzliya's Interdisciplinary Center, said Scud missiles in the hands of Hezbollah could be a game-changer, not only because of their potential for damage.
"In Syrian hands, it was rationally administered, and now it's not clear that in the hands of Hezbollah it will be administered rationally," he said.
| 41 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

KFC gets a taste of Islamic supremacist gratitude. But this is not surprising: dhimmitude breeds contempt. "U.K. KFC Faces Boycott Threat From Muslims Over Halal Trial," from FoxNews, April 14 (thanks to Twostellas):

Fingers were not lickin' good for KFC in their bid to sell fried chicken to Islamic customers in Britain.

The fast food chain was being threatened with a boycott by both Muslims and non-Muslims.

It hoped to woo the Islamic market by opening 86 trial outlets selling halal-only meat, slaughtered under strict religious guidelines.

But KFC's target diners insisted the chickens were not being killed in the right way and said they would stay away.

And furious non-Muslim customers have set up Facebook groups protesting that the trial branches, which also ban pork, have dropped their favorite bacon-topped Big Daddy burger from menus. Groups with names such as "Against the KFC Halal Trial" and "No Halal at Colne KFC" -- referring to a branch in the Lancashire, northern England, town -- were rapidly attracting members.

For meat to be halal, the animal must be alive when its throat is cut as a verse from the Koran is recited.

KFC insisted their methods met the approval of the Halal Food Society. But Islamic leaders disagreed, saying the pre-stunning of animals in the chain's mechanical process means a third were already dead at the point of slaughter. And the fact the prayer is played over a speaker means each bird it not blessed individually as it is killed.

They have now threatened to warn the U.K.'s 2.4 million Muslims not to eat KFC meat, and will meet with the fast food giant Wednesday to question how it is killing chickens sold as halal.

KFC hasn't jumped high enough yet to please its new masters. But it will. We have already discovered what KFC is; the rest is just haggling over the price.

| 150 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More evidence of the Gaza jihadists' use of civilians as human shields. They want civilians to be killed, so that they can use their deaths to bring down more international opprobrium upon Israel. "Killed Palestinians were heavily armed," from JTA, April 14:

JERUSALEM (JTA) - Four Palestinians believed to be planting explosives along the security fence in Gaza were heavily armed, Israel's army said.

Israeli troops fired on the Palestinian men on Tuesday morning, killing four. Initial reports had said one of the suspected terrorists was killed and three injured.

No Israeli soldiers were injured in the incident.

Israel's military found explosives, assault rifles, hand grenades and other weaponry on the bodies, according to an Israel Defense Forces statement released Tuesday evening.

Islamic Jihad said in a statement that it had sent the men to attack Israeli forces at the border, The New York Times reported.

"The presence of Palestinian civilians in the area adjacent to the security fence in Gaza is used by terrorist organizations as cover for their activities, including planting explosive devices, planning terrorist attacks and attempts to kidnap IDF soldiers. For this reason, the IDF considers this a combat zone," read the IDF statement.

On Sunday, Hamas prevented members of Islamic Jihad from firing rockets into Israel from northern Gaza, according to the Times.

| 4 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

They hoped to "ensure the maximum carnage when they blew themselves up." For the sake of Allah.

"'New York subway plotter arrested in Pakistan,'" from AFP, April 13 (thanks to Block Ness):

NEW YORK: A fourth suspect in a foiled plot to attack New York subways by self-confessed Al-Qaeda agent Najibullah Zazi has been arrested in Pakistan, media reported citing law enforcement sources.

Spokesmen for the FBI and federal prosecutors contacted by AFP declined to confirm or deny the report.

The New York Daily News and NBC news reported that the man - who was not identified - could soon be extradited to the United States and charged in Brooklyn.

Two other accused accomplices - Zarein Ahmedzay and Adis Medunjanin - were arrested in January and pleaded not guilty in February.

Zazi, who pleaded guilty in February, has been cooperating with investigators.

A local English daily reported that he and his friends had planned to "strap explosives to their bodies and split up, heading for the Grand Central and Times Square stations - the two busiest subway stations in New York City."

They planned to board trains on the 1, 2, 3, and 6 lines during rush hour and position themselves in the middle of the packed trains to "ensure the maximum carnage when they blew themselves up," the newspaper reported citing unidentified sources....

US Attorney General has called the plot the "most serious" since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001....

| 16 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In "Obama Tries to Eradicate Radical Islam: Not from America, but from America's mindset" at Pajamas Media (via Middle East Forum), our old friend Raymond Ibrahim discusses the unreality of Obama's policies regarding the global jihad:

The Obama administration has just announced its intent to ban all words that allude to Islam from important national security documents. Put differently, the Obama administration has just announced its intent to ban all knowledge and context necessary to confront and defeat radical Islam (news much welcomed by Islamist organizations like CAIR). While this move may reflect a naively therapeutic administration -- an Obama advisor once suggested that Winnie the Pooh should inform U.S foreign policy -- that Obama, the one U.S. president who best knows that politically correct niceties will have no effect on the Muslim world is enforcing this ban, is further troubling.

An Associated Press report has the disturbing details:

President Barack Obama's advisers plan to remove terms such as "Islamic radicalism" from a document outlining national security strategy and will use the new version to emphasize that the U.S. does not view Muslim nations through the lens of terrorism, counterterrorism officials say.

First off, how, exactly, does the use of terms such as "Islamic radicalism" indicate that the U.S. views "Muslim nations through the lens of terrorism"? It is the height of oversensitivity to think that the so-called "Muslim street" can be antagonized by accurate words in technical U.S. documents -- documents they don't know or care about -- especially since the Arabic media itself often employs such terms. Surely we can use "Islamic radicalism" to define, well, Islamic radicals, without simultaneously viewing all Muslims "through the lens of terrorism"? Just as surely as we can use words like "Nazism" to define white supremacists, without viewing all white nations through the lens of racism?

Read it all.

| 20 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

More on Turkey's race to abandon secularism and adopt Sharia (and, of course, its attendant Jew-hatred): "Turkish PM raises misgivings with ongoing criticism," from Agence France-Presse, April 12 (thanks to C. Cantoni):

ANKARA -- With bruising criticism of Israel and defense of Iran, and onslaughts against Turkey's military and secularists, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has stoked questions on where he is steering his country.

During a visit to Paris last week, Erdoğan branded Israel -- once Turkey's top regional ally -- "the principal threat to peace" in the Middle East, and objected to fresh sanctions against Iran -- a newfound friend -- over its nuclear activities.

Such outbursts have become an Erdoğan hallmark since Israel's devastating war on the Gaza Strip last year, feeding doubts -- both at home and abroad -- on what vision he is nourishing for Turkey, NATO's only mainly Muslim member and a candidate to join the European Union.

The rupture in ties with Israel has been accompanied by an unprecedented drive by Erdoğan's government for closer links with the Arab world, notably Syria.

Much to the bewilderment of Western allies, Erdoğan has also jumped to the defense of Sudanese leader Omar al-Bashir, indicted for war crimes in Darfur, arguing that "no Muslim could perpetrate a genocide."

Is Erdoğan turning his back on the West?...

As the great philosopher once said to me, "Well, duh."

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

One would think that if Islam really were a Religion Of Peace That Has Been Hijacked By A Tiny Minority Of Extremists™, this would be a relatively easy process. All one would have to do would be show the prisoners the peaceful aspects of the Qur'an that they had overlooked, and explain to them how Osama bin Laden and the rest had misunderstood Islamic theology. Then their loyalty as Muslims would do the rest.

Why isn't this happening?

Because, of course, the prevailing dogma that Islam is a Religion Of Peace simply isn't true. The Qur'an and Sunnah teach warfare against unbelievers. The Muslim chaplains in the prison system in the UK, and the prisoners, know that. So what can the chaplains do?

"Prison is 'not taming' Islamist radicals," by Gail Champion for BBC Radio 4, April 13:

Government efforts to de-radicalise jailed Islamic extremists are failing, former inmates have told the BBC....

The Ministry of Justice said it was working "with a number of third-sector partner organisations" to rehabilitate prisoners.

Around 200 extremists have been jailed since the 2005 London bombings and some are now due for release from prison and are returning to their communities....

Shah Jalal Hussain, who also lives in London and spent 18 months in prison after being convicted of raising funds to support terrorism, claimed that prison imams were viewed with open hostility and as "puppets of the regime".

"A number of times he [the imam] was even attacked physically. He tried to press charges, but dropped them in the end. Prison didn't change my views at all, in fact it made me stronger in my beliefs," he said.

'No easy solution'

The government said Muslim extremists presented a complex profile and there were "no off-the-shelf interventions" which could be used to deal with them.

Instead, "offenders are managed based on individual risk assessments and sentence plans".

Harry Fletcher of the National Association of Probation Officers (NAPO) said once prisoners were back in the community, traditional risk assessment tools and strategies were proving ineffective....

What a surprise!

| 7 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

The intrepid mujahedin, killing 18-year-olds on their way home from work. And still they seek to establish a pious earthly paradise through terror, and enforced ignorance and squalor. Funny how that never quite seems to work. "18-year-old Afghan woman slain in campaign of fear," by Kathy Gannon for the Associated Press, April 13:

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - A gunman lying in wait shot and killed an 18-year-old woman as she left her job at a U.S.-based development company Tuesday, casting a spotlight on a stepped-up campaign of Taliban intimidation against women in this southern city where U.S. troops plan a major operation in the coming weeks.
Although there was no claim of responsibility and police said the motive for the attack was unclear, Taliban militants have been particularly harsh with women who work for foreign organizations or attend school. Bands of thugs are increasingly harassing women who want jobs, education and their own style of clothing, women and aid workers say.
In Tuesday's attack, the gunman emerged from a hiding place and shot the woman, whose first name was Hossai, after she stepped out of her office building, said deputy police chief Fazle Ahmed Shehzad. Hossai died at the hospital, and the assailant escaped.
Hossai worked for Development Alternatives, Inc., a Washington-based global consulting firm that "provides social and economic development solutions to business, government, and civil society in developing and transitioning countries," according to its Web site.
Eight years after the U.S.-led invasion ousted the Taliban from power, fear again dominates the lives of many young women and girls in the violent south, the stronghold of a revived Islamist insurgency that curbed women's rights when it ruled most of the country until the 2001 U.S.-led invasion.
"Every day the security situation gets worse and worse," said Ehsanullah Ehsan, a clean-shaven man who has devoted the last 16 years to educating girls, first in the remote border regions of Pakistan and since 2002 in Kandahar.
Ehsan is head of the Afghan Canadian Community Center, which provides vocational training and schooling to men and women. He says each day brings another story of threats against his female students. While many of the threats come from the Taliban, others are from criminals and even police.
Harassment of women comes against the backdrop of a general deterioration of law and order in Kandahar, a city of nearly a half million people.
The aim of the upcoming operation by NATO and Afghan troops is to clear Kandahar of Taliban fighters, who threaten and intimidate those who do not follow their strict interpretation of Islam, and to bolster the local police force, which appears incapable of stopping petty crime that is rampant in the city.
In the best of times, lives of women in conservative Afghanistan are far more restricted than in the West, especially in rural areas where a woman's place is in the home and beneath the all-encompassing burqa. Since the fall of the Taliban regime in 2001, however, women in urban areas like Kabul, Mazar-i-Sharif and Jalalabad have more choices -- with some in parliament, government and business.
Even in Kandahar, the major city of the ultraconservative south, women say restrictions eased in the first years after the Taliban were gone. But as the Islamist movement began to rebound in 2003, pressure on women to adhere to strict Islamist and Afghan traditions increased -- with little protection from the ineffectual and corrupt Afghan police.
Ehsan told of one student whose family was warned by a shopkeeper to keep their daughters indoors and to let them leave only if they are wearing a burqa.
"The shopkeeper knocked on her parents' door and said: 'If you let her go out with her face showing and something happens to her, you have been warned and it will be her own fault,'" recalled Ehsan. "Why is it that every time it is the girls and the women who are targeted in our society?"
He said some threats come from uniformed men and young thugs who "tease the girls and make sexual demands." In the last six months, he believes more such threats have come from the Taliban, who warn women and girls not to go to school or work for foreign organizations....
| 22 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

April 13, 2010

Once again the thugs at CAIR demand that non-Muslims change their practices to conform to Islamic sensibilities, rather than calling upon Muslims in the United States to adapt to American culture. Do they really expect anyone to believe that McDonald's didn't hire this woman because it is "Islamophobic"? Their opposition to the hijab is, I am certain, entirely hygienic, and in a restaurant, that is something I am glad to see.

"Mich. McDonald's Accused Of Discrimination," from WWJ, April 13:

Rochester Hills (WWJ) -- The Michigan Chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations is accusing McDonald's of religious and ethnic discrimination. CAIR has filed an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission complaint against a McDonald's Restaurant in Rochester Hills. The complaint was filed on behalf of a Muslim woman who applied for a job at the restaurant. During the interview, she says that one of the restaurant managers informed her that wearing an Islamic head scarf, or hijab, would be a problem.

In 2008, the EEOC issued new guidelines on accommodating religious beliefs and practices in the workplace.

The guidelines offer protection for workers who wear religious attire such as a headscarf.

"We urge McDonald's to take immediate action to bring its hiring policies into compliance with long-established legal guidelines on reasonable religious accommodation in the workplace," said CAIR-MI Executive Director Dawud Walid.

Walid noted that in 2008, CAIR-MI raised concerns with McDonald's regarding two similar incidents in which Muslim women alleged being denied employment because of hijab....

| 119 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Today our SIOA "Leaving Islam" ad campaign rolled out on the streets of Miami -- it's an assertion of religious liberty, the free conscience, in response to the misleading CAIR dawah bus ad campaign that has rolled out in several major cities.

One of the first projects that we've been working on for Stop the Islamization of America and the Freedom Defense Initiative organization that I started with Pamela Geller was this bus ad campaign. Pamela's announcement on the campaign is here.

This is the first time anyone has offered public help to those who are threatened under Islam's apostasy law. In the Land of the Free, government and law enforcement should be on this. But they aren't. So we are. It is time for free citizens to stand for freedom -- or lose it.

APRIL12-2010013
APRIL12-2010010
APRIL12-2010011
APRIL12-2010012

LeavingIslam?.jpg

Why did we create and organize a bus ad campaign to offer resources to Muslims who want to leave Islam but feel threatened? We wanted to show that some people will stand up against violent intimidation, some people will stand up for religious freedom in America. And we wanted to counterbalance the smooth deceptions of the CAIR campaign. So Pamela Geller developed the above bus ad with the help of the enormously talented Big Fur Hat. We intend it to roll out nationwide, kicking off with South Florida.

Our pro-freedom campaign began today on the following buses all over Miami -- Route 3 (Biscayne Blvd and US1), Route 88 (Kendall Drive SW 88th Street, from the Dade and North Metro Rail station to SW 80th street), Route 40 (Bird Road SW 40th Street), Route L (Hialeah along 79th Street Causeway, Collins Avenue to Miami Beach Convention Center), Route E (Collins Avenue), and Route 11 (FIU Bus terminal to FIU South campus, West Flagler street ends at Government center Metro station) -- split between curb side and street side.

Here are the bus maps: Download Bus

Any Jihad Watchers in Florida readers who see these ads, please take some pictures and send them to me at director[at]jihadwatch.org.

We need funds to roll it out nationwide. People need to be educated. Help us get there. Please donate via the Contribute to Jihad Watch button on the right sidebar, and specify that your donation is for the bus ad campaign. Until SIOA is set up as a 501C3, donations should go through Jihad Watch. And join the SIOA Facebook group.

The Islam campaign is pictured below. But today, not these but our ads are running in Miami.

San francisco

San Francisco

Islambus2

Islam bus ad

Twin Cities

Bus-Miami-2 

Miami

Islambus

Chicago

America is the land of the free, and apostates must know they are free here and safe here.

Rifqa Bary can do it. So can you. Freedom of religion is an unalienable right. Sharia law holds no weight or legitimacy here. Apostates are free to leave Islam and to be who and whatever that want to be.

That was the objective of this bus campaign of SIOA and FDI. We set up a website, RefugefromIslam.org, for would-be apostates from Islam.

We want to help. We want to stand for freedom. Join us.

| 143 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Perhaps symbolically, as al-Qaeda-linked jihadists tend to pay attention to that sort of thing, in a city called Isabela. On the other hand, they do like their slaughter wherever they can inflict it. "15 killed in Philippines attacks," from Agence France-Presse, April 13 (thanks to Dumbledoresarmy):

Al Qaeda-linked militants in police uniforms set off bombs and fired at civilians on a strife-torn Philippine island in violence that left 15 people dead.
The gunmen targeted a government office and a church in Isabela city on Basilan island with two home-made bombs, in the latest show of force from the Abu Sayyaf network that is blamed for the worst attacks in the Philippines.
Isabela city mayor Cherry Akbar told reporters that 15 people were confirmed dead, including five militants who were apparently killed by one of their own bomb blasts.
Six civilians were also killed in the explosions, while three soldiers and one policeman were killed in gunbattles with the militants, Ms Akbar said.
At least 25 militants wearing police uniforms were involved in the attacks, according to the region's military chief, Lieutenant General Ben Dolorfino.
They sprayed bullets at terrified civilians scrambling away to safety, and engaged in a gunbattle with security forces on the outskirts of Isabela that lasted for at least three hours, according to various military chiefs.
"We have to take control and assure the people that we are on top of the situation," Sabban said as the fighting was ongoing.
"All we know right is that our marines right now are under fire."
Isabela, an impoverished island of nearly 500,000 people, is part of the southern Philippines' Mindanao region where the Abu Sayyaf and other Muslim rebel groups are fighting for an independent homeland.
Hundreds of US troops have been stationed on Mindanao since the end of 2001 to train and equip the Filipino military to combat the Abu Sayyaf....
| 12 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

Giving a whole new meaning to "Don't touch that dial."

There Is No Fun In Islam* Alert: An update on this story. "The day the music died: Somali Islamists ban songs," from AP, April 13 (thanks to Michael):

MOGADISHU, Somalia - Somali radio stations have stopped broadcasting music following an order from Islamist insurgents who say songs are un-Islamic.

Somalia has a tradition of music and most residents greeted the ban with dismay. The edict is the latest unpopular order from Islamists, who have also banned bras, musical ringtones and movies.

So will they rise up and throw the bums out? They did it once before, of course. But like all Islamic supremacists, the anti-music forces here resort to a tried-and-true tactic to make that an unappealing option:

Abdulahi Yasin Jama at Tusmo broadcasting says stations had no choice but to comply with the order, which came into force Tuesday. Only one government-controlled station is defying the ban.

The Islamists frequently assassinate those who defy them or carry out Shariah-based punishments like amputating limbs.

The ban on music echoes rules enforced by Afghanistan's hardline Taliban regime in the late 1990s.

Yeah, isn't that funny how both the Somalis and the Afghans misunderstand Islam in exactly the same way?

* The Ayatollah Khomeini said that.

| 36 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this | del.icio.us

In my Human Events column this morning I discuss the rise in anti-Semitism and the failure to address its cause:

Jews worldwide are more imperiled than they have been for decades. A new study shows that worldwide incidents of anti-Semitism, from vandalism to arson and beatings, were twice as frequent in 2009 as they were in 2008.

The study, released last Sunday by Tel Aviv University's Stephen Roth Institute for the Study of Contemporary Anti-Semitism and Racism, records that anti-Semitic incidents reached their highest level last year since the university started keeping these records in the 1980s.

What could be the cause of this? A global surge in neo-Nazism? Is the Ku Klux Klan conducting energetic membership drives in Western Europe, where the largest increase in anti-Semitic events occurred? No. According to the report, the increase is largely due to attacks from Muslims, who, the report says, were enraged over Israel's Winter 2009 incursion into Gaza. The Associated Press noted that "in Western Europe, especially Britain and France ... protests and anger by Muslim residents boiled over after Israel's invasion of Gaza in December 2008."

So presumably this "anger by Muslim residents" would not have "boiled over" if Israel had done nothing to defend itself from the regular rocket attacks coming from Gaza. The AP report goes on to suggest a further reason for this boiling over: "The Israeli invasion, launched in response to years of Palestinian rocket attacks, killed some 1,400 Palestinians, including hundreds of civilians, according to local officials and human rights groups. Thirteen Israelis also died in the fighting."

AP makes no mention, of course, of how, during the Israeli Gaza incursion, Hamas staged attacks from civilian areas in order to provoke retaliatory fire it could use for propaganda purposes. Yet just weeks ago, the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, an Israeli research group, released a 500-page report documenting Hamas' use of human shields and its deliberate placement of rocket launch sites near mosques and hospitals. Nothing better to stir up international indignation against the Jews than an Israeli missile hitting a hospital or house of worship--and Hamas wanted to make sure it happened.

Of course, it worked magnificently: The UN even released the "Goldstone Report," enshrining Palestinian propaganda against Israel, including charges that Israeli forces recklessly targeted civilians as established fact. The flimsiness of this "established fact" was underscored last week when a Palestinian teenager whom Palestinian authorities had reported as having been shot by the Israelis turned up at home. He hadn't been shot at all, but actually wandered into a weapons-smuggling tunnel that took him into Egypt, where he was briefly held by Egyptian authorities. Yet UN researcher Goldstone relied upon Palestinian sources--including, no doubt, many with the same vivid imagination--to compile his report.

The "Goldstone Report," not coincidentally, was spearheaded by the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), the 56-nation group that now constitutes the UN's largest voting bloc. The ultimate purpose of the "Goldstone Report" is to criminalize legitimate Israeli self-defense. And now the new report on anti-Semitism, however unwittingly, plays into this by attributing Muslim "boiling over" against Jews in Western Europe to rage over Gaza. It was all just a "backlash"--all the fault of the Israeli atrocities in Gaza.

Islamic anti-Semitism, with its centerpiece the deeply ingrained idea that the Jews are the worst enemies of the Muslims (as Koran 5:82 says), doesn't seem to have been considered. The fact that the Israeli atrocities in Gaza were manufactured products of the Palestinian propaganda machine doesn't seem to have entered in, either.

But in contrast to the Israeli war crimes in Gaza, the rise in anti-Semitism worldwide is real. The United Nations and the global human rights organizations, instead of accepting OIC-manufactured propaganda uncritically, should examine honestly and openly the ways in which imams in mosques in Europe and elsewhere are encouraging hatred of Jews, and call upon Islamic organizations around the world to clean their own house.

The study released last Sunday makes this all the more urgent, but with the increasing isolation of Israel and its ongoing bullying by Barack Obama, such a necessary reckoning is about as likely as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's converting to Judaism.

| 29 Comments
Print | FaceBook | Twitter | Email | Digg this |