May 20: "Everybody Draw Muhammad Day!"

Draw-Mo_Promo.jpg

The paintbrush/pen/pencil/crayon is mightier than the sword. Or hey, even needlepoint if you're up for it. The possibilities are endless. "Seattle cartoonist launches 'Everybody Draw Mohammed Day'," by Jamie Griswold for the Associated Press, April 23 (thanks to all who sent this in):

After Comedy Central cut a portion of a South Park episode following a death threat from a radical Muslim group, Seattle cartoonist Molly Norris wanted to counter the fear. She has declared May 20th "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day."
Norris told KIRO Radio's Dave Ross that cartoonists are meant to challenge the lines of political correctness. "That's a cartoonist's job, to be non-PC."
Producers of South Park said Thursday that Comedy Central removed a speech about intimidation and fear from their show after a radical Muslim group warned that they could be killed for insulting the Prophet Muhammad.
The group said it wasn't threatening South Park producers Trey Parker and Matt Stone, but it included a gruesome picture of Theo Van Gogh, a Dutch filmmaker killed by a Muslim extremist in 2004, and said the producers could meet the same fate. The website posted the addresses of Comedy Central's New York office and the California production studio where South Park is made.
"As a cartoonist I just felt so much passion about what had happened I wanted to kind of counter Comedy Central's message they sent about feeling afraid," Norris said.
Norris has asked other artists to submit drawings of any religious figure to be posted as part of Citizens Against Citizens Against Humor (CACAH) on May 20th.

But drawings of one "religious figure" in particular will provoke death threats and accusations of hatred and racism.

On her website Norris explains this is not meant to disrespect any religion, but rather meant to protect people's right to express themselves.
| 83 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

83 Comments

| Leave a comment

What a brilliant idea!! lmao.
I'm gonna be busy....Cartoon day, Boobquake...

I can’t believe that militant Muslims have won the day again. No wonder they think that the infidel West is weak and feeble. It often is. And the more the West, or the UK and US, give in to these Muslims, the more they will demand. The more they will think they can achieve.

This time it is the cartoon South Park that has been threatened by ‘militant’ Muslims. (Are all Muslims militant? It sometimes seems that way.) South Park dared to feature Mohammed. It is forbidden in Islam to portray Mohammed in any way. That’s right. It is forbidden in Islam. Not in America. Not in Christianity. Not for infidels to portray him. So why should non-Muslims bow down to these naked threats from Muslims? Because these people usually get what they want. This is just one more example of Muslims making non-Muslims abide by the strict and stupid strictures of that mass death-cult, Islam.

Isn’t South Park meant to be a hip and anti-establishment show? Maybe it’s hip. Maybe it’s anti-establishment. But it’s a soft sucker for a Muslim threat. Throw the Bible down the toilet and you get awards from an arty organisation. Accidentally stand on the Koran and there’s riot in Timbuktu and suicide bombings in Karachi.

It is still not clear if the programme’s makers, Mr Stone and Mr Parker, were responsible for all the bleeps and the blackouts. It may have all been done on the orders of the network, Comedy Central, which did indeed place additional audio bleeps throughout the sacrilegious episode.

However, it may have been a clever trick, on South Park creators’ part, not to cancel the whole episode completely. Instead they bleeped and blocked out the offending parts and flashed the word ‘CENSORED’. This at least shows the audience what has happened to their programme. It also shows the fans that South Park has in fact been threatened by Muslim thugs. So perhaps this wasn’t an outright example of cowardice after all.

The Muslim group warned South Park’s creators that they could ‘face violence’ if they depicted Mohammed in any way. That Muslim group is called Revolution Muslim. They even had the sick audacity to write, on a website, that the South Park creators ‘will probably wind up like Theo Van Gogh’. That is - dead. Another sacrificial lamb to the ever-thirsty Islam’s desire for infidel corpses. Van Gogh himself was murdered in 2004. His crime? To have made a film about how violent Islam is towards women. The Muslim killed Van Gogh, I assume, to prove to us all how non-violent Islam is. Muslims never seem to get the irony of their violent responses to accusations of Islamic violence. Irony, unlike Islam, is not really a medieval thing. (Backwards time travel is possible. Go to Islamic Pakistan and see.)

More specifically, this episode was to show Mohammed – I will not say ‘the Prophet’! – wearing a bear costume. And why not? Just the other day I saw a fairly funny add depicting the Buddha. Did any Buddhists riot or kill for this ‘offence’ – for this ‘insult’? Of course not. That may be because Buddhism is not an egg shell, like Islam, that can so easily be broken. It can take a few knocks. Just as many religions do. Remember The Life of Brian? That film was much loved, apparently, by many Christians.

With Islam everything is different. It is so weak, not strong, as a religion that even the slightest criticism, or ‘insult’ or ‘offence’, is seen as a fatal sacrilege. This is also because Islam is the most violent and irrational of religions. The rage and the riots do not show us the deepness of the faith, but Islam’s shallowness. There has never been an argumentative or philosophical tradition within Islam which could help Muslims cope with criticism. Fair enough, there have been various sects, schools of interpretation and whatnot. But no deep philosophical movement that has been allowed to question Islam itself. That’s partly why there are so many Muslims on this planet. Along with death for apostasy and the long history of Islamic imperialism, the closed Muslim mind also helps explain the fact that there are over a billion Muslims. That large number, though, is seen by many Muslims as the most definitive and clear proof of Islam’s truth and righteousness. It’s just a body count in the end.

"It is forbidden in Islam to portray Mohammed in any way. That’s right. It is forbidden in Islam. Not in America. Not in Christianity. Not for infidels to portray him. So why should non-Muslims bow down to these naked threats from Muslims?"
----------------
Actually Paul, yes it is. Muslims "forbid" anyone to portray Mohammad. Welcome to Dar-al-Harb (the House of War)! Those with their mentality firmly in Dar-al-Islam (the House of Islam), regardless of where they park their arse, claim hegemony over everybody else. Shari'a rules everyone, everywhere, regardless of their religion/state of belief. That's what makes Islam so insufferable -- its unbelievable arrogance and a superiority complex that would make even Hussein blush.

Please send pictures of both. ooops, I mean muhmamed picture and proof of boobday. Don't have to include head shot. Maybe a copy of a spencer book.
I will try my luck at drawing a muhammed toon.

"veiled threats"...

Picture this: One pregnant women to another: "How cute! That burka is the bomb!"

SNAP: May 20 will be my favorite HolyDay.


Picture this: A veiled hand grenade.

Picture this: A veiled CENSORED. There, that's it...


False modesty conceals the face of evil.


Someone mentioned the idea of an illustrated history of the subjugation text; how about a drawing of CENSORED roasting marshmallows on the torturer's chest-fire?

Would a drawing of CENSORED having sex with his 9-year old wife be considered illegal pornography, even if it is historically correct and a expression of a political opinion?

How is a person to properly object when the reality you object to is obscene?


let the mockery begin.

Here is my first picture of CENSORED:

CENSORED

I posted this yesterday on the "OIC/Human Rights thread.

This is soooo good: "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day" - May 20!


http://hotair.com/archives/2010/04/23/its-on-everybody-draw-mohammed-day-set-for-may-20th/

So Great!

Why do the media always call a prophet, he is only a prophet to muslims, not Jews, Christains,Hindus etc.

I've already drawn my "motoon". It's a stick figure, but it will get the point across. Will post it on my blog on 5/20.

http://www.byzantineblog.com

Andrew | April 24, 2010 11:35 AM | Reply

Why do the media always call a prophet, he is only a prophet to muslims, not Jews, Christains,Hindus etc.

Good point. mohammed isn't any sort of a prophet to me, as a Christian. He didn't meet any of the standards of the Old Testament prophets, or any of the New Testament Apostles or any of the post-Church Saints.

Prophets, Christ, and the Saints, have one thing in common: All performed Miracles or had Miracles attributed to them. The koran didn't claim any miracles for mo.

Here's a nice link to mahound cartoons from the Zombietime blog (Zombie published photo reports at Pajamas Media)...

By the way, I suppose this page is the likely reason why his page is currently blocked in Erdoganistan/Anatolian Arabia.

Actually, this is a good SERIOUS initiative if executed well.

There could be gatherings of people opposed to Islamic supremacism and everyone draws Mohammed and the best 10 entries get prizes ! Maybe books by Islamorealists like Robert Spencer or Serge Trifkovic or someone like that.

Actually reminds of the salt march by Gandhi against the British rule in India.

Where do we send our cartoons and will they be shown?
I want mine out there. Lets flood the pool of potential targets.

Can anyone provide a website or email to send these?
Can we publish them on the SIOA website?
Plus I suggest we all email them to CAIR.

Can we combine the two events?

"Veil" bikini tops being dropped to reveal boobs with the name CENSORED written on them.

TWO-TWO, two meanings in ONE!

or, maybe a "burka bra" with only the eyes showing?


This is gonna be fun!!!

This kind of humor just slays me...

Mike B,

"The koran didn't claim any miracles for mo."

54:1 (Shakir) "The hour drew nigh and the moon did rend asunder."

al-Jalalayn: "The Hour has drawn near, the Resurrection is close at hand, and the moon has split, it broke in two at [Mount] Abū Qubays and Qu‘ayqa‘ān, as a sign for the Prophet (s), for it had been demanded of him, and [when it took place] he said, ‘Bear witness [now]!’ — as reported by the two Shaykhs [al-Bukhārī and Muslim]."

Ibn Kathir: "[...] (and the moon has been cleft asunder.) It occurred during the time of Allah's Messenger, according to the authentic Mutawatir Hadiths the scholars agree that the moon was cleft asunder during the lifetime of the Prophet, and it was among the clear miracles that Allah gave him. Hadiths mentioning that the Moon was split..."

Multilingual Quran (Shia commentary): "The reference is a famous miracle of the Holy Prophet, recorded in several authentic traditions of the companions, particularly of the Ahl ul Bayt whose evidence is always true, performed at the insistent demand of the pagans and the Jews. The Jews who saw this miracle became Muslims but Abu Jahl said: "This is magic continuous". It is written in the Book of Joshua 10: 13: "So the sun stood still and the moon halted until a nation had taken vengeance on its enemies." So the Jews and the Christians cannot deny the possibility of "divine adjustment" in the solar system.
Some commentators think that the past tense is used here for the future-the moon will be rent asunder at the approach of the resurrection. Firstly authentic traditions relate the cleaving asunder of the moon, secondly the observation "this is magic continuous" in verse 2 leaves no room for the speculation of the enemies of the Holy Prophet. Even the Qadiani commentators, who habitually deny miracles, accept the incident to have taken place.
Aqa Mahdi Puya says:
Those who deny the miracle performed by the Holy Prophet will be punished as the people of Nuh were punished. Refer to verses 9 to 15."

Hmmm - I wonder if Molly has contracted for permanent, 24-hour bodyguard services, or inquired into the Witness Protection Program?? But hat's off to her - great idea....

Let's hope it contributes to CAIR's wish (in the wake of their Miami bus ad defeat) that it contributes to a widespread increase in understanding of Islam.

"Draw Muhammad Day" is a great idea. Visual artists and cartoonists express themselves through visual media and they should not have to be prohibited, or inhibited, from depicting a religious-political figure, i.e., Muhammad, who has become important in our times. If Muslims don't want to depict Muhammad they don't have to, and they don't have to look at depictions.

Muslims "forbid" anyone to portray Mohammad.

There are two separate issues here:

1) depictions of Mohammed which could lead to the crime of shirk in the form of idolatry (as if Muslims don't already idolize Mohammed as a demi-god anyway)

2) denigration of Mohammed in any way shape or form, which constitutes the crime of blasphemy, punishable by death in Islamic law. This can also be done in print or in speech, not only in depictions.

Thus, one could respectfully depict Mohammed in a painting or TV show or movie, yet still raise the fanatical ire of Muslims -- as in fact happened in the 1970s, sparking the first Islamic terrorist act on American soil in 1977 (not counting the Lone Wolf assassination of Robert Kennedy by the islamochristian Sirhan Sirhan).

In 1977, one movie theater in Washington, D.C., began showing a movie, Mohammed, Messenger of God, made by a Middle Eastern director, Mustapha Akkad, which apparently treated the subject with utmost reverence and respect -- but that, of course, was not good enough for a group of Muslims who felt this was Islamically illegal.

According to this report, that Muslim group (apparently all black American converts)

"...seize[d] three office buildings in Washington, D.C., killing a radio reporter (Maurice Williams, 24, of WHUR-FM), wounding 13 people and taking 134 hostages. Mack Cantrell, a city police officer wounded in the assault, died several days later of a heart attack."

Among their demands was for the movie to be yanked from the theater and from all future theaters; and for a personal meeting with boxer Muhammad Ali! (Ali refused to meet with them.)

"Norris has asked other artists to submit drawings of any religious figure "

I'm not an artist or cartoonist myself, but I have a good idea for a submission for this event:

Depict all of the religious figures -- the Buddha, Krishna, Jesus, Moses, YHWH (you know, a man with a white beard in the sky), Zoroaster, perhaps also a pagan or two (some voodoo goddess, a Celtic god, a Norse god, etc.), and last and least, Mohammed -- and have all of the religious figures but the last one standing together on one side, with Mohammed alone on the other side. The other religious figures would be shown smiling, laughing, having a good time, with a collective caption something along the lines of "Hell, we don't care if you depict us, even if you mock us -- water off a duck's back, take your best shot, you puny human cartoonists, ha ha ha!"

Meanwhile, the caption for Mohammed, standing off by himself with a malignant hunch sort of like a combination of the hunchback of Notre Dame and Shylock, muttering:

"I weel keel you...!"

Well weather Molly did or didn't contract for protection this will draw an inordinate amount of attention to the subject and like somebody else said on another thread, the Muslims will be damned if they do and damned if they don't. If they don't react then all the constant wailing about them being insulted by the slightest little thing will seem ludicrous. If they do react the way we expect them to they will merely prove our point.

Like a prominent figure who is a friend who works at the Center for Security Policy always says, the more high profile you are the safer you are because it will take so much effort to get rid of you. I love that Molly is a college student who is sticking it to them. After all, in America, college students get away with murder if they are liberal and spew the party line. How ironic that South Park which can be rather vile has prompted this defense of free speech, and now we see, the offense against Islam as well. Beautiful!

"Why do the media always call Muhammed a prophet, he is only a prophet to muslims, not Jews, Christians, Hindus etc.

Good point. Mohammed isn't any sort of a prophet to me, as a Christian. He didn't meet any of the standards of the Old Testament prophets, or any of the New Testament Apostles or any of the post-Church Saints."

Exactly.

Amazing, Hesp. What was (wasn't) I thinking in March 1977 that this could have passed me by, that I didn't remember it? Right in our nation's capital, no less.
And, yes, Sirhan Bishara Sirhan WAS a Plaestinian wasn't he? And his excuse, as I recall, was that RFK was sympathetic to Israel...


Sirhan may also have been a "Plaestinian," but I meant Palestinian, sorry...

I prefer "Paleostinian" myself, but I have no evidence to prove it.

Uh oh! K is likely to plunk me in the dink-tunk for that one!


You're killing me here, LOL!

I was going to suggest "Pleistocenians," so I went to Palaeos.com. It reads, "The great mammalian megafauna flourished." Of course, I first read it as, "The great mammarian megafauna flourished."
I need a drink...

Re: that 1977 Muslim siege in Wash. D.C.:

The folk pop singer Joni Mitchell wrote a song about it, "Otis and Marlena" on her double album Don Juan's Reckless Daughter (1977) -- though of course being thoroughly Leftist herself, the song's lyrics spin the whole incident from an angle of rich fat Americans colonizing as tourists the Americas, and the only real allusion to the siege is the refrain

While Muslims stick up Washington...

On one of the inside covers for one of the two LPs, there's a photograph of Joni Mitchell dressed up like a man with a moustache, kinky black hair and sunglasses and dark skin, wearing a vest, red shirt, and disco dancing high-heeled shoes, leaning over backward, and a cartoon balloon comes out of her mouth in which is written:

"Mooslems, Mooooslems!
Heh, Heh, Heh"

The following ACII Mo was created by jhffmn for the same Hotair.com announcement. Can be sent to any posting site:

          ▂▃▅▅▅▃▂     ▲◢◤▀◥◣▃ ▍◢◤
       ▂▅▓▓▅██████▇▅◢██▀   〓 ★ 〓
      ◢▓▓▅███■▀████▓▓█◤    ◢◤ ▍◥◣
    ◢▓▓▆███▀▐ ▊▀▓▀█▓  ▓▲
   ◢▓▓▆██▀ ▼▍▍▲▌▐▓◥█▓▓██◣
 ▃ ▓▆███▓ ▍▎▌▍▍▼▍▌▓ █████▅
▐█▓█████▃▼▌▐ ▐ ▌▍▼ ◢█████▓█◣
█▊■██████◣▓ ▌▍▲◥◤ ▅██████▓█▊
◥■ ████████▅▼▀▃▆███████▓▓▼
◢█▲▓████████▆█▀▓▓▓█■▀▓▓▓█▅
███▓▓▀██■▀    ▀■▓▓█▓▓▓▓███
▐██◣▓▓■▀   ▍▎     ▀■▓▓▓▓█■▀
  ▀■◢▅▂▅▃ ▐ ▍ ▃▅▂▃▅ ▼◢▓██◤
    ▌ ▀█■▆▓▓▇■█■▀  ▲█▀
    ▲▀▓◣▀ ◢▍ ▐◣▀ ◢〓◤ ◢■▀
    ◢▓█◣ ◥〓▌ ▐◥〓◤  ▃▓◢▉
  ▐▓█▓◣  ◢▍  ▂◣   ◢▓███▋
   ███▓▓ ▐◣▃▅█▅  ▃▓████
   ▼██▆▇█▅ ▀██▅▓▓▓████
   ▀███■▀   ◥▌▀■▇█■▀
    ███▀▓▓〓▃〓▓▓▀■▀
    ▀■▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓〓▀
        ▀■▓▓〓▀

I'm sure others can be made.


Thanks, Hesp,

I had no idea of Joni Mitchell's treatment of this incident. A buddy has, I think, all her albums, so will check that out.

Now that you've shaken the synapses on this incident, I DO vaguely recall it. For some reason I recall the building name and that there were over a hundred hostages. At the time, I'm sure that I interpreted this as a racially, rather than religiously, motivated incident--and I do think that's what it was.

Two things got my attention reading the article:

1. The interval between the crime and the trial seems pleasingly short by today's standards.

2. The sentences seemed rightfully harsh--24 years the minimum to more than a hundred years for most of the perps--compared to today.

So it's either my imagination or we've regressed over the past 33 years...

Most interesting--thanks again!

Ah, finally a way to put my old art school skills to good use. An image -- and a plan -- are starting to form.

I'm embarrassed to admit that I don't even remember the 1977 siege. Totally clueless in the '70s (and 60s, 80s, and 90s for that matter) about all things Muslim. I don't have "Don Juan's Reckless Daughter" because I hated it. "Hejira", of all things, was the last album of Joni's that I liked. Wonder if anyone has asked her about the "South Park" incident. She was interviewed in the LA Times the other day dissing Bob Dylan and everyone else within reach, so it would be interesting to hear which side she comes down on.

Give 'em hell in NYC tomorrow folks!

I don't recall the 1977 incident either, but then again I don't recall most of the 70's. Altho in defense of my memory I do remember Munich.

I was only enlightened about islam in 1993 when the WTC was bombed, then I started paying attention.

@gymgal--shake it, Baby, don't break it

Gymgal, pretty funny! I've had the opportunity to meet & get acquainted with Joe Walsh (James Gang, Eagles, etc.). When I first met him I mentioned something from the late 70's & he said, "You'll have to forgive me, there are large parts of the 70's & 80's I just can't remember!"
So you're in good company and the 70's & 80's weren't that great anyway, LOL!

Posted on HotAir rebuttal to David2.0:

Oh, David2.0, I hope you know how much good company you’re in. There are millions of Americans who unfortunately engage in the same kind of lack of understanding of the difference between speech and battery. Thank you for being so bold as to type down the position you advocate so we can see that which needs educating.
I know, I know, you have a friend who’s an Arab, or someone at work who’s sitting right next to you and you are red-cheeked and embarrassed that this might somehow insult your friend. Be sure that it’s not.

Anyone who is an American of Arab origin, who happens to be a Muslim, would not be insulted in the least, because he is more than clear on what freedom of speech means, as well as the old adage (think back!) “Sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me!”.

He, or she, would surely understand that those who use an ideology to commit violence against someone who mocks that ideology, all the while using the ideology to justify the violence itself, must be some kind of fanatic fruitcake, worthy of disdain, and unable to discern the tenets of freedom and human rights.

Surely you now understand that, right?

winoceros on April 24, 2010 at 7:57 PM


David2.0 had written:

Would you support “Kick A Jew” day?

What about “Slap A Christian” day?

Or are you just into Arab-bashing?

David2.0 on April 24, 2010 at 1:55 PM

Image of Mohammed have been painted,drawn,carved for centuries; so what happened??


http://zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/

mmmmmm boobquake :-)

Thanks for the treat mooslims (guess I owe you a beer for that):-P

Now! where's my pen I have a few ideas :-)

Here are some pictures that (for anyone clever with photoshop)can be made more....amusing...

http://www.zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/islamic_mo_full/

Women will find a couple quite offensive.

Feel free to sue your nearest mosque.


@George, Oh I know who Joe Walsh is :) Listened to him a lot, Rocky Mountain Way is still a favorite.

@anonamustafa, suing the mosque sounds interesting....I wonder if any female has tried that?

Sadly,googling sue and mosque turns up,yes,you guessed it,Muslims suing non-Muslims!

I only said it to point out the trivial litigation that goes on already.

Remember,"feeling" offended,could be a case,nowadays.

Instead of just cartooning Mohammed, how about turning him over to commercial advertisers? Something along the following lines:

TV commercial: scene opens with an Arab-looking man, bearded and in full bedouin desert costume, standing beside a kitchen table.
He says: "Hi, my name is Mohammed. I'm sure a lot of you know me as the last and greatest of the prophets; I founded Islam over 1400 years ago. But that was then. Today I'm hear to tell you about Mo's Mocha [holds up a coffee can labelled "Mo's"] -- it's quite simply the best-tasting coffee on the market today."
He picks up a cup and takes a sip, and says: "Ah! Try Mo's Mocha, amd you'll never buy another brand. That's a prophecy you can count on!"

alternative ending:
"... never buy another brand. Or else! [and slashes through the air with a scimitar] Ha-ha, all kidding aside, folks, you'll like it!"

My idea for a mo toon. picture a pig's head on a body. turban on head. right hand holding sword. Left hand holding the right hand of a little girl. Little girl holds little doll in left hand. Now we need a place to upload pictures.

Hesperado | April 24, 2010 12:35 PM | Reply "Norris has asked other artists to submit drawings of any religious figure "

I'm not an artist or cartoonist myself, but I have a good idea for a submission for this event:

Depict all of the religious figures -- the Buddha, Krishna, Jesus, Moses, YHWH (you know, a man with a white beard in the sky), Zoroaster, perhaps also a pagan or two (some voodoo goddess, a Celtic god, a Norse god, etc.), and last and least, Mohammed -- and have all of the religious figures but the last one standing together on one side, with Mohammed alone on the other side. The other religious figures would be shown smiling, laughing, having a good time, with a collective caption something along the lines of "Hell, we don't care if you depict us, even if you mock us -- water off a duck's back, take your best shot, you puny human cartoonists, ha ha ha!"

Meanwhile, the caption for Mohammed, standing off by himself with a malignant hunch sort of like a combination of the hunchback of Notre Dame and Shylock, muttering:

"I weel keel you...!"

I'm not an artist either, but I really like the above concept, as well as the original one of making May 20 the 'Everybody draw Muhammad Day'.

From the original caption above, I liked the word play on 'veiled' threats. Although I'm sure that if any of the objects in the caption were animate rather than inanimate objects, they'd howl in protest @ being portrayed as the prophet. Just like any of us would.

Marisol

Only the pen is mightier than the sword. The paintbrush is mightier than a kalashnikov, a crayon is mightier than a suicide belt and a pencil is mightier than a kassam rocket or a scud missile.

I'm an artiste!

Some Muslims are making infantile death threats against the creators of the tv cartoon series South Park. The cartoonists are accused of-- get this-- insulting Islam. So, Death to America! Death to Israel! Death to more cartoonists. Count me in.

Some wag has declared May 20, 2010 as "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day." Count me in on that too. I'm all for insulting Islam all the time. Yes, I'm so out of shape I can't draw breath, and I'm so dense at times I can't draw a conclusion; but I can draw a picture of Mohammed with my eyes closed. Here's a sample of how clever I am, me an artiste....

http://nodhimmitude.blogspot.com/2010/04/draw-mohammed.html

I'll post just about anything in the way of Mohammed cartoons if it comes even close to being interesting. People here now might not know that Derek Devereaux made his debut here. Now's your chance.

The Muslims are iconoclasts, thinking they can impose their iconoclast standards on the world. But Islam belongs to everybody and can be used in every non-violent way by anybody in a free world. Just as all the other faiths belong to everybody.

What can the Muslims do in return, that is not violent or threathening with violence? Now that they are no longer all-powerful or blissfully unknown to outsiders?

They can start "draw-Jesus-Buddha-Krishna-Moses-Darwin-etc-days" to their heart's content, but drawing these in whatever way people want is already free. It's just plain unreasonable for Muslims to claim that Mohammed be the exception!

Hesperado

what you said about the other figures made me think of the Laughing Buddha.

Here's a splendid specimen:

http://www.houseofbuddha.com/images/Laughing-Buddha-for-site-A.jpg

I know, too, that several times in the Bible it says that YHWH laughs (and the patriarch Isaac's name is a pun with the Hebrew word for Laughter; I once read an article about comedy whose author pointed out that 'The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob has Laughter for his middle name').

Good but you have to prepare. Think about their reactions.

Remember all -

Muhammad was a very unattractive, ugly man. Vanity is the reason he forbade his depiction.

Muhammad suffered from acromegaly, which causes (among other symptoms) excessive hormonal growth and distorts bone and facial growth.

You can google the condition to get a better idea of how it might have affected muhammad's appearance.

Hesperado,

You are mistaken. The first arselifter terrorist attack on US soil was in 1972, and not 1977 -

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/AmericanAttacks.htm

Of course, the Thomas Jefferson and Barbary pirates goes back before the US became an independent country.

Interestingly, the first arselifter terrorist attack was on New Year's Day, 1915!!

http://hosting.collectionsaustralia.net/stories/turks/index.html

Sorry, that should have read -

The first arselifter terrorist attack on Australian soil was on New Year's Day, 1915.

The acronym is appropriate but a wee bit inaccurate: I would fix it with this one:

C itizens
A gainst
C rybabies
A nd
P erpetually
O utraged
O ffended
P eople

But hey, that's just me.

So, to where do we send our entries?

Great idea and great response by JW posters.
Now all we need is an address to send our cartoons there.

How will the muslims in USA react?
How will muslim obama react - if this idea gets the right momentum.

Update:

It looks like Molly Norris is now distancing herself from the Draw Muhammad Day idea. She's linked to others who are accepting drawings (see "Freshest Thing" at her site). She's keeping up her original cartoon dedicated to the South Park artists.

She writes:
"I am NOT involved in "Everybody Draw Mohammd Day!"
I made a cartoon that went viral and I am not going with it.
Many other folks have used my cartoon to start sites, etc.
Please go to them as I am a private person who draws stuff...[...]"

Anonamustafa--I note that many of the Islamic depictions of Muhammad were made in Persia back in the 10000's +. That was while Iran was still a majority Sunni land.

As for my adding something, I fear that the pix of Muhammad with an enormous priapic ph@##us leading little Aisha into his tent has made anything I could do look pretty paltry. However, here's a limerick:

A guy named Muhammad said "God,
Must think it incredibly odd!
They say I'm not prophet
But headed for Tophet!
I'll put them all under the sod!"

Thanks for that link, mate.

I knew about that attack but the previous online description of it that I read, courtesy of the Broken Hill area tourist website, was not as detailed.

One finds oneself going through and analysing it the same way we learn to analyse news stories here.

Memo to anyone else reading this: OFFTOPIC POST; if you want to read what I'm now going to say, click on Gary Rumain's link first, provided in his postings above, from April 25 8.06 am and 8.10 am, and read the account there given of the 1915 Jihad raid in Broken Hill, NSW, Australia, so you'll know what I'm talking about.

The first thing I noticed, Gary, was that the two jihadis involved, one of whom was the halal butcher (hmmm) who had been convicted of 'killing a sheep on unlicensed premises' and been unable [or claimed to be unable - that's my cynicism talking] to pay the fine (why am I reminded of a halal butcher right here in Australia, just this month, who has also got into trouble for not conforming to non-Muslim rules and regulations for the conduct of a butchering business?) and the other an ice-cream vendor (which made me think of that jihadi plotter in New York City who ran a coffee cart), were never described as 'Mohammedans' or 'Moslems' (as someone in 1915 could say) but as 'Turks'. Which in fact, ethnically speaking, they weren't: they seem to have been from south Asia. 'Turk', as in some parts of Europe, seems to be used as a synecdoche for 'Muslim'; nevertheless, to call someone a Turk doesn't convey quite as much as to call them a 'Moslem' or 'Mohammedan'. Even calling someone an 'Afghan' isn't exactly the same as to say, straightout, 'Moslem' or 'Mohammedan'.

In the 20th and 21st century, in the West, the Mohammedans 'take over' the taxi-driving niche in major cities; in the 19th century and as late as 1915, the Muslims, called 'Afghans', pretty much monopolised outback goods transport, using strings of camels. You could say they were the equivalent of truckies.

In the aftermath of this classic jihad raid, the mob of irate Aussie infidels first attacked essentially the wrong target - the German club (sure, the Germans started WWI and the Turks had come in on the German side, so the Germans were deemed responsible; but the raid on the train full of civilians had been carried out by Muslims, not by the Germans, and it's pretty plain that the primary motivation was purely Islamic - 'to slay and be slain in the Cause of allah'). Then the Infidels identified the correct target - 'the Afghan [Muslim] camel camp'.

Does any seasoned jihadwatcher who has read the whole story provided at your link, Gary, suppose for one second that all or most of the Muslims at that camp were totally ignorant of the jihad ambush so carefully planned by those two mujahedin, one of whom was their halal butcher? Or that the Muslims at that camp would not have admired the two jihadis, and approved of what they had achieved?

But the Muslims were protected by the authorities! "Their [angry Aussie crowd on the warpath] way was barred by the local militia and the Police who stood guard all night".

And one gets the impression that there was a whole lotta denial going on, on the part of those Muslims in the camel camp, when the Infidel police started asking questions to try to find out about the perps; just like there is today when a Mohammedan suddenly 'goes jihad' in a Western country and kills a lot of people, or tries to:

"He [Mulla Abdulla, one of the jihadis] was of a very reserved disposition, *rarely speaking to anyone, and even the men in the camp are not sure where he was born*."

Suuure. 'We don't know anything about him!' 'We don't know where he came from!' 'We don't know a thing! He never said anything about it!' 'We had no idea what he was planning!' That, I assume, is something like what the Muslim cameleers, all wearing expressions of sincere and wide-eyed bewilderment, told the Infidel police who came asking questions. I don't believe it for a second.

And we even get the 'not of sound mind' explanation, and the 'he just snapped because somebody done him wrong' explanation with which we are so familiar, here, in the wake of modern episodes of Sudden Jihad Syndrome:

"He was always childish and simple in his ways. He was unable to pay a fine when he was convicted for killing a sheep on unlicensed premises and has become very broody as a result." (So if those pesky Infidel inspectors hadn't insisted, so cruelly, on poor Mulla Abdulla's having to conform to Infidel regs about where sheep may be killed, he wouldn't have shot up a lot of non-Muslims on a picnic train....?).

Mulla Abdulla had been in Broken Hill for 16 years. Unable to face the full frightening implications of this, the Infidel policeman at the time pushes off the blame onto the other raider, who is represented as a sort of 'blow-in', having supposedly come to the Muslim 'camp' more recently and 'believed to be an ice-cream vendor' (everything about this character, in the report, is vague: I suspect the local Muslims knew a lot more about him than they told the Infidels).

"Gool Mahomed came to the camp, and lived next to Abdulla. They became friends.

"It is Inspector Miller's view that Gool Mahomed was the instigator of the affair.

"He believes that as Abdulla was unable to pay the fine in the recent court case Gool used this as a lever in persuading Abdulla that there was very little to live for as he was certain to be arrested or undergo imprisonment. He no doubt preyed upon Abdulla's mind until he was persuaded that it was better to die and that it would be dying gloriously and with the certainty of great happiness in the hereafter if he killed as many of the British [{tr: non-Muslims - dda} as he could before he was himself slain. Mahomed then made his plans and Abdulla fell in with them."

So we have a double deflection - first, the 'not of sound mind' explanation for Mulla Abdulla and then the idea that poor weak-minded unhappy Abdulla was manipulated by a sinister outsider and newcomer; all of it functioning to deflect any hint of suspicion of complicity, or responsibility, away from all those other Muslims comfortably dug-in right there in Broken Hill.

Good point, Andrew. In fact, if muslims have any brains, they can see that the so-called prophet should be called a "profit" because he did everything to profit himself. Convenient revealations from allah whenever it suited (profited) him....

Hey, I've got a great idea for a cartoon if someone wants to draw one. I can't draw, so I couldn't do it justice.

Email me if you might be interested in drawing it:

djmartyr@gmail.com

Where can I upload my drawing?

dumbledoresarmy, yes they were actually Afghans. Imported for their camel expertise. Too bad they weren't deported afterwards. We used to have a White Australia immigration policy. Obviously, it wasn't enforced.

Here's a better report, actually from a newspaper of the time -
http://newspapers.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/1487366

You're analysis is essentially correct. Australians din't know much about pislam at the time. We've learnt a lot since.

The gal that started this has bowed out.
Cowardice? Self preservation?
Cowardice...
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/04/creators-of-everybody-draw-muhammad-day-abandon-effort-after-it-becomes-controversial.html

On Friday, Norris told a radio talk show host in Seattle that she came up with the idea because "as a cartoonist, I just felt so much passion about what had happened..." noting that "it's a cartoonist's job to be non-PC."

That passion, it appears, has lessened. And fast.

Her stark website today reads: ""I am NOT involved in "Everybody Draw Mohammad [sic] Day!"

Sigh....

I just found that article myself and was going to post it.

What fools and cowards these people are.

The reason Mohamed didn't want any depictions of him is that he had a disease that distorted his face to grotesque proportions. Apparently his ego couldn't cope with his followers knowing that, so he made it a crime to make pictures of him. If only Muslims knew the truth about their religion. Of course, questioning Islam was made a crime too.

Everybody Draw Mohammed Day is CANCELLED!
It has been changed to Everybody Draw Al Gore Day (courtesy of ihatethemedia.com).
Enough drawings have been made to get the human/constitutional rights point across.
At this point this thing may only offend non-radical Muslims.
Write to Comedy Central instead and tell them what wuss's they are. Their censorship has created a slippery slope toward the Artist's Fear.
Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Molly Norris
http://www.mollynorris.com/freshestthing.html

http://muhammadgangbang.com is holding a contest for the best muhammad drawing.

This early, original article is WRONG.
There is no Citizens Against Citizens Against Humor.
That was a made up group that I wrote into my cartoon.
My fictional cartoon went viral and was taken seriously.
I never HAD a place to send images to!
I never made a facebook page for it, a stranger did.
As soon as this went viral I condemned the activity as it only hurts people who were not responsible for this threat to freedom of expression. My one-off cartoon is NOT a good long term plan.
Please do something positive instead.
Thanks! Dang!
Molly
http://www.splicetoday.com/pop-culture/everybody-draw-mohammad-day

this is to in reply to Mary's post April 27, 2010 5:32 PM:
I dont understand wat pleasure it gives u in insulting the muslims and their prophet. Why would u like to make a fun of something which is considered sacred for one third of the worlds popuolation. This act of urs wont harm the muslims in any way it will only break the worls apart into two groups the muslims and the non muslims and if thats wat u want ur most welcome. Although u have disrespected my religion and my prophet Muhammad SAW .i wont even abuse u..all ill do is pray for ur mercy and that u may come to the right track..because this is wat islam teaches us. Islam does not teach insulting other faiths and their feelings..islam doesnt teach retaliating to such foolish acats by death threats and abuses. Islam Teaches us to be at peace with everyone. And all the propaganda u r doing against islam wont change the true meaning of islam. No matter wat u do u cant shatter the faith of muslims.and please tell me wat problem u have with islam and muslims i would luv to answer u.
may God have Mercy on u!

Some wag has declared May 20, 2010 as "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day." Count me in on that too. I'm all for insulting Islam all the time. Yes, I'm so out of shape I can't draw breath, and I'm so dense at times I can't draw a conclusion; but I can draw a picture of Mohammed with my eyes closed. Here's a sample of how clever I am, me an artiste....
Painem - Djancoek

WOW! a nice way to draw an EVEN greater division between populations of the world, well done. I can't believe how shallow and unbelievably disrespectful this is! I think it's time we treat each others beliefs with RESPECT! And this is certainly NOT the way to do it!!

Here's my contribution to Draw Mohammed Day. Great idea!

http://newatheism.blogspot.com/2010/05/draw-mohammed-day.html

I totally agree with u. it is time to start respecting each others believes and instead of having such foolish events we should try to bring the people of different religions closer to end the terrorist activities in the world. the world thinks that Islam teaches terrorism this is NOT true at all. ISlam forbidds the killing of a single inocent person whether he is a muslim or not. Islam forbidds suicides and any such acts. Islam never taught terrorism. the people who commit to such acts are NOT muslims at all. they are trying to defame isalm by presenting the world with a wrong image of Islam. Islam not about klling people its about bringing the world closer!
May God Bless u!

this is very disrespectful! this should be removed! you should respect other peoples belifes!!!!!

In the Hebrew scriptures the Jewish name of God is considered sacred and, out of deep respect for the name, Jews do not say the name of God and do not erase it if it is written.

Perhaps we should have an annual "not say GOD day" the following FRIDAY after draw Mohammed day.

By the way, how can you draw Mohammad if there are no pictures of him in the world. I know he had a red beard (possibly an Alexander the Great left over?) as natural red beards in Arabic ethnics is nonexistant.

So here is my picture of Mohammed

________________
|**************|
|**************|
|**************|
|******?*******|
|**************|
|**************|
|**************|

Any other days we should celebrate?

;>


*-@:{(> Sad Muhammad

*-@:{)> Happy Muhammad

Why do you want to draw Mohamed?
What makes Muslims angry with the drawers that they draw him as a joke .Let me ask you if I draw the Christ in a comedy cartoon will you be happy?I think no. I think that you don't know that Islam say any Muslim must believe in Mohamed,Christ,Moses,Noah and every other prophet .Not just that Islam forbids harming or do any little bad thing to any one who is not Muslim and if you do that you are like the one who harms Mohamed our prophet himself . Also Islam says killing any person is as killing everybody in this world .Also what you say that Islam exists by terrorism is not true , Islam does better than what America does today. Islam says when you want to tell people about Islam ,you ask the permission of the king or the one how leads this country and tell him about Islam if he refuses Islam ask him to go inside his country to tell his people about Islam and if he refuses you tell him let us or we will fight you once ,twice and three times and after the third one you go and fight him because he forbids you to say what you believe in and because he forbids freedom of expression. And what happened in the south park Islam forbids it .And finally I'll tell you that Mohamed you don't like when he said to people "Be Muslims" many people fought him and he was injured and fired from his country and they fought him in his new country and when he came back to his country with 10000 soliders he didn't kill any not Muslim and told them you are safe to live to follow anyone you want to follow .That is Mohamed the greatest example to be tolerant with how hurts,fights or tries to kill you .

Muhakh2, we are not drawing Mohammed just for the hell of it. This is to teach Muslims that if they threaten an American cartoonist or artist then we will draw a thousand or ten-thousand or even a million disgusting images of Mohammed (pbuh) until you people learn to stop threatening us.

I can't access the main Draw Mohammed Day! group anymore, nor another one I had been contributing to.

I think Facebook closed them down. God damn dhimmis

The Holy book says If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other.So what about the one who didn't insult you and you were the head of the insult ?
And the existence of USA was made by terrorism,isn't it?
In other hand the existence of Islamic world was made by tolerance and equality.

And there is an advice.....Before teaching Muslims not to threaten you ,go far and know more about Mohamed the greatest man you would ever know.ِAnd I should remind you to see this video about a priest became Muslim after watching Muslims real habits. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvEiTZ-Ruzk&feature=related

I definitely support Everybody-Draw-Muhammad-Day wholeheartedly. No one should be required to respect anybody's beliefs. But I can't help but notice how incredibly discriminatory a lot of its supporters are.
I doubt that most Christians would feel it would be acceptable to intentionally offend them, they certainly have no problems offending others. If you want the right to offend others you must agree that others have the equal right to offend you.
Every Christian that wants Minarets banned, as they should be, should willingly accept a similar ban on church steeples and tall crosses. Every Christian that calls Islam violent must admit that millions have died in the forced spread of their religion. Every Jew that calls anti-Israel Muslims Terrorists has no right to do so without also acknowledging that Israel blatantly, illegally, stole most of its land. [http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x182/xineann/palestine46-2k.jpg]

All one needs to do is read the comments and hate mail on Atheist websites to see that Christians have no problems demanding respect and the supposed right to not be offended.

If you wish to offend Muslims and disrespect their belief system but won't tolerate disrespect of your beliefs then you aren't doing it from a morally superior position, You're doing it because they're different, you're just proving you're a bigot and are no better than any racists, sexists or other discriminators.

Remember, the loud, violent, militant Muslims are just as misinformed about Islam as creationists and Hannity viewers are about Christianity.

Islam is violent and dangerous, Just as Christianity was in the dark ages.
Once again the Atheists hold the moral higher ground...

@EvilGod-I'll ask you a question where did you get that Islam is violent and dangerous ?Any Muslim uses violence isn't a Muslim , he has no religion because every religion denies being violent and forbid it. And thank you for your wrong information about Islam .

@ Muhakh2

If any religion encourages violence against others or is so poorly written that it can be easily misinterpreted so that it appears to encourage violence against others, it is violent and dangerous.

Whippings and stonings are not only permitted but are often required under Sharia law. Women have been stoned to death for being rape victims. Therefore Islam is violent.

Any religion that discouraged free-thought, condemns non-believers, punishes victims, supports discrimination has world domination as one of its major tenets and will gladly issue death sentences on cartoonists is obviously dangerous.

I don't pick solely on Islam. Muslims, Jews, Christians, Hindus, Scientologists, Mormons, etcetera are all deluded. They just have different delusions.

Claiming that Islam is peaceful because 99% of its followers are, clearly and intentionally overlooks that millions of Muslims are taught and believe otherwise. If you believe Islam is peaceful you were obviously taught by a moderate preacher and because that is what you were taught you don't understand how other Muslims come to the conclusions they have. Similarly, fundamentalist, Taliban-esque extremists believe what they were taught and don't understand how moderates could arrive at their opinions.

If a belief system is open to interpretation, and Islam, like most religions, certainly is, then one must conclude that either your god isn't intelligent enough to write or inspire someone to write an unambiguous guide book or that there are no gods. Either way you're wasting your life following the ancient myths of uneducated cave dwellers. Belief in any supernatural being whether it be Allah/Yahweh, Zenu or Santa Clause is still a phenomenal waste of our amazing brains.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter