Senators subpoena Obama administration, say it is not cooperating with Fort Hood probe

November 7th 2008!

What reason would the administration have from withholding eveidence from Homeland security?
This sounds as though its a little pro-bono work on the part of Eric Holder.
Homeland security should be fully complied with since there is proof that Hasan was in communication with a known terrorist.
The question that needs to be asked is what investigation is the White House doing that could be comprimised? The prosocution of Hasan? He killed 13 wounded 35 and there were I dont know how many witnesses. If Mr. Holder cant slam dunk this one then maybe somebody needs to dig Johnnie Cochran up and get him a new suit.
I smell a rat in the wood pile here.

"When did America become a third-rate banana 'republic'?"

The first step was taken when the Iranian Islamic regime committed an act of war against the U.S. by seizing the American embassy, and Peanut Jimmy did nothing about it except whine. Since then, Bushes 1 & 2, Clinton, and now BHO, have only made matters worse.

When did America become a third-rate banana 'republic'.

At the last election. This administration thinks it is almighty , they will probably just ignore the Senators.

"Didn't BHO promise us the "most open and transparent" administration ever? He wasn't lying to us, was he? Hmmm"

Taqiaa. Defending the faith. *smirk*

"Aren't you thrilled you voted for this clown [Obama]?"

Not me, I didn't. I wasn't fooled by Hussein for one second. But then again, I'm not a delusional MoonBat.

"Does anyone else find it relevant that Nasan chose 5 November - Guy Fawkes Day - for his massacre?"

Nah.

Without doubt OBL deliberately chose September 11 due to the Battle of Vienna on September 11, 1683 - when the Mohammedans were defeated by the Polish King Jan Sobieski and his army.

But - Guy Fawkes Day is not relevant to Islamic history in any way, so I think it's just coincidence.

Probably the usual technique of seeking to humiliate.

Basically, "We should not have to do this if your administration were doing its job properly. So we will express 'disappointment' that it was necessary to issue a subpoena' and 'reluctance' that we even had to do it."

This approach is so common in the pseudo-polite UK politics. First express concern that it is even necessary to ask, then get the information, then ask the government to justify why they were unwilling to provide it in the first place, then ask what circumstance altered for them to change their previous position, who actually made the decision on each occasion, who decided to withold it and why, etc ,etc.

Every stage is an opportunity to humiliate the administration for inconsistency, hiding something, changing position, not being adequately informed/advised, mismanagement of subordinates, etc.

OK Jane -- what about this:

This is kind of out there, but "Allah's wind of destruction" plays a major role in Islam's delusional 'end times' ideology. These winds, they are told, will bring death to all but those who submit to Mohammed's "prophecies."

I found this at an obscure web site* after reading up on this 'winds of Allah' business:

"The terrorist Katrina [the hurricane] is a soldier of Allah....It is almost certain that this is a wind of torment and evil that Allah has sent to this American empire."

###

Islamists loathe -- but study -- our culture, which has declined along with Hollywood no doubt. Could "Gone with the Wind" have come to their attention by any chance? Vivian Leigh's date of birth is 5 November. Allah despises women even when submissive; Scarlett O'Hara was NEVER submissive.

###

* http://forums.degreeinfo.com/off-topic-discussions/21052-katrina-wind-allah-sent-torment-infidel.html

Sorta reminds you of the Europe's response to Nazi Germany, don't it?

Sorry - but 11/5 is just coincidence.

Has nothing to do with Vivien Leigh's birthday, or Guy Fawkes Day.

September 11, 1683/2001 - Definitely.

Sorry Jane, but I think you have acquired the disease of our "government" and wish merely to obfuscate the dots.

Think like a lunatic, Jane. Try again.

You're the lunatic, Heidi. Good Riddance to you and your disease of Stupidity.

I would appreciate not hearing from your Stupidity again. Thank You!

Without doubt OBL deliberately chose September 11 due to the Battle of Vienna on September 11, 1683 - when the Mohammedans were defeated by the Polish King Jan Sobieski and his army.

Well, actually the Battle took place on September 12, not September 11

"My guess is you are about as American as as a burka barbie."

You are such an idiot I can't believe. Leave me alone, b -.

"BTW -- are you the new Darcy, Jane?"

BTW -- are you the new Abdullah Mik, Heidi?

You're very sick. Leave me alone - go pester someone else with your idiocy. If you're unable to leave me alone, then you're sicker than I thought.

Good Day.

"The Battle of Vienna took place on the 11 and 12 of September 1683."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Vienna

Vivian Leigh's birthday? That is the best joke I've heard in awhile. Surely you jest?

On 11 Sept., Sobieski's army reached the heights of Kahlenberg, near the city. The Turks were not engaged and neither did they engage.

The battle started the next day, Sep 12, when at about 4 in the morning the Polish king gave the order to attack on the plain below.

That's what is maintained by Britannica and Catholic Encyclopaedia, and (some Wikipedia entries).

I think you would agree that whenever there is a discrepancy between Wikipedia and a "real" encyclopaedia it is the latter that should settle the matters.

And, please, Jane and Heidi, remember who is your enemy. Don't waste your time and energy fighting betwen you when you can continue contributing such good comments you have been doing until now.
Please, ladies...would you stop that quarrel? Please...?
Regards to both of you.

From the "Gates of Vienna" website, since you thumb your nose at Wiki:

"Monday, September 11, 2006
The Other September 11th

I refer, of course, to the other 9-11: September 11th, 1683, the day when an alliance of Christian armies led by Jan III Sobieski, the King of Poland, arrived at the Gates of Vienna." Read it all.

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2006/09/other-september-11th.html

It's September 11. What's why OBL attacked us on September 11.

Hi Thomas,

She started it. I replied to her musing as to whether the Ft. Hood Jihadist deliberately chose 11/5 due to Vivien Leigh's birthday and/or Guy Fawkes day (both ridiculous, of course), in an unremarkable way - and I got this in return:

"Sorry Jane, but I think you have acquired the disease of our "government" and wish merely to obfuscate the dots."

Yeah, right. Sorry, but them's fightin' words, linking me to Hussein, whom I despise for the Muslim and Islamophile that he is. Then, she says,

"My guess is you are about as American as a burka barbie."

Un-effing-believable. What an imbecile. Those - also fightin' words. You get called a Muslim and see how you feel. To me that is an insult of the highest degree. I would choose Scientology over being a moon-god-worshipper and a believer in that rotten evil ideology Islam, a plague on the world for 1400 years.

That said, she hasn't returned and I'm glad of it. I hope we can just steer clear of each other and problem solved. Thanks for both your and AlaskanInfidel's concern and yes of course the enemy? - Islam.

Regards to you both. Hope you have a wonderful day!

Thank You, Buddica. I know that I've read your comments too with admiration.

"I will probably find myself at the end of her acidic tongue now, but I am a big girl and can take it." - lol! Thanks for the chuckle.

Proverbs 23:9 -

"Do not speak to a fool, for he will scorn the wisdom of your words."

Case in point, here.

Same to you.

"Back to our friend Nidal - boy to what extent will Obambi go to hide, muddle, justify such appalling acts? Impeach him now I say!"

To this extent: Though 11/5 is obviously an Islamic Jihad, complete with an "allahu-akbar"-shouting Mohammedan, Hussein will say, "Don't jump to conclusions." Remember that BS? And never mention Islam as the source of the Muslim's Jihad. Which it is.

Hussein is a Muslim and loves Islam. He's always praising Islam - never a word about Christianity, though he's supposed to be a Christian.

Now, officially, our government cannot even used the phrase "Islamic Jihad," or the word "Jihad." Instead, the Orwellian euphemism "Man-made disasters" is substituted for the truth.

To me, Hussein is a Muslim/Islam sympathizer just as people were Nazi sympathizers in the 1930's. 13 American soldiers were massacred in an Islamic Jihad and all our president can muster up is "Don't jump to conclusions." Hussein is a traitor - that's how I feel and that's how MANY Americans feel. Yes, I wish he would be impeached, for the good of our Judeo-Christian country. No, Hussein - the USA is NOT a "Muslim country," as you have asserted. STOP DEFENDING MASS-MURDERING ISLAM!

No, I don't "thumb my nose" at Wikipedia, or The Gates of Vienna. They are good source of information, to a point. And when the point is historical accuracy I will, with all respect for the two, rely on Britannica. After all,this is the place Wikipedia and Gates of Vienna look, or should look, for information, but not the other way round.

Anyway, it is not very important and I will not be offended at all if you should dismiss the authority of Britannica and Catholic Encyclopaedia (and some Wikipedia entries) in favour of other sources. No problem at all.

What is important is that you have made peace with Heidi. I am sure I am not the only one who is happy about that newest development in your relation.
Cheers,

This is what I said:

From the "Gates of Vienna" website, since you thumb your nose at Wiki:

I knew you would NOT "thumb your nose" at "Gates of Vienna" website.

Anyway, you say September 12, I say September 11. So, we'll leave it at that.

No, Heidi made peace with me. She started the skirmish. I agreed to her last post and wished her the same. Now, the skirmish is over! Yay.

And cheers to you, too.

Thanks Jane, we all need a chuckle in these desperate times. I agree wholeheartedly with your sentiments about the great deceiver Hussein O. He hates Christianity and all these new terminologies he is forcing on us are absurd. Still, let's be patient, our time will come.....

So glad you and Heidi have called a truce.

Best

"the great deceiver Hussein O."

Uh Huh. Just following in the footsteps of his Warlord "War is deception" false prophet Mo.

And thank you! You're the best, Buddica. Have a great day!

Jesting, sort of. Despite Jane's assurance that 5 November was a random day to commit treason and mass murder, I remain unconvinced and have not yet ruled out Guy Fawks.

Shalom!

"Despite Jane's assurance that 5 November was a random day to commit treason and mass murder (sic), I remain unconvinced and have not yet ruled out Guy Fawks (sic)."

lol

I think Mosab Hassan Yousef discusses the specific reasons for the 2008 Mumbai attacks in his book, "Son of Hamas." Would you like me to go back and check for you?

"I think Mosab Hassan Yousef discusses the specific reasons for the 2008 Mumbai attacks in his book, "Son of Hamas." Would you like me to go back and check for you?"

You're a Muslim.

Oh, you mean "allah?" lol! No thanks!

We've got your Mohammedan number - give up!

Oh, what about the recent Moscow Islamic Jihads?

What's your "special day" for those? Give it a rest!

So, why November 2008 for the Mumbai Massacre? Why specifically November 26-29? Well??

You haven't answered those questions, Mohammedan!

Islamists aren't at all fond the book "Son of Hamas" nor do they even believe Mosab has has converted to Christianity. What is the basis of their disbelief do you think?

AlaskanInfidel --

You have been posting here for quite some time; I am with you and am not a Muslim. In fact, I am quite fond of the fact that I have been banned from numerous web sites due to my jihad against Islam.

Where Jane gets these ideas is beyond me.