Turkey: Two-day-old girl murdered in honor killing

Misunderstanders of Islam commit yet another honor killing -- this time of a two-day-old girl -- in modern, moderate, secular Turkey. "Two-day-old girl killed in 'honour killing,'" from Reuters, April 17 (thanks to Thomas):

Turkish police on Friday detained an unmarried mother and six other people near Istanbul for their suspected role in the so-called "honour killing" of a 2-day-old baby girl, state news agency Anatolian said.

The baby was suffocated by her grandmother after the family learned the 25-year-old mother became pregnant out of wedlock, Anatolian said.

"My family decided to kill my baby," the mother told the police, according to Anatolian. "My 55-year-old mother choked the baby with a cloth. Then, my brothers buried the baby in a hole in the garden and covered the hole with cement."...

Among those detained were also a doctor and the doctor's secretary, They allegedly had agreed not to register the baby's birth in return for an undisclosed amount of money.

The baby's father is doing his military service and was not involved in the incident.

"Honour killings," or crimes carried out against women seen to have tainted the family's name, are not uncommon in mainly Muslim Turkey, particularly in poor and rural areas.

The European Union, which Turkey has applied to join, has repeatedly urged Ankara to take a tougher stance against such crimes.

To great effect, no doubt.

| 31 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

31 Comments

| Leave a comment

"The baby was suffocated by her grandmother after the family learned the 25-year-old mother became pregnant out of wedlock, Anatolian said."


It takes two to tango....why not go after the Muslim father also?....

Prosecuting the Muslim Male partner is usually Un-Islamic...as usual, the woman is treated badly and suffers..

If you are a Muslim woman...Are you thinking?....

As a Swedish citizen I feel ashamed over my government's official policy of supporting a Turkish membership in the EU. I try the best I can to take a personal stand by refusing to buy Turkish products. I also boycot products from other muslim countries. Voting with your feet is the only way to influence these medieval cultures, and force them to change.

As a Swedish citizen I feel ashamed over my government's official policy of supporting a Turkish membership in the EU. I try the best I can to take a personal stand by refusing to buy Turkish products. I also boycot products from other muslim countries. Voting with your feet is the only way to influence these medieval cultures, and force them to change.

Just before we all start bashing Turks, a few distinctions need to be made.


My fiancé is Turkish, although muslim by birth she is agnostic, describing herself as a Kemalist. Her brother has taken to Eastern Christian Orthodoxy, while her father remains a marginal muslim but devout Kemalist. Many educated Turks follow the same line, and are keen to distance themselves from these sort of happenings by highlighting that these sort of barbaric attitudes are prevalent mostly among the lower class, uneducated peasantry.

As her father pointed out to me, "In the cities it's Kemal. In the fields, its Islam."
Another thing is of course their loathing for Tayyip Erdogan. They see him as the anti-Kemalist, trying to undo much of what Kemal has done for Turkey.

Finally, the fact that Anatolian press report this as an 'honour killing', is already light years ahead of how our own 'western' press would report this, leaving you guessing as to the motives of such a crime.

Just to clarify my position re: EU membership for Turkey, I am against such a move.

In fact I am against the whole notion of the EU in principle. Hopefully, a few more weak economies like Greece will topple over and the whole thing will come down in heap.

If that happens I will run through the streets naked, dancing and prancing!

"In the cities it's Kemal. In the fields, its Islam."

That seems very true. (I have never been to Turkey, but the differences between urban and rural Turks are probably as visible in London or Hamburg).
In Britain, it seems increasingly to be "in the cities it's Islam. In the fields, its Queen and Country", a deepening tension which threatens our future.

Just to clarify - I'm not trying to bash Turks per se. I just want the Turkish people to understand and act in line with the fact that we're all living in the 21st century now. Religion has never been, and never will be, a good foundation for any nation. Any attempt to run a country according to religious dogma will be met by total rejection on my part - be it Christian, Mosaic, Muslim, Buddhistic, Hindu, Shinto, Scientological or any which way you want. All religions just strive to dummy down and opress.

Just to remind ourselves how different 'the West' is from Islam.

A story I have told before. Back in the 1970s I lived out in the backblocks, on a cattle station where my dad worked. On a neighbouring cattle station there was a typical Irish-Australian Catholic family, kin to the manager's wife on the station where my dad worked. The family included a young teenage girl about my age (15 or so). An unscrupulous little cad of a jackaroo got this girl pregnant. Was she disowned? Was she sent off somewhere to have the baby? Was she made to give it up for adoption? Was she 'honor' murdered and/ or her baby, like happens in dar al Islam? Nothing of the sort! We in dar al harb do things differently.

A delegation comprising my dad, the girl's father, the girl's uncle, and a number of other gentlemen, paid a visit to the little cad who had supplied the paternal DNA. (He was, by universal consent, deemed unfit to *marry* the girl; from what I recall of him, he was a real little creepl). I don't know what he was told...possibly the equipment used to castrate young bulls was alluded to...but he was last heard of in a cloud of dust, heading for the other side of Australia.

The girl had her baby (at the same time as her *parents* welcomed their latest child), and it was raised in the bosom of the family. A grandchild is a grandchild is a grandchild.

And another example. My dad's youngest sister has a daughter. That daughter, my cousin, is gay. She has a permanent partner. Two years ago my cousin had a baby. The family discreetly did not inquire as to how the paternal DNA was obtained for the making of this baby. And so far as my aunt is concerned, this was *the first grandchild*, her daughter's baby; and baby is being showered with grandmotherly love and attention.

A third story - from China, of all places. In Brother Yun's autobiography 'The Heavenly Man', which gives a great deal of insight into the unregistered, free 'house churches' of China, the underground church, toward the end Brother Yun describes how he assisted a young Christian woman who had been kidnapped and raped - and impregnated - by bandits. Rather than have an abortion, she chose to have the baby, which turned out to be a girl; and Brother Yun found, for that child, new parents - a childless couple within the church who would adopt it for their own, *thus choosing a GIRL as their one officially-permitted child*....A revealing instance of how Christianity differs from Islam, in that the young woman was NOT blamed at all, for the crime committed against her by wicked men, whilst a loving home was found for the baby, the child not being responsible for the circumstances surrounding her arrival in the world.

Just to clarify - I'm not trying to bash Turks per se.

No, of course not. It never even crossed my mind that you were.

All religions just strive to dummy down and opress.

I respectfully disagree with you there. Christianity and Christian clergy gave us modern science as we know it today, and in the medieval era, served to accelerate our development past the Islamic world. Christianity has been oppressive in the past, yes, true, but not as half as much as either Islam or especially Socialism racking up a staggering body count in just 80 years when it was prevalent.....and it still continues today.


Christianity as such, unlike Islam, does not have any framework that dictates how a state should be run. Our model for that is Democracy. A true Democratic nation should cherish the values of Freedom, Dignity and equality. Aggressive secularism and statism is no better than a dictatorship.

Having been married to a woman with a patriarchical and dominating grandfather who in the 20's and 30's was a missionary to Africa, and who wouldn't/couldn't take no for an answer, and also having discussed these matters with several protestantic and catholic church representatives for many decades, I beg to differ. It was not the Church that gave us science or democracy. Christianity as we know it was decided and defined roughly three centuries after the death of Jesus Christ. You may find differences between Christianity and Islam (the're not hard to find), but hearing a Christian born-again fundamentalist (I'm not claiming you are one of those) from the US, the UK, Sweden or any other country opening his/her mouth and claiming to know the truth, really doesn't make me feel at ease with Christianity beeing the good, or least bad, religion. It's all make-believe in my eyes.

The Swedish Turnip whether you see it as make believe or not you have to know that while Christians have done horrific things in the past, none of it is encouraged or condoned by Jesus, the Gospel or any writting in the New Testament.

Islam, the Quran, and Mohammad all condone and even encourage horrific things- violence in the name of Islam.

Vicke: I know those "facts" very well. But, just as I stated in my previous reply to the Norwegian Crusader, Christianity was defined three centuries after the death of Jesus Christ, at the church council in Nicaea A.D. 325. The earliest of the Gospels, the one according to Mark, was written around A.D. 70 - more than two generations after the birth of Jesus Christ. The other Gospels are from considerably younger dates, i.e. even further away from the real 'action'. To say that the Gospels portray Jesus Christ's true teachings is to stretch things a bit too far in my view. Anyone knowledgeable in history knows that. Truth is that we cannot know exactly who Jesus Christ was or what he really teached. Everything that has been done in His name has been done by people claiming to know what and who He was. Sorry, but I just don't buy that. I'm sure He has existed, and that He was a great leader -- I,m just not as convinced He was God's son and the Saviour of mankind.

Copy from the "Weasel"...

…suffocated…buried…covered the hole with cement…
What a progress ! This time the girl was dead ! … and her ‘clit’ wasn’t chopped off !…

HALELUALLAHLALALA !!

SPIT ! SPIT ! SPIT !

Turnip

The Assyrian Church of the East ("Nestorian"), was established in 33 A.D. by Theodos. Perhaps you speak of the main western Christian structured religions. A true student of Christianity knows it was teaching in an informal manner right from the end of Christ's life, it does take time to create the structure of organized religions, which wasn't the goal of Jesus and many of his earlier followers so it did take time for it to shift to the form of an organized religion. But as others have said, real Christian docotrine is far better than Islam. There have been people who used Christianity for wrong, as there have been for any religion, that doesn't make the faith itself wrong or bad. Unlike Islam, there is nothing Jesus said that is about killing or torturing others.

@Hyperphonic: I know of this too, and of the Coptics. That doesn't change the fundaments that you are all in essence using the same arguments as the Muslims, and that you therefore, in my eyes, are equally as deceived and deceitful. I don't care who is the lesser evil. I want to maximise prosperity for all. Religion has always been based on outcastedness and ostracism for the 'othera'. So far everything said here has just deepened my discomfort with religion.

It was not the Church that gave us science

.............but you give no reason. It was the Church and her clergy that gave us science as we know it today You appear not to have heard of Robert Grosseteste, Bishop of Oxford and a Franciscan friar by the name of Roger Bacon, widely credited with founding the empirical method in Europe.
True, it was Aristole who first proposed empiricism, but which institution preserved these teachings throughout the ages? The nobillity? The Mercantile class? No.

The Church.

Those who critisize the Church always seem to never give her any credit, I suspect deliberately, and that's annoying.

And btw, I am not a fundamentalist. As a Christian, I am expected to defend my point of view, as in any argument.

So far everything said here has just deepened my discomfort with religion.

At what point was our opposing view threatening to you?

You are welcome to your views. I don't want to impose any of mine on you, but I'm asking that you don't impose any of yours on me or any other who desires freedom to worship. (Islam is an exception. Tolerance of it is dangerous.)

From what I see, you appear to have personal problem with religion. Involving emotion in an argument is one I will steer clear of.

@NorseCrusader:

Please refrain from trying to look into my mind. I have stated my case without getting personal towards anyone. Your last reply reveals that you cannot yourself make that distinction, which only goes to show that you're locked up in the notion of them and us, good and bad, God and the Devil. I'm not threatened by you, I just feel discomforted by all the medieval hocus-pocus still governing people in this so called enlightened age.

I detest Islam as much as I detest any other religion claiming to be possessor of the "Truth". I probably wouldn't have these problems in a discussion with your agnostic girlfriend, or any other sensible person with an open mind. It's the people who are so dead sure about things that scare me...

Excuse me, I never claimed to be a possessor of the absolute universal truth, that's why faith is called faith, as opposed to conviction.


Your last reply reveals that you cannot yourself make that distinction, which only goes to show that you're locked up in the notion of them and us, good and bad, God and the Devil.

If by that you mean am I a moral absolutist? Yes, I am.


I just feel discomforted by all the medieval hocus-pocus still governing people in this so called enlightened age.

At least you haven't had the gall to call yourself tolerant.
I should have expected no less from some stating a sweeping remark like " All religions just strive to dummy down and opress.

Like Islam, I have no tolerance for intolerance, my fiancé, growing up around Islam has even less.

So we have more moral relativism from the Swedish Turnip, who clearly is a turnip, for only someone with the mind of a turnip could believe that other religions like Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism etc are as intolerant, misogynistic and wicked as Islam. It is Muslims who are making places like Malmo an increasingly unpleasant place to live in, and not Christians. Swedes haven't had to fight a battle for survival for over 200 years, and it shows, but the next battle for survival is around the corner, and it is a lot less than 200 years away - more like 20. In your mind, there is no distinguishing between good and evil or right and wrong because to you they don't exist. Islamic armies threatened to overrun the West for 1,000 years right up to 1683, and had they succeeded, then Western Europe would be an islamic hellhole today, and because of politically correct sandal-wearing woolly-headed moral relativist oafs like yourself who hum Imagine all day, that might yet be the fate of Western Europe 100 years from now, a foreboding scenario for the grandchildren, and some of todays children will still be around 100 years from now to see that nightmare scenario become reality in their twilight years.

It’s hard to argue against this practice when we've done it in the US 50 million times since 1973. We just call it "abortion" rather than "honor killing". At least they have the balls to use the word "killing" while we hide behind "choice".

I am deeply offended by two commenters above -- Swedish Turnip who brings up all this tangential Equivalencist nonsense, and twitter.com, who brings up the extraneous issue of abortion in the West -- in a story about Muslims doing an unspeakably grotesque and ghoulish act. All focus should be on that.

dumbledoresarmy, on the other hand, provides a helpful example of the contrast between Muslims and Christians.

Meanwhile, pulsar in the opening comment gurgitates sentimentalist nonsense about Muslim women -- even in the face of this story showing Muslim women being acutely directly depraved.

I'm relieved you left me out! LOL!

Sometimes no mention is an endorsement! :)

I didn't want this post to veer so dramatically off topic, but ...oh well.

As regards abortion - who knows how many 'backstreet' abortions are procured, or attempted, by desperate Muslimahs, often victims of rape, quite often of incestuous rape, both within dar al Islam and inside the Muslim colonies in dar al Harb, who know that if their pregnancy becomes known, they will very likely be *honor-murdered* themselves, by their families?

Ayaan Hirsi Ali's 'The Caged Virgin' includes the observation that abortion clinics in the Netherlands (as also the domestic violence shelters) were crammed with *Muslim* females. She discovered this first-hand in the course of her work as an interpreter. Indeed, that *Muslim* females appeared to far outnumber the native Dutch non-Muslim females, as clients of those establishments. Needless to say, these women were keeping their abortions secret from their potentially-murderous nearest-and-dearest...

de sousa's islamic family values at work.

The baby was suffocated by her grandmother after the family learned the 25-year-old mother became pregnant out of wedlock, Anatolian said.

How could a grandmother suffocate her own flesh and blood, a baby she would have presumably loved had she not been born out of wedlock. I certainly hope the family honor has been sufficiently restored; murder obviously carries no stigma in islamic society. How utterly sick, depraved, and evil these people are! What about the daughter? It is amazing that they didn't kill her and keep the infant but I guess there are slight variations in this horrific practice, depending on the specific islamic hellhole and its respective culture.

One would think the human rights zealots would address the problem of islamic honor killings. They do, after all, grossly violate the human rights of muslim women and infants. But they seem to think their time and energy are better spent accusing American soldiers of war crimes and searching for job discrimination against muslims in the West.

I couldn't suffocate a baby animal, much less an innocent, helpless infant. Only an evil monster could do such a thing but why not; allah said it was ok for muslims to kill their offspring and the children of their offspring. The human rights people should be working day and night to have islam banned for sanctioning the murder of innocent people. That would be humanitarian work.

Norse Crusader wrote:

As her father pointed out to me, "In the cities it's Kemal. In the fields, its Islam."
..................

Norse Crusader, this may be true to a point—but are "unsophisticated" or "conservative" bumpkins out in the boonies in the West "honor killing" little babies?

Also, this murderous family was detained right outside Istanbul—surely the most cosmopolitan city in Turkey. In addition, the family's *doctor* and secretary—certainly well-educated people—were in on it as well. They didn't suggest adoption or even giving the child up as an "orphan"—they went along with "honor killing" a *newborn infant.*

With all due respect to your fiancée and her father—whom I'm sure are lovely people—I think the horrors of Islam go a bit deeper than they are willing to acknowledge.

Norse Crusader, this may be true to a point—but are "unsophisticated" or "conservative" bumpkins out in the boonies in the West "honor killing" little babies?

Well, in general his statement was correct as applied to Turkey, but even there are of course exceptions to the rule. As you say, out here in our Western cities we have extremist muslims who are supposedly well educated. But the West isn't Turkey. There are different factors at play.

. In addition, the family's *doctor* and secretary—certainly well-educated people—were in on it as well. They didn't suggest adoption or even giving the child up as an "orphan"—they went along with "honor killing" a *newborn infant.*

The article didn't say that. It stated that the doctor and his assistant were arrested for taking a bribe not to register the child's birth. It did not state that they were complicit in it's death.

I think the horrors of Islam go a bit deeper than they are willing to acknowledge.

They are well are of that, but at the end of the day, Turkey isn't entirely free. You can't be too open with your views, especially not with Erdogan's government.

The EU is an organization of westernized, civilized nations. Through its tacit support of such barbaric acts as Islamic honor killings, Turkey does not meet the standards by which most reasonable people would judge a nation to be civilized.
Perhaps in another 600 years...

I agree that Turkey should be barred from EU membership. Yet these honour killings are not endemic to Turkey itself. They also occur in the EU, thanks to a particular demographic.

"Yet these honour killings are not endemic to Turkey itself. They also occur in the EU, thanks to a particular demographic."

Yeah, like among Turkish immigrants to Germany, carrying their Islamic virus into new countries.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter