Clueless NYC mayor backs Islamic supremacist mosque at Ground Zero

Bloomberg, like so many, is confused. He assumes a priori that Islam is simply a religion like Judaism and Christianity, and thus that it can fit easily into the American civic framework the way Judaism and Christianity do. He seems to have no idea whatsoever of the political and supremacist aspects of Islamic teaching, and no awareness of the fact that the Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf of the Cordoba Initiative is an open proponent of bringing Sharia -- a political system that would deny the freedom of speech and freedom of conscience, and restrict the rights of women and non-Muslims -- to the United States.

Our SIOA protest against this mosque is on for June 6 at noon, outside Zuccotti Park in lower Manhattan. Be there!

"Bloomberg defends Ground Zero mosque as freedom-of-faith issue," by David Seifman for the New York Post, May 29 (thanks to Pamela Hall):

In his fiercest defense yet of the mosque proposed near Ground Zero, Mayor Bloomberg declared yesterday that it must be allowed to proceed because the government "shouldn't be in the business of picking" one religion over another.

"I think it's fair to say if somebody was going to try, on that piece of property, to build a church or a synagogue, nobody would be yelling and screaming," the mayor said.

"And the fact of the matter is that Muslims have a right to do it, too."...

"What is great about America and particularly New York is we welcome everybody, and if we are so afraid of something like this, what does that say about us?" asked the mayor.

"Democracy is stronger than this. You know the ability to practice your religion was one of the real reasons America was founded. And for us to just say no is just, I think, not appropriate is a nice way to phrase it

". . . If you are religious, you do not want the government picking religions, because what do you do the day they don't pick yours?"...

| 51 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

51 Comments

| Leave a comment

mayor, we pray and hope that they (our representatives in government) do not pick a supremecist religion which does not practice toleration of others, but instead intimidates, emasculates, subjugates and kills, in order to ascend to the highest position, such as those people who think that SHARIA law is "better" and more beneficial for the populace than that which people vote upon and agree to modify.

The Mayor is correct and right. The Mosque will be built near ground zero, no federal or state judge will stop it.

The government will not forbid the building of a mosque there. The First Amendment means it cannot be stopped, unless the builders choose on their own to withdraw. If there were overwhelming public sentiment against it, voluntary withdrawal is conceivable, if very unlikely. But unfortunately the public is somewhat split on the issue. If anything, people in Manhattan might be more in favor of allowing the mosque than of forbidding it.

Dear Mayor:

Islam and Democracy are not compatible.

Clueless?

I don't think someone like Bloomberg is "clueless," and neither do you. The reality is that a lot of money is coming into the coffers -- and in the minds of politicians, that is the only thing that matters.

To be honest, people like Bloomberg are merely selling out and attaining what they want -- power for the moment no matter the cost.

The mosque will be built. There will be protests for about six months -- if that long; and two years from now, maybe even five -- everyone will believe that the mosque was always there in the first place.

Ask a new generation of American kids a few years from today about 9/11, and they probably will have it confused with the American Revolution, which they will assume started when Perl Harbor was bombed starting the First World War, and ended at the Alamo, as North Vietnam invaded Texas from the South during the Civil War, killing Davey Crockett as he wait for George Washington to cross the Deleware and send reinforcements to South Korea.

Truly maddening.

DuhfiendofIslam:

Your spelling and grammar have improved significantly, but you still need to work on your writing etiquette ...

It's mosque with a little "m", and Ground Zero with a "G" and a "Z", donchaknow.

~~~~~~~

I am more convinced than ever that there's more than one DOI.

"Clueless NYC mayor backs Islamic supremacist mosque at Ground Zero"

Clueless, is right! ...I would also add cruel & heartless.

A way must be found to stop that mosque!!!
That said, I AGREE that the city, state and feds ["shouldn't be in the business of picking" one religion over another.]
Once we start doing that there is no end to what religion might get put in the crosshairs down the road. Any legal challenge has to be irrelevant to the project's religious nature, or this will just not fly! And, on those terms, it should not! Without clear LEGAL grounds a mob, no matter HOW JUSTIFIED, cannot simply declare a fundamental right void for one group... Use their ACTIONS to pursue LEGAL claims that pass muster with the Constitution. Or someday YOUR grandkid might end up in the dock for the same thing...only then it will be YOUR church that gets targeted!
http://hereticscrusade.com

Expediency in the face of a clear danger is the WORST possible excuse for breaking your own ethical rules.

They are other ways, like when the KKK wanted to sponsor a highway, instead of eliminating the program, the only Constitutional way some could see to prevent this travesty, they let the group have the sign...then renamed that stretch the "Rosa Parks Memorial Highway"!
Political Judo; gotta love it!

It is the financing that needs to be pursued! Where did the money come from? If the financing is kept transparant they will never be able to raise enough to do it!
Someone needs to get a route for a Kosher Hot Dog cart that passes by the building lot, before the deal is done! : - )

To the American Citizens,

We have let our guard down, not only to enemies outside of our country but also to enemies within our own country. The elected officials are not following the will of the people.

The biggest problems stem from our Commander in-Chief not being truthful with the American Citizens and not doing the will of the citizens. I believe President Obama makes a new problem each week to divide America and sap her resources dry. This is repeal “Don’t ask don’t tell” week. What a horrible idea.

The biggest lie of Obama to get elected was to say that he is a Christian. If pressed for clarification now, he would probably say that he was “only” a member of a Christian Church. He would not have been elected if he said he was a muslim. This isn't a politically correct statement,but, it is is a fact. Obama has a muslim idealism of what he wants America to be.

I wish no ill will to muslims. I wish that muslims would discover Jesus Christ and leave the cult of Islam. Islam is an evil and hateful religion that has muslims working to have the entire world in submission to Islam. The truth trumps being politically correct. Some people say that only radical muslims want to have the world submit to Islam and the moderate muslims just want to live in peace with all other faiths. I say there is no radical Islam or moderate Islam. There is only Islam. There are many muslims around the world making this same statement. The muslims even want to build a huge Mosque beside the 9/11 site. Not very tolerant and peaceful towards the feelings of family members of Americans murdered at the World Trade Center by radical muslims.

All Americans but especially Christians need to stand up together and challenge President Obama to his pre-election claim of being Christian. CHRISTIAN AND JEWISH LEADERS MUST GET INVOLVED AND LEAD. Encourage your Pastors, Priests, and Rabbis to get involved. If this effects a Churches "tax status" so be it. Obama will try to change the tax status of Churches soon enough. If Obama was willing to claim to be a follower of Jesus Christ to the American people when his actions clearly prove otherwise, then Obama is willing to say anything or do any evil to further his hidden agendas. God only knows all the evil plans of this man.

I pray that all Americans will wake up and demand answers and action from our government to the wicked path our country is on. Our country is spiraling out of control in so many areas that Americans can't keep up with what this President is doing. But, I have started a list of ways President Obama is trying to destroy America.


A list of ways President Obama is trying to destroy America and American Values.

1. Publicly professing that one’s religion is a private matter, as if to speak of his faith would be offensive to believers of other faiths. It is offensive not to know what a powerful government official believes .He is dividing the country by this stance. My worry is that Obama's next step would be to make it illegal to speak of one’s faith in public.

2. Supporting Islam over other religions. It is unconstitutional. Examples- Working to destroy Israel under the pretext of making peace in the Middle East. Obama’s bowing to Saudis literally, politically, and financially. Obama’s administration placed an “Ambassador to Islam” in the State Department with direct contact to the Secretary of State. There is no such ambassador to Christianity or Judaism. Obama is sending increased aid and support to muslim countries and organizations. Obama supports the Organization of Islamic Conference(OIC) which represents 1.5 billion muslims around the world. Obama has decreased support and aid to our historic allies.

3. Trying to make Americans totally dependent on the government and destroy our economy. Health care bill. Obama is raising national debt to record highs. Obama inaction in response to the “Gulf” oil spill.
.

4. Trying to take rights and freedoms from Americans. Healthcare bill. Wanting to regulate free speech on Internet. Nominating candidates for the Supreme Court that will clearly work to take away people's rights.


5. Failure to secure our borders and the saboteur of American efforts to secure borders. He would rather focus on the safety, rights, and dignity of those who illegally enter America with no thought of American safety, rights or dignity. Obama would rather give a voice to the illegal immigrants than U.S. citizens. He gave a world stage to the Mexican president. How does the Mexican president deal with illegal immigrants in Mexico? Do visitors have to have paperwork?

6. Trying to destroy the Christian values America was founded on at home and around the world. He is the biggest supporter of abortion by an America President in history. He has a record of apologizing to Europe and the Middle East for the U.S. supporting freedom around the world and our free way of life. Do not forget the blood that Americans have shed all over the world in the name of freedom. I would like to see a list of all the places Americans have paid the ultimate sacrifice defending other countries. What foreigners have paid that price defending American soil? He has told the world that America is not a Christian Nation. Why would a person elected to office as a “Christian” say that?

7. Trying to demoralize and destroy U.S. Military. Obama is trying to shape a military force that will be loyal to him and not the American people. Since Obama's taking office, a plethora of changes has happened in the Armed Forces to weaken and confuse the military. He has made it hard to be a Christian in the military. I'm sure he would like to enact a "Don't ask-Don't tell" clause for religion in the military. Paganism now an acknowledged faith at a U.S. Military Academy(Air Force Academy). American soldiers have now been sent in harm’s way without bullets in their guns(Barney Fife brigade). There are American soldiers training Palestinian soldiers (terrorists) for war. Obama refuses to properly name the enemy in this war we are fighting. He refuses to acknowledge Radical Islam or Jihad Terrorism happening in America or abroad. He is pushing for homosexual rights in the military. I can't wait for the Army Gay Pride Parade. Obama is trying to strip the military of men and women that have a character of honor and integrity. Who, in their right mind, would now want their child to serve in the American military? It hurts me to have to say that. Think about the vacuum left by good American people leaving and avoiding the military. What do you think that vacuum will be filled with?

8. Obama and his administration love any kind of crisis.Example-take your pick from above or add your own.


Please continue to add to list.

The best way for Americans to deal with Obama is to take the power back given to him by Americans. We must study the candidates for the November election and only support candidates that act on the will of the American people.

We can make another step to let our government know our wishes.I am asking for people to be a part of a national protest on 9/11/10 at 12:00 noon at the Capital buildings of every State and the Federal Capital Building in Washington D.C. These rallies are to call for the impeachment of President Obama directly following the November elections.


President Obama is not a promoter of life or peace. He refuses to do the will of the American people. As a Christian, I know doing the will of the people is not always the best thing to do. I would prefer someone to do God's will. That will never happen with Obama.His moral compass is broken. Obama is doing what is right in his own eyes.


Obama has lied more than any politician in American history. Obama must be impeached. As Americans, we must voice our will to our representatives. We also must voice our opposition to Obama's latest Supreme Court Nominee Kagan. He has already proven that he was eager to defy the will of the people with his tactics in passing the Healthcare bill. Obama is only going to choose a Supreme Court nominee that follows his ideologies.
Obama-he is praised for high academic achievements, Harvard elitist, elected President with almost no political experience.
Kagan-she is praised for high academic achievements, Harvard elitist, no experience as a judge.


Obama can be impeached,he can be neutralized by voting out any elected official that have followed his agenda, or Americans can vote Obama out in 2 years.But,an Obama appointed Supreme Court judge can work to take away American freedoms for 30+ years. Are democrats willing to defy the will of the American people again by voting for this crack pot nominee?

I'm asking for people to protest at rallies at the Federal Capital Building in D.C. and every State Capital building to call for the Impeachment of President Obama directly following the November election. Most urgent right now,I'm asking for people to email and call our Leaders to reject Obama's Supreme Court nominee Kagan. The rallies will be held at noon on 9/11/10. If any elected official refuses to vote the will of the people then we will vote him/her out. We will monitor how they vote.

There is a heavy price that will be paid if we do nothing. We can avoid evil. But, we can't avoid the consequences of evil.


Respectfully,
An American Citizen


( My intentions are peaceful and working within the confines of our democracy. If you don’t believe what I have written then disprove it. The truth shines through. That being said, we must work together to get out of this mess. We can continue to complain to each other or we can take action. Taking action or not will have consequences as to whether our children or grandchildren live in a free country. This is the change I can believe in.)

PLEASE COPY AND SEND TO ALL AMERICANS THAT BELIEVE OUR PRESIDENT IS DISHONORABLE AND NOT FOLLOWING THE WILL OF AMERICANS.

There could be a silver lining to this proposed mosque. It would serve as a monument to the provenance of the perpetrators' ideology, it would be a convenient focal point for demonstrations, and rest assured that its imam's every word will be subject to intense scrutiny, as has already been demonstrated on this site.

How about full disclosere of donations made to Bloomberg by the Saudis? Also, what percent of the mainstream media is owned by the Saudis??

A frustrating and dangerously stupid attitude, Mr. Bloomberg. The fact is NYC will be attacked again by muslims. You could build a mosque dead center on Ground Zero and it won't matter. You could prostrate yourself before every muslim leader in the world (observe our president) and it won't matter. The attacks will only stop once we are a conquered people living under islamic law. Period. It is divinely decreed so your words, deeds and actions to appease muslims mean nothing. Someday, probably sooner rather then later, muslims will go too far and the entire world will recognize islam for the 7th century death cult that it is. On that day your attitude will be revealed to all as we know it to be now: weak, ignorant and naive.

Bloomberg is right: This abomination most certainly is a matter of religious freedom.

The victims and families of the 9/11 mass murder, the citizens of New York in particular and US citizens generally are all overwhelmingly non-Moslem. Ground Zero is hallowed ground to the memory of the dead, killed at the hands of those who felt entitled to kill on behalf of their warped notion of religion. We need freedom from that "religion."

Maybe Bloomberg is careless enough to be taken in by Rauf. Rauf pleads his case in English, appealing to a moral standard and open-mindedness in Americans that he and his cohorts have no use for, aside from the leverage it provides them to advance their cause. But Rauf's duplicity is demonstrated by what he says in in Arabic. Is Mr. Bloomberg aware of what Rauf is saying off-stage? Couldn't Bloomberg or someone --out of idle curiosity for crying out loud-- minimally ask where the money for this project is coming from? Why should Saudi money be allowed to buy up America, block by block, business by business, uUniversity by university, olitical hack by political hack?

This is most definitely a matter of freedom of religion, or its converse: Freedom from religion. That "religion." The risibly self-styled "Religion of Peace." May God keep us free from such a "religion," I ask in His name.

". . . If you are religious, you do not want the government picking religions, because what do you do the day they don't pick yours?"...

In drafting the First Amendment, the founding fathers did not have in mind the protection of a religion which mandates killing people of other religions. That would be paradoxical.

I love the "day they don't pick yours" line...as if that is a legitimate concern. Frankly, if most Americans TRULY understood the threat that Islam poses to the civilized world, I am convinced they WOULD be willing to make an exception to the First Amendment.

The issue here is one of education and awareness. Most people in America mean well, but they aren't familiar with Islam and assume it must be somewhat similar to their own religion.

I now hear the word "Jihad" mentioned on TV several times a week at a minimum. We still have light-years to go, but at least the ball is rolling thanks in no small part to this website and similar blogs. Its a start.

The protest of this mosque will be a victory for SIOA regardless of whether the mosque is actually built because it will inspire more people to read about the issues online where the truth is not as easily distorted by the mainstream media.

Badabing!

Exactly right on every point.

I've been following this guy's anti-American nonsense for years. After seeing his egregious assault on the 2ND amendment NOTHING this guy does or says would surprise me.

Although I admit I find it ironic that he would champion ANY amendment after diligently slinging feces on the second for so many years!!

I'll bet, if asked, mayor daly of Chicago would say the same thing about the 9/11 da'wa mosque!!

"I think it's fair to say if somebody was going to try, on that piece of property, to build a church or a synagogue, nobody would be yelling and screaming," the mayor said.

Hello! Perhaps if Christian or Jewish terrorists committed 9/11, then of course there would be yelling and screaming.

Good news is, you won't find any ....

A little off topic, but read THIS!!!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1282483/Children-draped-English-flags-fascist-protest-march-Newcastle.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

The PC/MC crowd is becoming increasingly disconnected from reality. Looks like a great turn out for the EDL!!

DefenderOfIslam says:

"The Mayor is correct and right. The Mosque will be built near ground zero, no federal or state judge will stop it."
---------------------
WHO would've ever thunk it? I spent all that time learning "Doiish (pronunced Doy-eeeeeesh)" and DOI goes and learns (near) perfect English!

Jeesh!

Anyway, how's that "headscraft" feeling today, D?

Did you ever try that special shampoo we recommended last time that scalp of yours got so freakin' itchy?


WHAT BLOOMBERG FAILS TO UNDERSTAND,ISLAM IS A CULT AND NOT A RELIGION. OUR FOUNDING FATHERS DIDN'T HAVE THE FORETHOUGHT TO DEAL WITH THE STUPIDITY OF AMERICANS OF THIS PRESENT ERA.

THERE WAS NO ISLAM IN AMERICA AT THE TIME OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS. AMERICA WAS ESTABLISHED ON A JUDAO-CHRISTIAN BASE. THE ROOTS OF GOD COME FROM JUDAISM. ALL TRUE GOD WORSHIPPING BRANCHES OFF THE ORIGINAL VINE HAVE THE SAME ORIGINAL BASE.

FOR ANYONE TO SAY THAT MUSLIMS WORSHIP THE SAME GOD AS THE HEBREWS AND CHRISTIANS IS A LIAR. THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF YEARS WRITTEN ABOUT IN THE OLD TESTEMENT AND NEW TESTEMENT. IF SUPPOSEDLY ALLAH IS THE SAME GOD, WHY DOES NOT ALLAH APPEAR AT ALL?

AN ANALOGY FOR PEOPLE THAT HAVEN'T REACHED MATURITY ABOUT ISLAM

IF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS SAW SOME NATION OF PEOPLE ENTER AMERICA PROFESSING THAT THEY FOLLOWED A RELIGION THEY DIDN'T KNOW.LET'S CALL IT "LAM".NOW IN THIS RELIGION,THAT MOST OF THE AMERICANS REALLY DIDN'T UNDERSTAND, IT WAS FOUND OUT THAT THE CENTRAL DOCTRINES OF LAM CALLED FOR ALL NONE BELIEVERS OF LAM TO CONVERT TO LAM OR BE MURDERED. IT ALSO CALLED FOR PRAYERS FIVE TIMES A DAY FOR BELIEVERS OF LAM. SO THEY CAN PRAY ABOUT HOW THE DIFFERENT WAYS THEY COULD MURDER, RAPE, AND PLUNDER NON-BELIEVERS.IT WAS ALSO FOUND OUT THAT ANOTHER CENTRAL DOCTRINE OF LAM SAYS THAT LAMIMS COULD LIE AT ANY TIME TO ADVANCE THE CAUSE OF LAM.THE LAMIMS CALL IT LAQIYYA.

OUR FOUNDING FATHERS WOULD HAVE UTTERLY DESTROYED THIS CULT. THEY WOULD OUTLAW THE LAMIMS HOLY BOOK AND MAKE THE FOLLOWERS OF LAM CHOOSE TO 1.LEAVE THE COUNTRY. 2.COMPLETELY GIVE UP THE CULT THEY ARE FOLLOWING. OR 3.BE PUT TO DEATH IF CAUGHT PRACTICING LAM.

FELLOW AMERICANS ARE SO STUPID. THEY HAVE BEEN BRAINWASHED TO BE PC FOR SO LONG.

TO TAKE THE ANALOGY ONE STEP FARTHER, WHAT IF THE LEADERS OF ILAM WERE VERY WEALTHY AND THEY OFFERED HUGE SUMS OF MONEY AND PILES OF GOLD TO GEORGE WASHINGTON TO ALLOW THE LAMIMS TO CONTINUE TO THRIVE IN AMERICA.DID I MENTION THAT LAMIMS HAVE MANY WIVES AND THEY BREED LIKE COCKROACHES?

GEORGE WASHINGTON WOULDN'T HAVE TAKEN THE MONEY OR REWARDS. HE WOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT ONE DAY WHEN THE LAMIMS BECAME POWERFUL ENOUGH, THEY WOULD TURN ON HIM AND HIS FAMILY. THEY WOULD ORDER GEORGE AND HIS FAMILY TO SUBMIT TO LAM OR BE KILLED.

A SILLY ANALOGY, BUT MAYBE HELPFUL FOR PEOPLE THAT NEED BOTTLE FED ABOUT THE TRUTH OF ISLAM. MAYBE ONCE THEY UNDERSTAND THIS THEY WILL BE READY FOR SOFT FOOD.

Bloomberg is a blooming idiot. Hard to believe that he is Jewish.

As about the #8, or 9th richest person in America he is certainly a part of the liberal elite. Money is more important than what is right and proper for New York.

Since Bloomberg leans more Democratic it is not hard to figure his need for PC covering this issue.

It will be actions like building the mosque at 911, which will be the beginning of the downfall for New York. Americans will desire less to visit or live, in a city which is becoming repulsive.

Why haven't the imam's finances been investigated? Where does an imam get $5 mil in his personal name? Were taxes declared and paid on it? If it's a gift, gift tax must be paid on a sum that large.

These AINO's (American In Name Only) like Bloomfield need to get booted...hard...Can we please stop electing reptilian space aliens to office?

I think there is wishful thinking on the part of Mayor Bloomberg and other Americans who halfheartedly support this misplace 911 Mosque. They think in pluralistic terms that our democracy is strong enough to absorb this 'immigrant' group as it has others in our nation's history without damaging us in the long run. Naively, they compare Islam to other world religions. So how bad can it be to absorb one more cultural group into our American experience, adding to the cultural diversity already here? After, we are all immigrants, even the Native Americans migrated across the Bering Straits thousands of years ago. So what's the big deal?

The problem with this is that the Islamic center is not a small canary in the coal mine, but a large gorilla. Islam has proven itself unable to adapt to other cultures, to fit and integrate into them, but looks down upon such cultures with disdain. This is not a religious observation, but a political one. Islam fails as a religion, but succeeds terribly well as a political control ideology. And that is why it is a gorilla, because it will do whatever it can devise to destabilize our society, especially our constitutionally protected freedoms, to install its own version of political justice, Sharia.

Bloomberg and Stringer, and all who are behind the Board's approval of this mega-mosque project at Ground Zero are either happily oblivious or complicitly guilty, so they can't hear the alarm bells going off, voiced by so many who are not Islam-ignorant. This thirteen storied mega-mosque does not belong downtown Manhattan, anymore than it belongs in Madrid, or Paris, or London, or Jerusalem, or Beslan. Maybe in Tehran, but not on our soil, which once given up to Islam is theirs. What will happen, instead of a peaceful coexistence between the mosque's culture and the surrounding American culture, will be a gradually increase rate of friction, until it heats up into a full fledged battle. There is no peace with Islam, and giving them such a large piece of real estate in one of the most expensive cities in the world will not appease them. Nor will it ameliorate them towards the American Constitution and Bill of Rights, which they consider subordinate to 'Allah's laws' and its extended Sharia. They will never accept our freedoms and way of life, because they are programmed by their religio-politcial ideology to reject them. And giving them land in this prime real estate for their mosque will not change that. This gorilla will demand it be fed, by consuming our freedoms, and will not feel satiated until such time all those freedoms are gone. And that will be a very long war. Bloomberg et al are clueless on any of this.

So it is wishful thinking on the part of Bloomberg et al that somehow this time it will be different, that the 911 Mosque is not a symbol of Islamic supremacy, nay even victory, over our free society, and they will do what it takes to make it so. In time, this will become amply evident, and pray that by then it is not too late. Bloomberg et al will go down in history for their foolish infamy. Even if not on the take for Saudi 'generosity', they are clueless at best. Too bad, New York.

IF muslims were to behave as the other religions mentioned by Bloomberg, then I would agree with his comments about "fairness" and muslim rights.

But muslims DON'T behave like the other religions, do they Mr. Bloomberg?

Based on their religious/political ideology, they have launched multiple attacks on your city, killed thousands of your citizens/visitors/tourists, deprived your city of a significant percentage of its commercial real estate by knocking down buildings, damaged the health of unknown thousands of other citizens and public workers, severely disrupted the economy and tax base of your city.....I could go on & on.

Answer this, Mr. Bloomberg.....Just who's side are you on?

Want to understand Mayor Bloomberg? Just think ordinary political hack. That's all he is, which, of course, is woefully inadequate in this age of renewed Islamic supremacism.

NYC needs a Rudy Giuliani on steroids. So does the nation. Does anyone see anyone out there fitting this description? I don't, and that's why we're in more trouble than we need to be. What a stupid age, i.e., an age of Western mediocrity (or even less) and Islamic "enthusiasm." Not a good combination. We're gonna' pay for this double whammy even more than we have already. And again I assert that the real problem is not Islam but rather Western ignorance of Islam. Mayor Bloomberg could be our poster boy here for this truth.

Under U.S. law, the government can't give religious reasons (for example, arguing that Islam is a cult) for stopping the building of the mosque.

Some day, when people are more aware of the totalitarian drive of Islam, the building of mosques that promote an Islamic state might be stopped under U.S. law.

At the rally, I hope Robert Spencer will use the venue to speak on a broader topic than just this one mosque: the ways in which many mosques in the U.S. violate U.S. law, since those mosques, which like other religious organizations are tax-exempt, promote an Islamic state and are thus political organizations, and are therefore not entitled to tax exempt status. It would be great if Robert could consult with his current lawyers about any possible kinds of legal challenges to mosques or to certain typical mosque activities, such as the promotion of jihad and sharia. Then Robert could tell the crowd at the rally about those legal possibilities, and ask Americans to demand legal action against any Islamic-law mongering mosque from California to New York, from Texas to Minnesota. That might naturally segue into some words from Robert about the Ground Zero imam's statements about Islamic law. Then it might be good to hear Robert say something like, "This mosque should not be built, but if it is, against the wishes of many of the families of 9/11 victims, what guarantees will the imam give to New Yorkers and Americans that Islamic law will not be promoted by the literature and imams of the mosque?"

It's important that everyone go to the demo on June 6.

Wellington,
Now Rudy Giuliani would have found a legal, constitutional way to give this mosque and every other jihad-promoting, sharia-mongering mosque a legal hard time.

Eleanor - obviously a literate Mohammedan typed that piece of horror for the illliterate "doi."

That this mosk (I prefer that spelling) could happen is like something out of the twilight zone. It IS the twilight zone. Bloomberg is insane, he should be committed to a mental institution.

"I think it's fair to say if somebody was going to try, on that piece of property, to build a church or a synagogue, nobody would be yelling and screaming," the mayor said."

Just how out of it is this clown?

Did the pod people come and steal his brain?

This is the mayor of NYC? Good God.

Very good point, traeh.

Long before New York or Detroit break out into a hot war with Islam, where they begin to look war torn like Beirut, there should be legal challenges to the political nature, especially anti-Constitutional effects of trying to slide Sharia through the back door. The 911 Mosque may be an important staging area for this effort to shariatize the West, particularly our Constitutional freedoms, a kind of grand home base - Caliphate mosque from which they will broadcast their supremacist agenda to all the other mosques of the land. If we keep challenging them on legal constitutional grounds, their momentum may be broken enough to either they stop and desist, or are told to leave. Their mosques are then shut down as bases for their political agenda. If they persist, then their Islamic agenda will come under intense scrutiny, with ill results for their cause, or else it leads to open warfare. Either way, this may be the beginning of the end for their Islamic supremacy ambitions, a kind of necessary evil endured to bring about their end. It might kill Islam entirely, and relegate it to another failed totalitarian ideology like Communism or Nazism, another nasty for the history books.

If the hope of the current powers that be is to use the location of the 911 Mosque to better monitor their activities, then there is some hope that this can turn out well, and our democracy becomes strengthened in the end. But as I said earlier, this may be wishful thinking, especially in the current political vacuum of leadership. We need clear headed people in office who are not Islamo-ignorant to take command of this situation. The 911 Mosque is very much a Trojan Horse on our shores, and we who understand this should keep up the pressure to dismantle it. June 6th will be important. (I will be out of the country, so it's a miss for me.) All who can attend must do so, if for no other reason than to show numbers. Islam's political agenda must be put on notice. It can be stopped.

Too bad our current crop of smiling politicians are so clueless about Islam, what dupes.

Bryan our founding fathers knew all about Islam, and the intricacies of its horrors. Here is what John Q Adams thought about Islam, I don't think our founding fathers specifically mention Islam in our Constitution due to the fact that they probably figured only idiots would allow this filth disguised as a religion to infiltrate onto American soil.

FOR THE RECORD THIS IS WHAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS THOUGHT OF ISLAM:

Adams on Jesus Christ and Christianity, Relative to Muhammad and Islam

"And he [Jesus] declared, that the enjoyment of felicity in the world hereafter, would be reward of the practice of benevolence here. His whole law was resolvable into the precept of love; peace on earth – good will toward man, was the early object of his mission; and the authoritative demonstration of the immortality of man, was that, which constituted the more than earthly tribute of glory to God in the highest… The first conquest of the religion of Jesus, was over the unsocial passions of his disciples. It elevated the standard of the human character in the scale of existence…On the Christian system of morals, man is an immortal spirit, confined for a short space of time, in an earthly tabernacle. Kindness to his fellow mortals embraces the whole compass of his duties upon earth, and the whole promise of happiness to his spirit hereafter. THE ESSENCE OF THIS DOCTRINE IS, TO EXALT THE SPIRITUAL OVER THE BRUTAL PART OF HIS NATURE." (Adam's capital letters)….[pp. 267-268]

“In the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar [i.e., Muhammad], the Egyptian, combining the powers of transcendent genius, with the preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an impostor, proclaimed himself as a messenger from Heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of the Mosaic law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle. Adopting from the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust by adapting all the rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE (Adam's capital letters)….Between these two religions, thus contrasted in their characters, a war of twelve hundred years has already raged. The war is yet flagrant…While the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace upon earth, and good will towards men.” [p. 269]

Adams on Jihad War, Dhimmitude, and the Muslim View of Non-Muslims; Examples of the Perfidy of Muslim States, Including the Ottoman Turkish State

“As the essential principle of his faith is the subjugation of others by the sword; it is only by force, that his false doctrines can be dispelled, and his power annihilated.

They [The Russians] have been from time immemorial, in a state of almost perpetual war with the Tatars, and with their successors, the Ottoman conquerors of Constantinople. It were an idle waste of time to trace the causes of each renewal of hostilities, during a succession of several centuries. The precept of the Koran is, perpetual war against all who deny, that Mahomet is the prophet of God. The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute; the victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace; and the faithful follower of the prophet, may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat: but the command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective. The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force. Of Mahometan good faith, we have had memorable examples ourselves. When our gallant [Stephen] Decatur ref had chastised the pirate of Algiers, till he was ready to renounce his claim of tribute from the United States, he signed a treaty to that effect: but the treaty was drawn up in the Arabic language, as well as in our own; and our negotiators, unacquainted with the language of the Koran, signed the copies of the treaty, in both languages, not imagining that there was any difference between them. Within a year the Dey demands, under penalty of the renewal of the war, an indemnity in money for the frigate taken by Decatur; our Consul demands the foundation of this pretension; and the Arabic copy of the treaty, signed by himself is produced, with an article stipulating the indemnity, foisted into it, in direct opposition to the treaty as it had been concluded. The arrival of Chauncey, with a squadron before Algiers, silenced the fraudulent claim of the Dey, and he signed a new treaty in which it was abandoned; but he disdained to conceal his intentions; my power, said he, has been wrested from my hands; draw ye the treaty at your pleasure, and I will sign it; but beware of the moment, when I shall recover my power, for with that moment, your treaty shall be waste paper. He avowed what they always practised, and would without scruple have practised himself. Such is the spirit, which governs the hearts of men, to whom treachery and violence are taught as principles of religion.” [p. 274-275]

“Had it been possible for a sincere and honest peace to be maintained between the Osmanli and his christian neighbors, then would have been the time to establish it in good faith. But the treaty was no sooner made than broken. It never was carried into effect by the Turkish government.” [p. 276]

“From the time when the disaster of Navarino ref had been made known to him, the Reis Effendi [Ottoman diplomat assigned to Russia] had assumed the tone of the aggrieved party, and made formal demands of indemnity, and the punishment of the offending admirals. He still manifested however, a solicitude to prevent the rupture of the negotiations by the departure of the ambassadors…” [p. 298]

“Upon the departure of the ambassadors, the Sultan, who must have been, however, unwillingly preparing his mind for that event, immediately determined upon two things; a war with Russia alone – and a dallying attempt to protract the negotiation, and gain time of preparation for the conflict.” [p. 298]

[From the Ottoman Reis Effendi, to his Russian counterparts] ‘The present friendly letter has been composed and sent, to acquaint your excel­lency. with the circumstance; when you shall learn, on receipt of it, that the Sublime Porte has at all times; no other desire or wish than to preserve peace, and good understanding ; and that the event in question has been brought about, entirely by the act of the said minister, we hope that you will endeavor, do every occasion, to fulfil the duties of friendship.’ But precisely at the time when this mild, and candid, and gently expostulary epistle was despatched for St. Petersburg, another state paper was issued, addressed by the Sultan to his own subjects-this was the Hatti Sheriff of the 20th of December, sent to the Pashas of all the provinces, calling on all the faithful Mussulmen of the empire to come forth and 'fight for their religion, and their country, against the infidel despisers of the Prophet. The comparison of these two documents with each other, will afford the most perfect illustration of the Ottoman faith, as well as of their temper towards Russia.

The Hatti Sheriff commenced with the following admirable com­mentary upon the friendly profession, which introduced the letter to count Nesselrode. ‘It is well known (said the Sultan) to almost every person, that if the Mussulmen naturally hate the infidels, the infidels, on then part, are the enemies of the Mussulmen : that Russia, more espe­cially, bears a particular hatred to Islamism, and that she is the principal enemy of the Sublime Porte.’

This appeal to the natural hatred of the Mussulmen towards the infidels, is in just accordance with the precepts of the Koran. The document does not attempt to disguise it, nor even pretend that the enmity of those whom it styles the infidels, is any other than the ne­cessary consequence of the hatred borne by the Mussulmen to them—the paragraph itself, is a forcible example of the contrasted character of the two religions. The funda­mental doctrine of the christian religion, is the extirpation of hatred from the human heart. It forbids the exercise of it, even towards enemies. There is no denomina­tion of christians, which denies or misunderstands this doctrine. All understand it alike—all acknow­ledge its obligations ; and however imperfectly, in the purposes of Divine Providence, its efficacy has been shown in the practice of christians, it has not been wholly inoperative upon them. Its effect has been upon the manners of nations. It has mitigated the horrors of war – it has softened the features of slavery – it has humanized the intercourse of social life. The unqualified acknowledgement of a duty does not, indeed, suffice to insure its performance. Hatred is yet a passion, but too powerful upon the hearts of christians. Yet they cannot indulge it, except by the sacrifice of their principles, and the conscious violation of their duties. No state paper from a Christian hand, could, without trampling the precepts of its Lord and Master, have commenced by an open proclamation of hatred to any portion of the human race. The Ottoman lays it down as the foundation of his discourse. [p. 299-300]

“The last appeal of the Sultan to the fanaticism of his people, and to the protection of his prophet, has been vain. He told them, that since the happy time of their great prophet, the faithful Mussulmen had never taken into consideration the numbers of the infidels. He reminded them, too truly reminded them, how often they had put millions of Christians to the sword; how many states and provinces they had thus conquered, sword in hand.” 9 [p. 302]

“[More from the Ottoman Sultan’s pronouncement to his subjects]...‘all infidels are but one nation…This war must be considered purely a religious and national war. Let all the faithful, rich or poor, great or little, know, that to fight is a duty with us; let them then refrain from thinking of arrears, or of pay of any kind; far from such considerations, let us sacrifice our property and our persons; let us execute zealously the duties which the honor of Islamism imposes on us – let us unite our efforts, and labor, body and soul, for the support of religion, until the day of judgement. Mussulmen have no other means of working out salvation in this world and the next.’”

Those provinces are the abode of ten millions of human beings, two thirds of whom are Christians, groaning under the intolerable oppression of less than three millions of Turks. Those provinces are in some of the fairest regions of the earth. They were Christian countries, subdued during the conquering period of the Mahometan imposture, by the ruthless scymetar of the Ottoman race; and under their iron yoke, have been gradually dwindling in population, and sinking into barbarism. The time of their redemption is at hand.” [p. 303]

“With regard to the Hatti Sheriff of the 20th of December, summoning the whole Ottoman nation to arms against Russia, the sultan now thinks proper to say, that it was only a proclamation which the Sublime Porte, for certain reasons, circulated in its states; an internal transaction, of which the Sublime Porte alone knows the motives, and that the language held by a government to its own subjects cannot b a ground for another government to pick a quarrel with it – especially, as the Grand Vizier had, immediately after the departure of the Russian envoy, written a letter to the prime minister of Russia, declaring the desire of the Sublime Porte till to maintain peace. That if Russia had conceived suspicions, from the Sultan’s address to his subjects, she might have applied amicably to the Porte to ascertain the truth and clear up her doubts.” [p. 311]

Remonstrating Against the Moral Equivalence of Britain and the European Powers

“In the kings [British King, George IV] speech, at the opening of the session of Parliament, on the 29th of January, he said that, ‘for several years a contest had been carried on between the Ottoman Porte, and the inhabitants of the Greek provinces and islands, which had been marked on each side, by excesses revolting to humanity’.” [p. 304]

“Still more extraordinary was it to the ears of Christendom to hear a British king, in a speech to his parliament, style the execrable and sanguinary head of the Ottoman race, his ancient ally; and denominate a splendid victory, achieved under the command of a British admiral, in the strict and faithful execution of his instructions, and untoward event. But the last member of the paragraph from his majesty’s speech, which we have quoted, to those accustomed to the mystifications of royal speeches and diplomatic defiances, explained these apparent disparates. He declares the great objects to which all his efforts have been directed, and of which, while adhering to his arrangements, he will never lose sight, are the termination of the contest between the hostile parties; the permanent settlement of their future relations to each other, and maintenance of the repose of Europe, upon the basis on which it has rested since the last general peace.” [p. 305]

“And where is the protection to the commerce of his majesty’s subjects! And where is the determination to launch all the thunders of Britain at half a dozen skulking piratical cockboats, driven by the desperation of famine to seek the subsistence of plunder, assigned in the protocols, the treaty and the communications to the Ottoman Porte, as the great objects of his majesty’s interference between a legitimate sovereign and his revolted rayahs?...In all these documents, issuing from the profound and magnanimous policy of the British warrior statesman, nothing is more remarkable, than the more than stoical apathy with which they regard the cause, for which the Greeks are contending; the more than epicurean indifference with which they witness the martyrdom of a whole people, perishing in the recovery of their religion and liberty…The royal speech of January, 1828 indicates that in the protocol and in the treaty, the government of George IV, had outwitted themselves, and were the dupes of their own policy. It presents the singular spectacle of a sovereign, wincing at the success of his own measures, and repining at the triumph of his own arms. From that time the partialities of England in favor of he ancient ally, have been little disguised; and the disposition to take side with the Porte has only been controlled, by the unwelcome necessity of adhering to the faith of treaties.” [pp. 306-307]

“Far from being like the Hatti Sheriff of the 20th December, an appeal to the Ottoman people, a bold and candid avowal of the precepts of the Koran; it is an utter departure from them, and an assumption, equally shameless and hypocritical, of argument on Christian grounds.” [pp. 308-309]

Justice of the Greek Revolution

“If ever insurrection was holy in the eyes of God, such was that of the Greeks against their Mahometan oppressors. Yet for six long years, they were suffered to be overwhelmed by the whole mass of the Ottoman power; cheered only by the sympathies of all the civilized world, but without a finger raised to sustain or relieve them by the Christian governments of Europe; while the sword of extermination, instinct with the spirit of the Koran, was passing in merciless horror over the classical regions of Greece, the birth-place of philosophy, of poetry, of eloquence, of all the arts that embellish, and all the sciences that dignify the human character. The monarchs of Austria, of France, and England, inflexibly persisted in seeing in the Greeks, only revolted subjects against a lawful sovereign. The ferocious Turk eagerly seized upon this absurd concession, and while sweeping with his besom of destruction over the Grecian provinces, answered every insinuation of interest in behalf of that suffering people, by assertions of the unqualified rights of sovereignty, and by triumphantly retorting upon the legitimates of Europe, the consequences naturally flowing from their own perverted maxims.” [p. 278]

“This pretended discovery of a plot between Russia and the Greeks, is introduced, to preface an exulting reference to the unhallowed butchery of the Greek Patriarch and Priests, on Easter day of 1822, at Constantinople, and to the merciless desolation of Greece, which it calls ‘doing justice by the sword’ to a great number of rebels of the Morea, of Negropont, of Acarnania, Missolonghi, Athens, and other parts 10 of the continent.The document acknowledges, that although during several years, considerable forces, both naval and military, had been sent against the Greeks, they had not succeeded in suppressing the insurrection.” [p. 301]

http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=11283

Bryan than hindit who convert to evan christian who hate all other religion who hate his own mother and father told the DA of the city I live in about our mosque have secret room with weapons, bomb making material, secret pirson and toutue room. When the DA show up with 50 heavily armed policeman and specical investagers they found nothing our thicher walls whetre 2 to 3 inches thrick comete. DA donot like being make fool of any one who ever visit the mosque would have know there is no way to have secret rooms in the builting. Was that hindit in big time touble with the DA.

There where muslim liveing in america at the time of our founding father many support the revold against the king of england. John Adam was than lawyer who represtent merchant and craftman, represtent Boston merchant compliament to the Sultan before the revold that then when ruler like the sultan hear all cases from foreigner in his court the last thing you want is than repub for insulting Islam and the Sultan , what he said about Islam was in his private papers after he die.

". . . If you are religious, you do not want the government picking religions, because what do you do the day they don't pick yours?"..."

Is not he picking islam here? Would he even speak about a church being built? He would not, but for islam he stands in support.


"Democracy is stronger than this. You know the ability to practice your religion was one of the real reasons America was founded. And for us to just say no is just, I think, not appropriate is a nice way to phrase it"

There a "democrat" goes again. Remember, we are a Republic, NOT a Democracy. He knows this, his embrace of this democracy wording is deception at best. The "Dems" and progressives like to say it, but refuse to follow it when faced with Healthcare law, or state border challenges. Democracy is mob rule, yet they vote in the minority against the will of the American people.

The Current buiding they want to remove may have historic register status, it may be a option on halting the mosque construction going forward.


DefenderofIslam,

This is what John Q Adams thought of Islam, clearly he thought its tenants are against everything our Constitution stood for in regards to human rights, and the equality of man. In the spirit of this sentiment from John Q Adams Islam should be declared sedition against our republic.

"This appeal to the natural hatred of the Mussulmen towards the infidels, is in just accordance with the precepts of the Koran. The document does not attempt to disguise it, nor even pretend that the enmity of those whom it styles the infidels, is any other than the ne­cessary consequence of the hatred borne by the Mussulmen to them—the paragraph itself, is a forcible example of the contrasted character of the two religions. The funda­mental doctrine of the christian religion, is the extirpation of hatred from the human heart. It forbids the exercise of it, even towards enemies. There is no denomina­tion of christians, which denies or misunderstands this doctrine. All understand it alike—all acknow­ledge its obligations ; and however imperfectly, in the purposes of Divine Providence, its efficacy has been shown in the practice of christians, it has not been wholly inoperative upon them. Its effect has been upon the manners of nations. It has mitigated the horrors of war – it has softened the features of slavery – it has humanized the intercourse of social life. The unqualified acknowledgement of a duty does not, indeed, suffice to insure its performance. Hatred is yet a passion, but too powerful upon the hearts of christians. Yet they cannot indulge it, except by the sacrifice of their principles, and the conscious violation of their duties. No state paper from a Christian hand, could, without trampling the precepts of its Lord and Master, have commenced by an open proclamation of hatred to any portion of the human race. The Ottoman lays it down as the foundation of his discourse. [p. 299-300]"

You HATER miss the point it John Adam was alive today he would defend Islam right to 1st ammention protection as than valid religion. The world have change since his times. Pam Geller is than racist as she support than white power leader in South Africa who have one of the dumbist law on racisal seperation ever make by men. Than black person was total forbiner by the law from resureing than white person who was drowning in water unable to swim even it the black person was the only person to see it an help the person I hear southern red necked say that is than dumbass law. John Adam wanted to give all black people the same one person one vote which white people have, the constitution gave then 3/5 of than white person vote.

What on earth is this person even saying?!

Learn how to write, for goodness' sake! Whatever point you're trying to make is indecipherable!

(Although it looks like all you know how to do is call people haters and racists.)

Amazoning, reely. I jest haveto shek my headthan, Kimk. I juts shek it, shek it, shek it!

Than.

hater.

Clueless one ...

John Adams was a defender of freedom and liberty -- so No, he wouldn't have defended islam as you purport, since islam runs counter to these things.

Two quotes by John Adams for you to nibble on and digest:

"But a Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty, once lost, is lost forever." -- John Adams, letter to Abigail Adams, July 17, 1775

"Children should be educated and instructed in the principles of freedom." -- John Adams, Defense of the Constitutions, 1787

~~~~~~

...oh, why do I bother?


Yeah, and dispense bogus information, too.

"DispenserofIdiocy", is more like it.

Or ...

"DefilerofInglesh", lol ...

Eleanor - where are you?!

Good God, just look at the islamic mental midget with an IQ of 3.

Hey doi - HATER!

"...oh, why do I bother?" [re:defenderofislam]

True. We're dealing with a mentally disabled person with an IQ of 3.

Eleanor has the right approach. All this illiterate Barbarian deserves is mockery and ridicule. Just like his infernal belief system.

Eleanor and champ - here's a favorite from doi's post above:


"I hear southern red necked"

LOL! Pronounce "necked" as "nekkid!" That's how I saw it, anyway!

Opposition to this mosque breaks the First Three Commandments of PC MC:

1) Thou Shalt Never Criticize Islam Itself.

2) Thou Shalt Only Criticize a Small Minority of Extremists Who Are Trying to Hijack Islam.

3) Thou Shalt Never Use Islam or anything centrally Islamic to Explain the Motivations of that Small Minority of Extremists.

Unless it is proved that this mosque and the Muslims behind it (Imam Rauf, etc.) fit the PC MC definition of "extremist" -- which is unlikely -- there is no reason in the PC MC view to oppose it, and every reason to vilify the opposition as "bigoted".

Whenever there are attempts to make an end run around these Commandments -- such as, for example, claims made that mainstream Islamic law in fact mandates indefinite war against non-Muslims; or that mainstream Islamic law is extremist and anti-liberal -- the PC MCs have a complex arsenal of pseudo-arguments and evasions to obfuscate the implication of those claims, for that implication is too horrible for the PC MC mind to face: the implication, namely, that the central mainstream culture of an entire People who are perceived to be an Ethnic People (or a wonderfully diverse Rainbow of Ethnic Peoples) is unjust and inimical to our laws and to our most cherished values -- including most of the very liberal values dear to the PC MCs themselves.

The Opposition to the Ground Zero Mosque thus seems to be pursuing a somewhat incoherent double track:

a) implying a direct and massive link between Islam and the Tiny Minority of Extremists who perpetrated 911

b) using the mosque issue in order to oppose certain Muslims (e.g., Imam Rauf) who are not, obviously, being directly branded as in cahoots with the 911 terrorists, but only as purveyors of some amorphous set of ideas inimical to Western laws and values (e.g., Sharia law).

Since PC MC remains dominant and mainstream throughout the West, anything that smells like (a) will not only be vehemently opposed and its proponents vilified, it will remain incomprehensible to the PC MCs, and in order to grasp why people are proposing (a), recourse will be had to labels such as "far right" and, of course, "bigots". Needless to say, the hypersensitivity of PC MCs to (a) is set so high, they will tend to brand even the milder (b) as consanguineous with (a).

John Adam succueful defend the two red coat charge with murber after a mob attack then his cousine of the Son opf Libery hater him for that. Since the 1st ammention grant
freedom of religion he would defend Islam right to be here.Quite afew muslim serve in Wasgington Army and afew die fighting for america freedom. John Adam would be most unhappy with you hater missuseing his private writeing. When John Adam was president he sign than treaty with the Ottoman Empire where the America Government state we arenot than Christian nation and never will be than Christian nation. The Senate approve of the treatry by 100% yes vote for it. John Adam put the we arenot than Christian Nation to protect some non-christian religions in america from bigots.

My IQ is over 140. South Africa old racist government have alot of supidist law which most racist would never approve of. That why the Britiah defeat then in the Boor war no other nation support then.

"My IQ is over 140. South Africa old racist government have alot of supidist law which most racist would never approve of. That why the Britiah defeat then in the Boor war no other nation support then."
------------
Breggin about than QI is in bad forum, D. It be no way too umpress enyones hear at than WartchJehud. We carenot how smarted yuo thinked yuo are becusae you're word speek volums about yuo. Yuor argiments spoked evun bigr armounts about yuo, than.

Go one back tothan comete room ware yuo hyde than wargin arse, and thinked about all than hate yuo half insyde yuo.

Try too luv than lyfe morethan than deth, okey?

Luv, andthan some bumbs to,
DOI

"One-celled organisms outscore him in IQ tests."

We need to stop thinking of Islam as a religion and start thinking of it as an all-encompassing totalitarian ideological system. Communism was similar, but it simply dispensed with religion, eliminating factions based on abstract doctrinal differences (Sunni v Shiite). This was a huge advantage in enforcing uniformity and discipline. Islam however has the advantage of obtaining religious protections from weak western societies that don't understand that Islam is NOT a religion and it does NOT merit these protections.

Dutch-Somali writer and activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali described the faith she was born into as "a dangerous, totalitarian ideology masquerading as a religion."

We need to stop thinking of Islam as a religion and start thinking of it as an all-encompassing totalitarian ideological system. Communism was similar, but it simply dispensed with religion, eliminating factions based on abstract doctrinal differences (Sunni v Shiite). This was a huge advantage in enforcing uniformity and discipline. Islam however has the advantage of obtaining religious protections from weak western societies that don't understand that Islam is NOT a religion and it does NOT merit these protections.

Dutch-Somali writer and activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali described the faith she was born into as "a dangerous, totalitarian ideology masquerading as a religion."

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter