Eric Holder: Jihad? What jihad?

This man is in serious denial.

And note that Holder and Smith agree that there is a difference between “Islam” and “radical Islam” and that the latter is a misinterpretation of the former. On what grounds do they believe this? Where is this peaceful, benign version of Islam that teaches peaceful coexistence with unbelievers as equals with believers in a secular society on an indefinite basis? No one has ever produced it. But everyone believes it exists.

(Video thanks to Ted.)

"The Islamic United States will be an introduction to the formation of the global village of the oppressed and that will be a prelude to the single global rule of the Mahdi"
''Islam or Islamism?'': Spencer at the Vienna Forum, May 8, 2010
FacebookTwitterLinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousEmailPinterestRedditStumbleUponPrint

Comments

  1. says

    note to concerned Americans…”..all of Obamas appointments seem to be of this same mindset—just swelling with dhimmitude”

  2. says

    Al-Awlaki “has a version of Islam that is not consistent with the teachings” [of Islam} asserts Eric Holder. Could he tell us, at some point soon, exactly those beliefs and attitudes exhibited by Al-Awlaki that do not possess textual authority in the Qur’an, Hadith, and Sira? Could he tell us how the behavior of Muslims, in the lands dominated by Muslims, toward a great number of different kinds of non-Muslims — Christians, Jews (until the last Jews left, in fear for their lives), Hindus, Buddhists, Confucians, Sikhsand others — contradicts the attitudes toward Infidels demonstrated by Al-Awlaki?

    This comedy can’t go on much longer. When people in our government, in the positions they hold, where they presume to protect and instruct us, show either ignorance or what is worse, a wilful ignorance, about Islam, and refuse to describe with any adequacy the meaning, and hence the menace, of Islam (and not of some imaginary Islam that the “violent extremists” are said to have pulled out of nowhere, when they are simply following classic doctrine, taking it straight up rather than on the rocks, diluted by by custom, local conditions, self-interest or fear of what Infidels can do in response, or a calculation that there are cleverer and more effective ways to conduct the struggle or “Jihad” to remove all obstacles to the spread, and then the dominance, of Islam — such ways as deployment of the Money Weapon, campaigns of Da’wa and propaganda on behalf of Islam, and demographic conquest.

  3. says

    “closet Muslim….just like his boss”

    The ability to convince others of charges which are both damning enough, and also happen to be true, is undercut when other charges or assertions are made which most people believe to be false.

  4. says

    he trys to dance the dance of denial, but it does come off quite well for as he stutters and ho hums we can see through him,it is no wonder that the obama regime wants to take control over the internet.

  5. says

    RS wrote:

    “,i>And note that Holder and Smith agree that there is a difference between “Islam” and “radical Islam” and that the latter is a misinterpretation of the former.”

    Neither of these two guys knows what in Hell they’re talking about.

    While Holder never did get the chance to express the fullness of his ignorance of the subject with a complete sentence, Smith’s smug, repeated use of just two words made his own ignorance so very clear.

  6. says

    Holder’s law firm defended terrorists pro bono, we know THAT much. He also failed to file the documents for his confirmation hearing. He should be impeached.

    He jumped to the defense of those club-wielding Black Panthers outside the polls. What does that tell you? Violence is OK for certain citizens. And I use the term citizen loosely.

  7. says

    Eric Holder was merely trying to adhere to the PCMC script that he, himself, had helped write. But in struggling so valiantly to avoid having to mention the “I” word he is like the mother insisting to her little boy that, actually, the emperor IS wearing clothes, and one should be commenting on how fine they are instead of pointing out the inadequacy of his manhood.

    Time for Eric Holder to go. Obama needs someone more adept at spin.

  8. says

    I do not think neither Obama nor Holder are ignorant.

    They are smart in “THEIR” way of thinking. I believe BOTH of them ARE practicing their FAITHs’ use of TAQIYYA to accomplish their goals..

    I believe neither will ever have STRONG words against anything that is Islamic..

    IMHO they are both Islamic. I do not have any other strong feelings about the remainder of his cabinet being Islamic, but that they all may have FAT ISLAMIC bank accounts somewhere in the world.
    Socialists, then total government dependency, then we will ALL be right for complete Dhimmitude and willing to follow our supremacist leaders to HELL..

  9. says

    I wrote a similar story yesterday titled “How can we win the War on Terror when we can’t even say the name of the enemy? (video)” at http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-41853-Homeland-Security-Examiner~y2010m5d15-How-can-we-win-the-War-on-Terror-when-we-cant-even-say-the-name-of-the-enemy.

    This administration is unbelievable.

    Michael Haltman, Columnist
    Examiner
    National Homeland Security
    New York Homeland Security
    131 Jericho Turnpike, Suite 205
    Jericho, New York 11753

  10. says

    YOU GUYS UP THERE MAKE ME SICK WITH FEAR – AND I’M NOT A COWARD – MY CAR IS COVERED WITH ANTI-ISLAMIC BUMPER STICKERS. BUT LOOK AT WHAT YOU WILL NEVER TALK ABOUT! THAT IS – THE MOST IMPORTANT THING! YOU ACT LIKE OUR AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN POLITICIANS ARE STUPID – BELIEVE ME, THEY ARE NOT! YOU ALL TALK LIKE TO BE A CAPITALIST IS TO BE AN ENEMY OF ISLAM (THE ENEMY OF MY ENEMY IS MY FRIEND NONSENSE) NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH! WHAT WE ARE SUFFERING FROM IS A VERY GREEDY LOVE OF MONEY – CAPITALISTS WORSHIP THE INVISIBLE HAND – AND THAT IS PRECISELY WHAT THE MUSLIMS ARE OFFERING YOUR POLITICIANS, AN INVISIBLE HAND FULL OF MONEY! WHY ARE THESE SLOW WITTED SAVAGES WINNING OVER US WESTERNERS TEN TO ONE? BECAUSE OUR POLITICIANS ARE NOT STUPID, THEY ARE FEASTING ON OIL MONEY BRIBES. THEY KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON AS SURE AS YOU AND I DO – THEY ARE WILLFULLY STUPID FOR OIL MONEY BRIBES – EVERY ONE OF THEM! UNTIL WE GET A STRONGER GOVERNMENT, ONE THAT FEARS THE PEOPLE MORE THAN IT LOVES OIL MONEY BRIBES, WE ARE AS GOOD AS DEAD, EATEN BY MINDLESS SAVAGES BECAUSE WE HAVE LEADERS THAT LOVE MONEY MORE THAN THE SURVIVAL OF DEMOCRACY AND FREE SPEECH! WHY ARE YOU WRITING ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE? ANYTHING ELSE IS A WASTE OF TIME – EVERYDAY OIL MONEY BRIBES ARE MAKING THE SAVAGES WHO WORSHIP A BIBLE OF MURDER, STRONGER AND STRONGER – ALL YOUR POLITICIANS ARE ON THE TAKE! FACE IT OR DIE! SHOW ME ONE WHO COULD RESIST A MILLION DOLLAR BILL, AND I WILL SHOW YOU A DEAD POLITICIAN. IF YOU HAVE REAL MONEY, YOU ARE NO LONGER A CITIZEN OF ANY PARTICULAR COUNTRY, YOU ARE A CITIZEN OF THE WORLD – YOU WILL BE VERY HAPPY ANYWHERE YOU WANT TO LIVE – YOU HAVE DIED AND GONE TO HEAVEN, TO HELL WITH AMERICA!

  11. says

    “What are the chances that Holder is a closet Muslim, just like his boss?”

    shiek, I don’t believe Holder is a Muslim like Hussein, but he submits to his boss as a good dhimmified Infidel should.

  12. says

    One of the worst things about folks like Smith and Holder is that none of us knows if their ignorance is merely simple or willful; for they’re never asked.

    I wish that Smith had allowed Holder to more fully express his ignorance; with the hope that such a fuller expression might have piqued further questioning by others more informed.

  13. says

    …Holder should be replaced with Bolton…

    Or with a cigarrete vending machine.

    What? Tobacco smoking not prohibitted on the premises?
    Yes, I know!
    Still, it makes more sense than keeping the imbecile in his post.

  14. says

    Henry, I suspect I would have appreciated the thought had I read the entire comment, but I stopped reading midway through the first sentence because of the upper case. Please, with respect, no one likes to be shouted at, so please be sparing with the usage of caps. Thanks.