Her opponent is Michael Ghouse of the Muslim American Congress. Take a listen.
Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed
Pamela tore that guy a new one. He had nothing to come back with.
Rare to hear someone like him acknowledge Hamas as a terrorist group though. Nice use of taqiyya. He thought Hizbollah did some nice things though, only “some of their acts are terrorist acts.”
People like Michael Gouse insist that the terrorists are only a tiny minority and moreover, misunderstanding or misusing Islam for their own purposes.
Despite all our overwhelming evidence we are still considered paranoid. Whereas we believe those who believe people like Michael Gouse, who “sells” “Islam-Lite”, are “THE NAIVES”.
Let a verbal civel war among the “Paranoids” and the “Naives” settle in the end what the majority of democratic voters will believe and vote for. And in that verbal war let both parties use as much relevant facts and logical arguments as can be found.
No longer are the only real good Islam-experts found among the Muslims. No longer do lies and ignorance go unchallenged.
…there is no moderate Islam…..the man made rules are the same for all Muslims…….they should be forced to stay in their own excuses for countries……..
Ghouse was pitted against the very knowledgeable and fast talking Brigitte Gabriel on Hannity’s television program this evening.
She obviously overwhelmed him.
IMO, everything said by knowledgeable kufar on these programs should be designed, and intended, to influence the host’s view. And those hosts still need a lot of education.
Even toward the end of the debate, Hannity still thinks the problem is ‘radical’ Islam.
He’s not the only one who doesn’t get it, though.
It is apparent from Holder’s testimony that neither he, nor those asking questions of him, nor any of the talking heads discussing that event, have the slightest idea what they’re talking about.
How embarrased will Representative Lamar Smith eventually be when he finally finds out that every Muslim on the planet reads the same version of the Qur’an (even if they don’t know what even a single word of it says) and that there’s no such thing as ‘radical’ Islam.
Kudos to Pamela. Just listened to the erudite and knowledgeable lady on Hannity’s radio show in debate with Muslim, Michael Grouse’s rendition of his “Taqiyya” explanation of the ‘real Islam. ‘Love that Demsci’s “Islam-Lite.”)
We concede to Mr. Grouse rationalization’s that some people manifest evil more than others in all races and religions. But, as Pamela reminds Mr Grouse, the “abrogated” verses in the Qu’ran call for Jihad against all infidels; to honor “Allahu Akbar” in chorus for all faithful Muslims to follow.
Just writing this nonsense makes me want to shake my head, but it can no longer be ignored, as some still persist in sticking theirs in the sand.
Who is funding this mosque? A 13-story building in Manhattan costs what, 50-100 million dollars? I can’t imagine any congregation being able to afford that.
Oops, I was wrong. This page
says the NY mega-mosque will cost upwards of $150 million, and that an imam with a spare $5 million bought the site. How does an imam get that kind of money? It’s clear from said imam that the mosque will be a huge da’wa operation, and will be hosting things like “seminars to reconcile religions”.
When you were building your nation you didnt hesitate to fight whoever was your enemy, be it the natives or the mexicans.Now that your nation is being and attacked and trying to be conquered by fire and by treason, you are not going to do anything? Incredible.But dont you be denied, you will have to stand up, all of you, even if it means another civil war.
What a lying POS this mahound is! When asked a direct question his first repsonse is, “I’m glad you brought that up.” But his answers indicate that he’s anything but glad! All he has is “A little song, a little dance, a little taqiyya down your pants!”
“Mosque madness at Ground Zero”
First the lawyers took something called “sex” and relegated it to a grammarical thing by renaming it “gender” and it worked like a charm the feminists gained control.
*** 8:12 ***
Let’s have that book festival and expunge the Ko-ran and Ha-diths. There’d be a whole lotta empty book covers laying around on that floor.
*** Bukhari Vol 4 Bk 52 Nbr 220 ***
If you expunged the Ko-ran and Ha-diths into nothingness, would the Infidel falling in catatonic shock make a sound?
l would love is someone like Pamela, she tried with Erogan’s quote about islam tell Hannity, there is only one islam and saying radical islam is one and the same. it is remarkable that there are some people who are marginal muslim and not out there murderering in the name is islam. but what we see it does not take much for a nominal muslim to become a pious muslim!
No, the fallen catatonic Infidel would not make a sound.
*** 33:21 ***
But you might hear muffled smooch-smack sounds as big strong Moslem Men with their asses plucked up high in the air kiss the floor of their brand spanking new mosque.
That’s one heckuva way to celebrate a 10th anniversary. Panache.
G-d bless you Pamela.
Pamela Geller Thank You and G_D bless you!
Right on the money!
Our “morally corrupt” pandering politicians ought to be ashamed for drawing a salary from the people’s treasury for misrepresenting us and also for not representing the people of America to appease the Islamists.
Our politicians should learn from Ms Geller’s absolute unvarnished truth about Islam as revealed by so many unrefuted islamic scholars and specialized experts.
Our politicians have failed the people, misrepresented the peoples’ will and their mandate. The politicians should learn from Ms Geller and Mr. Spencer to do the right thing, speak the truth about Islam and ensure that Islam and its followers must change their Jihadi ways, respect and bow down to the Constitution and the Laws of The United States of America. Sorry Islamists, this is not the Islamic Republic of America, it is The United States of America, and we intend to keep it that way.
Excellent presentation Pamela. Ghouse repeatedly stated, “I’m glad you brought that up”. Good.
In that receptive spirit, and to further delight Ghouse and all those who are unfamiliar with the extent of Islamic triumphalism towards 9/11 sacred sites, the following will familiarize readers with the Flight 93 Memorial which also just happens to be designed as a terrorist memorial mosque.
Alec Rawls blog, ErrorTheory dedicated years of effort to expose the back story to the hideous insult being built in memory of the 9/11 flight which successfully diverted the jihad from the US Capitol building.
Echoes of “Let’s Roll” must not be stifled by the politically correct nonsense spewed by those who would rewrite history to erase the links to Islamic triumphalism.
Rawl’s provides the following links to read his book documenting the Flight 93 memorial . . .pdf:
Crescent of Betrayal: the Director’s Cut, Part 1
Crescent of Betrayal: the Director’s Cut, Part 2
Crescent of Betrayal: the Director’s Cut, Part 3
Crescent of Betrayal: the Director’s Cut, Part 4
Crescent of Betrayal: the Director’s Cut, Part 5
He also has much more information in the archives found in the right hand column of ErrorTheory.
A mosque at ground zero? A greater piece of muslim triumphalism would be difficult to imagine. Whatever the language they use to justify it, it is in fact exactly the kind of memorial the murdering b****** of 9/11 would want.
It is a measure of muslims power and arrogance in the West that they could even propose it. Can anyone think of a insult to the victims? I cannot!
BTW Micheal Ghouse seems to have a strange accent for a American – rather Pakistani or I am just not hearing right..
First-class smackdown by Pam against the latest taqiyya-peddlar. With persistence, there is an excellent chance this project will be scrapped.
I do have a problem “with Muslims”. I have a problem with anyone who clings to an ideology for their own comfort and fantasies of protection and a blissful life after they die knowing that what they believe dictates violation of the rights of others, sanctifies cruelties, mandates the killing of others. Evading the knowledge of reality that would require they make some hard decisions in their own lives. The “moderate Muslims” never take the blame, always cry “misinterpretation”, always protest their innocence but never in the streets with signs reading “Death to al-Qaeda”. They are at best deluded or cowards, and at worst collaborators.
This mosque will be another atrocity inflicted by Muslims on us!!! They are not just happy with killing 3000 Americans in our own country, they want to rub in our face remind everybody what they can do in our own country and the dhimmis can’t or won’t do anything about it!!!
How the NY city authorities have approved this project is beyond any sane person’s imagination. They are just brain dead as the Muslims who are pushing this mosque in the name of multiculturalism and plurality. We should ask for building a Hindu temple, a Christian church and a Jewish synagogue in Mecca next to Kaaba, the black stone that Muslims worship and see how the principles of plurality that the Mike guy is mouthing off holds up!! These liars will say anything to deceive the dhimmis of this country – that is the politicians, MSM and the academia.
I see no hope for us!!!
That’s a fine one to trot out, Michael grouse. I wonder who is paying the bills? How much of this is oily money? This taqya spouting snake is their latest attempts to win over many clueless Americans. So moderate sounding so unlike the Osama bin laden of the world. He is saying to just let the moderate Muslims build the mosque and it will be a place for multicultural learning. They must be really desperate to have this atrocity built. So that from now till eternity every muslim all over the world, can crow that Islam has triumphed over the infidel Americans.
I am glad we have such great ladies as Pamela, Bridgette, and others to put these Islamic snakes in their proper places. At the very least the dhimmi crowd can’t lay the charge of bigotry on them.
Whoo Hoo!!!! Pamela was all over that guy, she rocks!!!
So this guy sez that jihadists are making an error by following false aya’s inserted into the Quran…There are some who believe that…They think Uthman corrupted it for vicarious reasons…But if that actually happened, then the Quran used by all Mahoundians, and there is no substitute, is a fake…Why am I not surprised at that? That means that this is not a moderate Mahoundian speaking, it is an apostate…He just does not realize it…This is from Reliance of the Traveler, sacred Islamic law…This makes an apostate…
(7) to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does not belong to it;
Uh oh…Someones in big trouble…
Wow. Pam Geller was very effective. Outstanding. Maybe even Hannity is waking up.
The guy claims Geller is reading the wrong translations. That is silly. Today one can immediately pull up any Qur’an verse in 15 translations online, and one can see that all those translations are in pretty robust accord with one another. One might lose some aesthetic qualities of the original Arabic, but the meaning barely changes from translation to translation, especially when one ignores the parenthetical comments inserted by some translators.
One can also recall the study done by Tina Magaard, a linguist who got her Ph.D. in Intercultural Communication from the Sorbonne, and did a three-year study of the original texts of the ten largest religions. One of her findings, despite reading the Arabic Qur’an, was that of all the religions, Islam was the most aggressive toward outside groups.
One might lose some aesthetic qualities of the original Arabic, but the meaning barely changes from translation to translation…
Yeah, a phrase like I shall terrorize the Infidels! pretty much retains its poetry no matter how it’s translated.
Those Moslems, they always have some double talk excuse at the ready when confronted with their bad facts, their actual facts.
How I would give ANYTHING to have a job so I could have the money to stand with them at the protest on the 6th!!!
These bastards are spitting on graves!!!
Makes me sick.
I read somewhere (although I have not seen it) that in the public toilets in Turkey, Christian Armenian gravestones are used as urinals & latrines.
Wherever this hateful religion has gone, death and war, suffering has followed. They have no remorse.
I have met moslems who have said to me privatly “Don’t ever forget, us moslems used to rule you Indians with the whip”
and “we used to take your women”
They have no pity, humanity or remorse.
This cannot be allowed.
I have found the source for the Armenian Gravestone urinal story, from the Guardian, if there are any Armenians on JW maybe they can confirm this.
But this is what they are planning to do with that mosque.
Ironically, there is a large Armenian community in Watertown, MA, where yesterday the feds arrested suspects in the Times Square bombing attempt.
Wow! I’ve never heard Pamela Geller speak before. Very impressive.
I’d like to propose that we award her the nickname “Chainsaw” in homage to the way she carved up her opposition.
Here’s one of Ghouse’s mistaken analogies. He pointed out that about 1% of the American population is in prison. That, I guess, was supposed to be comparable to the 1% of Muslims who, according to some polls of Muslims, express an interest in directly participating in jihad terror actions. But Ghouse left out several important details.
1. About half of the U.S. prison population is in prison for crimes that involved neither violence nor the threat of violence. Thus right off the bat, the Muslim population has twice as many (compared to the U.S. population in general) threats of violence per capita. Furthermore, on top of the 1% who are jihadists or would-be jihadists, the Muslim population, like every other, has ordinary violent criminals. So when that is also factored in, perhaps the Muslim population represents not merely twice as many, but thrice as many threats of violence per capita, compared with the American population in general. All these numbers, however, should be checked.
2. While polls suggest that something between 5% and 15% of Muslims agree with the use of jihadist terror (even if “only” 1% are interested in directly participating), we do not see between 5% and 15% of the non-Muslim U.S. population in agreement with what our prison population did to get there, and especially not with what the violent half of the prison population did.
3. Polls suggest that somewhere around 50% of Muslims would like (or think they would like) to live under Islamic law rather than under Western legal systems. By contrast, a very small percentage of non-Muslims in the U.S. desire to live under an authoritarian system rather than under a Western legal system.
4. The 1/2 of 1% of the U.S. population that is in prison for violence or the threat of violence does not constitute the vanguard of an ideological group with ambitions for the gradual takeover of the West and the subjugation of non-Muslims under Islamic law. The violent prison population in the U.S. has no unity, no plan, no overall goal for dominating society. By contrast, the 1% of Muslims who are interested in directly participating in terror, counted together with another, say, 9% of Muslims who agree with that use of jihadist terror, constitute a vanguard that represents, say, another 35% of Muslims. That additional 35%, though they do not usually agree with violent jihad, have the same goal as the jihadists, but seek to achieve it in other ways: a society ruled by Islamic law. Thus the jihadists or would-be jihadists are really the 1% vanguard of another, say, 49% of Muslims who have the same ultimate social goals. Further, the jihadists are the vanguard of an international Islamic movement with hundreds of millions of supporters and big oil money behind it.
5. Jihadists do not merely commit petty murders and rapes out of a personal pathology. They seek rather to acquire weapons of mass destruction to destroy whole societies. And as time passes and technology advances, acquisition of such weapons from Islamic nations or North Korea, or even subnational groups, is likely to become easier. It wasn’t some garden variety convict from a U.S. prison who destroyed the World Trade Centers. Jihadists did that, and could still do far worse.
So the analogy Ghouse makes by referring to the 1% of the U.S. population that is in prison, falls apart in a half dozen ways under even slight scrutiny.
As I listened to this Michael Ghouse offer one tired old excuse after another, what came foremost to mind was that I’m past listening to what any Muslim has to say anymore about Islam. I no more care what a Muslim has to say about Islam than I care what a Marxist or a fascist has to say about Marxism or fascism.
We never distinguish between moderate Nazism and radical Nazism, why do it with islam?
I believe this is a time to say “Let’s roll”.
We don’t have to play the “politically correct” card.
We who know the truth…there are no peaceful Muslims!!
Read their Koran for heavens sake. it is all there.
you might hear muffled smooch-smack sounds as big strong Moslem Men with their asses plucked up high in the air kiss the floor of their brand spanking new mosque. The question is will they get up again.????
“USDA toughens guidelines for ground beef purchases” at http://www.reutershealth.com/archive/2010/05/14/eline/links/20100514elin014.html
But apparently not Ground Zero purchases.
“When you were building your nation you didnt hesitate to fight whoever was your enemy, be it the natives or the mexicans.”
Yes, but for decades now, throughout the latter half of the 20th century, and continuing into our own century, there has developed a sociopolitical culture, Politically Correct Multi-Culturalism (PC MC) — massively expressed in public schools, universities, news media, political positions and debates, laws, church positions and activism, and in TV shows, movies and among entertainment figures in pop culture — of shame and guilt at what we had to do to build this nation and make it one of the most liberal, progressive and advanced polities in history. This shame and guilt are part of a larger Western movement that sees the advancement of the West as built upon the “oppression” and “genocide” of Third World Peoples. It is based in the PC MC dogma of Reverse Racism, by which Ethnic Peoples are forever victims, while the West has been through history, and is essentially, an Oppressor of Ethnic Peoples and will never pay off the mortgage of its Sins against them. The best the West can do is continue to pay, in guilt and shame, by placating the Other.
Meanwhile, Muslims come along — or rather, have returned — on our Western radar: Muslims: the Mother of all Others. And since they are perceived to be an Ethnic People (or a wonderfully diverse Rainbow of Ethnic Peoples), it is easy to see why this irrationality continues, robust as ever, to accord Muslims deference, respect and apologies, and to reinterpret any pathologies that Muslims and their Islamic culture ostensibly intrude upon the world as somehow always our fault, and not theirs.
Yes, there are incipient spider-cracks forming in the edifice of PC MC, but so far they do not portend the dismantling of it that is by now long overdue.
“We who know the truth…there are no peaceful Muslims!!”
That’s right. Moderate or peaceful muslims are (new PC term coming up) simply “not_yet_radical_muslims”.
Is there a YouTube link?
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Notify me of new posts by email.
Contact Jihad Watch
Spambot blocker question
5 - 3 =
Articles at Jihad Watch by