Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America forbids Muslims to aid American troops in Afghanistan and Iraq

For to do so would be “helping others in sin and transgression.”

The Assembly of Muslim Jurists in America says on its website: “AMJA recognizes that human brotherhood is the basic principle that should govern the relations between all peoples and nations. Therefore, the pursuit of peace and goodwill between all nations should be a desirable objective for all members of the human family. In this light, AMJA rejects any ideology or effort that aims to put the United States of America and Islam in conflict.” Apparently it intends to achieve this goal by making sure that U.S. troops cannot achieve anything in Islamic countries.

Expect Honest Ibe Hooper of CAIR to issue a thundering denunciation of this forthwith. Honest Ibe?

“US Muslim jurists forbid aid to aggressive troops,” from Iran’s Ahlul Bayt News Agency, June 30 (thanks to Will):

The Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America (AMJA) issued a fatwa prohibiting offering aid to foreign troops in Muslim countries whether on the personal or the business levels. The assembly, made up of jurists and scholars in charge of issuing fatwas for Muslims in the United States and headed by Sheikh Salah al-Sawy, received several inquiries about the stance of Islam on business deals with coalition troops in Iraq or NATO forces in Afghanistan, especially companies that transfer foodstuffs and other supplies to military bases.

The question was posted on AMJA fatwa bank, reads: “Is it permissible to participate in taking food to the American and foreign soldiers working in Muslim lands?” and the answer is, “That would not be permissible, for that would be helping others in sin and transgression.”

The fatwa, number 3062 to be issued by the assembly, stipulated that Muslims are not to help foreigners on personal or business basis as long as their presence in Muslim countries is linked to occupation….

“Muslims should help anyone involved in benevolent acts regardless of their nationality, religion, or political affiliation and whether they are civilians or soldiers.”

This, the fatwa added, is not the case with foreign troops in Iraq and Afghanistan and which are occupying those countries against the will of their people and, therefore, engaging in any type of interaction with them endows their presence with legitimacy and makes those who deal with them accomplices in the crime.

Iranian pol: West doesn't "differentiate between jihad and terrorist movements so they consider Hezbollah, Hamas and the jihadist forces in Afghanistan as terrorist movements"
Iraqi Christians ask Baghdad government to defend minority rights
FacebookTwitterLinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousEmailPinterestRedditStumbleUponPrint

Comments

  1. says

    This is traitorous behavior!!! Plain and simple. Charges should be brought against these traitors for promoting sedition against this country.

    So the Muslims live here but do not want to follow this government. It’s like they are having a separate nation within a nation. This nation Muslims are part of is ummah. It is the same behavior Muslims display living in all non-Muslim countries. Why shouldn’t they be thrown out and sent back to all those Islamic hell holes from where they came here!!!

  2. says

    “Muslims should help anyone involved in benevolent acts regardless of their nationality, religion, or political affiliation and whether they are civilians or soldiers.”

    We are in Iraq and Afganistan at the request of the governments and working with those governments. We are spending billions rebuilding and maintaining infrastructure. Our military doctors are treating everyone.

    This fatwa is clear ‘The Assembly of Muslim Jurists in America’ is allied with the Taliban.

  3. says

    So in response the US should not offer aid or sustenance to Muslims living in America.

    No jobs.
    No welfare.
    No housing.
    No service in stores.
    No travel on public transport including planes.

    Nothing.

    Then watch what happens.

    Maybe we should try it here in Britain.

  4. says

    Whatever happened to helping people simply because they needed help, regardless of differing ideas/beliefs/opinions?

    This is positively scummy.

  5. says

    If you follow the link to the AMJA website, that Robert kindly posted, you can get a real good feel of how the ulama are adapting to the 21st century. Hey, they have a ‘fatwa bank’ and a ‘fatwa hotline’. Sheesh, they’ll be selling ‘fatwa-proof insurance’ next, with an ‘act of allah’ clause in the small-print.

  6. says

    Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America forbids Muslims to aid American troops in Afghanistan and Iraq
    ………………..

    These are “Muslim Jurists” *in America*? I had to read that twice to make sure I had it right.

    More:

    The Assembly of Muslim Jurists in America says on its website: “AMJA recognizes that human brotherhood is the basic principle that should govern the relations between all peoples and nations. Therefore, the pursuit of peace and goodwill between all nations should be a desirable objective for all members of the human family. In this light, AMJA rejects any ideology or effort that aims to put the United States of America and Islam in conflict.”
    ………………..

    Well, the Taqiyya on this just makes your head spin.

    More:

    The question was posted on AMJA fatwa bank, reads: “Is it permissible to participate in taking food to the American and foreign soldiers working in Muslim lands?” and the answer is, “That would not be permissible, for that would be helping others in sin and transgression.”

    The fatwa, number 3062 to be issued by the assembly, stipulated that Muslims are not to help foreigners on personal or business basis as long as their presence in Muslim countries is linked to occupation….
    ………………..

    Note: this does not address fighting with American forces or providing them with intelligence”but just with *selling them food*. And Westerners wonder why we never get any real cooperation from the Afghans.

    “For to do so would be ‘helping others in sin and transgression.'”

    Whatever else you want to say about our presence in Iraq and Afghanistan, we rescued Iraq from the vicious dictator Saddam Hussein, and the Afghans from the even more vicious Taliban.

    But Muslims”*Muslim jurists*”see this as “sin and transgression*”either because they supported these tyrannies, or because they were removed by the efforts of ‘the filthy Kufr’.

    More:

    “Muslims should help anyone involved in benevolent acts regardless of their nationality, religion, or political affiliation and whether they are civilians or soldiers.”
    ………………..

    More Taqiyya. We are in these countries building schools, hospitals, and roads”leave aside for the moment whether this is wise on our part. And yet, none of these acts are seen by these “Muslim jurists” as “benevolent”.

    I would like to ask what acts Infidels could possibly perform that these “Muslim jurists” would consider “benevolent”. I imagine “recite the Shahada” (convert to Islam) would be one of the few examples they could provide.

    Also, note the description of American and other Western forces as “aggressive troops”. That is to contrast with Muslims, whose Jihad, in the absence of a Caliphate, is always supposed to be “defensive”.

    So”providing medical care to an Afghan child with cancer is considered “an act of aggression”, and blowing up that same child’s school is not.

    Welcome to Islamic jurisprudence and the tenets of Muslim “morality”.

  7. says

    This “Jurist”(mohamedist would be more accurate) is only making official what in practice has been the reality for 1400 years, muslims strive one way or another, moderately, stealthily or explosively to either controll and dominate you or kill you whenever and wherever they get an opportunity.
    Sensible and reasonable people should respond to this assault correspondingly, no more 911’s, no more ceding territory, space money or respect to anyone or anything muslim. Since we are all targets they have made themselves all our enemies.
    Therefore my anti-fawa is: muslim get out of our land with it’s sacred and holy constitution for you are it’s enemy, my enemy, and an enemy of my people, go back to islamland,this chap has awoken.

  8. says

    The problem is: We’re in their countries for no benefit to ourselves. And they’re in OUR countries for no benefit to ourselves. So, let’s trade ’em: We’ll get out of their countries and they can get the hell out of here! With an exception-clause for terror-attacks, where we will make brief but lethal appearances over those countries from which the terrorists came…

  9. says

    Does Robert really say that Pope Pius XII is in Yad Vashem?
    http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/06/robert-spencer-exposed-gets-facts-on-pope-pius-xii-wrong/

    “Paterfamilias, wrote to inform us that Spencer’s reply contained more factual errors. Spencer claimed that Pope Pius XII, though “controversial” was “memorialized at Yad Vashem.”

    The record of Pope Pius XII is controversial, but there has been a good deal of misinformation publicized about it. In reality, he helped save many hundreds of thousands of Jews and was memorialized at Yad Veshem.”

    According to Loonwatch, Pope Pius XII is not in Yad Vashem:

    So much for Robert Spencer’s research abilities. He could have easily done a Google search to check the veracity of such a claim, but for a paid polemicist with an ax to grind it’s probably considered a waste of time.

    Yad Vashem, the state of Israel’s official Holocaust memorial, has generally been critical of Pope Pius XII, the pope during The Holocaust. For decades, Pius XII has been nominated unsuccessfully for recognition as Righteous Among the Nations, an honor Yad Vashem confers on non-Jews who saved Jewish lives during the Holocaust altruistically and at risk to their own lives.

    I know Robert is meticulous and hates to make mistakes and so I don’t believe the loons at loonwatch. He can correct loonwatch and show they are wrong.

  10. says

    Maybe I’m not looking hard enough, but I have seen no mention of this in the MSM. Surprise, surprise.

    Logdon, you are right on the mark but don’t hold your breath. It will take an all-out war to see that result, which will mean that everyone woke up too late after all.

  11. says

    Raqnu

    As far as I know Pius XII is not honored at Yad Veshem. However, late in 1945, the World Jewish Congress gave a financial gift to the Vatican, in recognition of its efforts to rescue Jews from the Nazis. The Jewish historian Sir Martin Gilbert, author of several books on the Holocaust, has stated that “hundreds of thousands of Jews [were] saved by the Catholic Church, under the leadership and with the support of Pope Pius XII.” Another Jewish historian, Pinchas Lapide, estimates that as many as 800,000 Jews were saved through Pius XII’s efforts.

    And in 1985, when Cardinal Palazzini was honored at Yad Veshem for his efforts to save Jews in Italy during the Holocaust, he said: “The merit is entirely Pius XII’s, who ordered us to do whatever we could to save the Jews from persecution.”

    On the other hand, Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem, did all he could to make sure as many Jews as possible were murdered by the Nazis.

    Cordially
    Robert Spencer

  12. says

    It seems an old union song is appropriate:

    “Whose side are you on, boys
    Whose side are you on?
    Whose side are you on, boys
    Whose side are you on?”

    There is the infidel side and there is the Muslim side.

    Whose side are YOU on?

  13. says

    So was it a mistake to say that “Pope Pius XII was in Yad Vashem” or not? Did you ever say that? That is all I was asking.

    Okay, I agree loonwatch is pretty bad, they are practicing taqqiyah, but since when was reading your enemy a sin, I thought it was dilligence?

    They make claims that seem substantive to the uninitiated, and that needs to be looked at seriously.

  14. says

    @Kim did Robert Spencer say Pope Pius was in the Yad Vashem? If so, then is it a mistake? In his reply above he cites Jewish historians who say was a righteous amongst nations, but he doesn’t address the question at hand.
    At the end of the day, at the most it’s only a small mistake (if it is true he isn’t in Yad), but the loons of loonwatch are making such a big deal about it to try and get robert for anything.

  15. says

    If any of those SOBs are citizens then they’ve just committed treason. Pure and simple.

    If they are not, they need to be, at a minimum, deported as hostile foreign agents.

    This is not complicated.

  16. says

    The gist of this being that our nation’s enemy is firmly embedded within our borders and given constitutional protection. Occasionally they foment terror, and the court dockets are filling up with jihadists.

    This group of Muslim citizens is actively undermining our efforts in the war against Islamic jihad, and hence THEY ARE THE ENEMY.

    Because they wear no uniform and have no Al-Qaeda membership card, they are treated like Code Pinko–just another divergent group who has the right to be such.

  17. says

    Well I strongly agree of placing Charges against those traitor but if you think about it ..well it’s stupid and worthless Fatwa because Muslims supporting our brave troops in Iraq and Afghanistan weather they like it or not by pay taxes ( I assume) , I believe the Muslims in this Country should pick a side …either America Or the enemy ..it’s a one way road , and it kills me why the people in D.C not paying attention for this kind of behavior …are they not going to do any thing if matter were with Nazis.

  18. says

    Can people have their law licenses revoked for something like this? Isn’t this against the oath or the code of ethics or something? Somebody ought to contact the appropriate bar associations.

  19. says

    This is why people like Nidal Malik Hasan and other Muslims, who do not renounce Sharia, need to be removed from the military AT ONCE.

    Here is another instance of WHY we can’t trust those who are our (western) enemies.

    Israel – NCO – NONE JEW – Arrested for drug smuggling and espionage.(http://txlady706.wordpress.com/2010/06/30/israel-nco-none-jew-arrested-for-drug-smuggling-and-espionage/)

    Our governments have committed treason against us. This is not acceptable. The US government is especially corrupt. They have transgressed beyond that which would be considered foolish mistakes. These “mistakes” are TREASON!
    Hat tip- http://txlady706.wordpress.com/2010/06/30/muslim-jurists-and-scholars-are-issuing-fatwas-for-muslims-in-the-united-states-and-muslim-troops-in-the-military-fighting-in-afghanistan/

  20. says

    “Raqnu” is not related to “Quran”, though the letters are the same as in the Arabic-to-English transliteration.

    Raqnu, in the Persian Zenda Avesta, is the Spirit of Justice.

    I think it is a case of jumping the gun to conclude that “Raqnu” is a moniker for “Quran.” Such is not the case.

  21. says

    We’ve done our small part to make sure that our troops were taken care of in the past, and we’ll do it again and again for as long as they need us to.

    These “jurists” and their sheep are in no way a necessity for this cause, and are free to go and waste oxygen in a land far, far away.

  22. says

    There is an ancient, unspoken, social message that is transmitted whenever you feed someone. That message is “I want you to survive. Here is some food to ensure your survival”. Even wild animals understand that message! It’s how we tame them.

    Now I sit here reflecting on the unspoken social message these American “muslim jurists” are sending. Their message is “I do not want you to survive. I refuse to help you and will try to prevent others from helping you. I would rather see you dead.”

    I think of how many times in Iraq my comrades and I fed muslims (always making sure the food was halal) and I wonder if I will ever bother to feed a muslim again. I can guarantee that I will never knowingly feed an American muslim. Let their traitorous “jurists” feed them instead.

  23. says

    Wow you guys have serious problems. Raqnu is not quran. Learn something, you see the bad light for anything and do not look at positive.

    Thank you Mike Ryan!

    Anyway, I see Robert is busy now and probably cannot answer. Thanks for answering quickly earlier Robert.

  24. says

    I Asked a serious question.
    Anyway, I see Robert is busy now and probably cannot answer.

    You ‘see’ he is busy? Is your name Clare Voyant?

    You have been hanging around those loons to long…Sometimes even once can inflict serious damage…

    Robert answered you at 1:06…

  25. says

    Raqnu to mollify this crew I believe you should rename yourself as Raqnu Ckssu. following your rules thats, Quran Sucks.

  26. says

    OT: Tough talk from Eric Holder today in Kabul “The United States is committed to succeeding in Afghanistan and breaking the Taliban’s momentum”

    ..back in Feb. 5 Afghan civilians were killed in a nightime raid by US special forces (three women and two men, the men were reported as an Afghan police official and a district prosecutor)
    I Wonder if Holder is helping the Afghans with their inquiry.

  27. says

    Please remove the word LOL it is an Urdu word which means the tool of a man. This is the language that all Muslims use.they swear and insult others who oppose them.They never negotiate in good faith. Magdi

  28. says

    you said “We are in Iraq and Afganistan at the request of the governments and working with those governments. We are spending billions rebuilding and maintaining infrastructure. Our military doctors are treating everyone”

    You really believe that? Why are you deluding yourself? Both governments were the results of our policies. Are they what the people really want? If left to their own device these islamonuts would have an Iran like government for Iraq and a Taliban dominated government for Afghanistan. Once an Islamic hellhole, always an Islamic hellhole unless a commie type or a strong authoritarian type government is installed. As for us building all those projects at the cost of billions, they will neither be appreciated nor will we generate good will from them. It’s a total waste of money.

    Face it we won the war, we got rid of saddam and we drove the Taliban from office. We have no business staying there. We are just sitting ducks. We don’t have the stomach to take on the real evil doers of Porkiestan. Let’s get out of these two hell holes.

  29. says

    “Why shouldn’t they be thrown out and sent back to all those Islamic hell holes from where they came here!!!”

    They should be. End of story. Good Riddance, Mohammedans.

  30. says

    Yes, Jaladhi, you are absolutely right, these are Americans and they behave treacherously and they commit sedition.

    Not for an uprising in America, but in a war-situation abroad, where American and other democratic forces are indeed executing the policy of democratically chosen governments and with the request or consent of governments in both Iraq and Afghanistan, that also were chosen democratically. However imperfect that system is and works, it is so far the best we got, or so we feel anyway, in a vast majority in Democratic countries.

    Moreover the democratic armies overthrew heinous regimes and by that act must by now have saved many potential victims of them, had they stayed in power. They are in contrast to the armies of those regimes as humane as possible and do help and protect very valuable projects, like schooling children, including girls.

    I am glad what AMJA treacherously did was monitored and broadcasted by JW. This sort of attitudes and behavior of Muslims can and should be used to clarify what Islam, or part of it, is and what Muslims are consciously and subconsciously choosing for and against. And for what, with increasing volume they should be held accountable for, first and foremost in the democratic countries where they now live in big numbers. And yes, this will give justified reason to halt Islamic immigration, indeed discriminating on grounds of religion for immigration. Only stated as discriminating on grounds of being anti-democratic and pro-theocratic. And in view of increasing danger it should be enough if a person admits adherence to the totalitarian ideology of Islam to decide against him/ her. Or well-grounded suspicion thereof.

    Less and less Muslims can have it both ways; A. Pretending that Muslims are very divers en enormously divided. So not united and not first and foremost loyal to a well-identified religio-political group; Islam.

    So not for one iota responsible for what the mega-group the Muslims, the Ummah, or parts of it, does. And so not feeling responsible, then responding indignant upon all sorts of criticism against parts of Islam, Muslims. Against justified and logical defense of Democracy and religious minorities, and women’s rights even.

    But now Muslims seem to have also attitude B. This AMJA-group claims it knows Islam and can tell the world what it is and what is not. And what Muslims are expected to do and what they are expected to refrain from. And AMJA has the authority to issue fatwa’s, guidelines for all Muslims. This is admittance of unity and adherence and loyalty to Islam as a group as opposed to being divers and divided.

    We must more and more deny Muslims this kind of display of unity without challenging their stance of being divers and divided, hence not accountable for their co-religionists.

    If Muslims behave like AMJA I say they do represent, or try to, of a united big part of Muslims. They take responsibility to claim to know what Islam is or is not.

    Let ever more Muslims be asked what they choose; following these Islamic leaders or not. If they do, and these leaders behave so clearly treacherous, let the Muslims who admit following them be seen as accomplices, loyal to an enemy and united against our government and laws, to an extent we can determine when we monitor and analyse them.

    And with the kind of knowledge of Islam and division versus unity of Muslims we now have we already can say that Muslims have given us no reason to trust them at all. And therefore in the interest of safety should first be found guilty of aiding and abetting a clearly identified enemy. With the proviso that Muslims can more and more clearly swear and provide proof for loyalty to democratic governments, laws, values and interest. To assure fair treatment and to reassure the many concerned Muslim-defenders.

    All this reasoning is necessary not for those in the know but to convince or confound all those so-called fair-minded, independent, PCMC-people in the Democratic countries.

  31. says

    According to Loonwatch…

    You just lost your credibility…all of it…Loon watch is for loons and lunar-tics…You need to run your virus scanner every time you visit…I bet your puter is loaded with loon bugs…

  32. says

    The anonymous sissies over at loonwatch will never get Spencer to bite. They can publicly declare themselves or, to you and the rest of your brethren Mohammedan loonwatch trolls, begone from this forum.

    I can certainly understand why loonwatch won’t go public. no one there wants to reveal who is actually funding that site, because we all know, the more light that shines on Islam and the Muslims who openly advocate it, the uglier it and them look to all non-muslims.

    Stick that in your pipe and smoke it, Raqnu.

  33. says

    “…to you and the rest of your brethren Mohammedan loonwatch trolls, begone from this forum.”

    Exactly. Begone, Loonie Mohammedan, “Raqnu.”

  34. says

    “Okay, I agree loonwatch is pretty bad, they are practicing taqqiyah,(sic) but since when was reading your enemy a sin, I thought it was dilligence? (sic)

    “Loonwatch” is too pathetic to be an “enemy.” Or, hadn’t you noticed? Who cares what they say? They’re pathetic imbeciles. Why are you paying attention to pathetic imbeciles?

  35. says

    “Okay, I agree loonwatch is pretty bad, they are practicing taqqiyah, but since when was reading your enemy a sin, I thought it was dilligence?”

    Pretty bad? You call “your enemy” pretty bad? Methinks taqiyya is also being practiced outside of the loony bin watch by the likes of yourself, Raqnu. Either that, or you are simply intellectually and logically stunted (like most Mohammedans). Memo to you…neither answer reflects well of yourself.

    And to those who are trying to correct Champ…cease and desist. Not only is Champ 100% correct in deciphering the anagram in “raqnu” , but the lesson learned here is to never reinforce the intangible concept that a Mohammedan, a mental slave by trade, can ever be more clever than us well-schooled Kuffar.

    Eat shit Raqnu, and give a serving to “Danios” and the rest of the Muslim cowards over at the loony bin. Have “Danios” declare himself or bugger off.

  36. says

    “…but the loons of loonwatch are making such a big deal about it to try and get Robert for anything.”

    Who cares? They’re NOTHING. Get it? Pay no attention to the loons! Stop wasting your time! They’re nutjobs.

  37. says

    Well, champ, all of the letters in “Raqnu” are the same as in “Quran,” – so I still think you’ve got a great point.

  38. says

    So glad you made it outta there Annie, and Thanks..You done did your best..And I hope ya got around to picking up your signature special..If I had the bucks I’d get it for you myself..You take care of yourself ya hear?

  39. says

    This was posted on TROP this week….

    The 1991 Bangladesh Cyclone
    Remember when the US military saved 200,000 Muslim lives from the wrath of Allah? Neither do your America-bashing Muslim friends. . . so here’s a reminder.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_Bangladesh_cyclone

    Those are the ones that are now burning US and Israeli flags and chanting, “death to Israel” and “down with U.S.”

  40. says

    See how easy it is to find the American government spending billions to take care and feed these Islamic reptiles, these crocodiles. Yes, I am talking about both the lib and con administrations. But look how they find it almost impossible to feed their own. From cutting school lunch programs to letting the upkeep of schools go to hell. To dilapidated American cities. Meanwhile the American treasury is wide open for the rest of the world, as Hillary Claus thrown money around wherever she goes as it was going out of style. Damn shame I say.

    I think Enraged is correct we do desperately need a third party.

  41. says

    Annie

    someone in the UK has woken up and has reached much the same policy decision – re ‘feeding mohammedans’ – as you have.

    A surprising sort of person: he runs a popular gay bar in London. But he is, it seems, a patriotic Englishman who has watched the mounting death toll among British troops with dismay, and has also observed with disquiet the progress of Sharia Creep in his neighbourhood.

    Here is the report, as reproduced and flagged at New English Review:

    http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_direct_link.cfm/blog_id/28249

    ‘One of London’s leading gay club owners sparked controversy today after posting an online rant about British Muslims, PinkPaper.com can exclusively report.



    ‘The entrepreneur – who was responding on Facebook to a story on the Evening Standard site entitled “Protestors Fight Police in Clashes Outside Mosque” – **vowed to boycott Muslim-owned businesses in response to recent unrest in East London**.

    “He also tried to justify his decision by reference to the death toll of British troops in Afghanistan, which has this month risen above 300.



    ‘PinkPaper.com has been trying to contact Mark Ames of club XXL in London to ask how he justified his remarks.



    ‘Ames – or someone posing as him – wrote:

    “**From today I will be boycotting any shops, petrol stations restaurants or businesses I know are owned by Muslims** {my emphasis – dda}

    “this also includes holidays to muslim [sic] countries {nota bene – many gay guys from Western countries have been wont to go to places like Morocco; but Mr Ames, it seems, has realized that we are AT WAR and the pursuit of personal pleasure in Enemy Territory, to the financial benefit of said Enemy, is just not. on. any more – dda}.

    “today see [sic] our death toll up to 300,

    “so why the hell are we not just flying this scum back out to there beloved states {i.e. to their Islamic countries – dda} and pull out and let them fight out there [sic] own issues!”


    
HEAR, HEAR.

  42. says

    Mike Ryan,
    The link you gave to Raqnu is actually a link to Raçnu. Take a look at the text you linked to.

    The computer reads Raçnu as Raqnu, because in an English search (I guess) it confuses ç with q.

    Is the Spirit of Justice in the Zend Avesta sometimes spelled Raçnu and other times spelled Raqnu?

    The two words would seem to be pronounced differently, too. The ç (c-cedilla) is usually a soft c, as in français, no?

    I googled Raqnu, and it does in some contexts seem to mean a spirit being of some sort in some Wizards and Dragons type games, but I’m not sure.

    I’m not sure that it was wrong to say that Raqnu was an encripted form of the Qur’an.

  43. says

    No, you have serious problems. Oh, and no, we don’t see anything “positive” in “loonwatch” or hey – in Islam.

    “I’m not sure that it was wrong to say that Raqnu was an encripted form of the Qur’an. – traeh, above

    Right-O. And never trust a person who actually visits “loonwatch.”

    As awake said in an earlier post: “The anonymous sissies over at loonwatch will never get Spencer to bite. They can publicly declare themselves or, to you and the rest of your brethren Mohammedan loonwatch trolls, begone from this forum.”

    See ya, “Quran,” wouldn’t want to be ya. Troll.

  44. says

    Sorry, Quran, but YOU are the “fanatic.”

    As awake said above – “Eat shit Raqnu, and give a serving to “Danios” and the rest of the Muslim cowards over at the loony bin. Have “Danios” declare himself or bugger off.”

    Uh Huh. So right.

  45. says

    I see you point Desidude, but I would settle for something about QuranQuestioned. Raqnu should not only question Robert’s writings but also question severely the writings in the Quran. With the same zeal and attempts at fault-finding and logic! With the same standards. He should reason that Allah should not be afraid of that.

  46. says

    “…rename yourself as Raqnu Ckssu. following your rules thats, Quran Sucks.”

    That’s hilarious! 😀

  47. says

    “Sorry, Quran, but YOU are the “fanatic.”

    True, Kim, he’s the fanatic; only a loon and a fanatic for filthy lies would offer loonwatch to this forum and then expect to be taken seriously. What a maroon, eh,? Yeah his name is “Quran” alright, that’s my story and I’m stickin’ to it …

  48. says

    “With the same zeal and attempts at fault-finding and logic! With the same standards.”

    Right! …great point, Densci ..yeah that should keep him verrrrry busy.

  49. says

    “True, Kim, he’s the fanatic; only a loon and a fanatic for filthy lies would offer loonwatch to this forum and then expect to be taken seriously…Yeah his name is “Quran” alright, that’s my story and I’m stickin’ to it…”

    I thought you were too quick to accept that “mike ryan” character’s “correction” of your figuring out that “Raqnu” was really “Quran.” You were right, and thanks to traeh for doing that research!

  50. says

    This is welcomed news from the gay front. I hope this is not just some idle talk. If enough gays come forth to lead the anti dhimmitude crowd, I may have to change my mind about most gays being cowards and dhimmis.

  51. says

    You’re right, Kim, and thank you — I was too quick to agree with mike, who’s only reward in all of this was a ‘thank you’ from that slimeball; and Traeh’s research was spot on! …and very interesting, too. And how did he make that soft c? Wish I were more computer savvy ..

  52. says

    Please remove the word Lol. It is an Urdu word means the tool of a man. This is the only language all muslims know.To swear and insult those who oppose them . They cannot negotiate with others in good faith. magdi