Canada: Honor killing victim Aqsa Parvez's father and brother sentenced to life of prison dawah

Honor killing in Canada: Aqsa Parvez was murdered for refusing to wear the Islamic hijab -- not that this has anything to do with Islam, of course! An update on this story. "Father, son get life terms in Aqsa Parvez slaying," from CBC News, June 16 (thanks to Michael):

Aqsa Parvez's father and her brother have been sentenced to life in prison after pleading to killing the 16-year-old in their Mississauga, Ont., home.

The sentence was handed down Wednesday in court in Brampton, near the home where the teen was strangled by Muhammad Parvez and his son, Waqas, in December 2007.

On Tuesday, the pair pleaded guilty to second-degree murder.

An agreed statement of facts released in court revealed that when Aqsa entered her teen years, she began rebelling against her father's rules, including his insistence that she wear traditional Muslim clothing.

"She was experiencing conflict at home over cultural differences between living in Canada and back [in Pakistan]," the statement said.

Religious differences.

Aqsa was in almost constant disagreement with her father and her seven older siblings.

She told her father she did not wish to wear the hijab, wanting instead to dress in Western clothes with the same freedoms as the other girls in her high school.

'Freedom restricted'

The statement revealed that Aqsa "did not have a door on her bedroom, her freedom to talk on the phone with friends was restricted, she was required to come straight home from school and expected to spend her evenings and weekends at home."

In September 2007, Aqsa told a counsellor at Applewood Heights Secondary School in Mississauga "that she was afraid her father wanted to kill her."

The school made arrangements for Aqsa to stay at a shelter, but she stayed only three days. Soon after, she was permitted to wear non-traditional clothes to school but the conflicts within the family continued.

Aqsa later spent time living with friends, but during that time her father and other members of her family asked her to return home.

On Dec. 10, 2007, Aqsa was taken from the school bus stop by her brother at approximately 7:20 a.m. Just 36 minutes later, her father called 911 and told police he had "killed his daughter."...

Peel Regional Police took Muhammad Parvez into custody and charged him with murder. But it was Waqsa Parvez who actually killed Aqsa, according to the statement of facts.

Waqas Parvez, 26, was charged on June 26, 2008. His DNA was found beneath his sister's fingernails.

| 51 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

51 Comments

| Leave a comment

Finally, justice for Aqsa. Or, at least, acknowledgment.

Wonder how the morons at her school who ignored her fears and pleas for help are feeling now.

Most of them are probably still passing it off as "a domestic issue", "mental illness", or a multiculturalism malfunction.

So deserved. But, the death penalty would be real justice. I don't believe PC Canada has that justice, however.

Murdering children, especially your own, pleases allah

"In September 2007, Aqsa told a counsellor at Applewood Heights Secondary School in Mississauga "that she was afraid her father wanted to kill her."

Amina and Sarah Said had run away from home more than once making the same claim about their Muslim father....they too, are graveyard dead....


It is clear to see how controlling a Muslim parent can be...just wait until you see a Muslim in control of your life....


Just go talk to some Egyptian Copts or Pakistani Christians...they know the drill....

I am in agreement with you, Kim, that the death penalty would be the most appropriate punishment for these two despicable human beings, though I would settle for life with hard labor. Life imprisonment without hard labor is simply not enough. Also, I couldn't help thinking as I read this article of all the other young Muslim women throughout the world whose only shot at life will be filled with repression, abuse and fear, and in some instances an early death, PRECISELY because Islam exists. Islam is awful all around but it's especially awful for women.

Pulsar wrote:

"In September 2007, Aqsa told a counsellor at Applewood Heights Secondary School in Mississauga "that she was afraid her father wanted to kill her."

Amina and Sarah Said had run away from home more than once making the same claim about their Muslim father....they too, are graveyard dead....
.............

Exactly, Pulsar.

Here's another young woman who would be dead minutes after sending this text message to a friend about how much she feared her father:

"Dude, I'm so scared. Sh*t," she wrote. "At the welfare place, and guess who walks in? My dad!!! I'm so shaky!"

"Holy sh*t, did he see you?" Ushna quickly responded.

"I don't think so," Noor typed. "His fat *ss is right by the door so I can't even leave..."

"Oh, dear, that's awkward," Ushna wrote. "What's up with your parents, anyway?"

"My dad is a manipulative asshole," Noor replied. "I've honestly never met anyone ... so evil."
.....

That was Noor Almaleki, run over by her father Faleh Almaleki in the parking lot of an Arizona welfare office in October of last year. He also struck her boyfriend's mother, whom she was accompanying.

SF Weekly ran a good article, "Honor Thy Father", about the case a couple of months ago:

http://www.sfweekly.com/2010-03-31/news/honor-thy-father/2

Author Paul Rubin actually largely acknowledges the role of Islam in this vicious "honor killing".

"Islam is awful all around but it's especially awful for women."

Agreed, Wellington; and some of the bravest people on earth are the women that have left islam. I applaud those women, and pray for them, too.

Re: Honor killing in Canada: Aqsa Parvez was murdered for refusing to wear the Islamic hijab

Maybe Aqsa Parvez's father and brother should be sentenced to death for not weraring the Islamic hijab.

Looking at this from a cost analysis standpoint, will it cost Canadanian taxpayers more or less to incarcerate these two family men for their lifetimes, as opposed to what it would've cost to pay the two the welfare benefits they were no doubt going to receive over their lifetimes.

*** 92:8 ***

Fun fact: in Minnesota it's a common practice for a Moslem Man, a strong successful Moslem Man, to put wives 2 through 4, his "mosque wives", who the Welfare suppopsedly doesn't know about, on AFDC for having children out of wedlock. This in addition to free healthcare, free rent, subsidized SBA loans to buy the taxicabs, and so on.

The highly paid Judeo-Christian gubmint workers at the Welfare just look away, pious, self-satisfied, pretending not to notice.

*** 1:152 ***

I live in a Moslem hotbed, and every day I see Moslems in fine cars, Lexus sedans, Escalades, Chrysler Voyager minivans, the works, with the strong successsful Moslem Man at the wheel, his 4 women in their hijabs, the family no doubt chatting idly about how awful America is, and how much it could be improved by Islam.

But, with no highly productive Infidel Taxpayers, who'd pay for the gubmint checks they get every month?

And we are considered Muhamophobes because we do not want this barbarism for our loved ones and ourselves. We would be Muhamomorons if we did not object to this mental illness masquerading as a religion.
Muhammadenism should be labelled by the psychiatric community and treated by removing all Muhammaden source materials, Muhmmaden influences and sharp objects along with indefinite isolation.
Canada should also issue a strong warning to all Sharia compliant Muhammadens in Canada; planning to visit or those who immigrate as Jihad that stiffer sentences (including the hard labor suggested by Wellington) will be issued for future violations of humanity.

"In September 2007, Aqsa told a counsellor at Applewood Heights Secondary School in Mississauga "that she was afraid her father wanted to kill her."

What a coincidence! Isn't that exactly what a young lady named Rifqa Bary said? You'd almost think there's a connection there; some common thread. Oh, whatever could it be?

And it must be coincidence, too, that the victims are ALWAYS girls and young women.
Perhaps the mohammadans should honor-kill a few BOYS and YOUNG MEN, you know, to prove how egalitarian they are. Then they could proudly advertise themselves as, "EQUAL OPPORTUNITY BARBARIANS!

Canada gives them life, but I hope the prison system gives them a toilet plunger, and PLO assignment...
Permanent Latrine Orderly...Thank you Gomer Pyle...
After sixty years or so of industrial strength prison toilet plunging, they will learn the true meaning of 'honor'...

Her father and her brother murdered her because, among other things, she refused to wear the hijab.

Not the burqa or niqab.

The hijab, the headscarf.

The badge of female membership of the Ummah, marauding Mohammedan Mob, which also designates the wearer's status as the absolute property of some Mohammedan Male; the Slave Rag, with death the penalty for any attempt to escape. And Aqsa took off her Slave Rag, she was trying to escape; and she was killed to punish her for her insubordination, her rebellion, her feared future apostasy.

Burqa bans aren't going far enough. Let's just ban **every** variety of the Mohammedan female Slave Rag.

Whenever we see a Mohammedan teenage girl or even adult woman in the west, in a shirt and skirt or jeans, but with her head wrapped up in the hijab...how do we know, how can we know, that she may not be another Aqsa Parvez, wearing it under compulsion? Under threat of a beating, or...under threat of **death**, if she should dare to rip the ugly thing off and walk about with her hair uncovered as the free non-Muslim women do?

Some Mohammedan females, of course, **do** wear it willingly, and in so doing, they fly the flag of Jihad, implicitly threatening every free unveiled infidel woman that they meet; looking down their noses at us.

Ban the public wearing of **all** forms of the Mohammedan female Slave Rag - as being tantamount to the KKK robe and hood, or the SS deathshead badge - and one does two things at once: one provides a measure of protection and encouragement for the Aqsa Parvez potential defectors; and one challenges, and thus forces out into the open, the aggressive supremacism of those Mohammedan she-devils who love their enslavement and long to see every woman in the world miserably enslaved to murderous Mohammedan males, just like they themselves already are.

"Muhammad tried … to salvage the relationship with his daughter — concessions that would not have been made if this was a traditional killing for honour. [He made] many attempts to speak to school officials. Twice she ran away and twice he went to the police for help to help look for her. These are things that are not necessarily consistent with a father seeking to avenge pride for his family," Neuberger said.

I believe Jeffery Dahmer also used the police to help retrieve one of his victims. (Still bristling at the use of the word "traditional" in this article, too.)

Finally, a Cdn. judge with some balls (well at least more so than what you find in Europe these days). FYI Here is the Cdn. Press Article from today on the sentencing of the two. I think this sentence will likely be appealed and they will get early parole after 10 years. After a decade in Canada, they don't agree with our social customs (movies, friends, parties), Cdn. Laws, probably don't like our food and most definitely don't like our fashion (clothes) so why are they living here?

Ontario judge decries 'twisted' mindset in so-called honour killing of teen girl
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

at 18:40 on June 16, 2010, EDT.
By Allison Jones, The Canadian Press

Muhammad Shan Parvez, left, Shasma Parvez, centre, and mother of Aqsa Parvez, Anwar Jan, right, leave the Brampton court house after receiving the verdict in the 2007 killing of Aqsa Parvez in Brampton Ont., on Wednesday, June 16, 2010. The "twisted" mindset that led two men to believe killing their headstrong 16-year-old daughter and sister would spare the family embarrassment is "abhorrent," a judge said Wednesday. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Nathan Denette
BRAMPTON, Ont. - The twisted mindset that led a headstrong 16-year-old girl's father and brother to kill her in the belief it would spare the family embarrassment is abhorrent, a judge said Wednesday.

Muhammad, 60, and Waqas Parvez, 29, were both sentenced to at least 18 years in prison after pleading guilty to the second-degree murder of Aqsa Parvez in a so-called honour killing.

In the weeks leading up to the 2007 killing Aqsa had clashed with her family — originally from Pakistan — over her desire to shed the hijab, wear western clothing and have the same freedoms as her friends.

The two Parvez men believed they could keep the family's pride intact by killing Aqsa, rather than letting her have a part-time job and go to the movies with friends, according to facts agreed to in court after the men pleaded guilty Tuesday.

Superior Court Justice Bruce Durno called it "profoundly disturbing" that young Aqsa, facing the struggles of a modern teen's life amid strict family values, could be murdered by the very people who were supposed to protect her.

The killing was all for the purpose of avoiding "what they perceived as the community embarrassment of not being able to control a young woman they believed was rebellious," Durno said in passing sentence Wednesday.

"That twisted, chilling and repugnant mindset could imply that the family pride could at least be kept intact or perhaps even enhanced by having two grown men overpower and kill a vulnerable teenager."

A second-degree murder conviction carries an automatic life sentence and the judge has discretion to set parole ineligibility at between 10 and 25 years. Both the Crown and defence called for the men to serve 18 years before being eligible for parole and Durno agreed.

"This is clearly a case where there must be a very significant increase above the minimum because of the breach of trust from Muhammad, the abuse of a person under 18 by both, the abhorrent motivation behind the crime... (and) the gender equality issues," he said.

According to the United Nations, as many as 5,000 girls and women are murdered every year around the world as part of so-called honour killings, a crime generally defined as the premeditated murder of a female relative believed to have brought dishonour upon her family.

Crown attorney Mara Basso said outside court that after Aqsa's "shameful, horrible, evil, barbaric murder," the sentences bring her the justice and dignity in death that she never got in life.

"We all have to band together to see that there are no more deaths like Aqsa's," she said.

"We need to honour her memory because she was a very courageous young girl who had the courage to stand up for herself, for her principles every day in that lonely home."

The Parvez family home was not lonely in the literal sense — Muhammad Parvez and his wife were living there, along with six of their eight children, three of their children's spouses and two grandchildren.

Aqsa was allowed only to go straight to and from school, couldn't socialize with friends outside school, was forbidden from getting a part-time job and had no door on her bedroom.

She was eventually allowed to wear western clothing, which the family viewed as a huge concession and was frustrated she still could not be controlled, according to the agreed facts.

The father and brother's defence lawyers said this case is not an honour killing, rather a domestic crime in a dysfunctional family with some very archaic gender notions.

"It stigmatizes a segment of the community for the actions of very few, which does nothing to further what we need to do to prevent this in the future," Joseph Neuberger, Waqas Parvez's lawyer, said outside court.

"We have to do a good job at reaching out to these families (new to Canada) and not only inviting them into a multicultural society, but I think we have to spend more time on what we mean by social inclusion."

After they were sentenced, Muhammad Parvez put his arm around his son's shoulder, and with a slight nod and wave to family in the courtroom, the two killers were led away to begin their life sentences.

©The Canadian Press, 2010

But, APF, as we hand over our money to these people via welfare, we are living relatively safely. The real trouble will start courtesy of national debt, which will eliminate welfare, and then the truly dangerous predatory behaviour will begin. They will suck the life out of us, and be very angry that they have to go to the effort of physically robbing us rather than having funds deposited into their bank accounts. God help us all.

From the article:

Aqsa was in almost constant disagreement with her father and her seven older siblings.

This procreation and only this will be enough to overwhelm Western Society.

When G. Gordon Liddy was in prison, there were only two toilets for the many hundreds of inmates, so Liddy put a sign up over one of the commodes: "For Use By V.D. Patients Only".
That effectively allocated it to Liddy.
Someone needs to put a hijab on these guys and reserve them for their own use.

Maybe they can get raped and have to kill themselves while they are there in jail!

One can only hope!

"Aqsa was in almost constant disagreement with her father and her seven older siblings"


allowing freedom of choice is UN-Islamic

I agree, champ, about Muslim-raised women who leave Islam. They are indeed brave and insightful too. What a horrible situation to be in if a woman in a Muslim environment and you come to the conclusion that Islam is no longer an option for you. As with all totalitarian systems, leaving one almost always comes with significant risks, even more so if you're female in the case of Islam.

Part of my long-term optimism that Islam will eventually be put on the trash heap of history is due to the conviction that untold numbers of Muslim women, as they are exposed to a veritable plethora of alternative ideas in this modern world in which we live, are going to realize how excessively patriarchal (to the point of complete chauvinism) Islamic doctrine is. Well, as I've said to my wife, students whom I have taught and many friends, if you get the women on your side, the other side is a goner. I really do believe that a key element in the eventual demise of Islam as a respected belief system is the realization by most that it is deep bad news for females. Once this realization sets in, it will be pure viewing pleasure to see Muslim males thrashing here and there trying to keep their cozy (and sick) situation afloat.

The National news program tonight on CBC tried hard to show that this murder was not an honour killing. It first interviewed a woman who had sheltered Aqsa for ten days at one point. She said that only a mentally ill person, someone not normal, could do such a thing. Then CBC interviewed a young Muslim girl who emphatically stated what we've heard before that this was just domestic violence, not culturally related at all.

Yesterday CBC Radio featured the defence lawyer stating that characterizing the murder as an honour killing wasn't "helpful."

The CBC filters its reports to suit its own agenda.

Kinnedar:

CBC never fails to nauseate me.

The real trouble will start courtesy of national debt, which will eliminate welfare, and then the truly dangerous predatory behaviour will begin.

That's a good point.

*** 92:8 ***

Poor Prez Osama -- with each passing day during the Gulf oil spill increasingly exposed as just another Ivy League Moron who's never held a real job or managed anything, albeit a black one with such a sad-sack record -- is running up the debt for a reason I can understand: conversion to socialism.

But have he and Rahm given any thought to how the Moslems will react when their US taxpayer subsidized checks stop?

A corollary consideration is that, when the fiscal shit hits the fan, not as it is now, but as it will much harder a few years from now, the first thing the cities and states do is lay off police and firemen, not paper shuffling bureaucrats.

*** 8:39 ***

When our new neighbors here, our beloved oh-so-multicultural American Moslems, start taking their rightful money by force, will we still have cops and firemen to respond to the invetible Jizya-seeking Jihad war terror attacks on American soil?

There is a very interesting read over at Vlad Tepes on the Aqsa case, 14 pages of court documents that prove without a shadow of a doubt that all the members of Aqsa's family were aware of her murder before it happened. No wonder they didn't want a tombstone for Aqsa.

http://vladtepesblog.com/?p=23205

The Toronto Star asks an “honor killing expert” from the Religion of Peace:

“For it to be an honour killing, it has to be premeditated murder,” said Amin A. Muhammad, an honour killing expert based at Memorial University. “There was no one incident here which led them to want to regain their honour. It was over a period of time, and it was also about this father losing control.”

(You can always rely on Mohammedans to tell you all the lies in the world, but it is disgusting that the Toronto Star spreads that revolting nonsense to obscure the ugly reality)

http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/crime/article/824135--the-honour-killing-question-a-family-loses-control

http://sheikyermami.com/2010/06/17/aqsa-parvez-honor-killing-was-not-really-an-honor-killing-because/


Queen Rania said that honor killing is un-Islamic, and she is in fact fighting for stiffer penalties for the perpetrators of honor killing in Jordan. Maybe she's right...

Or maybe she's wrong... If she's wrong, can anybody here prove it? If honor killing is, in fact, based on Islam, then what specific verses in the Quran, Hadith, or Sunnah sanction honor killing?

"Once this realization sets in, it will be pure viewing pleasure to see Muslim males thrashing here and there trying to keep their cozy (and sick) situation afloat."

lol, Wellington! ...yeah that would be something 'wonderful' to behold.

Also, organizations like SIOA are offering safe houses and other resources for muslim women wanting to leave islam, which is another great reason to support this effort. Help is out there.

Now that some type of justice has been exacted, God rest her soul. I hope that those two find solace in Koran as that is what they will need for a long time.

Such senseless killng - and all avoidable.
Aqsa paid the ultimate penalty but whilst alive could hardly have been termed as a "trouble free" child. She too could have done much more to avoid confrontration, constant arguing and damaging the family atmosphere.

Children these days are not what we were when we were children. My mother, father, did all they could in their power to bring us up in a decent manner, spend money on education, teaching us life skills and keeping the home happy. As children we too had restrictions which may have seemed hard at the time, but looking back these were nothings and fro our own good.

Aqsa's mother & father must have left Pakistan with a heavy heart all those years ago to start a new life with people who used a differnt language, long droning accents, dressed differently and had a completely different set of living values.

Never the less they plodded on and her father working the Taxis probably did not get to spend as much time with his siblings as he needed and this was all that Aqsa (and many other American and Western children) need to "go their own way".

Before you slag me off, I have been to Africa and India and I see that their children don't "go their own way", they help round the house, they help with the chiores and they try very hard to get educated and make their parents proud and most importantly contribute to a happy house atmosphere.

Here in the West , children cannot wait to get laid, try alcohol, smoke and worse smoke drugs; and that is such a pity. We in the West have really lost our way with our children; yes people here will argure, but I can SEE it for myself - that it's largely true.

All this stuff about "Islam is to blame" - well IMHO it maybe only partially true - we as parents, out instutitions and indeed our very way of life are partially to blame too - and if you cannot see that , you are not free of bias in your mind and that indeed is a sorry state to be in.

Aqsa's parents will have wanted the best for her children, but like an idiot that father had little idea of parenting.

That being the case, I think her mother too shoulod be locked up even though she did not physically carry out the throating.

Come on, Roland, they don't have to come here. Remember the old idea of fighting for freedom, before the refugee idea kicked in? I have no sympathy, none at all. If these people don't know anything about the immoral activity in their own Muslim nations, then they are living in dreamland. The west is NOT the depository of "bad morals".
And yeah, I have beeen to Africa and India too. Nice people, good manners. And their cultures have plenty of hypocrisy.
As for my own Western children, sorry, no drugs, little alcohol; instead church choir, art, that sort of thing. I want the best for my children, and my ideas of parenting fall short of ideal, but the idea of killing them has never occurred to me.
Bias be hanged.

"From the article:

Aqsa was in almost constant disagreement with her father and her seven older siblings."

This procreation and only this will be enough to overwhelm Western Society. - Aiken Bryce

I thought the same thing. We're already overwhelmed by the Demographic Jihad. We've got a gigantic problem on our hands as Demography is Destiny.


Yes, if only she hadn't been so beligerent...what's the term Rifqa stipulated to? Unruly? Yes, that's it. Since Rifqa is "unruly", she too should expect that her life is forfeit.

Her poor, put upon, unable-to-avoid-killing-girls-who-disobey-them parents must be so frustrated that they've been forced to wait to mete out the salve to their honor.

Solace in the Koran? Would that be the one that Mohammed Parvez swore upon that he would kill his daughter? (from the court findings of fact)

Let's say you're right. That children in Pakistan try really hard to please their parents, they clean around the house, don't try to get laid or smoke or drink and generally are obedient. Your problem, along with being morally bankrupt, is that you think you are raising children. You are not raising children. You are raising future adults. So these happy obedient children you describe just grew up to be the violent, Islam-adherent murderers, the Parvez family. Exactly how is that wonderful little culture better?

I was a hellion of a child: disobedient, lying, sneaking around, drinking, running away, changing my clothes after I left home for school. When I said "My mother would kill me if she knew..." I can assure you, though I was afraid of her, it was purely figurative, as it is for the vast majority of Western youth.

It's no wonder oppressed and frightened children grow up to be the violent bullies Islam allows them to be.

Since you subscribe to submission instead of liberty, you will continue to demean Western culture as a culture of sin and permissiveness. This is the price of liberty.

I would take a little dancing and drinking from my children over the moral imperative of killing them should they behave in unIslamic ways any.day.of.the.week.

It never ceases to amaze me how morally vacant Muslims are. It's as if they have the demon of Mohammed where their human souls used to be.

As I have said many times on this site (which you could search if the search engine actually worked that way), I would shelter a Muslim apostate in a heartbeat.

winoceros - I was a hellion of a child: disobedient, lying, sneaking around, drinking, running away, changing my clothes after I left home for school.

Much as it pains me to say this - but you examplify exactly what I saying - a spoilt child of the West.

winoceros - When I said "My mother would kill me if she knew..." I can assure you, though I was afraid of her.

I doubt very much if you were afraid of her - you stood up to her, shouted her down and made her life a misery and posioned the house atmosphere - shame on you.

winoceros - It never ceases to amaze me how morally vacant Muslims are.

I am NOT a muslim, but I think it is people like you who help to drag the Aqsas "out of line". You want to teach them to drink & smoke & to peer pressure them to rebel against their own parents.

Parents are precious and we have to respect them - do you have children of your own? Do they respect you; or do you resort to the cane and slipper?

I notice this sentimentalism in the comments above about Muslim females, and in its train, an implicit assumption that all (most? many? some? how many?) women who wear any kind of covering are being forced against their will.

And then, the next step in the thinking process is that just because a Muslim female is being forced to wear a head covering, she must be also free of all the other mental baggage of Islam that tends to have dangerous consequences for us.

The indications of the data we have seen may show that a large number of females (including girls) are forced to wear the hijab; but the data does not seem to warrant the sentimental and hopeful extrapolations from this. The data indicates in fact that we must assume that most Muslim women are fanatical supporters of the same Islam that is endangering us.

If your sentimentality toward the female sex must compel you to think of Muslimas as "victims", then at least frame that victimhood as the Stockholm syndrome variety -- but a Stockholm syndrome so psychologically profound and so sociologically massive, it would be reckless for us to translate our sentimental concern into any kind of policy to try to address it.

To my fellow AIM (Anti-Islam Movement) members I say: Keep up your guard, for God's sake. Stop trying to find masses of Muslims to spare from suspicion and condemnation.

Hesp, I agree with you generally, but Aqsa was clearly trying to escape this rubric. And regarding apostates, in this case I would shelter them.

I could give a rip about what you think I typify. If you had the bullying, bitter, tyrranical, smothering, unaffectionate mother and absent father I grew up with, you might feel different. No, probably you wouldn't.

Anyway, since you can never understand why a child might act out, you really aren't capable of understanding why I shared that. Others might realize it's that no matter how "bad" a kid is, he or she doesn't have to worry about his parents killing him or her in order to look good to their neighbors. That act would hardly endear a parent to anyone in the West. Get it now?

I would never have taught anyone how to smoke. I never pulled anyone else away from their family or was a bad influence to anyone. I just wanted to escape my mother. And because parents are "precious" as you idealize them, I honor my mother now and have a very nice relationship, on terms she can handle.

If your personality is representative of how good Eastern kids are raised, I'm happy to be Western. It's all Aqsa's fault. I see.

And pardon me for mistaking your Muslim apologia for being a Muslim yourself. For anyone to believe murderers could find comfort in the Koran makes it sound like they're Muslim themselves.

I am a credit to my community, a fine parent of many children, and would never excuse violence against children the way you so blithely do.

Must be the upbringing.

Roland said:

"Such senseless killng - and all avoidable.
Aqsa paid the ultimate penalty but whilst alive could hardly have been termed as a "trouble free" child. She too could have done much more to avoid confrontration, constant arguing and damaging the family atmosphere."

Yes, yes Roland. It's clear she brought that murder on herself.

'I am NOT a muslim, but I think it is people like you who help to drag the Aqsas "out of line". You want to teach them to drink & smoke & to peer pressure them to rebel against their own parents.'

Uh, I think you are definitely a Muslim. Your thought processes are all Muslim, in stereo.

The real problem here wasn't Aqsa's behavior, it was the crippling insecurities of her Muslim family, especially her Muslim father, brought on by their adherence to Islam. That's what caused him to be embarrassed, his perceived notions of shame heaped on him by his Muslim community. That is what caused the son, who the court documents say was afraid of his father, agree to murder his sister. (He did not want to be married to the Pakistani cousin his dad chose for him but he was too afraid of his dad to divorce that cousin and marry a Canadian woman he was interested in.) That is what caused all his sons and daughters to feign ignorance while their sister was being choked to death in a room in the basement near some of their bedrooms, with the door off.

Let's get real, Roland. More so than a child's attitude if they turn to drink and drugs let's discuss a Muslim man's demented need to control his family, his overwhelming need to look good in the eyes of other Muslims and his pathological belief that he must kill people to make everything "normal". You guys need serious help.

Guys, we've been reading about this Muslim stuff for so long now that we are starting to get used to their negative thinking and anti-social behavior, almost like we accept that it is just something Muslims do. We cannot get desensitized to this. And we cannot let people like Roland get away with the tripe he's shoveling. He blew his I'm-just-a-concerned-westerner-like-everybody-else-here cover when he intimated that Aqsa brought this on herself. Then I knew he was a full blown Mohammadan when he complained that people in the west have "long droning accents". LOL! A five year old could spot you a mile away.

The repulsive Muslim apologist roland weighs in with this:

Such senseless killng (sic) - and all avoidable.
Aqsa paid the ultimate penalty but whilst alive could hardly have been termed as a "trouble free" child. She too could have done much more to avoid confrontration (sic), constant arguing and damaging the family atmosphere.
........................

Yes, if only Aqsa had worn her hijab and submitted to a forced marriage—all but three of the siblings were wed in arranged marriages to cousins in Pakistan who later joined them in Canada—then perhaps her father and brother would have let her live.

What could be more "damaging to the family atmosphere" than attempting to escape this sort of slavery?

Canadians who complain about the CBC amd the Toronto Star are right. They are both reprehensible. At least my taxes don't subsidized the Star.

I'm under no illusion, Hesperado, that many, actually most, Muslim women willingly wear Muslim garb. My concern is for that percentage of Muslim women, like Aqsa Parvez, who don't do so willingly. Nor would it be a case of either complete willingness or total unwillingness. There would be gradations of inclination too, this indicative of torn feelings by many Muslim women who find it hard to resist the notion that what they do, wear and believe is right and yet who are still possessed of some hesitation about the way their life is going precisely because they are Muslim. For these also I feel a certain sympathy, though not as much, of course, for those females who just want to be rid of the whole damn Muslim experience but fear the consequences of making a real break. Even if this is only 1% of Muslim women, that's still a hell of lot of human beings trapped in a religious prison and these folks deserve our understanding and sympathy. I trust you will find this comment of mine not sentimental in the least.

If these women weren't brainwashed from the time they were small I wonder how many of them would choose to wear a stinking tablecloth over their entire bodies when it's 90 frickin' degrees outside. It must be so great to try and breathe through a sheet, to try and see where you are going, especially when you are trying to hold onto three or four little kids while walking through traffic. It must be a very pleasant experience to be downtown and realize that you can't stand the smothering and claustrophobic effect of that thing and then realize that if you were to simply take it off you would risk being beaten to a pulp by an insecure Muslim man with a big stick, pumping testosterone, an anger management problem and now that you've exposed yourself, probably a hard on.

Yeah, I can see the appeal of going around town dressed as a Hefty bag. What's not to love?

The poor, long-suffering Canadian taxpayer now must foot the bill to keep these two creeps out of the rain and with three nourishing meals daily for the rest of their natural lives.

Maybe not, kepha. If Islamic law comes to Canada, they will be freed.

Roland stated:

"winoceros - When I said "My mother would kill me if she knew..." I can assure you, though I was afraid of her.

I doubt very much if you were afraid of her - you stood up to her, shouted her down and made her life a misery and poisoned the house atmosphere - shame on you."


roland,

Who the hell are to to theorize about winoceros's childhood?

And nice touch, blaming the victim. Poor Aqsa, if only she had been more compliant, if only her infidel friends hadn't tempted her away from the path of allah, if only she had obeyed her father, like a good little muslima.....

You make me sick.

The United States became a country of immigrants escaping unjust persecution. Instead of allowing the U.S. to now be a target of global jihadists bent on conquering and taking over in the name of Islam, we should be a safe haven for those trying to escape Sharia law. We should pass laws making jihad crimes, including aiding and abetting, hate crimes against non-Muslims with very stiff penalties. And, since jihadists are keeping a low profile until they can openly declare the U.S. conquered for Islam, we should also make stricter laws against domestic violence and child abuse, as that is the domestic terrorism used to subjugate women and children.

ImNoDhimmi - Who the hell are to to theorize about winoceros's childhood?

You don't know this loose cannon anymore than I do and you are so nieve.

He didn't deny my claim and he said he had a "bullying, bitter, tyrranical, smothering, unaffectionate mother".

The truth is that he - by his atrocious behaviour made her that way! By the time he had finished- she was too!

So don't come all smug and say that I make you sick - I say it like it is and that's the best way.

It is not because Muslim mothers and fathers do not love their children as much as other parents,but because Muslims see themselves as functionally made 'slaves' and not lovingly created 'children' of allah, servitude(Islam)must comes before anything else,including parental love.Islam deifies selfishness.
Any emotions engendered by slaves forming themselves into families such as selflessness and self sacrifcice, cannnot be allowed to weaken the hellish terrors for any one member not complying with their submission.

winoceros:

"Hesp, I agree with you generally, but Aqsa was clearly trying to escape this rubric."

1) Not all Muslim females who even try to escape their Muslim families are necessarily free of the mental baggage of Islam that is endangering us. Indeed, it's reasonable to say that even Muslims being killed by other Muslims are not our friends (except, of course, in the most cynically utilitarian way).

2) A teenager's embrace of American pop values and mores does not necessarily mean, if that teenager is also a Muslim, that that teenager is free of the mental baggage of Islam that is endangering us.

3) It's possible that Aqsa herself was sufficiently free of the Islamic mental baggage; but that reality, and that determination, is casuistic, and should never be applied as an abstract general principle that would then inform some general policy we might adopt -- for then the assumption of masses of harmless and innocent Muslims we must materially "save" becomes incumbent upon us, which would interfere with what we have to do to protect our societies from Muslims in general.

Anyone who disagrees with my three points above just hasn't sufficiently assimilated and digested the full horror of Islam. They may have been reading Jihad Watch for years, but something is evidently wrong with their digestion process: for when consuming and digesting Islamic data, one's system must perform an operation that is the reverse of normal alimentary digestion: rather than absorb nutrients and expel toxins, we must absorb the toxins and expel the nutrients. While PC MCs go to great lengths to pick out the nutrients (or even invent them or swallow the inventions proferred by taqiyya artists) from the mountain of shit that is Islam, there seem to be quite a few within the Anti-Islam Movement who take just a little too much time and trouble sifting through that mountain of shit to find nutrients as well -- perhaps to assuage their guilty conscience at the logical consequence of what that mountain suggests about all Muslims.

"I'm under no illusion, Hesperado, that many, actually most, Muslim women willingly wear Muslim garb. My concern is for that percentage of Muslim women, like Aqsa Parvez, who don't do so willingly."

I'm talking about the unwilling ones, of course. The sentimentality is misplaced there as well (indeed, that's where the sentimentality gets seduced). You just aren't looking at the macro picture. When protecting our societies from Muslims, we cannot get distracted by the individual, the micro picture, the ethical concern which we Westerners are so good at, have refined over the centuries. That concern could well get hundreds of thousands of us killed in the future. This is a case where paradoxically, the concrete individual is more abstract than the generalization, for it is the concern for the individual which superimposes a generality upon Muslims that is erroneous -- whether that generality supposes "most" or "many" does not matter.

The Muslim reality that is endangering us now comes from a complex mass which we do not have the time, nor the resources, nor the knowledge to be able to break down and parse sufficiently to save any given individual Muslim from the collateral damage necesary for our protection. That's the cold brute reality which sentimentality flinches from, and for that reason will therefore contribute to our endangerment.

For example: Imagine a moment in time, when a security person encounters a Muslim woman whose beautiful eyes plead humanity, vulnerability, innocence, and that security person because of his or her sentimental instincts makes one little wrong move in his security procedure, and an hour later the deployment of a weapon of mass destruction is the result.

Hesperado

I have a question for you.

Do you believe that every single person on this planet who is a Muslim born to Muslim parents, and every person who joins Islam whether willingly or unwillingly, must be categorised as a permanently damned soul, finally and perfectly beyond redemption, beyond saving? That NO-ONE, really, EVER leaves Islam? That leaving Islam is as categorically impossible as changing one's DNA? That there is NO escape? That even those who seem to any intelligent and reasonable person to have done so, such as Patrick Sookhdeo and Hannah Shah, Mark Gabriel, Magdi Allam, Nonie Darwish, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, must be ignored, dismissed, rejected, and either executed or deported to dar al Islam just as if they were identifying and practising Muslims, because their publicly proclaimed and practised apostasy simply **cannot** be real, no matter how real, consistent and sincere it seems to be?

And that no-one, therefore, for fear of being betrayed, should EVER under any circumstances show any interest in or offer any measure of help or encouragement to any person who, like Aqsa Parvez, or Hannah Shah, or Rifqa Bary, seems either to be trying to leave, or actually to have left, Islam?

Yes or No?

If Hannah Shah had not been helped by Infidels to escape her family, when she was an unhappy teenager much like Aqsa Parvez, she would be dead today, rather than an actively professing Christian married to a Christian.

Should Hannah Shah, rather than being helped to escape, and taken to church, been bundled onto a plane to Pakistan and told: you are a Muslim, you are a devil not a human being, you are an Orc and can never be anything else, go to Hell where you belong?

dumbledoresarmy,

I have articulated my position on this at least a hundred times over the months, if not years.

It's not about "all Muslims" in the simplistically literal or ontological sense. There are situations where not all of some category is bad, and yet certain factors about the overall situation necessitate taking measures as though all were bad.

Analogical example: In the modern West, where laws have developed to try to protect consumers in a manner as efficient and comprehensive as possible (and always fine-tuning and progressing to optimize this) and where the surrounding society is comparably healthy enough in terms of both technical and social infrastructure to be able to envision, devise and implement such protections, when there happens just one or two cases of deadly food poisoning from beef, the response is to interdict and suspend all the beef on the shelves of supermarkets in the entire region (if not a wider geographical area). Does that mean the government and the food industry believe that all the beef is tainted? No. It could be well be that most of it is perfectly harmless. So why do they treat all the beef as though it were tainted?

I leave it to you, an intelligent person, to be able to figure out the elementary reason that answers why -- which is approximately the same reason (with certain variances here in there which, again, an intelligent person can figure out for themselves) why I think we are forced to treat all Muslims the same.

I would only add that only a person who has not fully digested the full horror, in all its ghoulishly and terrifyingly diverse details, of the mountain of data about Muslims as reported on Jihad Watch over the years would disagree that my analogy only fails in terms of strenghtening my position: i.e., that the problem presented by Muslims is far worse, deadlier, and difficult to manage -- and thus forces the collective treatment of the problem far more -- than is my example of the tainted beef.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter