French govt signs "framework convention" to log "anti-Muslim racism"

Muslims in France are under no obligation to honor any "agreement" or treaty with their kuffar victims. Says so right in the Qur'an.

"French authorities signed here Thursday a "framework convention" with Muslim leaders to help log anti-Muslim racism in this country, the Interior Ministry said."

French authorities have also signed their own death warrants, and the death warrants' of their descendants.

Adieu, la belle France.

No doubt the "religion of peace" will use this to demand similar rights across the EU in the interests of "EU consistency".

Pan-European "grievance management" just for Muslims. Just need to include the OIC and it would be "world grievance management" for the entire Ummah.

No doubt the "anti-Muslim racism" grievances are already being created. Plus, of course, the "community leaders" who will demand the right to "oversee compliance".

Oh, I'd say that just a "wrong" look at a Muslim can get a French non-Muslim in a heap 'o trouble now.

When the counter punch comes, it will have been the cowardice of things like this that will cause that punch to be all the more powerful.

The people aren't being fooled. They know the time of day. They know that it is the Muslims who are the troublemakers. They also know that their "government," their "representatives," in league with the MSM, are doing them in.

Read this for a report on the growing discontent among the still-sane in Europe,
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2010/06/slouching-towards-zurich.html#readfurther

It's not Islamophobia when there is a legitimate reason to be scared, which is what they want. Keep us from asking questions, pointing out the obvious, and taking jabs at this awful "religion". Since when has Islam been a race, exactly what Robert stated. Last time I checked, anyone can be a Muslim. Sure, they are mostly of Arab decent, or as the popular media likes to put it, "Asian" (I really think of an Islamic terrorist when I see a Chinese or Japanese person walking about, right...). Arabs can be Christians, Jews, Budhists, etc...

Well, good luck living a peaceful life in the Middle East if you aren't a Muslim, or the right kind of Muslim. And now, good luck living in France if you aren't one either.

What about France "loging" Islamic racism?

Why the sudden change of heart?
At one time I thought France was coming to its senses by banning the burka. Now they're conducting a censorship against those who wish to speak the truth about Islam, a non-race, semi-religious, political organization similar in many respects to the Mafia.

What gives? Did a Saudi Prince suddenly butter the palms of the French government? There has to be a financial loophole here somewhere.

framework convention" with Muslim leaders to help log anti-Muslim racism in this country

Well the first thing France has to do is give up the silly notion that it can ban certain forms of Mahoundian dress...That could be interpreted as Anti-Muslim racism...
From there it is an easy leap to any resistance to sharia, is also anti-Mahoundian racism...In fact, anything short of total surrender is considered anti-Mahoundian racism...When Allah (GINO) instructed Mahoundians to fight until the whole world was for Allah (GINO), he didn't mean part of it...Any resistance to this at all is anti-Mahoundian racism...
But it seems that France is giving up resistance...or at least part of it is...I hope the other part wakes up soon...

Please forgive me for spamming this thread but it seems that the French equivalent of Tea Parties are about to become massive in the streets of Paris, Lyon, Lille, Nantes and Toulouse.

The issue at hand is the right to eat saucisson (French salami) and drink wine in public.

An apéro géant was planned in the highly islamised area of the Goutte d'Or in the 18th arrondissement of Paris. This area where the streets are illegally blocked by mohammedan prayer every friday, was where the Bloc Identitaire and Riposte Laic organised, via Facebook, a public picnic where wine and pork products were to be consummed, in strict violation of sharia law but not French law.

This is the area in question
View Larger Map

There has been much to laugh about the last few days. SOS Racisme clamed that the lettering on the poster suggested that the double s in saucisson was inspired by nazi ss posters.

The leader of the black rights organisation also claimed it the "apero de la haine", (Aperitif of hate)

This was banned by the authorities at the last hour, so tomorrow evening at 7 pm, with wine and saucisson in hand, the 10,000 facebook members will meet at under the Arc de Triomphe instead for a expression of solidarity against the islamic invasion.

The Bloc Identitaire, a right wing group, similar to the Liga Nord in Italy or the Vlaams Belang in Flanders has joined forces with the Riposte Laic a left-wing organisation who also refuse sharia on on our streets.

After the banning of the Apéro Géant at the Goutte d'Or, several other facebook groups have appeared promoting similar events in other French cities, as well as in London and Brussels.

The Toulouse event has brought about the wrath of the prefect who ahs demanded that the facebook organisers be identified and brought to justice. The Lyon event has brought the petulant rage of the LGBT group who demand that this be banned. It must be remembered that gays get beaten up regularly by mohammedans but stage their provocative kiss in protests not in front of mosques but in front of churches. Future sociologists will have their work cut out for them when they want figure out what motivated gays to support the banning of eating porc in the streets.

The events are happening so fast that it's best to check http://www.fdesouche.com/119165-apero-geant-a-la-goutte-dor/ to see what is going on. I hope that you will enjoy the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAHYj_p4DEw where at the 9th minute, Bruno Larebière takes out a saucisson and looks in the eye of the interviewer saying "This, is the symbol of resistance in 2010"

Much to look forward to in the next few days. Food and wine is possibly the one thing that French of all political colours can agree on and it may be that the humble pig will save France from its own stupidity

But what about the reverse? What about logging the number ofr anti-Infidel incidents, against individuals, companies, and the organs of the French state, from schoolteachers to police, committed by Muslims? Will these be logged, and the results made available, in exactly the same way, as the results of these promised loggings of "anti-Muslim" activities?

After all, the French authorities studiously avoid releasing figures on Muslim atttacks on Infidels, and they never identify by background those who are responsible for all sorts of criminal attacks. And even the attacks inside schools, on teachers and other students -- once an unheard-of event but now so common -- are, when publicly reported, always given without any identifying mention of the perpetrators.

If Muslims have a right to "know" about "anti-Muslim" acts, then French people, and the many non-Muslim immigrants (Chinese, Vietnamese, Hindus, and so on) have at least as great a right to know about Muslim acts against them, and not have to endure any longer being kept in the dark, when everyone in France really knows who is doing what, and to whom.

Sebastian, thanks for the link to that interview. Magnifique !!!

So, when will we have France and other countries signing a treaty condemning anti-Christian bigotry?

"The Bloc Identitaire, a right wing group, similar to the Liga Nord in Italy or the Vlaams Belang in Flanders has joined forces with the Riposte Laic a left-wing organisation who also refuse sharia on on our streets."

They should go out of their way to be as ostentatiously left-wing as possible. Give pride of place to the Riposte Laic, to non-Muslims -- Christians, Hindus, Buddhists -- whether they have endured Muslim mistreatment in Muslim-dominated countries, or Muslim attacks in countries still under the control of Infidels (as Thailand, the Philippines, India).

There must be no falling into the waiting trap of being labelled "right-wing." That Homeric epithet is at the ready, waiting to be affixed. Don't let that happen.

Re. the planned 'Sausage and Wine' protest picnic rallies in France:

Jews don't eat pork, but unlike the mohammedans they don't try to force other people to observe the same rule; and unlike the mohammedans, Jews **do** make and drink wine, the Hebrew scriptures are full of references to wine "that makes glad the heart of man".

The organisers of these protest picnics should invite and encourage Jewish residents of Paris, Lyons, Lille, Nantes and Toulouse to attend - indeed, offer them a place of honour, right in the middle of the picnic, so that they will be protectively surrounded by their fellow infidels with a wall of pork to ward off any Mohammedan marauders. They can byo kosher picnic baskets and when it comes time to pop the corks they can toss off a glass of wine right along with all the other non-Muslim French citizens.

Two of the most notorious and ghastly assaults by Mohammedans upon non-Mohammedans in France, indeed, in Paris itself, in recent times, were carried out by Mohammedans upon French **Jews**: the kidnapping and slow, fiendish torture-unto-death, by a whole gang of Mohammedan psychopaths, of the young Jew Ilan Halimi; and the violent throat-slitting of Sebastien Selam by his Mohammedan co-worker whom he had thought his friend, a throat-slitting that was described thus by the murderer, "I have killed my Jew, now I shall go to Paradise".

Something from the jihadwatch archives, from October 2009, featuring a New York restaurant, the Breslin Restaurant, associated with a restaurant called 'The Spotted Pig'.

Their Muslim 'neighbours', at the little mosque across the street, attempted - with incredible rudeness and veiled threats - to stop the public serving of wine and pork; just exactly as Muslims have done in France.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2009/10/muslims-threaten-new-york-restaurant-for-serving-alcohol.html

I encourage our French posters and lurkers, especially any who have come on board since October 29 2009, to click and 'read the whole thing'.

The salient passages:

QUOTE "After the recent FergusStock, a festival during which famed British chef Fergus Henderson cooked whole pigs [at the Breslin Restaurant, New York] for a rapt crowd of New York chefs and foodies, Mr. Friedman said

**the mosque's leaders called a meeting with the hotel.** {my emphasis - dda}.

"They said, 'Can you move the bar?'" he said. "And I laughed.

'And the guy said, 'Oh, you think that's funny?'

'And I said, 'Yeah, that is funny, that is really funny, because we're not going to move the bar just because you discovered we're serving booze.' Can you name one restaurant in New York that doesn't serve booze?"

'Mr. Friedman and his partner, Spotted Pig {note well the name - dda} chef April Bloomfield, did agree to nix plans for a dive bar in a townhouse next door,

' but as for the restaurant,

"I said, 'This is the United States of America and we'll do whatever the f**k we want.'"

'He {Mr Friedman - dda} said **the mosque had suggested it couldn't control the behavior of "a few bad eggs"; i.e., "we could get a brick through our window."** {nota bene - MAFIA TACTICS - dda}.

' Mr. Friedman said he made the police aware of this threat." END QUOTE.

Perhaps Mr Friedman's down-to-earth New York reply to the mafia-style threateners from the mosque-across-the-street, might be translated into French, slightly adapted, and placed on banners:

"This is La Belle France and we'll do whatever the f**k we want."

By the way: the Muslim attempt to force or frighten Mr Friedman and his 'Spotted Pig' chef partner, from publicly serving wine and pork at the Breslin restaurant, and the at-present-successful Muslim duping or frightening of French authorities into quashing the planned Apero Geant at the Goutte d'Or, are classic examples of Muslims setting out to 'command "right" and forbid "wrong", to force non-Muslims in New York and in Paris to conform to the Rules for Dhimmis as set out in the Reliance of the Traveller, the Umdat al-Salik.

Here are those rules:

"o11.5

'...non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property.

'In addition, they:

'(1) are penalized for committing adultery or theft, though not for drunkenness;


'(2) are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);

'(3) are not greeted with “as-Salamu alaykum”;

(4) must keep to the side of the street;

'
(5) may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

'(6) **are forbidden to openly display wine or pork**,

'(A: to ring church bells or display crosses,)

'recite the Torah or Evangel aloud,

'or make public display of their funerals and feast-days {nota bene - there goes Mardi Gras, if Europe is Islamified - dda};


''(7) and are forbidden to build new churches." END QUOTE.

There it is, rule number 6: the dhimmis "are forbidden to openly display wine or pork".

So.

To break the Rules for Dhimmis, to refuse to behave as dhimmis: **display wine and pork**!! And do it, repeatedly, throughout this summer, in every street and square and public park in France.

Thank you Hugh and Dumbledore's Army for your well thought out remarks.

Hugh, I think the label right wing is becoming as innefective as the labels racist or islamophobe. Quite honestly it's like water off a duck's back and you will will be labeled this if you oppose islam, whatever your political hue. If you watch this interview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzxUhnDMK7g&feature=player_embedded with Pierre Cassen of Riposte Laic, he clearly says (starting at the 9th minute) that today in France, the porc is now considered a racist product and that he has no qualms in being a partner of the Block Identitaire for this event.

As far as I'm concerned the Republic, born in the blood of Louis XVI, Marie Antoinette and the child Louis XVII then subsequently baptised in the tears of 300 000 massacred Vendéens has only it's age to confer legitimacy. I will therefore wave the tricolour and the sing the Marseillaise as I very much doubt Louis de Bourbon, the Duc d'Anjou will turn up. In fact the Movement Pour la France, led by Philippe de Villiers and the party most closely associated with the monarchy, has requested that its members do not attend.

Dumbledore's Army, with Jewish groups, things always get very complicated. Whenever a Jew gets attacked, Jewish organisations will condemn racism and will organise a march usually always well attended by Islamic groups. At the march in memory of Ilam Halimi, Philippe de Villiers, a good friend of Israel, was forcibly ejected by islamics.

I have I'm afraid lost all hope of a friendly understanding at an official level between Jews and Christians. Jews in France are somehow incapable to defend their own interests so even less so the interests of France. Most of my Jewish friends believe that that the Palestians are awful victims of Israeli occupation and are indifferent in the truth behind Mohammed Al Durah. They will probably consider Aperitif Géant a racial provocation and will no doubt condemn this. I will be attending the event with a good Jewish friend who is as expasperated as I am with the Israelites. Our main Jewish hope is Eric Zemmour, who can only get away with what he says because he is Jewish. He is attached to the letter and spirit of the French Republic as a baby to his mothers breast. This is his take on the event: http://dai.ly/bAWwpf

Remember also that the Jews have their homeland, while we on the other hand are losing ours. If France joins the ummah, Jews can always move to Israel. Where do we go when our land is lost? This is our battle and anyone can join in but please for the love of God don't get in the way.

Thank you for the 'Reliance of Traveller' I wasn't aware there was an actual rule forbidding the public display of wine or porc. I guess the islamisation of France may turn out to be somewhat more complex for the Ummah they they initially expected.

That the Monarchy Party in France is pro-Islam doesnot supprise me at all. Charlesmagethe First Holy Roman Emporous was very good friend with the Caph in Iraq as they both share common enemies the rival caph in Spain and the Eastern Roman Empire, they regurate exchange gifts. The Holy Roman Emporous was unable to get purple dye cloth to make clothes fit for than Emporous from the eastern roman empire, the Caph of Iraq sent him purple dye cloth which the Frankish ruler love as than gift.

The Frank and Eastern Roman troop where busy fighing each other in Italy and Eastern Europe. That was one reason the Eastern Roman Empire refuse him purple dye cloth, plus they didnot want than Holy Roman Empire in the west at all. The muslim trade with the Frankish Empire while the trade with the Eastern Roman Empire was limit due to trade rule from the Eastern Roman Empire. So you have than case that than cathority ruler was more freindly with than Islamist ruler, who was more freindy with than christian ruler than with than Islamist one. The Pope in Rome was on friendy term with the Caph of Iraq also than they exchange gifts also.

Dumbledore's Army, thanks for your interest. Around 800 people turned up. I find this very disappointing, but the organisers seem quite satisfied. http://www.fdesouche.com/119165-apero-geant-a-la-goutte-dor

Quite honestly, we have got a long, long way to go before the humble saucisson becomes the kryptonite