Sharia Alert: Mother of two set to be stoned to death for adultery in Iran

The imam of the Islamic supremacist mega-mosque at Ground Zero, Feisal Abdul Rauf, is an open proponent of Sharia. This is what that means.

"Iran: SKSW/WLUML Statement on planned stoning to death of young mother in East Azerbaijan Province," from Women Living Under Muslim Laws, June 18 (thanks to Banafsheh):

The Global Campaign to Stop Killing and Stoning Women and the International Solidarity Network, Women Living Under Muslim Laws urge all concerned to immediately contact the Iranian officials to express their concern over the planned stoning to death of Sakineh Mohammadi-Ashtiani. On 15 May 2006, Sakineh Mohammadi-Ashtiani was convicted of having an 'illicit relationship' with two men and was sentenced to 99 lashes by Branch 101 of the Criminal Court of Osku, in East Azerbaijan Province. Then, in a September 2006 trial of a man accused of murdering her husband, Mohammadi-Ashtiani was once again accused of committing 'fornication while married'. During this trial, Mohammadi-Ashtiani retracted the 'confession' she supposedly made during pre-trial interrogation, alleging that she had been coerced to confess under duress, and declared her innocence. Two of the five judges found her not guilty, pointing to the lack of evidentiary proof in the case against her, and noting that she had already suffered 99 lashes due to her previous sentencing. Even though double jeopardy is illegal in Iran, the other three judges, including the presiding judge, found Sakineh guilty on the basis of the 'judge's intuition', a provision in Iranian law that allows judges to make their own subjective and arbitrary rulings based on a 'gut feeling', even in the absence of clear or conclusive evidence. Mohammadi-Ashtiani was sentenced to death by stoning on 10 September 2006.

A mother of two young children, Mohammadi-Ashtiani has asked for amnesty from the Judiciary twice, but both times her requests have been denied.

Mohammadi-Ashtiani's lawyer, Mohammad Mostafaie, states that with all the complexities and confusion over her case, his client should not be executed, let alone stoned to death, and that her repentance is enough to warrant a pardon. Mostafaie has pleaded the Head of the Judiciary, Head of the Provincial Judiciary and members of the Amnesty Body to commute Mohammadi-Ashtiani's sentence to one that enables her to return to her life and children. In previous cases, Ayatollah Shahroudi, the former Head of the Judiciary in Iran, has commuted stoning sentences with the approval of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamene'i.

The newly proposed draft of the Islamic Penal Code of Iran contains provisions for annulling stoning sentences when the execution of such a sentence would damage the reputation of the Islamic Republic and lead to the degradation of Islam.

The Stop Stoning Forever Campaign, a grassroots initiative in Iran, has been urging Iranian officials to repeal the stoning law since its formation in 2006. There is no mention of stoning in the Qur'an and many prominent Ayatollahs, or religious scholars, have spoken in support of a ban on stoning in Iran. Many Muslim nations such as Malaysia, Indonesia, Tunisia, Algeria and others have banned death by stoning. Despite calls for abolition from around the globe, stoning is still legal in Iran and judges continue to issue and implement stoning sentences.

The Iranian Constitution forbids the use of torture. Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) demands that "No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment."

As a state party to the ICCPR, Iran has also made an explicit and unreserved commitment under article 6(2) that if the death sentence is imposed it is to be "only for the most serious crimes." The UN Human Rights Committee (in the case of Toonen v Australia) has made it clear that treating adultery and fornication as criminal offences does not comply with international human rights standards.

| 27 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

27 Comments

| Leave a comment

Does Iran have offical "stoners" or does Iran issue a "stoner summons" much like the western "jury summons" in which you must appear and carry out your role in the legal system...or does Iran just have plenty of stone throwing volunteers whenever the call arrives...?...

just curious.....

http://newstime.co.nz/stoning-in-iran-children-beg-for-the-life-of-their-mother.html
"Stoning in Iran – Children beg for the life of their mother"

Quran Chapter 24 Verse 2 “الزَّانِيَةُ وَالزَّانِي فَاجْلِدُوا كُلَّ وَاحِدٍ مِنْهُمَا مِائَةَ جَلْدَةٍ وَلَا تَأْخُذْكُمْ بِهِمَا رَأْفَةٌ فِي دِينِ اللَّهِ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِاللَّهِ وَالْيَوْمِ الْآخِرِ وَلْيَشْهَدْ عَذَابَهُمَا طَائِفَةٌ مِنَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ …” Google Translate “Adulteress and the adulterer and lash each one of them a hundred lashes and take you by the mercy of God in the religion, if you believe in Allah and the Last Day, and the punishment be witnessed by a number of believers …”

Daily repressive implementation of Sharia law in the Islamic Republic of Iran, e.g.:-

"Fine handed down by Iran's morality police to woman for mal-veiling'"

http://www.iranfocus.com/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=20846:fine-handed-down-by-irans-morality-police-to-woman-for-qmal-veilingq&catid=6:women&Itemid=28

"There is no mention of stoning in the Qur'an"

But the Hadith is clear!

Sharia Alert: Mother of two set to be stoned to death for adultery in Iran
....................

The horror never ends. We can add this to the stoning of the little 13-year-old rape victim in Somalia. Bloody barbarians.

I hope we can bring international pressure to spare this woman—but Iran has proven less and less prone of late to show any concern about the good opinion of the civilized world.

More:

The imam of the Islamic supremacist mega-mosque at Ground Zero, Feisal Abdul Rauf, is an open proponent of Sharia. This is what that means.
...................

This is *exactly* what the meretricious Imam Rauf means. This is what they have in store for us, if we are not stalwart and principled enough to fight against the imposition of Shari'ah in the West.

More:

Even though double jeopardy is illegal in Iran, the other three judges, including the presiding judge, found Sakineh guilty on the basis of the 'judge's intuition', a provision in Iranian law that allows judges to make their own subjective and arbitrary rulings based on a 'gut feeling', even in the absence of clear or conclusive evidence.
...................

And *this* is how such cases will be decided—on the whim of some barbarian "judge", who feels "in his gut"—a "gut" which has been steeped in the savagery of Islam from its earliest days—that stoning some woman, even on little evidence, constitutes Islamic "justice".

Once again, I would urge everyone here to see "The Stoning of Soraya M". This is not a perfect film—it is clunky in places, and does not explicitly charge Islam itself as the basis of such horror—but it is a brave and principled film, and gives a very good sense of just how obscene the practice of stoning is.

The film—not surprisingly—is not for the faint of heart. But it gives a very good sense of the savagery we are facing.

"The Stoning of Soraya M." should be mandatory viewing in all public schools.

Online petition to sign if any are interested in that:

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/save-sakineh-mohammadi.html

'Judge's intuition'. Could this be code for "guilty conscience"?

It appears this woman is a menace to society, a society of members of the Worship-the-Penis-Club in good standing. If these judges let her go there will be other women who might escape the fate of death-by-seeking-affection and these "men" can't have that. Their whole sexual house of cards would come crashing down if they ever admitted sex had anything to do with love and affection as opposed to control, subjugation and, torture as foreplay.

"The newly proposed draft of the Islamic Penal Code of Iran contains provisions for annulling stoning sentences when the execution of such a sentence would damage the reputation of the Islamic Republic and lead to the degradation of Islam."

It's hard to see how Islam could be any more degraded than it already is.

Some interesting comments about the film from the director, Cyrus Nowrasteh:

"There is so much political correctness and moral relativism. These are journalists who would chop off their right arm to expose a US president but they run a mile from saying anything about Islam."

He is thrilled his film is showing in Australia. "The Iranian government pressured Turkey not to show it but the Turks, to their credit, went ahead,'' he says. ''But it's not being shown in the UK and France: our distributor was told that cinemas there were too worried … Some places are really chicken."

("Drama about fatal stoning has passions running high")

http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/movies/drama-about-fatal-stoning-has-passions-running-high-20100525-warg.html

Just waiting to hear from a feminist that this quaint Islamic custom is the equivalent of our Western skin exfoliation -- just a little difference in degree. So what's all the fuss.

MBR wrote:

"The Iranian government pressured Turkey not to show it but the Turks, to their credit, went ahead,'' he says. ''But it's not being shown in the UK and France: our distributor was told that cinemas there were too worried … Some places are really chicken."
...................

Thanks for posting this, MBR—I had *no idea* that France and the UK were censoring this important film—out of fear, dhimmitude, and—perhaps—urging from the Repulsive "Islamic Republic".

Reprehensible. I saw the film at a theater in Berkeley—no problems there.

Cornelius @ "There is no mention of stoning in the Qur'an" But the Hadith is clear!

Yes the Hadithes are very clear

'Umar said, "I am afraid that after a long time has passed, people may say, "We do not find the Verses of the Rajam (stoning to death) in the Holy Book,"


Volume 8, Book 82, Number 814:
Narrated Abu Huraira:

A man from among the people, came to Allah's Apostle while Allah's Apostle was sitting in the mosque, and addressed him, saying, "O Allah's Apostle! I have committed an illegal sexual intercourse." The Prophet turned his face away from him. The man came to that side to which the Prophet had turned his face, and said, "O Allah's Apostle! I have committed an illegal intercourse." The Prophet turned his face to the other side, and the man came to that side, and when he confessed four times, the Prophet called him and said, "Are you mad?" He said, "No, O Allah's Apostle!" The Prophet said, "Are you married?" He said, "Yes, O Allah's Apostle." The Prophet said (to the people), "Take him away and stone him to death." Ibn Shihab added, "I was told by one who heard Jabir, that Jabir said, 'I was among those who stoned the man, and we stoned him at the Musalla ('Id praying Place), and when the stones troubled him, he jumped quickly and ran away, but we overtook him at Al-Harra and stoned him to death (there).

' "Volume 8, Book 82, Number 815:
Narrated Abu Huraira and Zaid bin Khalid:

While we were with the Prophet , a man stood up and said (to the Prophet ), "I beseech you by Allah, that you should judge us according to Allah's Laws." Then the man's opponent who was wiser than him, got up saying (to Allah's Apostle) "Judge us according to Allah's Law and kindly allow me (to speak)." The Prophet said, "'Speak." He said, "My son was a laborer working for this man and he committed an illegal sexual intercourse with his wife, and I gave one-hundred sheep and a slave as a ransom for my son's sin. Then I asked a learned man about this case and he informed me that my son should receive one hundred lashes and be exiled for one year, and the man's wife should be stoned to death." The Prophet said, "By Him in Whose Hand my soul is, I will judge you according to the Laws of Allah. Your one-hundred sheep and the slave are to be returned to you, and your son has to receive one-hundred lashes and be exiled for one year. O Unais! Go to the wife of this man, and if she confesses, then stone her to death." Unais went to her and she confessed. He then stoned her to death.

Volume 8, Book 82, Number 816:
Narrated Ibn 'Abbas:

'Umar said, "I am afraid that after a long time has passed, people may say, "We do not find the Verses of the Rajam (stoning to death) in the Holy Book," and consequently they may go astray by leaving an obligation that Allah has revealed. Lo! I confirm that the penalty of Rajam be inflicted on him who commits illegal sexual intercourse, if he is already married and the crime is proved by witnesses or pregnancy or confession." Sufyan added, "I have memorized this narration in this way." 'Umar added, "Surely Allah's Apostle carried out the penalty of Rajam, and so did we after him."

For those who, perhaps, like me, find it difficult to watch visual representations of horror (I have refused, for example, to watch any 'beheading videos'), but can manage, just, if the horror is represented through words alone.

A description of a stoning in northern Nigeria, which was posted in this forum some years ago, by a poster named 'Caroline', and which I copied and kept.

The 'source-link' which was originally provided no longer works, I am afraid.

An eyewitness account of a stoning:

http://www.liddyshow.us/liddyfile35.php

"Dear readers, please put on your thinking cap and imagine a mental picture of the following story.

'A deep hole is dug in the ground. A 30 year old lady, tied up from feet to shoulders, as a stick, is lowered alive into this hole, in a standing position. Only her neck and head are visible. Can you imagine a human head sticking above ground?

'When the order is given, a man throws a fist-sized stone at her protruding head. The stone hits her head with a thud. She screams in pain as the blood oozes down her face.

'Another man picks up a stone and scrap[e]s the side of her head drawing a lateral line of blood. She cries and screams in excruciating pain.

'Since it is a free for all, a teenage spectator from this open playing field, tries his luck, but misses her head completely. Another aims at her and flings it with force. The stone hits its intended target, her forehead.

'She screams and cries loudly for mercy.

'There is now a gash on her forehead.

'Blood spurting out, down her eyes, nose, cheeks, mouth and down to the ground. She cries out for mercy but to not avail.

'The minutes become an hour, between the many misses, scraps, nicks, chips and strikes. Another spectator flings forcefully at her.

'The stone hits the bridge of her nose with another thud. She screams again and again.

'This time the blood comes down from inside and outside her nose. Probably, her nasal bridge-bone is broken, causing the bleeding from inside her nostrils as well.

'Though her wounds are grave, as you can imagine, her screems by now are not as vociferous as earlier, and her tears help to wash some of the blood on her cheeks. Her vision has completely gone with the blood coating.

'The next stone hits her again. A piece of flesh pops out. No, its not, oh god, it really can't be her eye-ball. It is so bloody that you cann't really make out.

'By this time, blood has covered her entire face and the ground in front of her.

'She still makes groaning sounds. More time pass. Stoning her, continues.

'Her sounds are less and less audible. Her face has become unrecognisable. Flesh, like mashed meat is her face, but only more bloody, as she now literally has no human face. Small strips of flesh, like locks of hair are hanging from her.

'Her head is now drooping forward. At this stage a hit on her make splashes of blood.

'She has stopped making a sound for the last two stone pelting.

'Two hours have passed. The Islamic authorities check her neck for pulse. It is still beating but barely, due to the loss of blood. A flesh piece drops off her head, as the stoning process continues.

'Finally,death comes to this lady.

'She is then left there for a few more hours for the spectators to see, because this is a public lesson for all muslim females, who commit adultery. {yes: and we know what 'adultery' may consist of; for all we know, this lady may have been raped; or she may have been sentenced to death on the basis of someone's febrile imagining or in the capital court of village gossip - dda}.

'Then her father and relatives are allowed to dig her body, and bring it above ground.

'Pieces of her flesh, lying on the ground, is collected and because she has no face, it is put back on the front of her head, and bundled up.

'Now readers, imagine that is your mother, or your daughter, or sister, or even you, yourself.

'DNA is not accepted in Islam, but at least 4 witnesses of reputable character, should give testimony of the actual penetration of the sexual intercourse to convict him.

'You might ask, who has sexual intercourse in front of 4 witnesses?

'I can also ask you "how can you consider 4 men watching others' sexual intercourse, as reputable characters?"

'But, there is no question or denying that this is not a traditonal, customary, cultural or a kangaroo court, but a legal Islamic court, with legal Islamic judges and legal expert Islamic officials, in the muslim state of Bakori ( Nigeria), of the legal Government, democratically elected by the Muslim citizens of this state.

'These are the undeniable authentic facts, which no amount of words or actions can ever repudiate.

'Hear the deafening silence of the 1 billion muslims worldwide, who are in a vigorous fit of inactivity, calmly pretending not to know.

'But, the balance 5/6th of the world, (1.5 billion Christians, 1.1 billion Taoists, 1 billion Hindus, 700 million Bhuddists and others) can do something to stop this barbarism of the middle-east."

'This is JUSTICE, by order of that so-called "perfect" man and "perfect" human being, the so-called prophet Muhammad."

- Posted by: Caroline at July 6, 2006 7:34 PM


They won't be singing Bob Dylan's "Everybody Must Get Stoned" either.

IN CORE ISLAMIC TEXTS, MUHAMMAD REPEATEDLY ORDERS STONING
In the most canonical hadith collection, Sahih Bukhari:

Volume 8, Book 82, Number 805:
Narrated Jabir bin Abdullah Al-Ansari:
A man from the tribe of Bani Aslam came to Allah's Apostle and Informed him that he had committed illegal sexual intercourse and bore witness four times against himself. Allah's Apostle [Muhammad] ordered him to be stoned to death as he was a married Person.

Volume 8, Book 82, Number 809:
Narrated Ibn 'Umar:
A Jew and a Jewess were brought to Allah's Apostle on a charge of committing an illegal sexual intercourse. The Prophet asked them. "What is the legal punishment (for this sin) in your Book (Torah)?" They replied, "Our priests have innovated the punishment of blackening the faces with charcoal and Tajbiya." 'Abdullah bin Salam said, "O Allah's Apostle, tell them to bring the Torah." The Torah was brought, and then one of the Jews put his hand over the Divine Verse of the Rajam (stoning to death) and started reading what preceded and what followed it. On that, Ibn Salam said to the Jew, "Lift up your hand." Behold! The Divine Verse of the Rajam was under his hand. So Allah's Apostle [Muhammad] ordered that the two (sinners) be stoned to death, and so they were stoned. Ibn 'Umar added: So both of them were stoned at the Balat and I saw the Jew sheltering the Jewess.

Volume 8, Book 82, Number 813:
Narrated Ibn 'Abbas:
When Ma'iz bin Malik came to the Prophet (in order to confess), the Prophet said to him, "Probably you have only kissed (the lady), or winked, or looked at her?" He said, "No, O Allah's Apostle!" The Prophet said, using no euphemism, "Did you have sexual intercourse with her?" The narrator added: At that, (i.e. after his confession) the Prophet [Muhammad] ordered that he be stoned (to death).

Volume 8, Book 82, Number 815:
Narrated Abu Huraira and Zaid bin Khalid:
While we were with the Prophet [Muhammad], a man stood up and said (to the Prophet), "I beseech you by Allah, that you should judge us according to Allah's Laws." Then the man's opponent who was wiser than him, got up saying (to Allah's Apostle) "Judge us according to Allah's Law and kindly allow me (to speak)." The Prophet said, "'Speak." He said, "My son was a laborer working for this man and he committed an illegal sexual intercourse with his wife, and I gave one-hundred sheep and a slave as a ransom for my son's sin. Then I asked a learned man about this case and he informed me that my son should receive one hundred lashes and be exiled for one year, and the man's wife should be stoned to death." The Prophet [Muhammad] said, "By Him in Whose Hand my soul is, I will judge you according to the Laws of Allah. Your one-hundred sheep and the slave are to be returned to you, and your son has to receive one-hundred lashes and be exiled for one year. O Unais! Go to the wife of this man, and if she confesses, then stone her to death." Unais went to her and she confessed. He then stoned her to death.

Volume 8, Book 82, Number 817:
[excerpt from long hadith]...Allah sent Muhammad with the Truth and revealed the Holy Book to him, and among what Allah revealed, was the Verse of the Rajam (the stoning of married person (male & female) who commits illegal sexual intercourse, and we did recite this Verse and understood and memorized it. Allah's Apostle [Muhammad] did carry out the punishment of stoning and so did we after him. I am afraid that after a long time has passed, somebody will say, 'By Allah, we do not find the Verse of the Rajam in Allah's Book,' and thus they will go astray by leaving an obligation which Allah has revealed. And the punishment of the Rajam is to be inflicted to any married person (male & female), who commits illegal sexual intercourse, if the required evidence is available or there is conception or confession...

"There is no mention of stoning in the Qur'an..." -from the article.

Also from the wikipedia under adultery: "Punishing by stoning is not mentioned in the Quran, and is based solely upon hadith."

This is not precisely true. Stoning is mentioned in the Quran as a method of punishment or of killing, but Muslims are not explicitly instructed to use it as a method of punishment or killing. (Nor are they instructed not to use it). For that matter, many of the Quran's instructions to kill do not state explicitly which weapons or implements should be used. (Several verses imply the use of the sword in killing and punishing, such as 5:38, 5:33, 8:12, 47:4, but, according to my search of multiple translations, the word sword, or saif, is not explicitly mentioned in the Quran). Some verses suggest the Muslim may use anything in his power as weapons (8:60, 9:5). It is probably reasonable to suppose that any standard method of killing available in the historical context in which the Quran was revealed would be acceptable, unless stated otherwise in the Quran or Hadith, and as long as the killing is for an Islamically "just" cause (6:151, 17:32-33, 5:32).

Verse 17:32 calls adultery an abomination and an evil sin, and is immediately followed by a verse that prohibits killing except for a just cause. Yet there is no direct explicit instruction in the Quran to use stoning to kill adulterers.

Verse 24:2 is understood to refer to fornication or illegal sexual intercourse, though often translated as "adultery." The punishment there is for fornication, but not adultery. The distinction is made in the Hadith; adulterers are to be stoned to death, fornicators are to be flogged.

The Hadith and Sira make it clear that Muhammad ordered the death penalty by stoning as the punishment for adultery. Muhammad appealed to the Torah command of punishment of stoning to death for adultery, requiring that Jews also implement the penalty, not just Muslims. Note that the Quran itself appeals to extra-Quranic sources, (1) confirming the Torah and Gospel*, even in matters of killing; and (2) pointing to the importance of following Muhammad's orders (4:80, 7:157-158), example conduct (33:21), and al hikmah (the wisdom, e.g., see 3:164 and many others that refer to the Book/Scripture and the wisdom) which was to be gleaned from Muhammad's words and deeds.

*Apparently Muhammad didn't take to the "let he who is without sin cast the first stone" argument here, instead preferring the harsh injunction from the Torah which, as the Hadith and Sira suggest, the Jews themselves at the time weren't implementing, until Muhammad ordered them to implement it.

These are barbarians ruling Iran. They have failed to evolve into humans and yet we want dialogue with them over their nuclear ambitions. Wake up world and get rid of these sub-humans running this country.
Something very wrong in the world when we want dialogue with people who burn schools, ban music, throw acid on girls and behead people (Taliban). We also want dialogue with Hamas whose charter is to eradicate the Jews.
Get tough with these idiots and accept no compromise, especially when compromises are accepting human rights abuses.
The civilized world needs to wake up and start demanding acceptable standards of human rights before talking to these Neanderthals.
Diplomacy and dialogue with these morons seems to equate to sacrificing human rights. Crazy world we live in...

"The newly proposed draft of the Islamic Penal Code of Iran contains provisions for annulling stoning sentences when the execution of such a sentence would damage the reputation of the Islamic Republic"

Gotta love it eh folks? If the western world gets a look at what we really are behind all the taqiyya, then call off the full Sharia Law and save it for cases that don't get the exposure.

LAWS FROM THE "BRONZE AGE". These people will never change, and they are coming to America in droves.Peace.

"Judges' intuition! what a travesty of justice!! where are amnesty & Human rights groups....
I am happy that France is becoming strict...they should repent that one of the ultimate evil minds, Ayatollah Khomeinie( a person who it seems have written a treatise on how much insertion of penis is considered a sexual Act)was given asylum. Shah was a despot, but Khomeinie was even more.
Hitler must be at least having a smile in the hell,for his solitary confinement must have ended & he would have some soul mates there!!! 72 witches must be awaiting all these people.

Treah wrote, quoting the Hadith:

"Ibn 'Umar added: So both of them were stoned at the Balat and I saw the Jew sheltering the Jewess."
...................

It has often occurred to me that this last is the line in all the Islamic canon that I find most human, moving, and affecting—and it is about *the victims of Islam*, and is recorded by their murderers.

KrazyKafir,

Indeed. The securing of the spread, maintenance, and dominance of Islamic belief and propaganda is the overriding goal of Islam. We've seen before where Saudi Arabia or some other Islamic country has to hold back on some or other harsh sharia punishment after political pressure or negative media attention from the West is brought to bear on them. The Iranian regime tends to be more stubborn and defiant toward the West in this regard, but even they realize that ultimately the Islamic ideology has to be preserved and protected, even by sometimes postponing or canceling a sharia punishment when the West is paying attention. So even they will stop an execution by stoning, purely due to their concern that such a display "would damage the reputation of the Islamic Republic and lead to the degradation of Islam".

*Besides the propaganda jihad, even militant jihad has a major propagandistic component, and the spread of ideology is its ultimate goal. All the jihads have the spread, maintenance, and dominance of Islamic ideology as their ultimate goal.

One aspect of sharia that the Islamic countries and most Muslims worldwide won't compromise on is the blasphemy penalty. Polls and surveys indicate that most Muslims, even those living in the West, want criminal prosecution and punishment of those who criticize or lampoon Islam or Muhammad. It would be much more dangerous for them to compromise on this point by, for example, by allowing people to openly criticize and lampoon Islam or aspects of Islam. That would be too damaging to Islam. Besides, the West is giving them considerable free reign in allowing them to suppress freedom of expression, so there is no significant pressure brought to bear on Muslims and Islamic regimes to allow free expression (in the modern Western sense) and open criticism and lampoon of Muhammad and Islam. The Western politicians are to some extent culpable for failing to pressure Islamic countries in this regard.

gravenimage,

Good observation; I agree with your impression. One gets the impression that the description of the Jew defending the Jewess, from the Muslim perspective in this case, is presented as a bad thing, i.e., contrary to, or rebelling against, the will of Allah (as conveyed by the orders of Muhammad and those who follow him to the letter). The Jews are accused of this type of covenant-breaking, rebellion, etc., in the Quran and Hadith, where they are also accused of clinging to life and preferring life of the world over the hereafter.

Kinana of Khayar wrote:

One gets the impression that the description of the Jew defending the Jewess, from the Muslim perspective in this case, is presented as a bad thing, i.e., contrary to, or rebelling against, the will of Allah
.....................

I think you're right, Kinana.

Whereas, I see it as proof that the man had genuine affection for this woman, as well as a strong sense of chivalry-that he was trying to protect her while he himself was being *stoned to death*.

And, ultimately, whatever shelter he could offer her was scant. It is a pitiful and human image, and only—as I see it—damns the couple's persecutors.

It also shows how much more civilized the Jewish authorities were than Muhammed and the Muslims-even in barbaric, dark-ages Arabia.

Nearly a year ago I posted the following information, still pertinent:

a Muslim scholar writing in the 14th century complained even then that Jews had long since stopped stoning as proof that Jews had corrupted the guidance that Allah had given them!

...“because they disbelieved and killed the prophets unjustly” by reason of their disbelief in miracles, e.g. the splitting of the sea, the clouds giving shade, and the sending of the manna and quails, and splitting of the rock into twelve fountains/or, disbelief in the revealed books, e.g. the Gospel, Qur’an, the verse of stoning, and the Torah verse in which Muhammad is depicted;

-- Baydawi (died circa 1316 a.d.), in his important Qur’anic exegesis of the line from the Koran “because they disbelieved and killed the prophets unjustly” (Koran 2:61) in his work Anwār al-tanīl wa-asrār al-ta’wīl, ed. Fleischer, H. O., 1846—48. Reprint Osnabrück 1968, p. 63. English translation by Michael Schub.

Also, the great Muslim exegete Ibn Kathir:

“The Jews changed the law they had in their Book from Allah on the matter of punishment for adultery, from stoning to death, to a hundred flogs and making the offenders ride a donkey facing the back of the donkey.”

http://tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=5&tid=13875

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter