Daisy Khan on Islamic supremacist mega-mosque at Ground Zero: "the building came to us, which goes to show that there is a symbolism there, and that there's a divine hand in it"

Why do I suspect that when she's not appearing on television doing PR work for her husband, assuring us gullible infidels that all's well in the world of Islam...she otherwise wears a headscarf?

She is deliberately being simperingly sweet, and pretending like she cares about the "tragedy," to fool the stupid PC Kuffar.

But of course she's a wolf in sheep's clothing.

If she really cared about the "tragedy," (9/11), she'd immediately halt all plans for this accursed atrocity (the Ground Zero mosk) and issue an apology to the United States of America.

"Pamela Geller is a lady"

Oh, please. You know what she's calling Pamela behind closed doors? Right.

Say, where's her black hefty bag?

In reality "Daisy" is as sweet as a Puff Adder. She wants this symbol of Islamic conquest in Lower Manhattan and she wants it bad.

Islamic supremacism, expressed in terms of the will of Allah:

the building came to us, which goes to show that there is a symbolism there, and that there's a divine hand in it.

All the ummah are attuned that will of Allah nonsense.

"I think the building came to us, which goes to show that there is a symbolism there, and that there's a divine hand in it."

Oh, you mean from Allah your mass-murder god? The one who says this:

"Kill non-Muslims wherever you find them. Lie in wait and ambush them, seize and capture them using every stratagem of war." - Qur'an 9:5

The above Jihad verse should be plastered on billboards across America.

Her asinine declaration of "symbolism" and "divine" is so much Islamic bovine fertilizer. Goebbels would hire this female Puff Adder as his assistant in a millisecond.

Of course fools will be suckered in to her al-Taqiyya, no doubt about it.

...''is very symbolic for the fact that we really want to reverse what happened on 9/11 '
So how ya gonna 'reverse' it Mrs Rauf ?

Daisy says: "It was struck by a plane, a piece of the fuselage fell into the building."
"... she sees a divine hand in how the building 'came to us' -- so apparently Allah knocked down the World Trade Center towers and flew a bit of one of the planes into the Burlington Coat Factory building so that this mosque could be built...."

Yeah, Allah guided the plane into the buildings, and killed 3000 people, and guided a piece of the fuselage into this building to mark the spot to build a new mosque. If they still have the "piece of fuselage" they can incorporate it into a wall of the new mosque and make it a shrine, like the black stone in the Kaaba, which also fell from the skies. But the Saudis better be watching this pretty closely; they might be about to lost their prime tourist attraction. This isn't a crumby rock from pre-history, some hoary hearsay myth, this is a fully-documented event -- witnessed and photographed and taped by thousands. It's the clearest possible sign from Allah that this spot is to be the New Mecca: the focus for prayers, and the prime pilgrimage center. And it's so conveniently close to the headquarters of the OIC (formerly known as the UN), surely another sign from Allah of his intentions.
I can see it all: pilgrims will assemble at OIC (UN) headquarters, run to the WTC site (to be kept vacant), cast X number of stones, and spit, at the site, then walk to the new mosque, where the piece of the Holy Boeing will be cemented into a wall, kiss the Boeing, then circle the building Y times in a clock-wise direction, then Y times counter-clock-wise -- basically the whole shtick.
What a boon for the NYC tourist industry, the city will never need to compete for conventions and trade-shows again. The NYC mayor will become the new "guardian of the holy place". Mecca, stand aside, the New Mecca is here.
ps. If they don't have the real "piece of fuselage", they can just use a bit of wreckage from any jetliner crash and call it the Holy Boeing; it would be just as authentic as the Holy Rock in the Kaaba.

Burlington Coat Factory. Bet they made some long black coats there moons-ago, Regulators.

Daisy Khan on Islamic supremacist mega-mosque at Ground Zero: "the building came to us, which goes to show that there is a symbolism there, and that there's a divine hand in it"

The divine hand is Allah? Allah sent them a building?
Amazing, when was the last time Allah sent anything to anyone?
He didn't even send a golden chariot to pick up Mahound when he died, but he will send these people a building?
I think this is pushing blasphemy...do they think they are more deserving than Mahound? This is really some black magick taqiyya...

And the phallic symbolism of Islamic victory is all to evident...

Keep up the protests...

http://freemendo.typepad.com/undaunted/2010/06/read-hereabout-boeing-guards-who-somehow-let-twelve-or-was-it-fourteen-handguns-be-stolen-from-a-storage-locker-at-the-he.html

"...the building came to us, which goes to show that there is a symbolism there, and that there's a divine hand in it."

Yes... the symbolism is that Muslims will see homicidal mass slaughter as an opportunity to
build a mosque (mislabeled as a cultural center), and tell people what a wonderful chance to have interfaith dialogue. Then of course, they'll say, as her husband did, that it was a chance for christians to show that they have no bigotry against other religions- the way Islam never has, never does, and never will- by it's own sharia law and it's own prophet of murder.

If it was a 'divine hand' let it be a chance for them to build a 5 story cathedral in mecca and a 2 story synagogue in mecca and tell us how they're going to show muslim tolerance. But that will never occur because it is religiously not permitted for infidels to build in Mecca, be in mecca let alone preach anything in Saudi Arabia.

She is a liar, and a fraud, as everyone knows here, and that should be told to her face politely and firmly with a smile.

Oh... and just in case people forget. Remember when muslims attacked Israel, in 67' after never allowing jews nor christians to be in that holiest of city for Jews, with their holiest of sites there? And remember after the secular jews having retaken the entire city, as a sign of love, and sharing gave the Temple Mount to be administerd by the Waqf, the muslim authority and of course now- anyone who dares utter any prayers on that temple mount, if they're non muslim will be thrown off the area. Like slaves, they are not allowed to express anything. And the world tells Israel to accept this and worse, much much much worse. Did anyone see any divine revelation from Rauf or Khan telling muslims that all faiths should be allowed to pray as they wish up there, as well, or complain against islam for not allowing it.

Absurd

270 millions slaughtered by Islam these 1400 yrs and people don't throw this in their miserable faces. With a smile, and a polite demand.

Yes ebonystone, and the primary symbolism that she, her husband and their ilk privately gloat over is their imagining that by 9/11 they have enabled Muhammend's craven cant to supercede the Torah. In their lust-driven razzia to hijack many millenia of scripture inorder to further the ends of a heartless, long-dead bandit they are gravely mistaken in underestimating the resistance they will meet.

Look at her eyes (and look at the interviewer's too). I think the eyes say something about the kind of mindset they have.

Apart from pure taqiyya that Daisy demonstrates, she also appeared to me to be hard - eyed, and showed cynicism.

This is subjective, but I would like others too also to notice it.

The interviewer is typica American, sincere in what she says and making presumption of good faith in anyone she talks to or meets.

Really, it was like watching a vixen and an ewe in close proximity. The ewe (hard to think of the mighty America as ewe, but if Americans don't wake up in time, that is what it might come to) will be eaten up sooner or later.

Sanjay

' It was struck by a plane '
Oh really ? Tell us more .

Where is this woman's burka?

When a religious congregation decides to build a church or a temple, they raise the money from among their own membership. They scale the project to match anticipated growth in the congregation. They locate the building as close as possible to where the members live. If the church or temple has a "community center," that area is always secondary to the worship needs of the congregation.

So, some reasonable questions for Imam Rauf are: 1) What is the size of your Ground Zero congregation, now and in 10 years? 2) Where do your members live relative to the Burlington building? 3)How much of the funds so far has been raised from your own membership? 4) How much of the total $100 million project will be raised from your own membership? Straight answers to these questions would go a long way in determining if this project is to meet the worship needs of Imam Rauf's congregation or if the project has a more international propaganda objective.

So where are those hard hitting interviewers? I bet if this islamic witch was a member of the Nazi or KKK or other nasty groups she would be hit hard with tough questions. Instead we get softball questions. the interviewer, Silly Sally failed.

"Pamela Geller is a lady, and Robert Spencer -- together the two of them have formed something called Stop Islamization of America..."

One guesses Daisy did not have something nice to say about Spencer, which is why she cut herself off. The question is why would Daisy call Pam Geller a "lady"? Possibly as an insult, perhaps, maybe...?

daisy khan is full of sh....I work in the city and been following this event for a while, i was raised a muslim and i don't want the f....ing musque there either. I am going to find out when the next hearing is and then take the 1 train to cortland street, below ground zero and give her a piece of my mind...i know Islam inside out and I will ask the tough f...ing questins including where is her f...ing head scarf

Daisy Khan, the queen of misogyny. What a deluded, pathetic, repugnant, shameless, mendacious, and all-around disgusting advertisement for the human race she is.

Daisy Khan looks moderate: no veil, Westernized appearance, pleasant personality, wouldn't harm a fly. Were she not defending the mosque building, she would be one of the multitudes of Muslims which some Jihad Watchers consider to be part of our Hope: you know, one of those multitudes of Muslims who are "ignorant of Islam", or "relaxed in their faith" or somehow "victimized by Islam", etc. -- and as such, a mass of human potential that would leave and/or reform Islam, thereby helping us to solve the menace it poses to us. How many among this mass, however, have thoughts and feelings like Daisy Khan which go unnoticed only because they haven't expressed them or no one has bothered to ask them the right questions? And if there exist genuinely "ignorant" or "relaxed" or "victimized" non-Islamic Muslims among this mass, how would we ever determine who they are to distinguish them from the Daisy Khans among them? How could such a massive project ever get under way? And who would fund the research & development of a Mind Reading Machine to help us do it?

"...and that there's a divine hand in it"

That is what Daisy must have felt when she spotted those "I Dream of Jinnie" themed footie pajamas for the her Imam.

I think the building came to us, which goes to show that there is a symbolism there...
.............

Yes—there's "a symbolism" there, all right—a symbolism of Muslim supremacy.

More:

We were expecting some sort of, um, you know, resistance, but not an organized resistance. We were expecting that some families might need some hand-holding, we might want to speak to them.
.............

Yes—just a few weak, hurt Kaffir, easy to overcome...

More:

But what we did not expect is a national coalition of people coming together, the majority of them coming from outside New York. Pamela Geller is a lady, and Robert Spencer -- together the two of them have formed something called Stop Islamization of America, and that is the group that is leading this.
.............

Ha! No one expects the SIOA—but they will. Pamela and Robert are the face of the resistance. As for "coming from outside New York", Ground Zero is sacred ground for all Americans—indeed, all Westerners, and all of those threatened by the Jihad.

This mosque going up right at Ground Zero—in the wounded heart of Dar-al-Harb—would be seen as a victory for Jihadists *everywhere in the world*. We cannot let it go up.

I'm glad Khan and Rauf were surprised by the passion and extent of the resistance. Let them continue to be surprised.

Hey Islamic Daisy - you're as "sweet" as a Puff Adder. And you know it.

Hope you're reading.

Well, wasn't that ghoulish?

Don't forget that on page 252, of "What's Right with Islam" the author, Feisal Abdul Rauf is calling for a massive project on a "level never before undertaken" to turn America into a Muslim country before the decade is out.

If that sounds reminisant of the Apollo moon project that's exactly what he has in mind.

Why should we do this? Because, according to Feisal Abdul Rauf they will attack us if we don't. First the dahwa, then the jihad.

He's calling for an invasion.

I don't make this stuff up, it's all in his book.

The Building didn´t just "come to them", the building was brought to them.
The towers of the West were brought down, the tower of islam shall rise instead. That is what she is talking about, and she has trouble hiding it behind conciliatory platitudes of the usual kind we hear from the Religion of Peace™.

"Symbolism and a divine hand in it", yeah ...there´s no doubt about that. Is she really serious? Does she have a good laugh later?? "Reverse 9/11"??? By placing Allah right where everything was destroyed in the name of Allah?

Muslims have always enjoyed placing their mosques at the very center of what identified the nations they conquered, thus drubbing out national identity.

Is Allah a New York realtor now?

This video is troubing in so many ways.

Daisy Khan assures the viewers that the proposed insult will be an opposrtunity for pluralism, but hastens to add not only for Moslems but for people of other backgrounds. What does this mean? Is this call for multicultural pluralism? Religious pluralism? And if she hastens to call for it in the US, can we count on her to call for it in Pakistan? Iran? Egypt? And that Mecca of religious insolent insincerity (err, ahem I meant to say "religious insularity"), Mecca? And so many other Islamic "Utopias?"

It's obvious that she is lying. Check this web site out http://www.blifaloo.com/info/lies_eyes.php and then see how many times you can see Ms. Khan accessing her imagination instead of her memory.

Lastly, the interviewer seems particularly dull and incapable of interpreting her subject's body language and eye motion. Why? Working from script, perhaps?

All this reminds me of Crassus of ancient Rome, according to Wikipedia: "Most notorious was his acquisition of burning houses: when Crassus received word that a house was on fire, he would arrive and purchase the doomed property along with surrounding buildings for a modest sum, and then employ his army of 500 clients to put the fire out before much damage had been done."

Other tales tell us that men of the same bent were not averse to starting the fire themselves when business was slow.

OT 'Christian man teaching religious studies at a sharia girl's school suffers mysterious beating'.. at the "Religious Education" section on the school's website they clearly point the girls to islam. (on the powerpoint screen) "Marriage: During the wedding the bride and grooom should both believe in Allah."
http://abe.enixns.com/~centra2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=29&Itemid=33

The Central Foundation Girls' School (educating tomorrow's women) says, "it promotes discernment and enables pupils to combat prejudice."

The police have upgraded the investigation to attempted murder due to severity of the victim's wounds - to the mouth and neck (in a knife attack). The police were probably expecting to upgrade to murder.
**EMT's and vascular surgeons 1 - jihadis 0
The teacher also taught martial arts.(he pretty much says that he wants to go back because whoever takes his place probably wouldn't survive an attack like this)
http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/content/towerhamlets/advertiser/news/story.aspx?brand=ELAOnline&category=news&tBrand=northlondon24&tCategory=newsela&itemid=WeED22%20Jul%202010%2012%3A00%3A43%3A650

Whenever ANYone tells me there is a "divine hand" behind their actions, my inner cynic always makes me check to see if my wallet is still in my seat pants.

By the way, can someone do something about the "submit" button I have to hit every time I make a contribution here? It's just so, so, uh, evocative of something else!

Have a good weekend, fellow kuffar.

The Wrath of Khan revisited..Daisy eh..She loves me not.she loves me not..Not petaling,but peddling..BS..Roundabout please..Too many weeds in this fiasco..This one's Poison Ivy with a smile..

@1:01 Daisy Kahn states:

". . .actually, the building found us because it's been abandoned for the last nine years, was just sitting vacant. It was struck by a plane. A piece of the fuselage fell into the building and it was shut down since then and um, it's been vacant for nine years. . ."

Was this building abandoned or "condemned" by the City due to the damage? If condemned, it has public record of it's identity tied to ground zero. KELO this property for public use as a proper war memorial.
How long was this property openly offered for sale? Was it sold at fair market value? Have the state seize the property, compensate the purchaser for fair market value and send them on their merry way.

Is it "Khan," or is it spelled "CON"?

Puke time.

She wants to reverse 9/11. Can she bring 3,000 people back from the dead?

Anything with a "divine hand in it" should exclude all Quraish deities.

"We were expecting that some families might need some hand-holding..."
------------
That's the comment that really galls me. That line hit me straight away. It is so patronizing, condescending and infuriating.

For that, I would kick Daisy Con Khan right in the teeth if I could.

She can hold my hand in hell.

1. Beware the beguiling smile, the twinkling eye, the flattering tongue of the hand maid of Allah and his prophet, (Who is now and evermore henpecked by 72 barren virgin spinsters),

2. and her coterie of sooth-saying manipulators of perception.

3. For they are gullible, and hope that ye are as well.

'The Catholics went through it. The Jews went through it. Now it's our turn."

And thus the whole disengenuous argument is exposed.

This is becoming the modus operandi. The straw man. The religious freedom schtic. The false comparison.

Question?

Did the Catholics and Jews ever hijack planes and fly them into any building in America?

Do the Catholics and Jews plot constantly to overthrow the Western world to be replaced by their theocracies?

She's putting this mosque in a hermetically sealed bubble of isolation as if Iraq isn't happening. As if Afghanisan isn't happening.

As if the whole Islamist jihad where people are dying on a daily basis accounts for nought.

This is insane. People who should know better including Bloomberg are going through the hoops of self deception like marionettes on the end of these peoples strings.

Here's one. Why not build a 'healing and coming together' synagogue in Cairo celebrating the defeat of the Arabs in 1947, their 'naqba'?

Exactly the same principle she alludes to.

Pluralism, diversity, freedom of worship, you know all those western buzzwords which they screechingly adopt when dwelling in the belly of the Western beast yet somehow seem to be strangely irrelevant in their own lands.

This is straight up tagiyya. We know it yet the Bloombergs and priests who give up our rights and trample on our sensitivities seem to have developed a tin ear.

This affront must be stopped.

'taqiyya'!

Anyone here who can do a Latma for us (Latma being the hilarious Jewish Israeli satire team who gave us The Three Terrors) and write a satirical song re the 9/11 mosque proposal, to be sung to the tune of 'Daisy, Daisy, Give Me Your Answer, Do?'???

The link below is 1 of 3 from CNN's War within series. Please see frames 330-340 and pay close attention to the Koran on the Imams lap. RED INK. http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/international/2009/09/02/amanpour.war.within.part.3.cnn?iref=allsearch

http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/international/2009/09/02/amanpour.war.within.part.3.cnn?iref=allsearch watch frames 330-340

Please forward this video to everyone you know.

I got this video posted at loonwatch.
http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/06/on-the-not-mosque-at-not-ground-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-16295

I kick ass.

test

Daisy and her husband should talk to each other more often. She's guoted here as saying that the building came to them as though it was divine providence -

Her husband testified at the Landmark Preservation Commission that it took him 5 years to buy the building - while claiming at the same time that he didn't know this building was up for consideration as a landmark for the last 20 years - a fact that all sellers would have to reveal to potential buyers.

Another striking things about the sale of this building for under $5 million was the prior owner's statement that they wanted $18 million but sold it for this much lower price because they were desparate. Over 13 million dollars worth of desparation. One wonders how much of that $13 million was given in cash under the table and why it took 5 years to get the deal done.

You also have to wonder why the desparation existed at all, could it be that the building would have been granted landmark status. What else would scare off potential NYC developers? Testimony at the hearing had Community Board 1's record of repeatedly recommending the building for landmark status noted by one of those who testified.

Ah, I know, I'll bet that part of the problem was that the El Gamal brothers were merely waiters who didn't hit the lottery but somehow managed to come up with close to $60 million in cash that bought them an office building in Chelsea, the Burlington Bldg, and a million dollar apartment for each of them.

Who is funding these real estate deals? Its not 2 waiters that's for sure. But Andrew Cuomo doesn't see anything suspicious or worth investigating which makes him perfect for Albany now doesn't it.

We can only wonder what other real estate these brothers who were born in America but raised and educated in Lybia, (in the heart of terrorist training country) own since at the same Landmarks Commission hearing Sharif El Gamal stated that he was an experienced owner of many buildings in the area.

Perhaps all of us should become waiters at the restaurants these two men worked at, the tips must be fantastic!

After watching Amanpour, Levitt and Khan inverview my conclusion is get us men off the stage and let those who just care about people take change. What a refreshing experience to witness real sincere dialogue.