A Misunderstander of Islam, eh? No. Everything this Muslim cleric says is based on the Qur'an and Islamic law. "Friday Sermon in Gaza: Muslims Should Wage Jihad to Liberate the Al-Aqsa Mosque from the Filth of the Jews, the Brothers of Apes and Pigs," from MEMRITV, July 16 (thanks to all who sent this in):
Following are excerpts from a Gaza Friday sermon, which aired on Al-Aqsa TV on July 16, 2010:Preacher: Dearly beloved, the Al-Aqsa Mosque is subjected to a vicious campaign of Judaization and defilement, at the hands of the filthiest creatures made by Allah - the Jews.
"O ye who believe! Truly the Pagans are unclean..." -- Qur'an 9:28. The word translated "pagans" here is mushrikun, those who commit shirk, or the association of partners with Allah. The Jews are guilty of this according to Qur'an 9:30, which claims (falsely) that they say that Ezra is the Son of God. And according to Al-Islam.org: "As regards the people of the Book (i.e. the Jews and the Christians) who do not accept the Prophethood of Prophet Muhammad bin Abdullah (Peace be upon him and his progeny), they are commonly considered najis [unclean], but it is not improbable that they are Pak [pure]. However, it is better to avoid them."
[...] Today, we see the brothers of apes and pigs destroying homes with their occupants still in them, uprooting trees from their land, and killing women, children, and the elderly. [...]
The Qur'an three times recounts that Allah transformed disobedient Jews into apes and pigs (2:62-65; 5:59-60; 7:166). "When in their insolence they transgressed (all) prohibitions, We said to them: 'Be ye apes, despised and rejected'" (7:166).
A levy of blood will be paid for the Al-Aqsa Mosque. Our people will never relinquish the Al-Aqsa Mosque or Palestine. We will redeem it with our souls, with our blood, with our sons, with what is most dear to us - regardless of the sacrifices we will have to make - until it is liberated, with the grace of Allah, and until this holy land is purified from the filth of the Jews.[...]
Brothers in faith, the Al-Aqsa Mosque remains under oppressive occupation. The Jews continue to defile it with their filth. The only way to liberate it is through Jihad for the sake of Allah.
[...]
Jihad today is an individual duty, incumbent upon each and every Muslim man and woman. According to the Islamic legal principle, when an enemy invades a Muslim country, Jihad becomes the individual duty of every Muslim man and woman. A son should set out on Jihad even without the permission of his father, a wife should set out even without the permission of her husband, and a slave should set out even without the permission of his master. [...]
All the schools of Islamic jurisprudence agree that when a non-Muslim force enters a Muslim land, jihad becomes the individual obligation of every Muslim (fard 'ayn) rather than a collective obligation of the entire umma, from which one is released if others are taking it up (fard kifaya). Bulghah al-Salik li-Aqrab al-Masalik fi madhhab al-Imam Malik ("The Sufficiency of the Traveller on the Best Path in the School of Imam Malik,") says this:
Jihad in the Path of Allah, to raise the word of Allah, is fard kifayah [obligatory on the community] once a year, so that if some perform it, the obligation falls from the rest. It becomes fard `ayn [obligatory on every Muslim individually], like salah and fasting, if the legitimate Muslim Imam declares it so, or if there is an attack by the enemy on an area of people.
The Hanafi, Maliki, and Shafi'i schools of Sunni jurisprudence further declare that jihad, once it is fard 'ayn, is no different from prayer and fasting -- in other words, to engage in warfare with non-Muslims in that case is a religious devotion that cannot lawfully be evaded. Hashiyah Ibn `Abidin, an authoritative text of the Hanafi school, says that jihad is "fard 'ayn if the enemy has attacked part of the Islamic homeland. It thus becomes an obligation like salah [prayer] and fasting which cannot be abandoned."
"...the Al-Aqsa Mosque is subjected to a vicious campaign of Judaization and defilement, at the hands of the filthiest creatures made by Allah - the Jews."
Hang on a second! Isn't Allah perfect? If so, how could he create 'imperfection', so to speak? A bit of a logic missing somewhere. Or doesn't that matter in Islam.
I = idiotic
S = slanderous
L = ludicrous
A = asinine
M = malevolent
it looks like Mohammed believed that Allah had quite a family: the boys, Ezra and Jesus, and the girls Lat, Uzza, and Manat. Of course Mo didn't know about the third son, Hong Xiuquan, who wouldn't come along until more than a millenium after Mo's time.
They believe Allah created apes/pigs/Jews so that Muslims could prove to Allah who fights more Jews to merit a place in heaven.
It's Allah's means of testing Muslims...
"A bit of a logic missing somewhere."
More than a bit. Especially since in Islam, there's no such thing as free will. Everything happens according to the will of Allah. Which means that he deliberately created the unbelievers to be unbelievers, to be tortured in Hell for eternity. Which means in turn that Allah is one nasty, perverted being.
This mosque, like all others, bans non-Muslims from entering...on those rare occassions when Non-Muslims have entered...they were attacked and pelted with stones...
There is no such thing as a mosque that actually has interfaith activities allowed....no matter what the Muslims claim....as they do with the proposed Cordoba mosque...
A mosque is a beehive of hate activity....and that is the way it always has been and will always be.......
btw ,...this mosque is built on Jewish ground...once Muslims build a mosque, it becomes part of the Islamic Empire...a fortress, a lookout post, and a safe house for radical Islamic activities..
Interesting that Mohammed, who had daughters but no sons, was willing, at least for a while, to admit that Allah had daughters; but vehemently denied that he had any sons. Perhaps a way of saying how much Mo resembled Allah.
Jihad today is an individual duty, incumbent upon each and every Muslim man and woman. According to the Islamic legal principle, when an enemy invades a Muslim country, Jihad becomes the individual duty of every Muslim man and woman.
So in Allah/Mo's universe which does not allow for individualism, Jihad is the only time the individual is allowed to exist? 'Allah' once again abrogates himself.
From article...Jihad today is an individual duty, incumbent upon each and every Muslim man and woman.
I have posted this previously, but it's a good description...The idea that jihad is called for to only when Mahoundian lands are invaded, is misleading...It does not mention Q 8:39/2:93 others...But the description below does say that jihad is called for...
'Allah's word made superior...
To propagate Islam...
To keep Isalm from falling into a inferior position...
Preserve honor...
To keep 'lands' from being stolen...
Loss of Rule and authority...
Allah has many causes...jihad is prescribed for all of them...and it is 'obligatory'...
Noble Qur'an:2:190 Footnote: "Jihad is holy fighting in Allah's Cause with full force of numbers and weaponry. It is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars. By Jihad Islam is established, Allah's Word is made superior (which means only Allah has the right to be worshiped), and Islam is propagated. By abandoning Jihad Islam is destroyed and Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape from this duty, or does not fulfill this duty, dies as a hypocrite."
"..they (jews and christians)are commonly considered najis [unclean],..."
And he (Muhammad) used to have sexual relations with his menstruating women...and in Islam, this makes him (Muhammad).....NAJIS (UNCLEAN).
Muhammad and Menses (video):
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/04/muhammad-and-menses-mahomet-et-les.html
If Muhammad had sons, the Sunni-Shia split may not have developed. Quite interesting that Muhammad didn't, given his alleged stamina/virility.
Perhaps Mo was actually sterile/impotent. Khadija brought her daughters from prior marriages into their union. Maybe Muhammad took 15 more wives because he was trying to get one who could bear a son. Never panned out.
Slightly OT, but as of yesterday, Secretary of State Clinton's son-in-law is an "ape and a pig." I wonder how that will color her views and the Saudi view of her.
Al Aqsa is not the golden domed mosk on the temple mount. That mosk is Al Haram al Sharif which we call the Dome of the Rock. It was actually built by mohametans. To their credit it is a beautiful building although unfortunately, at least for the moment, covered with hate speech graffiti from the vile book of the mohametans. Perhaps it could one day become a museum dedicated to teaching the evils of mohametanism.
Al Aqsa is the smaller and older structure which was built as a CHURCH by Crusaders. So the mohametans took it and made it a mosk. How typical. Now it's their holy thing #3. Built by Christians. Right. It was stolen like all the rest. The Jews have not stolen it from the mohametans because the last time this nabi (pbum) checked it's still a mosk and still infested with moskitos.
So they (may pig poop be upon them) want to liberate the Crusader Church, which they themselves stole from Christians, from the Jews who have not taken it at all.
But logic is not a strong suit for primitive barbarians is it then?
nabi ZK (pbum)
Yes, it is interesting that Mohammad sired no sons suitable for inheriting the mantle he bestowed himself, in spite of his many wives and the virility, allegedly, of forty men. But I have seen references to at least one son, by Mariya the Copt. Does anyone know of other sons he may have sired, and what happened to them?
Mosque -- Mosquito. Heh. Very good.
And hey, here's a better idea. Since they know so much about building rockets, etc. etc., let the Jews dissimble the mosque, take it to the West Bank or Hamas, (does it matter?) and let them re-assemble it themselves. Then it would be on the shoulders of the "palestinians" to prove that they want a country. This was built on the foundations of the temples of Herod and Solomon. "here is your mosque, it's all in some pieces.. now you have the chance to put it where you want to, other that the most revered space in Judaism", THE HISTORICALLY ACCURATE PLACE NAMED IN SOME OF THE OLDEST TEXTS IN THE WORLD.. including the Romans, who named it Palestine. Read history people.
Preacher: Dearly beloved, the Al-Aqsa Mosque is subjected to a vicious campaign of Judaization and defilement, at the hands of the filthiest creatures made by Allah - the Jews.
...
Brothers in faith, the Al-Aqsa Mosque remains under oppressive occupation. The Jews continue to defile it with their filth. The only way to liberate it is through Jihad for the sake of Allah.
................
Well, it looks as though Israel's turning over the entire Temple Mount to the "Waqf Council"—Muslim control—really helped...sarc/off
Ebonystone wrote, in responce to Buraq:
"A bit of a logic missing somewhere."
More than a bit. Especially since in Islam, there's no such thing as free will. Everything happens according to the will of Allah. Which means that he deliberately created the unbelievers to be unbelievers, to be tortured in Hell for eternity. Which means in turn that Allah is one nasty, perverted being.
......................
Yes, Ebonystone—it also means that all that Jihad "struggle", and blowing things up, and murdering of Infidels is also fore-ordained, and hence essentially meaningless. Don't expect any of that to slow down the Jihad, however.
As for the viciousness and perversion of "Allah", I couldn't agree with you more.
Battle_of_Tours wrote:
Jihad today is an individual duty, incumbent upon each and every Muslim man and woman. According to the Islamic legal principle, when an enemy invades a Muslim country, Jihad becomes the individual duty of every Muslim man and woman.
So in Allah/Mo's universe which does not allow for individualism, Jihad is the only time the individual is allowed to exist? 'Allah' once again abrogates himself.
......................
I have noticed this, as well, Battle of Tours. The only acknowledgment of individualism is when it is, essentially, denied—and when it is in the service of murdering other individuals who refuse to toe the Islamic line. What a perverse creed Islam is!
Same monkey imam spouting the same lies and filth to the same stupid sheep-faced devotees as in the Mufti's time. Not much has changed.
Eastview, this made me laugh:
http://www.theworldsprophecy.com/george-bush-is-actually-a-direct-descendant-of-prophet-mohammed/
As the URL suggests, this article theorizes that the British royal family and W are themselves direct descendants of Muhammad (albeit through his daughters, of course).