Questions for Mayor Bloomberg on the Islamic supremacist mega-mosque

Cliff May asks common-sensical and thought-provoking questions. They'll be ignored, of course. "Dear Mayor Bloomberg: A few questions you might want to ask before approving a mosque for Ground Zero," by Cliff May, July 29:

Your Honor:

In regard to the proposal to build an Islamic center at the site of the 9/11 terrorist attack in Manhattan, I commend you for saying: "Everything the United States stands for and New York stands for is tolerance and openness, and I think it's a great message for the world. . . . " But I would urge you to question whether this project truly represents that idea -- or whether it undermines it.

Start with this: Before this project is approved, surely New Yorkers and other Americans should know who will be picking up the more than $100 million tab. Would you not be distressed were it later to be revealed that funds had been contributed by people who also finance terrorism?

You'll recall that, after the 9/11 attacks, your predecessor Rudy Giuliani turned down a $10 million check from a Saudi prince who had said that America shares blame for the atrocity. Feisal Abdul Rauf, the imam behind the Islamic center project, has said that U.S. policies "were an accessory to the crime that happened." How is that different?

By the way, the Saudi royal family embraces Wahhabism, an interpretation of Islam that cannot be said to value "tolerance and openness." Among other things, in Saudi Arabia non-Muslim houses of worship are prohibited and "infidels" -- people like you and me -- may not set foot in the holy cities of Mecca and Medina upon pain of death. Newt Gingrich has called on Abdul Rauf to state clearly that he disagrees with such policies. Is that not a reasonable request?

I have an additional suggestion: If this project -- also called the "Cordoba Initiative"-- is really to "symbolize interfaith cooperation," if it's really to be an "inter-religious center," a 13-story home for "multi-faith collaboration," should it not contain a synagogue and a church as well as a mosque?

I would recommend putting each on a different floor. On the highest floor, let's put the church -- since Christians founded this great nation of ours. One floor down, let's put a synagogue, since Jews were among the earliest immigrants to find religious freedom in America. And one floor farther down, we'd have the mosque, a place for a newer generation of immigrants to gather and worship freely.

Here's my guess: If you propose this to Abdul Rauf, emphasizing, as you have in the past, the First Amendment rule that the government "shouldn't be in the business of picking" one religion over another, he will nonetheless refuse. He will offer all sorts of explanations, but the truth, I suspect, is that he believes that Islam is not "one of the world's great religions" but rather the only true religion, that others are false and wicked. He will find it blasphemous that you want this center to give equal status to Christianity and Judaism. And he will see putting a church and synagogue on higher floors as symbolizing more than equality....

Read it all.

| 11 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

11 Comments

EVERYONE:

If Feisal Abdul Rauf's monument to Islamist arrogance and dhimmi submission is going to get approved, I suggest that we all band together and BOYCOTT everyone and anyone (and their business interests) associated with the planning, financing and construction of this project. Furthermore, I suggest that the boycott be conducted in the most high-profile manner possible and as soon as possible. A public message needs to be sent to all the entities associated with this project that there is going to be a financial and PR price to pay for their actions, and that message needs to be sent NOW.

A few introductory targets:

- Everyone associated with the Cordoba Project, and that includes donors

- All of the officials (and their business interests), from the Mayor of New York City to the members of the Community Board who have expressed their support for this project

- The architects, developers and construction companies involved in the destruction of he existing structure and construction of the new structure

- All of the financiers (and their business interests) contributing to the construction of this project

Certainly, there will be others who will deserve boycotting, but that's just a short list for starters.

If this is a done deal, it's time to start taking names, looking into their business interests and start dishing out some payback. These clowns don't care what you think - hit them where it hurts: in the wallet and the court of public opinion.

I'm in - how about YOU? We can start organizing TODAY.

Clifford May doesn't understand what Bloomberg means and thinks about 'tolerance'
Bloomberg, and others think that if we show such as Islam that we will let them have THEIR freedom(s) even when they deceptively intend to diminish ours, that we're in the right, the good and that is the point.
He doesn't... Bloomberg, understand or know about the glorification of homicidal immolation and slaughter attached to the 'purpose' of infidels. That is the purpose of 'infidels'. To be offered to be converted, to be otherwise offered to be dhimmi, or if refused, to be offed.... and not offered, But demanded.
And muslims will say it is evil that prevents their success in this regard and those endeavors.
Such is the 'evil' of the west, the evil of zionists, to thwart the will of Mohammed and his god. There should be no foregetting of this. And of course, even though Rauf would never accept a church and a synogogue above the mosque, that is also, not the real point.

That Islam should build a cathedral of 13 stories in Mecca, and a synogogue of oh, say 3 stories in Mecca and their city medina, stolen from the jews when it was Yathrib, and invite others to walk freely in Mecca and medina and anywhere in Saudi Arabia, and then... they can build a mosque say in, oh.....

Death Valley?

other than that, the game is over......

Mark

Mike Bloomberg is a liberal tyrant, who used his money, power and influnece to circumvent the two-term limit rule for Mayor of NYC that was so highly touted as proper justification for terminating Giuliani's tenure.

Bloomberg is a tax and spend liberal Mayor, an opportunist at every turn, who has run on the Dermocratic, Republican and Independent tickets at one time or another to suit his own personal needs. In fact, he spends most weekends in Bermuda, flying there on his personal jet, and able to purchase property there which is only afforded a very select few, given Bermuda's strict citizenship and residency laws.

He cares not about increased taxes because his personal wealth allows him not care, and I wouldn't be surprised, like most tax and spend liberals, like Rangel and Johnny "the yacht" Kerry, that he simply knows and utilizes the loopholes to avoid paying his full share of the taxes that they collectively levy on us paeons.

And finally, Bloomberg is a consummate dhimmi like many before him, declaring a righteous tolerance of Islam without any previous need or desire to actually learn a damn thing about Islam...it's texts and tenets, or its aggressive and violent history, which remains consistent and unchanged to this day. His refusal to even acknowledge the possibility of any insiduous underpinnings to this particular mosque project, speaks volumes about a general lack of character in the man.

He actually declared people who oppose this mosque, in this location, as "un-American".

He is a traitor and I for one can't wait to see him move on and pursue his pipe dream of winning the US Presidency.

Lan Astaslem!!!

I just don't "get" Hizzoner Mayor Bloomberg.

His city was attacked by muslims. Thousands of innocents were killed. Brave firefighters and police were killed. The buildings' collapse made the entire area a mass final-resting place for these victims. The building in question was damaged by this muslim attack.
Muslims CELEBRATED this attack, the worst attack on America in the history of this country. "Imam" Rauf won't disclose the source(s) of $100 Million in funds. Rauf is on-record that the USA was an "accessory" to the crime. He's on-record as supporting shariah in America. He has questionable ties to the muslim underworld. Daisy Khan has stated that there are already 200 mosques in New York City. So why there? Etc, etc, etc...

How can the mayor not know all this?? How can he ignore and deny it? Is it willful ignorance? Fear? Isn't he already too wealthy to be bought-off? Has he no pride, no shame, no feeling for his own citizens? Is it just "trendy" to be pro-islam and damn the consequences? And the same goes for the people on these commissions. Is it something in the water?

I know, I know, this is just a repitition of what we already know. But shouldn't that be enough for these people? Honestly, I just don't get it...



"Honestly, I just don't get it..."

Understand completely. What's in it for him (Bloomberg) to be so immoral, so insensitive? Truly, his pro-mosk stance is incomprehensible.

Bloomie is either your typical rich elitist(which applies to most high ranking members of both political parties) that is so out of touch and ignorant of reality they think this Mosque is all about nothing.

If you have ever listened to the clowns on both sides of the isle they all come off stupid and blathering talking points the same way a goose craps.

Or Bloomie can be one of those rich Jews who in WWII sold out their less wealthy members of Jewish society to Nazis to save their hides. And he sees nothing wrong with appeasing the Muslims so as long as they don't bother him and his rich friends.


Why isn't the idea of a "multi-religious" center made more of a point of argument? Doesn't anyone think, under the premise under which this "outreach" initiative is proposed, the suggestion of a sincere collaboration between Jews, Christians, Muslims ... AS WELL AS Hindus and Buddhists ... undermine the true designs of a Islam-only center?

BTW- I do NOT think this whole 3-tiered, Christian, Jew, Muslim, approach suggested is right on ANY level. Remember, Hindus, ESPECIALLY, are in this fight!

This seems to me to be Achilles Heel of any exclusively Islamically-motivated political subterfuge.

Why pussy-foot around with this whole "historical preservation" notion ... or even eminent domain? Call a spade a spade. This is touted as a cultural center being built under the a auspices of diversity and tolerance. Build a church, synagogue, mandir, temple ... AND mosque.

Who would ... who COULD argue with that? EXCEPT and ISLAMIST.

Pamela and Robert. PLEASE make this an essential point of your argument!

Boycott all Muhammaden businesses; gas stations, food marts, dentists, doctors, etc.

Putting money into the hands of Muhammadens is treasonous against humanity. We are directly and/or indirectly responsible for financing our own demise. We must withdraw our funding from every avenue to prevent the expansion of Muhammadism.

Perhaps the best way to communiate our opposition to the building of this mosque is to orgaanaize a "Freedom Bus" caravan from all across America, much like what took place during the 60s. This will send a message that ground zero is sacred.

Cordoba (Qurtuba). The name of this "initiative" is -as most readers here know - the city that was once capitol of Al Andalus caliphate, an entity that Bin Ladin & Co. swear to "restore." I doubt if the name was picked by Feisal out of a hat or turban. I also am certain that many of the hapless liberal dhimmi idiots can be relied upon to "remember" the glory days of Cordoba when all the Jews and Catholics and Muslims cooperated in the idyllic civilization where everyone lived together in complete harmony. BUT are Bloomberg and his more astute partners stupid enough to buy all this nonsense?
Pardon my naivete but what's in it for Bloomberg and his ilk? Does Bloomberg know that Feisal and all devout Muslims consider him a pig and/or ape? Does Bloomberg have a grove or hedge of Jewish Trees to hide behind when the other trees and rocks decide to rat on him?
The madness is frustrating! The lemmings are rsuhing to the shore.

Abraham

That is a really, really good idea.

A Freedom Convoy.

Buses. Trucks (if there are any Islamosavvy truckies lurking and reading this: this is your chance! Get in touch with SIOA and ACT for America and start brainstorming now).

I think there should be bikes, too. Harley-Davidsons.

Could the 'Patriot Riders' be asked to supply an honor guard? I doubt *they* want this mosque; specially if someone like our friend 'Davegreybeard' can explain to them exactly why this particular mosque is such a ghastly insult and expression of blatant Muslim aggression, sadism and supremacism.

Shoutout to jihadwatch occasional poster, SolsticeWitch - you reading this? - you have contacts among law-abiding bikers - would they be in on something like that? Coast to coast! Rally and ride for Freedom! NO to sharia! Lan astaslem! People who couldn't do the whole trip because of time and work constraints could maybe join in for part of it; relay style.

Shoutout to Wreckerboy (also a jihadwatch poster at one time) - *you're* Native American - have you been able to wake up any of your First Nations kin? Would you join a Freedom Convoy, if it were organised? Islam would attack and destroy First Nations culture as it destroys all non-Islamic cultures and peoples: no more paintings, no more carved totem poles, no more dancing and singing and fluting, no more uncovered women with long shining braids walking in the sunlight. Having First Nations people along on the Freedom Convoy to proclaim that Turtle Island is OFF LIMITS for Jihad and the Sharia Pushers, and to say NO! to the music-killers, the soul-eaters, the dog-haters, the woman-stealers, would be excellent.

Do it, people!

Please! A modern-day Ride of Paul Revere.

And film the whole trip and put it up on youtube as you go along.


Leave a Comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.

Site Meter