Sharia Special in the U.K.: National Health Service picks up the tab for "increasing number" of hymen restoration surgeries for Muslim women

There is a virtually unlimited need, and an unlimited demand for health care the world over. It is a perpetually scarce and costly resource. So, what better way to spend it than in submission to Islamic mores?

Not that the taxpayer-funded virginity "Mulligan" is new to the U.K. This has been going on for a number of years now.

But along with the matter of resources, this practice enables the non-engagement of the issues of honor killing and penalties enshrined in Islamic law. Indeed, for all parties involved in the transaction, there is much to be swept under the rug.

"NHS pays for Muslim virginity operations," by Tim Stewart and David Pilditch for the Express, July 30 (thanks to Twostellas):

AN INCREASING number of Muslim brides are having controversial pre-marriage "virginity repair" operations.
Taxpayers funded 116 hymen replacements on the NHS between 2005 and 2009, official figures revealed.
There were 30 operations in 2009 - up 25 per cent from 24 in 2005, it emerged yesterday.

You'll want to read this next part sitting down:

Private clinics report a huge surge in demand for the procedure, costing between £1,800 and £4,000. It means the taxpayer has forked out up to £400,000 over the four years to fund the half-hour operation.
Doctors say the trend is driven by young Muslim women under pressure from future husbands or relatives who insist they should be virgins.
Gynaecologist Dr Magdy Hend charges £1,850 for hymenoplasty at his Regency Clinic in Harley Street. He said: "In the past, we would do one or two a week. Sometimes now we get two or three a day. Demand has tripled."
Imam Dr Taj Hargey, chairman of the Muslim Educational Centre in Oxford, said it was "disappointing" that Muslim women in this country felt the need to resort "to subterfuge surgery".
The NHS says it does the operation only for "clinical need".

Dear NHS: I've decided I want my tonsils back. Can you hook that up, too?

| 49 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

49 Comments

| Leave a comment

It's not the only scandal...

You can add in the cover up of injuries to children from Shia sword flagellation ceremonies, necessitating hospital treatment.

And the huge burden resulting from very serious genetic conditions arising from the practice of cousin marriage among many Muslim communities. Again, this is rarely talked about.

Plus there is the epidemic of self-harm "suicide" attempts associated with pressure on Muslim girls to enter into marriages against their will.

These costs are going to cause people with actual health issues not to be able to get the help they need because the NHS wont have the money for real healthcare. They just take, take, take, take and take some more and they give nothing but trouble in return. So narcissistic!

Great Britain's great love-fest with Muslims for the past 50 years, and their biased immigration policy favoring and encouraging many many multiple times more Muslim immigrants with large families from Islamic countries into Britain, sploiling them with free weekly cash allowances and enormous second to none benefit packages, a Muslims first, the rest to follow forced political climate to cater to their every request and complaint has created these special "virgin" problems, pardon the pun.
The British people are the real victims, be it thorugh their willfull good manners to remain quiet or utter stupidity to allow their politicians for rearranging the entire British landscape forever to establish an unexpected Muslim Raj in Britainia.
God save the Queen!

Notsoshariah, I have to say that I don't object to free treatment for the victims of sword flagellation, self-harm and depression, inbred children and FGM. That's what the NHS is about - unconditional help for the innocent, who should not have to pay for other people's crimes.

The people who should be paying are the flagellators, the over-controlling parents, the marriage-brokers and the cutters. The real question to ask is: why is it so hard to catch them?

The point about "revirgination" is that it's in a different category. Firstly, the operation is of dubious health value. The women who ask for it are basically being ripped off. Secondly, the woman usually (though not always) chose to give up her virginity. Doctors should be refusing to perform this ridiculous operation, and should certainly not be performing it at the taxpayer's expense.

The question to ask here is: why do women think they need to become fake virgins? What can we do about the culture that destroys women who have given their virginity to the "wrong" man? I'm guessing that, as often as not, he's actually the right man, but the woman for some reason is made to feel she "shouldn't" marry him. These are the real cultural issues that need to be explored.

I'm guessing that it's easier to fork out £100,000 a year (not a huge sum by government-spending standards) and then whine about it than it is to invest several millions into unpicking deeply-rooted cultural corruption.

Off topic, but the ADL just came out against the Ground Zero Mosque. ADL spokesman said more questions about the financing needed answering, and that while the builders may have a right to build, it is not the right thing to do.

Don't forget to cover the cost for
this http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2007269,00.html

have nose and ear prosthetics.

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2007269,00.html
Or will having the nose and ears cut off not be covered because they can wear a burka to hide it?

The "Clinical Need" must be to protect the women from honor killings when they get "found out."

“…and there will be Hour Al-in (paradise women) as if they are preserved pearls… and we made them virgins”
Qur'an 56:22-37
Now I understand how!!!
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/07/perfect-man.html

There's a whole lot of deception going on here -- and almost everyone seems OK with this.

The bride deceives her husband-to-be: "You're the first, honest."

The husband deceives the new bride: "Yes, honey. I'm a virgin too."

The bride deceives the doctor: "I was coerced into sex. I really didn't know what I was doing."

The doctor deceives the patient: "Yes, I understand. This little operation will restore your reputation. The perception is more important than reality -- or is that, the reality is more important than the perception? I'm getting confused. I'm not in this for the money, but just make sure your NHS coverage is valid."

The doctor deceives the NHS: "This operation is vital for my patient's psychological well-being. In no other way can she deceive her husband on their wedding-night. How can she be expected to start their honest life-long relationship without my secretive surgical expertise?"

The NHS deceives the taxpayer: "We only fund operations for clinical need." (that's NHS-speak for, "We fund Muslim religious demands.")

The bride and groom's families smile and deceive each other: "We know the bride was a true virgin -- no surgical hanky-panky involved here."

Ah, Islamic family values ...

I think this is a good deal and the health service should keep paying for it. It destroys some of the underpinnings of islamic culture. These girls will have gotten away with the loss of their virginity just like millions of kuffer women. They will help their daughters to do the same. It's one of many things we should be doing to undermine the islamic hold over its votaries. It is the kuffer reply to stealth jihad. What more of a threat to their misogynistic control over their women, which is absolutely essential to their total control program, than to corrupt their young by showing them how to have a good time.

Nicely put Kinnedar!

It is happening already. Fatima gets her virginity back, but Granny is denied a hip replacement.

"But along with the matter of resources, this practice enables the non-engagement of the issues of honor killing and penalties enshrined in Islamic law."

I agree , it simply puts the reality of "(dis) honor killing back in the closet.

I did not know that 9 year olds needed this treatment. Ah well, its cultural innit ?

This type of operation is afew thousand year old now. Than muslim marraige person at the Mosque I goto is looking for than wife for me I let her know she doesnot have to be than virgin she can be than woman who was married before. I than 60 year old looking to have my first childern.

Can you knock it off please?

First of all, this surgery is on dubious grounds, and in fact in my understanding of the hadiths is not legal under sharia.

Second of all, no one understands what you're trying to say.

I heard it happens a lot in Syria and Egypt too.

Eventually the operation should be performed at the costs of the patients, but if we brainstorm a little, then ....

As long as it's on-going, it can broadcasted. and become common knowledge. Which means that the proof of virginity won't mean much in future, because it can be so easily erased.

So, on second thoughts, maybe we should encourage these operations on Muslima's, giving it easily for free. The absurd and misogynistic demand for virginity will become meaningless in places where this operation is routine. And the Muslims will know it. They might as well ask for male virginity in respect to proof.

The UK must have gobs of money to spend on health care if they spend it on such things as this. Last I heard, the UK is low on cash for health care and is rationing their health care. Stories abound that older people in the UK with serious medical problems are being denied care. Now I know why, so they can spend it on Muslims who need their virginity restored. Big government at its best, I presume.

The UK is an absolute mess now.....it is becoming a living nightmare in many of our city centres.....with Muslim "outreach" interfaith festivals and Muslim community action programmes........all funded by the taxpayer.......and now this abomination. I sincerely hope the meltdown occurs and Muslims are shown the door......I literally cannot stand the arrogant devious bastards. However, that is not going to happen with Cameron and his ilk at the helm.....perhaps the UK will become "partitioned" in the end and the Muslim loving multiculturalists can live in the Islamic half of the country as dhimmis.....whilst the true men of England can rebuild the "sceptered isle" and get our pride back.

Reminds me of that old Madonna song " like a virgin "..

With just a few changes to the lyrics, a Muslim version is now possible.

People,

Yes it's true that odd muslimah can scuumb to jawani too,- get carried away and go too far. Over the next couple of weeks she is desperately sorry for the sway of her emotions and that's regretabble.

But please remember that mostly muslimah are swayed by corrupt non-muslims and that is really not on. How dare they try to steal our crop - our youth for their dastardly one nighters - mostly leaving the muslimah to fend for herself.

Confiding in her mum is not on - her mum is a model of chastity - having brought up the rest of her daughters in a pristine way, all married, all bled on the 1st night and now happy raising theor own daughters (and sons).

I have to raise my hand and praise the NHS for their admirable service - the doctors and nurses and the support is truly wonderful.

Not many people here will understand that - not to worry - if you are truly worried about the NHS bill - keep your mits off our muslimahs and watch the bill shrink.

Ahmed walked into the neighborhood mosque and a friend called out, "Hey, Ahmed, you idiot! You must pull down the shades when you are making sex with your wife. I could see everything last night!"

Ahmed put a big grin on his face: "Ha! The joke is on you. I wasn't even home last night!"

Roland sez:

"But please remember that mostly muslimah are swayed by corrupt non-muslims..."

the truth remains...mostly muslimahs are corrupted by Muslim men...

"The question to ask here is: Why do women think they need to become fake virgins?"

You mean, why do Muslim women think that?

Because Islamic society is an "Honor Society" in which ALL of a family's reputation ("honor") reside with the female members. Ergo, there is a huge obsession with women's chastity. If it's discovered that the bride-to-be is no virgin, she could easily get honor killed by her family, and they would feel 100% justified.

That's the sickness of an "Honor Culture" like misogynist Islamic societies. Well, one sickness. Of course there's many more.

"if you are truly worried about the NHS bill - keep your mits (sic) off our muslimahs and watch the bill shrink."

Unbelievable. Your mindless moron mentality shows the lobotomy effect Islam has had on your brain. You are a poster boy for the backwardness and primitiveness that is Islam. In short, you're a Throwback. All the way back to the 7th century AD when Islam was invented by your psycho Warlord. To the detriment of the entire planet.

"The "Clinical Need" must be to protect the women from honor killings when they get "found out."

Definitely, as I already posted above.

Than muslim marraige person at the Mosque I goto is looking for than wife for me I let her know she doesnot have to be than virgin she can be than woman who was married before. I than 60 year old looking to have my first childern.

Defender...Your brother in Islam YYK says no one can understand you...I understand you...Nasty old men need love too...It's a good thing the marriage person at the mosque is helping you find a willing bride of child bearing age...You are not demanding a virgin, but you might get one anyway...Since you are 60, and probably not too potent, you need a fertile young woman of at least 12 years of age...And you need her quick...I'm sure there are lots of Mahoundian families who would sell you one if the price is right...but if you don't have any money, you will have to settle on what you get...Good luck on your up and coming love life...

Roland, if you're so concerned about khufr "getting at" your daughters, you and those like you are perfectly free to pack up your daughters, sons, wives, and other relatives, and take them all back to the perfect Sharia paradise of your choosing, where they won't have to worry about the nasty khufr "corrupting" them.

And we also won't have to worry about you folk busybodying into our business.

"Because Islamic society is an "Honor Society" in which ALL of a family's reputation ("honor") reside with the female members."

I just want to make one correction, Courreges W: A family's reputation resides within the female members' vaginas.

They don't care if someone beats the crap out of their women. They don't care if their women are fired from their jobs (if they let them work at all). They don't care if their women are given an unfair score at school/uni. They only care if their women are "dis-honoured" in a sexual context.

What they and their apologists don't understand is that most psychologically healthy, loving, caring families become angry at the perpetrators of the "dis-honour" against their women even when the "dis-honoured" female is a willing accomplice in the "dis-honouring."(shotgun wedding)Only cultures infected with islam suffer from this rage at the women for being "dis-honoured." The blame the victim mentality.

Now, if these UK mohammadan females were smart, they'd do what many of the hypocritical hijabed Turk mohammadan hos do: back door with dozens of guys before marriage (they seriously believe that they are still virgins. Technically yes, but psychologically and spiritually no frigging way!), while looking down their noses at kafir "oruspus" who have one, maybe two loving physical relationships before marriage. Such is the hypocrisy of mohammadan "Vagina Virgins."

And while we're on the topic of what is more corrupt; backdooring with dozens of guys or doing what God intended with less than you can count on one hand: abortions are common practice here in Turkistan (soon to be). I've met more mohammadans who've had multiply abortions than I've met kafirs who've even had one.

Hey, mo-bots! Not admitting to wrong doings does not make them disappear or non-existant. Your cultures are just as "corrupt" if not more so than our kafir cultures. Unlike you, we admit our mistakes and don't blame them on "da jooos".

Q: Why do most Muslim rapes go unreported?
A: Goats can't testify.

Yusef YK Simple the muslim woman who arrange marriage is free to pick the best choice for me as I than not demanding that she be than virgin she might be than woman who was diroves by her hushand for not being young anymore or her hushand die. Than she can be than very good wife to me that what matter to me.

Kinneddar,
I think the pervasive grand deceptions of islam are part of what finally got to Ayaan Hirsi Ali. The more pious your goal, the more deception you practice. At prayer, in relationships, at home, in appearance, in thought... the facade becomes more important than the substance.

But mo/allah care only about themselves and getting the minions to the whore house in the sky, or the roasting oven below. The torment of being a good, orthodox muslim, slave of allah.

Yusef, why are you being so mean to the Defender? Is he not your muslim brother-in-arms? Does he not represent the same belief-system as yourself? Is it fair for you to diroves yourself from him this way? When he's reaching-out to you? Don't you see that you guys are "two peas in a pod?"
Good luck conquering than world, Yusef...

"Roland, if you're so concerned about Kuffar "getting at" your daughters, you and those like you are perfectly free to pack up your daughters, sons, wives, and other relatives, and take them all back to the perfect Sharia paradise of your choosing, where they won't have to worry about the nasty Kuffar "corrupting" them."

Right on. Get out of our Western countries, Islamic Barbarian al-roland. And take all of your numerous polygamous relatives with you. Goodbye and Good Riddance, Barbarians.

"Yusef, why are you being so mean to the Defender?"

He's embarrassed as all-get-out by the illiterate brain-damaged-by-Islam Idiot.

LOL, CW, I know! Isn't that strange? I mean, when they look so alike!
Perhaps the Defender would be better-served to take his chances with the kuffar??

The theme-song of the Moslem Paradise: "[After]Life Is Just A Bowl of Cherries."

The report does not mention whether only Muslim women are accepted for hymen restoration, or born again virgins.

Are infidel women considered? Surely non-Muslim males also have a right to be fooled into thinking they are marrying virgins!


Gosh what a mess we are in, and well deserved I might add, for tutting from the sideline as the lunatics take over.

I knew there had to be "scholarly" opinion on the subject of fake hymen restoration—and I was not disappointed!

You'll be glad to know that while the operation is, as a rule, Haram, that there are instances where it is "commendable", and even a case or two where it is "obligatory".

That's "obligatory" on the Kaffir's dime, of course.

Also, it always amazes me how essentially meretricious Islam is. "Truth" is not exactly a "Muslim virtue"—none of that "confession is good for the soul" stuff. After nattering on and on about exactly when and how it is permissible to mislead and how "concealing sin" is a virtue, the good Imam actually intones "deceit is forbidden in Islam".

But then—it may be Haram after all!

Here's the "Islam Online" Fatwa:

http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&cid=1119503544618

They can't "get out" of Britain. They are here in the third generation. They know no other home. Many of them don't have an alternative citizenship.

The problem is here among us. We can't send it away. We have to confront it head-on and demand that Muslims live by the same laws, and allow their children the same freedoms, as the rest of us do.

Diana: I thought Muslim countries accepted any Muslims? Or at least that they were given priority.
But it is strange how Muslims seem to think they are stuck as if with glue to the West. They are always telling us they are here to stay; they dislike us but are not going anywhere. I don't see why not: people move around the world all the time, so why can Muslims not go anywhere once they have tasted life in kuffar countries?

As regards the allegedly 'superior' morality of Islam and Muslims, here is what is happening in Malaysia.

http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/SEAsia/Story/STIStory_557980.html

"Authorities in Muslim-majority Malaysia are grappling with the problem of rising numbers of abandoned infants, often dumped dead or dying in the streets or on rubbish dumps."...

'Baby dumping cases usually happen among the Muslim community as teenagers were desperate to conceal their pregnancies. Some of the girls were also disowned by their families,' he [chief minister of Malacca state, Mohamad Ali Rustam] said".

I wonder what the stats are like for the Christian, Hindu and Buddhist/ Taoist/ Confucian girls? I wouldn't mind betting that they mess around less than the hypocritical Muslims and have fewer 'whoops!' pregnancies, in the first place.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali, when she was working as an interpreter in the Netherlands, found out that the vast majority of women making use of Dutch abortion clinics, were not the native Dutchwomen, but ...*Muslim* women, whether immigrants/ 'refugees' or the offspring of same.

Going back to the story I referenced, from Malaysia: the interesting thing is that the number of foundlings is *rising* ..over a time period within which we also see Malaysia is becoming *more and more strictly Islamic*.

Now, if Islamifying a population resulted in more moral behaviour, wouldn't one have expected the number of foundlings to be *decreasing* as Malaysia became more devotedly and rigidly Islamic, rather than *increasing*?


Very aptly put, PJG.

I think it's a matter of voting with their feet, moving and then not moving included.

I know Muslims who dismiss the significance that they sought to live and continue to live in Kuffar-countries with: Oh, but THAT's for economic reasons. As if these economic reasons were something like irrelevant, unrelated to form of government, some accident of history, or ... the result of gross exploitation by citizens of Democratic nations of citizens of Islamic countries!

But my position is that the economic reasons are also something to commend the Kuffar-countries for. And that the Islamic countries deserves chastisement for not providing better economic circumstances. I think the economic situation definitely has to do with the governmental system.

The very enjoyable freedom in Democratic countries is something that enhances the affluence in them and which also makes them more attractive to go to and stay in then Islamic countries.

In my opinion vast numbers of Muslims suffer from a delusion; they seem to think that an affluent state can exist WITH Islamic laws, governing system. But such a state is only theoretical. I think the oil-rich countries should not count, they get their affluence from a accident in geography and even so they do not do too well economically.

Muslims clearly see the disadvantages of Democratic countries and the merits, in their eyes, of Islam. Or they maintain that Allah's will is unfathomable. But they should look at the whole picture and also see the many merits of Democratic societies (including high education and employment possibilities) and the many disadvantages of Islamic societies.

And they should consider that they either live in the right sort of existing society but then also should be most loyal to it and united with it, in all important respects, or that they live in the wrong society for their Islamic tastes and consequently should move to an existing Islamic society, building that up if they can.

Now they try to have it both ways; prophiting from the Democratic societies and still being loyal to the Islamic ones. We MUST point this out to them and demand clear choices from them somehow. In word and deed.

Istanbulchick

I see you have mentioned the subject of 'backdooring'; Muslim females preserving their *vaginal* 'virginity' by engaging in anal sex.

It isn't only that they and the males do this *before* marriage, for the reasons you've given; the practice continues even within marriage.

There is something seriously weird about Islam. It is back to front, reversing nature, widdershins, in so many, many ways.

I've mentioned, before, a number of articles on sexuality in the world of Islam.

In this one,

http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/Read.aspx?GUID=473928E3-18E1-4E4E-ADF6-1AD796E3D400

'Symposium: To Rape an Unveiled Woman'
By Jamie Glazov
FrontPageMagazine.com | Tuesday, March 07, 2006

one of the interlocutors, Peter Raddatz, a German scholar of Islamic Studies and the co-author of the renowned “Encyclopaedia of Islam”

makes the following observation:

"The personal literary reports and the official UN analyses on Islamic family dynamics concur in a somewhat disquieting aspect.

"They confirm not only the tendency to incest **but also an even stronger attitude towards anal sexuality, meaning an unusually high percentage of males preferring anal intercourse to vaginal, especially in the framework of "normal" marital life** {my emphasis - dda}."...

and again,

"There is no "culture" in the world where more married people practice anal intercourse than in Islam".

Something else, that was brought to our attention during a discussion of a report about a Muslim cabbie who refused to carry a gay couple in his cab.

From this article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/06/world/middleeast/06dubai.html?scp=1&sq=muslim%20marital%20counselor&st=cse

The article was about a devout Muslim woman {I would say, having read the article, that she was also to some extent influenced by 'western' ideas - dda} who was working as a marital counselor in Dubai:

"'**Many men who had anal sex with men before marriage want the same thing with their wives, because they don’t know anything else,**' Ms. Lootah said. 'This is one reason we need sex education in our schools.'"...

(The article includes the information that the earnest Ms Lootah, for bringing this unpleasant topic out into the open and trying to assist psychologically-warped Muslim couples to have something even vaguely resembling what we westerners would view as a normal sex life, has received death threats).

Thanks for the added info, Dumbledoresarmy. I have been the ear that many Turkish wives complain to about their spouses' lack of ability and anal(among other)perversions.

I've always believed that men who want anal from woman are repressed homosexuals. Since having come to dar al islam I have learned that my personal theory is true.

Turkish men, as I have no doubt, all mohammamadan males believe anal sex with another dude is not gay if, no joke, he, the mohammadan is the "top."

Many is the time I've had an angry rejected mohammadan creep tell me "well I ***ked thousands whores like you! I also ***cked many of yous mens! Yous mens is gays who loves muslim *ock!" Of course, they don't see the hypocrisy in calling a woman who told them "NO" a whore and her "mens" gay after proudly and vehemently proclaiming to have had intercourse with "thousands" from both groups. I still haven't decided if it's stupidity or insanity that prevents them from realizing how utterly absurd their insults are. muslim-logic is the grand-daddy of oxymorons.

mohammadan perversions no longer shock or surprise me. Their smug retorts about our "wild womens" and "divorces" and "priest rapers" no longer affect me simply because in our cultures those acts ARE perversions while in their cultures they are the norm.

Hi Yusef,
I have been reading most of the pages on this site. And have read quite a few of your comments.
I'm surprised........... you have'nt yet left the religion of death , ie... islam.
You need to explain your reasons.

Istanbulchick

If you first started reading at jihadwatch after November 5 2009, you may not have encountered this item from the jihadwatch archives.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2009/11/sharia-cab-in-new-york-city-muslim-cabbie-kicks-out-gay-couple.html

It was a poster in that discussion, who provided the very useful link to the fascinating NYT article about the marriage counsellor in Dubai.

There are many comments in that thread which throw light upon the awful subject of sexuality and 'family' life inside dar al Islam. I think you will find the comments by 'apostate islam' and the comments by 'al kaafir al amrikii' to be of particular interest.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter