Spain: Catalonian parliament rejects burqa ban

On something of a technicality. As the story below describes, the vote did not go off without a hitch. Nevertheless, a number of communities in the region have taken up the issue on the municipal level, including Barcelona, and the Spanish senate has approved a ban. "Catalonian parliament rejects burqa ban," from Agence France-Presse, July 1:

BARCELONA -- Catalonia's parliament rejected Thursday a move to ban the wearing of the Islamic burqa in public places across the Spanish region after reversing an initial vote.
A resolution moved by conservatives and centre-right nationalists was passed, but opponents said there had been a technical error and some absentees at the moment of the vote.
After the session was suspended, the parliamentary speaker ordered the vote to be put again, prompting a walk-out by the motion's supporters and a victory for its left-wing opponents.
The motion would have called on the government of the northeastern region to ban the Islamic women's garment which conceals all but the eyes, in the street as well as in public buildings.
Right-wing deputy Rafael Lopez said it was a question of values, of voicing opposition to clothing which he said kept women in a "degrading prison."
Left-wingers said they did not approve the wearing of the burqa but called the motion politically-motivated with regional elections coming up this year.

So, politics matter more than principles?

Nine municipalities in Catalonia, including Barcelona, have banned the use of face-covering Islamic veils in public or are considering doing so.
Human rights group Amnesty International had called on the Catalan deputies to reject the motion.
"Any wide-ranging ban will violate the rights to freedom of expression and religion of those women who choose to wear a full-face veil as an expression of their identity or beliefs," said John Dalhuisen, Amnesty International's expert on discrimination in Europe.
"Women should be free to choose what and what not to wear. This is their right under international human rights law."

While you're at it, tell that to Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran, and Afghanistan. And while you're at it, tell it to the women who have been harassed, threatened, raped, and subjected to beatings and honor killings in the Muslim world for choosing not to wear the veil, or for not veiling enough. Or are those countries "more equal than others" in being allowed to state the norms of behavior for their societies?

Spain's upper house of parliament last week approved a motion calling on Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero's Socialist government to ban the Islamic veil in public.
Earlier this month Justice Minister Francisco Caamano said the government planned to restrict the wearing of the veils in public places under a proposed new law on religious freedom.
Immigration from Muslim countries has grown in Spain since the 1990s, with Catalonia in particular being home to a large community of Pakistani origin.
There are now about one million Muslims among Spain's population of 47 million.
| 14 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

14 Comments

| Leave a comment

Spain and Catalonia will pay dearly for this dhimmitude. And there won't be any Amnesty International left if and when islam rules the roost. The islamic barbarians don't give a hoot for any human rights.

Spain: Catalonian parliament rejects burqa ban
......................

Foolish dhimmitude in Al-Andalus.

Who cares?
Who wants to look at hairy legs and armpits anyhow?
Their women are mostly ugly under those bags.
The really attractive women are usually converts who have refused to cover their beauty.

There is no freedom to enslave oneself. The burqa is a clear case of self-enslavement and not only should it be banned, but any man walking with a be-burka-ed women should be arrested and charged with human trafficing or something analogous.

As this article indicates it was "left-wing opponents" who were responsible for this stupidity masquerading as something enlightened. Yes, some conservatives don't "get" Islam, but far, far more of those on the Left don't "get" it. In fact, many on the Left in one Western country after another look upon virtually any criticism of Islam as evidence of bigotry, which, of course, is extra stupid.

In the fight against Islamic supremacist designs, Western conservatives can be counted on to a much greater degree than can liberals. Shame, deep and everlasting shame, on modern liberalism for this. And please, no one bother to comment yet once again that this is a conservative blog. For the most part (not entirely though because some liberals do comment here and "get" it) it is PRECISELY because conservatives understand what we're in for from Islam far better than do the PC/MC, touchy-feely, kissy-face, huggy-bear, oh-so-wonderfully-tolerant, any-criticism-of-Islam-is-racist liberal crowd. One knows this or should know it.

In the early 1990s, Australian journalist Geraldine Brooks visited the Islamic University of Gaza.

She described her experiences there, in chapter 8 (in partial sarcasm entitled 'the getting of wisdom') of her 1994 book 'Nine Parts of Desire', which despite moments of fuzzy-headedness, does also contain some very telling anecdotes and observations.

She writes:

"The campus of the Gaza university is split down the middle, with one section for men and one for women. When I visited the women's campus in the spring term of 1993, I wore a scarf and a loose-fitting, long-sleeved ankle-length dress, since I knew the institution strictly enforced hijab. But my arrival at the women's gate caused a flurry anyway. 'We have to find you a jalabiya', explained Asya Abdul Hadi, a recent graduate, pointing to her own neck-to-toe button-through coat. 'Even on the women's campus, we have men professors'.

"Eventually, someone found a baggy blue serge garment that belonged to a student at least five inches taller than I. Grabbing a fistful of fabric so I could walk, I tottered after Asya into the high-walled campus...".

A little later, she is in the women's cafeteria, talking to a 30 year-old administrator named Majida. She reflects:

"Driving from the huge military roadblock that divides the Gaza Strip from Israel, I hadn't seen a single unveiled woman.

'There is no coercion', said Majida. I gazed down at my dowdy serge sack. 'Of course, we can impose it here, inside the university. But outside we don't impose it. The relationship is with God, and each woman can decide for herself'.

"I sipped my Coke and said nothing. I had been in the emergency room of a Gaza hospital when a young Palestinian nurse came in, shaking, her uniform covered in wet, brown stains. 'It was the boys in the market', she said. 'They told me to cover my head. I told them I was Christian, but they said it didn't matter. They said, the Virgin Mary covered her head, so why not you? **They threw rotten fruit at me and told me next time it would be acid**.'" (my emphasis added - dda). END QUOTE.

I wonder if there may be some regional thumbing-of-the-nose by the Catalonians toward the dominant Castillians involved in this. Spain still has some simmering secessionist movements (most notably the Basque Pyrenees in the north), and bitter memories of the Spanish Civil War in the 1930s where regional loyalties played quite strong roles in the fighting. Barcelona was one of the cities that was heavily bombed by the Nationalist forces in Madrid.

Several years ago I attended a professional meeting in Barcelona, and upon arriving at the airport was quite surprised to see the airport signs written in three languages. First was Catalan, second was English, and at the bottom was Castillian, the "official" version of Spanish. Catalan, not Castillian, was spoken on the streets. Upon inquiring about this, I was informed that Catalonians consider themselves superior to Castillians, and vice versa, and that they are quite bitter rivals.

Whatever their recent historical squabbles, perhaps Spaniards should remember that once upon a time they faced a far deadlier foe - and now it's back. It was when the houses of Aragon and Castille teamed up in the remarkable marriage of Isabella and Ferdinand that made possible driving the Moors out of Spain, finally and irrevocably, after more than 750 years of Muslim infestation. Where are such leaders today who remember and act to safeguard their proud history and will not let petty squabbles prevent them from recognizing and dealing with this larger danger?

Where are such leaders today who remember and act to safeguard their proud history ...

I think one should ask: "Where are the masses today who remember and act to safeguard their proud history...?"

Or perhaps, "where, (except in a muslim world), are the masses who are proud of their history"?

Technical issue - period. People need to be identifiable -period. One doesn't know what the hell could be under that thing. Stupid.

"I sipped my Coke and said nothing. I had been in the emergency room of a Gaza hospital when a young Palestinian nurse came in, shaking, her uniform covered in wet, brown stains. 'It was the boys in the market', she said. 'They told me to cover my head. I told them I was Christian, but they said it didn't matter. They said, the Virgin Mary covered her head, so why not you? They threw rotten fruit at me and told me next time it would be acid."

Muslim boys already transformed into woman-hating sociopaths courtesy Islam and their false prophet.

If stoning to death of adulterous women were permitted in the US, there would be a shortage of stones. In a survey of 100 American married women an alpha man seduced 75% of them. The others refused the invitation for undisclosed reasons, it might have been because they were lesbians. Iranian men understand the nature of married women, the fear of stoning has made the adulteress a rarity.

Morris

You better check your facts. The 75% figure is ridiculous!
Your pro-Muslim bias is quite obvious. So you think that Iranian men "understand the nature of married women" - you imply that the fear of stoning keeps them in line. Just what keeps sadistic Muslim males in line, so they don't beat women, commit honor killings, rape Infidel women, commit acts of jihad, perform female genital mutilations, kill apostates from their brutal religion, and so forth?

You really should consider deleting the "Wise" from your moniker, and substitute something more appropriate such as "Doofus"!

Iranian men understand the nature of married women, the fear of stoning has made the adulteress a rarity.

I understand the nature of a muzzlum. If the punishment for stoning an adulteress were stoning, the fear of stoning would have made an adulteress-stoning muzzlem a rarity.

A muzzlum man, like a dog, respects only stick and stones.


Oho. Looks like 'Morris Wise' has outed himself as a Mohammedan misogynist boggart, or else as a creepy *non-Muslim* misogynist of the very nastiest kind, insulting every married woman here present with his sweeping accusation - on the basis of *just one* probably-highly-dubious 'survey' (*very* small sample size - and where and when was it done? by whom? - Playboy magazine?? ) that the only women in the free world who haven't committed adultery, are lesbians.

Ignore him henceforward, everyone.

His opinions are beneath contempt.


Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter