More suffering from the world's largest prison camp.
(Video thanks to Bob.)
Starving Gazans smuggling in luxury cars
13 Comments
Leave a Comment
NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.
Sure beats ancient times when an enemy besieged a town or city into surrender.
Deu 28:53 "Then you shall eat the offspring of your own body, the flesh of your sons and of your daughters whom the LORD your God has given you, during the siege and the distress by which your enemy will oppress you.
Gaza misery is nothing but a big Islamic lie....the tradegy of Gaza is that they are stuck with Islam,....
from http://www.fr15.org.uk/work/ramadhan-2010
"Provide Ramadhan meal from [UK pound] 1.50 per day in Africa, Kashmir, Iraq, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh.
Provide a Ramadhan meal in Gaza from only [UK pounds] 4.00 per day."
Either the hungry in Gaza enjoy a higher level of cuisine than do the hungry in Africa and Bangladesh, or they eat more than twice as much. Or does victimhood come at a price? Which is it? We jizya and zakat givers have a right to know.
The Gaza fraud is a most fitting one, for, in microcosm, it mirrors a far greater fraud----Islam itself. The good news is that more and more of the world is catching on to the microcosmic lie (forget the UN here though) as well as to the macrocosmic travesty of the truth (again forget the UN, OIC et al.).
People - Did you see this in the NYT?
"Across Nation, Mosque Projects Meet Opposition" (!)
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/08/us/08mosque.html?_r=1&th&emc=th
People, I urge you to read the article I linked above. Americans are truly waking up. Even Walid Shoebat, Wafa Sultan, and Nonie Darwish are mentioned! And Brigitte Gabriels's "ACT! For America."
In all of the recent conflicts, opponents have said their problem is Islam itself. They quote passages from the Koran and argue that even the most Americanized Muslim secretly wants to replace the Constitution with Islamic Shariah law. -NYT
This is the New York Times? Where was I? A Rip van Winkle sleep? Boy, things change fast in America! One day Islam is the 'religion of peace', then next it is seditious to replace the US Constitution with Sharia. Maybe the Ground-Zero-Conquest mosque was not such a good idea, eh? And now Gaza, the land of plenty. Wonders will never cease. Truly 'Allah' works in mysterious ways, usually to crap on Muslims who worship him.
Stealth Jihad now goes underground? Times they are a changin'.
What we're starting to see, I hope, is something called the 'tipping point'.
It takes a fair bit to reach that point, when you're dealing with something as massive and unwieldy as the United States. 300 million people, and as yet only a couple million Muslims, those being concentrated up till now in specific areas/
Smaller places, with Muslim colonies forming higher percentages of the total population, have reached 'tipping point' sooner - the Netherlands first, with Pym Fortuyn and then Theo van Gogh and then Geert Wilders and the Freedom Party being thrown up one after another; then, all of a sudden, the British working class and lower middle class - with Muslim insults to returning soldiers the proverbial last straw - finding their voice by inventing the EDL; France progressing from a ban on hijab in schools to a ban on the face veil to, today, a serious proposal, made at the highest echelons of government, to strip citizenship from certain categories of criminal (such categories applying almost exclusively to ...Muslims).
In the case of the United States, I suspect the insolent proposal to plank down a great big mosque where Muslims can chant 'allahu akbar', right next to the spot where *three thousand people* were mass-murdered by 19 Muslims *also* chanting allahu akbar, has precipitated something.
Think about it. The curious, young and old, who read that NYT article (pro-Muslim and sneeringly-dismissive of the Resistance though it is), may well be prompted to google strange terms like 'shariah'. I wonder how many passes they will make before jihadwatch and related sites snag in their google nets? And I do not think that what they find out about sharia, also spelled shariah, will please them.
Who knows, besides jihadwatch they may come across The Barnabas Fund, where for the princely sum of a dollar or so, they can get a handy little booklet that tells them exactly what sharia permits Muslims to do to each other, and more importantly, what it permits and prescribes to be done to non-Muslims .
Think of what will happen when people -having seen the names in the article - decide to research bodies such as ACT for America and Former Muslims United, or look up Nonie Darwish to find out more about her.
Ladies and Gentlemen, put your hands together and welcome the Spirit of Truth.
B of T, dda, and London Jim - Thanks for reading! I told you it would be a real eye-opener! And in the "New Duranty Times" no less!
What imperialist powers are learning in the West Bank is that you don't want to impoverish everyone. It's best to have an elite ruling class that are willing to lord it over the suffering peasants. They can also be tools of your oppression.
So sure, you go Haiti or Guatemala or any third world country and you'll see tiny, tiny sectors with vast opulence, while the remaining 95% of the country lives in rags and filth. This is what you see in Ramallah. You can go to Ramallah and in parts of it you'd think you were in Paris. It's great. For the privileged tiny minority.
The rest live barely above starvation level, and supposedly that's acceptable since there is a rich minority class. Israel officials say that the goal of the blockade is to "put Palestinians on a diet." What right do they have to prevent Palestinians from getting food? Why can't Palestinian children have shoes, fruit juice, and plastic toys? Does the fact that a tiny opulent minority gets plenty of stuff justify in your mind the cruel policies you advocate towards Palestinian children and their parents?
I read the article in the NY Times and to be honest I don't see what you're getting excited about Courreges. It paints those opposed to building mosgues with the wide brush of people being overcome with fear and emotion and if they only understood the real Islam, they would have different opinions.
One thing I did find fascinating in the article was the quots by Camie Ayash. In it she says “There’s no conflict with the U.S. Constitution in Shariah law. If there were, Muslims wouldn’t be living here.” No comment from the article's writer on how such a statement could possibly be true or even suggest the possibility that Camie is the one confused by emotion.
The NY Times continues it's tradition of pandering to the libs and lecturing everyone else.
Luxury is the thing that no one in the world would ever ignore. People are working hard for most of the part of their lives only to get the best luxurious lives and to reach to a position where they can cherish luxurious treats all the time, even when they are in the cars. The Luxury Cars are made for these people. These are the carriers of utilities that not only offers pace to the lives but also offer the luxuries to the insiders even while they are on the wheels. These luxurious cars are quite dynamic in the nature and have the most royal and prestigious feel to the insiders.