ABC, CBS, NBC ignore vast opposition to Islamic supremacist mega-mosque at Ground Zero, heavily feature pro-mosque spokesman (including Hamas-linked CAIR)

(Off topic)

Am I dreaming or is the following article really from UC/Berkley? Maybe there's hope?

http://www.dailycal.org/article/110325/the_west_s_moral_superiority_over_radical_islamic_

'Living in fear of the Religion of Peace'...The movie...

Chapter 26...The media and its pact with the Devil...

ABC, CBS and NBC, MSNBC and others (FOX) MSM'ers have entered into an unholy alliance with Islam...It is becoming clear that they have chosen to support Allah and his submitters over patriotic, or any Americans...They have all become Tokyo Rose...It won't be long till they start selling sharia...

They've all learned their trade from the Bullshit Brainwashing Conspiracy

It would be refreshing if the media picked up on this little piece about the Koran burning protestors burning down a Christian school that only had Muslim teachers, students and a library packed with now incinerated Korans.

http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Kashmir:-principal-of-fire-ravaged-Christian-school-speaks-out-19462.html

http://newstime.co.nz/quran-set-on-fire-at-ground-zero-on-911.html
Islamophobia: Does America Have a Muslim Problem?
NO … but with Islam, the “prophet” Muhammad,
and the declaration of open-ended war against the kuffar, the Quran.

Islamophobe (is-slahm-o-fohb) – A non-Muslim who knows too much about Islam.

MSM, not the Aol, should pick-up on Molly Norris, the "evil perpetrator" of Everybody Draw Mohammad Day, going into hiding.

http://www.aolnews.com/surge-desk/article/molly-norris-artist-behind-everybody-draw-mohammed-day-goes-into-hiding/19635192

That's what MSM is really pushing, fear those rat bastards and if you keep your mouth shut you can live another day to watch Oprah's next big giveaway.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/sep/14/shariah-a-danger-to-us-security-pros-say/

Even those overall numbers fail to show how the debate has grown increasingly tilted over time. During the first week (August 14-20), the networks actually provided more visibility to mosque opponents -- 55 percent of soundbites, vs. 45 percent for mosque supporters. But in the following weeks (August 21 to September 13), the networks' coverage lurched in the other direction, with mosque supporters receiving a 63 percent to 37 percent advantage....
.............

Appalling. One would not necessarily expect coverage to exactly mirror public opinion, but at this point it is clear that the media is no longer in many cases reporting the news, but instead intending to *shape* it.

Did they all attend the Walter Duranty School of Journalism? (Walter Duranty is the New York Times foreign correspondent who sent back glowing—and almost completely false—dispatches from the "worker's paradise" of the oppressive Soviet Union during the 1930s).

In any case, it is not working. A strong majority of Americans—not excluding generally solid "blue state" New Yorkers—are completely opposed to the triumphalist Ground Zero mosque. And this is so even with the threat of being stigmatized as "bigots" and "Islamophobes".

The American MSM is unwittingly impaling itself as it has never done so before (the Cold War and the whole Communist "thing" included). I see this as a great positive. The MSM standing up for a religious ideology that would destroy the very freedoms the MSM cherish, if only this ideology called Islam got the chance to do so, will eventually rank as one of the most cowardly, misguided and stupid actions in the entire history of journalism.

Time for the MSM to get its comeuppance. It's aiding this big time and it is so very richly deserved.

Instructive how those who are on the wrong side of history, be it through ignorance or complicity, serve as some of the greatest allies of liberty PRECISELY because they don't realize they do. Ignoramuses and the malevolent eventually defeat their own causes just by being themselves. If history teaches any lesson, it teaches this.

The origins of Political correctness and its deliberately designed destructive effects on Western culture.

Here are a couple of videos that are a Must See.

http://vladtepesblog.com/?p=25818

Ad Israel is Western as well as on the frontline against Islam, attacks on it from the Left are natural.

These two videos are a must see.

Jihadis enjoying la vida loca:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/09/14/terror-flight-venezuela-iran-illicit-arms-hezbollah-hamas-protest/

As the 19th century British historian, Edward Augustus Freeman, put it: Islam is at war with every other creed on earth. Yet today, a lot of people still don't get it, even the ones who call themselves newsmen.

" the liberal, elite media are hopelessly out of touch with the public they ostensibly serve."

No they're not. They know well enough how the public feels, they're just scared as hell of large groups of people showing they have their own opinions not shaped by them. They can't stand the idea of a Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer & others influencing the opinion of many (esp. not a Geert Wilders!). They, the power elites of media, insist on being the opinion shapers - that's why they wont cover such large protest events unless it represents their views. They must rule the minds of most Americans, they are not doing it and they are scared.

The Main Stream Media think they are perfectly entitled to do what they want with the truth now. They think they have the power to shape public opinion and it simply isn't working. With all the new forms of technology such as the web, twitter and blogs the truth is always going to come out.

Remember how the MSM tried to make it appear that all the Tea Party people were ignorant racist gun loving nazis? Well it never worked. Just look at last night's elections.

The MSM loses credibility with the public every day that goes by. They are losing viewers due to newer technologies, and their dishonest reporting. They are simply appalling.

And I don't feel one bit sorry for them.

The MSM are secretly terrified of Islam. They have discovered a new word, "Islamophobe" which they hurl around at anyone who discusses Islam that they don't agree with. I say it is the MSM that are the true "Islamophobes" Because they nothing about Islam, yet they fear it completely.

Any wonder why the news is reporting lower revenue across all medium (print, web, tv, etc)? The only exception has been Fox news which tends to do more balanced reporting.

Boy everyone in this country is running around yammering about their fucking rights. "I have a right, you have no right, we have a right."

Folks I hate to spoil your fun, but... there's no such thing as rights. They're imaginary. We made 'em up. Like the boogie man. Like Three Little Pigs, Pinocio, Mother Goose, shit like that. Rights are an idea. They're just imaginary. They're a cute idea. Cute. But that's all. Cute...and fictional. But if you think you do have rights, let me ask you this, "where do they come from?" People say, "They come from God. They're God given rights." Awww fuck, here we go again...here we go again.

The God excuse, the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument, "It came from God." Anything we can't describe must have come from God. Personally folks, I believe that if your rights came from God, he would've given you the right for some food every day, and he would've given you the right to a roof over your head. GOD would've been looking out for ya. You know that.

He wouldn't have been worried making sure you have a gun so you can get drunk on Sunday night and kill your girlfriend's parents.

But let's say it's true. Let's say that God gave us these rights. Why would he give us a certain number of rights?

The Bill of Rights of this country has 10 stipulations. OK...10 rights. And apparently God was doing sloppy work that week, because we've had to ammend the bill of rights an additional 17 times. So God forgot a couple of things, like...SLAVERY. Just fuckin' slipped his mind.

But let's say...let's say God gave us the original 10. He gave the british 13. The british Bill of Rights has 13 stipulations. The Germans have 29, the Belgians have 25, the Sweedish have only 6, and some people in the world have no rights at all. What kind of a fuckin' god damn god given deal is that!?...NO RIGHTS AT ALL!? Why would God give different people in different countries a different numbers of different rights? Boredom? Amusement? Bad arithmetic? Do we find out at long last after all this time that God is weak in math skills? Doesn't sound like divine planning to me. Sounds more like human planning . Sounds more like one group trying to control another group. In other words...business as usual in America.

Now, if you think you do have rights, I have one last assignment for ya. Next time you're at the computer get on the Internet, go to Wikipedia. When you get to Wikipedia, in the search field for Wikipedia, i want to type in, "Japanese-Americans 1942" and you'll find out all about your precious fucking rights. Alright. You know about it.

In 1942 there were 110,000 Japanese-American citizens, in good standing, law abiding people, who were thrown into internment camps simply because their parents were born in the wrong country. That's all they did wrong. They had no right to a lawyer, no right to a fair trial, no right to a jury of their peers, no right to due process of any kind. The only right they had was...right this way! Into the internment camps.

Just when these American citizens needed their rights the most...their government took them away. and rights aren't rights if someone can take em away. They're priveledges. That's all we've ever had in this country is a bill of TEMPORARY priviledges; and if you read the news, even badly, you know the list get's shorter, and shorter, and shorter.

Yeup, sooner or later the people in this country are going to realize the government doesn't give a fuck about them. the government doesn't care about you, or your children, or your rights, or your welfare or your safety. it simply doesn't give a fuck about you. It's interested in it's own power. That's the only thing...keeping it, and expanding wherever possible.

Personally when it comes to rights, I think one of two things is true: either we have unlimited rights, or we have no rights at all

At the risk of feeding a net troll, I would like to ask the person ranting about an imaginary God giving rights, let's assume the contrary, that there is no God at all, and remove him completely out of the picture. So what is your solution to a problem that we face, of government controlling our rights and expanding its power ad infinitum? Do we throw up our hands and conclude that it is our lot to live in hell on earth? Do you admit that perhaps it really is humans that are screwing up everything? I don't see robots running the government, the last time I checked. What's your solution for broken humanity?

In the absence of a 911 memorial, one masterful painting is serving as an authentic memorial for 9/11/2001.

By request, artist Marc Rubin was in NYC this 9/11 with his 7 x 14 ft painting "Atrocity 911" to serve as a memorial at the Zuccotti Park memorial service. Afterward the artist decided to go with quiet assistaqnce of NYPD, NYFD and First Responsers to Park Place and Broadway to serve as an "in your face" protest against the pro mosque people who were across the street.

Here is a link to a short photo montage flash movie of the public's reaction to the painting: http://www.marcrubin.com/911-2010.ivnu

We all have to voice our position and make it heard not only in USA but also all over the world.
The people who own and work for these Main Stream Media are interested in money and have respect for the money that come from Saudi share holders.They do not care about the dignity of America and the future of their young generations !

A look at the possible future.

"9/11, a 2061 Memorial"

http://bigpeace.com/ndarwish/2010/09/15/911-a-2061-memorial/

"Personally when it comes to rights, I think one of two things is true: either we have unlimited rights, or we have no rights at all"

Aside from the description of plight of many of the Japanese Americans in World War 2, this was the only thing that Mr. Helter-Skelter wrote that made any sense, and even then he denies that rights can be limited by legal due process.

Why waste time picking apart this conflated mishmash of ideas?

Fun with FAQ's

From the Cordoba Initiative’s Frequently Asked Questions
http://www.cordobainitiative.org/?q=content/frequently-asked-questions

Why are you building “a mosque near Ground Zero”?
Strictly speaking, it will not be a “mosque” although it would have a prayer space on one of its 15 floors. At the beginning, no one considered the fact that Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf Abdul Rauf’s current mosque is 12 blocks from the Ground Zero site, while the Park51 Community Center location is only 2 and one-half blocks away.  We never discussed wanting to be close to Ground Zero; our goal was to find a good real estate opportunity for a community center.  51 Park seemed to fit the bill.

[from the Dec 8,2009 New York Times
"The location was precisely a key selling point for the group of Muslims who bought the building in July. A presence so close to the World Trade Center, “where a piece of the wreckage fell,” said Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, the cleric leading the project, “sends the opposite statement to what happened on 9/11.”"

“We want to push back against the extremists,” added Imam Feisal, 61."]

But why so close to Ground Zero?

We wanted to build a community center in our old neighborhood, and the Park51 location became available.  (In our part of lower Manhattan, it’s hard not to be close to Ground Zero.)  As Muslim New Yorkers and Americans, we want to help and be part of rebuilding our neighborhood. It is important for everyone to show the world that Americans will not be frightened or deterred by the extremist forces of hatred.

“Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf  is a member of the Perdana Global Peace Organization, which is a funder of the flotilla that attempted to deliver aid to residents of Gaza.”
Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf  has never been a member of this group.  Several years ago, Imam Feisal was invited to Malaysia, the most moderate Islamic country in the world, to participate in a Peace Conference sponsored by the Perdana Peace Group. He was one of the hundreds of speakers present. He has no political, advisory or business affiliation of any nature with the Perdana group.  A photo of Imam Feisal was taken at the conference, and this has been used to “prove” his membership in the Perdana Global Peace Organization, but the allegation is false. Because of the controversy surrounding Perdana, we have requested the Perdana Group to remove the photo of him from their publicity.

[While it is true that one can not get to the picture of Feisal Abdul Rauf from the Perdana home page, if one goes to the web page in question and clicks on “home” the current home page from the Perdana site comes up.

If Feisal wants to distinguish himself from Mahathir, he needs to do better than this.]

“Imam Feisal wants to establish a “shariah state“ in America”
Actually, quite the contrary. Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf  believes that all Muslims must adhere to the laws of the land in which they reside, including in America. This is a basic tenet of Islam. He has repeatedly stated that America is already one of the most “Shariah compliant” countries in the world because of America’s adherence to our Bill of Rights and because we allow members of all religions, including Muslims and Jews, to practice their faith freely. In other words, Imam Feisal believes that Muslims practice Shariah when they fast, pray, give to charity and uphold the commandments to protect life, liberty, dignity, the pursuit of happiness and the right to freedom of worship.

[This is coming from the man who is insisting, to the point of creating a national security threat, on building an “Islamic community center” in connection with Ground Zero.
A man who is obsessed with shariah, and who runs a Shariah Index Project.
I think it is perfectly reasonable to assume, that if he can, he will press his advantage, and try to institute more shariah law in this country.
It is something you have to constantly be on the look out for with bumptious Muslims like Feisal Abdul Rauf.]

Folks, TRSTHNTR has linked to something very hopeful. It's a Washington Times article from Tuesday. An excerpt:

A panel of national security experts who worked under Republican and Democratic presidents is urging the Obama administration to abandon its stance that Islam is not linked to terrorism, arguing that radical Muslims are using Islamic law to subvert the United States.

The report is 150 pages or so, and included on the team who wrote it are a number of people whom Jihad Watchers will recognize as friends, including Andrew McCarthy (lead prosecutor in the first WTC attacks) and Diana West, author and columnist.

The 150 page report, called Sharia: The Threat to America, An Exercise in Competitive Analysis, Report of Team 'B' II, is free to read online, and includes a ten-page executive summary, which I read and found excellent. The authors also explain the long title. It's brilliantly based on the title of another report that marked a sea change in strategy toward the Soviet Union thirty years ago. The content is impressive, based as it is on the intellectual resources of a talented team of people who together represent a broad range of experience. And they are on our side.

If you are tired of the "Religion of Peace" propaganda coming out of Washington for the last ten years, this report heralds a sea change to something realistic.

List of co-authors of the report:

Team Leaders: Lieutenant General William G. “Jerry” Boykin—US Army (Ret.), former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence

Lieutenant General Harry Edward Soyster—US Army (Ret.), former Director,
Defense Intelligence Agency

Associates: Christine Brim—Chief Operating Officer, Center for Security Policy

Ambassador Henry Cooper—former Chief Negotiator, Defense and Space
Talks, former Director, Strategic Defense Initiative

Stephen C. Coughlin, Esq. —Major (Res.) USA, former Senior Consultant,
Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

Michael Del Rosso—Senior Fellow, Claremont Institute and Center for Security
Policy

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.—former Assistant Secretary of Defense for International
Security Policy (Acting), President, Center for Security Policy

John Guandolo—former Special Agent, Counter-Terrorism Division, Federal
Bureau of Investigation

Brian Kennedy—President, Claremont Institute

Clare M. Lopez—Senior Fellow, Center for Security Policy

Admiral James A. “Ace” Lyons—US Navy (Ret.), former Commander-in-
Chief, Pacific Fleet

Andrew C. McCarthy—former Chief Assistant U.S. Attorney (Southern District
of New York); Senior Fellow, National Review Institute; Contributing
Editor, National Review

Patrick Poole—Consultant to the military and law enforcement on antiterrorism
issues

Joseph E. Schmitz—former Inspector General, Department of Defense

Tom Trento—Executive Director, Florida Security Council

J. Michael Waller—Annenberg Professor of International Communication,
Institute of World Politics, and Vice President for Information Operations,
Center for Security Policy

Diana West—author and columnist

R. James Woolsey—former Director of Central Intelligence

David Yerushalmi, Esq.—General Counsel to the Center for Security Policy