Mega-mosque imam says Qur'an-burning would have been "disastrous" and would have "strengthened radicals," implying Muslims cannot control themselves

This comes after his threat that "anger will explode" among Muslims if the Qur'an burning went forward. Honestly, though, such thinly veiled threats are tantamount to a denial of free will in the Muslim world.

That should be insulting to the intelligence of a Muslim who believes him- or herself above such histrionics as we have seen in Afghanistan in recent days. Besides, isn't Ramadan about self control? So, everyone should be at the top of their game there right about now.

Does Rauf really mean to tell us that, instead, real or imagined (like the Newsweek debacle) insults to Islam are really that much like poking a bee-hive with a stick where free will is concerned? Again, Muslims ought to be insulted, but many seem more bent on leveraging that instability to quash free speech in the West -- Rauf included.

"Koran burning 'would be disaster' NY imam warns," from BBC News, September 12:

The New York imam leading efforts to build an Islamic centre near the World Trade Center site says plans by a small US church to burn Korans would have sparked "a disaster".
Feisal Abdul Rauf told ABC News that the event - now called off - would have "strengthened radicals".

The BBC seems to find free speech distasteful, too:

Rallies for and against the proposed centre marred the 9/11 commemorations.
Meanwhile, two people died in eastern Afghanistan as protests sparked by the threatened book burning continued.
Security forces opened fire when some demonstrators tried to storm the district governor's office in Baraki Barak, in Logar province, on Sunday.
Protests have erupted across the Muslim world since Florida Pastor Terry Jones announced plans to burn Korans outside his church to mark the 9/11 attacks.
Mr Jones said he cancelled the event because those behind the Islamic centre near Ground Zero had agreed to relocate it - a claim denied by Mr Rauf.
"How can you equate the burning of any person's scripture with an attempt to build inter-faith dialogue?" Mr Rauf told ABC.

It's not a dialogue when skeptics and concerned citizens are branded haters, Islamophobes, and per Rauf's wife, "metastasized anti-semites."

Rauf is preaching his side, and all he wants to hear back is, "Yes, sir, gee, that's great, sir. Now we understand." That's not dialogue.

And ironically, Jones did more to negotiate in good faith, and appears to have been hoodwinked by one of Rauf's henchmen.

"This is a house with multi-faith partners, intended to work together towards building peace."

Your conduct in the entire course of the project demonstrates you want peace and coexistence only on your terms.

He said burning the Koran would have sparked "a disaster" in the Muslim world....
"It would have strengthened the radicals. It would have enhanced the possibility of terrorist acts against America and American interests," he said...

Again: why no self-control, why no apparent exercise of free will?

| 72 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

72 Comments

| Leave a comment

insulting to the intelligence of a Muslim...

Hmmm....

I think reading the Koran daily is insulting to intelligence. A question: Does it read better in Arabic? In English, it's about as bad as the Book of Mormon. Chapter 1....zzzzzzzz.

'Living in fear of the Religion of Peace'...The movie...

Chapter 22...Ruafs lament...Or...If you make them mad, they will get angry...

He said burning the Koran would have sparked "a disaster" in the Muslim world....
"It would have strengthened the radicals. It would have enhanced the possibility of terrorist acts against America and American interests," he said...

He's obviously been talking to Rasool Obama...We certainly can't have a disaster in the Mahoundian world...now can we...


http://ow.ly/2D4It There is a darkness upon the world hidden in a religion that would be banned upon the earth if it was anything else. Start at the link above then check out the other post in archives.

veteranoutrage.com

Islam is EVIL and is a demonicly dictacted false religion..

Therefore since Islam has no real POWER to change the heart of man - it only can do one thing..
Threaten, bluster or intimidate..

Just like islams father SATAN..
Who is the father of all lies..

Muslims hate the west due to when they arrive
they are immidiatly tempted to go out and sin..

In the muslim mind it is the west that made them sin..
Not the FACT that islam has no power over sin..


I dont have to drink anymore..
Jesus set me free..

Now i have POWER over the demon of alchohol so i dont need to do anything thanks to Jesus setting me free..


But Islam has NO power whatsoever..

So when the muslim sees alchohol he cannot control himself..

No manner of man made ritual will stop sin..

This is why islam cannot control itself..
Islam is a lie from the pitts of hell spawned by satan himself..

Robert is a fine scholar (better than most) i believe..
and i love this site..
I learned a ton from here..

But one thing i do know ..
Islam is voilent and evil because it is islam..
This is why the muslims cannot control themselves..

Every time Imam Feezel Rauf speaks, he proves our point. Let him keep talking.

So this man is saying that we should knuckle under to terrorist threats? These mohametans need to simmer down a tad. This has been an annual event for the last nine years. Thousands of korns have been roasted and now they finally notice? Not too observant. Are they?

David and Nabeel have a great clip about the original korn burning. Can you believe it was moahmetans themselves who did the deed?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91AM7665cbo

nabi ZK (pbum)

Your conduct in the entire course of the project demonstrates you want peace and coexistence only on your terms.

Of course we must acknowledge that the Imam is behaving as any good Moslem should, according to The Book with a nod to the other sacred scriptures, or as Prez Barack Hussein would say, "holy book." Holy books, actually, but he makes his point. He must not of studied the Ha-Deeths growing up in Jakarta.

*** Bukhari Vol 9 Bk 84 Nbr 59 ***

When Mohammed died and Abu Bakr became his successor and some of the Arabs reverted to disbelief, Umar said, "O Abu Bakr! How can you fight these people although Mohammed said, 'I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: None has the right to be worshipped but Allah, and whoever said, None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' Allah will save his property and his life from me, unless he does something for which he receives legal punishment.

None has the right to be worshipped but Allah. Except maybe Mohammed (33:21). So, the Imam is in and the protestors are out, they have no rights. Well, they still have some rights but they're fading, and they're not holy as our Prez from Harvard Law School would have it.

http://newstime.co.nz/quran-set-on-fire-at-ground-zero-on-911.html
Qur’an set on Fire at Ground Zero on 9/11

Yet still … burning of the Quran

"a disaster" in the Muslim world....
"It would have strengthened the radicals. It would have enhanced the possibility of terrorist acts against America and American interests,"


As opposed to?

I thought there was already a disaster in the Muslim world? I believe it's called ISLAM.

Muslims do what their imams and the koran tell them to do.

Well of course, because Muslims are like bratty and vicious little children who will throw fits, blow things up and destroy them if they don't get their way.

The whole world is being held hostage to this demented cult of violence and death, and our "leaders" stand by spouting bullcrap thinking they are conning us.

If Muslims want to act like savages, then they will be treated like savages. It's that simple.

But thanks, Rauf, for admitting that Muslim fanatics are wild and vicious animals that cannot control themselves. The image just speaks so highly of the ideology itself. Rauf should be very proud that the cult he's pushing creates such depravity.

To paraphrase Matthew 7:16, by its fruit, you shall know Islam...

I wonder how many Korans quietly went into the fireplace last Saturday night?

I can see headlines now: "Man burns Koran, struck by lighting, Arab street riots." LOL

Allah would be pleased. ;-)

These islamic nuts never know what their left hands are doing from their right hands, and it's the reason why God, the Judeo-Christian God, said they will be like wild donkeys ( wild asses) after every brother. They're so stupid with brains like donkeys still depending on their false belief to death. Their leaders, since the days of bandit, rapist, thief, killer Muhammad, still profess the pagan belief of the moon god, al-ilah. They would not accept the fact that before muhammad, Jesus, the Almighty, sacrificed for the sin of every one about 630 years. muhammad's father and grand father were pagans worshiping the moon god, al-ilah and the 3 stars (daughters) al lat, manat and al uzza. satanic koran says evil muhammad died a sinner and eaten by worms and is now in hell with 70 85-year old virgins. Jesus the Messiah was raised by the Father Almighty on the 3rd day and is now seated at His right hand.
So, the planned koran-burning should be done forever to rid this world of satanic verses to eliminate moronic muslims from inciting violence and blasting innocent people. Let me tell you islamic pendejos, read the internet and books and find out the false belief you're into. koran's satanic verses have been injected into your brain by your leaders using you as donkeys to die for them. You need a revolution against your sheikhs, imams, kings and princes. Your enemies are not the people outside islam. It is the people in your Islamic belief. They had been poisoning your weak minds since the evil muhammad became an adult. So wake up islamic weak minds, you're living with your own enemies, your islamic leaders!

Another words when it comes to us Muslims,it is a lose lose for us infidels.

Yep we better allow ourselves to be subjugated,we better allow for shariah, and we better adhere to the demands of Islam or there will be hell to pay according the great bridge builder between faiths Iman Rauf.

There is no doubt in this not so moderate Muslims (understatement) that he is trying to intimidate those who are against the mosque by suggesting that violence will come upon them. This is exactly how Muslims try to gain control over the infidel minds and lands.

Iman Rauf is clearly trying to turn the screws on us proud Islamophobes so that the dhimmi enablers among us will try to get us to comply. We already have numerous dhimmi enablers of Islam lining up on CNN wanting to accuse those who are against the mosque at ground zero as extremists, racists, and bigots.
I don't get the racist part but dhimmis' like Michael Moore, and the Reverend Jesse Jackson are out there pushing that line.

No matter how far we have tried to stay removed from those that are desecrating the Qu'ran these Islamic appeasers and enablers still try to lump the anti Mosque movement in with them.

We will make a serious mistake if we allow our Achilles heal to show which is political correctness to define are position against this intolerant totalitarian ideology.

Nearly 90 percent of Islamic countries are run by dictatorships while 96 percent of Western Countries are run by free democracies.

Those statistic in themselves speak volumes of what we need to know about Islam.

As than muslim if my koran from old and torn I cannot throw it in the tash can I must burn the Koran.

Thank God for that. Imagine how much wool the CAIRs and Imam Feezels of the world would be pulling over everyone's eyes if JW and others weren't here to expose their B.S.

Amir Tahiri, an Iranian expatriate and evidently nonbelieving "cultural" Muslim whose columns occasionally appear in the New York Post, and about whom I have mixed feelings, has written a laudatory piece about the significance of the Ground Zero mosque, which I urgently recommend to everyone: please, please read, and circulate:

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/islam_center_eerie_echo_of_ancient_iRTMW6TprkULnaA1Nqi9xM

I hope this link works. It's from the New York Post online, and the column was published on September tenth. Mandatory reading.

The good Imam speaks the truth. Too many Muslims can not control themselves. They are so filled with their own supremacy nonsense that they think we owe them something.

They can get angry for all I care. Personally, I wouldn't burn a book, not even Mien Kampf or the Quran. Are these books disgusting? Yes. They show us the depths of hate that a human can make. But if they didn't exist, we'd never believe that it was possible.

This is the ultimate hate. It is hatred against the other. Islam is riddled with it. They have much to learn. And if the choose not to learn, they can have this lesson in other ways.

Since when do religions demand adherence to law and rules by members and non-members. They don't governments do. Tolerance is not a quality of tyranny or its political puppets.

"It would have strengthened the radicals. It would have enhanced the possibility of terrorist acts against America and American interests," he said...


But isn't this a "fringe" element that has "hijacked" Islam?
The only way to "strengthen" the radicals is to bring more people to their side, which means there are many more Muslims looking for a reason to riot.

When will our leaders admit the truth? The so-called moderates are merely the "silent majority" of Muslims. They don't speak out AGAINST the violence so that can only mean they support it.

Ack! I am beginning to comprehend DOI-ish!

I think he/she meant:

As a Muslim if my Koran is old and torn I cannot throw it in the trash can, I must burn the Koran.


However, opinions vary:

http://www.ummah.com/forum/showthread.php?221340-how-to-dispose-of-islamic-literature-in-a-halal-manner

But I suspect Infidel hands are not allowed to dispose of Islamic literature regardless of the method ...

Telling that no one has to worry about strengthening radicals among Christians, Buddhists, Jews, Hindus, Zoroastrians, Taoists, Wicca folk, Confucianists, Janists, agnostics, atheists or any believers or non-believers except Muslims. Just Muslims. Yeah, just Muslims. As I said, telling.

Sick of Islam yet? I am. Why isn't everyone? After all, burning books is a bad idea but harming or killing folks for burning books is a far worse idea.

"He said burning the Koran would have sparked "a disaster" in the Muslim world...."

Yeah, a disaster...for them!

They're have rioted, burned everything in sight, broken windows. And then, the anger would have fizzled out.

And then, they've have looked at each other, and seen that life goes on.

Then they would have had to clean up their own mess, and been without, no cars, no eateries, or supermarkets (so vital at the end of Ramadan), no shops, but with the realization that other countries don't really care about islam, or wants anything to do with it.

Many a lightbulb would have lit in their brains, about how stupid it all is.

So koran burning by a man - whose family now says may suffer depression - with a few dozen followers represents a Kafirun attack on islam?

The media never gave the man a megaphone; they gave the islamonazis a cause on which to hang their muz under siege fictions.

How do muz confront terror? If the cause-of-allah dictates, they may condemn particular acts, but generally they use the issue as means to the end of painting the US and its allies as "terrorists."

The group attached to this link is directly related to the Muslim Council of Britain, which has effective control over much of what is written about the slaves-of-allah.

See notes to a nominal "investigation" of terrorism in Lebanon. Nothing is said about Syrian occupation and extortion from the government of Lebanon. Nor is their any reference to besieged Christians. Muz use terror as the primary weapon of conquest, but condemn select "counter-terror" methods, only when they have to.

http://www.cfsot.com/index.php?thm=publications

"This long-term struggle favours Hezbollah and its allies, which are politically and militarily dominant. Moreover, the regional balance of power favours Hezbollah, evidenced by the decline of American influence in the Middle East and the insidious strategic retreat of Israel."

"In this frank interview with Islamism Digest Sayyed Fadlallah sets out the Islamic position on terrorism and resistance. He identifies the United States as the lead sponsor of terrorism, while Hezbollah – according to Sayyed Fadlallah – symbolises the pinnacle of resistance to oppression and hegemony."

It's amazing, the self control muslims have. Why, when those misunderstanders of 'the prophet' in mombai slaughtered a hundred or so, wounding so many, slaughtering a pregnant women, disembowling? her and her husbands disfigurement- an innocent rabbi and his pregnant wife, who were attacked merely because they were jewish- why the muslims showed their calm and tranquil natures. In fact- with all the 16,000 jihadist attacks since 9/11, they've been able to not march by the tens of thousands, in protest, able to not march and scream for the heads of the misunderstanders and doers of such evil, because they are a tranquil lot. Very tranquil. We should note this, more often.
These tranquil moments of Islam, when they should be displaying their sorrow and begging for forgiveness for the few, the 'radical's' etc.
But of course.....

"Islamic Pendejos"

Oh yeah.

He might be right about the lack of self control. Just came across this lovely little prayer:

Tabari VIII:153/Ishaq:532 "I ask the Merciful One for a pardon and for a sword that cuts wide and deep, creating a wound that shoots out foaming blood. I ask for a deadly thrust by a thirsty lance held by a zealous warrior that pierces right through the guts and liver, slitting the bowels. People shall say when they pass my grave, 'Allah guided him, fine raider that he was, O warrior, he did well.'"

Charming.

Plus apparently a couple of preachers in Tennessee went ahead and had their own Koran Roast on their barbecues on Saturday, so don't they count? I'm beginning to think ol' Feisal has a bit of a thing for Terry Jones.

Don't let Daisy find out.

Oh here's another good one:

Qur'an 9:5 "When the sacred forbidden months for fighting are past, fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, beleaguer them, and lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war. But if they relent, performing their devotional obligations and paying the zakat tax, then open the way. Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. I created Islam to start fights that will kill, enslave, and torture people by way of deceptive ambush. Surrender, or I will have Muslims terrorize you."

Thanks for posting that. I will be posting it at other sites.

It is quite delightful, isn't it? (sarc)

Again, Muslims ought to be insulted...

Aren't they in a permanent state of insulted? They always seem to be aggrieved or potentially aggrieved about everything, even Valentine's Day.

The BBC seems to find free speech distasteful, too.

Our friends in England really messed up when they concentrated all that power into one organization, a quasi-governmental outfit no less.

I think reading the Koran daily is insulting to intelligence.

I read the thing and I'll tellya when I finally put it down I was mad. Felt insulted, violated even. But who could I turn to? Driving over to the local mosque and registering a complaint about how awful the Ko-Ran is could get a guy killed.

Remember that week in Yathrib when The Holy Prophet Mohammed put out two contract hits on his critics. The murders of Afak and Marwan kinda set the tone for how Moslems handle criticism. Murder would be preferable, but a good old fashioned religious riot will suffice.

To Mr. Spencer:

I think that if you look at my posts since the last week of August, you will see that what I had anticipated has largely come to pass.

I don't think that anybody "reclaimed 9/11," which I don't think is even possible. Everybody is trying to use the day for their own purposes.

There is now a small dispute as to how many attended the rally, just as I predicted.

I was disappointed by Mr. Wilders' speech, because even he did not assert the primary facts (he had almost all conclusions and characterizations about Islam) that form the basis of opposing the GZ mosque.

Nobody, not even one prominent person, is responding publicly with powerful facts that defeat the claims of bigotry and religious intolerance being made universally by the media and the political leaders.

Your event got practically no press (in part because the media was apparently afraid of itself after the media results of the actions of the well-mustachioed pastor).

The media likes drama, and your rally provided none. The pastor by himself did more to raise awareness of Islamic insanity than your rally. I generally don't think burning books is a good idea, but in this case I think the world would have been better off if he had not backed down.

Geraldo ridiculed Pamela Geller as an extremist before he even said hello to her -- very unfortunate.

Dhimmitude is now official US policy, based upon statements by Obama, the defense secretary, and the general.

If you really want to make inroads against Islamic expansion, I have some pretty good ideas as to how it can still be done. You will need to respond to this post, so we can set up a line of communication.

It turns out that I have some vulnerabilities in my personal situation that prevent me from becoming a public figure on this issue. Otherwise, I would be right at the forefront.

Robert already has the saintly and only sub-atomic scale, quanto-mechanical ability to be at more than one place doing more than one thing at a time. His efforts are unmatched in the propaganda front of this war. if unable to take you up on your suggestion remember that we can build an armada of efforts complementing Roberts miraculous work.

Arthur, there's a contact button on the left-hand side of this blog, at the end of the majority of printed data. That's supposing you wish to actually make contact in private.

Arthur leave your ideas here for everyone to discuss. I think the msm is just another tool and is guided by its multicultural bias.

Your conduct in the entire course of the project demonstrates you want peace and coexistence only on your terms.
...................

Yes. Imam Rauf has also refused to meet with Pastor Jones if he comes to New York City. Why?

If he could win Jones over with some of that vaunted "inter-faith dialogue", wouldn't that be a big win for "building peace"? sarc/off

Robert and Marisol, This is a little OT but, I have been contacted by e-mail by someone calling themselves "Dr. Ali" who informs me that my commentary on typepad is now being "followed" by them. I have only used this e-mail address and this "handle" to comment here on JW. Has anyone else heard from "Dr. ALI"? Is there any way to track down this creep? I wonder how they have gotten e-mail addresses. Isn't that illegal? If anyone knows anything about this could you let everyone know? If anyone has heard from "Dr. Ali" could you let everyone know. I think this kind of crap should be hunted down. I'll watch comment to see if anyone knoww anything about this. Thanks. Semper Fi

I just dont understand why they are so adamant on having a mosque close to ground zero why cant anywhere else and why they make a big deal of it as if their religion is insulted when its obvious that having a mosque at that site is against sensitivity of everyone who vividly remember the day when the islamic terrorists destroyed wtc towers.If anything they shud respect the feelings of the common man just the way they expect the non muslims to respect theirs. Just mind boggling

Christopher Martel wrote:

Robert and Marisol, This is a little OT but, I have been contacted by e-mail by someone calling themselves "Dr. Ali" who informs me that my commentary on typepad is now being "followed" by them. I have only used this e-mail address and this "handle" to comment here on JW. Has anyone else heard from "Dr. ALI"? Is there any way to track down this creep? I wonder how they have gotten e-mail addresses. Isn't that illegal?
..................

Take a deep breath—this is not nearly as sinister as you seem to think. "Dr. ALI", whoever he is, almost certainly *does not have your e-mail address*.

If you click on my name, you will find that I am "following" several posters, and several posters are "following" me. this doesn't mean a whole lot—on the old "IntenseDebate" system, it meant that if someone you were following posted a comment, you would be notified. With TypePad, it doesn't even mean that in practical terms.

As a rule, a poster will decide to "follow" someone who's comments they generally admire—that is true with the people I'm "following". Occasionally, someone will "follow" someone they merely consider "interesting" in some way. I suppose it is possible that occasionally someone "follows" someone they vociferously disagree with, but I have never heard of this.

I have never seen "Dr. ALI" post here—although it is also possible that he posts on some other group that uses TypePad. It is also possible that he merely "lurks" here—many readers do not post—or that he is new to JW.

While it is impossible to know for sure, Christopher, it is most likely you have someone who admires your comments, and wants to read more.

You lucky son of a gun! if only Mr. Ali could do the same for me and find me. I would offer him a big welcome,Texas style that is.

You lucky son of a gun! if only Mr. Ali could do the same for me and find me. I would offer him a big welcome,Texas style that is.

He is a sorry specimen, isn't he?

Moore is just another ungrateful terd who has been afforded opportunities here that he would have never had anywhere else, especially in the countries he seems to adore.

He should order himself a jumbo sized burkha and move to the Middle East.

Sorry for my doubble barreld response,guess I'm just shoouting my mouth, my apologies Sir.

"If you really want to make inroads against Islamic expansion, I have some pretty good ideas as to how it can still be done. You will need to respond to this post, so we can set up a line of communication."

Why don't u send an email to Robert with your ideas? Why does he 'need' to respond to ur post? His email id is public.

"It turns out that I have some vulnerabilities in my personal situation that prevent me from becoming a public figure on this issue. Otherwise, I would be right at the forefront."

Correct. Most of us have some 'vulnerabilities' or don't want to spend 24/7 watching our back for ROPers.

"I just dont understand why they are so adamant on having a mosque close to ground zero"

Because that's their whole point. Destroying the cultural symbol of an unislamic culture, and replacing it with a mosque is centuries old Islamic practice.

"If anything they shud respect the feelings of the common man just the way they expect the non muslims to respect theirs."

You are talking about the "golden rule" - treat others like you want to be treated. This "golden rule" doesnot apply to Islam. There is not a single instance, where Mohammed talks about this rule or any variant. This idea that infidel sensitivities deserve the same respect as muslim sentiments, is alien to Islam.

It's not mind boggling at all. This is precisely and exactly how Mohammed taught them to behave.

Thanks to Thinking_One for his comment. I think it is good to get everybody's input. Some ideas which I think are great may actually turn out to be impossible or dumb ideas, based on something that somebody else knows.

Everybody knows what the possible courses of action are, so a lot of secrecy is not necessarily that valuable.

Somebody named "Egghead" a few days ago agreed with my analysis to a very large extent. I appreciated his post a great deal.

I don't mind communicating with Mr. Spencer in private as long as I have some indication that he is actually interested in what I have to say. So far, I have gotten no such indication.

Hi Cao Moo,
The last two sentences you have are not part of 9:5 (or 9:6, for that matter), unless I'm mistaken.

Courreges W,
Before you go posting that version of 9:5, notice my above reply to our somewhat bovine friend Cao Moo.

Somebody named "Egghead" a few days ago agreed with my analysis to a very large extent. I appreciated his post a great deal.

Arthur, you must be pulling our leg. This is all a joke, right? If it's not, it's even funnier... I have to say, the above statement from you had me laughing.

AJ i think the west has the luxury to correct themselves and isolate islamic extremists becos they are so less in number but in india the scope is miniscule becos ours is the second largest muslim population in the world and also i do reiterate that indian muslims behave much better than their counterparts anywhere else around the world and live in relative harmony with us.

OK thanks man however I did recieve a email in my inbox informing me that this dude was "following" me -- maybe the email was from typepad, yes? Anyway, everybody should check out this -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF-4ihLA_JY -- you can refer people to this when they try to call you "racist" for pointing out the truth about islame

Hi Arthur, You said,

To Mr. Spencer:
I think that if you look at my posts since the last week of August, you will see that what I had anticipated has largely come to pass.
I don't think that anybody "reclaimed 9/11," which I don't think is even possible. Everybody is trying to use the day for their own purposes.

Arthur, this reminds me of a little while ago -- I read The Tao of Physics, and I realized all of a sudden I knew what was going to be the next discovery in quantum reality, and I wrote an email to Michio Kukutami -- he's that guy who won the Nobel in Physics and discovered 37.4 dimensions in quantum dynamical spatiality -- and I don't know why he never answered me, he only gets 300,000 emails a year since his bestseller came out, but anyways, like you predicting really important stuff to Spencer, Arthur, I predicted controversy in physics would continue, to Michio Kukutami, but he didn't respond to me for some reason. Oh well, but anyway, you said,

There is now a small dispute as to how many attended the rally, just as I predicted.

Gosh, how did you realize people would ever dispute something like that Arthur? How could you ever in a million to the millionth power years have possibly known that would happen. I bet nobody never predicted that before, not just in the world, but in the whole universe all 37.4 dimensions! Gosh! Anyways, you said

I was disappointed by Mr. Wilders' speech, because even he did not assert the primary facts (he had almost all conclusions and characterizations about Islam) that form the basis of opposing the GZ mosque.

Gosh, I wish you were there instead of that schlump Geert Wilders, Arthur, you know the primary facts so darn well. I bet you carry them around with you in your wallet. And Geert Wilders probably has never once followed your advice in your emails so you could help him!

Nobody, not even one prominent person, is responding publicly with powerful facts that defeat the claims of bigotry and religious intolerance being made universally by the media and the political leaders.

Wowie jeez, you keep amazing me. You got not only the primary facts but the powerful ones. I wish other people did, too. But not a single person at that rally had powerful facts. If only you was there Arthur! Then there would be at least one prominent person! Oh! If only Robert would listen to you!! I bet the White House has probably not answered your personal phone calls to Obama either, darn them. How dare they!

Your event got practically no press (in part because the media was apparently afraid of itself after the media results of the actions of the well-mustachioed pastor).

Yeah, Robert Spencer, why don't you LISTEN for once to Arthur! He could get you more publicity. He knows about stuff like that, more than you. I mean, yeah Jihad Watch gets only umpteen million unique visitors per month, what's that to what Arthur could drum up.... Robert?? .... Robert????? ..... Robert????????????? ...... Harummph!

Arthur...I don't think Robert is going to answer us. But you know what? Maybe he just had to go to the bathroom, so he stopped watching your conversations and comments for a minute, but he'll be back and start watching what we are saying, and then he'll finally answer you? He's just been taking it easy lately, that's why he hasn't responded. I'm sure he understands how much you have to offer. That's why he's not answering you.

The media likes drama, and your rally provided none. The pastor by himself did more to raise awareness of Islamic insanity than your rally. I generally don't think burning books is a good idea, but in this case I think the world would have been better off if he had not backed down.

Gosh, Arthur, you sure take a bold stance. Don't listen to all the people who say it's really stupid. As long as you state it like that, in that bold way like Prince Gawainevere riding in on a white horse dressed up in such bold style ready to help Robert Spencer and the rest of us, we know you gotta know what your talking about. You're an authority, anybody can tell.

Oh yeah, and you said

Geraldo ridiculed Pamela Geller as an extremist before he even said hello to her -- very unfortunate.

You mean he'll never get to be friends with her now, and how unlucky he is?

Gosh, don't worry Arthur. Pam seems soft-hearted, I bet she'd forgive Geraldo if he asks nice.

Oh yeah, and you said,

Dhimmitude is now official US policy, based upon statements by Obama, the defense secretary, and the general.

Gosh, you know how to pronounce upon official US policy. I never before heard anything that sounded so authoritativey (I mean, like, in-chargey). Lead on, k?

If you really want to make inroads against Islamic expansion, I have some pretty good ideas as to how it can still be done.

You mean it's not too late? Hey, Robert! Robert???? Robert!!!!?????? Hurry up, we don't have much time! You gotta talk to Arthur!!! Oh come on, Robert, put down your tea and stop doing nothing but staring at blank walls for hours on end, and for just a few minutes come and talk to Arthur!!! He knows how to end this nightmare!!

Oh Arthur, I'm sorry. Robert is just not accustomed to your level of activity. He's probably resting or already it's past his bedtime.

Anyway, Arthur, you said to Robert,

You will need to respond to this post, so we can set up a line of communication.

Gosh, this reminds me so much of the time I wrote President Reagan and his national security advisers cause I wanted them to contact me so I could advise them about national security. I used exactly the same words as you, "I have some pretty good ideas" -- except I said it was about national security, and then I even said, "we need to set up a secure line of communication, because I believe foreign intelligence agencies might be watching me and, god forbid those agencies should get in on my ideas before you do, Mr. President. I'm at your service whenever you call." Gosh darn it, Arthur, President Reagan just completely ignored me. I saw no sign of any interest in my ideas. So you said,

It turns out that I have some vulnerabilities in my personal situation that prevent me from becoming a public figure on this issue. Otherwise, I would be right at the forefront.

"It turns out"? Gosh, Arthur, that's kind of a cloudy way to put it.

And you said you have some vulnerabilities in your personal situation? Is "personal situation" a euphemism for, like, private parts? Gosh Arthur, I'm not sure what you mean. It sounds kind of...of...I dunno...gobbledegooky.

Wait. I get it. You're like a spy, like a delta forcey person, so you have to talk in that kind of code type language. You can't say it like a not-spy, like, "I'm so scared and I have allergies and stuff, and I can't risk nicking my finger cause I have a hangnail; otherwise I'd be right up front." You can't give away your secret identity like that. But to keep your spy high government official type cover you can say, "It turns out I have some vulnerabilities in my personal situation." Gosh, that kind of code talk must have taken a lot of executive bureaucrat weasel-word training or spy training or something. Oh Wow. I just realized maybe you did get through to Obama with a personal phone call. You must be the one who told him to use that codey talk about "overseas contingency operations." You are even more brilliant than I ever thought.

You say, "Otherwise, I would be right in the forefront." You mean like, you're basically our leader already? Wow, you are so powerful, leading everyone even before we met you! You're very, kind of...importanty. So anyway, what you were saying is that you'd be the boss of us for sure, except something just turned up in your situation, so you're sorry, you can't grace us with your overlordship, but you can give Robert advice an stuff?

Gosh Arthur, you know, some people kind of appoint themselves leaders over others. I'm so glad you aren't like that.

The episode with the Rev. Terry Jones was sickening to watch play out. The MSM went looking for someone fitting their and Hollywood's image of a fire breathing, knuckle dragging, bigoted fundamentalist modern day version of Elmer Gantry who could be set up as a patsy and then destroyed publicly. They found him in the good Rev. Jones, who was virtually the only one with guts enough to actually carry out a meaningful protest that many Americans, as well as posters here, feel is not only fitting, but is further a completely protected form of free speech.

Did anyone else watch the Morning Joe show on CNBC yesterday, where Jones was invited to be interviewed live? After being introduced he was lectured about Christianity and then, before even speaking a single word, was unceremoniously cut off and dismissed by Mika Brzezinski saying that they didn't really need to hear anything he had to say. I have never seen such brazen disrespect for an invited guest before. In the end it was the Rev. Terry Jones who was the ONLY one in this sorry episode to have acted honorably, with restraint and decency. The rest, Obama, Patraeus, Hillary, all of them, and most particularly the MSM, acted shamefully and disgracefully.

The MSM created this firestorm of controversy around Terry Jones. THEY are the ones responsible for cynically elevating his threatened innocuous act into becoming an international incident.

Of course, by sh*tting on Jones the MSM was really letting the rest of us know how they really feel about us. As if we didn't know already.

I just realized, I think I may know Arthur. Personally. Probably not. But maybe. I think Arthur has been totally pulling our leg, and trying to pull Robert Spencer's. I know an Arthur with this kind of humor. It's subtler, wackier, and funnier than it might appear at first. Arthur, are you the guy whose real initials are I.S.? From Hungary?

Every time a Muslim reacts to criticism or ridicule by threatening to kill the perpetrator - the Muslim should be arrested for threatening to kill. I believe one of the criteria for proving this crime is that the person has the ability to carry out the act. Well, there is ample evidence to show that thousands of angry Muslims would kill you for offending their religion.

What sort of world are we living in when free speech is being stifled, and criticism of religion is rewarded with a death sentence. Free speech must be defended. A decline in free speech is a decline in democracy.

What next? Negative comments about everything and anything will be outlawed for fear of offending someone.

The personal friend of mine to whom I referred has not infrequently used "Arthur" as a sort of alternative first name. When the Arthur on this comments thread said this,

Somebody named "Egghead" a few days ago agreed with my analysis to a very large extent. I appreciated his post a great deal.
I could hardly believe the person who posted that was not pulling our leg. Given his earlier entertaining -- because idiotically, foolishly self-important -- appearances at this website (if I remember them correctly) the above line struck me as a sly joke on us all, and reminded me right away of my friend's peculiar sense of humor. If the Arthur on this comments thread is the Arthur I know personally, he doesn't mean what he says at all. I think he is slyly trying to lampoon us. He is projecting the characters he thinks we, or some of us, are. Or otherwise playing with us. The friend I am thinking of has certainly done that at times. I recall his telling me once how a salesperson called him and tried to manipulate him into staying on the phone long enough till the salesman could make a sale. So, for my friend's own entertainment, my friend started manipulating the salesman back, pretending to be friendly and interested, and finding natural reasons to keep shifting the conversation to things completely unrelated to the product the salesman was trying to sell. So my friend would turn to topics like 19th century Russian novels, about which my friend has some things to say. And my friend would share these, and ask the salesman what he thought about it, until the salesman was dieing to get off the phone. Could the Arthur I know be the Arthur here? I wouldn't be surprised.

Well, gratitude, tonight on the news I saw a man in Queensland who had rolled cigarettes (or a joint?) using the Bible and Koran had been suspended from his job and apparently "Muslims" from somewhere in the world had insisted that burning the Koran should be made against the law!
Ah, dear me...how can they keep up with the terrible things we infidels think of which are against their religion?
We need new laws! Against smoking the Koran! Dancing improperly to Sufi music! Laughing at the jokes of conquered peoples! Walking in the middle of the street!

Just imagine the list of things which need to be banned in non-Muslim countries...they wish...

Pour les lecteurs francophones, un article très intéressant intitulé : "comment on vous manipule avec le mot Islamophobie"
http://www.dieucafe.com/2010/09/13/comment-on-vous-manipule-avec-le-mot-islamophobie/

Pour les lecteurs francophones, un article très intéressant intitulé : "comment on vous manipule avec le mot Islamophobie"
http://www.dieucafe.com/2010/09/13/comment-on-vous-manipule-avec-le-mot-islamophobie/

'Living in fear of the 'Religion of Peace'...The movie...
Now playing at a theater near you...

Chapter 23...Rauf the hierophant of superior wisdom and knowledge speaks...Or...The Charlatan and the Media...

Rauf...'Sufis teach that we first must battle and destroy the evil within ourselves by shining upon it the good within..."and then we learn to battle the evil in others by helping their higher selves gain control of their lower selves".

Where in the Quran or hadith is 'higher and lower selves' addressed? A pious Mahoundian has no lower self since he believes in Allah and the 'prophet', and prays five times a day...It is only you kufr who have a lower self, and you have little control over it...Only those who have no lower self can help those who are out of control...
The therapy session starts out with the idea that there is something wrong with the kufr, that must be cured...The diagnosis is Arrogance and evil Q-98:6...The cure is conversion or dhimmitude...or...else...

Rauf covers the 'or else' by his threat of increased terrorism and hard feelings by world ummah...
Rauf is using the fear of the 'Religion of Peace' to push forward the agenda of the 'Religion of Peace'...'Accept and obey my words or the boogy man (Allah) is going to get you'...The media is making Rauf the spokesman for the entire Ummah, a position he is not qualified for...
The dhimmi's are bowing down and kissing the feet of a charlatan...In reality, nothing he says can be trusted...

This comment may be a little late, but...Typepad has been compromised...A 30 second visit to a web site called 'Spencerwatch' got my typepad account attacked, by changing the screen name and limiting the ability to post on any typepad using site...It was fairly easy to fix once I found out the problem was only with typepad...

OT...

Well, gratitude, tonight on the news I saw a man in Queensland who had rolled cigarettes (or a joint?) using the Bible and Koran...

I once knew a down and out man who would scour town for cigarette butts, then he would take them home re-roll the cigarettes in newsprint, and smoke them...He died of lung cancer...

You nailed it. Excellent localization, I'll arrange the clandestine meeting with Artful Arthur, I'll be the nun wearing the cornette headgear and cleated pumas shoes sprinting up and down the Sistine chapel attempting my flying nun stunt.

OK thanks man however I did recieve a email in my inbox informing me that this dude was "following" me -- maybe the email was from typepad, yes?
............

Yes, that would be TypePad that emailed you—it's automatic—not Dr. ALI himself.

I have to admit, though—if I heard some guy named "Dr. ALI" was "following" me, and I didn't know anything else about it, I might be pretty alarmed myself.

Don't panic, Chris. As gravenimage and others have said this is a common feature of blog commenting software. It just means someone found you interesting enough to want to be alerted whenever you make comments. I'm a regular commenter (using a different handle) over at that liberal rag Huffington Post. There is a small coterie of like minded thinkers (includi9ng maybe some regular JW commenters, in fact?) who regularly take on the purveyors of Leftist pablum and Islamist excuses. I follow something like 100 people I find interesting enough to read, and I have approximately an equal number "following" me, some of the latter being hostile.

In setting up the account one has an option of having an email sent every time someone "following" you makes a comment, or responds to one of yours. It's a great feature. I have a separate dummy gmail account that I use specifically for this (as well as other gmail accounts for other blogs I comment on), so that my regular email is not affected.

@ Christopher Martel

I received one some time back from a dude named "Robert" who declared that he was only following "bigots"


"Robert4
Everyone I follow is a bigot, a racist, and/or objectively pro-terror. They post their filth on Pamela Geller's blog Atlas Shrugs (atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com). Words have meanings, ideas lead to actions. We can avoid evil but we cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding evil. Never forget."

Go have a look at his dashboard, he could now be the one using the handle "Dr. Ali"

http://profile.typepad.com/robert4

It happened because I logged into Atlas using type pad. Pamela changed it so that we have several ways to sign in so this guy couldn't continue to harass her posters. I try not to use a type pad login at Atlas. That's probably where he picked you up.

Anyway, here's your dashboard and "Dr Ali's". I doubt he has your e-mail addy.

Here's your Typepad Dashboard
http://profile.typepad.com/srg4you

Look at "follow" and you'll see that someone is following you. Click on the number & it takes you to guess who, Dr. Ali.

Here's Dr Ali's
http://profile.typepad.com/doc2ali

To focus on the Pastor just threatening to burn Qurans instead of the jihadi murderers and vandals is the same cowardice and false guilt we use when human shields are used and killed by jihadists. Just because Sharia law bestows privilege on non-Muslims and allows plunder and subjugation and murder and abuse of non-Muslims, women, and converts from Islam does not mean that we must accept and provide for it.

http://ow.ly/2EjrY This beheaded 12 year olds crime:? She was a Christian. Same for the others with her.


http://ow.ly/2EifB Yea, We Are Different in America And I Want It To Stay That Way!

http://ow.ly/2GWxE Rape of 4 year old by Imam is perfectly OK because it is written….

http://ow.ly/2EhTu How To Stone A Young Woman , Crush Her Skull And Kick Her To Death by The Followers Of A loving Religion!


http://ow.ly/2EhEj The goal of Islam is to rule the entire world and submit all of mankind to the faith of Islam. Any nation or power that gets in the way of that goal, Islam will fight and destroy

http://ow.ly/2Ei9q Understanding Muslims. The Good, The Bad, The Ugly!

http://ow.ly/2EhJB Why the Mosque Should Be Built In "Death Valley, CA"

http://ow.ly/2Eibp Can We Trust This Imam and This Muslim Center? U.S. vs. Holy Land

http://ow.ly/2EhLN The truth about Isalm and Sharia Law

http://ow.ly/2EhO9 How Dark The World Turns. Night Is Upon Us. Iran Is A world Instigator That Must Be Stopped.

http://ow.ly/2EhQL Stop Muslim Immigration to the United State

http://ow.ly/2EhYz The Islamization of Paris Hell No! We Are Not Giving Up Our Nation To The Muslims!

http://ow.ly/2Ei0r The Quran-Burning - A Perfect Ending


http://ow.ly/2Bdzu Robert Fisk: The crimewave that shames the world - Robert Fisk, Commentators - The Independent


http://ow.ly/2H3Do Sharia: A challenge the Political Elites Are Ignoring At Our Peril!

http://ow.ly/2HKeA A German’s View of Islam!

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter