Bill O'Reilly fawns over anti-Semitic Islamic supremacist Ahmed Rehab of Hamas-linked CAIR

A real "stand up guy," Joe Kaufman of Americans Against Hate, has this:

FOX NEWS' BILL O'REILLY PRAISES ANTI-SEMITIC REPRESENTATIVE OF HAMAS-RELATED GROUP

CALLS CAIR'S AHMED REHAB A "STAND UP GUY"

(New York, NY) On Monday night, October 25th, popular Fox News television host Bill O'Reilly praised CAIR spokesman Ahmed Rehab, calling him a "stand up guy."

O'Reilly had Rehab on the show to discuss the subject of Muslims.

Not once did O'Reilly challenge Rehab about the Hamas ties of his organization or about Rehab's anti-Semitism.

CAIR or the Council on American-Islamic Relations was founded by Hamas operatives in 1994, under the leadership of then-global head of Hamas, Mousa Abu Marzook. The U.S. Justice Department has linked CAIR to the financing of Hamas.

Rehab, O'Reilly's guest, has refused to condemn Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist organizations. Rehab has also exhibited anti-Semitic tendencies, claiming that there is a "Jewish control over the media" and that "Jewish film producers... predate on weak minorities by default."...

Who is tonight's guest, Bill? David Duke?

Pamela Geller has some trenchant observations here.

The thuggish Rehab has also spoken up in defense of the Islamic supremacist group Hizb-ut-Tahrir's right to hold its convention in Chicago (Hizb-ut-Tahrir is banned in many countries), while working to suppress the freedom of speech of anti-jihadists.

Ahmed_Rehab2.jpg

| 33 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

33 Comments

| Leave a comment

Ted Baxter, meet Ahmed Rehab.

Rehab is fibbing...Either that or he does not read his Quran...

Ever notice how these Islamic mouthpieces tend to answer questions with other questions to avoid answering? Ibrahim Hooper did the same thing with Megyn Kelly.

Again with the thing! We will never be rid of that bizarre photograph.

I slighly disagree. O'Reilly gave Rehab a fairly hard time but nothing like as hard a time as Paxman (UK) would have given him. Paxman wouldn't have ended "stand-up guy" or anything approaching that and would have repeated the question if Rehab failed to answer. The US needs a Paxman.

Rehab read out an apparent May press release which ended "as a faith group" Muslims abhorred the Times Square bomber.
Eh? Is that the usual Taquiyya and Kitman?

Slightly not slighly. As for "as a faith group" what I meant was is he eliminating the POLITICAL aims of Islam. That is on a spiritual level we abhor it but not on a political level?
The addition of "as a faith group" in the press statement leaves the questions. If the Muslims of America really meant it then "as a faith group" was unnecessary.

I lost my respect for O'Reilly when he had a guest who was in favor of sterilizing retarded and disabled women (only women--evidently retarded tally-whacker is okay)and he seemed to agree with her.

O'Reilly and Rehab are meant for each other. Rehab is a "pretty boy", who looks femme enough for O'Reilly to get turned on, and not be disgusted. Yes, I know Bill's married, and has children--but he doesn't like women much, despite that.

P.S.

I tried to find a reference to the episode I mentioned above, but was unable. It was several years ago, in the late nineties.

It's not gone unnoticed that when Mr. O'Reilly speaks of "Muslim (world) anger against the US" it is always in the context of US support for Israel, and nothing but US support for Israel.

O'Reilly weighed in on the controversy over Mel Gibson's 2004 movie, "The Passion of Christ." Jewish leaders and organizations (particularly the ADL / Abraham Foxman) expressed some reasonable concerns about the movie, in the way it was edited; how the Jews were portrayed in the film. Might it stir anti-Semitism, etc.? (I've had significant (!) disagreements with Foxman over the years but not over this issue, especially on Israel.)

As the controversy became heated, Bill O'Reilly took to the air on the side of Gibson, who he described as a friend and business partner. O'Reilly's radio program was then syndicated here in central Florida. O'Reilly warned there would be a "backlash" (or a huge public backlash) against the people who were critical of Gibson and / or Gibson's film.

I took it to be a not-so-veiled warning against Gibson's largely Jewish critics. As it turned out, Foxman's instincts about Gibson proved correct. After Gibson's (July 2006) tirade against the Jews (and our propensity to foment all the wars around the globe), I did not hear or read anything further from Bill O'Reilly on his friend Mel Gibson.

On Monday night, October 25th, popular Fox News television host Bill O'Reilly praised CAIR spokesman Ahmed Rehab, calling him a "stand up guy."
......................

It is true that Bill O'Reilly is not well educated about Islam–and, as a result, tends to miss the questions to ask.

However, I must address the "stand up guy" issue. Posters here have been angered by this before—but O'Reilly refers to *any* guest who knows he may have be asked some tough questions as a "stand up guy" just for coming on the show, rather than refusing to appear at all.

It *does not* mean that O'Reilly admires or otherwise respects his guest—and it certainly doesn't mean he agrees with him.

While I wish O'Reilly were better informed about Islam, he at least seems to have some common-sense qualms. The fact that he—deservedly or not—has a *huge* audience means that any anti-Jihad stance he takes reaches a lot of people.

I agree with you, gravenimage, about O'Reilly's signature "stand up guy" remark. He uses this term for any controversial guest, even including Dougie Hooper, who is willing to appear on his program. But O'Reilly, like Glenn Beck, is not knowledgeable about Islam or the status of CAIR, ISNA, etc., which leads to his missing some fairly obvious questions to ask his guests. The problem with his using it in the present case is that it gives the appearance of according respect to someone who doesn't actually deserve it.

Bill needs to take some time off from his busy schedule of radio and TV shows to study and learn about the subject of Islam, and not from its apologists but from its major critics like Robert or Daniel Pipes. This is a major news subject these days and for O'Reilly not to know something about it beyond superficial talking points tossed out without understanding the underlying issues is unconscionable.

The problem with Bill is that he asks these CAIR representatives ,or apologists, on the show, and is not equipped with enough knowledge to properly refute the soothing lies that they spin. And then he has guests like Mary Katherine Ham, and Juan Williams to analyze what just happened. No disrespect indented to either one, but their knowledge isn’t any deeper than Bills. The No Spin Zone. LOL Hmmmmm, I wonder if one of the conditions was that there would be nobody else on during the interview. But, if that was the case, then that should have been disclosed. Back to square one.

You make some good points. My problem with your central argument is this. A man of O'Reilly's stature cannot afford to be ignorant about Islam. Much of what I hear from O'Reilly appears to be rooted in fear (or an absence of moral courage) for whatever reason. For example, O'Reilly exhibits incredible trepidation at the idea Israel might destroy Iran's nuclear capability. O'Reilly fears a violent response from Iran, as though the United States and Israel are incredibly impotent. Who is impotent but Mr. O'Reilly?

Beyond that, O'Reilly has a good staff. If he is ignorant and his staff is ignorant, heads need to roll, don't you think? Something I keep hearing from O'Reilly time and time again is that this conflict is "not religious," but entirely political.

Why is he saying that? How can both he and his staff be this ignorant?

Why did he interrupt P. Geller twice (on the video on her site) when she tried to explain that CAIR is a criminal enterprise. The second time she tried to bring it up, O'Reilly dismissed it saying (paraphrasing), "Everyone know that." That the point, isn't it? EVERYONE DOES NOT KNOW THAT.

If Fox News analysts want to interview these CAIR thugs,

1) The public should be informed every time that CAIR has ties to Islamic terrorist organizations, CAIR will not condemn jihadist killers like Osama bin Laden by name; CAIR will not condemn but supports Hamas and Hezbollah; CAIR supports the imposition of Sharia law on the West, etc.

2) There should ALWAYS be a scholar or an expert of terrorism and national security available - such as R. Spencer or S. Emerson - to refute CAIR's lies.

Eastview, you wrote: "But O'Reilly, like Glenn Beck, is not knowledgeable about Islam or the status of CAIR, ISNA, etc....."

On Islam you could be right but not on the status of CAIR. I've watched this video more than once; the one whereby O'Reilly allowed P. Geller to (sort of) respond to Nihad Awad's lies and slanders:

Watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhBZeGL3-HI

If you watch it, you will see clearly that he does NOT want the public to know that CAIR is a criminal, terror enterprise. It's not that O'Reilly is not knowledgeable about CAIR. He and other Fox News analysts want the public to believe CAIR is a credible Islamic spokes-organization for mainstream Islam.

What is that in your opinion Eastview?

How often has O'Reilly interviewed Spencer? Michael Savage used to interview Spencer. I haven't heard Spencer on Savage for many months. He interviews B. Gabriel now. My local central Fla. radio host says they will have Spencer on but it's been months now since he said it. Why doesn't R. Limbaugh interview Spencer instead of Dick Cheney and Karl Rove? Does Hannity interview Spencer like he does D. Horowitz? If not, why not? Does Hannity have Spencer on his radio program or his Fox News segment at night? Why are these people intentionally ignorant about Islam Eastview?

BILL O'REILLY AND THE MYTH OF MODERATE ISLAM

Whenever Bill O'Reilly's debating a guest on the Factor about the universal "Moslem problem" of war and terror-there's been 40,000 victims of deadly Moslem terror since 9/11-he repeats like a mantra the following words: 'most Moslems in the world are moderate peace loving people who are against the jihadists; and if only these "moderates" would rise up against the jihadists and join the United States in its War on Terror they would be defeated and the war would be won.'

This all sounds very reasonable. In fact it is the conventional wisdom on the subject which we heard from George Bush in numerous speeches and now from Barack Obama who is bending over backwards to appease the Moslem world in a futile attempt to win their love and join us against the radicals. But facts are facts, and truth is truth and the truth is that Bill O'Reilly and this conventional wisdom about the war we are in and its solution are flat out wrong.....

Click my name to continue reading the article on my blog.


Wildjew, I don't disagree with anything you say, and I also wonder about the factors that dictate who radio and TV hosts like O'Reilly or Beck or Limbaugh or Jackson invite on their shows. But I can't respond in more detail now (got an appointment to run to) but will get back to this later.

O'Reilly considers Geert a racist and won't have him on nor any of the more well known Muslim apostate's so that tells me his position in more in line with CAIR than Spencer's and Geller's.

Just another rich dhimmi and blowhard.


Interesting. Thanks.

Bill has already seen what happens when he dips his toe in the water of truth, all by himself. People call him racist, and walk off their own show. He can't hire someone to stand by his side for the rest of his career. Someone who knows how to back up the scary truth with knowledgeable facts. But, he could set up a forum where he pits the knowledgeable against the taqiyya artists. That way he wouldn't have to try to defend statements he is incapable of defending.

O'Reilly needs to take a lesson from Megyn Kelly

O'Reilly is a big buffoon. He is a phony. I recognized him as such when he demonized the entire Serbian people.
As I said here before, a double-litmus test must be applied to get a sense of a person: 1) total support for Israel & 2) total support for Serbia. Anyone who fails either of those tests, or both, is a phony, or worse.

Ruslan Tokhchukov, EnragedSince1999.

Good point. I don't understand all these attacks against Serbs. Weren't they allied with the democracies against Nazism?

I recall that, and it's one of many, many lapses BO has had over the years.

O'Reilly is all about himself. He writes idiotic books about morality, mashes on some gal, and pays her off. He is no more an author, or moral authority, than my cat.

He does seem to garner a large audience, but he's pompous, predictable, and straddles the middle. He once eviscerated a Thomas More Law Center attorney whose client fired a lying transsexual applicant. I don't watch the guy.

CAIR sent one their humungous Qur'ans to me some years ago. Sure enough, in chapter 5 verse 38, just like Usama bin Laden's copy and Ahmed Rehab's copy I'm sure, God commands the amputation of a human being's hands for theft.

This 'extremist' nonsense will begin to crumble when BillO and other 'journalists/analyists' inform themselves enough to point out to their 'stand up' Muslim guests that Somalia's Al Shabab Muslims are currently amputating their fellow Muslim's hands because that's what the Qur'an tells them to do and to ask those same 'stand up' Muslim guests to explain whether they think the Al Shabab boys are extremists for merely doing what the Qur'an says and to ask those same 'stand up' Muslim guests where on the planet they believe this divine punishment is morally acceptable to them and whether--like the former Cat Stevens--they would do what Islam expects of its every slave; or if they believe God got it wrong.

A lot of 'the folks' have been slinging the extremist line out ipso fact but none that I'm aware of have been challenged to explain--in their own words--what it means.

Ditto the 'twisted/hijacked a great religion' line.

As they say, 'citations, please'.

I believe that Ted Baxter called U.C. Berkeley lecturer Hatem "how come we don't have an intifada in this country" Bazian a "stand up guy" during their interview a few years ago too.

The Father Guido Sarducci look alike Prince Alwaleed bin Talal will be pleased with his faithful servant, Habib O'Reilly.

"A stand-up guy" to O'Reilly is someone who comes on his show.

If Hitler came on "The Factor," O'Reilly would say, "I think you're wrong, but you are a stand-up guy for coming on and facing the music."

However, if Hitler went on MSNBC instead, he would not only be wrong, and a hateful man, but a coward who "won't come on The Factor and explain himself."

O'Reilly is a coward who plays a tough guy on TV.

While Islamic jihadists are working night and day to conquer Christendom, destroy Judeo-Christian civilization and reduce us all to dhimmis, O'Reilly devotes all his attention to fighting "The War on Christmas" by secular progressives.

If O'Reilly was a stand-up guy, he would take on the jihadists, but that might be dangerous both to his physical health (as jihadists can be explosive) and his career, given the Saudi ownership of Fox News.

Rehab is such a small, lying, conniving, disembling little prick, isn't he?

He doesn't look any better without the halal lipstick, either.

"Father Guido Sarducci"

Heh. SNL needs a new Fr. Guido Sarducci, who could sponsor a "Find the Face of Muhammad in the Pizza" contest! BTW, I suppose you know that Fr. Sarducci was arrested in the Vatican for impersonating a priest. The tip off was the cowboy boots he was wearing. :)

Getting back to your question about O'Reilly and CAIR.

Yes, it is distressing to see O'Reilly's softball pitches to his Muslim guests, and the way he effectively dismissed Pamela when she was on his show. Although it is obvious that O'Reilly is personally not knowledgeable on many of the issues that get discussed on his show (how could he be - there are only 24 hrs in a day, and that's not enough time to become expert on all the issues he discusses, what with his books and all the time spent in make up, etc.), I think the real problem lies in the stance Fox itself takes on major issues, of which Islam is only one.

The issues discussed on any given show and the guests who are invited are laid out well in advance. Who decides which guests to invite, who scripts the questions, who decides what level of political correctness needs to be adhered to, etc.? Presumably there are pre-show staff meetings to go over the line-up, the time line is laid out for all the segments of the hour-long show (usually an individual segment is something like 20 minutes, with a commercial break half way through), etc. Busy, busy, busy. No time for reflection on the actual content of the segments, and the presenters are more concerned with the form of the presentation than with actual content. They leave it up to audience polls to provide them with feedback about impact, and then they adjust the format in such a way as to maximize their audiences.

But, yes, O'Reilly is a bozo and a blow hard, but I think he is naive and just too full of himself to recognize or admit to his ignorance, and his statements about Geert and about "terrorism not reflecting the views of most Muslims, only a small number of extremists" actually are boilerplate scripts handed to him by those who formulate what the corporate stance will be. Geraldo is the same. Even Megyn Kelly, who I have watched moderate here fiery and passionate opinions over time as she has moved up the ladder, are subject to corporate discipline. These people are the on-screen faces who present what at root is a corporate stance on whatever issue is discussed, and they are subject to corporate discipline if they deviate too far from the party line.

The people who really need to have their feet held to the fire are Roger Ailes, O'Reilly's boss, and of course, Rupert Murdoch, Ailes' boss. They are the ones who decide what the corporate stance about CAIR will be, and yes, I agree that Fox appears to accept CAIR as the "official" organization representing Muslims. Fox advertises itself as "Fair and Balanced" which means that they try to have two sides of a controversy represented in a segment. CAIR is readily available, they have spokesmen like Rehab and Hooper ready at the drop of a hat to come on the show and defend Islam, so that's why they were there.

CAIR would go away in an instant if their connections to terrorism were to receive the exposure that is deserved. That is why the work that Pamela and Robert are doing to expose these connections is so important and needs to be kept before the public. Of course, the other thing that needs doing is for the Justice Department to investigate and document the connections of the principals behind CAIR (and ISNA and MSA, etc.) and bring them to justice, either with jail terms or deportations. It won't happen under Eric Holder or Obama, of course, but there's a new storm brewing in the West that will soon blow these guys from office, and under the new management the necessary steps can be taken to deal with CAIR.

Almost forgot. Rehab was an @$$hole on the show, arrogant, argumentative, all the characteristics we have learned to associate with angry Muslims. O'Reilly actually did a moderately good job calling Rehab on his clumsy attempts to avoid answering questions, but he didn't persist in holding Rehab's feet to the fire until he answered. And yes, not wearing lipstick does nothing to improve Rehab's appearance.

Stopped watching the bloviator long ago!

I think "fawning" might be a bit over the top in describing O'Reilly's treatment of Rehab. "Moderate Muslims" & "stand up guy" might be worth a smirk,but I don't think O'Reilly let him get away with any crap. Antisemitism is part of the cancerous theology of Islam,but Rehab didn't articulate it on camera. I think we ought to educate rather than bash people like O'Reilly. H's got more potential for recognizing the Islamic threat than probably 90% of our current political commentators.

Except for his comment about Rehab being a "Stand up guy" and not asking some very pertinent questions, this interview by Mr. O'Reilly is more pointed and, in my humble opinion, reflects a welcome increase in the scrutiny over the Muslim community and it's role in aiding and abetting Muslim extremism, intentionally or unintentionally, by Fox News which has heretofore been as blind as every other practitioner of the Journalist profession in America. Remember, not too long ago, none other than Charles Krauthammer and Glenn Beck denounced Geert Wilders as some sort of radical kook. Let's hope the pace picks up and spreads exponentially. It's long overdo.

Just when I thought it was safe to read Jihad Watch again! There's that picture of Rehab! Robert, in the name of all human decency - please, a warning label or something? Yech! Double yech!

What a joke ...

O'Reilly ends by stating that Rehab is a "stand up guy", when in fact he is an ARROGANT guy! What, is Bill kidding? Probably! Rehab is a guest on The O'Reilly Factor, yet he behaves as if he's running the show. And that other CAIR clown, Hooper, behaves the same way during interviews. Those two always want to seem *in control*, when all they do is prove that they have something to hide with their defensive posturing. And the truth they want to hide is that islam is NOT really a religion of peace. That much is clear.

I would loooove to see O'Reilly get on the subject of their "prophet muhammad" and the evil life that he led. Now wouldn't THAT topic create a firestorm of fury from ALL muslims. Even the so-called moderate and peaceful muslims would come out of the woodwork and show their fangs. Hey Iran can threaten to wipe Israel and the US off of the map, and the moderates remain silent; yet ask them legitimate questions about "muhammad", and you'll need to run for cover for protection from their response! ...muslims are such hypocrites.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter