Congressman Keith Ellison (D-Muslim Brotherhood) likens resistance to Islamic supremacism to racism

Why do such shows go out of their way to find the scariest, most cartoonish Muslims possible and present them as spokespeople for Muslims? -- Congressman Ellison (D-Muslim-American-Society)

Is it because they're the ones behind the attacks on the Free World? They are 'scariest' because they quote Islamic scriptures accurately. They are 'cartoonish' because they revel in their classic villain roles with relish, usually with a AK-47 by their side. They are 'spokespeople' because they find a willing audience in Dar-al-Islam everywhere. Dig it? ... Now, Congressman Ellison, what was your point again?

If having a problem with Islam is racism, then maybe we'd better check out the skin color of the so-called prophet of Islam, Mohammed.

Bukhari vol 1 no 63

While we were sitting with the prophet in the mosque, a man came riding on a camel. He made the camel kneel down in the mosque, tied its foreleg and then said, “Who among you is Mohammed?” At that time the prophet was sitting among us, leaning on his arm. We replied, “The white man reclining on his arm.”

Bukhari vol iv, no 744
Narrated Ismasil bin Abi Khalid: I heard Abu Juhaifa saying, “I saw the prophet and Al-Hasan bin Ali resembled him. “ I said to Abu Juhaifa, Describe him (Allah's apostle) for me.” He said, “He was white and his beard was black with some white hair in it. …...”

Nope, nothing there about having dark skin. So, we're in the clear. The psychotic ideology is all there is left to object to.

Now Ellison, how about some answers to questions about Islam's aim to crush free speech and human rights. Mmmmmmmm.........??

Why do such shows go out of their way to find the scariest, most cartoonish Muslims possible and present them as spokespeople for Muslims? -- Congressman Ellison (D-Muslim-American-Society)

What he is really saying is why does the media let the cat out of the bag about the Muslim Brotherhood's nefarious plans to install islam in America.

"Muslim Brotherhood’s Secret Plan: “The Project”"

http://www.worldthreats.com/?p=349

Jon Stewart at least lets his guests speak and doesn't cut their mics and for long interviews puts it all up on the web.

You should try taking him down Robert. (I know, I sound like a broken record, but you could really shine a spotlight on Islam on his show to an audience that's generally brainwashed on that subject)

Imagine a respected TV show or news magazine article with the title, "Should Americans Fear Black People?"...

Now replace black with Muslim, and that's just about how ABC News treated Islam and Muslims this past weekend, on 20/20 and This Week with Christiane Amanpour.
.................

This is absolutely absurd for two reasons—firstly, as Mr. Spencer points out, Islam is not a race. It is nothing intrinsic, it is an *ideology*, and like any ideology—fascism, communism, Catholicism, Scientology, rational positivism, democracy—it can be evaluated by anyone, and be deemed positive, neutral, mixed, negative, or something that presents an imminent danger.

Secondly, to consider the aggressively dhimmified Christiane Amanpour—who has consistently whitewashed Islam and vilified anyone who has suggested it presents a grave threat—is patently ridiculous.

Amanpour typically presents a few stock images of Islamic terrorism or "extremism", then goes on to indicate that she does not believe they represent true slam or the sentiments of most Muslims.

Apparently even this was too much for for Keith Ellison, who—like any "good" Muslim—does not want to see *any* criticism of Islam, even in passing.

More:

We are having a national conversation about belonging... Recent news shows and media reports do nothing to shed light or understanding on this national conversation, which is too bad....
.................

Ellison here neatly sidesteps the vision many Muslims have of "belonging" in the West—which is not assimilation and equality, but is "dominating and not being dominated"—the imposition of Shari'ah law, oppression of Infidels, and destruction of the very constitution that Ellison *is supposed to be defending* as a congressman.

More:

An aside: several people have written to me asking why I was so quiet during the ABC "This Week" panel hosted by nakedly biased pseudo-journalist Christiane Amanpour. In fact, I wasn't: they taped two hours and only broadcast one, cutting out much of what I said.
.................

This, in and of itself, is common in journalism—except when live, television and sometimes even radio interviews are initially much longer than the final broadcast, just as most print interviews and reports gather much more material than is used in the final piece.

This is done to gather a large amount of interesting material that can be edited to avoid "dead space" and make the final piece pithier.

It can also, unfortunately, be used to create an entirely biased piece, which gives an entirely false impression of the interview as a whole. Disgustingly, this appears to be the case with Mr. Spencer's treatment here.

Why does everything have to have something to do with "racism"? These guys think that if they play the race card we'll all shut up and slink away because we don't want to be seen as a racist. Sorry, ain't gonna happen. We all know we're not racists regarding the muslims, since *yawn* islam is not a race.

The whole race thing is so tiresome, but the people that like to play the card know it works(worked) in some circles.

They've played THE RACE CARD so often, it's now getting worn, tattered and torn.

"Imagine a respected TV show or news magazine article with the title, "Should Americans Fear Black People?" ...Wouldn't a more accurate analogy be "Should Americans Fear Nazis?"

Opposition to Islam is not about race. That's a lie and an insult from Ellison to all who oppose Islam because it's anti-human rights. I think the KKK and those types are disgusting.

Here's an example, one of many, of why people really oppose Islam (I guess Ellison wants to hide this sort of thing):

On page 222 (326 in the Arabic) of THE EARLIEST MUSLIM BIOGRAPHY OF MUHAMMAD, HE AFFIRMS THAT THOSE WHO DO NOT FOLLOW HIM WILL BE SLAUGHTERED

Abu jahl said to them: "Muhammad alleges that if you follow him you will be kings of the Arabs and the Persians. Then after death you will be raised to gardens like those of the Jordan. But if you do not follow him you will be slaughtered, and when you are raised from the dead you will be burned in the fire of hell." The apostle [Muhammad] came out to them with a handful of dust saying: "I do say that."

Ellison should be ashamed of himself. If his Islam has any worth, it shouldn't include lying about these kinds of things and smearing others.

I can't stand Ellison. He is a disgrace to our country. Oh, and Keith - your hate-filled mass-murder "Kill the Infidels" barbaric ideology SUCKS.

I admit I did not take much notice beyond "At a time when our nation is seeing a rise in intolerant behavior, crossing every cultural line, whether based on race, religion or sexual orientation" for I knew very well it would somehow be the Infidel who was blamed and not the Quran's inherent intolerance and supremacism.
And the Muslim is always offended. Always. This hateful hypocrisy is tiresome.

Here in the netherlands most muslims are moroccan or turkish, so at least we don't get the accusation that being against islam is racism. Then again, we get the standard 'any criticism = islamophobia' garbage.

Yes Muslims like Keith Ellison are genuinely upset with that ABC production precisely because it was NOT a total whitewash - too much truth got squeaked in in spite of heavy editing of Mr. Spencer edifications. If the program is not going to be a ignorant Kumbayya whitewash on Islam for the sucker infidels Muslims will be mad.

BTW this WP article nicely supplied links to useful websites of Robert Spencer, Ayaan Hirsi and Franklin Graham (thanks, Keith, they can use the free advertisement). I've notice that Jihadwatch.org is still climbing on the charts
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/jihadwatch.org+hotair.com+dailykos.com/

However the whole left side of Amanpour could have much used some debate coaching for such programs. They should have followed a number of rules so that more relevant info got in that would have been too difficult to edit out. - I won't presume to lecture here unless let Mr. Spencer et al cares to read them.

"The Muslim Brotherhood's Conquest of Europe"

(by Lorenzo Vidino, 2005)

http://www.meforum.org/687/the-muslim-brotherhoods-conquest-of-europe

There were the obligatory clips of terrorist training camps, the planes flying into the twin towers, the victims of so-called 'honor killings.' The Muslim experts - looking officially 'Islamic' in their long beards and hats - included one declaring that one day the flag of Islam would fly over the White House.

How about 16179 attacks by Jihadis world wide? Does that cut it? Should we worry?

What race? Ellison isn't even a good bullshitter. He isn't articulate enough, and we should hope that he keeps on flapping that mouth of his.

Ellison is an enabler of evil. I have come to the conclusion, irrevocable I might add, that anyone who promotes Islam, or who describes as bigots those who criticize Islam for all its warped and supremacist tenets, is an advocate of wickedness, either a willing enabler or a dupe supporting an ideology in Islam which is an enemy of liberty.

I cherish liberty, therefore I oppose, indeed despise, its enemies. This is why I have come to hate Islam for it is unquestionably an enemy of liberty. Yes, "hate" is not too strong a word. After all, who would say that those who "hate" Nazism are extremists? Am I comparing Islam to Nazism? You betcha'. They're both totalitarian ideologies. Only difference is one is secular and the other spiritual (though no true spirituality exists in Islam---it is a dead form of spiritualism which characterizes it).

veteranoutrage.com

I am sorry but i call it as i see it
This guy is either outright working for the islamic nazis
or is selling all of america out by sending all our secrets to his friends the muslim brotherhood who then email it to the taliban..

Dont tell me to be nice
not after all the horrors committed by these muslim nazi child molesting mass butchering psychopaths..

veteranoutrage.com

I'm sick and tired of people who liken Islamophobia to anti-Semitism or racism, it has become a common way of proceeding against critics of Islam in the Western worldby now, part of stealth jihad, so Ellison is no exception. It's not only stupid, but it's malicious and insidious as well, critics of Islam are slandered for telling the truth about a horrible, barbaric Nazi ideology. In a way it's ludicrous, but worst of all lots of people believe that sort of crap. What we need is information and enlightenment, thanks a lot, Robert for keeping us informed.

Of course people who resist Islamicization in America are "racist". It's the last arrow in the Left's quiver: tar those whom you don't like with the racism brush.

Ellison is untouchable because he is a Leftist, African-American, and Muslim. The major media would never look into his connections with the Ikhwan for precisely those reasons.

Some one should ask this creep what race is islam! MSM cannot even a credible reporter to do this very easy question!

Ellison himself is pretty cartoonish, and his Islam of deceit is just another form of the multifaceted mosaik that makes up the Islamic strategy of conquest.

Scratch the surface, and you'll find that Ellison and Chaudrey are not so different when it comes to the goals of Islam.

For these types, the race card comes in handy. Why not use it.....?

Keith Ellison:
"We are having a national conversation about belonging. The threatened Qur'an burning in Florida and the controversy over the proposed Islamic Center in lower Manhattan are examples of this national conversation about whether America can stretch her arms wide enough to embrace Muslims too."

I think that it's not fair to look at this conversation as concerning only America. In the 21st century we live in global village. We humans now know much about and much influence each other on a worldwide scale.

And by their own admission many believers consider their religion and their God, prophet the "organisation" they give their highest loyalty and allegiance too. Ihsanoglu of the OIC also said that Muslims owe their highest allegiance to the Ummah. And how many (influential) Muslims have denied it?

If Muslims want America to embrace them too, they should first clearly and in big numbers and percentages declare that America and its laws and values are what they give their highest loyalty and allegiance too. Embracing should come from 2 sides, not 1.

Or, Muslims should state clearly that they give their utmost loyalty to a religion/ ideology that has been clearly shown to be in contradiction with an essential part of America's democratic laws and values.

And that choice is crucial, Islam and Muslims are in part hostile to America's governing system, laws. And that claim has a lot of evidence and clues behind it. And the burden of proof is on the Muslims and their defenders to disprove it.

Islam-Defenders now consciously or unconsciously keep telling us to trust and respect Muslims as a matter of course, without any questions asked.

And if Muslims do not give their highest loyalty to America and its laws, but to Islam and its laws, and the Ummah, then only looking at America is indeed very unfair. Because if we look at the world faithwise, then Islam GETS the FAIR treatment FROM the others, but GIVES the UNFAIR treatment TO the others. In their respective countries.

The Muslims can't have it both ways; AND being first and foremost connected with Islam and the Ummah AND demanding absolute equality under the American law and trust and respect for which they did nothing to earn and deserve it.

Is this guy in any danger of being voted out in the November elections? Because he's gotta go.

It shouldn't be forgotten, either, that it wasn't just South America that took in a whole pile of Nazis fleeing justice.

Lots and lots of Nazis who jumped ship after HItler's defeat fled to the Muslim Middle East -to places like Egypt and Syria - where they were welcomed with open arms and settled in as snug as bugs in a rug. Many participated in the Jihad against the Jews as soon as it was launched.

John Roy Carlson, in his book 'Cairo to Damascus' - if you haven't read it, *do*, it contains one of the first detailed and intelligent discussions, in a book widely read in the English-speaking world, of the Muslim Brotherhood or Ikhwan, its motives and aims - describes how he met quite a few thoroughly unrepentant Nazis who were busily assisting the Arab Muslims to attack the Jews of newborn Israel.

Many, perhaps most of these Nazis hiding out in the Muslim world converted to Islam, sooner or later; and by conviction and choice, not because of coercion. One of the best known of such converts from Nazism to Islam - perhaps one should view them as moving, logically, from the rip-off to the original, from Hitler's copy of Islam, to Islam itself - is perhaps one of Goebbels' pet propagandists, Nazi scholar and orientalist Johann Von Leers - you can read, in full, one of Leers' poisonously anti-semitic and fawningly Islamophile articles, in Andrew Bostom's anthology 'The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism'.

Pursuant to the above: it should be noted that Hitler did have some knowledge of Islam.

Specifically, he had read the writings of a jihad-minded Indian Muslim named al-Mashriqi.

This interesting fact was unearthed by Andrew Bostom two years ago, and deserves to be better known.

http://www.andrewbostom.org/blog/2008/10/22/hitler-and-jihad-part-1/

'Hitler and Jihad'.

'Perhaps the earliest recorded evidence of Hitler’s serious interest in the jihad was provided by Muhammad ‘Inayat Allah Khan [who adopted the pen name “al-Mashriqi”—“the Orientalist” or “the Sage of the East”].

'Born in the Punjab in 1888, al-Mashriqi was a Muslim polymath who attended Cambridge on a government scholarship, and excelled in the study of oriental languages, mathematics, engineering, and the sciences.

'Not only did Mashriqi translate the standard abridged version of Mein Kampf (then commonly available) from English into Urdu, during one of his sojourns in Europe, which included time spent in Berlin,

'he met Hitler in the early years of the Fuehrer’s leadership of the National Socialist [Nazi] Party.

'Their meeting took place in 1926 at the National Library.

'Here is the gist of Mashriqi’s report on his interaction with Hitler as described in a letter to the renowned scholar of Indian Islam, J.M.S. Baljon:

- "I was astounded when he [Hitler] told me that he knew about my Tazkirah. The news flabbergasted me. . . I found him very congenial and piercing.

"He discussed Islamic Jihad with me in details.

"In 1930 I sent him my 'Isharat' concerning the Khaksar movement with a picture of a spade-bearer Khaksar at the end of that book. In 1933 he started his Spade Movement."

I wonder how Mr. Ellison feels about Molly Norris?

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/2010/09/19/2010-09-19_everybody_draw_mohammed_day_cartoonist_molly_norris_goes_into_hiding_after_radic.html

It is just a plain simple fact, that the way of his "Allah" as related by Mohammed is directly at odds with liberty and freedom as we know it.

Ask Mr. Norris this one question.

I'm really interested in Ellison's definition of "intolerant behavior", I wish someone would pin him down before November, I have a feeling his answer would cost him re-election.

Being a little cynical. Ellison reads like a commercial attempting to get people to see a program no one saw the first time around. Full of hooks, leaders, lines and sinkers any fisherman would recognize.

Ellison needs to decide if he is better off playing the race card or the religion card. Either way he loses, mostly because of that race-baiting socialist in the White House with the admitted love affair with islam.

When the POTUS is minority and and islamophile (if not an actual muslim), that pretty much squashes any credibility for playing the "pity" cards.

To Robert Spencer--I wonder if Fox might have you discuss what took place in that one-sided debacle. I'd love to see you go against Raza Aslan, that arrogant phony, and force both sides to have their mics off when the other is speak--limited to, say 2 minutes per topic. You'd kick islamic butt.

I find especially amusing teh thesis that the deficiencies of a persons culture have nothing to do with any crime or such commited by members of that vulture, um I mean culture... does that mean that White European culture is Ot to blame for every problem in the world???
http://hereticscrusade.com

We are having a national conversation about belonging.

Here is a definitive contribution to said conversation by Organization of the Islamic Conference Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, made in a speech at Columbia University on Sept. 18, 2008:

"The Muslim Ummah, means the 'community of the faithful'. It is a unique bond that has no similar example under any other political or religious system in the world. It is a belonging to ideals which bring Muslims together in an eternal brotherhood lock which transcends all other consideration of allegiance or loyalties or barriers of nationhood, ethnicity, geography or language."

There can be no clearer evidence than this statement, direct from the mouth of one of the most senior representatives of the Muslim world, that Muslims emphatically do not belong, either to or in America, and never will.

Truly there is absolutely nothing new under the sun.
Mr Ellison mirrors the philosophy of his constituents and admirerers. He follows the tenets of islamo-fascism. Not
for him all those tawdry swastickas. His brand comes to
us from camels ass arabia via Louis Farrakhan. Just keep repeating- November 2, like a mantra.

Come on, Minnesotans, why do we stand for this guy. I've got a racist and hypocrite Muslim for a congressman, a loathsome comedian for a Senator and a fraud for a President. Can't we see this? It is all very public and proven. He calls us racist - the ones who spread this charge around so flagrantly are themselves so hypocritically racist by their own actions and rhetoric - his very rhetoric and actions prove he is the most racist of all, his name is Hakim Muhammed, you thought Keith Ellison, he forsook that name long ago, his legal name now is Hakim etc. Yes, Muhammed, an etc. He proves himself most racist of all for his conviction is of his philosophy Islam and a supremicist a tenet being we should be dimmies (a racist designation of the most degregation) the opposite of our constitution, of the people, by the people and for the people. He wants to subjugate the Constitution and all Americans and substitute Sharia Law. And he has the gall to call us racist?