Dutch kangaroo court hears Muslims' complaints against Wilders

"My family and I no longer feel safe in the Netherlands because...

...Improvement and Change in the Muslim World "Can Only Be Attained Through Jihad and Sacrifice"
http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/4650.htm

"My family and I no longer feel safe in the Netherlands......"

Good.

Get out.

Then the million voters should be heard from or Dutch justice is a complete sham.

"It's getting scary. ... Soon the kids won't be able to say that they're Muslim or half-Moroccan,"

I think that should eventually be the point, thanks for passing that idea over to Mr. Wilders :)

I mean, come on, you want to make up something like that just to complain? Please...

Keep it up and guess what, it may happen.

As referenced yesterday several times on a previous post - no justice here for the brave Mr. Wilders. And also as predicted there was no removal of the judge for his obviously transparent prejudicial statements. They just can't see the 500 pound kangaroo in the room!

This Kangaroo Court is a joke. The only potential advantage might be world opinion of the Danes 'lack of justice system' after the inevitable conviction. It won't change the outcome but may hopefully draw more brave people to speak out. The conviction and hopefully its appeal will bring more negative attention. (Yes, I'm a foolish optimist.)

It would be nice to see ALL the members of Mr. Wilders Party repeat identical speeches to Mr. Wilders'. (Im Geert Wilders; NO, I'm Geert Wilders . . .)

It is difficult to comprehend that a few crybaby whiny butts have this much influence over pseudo-impartial judges. Ooops, I answered my own statement.

What a disgrace!

We ARE at WAR!

"charged with inciting discrimination and hatred and with insulting a people on religious grounds"

Exactly. The Quran tells us this kind of unsavory stuff on almost every page, but why it is Wilders being accused for saying it I cannot understand.

Well, although I am as skeptical as the anyone who posts on JW about the fairness of Wilders' trial, there is hope.

The further the ruling classes stray from the views of the Dutch electorate, the more popular Geert Wilders' party will become.

The measure of the success of Wilders' party is also the measure of the dissatisfaction felt by the Dutch electorate with the liberal left.

In general, things are going in the right direction. And the more trouble Islam causes, the more support Wilders' will attract.

This principle, of course, goes for any other country where democracy expresses the will of the people.

Islam should be on trial for inciting hatred of non-believers (anyone not muslim) and all the trimmings that go with following the Quran.

What are the statistics for attacks on Muslims in the Netherlands?

Geert Wilders has said repeatedly that he is not against Muslims but that he is against Islam and the practices of sharia law. Clearly there is a distinction if there are practicing Muslims who choose to ignore the jihadist versus in the Quran, the hadiths, and the sirah and do not wish to see the slow introduction of the backward world of sharia law into their nation of choice.

What remains disturbing is why we don't see so called moderate Muslims coming forth in defense of Geert Wilders as he points out what is wrong in in the Islamic world.

It is of course no wonder that 96 percent of Islamic countries have no freedom and are run by dictators where the opposite is found in Western Democracies.

Yes we know that in the fundamental teachings of Islam, Mohammed said that battle is prescribed for you and those words are suppose to be pure for all time no matter how archaic they are.

The on going struggle is what Muslim, or what Muslim convert is going to subscribe to the literal teachings from the Islamic trilogy?

Apparently in countries like the Netherlands it is against the law to warn the people of any possible, or impending threat. Yep as crazy as that sounds it is clearly true.

Sir Winston Churchill was villified by his own country for demonstrating Nazi-phobia and the same is occurring with Geert Wilders. The Dutch along with numerous other dhimmi leaders are so fearfull of upsetting the apple cart that when it does fall over they will not know what to do. They are indeed trapped in the warped perverted social disease of the multicultural and politically correct ideology, thus they have become the enemy of their righteous selves.

And as we know Sir Winston clearly understood the archaic threat that he found in the Islamic world through his book "The River Wars" written in 1899 below:

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/004826.html

Look, played from the bottom of the deck - it's the Victim Card!

Can Mr Wilders file a counter-complaint about the koran being a hate-speech organ?
Or maybe his lawyers might be allowed to show that what Mr Wilders said is not hate speech but this is what is actually written in the koran?

"My family and I no longer feel safe in the Netherlands because Mr. Wilders is continually making hateful remarks about Islamic Dutch people."

That's interesting. Mr. Wilders represents real Dutch citizens who no longer feel safe
thanks to the proliferation of non-Dutch islamic immigrants--aliens--who threaten their safety and the very essence of their society.

But the esteemed Dutch jurists can't be bothered with this little ironic truth. No, they're busy sharpening the knives of their islamic squatters--knives that will be used to cut their own cultural throats...

My family and I no longer feel safe in _____________ because of Muslim violence in New York, Washington DC, Pennsylvania, Ft. Hood, North Carolina, Los Angeles, Paris, Amsterdam, Hamburg, Bali, London, Madrid, Mumbai, Thailand, Nairobi, Beslan, Moscow, ... .

OMG, those Muslims are such hypocrites. Such LIARS. That they come here, under false pretenses, abuse us, vilify our brave speakers, fellow natives, abuse their own people too, and then, for speaking the truth about the situation, they vilify him and cause him to be punished, (this is perverse that the Netherlands will stoop to this), now saying his truth is causing them to 'be afraid'. Bullsh--. They know they are not in danger. But we are.

I cannot stand it. It is to be expected, yes, because it's taught in their religion to lie, to deceive, to feign. But to see it actually happening here in the West, in our countries, and is succeeding, becuase our leaders and media go along with those lies, support them and prop them up, to maintain their power over the truth-sayers like Geert Wilders, makes me so angry I become ill from it.
Geert Wilders is a great man, Wafa Sultan is a great woman, and all who defend them and the truth and their right to speak it, in safety are blessed infidels.

May the liar, their leader, Mohammed, the criminal rapist and murderer of innocents, burn in hell for his destruction of humans. Come out of the lies, Muslims, reject that vile man, and his God, Allah.

These Muslims are such LIARS! Their hypocrisy makes me sick.

Because they are taught that, from the prophet, to lie, to feign, to deceive. What makes me even more incredulously angry is that it seems to be succeeding, here in our own countries. They come here under false pretenses; then, they abuse our citizens and their own people while they are living under our laws, completely disregarding them and harming us. When a brave person is opposed to them, using his right to speak of his concerns for our safety, they then lie and shout they 'feel unsafe' when they know they are not in danger, and our media and courts and leaders prop up their heinous lies and criminal ongoing threats. Punishing a fair and decent, kind and tolerant man of our own, (shame on the Netherlands), for defending our heretofor understood freedom to speak safely the truth, vilifying him and getting away with it.
Please defend our brave man Geert Wilders, Wafa Sultan, brave apostate woman who speak for all of us infidels.

Sorry for that double post, please erase the first one
(I tried to do that, but instead, it posted)

"The Kangaroo Trial in Progress"

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2010/10/kangaroo-trial-in-progress.html

Glory to Geert!
For he is the courageous one. For he is the valiant one. For he is the capable one. For he is the hero of the Resistance.
Why haven't we created a party here in the US such as Geert's glorious Freedom Party? Why is our American nation THIS inept?! How is it that the tiny Holland located in Europe (Eurabia!) has surged so far ahead of us as far as the Resistance is concerned?
Even more astonishing, the EDL, even though it is smaller than the Dutch Freedom Party, is just as good. This is in England ! ! ! Londonistan ! ! ! ! ! !
I have condemned the English for years for the evil they did unto the Jews in the Mandate, throughout the nearly 3 decades of the Mandate, and during the Holocaust, and for their role alongside the US in the slander, scourging and crucifiction of Serbia.
But EDL is an astonishing, welcome surprise. If anyone redeeems the English people, it will be they.
All the power to you, EDL folks! Continue on the right track, marching for Israel under the Blue Star, and God will be with you! Indeed, may I suggest that you strengthen the Israel battle cry. Embrace Israel's Zionist cause as your own. GRAB THE PUBLICITY! IT WILL ENHANCE YOUR POWER AND INFLUENCE EXPONENTIALLY! And the best way to do this is to seize on Ahmadinejad's daily threats to annihilate Israel, and his nuclear terrorism project. LAY A SIEGE TO THE IRANIAN EMBASSY WITH ISRAELI FLAGS! A BLUE-WHITE SEA! And enormous banners: "WE ARE ALL ISRAELIS NOW!", "NO TO ANOTHER HOLOCAUST!", "DOWN WITH THE IRANIAN ISLAMO-NAZI REICH!", "STOP IRAN BEFORE IT STARTED THE NUCLEAR JIHAD!".
Now, it is more likely that Iran will direct nuclear terrorism first at the West whom it sees as a big, soft and easy target, but Ahmadinejad's calls for the "wiping off the map" of the 6 million Israeli Jews give you the opening to seize the high moral ground that is rightfully yours.
Go on the offensive everywhere! Make it a habit to show up with Israeli flags on college campuses where you are guaranteed to be confronted by the ubiquitous "Palestinians" and their lowly white local groupies. Seek the confrontations! It gives you the welcome, empowering PUBLICITY, PUBLICITY, PUBLICITY!
I have been applauding your brave face-offs with the Muslims and their leftist collaborators. Taking back the streets of your country from the Islamo-Nazi Storm Troopers! Bravo! Take it to the next level! Loudly condemn the leftist-Muslim crowds as the "new Stalin-Hitler pact".
Hound the leftist with tants and banners such as: "Quislings!", "Traitors!", "Islamo-Nazi collaborators", "Go French-kiss Hamas into the ass, you, Islamic terrorists' grouppies!", etc.
You have shown that you have guts. So, energize! Rally! Step it up! And God be with you.

Ruslan Tokhchukov, Temporarily Not Enraged But Cheering.

This is rediculous. They claim THEY no longer feel safe ? It's a world gone upside down! The average dutch citizen no longer feels safe thanks to primarily the dutch moroccan youth. They are overrepresented in crime statistics and cause trouble for everyone.

I even found a government website that acknowledges there are large problems. They use euphamisms and understate it there, but even they can't deny it. http://international.vrom.nl/pagina.html?id=38640

Muzlums in the Netherlands don't feel safe because of what Geert says? Then why is it HE is the one who needs bodyguards and not them? What a load of shiite!

What about Hindus, polytheists - do they feel safe when they hear what Muslim preachers have to say about polytheists?

Witness setback in US terror case - Case foreshadows future terror trials

Blow to US prosecutors as terror case witness barred

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11481343

So much for Obama transferring the case to the civilian courts. Is this guy subverting the US?

The Jihadists are using our own courts to subvert our own justice system and impose sharia and conquer us.

So, let me understand this : Geert is a leader of a political party which is about the third most popular in Holland right now, and running on the platform Geert is being tried for as unDutchmanlike. Something is just totally wacked here. No ? Maybe Matt Damon can bring his discomfort with Sarah Palin to a prosecutor and solve the wacky Republican problem !

I'm not convinced that Wilders lawyer is the right man for the job.

This charade needs to be countered with a more aggressive strategy. Walkouts, boycotts, yelling in disgust, massive parades by Wilders supporters outside the court house, etc etc.

The inquisitors have to learn to fear their countrymen, instead of doing the bidding of the Mohammedans and the mayonnaise sellers from the business lobby.

Suggested street theatre for a large group of Wilders supporters, staked out outside the court.

Download, from the internet, a copy of the complete text of the 'Calcutta Koran Petition', print it off, translate into Dutch from English, and read it aloud, at a leisurely pace, in public, taking turns until it has been read in its entirety.

http://www.bharatvani.org/books/tcqp/

Intersperse with passages from the works of one of the greatest Dutch analysts of Islam, C Snouck Hurgronje (1857-1936) - 'Mekka in the Latter Part of the 19th Century' and 'The Acehnese'.

Throw in, from the Horrible Hadith, giving all relevant references the stories of the assassinations of Asma bint Marwan, Ka'b bin Ashraf, and Abu Afak; murders of people who had criticised Mohammed, carried out by his followers, and heartily approved of by the big boss Mohammed himself.

As well as staking out the court - in a large group as close as one is permitted to go - other groups could be holding vigil and reading the same texts at the sites where Theo Van Gogh and Pym Fortuyn were murdered, the former by a Muslim sharia-pusher 'commanding right' by carrying out the sharia punishment for 'blasphemy', the latter by a deluded non-Muslim janissary of jihad who was acting, so he thought, to protect the poor wee Muslims from attack.

Throw in Robert Redeker's article that appeared in Le Figaro - you'll find the full text in French, and a link to a site that gives an English translation, if you carefully read the comments thread to the following jihadwatch article about him:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2006/09/writer-of-anti-islam-article-gets-death-threats.html

Just translate it into Dutch, and you've got it.

A couple of blazing pieces in defence of free speech, and the right to criticise Islam:

the first written in the wake of the Salman Rushdie affair -

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/islam-back-to-the-dark-ages-we-should-not-repeal-the-enlightenment-to-appease-ayatollahs-says-conor-cruise-obrien-1382946.html

"Islam: back to the Dark Ages: We should not repeal the Enlightenment to appease Ayatollahs, says Conor Cruise O'Brien"

CONOR CRUISE O'BRIEN - FRIDAY 12 AUGUST 1994.

and the second written just after the aborted Times Square bombing, but relating, unforgettably, magnificently, the response of New York poet Ginsberg, to the death fatwa upon Rushie.

http://reason.com/archives/2010/05/14/the-poet-versus-the-prophet

'The Poet Versus the Prophet - On standing up to totalitarian Islam'
Mark Goldblatt | May 14, 2010

(Here's why I suggest it. Come on, guys, translate it into Dutch - dda).

"I got to know the poet Allen Ginsberg towards the end of his life. Not very well, just a nodding acquaintance, but after he died I attended a memorial in his honor at the City University Graduate School.

"At that service, his personal assistant related a story about Ginsberg’s reaction to the death sentence pronounced on the novelist Salman Rushdie by Ayatollah Khomeini in 1989.

" Rushdie’s “crime,” you’ll recall, was writing a provocative, perhaps even blasphemous novel inspired by the life of Muhammad called The Satanic Verses.

"Though I might be screwing up a few details, the gist of the story was as follows:

"Soon after news of the fatwa broke, Ginsberg and his assistant climbed into the back seat of a taxi in Manhattan.

"After a glance at the cab driver’s name, Ginsberg politely inquired if he was a Muslim.

"When the cabbie replied that he was, Ginsberg asked him what he thought about the death sentence on Rushdie.

"The cabbie answered that he thought that Rushdie’s book was disrespectful of Islam, and that the Ayatollah had every right to do what he had done.

"At this point, according to his assistant, Ginsberg, one of the gentlest men ever to walk the planet, flew into a rage, screaming at the cabbie as he continued to drive,

'“Then I shit on your religion! Do you hear me? I shit on Islam! I shit on Muhammad! Do you hear? I shit on Muhammad!”

"Ginsberg demanded that the cabbie pull over. The cabbie complied, and, without paying the fare, Ginsberg and his assistant climbed out. He was still screaming at the cabbie as the car drove off."

And Goldblatt continues:

"I’ve had a couple of weeks now to think about Ginsberg cursing out that cabbie, and cursing out Islam and Muhammad.

"You see, I live in Manhattan, three blocks from Times Square.

"As near as I can determine, I was walking with a friend about thirty feet from the car bomb on May 1st right around the time it was supposed to detonate.

"Except for the technical incompetence of a Muslim dirtbag named Faisal Shahzad, I and my friend would likely be dead now.

"Note the phrase: “Muslim dirtbag.”

"Neither term by itself accounts for the terrorist act he attempted to perpetrate; both terms, however, are equally complicit in it. It might have been a crapshoot of nature and nurture that wrought a specimen like Shahzad, but it was Islam that inspired him, that gave his fecal stain of a life its depth and its justification.

"Why is that so difficult to admit?

"Let me ask the question another way:

"Where’s the rage? Why won’t anyone say in public what Ginsberg said in the back seat of that cab?

"If Islam justifies, or is understood by millions of Muslims to justify, setting off a bomb in Times Square, then I shit on Islam."...

Interesting.

"No longer feeling safe" is a highly subjective statement which is difficult to gage.

Are their anti-Muslim attacks against individuals on the streets? Is Mr. Wilders calling for violence and disrespect?
"No" to both questions.

Just who in the Netherlands "no longer feels safe" to walk the streets?

Anti-gay and anti-Jewish attacks in Holland reach "record highs":
http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?id=188486

Is it gays who are attacking Jews? Did Dutch people suddenly become homophobes? Is it Jews who are attacking homosexuals?

More material that may be of use, and which I offer here, conveniently gathered together for the convenience of our Dutch friends, and of other European supporters of Mr Wilders,

First, the Australian scholar Rev Dr Mark Durie, in an interview at Front Page, explaining how he became interested in finding out about Islam and Jihad (after spending a good deal of time studying the language and literature of those very same Acehnese about whom Dutch scholar C S Hurgronje wrote a whole book).

As posted in full on his own blogspot:

http://markdurie.blogspot.com/2010/09/third-choice-interview-of-mark-durie-by.html

An excerpt, to show you why I think it may be helpful:

"I (Durie) first became interested in Islam when doing linguistic field work in Aceh, Indonesia, in the early 1980’s.

"The Acehnese people are proud of their Islamic identity, but despite enjoying countless discussions about religion with them, I made no attempt to study Islam formally; my whole focus was on linguistic research.

"But I couldn’t escape learning about jihad, because it played such a large role in the historical consciousness of the people. An amazingly large number of works of Acehnese literature are jihad epics.

"Another aspect of my experience was contact with local Christians; this is how I came to know of the difficult circumstances of non-Muslims living in an Islamic society.

"When I left academia to become an Anglican minister, around 1998, I thought I was leaving Islamic jihad well behind me.

"I had no idea of the depth and breadth of the global Islamic movement.

"**Then as I watched the burning World Trade Center towers collapse in the New York morning sunshine, I knew there was no ideology on this earth other than Islamic jihad which could have inspired such an attack.** {my emphasis - dda; and just look at what he says next...}.

"**It was no surprise when verses from the Koran reportedly found in the backpacks of the terrorists were exactly the same verses which had figured so prominently in Acehnese jihad epic poems from over a century ago** {my emphasis - dda}.

"At that point I knew I had to try to understand Islam properly.

"So I read the hadiths, the Koran, and Ibn Ishaq’s biography of Muhammad in the months after 9/11, with the eye of a theologian – I was constantly asking how this material would form people’s spiritual identity.

"This exploration made me deeply troubled.

"The persona of Muhammad which arose before me from Islam’s primary sources shocked me to my core.

I thought, “If this man’s life is supposed to be the best example, we are all in deep trouble.”...

Read the whole thing. It's excellent. And what Durie says about dhimmitude, the mindset it involves, is a pretty good explanation of why Wilders is being attacked so frantically, even hysterically, by his own people. Wilders is *refusing* to behave like a dhimmi. He's breaking ALL the dhimmi rules. He's refusing to grovel or to flatter. He's *criticising* Islam.

Now: two articles that skewer the whole business of Muslim grievance theatre.

1. It's OK to Dislike Islam

http://davidthompson.typepad.com/davidthompson/2007/03/intimidation_re.html

and 2. 'The Passive-Aggressive Jihad'

http://davidthompson.typepad.com/davidthompson/2007/03/the_passiveaggr.html

From the first of these

- “There is nothing wrong with an attack on Islam (or any other sacred belief).”

'One of the creeping, unanalysed myths of our time is that it is somehow wrong to dislike Islam, or any part thereof, and wrong to take a dim view of its tenets and demands, and wrong to take a still dimmer view of the figure who founded it.

'I can practically hear the distant tutting and grunts of disapproval.

' Poor Islam. Poor Muslims. Their beliefs are being mocked. How hurtful. How 'racist.' How terribly unfair.

'No. It's not unfair at all.

'What's unfair is a demand for unearned deference and a unilateral exemption from the testing of ideas.

'What's unfair, indeed despicable, are efforts by Islamic groups to cow dissent and stifle criticism with a well-rehearsed pantomime of victimhood and the projection of false motives.

'Pretending to be hurt in order to assert one's will over others, even violently, or to gain unreciprocated favours, or to exert control over what others may say and think, is cowardly and malign.

' Let me say that once again. It's cowardly and malign."

And we are seeing just such a cowardly and malign pantomime of victimhood, engaged in so as to get their own way, parading before us in the shape of all those whining, squawking, wailing Muslims in the Netherlands who complained about Geert Wilders.

Do Dutch policemen have to masquerade as Muslims to cut down on "Islamophbic" attacks due to Geert Wilder's activities and views?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/netherlands/7846704/Dutch-police-use-decoy-Jews-to-stop-anti-Semitic-attacks.html

Rallies on behalf of Mr Wilders, in the Netherlands and elsewhere in Europe, should be 'teach-ins'.

Here are two consciousness-raising texts that might be shared amongst the group, and also pressed upon passers-by.

First: Hugh Fitzgerald's devastating discourse - 'Islamophobia? Really?'

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2005/12/fitzgerald-islamophobia-really.html

I think it would make a powerful statement if translated into Dutch, French and German, and declaimed aloud; have it printed out in sheaves, for distribution.

Second: a hilarious pop quiz designed to determine one's level of 'Islamophobia', devised by a clever American Jewish lady named Lorna Saltzman, and originally made available by Phyllis Chesler on her Pyjamas Media blog.

Download it, translate into Dutch, add the little boxes to be ticked after each question - 'Yes' or 'No', not forgetting the two little boxes at the bottom where the totals of 'Yeses' and 'Noes' can be added up, and invite people to fill it out on the spot, or take home and complete at their leisure.

http://pajamasmedia.com/phyllischesler/2009/08/26/are-you-an-islamophobe/

PHYLLIS CHESLER: CHESLER CHRONICLES
August 26th, 2009 10:17 am

'Are You An Islamophobe? - Take This Test To Be Sure'

"Are you an Islamophobe? Here is a simple test. 

Lorna Saltzman’s Test -

"Do you favor equal rights and treatment of women and men?

"Do you oppose stoning of women accused of adultery?

"Do you favor mandatory education of girls everywhere?

"Do you oppose slavery and child prostitution?

"Do you support complete freedom of expression and the press?

"Do you support the right of an individual to worship in her chosen religion?

"Do you oppose government- and mosque-supported anti-Semitic publications, radio, TV and textbooks?

"Do you oppose the wearing of burqas in public places, schools and courts?

"Do you oppose segregation of the sexes in public places and houses of worship?

"Do you oppose the death penalty for non-Muslims and Muslims who convert to another religion?

"Do you oppose “honor” killings?

"Do you oppose female genital mutilation?

"Do you oppose forced sexual relations?

"Do you oppose discrimination against homosexuals?

"Do you support the right to criticize religion?

"Do you oppose polygamy?

"Do you oppose child marriage, forced or otherwise?

"Do you oppose the Quranic mandate to kill non-Muslims and apostates?

"Do you oppose the addition of sharia courts to your country’s legal system?

"Do you disagree with the quran which asserts the superiority of Islam to all other religions?

"If you answered most or all of these affirmatively, you are a vile Islamophobe and deserve to be beheaded as the quran instructs.

"If you answered one third or more of them affirmatively, you are a borderline Islamophobe and need to receive brainwashing to become a full-fledged dhimmi.

"If you answered a quarter or fewer affirmatively, you need a few private lessons in dhimmitude to scrub yourself clean of those remnants of Islamophobia.

"If you answered affirmatively to NONE of these, Congratulations! You are a worthy observant (radical–PC addition) Muslim and have a bright future vilifying Jews, torturing women or, inshallah, becoming a suicide bomber.”

Have marauding bands of Dutch "youth" chanting Wilders' name attacked innocent Muslims, torched mosques, burned (gasp!) the Qur'an? Why, no. Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh are still dead, however.

While Muslis are free to go about their business free of fear the Netherlands, Wilders is still under armed protection in his own country in fear for his life.

Since when is Truth considered a hate crime? This is infuriating. I see a major backlash or uprising coming, if this court convicts mr. Wilders.

If Wilder's is convicted, will he continue to speak out from Jail? Or does he expect to be murdered there?

Ade, Europa!

I agree that Wilders' trial is a travesty, and when the judge was not changed after a clearly hostile comment, it became more of one. If Mynheer Wilders lands on our shores, I hope he gets political asylum--and I would be honored to shake his hand.

But I think we Americans should take this as a dire warning and get ourselves disentangled from the rotten corpse called Yurrup. When we were attacked on 9/11, Yurrup made some proper noises, but it wasn't long before Yurrup's Innalekshools were once more hating us for having made it impossible for them to live and work under the benign eye of their father Stalin and defending the very jihadi barbarians who'd gladly slit their throats at the first opportunity. Yurrupean reactions to the life and death of Theo van Gogh were first cheering his "brave" (and cheap and tawdry) celebrations of blasphemy, then cravenly caving in to dhimmitude when offended Muslims murdered Mynheer Theo in the street. Finally, when a European stands up to the barbarians, they put him on trial.

This tells me that America should probably wise up and let Yurrup fall into the wasteful, sodden, sodomized idiocy and poverty that have marked every Islamic land as soon as the ahl-al-kitab population dropped below a critical mass. Since Yurrup voluntarily de-Christianized and celebtrated it in the works of such "artists" as Theo van Gogh (while Bouyeri should have hanged for murder, Gogh was not someone I particularly admire); and then meekly bent over and bared its buttocks to Gogh's murderers for either a spanking or that sin against nature. How strange that the continent that prides itself in its blasphemies and mocking towards Christ suddenly becomes meek and respectful towards Islam!

I'm not sure that Yurrup is worth the bones of another American soldier. Had I the money, I'd cross the pond tomorrow and bring home some uncles and more distant relatives after more than half a century. Then I'd rent a platform in Brussels and loudly apologize for my dead countrymen's having cut short the totalitarianisms for which thinking Yurrupeans seem to have an insatiable admiration.

Islam? Fascist?

Fascists have anyone who disagrees with them put on trial and...

Kepha seems to have decided that Europe, and everyone in Europe, is absolutely beyond redemption; that the church in Europe is dead beyond hope of resurrection; that all that Europe warrants is an expression of contempt and a wiping off of dust from shoes.

I do not agree.

http://www.taize.fr/en_article6625.html

http://www.labri.org/

I do not believe that the seeds that have been sown, over the past sixty years, by Brother Roger of Taize and the Taize Community, or by the very different - and yet, equally, deeply Christian community of L'Abri, in Switzerland, under Francis Schaeffer, author of 'The God Who Is There' can all been sown in vain.

G K Chesterton: The Five Deaths of the Faith

http://www.worldinvisible.com/library/chesterton/everlasting/part2c6.htm