Spencer: The Jihad Against A Seattle Cartoonist

JihadSeattle.jpg


In Human Events today I ask why we aren't hearing anything from the mainstream media about Molly Norris:

It should be front-page news in every newspaper in the country: Seattle cartoonist Molly Norris has given up her job, her home, and even her identity because of death threats for Islamic supremacists. That Islamic jihadists can force an American citizen into hiding for exercising her freedom of speech is bad enough; that her cause has aroused only indifference from the media and the nation's leading officials is even worse.

Norris was a popular cartoonist for the Seattle Weekly. Her life changed forever a few months ago when she announced "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day" on Facebook. It was a lark, but with a serious point about violent threats and intimidation: if Islamic supremacists were threatening to murder European cartoonists Kurt Westergaard and Lars Vilks because of their cartoons of Muhammad, and anyone else who dared to draw him, then if everyone drew him, the thugs couldn't possibly kill us all, could they?

And now Norris herself has become a living illustration of how right her point was in the first place, and yet the political and media elites are not standing with her. "On the insistence of top security specialists at the FBI," the Seattle Weekly explained, "she is, as they put it, 'going ghost': moving, changing her name, and essentially wiping away her identity. She will no longer be publishing cartoons in our paper or in City Arts magazine, where she has been a regular contributor. She is, in effect, being put into a witness-protection program-except, as she notes, without the government picking up the tab."

This is in sharp contrast to the Ground Zero mosque Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, who is receiving protection from the New York City Police Department because of threats he has allegedly received. In even sharper contrast, Gainsville, Florida authorities have announced that they plan to bill the abortive Koran-burner Terry Jones $180,000 for security costs for the Koran-burning event that he ultimately called off after a blizzard of international publicity, all negative - despite the fact that they never bothered to warn Jones beforehand that he would be footing the bill....

There is more.

| 77 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

77 Comments

Again, Robert Spencer nails it.

That Molly Norris has to give up her identity and go into hiding in the United States of America, the land of the First Amendment, is the shame of all levels of government.

I think I may just write a letter to AG Holder and ask why the FBI hasn't been put to work investigating the Jihadists.

The primary reason for the existence of government is to protect the nation and its citizens.

So where is Obama?

Good Golly, Miss Molly: You're on Your Own
By J.R. Dunn

But what I like least of all is how long it will take to effect any repairs. Molly Norris's timid colleagues have pranced off scot-free. The media and the left are studiously looking elsewhere. Obama, despite his habit of leaping to his feet every time a squirrel is run over, remains strangely silent. Molly Norris has become a non-person, no different from those American communists dragged off to the Gulag during the '30s. We are all less free, less secure, and less proud than we were. And it is going to stay that way for a long time to come.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/10/good_golly_miss_molly_youre_on.html

"EVIL PREVAILS WHEN GOOD MEN DO NOTHING"

Can you give some recommendations on what should be done?

“We have to be a country where freedom of expression thrives”

Colorado: “Taxpayer-supported, public museum which is family-friendly,” presents Jesus in a Sex Act

http://sheikyermami.com/2010/10/05/state-of-the-art/

No double standards here:

Art Censored at Penn State for Being Critical of Islamic Terrorism

I'm sure-finally-mainstream newspapers will take a hint and
cease boring people with their "all religions have nuts"
cult answer.

Brian Schiff

The Rasool Obama regime is not in it to protect the Constitutional rights of Molly(s). The right to 'Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness' is not on the agenda...rule and control is...Everything the elitist 'progressive' rulers in DC do, leans in that direction...The MSM leans in that direction, the courts lean in that direction and many top brass in the military lean in that direction...Sharia law is the perfect instrument for total control...In order to install sharia it is necessary to install Islam...That means that anything negative to Islam has to be discredited, smeared, destroyed, maybe killed...
The US gov and MSM have 'killed' Molly, by omission...by ignoring, by minimizing...The unholy trinity are, the current US gov, the MSM, and jihadi agents, both Mahoundian and kufr...
The same tactics are being used against Geller, Spencer, Wilders, and numerous others who sound the alarm...
Before all this can come about, the Constitution needs to be destroyed...They are working on that...

Paul Delaup, others interested:

I suggest we have an

"Everyone is Molly Norris Day."

Dag Walker, Vancouver, Canada.

"I think I may just write a letter to AG Holder and ask why the FBI hasn't been put to work investigating the Jihadists."

Yes, write don't e-mail, because then Holder, Axelrod, and Hussein will be able to trace you, and you might get a knock on your door in the middle of the night, and perhaps removed to a camp somewhere as an "undesirable."

That I would feel this way about our current president and administration shows you the dire straits we're in.

I think it's quite clear why Terry Jones received so much publicity from the media, and the Molly Norris story didn't. Terry Jones is EXACTLY the caricature of an "Islamophobe" that the left-leaning MSM wants. He's a fundamentalist Christian who wants to burn books. This is precisely the story that the mainstream press wants to tell: the only people who really have a conflict with Islam are intolerant, right-wing Christian nutcases. This is the Gospel of Holy Multiculturalism, and they believe it deserves to be plastered all over the front page.

The fact that a left-leaning cartoonist might face death threats from Islam---well, that doesn't fit into the mainstream media narrative, so that story doesn't really have any legs.

l hope she takes her time now to read up on islam, and visits this site, maybe she can be Roberts west coast helper.

OT: Anyone want to play, answer-the-academic?

Islam sparks on-campus debate:

"There are many Muslims who peacefully coexist with other religious groups in the U.S.--and support the Constitution. There's a diversity of beliefs and practices within Islam; it's not a monolithic faith. I'll admit that moderates haven't come out enough in the mainstream to combat terrorism--but [But, BUT!] Islam isn't the problem."

If Jones didn't ask for police presence I see no reason he should have to pay.The way I understand it, Gainsville police took it upon themselves to basically surround his church even after he called off the burning and flew to NYC. There was nothing going on and still they sent dozens of police cars and personel to his church. That was their decision, not his.

As for Molly Norris, she had a newpaper at her disposal, why not use it?

She could have easily continued working for the paper long enough to inflame her audience and forced authorities to have her back. IF her editor would have allowed it that is. If not there are other ways to reach out to the audience.

I believe the Gov has a resposibility to protect it's citizens, but at this point it is up to us to force them to uphold the oath they took to do so.

OT. Can anyone tell me how to offer a news article for posting here? The article I want to suggest is this from the BBC:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-11475137

"Two Algerian Christians 'did not break Ramadan rules'
Two Christians who were on trial in Algeria for breaking Ramadan fasting rules have been cleared of wrongdoing.

Human rights groups said the trial was a violation of the right to religious freedom under the constitution.

Hocine Hocini and Salem Fellak were arrested in August during the month of Ramadan, after they were seen eating lunch on the building site where they worked in Kabylie, northern Algeria.

The men's lawyer called the verdict a "victory for justice".

The two men admitted they had been eating, but said they had done it discreetly, and felt they had done nothing wrong.

The judge at the court in Ain El Hamman threw the case out because "no article [of law] provided for a legal pursuit" against the men, thereby rejecting the prosecutors' request for three-year prison sentences.

Two similar cases are scheduled in the coming weeks.

Algeria is a mostly Muslim country; the ministry of religious affairs estimates there are only about 11,000 Christians among a population of 36 million.

Most of Algeria's Christians are Protestants."

Arrested and out on trial for eating lunch! No wonder there are so few non-muslims in Algeria.

@aitch: Go to the BBC article and click on the "email article" icon. Then email to director@jihadwatch.org

Or use the JihadWatch contact form @
http://www.jihadwatch.org/formmail/contact.php

[Robert wrote: "why we aren't hearing anything from the mainstream media about Molly Norris"]

Maybe they're deafened by their collective silence over the assault and battery of Human Events reporter, Emily Miller.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=39262

Ok - many thanks Kaddafi_Delenda_Est

Q: Is there justification for burning Korans or drawing cartoons of Muhammad?
A: YES! Those who burn Korans or draw cartoons of Muhammad are sending a message that free speech is sacred and free people are not going to allow Islamic intimidation to shut it down.

Pamela, Robert, David, Geert, and others are great spokesmen for the effort to inform people of the dangers of Islam, and they have pointed out that we, the people, having the right to free speech, also have the right to draw cartoons of anything we want to, including the warrior Muhammad, as well as the right to burn anything we want to, including the right to burn Mein Kampf or my Koran.

But, THEY ALSO NEED TO PROMOTE THE EXERCISE OF FREE SPEECH, draw Muhammad days, Koran burning days, an "International Free Speech Day", to remind free people that we must protect the freedom of speech. We're either in their face, or they're in our behinds. There can be no backing up or backing down.

Here's a petition for an International Free Speech Day: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/nationalfreesp...

Stories like this one make me wonder if we really should worry too much about whether or not sharia will capture the nation because it looks like it's already a done deal. What a mess this nation has become-I still remember thinking how crazy it was that Salmon Rushdie had to hide for his life in Britain back in 1989 and that I hoped that something similar would never happen in the US. Well, looks like the entire West has capitulated-we can thank our gutless politicians for destroying all of our nations from within. Norris, Rushdie and other will have lots of company in the future thanks to them.

I am deeply embarrassed and ashamed that this sort of thing is allowed to go on in the US.

How dare a US citizen be threatened by these Bronze Age bozos and now has to live in obscurity the rest of her life? Where are the protests from our government? Oh, I forgot, Obama is in charge....

Throw all the Muslims-even the homegrown ones-out of our country. "Moderate" or not; have you noticed how many "moderates" are speaking out against the edict against Molly? I hate to say this, but with this and other acts and declarations made by Muslims, it is impossible to trust any of them.

Let them all go back to the sand countries where this idiocy first originated. Not one US citizen should have to live in fear in this "land of the free". Especially when threatened by those who seek to destroy the very foundations upon which our country was built.


It is interesting to note the almost uncanny resemblance of Molly Norris to Janeane Garofalo when Norris puts her hair and glasses on a certain way.

Just an observation of course, check it out on Google.

It should be front-page news in every newspaper in the country: Seattle cartoonist Molly Norris has given up her job, her home, and even her identity because of death threats for Islamic supremacists. That Islamic jihadists can force an American citizen into hiding for exercising her freedom of speech is bad enough; that her cause has aroused only indifference from the media and the nation's leading officials is even worse.
....................

Yes. The lack of coverage this incredibly important story has received is inexplicable. You would think it especially likely that the media would pick up on this since Molly Norris actually worked in media herself.

More:

Norris was a popular cartoonist for the Seattle Weekly. Her life changed forever a few months ago when she announced "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day" on Facebook. It was a lark, but with a serious point about violent threats and intimidation: if Islamic supremacists were threatening to murder European cartoonists Kurt Westergaard and Lars Vilks because of their cartoons of Muhammad, and anyone else who dared to draw him, then if everyone drew him, the thugs couldn't possibly kill us all, could they?
....................

One very small point, here—Molly Norris was coming to the defense of South Park animators Trey Parker and Matt Stone, who received death threats themselves for their depiction (actually, non-depiction) of the "Prophet" Muhammed. I'm not sure Ms. Norris was even aware of the situation with the MoToon cartoonists or artist Lars Vilks.

This just shows *how many* artists are being threatened by Shari'ah, though.

Parker and Stone haven't, to my knowledge, come to Molly Norris' defense, either. That they may still be facing death threats from the members of the "Religion of Peace" may be a mitigating factor in their lying low, though.

Here's the inimitable Mark Steyn on the Molly Norris story:

"Mollifying Muslims, and Muslifying Mollies"

He writes about pastor Terry Jones' abortive Qur'an burning and his own prosecution in Canada for exercising his freedom of speech.

"'...You may have noticed that Molly Norris' comic is not in the paper this week. That's because there is no more Molly.'

On the advice of the FBI, she's been forced to go into hiding. If you want to measure the decline in western civilization's sense of self-preservation, go back to Valentine's Day 1989, get out the Fleet Street reports on the Salman Rushdie fatwa, and read the outrage of his fellow London literati at what was being done to one of the mainstays of the Hampstead dinner-party circuit. Then compare it with the feeble passivity of Molly Norris' own colleagues at an American cartoonist being forced to abandon her life: "There is no more Molly"? That's all the gutless pussies of The Seattle Weekly can say? As James Taranto notes in The Wall Street Journal, even much sought-after Ramadan-banquet constitutional scholar Barack Obama is remarkably silent:

'Now Molly Norris, an American citizen, is forced into hiding because she exercised her right to free speech. Will President Obama say a word on her behalf? Does he believe in the First Amendment for anyone other than Muslims?'"

You can read it all here:

http://www.steynonline.com/content/view/3505/


It is just a matter of time before some good ole unemployed redneck boys latch onto the idea of putting out a Molly Norris decoy to attract some Jihadists to a shack in the woods and then the dueling banjos music will start to play and then...

squeal like a pig, boy!

With age comes wisdom. God gives life. Only He should take it away. Anybody who believes different is not a man of God. Those who have to kill to protect innocent others from being killed will be blessed by God.

@AppauledByTheWorld.'' hoped that something similar would never happen in the US''. Oh, did you 'hope'? really? yet you almost seem to welcome shari'a resignedly and accept the capitulation as a fait-accomplie. Something does not ring true about your statement. Correct me if my estimation errs, but I go by the time-worn maxim that thought pissed in it's shoe and hoped it was sweating.

Paul Dunlaup:
"EVIL PREVAILS WHEN GOOD MEN DO NOTHING"

Can you give some recommendations on what should be done?"

One option that immediately comes to mind is to hold another "Everybody Draw Muhammad Day". The message needs to be re-sent that we will not tolerate or submit to the treats of Islamist dinosaurs.

FROM ONE OF THE CORE ISLAMIC TEXTS, A HADITH IN WHICH MUHAMMAD SAID THERE IS TO BE NO PUNISHMENT FOR MURDERING SOMEONE WHO INSULTS MUHAMMAD:

Here, from Sunan Abu-Dawud, a canonical hadith collection, is a hadith that shows Muhammad supporting the murder of a woman by her husband, merely because she used to speak to her husband insultingly about Muhammad:

Sunan Abu-Dawud, Book 38, Number 4348:

Narrated Abdullah Ibn Abbas:

A blind man had a slave-mother [a slave who bore children for him] who used to abuse the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and disparage him. He [the blindman] forbade her but she did not stop. He rebuked her but she did not give up her habit. One night she began to slander the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and abuse him. So he [the blindman] took a dagger, placed it on her belly, pressed it, and killed her. A child who came between her legs was smeared with the blood that was there. When the morning came, the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) was informed about it.

He assembled the people and said: I adjure by Allah the man who has done this action and I adjure him by my right to him that he should stand up. Jumping over the necks of the people and trembling the man stood up.

He sat before the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and said: Apostle of Allah! I am her master; she used to abuse you and disparage you. I forbade her, but she did not stop, and I rebuked her, but she did not abandon her habit. I have two sons like pearls from her, and she was my companion. Last night she began to abuse and disparage you. So I took a dagger, put it on her belly and pressed it till I killed her.

Thereupon the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Oh be witness, no retaliation is payable for her blood.

Self-lobotomizing society

If a liberal democratic society fails to provide protection for people like Molly Norris, and mind can no longer operate openly, then that society has become self-lobotomizing. Self-lobotomizing under the gun of Islamic death threats.

Yes, round-the-clock protection for journalists and others threatened with death will be costly. But then maybe the government will start taking more seriously the intrusion of the Islamic law ethos into our lives.

KDA,
Credo: Islamismus cedit pro stercore. Why Kaddafi and not Islam itself?

Isn't it time for another "Everyone Draw Mohammed Day"?

@Mike, absolutely of the same mind. . .continual and relentless ribbing will draw the Hydra to rear all it's heads while the msm are still sitting on the fence. The prats will jump when their ankles are being snapped .

Tanstaafl wrote:

Isn't it time for another "Everyone Draw Mohammed Day"?
.................

I hope it will be an annual event, Tanstaafl. We should celebrate it every May 20.

Here's the stalwart Kurt Westergaard of MoToons fame giving a big "thumbs up" to Everybody Draw Muhammed Day:

"It is actually a very fun initiative."

http://tundratabloid.blogspot.com/2010/05/kurt-westergaard-thinks-everbody-draw.html

Here's Molly Norris 'trying to get her sense of humor back'. I believe this was *before* she was forced into hiding:

http://www.seraphicpress.com/images/molly-norris-1-thumb.jpg

Certainly, Cato's maxim can be applied broadly to any belligerant. Kaddafi's turf coincides (roughly) with the former Carthaginian empire.

But why Kaddafi?

Nemo me impune lacessit

"It should be front-page news in every newspaper in the country: Seattle cartoonist Molly Norris has given up her job, her home, and even her identity because of death threats for Islamic supremacists."

Robert:

That should read as "from Islamic supremacists." Of all the typos that could slip by, why did that particular one pass the proof-reading? The text literally reads as if Molly were the one issuing death threats.

Hey guys !

I know this is out of topic but did anyone watch the NATGEO

special on the Koran and it's "seemingly contradictions" it was on yesterday night?


Yes that was the in the NatGeo description of the program


It was a great laugh.

At one point in the show the Head of Sharia Courts in Palestine said that the number of Folks who had been killed or maimed since the time of Mohammed for Sharia infractions


is less than FINGERS OF ONE'S HANDS!


Not only that they would post contradictory verses as a CONTINUATION ( not an ABROGATION) of the original verses

No wonder they didn't post the actual verses for verification


I think Spencer needs to call NATGEO out on that

Back to topic

We need to elect persons who will protect the Molly Norris', the Spencers of this world


God Bless

IBN KATHIR, PERHAPS THE WORLD'S MOST POPULAR QURAN COMMENTATOR, SAYS ALLAH'S PARDON OF UNBELIEVERS WAS REPEALED BY QURAN CHAPTER 9 AND ITS VERSES OF THE SWORD

Kathir explains toward the bottom of this page that Quran 2:106, which advises Muslims to forgive and be indulgent toward unbelievers, has been canceled by verses in Quran Chapter 9 (which was the last or close to the last Quran chapter revealed). Kathir quotes part of 9:5, but here's the whole verse:

Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
And Kathir quotes part of 9:29. Again, here's the whole verse:
Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger [Muhammad] have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth [Islam], out of those who have been given the Book [Christian and Jews], until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.
On Islam and the state of subjection referred to in 9:29, read Mark Durie's brilliant, concise, and very readable book, The Third Choice: Islam, Dhimmitude, and Freedom.


Anyway, then Kathir says,

Allah's pardon for the disbelievers was repealed. Abu Al-`Aliyah, Ar-Rabi` bin Anas, Qatadah and As-Suddi said similarly: "It [the pardon, or forgiveness] was abrogated by the Ayah [verse] of the sword." [Quran 9:5]

"She could have easily continued working for the paper long enough to inflame her audience and forced authorities to have her back. IF her editor would have allowed it that is. If not there are other ways to reach out to the audience."
------------------------------
Her News Weekly features some gal named Ranyah Ghussein who was gushing about the women who showed up in Burqas to protest Hirsi Ali the other day. The article basically stated that Hirsi Ali wasn't sufficiently Muslim enough to know what she was talking about, then proceeded to lead readers to think the only reason Hirsi Ali is doing this is for money. I wish I had saved the article as it was a really bad hatchet job and pure example of Taqiyya by a "moderate" muslim.

Needless to say I repied on their messages boards and ripped the article to shreds. The article is no longer posted and I'm sure they will say its because of "hatefilled" comments. In reality, I counter all her points and she was left looking pretty bad. Not once in her entire article did she address any of the points that Hirsi Ali made. Not once did she agree that Women are treated badly in Muslim countries. Even in countries like Iran where women are stoned to death sometimes based on heresy and not objective facts.

Given that her co-workers were Muslims of this nature, I don't blame her for not even attempting to speak out via the news weekly.

Episodes like the Molly Norris one form a part of a larger, slowly developing hatred of Islam by the bulk of the citizenry in America and other Western nations. Muslims keep pushing the envelope and eventually they will push too far and then the backlash will be huge---titanic in fact. Also, today's pathetic elites, in politics, the media and academia will be looked upon almost like Quislings future generations from now. Yep, still developing.

Verus. Pugnam lacessit. Pugnam lacessunt. Optime. Vale KDA! And thank you for the reply.

OT...Faisal Shahzad the Times square bomber gets life...Apparently the judge told him he misunderstood his religion...

@B ''. .where women are stoned to death on heresy and sometimes not on objective facts''. Do ammend that statement accordigly, for it paints you in a bad light. . .almost giving tacit approval to stoning if the objective facts are tantamount. . .

gravenimage,

Maybe November 2nd (the date Theo Van Gogh was murdered) should become "Everybody-write-a-one-sentence-criticism-of-Muhammad-or-Islam" day.

The day would need a central website where Quran, hadith, and good biography websites would be listed so that people could go to those websites for information.

Perhaps a rule could be that one must append an accurate quote from the Quran, the reliable hadith, or the earliest biography of Muhammad, including verse or hadith number, or page number of Muhammad's bio, and preferably a weblink to the quoted material.

Maybe I'll start it, perhaps on blogspot.

'German Taliban' video posted on al-Qaeda site

A recruiting video casts fresh light on how European Islamists are joining insurgents fighting in Pakistan's mountainous tribal areas.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8043343/German-Taliban-video-posted-on-al-Qaeda-website.html

Yes. That is why I wish those Quislings very, very long life, so they are around when (or if?) the nations stand up and demand that justice should be meted out and the traitors be punished for the enormous damage they have caused. As much as I detest Islam, my deepest revulsion is reserved for these traitors.

@B, just re-read your post and realilized to my horror that I was lambasting a quote that you.'d posted from somebody else. Apologies .

Here's my cartoon on the Molly Norris story, "Chuck (Molly) Norris"

I really hate it when I read about this happening in America! How far have we fall? As we allow more Muslims into our country this will only get worse and worse. Someday the sleeping giant will awaken and we will fight tooth and nail for our freedoms. If they don't like it then maybe they should go back to Sharialand! Where are the Marines and other service men who could offer this women protection? She cannot count on the government for protection, especially with Obama.

If our public safety officials - and the DHS - refuse to provide protection against jihadi violence, without additional charge, this is gross dereliction of duty. What are our tax dollars paying for?

Here's another example of the same thing: News Flash: Lars Vilks US Appearances Cancelled ... because US authorities refused to provide security for the event.

Great cartoon, Bosch. Would love to see it expanded into a whole story.

Yes, and in addition, you can join the Lars Vilks Mo-doggies art project!

Watch Lars Vilks here and learn about the MoDoggies art project.

"Islam sparks on-campus debate" Well Kaddafi_Dalenda-Est, I checked the site that you provided. There was no debate to speak of except for one on "Islamophobia" with brief reference to the unfortunate case of a New York cab driver stabbed for being Muslim and "300 Muslim died in 9/11" (The number seems to be inflated, though I'm not sure), "Halal replacing Kosher" pita place, etc. NOTHING substantive. Why pretend there is honest discussion or debate on real issues, not self defensive stories already recycled to death in the mainstream media?

Thanks Traeh, I think the gist behind it will definitely be in The Infidel.

Corporation of the People, by the People, for the People.

The United States 'government' is actually the United States Corporation. It was created behind the screen of a 'Federal Government' when, after the manufactured 'victory' in the American War on 'Independence', the British colonies exchanged overt dictatorship from London for the far more effective covert dictatorship that has been in place ever since.

In effect, the Virginia Company, the corporation headed by the British Crown that controlled the 'former' colonies, simply changed its name to the United States of America and other related pseudonyms. These include the US, USA, United States of America, Washington DC, District of Columbia (Samurais) and the President of the Corporation is known as the President of the United States. This is an accurate title given that one is the names for the Corporation is the 'United States'. He or she is not the President of the people or the country as they are led to believe - that's just the smokescreen.

This means that Bush launched a 'war on terrorism' on behalf of a private Corporation to further the goals of that Corporation. It had nothing to do with 'America' or 'Americans', because these are very different legal entities. It is the United States Corporation, not the 'government', which owns the United States military and everything else that comes under the term 'federal'. The privately-owned Corporation called the United States is the holding company, if you like, and the fifty states are its subsidiaries.

You may have noticed that the national flag of the United States always has a gold fringe when displayed in court or federal buildings, and you see this also in federally-funded schools and on the uniforms of US troops. Under the International Law of the Flags, a gold fringe indicates the jurisdiction of commercial law, also known as British Maritime Law, and, in the US, as the Uniform Commercial Code, or UCC. The gold fringe is not part of the American flag known as the Stars and Stripes, but it is a legal symbol indicating that the court, government building, school or soldier is operating under British Maritime Law and the Uniform Commercial Code; military and merchant law.

For example, if you appear in a court with a gold-fringed flag your constitutional rights are suspended, and you are being tried under British Maritime (military/merchant) Law. If it seems strange that a court or building on dry land could be administered under Maritime or Admiralty Law, look at US Code, Title 18 B 7. It says that Admiralty Jurisdiction is applicable in the following locations:

1) the high seas
2) any American ship
3) any lands reserved or acquired for the use of the United States, and under the exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction thereof, or any place purchased or otherwise acquired by the United States by consent of the legislature of the state. In other words, mainland America.

All this is founded on Roman law, which goes back to Babylon and Sumerian law, because the Illuminati have been playing this same game throughout the centuries wherever they have gone. The major politicians know that this is how things are and so do the top government administrators, judges, lawyers and insider 'journalists'.

Americans think that their government and legal system is pegged in some way to the Constitution, but it is not. The United States, like Britain and elsewhere, is ruled by commercial law to overcome the checks and balances of common law. It's another monumental fraud. The US court system does not operate under the American Constitution, but under corporate law. It is the law of contracts and you have to make a contract with the Corporation for that law to legally apply to you.

The scam has been set up so that when you register with the 'Federal Government' in any way, by accepting a Social Security Number, driver's license, or any of the other official federal documents, you are, unknowingly, contracting to become an asset-employee of the United States Corporation...Every word, or use of lower/upper case, is making a legal statement. Have you noticed that when you receive correspondence relating to government, law and anything to do with finance, including taxation, your name is always spelt in all upper case, as in BILL JONES?

But your upper case name is not you. It is a corporation/trust set up by the 'government' Corporation through the treasury department at your birth. Every time a child is born a corporation/trust is created using his or her name in all upper case. So BILL JONES is what they call a 'straw man', a corporate, not human, entity. They do it this way because governments are corporations and they operate under commercial law, the law of contracts. The laws passed by governments only apply to corporations and not to living, breathing, flesh and blood, sovereign, free men and women spelt in upper and lower case, or all lower case, as with Bill Jones, or bill jones. The living, breathing sovereign man and woman is subject to common law, not eh commercial law introduced by governments through legislation.

Using commercial law makes it much easier to install an 'elected' dictatorship. Unlike common law, you are not subject to precedents built up over centuries. You simply have to get a majority to vote for a bill in Parliament of Congress, or have the US President sign a document, and the law is imposed. What you also have to do - clearly not difficult - is to keep from the people the knowledge that their name in all upper case is not them. They will then pay you taxes and be subject to your jurisdiction and control in all areas of their lives, by unknowingly standing surety for the corporation - 'BILL JONES' - that they don't even know exists.

All court documents have the person's name in all upper case because under the law of contracts the living, breathing being cannot be tried under corporate law, only a corporate entity can. It is so crazy that Americans pay personal income tax to the government (corporation) via the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) when the law to introduce personal income tax was never passed. Ask anyone from the US government or IRS to produce the law that says Americans must pay income tax on their wages and they will not be able to do it. Many have tried and the law has never been revealed because it doesn't exist...A $50,000 reward was offered by the We The People organization to anyone who could produce the law and IRS agent, Sherry Jackson, thought it would be easy money. She then found out that there was no law and resigned to become a campaigner against this fantastic hoax...

...Yet, when people don't pay taxes, which they do not legally have to pay, the IRS takes their property, puts them in jail, and ever more often sends in the armed goons in the black masks. It's fascism, nothing less...If anyone thinks that without personal income tax there would be no education and other public services - it's not true. They are paid for by state and property taxes, business taxes, sales taxes, fuel tax, booze tax and all the other endless taxation that we pay besides income tax. In fact, personal income tax in the US is roughly the same as the money paid by government to the banks in interest on loans.

I'm surprised that the artist who does "Jesus and Mo" hasn't received similar threats. After all, that comic has been drawing Mohamed for years, and with a lot snarkier dialog...

http://www.jesusandmo.net/

Well, we probably don't hear too much of her is because of the double strike her story is against the so called "progressive" narrative regarding islam as a religion of peace etc.

1) She started the draw day which progressives find abominable and provocative, although when the provocation is answered by death threats, it no longer fits the narrative.

2) She recanted what she started and denounced it, and seemingly crossed over to the progressive narrative! And yet her reward is death threats.

So where does that leave the narrative? Better to not talk about her.

I was surprised when I saw that name, I didn't know you commented here, You're work is great stuff!

I recommend we all wear t-shits and sport stickers emblazoned with "Mo-toons."

While driving in San Diego a few years back, I was verbally assaulted by Muslim motorists because of the "United for freedom, united against terrorism" and crossed Israeli and American flags sticker on my truck.

"They" can not kill us all.

I recommend we all wear t-shits and sport stickers emblazoned with "Mo-toons."

While driving in San Diego a few years back, I was verbally assaulted by Muslim motorists because of the "United for freedom, united against terrorism" and crossed Israeli and American flags sticker on my truck.

"They" can not kill us all.

IN CORE ISLAMIC TEXTS, MUHAMMAD SAYS THE BELL IS SATANIC

From Sahih Muslim, a canonical hadith collection
Book 024, Number 5279:

Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The bell is the musical instrument of the Satan.

----------------------------------------------------

MUHAMMAD COMPARES HIS "DIVINE" INSPIRATION TO THE RINGING OF A...BELL

In Sahih Bukhari, the most canonical hadith collection:
Volume 1, Book 1, Number 2:

Narrated 'Aisha:
(the mother of the faithful believers) Al-Harith bin Hisham asked Allah's Apostle "O Allah's Apostle! How is the Divine Inspiration revealed to you?" Allah's Apostle replied, "Sometimes it is (revealed) like the ringing of a bell, this form of Inspiration is the hardest of all and then this state passes ' off after I have grasped what is inspired. Sometimes the Angel comes in the form of a man and talks to me and I grasp whatever he says." 'Aisha added: Verily I saw the Prophet being inspired Divinely on a very cold day and noticed the Sweat dropping from his forehead (as the Inspiration was over).

Molly Norris is the most accidental of travelers here. Her light-hearted and wholly unoffensive portrayals of Mohammed as a tea-cup, or a domino or a box of pasta, etc, underscore her boundless naivete. She had absolutely not the foggiest notion of what she was getting into, none whatsoever, not one iota.

She could have portrayed Mohammed as far worse, as most choose, and in such a case might have been 'more deserving' of the Islamist ire. That the Islamist response is so disproportionate and over-the-top to such a gentle teasing is, well, or should be anyway, instructive....

Wow..A Flag Mecca buiding! Oh sorry! A Flag Mecca mosque?Finally! After such sooo long a time! Visitors welcome too! Can't wait to see the Travolta Chamber! Perfect for Moslem apostates with nowhere to go..Good name..All kinda squarish and roundish at the same time..Horschack! That explains the "2" on the Ground Zero mosque!..It's the first of three..First Room 222, then Welcome Back Kotter! (Sorry Mar)

She'll just have to be converted like the eleven year old mentally handicapped boy was abused into doing on a London street by "chowderhead"..Naive and ignorant..Not the kid..Her and "chowderead".

Sad part is there's nothing to convert to..

Appreciate the words and link, wri7913.

And thanks as well, Foolster41

Molly Norris is a middle-aged artist trying to revive her career:

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2010/09/elusive-molly-norris.html

"One very small point, here—Molly Norris was coming to the defense of South Park animators Trey Parker and Matt Stone..." -Gravenimage

Did you know that the guy who made that threat, Zachary A. Chesser, and the guy who runs the website that the threat was posted on, Joseph Cohen, were both Jewish? How does one go from a Shas supporter to a violent Jihadist?

http://original.antiwar.com/cathail/2010/05/10/from-shas-to-hamas/

I just read the "al Qaeda" magazine where the threat against Molly appeared:

http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/PDF/Inspire%20Summer%202010R.pdf

You people are hilarious. Perhaps this magazine is not really from Al Qaeda?:

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2010/07/5-reasons-to-doubt-al-qaeda-magazines-authenticity/59035/

From the above Atlantic link:

"There are also reasons to doubt that the report was produced by U.S. counterintelligence, as CI officials would likely know enough to edit out these red flags. It's unclear who that leaves..."

Perhaps it leaves some "former" Shas supporters?

Now it looks to me that Islam has taken over America.
Muslims from afar tell us that we no longer have unalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. In addition to this Americans have no right of free speech or self expression.

Has America become “the land of the Islamic slaves and home of the cowards”?

Lost freedoms are seldom returned without revolution.

"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." ~~ George Washington

"...But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guard for their future Security."....Thomas Jefferson. The Declaration of Independence.

"the backlash will be huge---titanic in fact."

What's that exactly? The backlash I mean. Spell it for us.

The first issue of the "Inspire" magazine came out on July 1 of this year. It was the Summer issue. The Fall issue should have come out on Oct 1! Where is it!

Haaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Molly sounds like a fun artist:

“In Kirkland at the Atelier 31 Gallery, 122 Central Way, acrylic painter Molly Norris Curtis presents her high school years as a series of dramatic clips: beer on the beach, drugs in study hall and her soon-to-be-dead boyfriend steering with one knee down the freeway, opening Sept. 13, 6 to 9 p.m”
THE SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER
September 6, 2001, Thursday FINAL
IN THE GALLERIES
SECTION: LIFE AND ARTS, Pg. D1

Here is CAIR’s response to “Draw Mohammed Day”:

“This is the guidance Muslims should follow as they express concern about an insulting depiction of the Prophet Muhammad, or of any other prophet of God. Instead of reacting negatively to the bigoted call to support "Draw Muhammad Day," American Muslims -- and Muslims worldwide -- should use that and every other day as an opportunity to reach out to people of other faiths and beliefs to build bridges of understanding and respect. The best and most productive response to bigoted campaigns like "Draw Muhammad Day" is more communication, not less communication -- including not restricting the free flow of ideas with measures like banning Facebook. Research has shown that anti-Islam prejudice goes down when people interact with ordinary Muslims and have greater knowledge of Islam. Therefore, the best reaction to those who would mock the Prophet Muhammad (or the religious symbols of any faith) might be a mosque open house for the local interfaith community, a community service activity organized by Muslims and involving people of other faiths, or a newspaper commentary describing the life, legacy and personal character of the Prophet Muhammad, which is the opposite of the calumny some people fabricate about him. This should be of concern to all decent and objective people. We will all benefit if each of us -- whether Muslim, Jew, Christian, Buddhist, or Hindu -- exhibits the common human decency required by our respective faiths.”
http://arabnews.com/opinion/columns/article56652.ece

How evil!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TveaTXLE6W0&feature=related

Watch from 0.35 to 0.47,where the fuck was this so called secretary of state when Molly Norris was issued with a DEATH sentence for posting Everybody Draw Mohammed Day(pox be upon him).To the best of my knowledge the U.S Government has not come out in support of Molly.For fuck sake America,get rid of these arseholes.

The day will come when this so called religion of peace will go to far.The responce will be nothing short of devistating.

Pissed off Australian.

A people whose leaders are already frightened of their enemies have already lost the fight unless the people rise up and fight without their leaders.

It is sad and sickening to see what has been happening in the UK and Europe is now happening in the US.

We have no leaders in the UK and only one or two on the European continent who will stand against the scourge. Geert Wilders is one of these brave leaders who comes to mind.

In the UK, over the years when we had a Labour Government run by Blair and then Brown who was never elected to the office of premier, every response to Islamic violence has been met with the response that these terrorists are a very small minority. The last government was even told not to put the words islamic and terrorist together.

I do not accept that our only danger comes from a tiny minority of muslims. That minority is growing fast and our danger also comes from the acceptance of muslim violence by other muslims who, themselves have not committed violence.

After 7/7, the English muslim atrocity in London, and after 911, too many muslims said things like. Well I am sorry it happened BUT......

These Muslims must show which side they are on, the side of the Country in which they live or the terrorists trying to destroy that same Country. There are no half measure with murder.


Bruce Davey:
"Molly Norris was issued with a DEATH sentence"

No. She was not issued a death sentence. The "Inspire" magazine which contains the supposed death threat is bogus, and can only be believed by an imbecile.

A fake death threat outrages you, but when a foreign country actually executes a US citizen (Furkan Dogan: the story which you linked to)in the real world, and the US does nothing about it, you don't care. What kind of country does not protect its own citizens from illegal executions by foreign countries?

Quit picking on the woman, Dave.

Defend your "religion" against Scientology. They are appropriating Mecca.

What kind of a Muslim won't defend his religion from such appropriation?

They are laughing at you, and so are we.

As usual,those that cannot handle the truth resort to personal attacks,as in dave742.If you dont like my comments dave,fine,but PROVE ME WRONG WITH EVIDENCE.Calling me an imbecile only shows your lack of intelligence.

Bruce Davey:
I posted the link to the "Inspire" magazine that contains the death threat in question. Did you read it? All it takes is the time to read it along with some common sense. If you need assistance, the Atlantic Monthly article I linked to details the obvious issues with this supposed "Al Qaeda" magazine. Why do you accept whatever crude propaganda that is presented to you, but then you need "PROOF" to ignore it? What would constitute proof to you that this article and magazine are Usrael's propaganda? If Awlaki denied making the death threat, would you accept that as proof? I doubt it. You will accept the most baseless accusation that supports your views, but will accept nothing that goes against them. If Al Qaeda put out this magazine, then more should be coming, right? The next one should be here, and it is not. When quarter after quarter goes by and new issues do not appear, will you accept that as proof that this issue is bogus and was simply fabricated as a source of a media onslaught?

dave, issue #2 is out. So much for conspiricy theory, huh?

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/10/us-jihadi-i-am-a-traitor-to-america-because-my-religion-requires-me-to-be.html

I'm sure you can't wait to read it.

Leave a Comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.

Site Meter