UK jihadist: Muslims "may say one thing to you in front of CNN," but behind your backs they support jihad

Anjem Choudary must be some kind of Islamophobe: "This is something, you know, the Muslims around the world, I don't think would differ with. They may say one thing to you in front of CNN. But I can assure you behind your backs, in every masjid and every community center, they are standing with their Muslim brothers and sisters saying, We hope the Americans and British are pushed out of our countries, and we can implement the Sharia."

Qur'an 3:28 warns believers not to take unbelievers as "friends or helpers" (َأَوْلِيَا -- a word that means more than casual friendship, but something like alliance), "unless (it be) that ye but guard yourselves against them." This is a foundation of the idea that believers may legitimately deceive unbelievers when under pressure. The word used for "guard" in the Arabic is tuqātan (تُقَاةً), the verbal noun from taqiyyatan -- hence the increasingly familiar term taqiyya. Ibn Kathir says that the phrase Pickthall renders as "unless (it be) that ye but guard yourselves against them" means that "believers who in some areas or times fear for their safety from the disbelievers" may "show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly. For instance, Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda' said, 'We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.' Al-Bukhari said that Al-Hasan said, 'The Tuqyah [taqiyya] is allowed until the Day of Resurrection." While many Muslim spokesmen today maintain that taqiyya is solely a Shi'ite doctrine, shunned by Sunnis, the great Islamic scholar Ignaz Goldziher points out that while it was formulated by Shi'ites, "it is accepted as legitimate by other Muslims as well, on the authority of Qur'an 3:28." The Sunnis of Al-Qaeda practice it today.

(Video thanks to Brian.)

| 29 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

29 Comments

We should be grateful for Mr. Choudary - the world's most honest Muslim. You may despise what he stands for - but he never fails to tell it how it is.

@ un:dhimmi
You wrote:- "We should be grateful for Mr. Choudary - the world's most honest Muslim. You may despise what he stands for - but he never fails to tell it how it is."

'...the world's most upfront Muslim...', you mean.

Honesty has nothing to do with Islam. Islam is founded on a lie. Mohammed claimed that revelations made around 1,500 years before he was born were redelivered to him in a smart, new package.

So, talking about Choudery as 'honest' implies there are 'honest' and 'dishonest' Muslims. They are all peddling the same dishonesty. Choudery is upfront about Islam's intentions, but he's just as big a crook as Rauf and his fellow travelers.

I truly like seeing & hearing this honest Muslim Anjem Chaudary in the media, he tells it straight. He should be heard from more often to wake up those people who still think Islam is just another peaceful religion unfairly maligned and one that sane pwople can coexist with. I wish he were given a nightly spot on the FOX network, called something like "Your Cordial Jihadist Tells It Like It Is".

Excellent video. Thanks for posting. The ending was the icing on the cake.

Yes Mr.Choudary is the honest broker of what Islam demands of those who follow Allah.

For those of us who have been paying attention for years (Robert Spencer for over 30 years) , what Anjem Chaudary expresses is no shock to us as the video is so titled. We have heard his ramblings for probably nearly a decade now.

It seemed almost a little weird as Elliott Spitzer put on his former prosecutor mask saying Choudary would be arrested for his treasonous remarks. Of course in the UK treasonous comments appear not to be a violation of law. Apparently you have to blow up a subway or something before your arrested, such is the insanity political of correctness in the UK.

What I would love to see: Bill O'reilly invite Anjem Choudary on as a guest and than encourage the ladies of the VIEW along with Joyless Blowhard to have them on both shows, no doubt that would be provocatively interesting.

Un:dhimmi and Buraq

Your both right

Why on earth is this guy still breathing? Is there no law in Britain anymore? The only place this guy should be speaking from is a jail cell.

Can someone PLEASE tell me what is it that Muslims and Islam have to offer that prevents our governments from deporting every last one of them, or at the very least, slamming the doors shut on any further Muslim immigration.

What ever happened to laws pertaining to sedition and treason? What is wrong with us???????????????

Ima

So far as I am aware the motormouth "cleric" Choudhary (many spellings of that) is self appointed, does not run a mosque, and has a tiny following. Most muslims hate him as well - some not least because he gives the game away.
What is truly amazing is the amount of air time he gets in the UK and now in the US.
Choudhary is a trained lawyer who practiced only for a short time before embarking on his "mission" full-time. Since then he and his family have existed on benefits.
No-one seems to have queried how he affords to travel the length and breadth of the country or that his "mission" effectively makes him unavailable for work.

The UK Government's plans on benefits and housing benefits should significantly reduce his income and even dispossess him of his current taxpayer funded house. Or at least that is what is supposed to happen because this parasite won't be getting a job. In fact I doubt anyone would employ him.
Unfortunately he was born in the UK. Sadly even those who weren't - like Bakri and Abu Hamza - we seem unable to deport or extradite because of their "human rights"
'Twill all end in tears one way or another.

One thing he said that caught my attention...
"We hope that Americans and British are pushed out of OUR countries."
By this he doesn't just mean Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, etc.

While he didn't say it explicitly, he seems to imply that he includes all of the UK and the US, as "our countries".??

A follow-up question: At what point does a country become "our country"?

veteranoutrage.com

Wow talk about in your face..
Well folks when our Islamic enemies are now
openly stating we are lying to you
you would HOPE someone would listen?


veteranoutrage.com

It doesn’t get anymore blunt than that. Nevertheless, the sheeple will bury their heads in the sand and claim he was an extremist, one of that tiny minority of extremists trying to hijack the wonderful Religion of Peace™.

Is Spitzer some kind of Islamophobe now?

This guy is unbelievable. I have seen him make radical comments before, but he always dances around the issue of his responsibility. He is a complete ass. I would love to meet up with him somewhere and put a foot upside his head.

Check out this article from dailymail.co.uk regarding Chaudry before he became radicalized. It is pretty startling! Too bad Sharia punishment was not imposed on him back in his college days.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1161909/Swilling-beer-smoking-dope-leering-porn-hate-preacher-Andy-Choudary.html

Why does England tolerate this pathetic parasite Madman?

But, but, I thought that Muslims just want to get along...

Quick, someone call the Islamophobia hotline at ABC!

Maybe Christine Amanpour can sort this guy out.

Oops, she already tried... See this video where she gets Anjem Chaudary to agree with Franklin Graham about the true face of Islam:


Courreges W, the tribes are gathering. . the importance of all this. The word 'remaunden' is deeply embedded in out national psyche.

Oops, forgot the link.

Maybe Christine Amanpour can sort this guy out.

Oops, she already tried... See this video where she gets Anjem Chaudary to agree with Franklin Graham about the true face of Islam:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agOU2R6MTbg

Anjem Chaudary : "They may say one thing to you in front of CNN. But I can assure you behind your backs, in every masjid and every community center, they are standing with their Muslim brothers and sisters saying, We hope the Americans and British are pushed out of our countries, and we can implement the Sharia."

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/10/uk-jihadist-muslims-may-say-one-thing-to-you-in-front-of-cnn-but-behind-your-backs-they-support-jiha.html

If Choudary keeps revealing what goes on in mosques, he is likely to get a fatwa.

If we did not have the likes of him, Qatada and Bakri, we would all wake up one morning to the call of the mezzuen. If we loose this war, Choudary will be quite justified in asking us what the hell is the matter with us.

The problem is not the likes of Choudary but the silent moderate Muslim community, whose ever increasing numbers lead to more appeasement of Islamic practices, sharia here and there, and will take us down the road to Bosnia in a quiet manner.

"If we did not have the likes of him, Qatada and Bakri, we would all wake up one morning to the call of the mezzuen. If we loose this war, Choudary will be quite justified in asking us what the hell is the matter with us."

Well said DP111.

Let's face it, clowns like Choudary, while not to be trusted, are definitely to be taken seriously.

They are doing the civilized world a favor by exposing the expansionist totalitarian heart of Islam for all to see.

Thanks Anjem. Keep it up.

DhimmiNot

you asked

"A follow-up question: At what point does a country become "our country"?"

Well, here's something from the little prayer booklet the Barnabas Fund puts out.

Their September/ October 2010 booklet contains the following information, in a request for prayer for Mauritius, which is currently 20 % Muslim, 30 % Hindu, and around 50 % Christian and other.

"There are many Muslim politicians, including the vice-Prime Minister, and also a radical cleric who is lobbying for sharia law. **According to Islamic strategy for Africa, if a country's population reaches 33 % Muslim then the country is effectively "taken" for Islam** [my emphasis - dda]. Mauritius is fast approaching this figure"...

Now, there isn't a footnote supplying a formal reference for this statement, that there is an Islamic strategy for Africa involving the claiming of a country for Islam once its population is 33 % Muslim. (Perhaps it's in an OIC document somewhere).

But Patrick Sookhdeo, founder of the Barnabas fund, is an apostate from Islam and his knowledge of historic and contemporary Islamic sources, from all over, is as good as Mr Spencer's and quite probably better. I think he has his ear to the ground. So I'll take the statement seriously.

I wonder whether that 'if it's 33 % Muslim, it's OURS' rule is being applied in more places than Africa?

What if it applies in suburbs, towns and provinces as well as in whole countries?

For cheap oil and the chance to form a HUGE empire to compete with America, Ima.


See http://dhimmitude.org/archive/by_eurabia_122002_eng.doc

After reading this summary, it is imposiible to resist the conclusion that de Gaulle had some serious penis envy going on.

Patronising Muslim fanatics like Choudry is a way of life with the UK ! M.F.Hussain , an artist from India , who drew Indian godess Laxmi naked in oen of his "work of art" and Mr.Nadim , an Indian film music director , who is wanted in India for the murder of a audio disk producer both ran away from India and took refuge in the UK. Why ? Both the above fugitives are Muslims ! The irony is Mr.Hussain has finally been given parmanent citizenship of the middle eastern Islamic country Qatar by the wife of a Sheikh of Qatar ! So both UK & Qatar are guilty of harbouring Muslim fugitives wanted in India !

Dumbledoresarmy

You asked "what if it applies in suburbs, towns and provinces as well as in whole countries?"

This video shows John Reid, the then Home Secretary, being heckled by a radical Muslim for coming into a "Muslim area", by which he meant Leyton in East London. Forty years ago my grandparents lived in Leyton and I can assure you it was not a Muslim area then.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxA4lmxjIbk

The same thing has happened in towns and cities throughout Britain where the indigenous people have been effectively ethnically cleansed from large areas where they used to live and replaced by colonists, for that is what they really are. It's high time the boot was put onto the other foot.

I for one am so grateful that there are such HONEST muhammadans like mulah Anjem Choudary. I am disgusted by the taqqiya artists the like of Zeba Khan, Majiid Nawas, Reza Aslan, Irshad Manji, Sumbul Ali Karamali or Fatima Mernissi. These “it’s the culture, not islam” apologists are the dangerous ones lulling us into a soporific state of dhimmitude.

Based on Mr Choudary's helpful remarks, he deserves to be arrested, prosecuted for blasphemy in that he takes God as a witness for murder and against the Christian religion.

The just punishment is that he be taken from hence to a lawful prison and there tied to a stake embedded in combustible material and that he be burned to death.

Dumbledoresarmy, Pam M and Robert Spencer

This thread needs to be continued as it is so fundamental.
I'm afraid it may get lost among the other jewels.

I also am a fan of Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo.
One of his books which I especially like is:
"The Challenge of Islam to the Church and Its Mission" 2008

It's a real exposé of the falseness of Islam.

The frightening thing about England is that, although Shariah law has been brought in to a few areas where muslims congregate, we were never told about this.

In fact the previous Labour government (made up of many former communists/marxists), created a climate where nobody could complain or protest at this islamification of the UK -actually mainly England. If you complained about the huge influx of immigrants you were called racist. If you complained about anything else you were called an islamaphobe. This was all designed to make the British people keep quiet and accept the radical changes Labour under Blair and Brown were making to our Country. One of Labour's men actually leaked that Blair was flooding our Country with immigrants to rub the Right's nose in diversity. What a crass and spiteful act!!!

We, the English, were told by a Labour Minister, Jack Straw, that the English are a race not worth saving. Now, if WE said that about any other race, WE would be called racists. So what is the difference? We are the English and we are constantly rubbished and undermined by the UK Government. We, like the Scots should have our own parliament, especially seeing as we are about 6 times the size of Scotland, but the UK Government will not extend this to the English so we are now second class citizens in our own Country.

Every foreign culture they are flooding our Country with, must be protected even at the expense of our English culture. Old ladies have been told to take China pig ornaments out of their windows because local muslims may be offended. Some schools cancelled their Christmas pantomine because they wanted to celebrate a muslim festival a little later. Many of our schools seem to have a leftwing staff who are too pleased to carry out these ludicrous and insulting things. But they only insult Christians so it does not matter.

Labour's leftwing lackeys are now in many key posts in this Country and now they can control what the public see or hear, and often hide the rest of the news if it is not to their taste.

Our soldiers coming home from previously Iraq and then Afghanistan, have been cursed at and called murderers, baby killers etc by protesting muslims. These soldiers have recently lost close friends and seen terrible things and now newcomers to our Country abuse them. The muslims hold up banners saying, kill people who do things they don't like and we are the cancer and they are the answer, Islam will take over the world and other nasty, stupid things and we have to grit our teeth and take it. The leftwing press though are very slow to report this. In fact, you find it on the internet first.

We will not just grit our teeth forever. We always welcomed people to our shores but why should we accept those who abuse our hospitality?

I wouldn't burn anyone at the stake, no matter how evil they were.

However: in the UK, Guy Fawkes' Day approaches. A time for celebrating the exposure and failure of 'gunpowder, treason and plot'. These days, of course, it's 'TATP, treason and plot' (say TATP 'tat-p' and the old rhyme still scans).

I really don't see why a suitable full-colour near-life-size picture of Mr Anjem Choudary's ugly mug should not be downloaded from the internet (where many such photos of him exist, by now), printed off at something like life-size, and stuck onto a suitably-costumed hessian-and-straw effigy, which effigy might then be popped into the bonfire to roast, back to back with the traditional figure of the Guy. Before lighting the bonfire (into which could also be tossed a print-out of the text of the Pact of Omar, which is one legendary formulation of the viciously repressive 'Rules for Dhimmis'), the assembled Resistance might loudly proclaim their condemnation and rejection of the vile barbarism that is Sharia, sing a round of the National Anthem, and drink a toast to Her Majesty the Queen.

There are other much more prominent Islamic figures, too, whose effigies might similarly be burnt on Guy Fawkes Day as a symbolic way of rejecting and condemning all their evil works and days and puncturing their pride and presumption: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, for one, and Hassan Nasrallah for another who heads up Hezbollah (he who has proclaimed that it would be nice if all the Jews in the world gathered in Israel, for that makes it easier for the Muslims to kill them) and Osama bin Laden and his 2IC Ayman Zawahiri, for others; and the head of the Abominable House of Saud; and the genocidal despot who rules over Sudan.

Leave a Comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.

Site Meter