British town of Luton "synonymous with Islamic extremism"

But in the seventh paragraph of this report, we are reassured: "Many Muslims in Luton have long recognised the problem they have with extremism."

That's it. Nothing follows to elaborate on action taken, or on where the line is drawn for "extremism." The boilerplate is in order, and the article moves on. "Sweden suicide bombings: Luton synonymous with Islamic extremism and racial tension," from the Telegraph, December 13:

Two years ago a leaked British intelligence report identified the town as being home to one of the main concentrations of extremists in the country.
It has a long and troubled history. In 2004 two of the most notorious terrorist cells in British history met at the Toddington service station just north of Luton.
The leaders of the fertiliser bombers, who were plotting a campaign to rival September 11 terror attacks, and the July 7 bombers met on at least two occasions, watched by MI5.
The middle man, Mohammed Quayam Khan, was on the surface of model of respectability. He worked as a taxi driver and at a café in the centre of Luton and lived with his children in the Bury Park district, a largely Muslim area.
At the same time, however, he was allegedly liaising with al-Qaeda and helped them to set up a training camp in Pakistan. He has never been arrested.
The July 7 bombers, based in West Yorkshire, met in Luton on the day of the attacks in 2005, abandoning their cars at the station to catch the train south.
Many Muslims in Luton have long recognised the problem they have with extremism.

Plop. Now, where were we?

In 2001 two young men were killed fighting in Afghanistan, one of whom was the brother of Salahuddin Amin, a member of the fertiliser bomber gang.
At one stage Abu Hamza, the radical cleric now in jail, is said to have lived in the town and Omar Bakri Mohammed, another extremist, was a regular visitor until he was banned from returning to Britain soon after the July 2005 bombings.
The concentration of extremists has exacerbated racial tensions. In March 2009, soldiers from the Royal Anglian Regiment were marching through Luton when they were subjected to a tirade of abuse from a group of Muslim men who called them murderers, rapists and baby killers. Five of the men were later convicted of being abusive....
| 6 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

6 Comments

The longer our western governments delay identifying the problem (ie that ISLAM is the source of all this terrorist violence) and dealing with it decisively, the bigger the problem becomes (because of muslim higher birth rates). Ultimately we are headed toward civil war within each of the former western democracies that continue to appease Islamic demands!

Luton is part of the British tribal areas, similar to those in Pakistan where the government allowed extremism to flourish and the police more or less withdrew because of fears of inflaming tensions. The town is a disgrace and an area no one in their right minds would consider visiting. Luton is a hotbed of extremism and the presence of the Stockholm terrorist in the town is no surprise whatsoever.

I heard the local head/spokesman for Muslims in Luton on BBC (domestic) Radio 4. He said that local Muslims had tried to reason with this extremist but it didn't work. He said that the security services were to blame for not spotting him and that local Muslims might have been able to do better if they had spoken (to the terrorist) more. He said it was not their job to report their concerns outside the Muslim community.

Considering how this society has bent backwards in appeasement of Muslim demands they can't claim that they are not given a hearing.

In fairness I should say that a few years ago the members of one mosque did report their extremists to the police and no action was taken.

Political correctness is becoming the death-knell of a once comfortable society. A very ugly group calling itself "Muslims against Crusades" (MAC) is going around East London putting up posters saying Christmas is evil Anarchists are going around tearing them down.

There's plenty of activity in the undergrowth but a universal deaf ear in Parliament.

'........he was allegedly liaising with al-Qaeda and helped them to set up a training camp in Pakistan. He has never been arrested.'

Was there proof against his involvement?
Inspite of proof, if no arrest was made, then UK is in deeper sh*t than i thought.
I hope at least now France and UK will stop apeasement and make a new beginning.
Its still not too late to take a U-turn and return to pre-political-correctness sanity.
The first step would be to start calling these scum muslim-terrorists rather than plain old extremists.

"Many Muslims in Luton have long recognised the problem they have with extremism."

And ? So ? Therefore ?

From the article:

"In March 2009, soldiers from the Royal Anglian Regiment were marching through Luton when they were subjected to a tirade of abuse from **a group of Muslim men who called them murderers, rapists and baby killers** {my emphasis - dda}."

Projection. Un caso clinico.

Murder (mass-murder), rape (on the grand scale) and the killing of children, even of infants (and even the ripping open of pregnant bellies of non-Muslim women and dragging out of the dying fetus to be mutilated individually, in front of the dying mother) is absolutely bog-standard Muslim jihadist behaviour, recorded by horrified survivors (or by boastful muslim chroniclers) after every major jihad campaign.

Dostoyevsky apparently collected accounts from the jihad mass-murders of the Bulgarian Christians. As David Bentley Hart reports in "The Doors of the Sea" -

"...true stories, as it happens, that Dostoyevsky had collected from the press and other sources. He tells of Turks [that is, of Turkish Muslims - dda] tearing babies from their mothers' wombs with daggers, or flinging infants into the air to catch them on bayonets before their mothers' eyes, or playing with babies held in their mothers' arms - making them laugh, enticing them with the bright metal barrels of pistols - **only then to fire the pistols into the babies' faces** {my emphasis - dda}."

From the jihadist attack on the church in Baghdad, this, as reported by the Catholic Sun in Phoenix Arizona when they covered an Iraqi Christian protest rally:

http://catholicsun.org/2010/november/09/iraq-protest.html

'Bloodbath at Iraqi church sparks local protest'.

'Oshana choked back tears as she retold how nine terrorists, wearing explosive-packed vests, stormed the cathedral.

“A woman trying to save her child from the bullets covered her child with her body,” Oshana said.

**“They flipped her over and purposely killed the child and allowed the child to die in front of the mother ** {my emphasis - dda} while she was holding onto his neck because he was bleeding.”...

"The terrorists demanded the priest make an Islamic announcement. {I assume this means they told him to say the Shahada - i.e. convert to Islam - dda}.

" When he refused, he was shot.

"They then demanded that a 4-month-old baby who was crying “shut up.”

"A second priest told the terrorists the mother was trying to calm the infant.

"The gunman’s response was to shoot the priest, **then turn his gun on the baby** {my emphasis - dda}".

It is Islam, Islam, Islam that a. sets out to impress on persons born-neurologically-normal a mental program that turns them into robotic killers behaving exactly like the worst kind of psychopathic serial killer we sometimes encounter in the West, and that b. validates and nurtures the *born* psychopath and has set up its system so as to give such monsters every opportunity to indulge their depraved appetites to the max.

Muslims who accuse western men of being depraved baby killers had best look in the mirror of history, the history of Jihad, and see the faces of millions of sadistic Muslim baby-murderers from the past, looking back at them with cold, dead eyes.

Leave a Comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.

Site Meter